Science of the Total Environment 408 (2010) 5506–5512 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Science of the Total Environment j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / s c i t o t e n v Oak forest exploitation and black-locust invasion caused severe shifts in epiphytic lichen communities in Northern Italy Juri Nascimbene a,⁎,1, Lorenzo Marini b,1 a b Department of Biology, University of Padova, via U. Bassi 58/B, I-35121 Padova, Italy Department of Environmental Agronomy and Crop Production, University of Padova, viale dell'Università 16—35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 30 April 2010 Received in revised form 17 July 2010 Accepted 19 July 2010 Available online 14 August 2010 Keywords: Alien species Cyanolichens Forest management Rare species Trentepohlioid lichens a b s t r a c t In the last two centuries, native European oak forests have undergone a dramatic decline related to increasing human pressure for agriculture and urbanization. Oak forests were either completely eradicated and transformed into agricultural landscapes or replaced by second-growth formations. Intensive forest management and the replacement of native forests with production forests or arable lands are recognized amongst the main threats to many lichens in Europe. In this study, we used historical information on the epiphytic lichen biota which was hosted in a native oak-dominated forest of Northern Italy to identify shifts of lichen communities due to the changes in land use which occurred during the last two centuries. We also compared the epiphytic lichen communities inhabiting remnant oak forests with those found in the habitats that have replaced native forests: black-locust forests and agrarian landscapes. Almost all the species sampled during the 19th century are now extinct. The loss of native habitat and the subsequent invasion by black locust were probably the most influential factors which affected the composition of lichen communities, causing the local extinction of most of the species historically recorded. Despite the fact that oak remnants host only a few species which were historically recorded, and that they currently are the lichen poorest habitat in the study region, they host lichen assemblages differing from those of black-locust forests and agrarian stands. In these habitats lichen assemblages are mainly composed of species adapted to well-lit, dry conditions and tolerating air pollution and eutrophication. This pattern is likely to be common also in other lowland and hilly regions throughout Northern Italy where oak forests are targeted among the habitats of conservation concern at the European level. For this reason, a national strategy for biodiversity conservation and monitoring of lowlands forests should provide the framework for local restoration projects. © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction The exploitation of forests may produce severe impacts on several components of biodiversity (Heywood, 1995). In the last two centuries, native oak forests across whole Europe have undergone a dramatic decline related to increasing human pressure for agriculture and urbanization. Native oak forests were either completely eradicated and transformed into agricultural landscapes or replaced by second-growth formations. Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.), an alien species introduced in the late 1700s from the southeastern United States, is amongst the most invasive species that have replaced oaks in Italy (see e.g. Caprio et al., 2009; Motta et al., 2009). The high potential for wood and erosion control, together with its fast and highly competitive growth, greatly enhanced the spread of this species which invaded large wet and fertile areas. Amongst the various components of forest biodiversity, epiphytic lichens are considered particularly sensitive to human-related altera⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 43942894. E-mail address: junasc@libero.it (J. Nascimbene). 1 Both authors equally contributed to the study. 0048-9697/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.056 tions of forests (Aragón et al., 2010) such as intensive management or replacement of native forests with secondary forests (e.g. Fritz et al., 2008; Hedenås and Ericson, 2000; Humphrey et al., 2002; Johansson, 2008; McCune, 2000; Moning and Müller, 2009; Nascimbene et al., 2007; Rogers and Ryel, 2008). For instance, clearing of forests and logging can alter humidity, temperature and light conditions (Moen and Jonsson, 2003), causing a systematic reduction in populations and local extinction of some cyanolichens and some crustose sorediate species (e.g. Aragón et al., 2010). Management also tends to diminish some types of phorophyte in the landscape, and consequently, the substrate specialist lichens also decrease (Hedenås and Ericson, 2008; Belinchón et al., 2009). Moreover, forest management and land-use changes might interplay with the negative effects of air pollution (e.g. Geiser and Neitlich, 2007; Jeran et al., 2007; Jovan and Mc Cune, 2004; Mayer et al., 2009) and climate changes (e.g. Ellis and Coppins, 2007; Ellis et al., 2007, 2009) resulting in a severe decline of several sensitive species such as the two large macrolichens Usnea longissima (e.g. Esseen