Six concepts about the architecture of the new millennium.
Marcelo Fraile Narvaez.
In 1984, the Italian writer Ítalo Calvino, was invited by Harvard University, to give a cycle of six
lectures that would take place during the academic year 1985/1986. After some problems to
choose the subject, Calvino finally inclined to try "... 'some' literary values that should be
preserved in the next millennium" [1]. He titled his Lectures "Six proposals for the next
millennium", even though the lectures never developed, because Calvino died on September 19,
1985. Only five and some drafts of the six conferences were developed. These were post
humously published sometime after.
The title and some of his thoughts about this article were inspired by the last work of this great
Italian master.
One question and six concepts
What is contemporary architecture?
Although it seems to be a simple question, we will soon discover with some discouragement how
ambitious and complicated it can be to find an appropriate answer to this question.
According to the Cambridge Dictionary, the contemporary word is defined as to " living at,
happening at or belonging to the same period "[2].
In the specific field of design, contemporary architecture implies a chronological question.
In its essence refers to architecture product of its time, and which defines its own topicality.
Conceptually, contemporary architecture rejects those historical styles of the past, replacing them
with an innovative and different proposal from what existed so far. For the architects Beatriz
Villanueva Cajide and Francisco Javier Casas Cobo, contemporary architecture, "...
historiographically, does not exist, except in the absolute present, understanding as such the
moment lived and, maybe, ten or twenty years ago, until the moment when the historiography
frames it like history and ceases to be contemporary "[3].
In the contemporary, we rethink architecture as "... to check that aspects have lost validity, which
have been renewed and what [new] concepts ... have appeared" [4]. It is in this sense that the
idea of contemporary architecture acquires greater relevance: as a motor of change, it
establishes new theoretical positions between man and his architectural production.
In the beginning of this new century, we find ourselves living a particularly sensitive historical
moment. For Josep María Montaner, we are able to "... have a certain perspective to interpret the
evolution of architecture ... and detect the most remarkable characteristics of the recent turn of
the century" [5].
We are in the presence of a new way of understanding the architectural project, under a
technological-digital perspective, where process and generation are tinged with a search for
optimization and efficiency. Numerous sources produce and reproduce an unprecedented
architecture, developed in an area of some formal forcefulness, where mathematical algorithms,
digital biological systems and advanced structural systems try to detach from their heavy
historical-eclecticist load.
In an attempt to answer the initial question, this article proposes the study of six key concepts, six
elements that help us understand and define precisely the characteristics of this new architecture.
1. Globalization Together but far apart.
For the British historian Eric Hobsbawm, the "short" [6] twentieth century, ended on the night of
Thursday 9 to Friday 10 November, 1989, with the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of a divided
Germany. This was a transcendental point in history that marked the collapse of the Soviet Union.
It was the outcome of the Cold War after years of silent battles: capitalism had defeated
communism. A heavy iron curtain rose, and the world once again seemed to be just one: at last
Muscovites could taste a McDonald's hamburger sitting near The Pushkin Square in Moscow.
However, the initial optimism was soon affected by a new and terrible war: the Gulf War. Between
1990 and 1991, a coalition of forces composed of 34 countries, under the command of the United
States, declared war on Iraq in response to the invasion of Kuwait. A terrible fight that mixed
ideals of freedom with an economic-oil background that muddied everything.
The Gulf War was a new kind of contest that marked a milestone in the history of armed conflicts.
For the first time, a war was televised live: sitting in the comfort of their home, the viewer could
see by CNN 24 hours, the troops of the liberating coalition fighting and dying in the hot and desert
lands of Kuwait.
Gary Shepard, a reporter for the American ABC news network, broadcast live from the Rashid
hotel in Baghdad, while the explosions, the shootings of the anti-aircraft batteries and the
Bombers could be heard in the background.
Sadly, the Gulf War was only the beginning of this new century, on September 11, 2001, flights
11 of American Airlines and 175 of United Airlines crashed into the World Trade Center's twin
towers, marking a new tipping point, a before and after in the history of the contemporary world.
Its influence, can still be felt today, at every airport on the planet: each passenger is subjected to
a whole series of rigorous scans and controls. For an instant one loses all his constitutional rights
to become a suspect, is stripped of his shoes, belts, coats and electronic elements, all for the
general safety. One is guilty until proven innocent.
But not everything has been chaos and war in this new 21st century. With the arrival of the
internet and important advances in the field of micro and nanotechnology, a new way of
conceiving the universe has been created: Our world has become smaller and seems to be
spinning faster. Alvin Toffler defined it as "Shock of the future", "a disastrous tension and
disorientation that provokes in the individuals (the excessive changes) in a short lapse of time."
[7].
The use of new digital technologies has transformed the contemporary society’s way of life. A
deep cultural impact, with a renewal process, which tries to replace the previous model, now
obsolete, by one inspired in digital, technological methods. It’s a complex model by nature, which
present in its essence a contradiction, an inevitable consequence in its situation.
Zygmunt Bauman a Polish philosopher and essayist, very concerned about the changes that are
taking place in humanity, catalogs in his book, "Liquid Modernity" contemporary society with the
physical phenomenon of fluidity "... a dissolution of old concepts, where ancient Theories have
been and are being refuted, giving way to new ones, much more complex and relative "[8].
Product of a technological environment, contemporary society is immersed and lives in front of
the screens, looking the other way. It’s a technology capable of slowing or accelerating time,
where five minutes are transformed into an eternity, while we await the response of a WhatsApp
that already has its two blue ticks.
Thanks to technology, we are available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, no matter if we are in
the desert, on a nudist beach or in hell, something we can’t miss is a smartphone with its battery
sufficiently charged and good 4G connection.
It’s a technology that allows a meticulous record of reality, allowing us to photograph and film
absolutely everything. The 21st century will go down in history as one of the best documented
centuries.
We have become chroniclers of our lives: our 15 minutes of Warhol [9], requires us to share
birthdays, vacations, surgeries and meals online. Nothing is ruled out. The difference between
public or private in our life is determined by a box sometimes configured by default.
For some with a positivist vision of reality, this technology allows us to open new windows to new
realities, windows that communicate and relate to the rest of the world; for others, it is a
reinterpretation of the Pied Piper of Hamelin, who hidden among the shadows of zeros and ones,
hypnotizes the masses, isolating us from each other.
In the 1993 science fiction film, Demolition Man [10], Lieutenant Lenina Huxley, (played by
actress Sandra Bullock), invites John Spartan (a a policeman of the XX century, recently thawed,
played by the actor Sylvester Stallone), to her apartment to have intimacy. However, the initial
excitement of Spartan is quickly frustrated when the young lieutenant extracts from a box two
"cyber helmets", which will be responsible for consummating the act, of course, in a virtual way,
that is, without having any type of physical contact.
