CHAPTER 7
Procellariform extinctions in the
Holocene: threat processes and wider
ecosystem-scale implications
R. Paul Scofield
7.1 Introduction
Procellariiformes are the order of tube-nosed seabirds that includes the albatrosses, petrels, and
shearwaters. Members of the order breed mainly
on islands; individual species are often extremely
widely distributed, with populations on many
islands within many island groups, and frequently in different oceans. The order has a global distribution, and contains four extant families:
Pelecanoididae (diving-petrels), Procellariidae
(shearwaters, petrels, and fulmars), Diomedeidae
(albatrosses), and Hydrobatidae (storm-petrels),
together with either one or two extinct families.
Species are generally either pelagic scavengers primarily taking squid and fish, or are planktivorous.
As basal members of the Neoaves, the group has a
physiologically restrained breeding system in which
birds only produce a single egg, usually annually,
with no relaying, do not have complex nest structures, breed either at or below ground level, and
generally have a tightly constrained breeding season. These traits leave them open to predation by
mammalian predators, and it is hypothesized that
for this reason their breeding biology is characterized by a number of behaviours that have evolved
to reduce the effect of such predation. On islands
where petrels are without predators they occur in
huge numbers; indeed, one of the largest concentrations of breeding animals in the world is a petrel colony (Reyes-Arriagada et al. 2007). Although
these vast colonies are susceptible to the invasion
of exotic mammals, and can disappear rapidly (see
Atkinson 1985 for examples), procellariiform populations also typically spawn offshoots of a few hundred individuals on tiny offshore islands or stacks,
and when invasions occur it is rare for populations
to disappear entirely. Furthermore, a majority of
petrel species arrive nocturnally on their breeding
grounds, and burrow-nesting and extensive habitat gardening are the norm.
Despite being susceptible to mammalian predation, the procellariiforms are an ancient group that
has survived comparatively unchanged since the
earliest Cenozoic. Although procellariiform communities are dynamic over time (Warheit 2002),
responding to environmental changes, mammalian
invasions and the emergence of new islands, the
taxa themselves have shown remarkable resilience.
For example, the short-tailed albatross, Phoebastria
albatrus, which is rare but still extant today, has
managed to survive since at least the Pliocene
(Olson and Rasmussen 2001) and move from the
Atlantic, where it is now extinct (Olson and Hearty
2003), to the Pacific. Here I will attempt to determine reasons for the group’s longevity, and discuss
their ecosystem impacts and extinction drivers in
the Holocene.
7.2 The earliest fossil record of
procellariiformes
7.2.1 The Tertiary record (and earlier)
Fossil evidence suggests that procellariiforms
have survived comparatively unchanged since the
151
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 151
12/5/2008 12:21:47 PM
152
Perhaps Para
here?
HOLOCENE EX TINCTIONS
earliest Cenozoic, and there is limited (and somewhat contentious) evidence of procellariiformlike birds at the end of the Mesozoic. The late
Maastrichtian Lance Creek Formation of Wyoming
contains two species of the genus Lonchodytes
described by Brodkorb (1963a). Hope (2002) argued
that Lonchodytes is likely to be a procellariiform
(most closely resembling procellariids) although
this has been questioned (Scofield et al. 2006). Of
a similar age, and equally enigmatic, is a fragmentary clavicle from the Nemegt Basin in Mongolia,
which Kurochkin (1995, 2000) assigned to the
Diomedeidae. Olson and Parris (1987) described
Tytthostonyx glauconiticus from the Late Cretaceous
or early Paleocene of New Jersey, placing it in its
own family (Tytthostonichidae) and suggesting
that it appeared to be either a basal procellariiform or close to the origin of the Fregatidae and
the Pelecaniformes, the later opinion with which
Feduccia (1996) concurred.
Eopuffinus kazachstanensis, a species assigned to
the Procellaridae, is known from the Paleocene of
Kazakhstan, although it is currently considered of
uncertain status. The earliest unequivocal procellariiform appears to come from the Late Eocene of
Louisiana. A distal tibiotarsus has been accepted as
morphologically close to the extant genus Pterodroma
in the Procellaridae (Feduccia and McPherson 1993).
Procellariiforms and petrel-like taxa are known
from Eocene deposits from Uzbekistan, Louisiana,
and perhaps the London Clays (but see Mayr et al.
2002). Murunkus subitus, based on a carpometacarpus from the mid Eocene of Uzbekistan, has been
placed in the Diomedeidae (Panteleyev and Nessov
1987), as has Manu antiquus from the mid to Late
Oligocene of Otago, New Zealand (Marples 1946),
although both assignments are tentative. Another
extinct procellariiform family, the Diomedeoididae
Fischer, 1985, has recently been described from the
Oligocene of Germany, and subsequent work by
Mayr et al. (2002) has shown this group to indeed
warrant family status and include a number of species originally described as albatrosses.
Procellariidae are reliably reported in the
Oligocene. ‘Larus’ raemdonckii from the early
Oligocene (Rupelian) of Belgium was placed
in the extant genus Puffinus (Procellariidae) by
Brodkorb (1963b). Three extinct Diomedea species
(Diomedeidae) are known from the North Pacific
Neogene, and several more indeterminate Tertiary
records exist for the genus (Chandler 1990).
The Upper Miocene of Australia has produced
a Diomedea species described from an unguis
(Wilkinson 1969).
The fossil record of Hydrobatidae and
Pelecanoididae is much younger. The first stormpetrel is found in the upper Miocene of California
(Olson 1985c), while Scofield et al. (2006) and Worthy
et al. (2007) have recently described diving-petrels
differing little from modern species from the
Miocene of southern New Zealand. A diving-petrel
has also been described from the early Pliocene of
South Africa (Olson 1985c).
7.2.2 Pre-human petrel extinctions
In Table 7.1, I summarize a list of published procellariiform taxa that became extinct in the Pliocene
and Pleistocene. While undoubtedly incomplete, it
is indicative of comparatively low levels of extinction in the group. Our understanding of extirpations
of extant species populations is more incomplete
for this interval; however, the Pleistocene fossil
record for the Palearctic has been comprehensively
surveyed by Tyrberg (1998), and the Quaternary
in the Mediterranean Region was examined by
became
Sánchez Marco (2004), and similarly low levels
of
population extinction have been recorded (Table
7.2). Thus, from what is currently known about the
avian fossil record, it would seem that comparatively few species of procellariiforms have become
extinct in the last 4 million years, before humans
began to impact global ecosystems. However, it is
worth noting that, in being primarily pelagic, the
bones of procellariiforms will usually only be preserved when birds return to the land to nest. Even
then conditions have to be suitable for preservation
to occur, as is evident from the fact that the majority of Pleistocene procellariiform fossils are known
from limestone or karstic environments. Where
these conditions are absent, fossil seabirds are rare.
