African Elections as Vehicles for Change
Nic Cheeseman
Journal of Democracy, Volume 21, Number 4, October 2010, pp. 139-153
(Article)
Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press
DOI: 10.1353/jod.2010.0019
For additional information about this article
http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/jod/summary/v021/21.4.cheeseman.html
Access provided by Oxford University Library Services (17 Mar 2014 18:56 GMT)
africanelections
asvehiclesforchange
NicCheeseman
NicCheesemanisuniversitylecturerinAfricanPoliticsatOxfordUniversity.HehaspublishedwidelyonAfricandemocratizationinjournals
suchasAfricanAffairsandtheJournalofModernAfricanStudies.His
monographDemocracyinAfricaisforthcomingfromCambridgeUniversityPress.
S
incethereturnofmultipartismtosub-SaharanAfricaintheearly1990s,
transfers of power between rival parties have been rare—even in those
countrieswhereanincreaseinpoliticalrightshasgonehandinhandwith
greater respect for civil liberties. Instead, presidents’ ability to control
stateinstitutionsandtheflowofpatronagehasgeneratedanincumbency
biassostrongthatnumerouscountriesinAfricahavewitnessedelections
without change. Since 1989, only twelve sub-Saharan Africa countries
haveexperiencedoppositionvictories,andofthoseonlyBenin,Ghana,
Madagascar,andMauritius,havemetSamuelP.Huntington’sfamous,if
crude,“two-turnover”testforaconsolidateddemocracy.1
ExplanationsofwhytransfersofpowerhaveoccurredincertainAfrican countries but not in others have typically taken the form of finegrained case studies that describe a complex mix of economic decline,
fallingsupportforincumbents,andtheabilityorinabilityofopposition
partiestoformabroadalliance.2Comparativeanalysishasbeenrare,and
the literature has said little about a general pattern that merits more attentionthanithassofarreceived:Inpresidentialsystems,theprospects
foroppositionsuccessareconditionedbywhetherornottheincumbent
standsforreelection.Inotherwords,whenasittingpresidentcannotrun
becauseoftermlimits,health,orinternalpartyrules,therulingpartyis
likelytoperformsignificantlyworseatthepolls.
The importance of incumbency in Africa is one manifestation of a
moregeneraltrendnotedbyGideonMaltzinthesepagesin2007.Comparingallelectionsinelectoralauthoritarianregimesbetween1992and
2006, Maltz finds that while incumbents retained power in 93 percent
JournalofDemocracyVolume21,Number4October2010
©2010NationalEndowmentforDemocracyandTheJohnsHopkinsUniversityPress
140
JournalofDemocracy
Table1—PresidenTialTransfersofPowerinMulTiParTy
africa,1990–20091
Transfersin
IncumbentPolls
Transfersin
Open-SeatPolls
Elections
Benin(1991,1996),CapeVerde(1991),Madagascar
(1993,1996,2001),Malawi(1994),Senegal(2000),
Zambia(1991)
Benin (2006), Cape Verde (2001), Côte d’Ivoire
(2000), Ghana (2000, 2008), Kenya (2002), Mali
(2002),Niger(1993),SierraLeone(2007)
Sample includes all sub-Saharan African polities holding direct multiparty presidential
elections.Transfersareexcludediftheywereimmediatelyprecededbyacoupandthereforeheldintheabsenceofarulingparty.
1
oftheelectionsthattheycontested,theirsuccessorswonjust52percent
of the time.3 The pattern that Maltz identifies is especially noteworthy
in the African context, where weak institutions and personalized power
tendtomagnifytheadvantagesofincumbency.Althoughopen-seatpolls
havebeenrelativelyrare,theyaccountforhalfofallpresidentialtransfers
of power from one party to another between 1990 and 2009 (see Table
1above).Indeed,mostoftheelectionscitedasevidenceofrealdemocratic gains in Africa—such as the Ghanaian election of 2000 and the
Kenyanelectionof2002—occurredaftertermlimitsforcedpresidentsto
stepdown.
Despitetheclearsignificanceofincumbencytopoliticalchangearound
theworld,therehavebeenfewattemptstotracethemechanismsthrough
which nonincumbent elections create fresh opportunities for opposition
parties or to assess whether open-seat polls are more likely to lead to
transfersofpowerinsomeregionsratherthanothers.Theselacunaerepresentsignificantlimitationsonourunderstandingofelectoralcompetition,becauseincumbencymattersfordifferentreasonsindifferentpoliticalcontexts.
ConsidertheUnitedStates,whereinthelastthirtyyearsonlyGeorge
H.W.Bushlostasanincumbentandtransfersofpowerbetweenparties
havehistoricallyresultedfromopen-seatpolls,themostrecentexample
being the election of Barack Obama.4 Much of the extant work on the
significanceofincumbencyintheUnitedStatesandotherestablisheddemocraciesfocusesontheclaimthatbecausetheelectorateisfacedwith
lesser-knowncandidatesinopen-seatelections,thesignificanceofretrospectivevoting(castingone’sballotbasedonacandidate’spastperformance)isreduced,tothelikelydetrimentofrulingparties.Althoughthis
literature offers many insights into the advantages conferred by incumbencyinEuropeandNorthAmerica,itisnotveryhelpfulinaccounting
forthecharacterofnonincumbentelectionsinAfrica.
Firstofall,votingbehaviorinAfricaistypicallylesswell-explained
byretrospective-votingmodels,andinanycaseevaluationsofpartyand
individualperformancesareoftenmoreheavilyshapedbypatronagerelationsandcommunalidentitiesthanisthecaseinestablisheddemocracies.