et al., 1981; Nascimbene and Tretiach, 2009) and Lobaria pulmonaria (e.g. Scheidegger and Werth, 2009). Science-based assessment of forest lichen decline is often hindered by the scarcity of detailed historical information available for direct J. Nascimbene, L. Marini / Science of the Total Environment 408 (2010) 5506–5512 comparison with the communities found in the remnant habitats. Historical comparisons have been successfully applied only within urban environments, where site-referred historical data could be more easily retrieved (Rose and Hawksworth, 1981; Isocrono et al., 2007). When this information is available, historical comparison is a powerful tool to evaluate changes in biodiversity (Biesmeijer et al., 2006; Mac Nally et al., 2009), despite some limitations, related to heterogeneity of available datasets or differences in the sampling effort (e.g. Kosior et al., 2008; Newbold, 2010). In this study, we used historical information on the epiphytic lichen biota which was hosted in native oak forests in a region in Northern Italy. These data provide an exceptional framework to identify shifts in lichen communities due to the changes in land use which occurred during the last two centuries. Specifically this study had two main objectives: (1) to check if epiphytic lichens historically recorded (1851–1894) in a region formerly covered by large native oak forests are still present in the remnant forests, and (2) to compare the epiphytic lichen communities inhabiting the remnants, with those found in the habitats that have replaced the native forests (black-locust forests and isolated trees in agrarian landscapes). 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Study area The study was carried out in the Montello area, an elliptical shaped hill placed in the northern part of the Venetian plain (NE-Italy, Veneto, Treviso), extending over a 5000 ha surface with its main axis (13 km) NNE–SSW oriented (Fig. 1). The mean elevation is 200 m (maximum 369 m) and it is 100 m higher than the surrounding plain (Ferrarese and Sauro, 2005). The climate is temperate to humid subtropical with a mean annual temperature of 12.9 °C, January being the coldest month (mean temperature 3–4 °C) and July being the warmest one (mean temperature 22.7 °C). Mean annual rainfall is 1100 mm, with maxima in spring and autumn. 5507 2.2. Historical landscape and forest management For centuries the Montello area was covered by a continuous oak [Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] forest. However, similarly to what occurred over much of the hilly and lowland deciduous forests in Northern Italy, since the end of the 19th and during the 20th centuries native oak forests were subjected to severe cutting for agriculture land reclamation. The first written information on the forest of Montello is available in a document dated 994 (Favero, 1875). From 1389 to 1797 the forest was owned by Venice republic and was used for providing the wood for the huge naval arsenal. The management was based on selective cutting resulting in a continuous, pure multilayered oak forest (Favero, 1875; Susmel, 1994). After the decline of Venice the forest was owned by the Austro-Hungarians until 1866. In this period, the intensity of the exploitation increased mainly due to illegal cutting by the local population. The intense disturbance promoted also the establishment of black locust (R. pseudoacacia), which was favoured by man because of its fast growth and good wood quality for firewood and agricultural uses. In 1892, the local stakeholders declared the total destruction of the native forest and the conversion of the whole area into a farmland (Bertolini, 1905). However, due to non-optimal conditions for agriculture, the conversion was not completed and part of the area remained covered by forests which were overexploited and greatly disturbed during the First World War. Between 1950 and 1970 the area was largely abandoned while in the surrounding region both industries and agriculture greatly developed. From 1954 to 2004 the total forested area progressively increased (Ferrarese and Castiglioni, 2005), being mainly related to the rapid spread of black locust, which prevented the re-establishment of the native oak forest. 2.3. Current landscape and management Currently, Montello appears like an island surrounded by the anthropogenic landscape of the Venetian plain with diffuse agriculture and secondarily urbanization. In this area there are only minor industrial Fig. 1. Geographic position of the study area in north-eastern Italy. In the detailed map, the position of the 18 sampling plots surveyed for comparing currently available habitats (oak forest, agrarian habitat, and black-locust forest) for epiphytic lichens is reported. 