Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development Vol. 22, No.02 (Part-5), March 2018
The Fourth Scientific Engineering and First Sustainable Engineering Conference
www.jeasd.org (ISSN 2520-0917)
Vol. 22, No.02 (Part-5), March 2018
ISSN 2520-0917
10.31272/jeasd.2018.2.62
DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF A HYBRID HYDRO-WIND
MICROPOWER SYSTEM FOR RURAL COMMUNITIES
*Dr. Amer Mejbel Ali1, Dr. Sameer Saadoon Algburi2, Dr. Mohammad Abdelmajed
Aljaradin3
1) Asst. Prof., Electrical Engineering Department, Mustansiriayah University, Baghdad, Iraq.
2) Asst. Prof., Visiting Researcher at Lund University , Lund ,Sweden
3) Asst. Prof., Faculty of Engineering , Lund University, Lund ,Sweden
Abstract: Renewable energies can play an important role to provide electricity to rural communities .This
work study the optimum design of a hybrid hydro-wind , micro-power system in rural area . Six case
studies, including the impact of hydro head, flow rate, efficiency, and head loss for micro hydropower
with wind turbine hub height were implemented based on HOMER software. The simulation results show
the importance of using HOMER to assist system designers for assigning the optimum design of hybrid
system components.
Keywords: HOMER, Renewable Energy, Micro-Power System, Hydro Power, Wind Power.
التصميم االمثل لمنظومة قدرة كهربائية صغيرة هجينة (رياح – مياه) للمناطق الريفية
يذسس انثحث انحاني انرصًيى. انطاقاخ انًرجذدج يًكٍ اٌ ذهؼة دٔسا يًٓا في ذزٔيذ انطاقح انكٓشتائيح نهًجرًؼاخ انشيفيح:الخالصة
ذى دساسح سد حاالخ نٓزِ انًُظٕيح اخزخ تُظش االػرثاس ذأثيش. االيثم نًُظٕيح قذسج ْجيُح ذؼًم تطافري انًياِ ٔانشياح في يُطقح سيفيح
اسذفاع يُسٕب انًياِ ٔيؼذل جشياَّ ٔكفاءج انرٕستيٍ انًائي ٔفقذ االسذفاع يغ دساسح ذأثيش اسذفاع ذٕستيٍ انشياح ٔرنك تاسرخذاو تشَايج
أضحد انُرائج نٓزا انثحث اًْيح اسرخذاو تشَايج ْٕيش نًساػذج انًصًًيٍ في اخرياس انرصًيى االيثم نًكَٕاخ انًُظٕيح انٓجيُح.ْٕيش
1.Introduction
The world today is pointing to a clean environment by reducing the hurtful emissions
like carbon dioxide. One active way to achieve that is by expanding of using renewable
energies. Also, these energies being the best manner to produce electric power to
isolated (not grid- connected) rural communities due to its affordable,easily installed,
and community ownership. Small-scale hydropower is a technique use moving water of
the river to produce electricity in isolated regions with negligible environmental
impact. Micro hydro system (as in Fig.1) is comprised of a number of components, the
most important incorporate the intake where water is redirected from
______________________________________________________
*Corresponding Author dramerma@uomustansiriyah.edu.iq
1
Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development Vol. 22, No.02 (Part-5), March 2018
The Fourth Scientific Engineering and First Sustainable Engineering Conference
www.jeasd.org (ISSN 2520-0917)
the natural stream, river, or maybe a waterfall. In mild climates, this structure
must stand up to ice as well. As a rule miniaturized scale hydro establishment doesn't
have a dam and supply, like expansive hydroelectric plants have, depending on
a low stream of water to be accessible year-round. [1]
Figure 1: Typical run-of-river hydropower components
The wind is continually blowing somewhere and wind power has become a key
player in the present power system. Actually, no vitality source keeps running at 100
percent limit, every minute of every day, 365 days a year .Rural communities benefit
directly and indirectly from hydropower and wind power projects. Just as is the case
with new jobs and additional income are created, new revenues are generated to be
spent in local stores, restaurants, and services businesses, boosting the neighborhood
economy and making more employments. HOMER is a micropower optimization
modeling software developed by the national renewable energies laboratory (NREL) in
the USA. Streamlines the errand of assessing designs of both off-grid and gridconnected power systems for a diversity of implementations. When we layout a power
system, we must activate many resolutions about the arranging of the system:What
combinations does it make sense to include in the system layout?How numerous and
what estimate of each component ought to we utilize ? The expanding number
of innovation alternatives and the variety in innovation costs and accessibility
of energy
assets make these choices troublesome. HOMER's optimization
and affectability investigation calculations make it less demanding to
assess the numerous conceivable system setups. The renewable energy as well as
conventional power generating technologies can be modeled through HOMER. Many
research works have been done in the field of design optimization for a hybrid micro
power system, including micro hydro power units based on HOMER ,for example
Deepark et al(2011) proposed a hybrid system consist of wind turbine,PV panels ,diesel
generator ,and hydro power, to supply power of 3 MWh/day to an isolated area in
India [2].