NicCheeseman
141
Second,thedistinctivewayinwhichpoliticalcompetitionisconducted
incontemporaryAfricaexaggeratesthesignificanceofincumbency.The
weaknessofpoliticalparties,thesalienceofethnicidentity,andtheimportanceofneopatrimonialpoliticscombinetocreateanelectorallandscapeinwhichinstitutionsaretypicallyweakandpowerisconcentrated
inpoliticalleaders.Thus,whileopen-seatelectionsarelikelytobeeven
more strongly correlated with transfers of power in Africa, the mechanismsthroughwhichincumbencyworksarelikelytobedistinctive.Finally,becausetheexistingliteratureaddressesdemocraticpolitiesonly,it
haslittletosayabouttheinterrelationshipofincumbency,turnover,and
democratization.Yetifdemocraticconsolidationrequirestheremovalof
oldauthoritarianpowersandturnoverisanindicatorofdemocraticprogress,open-seatelectionsmaybeasignificantfactorinthedemocratizationprocess.
ThisessaydrawsonacomparativedatasetofAfricanelectionsinthe
multipartyeratodemonstratethatopen-seatpollsareparticularlylikely
to result in opposition victories in sub-Saharan Africa for two reasons:
because of the challenges that they pose for ruling parties and because
theyareoftenmoretransparentandfair.Whilethiscombinationdoesnot
ensure a transfer of power, it does create a rare window of opportunity
for political change. When an open-seat poll coincides with economic
hardtimes,government-relatedpoliticalscandals,andastrongopposition
campaign,turnoverbecomesnotonlypossiblebutlikely.Thusinternationalanddomesticactorsseekingtoenhancetheprospectsforpolitical
change would do well to prioritize the introduction of, and respect for,
termlimits.Ofcourse,turnoverdoesnotguaranteedemocraticgains,as
therecentexperienceofKenyademonstrates,butitmayhelpbothtobuild
trustintherulesofthegameandtoboostthelegitimacyofthepolitical
process,anditisultimatelynecessaryfortheinstitutionalizationofcompetitivemultipartypolitics.
The Impact of Incumbency
ThevastmajorityofAfricanpoliticalsystemsnowfeatureconstitutions
thatplaceatwo-termlimitonthepresidency.Ofthethirtycountrieswhere
termlimitshavebeenreached,presidentsrefrainedfromseekingathird
terminBenin,CapeVerde,Ghana,Kenya,Mali,Mozambique,S~aoTomé
andPríncipe,Seychelles(three-termlimit),SierraLeone,andTanzania.5
Intheir2007articleinthesepages,DanielPosnerandDanielYoungcited
thesecases,aswellastheinabilityofthepresidentsofMalawi,Nigeria,
andZambiatosecureunconstitutionalthirdterms,asevidencethatAfricanpoliticswas“institutionalizing.”6Subsequentevents,however,have
demonstratedthatrespectfortermlimitshasnotbeeningrainedacrossthe
continent.Todate,incumbentpresidentshavesucceededinamendingthe
constitutiontoremaininofficeinAngola,BurkinaFaso,Chad,Djibouti,
142
JournalofDemocracy
Table2—TheiMPacTofincuMbencyon
nonfounding-elecTionouTcoMes,1990–20091
Incumbent(%) Open-Seat(%) Difference
Ruling-partyvoteshare
65
53
-12
Winningmarginwhererulingpartywon
41
31
-10
Voterturnout
65
62
-3
Rateofturnover
12
45
+33
1
Sampleincludesallsub-Saharanpolitiesholdingdirectmultipartypresidentialelections.
Gabon, Namibia, Niger, Togo, and Uganda.7 Nonetheless, over the last
two decades the enforcement of term limits in a range of countries has
resultedinasignificantnumberofopen-seatpolls,makingitpossiblefor
thefirsttimetoexaminetheimpactofincumbencyonelectoraloutcomes
inAfrica.
IfonelooksatalldirectpresidentialelectionsinAfricabetween1990
and2009,itisclearthatoppositionpartiesperformfarworsewhenrunningagainstasittingpresident.Althoughtherewereninecasesinwhich
rulingpartieslostdespitefieldinganincumbent,fourofthesedefeatsoccurredduringtheratherexceptionalcircumstancesoffoundingelections
(Benin in 1991, Cape Verde in 1991, Malawi in 1994, and Zambia in
1991),andthreeareaccountedforbyjustonecountry(Madagascar).By
contrast, the transfers of power resulting from open-seat elections have
been spread more evenly, both geographically and chronologically (see
Table1).Moreover,acomparisonofallnonfoundingelections(seeTable
2)revealsthatoppositionpartieswerealmostfourtimesmorelikelyto
winnonincumbentelections,whilethevoteshareofrulingpartiesdropped
onaverageby12percentwhentheyhadtoputupanewcandidate.Even
whenincumbentpartieswon,theirmarginofvictoryfellby10percentin
open-seatpolls.
Significantly,theseresultsarenotdrivenbytheinclusionofelectoral
authoritarian systems, in which landslide victories and incumbent electionsinevitablygohandinhand.Evenwhenexcludingallcountriesrated
asNotFreebyFreedomHouse,theshareofelectionswonbytheruling
party in incumbent and open-seat polls remains virtually unchanged at
64percentand50percent,respectively.Norisitthecasethatpresidents
abidebytermlimitsonlyinfulldemocracies.Thusthepatternreported
here does not emerge simply because open-seat elections occur only in
countrieswithlessrepressivepoliticalenvironmentsthataremoreconducive to opposition victories. Even when the sample is limited to Africa’selectoraldemocracies,rulingpartiesfareworseinopen-seatpolls.
Inshort,incumbencyhasanindependentimpactontheperformanceof
theopposition.