5508 J. Nascimbene, L. Marini / Science of the Total Environment 408 (2010) 5506–5512 activities which developed in the last 3–5 decades, resulting in relatively high levels of lichen diversity and in moderate or low degrees of air pollution even in the past years when some areas of the Veneto region were affected by high levels of SOx pollution (Cislaghi and Nimis, 1997; Nimis et al., 1991). Forty percent of the Montello area is managed for extensive agriculture, including arable fields, hay meadows, and vineyards, while the remnant 60% is covered by forests. The forest landscape may be described as a rather continuous black-locust matrix with interspersed oak-dominated patches. Pure black-locust formations are, therefore, the main forest type, representing over 90% of the forested area. They are private forests managed with short-rotation cycles (15–30 years), mainly for firewood production. Of the original c. 5000 ha of the oak forest present in the 19th century, only a few remnant patches (total area 106 ha) remained in the central part of the hill. They are non-intensively managed with occasional cutting by the owners. Additional minor formations are chestnut forests and artificial conifer plantations. Since 2000, Montello has been included in the Natura 2000 network (IT 3240004). 2.4. Comparison between historical and current lichen data Information on the epiphytic lichen biota hosted in the past in the oak forest of Montello was retrieved from two main sources. The analytical lichen flora of Veneto by Saccardo (1894) includes all the records which were known for the region until that date. From this checklist we compiled the records for which it was clearly stated the provenance from Montello. Further information was retrieved from the herbarium BASSA which hosts the specimens collected by Massalongo and Beltramini during their field trip in August 1851 (Nascimbene, 2007). We included only species for which the note on the collecting site was completed by a precise comment on the habitat (oak forests). Despite the fact that in a comment to their field work Massalongo and Beltramini stated that the Montello was a relatively lichen poor area (Nascimbene, 2007) this dataset is not proposed here as an exhaustive checklist. In 2009, we carried out accurate floristic surveys in all (n = 43) the oak remnant formations (total area 106 ha), checking if the species sampled between 1851 and 1894 were still present in the remnant forests. The minimum, mean and maximum patch size was 0.369, 2.47 and 12.6 ha, respectively. We carefully explored all the microhabitats potentially hosting the species historically recorded, including the base of the trunks which are often covered by mosses and are potentially suitable for example for some Peltigera species. We retrieved the current rarity status of each species included in the historical list. Nimis and Martellos (2008) have estimated the rarity of the species at the national level on the basis of: a) number of samples in the TSB lichen herbarium, b) number of literature records, and, c) expert judgement. Eight commonness-rarity classes were used, from extremely rare to extremely common. The ‘extremely rare’ status is given only to taxa known from less than 5 localities in Italy, or to those that were not mentioned in the literature in the last 50 years. Recently-described or dubious taxa are excluded from this category. Extremely rare species are roughly compared to threatened species (Nimis and Martellos, 2008) according to the IUCN criteria (2001) and therefore targeted for conservation purposes at the national level. Nomenclature of lichens follows Nimis and Martellos (2008). 2.5. Comparison between currently available habitats for epiphytic lichens A second lichen survey was performed to compare the three main habitats which are currently available for the establishment of epiphytic lichen communities: (1) isolated, mainly subneutral-barked (e.g. Juglans regia L.), trees in agrarian landscapes providing well-lit conditions, (2) pure black-locust forests providing moderately shaded conditions, and (3) remnant oak forests not including black-locust trees, providing shaded conditions and subacidic–acidic substrates. For each of the three habitat types, six 30 × 30 m plots were selected in different parts of the hill in order to encompass the variability of each habitat in the study area (Fig. 1). The minimum distance between plots of the same habitat was 500 m to reduce spatial dependence. The borders of the forest plots were at least 50 m far from the forest edge. Agricultural plots were selected where at least six trees with DBH N 15 cm could be found within a 900 m2 area. In each plot, 6 trees with DBH N 15 cm were selected for lichen survey by random sampling, for a total of 108 trees (36 in each habitat type). In blacklocust and oak forests only black-locust and oak trees were respectively used for the lichen survey. In agricultural habitats lichens were mainly surveyed on J. regia L. (70%), and on Prunus avium L., Pyrus sp., and Quercus sp. The lichen inventory followed the guidelines proposed by Stofer et al. (2003) for the Forest BIOTA project, which are based on the European guidelines for lichen monitoring (Asta et al., 2002). Lichen diversity was sampled using four standard frames of 10 × 50 cm as sampling grids, subdivided into five 10 × 10 cm quadrats, which were attached to the tree trunk at the cardinal points with the lower side at 100 cm from the ground. All lichen species inside the frames were listed and their frequency was computed as the number of 10 × 10 cm quadrats in which the species occurred. Nomenclature of lichens follows Nimis and Martellos (2008). 