To be published in ApJ Main Journal
The Substellar Mass Function in σ Orionis
arXiv:astro-ph/0104097v1 5 Apr 2001
V. J. S. Béjar
Instituto de Astrofı́sica de Canarias, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
E. L. Martı́n
Institute of Astronomy. University of Hawaii at Manoa. 2680 Woodlawn Drive. Honolulu,
HI 96822, USA
M. R. Zapatero Osorio
Instituto de Astrofı́sica de Canarias, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
Current address: Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of
Technology, Pasadena, USA
R. Rebolo
Instituto de Astrofı́sica de Canarias, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientı́ficas, CSIC, Spain
D. Barrado y Navascués
Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, D–69117 Heidelberg. Germany
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, E–28049 Madrid, Spain
C. A. L. Bailer-Jones, R. Mundt
Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, D–69117 Heidelberg, Germany
I. Baraffe, C. Chabrier, F. Allard
École Normale Supérieure, Lyon Cedex 7, France
e-mail addresses: vbejar@ll.iac.es, ege@teide.ifa.hawaii.edu, mosorio@gps.caltech.edu, rrl@ll.iac.es,
barrado@pollux.ft.uam.es, calj@mpia-hd.mpg.de, mundt@mpia-hd.mpg.de,
ibaraffe@ens-lyon.fr, chabrier@ens-lyon.fr, fallard@ens-lyon.fr
ABSTRACT
We combine results from imaging searches for substellar objects in the
σ Orionis cluster and follow-up photometric and spectroscopic observations
to derive a census of the brown dwarf population in a region of 847 arcmin2 .
We identify 64 very low-mass cluster member candidates in this region. We
–2–
have available three color (IZ and J) photometry for all of them, spectra for
9 objects, and K photometry for 27 % of our sample. These data provide a
well defined sequence in the I versus I − J, I − K color magnitude diagrams,
and indicate that the cluster is affected by little reddening despite its young age
(∼5 Myr). Using state-of-the-art evolutionary models, we derive a mass function
from the low-mass stars (0.2 M⊙ ) across the complete brown dwarf domain
(0.075 M⊙ to 0.013 M⊙ ), and into the realm of free-floating planetary-mass
objects (≤ 0.013 M⊙ ). We find that the mass spectrum (dN/dm) ∝ m−α
increases toward lower masses with an exponent α = 0.8 ± 0.4. Our results
suggest that planetary-mass isolated objects could be as common as brown
dwarfs; both kinds of objects together would be as numerous as stars in the
cluster. If the distribution of stellar and substellar masses in σ Orionis is
representative of the Galactic disk, older and much lower luminosity free-floating
planetary-mass objects with masses down to about 0.005 M⊙ should be
abundant in the solar vicinity, with a density similar to M-type stars.
Subject headings: open clusters and associations: individual (σ Orionis) — stars:
low-mass, brown dwarfs — stars: mass function — stars: pre-main sequence
1.
Introduction
Although there is no definitive theory to explain the formation processes of stars,
the widely accepted scenario is that they form via fragmentation of rotating interstellar
molecular clouds followed by gravitational collapse. However, given the typical conditions
and properties of Galactic molecular clouds, this simple paradigm has difficulties
(Bodenheimer 1998) in explaining the genesis of numerous populations of substellar objects
(M < 0.075 M⊙ ). Several arguments have also been proposed against the formation of
objects below the substellar boderline (Silk 1995) or below the deuterium-burning mass
limit (Shu, Adams & Lizano 1987), which according to Saumon et al. (1996) and Burrows
et al. (1997) is located in the range 0.013–0.011 M⊙ (∼ 14–12 MJup , where 1 M⊙ = 1047
MJup ). The overall distribution of masses for invidual objects resulting from star-forming
processes can be described by the mass function (MF), defined as the the number of objects
per interval of mass on a logarithmic scale, ξ(m) = dN/d log m, or alternatively by the
mass spectrum defined as φ(m) = dN /dm. The MF was first studied for the stellar regime
by Salpeter (1955), who found that a power-law relation of the type ξ(m) ∝ M −γ , with an
index γ = 1.35, (which corresponds to dN/dm ∝ m−α with α = 2.35 for the mass spectrum)
was adequate in the mass range 1–10 M⊙ . Subsequent studies of the field MF appear to
–3–
demand lower values of α at smaller masses, or even suggest alternative functional forms
(Miller & Scalo 1979). A recent study of the very low-mass MF based on DENIS and
2MASS discoveries of nearby ultracool dwarfs suggests a value of α in the range 1 to 2
(Reid et al. 1999). A deep survey for methane dwarfs suggests, however, that α ≤ 0.8 for
disk brown dwarfs (Herbst et al. 1999).
