Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

The invisibility cloak

2020, Feminist Critique and the Museum: Educating for a Critical Conciousness

Historically, women artists have been all but invisible in museums in Portugal and around the world. We use the motif of the ‘invisibility cloak’, that we take on loan from J.K.Rowling’s Harry Potter, to think about what has shrouded women’s creativity, artworks and stories to make it feel like they never existed, and thus are always perceived as natural outsiders in a world of men. The questions we take up in this chapter are: How widespread is this invisibility today? Is this invisibility still taken as normative in contemporary art museums? If this is still the case in contemporary art museums, what are the pedagogical implications?

Coordenado por Kathy Sanford, Darlene Clover, Nancy Taber e Sarah Williamson, o volume Feminist Critique and the Museum: Educating for a Critical Conciousness, conta com ensaios de Kathy Sanford, Darlene Clover, Nancy Taber e Sarah Williamson, Lisa R. Merriweather, Micki Voelkel and Shelli Henehan, Ash Grover, Laura Formenti, Silvia Luraschi e Gaia del Negro, Sachyio Tsukamoto e Sara C. Motta, Lauren Spring, Jennifer Thivierge, Monica Drenth, Astrid Schönweger, Mary Pinkoski e Lianne McTavish, Gaby Franger, e Emília Ferreira, Joana d’Oliva Monteiro e Sílvia Prazeres Moreira. Este capítulo, abordando o panorama museológico e educativo em Portgal, intitula-se “The invisibility cloak: Unveiling the absence of women artists in the Museu Nacional de Arte Contemporânea”. “Historically, women artists have been all but invisible in museums in Portugal and around the world. We use the motif of the ‘invisibility cloak’, that we take on loan from J.K.Rowling’s Harry Potter, to think about what has shrouded women’s creativity, artworks and stories to make it feel like they never existed, and thus are always perceived as natural outsiders in a world of men. The questions we take up in this chapter are: How widespread is this invisibility today? Is this invisibility still taken as normative in contemporary art museums? If this is still the case in contemporary art museums, what are the pedagogical implications?”