2.6. Data analysis The comparison between historical and current lichen data was done only qualitatively as the historical records were not precisely localized. We, therefore, estimated species extinctions at the regional level. Concerning the comparison between currently available habitats, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to test the effect of habitat type on species richness. The analysis was performed using the cumulative number of species per plot (sum of the species found on the six trees) and mean number of species per tree, separately. In both cases we used the plot as replicate to avoid pseudo-replication. After the ANOVA, a Tukey's honest significance test for multiple comparison was applied to detect differences between the three habitat types (P b 0.05). To test the influence of habitat type on species composition, ordination methods were applied. The response variable was the species by plot matrix based on species frequencies. A preliminary Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) was performed. The largest DCA gradient length, expressed in the standard deviation (SD) units of species turnover, of the first four DCA axes was 3.23. Thus, the use of linear-based ordination models was appropriate for these data (Ter Braak and Šmilauer, 2002). First, a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to extract the variability related to species composition. Second, a Redundancy Analysis (RDA) was performed, using habitat type as a factor. RDA tested if the three habitat types differed in species composition using a Monte Carlo permutation test (n = 1000). We ran both PCA and RDA to evaluate how much variation in species composition data was explained by habitat type. For these analyses we used the CANOCO package (Version 4.5, Ter Braak and Šmilauer, 2002). 3. Results 3.1. Historical vs. current lichen records The historical list included 30 species and 1 lichenicolous fungus (Sphinctrina turbinata) (Table 1). They were mainly crustose (55%) and foliose (35%) species reproducing by ascospores (77%), or soredia (16%). Fifty-five percent of the species had chlorococcoid green algae, 29% cyanobacteria, and 26% trentepholioid algae as photobiont. Five species were extremely rare at the national level. J. Nascimbene, L. Marini / Science of the Total Environment 408 (2010) 5506–5512 Table 1 Comparison of species found in the oak forest during the period 1851–1894 and in 2009. For each species the photobiont type and the current rarity status at the national level are reported according to Nimis and Martellos (2008). Photobiont: Ch = green algae other than trentepohlia; Cy = cyanobacteria; Tr = trentepohlioid alga. Species found between 1851 and 1894 2009 Photobiont Acrocordia gemmata (Ach.) A.Massal. Arthonia cinereopruinosa Schaer. Arthonia cinnabarina (DC.) Wallr. Arthonia elegans (Ach.) Almq. Arthonia pruinata (Pers.) A.L.Sm. Arthonia radiata (Pers.) Ach. Bacidia rosella (Pers.) De Not. Calicium abietinum Pers. Degelia plumbea (Lightf.) M.Jørg. & P.James Flavoparmelia caperata (L.) Hale Fuscopannaria leucophaea (Vahl) M.Jørg. Gomphillus calycioides (Duby) Nyl. Lecanographa amylacea (Pers.) Egea and Torrente Lecidea exigua Chaub. Leptogium corticola (Taylor) Tuck. Leptogium cyanescens (Rabenh.) Körb. Lobaria pulmonaria (L.) Hoffm. Nephroma resupinatum (L.) Ach. Pannaria rubiginosa (Ach.) Bory Parmotrema perlatum (Huds.) M.Choisy Peltigera canina (L.) Willd. Peltigera horizontalis (Huds.) Baumg. Peltigera polydactyla (Neck.) Hoffm. Pertusaria amara (Ach.) Nyl. Pertusaria hymenea (Ach.) Schaer. Pertusaria leioplaca DC. Pertusaria pertusa (Weigel) Tuck. Pyrenula nitida (Weigel) Ach. Pyrgidium montellicum (Beltr.) Tibell Ramalina farinacea (L.) Ach. Sphinctrina turbinata (Pers. Fr.) De Not. Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Confirmed Extinct Extinct Extinct Tr Tr Tr Tr Tr Tr Ch Ch Cy Ch Cy Ch Tr Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Confirmed Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Extinct Ch Cy Cy Ch/Cy Cy Cy Ch Cy Cy Cy Ch Ch Ch Ch Tr Ch Ch – Nationally rare + + + + + Only two species out of 31 were found again in 2009 (Flavoparmelia caperata and Parmotrema perlatum). Both species are still common in Italy. P. perlatum is more frequent in areas with suboceanic climate, such as the Tyrrhenian side of the peninsula, while in the north it is restricted to remnant humid forests (Nimis and Martellos, 2008). 3.2. Current lichen diversity Forty-seven species were found in the 18 plots (Appendix). Cumulative species richness as well as mean species richness was highest in agrarian stands and lowest in oak forests, black-locust forests being in an intermediate position (Fig. 2). Also the overall number of species increased from oak to black-locust forests and agrarian stands (16, 19, and 37). Thirteen percent of the species occurred in all the habitat types, being however more frequent in black-locust forests and agrarian stands, such in the case of the two nitrophytic species Candelaria concolor and Phaeophyscia chloantha. In the PCA ordination (Fig. 3a), the two axes represented 64.3% of the total variation in species composition (43.4% axis 1 and 20.9% axis 2). Plots belonging to different habitats were clearly separated, indicating major differences in species composition. Black-locust forests were in an intermediate position between oak forests and agrarian stands. In the RDA ordination, which was constrained to the habitat types (Fig. 3b), the two axes represent 52.6% of the total variation (38.4% axis 1 and 14.4% axis 2), i.e. the constrained ordination explained a large proportion of variation in species composition. A high number of species was related to agrarian stands. However, each habitat included some associated species, such in the case of Catillaria nigroclavata and Hyperphyscia adglutinata for black-locust forests, and Arthonia spadicea, Lepraria lobificans, and P. perlatum for oak forests. The forest species Dimerella pineti is shared between black-locust and oak forests. 