Far from being transformed into a cult film, Demolition Man, presents an almost cartoon vision of
the future 2032, where its inhabitants have suffered a process of infantilization, lacking all evil.
However, this cinematic look would have its nuances of reality, when Billie Whitehouse, with Ben
Moir and Havas Worldwide, developed Fundawear: a new conception in the design of high-tech
underwear.
Fundawear is the first underwear with portable technology. A fine garment developed with high
quality bamboo fabric, which hides in its inside a series of sensors that allow you to feel the
physical contact, when transferring in a wireless way, the caresses of a person, no matter where
in the world you are: for this you only need to have an application installed on your smartphone.
With every touch on the phone, it is transmitted to the sensors of Fundawear, a signal that is
physically reproduced in the skin of the one who possesses it, giving the owner a sensation
similar to a caress.
We are in the presence of a virtualization of the human being, where the physical body is
transformed into zeros and ones, and whose personality communicates and lives in the
cyberspace. Sometimes both identities converge in some points in common: real worlds, watched
and monitored through cameras, safe worlds, protected under strict satellite networks. It’s a
contemporary world where the barriers between both universes sometimes seem to blur
continually.
Similar way, in the specific field of architecture, "New technologies challenge gravity, loss of
energy and the economy of resources" [11]. We are living a complex stage, one of apparent
globalization, a process that unifies forms and scales. A kind of process that is presented to us
with "... bits of an information flow that run through circuits in the form of electronic impulses ...
bits without weight" [12].
One example in this sense is the Russian pavilion of the 13th Venice Architecture Biennial of
2012, a design by architects SPEECH Tchoban & Kuznetsov. It was a project aimed at the
development and promotion of science through an innovative approach: three rooms completely
covered from floor to ceiling with retro-illuminated plastic tiles where QR codes were displayed.
The public that visited the sample, had to have smartphone or tablets equipped with a QR code
reader software, in order to decode the message. A virtualization of architecture, where digital
devices were required to be able to discover it, in order to understand it: "The boundaries
between the virtual and the real are no longer distinguished, it is" ... an attempt to find an
architectural metaphor that illustrates a current topic: cyberspace "[13].
The new designers, who are looking for that change, carry with them the germ of the revolution,
with "... their specific-artistic language and with their technical-scientific knowledge that
symbolizes this complexity" [14]. The humanists of the 21st century are experts in multiple topics,
from mathematics, botany to fashion [15]: are transformed into rock starts, they embody world
fame, receive nobility titles, are photographed in front of presidents and even have their own fan
club. Analogously, the main capitals of the world dispute their buildings, as if they were works of
art.
Trend creators, obsessed with form and control, teach people how to inhabit them and how to live
them: flexible, limited spaces, where the common individual is transformed into a pixel seen
through a security camera.
Koolhaas ' non-places have been transformed into the "pixel places": monitored, controlled,
inspected places. A representation in images of the city through multiple screens: "On each
landing, in front of the elevator door, the poster of the huge face looked from the wall. It was one
of those drawings made in such a way that the eyes follow you wherever you are. 'THE GREAT
BROTHER WATCHES YOU', said the words at the foot (...) "[16].
2. The representation. The new digital pencil
For better or worse, the teaching of architecture in some educational institutions, is still
associated with the image of Le Corbusier standing in front of his drawing board: in his hand a
pencil looks, as if it were a magical object. A pencil from which flows the force of genius that
every architect must possess. With each line, the universe is paralyzed to contemplate the traces
that flow magically from his hand: a new work of art has been born in the world.
Under this sympathetic and unconscious look, the architect's ingenuity is linked with his ability to
draw "by free hand". Their Power lies in it, the more precise their sketches, the better professional
it seems.
However, despite this nostalgic look, since the 1980s, we have entered into a vertiginous process
of digitization of architecture: new technological tools have developed a new way of representing
reality. Theoretical schemas of a complex existence, "... that is elaborated to facilitate its
understanding and the study of its behavior" [17].
The use of digital systems as a "means of representation" has undoubtedly been the first
contribution and the one that has produced the most direct influence on the project processes. An
architecture of millimeter precision, where the formal complexity presented can only be conceived
through digital media: "Mathematical calculus is reconciled with a renewed aesthetics of the world
and architecture" [18].
These are complex volumes, with non-Cartesian characteristics, "layers and surfaces", which
Helio Piñon calls the Guggenheim effect [19], recovering what Rafael Moneo called the "forgotten
geometries" and that now, thanks to digital technology, can be manipulated [20].
A new “digital” world emerges, with important transformations in our daily and work habits: haptic
gloves, helmets with virtual reality viewers, augmented reality systems, which allow designers to
discover a different world, a georeferenced world, which overlaps the real, and multiplies it,
powers it and resignifys it.
With the advent of parametric systems at the beginning of the year 2000, a renewed architecture
made its appearance in the design world: a project tool, where "the forms stopped being drawn or
represented to be calculated" [21].
The parametric design makes it possible to use complex
programming that is sufficiently wide to allow "...the decoding, manipulation and eventual
reprogramming of information codes" [22]. The initial models can be transformed by modifying the
values of their primitive variables, without the need to replace or redefine their geometry: different
solutions for dependent variables.
A new generation of systems capable of simulating, evaluating and analyzing automatically, in
real time and while designing, installations, structures, and environmental conditions of each
project: according to pre-established parameters, it is possible to obtain infinite variations of the
model, which are selected according to comparative terms numerically adjusted by the designer.
The use of mathematical algorithms, facilitates analysis, extracts particularities, finds
relationships, manifests rules. In addition, it adjusts the space within a new vision of the world,
which does not seek to obtain only complex forms, but also efficiency.
It’s a technology that can predict the amount of lighting, through a specific window, on a specific
date. No matter the scale or complexity of the project, everything can be modeled, processed and
analyzed.
The parametric design allows the integration between design, theory and technology with the aim
of achieving the most effective solution to the problem posed: a productive interrelation between
parametric design and constructive materialization [23]. A true revolution in the way of designing
and representing architecture. A look through a digital window, to live and feel an architecture to
come.
3. Materiality. Prefabrication on demand
"A great time has just begun. There is a new spirit. The industry, overflowing like the river that runs
towards its destination, brings us new tools, adapted to these new eras animated by a new spirit
"[24].
With the publication in Paris in 1923 "Towards an architecture" [25], Le Corbusier, established a
strong industrial regulation that regulated the design in its different scales. A standardizedmechanistic model, with a prefabricated production system; a production of objects without
variations, rigorously identical according to a strict Euclidean geometry.
As if it were a dream, the architects had to design perfect living, efficient and functional machines.
Later, the industry would be responsible for producing its parts that would later be assembled in
the final model.
However, despite advances in robotics and automation of the industry, in the field of construction,
advances were restricted to the construction of modular elements that required operators and
machines to be installed on site. As incredible as it seemed, in essence, the construction at the
end of the 90s continued to maintain a constructive system based on the work of man.