Niharika et al (2013) present the sizing of hybrid system contain
solar,wind,hydro,biomass,diesel generator,and battery banks,to supply many
neighboring villages in Malaysia of total power of 720 MWh/year [3]. Onojo et al
(2013) used HOMER to simulate a combination of hydro,solar,an d biomass to supply
a backup power of 493 kW /day to a building in Nigeria [4]. Luis et al (2015) study the
2
Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development Vol. 22, No.02 (Part-5), March 2018
The Fourth Scientific Engineering and First Sustainable Engineering Conference
www.jeasd.org (ISSN 2520-0917)
optimization of PV-hydropower system to supply a peak power of 287 kW ,installed on
a small river dam in Brazil [5]. Getnet and Getachew(2016) discuss the optimization of
10 kW PV and 4 kW hydro on rural area lie on a river in Ethiopia [6].The aim of this
work is to study the effects of hybrid hydro-wind considerations on the design
optimization of stand-alone micro-power system.
2. Study Area
The sight which taken as a study area in this work (as in Fig. 2) is Beria village (19º
45′ South , 43º 45′ East) lay in the Pungwe river in Mozambique.
Figure 2: The map of the study area
3. System Modeling by HOMER
The proposed micro-power system for this work (as in Fig. 3) consist of three
parts .The first part is the electrical load which is specified in Fig. 4. The second part is
the wind turbine type PEG 20/25 which declared in Fig.5 and the average speed of study
area is shown in Fig. 6 [ 7 ] .The third part is the mini hydro power generator which its
resource inputs are demonstrated in Fig.7.
.
Figure 3: System configuration
3
Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development Vol. 22, No.02 (Part-5), March 2018
The Fourth Scientific Engineering and First Sustainable Engineering Conference
www.jeasd.org (ISSN 2520-0917)
Figure 4 : The proposed load profile.
Figure 5: Wind generator specifications.
Figure 6 : Average wind speeds in Beira , Mozambique.
Figure 7: Hydro resources inputs.
4
Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development Vol. 22, No.02 (Part-5), March 2018
The Fourth Scientific Engineering and First Sustainable Engineering Conference
www.jeasd.org (ISSN 2520-0917)
4. Theoretical Background
In order to visualize this research work ,the terms used in it were identified as
follows[8]:
4.1. The Capacity Shortage Fraction (Fcs)
A capacity shortage is a decline in electric power that take place between the desired
operating capacity and the existing quantity of operating capacity that can be provided
by the system. The capacity shortage fraction is equal to the total capacity shortage
divided by the total electrical demand. HOMER sees a system workable (or agreeable)
only if the capacity shortage fraction is lower than or equal to the maximum yearly
capacity shortage. HOMER employs equation 1 to calculate the capacity shortage
fraction:
Ecs = Ecs / Edemand
(1)
Where
Ecs
= total capacity shortage [kWh / yr]
Edemand = total electrical demand (primary and deferrable load) [kWh/yr]
HOMER keeps track of such shortages and calculates the total amount that occurs over
the year.
4.2. The Pipe Head Loss ( Fh )
It is the frictional loss within the hydropipeline, communicated as division
accessible head.Water(likevery gooey liquid ) streaming through a pipe encounters
a loss in pressure due to friction. We can express this pressure loss in terms of a loss
of head, where the head is the vertical drop through which the liquid streams.In
HOMER, we indicate the pipe head loss as a rate of the accessible head.Little highhead, low-flow hydro systems regularly encounter pipe head losses of between 10% and
20% . With low-head systems, pipe head losses are regularly as it were a couple
of percent.
4.3. Available Head ( h )
The full accessible vertical drop between the intake and the turbine. Frictional losses
in the pipeline between the intake and the turbine make the effective head slightly lesser
than the obtainable head. HOMER uses the obtainable head to estimate the titular hydro
power and the effective head. It utilizes the effective head to estimate the power output
of the hydro turbine.
