Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Paper presented at ECREA Radio Conference in Madrid 2015.
"The resilience of radio in an increasingly multi-platform digital age"
Noise, Soundplay, Extended Radio. A case study of Bugs & Beats & Beasts by Andreas Ammer and Console as an example for the resilience of German Hörspiel as a radiophonic art form2014 •
OLIVEIRA, PORTELA and SANTOS (Org.) Radio evolution Conference Proceedings
Free, Pirate, Community – the representation of identities on FM radios in São Paulo/Brazil.2012 •
This paper proposes to offer an up-to-date perspective of the FM radio broadcasting scenario in the city of São Paulo (Brazil), focusing on its commercial, educational, pirate and community radios. Special attention is given to pirate and community radios in an attempt to demonstrate the impasses encountered in developing a radio broadcasting system able to represent the city’s ethnic, religious, geographic, political and culture diversity. The term “community radio” used herein refers to radio stations that have been authorized to broadcast within this modality based on legislation passed in 1998. The current situation of community radios in the city will be looked into and, because of its importance within this scenario, a more detailed description will be offered of the Heliopolis FM Radio Station (87.5 MHz), created in 1992 and which in 2008 became the first legal community radio in São Paulo.
The aim of this article is to report, summarize and spread the results of a large scale European research project funded by EBU Radio in 2011 to map best practices in social media and European public radio, focusing on the way successful public service radio formats have incorporated social media in their production flow. The programmes have been selected for one of the following reasons: programmes that are audience leaders in their country, use innovative radio language or are youth oriented productions. The survey has been carried out by a team of ten European researchers from seven countries on a sample of 28 public radio programmes analysed for two months between January and February 2011. The research team attempted to answer the empirical question: ‘How social media are used by public service?’. Are there some common threads and shared practices among successful programmes in different countries? The team adopted an empirical approach based on social media content analysis and interviews with radio producers. This article will present the main results of this empirical research project. It will conclude with practical guidelines for public radio production and social media innovation.
Introduction This book is divided into two macro-sections: Interactive Publics and Productive Publics. These two sections do not represent two different worlds of practices but, conversely, describe two different moments of the same process: audience participation mediated by radio. We conceive of audience participation in radio as a process that is articulated along a continuum, moving from interaction (with a low level of activity) to co-creation (Banks and Deuze 2009) and co-production (with a high level of participation). Here we will show and analyse different innovative practices of interaction and participation. In this body of work, interactivity is intended in both its minimal technical meaning, as a sequence of action and reaction, as well as in the wider sense of a social-communicative relationship (listeners that reply to a call by a radio host by either phone, smartphone messaging systems, email or Facebook/Twitter texts; listeners that react to a call by a radio host by doing something, such as downloading content or liking/commenting/sharing social media posts; radio hosts and authors that reply to questions and content coming from listeners). The boundary between interactive and productive publics is traced according to the ideal model of audience participation (AIP model – Access; Interaction; Participation – see Carpentier (2007), where: “this difference between participation on the one hand, and access and interaction on the other, is located within the key role that is attributed to power, and to equal(ised) power relations in decision-making processes.” (Carpentier 2011, 29). According to the AIP model, in the first section, contributors will analyse processes of participation that allow listeners to produce content (SMS, phone calls, social media messages, etc.) but do not let them take part in the co-creation of radio programmes in any way. The first section of this work will analyse contemporary forms of interaction between radio and its listeners, using specific case studies to examine all the technological means that are currently involved in these processes: the telephone, short text messages, social network sites. The second section will focus on examples in which the radio public not only reacts to the producers’ requests using the technology at hand, but consciously participates in the production of radio content and has some voice in deciding the content being produced. Some examples in this section will look at the collective production of a playlist used by music programmes: a number of programmes have been built upon listeners requests and music choices, by different means. Further examples of co-creation refer to other genres, such as the documentary. In Sweden, Germany, Italy and Latin America, some radio producers seek to involve the public in one or more steps of the productive process of a radio documentary, by means of crowdfunding as well. The title of the book Radio Audiences and Participation in the Age of Network Society highlights the paradigm shift that is transforming the nature of mass media audiences and publics. The rise of the network society (van Dijck 1991; Castells 1996; Wellman 2001), due to the diffusion of ICTs, is also restructuring the topology, the properties and the very nature of media audiences, which are no more understandable only as diffused in time and space (Abercrombie and Longhust 1998). Audiences and publics attracted to media such as radio are no longer invisible, silent and disconnected. Listening habits are changing and listeners are increasingly more used to both listening to radio and leaving comments on social media, where their feelings and opinions are public, searchable, accessible and measurable, as Lacey claims: “Listeners are able to represent their listening to their social networks and track others’ online listening in real or archived time. On the one hand, this means that listening is a practise that is increasingly surveilled and increasingly open to measurement and commodification. On the other hand, it is also a sign of persistent desire to create and partake in forms of collective listenings to mediated music, sound and speech, albeit in virtual space.” (2013, 155). Radio audiences are a mix of traditional radio broadcasting audiences and networked publics (Varnelis 2008; Boyd 2011). This not only means that new media are changing the nature of listeners/viewers, transforming them into interactive users (Livingstone 2003), but also that radio publics, once organized into networks, now have different properties, different behaviours and different affordances. Networked publics are made up of listeners that are not only able to produce written and audio content for radio and co-create along with the radio producers (even definitively bypassing the central hub of the radio station), but that also produce social data, calling for an alternative rating system, which is less focused on attention and more on other sources, such as engagement, sentiment, affection, reputation, and influence. What are the economic and political consequences of this paradigm shift (see chapter 6 and 14)? How are radio audiences perceived by radio producers in this new radioscape (see chapter 1, 2, 4 and 7)? What’s the true value of radio audiences in this new frame (see chapter 6 and 14)? How do radio audiences take part in the radio flow in this age (see chapters 7, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 13)? Are audiences’ interactions and co-creations overrated or underrated (see chapter 2) by radio producers? What’s the role of community radio in this new context (see chapter 11, 12 and 13)? These are some of the many issues that this present book aims to explore.