However, with the advent of the new millennium, fresh signals were visible on the horizon: a
paradigm shift, under a techno-digital root, finally abandoned the "mechanistic" scheme [26]
inherited from the Modern Movement, of "productive seriation" of the mechanized industry of
Sigfried Giedion [for] recovers the ambition to personalize production "[27]. Offering innovative
solutions to the scientific crisis posed, providing a renewed vision of the world and promising
alternative challenges on which scientists can work in the future.
New materialization systems, flexible and efficient make their appearance in the construction
market: CAD-CAM or 3D printer systems, it does not matter if you build an object or a thousand,
the cost will be the same, the quantity of products is no longer a limitation when it comes to
manufacture.
A robotic architecture, the result of the combination of a virtual world and a physical one,
something that for Gramazio and Kohler could be defined as a "digital materiality", that have
made the contemporary designer again in craftsmen: where digital prefabrication processes
enable designers to materialize their own ideas, eliminating intermediaries.
In a very short time, nothing will prevent a studio located in Buenos Aires from being able to
connect with its subsidiary in Japan, to develop an online project as a whole. Taking advantage of
the time difference, both studies could work on the design in a continuous way saving time and
money in its execution. Once the technical documentation has been completed, it could be sent
to a company in Russia which would be in charge of the materialization of its parts. After the
manufacturing, these could travel to Sydney where they would be mounted on site by bricklayers
robots. It is not science fiction, it’s the future, it’s the immediate future.
Perhaps one of the most interesting works in this regard is that of the Gantenbein winery in
Fläsch, a Swiss City, a 2006 project by the Swiss architects Fabio Gramazio and Matthias Kohler.
The initial design was developed from a structural skeleton of reinforced concrete, closed with a
perforated masonry wall that would act as a temperature and lighting filter: a series of
prefabricated brick panels, designed from a genetic algorithm, whose variables had have been
previously defined according to the parameters of light and sunlight.
For its construction, the walls were manufactured in the research area of the ETH in Zurich,
through KUKA, an industrial robot arm that placed each of the bricks according to the genetic
algorithms. Subsequently, the panels were transported to the site to be installed by cranes:
20,000 bricks located at an angle and millimeter separation, transforming each panel into a single
one.
Two years later, Gramazio, Kohler and Raffaello D'Andrea, joined the ETH Zurich, to make the
first architectural installation designed from a series of parametric algorithms and built using
robots, with the ability to fly. These systems, called ROB [28], were used to build a loop wall 3.5
m wide by 6 m high, using 1,500 bricks made of polystyrene foam.
Industrial flying robots, articulated mechanical arms with six-axis mobility, high performance 3D
printing systems, are allowing the materialization of new shapes, variable surfaces, topological
and structurally optimized. A wide range of mechanical-digital tools, with manometric accuracies
prepared for milling, cutting and adding: a step towards automation and full robotization of
architectural production.
In any case, the future seems promising: the company D-Shape [29], founded by Enrico Dini, is
developing a large-scale 3D printer, which uses as a raw material a product similar to concrete,
based on a mixture of sandstone and chlorine.
The printer has cranes and elements to move through the site, "printing" the walls with repetitive
tasks, according to a previously loaded design. The printing is made in layers, always in even
number: the first, of sand with the liquid binder and the second, of dry sand. Although the printer
still requires human attention, it is expected that in the near future the technology will improve
considerably, obtaining an absolutely autonomous, functional and reliable tool.
Also, one of the most ambitious projects of the last five years, is the study of the architects Foster
+ Partners, who have joined with the European Space Agency (ESA), in order to build a
permanent base for four people in the south pole of the Moon [30].
The project consists of a structure of protection resolved with modular tubes, as a skeleton, linked
by means of an inflatable dome, which will be deployed on them. Below, a solid structure, in the
form of a dome, will be built by means of a 3D printer with robotic arms: with each pass, the
machine will "print the walls", by means of a light foam formed mainly with lunar soil or "Regolith",
a system that besides being practical, will generate savings of between 30% and 50% in costs.
For Foster + Partners, the structure is planned to be erected in a matter of hours, in order to
protect and shelter its inhabitants from the drastic and changing temperatures, micrometeorites
and gamma radiation on the lunar surface.
Thomas L. Friedman, journalist and author of the book "The world is flat" [31] assures that "... the
strength of this age is based on the ability of individuals to take control of their lives" [32].
After an excessive industrialization of all fields of knowledge, the concept of the single object,
manufactured or repaired by oneself, seems a tempting offer. There is a rejection of the idea of
having to buy depersonalized, identical artifacts. Under this new philosophy, inventors and
creators experiment with new forms, using free hardware tools, to create prototypes and small
artifacts. A new paradigm that impels us to do new things, manufacturing objects whose
materialization is made through the use of digitally controlled equipment. "Made by oneself":
custom objects, with an extra value, that of the exclusive object.
4. The Shape. Difficult and complex
“… more and more, more is more” [33].
It is impossible to avoid the strong predilection that Western architecture has for the use of
Euclidean geometry: an architecture that "... It takes its canonical form [of] the Greek culture" [34]
and it would seem that, in its metric, in its measures, in its equilibrium it find the security that so
much needs.
From the constructivism from the 10’s and 20’s, through the Bauhaus courses and the harmonicproportional studies of Le Corbusier, to the recent works of the Shinichi Ogawa & Associates
studio, in the city of Kanagawa, Japan, "... the figure cubic, perfect, abstract, monochrome and
omnipresent"[35], represented and represents the embodiment of the ideals of modernity, and it’s
used as raw material in architecture.
For the German architect, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, in the mid-twentieth century, architecture
could be defined with his famous phrase "Less is more": an architecture that sought linguistic
simplicity, in its structural elements, in its pure geometric forms, and in a total absence of
ornamental elements.
However, a short time later, during the 70’s decade, the American architect Robert Charles
Venturi, expressed his reaction against this type of architecture: his well-known phrase "Less is a
bore", is an attempt to overcome "... the limited vocabulary of orthodox modern architecture "[36].
For Venturi, the modern movement, and its extreme puritanism, had been the cause of an empty
architecture of content that had finally been transformed into insipid and boring.
With Venturi, soon echoed other criticisms against the monotony of the modern movement.
Unfortunately, they were also the cause of an "... epidemic of postmodernist towers ... neither
more varied nor more interesting than those of the Modern Movement" [37].
At the end of the 80’s decade and according to the changes in technology, a new tool became
popular among designers around the world: computer-aided design CAD [38], a graphic system
used as a geometric "means of representation" of the Space.
According to changes in hardware technology, a new generation of programs, increasingly
powerful and accessible, allowed the emergence of systems capable of handling a greater
number of calculation variables, build simulations, modify them, analyze them and, finally,
optimize them. for its definitive construction.