Threemainfactorsexplainwhyrulingpartiesstrugglewithoutanincumbent candidate. First and most fundamentally, weakly institutionalizedpartystructuresandhighlypersonalizedpoliticsmeanthatthebattle
toselectanewpresidentialcandidateoftenresultsinadividedpartyun-
NicCheeseman
143
abletorolloutaunitedcampaign.Second,nonincumbentcandidatescannotpointtoarecordofaccomplishments,andsotheirpromisestokeyclientgroupsarelesscredible.Atthesametime,nonincumbentcandidates
mayfacegreaterobstaclesinfundingtheirelectioncampaigns.Finally,
unlesstheoutgoingpresidenthashandpickedhissuccessor,theremaybe
a distance between the incumbent and his party’s candidate. The president,whoretainsultimatecontroloverthemachineryofgovernmentuntil
anewleaderisinaugurated,maythusfeelthathehaslessatstakeinthe
pollsandprovemorewillingtopresideoverafreeandfaircontest.
Succession Struggles
Maltzhasarguedthatthemajorchallengetothecontinuedhegemony
ofelectoralauthoritarianregimesiseffectivelymanagingthesuccession
process.8RulingpartiesinAfricaarewellawareofthedangerposedby
leadership battles. Thus, they typically either avoid asking incumbents
tostandforrenominationortheyemployrubber-stampprocessesstructuredtopreventintrapartycompetition.Wheretermlimitsexistandare
respected,however,rulingpartiesareforcedtoengageintheunsettling
actofchoosinganewleader.ThisisahugehurdleforpartiesinAfrica,
becausethecentralityoftheexecutivetopoliticallifeandthelowinstitutionalizationofpoliticalpartiestendtomagnifythestakesofsuccession
politics.RodgerGoveaandJohnHolmfindthat,asaresultoftheweaknessofformalpartystructures,themajorityofsuccessionprocesses(61
percent) between 1963 and 1988 were “unregulated,” meaning that the
outcomeoftheprocesswasgovernedbytheinformalbalanceofpersonal
networkswithinthepartyratherthanastraightforwardprovisioninthe
party constitution. Moreover, many unregulated successions deteriorate
intopoliticalcrisesandviolence.9Lessdramatically,themismanagement
of the succession process can entrench internal party divisions, leading
togreaterinfightingand,inextremecases,thebreakupoftheparty,all
ofwhichmakesithardertoputtogetheracoherentandunitedelection
campaign.Theprimaryprocessistypicallydestabilizingformostpoliticalparties—eveninwell-establisheddemocracies.Itisevenmorelikely
toleadtolastingdivisionswherepartiesarepoorlyinstitutionalized,asin
sub-SaharanAfrica.10
ThestoryofSierraLeone’srulingpartyduringthe2007electioncycle
providesagoodexample.InSeptember2005,theSierraLeonePeople’s
Party(SLPP)selectedthesittingvice-president,SolomonBerewa,toreplaceoutgoingpresidentAhmadTejanKabbah,thwartingthepresidential
ambitionsofCharlesMargai.Margai,sonofthecountry’ssecondprime
minister,ultimatelydecidedtoabandonthepartyandestablishtherival
People’sMovementforDemocraticChange(PMDC).ThePMDCrepresentedamajorchallengetocontinuedSLPPrulefortworeasons.First,
thenewpartyappealedtosomeofthesameconstituenciesastheSLPP
144
JournalofDemocracy
andthreatenedtosiphonsupportawayfromtherulingpartyinitsstrongholdsinthesouthandeastofthecountry.Second,theSLPPalreadyfaced
asevereelectoralchallengefromErnestBaiKoroma,thecandidateofthe
AllPeople’sCongress(APC).11Inthefirstroundofthepresidentialelection,Margaisecured14percentofthevote,denyingBerewathe55percentthatheneededtoavoidasecondround.Then,intherunoffbetween
BerewaandKaroma,Margaiturnedhisbackonhisformercolleaguesin
governmentandurgedhissupporterstobacktheopposition,enablingthe
APCtomakeinroadsintotraditionalSLPPareasandhelpingKaromato
wintheadditionalvotesneededtosecurearareoppositionvictory.
In Kenya, the ruling Kenya African National Union (KANU) paid a
similarlyhighpriceforfailingsuccessfullytomanagethebattletoreplace
DanielarapMoiintherun-uptothe2002election.Moi’scontroversial
decisiontoimposehisfavoredsuccessor,UhuruKenyatta,resultedina
numberofprominentpoliticalleadersabandoningKANUtojointheopposition—aturnofeventsthatdirectlycontributedtoKANU’sdefeatby
theNationalAllianceRainbowCoalition(NARC).
