Mecánica de suelos y cimentaciones

, l'objectif du développement durable se traduit par des stratégies devant réinventer les modes et habitudes de production et de consommation. La mise en oeuvre de ces stratégies se traduit dans le domaine de l'environnement par le recours à des formes d'énergies renouvelables. Mais qu'est-ce que l'énergie renouvelable? Et comment se traduit sa mise ne application dans le cas de l'énergie solaire? Ce sont les principales questions auxquelles répond le présent article essentiellement axé sur la production d'électricité qui est identifiée comme le principal domaine pour le développement des énergies renouvelables.

București, 1995

Ministerul Învățământului. Institutul Român de Tracologie. Bibliotheca Thracologica VIII.

2018

Nunc decet caput impedire myrto. Studies Dedicated to Professor Piotr Dyczek on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday, Warsaw, 2021

This paper resumes a discussion on Cassius Dio’s famous passage mentioning a camp (stratopedon) left by Trajan at Sarmizegetusa after the peace treaty with Decebalus, King of the Dacians, in AD 102. The exact location of the camp has been a matter of debate for more than a century. Some scholars thought that Cassius Dio meant the site of future Colonia Augusta Dacica Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa, whereas others pointed out to Sarmizegetusa Regia, the presumed Decebalus’s royal residence. The discussion received a new impulse after the World War II, when large-scale excavations were carried out at Grădiștea de Munte (Sarmizegetusa Regia), uncovering both Dacian and Roman monuments, including a Roman stone fort and stone slabs bearing names of some legionary detachments. After reviewing all the available data, we stressed out that this stone fort could have been only erected in AD 106, since it seems to reuse some of the legionary stone slabs. Further on, based on the older aerial photographs and recently published LiDAR prospections, we argue that a larger camp had been in place at Sarmizegetusa Regia, which could be possibly identified with the camp (stratopedon) mentioned by Cassius Dio.

Arabie - Arabies. Volume offert à Christian Julien Robin par ses collègues, ses élèves et ses amis, 2023

ΟΧΥΡΩΣΕΙΣ ΤΗΣ ΟΘΩΜΑΝΙΚΗΣ ΠΕΡΙΟΔΟΥ ΣΤΟ ΑΙΓΑΙΟ. Πρακτικά Διεθνούς Επιστημονικού Συνεδρίου, 2021

REVEALING THE OTTOMAN FORTIFICATION ARCHITECTURE AT THE BASTIONS OF THE TOWN WALLS OF RHODES The development of the strong walls of the town of Rhodes was determined by disasters and rebuilding after construction failures, especially in the sieges, but also other historically established catastrophic events. In the historical evolution of the fortifications, it is obvious the urgent effort of the town’s defenders to defend it in view of the expected tough siege of the Ottoman Turks at the end of the 15th and the beginning of the 16th century. The Turks immediately after the occupation of Rhodes repaired the fortifications by order of Suleiman himself, who on 29-12-1522 “entered Rhodes as the ruler of the conquered fortress that showed his beauty". He visited and noticed the parts of the city, the fortification, the harbor and the sea, the great chain, the towers of Mandraki and the Arabs and the rest of the marvelous places, and ordered that Sandzak-Beis be appointed for the good guard of Rhodes, Kadis and the Captain -Disdar and the wall keepers to repair the ruined parts. The Rhodes guard included 500 “people of the walls” and 500 janissaries. It is well known from the numerous descriptions of the sieges that the fortress constructions have suffered great damage from the constant and relentless bombardment of the artillery and from the undermining. These early interventions by the Turks are difficult to distinguish, as they seem to have not altered their original form. Only the reconstruction of the bastion of St. Athanasius, which was the focus of the battle of 1522, which was made according to a Persian inscription built on the south face of 1530-1531 by Abu-Ul- Gelil, is documented and dated precisely.

Pardes: Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies in Germany , 2024

Edited by Tim Corbett, Björn Siegel, and Mirjam Thulin. In the aftermath of the Shoah and the ostensible triumph of nationalism, it became common in historiography to relegate Jews to the position of the “eternal other” in a series of binaries: Christian/Jewish, Gentile/Jewish, European/Jewish, non-Jewish/Jewish, and so forth. For the longest time, these binaries remained characteristic of Jewish historiography, including in the Central European context. Assuming instead, as the more recent approaches in Habsburg studies do, that pluriculturalism was the basis of common experience in formerly Habsburg Central Europe, and accepting that no single “majority culture” existed, but rather hegemonies were imposed in certain contexts, then the often used binaries are misleading and conceal the complex and sometimes even paradoxical conditions that shaped Jewish life in the region before the Shoah. The very complexity of Habsburg Central Europe both in synchronic and diachronic perspective precludes any singular historical narrative of “Habsburg Jewry,” and it is not the intention of this volume to offer an overview of “Habsburg Jewish history.” The selected articles in this volume illustrate instead how important it is to reevaluate categories, deconstruct historical narratives, and reconceptualize implemented approaches in specific geographic, temporal, and cultural contexts in order to gain a better understanding of the complex and pluricultural history of the Habsburg Empire and the region as a whole.