Finally, at the beginning of the new millennium, once " surpasses [do] the scenographic character
of Postmodernism" [39], a new method of thinking, with a technological-digital origin, makes its
irruption challenging the traditional conceptions of the project. An avant-garde architecture, which
deviates from the Euclidean geometry, from the Cartesian space, to try to experiment with a
topological geometry, of curved surfaces, that uses NURBS (Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines),
under a flagrant distancing from the discrete volumes [40]
Under rigorous control, the architecture of the new century is materialized through complex
geometric forms that remain unchanged through continuous transformations and deformations.
Innovative forms, difficult to understand, forms linked to movement, to the apparent randomness,
to controlled chaos, to an expression of its variables of origin.
An architecture that finds its inspiration in physics, in mathematics, or in biology: animated forms,
in constant mutation, subject to the forces and interactions of the environment, that "participate in
the dynamic flows", directing the movement, allowing them to self-regulate
For the Dutch architect, Rem Koolhaas, it is an architecture where the "... accumulation and
accession have replaced other forms of organization, such as hierarchy and composition" [41].
One of these examples can be found in Jellyfish house, designed by the Iwamotto-Scott studio in
2005. The project was conceived trying to resemble a marine creature, which is linked and tries to
respond to the environment, adapting to the conditions that surrounds it.
Located on a land reclaimed from the sea, more precisely on the Island of Treasure, an artificial
island built outside the natural island of Yerba Buena, in the middle of the Bay of San Francisco,
the house is designed from a mathematical structure, a mutable skin, elaborated on the basis of a
parametric mesh, which uses an efficient geometrical logic of Delauney triangulation and Voronoi
diagrams for its generation. A mathematical design, where the openings are located within a
three-dimensional topological grid. What is a beam and what is a column? The new shape is a
complex composition of structurally deformed parts, visually and mechanically to adapt to the
design.
Four years later, the Iwamoto-Scott study, used this type of systems, for the Edgar Street Towers
project [42], in order to evaluate the behavior of the materials according to the superficial
conformations that the structure acquired with different geometries. . And, when it moved away
from the most appropriate forms, the system was designed to be reconfigured in order to adapt to
the new tensions of the modified surface, looking for structural forces to find the path of least
resistance to the earth along any surface [43].
Topological geometries, which seek to represent complex surfaces mathematically. A mutable
architecture, an undulating sheet, a fold, subjected to the processes of deformation and
transformation of space and time.
This is the case of the Kunsthaus Museum in Graz. Located on the banks of the River Mur, in the
historic center of the Austrian city of Graz. The "Friendly Aliens" [44], opened its doors during
2003, to commemorate the election of this city as European Capital of Culture. Work of the group
Spacelab directed by Sir Peter Cook and Colin Fournier, was the winning project of a contest
organized in the year 2000.
The building, conceived as a space dedicated to temporary exhibitions of contemporary art, is a
blue elongated bubble, implanted within a very homogeneous and traditional urban context. A
kind of living organism with strange eyes, a trace of animal form, which contains several levels in
its interior and communicates with an existing building.
Inside, an exhibition hall is illuminated thanks to 16 skylights that, like eyes, are located in the
amorphous volume. These skylights point to different points of view, allowing not only to bring
light and fresh air to the interior of the building, but also to frame the surrounding landscape.
Its façade, the BIX Facade [45], conceived by the group of German architects Realities: united, is
made up of more than 1000 panels, made of vacuum and three-dimensional laminates, from
which the cylindrical protuberances that make up the skylights emerge.
The panels are composed of a polyethylene terephthalate film with the incorporation of
anisotropic carbon yarns in order to give greater tensile strength along the tension lines, and
structural panels of Kevlar-Nomex fiber for the resistance to the compression. These features
allow multiple formal, structural variations (stiffness, opacity, flexibility or transparency), and cover
the width of the roof without intermediate structural supports. Inside, there are audiovisual
systems, loudspeakers, lighting elements and a series of laminated tubes through which the
different necessary channelings circulate.
A sensitive skin, which incorporates within its thickness, 930 fluorescent lamps 40 w, circular
shape with a diameter of 40 cm, and sensors, like pixels, are connected to a computer system
transforming the skin of the building as a large screen urban, a screen 20 meters high by almost
40 meters wide, which allows you to reproduce images and texts in motion.
From this line of thought, one of the most ambitious projects of recent times, is the proposal of
2012, for the Cathedral of Our Lady of Los Angeles, Xiaofeng Mei and Xiao Gao.
Far from the angles of 90 degrees, the building is inspired by biological forms, skeletons, spines
and fish scales: a complex geometric shape, to reinterpret the concept of spirituality. A complex
but welcoming environment that allows believers to reflect and meditate.
In the new millennium, the box has been fragmented, in its replacement a new architecture has
arisen, of complex conformations, metaphoric eccentricities, geometric manipulations, NURBS
surfaces, a four-dimensional architecture. A new architecture that manifests itself through the
generation of a new type of space, never before imagined by man.
5. The ecology. When everything is green
In the contemporary world where more than a half of the population lives in urban spaces, the
problems of the environment and the search for sustainable development, constitute a subject of
constant validity in the official agendas.
The growing concern for the environment has increased the need to transform production and
consumption systems, seeking to optimize resources so that they tend to be more effective and
less polluting. New strategies aim at the conservation of energy and water, the recycle of
structures, and the use of "friendly" materials with maximum energy savings and a low impact on
the environment: the color green is the politically correct color of the 21st century.
In the specific field of architecture, some decisions are still limited, restricting themselves to small
actions of dubious long-term impact. They are the false converts, which, emblazoned of green,
promote their projects as eco-sustainable, but in the background they continue to develop large
volumes of reinforced concrete, now with gardens on their balconies and terraces: green
buildings alone in the titles, that hide the old corpses of "high tech Parisian" eras to the new
generations.
But not everything is lost in this battle for the future of the planet: under the efficient management
of energy and natural resources, some contemporary architects are experimenting on innovative
concepts in the design process. In search of a new type of architecture that is not harmful to the
environment, they experience an eco-sustainable, flexible and ecological architecture.
One of the representative examples in this line of thought are the Al Bahr towers in Abu Dhabi,
designed by the Aedas studio, who have demonstrated how technology can be understood as
part of the design process and not simply as a tool for their design representation. A new mode of
projection where matter has become binary information, defined through a three-dimensional
model.
Since its conception, the designers developed a contextual and culturally sensitive design without
losing all the new possibilities that technology provided them, having as a reference to nature to
reach the highest standards of energy efficiency.
Under a simple geometry, the Aedas study used a series of parametric algorithms, in order to
investigate what was the optimal relationship between the radius of the building and the outer
surface of the envelope, seeking to minimize the surface exposed to solar radiation. To do this,
they developed a partial screen covering externally, the faces directly exposed to the incidence of
the rays of the sun.