5
Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development Vol. 22, No.02 (Part-5), March 2018
The Fourth Scientific Engineering and First Sustainable Engineering Conference
www.jeasd.org (ISSN 2520-0917)
4.4. Wind Turbine Hub Height (zhub)
It is the height over ground at which the rotor sits. Hub heights typically range
between 25m (for smaller wind turbines, 50 kW or less) and 100m (for large, multimegawatt wind turbines). Wind speeds resort to rise with height over ground, so if the
hub turbine is not similar to the anemometer height, HOMER regulate the wind speed
data appropriately.
4.5. Hydro Turbine Flow Rate (
)
It is the amount of water passing through the hydro turbine .HOMER estimates this
value each time step using equation 2:
(2)
Where
is the flow rate obtainable to the hydro turbine
is the minimum flow rate of the hydro turbine
is the maximum flow rate of the hydro turbine
4.6. Design Flow rate (
)
The design flow rate is the flow rate for which the hydro turbine is designed.This is
also typically the flow rate at which the turbine works at its maximum efficiency
,although HOMER suppose the turbine efficiency is constant. HOMER utilizes the
design flow rate to estimate the hydro turbine flow rate and the nominal hydro power.
4.7. Nominal Hydro Power (
)
Is the power generated by the hydro turbine given the obtainable head and stream
flow equal to the design flow rate of the hydro turbine. The estimation of the nominal
hydro power contains the efficiency of the hydro turbine ,but not the pipe head loss.
HOMER uses this value only to characterize the size of the hydro system, and to permit
easy rapprochement with the sizes of other parts of the power system. HOMER
estimates the nominal hydro power using equation 3:
(3)
Where
g
is hydro turbine efficiency [%]
is acceleration due to gravity [9.81 m/s²]
is the design flow rate of the hydro turbine [m³/s]
is density of water [1000kg/m³]
6
Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development Vol. 22, No.02 (Part-5), March 2018
The Fourth Scientific Engineering and First Sustainable Engineering Conference
www.jeasd.org (ISSN 2520-0917)
4.8. Cost of Energy (COE)
HOMER defines the leveled cost of energy as the average cost per kWh of useful
electrical energy produced by the system .
4.9. Net Present Cost ( NPC)
The net present cost (or life-cycle cost) of a component is the present value of all the
costs of constituting and operating the component over the project existence, minus the
present value of all the revenues that it earns over the project existence. HOMER
estimates the net present cost of each component in the system, and of the system as a
whole.
5. Case Studies
Six case studies were implemented in this work. Case study 1 take the impact of
hydro head on optimization when uses hydro power only, case study 2 take the impact
of water flow rate on optimization when uses hydro power only, case study 3 take the
impact of hydro turbine efficiency on optimization when uses hydro power only, case
study 4 take the impact of hydro head loss on optimization when uses hydro power
only, case study 5 take the impact of wind turbine hub height on optimization when uses
wind power only, and case study 6 take the impact of hydro head on optimization
when uses both hydro and wind power .
6. Simulation Results and Discussion
HOMER gave 0088 simulation results for the proposed system of this work cover all
six case studies .Tables 1 to 6 show some of these results with respect to each case
study.Figure 8 shows the optimum design in case studies 1 ,5, and 6 when wind turbine
hub height= 15m, hydro head= 12m, design flow rate= 100L/s, hydro turbine
efficiency= 95%, hydro head loss= 30% and maximum annual capacity shortage= 60%.
Table 1. Effect of hydro head (Case study1)
Hydro
Output
COE
Capacity
Head
Power [$/kWh]
shortage
[m]
[kW]
[%]
4
3.7
0.081
0.00
6
8
10
12
5.6
7.5
9.3
11.2
0.081
0.081
0.081
0.081
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Table 2 . Effect of flow rate (Case study2)
Flow
Output
COE
Capacity
rate
Power
[$/kWh]
shortage
[L/s]
[kW]
[%]
50
5.6
0.081
0.00
100
150
200
11.2
16.8
22.4
0.081
0.081
0.081
0.00
0.00
0.00
7
Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development Vol. 22, No.02 (Part-5), March 2018
The Fourth Scientific Engineering and First Sustainable Engineering Conference
www.jeasd.org (ISSN 2520-0917)
Table 3. Effect of hydro turbine efficiency (Case Study3)
Turbine
Output
COE
Capacity
efficiency
Power
[$/kWh]
shortage
[%]
[kW]
[%]
75
8.8
0.081
0.00
80
85
90
95
9.4
10
10.6
11.2
0.081
0.081
0.081
0.081
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Table 4.Effect of hydro head loss (Case Study 4)
Hydro
Output
COE
Capacity
head loss
Power
[$/kWh]
shortage
[%]
[kW]
[%]
5
1.8
0.082
2
10
15
20
30
40
60
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
0.082
0.082
0.082
0.084
0.087
0.102
2
3
5
8
14
35
Table 5 . Effect of wind turbine hub (Case Study 5)
Wind
Output
COE
Capacity
turbine
Power
[$/kWh]
shortage
height [m]
[kW]
[%]
10
4.6
0.174
56
15
20
25
5.4
5.9
6.3
0.163
0.157
0.153
52
49
46
Table 6 . Effect of hydro head (Case Study 6)
Hydro
Output
COE
Capacity
Head
Power
[$/kWh]
shortage
[m]
[kW]
[%]
4
3.7
0.183
0.00
6
8
10
12
5.6
7.5
9.3
11.2
0.183
0.183
0.183
0.183
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Figure 8: The overall system design.