Early searches for brown dwarfs in stellar clusters and associations (see eg. Rieke &
Rieke 1990; Stauffer, Hamilton & Probst 1994; Jameson & Skillen 1989) and the subsequent
confirmation of their existence (Rebolo, Zapatero Osorio, & Martı́n 1995; Basri, Marcy
& Graham 1996; Rebolo et al. 1996) prompted among other questions the nature of the
behavior of the MF in the brown dwarf domain and whether the fragmentation process can
extend beyond the deuterium-burning mass limit. Several studies in very young clusters
have provided partial answers to these questions (Bouvier et al. 1998; Luhman & Rieke
1999; Luhman et al. 1998, 2000; Barrado y Navascués et al. 2001a; Tamura et al. 1998;
Lucas & Roche 2000; Hillenbrand & Carpenter 2000; Najita, Tiede & Carr 2000; Martı́n
et al. 2000; Moreaux, Bouvier & Stauffer 2001). In spite of considerable progress made
in recent years, the incompleteness of the photometric surveys at very low masses and
the lack of a well defined spectroscopic sequence have prevented a reliable description
of the MF over the whole brown dwarf regime. Here we present a determination of the
MF for the σ Orionis young stellar cluster, which is reliable and complete down to the
deuterium-burning mass limit, and a first estimate on how this MF extends to smaller
masses, i.e., to the planetary regime.
2.
Age, distance, and extinction in the σ Orionis cluster
The σ Orionis cluster belongs to the Orion OB1b association, for which an age of
1.7–7 Myr and a distance modulus of 7.8–8.3 are estimated based on studies carried out
on massive stars (Blaauw 1964, 1991; Warren & Hesser 1978; Brown, de Geus & de
Zeeuw 1994). The spectral type of the central star of the same name is O9.5 V. In order
to account for the location of this star in the hydrogen-burning phase, its age must be
younger than 5 Myr (on the basis of models with winds from Meynet et al. 1994). Recent
investigations of the low-mass stellar and brown dwarf cluster populations have confirmed
that σ Orionis has indeed a very young age in the interval 1–5 Myr (Béjar, Zapatero Osorio
& Rebolo 1999 (BZOR); Wolk & Walter 2000), which is consistent with the estimates
found for the massive stars. The inferred MF in σ Orionis may be very close to the true
initial mass function (IMF) since no significant dynamical evolution is expected for cluster
members. Additionally, the distance to the cluster is known through the determination
–4–
provided by Hipparcos of the distance modulus of m − M = 7.7 ± 0.7 (value given for the
central star). This measurement is in agreement with previous distance determinations of
the OB1b subgroup. The σ Orionis star is affected by a low extinction of E(B − V ) = 0.05
(Lee 1968), thus, the associated cluster is expected to exhibit very little reddening. From
the comparison of the colors of some of the σ Orionis objects with counterparts of the same
spectral type in the Pleiades and the field, BZOR did not find any significant reddening. In
addition, the location of a larger sample of objects in the I − J vs J − K color-color diagram
shows that their infrared excesss E(I − J) is smaller than 0.3 mag (i.e., AV ≤ 1 mag, on the
basis of the relationships given in Rieke & Lefobski 1985). All these properties of youth,
proximity and low extinction confirm this cluster as a very interesting site for investigating
the IMF.
3.
Surveys and membership selection criterion
In order to construct the brown dwarf MF in the σ Orionis cluster we have combined
optical (IZ) and near-infrared (J) surveys recently conducted around the central star
(Zapatero Osorio et al. 2000; BZOR; Béjar 2000). New observations in the optical range
were obtained with the Wide Field Camera instrument mounted on the primary focus of
the 2.5–m Isaac Newton Telescope at the Roque de los Muchachos Observatory on 1998
November 12–13 (Béjar 2000). Images were bias-substracted and flat-fielded within the
IRAF1 environment. Instrumental magnitudes were transformed into observed magnitudes
by differential photometry of objects in common with images taken under photometric
conditions with the IAC80 telescope (Teide Observatory), which were calibrated in the
Cousins system by observing Landolt’s (1992) standard stars at different airmasses. Near
infrared photometry in the J–band has been acquired using the 3.5–m telescope at the
Calar Alto Observatory on 1998 October 27–31 (Zapatero Osorio et al. 2000). In addition,
K–band photometry has been obtained on individual candidates with the 1.5–m Carlos
Sánchez Telescope at Teide Observatory (1998 September 18, 2000 January 27, 2000
February 20), the 2.2–m telescope at Calar Alto Observatory (2000 February 16–18) and the
3.8–m United Kingdom Infrared telescope (UKIRT) at the Mauna Kea Observatory (2000
December 5–6). Raw frames were reduced following standard techniques in the infrared,
which include sky-substraction and flat-fielding. The photometric calibration in the UKIRT
system was achieved with faint standard stars (Hunt et al. 1998) observed at different
airmasses on the same nights, except for the UKIRT data, which were calibrated later
1
IRAF is distributed by National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which is operated by the Association
of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under contract with the National Science Foundation.