Inspired by a traditional Islamic element, the mashrabiva [46], they developed a high-tech artificial
skin, which serves to diffuse sunlight, along its 25 floors. A mobile artificial protection that
prevents overheating and radiance on the facade of the building: a screen developed from a
network of repetitive triangular geometric patterns, forming a dynamic complex three-dimensional
grid. Inside, a computer controls the shape of these triangles according to the movements of the
sun, opening or closing according to the incidence of light on them. The screen allows the
building to remain cool by reducing brightness, without detriment to natural lighting. A direct
analogy to the behavior of native plants: the screen is transformed into a permeable membrane
that establishes a symbiotic relationship between the inside and the outside, reducing by 50% the
use of environmental conditioning systems.
At night, the screen is folded and saved, and the systems go into hibernation until the next day.
On the south-facing deck, a series of photovoltaic cells are responsible for producing renewable
electrical energy, which, among other things, feeds the functioning mechanisms of the
membranes.
Another Interesting project is the Hydra-Tesla Research Center, better known as Hydra
Skyscraper. it’s a project of the multidisciplinary study of the Serbian architects, Milos Vlastic, Vuk
Djordjevic, Ana Lazovic and Milica Stankovic, who obtained an honorable mention, in the
international competition EVOLO of 2011.
Inspired by the hydra [47], the architects designed a skyscraper which its structure is developed
from a grapheme [48], the basic structural element of carbon allotropes. The graphene has a
great thermal and electrical conductivity, and a hardness 200 times higher than steel. The
building is like a gigantic Faraday box, with tentacles on its upper part, which, during an electric
storm, captures the rays and leads the energy to the base of the building, where it is stored in
mega-batteries. Finally, energy is useful to produce hydrogen through a process called
"electrolysis of water", which divides the water molecule into O2 and H, using the latter as a
source of renewable and clean energy necessary for its operation [49].
In this context, it would be absurd to pretend that "design will save the world"; on the contrary,
what is intended upon it is to produce an adequate design of the elements that make up our
environment, in order to improve our quality of life, without this generating a harmful impact on
the environment.
A change of mentality is imperative, where the design in the architecture does not conform to the
search for energy savings, the recycling of waste, or the reduction of pollution; new, more
ambitious projects are required, seeking to integrate with the environment, responding to social
interests, and acceptable economic values, as mechanisms improve the quality of citizen’s
lifestyle.
6. The senses. Seduce and / or impact
For the Finnish architect Juahni Pallasmaa, phenomenology is presented as a "pure look or see
the essence of things, away from intellectual explanations or conventional definitions." To do this,
it is imperative to "apprehend" architecture, "... open a view towards a second reality of
perception, dreams, forgetting memories and imagination." [50] Human intervention on nature
transforms it from actions linked to emotive, with sublimation.
In recent years, architects such as Steven Holl, Peter Zumthor and Daniel Libeskind have
developed an approach towards a type of architecture focused on the experimentation of their
phenomena. Understood as an integral part of life, they describe its essence as the presence and
meaning of a concrete experience. A sense of space and time, a "… way to experience
architecture walking through it, touching it, listening to it" [51], revealing it in its true background.
Phenomenology is the science of experiences. For that reason "... it is not about describing some
houses, pointing out the picturesque aspects and analyzing what constitutes their comfort" [52]
On the contrary "... the physical phenomena of architecture, the generating force lies in the
intentions behind it"[53].
Therefore, it would be extremely unwise and simplistic to think about expressing the architecture
by means of plan and sections. Phenomenology poses in architecture a search, an investigation
into the deep, variables and how you are modified and modified by space, where light, color and
texture, are conjugated to make intervene and influence the senses of the spectator, trying to
discover the emotions that inhabit each place.
In this sense, one of the most interesting projects is the art museum designed by James Turel,
located in Estancia Colomé, 62 km from the village of Cachi, in the area of the Calchaquíes
Valleys, province of Salta.
A space of 1700 m2 covered, dedicated exclusively to the works of the American artist James
Turrell, Called "the sculptor of light": in its interior are exhibited nine installations of permanent
light, drawings, engravings and photographs that cover 50 years of the race of the artist
The author proposes a design that expresses itself through a symbolic architecture, where the
emotional dimension is essential. The proposal moves away from the merely utilitarian, it is
opposed to the typical mechanistic ideas of the first part of the 20th century: its works are a sign,
a mark of time, a "... presence of the invisible within the everyday world" [54] .
Turrell works with light in a dreamlike way. It uses it as raw material to build spaces, it seeks to
produce forms from it. It shows a fascination for luminous phenomena, which relates in a range of
colors of great strength that play with perception and affect us physically and emotionally. For him
there is a physical, emotional and even spiritual relationship with her. "The power of light does not
come from the image it brings. It comes from our original relationship with light "[55].
In his works, there is no image, nor the focal point; his works deal with the perception of space
and the phenomena of light. A combination of architecture, light, technology and beauty to
produce in the spectator a series of indescribable sensations. A superposition of individual
images, a storm of images stored in memory, "... through the senses, especially through sight
and the synesthetic experience of touch through sight" [56], where the image becomes a
combination of all of them.
An architecture where each project is unique, as well as its phenomenological conditions and in
which a "magical force [that succumbs] to the charm of a fully developed architectural body" is
enclosed "[57].
Similarly, another project representative of this architecture of emotions, is the Jewish Museum of
the city of Berlin (Jüdisches Museum Berlin), of 1999, work of the Polish architect, nationalized
American, Daniel Libeskind.
The initial idea of Libeskind, was to develop an empty space that produced strong sensations
when going through its interior: a lack of objects and meanings, denoting "emptiness and
absence"; a sensitive journey, charged with a strong experiential experience, with irregular,
inclined, perforated volumes, a phenomenon of controlled chaos, where time and space also
seemed to fragment.
Inside the building, a staircase is developed in a diagonal space that crosses the entire height of
the volume. This space is constantly traversed by diagonal beams: a symbol of the continuity of a
town, with its history, survival and memory; "... the straight line of emptiness represents what has
been lost and can never be recovered" [58].
Following the path through this three-dimensional zigzag, another space with a strong impact on
the observer is the Shalechet installation, fallen leaves: an alley with 10,000 iron plates shaped
like faces, scattered across the floor, made by the artist Israeli Menashe Kadishman. Visitors,
walking through the place, tread on these plates producing a terrifying metallic sound, managing
to represent the suffering of the dead by the holocaust: "... an emblem of the invisible, of the
empty, of the structural features that have been accumulating in the space of Berlin "[59] and that
are manifested in architecture. "An impossible interior space, inaccessible through language,
could be described, but words can not replace an authentic physical and sensory experience"
[60].