InGhanain2008,adivisivecontesttoreplacePresidentJohnKufour
lefttherulingNewPatrioticParty(NPP)rivenandmarreditspublicimage, opening the door to an opposition win at the polls. The seventeen
candidateswhocontestedtheNPPpresidentialprimaryspentvastsumsof
moneyduringaperiodofeconomichardship,givingtheimpressionthat
thepartywasoutoftouchwiththecommonman.Intrapartycompetition
intensifiedasKufourmeddledintheprocessinabidtopreventlongtime
rivalNanaAddoDankwaAkufo-Addofromsecuringthepost.Although
Akufo-Addoultimatelywonarelativelyeasyvictory,theprimariesleftthe
NPPdeeplydivided.TheoppositionNationalDemocraticCongress(NDC)
madeeffectiveuseinitscampaignnotonlyofpresidentialcandidateJohn
EvansAttaMillsbutalsoofformerpresidentJerryJohnRawlings.PresidentKufour,bycontrast,refusedtocampaignforAkufo-Addoandwould
notevenreturnthephonecallsofhisownparty’scampaignmanager.12
ThedeepdivisionsthatranthroughtheNPPextendedtotheselection
ofconstituencymembersofparliament(MPs).Losingprimarycandidates
reportedthatseniorpoliticalleadershad“interfered”intheircontestsin
ordertofavoranallyfromthe“otherside,”andconsequentlyrefusedto
accept the legitimacy of their defeat.13 Following the party primaries, a
significantnumberoflosersfeltsufficientlyinfuriatedthattheydecided
to run as independents—a relatively rare occurrence in a strongly twoparty system. These breakaway candidacies had a huge impact on the
parliamentaryelectionsandeventhepresidentialelection.Notonlydid
the former-NPP independents not campaign on behalf of Akufo-Addo,
theyalsodivertedtheattentionoftheofficialNPPcandidates—whowere
nowembroiledindivisivelocalbattles—awayfromcampaigningfortheir
party’spresidentialcontender.Intheend,MillsbeatAkufo-Addobyjust
29,419 votes in a runoff, leaving NPP supporters to rue these internal
NicCheeseman
145
cleavages.TheNPPalsosufferedintheparliamentarypolls,whereinternaltensionsmostlikelycosttheparty3seatswhereformerNPPcandidateswonasindependents,and5to10seatswhereofficialanddissident
NPPcandidatessplitthevote,allowingforanNDCvictory.Giventhat
theNDCwononly7moreseatsthantheNPP(114to107),itiseasyto
seewhyseniorNPPleadersbelievethatitwasdisunitythatcostthemthe
election.14
Of course, the challenges posed by succession battles are not insurmountable.InthemuchdiscussedcaseofSouthAfrica,theAfricanNational Congress (ANC) went through an extremely divisive succession
battletochooseThaboMbeki’ssuccessor,whothenwentontoleadthe
ANC to yet another landslide victory in a nonincumbent election. Yet
eveninthiscase,wheretheANC’slegitimacyasthepartyofliberation
continuedtounderpinitselectoraldominance,thesuccessionstruggleleft
itsmark.TherivalrybetweenMbekiandhismainadversaryJacobZuma
intensifiedcompetitionwithintheANC,andaperiodofheatedinfighting
founditsultimateexpressioninthedecisionofanumberofANCleaderstoleavethepartytoformtheCongressofthePeople(COPE).COPE
presidentialcandidateMosiuoaLekotamayhavesecuredonly1.3million
votes(7.4percent),butthiswasstillasignificantperformancegiventhat
COPEhadbeenformedjustmonthsearlier.Inshort,successionbattles
andopen-seatelectionstendtoproduceinternalstrainsandchallengesfor
rulingparties,eventhoughthesearenotalwaysfatal.
The Advantages of Incumbency
Incumbents enjoy considerable advantages in presidential systems
wherepowerandcontroloverpatronageareheavilycentralized,butthese
advantagesmaynotextendtothesuccessorinopen-seatpolls.Neopatrimonialpoliticalstructureslimittheconstraintsonexecutiveactionand
enableincumbentstotreatpublicfundsaspersonallargesse.Thusmany
Africanpresidentshavebeenremarkablyadeptatbuildingpoliticalmachineswhileinofficebydivertingresourcestotheir“homelands”inorder
torewardsupportersandpunishenemies.Theinstrumentaluseofpatronagetoplaydivide-and-rulepoliticshascharacterizedregimesasdiverse
as Moi’s in Kenya, Hastings Kamuzu Banda’s in Malawi, Gnassingbé
Eyadema’sinTogo,andJosephKabila’sintheDemocraticRepublicof
Congo. Significantly, building an effective political machine is a longtermstrategythatmustbeginanewassoonaseachelectionisover;as
MwaiKibakilearnedrecently,votersarelikelytoturntheirbacksonlastminuteappealsiftheyfeelthattheyhavebeenabandonedforyears.
Preciselybecausetheyareinpowerandcanconstructdurablepatronagenetworks,incumbentshaveaconsiderableadvantage.Theyarealso
betterplacedtomakebelievablepromisestoprospectivevoters,whocan
usealeader’spastperformancetoevaluatethereliabilityofhispledgesto
146
JournalofDemocracy
providemoregoodsinthefuture.Thisissignificant,becauseinelectoral
systemswithfewswingvoters,electoralsuccessislargelydeterminedby
candidates’ ability to maximize the turnout of their core supporters. As
recentresearchonKenyahasshown,thedistributionofpatronageandthe
location of parties’ rallies strongly suggest that parties consciously and
strategically work to generate the highest turnout possible among their
baseandtoattractsomeswingvoters,whilelargelyignoringopposition
strongholds.15 Incumbents’ capacity to construct political machines and
makecredibleclientelisticappealsgivesthemacomparativeadvantagein
generatingturnout,solongastheyhavebeensufficientlygenerous.16
Theadvantageofincumbencymaynotweighsoheavilyinopen-seat
polls,however.Whilenonincumbentcandidatesarelikelytobewealthy,
theywillnothavehadthesamelevelofaccesstostateresources.Ifthe
sittingpresidentwillnotbankrollthecampaignofhissuccessor,theresourcegapbetweengovernmentandoppositioncandidatesnarrows.This
appearstohavebeenthecaseinKenya,whereMoi’sbackersrefusedto
fundUhuruKenyatta’scampaign,forcinghimtorelyinsteadontheKenyattafamilyfortune;consequently,inthe2002contestKANUspentjust
athirdofthe$100millionthatithadlavishedonthe1992campaign.17
Nonincumbentsmayalsofinditdifficulttoconvincevotersoftheircredibility,andmaystruggletowintheloyaltyoftheirpredecessor’ssupporters.Inhighlypersonalizedsystems,votersoftenidentifywithaparticular
individualratherthanaparty,andthegoodwillwonbyanincumbentmay
behardtotransfertohissuccessor.