–5–
using objects in comon with images taken under photometric conditions with the 1.23–m
telescope at Calar Alto Observatory during 2000 January 22–23. The IZ and J-band data
of these surveys overlap in a sky region of 847 arcmin2 (the location of this region is shown
in Fig.1 of BZOR). Therefore we restrict our MF analysis to this particular region of the
cluster in which we have three color photometry for all candidate members, with limiting
ICousins and JUKIRT magnitudes of 23.8 and 21.2, and completeness magnitudes of 21.5 and
19.5, respectively. We have adopted as the limiting magnitude of our survey the detection of
95% of the total number of point-like sources on the frames; and as completeness magnitude
the value at which the number distribution of detections as a function of magnitude deviates
from an exponential law.
Spectroscopic observations of a total of 14 candidates in σ Orionis have confirmed
them as cluster members (see BZOR, Béjar et al. 2000; Zapatero Osorio et al. 1999,
2000). We note that nine of them are located in the overlapping area of 847 arcmin2 . The
14 members give a well defined spectroscopic sequence from M6 (the most luminous and
bluest targets) down to L4 (the reddest ones close to the limiting magnitude of the survey).
Available I and J-band observations for these objects allow us to define the location of the
low-mass star and brown dwarf sequence of the cluster (Figure 1), which we will adopt as
a reference for the identification of cluster members. This location is suitably reproduced
by the combination of the 5 Myr “dust-free and dusty” Lyon models (Baraffe et al. 1998;
Chabrier et al. 2000) as shown in Figure 1. Below I = 20 we expect dust condensates in the
atmosphere of cluster members cooler than M9, and so the dusty models seem to be more
appropiate.
In the 847 arcmin2 region under consideration we identify a total of 64 photometric
candidates that are distributed along the theoretical and observational sequences with a
dispersion around 0.5 mag. They seem to be very young objects and have colors redder than
the 10 Myr isochrone given by the dust-free Lyon models (see Fig. 1). All the candidates
have I − Z colors and I magnitudes consistent with cluster membership. Follow-up K-band
photometry for 17 of them also indicates their belonging to the I vs I − K cluster sequence,
which reinforces their very likely membership (BZOR; Béjar et al. 2000; Zapatero Osorio
et al. 2000). In addition, we have very recently obtained spectra for 6 of our faintest
candidates; based on our preliminary analysis these objects fit the expected spectroscopic
sequence and so are bona fide low-mass members with a very high probability (Barrado y
Navascués et al. 2001c). The photometric and spectroscopic data of our candidates and
those members defining the cluster sequence are shown in Tables 1 and 2. In the latter
we have not included the six candidates from Barrado y Navascués et al. (2001c). As
explained in the previous section we do not find any evidence for reddening or infrared
excesses and so we have not applied any extinction correction to our data. ¿From the
–6–
successful spectroscopic results along the photometric sequences we conclude that our
selection criterion using optical and near-infrared photometry is very efficient in identifying
true members of the cluster. A similar criterion for membership has proved successful in
low-extinction clusters such as the Pleiades (Zapatero Osorio et al. 1997; Martı́n et al.
2000; Moreaux et al. 2001) and IC 2391 (Barrado y Navascués et al. 2001b).
4.
The mass spectrum of brown dwarfs and planetary mass objects
The cluster luminosity function (LF) have been derived by counting the number of
objects per magnitude interval in the I band, and it is shown in Figure 2. The first bin, MI
= 7.5–8.5, corresponds to stars so bright that were saturated in some of the images of the
surveys under consideration. Fortunately, the BZOR data allowed us to make an estimate
of the counts for this massive bin which was conveniently normalized to the present survey.
We can see in Figure 2 that the LF is rising up to MI =9 mag and then falls down and
becomes flat from MI =11.5 mag. The LF remains flat down to the completeness limit of
our surveys. We note that the bins where the luminosity function shows a peak correspond
to a mass range (0.08–0.05 M⊙ ) which includes objects that have finished the deuterium
burning phase (the more massive ones) and those actually burning deuterium. Both types
of objects will have similar luminosities, if the age of the cluster is in the range 3–6 Myr,
and therefore contribute to produce a peak in the LF.
In order to derive the IMF, we have first determined the masses for the
σ Orionis members following a similar procedure to that described in Zapatero Osorio et al.
(2000), which means that we adopted the mass–luminosity relationship given by the Lyon
models (Baraffe et al. 1998; Chabrier et al. 2000). In favor of these models it can be argued
that they have been successful in fitting the mass–luminosity relation in various optical
and infrared passbands (Baraffe et al. 1998; Delfosse et al. 2001), as well as in predicting
coeval ages for the members of several young multiple systems (White et al. 1999; Luhman
1999), and that they provide a good fit to the infrared photometric sequence in the Pleiades
and σ Orionis clusters (Martı́n et al. 2000; Zapatero Osorio et al. 2000). Additionally, the
Lyon tracks provide magnitudes and colors in the filters of interest as a function of mass,
while in order to transform the effective temperatures and luminosities of other models into
observables we would have to use bolometric corrections.
