"Odd, Idle, and Vicious: Plato's Use of Public Opinion in his Characterization of the Philosopher in Republic VI"

Plato’s characterization of the philosopher often emerges as a way to respond to popular conceptions and representations of the intellectual in Athenian society. In Book VI of the Republic in particular, he articulates his greatest defense of the philosopher against two major charges—that of being vicious and useless. Voicing what appears to be a commonly held view among Athenians, this representation of the philosopher is raised by Adeimantus as an objection to Socrates’ proposal of a philosopher-king. Surprisingly, rather than dismissing the allegations as false, Socrates admits ‘that what they say is true’ (Rep. 487d10) and incorporates these criticisms into his argument. This paper proposes that the popular depiction of the philosopher as vicious and idle plays a significant role in Plato’s own characterization of the philosopher, illustrating how Plato diagnoses the philosopher’s alienation from public affairs in a manner that defines and legitimates his own ideas of philosophy.