Many modern-day petrel colonies occur on peat
soils, which are often extremely acidic because petrels acidify the soil though the nitrification of their
guano. Petrel biology therefore typically ensures
the destruction of their bones. The outcome of this
until
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 152
12/5/2008 12:21:47 PM
HOLOCENE PROCELL ARIFORM EX TINCTIONS
153
Table 7.1 Procellariiform species that became extinct in the Pliocene and Pleistocene.
Species
Locality
Reference
Calonectris krantzi
Phoebastria anglica
Phoebastria rexsularum
Pterodroma kurodai
Pterodromoides minoricensis
Lee Creek (USA)
UK; USA
Lee Creek (USA)
Aldabra (Indian Ocean)
Menorca; Lee Creek (USA)
Puffinus nestori
Puffinus pacificoides
Puffinus tedfordi
Puffinus nestori
Ibiza (Mediterranean)
St. Helena (South Atlantic)
Western North America
Ibiza (Mediterranean)
Olson and Rasmussen (2001)
Olson and Rasmussen (2001)
Olson and Rasmussen (2001)
Harrison and Walker (1978)
Olson and Rasmussen (2001);
Seguí et al. (2001)
Alcover (1989)
Olson (1975)
Howard (1971)
Alcover (1989)
Table 7.2 Procellariiform populations that have been documented as becoming extinct in the Pliocene
and Pleistocene.
Species
Locality
Reference
Calonectris diomedea diomedea
Phoebastria cf. albatrus
Bermuda
Bermuda; Lee Creek (USA)
Phoebastria aff. immutabilis
Phoebastria aff. nigripes
Puffinus mauretanicus
Lee Creek (USA)
Lee Creek (USA)
Pityusic Islands (Mediterranean)
Olson et al. (2005b)
Olson and Rasmussen (2001);
Olson and Hearty (2003)
Olson and Rasmussen (2001)
Olson and Rasmussen (2001)
Alcover (1989)
cultural
putative
is that our understanding of the extinction of many
Neogene procellariiform species (e.g. Puffinus
felthami and Puffinus kanakoffi, described from the
Pliocene of California; Chandler 1990) remains
incomplete, and these species could well have survived considerably later into the human-impacted
Late Pleistocene. For these reasons, it is possible
that apparently Pleistocene (and even Pliocene)
extinctions were in fact human-induced.
7.3 An unparalleled series of
extinctions?
The Holocene fossil record of the Procellariiformes
is considerably more complete than that of the
Pliocene and Pleistocene. However, many seemingly
geologically young sites are not reliably dated, and
may actually be pre-Holocene in age. Some subfossil dune deposits dated as Holocene may include
birds that have been forced ashore by storms or
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 153
by vagrancy, and so these records may not actually indicate breeding populations. Furthermore,
archaeologists frequently interpret the presence
of species in middens to indicate nearby breeding
sites, but the occurrence of species known to be
high-latitude specialists in tropical sites (Steadman
2006b) indicates that that some indigenous populations may have exploited vagrant or migratory
populations. Nevertheless, there is strong evidence
that species-level extinctions have occurred more
often in the Holocene than is documented in the
Pliocene and Pleistocene (see Chapter 4 in this
volume), and 56% (76 of 136; Onley and Scofield
2007) of Holocene procellariiform species have lost
populations (Table 7.3).
‘In terms of its rate and geographical extent, its
potential for synergistic disruption and the scope
of its evolutionary consequences, the current mass
invasion event is without precedent and should
be regarded as a unique form of global change’
12/5/2008 12:21:47 PM
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 154
Table 7.3 Procellariiform populations that have become extinct in the Holocene (some of these populations have since reintroduced themselves).
Species
Locality
Likely cause of
extinction1
Pre- or postEuropean?
Reference
Diomedea exulans
Diomedea sanfordi
Phoebastria albatrus
Macquarie Island
Pitt Island (Chatham Group)
Agincourt Island and Pescadore Islands (Taiwan); Izu, Bonin,
Daito, Senkaku and western volcanic groups of Japan
Johnston, Marcus, and Wake Islands, Izu Islands
Johnston, Marcus, Volcano, Wake, and Marshall Islands, and
Northern Marianas
North Island (New Zealand)
Southern New Zealand
Macquarie Island
North Island (New Zealand), Amsterdam Island
1
1
1
Post
Pre
Post
de la Mare and Kerry (1994)
Millener (1999)
Hasegawa and DeGange (1982)
1
1
Post
Post
Rice and Kenyon (1962)
Rice and Kenyon (1962)
1
1
1
1
Pre
Post
Post
Pre/post
1
1
Post
Pre/post
Worthy and Holdaway (2002)
Worthy and Holdaway (2002)
Clarke and Schulz (2005)
Worthy and Jouventin (1999); Worthy and
Holdaway (2002)
Imber (1994); Worthy and Holdaway (2002)
Megyesi and O’Daniel (1997); Steadman (2006b)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Post
Post
Pre
Pre
Post
Pre
Post
Pre/post
Post
Post
Pre
Post
Post
1
1
1
Post
Post
Pre/post
Phoebastria immutabilis
Phoebastria nigripes
Thalassarche bulleri
Macronectes halli
Halobaena caerulea
Pachyptila turtur
Pachyptila vittata
Bulweria bulwerii
Pseudobulweria aterrima
Pseudobulweria becki
Pseudobulweria rostrata
Pterodroma alba
Pterodroma arminjoniana
Pterodroma axillaris
Pterodroma baraui
Pterodroma brevipes
Pterodroma cahow
Pterodroma cervicalis
Pterodroma cookii
Pterodroma defilippiana
Pterodroma cf. feae
Pterodroma gouldi
Pterodroma hasitata
Pterodroma hypoleuca
Southern New Zealand, Main Chatham Island
Main Hawaiian Islands, Midway Atoll, and many southeast Pacific
Islands; islands off China; Tenerife and islands off Lanzarote
(Canary Islands)
Amsterdam Island
?Solomon Islands
Ofu (Samoa), Aitutaki, Huahine
Huahine; Ua Huka
Amsterdam Island
Pitt Mangere Island (Chatham Islands)
Amsterdam Island
Many central Pacific Islands
Bermuda
Raoul Island (Kermadec Islands)
North Island (New Zealand)
Isla Robinson Crusoe (Juan Fernández Group)