The σ Orionis cluster substellar IMF is illustrated in Figure 3, where the mass spectrum
representation on a logarithmic scale is provided. For the age of 5 Myr a single power-law
fit facilitates a reasonable representation of the data points with a slope of α = 0.8 ± 0.4
in the mass range which goes from very low mass stars (0.2 M⊙ ) through the whole
–7–
brown dwarf domain to 0.013 M⊙ . The uncertainty of ±0.4 in the α index accounts for
possible different ages of the cluster and the use of other evolutionary models. We have
investigated the sensitivity of our mass spectrum to age by deriving α for ages from 3 Myr
to 10 Myr. The values found were between 0.5 to 1.0. This interval also accounts for an
uncertainty of 0.2 mag in the estimation of the cluster distance modulus. The dependence
of the mass spectrum on theoretical models is even more uncertain. Our calculations
considering Burrows et al. (1997) isochrones yield α values up to 0.4 higher depending on
age. Our main result is that the very low-mass stellar and substellar mass spectrum of the
σ Orionis cluster is generally rising toward lower masses. IMFs with slopes in the range
0.4–0.8 below the star–substellar mass borderline, have been obtained recently for other
young clusters (Luhman et al. 2000; Lucas & Roche 2000; Hillenbrand & Carpenter 2000;
Najita et al. 2000; Martı́n et al. 2000; Moreaux et al. 2001), showing that the formation of
brown dwarfs is a quite common process in the Galactic disk.
A remarkable feature of Figure 3 is the evidence for an extension of the IMF into the
domain of planetary masses (i.e lower than the deuterium burning mass). Despite the
incompleteness of our survey and the possible contamination of several cluster non-members
at these very low masses (see details in Zapatero Osorio et al. 2000), the planetary mass
interval is rather well populated. This indicates that free-floating planetary mass objects
with masses 0.013–0.005 M⊙ are abundant in σ Orionis. We find no evidence for a “bottom
end” of the IMF in the mass interval covered by our analysis, i.e., there is no obvious
deficit of objects near and beyond the deuterium-burning mass limit. Deeper surveys will
be needed to determine the existence and location of a minimum-mass limit in the IMF.
5.
Conclusions and future perspectives
Recent searches have found a significant population of brown dwarfs in the σ Orionis
cluster. We have estimated the mass spectrum, dN/dm ∝ M −α , from very low mass stars
(0.2 M⊙ ) to 0.013 M⊙ and we have found that this is still rising across the whole brown
dwarf regime with α=0.8 ± 0.4. Our results also suggest that the mass spectrum keeps
rising down to 0.005 M⊙ . If the IMF in the σ Orionis cluster has α=0.8 down to 1 Jupiter
mass, isolated planetary-mass objects in the mass range 1–12 MJup would be as numerous
as brown dwarfs; and brown dwarfs and free-floating planets together would be as numerous
as stars (see below for further details). However, their contribution to the total mass in the
cluster would be less than 10 %.
The relatively large number of free-floating planetary-candidate members found in the
σ Orionis cluster suggests that such low-mass objects form commonly in nature, and that
–8–
older and cooler isolated planets could be populating the Galactic disk and hence the solar
neighborhood. Assuming that the IMF of σ Orionis is representative of the disk population,
and extrapolating it to a mass of 1 MJup , we obtain the densities of free-floating substellar
systems given in Table 3. They are anchored to a density of stellar systems in the solar
neighborhood of 0.057 pc−3 (Reid et al. 1999). With this estimate for an index of α ∼ 1 in
the mass spectrum we would expect a total number of substellar objects around 435 within
a radius of 10 pc, whereas there would be 239 stars. Isolated planets much older than
objects in σ Orionis will be extremely faint and cool enough to show molecular features like
the giant planets in the Solar System. Therefore, even if they form a large population in the
solar neighborhood, their detection is a challenge to present-day observational capabilities.
According to theoretical predictions of radiated fluxes at different wavelengths (Burrows et
al. 1997; Allard et al. 1997), these objects in the mass range 1–12 MJup at the solar age
could have effective temperatures of 100–300 K and an absolute magnitude of MJ = 20–25
and MM =15–17. Current surveys such as 2MASS, DENIS, or SLOAN are unable to detect
them out to distances greater than 1 parsec because they are too shallow. Deeper surveys,
such as those reported by D’Antona, Oliva & Zeppirelli (1999) and Herbst et al. (1999) do
not cover enough area. Free-floating planetary mass objects are extremely faint at optical
and near-infrared wavelengths due to the absorption of methane and water, but they have
a moderately transparent region around 5 µm. They could be identified with the Space
Infrared Facility (SIRTF ) out to distances of several parsecs from the Sun (Martı́n et al.