This is an architecture that appeals to the sensory, which considers "... the unpredictable, the
random and the complex of phenomena [as] a new way of thinking them" [61], where space is
conceived as a great instrument that mixes sounds, amplifies them, and transmits them
everywhere. The relationship between the building and its surroundings is "... a disposition of
mind, a sensation in perfect concordance with the built space, communicated directly to those
who contemplate it, inhabit it and visit it" [62]. An architecture capable of "... quiet and cry" [63].
An architecture that alarms, far from the architecture of marketing, that of shopping centers; an
architecture that does not consider function or form as the leitmotiv. Its roots reside in our first
experiences: the house, that warm lap that welcomes us and becomes our corner in the world,
our first universe.
Another interesting example is the Bruder Klaus Chapel, built in 2007, in Mechernich, Germany,
by the Swiss architect Peter Zumthor.
Of austere exterior, it stands out from the landscape as a rigid prism 12 meters high, lacking any
kind of exterior ornamentation, except for a single triangular-shaped metal door: from afar, its
shape can be confused with that of a tank waters or that of a deposit of grains.
However, its interior is different. A space built in the shape of a tent with a central hole: built from
112 trunks of trees, to form a rustic formwork, on which were poured for 24 days, layers of
concrete rammed 50 cm thick.
When the concrete was ready, the interior wooden structure was set alight to release an empty
space, leaving inside it an irregularly textured walls and blackened by fire. An inside
"atmosphere" of smells and textures, "... in a way that goes beyond form and construction" [64].
Its illumination comes from an upper oculus that spills its light inside the small interior space and
from tiny points of light located in the side walls of the chapel: rain and sun penetrate into the
chapel, creating different experiences according to the time of day and the time of the year. A
space created for reflection, under "... a beautiful silence [a building] ... that represents nothing, it
just is" [65].
At the beginning of the 21st century a new challenge is presented related to the future. A new
architecture, which emphasizes the spatial experiences, the sensations in the constructed
objects, the perceptual exchanges between people and things.
In this sense, a reinvention of the site is required, "... in which people and nature confront each
other under a substantial sense of tension." [66] This is what Japanese architect Tadao Ando
calls "... the need to discover the architecture that the site itself seeks "[67], is the critical
regionalism of Kenneth Frampton that" adheres to the positive assessment of regional
architecture, vernacular and its sensitivity to the conditions of light, wind and temperature " [68] A
strategy that aims to rescue subjectivity as an essential condition to conceive and explain
projects.
Conclusions
First
In 1979, in the magazine SUMMA humor, the architects Miguel Angel Faure, and Liliana Nidia
Carnevale, wrote an ironic article titled "Vademecum rhetorical for architects" [69], where they
recounted "... a valuable assistant for the preparation of descriptive memories, criticism and
theoretical essays in architecture "[70].
The article presented three columns of words, which at first glance seemed unrelated. The
process that animated the article was very simple: one should take a term from each group of
words, and add the necessary words to articulate each word and make sense of the sentence. In
this way, one could obtain results such as: "the result is a programmed functional design, with
compatible morphological premises, a compatible projective message, within a normative
existential context".
Second
In this quick passage through the development of six key concepts, we have tried to answer our
initial question: What is contemporary architecture?
Six looks, questionable perhaps, ambiguous, controversial. Six ideas that tried to form a map of
the situation, a range of new causalities where authors, works and concepts intertwine looking for
an answer.
In 2014, the Princess of Asturias Foundation, a non-profit private institution, awarded Canadian
architect Frank O. Gehry the Prince of Asturias Award for the Arts 2014 [71], one of the most
important awards in the field of architecture.
When Gehry entered the room destined for his usual meeting with the press, one of the
journalists asked him about the criticism he had received for being part of the supposed
architecture of the show. To which the architect replied: "Let me tell you one thing: 98% of the
buildings that are built today are pure shit. There is no sense of design, no respect for humanity,
for nothing. Occasionally there are people who do something special, but they are very few. Holy
God, leave us alone! ... do not ask stupid questions "[72]. Subsequently, "Gehry raised the middle
finger of his right hand" [73].
At the moment, the current paradigm inherited from the classical sciences has imposed on us a
static and determined look that contrasts drastically with the complexity that this new approach of
the contemporary world proposes to us.
Perhaps now after opening so many doors we are more confused than before. Perhaps the 21st
century needs a new way of philosophizing, "... where both the word 'history' and the word 'art'
[must be] rethought and resignified" [74].
Perhaps, for the lack of a sufficient historical perspective, we are not ready to answer the initial
question, or simply ... in our obstinacy perhaps ... we are just asking stupid questions.
Bibliographical citation
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
CALVINO, Ítalo, Seis propuestas para el próximo milenio, Madrid, Siruela, 1990, pág. 9.
Cambridge Dictionary, ttps://dictionary.cambridge.org/es/diccionario/ingles-espanol/contemporary (14/03/2019).
VILLANUEVA CAJIDE, Beatriz; CASAS COBOS, Francisco Javier, “¿Qué es arquitectura contemporánea?”, en La
ciudad viva, Andalucía, Consejería de Fomento y Vivienda de la Junta de Andalucía, 25 de febrero de 2013, en
http://www.laciudadviva.org/blogs/?p=16208 (consultado 16/10/2016).
MONTANER, Josep María, La condición contemporánea de la arquitectura”, Barcelona, Gustavo Gili, 2015, pág. 7.
MONTANER, Josep María, Op. cit, pág. 7.
HOBSBAWM, Eric, Historia del Siglo XX, Buenos Aires, Critica, 1998, pág. 13.
TOFFLER, Alvin, El shock del futuro, Barcelona, Plaza & Janes, 1970.
BAUMAN, Zygmunt, Modernidad Liquida, México, FCE, 2004.
En alusión a la cita “en el futuro todos tendrán sus 15 minutos de fama mundial” atribuida al artista plástico Andy
Warhol.
Demolition Man (1993) es una película de acción y ciencia ficción, producida por el Warner Bros., dirigido por
Marco Brambilla y protagonizado por Sylvester Stallone, Wesley Snipes y Sandra Bullock.
IBELINGS, Hans, Supermodernismo. Arquitectura en la era de la globalización, Barcelona, GG, 1998.
CALVINO, Ítalo, Op. cit., pág. 9.
IBELINGS, Hans, Op. cit.
ZÁTONYI, Marta, Una estética del arte y el diseño de imagen y sonido, Buenos Aires, Nobuko, 2002.
En alusión al libro de Cordura Rau, Why Do Architects Wear Black?, Vienna & New York, Springer Verlag, 2008.
ORWELL, George, 1984, México DF, Gerrero editor, 1999.
DRAE, op. cit.
IBELINGS, Hans, Op. cit.
PIÑON, Helio, La Forma y la mirada, Buenos Aires, Ed. Nobuko, 2005.