Scotland, The Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden
12/5/2008 12:21:47 PM
North Island (New Zealand)
Guadeloupe, Martinique
Main Hawaiian Island and islands of north-west chain (including
Kure)
Worthy and Jouventin (1999)
BirdLife International (2007a)
Steadman (2006b)
Steadman (2006b)
Worthy and Jouventin (1999)
Tennyson and Millener (1994)
Worthy and Jouventin (1999)
BirdLife International (2007b)
Olson et al. (2005b)
Veitch et al. (2004)
Worthy and Holdaway (2002)
Brooke (1987)
Lepiksaar (1958); Ericson and Tyrberg (2004);
Leopold (2005); Serjeantson (2005)
Worthy and Jouventin (1999)
Bent (1922)
Kepler (1967); Olson and James (1982)
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 155
Pterodroma inexpectata
Pterodroma lessonii
Pterodroma macroptera
Pterodroma cf. madeira
Pterodroma mollis
New Zealand mainland
Campbell Island
Amsterdam Island
El Hierro (Canary Islands)
Amsterdam Island, Macquarie Island
1
1
1
1
1
Pre
Post
Post
Post
Post
Pterodroma neglecta
Raoul Island (Kermadec Islands); Isla Robinson Crusoe (Juan
Fernandez Group)
Raoul Island (Kermadec Islands), Henderson Island, many central
Pacific Islands
Easter Island
Lord Howe Island, Norfolk Island
Oahu and other Hawai’ian Islands
Norfolk Island
Tahuata, Easter Island
Amsterdam Island
New Zealand mainland
Northern South Island (New Zealand)
Giraglia Island (Mediterranean)
Islands off southern Japan and south-east Russia
Amsterdam Island
San Benedicto Island (Mexico)
Lifuka and Hu’ano (Tonga), Ofu (Samoa), Henderson and many
southeast Pacific Islands
Main islands of Bonin Group
North Island and some offshore islands (New Zealand)
Amsterdam Island
Chatham Island
North Island and northern South Island (New Zealand)
New Zealand mainland
New Zealand mainland, Main Chatham Island
Northern South Island (New Zealand)
Bermuda
Cabrera, Formentera (Balearics)
Ogasawara Island, Marcus Island, Wake Island, Henderson Island,
Pitcairn Island, and some Marquesas Islands
O’ahu, Maui, and Laana’i (Hawaii)
Guadalupe Island (Mexico)
1
Post
Worthy and Holdaway (2002)
Taylor (2000)
Worthy and Jouventin (1999)
Rando (2002)
Worthy and Jouventin (1999); Clarke and Schulz
(2005)
Veitch et al. (2004)
1
Post
Wragg and Weisler (1994); Steadman (2006b)
1
1, 2?
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
3
1
Pre
Post
Pre
Pre
Post
Pre
Pre
Post
Pre/post
Post
Post
Pre
Steadman (2006b)
Meredith (1991); Holdaway and Anderson (2001)
Olson and James (1982)
Medway (2002)
Steadman (2006b)
Worthy and Jouventin (1999)
Worthy and Holdaway (2002)
Worthy and Holdaway (2002)
Thibault and Bretagnolle (1998)
Oka (2004)
Worthy and Jouventin (1999)
Jehl and Parkes (1982)
Wragg and Weisler (1994); Steadman (2006b)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Post
Pre
Post
Pre
Pre
Pre
Pre
Pre
Pre
Post
Pre/post
1
1
Post
Post
Pterodroma nigripennis
Pterodroma phaeopygia
Pterodroma ?pycrofti
Pterodroma sandwichensis
Pterodroma solandri
Pterodroma ultima
Procellaria cinerea
Procellaria parkinsoni
Procellaria westlandica
Calonectris diomedea
Calonectris leucomelas
Puffinus assimilis
Puffinus auricularis
Puffinus bailloni
Puffinus bannermani
Puffinus bulleri
Puffinus carneipes
Puffinus elegans
Puffinus gavia
Puffinus gravis
Puffinus griseus
Puffinus huttoni
Puffinus lherminieri
Puffinus mauretanicus
Puffinus nativitatis
12/5/2008 12:21:47 PM
Puffinus newelli
Puffinus opisthomelas
Hasegawa (1991)
Worthy and Holdaway (2002)
Worthy and Jouventin (1999)
Millener (1999)
Worthy and Holdaway (2002)
Worthy and Holdaway (2002)
Imber (1994); Worthy and Holdaway (2002)
Worthy and Holdaway (2002)
Olson et al. (2005b)
Oro et al. (2004)
Wragg and Weisler (1994); Seto (2001);
Steadman (2006b)
Ainley et al. (1997)
Everett and Anderson (1991)
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 156
Table 7.3 Continued
Species
Locality
Likely cause of
extinction1
Pre- or postEuropean?
Reference
Puffinus pacificus
Puffinus puffinus
Puffinus yelkouan
Pelecanoides georgicus
Pelecanoides urinatrix
Main Hawaiian Islands, Tonga and many southeast Pacific Islands
Bermuda; many European islands
Mediterranean Islands
Macquarie Island
Macquarie Island, Chatham Island, New Zealand mainland,
Amsterdam Island
Main Chatham Islands
Amsterdam Island
Henderson, Ua Huka, Tahuata
Rapa Island
‘Eua (Tonga), Samoa, Mangaia, Tahuata, Easter Island, Henderson
Island
Many islands and one mainland site around coast of Europe
Main islands of Azores, Canary Islands and Hawai’i
Central Kuril Island (Russia); some islands in north-western
California
Many islands and one mainland site around coast of North
America and Ireland
Many Californian Islands
Numerous islands in Gulf of California
Midway Island, Izu Islands
1
1
1
1
1
Post
Post
Post
Post
Pre/post
1
1
1
1
1
Post
Post
Pre
Post
Pre
Olson and James (1982); Steadman (2006b)
Brooke (1990)
Martin et al. (2000)
Clarke and Schulz (2005)
Worthy and Jouventin (1999); Worthy and
Holdaway (2002); Clarke and Schulz (2005)
Imber (1994)
Worthy and Jouventin (1999)
Steadman (2006b)
Murphy and Snyder (1952)
Wragg and Weisler (1994); Steadman (2006b)
1
1
1
Post
Pre
Post
Martin et al. (2000)
Olson and James (1982); Rando (2002)
Boersma and Silva (2001)
1
Post
1
1
1
Pre and post
Post
Post
Podolsky and Kress (1989); Huntington et al.
(1996)
Everett and Anderson (1991)
Donlan et al. (2000)
Hasegawa (1984); Baker et al. (1997)
Garrodia nereis
Pelagodroma marina
Fregetta grallaria
Fregetta tropica
Nesofregetta fuliginosa
Hydrobates pelagicus
Oceanodroma castro
Oceanodroma furcata
Oceanodroma leucorhoa
Oceanodroma melania
Oceanodroma microsoma
Oceanodroma tristrami
1
Key to likely causes of extinction: 1, introduction of predators; 2, hunting; 3, volcanic eruption.
