“At long last! We finally have a scholarly volume of work that critically and efficaciously examines the multiple crossovers between tourism, migration, and exile.
This remarkable collection of chapters provides an endless buffet of theoretically
rich and empirically inspiring insights into diverse human mobilities and their
implications for tourism. Crucial concepts, including migration, belonging, identity, existential fluidity, imaginaries, exclusion and inclusion, and many others, are
skillfully interpreted through the lenses of mobilities, diasporas, migrations, refugees, and exiles. I congratulate Natalia Bloch and Kathleen M. Adams for putting
together this consequential tome, which is global in its reach and appeal. This masterpiece belongs on the desk of every social scientist who has interests in tourism,
migration, exile, and all other manifestations of human mobility.”
Dallen J. Timothy, Professor and Senior Sustainability Scientist,
Arizona State University
“One of the most important developments in the study of mobilities over the last
quarter century has been a growing willingness by scholars to consider the intersections between different forms of (im)mobility. Natalia Bloch and Kathleen M.
Adams’s edited volume constitutes a major contribution to this effort. This diverse
collection of ethnographic case studies demonstrates the dynamic productiveness of
addressing the overlaps and interplays between tourism, migration, and exile rather
than treating these mobilities as investigative siloes. It will be a significant resource
in both research and teaching.”
Vered Amit, Professor Emerita of Anthropology,
Concordia University Montreal
“This collection constitutes an important step towards the integration of the study
of mobilities. In a series of ethnographic case studies of tourists, migrants, exiles,
refugees, returnees, and volunteers, the volume provides a framework for the systematic study of the great variety of personal mobility phenomena in different
parts of the contemporary world. The insights of the authors and editors constitute
a step forward towards the formulation of a systematic comparative approach to
mobilities.”
Erik Cohen, Department of Sociology and Anthropology,
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
“Tourist, migrant, traveler, refugee: too often we take for granted what these
terms mean and to whom they should be applied. This collection’s lucid, thoughtprovoking chapters trenchantly challenge such simplistic categorizations, using the
fine-grained lens of ethnography to reveal how mobilities overlap, intersect, and
blur in lived experience – despite deep-rooted systems of governance, finance,
representation, and scholarship that keep them conceptually distinct. Addressing
a dazzling range of geographical settings, populations, motivations, and outcomes,
this wonderfully coherent yet notably interdisciplinary volume will be a landmark
work, prompting serious reflection and debate.”
Dr. Naomi Leite, Reader in Anthropology, SOAS,
University of London
INTERSECTIONS OF TOURISM,
MIGRATION, AND EXILE
This book challenges the classic – and often tacit – compartmentalization of
tourism, migration, and refugee studies by exploring the intersections of these
forms of spatial mobility: each prompts distinctive images and moral reactions, yet
they often intertwine, overlap, and influence one another.
Tourism, migration, and exile evoke widely varying policies, diverse popular
reactions, and contrasting imagery. What are the ramifications of these siloed
conceptions for people on the move? To what extent do gender, class, ethnic, and
racial global inequalities shape moral discourses surrounding people’s movements?
This book presents 12 predominantly ethnographic case studies from around the
world, and a pandemic-focused conclusion, that address these issues. In recounting
and juxtaposing stories of refugees’ and migrants’ returns, marriage migrants,
voluntourists, migrant retirees, migrant tourism workers and entrepreneurs, mobile
investors and professionals, and refugees pursuing educational mobility, this book
cultivates more nuanced insights into intersecting forms of mobility. Ultimately,
this work promises to foster not only empathy but also greater resolve for forging
trails toward mobility justice.
This accessibly written volume will be essential to scholars and students in critical
migration, tourism, and refugee studies, including anthropologists, sociologists,
human geographers, and researchers in political science and cultural studies. The
book will also be of interest to non-academic professionals and general readers
interested in contemporary mobilities.
Natalia Bloch is an Anthropologist and Associate Professor in the Institute of
Anthropology and Ethnology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland.
She specializes in the anthropology of mobility in the postcolonial context. She
conducted research in Tibetan refugee settlements and among mobile workers and
entrepreneurs of the informal tourism sector in India. She is the author of the book
Encounters across Difference. Tourism and Overcoming Subalternity in India (2021). Her
articles have appeared, among others, in Critique of Anthropology, Annals of Tourism
Research, Journal of Refugee Studies, Critical Asian Studies, and Transfers. Interdisciplinary
Journal of Mobility Studies.
Kathleen M. Adams is an Anthropologist, Professorial Research Associate at
SOAS, University of London, and Professor Emerita at Loyola University Chicago.
Her specializations include the politics of tourism and heritage, museums, arts,
public interest anthropology, and the nexus of tourism and homeland migrant visits
in Indonesia. She has authored five books, including two award-winning volumes,
Art as Politics: Re-crafting Identities, Tourism and Power in Tana Toraja, Indonesia (2006)
and The Ethnography of Tourism (2019, coedited). Her articles have appeared in
various journals, such as Annals of Tourism Research, Tourism Geographies, Museum
Worlds, International Journal of Heritage Studies, and American Ethnologist.
INTERSECTIONS OF
TOURISM, MIGRATION,
AND EXILE
Edited by Natalia Bloch
Kathleen M. Adams
Cover image: Michał Sita
First published 2023
by Routledge
4 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
OR
© 2023 selection and editorial matter, Natalia Bloch and Kathleen M.
Adams; individual chapters, the contributors
The right of Natalia Bloch and Kathleen M. Adams to be identified as the
authors of the editorial material, and of the authors for their individual
chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or
utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now
known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in
any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing
from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or
registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation
without intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN: 978-1-032-02279-6 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-1-032-02280-2 (pbk)
ISBN: 978-1-003-18268-9 (ebk)
DOI: 10.4324/9781003182689
Typeset in Bembo
by Apex CoVantage, LLC
CONTENTS
CONTENTSCONTENTS
List of Figures
List of Tables
Foreword
Mimi Sheller
Acknowledgments
List of Contributors
Problematizing Siloed Mobilities: Tourism, Migration, Exile
Kathleen M. Adams and Natalia Bloch
ix
x
xi
xiv
xv
1
1 Temporality and the Intersection of Tourism and
Migration: Mobilities Between Cuba and Denmark
Nadine T. Fernandez
31
2 Migrant, Tourist, Cuban: Identification and Belonging in
Return Visits to Cuba
Valerio Simoni
45
3 Diasporic Im/mobilities: Migrants, Returnees, Deportees,
Expats, Tourists, and Beyond in the Vietnamese Homeland
Long T. Bui
60
4 Student Migration as an Escape from Protracted Exile: The
Case of Young Sahrawi Refugees
Rita Reis
78
viii Contents
5 The Intersections Between Tourism and Exile: Justice
Tourism in Bethlehem, Palestine
Rami K. Isaac
6 Crafting Activists from Tourists: Volunteer Engagement
During the “Refugee Crisis” in Serbia
Robert Rydzewski
7 Panama’s Temporary Migrants in the Tourism Era
Carla Guerrón Montero
94
112
130
8 Intersections of Tourism, Cross-border Marriage,
and Retirement Migration in Thailand
Kosita Butratana, Alexander Trupp and Karl Husa
148
9 The Tourist, the Migrant, and the Anthropologist:
A Problematic Encounter Within European Cities
Francesco Vietti
170
10 In and out of Brazil: Overlapping Mobilities in the
Capoeira Archipelago
Lauren Miller Griffith
187
11 Intersections of Professional Mobility and Tourism Among
Swedish Physicians and Researchers
Magnus Öhlander, Katarzyna Wolanik Boström
and Helena Pettersson
12 Mobility Through Investment: Economics, Tourism, or
Lifestyle Migration? Narratives of Chinese and Brazilian
Golden Visa Holders in Portugal
Maria de Fátima Amante and Irene Rodrigues
201
217
13 Pandemic Postscript: Tourism, Migration, and Exile
Stephanie Malia Hom
238
Index
252
FIGURES
FIGURESFIGURES
1.1
1.2
7.1
7.2
7.3
People of Cuban origin in Denmark
International tourism – numbers of arrivals in Cuba in 1995–2018
Afro-Antillean migrants on Colon Island, 19th century
Map of Panama
Marta in Providencia
37
38
132
135
140
TABLES
TABLESTABLES
5.1 Most frequently used words
8.1 Reasons for migration to Thailand
8.2 Aspects of visiting family and relatives in Thailand
12.1 GV grantees by country of origin, October 2012 to May 2021
100
156
162
218
FOREWORD
FOREWORDFOREWORD
In these times of pandemic disruptions to travel, hardening migration and border
policies, and roiling climate emergencies troubling our entire planet, the burning
questions of human and other species’ (dis)placements press upon all other issues.