KOLAREVIC, Branco (2003), “Digital Morphogenesis”, en Kolarevic, B. (ed.), Architecture in the Digital Age: Design
and Manufacturing, Spon Press, New York y London, págs. 17-45, en www.i-m-a-d-e.org/fabrication/wpcontent/uploads /2010/08/02, consultado el 08/10/16.
LYNN, Greg, “Embriological house”, BLOB, 2000, http://archives.docam.ca/en/wp-content/GL/GL3ArchSig.html, consultado
el 08/07/13.
CASTELLS, Manuel, The Rise of the Network Society, Massachussetts, Blackwell, 1996, p. 29.
LYON, Arturo, Entwined: Materializaciones Generativas. Exploración en Pieles Estructurales; entre el diseño
paramétrico y algoritmos generativos, MARQ 4, Fabricación y tecnología digital, AA VV, Chile, Hugo Mondragón Claudio Labarca, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 2009.
LE CORBUSIER, Hacia una arquitectura, Buenos Aires, Editorial Poseidón, 1964.
LE CORBUSIER, Op. cit.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
ZÁTONYI, Marta, Op. cit.
ORTEGA, Lluís, La digitalización toma el mando, Barcelona, Gustavo Gili, 2009.
Flight Assembled Architecture by Gramazio & Kohler and Raffaello d'Andrea,
http://www.dezeen.com/2011/11/24/flight-assembled-architecture-by-gramazio-kohler-and-raffaello-dandrea/,
consultado el 08/07/13.
Personal Manufacturing and 3d Printing, D-Shape's Plans, http://fabbaloo.com/blog/2013/5/1/d-shapesplans.html#.UeCw1o0998F, consultado el 08/07/13.
Foster + Partners to 3D print buildings on the moon, http://www.dezeen.com/2013/01/31/foster-partners-to-3d-printbuildings-on-the-moon/, consultado el 08/07/13.
FRIEDMAN, Thomas, The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century, Paperback, 2005
SCHERER, Fabiana, Hágalo usted mismo, http://www.lanacion.com.ar/949441-hagalo-usted-mismo, consultado el
08/07/13.
Bjarke Ingels Group, Yes Is More: An Archicomic on Architectural Evolution, Barcelona, Taschen, 2009.
DOBERTI, Roberto, “Forma y geometría”, en Espacialidades, Buenos Aires, Infinito, 2008, pág. 86 y ss.
35. MADERUELO, Javier, La idea del espacio en la arquitectura y el arte contemporáneo 1960-1989, Madrid. Editorial
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
Akal, 2008.
Bjarke Ingels Group, Op. cit.
Bjarke Ingels Group, Op. cit.
CAD: del inglés, computer-aided design (diseño asistido por computador).
LEACH, Neil (2009), “Digital Morphogenesis”, Architectural Design, Vol 79, Nº1.
KOLAREVIC, Branco (2003), “Digital Morphogenesis”, en Kolarevic, B. (ed.), Architecture in the Digital Age: Design
and Manufacturing, Spon Press, New York y London, págs. 17-45, en www.i-m-a-d-e.org/fabrication/wpcontent/uploads /2010/08/02. (consultado el 08/07/13).
Bjarke Ingels Group, Op. cit.
IWAMOTO, Lisa, “Line Array, Protocells a Dynamic Structure”, AD Protocell Architecture, Vol. 81, Nº2, Marzo-Abril
2011, pp. 112-121.
Este tipo de trabajos llevó al descubrimiento y patentamiento de nuevos sistemas constructivos como el de una
rejilla en diagonal de acero, que fue utilizada en la construcción de “The Gherkin” (el Pepino) de Norman Foster.
Friendly Aliens, del inglés “amigo alienígena”.
La palabra BIX, nace de la combinación de las palabras "Big", del inglés: grande; y "Pixel", pixeles.
Elemento decorativo perforado, tradicional de la arquitectura árabe, generalmente construido en madera tallada de
reducida sección, utilizado como tamiz solar.
La hydra es un organismo de la familia de las phylum cnidaria, que vive en el agua dulce, posee una forma tubular
de simetría radial y una serie de tentáculos en uno de sus extremos con los que captura a sus presas.
48. Graphene: elemento estructural básico de algunos alótropos de carbono incluyendo grafito, carbón, nanotubos de
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
carbono y fulerenos. Material de gran conductividad térmica y eléctrica, y con una resistencia mecánica 200 veces
superior
a
la
del
acero.
http://www.architectureserved.com/gallery/Hydra-Skyscraper-Tesla-researchfacility/1108779, consultado el 16/07/14.
Pese a lo premonitorio del proyecto, este ha recibido fuerte críticas, en especial la del co-director de Laboratorio de
Investigación de Rayos de la Universidad de Florida, el Dr. Martin Uman, quien no cree viable este proyecto en un
futuro inmediato.
NESBITT, Kate, Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture: An Anthology of Architectural Theory 1965-1995, New
York, Princenton Architectural Press, 1996.
HOLL, Steven, “Phenomena and Idea”, GA Architect, 11, Tokyo, ADA Edita, 1993, págs. 12-17.
BACHERLARD, Gaston, La poética del espacio, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1965. (1º ed., Presses
Universi-taires de France, París, 1957).
HOLL, Steven, “Cuestiones de Percepción”, en El Croquis: Steven Holl 1986-2003, págs. 88-89.
NESBITT, Kate, op. cit.
Catalogo James Turrell, The Hess Art Collection at Colomé, Entrevista con James Turrell, 2009, Germany, Hess y
Steiner.
MILETO, Camilla, “La conservación de la arquitectura: materia y mensaje sensibles”, Loggia. Arquitectura y
Restaura-ción, n°19, Valencia, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, 2006.
ZUMTHOR, Peter, Pensar en Arquitectura, Barcelona, GG, 2009, pág 15.
En BATES, Donald, “Una conversación entre líneas con Daniel Libeskind”, en GIMÉNEZ Carlos, MIRAS, Marta,
VALENTINO, Julio, La arquitectura cómplice, Buenos Aires, nobuKo, 2011.
ERBACHER, Doris, KUBITZ, Peter Paul, “El Museo Judío de Berlín. Entrevista con Daniel Libeskind”, Elemento
52, México, Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, 2003.
HOLL, Steven, op. cit.
GIMÉNEZ Carlos, MIRAS, Marta, VALENTINO, Julio, La arquitectura cómplice, Buenos Aires, nobuKo, 2011.
ZUMTHOR, Peter, Atmósferas, Barcelona, G. Gilli, 2006.
APARICIO GUISADO, Jesús M., El muro, Madrid, Biblioteca nueva, 2006.