Thisproblemcanbeexacerbatedbyethnicrivalries,especiallyifthe
incomingleaderrepresentsadifferentethnicgrouporcommunityfrom
thatofhispredecessor;supportersoftheoutgoingleadermaybereluctant
toturnoutenmasseforthenewman,whilethenewcandidate’ssupportersarelesslikelytobefullyincorporatedintotheparty’spoliticalmachine.ThemultiethnicnatureofmanyAfricancountriesmeansthatopenseat elections will often result in a change in the ethnic identity of the
rulingparty’spresidentialcandidate.Infact,inhighlydiversecountries
suchasKenyaandMali,successfulpartiesmustbemultiethniccoalitions
in which the presidential candidacy rotates among the different groups.
(This practice has been institutionalized in Nigeria.) Kenya and Ghana
wellillustratethechallengestorulingpartiesposedbytheethnicrotation
ofpresidentialcandidates.InKenyain2002,itwaspartlyinrecognition
ofthegroundswelloffrustrationwith24yearsof“Kalenjinrule”thatMoi
choseUhuruKenyatta,aKikuyu,ashissuccessor.ButKenyattahadno
credibilityamongmanyofthesmallerethnicgroupsthatMoihadcarefullyknittedintohisrulingalliance.Ahugenumberrefusedtotransfer
theirallegiancetoKenyatta,contributingtoalandslideelectionvictory
forKibakiandtheNARC.
TheNPPfacedasimilar,iflessdramatic,probleminGhanawhenJohn
Kufour, an Ashanti, was replaced by Akufo-Addo, an Akyem. Ashanti
NicCheeseman
147
voterswerelessenthusiasticaboutAkufo-Addo’scampaignthantheyhad
beenaboutKufour’sin1996and2000.Moreover,giventhetensionbetweentheKufourandAkufo-Addoblocs,theNPPstruggledtopersuade
AshantivotersthattheywouldbelookedafterbyanAkufo-Addoadministration.18 Conversely, although both the Ashanti and the Akyem have
historicallyformedpartoftheNPP’sAkanvotingbloc,manyAkyemfelt
thattheirsupporthadbeendisregardedduringKufour’stenureasparty
leader. As a result, turnout in NPP strongholds was far lower than expected,leavingthepartyvulnerable.Intheend,theNPPmissedouton
an absolute first-round majority in the presidential election by only 0.9
percent,andultimatelylosttherunoffbyjust40,586votes.ManyNPP
leadersbelievethattheparty’scomplacentattitudetowarditsownsupporterscontributedtoitsdownfall.19
To Stay or Go?
Transfers of power require meaningful elections and the willingness
oftherulingpartytoconcededefeat.Theimpactofnonincumbencyon
these two processes is not straightforward. Open-seat elections create
anomalous power dynamics because the new presidential candidate is
nominally in charge of the party and the election campaign, while the
sittingpresidentretainscontrolofthestate’scoercivecapacityuntilthe
electionresultshavebeenannounced.Stealinganelectioninmostcases
thereforerequiresthesupportoftheoutgoingleader.Thisbifurcatedauthoritystructurecanplayoutindramaticallydifferentways.Whereasittingpresidenthandpickshissuccessororthedeathofanincumbentmeans
thatthepresidentialcandidatebecomesactingpresident,statepowermay
be deployed to ensure a ruling-party victory in highly competitive contests.EventsinTogofollowingthedeathoflongtimedictatorGnassingbé
Eyademain2005followedthispattern,asmembersoftheancienrégime
crackeddownontheoppositioninanattempttoensurethesuccessionof
thedictator’sson,FaureEssozimmaGnassingbé.
Whenasittingpresidentissucceededbyacandidatetowhomhehas
littleattachment,however,hemaybelesswillingtounderminetherules
ofthegameandmoreinclinedtoconsiderhisownlegacy.Shouldthisbe
thecase,theoppositioncandidateisabletocompeteonamorelevelplayingfield,asinGhanain2000and2008,Kenyain2002,andSierraLeone
in2007.Theseprocessesarenoteasilymeasurable,asnocomprehensive
datasetofelectoralfairnessexists,andthetwodivergentoutcomesproducedbythisbifurcatedauthoritystructurearelikelytocanceleachother
outinany“largeN”analysis.
However,lookingataseriesofelectionswithinagivencountrysuggeststhatnonincumbentelectionsmaybesignificantlymoreopen.Kenya
is a case in point. Desperate to remain in power, Moi prepared for the
electionsof1992and1997byinspiringethnicclashes,distortingthereg-
148
JournalofDemocracy
Table3—elecTion-yearfreedoMhousescores
inKenyaandghana1
FoundingElection
(incumbent)
2ndElection
(incumbent)
3rdElection
(nonincumbent)
PR
CL
Total
PR
CL
Total
PR
CL
Total
Kenya
4
5
9
6
6
13
4
4
8
Ghana
5
5
10
3
4
7
2
3
5
1
PR=politicalrights,CL=civilliberties.FreedomHousescoresrangefrom1to7,with
lowerscoressignifyingmorefreedom.
istration process, and—just to be sure—stuffing ballot boxes on polling
day.Clearly,theprospectofcedingpowersatillwithMoi.Incontrastto
thisdismalpicture,the2002open-seatelectionstandsoutasremarkably
freeandfair.ThisisreflectedinTable3above,whichshowstheFreedom
HousescoresfortheyearofthefirstthreemultipartyelectionsinKenya
(1992,1997,and2002)andGhana(1992,1996,and2000)inordertogive
anindicationofthepoliticalclimatewithinwhichthepollswereheld.Not
onlywerethe2002electionsKenya’sonlypollstodatewithnocivilunrest,butthecountingprocesswaswidelyseentobeaccurate.Havingbeen
forcedtorespecttermlimits,Moiprovedtobefarlessinvestedinsecuring
awinforKenyatta,eventhoughMoihadhopedtowieldpowerbehindthe
scenesunderaKenyattapresidency.