2001) or with wide ultra-deep ground-based near-infrared surveys such as the one planned
with Megacam on the Canada-France-Hawaii telescope.
We are indebted to A. Burrows for facilitating an electronic version of his models. We
are grateful to Carlos Gutiérrez and J. Licandro for taking data necessary for calibrating
some of the K images. Partial financial support was provided by the Spanish DGES project
PB98–0531–C02–02. and CICYT grant ESP98–1339-CO2.
REFERENCES
Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H., Alexander, D. R., & Starrfield, S. 1997, ARA&A, 35, 137
Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. 1998, A&A, 337, 403
Barrado y Navascués, D., Bouvier J., Stauffer J.R., & Martı́n E.L. 2001a, ApJ, 546, 1006
Barrado y Navascués D., Stauffer J.R., Briceño C., Patten B., Hambly N., & Adams, J.,
2001b, ApJ Supplements, accepted.
–9–
Barrado y Navascués et al. 2001c (in preparation)
Basri, G., Marcy, G. W., & Graham, J. R. 1996, ApJ, 458, 600
Béjar, V. J. S., Zapatero Osorio, M. R., & Rebolo, R. 1999, ApJ, 521, 671 (BZOR)
Béjar, V. J. S., 2000, Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. La Laguna (Tenerife)
Blaauw, A. 1964, ARA&A, 2, 213
Blaauw, A. 1991, in NATO/ASI Series C, Vol. 342, Physics of Star Formation and Early
Stellar Evolution, eds C. J. Ladda & N. D. Kylafis (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 125
Bodenheimer, P. 1998, in ASP Conf. Ser., vol. 134, Brown Dwarfs and Extrasolar Planets,
ed. R. Rebolo, E. L. Martn, M. R. Zapatero Osorio, (San Francisco:ASP), 115
Bouvier, J., Stauffer, J. R., Martı́n, E. L., Barrado y Navascués, D., Wallace, B., & Béjar,
V. J. S. 1998, A&A, 336, 490
Brown, A. G. A., de Geus, E. J., & de Zeeuw, P. T. 1994, A&A, 289, 101
Burrows, A. et al. 1997, ApJ, 491, 856
Chabrier, G., Baraffe, I., Allard, F. , & Hauschildt, P. H. 2000, ApJ, 542, 464
D’Antona, F., Oliva, E. & Zeppieri 1999, A&A, 352, 567
Delfosse, X. et al. 2001, in preparation
Herbst, T. M., Thompson, D., Fockenbrock, R., Rix, H. & Beckwith, S. V. W. 1999, ApJ,
526, L17
Hillenbrand, L. A. & Carpenter, J. M. 2000, ApJ, 540, 236
Hunt, L. K. et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 2594
Jameson, R. F., & Skillen, I. 1989, MNRAS, 239, 247
Landolt, A. U. 1992, AJ, 104, 340
Lee, T. A. 1968, ApJ, 152, 913
Lucas, P. W., & Roche, P. F. 2000, MNRAS, 314, 858
Luhman, K. L. 1999, ApJ, 525, 466
– 10 –
Luhman, K. L., & Rieke, G. H. 1999, ApJ, 525, 440
Luhman, K. L., Rieke, G. H., Lada, C. J., & Lada, E. A. 1998, ApJ, 508, 347
Luhman, K. L., Rieke, G. H., Young, E. T., Cotera, A. S., Chen, H., Rieke, M. J., Schneider,
G., & Thompson, R. I. 2000, ApJ, 540, 1016
Martı́n, E. L., Delfosse, X., Basri, G., Goldman, B., Forveille, F., and Zapatero Osorio,
M. R. 1999, AJ, 118, 2466
Martı́n, E. L., Brandner, W., Bouvier, J., Luhman, K. L., Stauffer, J., Basri, G., Zapatero
Osorio, M. R. & Barrado y Navascués, D., 2000, ApJ, 543, 299
Martı́n, E. L., Brandner, W., Jewitt, D., Simon, T., Wainscoat, R., Connelley, M., Marley,
& M., Gelino, C., 2001, PASP, (submitted)
Meynet, G., Maeder, A., Schaller, G., Schaerer, D., & Charbonnel, C. 1994, A&AS, 103, 97
Miller, G. E. & Scalo, J. M. 1979 ApJS, 41,513
Moreaux, E., Bouvier, J. & Stauffer, J. R. 2001, A&A, 367, 211
Najita, J. R., Tiede, G. P. & Carr, J. S. 2000, ApJ,541, 977
Rebolo, R., Martı́n, E. L., Basri, G., Marcy, G. W., & Zapatero Osorio 1996, ApJ, 469, L53
Rebolo, R., Zapatero Osorio M. R. & Martı́n, E. L. 1995, Nature, 377, 129
Reid, I. N. et al. 1999, ApJ, 521, 613
Rieke, G. H., & Lefobski, M. J. 1985, ApJ, 288, 618
Rieke, G. H., & Rieke, M. J. 1990, ApJ, 362, L21
Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161
Saumon D., Hubbard, W. B., Burrows, A., Guillot, T., Lunine, J. I., & Chabrier, G. 1996,
ApJ, 460, 993
Shu, F. H., Adams, F. C. & Lizano, S. 1987, ARA&AS, 25, 23
Silk, J. 1995, ApJ, 438, L41
Stauffer, J. R., Hamilton, D., & Probst, R. G. 1994, AJ, 108, 155
Tamura, M. , Itoh, Y., Oasa, Y., & Nakajima, T. 1998, Science, 282, 1095
– 11 –
Warren, W. H., & Hesser, J. E. 1978, ApJS, 36, 497
White, R. J., Ghez, A. M., Reid, I. N., & Schultz, G. 1999, ApJ, 520, 811
Wolk, S. J., & Walter, F. M., 2000, in Very Low-Mass Stars and Brown Dwarfs, ed. R.