The fractious and fragmented temporalities of moving and dwelling are at the forefront of social and ecological thought. In the face of inexorable climate mobilities,
multispecies extinctions, viral outbreaks, political violence and wars driving exile,
skyrocketing inflation, logistics breakdowns, and economic recessions, many are
asking: Where can we stay or where can we go? How can we stay and how can we
go? Shall we stay or shall we go?
Even so, in the midst of these existential crises, things may be weirdly calm and
business as usual also continues. People go back to workplaces (which some never
left); tourists go off on vacations (while others indulge in local staycations); families make decisions about where to move or how to stay in touch across distances;
hopeful migrants climb into boats and cross deserts; and many people continue to
find new ways to combine work, travel, migration, and international opportunities
such as education or entrepreneurship. Birds and animals migrate; plants reproduce;
tides come and go. Life goes on.
While the study of tourism mobilities, migrant mobilities, and experiences of
exile and return has animated many debates about belonging and mobility in the
contemporary world, it still remains a challenge to think about them simultaneously. Yet especially now this is a necessity in the emergent worlds of (re)mixed and
mixed up (im)mobilities. And our theories, methodologies, and epistemological
questions must forge new pathways to understand the current context.
This volume brings together sensitive investigations of multidimensional human
mobilities and multilayered representations of complex (im)mobilities. One of the
great outcomes of this book, like much satisfying ethnography, is to disrupt takenfor-granted dichotomies and dualistic thinking with more subtle hybrid models
xii Foreword
and braided forms of understanding. In drawing our attention to the many ways
in which tourism, migration, and exile are not just entangled subjects but are
intrinsically co-present flickering identities within diverse performances of travel,
the authors dislodge settled categories and the assumptions we bring to them:
home and away, consumption and production, citizen and foreigner, self and other,
belonging and estrangement, danger and safety, and the local and the global.
Many of the contributions also hint at some ways for building more ethical relations of mobility and mobilizing research for greater mobility justice. All human
mobilities, whether we like it or not, are governed by highly unequal mobility
regimes and legal regimes (borders, visas, passports, temporary work permits, citizenship laws, racialized discrimination, data collection, surveillance, mobile tracking, vaccine cards, etc.). Such mobility regimes differentiate these subject positions
of the tourist, the migrant, and the exile and diffract the spaces of mobility into
splintered channels and systems of rule. Yet as the field of mobilities research
shows us, these mobile subjects are also always interrelated with each other in
multiple obvious and not-so-obvious ways. It is the complexity of these possible
entanglements – and their implications for mobility justice – that this book compellingly conveys, delving into unexamined places with new optics and research
approaches.
In the studies presented here, we encounter complex mixtures of expatriates,
exiles, deported refugees, and diasporic return tourists, for example, in return
mobilities to Viet Nam (Bui) or the subtly hyphenated practices of pilgrimage,
educational travel, migration, and “visiting friends and relatives” tourism in the
capoeira communities of practice around the world (Griffith). Tourism, migration,
and exile all rely on the creation of “imagined archipelagoes” of different kinds
(places where one desires to travel, places where one visits for a while, places where
one anchors nostalgic memories or dreamed of futures), as well as more dystopian
archipelagoes (places where one gets stuck, places to which one can never return,
places where one cannot get a visa, and places one was forced to flee in terror). Yet
the tourist archipelagoes, the migrant archipelagoes, and the archipelagoes of exile
are overlapping and mutually constitutive.
Whether in physical places of transiting, waiting, and dwelling, or in imagined
representational spaces of belonging, alienation, and nostalgia, the stories of the
tourist, the migrant, and the exile appear together, confront each other, transform each other, and get wrapped into individual experiences of multi-mobilities.
New stories and physical experiences can also be intentionally produced. Other
chapters focus on the active intersectional practices of co-production and public
pedagogy such as “justice tourism” in Palestine (Isaac) or “responsible tourism” in
the European Migrantour (Vietti). Both seek to “radicalize” tourism not only by
juxtaposing the politics of migration and displacement with the tourist’s experience of freedom of mobility but also by building relations of learning and active
engagement between oppressed groups suffering domination and those who seek
out cross-cultural understanding of the places they visit or even their own homes.
Foreword xiii
At the heart of these inquiries are also questions of the mobilities of the ethnographer, the researcher, the academic, and the writer. What are our obligations to
others and to the places through which we travel or stop traveling? Can dreams of
liberation, justice, and healing still motivate our research travels or are we just business travelers becoming tourists? How does the diversification of higher education
allow for the emergence of new mobile subjects who can practice ethical tourism/
research/mobilities in ways that can respond to the demands of these times? These
are questions for anthropology, global education, and academia as a whole. And in
asking these questions, we can perhaps radicalize not only tourism but also radicalize ourselves, our methodologies, and our multidimensional travels through the
world, or better yet in relation to the world(s) of others.
Mimi Sheller
Dean of The Global School, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This volume emerged from a co-organized panel presented at the 2019 International
Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences. The Congress, World Solidarities, was held at the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland: We thank both
these institutions for creating a fertile venue in which to germinate the ideas at the
core of this book. Our appreciation also goes to Bobby Luthra Sinha who served as a
discussant for the panel. In addition, we extend our heartfelt thanks to Uma Kothari
and Nelson Graburn for their suggestions, feedback, and encouragement. We also
wish to express our gratitude to our editor at Routledge, Faye Leerink, for seeing the
promise of this volume, for her patience with pandemic-induced delays, and for her
impressive professionalism. Our thanks are also due to the rest of the staff at Routledge, Prati Priyanka, Spandana P.B. and others, who skillfully shepherded us through
the publishing process, as well as our indexer, Kamila Grześkowiak.
Natalia would like to thank the co-editor of this book, Kathleen M. Adams, for her
encouragement and constant support. It was a great pleasure to work with such a prominent anthropologist. She also thanks her colleagues in the Institute of Anthropology
and Ethnology at the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań for creating an inspiring
working environment. Last but not least, her heartfelt gratitude goes, as always, to her
family, especially her partner and fellow anthropologist, Łukasz Kaczmarek, their son
Leonard, and her parents, Marianna and Stanisław Bloch for their love and support.
Kathleen conveys her heartfelt appreciation to her co-editor, Natalia Bloch: Her
intellectual curiosity, tireless work ethic, and good humor made it a genuine delight
to work together on this project. She also thanks the Little Engines/Unicorns writing group for their support: They made the months spent in front of her laptop a
little less isolating. She also offers her gratitude to Don LeBuhn, Kelly Halligan,
and J.J. for enabling her to spend time in an inspiring setting replete with unforgettable vineyard walks (and the most wonderful canine companion) during the most
intensive phase of manuscript preparation. Finally, her deepest debt of gratitude is
to her family, especially her husband, Peter Sanchez, who saw to it that manuscript
preparation did not crowd out tennis and hikes in the redwoods.