Ghanaianelectionshavefollowedasimilarpath.Theoppositionboycotted the 1992 polls, citing irregularities. Although the 1996 election
represented a considerable improvement (in part due to the building of
interpartytrustthroughtheInter-PartyAdvisoryCommitteeestablished
bytheelectoralcommissionin1994),thepoliticalenvironmentwasfar
fromfreeandopen,withfewcommentatorsconfidentthatRawlingswas
preparedtolose.20Bycontrast,thenonincumbentelectionof2000wasthe
mosttransparentthatGhanahadseen,asindicatedbythesignificantimprovementinFreedomHousescores.Ofcourse,thetransferofpoweralso
owedmuchtoGhana’sgradualdemocratizationunderRawlingsandthe
emergenceofoneofAfrica’smostindependentandprofessionalelectoral
commissions,butitwasalsosignificantthatRawlings’spersonalpower
andpridewerenotatstake.
TheGhanaianelectionsof2008offeranopportunitytotracethedecision-makingprocessofadefeatedrulingpartyoperatingwithinabifurcatedpowerstructure.WhenanNDCvictorybecameinevitable,AkufoAddocameunderenormouspressurefrompartyactivistsandasignificant
number of NPP leaders to reject the results.21 Party hard-liners felt that
the reported NDC intimidation of NPP agents in some constituencies
justified defying the electoral commission if the margin of victory was
slim.AheatedmeetingofAkufo-Addo’scampaignteamthatwascalled
todecidetheparty’sresponsetoitsdefeatwasreportedlysplitdownthe
middle, despite the self-professed commitment of the NPP to constitutionalism.Significantly,eventhoughtheelectionteamultimatelyagreed
toconcededefeat,thedecisionwastakenoutoftheirhandsbythesitting
NicCheeseman
149
president, John Kufour. While the election team was meeting to thrash
outitsresponse,KufourwentonGhanaianradioand,withoutconsulting
thoseinthemeeting,announcedthattheNPPwouldrespectthedecision
oftheelectoralcommission.Thisdeclarationeffectivelyendedtheelection;withoutKufour’sbacking,Akufo-Addolackedthecontroloverstate
securityforcesthathewouldhaveneededinordertoholdontopower
inthefaceofinevitableNDCprotests.Thepresident’srivalswithinthe
NPPseethisasfurtherevidencethatKufour,whohaddonelittleduring
thecampaignitself,wasalltoohappytofrustrateAkufo-Addo’spersonal
ambitions.22
ThetransferofpowerinSierraLeonewasunderpinnedbyasimilardynamic. President Kabbah initially promoted Berewa’s candidacy, but by
thetimeofthe2007campaignrelationsbetweenthetwohadsoured.The
tensionbetweentheoutgoingpresidentandthenewpartystandard-bearer
enabledthenewlyreconstitutedNationalElectoralCommission(NEC)to
maintainitsindependencefromtherulingSLPPduringanextremelyclose
and controversial contest. The vote count for the presidential runoff revealedthatinanumberofpollingstationsmorepeoplehadvotedthanwere
registered.TheNECdecidedtoinvalidateallvotesfromthesepollingstations,therebyrejectingbothfraudulentandlegitimateballotsintheseconstituencies.BecausethepollingstationsinquestionwerelargelyinSLPP
strongholds,therulingpartyplannedtoservetheheadoftheNECwithan
injunctiontopreventherfromdeclaringtheelectionresult,thusgivingthe
regimeanopportunitytoreassertcontrolovertheelectoralprocess.
According to Berewa, however, Kabbah’s stance toward his successor and lack of support during the election completely undermined this
strategy. Having denied his party the usual advantages of incumbency,
Kabbah’srefusaltointerveneonBerewa’sbehalfhelpedtoweakenthe
SLPP’s momentum and to embolden the NEC to declare an opposition
victory.AttheSLPPpartyconferencein2009,Berewablamedtheformer
presidentfortheparty’sdefeat,declaringthatthe“thingthatKabbahdid
thathurtmealotwaswhenhebroadcastthathewasneutral.Howcanyou
beneutralagainstyourownparty?”23
Ofcourse,suchrivalriesarenotinevitable.Thesittingpresidentand
the party’s candidate may pull in the same direction, resulting in a furthercompressionofdemocraticspace,asoccurredinNigeriain2007.In
that case, departing president Olusegun Obasanjo and candidate Umaru
Yar’Aduapresidedoverthemostfarcicalofpolls,whichwerecontrolled
bythegovernmentfromstarttofinish.Althoughnonincumbentelections
donotalwaysproduceamorelevelplayingfield,incaseswheretherelationshipbetweenthesittingpresidentandthepresidentialcandidateisnot
intimate,thedivisionofauthoritymayhamperelectoralmanipulationand
maketheretentionofpowerthroughunconstitutionalmeanslesslikely.
The combined impact of succession struggles, of the difficulty that
nonincumbent candidates may have in mobilizing patronage networks,
150
JournalofDemocracy
and of the greater willingness of retiring presidents to oversee free and
fairelectionsmeansthatopen-seatpollsrepresentrealwindowsofopportunityforoppositionpartiesinAfrica.Thisfindingisconsistentwiththe
workofMarcMorjéHowardandPhilipG.Roessler,whoseanalysisofa
globaldatasetoncompetitiveauthoritarianregimessuggeststhatnonincumbentelectionsaremorelikelytohaveliberalizingoutcomes,though
thisisnotinevitable.24
Ofcourse,open-seatelectionscanonlybepartoftheexplanationfor
anytransferofpower.InKenyain2002,Moi’sdefeatwasunderpinned
bycontinuedeconomicdeclineandalearningprocessamongtheopposition.InGhanain2008,theglobaleconomicdownturn,accusationsofcorruption,andasensethatitwastimeforachangecontributedtotheNPP’s
defeat.Furthermore,open-seatelectionsmaynotleadtoturnoveratallif
otherconditionsareunfavorable—asinSouthAfricain2009,wherethe
rulingANCretainedpowerdespiteasuccessionbattlethatexacerbated
intrapartyrifts.Thusmoreworkisneededtounderstandtheconditions
underwhichoppositioncoordinationandnonincumbencycreatethenecessaryconditionsforpoliticalchange.