12/5/2008 12:21:47 PM
of neccesity
HOLOCENE PROCELL ARIFORM EX TINCTIONS
(Ricciardi 2007). Being burrowing species with
low fecundity, procellariiform populations have
evolved in the absence of mammalian predators.
The arrival of humans on oceanic islands during
the Late Pleistocene and Holocene precipitated a
wave of extinctions among birds, especially seabirds, caused largely by the introduction of exotic
mammals (see also Chapter 2 in this volume). The
magnitude of this extinction event varies markedly between islands, and correlates of recent bird
extinctions are becoming increasingly understood
(e.g. see Blackburn et al. 2004; Duncan and Forsyth
2006; Chapter 12 in this volume). But what are the
mechanisms driving procellariiform extinctions?
7.4 Human-induced petrel extinction
7.4.1 Hunting versus introduced predators
Evidence for the effect of hunting by prehistoric settlers being responsible for local or global
extinction of petrel species is limited. MourerChauviré and Antunes (2000) found the bones of
157
the extinct shearwater Puffinus holeae associated
with Upper Pleistocene Neanderthal middens in
Portugal, and Rando and Alcover (2007) found cut
marks and burning on bones of the extinct lava
shearwater Puffinus olsoni on the Canary Islands
(Fig. 7.1). However, while these observations indicate that at least some now-extinct procellariiforms
were actively persecuted by humans before the
historical period, they provide little information
on the intensity of anthropogenic persecution or
whether it represented a significant factor in the
disappearance of these species.
It is also rarely possible to tell from the fossil record how quickly petrel populations disappeared, although some evidence can be gained from
St. Helena (discovered in 1502 and first described
in written accounts in 1588), where the St. Helena
petrel, Pseudobulweria rupinarum, became extinct
shortly after human arrival. Here the species was
extinct or very rare before any documented record
could be made of it (Olson 1975). In another more
recent case feral cats, Felis catus, probably reached
Figure 7.1 Burnt and cut bones of extinct Puffinus
olsoni from the Canary Islands, indicating that the
species experienced prehistoric exploitation by
humans. Scale bar = 2 cm. Courtesy of J.C. Rando
and J.A. Alcover.
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 157
12/5/2008 12:21:47 PM
158
HOLOCENE EX TINCTIONS
Little Barrier Island, off New Zealand’s North
Island, in about 1870. By the 1980s the population
of Parkinson’s petrel, Pterodroma parkinsoni, was
functionally extinct (Veitch 1999).
7.4.2 Introduction of predators
7.4.2.1 Rats
Invasive rats are some of the largest contributors to
seabird extinction and endangerment worldwide
(Jones et al. 2008a). The most problematic species
of the genus Rattus are native to Asia. Rats spread
out of Asia at times of major human diaspora,
with the Pacific rat or kiore, Rattus exulans, being
spread through the Pacific by Melanesian and
Polynesian peoples in the Late Pleistocene and
Holocene (Spennemann 1997; Matisoo-Smith et al.
1998). The black rat, Rattus rattus, reached Europe
in Roman times while the brown or Norway rat,
Rattus norvegicus, arrived in the Middle Ages
(Kurtén 1968). Thus, although rats are generally
thought of as ubiquitous, their presence is a relatively new phenomenon worldwide. Being commensal with humans, rats generally accompany
humans accidentally wherever they settle, including islands representing important sanctuaries for
procellariiforms. The introduction of rats to island
communities is frequently devastating. For example, the accidental introduction of black rats to Big
South Cape Island (Taukihepa) (Atkinson and Bell
1973) led to a plague of rats, the rapid extinction of
three species of landbird, and the decline to virtual
elimination of two seabird species within 5 years of
their introduction (Bell 1978). Among predators, R.
rattus and to a lesser extent R. norvegicus are well
known as the leading agents of bird extinction on
islands, but the effects of R. exulans introduced by
Polynesians throughout Remote Oceania is now
thought to be significant, especially on seabirds
(Steadman 2006b). Whereas the larger rat species
kill the adults of smaller species of petrel, all species kill chicks and eggs. Modern techniques such
as stable-isotope analyses (e.g. Hobson et al. 1999;
Stapp 2002) have not only confirmed that rats
do actually feed on seabirds, but have also suggested that the traditional studies of rat stomach
contents were underestimating the importance of
seabirds in the diet of rats. One study looking at
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 158
the relative effects of predation by rats on species
of differing size showed that small species of petrel are most susceptible to egg and adult predation
whereas larger species such as Cory’s shearwater,
Calonectris diomedea, are more likely to be affected
by chick predation (Igual et al. 2006). These studies
indicate that our knowledge of the way rats impact
island populations is limited and that more work
is needed. There can be no doubt, however, that
rats severely impact seabirds, reducing their populations and in many cases triggering their local
extinction (Atkinson 1985). Wherever archeological evidence is examined in the Pacific, extinctions
begin with the introduction of kiore, and, whether
prehistoric or recent, seabird extinctions on islands
normally occur very shortly after the introduction
of rats.
7.4.2.2 Mice
The ubiquitous, commensal house mouse, Mus
musculus, is the most widely introduced of all mammals, but its effect on native biota is poorly known.
On Gough Island in the South Atlantic, unlike
most other sub-Antarctic islands, the house mouse
is the only introduced mammal. Mice were known
to affect populations of the small storm-petrels
and diving-petrels but were thought to pose little
population level risk to large seabirds. However,
recent video evidence has shown house mice killing chicks of the Tristan albatross, Diomedea dabbenena, and Atlantic petrel, Pterodroma incerta, and
has indicated that mouse-induced mortality is a
significant cause of poor breeding success in these
species. Population models show that the levels
of predation recorded there are sufficient to cause
population decreases (Wanless et al. 2007). It is suggested that mice may not be a significant issue to
larger seabirds on islands when constrained by
other introduced predators, but when these mouse
populations are released from the ecological effects
of predators and competitors by eradication and
restoration programmes, they too may become
predatory on seabird chicks (see section 7.4.2.9,
below).
an other
7.4.2.3 Cats
Feral cats, F. catus, have a devastating effect on seabird colonies. Researchers have estimated that cat
12/5/2008 12:21:48 PM
HOLOCENE PROCELL ARIFORM EX TINCTIONS
mortality on Marion Island prior to rat eradication
was 450 000 seabirds per annum (van Aarde 1980),
whereas on Macquarie Island 47 000 broad-billed
prions, Pachyptila vittata, and 110 000 white-headed
petrels, Pterodroma lessonii, were estimated to be
killed annually (Jones 1977), and on Kerguelen
Island 1.2 million seabirds were estimated to be
killed annually (Pascal 1980). This level of mortality has dramatic effects on the population viability of seabird breeding colonies. For example, cats
have been responsible for the local extinction of 10
petrel species on the Crozet Islands in the last century (Derenne and Mougin 1976), whereas in New
Zealand the extinction of most seabirds from main
Chatham Island has been attributed to cats (Imber
1994). However, the effects of cats are not always
predictable, and their removal may upset delicate
(though artificial) ecosystems that have developed
on some islands (see section 7.4.2.9, below).
