Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2017
The oriental perceptions over the heritage is a topic almost unexplored in occidental countries. In Brazil, there are few researchers that explore Indian architecture, and even less researchers have studied about the preservation in India, being still a mystery for architects and conservation professionals. The four papers that will compose the debate bring different points of view over the Indian architectural heritage. Altogether, they cover a great extension of topics, from the beginning of the preservation in India ‘till the perceptions upon modern and contemporary architecture, approaching different topics, as preservation and interventions. All papers talk about the heritage in India, which is a huge topic, considering the size of its territory (not so impressive considering Brazil’s size, but definitely huge compared to European countries), and its extremely old and diverse culture. Buildings/monuments are hundreds and sometimes even thousands of years old, representing a multi-cultural, multi-religious, multi-racial and multi-ethnic society. The main objective of this Thematic Debate is to discuss the different perceptions related to heritage in India, bringing up contemporary issues about preservation and interventions on antique and/or traditional architecture and modern and/or contemporary architecture. The first and introductory paper brings a general approach about preservation, an overview on how the issue is being dealt (which is necessary to guide the reader into the Indian scenario), while the following ones bring up more specific situations, case studies related to unprotected buildings from the 20th century, where a greater appreciation of traditional architecture over modern / contemporary architecture is observed, except when external agents dedicate to the valorisation of these exemplars (as observed in Chandigarh). It’s important to emphasise that the case studies relate to relatively new buildings (colonial and post-colonial) which face a very difficult situation of being recognized as heritage (and subsequently protection). It makes sense to discuss precisely this type of buildings and issues in a Brazilian conference, as the situation and style of buildings of the 19th and 20th century in India shares similarities with Brazil. But the recognition of this era and the perception of architecture as something of a specific impact, as well as value to the society, is very different. In India awareness for the quality of "young" buildings is definitely lacking.
National Conference: Cultural Identities - Manifestation through Architecture (CIMA) 2020, 2020
Modern architectural heritage has various tangible & intangible values associated with them. It is the cultural significance of and the association of these values, which makes it heritage. Like ancient architectural heritage, the post-independence architecture of India has a potential association of values of cultural transformation, social & technological development, innovation, tradition & lifestyle. This paper attempts to explore the various values of the post-independence architecture of India, which makes it an integral part of the nation's cultural heritage. The period under consideration is five decades after independence (1947 to 2000)for this research. Cultural significance of the architecture of this period has been explored through the history of modern architecture of India and the significant modern architecture in the broader setting. For a comprehensive understanding of the cultural significance from a global perspective, there is a brief discussion of the values considered by major organisations involved in the recognition & protection of 20th-century heritage. In light of the broader spectrum of values associated with the architecture of this period and the cultural significance of the post-independence architecture of India, the values associated with the significant modern public buildings of this period have been identified.
Art of the Orient, 2016
Indian architecture isone of the most famous in the world. Its architecture was based on the concept of religious plurality. One might notice that the architecture of Hindu, Buddhist, Islamic and colonial or Indo-saracenic were distinct. Based on these styles four historical eraswere classified i.e., the ancient Indian, pre-Islamic, and colonial periods. This article seeks to reassess the general perception of Indian Architecture and its relation to the formation of Indian identities. It focusses in particular on the interpretation of the concept of plurality n the academic world by western art-historians. The socioeconomic factorsplays determining role in defining the architectural styles of south Asia.
IAEME PUBLICATION, 2019
Culture has been generally understood as the characteristics and knowledge of a particular group of people in the areas encompassing language, religion, cuisine, social habits, music and arts. Margaret Mead, an American cultural anthropologist defined Culture as “the whole complex of traditional behaviour which has been developed by the human race and is successively learned by each generation”. Such shared patterns on behaviour are largely influenced by the nature of spaces. Since architecture is the physical manifestation of culture, any change in the same has the power to gradually bring about a change in culture. Societies which have been closely knit have grown to be non-concerned of each other with changing design patterns. External influences on architecture and planning from different sources has been modulating the culture of places. And so, a conscious action towards conservation of culture can be strengthened by conservation of local architectural heritage. This important fact has been established in this paper through the study of urban planning and designs case studies through history of the city of Patna, Bihar, India. With the assumption that architecture is a complete symbol of human culture it tries to study the role of architectural conservation in promoting cultural identity.
FUNDAČAO ORIENTE, 2015
This essay is an attempt to map the cultural terrain on which Indian Architecture finds itself and the milieu in which Indian Architects practice. Using issues that are seen to be current and critical, the essay looks directly at three dialectic relationships, with their general implications to the making of the built environment in the Indian sub-continent. Inside and outside, permanent and transient and the issue of size (big and small), are seen to be in a shifting dialogical relationship rather than in fixed polar positions. The imprints of the past and the trajectories of the present only tighten the weave and density of a culture of diversity where several civilizational modes co-exist simultaneously. In the world’s largest democracy, with the liberalisation of its Economy, with an opening up to the ‘outside’ world, there is a sudden conflict between what has always been (Environment, and Culture) and what can be, (Development). At an Individual level, ‘character’ is in tension with ‘identity’ and now the hyper-identity of ‘brand’. In this world that seemingly expands (growth) towards infinity, pulling apart both communities and institutions, the essay recognises that the imagination of the architect in India is engaged in the difficult and important process of ‘slowing the world’, and of making the ‘far thing near’, and that this process is necessarily imbedded in the self. This process is emerging, clumsy and inarticulate but it is possible to study its registers in language and attitudes and the questions that are seen to be forming within the architectural profession.
Forging Architectural Tradition National Narratives, Monument Preservation and Architectural Work in the Nineteenth Century (D. Damjanović, A. Łupienko, eds), 2022
This is the introduction to a book on national ideal in architecture, national tendencies in conservation movement and national narrations in the history of art in (mainly) Central, North-Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. The book is co-edited by Dragan Damjanović. The book was published in the series "Explorations in Heritage Studies" at Berghahn Books.
India is in the stage of rapid industrialization and modernization. Adapting to the international architectural practices, the country's urban landscape has gained a complete face-lift over the years.. In this context, when India boasts of a rich traditional built heritage it seems unfair of the current professional practices to go about the design process with such neglect of the past. There is a need and urge for the inclusion of new critical perspectives of design by inclusion of understanding the social and cultural importance of built spaces through an anthropological approach to its study as there is a rapid depletion rate and obsolescence of the vernacular structures in the country. This paper investigates into the significance of architectural anthropology in the Indian context as well as its application in the regional contexts. Indian architecture both expresses and prescribes culture as reflections of social, political and financial aspects of a region and this parame...
Academia Letters, 2021
Consecutio rerum, 2018
Tendances et directions dans les recherches actuelles des théologiens orthodoxes roumains de la diaspora, 2022
Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 2021
Early Science and Medicine, 1997
Romanian Journal of Transport Infrastructure
Veterinary Quarterly, 2018
Proceedings of the 2nd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, BIS-HSS 2020, 18 November 2020, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia, 2021
nternational Conference of Science, Engineering & Environmental Technology (ICONSEET), 3(18): 125-132, 2018, 2018
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Indian journal of health sciences and care, 2023
2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2016