8
Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development Vol. 22, No.02 (Part-5), March 2018
The Fourth Scientific Engineering and First Sustainable Engineering Conference
www.jeasd.org (ISSN 2520-0917)
From above results we see that ,the case study 1 is the optimum one, since it gave
energy cost COE= 0.081 $/kWh and the total NPC= 10, 057$ which are the lowest, and
the load is provided with the complete energy requirement, and there is no capacity
shortage in feeding the load. While when using wind power only in case study 5 ,it is
seen that according to COE and total NPC of this design categorized, the load couldn’t
be provided with total energy requirement and the capacity shortage depends upon the
wind turbine hub height, for 15 meters height, the capacity shortage is 52%. Total NPC
and COE are 12, 594$ and 0.163$/kWh respectively. According to COE and total NPC
of design for case study 6, the load is provided with complete energy requirement and
there is no capacity shortage in feeding the load ,and the value of total NPC and COE
are 22, 651$ and 0.183$/kWh respectively.
7. Conclusions
The design optimization of a hybrid hydro-wind , micro-power system for rural
community were investigated. Six case studiess were implemented using HOMER
software and taking into account the consideration of hydro head,flow rate,efficiency
,and hydro loss for micro hydro power with wind turbine head.The optimun design were
extracted from 8400 of HOMER simulation ressults.We can get the optimum design
by using a hydropower turbine only with choosing some characteristics of it .Designers
of micropower system with using renewable energies must implement HOMER
software as a first stage for their design to guide them to have the right descions in
planning and constructing such systems.Also it was concluded that the devloping
hybrid micropower system using HOMER will encourage the private investors to
expand their projects in isolated rural places using available renewable energies.
8. References
1. Wikipedia ,Micro hydro , available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_hydro:
2. Deepak Kumar Lal, Bibhuti Bhusan Dash, and A. K. Akella (2011). "Optimization of
PV/Wind/Micro-Hydro/Diesel Hybrid Power System in HOMER for the Study Area",
International Journal on Electrical Engineering and Informatics , Volume 3, Number
3.
3. Niharika Varshney, M. P. Sharma, D. K. Khatod (2013) " Sizing of Hybrid Energy
System using HOMER", International Journal of Emerging Technology and
Advanced Engineering, Volume 3, Issue 6.
4. O.J.Onojo, G.A. Chukwudebe, E.N.C. Okafor, S.O.E. Ogbogu (2013) " Feasibility
investigation of a hybrid renewable energy system as a back up power supply for an
ICT building in Nigeria" , Natural and Applied Sciences, Vol. 4 ,No. 3.
5. Luis E. Teixeira, Johan Caux, Alexandre Beluco, Ivo Bertoldo,José Antônio S.
Louzada1, Ricardo C. Eifler (2015) " Feasibility Study of a Hydro PV Hybrid System
Operating at a Dam for Water Supply in Southern Brazil", Journal of Power and
Energy Engineering,3.
9
Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development Vol. 22, No.02 (Part-5), March 2018
The Fourth Scientific Engineering and First Sustainable Engineering Conference
www.jeasd.org (ISSN 2520-0917)
6. Getnet Zewde Somano, Getachew Shunki (2016) " Design and modelling of hybrid
PV-micro hydro power generation case study Jimma zone" American Journal of
Electrical Power and Energy Systems,5.
7.World Weather & Climate Information , available at https://weather-andclimate.com/
8.HOMER User Support ,available at https://www.homerenergy.com/support/
10