7.4.2.4 Foxes
More than 10 million seabirds belonging to 29
species formerly bred on the Aleutian Islands off
Alaska (Croll et al. 2005). The region lacked large
terrestrial predators prior to the arrival of humans,
but in the past 5000 years Arctic foxes, Alopex lagopus, have been introduced to at least 400 of these
islands. Being primarily carnivorous, foxes preyed
on the local seabirds that had evolved in the absence
of predators, and only those species that nested on
unreachable cliff faces were able to survive. Burrownesting species and surface-nesters (e.g. gulls) were
predated easily, and their populations became
locally or regionally extirpated. Fox removal from
40 islands has resulted in an increase by two orders
of magnitude in whiskered auklet, Aethia pygmaea,
and other seabird populations. Similarly, nine foxfree islands have nearly 100 times more seabirds
than nine geographically and ecologically similar
but fox-infested islands (Croll et al. 2005).
7.4.2.5 Pigs
Pigs, Sus scrofa, are a frequently ignored but
extremely important predator of burrowing petrels. They were responsible for the eradication of
Buller’s petrel, Puffinus bulleri, on one of the two
main islands in The Poor Knights group off northern New Zealand (Medway 2001), they have been
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 159
159
implicated in the decline of Galapagos petrel,
Pterodroma phaeopygia, in the Galapagos Islands
(Cruz and Cruz 1987), and they have been responsible for the degradation of habitat on the main
Auckland Islands and (with cats) caused the extinction of most breeding seabirds in this island group
(Challies 1975).
on the large main
7.4.2.6 Ungulates
island
The indirect effects on ungulates on habitat are discussed below. Livestock on some isolated islands
may not only trample burrows, but also exhibit unusual behaviours caused by an absence of nutrients
that can directly affect seabird survival. In particular, they may eat chicks and/or fledglings in order to
ingest nutrient-rich bone. On Foula in the Shetland
Islands, sheep, Ovis aries, have been observed biting off the legs, wings, or heads of unfledged young
Arctic tern, Sterna paradisaea, and Arctic skua,
Stercorarius parasiticus, chicks, and on Rhum in the
Inner Hebrides, red deer, Cervus elaphus, have been
seen biting the heads off chicks of Manx shearwater,
Puffinus puffinus, and occasionally also chewing the
chicks’ legs and wings (Furness 1988).
7.4.2.7 Mongooses
The mongoose, Herpestes auropunctatus, was introduced to many tropical islands to control rats and
other species in sugar cane plantations. This has
severely affected many ground-dwelling species
and especially seabirds. For example, in some years
more than 60% of all egg and chick mortality in
the Hawai’ian petrel, Pterodroma sandwichensis, on
Oahu is caused by cats and mongooses. Although
rats also prey on P. sandwichensis eggs, the major
threat that they pose is providing a prey base for
these larger exotic predators. The lower limit of
the Hawai’ian petrel’s breeding range on Maui
now coincides with the upper limit of permanent
mongoose infestation. In contrast, the species has a
high breeding success rate on Kaua’i, where mongoose are not established (Simons 1983).
7.4.2.8 Snakes
The accidental introduction of the brown tree snake,
Boiga irregularis, to Guam around 1950 induced a
cascade of extirpations that may be unprecedented
among historical extinction events in taxonomic
12/5/2008 12:21:48 PM
160
HOLOCENE EX TINCTIONS
scope and severity. Birds (including wedge-tailed
shearwater, Puffinus pacificus), bats, and reptiles
were affected, and by 1990 most forested areas
on Guam retained only three native vertebrates,
all of which were small lizards (Fritts and Rodda
1998). It is clear that some petrels and shearwaters
can coexist with snake species (e.g. tiger snakes,
Notechis spp., with wedge-tailed shearwater and
short-tailed shearwater, Puffinus tenuirostris, in
Australia), so it would appear that it is the invasive nature of the Boiga population and the Guam
fauna’s lack of adaptation to snake predation that
has caused extirpation.
goats, Capra aegagrus hircus, are very destructive to
vegetation; by browsing on seedlings they slow or
even halt the regeneration of the forest canopy and
reduce native plant diversity. Cattle in particular
can damage and destroy burrows and consolidate
soils, and have been implicated in the decline of
the Galapagos petrel (Cruz and Cruz 1987). Goats
are present on at least nine island groups in the
Pacific and four in the sub-Antarctic. Wherever
they are present in dense populations they cause
great destruction to vegetation and landscapes,
typically compounded by subsequent soil erosion, which often results in total habitat loss.
Forested environments can therefore be converted
into degraded grasslands (e.g. on Isabela Island,
Galapagos) or become more vulnerable to further
invasion by weeds or to cyclone damage, all of
which can adversely affect burrowing seabirds as
well as wider island ecology.
7.4.2.9 Mesopredator release
The example of Little Barrier Island, in New
Zealand’s northern Hauraki Gulf, demonstrates
the complexity of the delicate (though artificial)
ecosystems that have developed on some islands.
Cats were introduced in the 1870s to an island that
previously only hosted an introduced population
7.4.4 Fisheries interactions
of kiore. Contrary to previous expectations that
cats would preferentially forage on smaller prey,
Fishery waste is unquestionably an important food
cats virtually exterminated not the much smaller
source for seabirds, with about 6 million birds
Cook’s petrel, Pterodroma cooki, but the large
including procellariiforms being supported by this
Parkinson’s petrel from the island. It has been sugresource in the Baltic Sea alone (Garthe and Scherp
gested that the timing of Parkinson’s petrel chick
2003). An interesting and unexpected outcome of
emergence from their burrows, during a period
such high levels of food availability is that numbers
of low food availability for cats, led to their disof generalist gulls, Larus, have reached unnaturally
proportionate decline (Veitch 1999). Cook’s petrel
high population levels, and exclude more specialsurvived in large numbers on the island until cats
ized seabird species (e.g. Manx shearwater) from
were eradicated in 1990. However, the initial eradiresources such as limited nesting grounds in these
cation of cats on Little Barrier Island led not to an
highly populated areas (Garthe and Scherp 2003).
increase but a decrease in Cook’s petrel, due to the
However, fisheries interactions are not always negareduced breeding success of these small petrels
tive; northern fulmar, Fulmarus glacialis, was hiswhich are vulnerable to predation by kiore (Rayner
torically restricted to Arctic regions, but a gradual
et al. 2007). What led to this apparently counter-insouthward expansion begun during the mid-1700s
tuitive situation? Elimination of the top introduced
from Iceland through the Faeroes, Shetland and
predators from islands can, in fact, lead to the
Orkney, and down the British and Irish coasts to
decline of smaller prey populations throughcomma
the
the Channel Islands and France (Fisher 1952). This
ecological release of smaller introduced predators,
expansion has been postulated to have resulted
in a process termed mesopredator release (Crooks
from increased availability of offal from whaling,
and Soulé 1999).