5509 4. Discussion Our study found severe species extinction comparing the available historical records with those found on the remnant habitats. Amongst the species historically recorded in native forests, there is a large incidence of lichens with cyanobacteria and Trentepohlia as photobiont. These lichens, which in Europe have an oceanic–suboceanic distribution, are considered old-growth specialists extremely sensitive to intensive forest management (e.g. Campbell and Fredeen, 2004; Kuusinen, 1996), and human impact (e.g. Gauslaa et al., 2007; Geiser and Neitlich, 2007; Richardson and Cameron, 2004; Wolseley and Aguirre-Hudson, 1997). In Italy, they are mainly restricted to the western side of the peninsula and to the rainiest areas of the Alps where they are associated with humid and scarcely disturbed forests (Nascimbene et al., 2007, 2009; Nimis and Tretiach, 1995). In our study region, the continuous native oak forest was transformed into either black-locust formations or arable lands, while only a few remnant patches are still preserved. According to Belinchón et al. (2009), destruction and fragmentation of forest habitats represent one of the most important threats for epiphytic lichens. The loss of the native habitat, the subsequent invasion by black locust and the agricultural management, were probably the most influent factors which affected and modified the composition of lichen communities (Aragón et al., 2010; Loppi and De Dominicis, 1996; Van Herk et al., 2003), causing the local extinction of most of the species historically recorded and the establishment of lichen communities composed by eutrophication-tolerant species. Air pollution might potentially have contributed to this process but the relatively high values of lichen diversity found in this area by Nimis et al. (1991), indicating low impact of SOx pollution, allowed us to hypothesize that metapopulation processes are likely to be more important than air pollution in our specific case. This hypothesis is also corroborated by the fact that some of the species still found in the remnant oak forests, such as A. spadicea and P. perlatum are sensitive to air pollution (Nimis, 1993). The historical and current pollution conditions of our study region are significantly different from that in central and eastern Europe, where large industrial areas related to metal and coal mining and transformation developed since the end of 19th century, producing severe impacts on epiphytic lichens and causing the extinction of many species even in remote forested areas which were greatly impacted by a long-distance acidic deposition. Despite high and diffuse anthropization, the landscape of northeastern Italy is still largely dominated by agriculture mixed with small industries which mainly developed in the last 3–5 decades. Considering the habitats currently available to epiphytic lichens, remnant oak forests host lichen communities which clearly differ in species composition from both agrarian habitats and black-locust forests. Oak remnants hosted only a few species which were found in native forests and were the lichen poorest habitat in the study region. Aragón et al. (2010) have demonstrated that in oak forests, management intensity was the main predictor affecting the total epiphytic richness, suggesting that our small remnants could be influenced by past intensive management, resulting in species poor lichen communities. However, it is noteworthy that these communities were mainly composed by sub-acidophytic, shading tolerant, and nitrogen intolerant species (Nimis and Martellos, 2008), indicating that in this habitat the current level of eutrophication through nutrient deposition from the surrounding agrarian landscape is still low (Loppi and De Dominicis, 1996; Van Herk et al., 2003). Agrarian habitats were the species richest habitat. However, they hosted lichen assemblages dominated by lichens preferring well-lit and dry conditions, most of which are related to eutrophicated substrates (Nimis and Martellos, 2008). Despite the fact that eutrophication could cause impoverishment and shifts in species composition (Aragón et al., 2010; Loppi and De Dominicis, 1996), several nitrophytic lichens are enhanced by high levels of N deposition, resulting in relatively species rich communities (Loppi and Nascimbene, 5510 J. Nascimbene, L. Marini / Science of the Total Environment 408 (2010) 5506–5512 Fig. 2. Results of the one-way ANOVA and Tukey's honest significance test for multiple comparisons. We tested both (a) the cumulative number of species per plot and (b) the mean number of species per tree. We used the 18 plots as replicates in both analyses. Bars indicate mean with SE while different letters mark significant differences at P b 0.05. 