The Impact of Term Limits
Anothertopicdeservingofgreaterscholarlyattentioniswhetherterm
limits, by increasing the likelihood of alternations in power, promote
democraticconsolidation.Therearethreegoodreasonsforthinkingthat
turnover can play such a positive role in the democratization process.
First, transfers of power in nonincumbent elections have helped to removeentrenched,corrupt,andauthoritarianpartiesfrompower,creating
opportunitiesforfurtherpoliticalliberalization.ThedefeatofKANUin
Kenya is perhaps the most striking illustration of this. Until the nonincumbent election of 2002, the reintroduction of multipartism in Kenya
hadnotresultedinanimprovementingovernanceorcivilliberties.Itwas
nottheintroductionofmultipartyelectionsbuttheremovalofMoifrom
powerthatopeneduppoliticalspaceinKenya.Thisisnotanisolatedexample.Comparingthetwentycountriesinwhichoppositionpartieswere
abletocapturethepresidencyinnonfoundingelectionsbetween1992and
2006,Maltzfindsthatturnoversweretypicallyfollowedbyasignificant
improvementinthequalityofpoliticalrightsandcivilliberties.25
Second,turnoverisimportantbecauseitisperhapsthemostpowerful
sign that key actors have a genuine commitment to democratic values.
As Huntington has argued, we can only say that democracy is consolidatedwhenboththepreviousauthoritarianrulingpartyandthepartythat
defeatsithavedemonstratedthattheywillwillinglyreleasethereinsof
powerattheappropriatetime.26Butanalternationinleadershipdoesmore
thansimplyproveacommitmenttodemocraticvalues—itcanalsofoster
them.Theexperienceofwitnessingarulingpartygracefullyacceptdefeat
NicCheeseman
151
buildsconfidenceamongarangeofactorsthatpoliticalleadersintendto
followtherulesofthegame,andthusmovescountriesclosertoapoint
wheredemocracybecomestheonlygameintown.27
Democratizationisaniterativeprocesscomposedofanumberoftiny
steps. It is advanced when democratic rules are followed and set back
whentheyarebroken.InoneoftheonlyattemptstoidentifythemicroprocessesthatmayconnectturnoveranddemocraticconsolidationinAfrica,
DevraMoehlerandStaffanI.Lindberghaverecentlyshownthatturnover
servestoreducethegapininstitutionaltrustbetweenwinnersandlosers.
Althoughthispositiveeffectofturnoverserodesovertime,Moehlerand
Lindberg conclude that, in the short run, alternations in power help “to
establishaself-reinforcingequilibriumbyprovidingincentivesforelites
onbothsidestoplaybythedemocraticrulesofthegame.”28
Similarly,althoughAfrobarometersurveydatahaveshownthatthefirst
twodecadesofmultipartisminAfricasawagradualdownwardtrendin
popularsupportfordemocracy,MichaelBrattonfindsthatthiswasoffset
incountriesthathadexperiencedanalternationinpower,suchasGhana
andMali.29Inotherwords,transfersofpowerinjectedmultipartyregimes
withamuchneededdoseoflegitimacy.Thisisasignificantfindingbecausethestrongerthepopularsupportfordemocracy,themorecostlyit
is for leaders to abuse democratic institutions and indulge authoritarian
tendencies;thusinitialdemocraticgainsarelesslikelytobeeroded.Taken
together,allthissuggeststhat—inadditiontotheobviousgainofsimply
removingauthoritarianleaders—nonincumbentelectionscanplayanimportantroleintheevolutionofanationalconsensusinfavorofdemocracy.
Clearly,therearegoodreasonstobelievethatthemoreturnoverwesee,
themoreconfidentlywecanspeakofdemocraticconsolidation.
Yetitisalsoclearthattherelationshipbetweennonincumbencyanddemocratizationiscomplexandthattheextentandlastingsignificanceofthe
democraticgainsfromturnoverarequestionable.Mostobviously,thereis
noguaranteethattheopposition,wheninpower,willruleinamoredemocraticandtransparentmannerthantheirpredecessors.InBenin,thevictory
ofPrimeMinisterNicéphoreSoglointhe1991presidentialelectionledto
asteadyprocessofdemocraticconsolidationthathasseentwoturnovers,
buttheprocesshasbeenfarfromstraightforward.Havinglostthefounding
election,authoritarianleaderMathieuKérékoumadeoneofAfrica’smost
remarkablepoliticalcomebackstoregainpoweratthe1996polls.Turnover
mayhaveaidedtheconsolidationprocessinBeninthen,butnotbecauseit
permanentlyremovedtheleaderoftheancienrégimefrompower.
Othercountrieshavehadfarmorebleakexperienceswithturnover.In
Zambia,itwasoppositionleaderandtrade-unionheroFrederickChiluba
who,havingdefeatedKennethKaundainthefoundingelectionof1991,
established the most corrupt and venal regime in the country’s history.
Kenyahassufferedasimilarlymixedfatefollowingthevictoryofoppositionforces.Mostobviously,theflawedpollsof2007demonstratedthat
152
JournalofDemocracy
KibakiwasnomorewillingtogiveuppowerthanMoihadbeenin1992
and1997.Inpartbecauseoftheseevents,Kenyans,whohadbeenamong
theworld’smostoptimisticpeoplein2002,justyearslaterhadbecome
someofthemostpessimistic.Yetdespitethecalamitousfalloutfromthe
“Kenyacrisis,”inwhichmorethanathousandpeoplediedandmorethan
ahundred-thousandweredisplaced,Kenyaremainsamoreopencountry
nowthanitwasduringthefinalfifteenyearsunderMoi.