and more recently due to fisheries discards (Fisher
and Lockley 1954), although other explanations
have also been suggested; some researchers have
7.4.3 Habitat destruction
suggested that a behavioural or genetic transformation may have occurred and a colonizing phenoThe indirect effects of ungulates on burrowing pettype emerged among the boreal fulmar population
rels are poorly documented. Cattle, Bos taurus, and
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 160
12/5/2008 12:21:48 PM
HOLOCENE PROCELL ARIFORM EX TINCTIONS
161
space
which was able to spread into lower latitudes
(Wynne-Edwards 1962), or that a gradual change in
sea temperature or oceanographic conditions may
have taken place (Salomonsen 1965). Evidence now
suggests that the spatial overlap between fulmars
and commercial fisheries is far from complete, and
while it is indisputable that northern fulmars are
major consumers of fishery waste in the southern
part of their range, the extent to which their distribution is or was constrained by the availability of
this resource is debatable (Phillips et al. 1999). The
real question arises about what will happen when
supplementary fisheries offal is inevitably removed
by overfishing. Will fulmar populations stay high?
7.4.5 Direct fisheries mortality
The recent decline in procellariiforms in the
Southern Ocean is thought to be largely driven by
birds getting accidentally caught on fishing long
lines or tangled in trawling gear. It is believed that
the high levels of mortality offset any population
increases accrued by the ready availability of fishery waste. The magnitude of by-catch mortality is
exemplified by black-browed albatross, Thalassarche
melanophris, the IUCN Red List status of which rose
from Least Concern in 1998 to Near Threatened
in 2000, Vulnerable in 2002, and Endangered in
2003, an increase greater than virtually any other
bird species. Many different methods have been
developed to mitigate fisheries by-catch, but these
can only be enforced rigorously within Exclusive
Economic Zones of individual countries, or within
areas designated by international agreements such
as the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic
Marine Living Resources. Implementation in international waters, where many of these pelagic
species feed primarily, is currently politically difficult.
example, show that there have been consistent
declines in oil release into the southern North Sea
in recent years (Furness and Camphuysen 1997).
As predators high in marine food webs, procellariiforms can also be affected by pollutants that
accumulate at higher trophic levels. Recent work
on mercury in seabirds has permitted an analysis
of spatial patterns and of the rates of increase in
mercury contamination of ecosystems over the last
150 years, since mercury concentrations in feathers of museum specimens can be used to assess
contamination in the birds when they were alive.
This work has led to hypotheses about the cause
and effect of these levels of pollutants, but specific mechanisms and pathways remain unclear.
Surprisingly, pelagic procellariiforms show higher
pollutant loads than coastal seabirds, and increases
have been greatest in seabirds feeding on mesopelagic prey (Furness and Camphuysen 1997). Floating
plastic is a pollutant of considerable concern, especially in the Pacific, where voluntary ingestion in
surface-feeding birds may occur due to floating
particles of plastic being confused with prey items,
or through plastic already being incorporated
within the bodies of prey species. Plastic is often
passed from parents to chicks in regurgitated food
(Blight and Burger 1997). The effects of this pollution on procellariiforms is poorly understood, but
assimilation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) is
recognized as inhibitory to fecundity (Powell et al.
1996), and chicks that ingest plastic fledge at lower
weights and are liable to death from dehydration
(Sievert and Sileo 1993).
7.5 Financial impacts of a
decline in procellariiforms
As well as ecosystem impacts, economic impacts
may result from alterations in seabird abundance.
7.4.6 Pollution
7.5.1 Guano production
Many studies have shown that procellariiforms
are sensitive to marine pollution. For this reason,
procellariiform species have frequently been used
as monitors of pollution, especially oil pollution.
Beached bird surveys provide important evidence
of geographical and temporal patterns, and, for
Guano is not primarily produced by procellariiforms, but they are a contributor to this valuable
economic resource. The growth of seabird populations from 1925 to 1955 in the Peruvian Current
was probably a response to increased productivity
of the Peruvian upwelling system, but a subsequent
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 161
12/5/2008 12:21:48 PM
162
HOLOCENE EX TINCTIONS
drastic decline in seabird abundance was likely to
be due to competition for food with the large-scale
regional fishery, which caught approximately 85% of
the region’s anchovies that would otherwise would
have been available for seabirds. This crash lead to
a financially devastating decline in guano production on the islands of the Peruvian coast (Jahncke
et al. 2004). The decline in guano led to economic
depression and political turmoil in western South
America that still has repercussions today.
7.5.2 Impact of birds on fisheries
Whereas the impacts of fisheries on procellariiforms are widely published, the impacts of procellariiforms on fisheries are less well known. Prior
to effective mitigation it was estimated that albatrosses and petrels removed over 20% of all baits
from tuna long-line hooks prior to their deployment (Tasker et al. 2000). Brooke (2004) estimated
that petrels take approximately 16 million tonnes of
prey per annum (approximately twice the annual
take of the Japanese fishing fleet), whereas annual
pelagic marine fisheries take 70 million tonnes.
Brooke (2004) further estimated the trophic levels at which the majority of fisheries and petrels
operate, and concluded that seabirds and fisheries
overlap considerably. Whether seabirds and fisheries are actually in competition is arguable, though,
as they could be taking fish of different ages and
size ranges.
7.5.3 Harvest
Three significant human harvests of procellariiforms still occur—northern fulmar on the Faeroe
Islands and Iceland; short-tailed shearwater in
southern Australia; sooty shearwater, Puffinus griseus, in southern New Zealand (Mallory 2006)—
and at least 10 other populations are quasi-legally
or illegally harvested. These harvests require
mechanisms to be put in place to ensure that
they remain sustainable and economically viable.
However, much ongoing seabird harvesting is
sporadic and unobserved.
In particular, poaching and difficulties of enforcing harvest prohibitions make it clear that existing
legislative restrictions and reservations are not
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 162
sufficient safeguards to halt ongoing risk to seabirds and the economies they sustain.
7.6 The impact of procellariiforms
on ecosystems
Little is known about the potential consequences
of widespread disappearance of fish-eating and
scavenging bird species. There is an urgent need
to investigate whether ongoing declines in seabird
populations may have unanticipated top-down or
bottom-up consequences as a result of trophic cascades or significant reductions in nutrient deposition (Sekercioglu et al. 2004).