CONTRIBUTORS
CONTRIBUTORSCONTRIBUTORS
Kathleen M. Adams is a Cultural Anthropologist, Professorial Research Associate
at SOAS, University of London, and Professor Emerita at Loyola University Chicago. Her specializations include the politics of tourism and heritage, museums,
arts, public interest anthropology, and the nexus of tourism and homeland migrant
visits in Indonesia. She has authored five books, including two award-winning volumes, Art as Politics: Re-crafting Identities, Tourism and Power in Tana Toraja, Indonesia
(2006) and The Ethnography of Tourism (2019, coedited). Her articles have appeared
in various journals, such as Annals of Tourism Research, Tourism Geographies, Museum
Worlds, International Journal of Heritage Studies, and American Ethnologist.
Maria de Fátima Amante is an Anthropologist, Associate Professor, and Head
of the Anthropology Department at the School of Social and Political Sciences
(ISCSP), University of Lisbon. She teaches several courses on migration. Her specializations include topics in political anthropology such as images and practices
of the State, borders, mobility, and migration issues. Her current research interests
are in mobility regimes, which she examines through the case of the Golden Visas
policy in Portugal, focusing on Brazilian investors. She has published in several
peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies and the
Journal of Borderland Studies.
Natalia Bloch is an Anthropologist and Associate Professor in the Institute of
Anthropology and Ethnology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland.
She specializes in the anthropology of mobility in the postcolonial context. She
conducted research in Tibetan refugee settlements and among mobile workers and
entrepreneurs of the informal tourism sector in India. She is the author of the book
Encounters across Difference. Tourism and Overcoming Subalternity in India (2021). Her
articles have appeared, among others, in Critique of Anthropology, Annals of Tourism
xvi Contributors
Research, Journal of Refugee Studies, Critical Asian Studies, and Transfers Interdisciplinary
Journal of Mobility Studies.
Long T. Bui is an Associate Professor at the University of California, Irvine, in the
Department of Global and International Studies. His book, Returns of War: South
Vietnam and the Price of Refugee Memory (2018), reframes the legacy of the Republic
of Vietnam (South Vietnam) through a multidisciplinary approach that includes
ethnography, oral history, literary memoirs, and archival research to understand
how individuals and groups today remember this figure of loss. His second book is
Model Machines: A History of the Asian as Automaton (2022).
Kosita Butratana has a Master’s degree in Educational Psychology and Guidance
from Chiang Mai University, Thailand, worked as an independent certified tourist
guide, and was a lecturer at Suan Dusit Rajabhat University (Hua Hin Campus).
She has conducted fieldwork for various projects related to tourism and migration
in Southeast Asia and is currently a doctoral student at the Department of Geography and Regional Research at the University of Vienna, Austria, working on Thai
marriage migration.
Nadine T. Fernandez is a Cultural Anthropologist and Professor in the Social Sci-
ence and Public Affairs Department at SUNY Empire State College. Her research
on race and gender relations in Cuba and Cuban marriage migration takes an
intersectional perspective on transnational migration and tourism. Her publications
include Revolutionizing Romance: Interracial Couples in Contemporary Cuba (2010); a
co-edited (with Christian Groes) book Intimate Mobilities: Sexual Economies, Marriage and Migration in a Disparate World (2018); a co-edited (with Katie Nelson)
open-access textbook Gendered Lives: Global Issues (2022); and several book chapters and journal articles.
Lauren Miller Griffith, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Anthropology at Texas
Tech University. She studies performance and tourism in Latin America and the
USA. Her most recent book (forthcoming from the University of Illinois Press)
focuses on the relationship between capoeira and social justice and is titled Graceful
Resistance: How Capoeiristas Use Their Art for Activism and Community Engagement.
She is also the author of In Search of Legitimacy: How Outsiders Become Part of the AfroBrazilian Capoeira Tradition (2016) and co-author of Apprenticeship Pilgrimage (with
Jonathan S. Marion), which was published in 2018.
Carla Guerrón Montero is a Cultural and Applied Anthropologist, and Professor
of Anthropology at the University of Delaware, United States, with joint appointments in Africana Studies, Latin American and Iberian Studies, and Women and
Gender Studies. Her specializations include the anthropological study of tourism,
cuisine, gender, and race in the Latin American African Diaspora. She is the author
of From Temporary Migrants to Permanent Attractions: Tourism, Cultural Heritage, and
Contributors xvii
Afro-Antillean Identities in Panama (2020), co-editor of the award-winning book Why
the World Needs Anthropologists (Routledge, 2021), and author of numerous book
chapters and peer-reviewed journal articles in English, Spanish, and Portuguese.
Stephanie Malia Hom is an Associate Professor of Transnational Italian Studies at
UC Santa Barbara and co-founder of the UC Berkeley Tourism Studies Working
Group. She is the author of Empire’s Mobius Strip: Historical Echoes in Italy’s Crisis of
Migration and Detention (2019) and The Beautiful Country: Tourism and the Impossible
State of Destination Italy (2015). She also co-edited the volume Italian Mobilities (Routledge, 2016) and a special issue of California Italian Studies (2019) on “Borderless
Italy.” She writes and lectures on Italy and the Mediterranean, mobility studies, colonialism and imperialism, migration and detention, and tourism history and practice.
Karl Husa is an Associate Professor (ret.) at the Department of Geography and
Regional Research at the University of Vienna, Austria. Until 2016, he was Head of
the Southeast Asia Research Group at the Department and acted as Deputy ASEAUNINET representative of the University of Vienna. Since 2010, he has also acted
as an affiliate researcher at Suan Dusit University and as a visiting professor at the
Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia at Mahidol University in Thailand, most recently in 2022. His main research areas are demography, population
geography, and human migration, with a regional focus on Southeast Asia.
Rami K. Isaac, born in Palestine, holds a Ph.D. in Spatial Sciences from the Uni-
versity of Groningen, in the Netherlands. He is currently a Senior Lecturer in
tourism at Breda University of Applied Sciences in the Netherlands. In addition,
he is an Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Tourism and Hotel Management at
Bethlehem University, Palestine. His research interests are in tourism development
and management, critical theory, and political aspects of tourism. He co-edited
several books and published book chapters and numerous articles on tourism and
political (in)stability, occupation, tourism, and war, dark (heritage) tourism, and
transformational tourism.
Magnus Öhlander is a Professor in European Ethnology at the Department of
Ethnology, History of Religions and Gender Studies, Stockholm University,
Sweden. He has done research about elderly care, ideas about racism in Swedish
public debate, the discourse on immigrant patients in health care, Polish-born physicians working in Sweden, internationalization and knowledge transfer in the field
of medicine, and internationalization among scholars in the Humanities. His latest
research interests focus on nurses migrating to Sweden to work. He has also written
about culture theory and ethnographic methods and teaches European ethnology,
diversity studies, and culture theory.
Helena Pettersson is an Associate Professor in Ethnology at the Department of
Culture and Media Studies, Umeå University, Sweden. Over the past decade,
xviii Contributors
her research has been focused on highly skilled migration, international mobility,
and knowledge production in the academy, parallel with science and technology
studies and gender studies. Currently, she is also working on the topic of the cognitive and cultural understandings of curiosity. She is Departmental Deputy Chair
and Head of Research, as well as Elected Member of the Royal Skyttean Academy
of Letters & Science.
Rita Reis is a Ph.D. candidate in Social Anthropology at the Institute of Social
Sciences, University of Lisbon. Through the case of Sahrawi refugees, Reis’ research
focuses on contexts of refugees and forced migrations, with special emphasis on
youths’ perspectives. Her research project focuses on Sahrawi student mobilities
from refugee camps to Algiers (Algeria) and Badajoz (Spain). By analyzing the subjective and moral dimensions of prolonged forced migrations, her research aims to
understand the notions of normality/exception and future perspectives.