64. SVEIVEN, Megan, “Capilla de Campo Bruder Klaus / Peter Zumthor”, en Plataforma arquitectura, Abril, 2015,
consultada el (10/10/16) http://www.plataformaarquitectura.cl/cl/764856/iglesia-de-campo-bruder-klaus-peterzumthor
65. SVEIVEN, Megan, “Capilla de Campo Bruder Klaus / Peter Zumthor”, en Plataforma arquitectura, Abril, 2015,
consultada el (10/10/16) http://www.plataformaarquitectura.cl/cl/764856/iglesia-de-campo-bruder-klaus-peterzumthor
66. NESBITT, Kate, op. cit.
67. Ibid.
68. Ibid.
69. FAURE, Miguel Angel; CARNEVALE, Liliana Nidia, “Vademécum retorico para arquitectos”, en Summa Humor, nº1,
1979.
70. FAURE, Miguel Angel; CARNEVALE, Liliana Nidia, “Vademécum retorico para arquitectos”, en Summa Humor, nº1,
1979.
71. Premio Príncipe de Asturias de las Artes 2014, en http://www.fpa.es/es/premios-princesa-deasturias/premiados/2014-frank-o-gehry.html?especifica=0, consultado el 01/10/2016.
72. MARTIN RODRIGO, Inés, “La peineta de Gehry a la arquitectura del espectáculo”, en Diario ABC, Cultura, Oviedo,
24/10/2014, en http://www.abc.es/cultura/20141023/abci-gehry-peineta-oviedo-principeasturias201410231845.html, consultado el 01/10/2016.
73. MARTIN RODRIGO, Inés, “La peineta de Gehry a la arquitectura del espectáculo”, en Diario ABC, Cultura, Oviedo,
24/10/2014, en http://www.abc.es/cultura/20141023/abci-gehry-peineta-oviedo-principeasturias201410231845.html, consultado el 01/10/2016.
74. ZÁTONYI, Marta, op. cit., pág. 221.
Bibliography
APARICIO GUISADO, Jesús M., El muro, Madrid, Biblioteca nueva, 2006.
BACHERLARD, Gastón, La poética del espacio, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1965. (1º ed.,
Presses Universi-taires de France, París, 1957).
BAUMAN, Zygmunt, Modernidad Liquida, México, FCE, 2004.
Bjarke Ingels Group, Yes Is More: An Archicomic on Architectural Evolution, Barcelona, Taschen, 2009.
CALVINO, Ítalo, Seis propuestas para el próximo milenio, Madrid, Siruela, 1990, pág. 9.
CASTELLS, Manuel, The Rise of the Network Society, Massachussetts, Blackwell, 1996, p. 29.
Catalogo James Turrell, The Hess Art Collection at Colomé, Entrevista con James Turrell, 2009, Germany,
Hess y Steiner.
DOBERTI, Roberto, “Forma y geometría”, en Espacialidades, Buenos Aires, Infinito, 2008, pág. 86 y ss.
En BATES, Donald, “Una conversación entre líneas con Daniel Libeskind”, en GIMÉNEZ Carlos, MIRAS,
Marta,
ERBACHER, Doris, KUBITZ, Peter Paul, “El Museo Judío de Berlín. Entrevista con Daniel Libeskind”,
Elemento 52, México, Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, 2003.
FAURE, Miguel Ángel; CARNEVALE, Liliana Nidia, “Vademécum retorico para arquitectos”, en Summa
Humor, nº1, 1979.
FERNÁNDEZ GALIANO, Luis (1998), “Placeres del pliegue. La ultima vanguardia holandesa”, Arquitectura
Viva 69.
GIMÉNEZ Carlos, MIRAS, Marta, VALENTINO, Julio, La arquitectura cómplice, Buenos Aires, nobuKo,
2011.
HOBSBAWM, Eric, Historia del Siglo XX, Buenos Aires, Critica, 1998, pág. 13.
HOLL, Steven, “Cuestiones de Percepción”, en El Croquis: Steven Holl 1986-2003, págs. 88-89.
IBELINGS, Hans, Supermodernismo. Arquitectura en la era de la globalización, Barcelona, GG, 1998.
IWAMOTO, Lisa, “Line Array, Protocells a Dynamic Structure”, AD Protocell Architecture, Vol. 81, Nº2,
Marzo-Abril 2011, pp. 112-121.
JENCKS, Charles, “The Century is Over, Evolutionary Tree of Twentieth-Century Architecture”, en
Architectural Review, julio 2000, pág. 77.
KOLAREVIC, Branco (2003), “Digital Morphogenesis”, en Kolarevic, B. (ed.), Architecture in the Digital Age:
Design and Manufacturing, Spon Press, New York y London, págs. 17-45, en www.i-m-a-de.org/fabrication/wp-content/uploads /2010/08/02, consultado el 08/10/16.
KUHN, Thomas, La función del dogma en la investigación científica, Barcelona, Cuadernos Teorema, 1970,
pág. 4.
LE CORBUSIER, Hacia una arquitectura, Buenos Aires, Editorial Poseidón, 1964.
LYNN, Greg, “Embriological house”, BLOB, 2000, http://archives.docam.ca/en/wp-content/GL/GL3ArchSig.html,
consultado el 08/07/13.
LYON, Arturo, Entwined: Materializaciones Generativas. Exploración en Pieles Estructurales; entre el
diseño paramétrico y algoritmos generativos, MARQ 4, Fabricación y tecnología digital, AA VV, Chile, Hugo
Mondragón - Claudio Labarca, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 2009.
MADERUELO, Javier, La idea del espacio en la arquitectura y el arte contemporáneo 1960-1989, Madrid.
Editorial Akal, 2008.
MILETO, Camilla, “La conservación de la arquitectura: materia y mensaje sensibles”, Loggia. Arquitectura y
Restaura-ción, n°19, Valencia, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, 2006.
MONTANER, Josep María, La condición contemporánea de la arquitectura”, Barcelona, Gustavo Gili, 2015,
pág. 7.
NESBITT, Kate, Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture: An Anthology of Architectural Theory 19651995, New York, Princenton Architectural Press, 1996.
ORTEGA, Lluís, La digitalización toma el mando, Barcelona, Gustavo Gili, 2009.
ORWELL, George, 1984, México DF, Gerrero editor, 1999.
PIÑON, Helio, La Forma y la mirada, Buenos Aires, Ed. Nobuko, 2005.
ZÁTONYI, Marta, Una estética del arte y el diseño de imagen y sonido, Buenos Aires, Nobuko, 2002.
ZUMTHOR, Peter, Atmósferas, Barcelona, G. Gilli, 2006.
ZUMTHOR, Peter, Pensar en Arquitectura, Barcelona, GG, 2009, pág 15.
TOFFLER, Alvin, El shock del futuro, Barcelona, Plaza & Janes, 1970.
Fraile Narvaez, M. (2016). Six concepts about the architecture of the new millennium. Initially
published in the magazine TRP21 nº4 (2016). www.trp21.com.ar