7.6.1 Trophic cascades
This term has been coined to describe a situation
where predators in a food chain suppress the
abundance of their prey, thereby releasing the next
lower trophic level from predation or herbivory
(Paine 1980). When human or other agencies alter
this balance, then large-scale ecological shifts may
occur. In a classic example, when the abundance
of the northern fulmar, a large piscivorous seabird,
increased in the North Atlantic, the abundance of
its prey (capelin, Mallotus villosus, a zooplanktivorous fish) decreased, large zooplankton abundance
increased and phytoplankton biomass decreased.
The combined effects of environmental conditions and overfishing have led to dramatic fluctuations in pelagic fish stocks. These changes have,
in turn, induced large decreases in some seabird
populations (although no information is available
for northern fulmars) (Cherel et al. 2001). It would
appear that birds reliant on single prey species
are more likely to represent such keystone species
(Bruno and O’Connor 2005).
7.6.2 Allochthonous nutrients
There is increasing recognition that a diverse range
of terrestrial ecosystems are in fact supported by
nutrients that originate from marine systems
(Polis et al. 1997; Erskine et al. 1998; Vitousek 2004;
Ellis 2005; Ellis et al. 2006; Harrow et al. 2006).
Seabird droppings are enriched in important plant
nutrients such as calcium, magnesium, nitrogen,
12/5/2008 12:21:48 PM
HOLOCENE PROCELL ARIFORM EX TINCTIONS
phosphorus, and potassium. By feeding in productive oceanic waters and defecating inland,
seabirds act as a primary vector for transferring
nutrients to terrestrial systems. The size of these
nutrient inputs cannot be underestimated. It is
estimated that seabirds around the world transfer
more than 104–105 tonnes of phosphorus from sea
to land every year (Murphy 1981). Ironically, many
marine currents that facilitate spectacular marine
productivity (e.g. Benguela, California, Humboldt)
also create temperature inversions that result in
low-productivity deserts on nearby landmasses,
and seabirds help offset this inbalance by providing allochthonous inputs in the form of guano and
carcasses.
The effects of seabird nutrient inputs on terrestrial systems can be ably illustrated by several
examples. The two species of seabird on 17 ha
Heron Island in Australia’s Great Barrier Reef contribute 129 tonnes of guano per annum, including
9.4 tonnes of nitrogen and 1.4 tonnes of phosphorus
(Staunton Smith and Johnson 1995). These high
nutrient levels (over three times the recommended
levels of nitrogen fertilization for nearby agricultural areas) have created unique soil environments
that cannot be replicated by terrestrial processes.
On the Aleutian Islands, Croll et al. (2005) found
that guano was the main source of fertilizer for terrestrial vegetation. When introduced arctic foxes
nearly eliminated breeding seabirds in the region,
the annual input of guano was reduced from 362
to 5.7 g/m2, resulting in substantial declines in
soil phosphorus, marine-derived nitrogen, and
plant nitrogen content, and triggering an ecosystem switch from grassland to maritime tundra on
fox-infested islands. Similarly, increased numbers
of snow geese, Chen caerulescens, due to intensification in agricultural practices along migration
pathways in North America has altered plant productivity and community structure on their Arctic
breeding grounds thousands of kilometres away
(Jefferies et al. 2004). Twenty eight to 38% of the
nitrogen in the biota of streams near Westland petrel, Procellaria westlandica, breeding colonies in the
South Island of New Zealand is marine-derived
(Harding et al. 2004), and possible correlations have
been shown between Westland petrel numbers and
growth rates of long-lived tree species (Holdaway
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 163
163
et al. 2007). These effects are also of critical importance today in islands in the Southern Ocean. On
high-latitude Marion Island, plants influenced by
seabirds were 55% more enriched in nitrogen (1.59
compared with 2.46% N) and 88% in phosphorus
(0.17 compared with 0.32% P) than plants away
from guano areas (Smith 1978). Plants collected
from a range of sites on sub-Antarctic Macquarie
Island varied by up to 30% in their leaf δ15N values,
with the majority of nitrogen utilized by plants
growing in the vicinity of animal colonies or burrows being animal-derived (Erskine et al. 1998).
Other studies have demonstrated that the presence
of breeding seabirds increases plant productivity
(Bancroft et al. 2005; Wait et al. 2005), leaf nutrient
status (Anderson and Polis 1999; García et al. 2002),
and, probably most telling of all in terms of understanding biodiversity, insect abundance (SanchezPinero and Polis 2000)
Any disruption to these nutrient imports may
drastically affect ecosystems at both small and
large scales (Vanni et al. 2004), and this is especially true in coastal areas and unproductive
island systems. In particular, vast colonies of burrowing petrels and shearwaters existed on the
New Zealand mainland before human contact
(Holdaway 1989), but today these have been virtually eradicated (Worthy and Holdaway 2002).
Although New Zealand and many other islands
are generally interpreted by conservation planners
and restoration ecologists as being naturally nutrient-poor systems, the removal of huge numbers of
inland seabird colonies by introduced mammalian
predators during the Holocene has undoubtedly
had a massive impact on island nutrient cycling
and productivity, which needs to be recognized in
future conservation management (Harding et al.
2004). However, it remains extremely difficult to
make meaningful inferences about ecosystemlevel changes that lack direct scientific observation data, even from the recent past (see also
Chapter 10 in this volume). For example, several
studies have attempted to address the impact of
the now-extinct passenger pigeon, Ectopistes migratorius, on North American ecosystems (Webb 1986;
Ellsworth and McComb 2003). Between the seventeenth and nineteenth centuries, ‘countless numbers’ and ‘infi nite multitudes’ of these birds were
12/5/2008 12:21:49 PM
164
HOLOCENE EX TINCTIONS
described on their annual migration from eastern
and central Canada and the north-east USA to the
southern USA, with flocks sometimes a mile or
more in width and taking several hours to pass
overhead (Lewis 1944), but the species was extinct
in the wild by 1900. The role that such huge numbers of birds played in shaping their environment
cannot be underestimated, but calculating factors such as the effect of nutrients from passenger
pigeon droppings on plant growth is confounded
by the actual physical impact of such huge numbers of birds on vegetation, and the effects of
other large-scale vegetational changes brought
about by agricultural changes over the same time
period. Similarly, the consequences of the loss of
marine nutrient inputs to the main islands of New
Zealand are unknown; given the unique character
of the archipelago’s now-compromised combination of colonial seabirds breeding in mammal-free temperate forests on a relatively large
landmass, predicting the consequences for New
Zealand terrestrial ecosystems of the extinction of
most burrow-nesting seabirds from such studies
is difficult. Indeed, the effects of seabird removal
on the soil chemistry and ecology of larger areas
are often poorl y understood. For example, on the
New Zealand mainland, recent work has shown
that topography and underlying soil chemistry
influence the effects of nitrification (Harrow et al.