Irene Rodrigues, Ph.D. in Anthropology (2013, ICS, Universidade de Lisboa), is
an Assistant Professor in Anthropology at ISCSP, University of Lisbon. Since 2002,
she has been engaged in several research projects on Chinese migration. She is the
co-editor of the book The Presence of China and the Chinese Diaspora in Portugal and
Portuguese-Speaking Territories (2021), co-author of the documentary on Chinese
migrants in Portugal We the Chinese (2013), and has authored several articles and
book chapters.
Robert Rydzewski defended his Ph.D. in Anthropology and Cultural Studies at
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland, in 2020. He is Assistant Professor at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań and Postdoctoral Researcher at the
Centre for Southeast European Studies at the University of Graz. Currently, he is
working on a monograph on the migratory Balkan route in South-Eastern Europe.
In cooperation with pro-migrant activists, he also runs a project on partnerships
between pro-refugee grassroots groups and formal entities in Poland.
Valerio Simoni is a Senior Research Fellow at the Department of Anthropology and Sociology and the Global Migration Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute,
Switzerland, and Research Associate at the Centre for Research in Anthropology, Portugal. Drawing on long-term ethnographic research in Cuba and Spain
and focusing on situations marked by cross-border mobilities, notably international
tourism and migration, his work addresses processes of social transformation with a
special interest in the study of ethics, intimacy, economic practice, and the politics
of belonging and community formation. He is the author of the award-winning
monograph Tourism and Informal Encounters in Cuba (2016).
Contributors xix
Alexander Trupp is the Associate Dean for Research and Postgraduate Studies
cum Associate Professor at the School of Hospitality and Service Management,
Sunway University, Malaysia. He is also the acting head of the Asia Pacific Centre
for Hospitality Research and editor-in-chief of the Austrian Journal of South-East
Asian Studies. Prior to joining Sunway University, Alexander worked at the University of Vienna (Austria), Mahidol University (Thailand), and the University of
the South Pacific (Fiji). His research is nested in the fields of tourism geography,
mobilities, and sustainable tourism, with a regional focus on Southeast Asia and the
Pacific Islands.
Francesco Vietti is an Anthropologist and Assistant Professor at the University of
Turin, Italy. His main research topics are mobility, heritage, and intercultural education. In the last decade, he has conducted fieldwork in Eastern Europe and the
Balkans and has recently turned to focus his interest on the Mediterranean small
islands that experience significant flows both of tourists and migrants. From 2009
to 2019, he was the Scientific Coordinator of the European project “Migrantour.
Intercultural Urban Routes.” Since 2019, he has been coordinating the summer
school “Mobility and Heritage in the Mediterranean” (University of Milan Bicocca and University of Malta).
Katarzyna Wolanik Boström is an Associate Professor in Ethnology in the Depart-
ment of Culture and Media Studies, Umeå University, Sweden. Her research interests include narrativity, life stories, highly skilled mobility, and professional learning.
Her Ph.D. thesis analyzed how Polish professionals narrated their life stories after
the fall of communism. Her other research projects have focused on international
mobility among medical personnel, the practices of “internationalization” among
Swedish Humanities scholars, and autobiographic storytelling.
PROBLEMATIZING SILOED
MOBILITIES
KATHLEEN M. ADAMS AND NATALIA BLOCHPROBLEMATIZING SILOED MOBILITIES
Tourism, Migration, Exile
Kathleen M. Adams and Natalia Bloch
Roughly three hours by car from Mexico City nestled in the arid hills of the
Central Mexican highlands lies Parque EcoAlberto, a three-thousand-acre resort
and eco-adventure destination collectively owned by the indigenous Hñúhñú
community. Here, capitalinos (urban Mexicans from the capital) and tourists from
farther afield can romp in a sprawling waterpark, soak in natural hot springs, or
enjoy zip-lining, rock-climbing, kayaking, camping, and overnight stays in rustic
cabins. However, the park’s biggest draw is La Caminata Nocturna, an interactive
“night walk” where, for about US$20, tourists experience a simulated evening of
dark play as undocumented migrants. For four moonlight hours, local guides lead
small groups of vacationers through rugged desert terrain, winding through craggy
hills, forging riverbeds, circumnavigating brambly cacti clumps, and balancing atop
imposing walls in simulated attempts to surreptitiously cross the “border” into the
United States. Along the way, these groups of make-believe migrants encounter
assorted staged threats, ranging from pre-positioned wild beasts to costumed border
patrol officers. When sirens or gunshots puncture the nocturnal desert soundscape,
the Hñúhñú guides harangue their tourist charges to shut off their lights, move
more quickly, or run for cover lest they be captured by la migra (immigration
patrol). When Hñúhñús masquerading as border patrol agents ultimately capture
and interrogate the tourists, the lighter-skinned Mexican tourists from the capital
are sometimes singled out and questioned for being “too white to be Mexican”
(Hasian, Maldonado and Ono, 2015, p. 319).
Centuries ago, the indigenous Hñúhñús’ homeland was in the more fertile
Mezquital Valley, but conquest by Aztecs, Spaniards, and other groups forced them
to retreat into the region’s most arid mountain nooks (Schmidt, 2012, p. 204),
effectively rendering them marginalized exiles living on the fringes of their own
ancestral lands. The Hñúhñús in this particular craggy hinterland valley had
long relied on farming for their livelihood, but much changed with the 1980s
DOI: 10.4324/9781003182689-1
2
Kathleen M. Adams and Natalia Bloch
devastation of Mexico’s agricultural base and the subsequent rise of industrial farms
that wreaked havoc on small-scale farmers: An estimated 80% of the community
has undertaken the dangerous journey north to toil as undocumented farmworkers, construction workers, and truck drivers in the United States (Healy, 2007, par.
9; Walsh, 2019, p. 41). Aiming to curtail out-migration by creating local jobs, the
community initiated Parque EcoAlberto in 2004, with financial assistance from the
Mexican government. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, La Caminata Nocturna
employed over 70 Hñúhñús playing roles as masked guides (coyotes, who smuggle
migrants into the United States for a fee), Border Patrol agents, guards, ranchers,
and fellow aspiring migrants (Healy, 2007). Many of these indigenous employees
themselves had spent time as undocumented workers in the American Southwest
(Hasian et al., 2015, p. 322). Today, most community residents rely on jobs at the
eco-resort or on remittances from undocumented migrants for their livelihood
(Hasian et al., 2015, p. 322).
In recent years, the Park’s Camina Nocturna has attracted growing media attention: It has been featured in The New York Times, The Daily Mail, Vice, and the
BBC news and has even been the topic of a documentary film,1 drawing ever more
tourists from around the world up until the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Although some commentators note the ethically problematic dimensions of tourists play-acting as undocumented migrants,2 La Caminata Nocturna’s founders and
its Hñúhñú actors envision the touristic simulation as offering not only a novel
source of locally based income but also an opportunity to forge a sense of community and raise awareness of migrants’ experiences (Healy, 2007, par. 12). Some
scholars aptly herald the park as a “prime example of the complexities of freedom
and liberty in the contemporary age of free trade, global markets, diasporas and
human migrations” (Hasian et al., 2015, p. 312). For us, the park also poignantly
encapsulates the core themes of this book: The intersections of tourism, migration,
and exile.
Within the borders of the park, we find descendants of internally displaced
persons (IDPs) – many of them returned undocumented migrants – working as
performers in a tourist setting. As they reenact sanitized versions of community
members’ haunting border-crossing experiences, their tourist entourages play at
being migrants. The simulations themselves showcase how peoples’ varied experiences with mobility are entwined with race, ethnicity, class, politics, and global
regimes. Moreover, the park embodies the touristic commercialization of painful,
danger-fraught migrant experiences and prompts an array of ethical debates.