The cases of Benin, Kenya, and Zambia suggest that the impact of
turnover can be fully understood only in retrospect, as the gains of an
isolatedelectoralturnovermayprovetobeillusory.Nonetheless,thepotentialfortermlimitstogeneratenonincumbentelectionsthatcontribute
toprocessesofdemocraticconsolidationisclear.Therearegoodreasons,
therefore,forinternationalactorstopushfortermlimitstobeincluded
inconstitutionsandtoinsistthattheyberespected.Atatimewheninternationalconfidencein,andcommitmentto,Africandemocracyappears
tobeonthewane,thisisgoodnews:Termlimitsareremarkablyeasyto
monitorcomparedtootherformsofpoliticalandeconomicconditionality,andtheyareagoalaroundwhichawiderangeofinternationaland
domesticactorsarekeentocoalesce,aswaswitnessedinanti–third-term
campaignsinMalawi,Nigeria,andZambia.Supportingthesemovements
willnotguaranteedemocraticchange,butitwillimproveitsprospects.
NOTES
1.SamuelHuntington,TheThirdWave:DemocratizationintheLateTwentiethCentury(Norman:UniversityofOklahomaPress,1991).
2. Lindsay Whitfield, “‘Change for a Better Ghana’: Party Competition, Institutionalization and Alternation in Ghana’s 2008 Elections,” African Affairs 108 (August 2009):
621–41.
3. Gideon Maltz, “The Case for Presidential Term Limits,” Journal of Democracy 18
(January2007):134.
4.ThomasM.Holbrook,“Incumbency,NationalConditions,andthe2008Presidential
Election,”PS:PoliticalScience&Politics(October2008):709–12.
5.TermlimitsarenotemployedinCôted’Ivoire,EquatorialGuinea,Gambia,GuineaBissau,Mauritania,Sudan,andZimbabwe.
6.DanielN.PosnerandDanielJ.Young,“TheInstitutionalizationofPoliticalPowerin
Africa,”JournalofDemocracy18(July2007):126–40.
7.PosnerandYoung,“InstitutionalizationofPoliticalPowerinAfrica,”132.
8.Maltz,“TheCaseforPresidentialTermLimits.”
9.RodgerGoveaandJohnHolm,“Crisis,ViolenceandPoliticalSuccessioninAfrica,”
ThirdWorldQuarterly18(March1998):129–48.
10.MartyCohenetal.,ThePartyDecides:PresidentialNominationsBeforeandAfter
Reform(London:UniversityofChicagoPress,2008).
NicCheeseman
153
11.MagnusOhman,“The2007PresidentialandParliamentaryElectionsinSierraLeone,”ElectoralStudies(December2008):764–68.
12.Author’sinterviewwithKonaduApraku,NPPelection-campaignmanager,Accra,
Ghana,8July2009.
13.Author’sinterviewwithNanaYawOfori-Kuragu,independentNPP-affiliatedMP,
Accra,Ghana,11July2009.
14.Author’sinterviewwithAmbroseDery,NPPMPanddeputyminorityleaderinParliament,Accra,Ghana,7July2009.
15.SimeonNichter,“VoteBuyingorTurnoutBuying?MachinePoliticsandtheSecret
Ballot,”AmericanPoliticalScienceReview102(February2008):19–31;JeremyHorowitz,
“EthnicGroupsandCampaignStrategyinKenya’s2007Election,”WorkingGroupinAfricanPoliticalEconomyWorkingPaper17,December2009.
16.PedroC.VicenteandLeonardWantchekon,“ClientelismandVoteBuying:Lessons
fromFieldExperimentsinAfricanElections,”OxfordReviewofEconomicPolicy25(Summer2009):292–305.
17. David Throup, “The Kenya General Election: December 27, 2002,” CSIS: Africa
Notes14(January2003).
18.Author’sinterviewwithBenEphson,politicaleditoroftheDailyDispatch,Accra,
Ghana,10July2009.
19.ArthurKennedy,ChasingtheElephantintotheBush:ThePoliticsofComplacency
(Bloomington,Ind.:AuthorHouse,2009).
20.Richard Jeffries, “The Ghanaian Elections of 1996: Towards the Consolidation of
Democracy?”AfricanAffairs97(April1998):189–208.
21.AuthorinterviewwithElizabethOhene,formerNPPministerofeducation,Accra,
Ghana(16July2009).
22.AuthorinterviewwithYawOsafo-Maafo,formerNPPministeroffinance,Accra,
Ghana(18July2009).
23.SilasGbandia,“Ex-PresidentKabbaWeepsasBerewaSaysHeIsaSell-Out,”SierreLeoneNews,6March2009,www.thesierraleonenews.com/national/122-ex-presidentkabba-weeps-as-berewa-says-he-is-a-sell-out.
24. Marc Morjé Howard and Philip G. Roessler, “Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in
Competitive Authoritarian Regimes,” American Journal of Political Science 50 (April
2006):365–81.
25.Maltz,“CaseforPresidentialTermLimits,”135.
26.Huntington,ThirdWave.
27.AdamPrzeworski,DemocracyandtheMarket:PoliticalandEconomicReformsin
EasternEuropeandLatinAmerica(Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,1991).
28.DevraMoehlerandStaffanI.Lindberg,“NarrowingtheLegitimacyGap:Turnovers
asaCauseofDemocraticConsolidation,”JournalofPolitics71(October2009):1463.
29.MichaelBratton,“TheAlternationEffectinAfrica,”JournalofDemocracy15(October2004):147–58.