Rebolo, & M. R. Zapatero Osorio (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press), 38
Zapatero Osorio, M. R., Béjar, V. J. S., Rebolo, R., Martı́n, E. L., & Basri, G. 1999, ApJ,
524, L115
Zapatero Osorio, M. R.,Béjar, V. J. S., Martı́n, E. L., Rebolo, R., Barrado y Navascués, D.,
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., & Mundt, R. 2000, Science, 290, 103
Zapatero Osorio, M. R., Rebolo, R., Martı́n, E. L., Basri, G., Magazzù, A., Hodgkin, S. T.,
Jameson, R. F., & Cossburn, M. R. 1997, ApJ, 491, L00
This preprint was prepared with the AAS LATEX macros v4.0.
– 12 –
Fig. 1.— I vs. I − J color–magnitude diagram for the σ Orionis cluster. Selected
candidates are indicated with filled circles. The 5 Myr isochrones from the Lyon Group
(Next Gen models—full line—and Dusty models—dashed line), and from the Arizona
group (dotted line) and the 10Myr Next Gen isochrone (full line, bluer than 5Myr) are
also shown for comparison. Open circles around filled symbols denote candidates with
available spectroscopy confirming their membership. Empty open circles are for members
with spectroscopy but located outside of the 847 arcmin2 , and thus not included in the
MF computation. Error-bars are based on photometric uncertainties and are smaller than
symbol size for the majority of the brightest objects. Completeness magnitude, spectral
type, estimated temperatures and masses for the age of 5 Myr are also shown.
Fig. 2.— I-band luminosity function in the σ Orionis cluster. the dashed line indicates the
completeness limit of our search. Error bars corresponding to Poissonian uncertainties are
also shown.
Fig. 3.— The mass function of the σ Orionis cluster for substellar masses adopting several
plausible ages. The best power-law fitting (dN/dM ∝ M −α , dashed line) down to the brown
dwarf-planet boundary (∼ 0.013 M⊙ ) gives α = 0.8 ± 0.4 for the most probable age of 5 Myr.
Error bars correspond to Poissonian uncertainties (from the finite number of objects), except
for the planetary-mass interval where the upper limit (arrow) denotes the incompleteness of
the photometric and spectroscopic searches, and the lower error bar accounts for the possible
contamination of cluster non-members as discussed in Zapatero Osorio et al. (2000).
– 13 –
Teff (K)
3500
3000
M6
2500 2000
M7 M8
L0
1500
L4 ( 5 Myr)
0.20 Msol
0.15 Msol
0.07 Msol
0.04 Msol
0.02 Msol
Completeness magnitude
0.01 Msol
– 14 –
– 15 –
Lyon Group models 3 Myr
Stars
α = 0.6
Free-floating
Brown dwarfs
planets
Lyon Group models 5 Myr
Stars
α = 0.8
Free-floating
Brown dwarfs
planets
Lyon Group models 10 Myr
Stars
α = 0.7
Brown dwarfs
Free-floating
planets
– 16 –
Table 1.
Name (IAU)
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
J053911.7–022741
J053920.8–023035
J053939.2–023227
J053920.1–023826
J053847.5–023038
J053908.1–023230
J053907.9–022848
J053817.1–022228
J053944.4–022445
J053944.3-023301
J053757.4-023845
J053813.1-022410
J053909.9-022814
J053746.6-024328
J053911.4-023333
J053848.0-022854
J053849.2-022358
J053915.0-024048
J053721.0-022543
J053825.6-023122
J053904.4-023835
J053923.3-024657
J053829.0-024847
J053835.2-022524
J053751.0-022610
J053755.6-022434
J053943.7-024729
J053934.2-023847
J053908.8-023958
J053829.5-022517
J053916.6-023827
J053907.4-022908
J053657.9-023522
J053820.9-024613
J053913.0-023751
J053755.5-023308
J053915.1-022152
J053821.3-023336
J053926.8-023656
J053832.4-022958
J053736.4-024157
J053936.4-023626
J053926.8-022614
J053948.1-022914
J053912.8-022453
J053825.6-024836
J053946.5-022423
J053910.8-023715
J053903.2-023020
J053825.1-024802
J053833.3-022100
J053725.9-023432
Photometric data of the selected candidates
prev. ID.