Beyond Silos: Decompartmentalizing Tourism,
Migration, and Exile
This book aims to challenge the classic – and often taken-for-granted – compartmentalization of tourism, migration, and refugee studies by exploring the intersections of these forms of human spatial mobility. The chapters in this volume offer
case studies from around the world examining how tourism, migration, and exile
Problematizing Siloed Mobilities 3
intertwine, overlap, and influence one another.3 Such intersections are multidimensional and multidirectional. Migrants and established exiles can be tourists in
their home countries (and elsewhere), drawing on economic, social, and cultural
capital gained through mobility. While visiting friends and relatives (VFR tourism),
tracing ancestral roots (ancestral/roots/diaspora tourism), or traveling via transnational networks, they engage in tourism and leisure activities. Moreover, some
return migrants invest in tourism enterprises. Migrant and refugee neighborhoods
can also become tourist destinations for both outsiders and other migrants seeking
a taste of home, as witnessed in “Chinatowns” worldwide. In addition, refugee
communities can attract tourists within the framework of justice tourism, via solidarity tours or as volunteer tourists (who often become activists). Refugee children
from the Global South are offered holiday escapes in the Global North, which can
sometimes pave paths out of protracted exile. Furthermore, it is not only “locals”
but also migrants who work as laborers and entrepreneurs in the tourism sector
(at times becoming tourists themselves, using forms of capital acquired through
interactions with tourists). Tourism, on the other hand, can stimulate migration.
Vacationers develop friendships and romantic relationships with local residents and
tourism sector employees, ultimately relocating to their countries of origin and
sometimes becoming migrant-tourism entrepreneurs themselves. Additionally,
tourism is often an initial step to retirement migration. Finally, in many forms of
mobility, the boundaries between migration and tourism are vague, as evidenced
in entrepreneurs’ and investors’ lifestyle migrations and in the mobilities of highly
skilled professionals. Thus, while scholars have classically researched and theorized
tourism, migration, and exile separately, social reality blurs these seemingly fixed
categorical boundaries. As a growing chorus of researchers has begun to observe,
people may be migrants/exiles and tourists simultaneously and their status may
change over time, sometimes repeatedly; “one set of movements leads to another”
(Hall and Tucker, 2004, p. 15; see Levitt and Glick Schiller, 2004). In offering
a collection of ethnographic case studies that dismantle and move beyond these
deep-seated conceptual boundaries, this book aims to examine mobilities in their
mutual constitution and “fluid interdependence” (Sheller and Urry, 2006, p. 212).
Rather than circumscribing ourselves within a single mobility silo, we advocate
for greater recognition of the variegated and intersecting mobility experiences that
shape people’s lives and inform their practices.
As many of the chapters in this volume illustrate, different mobilities evoke varying
political and popular imagery: some forms of mobility are positively valued, appreciated, and encouraged, while others are demonized and restrained (Glick Schiller and
Salazar, 2013, p. 188). Consider, for instance, the semantic valorization of second home
owners and long-term tourists from the Global North as “cosmopolitan nomads” versus the typical media representation of migrants from the Global South as “aliens” and
“intruders.” In a similar vein, highly skilled professionals and business travelers freely
traverse nation-states’ borders whereas impoverished asylum seekers are pushed back
from “fortress Europe.”4 We believe that considering how uneven distributions of
power permeate people’s movements will prove valuable on several levels. First, such
4
Kathleen M. Adams and Natalia Bloch
examinations promise to sharpen social critiques of how public discourses conceptualize and moralize various forms of mobility, reflecting gender, class, ethnicity, race, and
other global inequalities. Second, deconstructing the conceptual foundations of these
moral valorizations of people’s movements will enable new theoretical insights and,
finally (we hope), will also foster empathy with those whose movements are restrained.
Beyond the Trinity of Tourism, Migration,
and Exile: Other Intersecting Mobilities
Scholars interested in forms of human mobility and their intersections have highlighted a broad range of movements, far more than the trinity we are spotlighting
in this volume (see Clifford, 1997; Salazar, 2017). For instance, we have abundant
studies highlighting intersections between pilgrimage or sacred travels and tourism,
dating back to the 1970s, when Nelson Graburn (1977) penned his classic treatise
on tourism as a sacred journey and Victor and Edith Turner (1978, p. 20) made
their much-quoted observation that “a tourist is half a pilgrim if a pilgrim is half
a tourist” (e.g., Badone and Roseman, 2004; Cohen, 1992; DiGiovine and Choe,
2020; Eade, 1992; Ebron, 1999; Graburn, 1983; Pfaffenberger, 1983; Smith, 1992;
Timothy and Olsen, 2006). We also have studies that spotlight (post)modern forms
of nomadism and their intersections with exile, diaspora, or tourism (e.g., Cohen,
1973; Peters, 2006; Richards and Wilson, 2004; D’Andrea, 2009), including a
growing array of studies of digital nomads (e.g., Makimoto and Manners, 1997;
Richards, 2015; Thompson, 2019). In addition to the pilgrim, the nomad, the
exile, and the tourist, a recent special issue of Social Anthropology offers individual
chapters on two other “key figures” that have animated mobility research theory:
the pedestrian and the flaneur (see Salazar, 2017). So why did we select tourism,
migration, and exile as our focal points?
While we could have opted to embrace a scattershot approach in this collection, highlighting all these varied and intersecting forms of mobility, we felt that
by focusing our lens on tourism, migration, and exile, we could enable richer,
more nuanced analyses and foster an opportunity for patterns to surface between
the chapters. For us, tourism, migration, and exile have been especially important
for structuring people’s lives, imaginations, and understandings of their own and
others’ experiences in the current era.5 Moreover, as others have argued, migration
and tourism are two of the most important social and economic (and we would add
cultural) dynamics in society today (Hall and Williams, 2002). We believe this statement also applies to exile/refugees/forcibly displaced people. However, many of
the chapters in this book also highlight how other genres of human mobility articulate within their case studies. For instance, Rami K. Isaac (Chapter 5) and Lauren
Miller Griffith (Chapter 10) weave the theme of pilgrimage into their respective
discussions of justice tourism in Bethlehem and capoeira-oriented mobilities. Also,
Rita Reis (Chapter 4) addresses nomadism in her analysis of young Sahrawi refugees’ vacation and educational migrations. Moreover, although a growing number
of works highlight intersections between tourism and migration or between exile/
Problematizing Siloed Mobilities 5
diasporas and tourism, very few works address all three forms of mobility together.
We believe that dismantling the pernicious dichotomous classifications haunting
migration, tourism, and refugee studies will enable us to better understand mobility practices. Spotlighting the intersections of different forms of human spatial
mobilities promises to yield fertile grounds for harvesting new insights, including
critical insights into the global power relations and inequalities inscribed in various
moralizations of specific mobilities.
The Conundrum of Definitions
Offering definitions of the three forms of mobility at the core of this volume carries the risk of reifying the very silos we seek to problematize. The categories of
tourism, migration, and exile are, after all, abstractions that cannot possibly capture
the multidimensional nature of human mobilities (see Bell and Ward, 2000; Hall
and Williams, 2002). Here we briefly sketch some of the classic ways in which
these concepts have been defined and indicate the challenges in finding suitable
definitions.
Anthropologists have had a notoriously difficult time defining tourism (Nash,
1981; Stronza, 2001). In what is widely hailed as one of the first anthropological
volumes dedicated to tourism, Hosts and guests (1977[1989]), Valene L. Smith
defined the tourist as “a temporarily leisured person who voluntarily visits a
place away from home for the purpose of experiencing a change” (1989, p. 2).
