Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2022, Daily Philosophy
Radical scepticism has a good claim to be both the longest lasting tradition in philosophy and the consistently least popular. There's a lot to be said for it.
Oxford Bibliographies Online, 2011
The skeptical tradition originated in the Hellenistic period of ancient philosophy. After mostly lying dormant through much of the medieval era, it was revived and—to some extent—transformed in early modern philosophy. Determining to what extent there is a single view shared across the different periods is complicated by the fact that at least some of the main figures in the tradition said quite explicitly that they did not have any view at all. But if there are no theoretical commitments binding all of the different skeptics together, then what allows us to say that there is in fact a single tradition? There are at least two relevant considerations. The first is that the later figures in the tradition make use of many of the arguments originally formulated by the ancient skeptics—and, indeed, given their centrality to epistemology, those arguments are likely to be an enduring legacy of the skeptical tradition. The second consideration is that many of the later skeptics—Hume is a good example—arrived at their philosophical outlook through profound reflection on the earlier figures in the tradition. It is a matter of controversy whether key aspects of ancient skepticism have been retained or lost—for example, some scholars of ancient philosophy have argued that modern skepticism is in certain ways a watered down version of its ancient predecessor, given that the ancient skeptics focused on what we ought to believe and the modern skeptics focus, supposedly, only on whether we have knowledge. But, whether or not this is true, it has become increasingly clear that there is much to be learned about skepticism through study of the tradition as a whole. Given that so much of philosophy has been shaped by both skepticism and anti-skeptical responses to it, the importance of the history of skepticism cannot be overstated.
Hamburg Buddhist Studies 13, 2020
Is Buddhism's attitude towards accepted forms of knowledge sceptical? Are Pyrrhonian scepticism and classical Buddhist scholasticism related in their respective applications and expressions of doubt? In what way and to what degree is Critical Buddhism an offshoot of modern scepticism? Questions such as these as well as related issues are explored in the present collection, which brings together examinations of systematic doubt in the traditions of Buddhism from a variety of perspectives. What results from the perceptive observations and profound analytical insights of the seven essays is a rich and multi-faceted picture of two families of philosophical systems-scepticism and Buddhism-that seem both akin and at odds, both related and distant at the same time.
CULTURE AND DIALOGUE 1.1, 2011
An abridged and slightly revised version of this paper was published in J. Warren, F. Sheffield (eds.), Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy (2013), 496-510.
Ancient Philosophy 34 (2014)
This paper pursues two tasks: first, to criticize a number of prominent contemporary interpretations of the Pyrrhonism of Sextus Empiricus, especially Jonathan Barnes’s; and second, to outline an alternative interpretation of Sextus that (a) reconciles the opposing sides of the long-standing dispute over the scope of Pyrrhonian suspension of judgment, and (b) suggests a sympathetic alternative to some of the most influential accounts of the Pyrrhonian way of life.
Ancient Greek Skepticism, 2019
https://www.iep.utm.edu/skepanci/ A Priori and A Posteriori Ancient Greek Skepticism Art and Epistemology Belief, Aim of Benedict de Spinoza: Epistemology Brain in a Vat Argument, The Cicero: Academic Skepticism Coherentism in Epistemology Confirmation and Induction Consequentialism Epistemic Contemporary Skepticism Contextualism in Epistemology Defeaters in Epistemology Disagreement, Religious Doxastic Voluntarism Dummett, Michael Dynamic Epistemic Logic Epistemic Circularity Epistemic Closure Principles Epistemic Entitlement Epistemic Luck Epistemology Epistemology and Relativism Epistemology of Perception, The Epistemology of Testimony Epistemology, Infinitism in Ethnoepistemology Evidence Evidentialism Evil Demon Problem, The New Evolutionary Epistemology Fallibilism Feminist Epistemology Foreknowledge and Free Will Foundationalism Gettier Problems Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology Justification, Epistemic KK Principle (Knowing that One Knows) Knowledge Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description Knowledge Norms Language, Knowledge of Memory, Epistemology of Metaepistemology Middle Knowledge Moral Epistemology Naturalistic Epistemology Objectivity Omniscience and Divine Foreknowledge
The discourse that calls itself philosophy has long had problems with both women and Pyrrhonian Sceptics. This article explores how both Pyrrhonism and Michèle Le Dœuff’s feminist philosophizing threaten this discourse by revealing its lack of philosophical rigour, to the extent that it should be relabelled philosophism. This exploration will also reveal how anti-feminism relates to anti-scepticism in the masculinist and philosophist imaginaries. Using Pascal as an initial point of contact, the article then suggests how feminist philosophy and Pyrrhonism might develop a rational solidarity in the practice of philosophizing and in undoing, and keeping undone, oppressive relationships.
Philosophy Compass, 2011
Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies, 2016
Rónai. Revista de Estudos Clássicos e Traductórios (ISSN 23183446) 8 (2), pp. 309-330., 2020
Polish Journal of Philosophy, 2011
Ancient Philosophy, 2011
History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis / Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse, 2020
European Journal of Political Theory, 2005
Philosophy Compass, 2011
Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie, 2008
Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2013
Sképsis: Revista de Filosofia , 2020
Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36, No. 3:457-481, 2000
A Touch of Doubt
Oxford University Press, 2021
Early Greek Ethics, 2020