2010). The ecological requirements of the species found in black-locust forests were similar to those inhabiting agrarian stands. The presence of a few forest lichens, such as D. pineti, which was mainly associated with oak remnants, or the rare Agonimia allobata, which was recently found in the region within riparian forests (Nascimbene et al., 2008), indicates a potential of these alien formations for hosting specific lichen communities. In this perspective, further research is needed to clarify if there is a succession during the rotation cycle (see e.g. Rogers and Ryel, 2008), with a shift from open habitat to forest habitat communities, and if a prolonged rotation cycle could allow black-locust stands to be suitable surrogates for richer forest lichen assemblages. 4.1. Management implications Our study indicated that the loss of the native oak forest with the subsequent invasion by black locust was probably the major cause of local extinction of several rare lichen species. The few remnant oak forests were species poor and mainly composed of common species. Since oak forests are targeted amongst the habitats of conservation concern in Europe (e.g. see Council Directive 92/43/EEC), future forest management should aim at restoring a more natural forest composition, favouring the spread of oaks and other native trees in lowland systems which are included in the Natura 2000 network. This might be expected to produce positive effects on lichen communities, providing more habitat area and more buffered conditions enhancing the establishment of forest species. The invasiveness of black locust is the main constraint to restoring large oak forests in the study area due to its fast vegetative reproduction. Since an inversion of the ratio between oak and blacklocust forests does not seem realistic even in the long term, it should be investigated if some changes in the management of black-locust forests could be introduced to promote more conservation-oriented practices. These problems are likely to be common also in other lowland and hilly regions throughout Northern Italy, involving Natura 2000 sites (e.g. Motta et al., 2009). For this reason, a national strategy for biodiversity conservation and monitoring of lowlands forests should provide the framework for local restoration projects. Fig. 3. (a) PCA ordination diagram of the 18 plots against the first two Principal Components and (b) RDA ordination diagram of lichen species occurring in the 18 plots against the first two canonical axes constrained by habitat type. In parentheses the explained variation by each axis is reported. In the RDA plot, only species with a fit-range above 10% are shown. ▲ Categorical variables; ↑ Species. Abbreviations as in Appendix. 5511 J. Nascimbene, L. Marini / Science of the Total Environment 408 (2010) 5506–5512 Appendix (continued) A (continued) Acknowledgements Species The work was economically supported by the Civic Museum of Montebelluna (Treviso). Francesco Bortignon (Montebelluna) is thanked for his contribution during the field work, Francesco Ferrarese (Padova) for providing GIS information, and ARPAV, Centro Meteorologico di Teolo, for providing climatic information related to the study area (Volpago del Montello). L.M. was supported by the PRATIQUE project (Enhancements of Pest Risk Analysis Techniques) financed through the EU Seventh Research Framework Program (FP7) (Contract No. 212459). We are grateful to the Associate Editor James P. Bennett and to three anonymous referees for providing useful suggestions and stimulating comments which improved the clarity and the effectiveness of the manuscript. Appendix A Species found in the 18 plots. Frequency in each habitat type is expressed as the proportion of plots in which the species occurred. BL = Black-locust forests; O = Oak forests; A = Agrarian. * marks nitrophytic species, while ° marks shading tolerant species according to Nimis and Martellos (2008). Species Abbreviations Frequency (%) Agonimia allobata (Stizenb.) P.James° Anisomeridium biforme (Borrer) R.C.Harris Arthonia radiata (Pers.) Ach. Arthonia spadicea Leight.° Arthrosporum populorum A.Massal. Caloplaca cerinella (Nyl.) Flagey* Caloplaca ferruginea (Huds.) Th.Fr. Caloplaca obscurella (Körb.) Th.Fr. Caloplaca pyracea (Ach.) Th.Fr. Candelaria concolor (Dicks.) Stein* Candelariella efflorescens auct. eur.* Candelariella reflexa (Nyl.) Lettau* Candelariella xanthostigma (Ach.) Lettau Catillaria nigroclavata (Nyl.) Schuler Cladonia coniocraea (Flörke) Spreng. Dimerella pineti (Ach.) Vezda° Evernia prunastri (L.) Ach. Flavoparmelia caperata (L.) Hale Flavopunctelia flaventior (Stirt.) Hale Hyperphyscia adglutinata (Flörke) H. Mayrhofer & Poelt* Hypogymnia physodes (L.) Nyl. Lecania cyrtella (Ach.) Th.Fr. Lecanora carpinea (L.) Vain. Lecanora chlarotera Nyl.* Lecanora sambuci (Pers.) Nyl. Lecidella elaeochroma (Ach.) M.Choisy Lecidella pulveracea (Schaer.) P.Syd. Lepraria incana (L.) Ach.° Lepraria lobificans Nyl.° Melanelixia fuliginosa (Duby) O. Blanco. A. Crespo. Divakar. Essl.. D. Hawksw. & Lumbsch Melanelixia subaurifera (Nyl.) O. Blanco. A. Crespo. Divakar. Essl.. D. Hawksw. & Lumbsch Normandina pulchella (Borrer) Nyl. Parmelia sulcata Taylor Parmelina tiliacea (Hoffm.) Hale Parmotrema perlatum (Huds.) M.Choisy Phaeophyscia chloantha (Ach.) Moberg* Phaeophyscia hirsuta (Mereschk.) Essl.