Yet, the boundaries of this classic definition quickly unravel when one asks
questions such as, “what constitutes home?” For instance, how does second
home travel fit in (Jaakson, 1986)? This category of mobility – one that straddles
the tourism and migration binary – has inspired a number of studies, ranging
from examinations of elite, wealthy tourists/(temporary) migrants with second
homes (e.g., Hall and Müller, 2004) to more “ordinary” middle-class getaway
cottage owners (e.g., Harrison, 2008, 2010). Analyses of second home travel
challenge the notion that tourism, by definition, entails leaving a home: rather
studies have highlighted the negotiations of home, identity, and place entailed in
second home travel (e.g., McIntyre et al., 2006). And what of migrant touristworkers who combine motivations and practices related to leisure, sightseeing,
and paid work (Williams and Hall, 2002, pp. 5, 13; see also Bianchi, 2000).
Consider, for instance, Australian and New Zealander backpackers traveling in
Europe who supplement their tourism budgets with odd jobs (Mason, 2002),
or backpackers from Japan, South Korea, or Taiwan on “working holidays” who
are temporarily employed by tourism entrepreneurs from those countries (both
first- and second-generation migrants to Australia and New Zealand) who provide services to tourists from their countries of origin (Cooper, 2002). In short,
classic definitions of tourism invariably have fuzzy borders that pull us into other
travel genres.
The classic definition of migration as production-led mobility is unfounded
not only when we reflect on “migrant tourist-workers” and “working holidays”
6
Kathleen M. Adams and Natalia Bloch
but also when we consider migrants engaging in tourism practices, in the form
of VFR or homeland tourism (see, e.g., Boyne et al., 2002; Nguyen and King,
1998; Duval, 2003; Ashtar et al., 2017; Din, 2017; Horolets, 2018; Adams, 2019;
Moon et al., 2019) as well as other forms of leisure tourism (Dwyer et al., 2014).
Moreover, many migrants do not produce but consume, as in the case of retirement migration, both residential and seasonal (e.g., Ono, 2008; Gustafson, 2002;
Woube, 2014). Additionally, the time span that seemingly distinguishes migration
from tourism – with more permanent migrant mobility and temporary tourist
trips – fails to capture the complex nature of current mobilities (see Williams and
Hall, 2002, pp. 4–5), if we compare circular migrants (e.g., Skeldon, 2012; Duany,
2002; Deshingkar and Farrington, 2009), business travelers (e.g., Gustafson, 2014;
Unger et al., 2016), and highly skilled mobile professionals (e.g., Nowicka, 2007;
Baas, 2017) with residential tourists (O’Reilly, 2007). Finally, the voluntary character of migration which is treated as a core distinction between migrants and
forcibly displaced people, including refugees, becomes less obvious if we question
the very notion of voluntariness (Bakewell, 2021). This is also the case with the
classic distinction between migrants’ economic motivations and refugees’ political
motivations. Is it voluntary or forced migration when someone decides to flee
their homeland due to being unable to secure a livelihood and provide for their
family? And if a poor economic situation in one’s country is the result of political circumstances – an authoritarian regime, occupation, or war – can we still talk
about purely economic motivations? Is starvation necessary to speak of economic
coercion? And what of situations where one can no longer live a dignified life in
one’s own country?
Moreover, humans are guided by multiple and complex motives, and the labels
they use to define themselves are often strategies for maneuvering global mobility
regimes (consider Cubans who employ the category of migrants to maintain rights
to return visits discussed in Chapters 1 and 2 in this volume or Chinese investors in
Portugal who remain silent about their political motivations for mobility featured in
Chapter 12). In addition, when defining refugeehood, we encounter a narrow, legal
definition of a person who flees persecution and is recognized as a refugee by being
granted this status based on the 1951 Geneva Convention relating to the Status of
Refugees. However, this definition excludes a number of forcibly displaced peoples
(see Malkki’s critique, 1995a), such as IDPs, climate refugees, asylum seekers whose
claims have been rejected, and those who, for various reasons, decide not to pursue
such a status. Thus, as Liisa Malkki rightly points out, “the label ‘refugees’ connotes a bureaucratic and international humanitarian realm,” while “ ‘exile’ connotes
a readily aestheticizable realm” (1995a, p. 513), often explored in 20th-century
literature (e.g., Said, 1984). In this book, however, we have decided to employ the
category of exile in its structural rather than symbolic sense. That is, as a broader,
more encompassing term which refers to all those people who are not free (or able)
to return to their home countries (drawing on the historical concept of exile as
punishment, i.e., the banishment of a person from one’s homeland; see Böss, 2006).
In other words, when talking about exile, we bear in mind the need to historicize
Problematizing Siloed Mobilities 7
and politicize this category (Malkki, 1995a, p. 514), as Malkki did in her seminal
book Purity and exile. Violence, memory, and national cosmology among Hutu refugees in
Tanzania (1995b).
When discussing the complexities of mobilities, the ground-breaking book
Mobilities by John Urry (2007), along with Mimi Sheller’s and Urry’s article “The
new mobilities paradigm” (2006), must be mentioned. They postulated a new paradigm for theorizing (im)mobilities which would not only dismantle the conceptual
boundaries between different forms of mobilities but also move us beyond the
binary conceptualizations of movement and stasis, displacement and emplacement,
and fixity and motion. Their work has thus created fertile theoretical terrain for
projects such as ours. Finally, an important theoretical framework for this book
has been shaped by studies of global mobility regimes that privilege some sets of
movements while restraining others, thus creating hierarchies of mobilities and
producing inequalities in terms of the right and opportunities to be mobile (see
Tesfahuney, 1998; Cunningham, 2004; Shamir, 2005; Gogia, 2006; Turner, 2007;
Koslowski, 2011; Glick Schiller and Salazar, 2013).
Multiple Mobilities: Prior Iterations
Although multiple mobilities have been embedded in historical processes for centuries, it is only recently that they have come to be recognized as an undeniable
aspect of the human condition (Urry, 2007, p. 35). Clearly, we are not the first
scholars to realize that the siloed fields of migration, tourism, and refugee studies
have much to gain by engaging in dialogue. Over the past two decades, scholarship problematizing the divisions between tourism and migration has blossomed.
C. Michael Hall and Allan M. Williams’ edited volume, Tourism and migration:
New relationships between production and consumption (2002) was the first major book
to address the dynamic interplay between tourism and migration, questioning
the taken-for-granted binary of production/labor/migration and consumption/
leisure/tourism. Path breaking for its time, it was composed of studies by human
geographers and scholars of tourism and tourism management and addressed tourism’s intersection with labor migration, consumption-led migration, VFR travel,
and other forms of tourism-induced mobilities. Our book, published 20 years after
this landmark publication, aims to further explore these intersections by addressing
newer forms of mobility that have emerged in recent years and adding one more
important dimension of mobility, namely, exile.
The intersections between tourism and migration were further explored in the
book Going abroad: Travel, tourism, and migration. Cross-cultural perspectives on mobility
edited by Christine Geoffroy and Richard Sibley (2007) as well as by Peter Burns
and Marina Novelli in the edited volume Tourism and mobilities. Local-global connections (2008). The authors of the latter argue that the “tourism” category is no
longer useful in capturing the complex realities of traveling people as it encompasses various forms of mobile practices. Already in 2003, Karen O’Reilly queried “When is a tourist?” and presented ethnographic accounts of three forms of
8
Kathleen M. Adams and Natalia Bloch
tourism-related migration of British citizens to Spain: retirement migrants, entrepreneurial migrants, and consumption-driven, economically active migrants
(O’Reilly, 2003). Fiona Allon, Kay Anderson, and Robyn Bushell demonstrated
that “backpackers are not just tourists; they are also frequently students, working
holidaymakers, highly skilled professional workers, and even, at times, long-term
semi-permanent residents” (2003, p. 73).