The Radio Journal. International Studies in Broadcast and Audio Media, vol. 5, N. 1, 2007, pp. 9-18 (ISSN 1476-4504)
Four steps in innovative radio broadcasting: from QuickTime to Podcasting2007 •
"Is podcasting the future of radio? Is podcasting that missing link connecting radio and the Net that Internet radio stations were not able to establish? Is podcasting a revolutionary or a transitory cultural trend? Furthermore, is podcasting a way towards a more democratic audio media system or is it rather a new tool in the hands of the multinational recording industry? This article will explore these questions, providing an historical framework to the introduction of digital sound (from 1991 to 2007) and related social practices, distinguishing four main phases: the birth of the popular use of digital music; Web radio; Music for free; the iPod and Podcasting."
Radio Audiences and Participation in the Age of Network Society
The Automatic DJ? Control, Automation and Creativity in Commercial Music Radio2015 •
European Journal of Communication
No news from abroad: A comparative content analysis of news issues on Italian radio2014 •
Published here: http://onlinestore.sunderland.ac.uk/browse/extra_info.asp?compid=1&modid=1&deptid=73&catid=81&prodvarid=267 The version below is the undited, and unproofed copy. If you plan on referencing the text, I suggest you buy the book. It's rather good, and has some other excellent chapters Richard Berry is a Senior Lecturer in Radio and currently also manages the University’s Community Radio station, Spark FM – for which he also researched and wrote the licence application. He is a graduate of the University of Humberside (now Lincoln) and the University of London and previously worked in local radio news and Further Education before joining the University of Sunderland in 1997, where he now teaches undergraduate and postgraduate radio production and broadcasting. He has been researching and teaching on the impacts of new technologies in radio since 2004, specifically in the areas of Digital Radio, Podcasting and Visualised Radio.
Journal of Radio and Audio Media
'Haptically mediated' radio listening: the remediation of radio through digital mobile devices. Pre-print version2018 •
This paper aims to focus on the tactile aspects of radio listening, which until now have been underestimated by radio scholars, and to describe how 'haptically-mediated radio listening' has evolved, from the beginning of broadcasting to the arrival of digital media. This paper will first perform an overview of the studies that have dealt with the haptic dimension of media, then focus on what we call 'haptically-mediated' radio listening, a specific form of radio listening made possible by the interaction with radio content through mobile digital devices, and conclude with a critical depiction of the implications of haptically-mediated listening for audience commodification.
Communication & Society
Twitter as a public service medium? A content analysis of the Twitter use made by Radio RAI and RNE2014 •
Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture
Twitter or Radio Revolutions? The Central Role of Açık Radyo in the Gezi Protests of 20132017 •
The Politics of Privacy: Communication and Media Perspectives in Privacy Research
Reflections upon the Privacy in the Converged Commercial Radio: A Case Study of Royal Prank2020 •
Local radio – an endangered species? The Polish case
Local radio – an endangered species? The Polish case2013 •
Journal of Radio & Audio Media
The Political Economy of the Radio Personality2014 •
2018 •
"The Radio Journal. International Studies in Broadcast and Audio Media", Volume 2, Number 1, 2004, pp. 45-56
An Unheard Story? The Challenge for Radio Studies in Italye-Book - Radio, sound and Internet
Hybrid Processes on radio: how the video camera is becoming part of a new format of radio showsProceedings of Net Station International Conference
How the São Paulo youngsters listen to radio2015 •
University of California, Santa Barbara
Gender, Labor, and the Commodification of Intimacy in K-pop2020 •
Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook 10(1): 123-137.
From parasocial interaction to social TV: Analysing the host–audience relationship in multi-platform productions.2012 •
Media, Culture & Society
The media as ‘home-making’ tools: life story of a Filipino migrant in Milan2011 •
Radio Evolution, Conference Proceedings, pp. 117-130.
Casting Doubts on Web Media. Can Internet Radio make a Difference in the Greek Case?2012 •
Contracampo - Brazilian Journal of Communication
Music Promotion In Brazil: from ‘caitituagem’ to the challenges of digital competition2019 •
Interpreting Primo Levi. Interdisciplinary Perspectives. A. Chapman, M. Vuohelainen (eds.). . Basingstoke: Palgrave
On Solid Air: Primo Levi and the Radio RAI2016 •