* Phaeophyscia orbicularis (Neck.) Moberg* Phaeophyscia pusilloides (Zahlbr.) Essl. Physcia adscendens (Fr.) H.Olivier* agoal anibif artrad artspa arpopu calcer calfer calobs calpyr cancon caneff canref canxan catnig clacon dimpin evepru flacap flafla hypadg BL A hyphys leccyr lecarp lechla lesamb leciel lecifla lepinc leplob melful 0 16.7 0 0 0 16.7 0 0 0 0 melsub 0 norpul parsul partil parper phachl phahir phaorb phapus phyads O 16.7 0 0 33.3 0 16.7 0 33.3 0 0 0 100 0 16.7 0 0 33.3 0 0 16.7 0 16.7 0 0 0 50 0 100 100 16.7 83.3 50 0 50 50 16.7 50 66.7 16.7 83.3 83.3 0 0 0 33.3 66.7 0 100 0 33.3 0 0 66.7 33.3 0 16.7 0 100 100 0 33.3 0 33.3 0 33.3 0 50 16.7 33.3 0 83.3 0 0 33.3 0 16.7 0 100 33.3 0 16.7 66.7 33.3 0 33.3 0 16.7 0 0 66.7 100 16.7 66.7 16.7 100 0 16.7 83.3 100 0 83.3 0 0 50 16.7 0 0 0 0 (continued on next page) Abbreviations Frequency (%) BL Physcia clementei (Turner) Maas Geest. Physconia distorta (With.) J.R.Laundon* Physconia perisidiosa (Erichsen) Moberg Pseudevernia furfuracea (L.) Zopf v. furfuracea Punctelia borreri (Sm.) Krog Punctelia subrudecta (Nyl.) Krog Xanthoria parietina (L.) Th.Fr.* phycle phydis phyper psefur punbor punsub xanpar A 0 50 0 16.7 0 16.7 0 33.3 16.7 50 0 33.3 16.7 100 O 0 0 0 0 16.7 0 0 References Aragón G, Martínez I, Izquierdo P, Belinchón R, Escudero A. Effects of forest management on epiphytic lichen diversity in Mediterranean forests. Applied Veg Sci 2010;13:183–94. Asta J, Erhardt W, Ferretti M, Fornasier F, Kirschbaum U, Nimis PL, et al. Mapping lichen diversity as an indicator of environmental quality et al. In: Nimis PL, Scheidegger C, Wolseley P, editors. Monitoring with lichens, monitoring lichens. NATO Science Series, Earth and Envir., Ser.Kluwer; 2002. p. 273–9. Belinchón R, Martínez I, Otálora MAG, Aragón G, Dimas J, Escudero A. Fragment quality and matrix affect epiphytic performance in a Mediterranean forest landscape. Am J Bot 2009;96:1974–82. Bertolini P. Il Montello storia e colonizzazione. Roma: Nuova Antologia; 1905. Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M, Ohlemüller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, et al. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and The Netherlands. Science 2006;313:351–4. Campbell J, Fredeen AL. Lobaria pulmonaria abundance as an indicator of macrolichen diversity in Interior Cedar-Hemlock forests of east–central British Columbia. Can J Bot 2004;82:970–82. Caprio E, Ellena I, Rolando A. Native oak retention as a key factor for the conservation of winter bird diversity in managed deciduous forests in northern Italy. Landscape Ecol 2009;24:65–76. Cislaghi C, Nimis PL. Lichens, air pollution and lung cancer. Nature 1997;387:463–4. Ellis CJ, Coppins BJ. Changing climate and historic-woodland structure interact to control species diversity of the ‘Lobarion’ epiphyte community in Scotland. J Veg Sci 2007;18:725–34. Ellis CJ, Coppins BJ, Dawson TP, Seaward MRD. Response of British lichens to climate change scenarios: trends and uncertainties in the projected impact for contrasting biogeographic groups. Biol Conserv 2007;140:217–35. Ellis CJ, Yahr R, Coppins BJ. Local extent of old-growth woodland modifies epiphyte response to climate change. J Biogeogr 2009;36:302–13. Esseen PA, Ericson L, Lindström H, Zackrisson O. Occurrence and ecology of Usnea longissima in central Sweden. Lichenologist 1981;13:177–90. Ferrarese F, Sauro U. La geomorfologia del Montello. In: Castiglioni B, editor. Montello. 3kcl Karstic Cultural Landscapes. Montebelluna: Museo Civico di Storia Naturale e Archeologia; 2005. p. 27–41. Favero L. La selva del Montello nel trivigiano. Milano; 1875. Ferrarese F, Castiglioni B. L'evoluzione del paesaggio antropico: gli insediamenti e l'uso del suolo. In: Castiglioni B, editor. Montello. 3kcl Karstic Cultural Landscapes. Montebelluna: Museo Civico di Storia Naturale e Archeologia; 2005. p. 83-102. Fritz Ö, Gustafsson L, Larsson K. Does forest continuity matter in conservation? A study of epiphytic lichens and bryophytes in beech forests of southern Sweden. Biol Conserv 2008;141:655–68. Gauslaa Y, Palmqvist K, Solhaug KA, Holien H, Hilmo O, Nybakken L, et al. Growth of epiphytic old forest lichens across climatic and successional gradients. Can J Forest Res 2007;37:1832–45. Geiser LH, Neitlich PN. Pollution and climate gradients in western Oregon and Washington indicated by epiphytic macrolichens. Environ Pollut 2007;145:203–18. Hedenås H, Ericson L. Epiphytic macrolichens as conservation indicators: successional sequence in Populus tremula stands. Biol Conserv 2000;93:43–53. Hedenås H, Ericson L. Species occurrences at stand level cannot be understood without considering the landscape context: Cyanolichens on aspen in boreal Sweden. Biol Conserv 2008;141:710–8. Heywood V. Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995. Humphrey JW, Davey S, Peace AJ, Ferris R, Harding K. Lichens and bryophyte communities of planted and semi-natural forests in Britain: the influence of site type, stand structure and deadwood. Biol Conserv 2002;107:165–80. Isocrono D, Matteucci E, Ferrarese A, Pensi E, Piervittori R. Lichen colonization in the city of Turin (N Italy) based on current and historical data. Environ Pollut 2007;145: 258–65. IUCN. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Cambridge: IUCN Species Survival Commission. Gland, IUCN; 2001. Jeran Z, Mrak T, Jaćimović R, Batič F, Kastelec D, Mavsar R, et al. Epiphytic lichens as biomonitors of atmospheric pollution in Slovenian forests. Environ Pollut 2007;146: 324–31. Johansson P. Consequences of disturbance on epiphytic lichens in boreal and near boreal forests. Biol Conserv 2008;141:1933–44. Jovan S, Mc Cune B. Regional variation in epiphytic macrolichen communities in northern and central California forests. Bryologists 2004;107:328–39. 5512 J. Nascimbene, L. Marini / Science of the Total Environment 408 (2010) 5506–5512 Kosior A, Celary W, Solarz W, Rasmont P, Fijał J, Krol W, et al. Long-term changes in the species composition and distribution of Bombini (Apidae) in Cracow since the mid 1850s. Ann Soc Entomol Fr (ns), 44. ; 2008. p. 393–407. Kuusinen M. Cyanobacterial macrolichens on Populus tremula as indicators of forest continuity in Finland. Biol Conserv 1996;75:43–9. Loppi S, De Dominicis V. Effects of agriculture on epiphytic lichen vegetation in central Italy. Israel J Plant Sci 1996;44:297–307. Loppi S, Nascimbene J. Monitoring H2S air pollution caused by the industrial exploitation of gethoermal energy: the pitfall of using lichens as bioindicators. Environ Pollut 2010;158:2635–9. Mac Nally R, Horrocks G, Lada H, Lake PS, Thomson JR, Taylor AC. Distribution of anuran amphibians in massively altered landscapes in southeastern Australia: effects of climate change in an aridifying region. Global Ecol Biogeogr 2009;18:575–85. Mayer AL, Vihermaa L, Nieminen N, Luomi A. Epiphytic macrolichen community correlates with modelled air pollutants and forest conditions. Ecol Ind 2009;9: 992-1000. McCune B. Lichen communities as indicators of Forest Health. New Front Bryol Lichenol 2000;103:353–6. Moen J, Jonsson BG. Edge effects on liverworts and lichens in forest patches in a mosaic of boreal forest and wetland. Conserv Biol 2003;17:380–8. Moning C, Müller J. Critical forest age thresholds for the diversity of lichens, molluscs and birds in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) dominated forests. Ecol Ind 2009;9:922–32. Motta R, Nola P, Berretti R. The rise and fall of the black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) in the “Siro Negri” Forest Reserve (Lombardy, Italy): lessons learned and future uncertainties. Ann For Sci 2009;66:410–9. Nascimbene J. La collezione lichenologica di Alberto Parolini. Boll Mus Civ Bassano del Grappa 2007;26:45–58. Nascimbene J, Marini L, Nimis PL. Influence of forest management on epiphytic lichens in a temperate beech forest of northern Italy. Forest Ecol Manag 2007;247:43–7. Nascimbene J, Marini L, Nimis PL. Epiphytic lichens in a riparian Natural Reserve of Northern Italy: species richness, composition and conservation. Plant Biosyst 2008;142:94–8. Nascimbene J, Marini L, Nimis PL. Influence of tree species on epiphytic macrolichens in temperate mixed forests of northern Italy. Can J Forest Res 2009;39:785–91. Nascimbene J, Tretiach M. A critical evaluation of the Italian distribution of the rare macrolichen Usnea longissima Ach. Plant Biosyst 2009;143:14–9. Newbold T. Applications and limitations of museum data for conservation and ecology, with particular attention to species distribution models. Prog Phys Geog 2010;34: 3-22. Nimis PL. The lichens of Italy. An annotated catalogue. Torino: Museo Regionale Scienze Naturali, Torino, Monografie, XII; 1993. Nimis PL, Tretiach M. The lichens of Italy — a phytoclimatical outline. Cryptogamic Bot 1995;5:199–208. Nimis PL, Lazzarin A, Gasparo D. Lichens as bioindicators of air pollution by SO2 in theVeneto Region (NE Italy). Stud Geobotan 1991;11:3-76. Nimis PL, Martellos S. ITALIC — The Information System on Italian Lichens. University of Trieste, Dept. of Biology; 2008. Version 4.0. IN4.0/1 (http://dbiodbs.univ.trieste.it/). Richardson DHS, Cameron RP. Cyanolichens: their response to pollution and possible management strategies for their conservation in northeastern North America. Northeast Nat 2004;11:1-22. Rogers PC, Ryel RJ. Lichen community change in response to succession in aspen forests of the Rocky Mountains, USA. Forest Ecol Manag 2008;256:1760–70. Rose CI, Hawksworth DL. Lichen recolonization in London's cleaner air. Nature 1981;289:289–92. Saccardo F. Saggio di una flora analitica dei licheni del Veneto. Padova: Prosperini; 1894. Scheidegger C, Werth S. Conservation strategies for lichens: insights from population biology. Fungal Biol Rev 2009;23:55–66. Stofer S, Catalayud V, Ferretti M, Fischer R, Giordani P, Keller C, et al. Epiphytic lichen monitoring within the EU/ICP forests biodiversity test-phase on level II plots; 2003. Available from: http//www.forestbiota.org. Susmel L. I rovereti di pianura della Serenissima. Padova; 1994. Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. CANOCO Reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Ithaca, USA: Microcomputer Power; 2002. Van Herk CM, Mathijssen-Spiekman EAM, De Zwart D. Long distance nitrogen air pollution effects on lichens in Europe. Lichenologist 2003;35:347–59. Wolseley PA, Aguirre-Hudson B. The ecology and distribution of lichens in tropical deciduous and evergreen forests of northern Thailand. J Biogeogr 1997;24:327–43.