Studies of lifestyle/amenity migration also illustrate the blurred boundary
between migration and tourism, given that many migrants are not (only) economically motivated: they make their migration choices by weighing factors akin to
those considered by tourists when selecting their destinations. Lifestyle migration
is thus a form of mobility in which both the quest for a good life and class constitute particularly important fields of inquiry (Moss, 2006; Amit, 2007; Benson and
O’Reilly, 2009; Benson and Osbaldiston, 2014; Åkerlund and Sandberg, 2015;
Duncan et al., 2016). Lifestyle migration encompasses a range of leisure-oriented
mobilities already mentioned in this introduction – residential tourism, retirement
migration, and second home tourism – in which “home” and “away” (another often
taken-for-granted binary) are deconstructed (Janoschka and Haas, 2014). However,
this form of consumption-led mobility can be combined with production, challenging the dichotomy of work and leisure, as in the case of “travel-stimulated
entrepreneurial migrants” (Snepenger et al., 1995), “lifestyle entrepreneurs in tourism” (Ateljevic and Doorne, 2000), and the previously discussed “digital nomads”
(Makimoto and Manners, 1997). Moreover, not only are these mobilities usually
inspired by prior tourist experiences, but lifestyle entrepreneurship often occurs
within the tourism sector.
Tourism is not only a leisure activity for tourists but also a workplace and a
source of income for migrants, given the sector’s many low-skilled and low-paid
jobs. A number of studies have explored international and domestic migrant workers and small-scale entrepreneurs in the tourism sector, both formal and informal
(e.g., Adams, 1992, 1996; Forshee, 2001, 2002; Bianet Castellanos, 2010; Lenz,
2010), including sexual relations offered to tourists by migrant women (Brennan,
2004; Lindquist, 2008). These migrant workers in the tourism sector challenge
the classic notions – and another binary – of “hosts” and “guests” (Griffin, 2017;
Bloch, 2020).6 Studies of this realm address postcolonial and postsocialist disparities, interrogate tourism’s emancipatory potential for migrants’ well-being and
empowerment, or spotlight tourism’s capacity for serving as a platform for creating self-representations (Enloe, 1989; Castellanos, 2010; Ghodsee, 2005; Bloch,
2021b). Sometimes, the encounters between migrant tourism service providers
and tourists trigger further mobility, i.e., marriage migration, which itself can be
economically driven or a lifestyle mobility (see, e.g., Jaisuekun and Sunanta, 2021).
In some tourist destinations, migrant workers and working tourists share the same
space (Carson et al., 2016). Finally, return migrants challenge the dichotomy of
migration and tourism, not only because they often feel or are treated as tourists in
their own homeland but also because they sometimes provide services to tourists
(Adams and Sandarupa, 2018; Adams, 2019; Pido, 2017). Thus, as Noel Salazar
Problematizing Siloed Mobilities 9
(2020) notes, tourism without migration would not be the same as it is (if it would
be at all), just as migration without tourism be entirely different; for this reason,
labor migration and tourism mobilities should be consistently brought together in
our analyses. Likewise, writing in broader terms, Erik Cohen and Scott Cohen
(2015) called for tourism studies’ incorporation into the mobilities paradigm in
order to shed new light on how tourism is entangled with other forms of discretionary mobilities and to deconstruct “problematic binary modernist thinking in
tourism studies” (2015, p. 157).
Recognition of the importance of exploring the ways in which exile intersects
with migration is evident in the establishment of the Journal of Immigrant & Refugee
Studies in 2002. Its editors declare that “it is unique in its character as it covers
both migration and refugee studies,”7 creating a platform where studies of these
two mobilities can be presented together although in most cases they continue to
be analyzed separately. Moreover, exiles may become migrants. This is not obvious, given the popular mass media image of refugees as newcomers struggling in
temporary camps. However, the majority of the world’s forcibly displaced people live in protracted exile (see Aleinikoff, 2015). These are mostly second- and
subsequent-generation refugees who see international educational mobility and
economic migration as avenues for gaining political agency and/or as pathways
for escaping from exile, as has been demonstrated in studies of Sahrawi refugees
(Chatty et al., 2010; Farah, 2010; Reis, 2019), Sahrawi and Palestinian refugees
(Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, 2015), or Tibetan refugees (Choedup, 2015).
In their edited volume Coming home? Refugees, migrants and those who stayed
behind, Lynellyn D. Long and Ellen Oxfeld (2004) discuss not only return migrants
but also the experiences of returning refugees during both temporary visits and
permanent repatriation. Many other studies have addressed the links between
established diasporas/subsequent generations of refugees and tourism in the form
of diaspora/roots/ancestral tourism (e.g., Butler, 2003; Leite, 2005, 2017; Tie and
Seaton, 2013; Marschall, 2017). The landmark volume in this field is Tourism, diasporas and space edited by Tim Coles and Dallen J. Timothy (2004a) which discusses
the production of diaspora tourism destinations as well as the experiences of diaspora tourists. In addition, Sabine Marschall’s edited volume, Tourism and memories
of home. Migrants, displaced people, exiles and diasporic communities (2017), offers a
collection of ethnographic studies from different parts of the world highlighting
the tourism-memory nexus in diaspora tourism. Here, the emphasis is on examining how memory underpins the touristic mobility of exiles and migrants who
travel to their (often imagined) homelands. The ethnographic monographs exploring this nexus include Shaul Kelner’ (2010) volume on political-religious homeland tours organized by the Israeli government to foster Jewish-American youths’
attachment to Israel. Other writers have explored how Jewish diaspora tourism
is tethered to processing difficult pasts and cultivating new personal identities (e.g.,
Lehrer, 2013; Feldman, 1995) The intersections between historic exile and diaspora have been also explored with regard to the slave trade and contemporary black
diaspora tourism to ancestral homelands (e.g., Holsey, 2008; Bruner, 1996).
10
Kathleen M. Adams and Natalia Bloch
Not only do members of diasporas become tourists, but refugees can also transform into tourism sector entrepreneurs, which is an important topic with regard
to both urban refugees (i.e., those living outside the camps and not being assisted
by humanitarian agencies) and refugee self-reliance (e.g., Portes and Jensen, 1989;
Wauters and Lambrecht, 2008; Alrawadieh et al., 2019; Cetin et al., 2022). Also, the
cultural capital of refugee groups can be skillfully converted into economic capital via
tourism – commodifying refugees’ ethnic culture may be a survival strategy in exile,
as demonstrated by the case of Tibetan refugees in India (McGuckin, 1997), who
have maintained their ability to manage their cultural heritage and its commodification. In contrast, Kayan refugees from Myanmar are denied control of tourism in
their villages in Thailand by Thai state agencies that use Kayan “long-neck women”
as an icon of ethnic tourism in Thailand (Cole and Eriksson, 2010, pp. 115–117).
Nevertheless, tourism also has the potential to become a platform for recovering
refugees’ voices – empowering refugees not only economically (as in the studies
discussed earlier) but also politically. The history of exile is often subaltern history, unvoiced in the narrative of mainstream tourism shaped by the state and its
citizens. However, alternative tours – in the form of solidarity or justice tourism
(see Higgins-Desbiolle, 2009) – can bring these stories to light, as demonstrated
in studies of tourists visiting Palestinian refugee camps (Isaac, 2010; Kassis et al.,
2016), Tibetan refugee settlements (Bloch, 2018, 2021b, pp. 149–157), and refugee
camps in Western Sahara (Popović, 2018) or refugees acting as tourist guides in
refugee-receiving countries (Burrai et al., 2022).
Since Europe’s crisis of receiving refugees in 2015 and 2016,8 voluntourism in
support of asylum seekers has been widely explored (e.g., Chtouris and Miller, 2017;
Trihas and Tsilimpokos, 2018; Sandri, 2017; Freedman, 2018) wherein not only do
tourists become volunteers – responding to the call “what can tourist do to help?”