2006). Furthermore, the effects of nitrification are
difficult to predict because the responses of different tree taxa to nutrient enhancement vary considerably (Islam and Macdonald 2005), and excessive
nutrient inputs may inhibit growth, change species composition, or even kill certain species of
plants (Hogg and Morton 1983).
remove space
7.6.3 Environmental modification
The term ecosystem engineer describes a species
that modulates resource flows and species composition within an ecosystem through the physical modification of habitat (Jones et al. 1994).
Procellariiforms are classic ecosystem engineers,
and burrow building is a common example of
ecosystem engineering, as burrows may provide
habitats for a range of other burrowing and
non-burrowing species. High burrow densities
can also reduce plant growth rates and seedling establishment (Mulder and Keall 2001).
Biopedturbation has been shown to drive
decreased diversity and structural complexity
in island ecosystems (Bancroft et al. 2005), and
influences entire island ecosystems through the
effects of burrowing and underground deposition of vegetation on biotic and abiotic island
processes (McKechnie 2006). Comparison of ratfree and rat-invaded offshore islands in New
Zealand has shown that predation of seabirds by
introduced rats has led to altered soil properties,
thereby structuring plant and animal communities (Bancroft et al. 2004, 2005; Fukami et al. 2006).
7.6.4 Seabirds as scavengers and their
role in reprocessing nutrients
Although not generally obligate scavengers, most
seabird species will scavenge opportunistically.
In particular, giant petrels, Macronectes spp. ,
together with skuas, Catharacta spp. , are considered the marine equivalents of vultures on subAntarctic islands, although giant petrels also feed
on marine invertebrates and chicks of various
marine birds (Hunter and Brooke 1992). Albatross
and petrel diets contain large amounts of deepwater species of squid and crustaceans that have
not been recorded by oceanographers at the surface even at night, and it is hypothesized that other
than scavenging at fishing boats the only way such
food items could be obtained is through scavenging at the surface following natural death (Croxall
and Prince 1994). We know little about the potential ecological consequences of the changes in the
numbers of these scavenging seabirds, but it has
been theorized that a lack of alternate pathways
for the remineralization of nutrients may decrease
ecosystem biodiversity and resilience (Nixon
1981).
7.7 The original terrorists?
The structure of procellariiform populations
is very like the structure suggested by Louis
Auguste Blanqui (1885) for revolutionary human
organizations to avoid persecution and survive.
By their very nature, the secretive yet widespread
"ecosystem
engineer"
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 164
12/5/2008 12:21:49 PM
HOLOCENE PROCELL ARIFORM EX TINCTIONS
165
Table 7.4 Procellariiform populations that have become established in the Holocene.
Species
Locality
Reference
de la Mare and Kerry (1994)
Miskelly et al. (2006)
Gummer (2003)
Fisher (1952)
Four species of Antarctic petrel
Macquarie Island
Pitt and Main Islands (Chatham Group)
Hawaiian Islands
Iceland to the Faeroes, Shetland and Orkney Islands, and down
the British and Irish coasts to the Channel Islands and France
Antarctic coastline
Human-encouraged
Phoebastria immutabilis
Pachyptila turtur
Puffinus newelli
Pterodroma axillaris
Pterodroma leucoptera
Pterodroma phaeopygia
Pterodroma pycrofti
Puffinus gavia
Pelacanoides urinatrix
Oceanodroma leucorhoa
Hawai’ian Islands
Mana Island (New Zealand)
Kilauea Point, Kauai (Hawai’i)
Pitt Island
Boondelbah Island (NSW, Australia)
Santa Cruz Island (Galapagos)
Cuvier Island (New Zealand)
Maud and Mana Islands (New Zealand)
Mana Island (New Zealand)
Old Hump Ledge and Ross Island (Gulf of Maine, USA)
Natural
Diomedea sp.
Diomedea antipodensis
Phoebastria immutabilis
Fulmarus glacialis
species of procellariiforms have formed comparable isolated, independent ‘cells’ which experience
limited genetic interchange over time. By existing
in these isolated pockets, populations of many species have survived virtually unchanged over long
intervals of geological time, and although populations of more than 50% of extant procellariiform
species have been documented to have lost populations during the Holocene (Table 7.3), most species
still retain isolated populations that are protected
from sources of predation due to their Blanquistic
behaviour. However, these refuges are now being
progressively invaded by the recent demand for
coastal property and the increasing use by humans
of even very small islands.
7.8 So, what is being done to prevent
this ancient group from extinction?
Given the antiquity of the procellariiform lineage,
the extreme effects that large seabird breeding
colonies have at the landscape and regional levels,
and the importance of their ongoing population
declines, extirpations and extinctions cannot be
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 165
Hiller et al. (1988); Ainley et al.
(2006)
Gummer (2003)
Gummer (2003)
Byrd et al. (1984)
Gummer (2003)
Priddel et al. (2006)
Podolsky and Kress (1992)
Gummer (2003)
Gummer (2003); Bell et al. (2005)
Miskelly et al. (2004)
Podolsky and Kress (1989)
overestimated. Seabird fisheries by-catch can and
is being addressed within the territorial waters
of most countries, and is also being tackled by
international initiatives and agreements outside
national Exclusive Economic Zones. Recent work
has demonstrated that compensatory mitigation can facilitate high-value uses of biological
resources and cost-effective conservation gains
for species of concern (Wilcox and Donlan 2007).
For example, by levying fishers for their by-catch,
money can be made available to remove invasive
mammals from breeding islands. However, pollution can only be prevented from affecting populations through effective international agreements
and monitoring.
It has been shown that removal of invasive
predators is more than 20 times more effective in
giving percentage increases in population growth
per dollar invested than fisheries closures, and is
also more socio-politically feasible (Wilcox and
Donlan 2007). Rat populations can be reduced by
poisoning (Igual et al. 2006), but ultimately the only
long-term solution on islands is eradication. Work
in New Zealand has shown that large-scale rat
12/5/2008 12:21:49 PM
166
HOLOCENE EX TINCTIONS
eradication can be achieved even on comparatively
large islands such as Campbell Island (115 km2) in
New Zealand’s sub-Antarctic (Towns and Broome
2003). Techniques have also been developed to
remove feral cat populations from islands. Over
the past two decades, these conservation techniques have prevented the extinction of many
island species and restored many island ecosystems (Nogales 2004). Habitat restoration and active
07-Turvey-Chap07.indd 166
transfer of petrel species to islands is further helping to redress the balance (Table 7.4).
Ultimately, the procellariiforms are a largely
secretive group of birds that remain difficult to
study, and their precarious status is also relatively
poorly known. Ironically, their survival may ultimately depend on publicity and public awareness,
and not the secretiveness that has enabled them to
survive for so long.
12/5/2008 12:21:50 PM