I
R-I
I-J
SOri1
SOri3
SOri4
SOri5
SOri6
SOri7
SOri8
SOri9
SOri10
SOri11
SOri12
SOri13
15.08±0.04
15.16±0.04
15.23±0.04
15.40±0.05
15.53±0.04
15.63±0.04
15.74±0.04
15.81±0.04
16.08±0.04
16.424±0.008
16.471±0.010
16.410±0.018
16.485±0.012
16.514±0.003
16.731±0.011
16.789±0.014
16.813±0.017
16.843±0.008
16.867±0.008
16.896±0.014
16.945±0.009
16.979±0.008
17.040±0.010
17.109±0.008
17.128±0.009
17.144±0.009
17.144±0.007
17.154±0.007
17.163±0.008
17.230±0.008
17.264±0.008
17.321±0.009
17.385±0.008
17.429±0.008
17.438±0.008
17.612±0.008
17.640±0.008
17.697±0.013
17.911±0.008
17.922±0.008
18.095±0.009
18.459±0.017
18.657±0.008
18.921±0.009
19.425±0.008
19.724±0.009
20.144±0.010
20.656±0.015
20.72 ±0.014
21.172±0.023
21.30 ±0.05
21.32 ±0.03
1.70±0.07
2.15±0.07
2.16±0.07
1.86±0.07
2.00±0.07
2.07±0.07
1.87±0.07
2.06±0.07
1.97±0.07
1.94±0.06
1.75±0.05
1.93±0.06
1.47±0.04
1.95±0.04
1.79±0.04
1.78±0.05
2.07±0.04
1.80±0.04
1.70±0.04
2.20±0.04
1.98±0.04
2.12±0.05
2.26±0.05
2.27±0.05
1.93±0.05
1.77±0.05
2.06±0.05
2.31±0.05
1.93±0.05
2.03±0.05
2.15±0.05
2.29±0.05
2.17±0.05
1.76±0.05
2.18±0.05
2.47±0.05
2.29±0.05
2.10±0.05
1.98±0.05
2.33±0.10
2.46±0.05
2.11±0.05
2.30±0.05
2.42±0.05
2.29±0.05
2.29±0.05
2.19±0.05
2.44±0.05
2.46±0.05
2.40±0.05
2.22±0.05
2.47±0.05
2.67±0.08
2.52±0.05
2.37±0.05
2.52±0.05
2.69±0.05
2.95±0.05
3.10±0.05
3.13±0.05
3.51±0.05
3.28±0.06
3.31±0.09
3.10±0.07
SOri15
SOri16
SOri19
SOri18
SOri17
SOri28
SOri22
SOri23
SOri24
SOri32
SOri21
SOri25
SOri29
SOri26
SOri20
SOri33
SOri31
SOri30
SOri35
SOri38
SOri36
SOri39
SOri40
SOri45
SOri50
SOri51
SOri53
SOri54
SOri55
1.81±0.07
1.91±0.06
2.06±0.06
2.02±0.07
1.88±0.06
2.29±0.08
2.11±0.07
2.10±0.06
2.01±0.06
2.26±0.07
1.91±0.08
2.17±0.10
1.98±0.07
1.83±0.08
1.68±0.07
2.28±0.06
2.03±0.05
1.71±0.08
2.25±0.06
2.19±0.09
1.94±0.14
2.24±0.10
2.18±0.05
2.75±0.017
I-K
3.31±0.06
3.09 ±0.03
3.18±0.07
4.09
4.07
4.21
4.48
4.58
4.72
4.35
4.32
±0.10
±0.09
±0.16
±0.05
±0.10
±0.09
±0.10
±0.10
R.A.(J2000)
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
39
39
39
39
38
39
39
38
39
39
37
38
39
37
39
38
38
39
37
38
39
39
38
38
37
37
39
39
39
38
39
39
36
38
39
37
39
38
39
38
37
39
39
39
39
38
39
39
39
38
38
37
11.7
20.8
39.2
20.1
47.5
08.1
07.9
17.1
44.4
44.3
57.4
13.1
09.9
46.6
11.4
48.0
49.2
15.0
21.0
25.6
04.4
23.3
29.0
35.2
51.0
55.6
43.7
34.2
08.8
29.5
16.6
07.4
57.9
20.9
13.0
55.5
15.1
21.3
26.8
32.4
36.4
36.4
26.8
48.1
12.8
25.6
46.5
10.8
03.2
25.1
33.3
25.9
DEC.(J2000)
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
27
30
32
38
30
32
28
22
24
33
38
24
28
43
33
28
23
40
25
31
38
46
48
25
26
24
47
38
39
25
38
29
35
46
37
33
21
33
36
29
41
36
26
29
24
48
24
37
30
48
21
34
41
35
27
26
38
30
48
28
45
01
45
10
14
28
33
54
58
48
43
22
35
57
47
24
10
34
29
47
58
17
27
08
22
13
51
08
52
36
56
58
57
26
14
14
53
36
23
15
20
02
00
32
– 17 –
Table 1—Continued
Name (IAU)
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
SOri
J053900.9-022142
J053947.0-022525
J053903.6-022536
J053937.5-023042
J053852.6-022846
J053942.1-023031
J053653.3-022414
J053724.7-023152
J053826.1-022305
J053812.6-022138
J053839.1-022805
J053918.1-022855
prev. ID.
I
SOri56
SOri57
SOri58
SOri60
SOri61
SOri62
SOri64
SOri66
SOri65
SOri67
SOri68
SOri69
21.74 ±0.03
21.88 ±0.03
21.91 ±0.03
22.76 ±0.05
22.78 ±0.05
23.04 ±0.07
23.13 ±0.13
23.23 ±0.12
23.24 ±0.12
23.41 ±0.090
23.78 ±0.17
23.89 ±0.16
R-I
I-J
I-K
3.30±0.08
3.24±0.09
3.31±0.09
3.59±0.13
3.16±0.16
3.59±0.15
3.60±0.17
3.40±0.22
3.34±0.22
3.49±0.20
3.6 ±0.3
3.6 ±0.4
4.65 ±0.10
5.03 ±0.20
5.07 ±0.10
5.36 ±0.15
4.51 ±0.25
4.41 ±0.30
R.A.(J2000)
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
39
39
39
39
38
39
36
37
38
38
38
39
00.9
47.0
03.6
37.5
52.6
42.1
53.3
24.7
26.1
12.6
39.1
18.1
DEC.(J2000)
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
–02
21
25
25
30
30
30
24
31
23
21
28
28
42
25
36
42
46
31
14
52
05
38
05
55
Note. — Units of right ascension (J2000) are hours, minutes, and seconds, and units of declination (J2000) are degrees,
arcminutes, and arcseconds. Coordinates are accurate to ±1′′ . All the available R-band photometry and I-band data for
candidates SOri1–10 have been taken from BZOR. Photometric meausurements for candidates SOri50-69 have also been
presented in Zapatero Osorio et al. 2000.
– 18 –
Table 2.
Spectroscopic data of σ Orionis members
Name
I
SOri12∗
SOri17∗
SOri29∗
SOri25∗
SOri39∗
SOri27
SOri40∗
SOri45∗
SOriJ053710.0-024302
SOriJ053636.3-024626
SOri47
SOri52
SOri56∗
SOri60∗
16.471±0.010
16.945±0.009
17.230±0.008
17.163±0.008
17.922±0.008
17.090±0.04
18.095±0.009
19.724±0.009
20.266±0.011
20.614±0.019
20.530±0.05
20.958±0.016
21.740±0.03
22.76 ±0.05
I-J
I-K
2.26 ±0.05
2.17 ±0.05
2.11 ±0.05
2.46 ±0.05
2.47 ±0.08 3.18±0.07
2.23 ±0.05 3.18±0.05
2.67 ±0.06
2.95 ±0.05 4.07±0.09
3.5 ±0.3
4.9 ±0.4
3.4 ±0.11
3.30 ±0.10 4.79±0.15
3.24 ±0.15 5.53±0.15
3.30 ±0.08 4.65 ±0.10
3.59 ±0.13 5.07 ±0.10
Spectral
Type (PC3)
Spectral
Type
M4.5
M4.6
M4.8
M5.1
M5.1
M5.1
M5.6
M8.0
M8.2
M9.4
L1.4
L0.5
L0.5
M6
M6
M6
M6.5
M6.5
M7
M7
M8.5
M8.5
M9.5
L1.5
L0.5
L0.5
L4
Note. — Spectral type have been derived using pseudocontinuous index PC3 ([823.0–
827.0]/[754.0–758.0], Martı́n et al. 1999) and from comparison with standard M dwarfs.
∗
Candidates within the 847 arcmin2 of present survey.
– 19 –
Table 3.
Substellar density in the solar vicinity
α
ρBD
systems/pc3
NBD
d < 10 pc
ρPl
systems/pc3
NPl
d < 10 pc
Ntot
d < 10 pc
0.5
0.8
1.0
1.5
0.015
0.028
0.042
0.114
63
117
176
478
0.008
0.027
0.062
0.510
34
113
259
2136
95
230
435
2614
Note. — α indicates the exponent of the mass spectrum (dN/dm ∝ m−α )
and BD and Pl indicates brown dwarfs (0.075–0.013 M⊙ ) and planetary
mass objects (0.013–0.001 M⊙ ), respectively