(Porter, 2015) – but also volunteers become accidental tourists (Paraskevaidis and
Andriotis, 2021). In addition, the influence of refugees’ presence in the tourism sector
in receiving countries – when “refugees and tourists share the same beaches” (Kingsley, 2015) – has been studied, particularly by scholars in economics and tourism management (e.g., İstanbullu Dinçer et al., 2017; Pappas and Papatheodorou, 2017; Tsartas
et al., 2020). Moreover, tourism infrastructure – hotels, hostels, guesthouses – is often
used to accommodate refugees. This intersection has been documented since the eve
of the World War II when Amsterdam’s Lloyd Hotel housed Jewish refugees. Other
notable examples of tourism infrastructure being repurposed for refugees occurred
during the war in Yugoslavia when Dalmatian resorts opened their doors to refugees
from Bosnia and during the genocide in Rwanda when Hotel des Milles Collines in
Kigali offered refuge to a few hundred Tutsis (Fregonese and Ramadan, 2015). Such
actions can constitute revival strategies for hotels experiencing stagnation or survival
strategies in periods of tourism decline due to political instability. They can also be acts
of solidarity (see, e.g., Manning, 2009). There are also cases where asylum seekers (and
grass roots groups working on their behalf) have organized initiatives to occupy hotels,
as was the case with the shuttered Hotel City Plaza in Athens which was appropriated
as a residence for refugees in 2016 (García Agustín and Jørgensen, 2019).
Problematizing Siloed Mobilities 11
Finally, of particular interest are the studies that encompass all three forms of
mobility. Magdalena Bodzan (2020) offers an ethnographic case study of several culinary initiatives in Warsaw, Poland, which brought together refugees and
migrants as cooks and tourists as customers. These initiatives drew on the cultural
and refugee capitals of the cooks and involved both capitalizing on their ethnicity
and modifying it to mesh with the tourists’ tastes (for instance, adapting meals to
accommodate vegetarians).
Researching Mobilities: Methods
Given the volume’s anthropological origin, the majority of the chapters’ authors are
anthropologists, although contributors also include human geographers, a scholar
in spatial sciences, and a scholar in ethnic studies. Therefore, the chapters’ findings
emerge primarily from anthropology’s hallmark methodology of ethnographic field
research (participant observation, informal conversations, autoethnography, activist research, and online ethnography), as well as in-depth unstructured interviews,
and semi-structured interviews (Fetterman, 2020; LeCompte and Schensul, 2010;
Spradley, 2016). Some chapters also draw on visual and textual content analysis,
archival research, and certain quantitative methods (word frequency count and surveys). We believe that qualitative research methods, particularly ethnography, are
the best means for gaining insights into people’s everyday perceptions and experiences of (im)mobility. This sort of approach, which foregrounds emic perspectives, has much potential to deconstruct the legacy of scholarly and state-imposed
conceptual categories. Ethnographic methods, particularly long-term participant
observation – living with and partaking in the daily life of the community one
seeks to understand for an extended period – inevitably force researchers to reassess
their prior understandings.
Long-term participant observation also enables researchers to build trust with
individuals who may be hesitant to speak candidly during formal interviews with
outsiders (Adams, 2012). This is especially important for research on sensitive topics, such as undocumented migration or tourist destination residents’ ambivalence
about tourism in their communities. As Stroma Cole observed while researching
local understandings of tourism in Eastern Indonesia, “spontaneous, indoor fireside
chats were a more successful technique than attempting to carry out questionnairebased interviews . . . [and] disclosed information on topics that were not openly
discussed at other times” (Cole, 2004, pp. 295–296). Moreover, unlike surveys,
long-term fieldwork allows us to capture not only frozen moments in time but also
dynamic processes and changes.
Anthropologists studying mobilities argue that such fieldwork needs to be
mobilized, that is, moved away from synchronic studies of territorially bound culture to enable us to follow people on the move (e.g., Appadurai, 1996; Clifford,
1997; Elliot et al., 2017). Although many scholars researching mobile lives draw
on mobile or itinerant ethnography (Schein, 2005, 2002; see also Sheller and Urry,
2006, pp. 217–218), studying mobilities does not always involve movement on the
12
Kathleen M. Adams and Natalia Bloch
researcher’s part: sometimes “staying put” turns out to be the most effective way to
observe mobilities (Coates, 2017, p. 119). Often scholars combine mobile methods
(following our research partners) with ethnographic research rooted in concrete
locales. In essence, “a processual, collaborative, and creative ethnographic focus
enables anthropologists to document the many ways in which mobility transforms
social life, both for ‘movers,’ ‘stayers,’ and those in-between” (Salazar et al., 2017,
p. 15).
Many of the chapters in this volume draw on the methodology of multi-sited
ethnography (Marcus, 1995). George E. Marcus coined this expression to describe
the adaptation of “conventional ethnographic research designs to examine the circulation of cultural meanings, objects and identities in diffuse time-space” (1995,
p. 96). Although some of the contributors to this volume may not use Marcus’
term to describe their data gathering practices, their approaches fit under the
broad umbrella of multi-sited ethnography. Ideally suited for learning about the
lives, experiences, and meaning-making dynamics of moving peoples, multi-sited
ethnography is not limited to simply studying individuals in various geographical
locales: it also entails following people, objects, ideas, and meanings through various social and political contexts: tracing the connections between local and global,
between offline and online, and between discourses and practices (for instance,
by bridging migrants’ everyday experiences and the macro workings of mobility
regimes).
Paths to This Book
Often, one gleans only small hints of how the volume editors came to the topic
at hand, beyond usually via passing mention of an initial conference panel (see
endnote 3). Since length constraints prompted us to refrain from contributing our
own ethnographic chapters to this volume, we turn to share some of our relevant
research findings here, thereby adding two additional Asian regions – India and
Indonesia – to those addressed in this volume. In keeping with scholarly recognition of the value of attending to how the personal informs research paths (e.g.,
Okely and Callaway, 1992; Amit, 2000), we also briefly reference our formative
experiences with these intersecting mobilities. In so doing, we nod to calls for
greater transparency regarding the ways in which personal backgrounds intersect
with and color our research agendas, engagements, and findings.
Both of us, the editors of this book, encountered intersecting mobilities in
our anthropological research and personal lives. When she was an undergraduate
student from a postsocialist Central European country, Natalia Bloch became a
“migrant tourist-worker” at a melon plantation and a vineyard in Valencia in order
to earn money to support her desire to travel to Spain. She worked with undocumented migrants from Morocco who dreamed of further migration to France,
migrants who rushed to hide in the shed when the Spanish police made periodic
unannounced inspections (she noted that they did not check too carefully – presumably they had an arrangement with the vineyard’s owner). Later, when she
Problematizing Siloed Mobilities 13
became a PhD student in anthropology, Bloch worked as a tour guide for Polish
tourists traveling to India and Nepal (see similar experiences of leading anthropologists of tourism: Bruner, 1995; see also 2005; Smith, 2005). This enabled her to
travel to India and conduct her fieldwork in Tibetan refugee settlements before she
obtained a PhD research grant. At the close of each tourist season, she sent tourists home and turned to her research. In this way, her interest in the anthropology
of tourism was born and comingled with refugee and, subsequently, migration
studies.
One of Bloch’s field sites was Dharamshala, a refugee settlement in northern
India and an informal capital of a Tibetan diaspora that has been turned into a
tourist attraction. Dharamshala’s attractiveness is used by refugees to gain visibility
and promote their political cause via their direct encounters with tourists. In her
book Encounters across difference. Tourism and overcoming subalternity in India (2021b),
Bloch demonstrated that skillfully politicized tourism can both transform tourists into allies in refugees’ struggle for self-determination and serve as a platform
for recovering refugees’ voices. In this form of justice tourism, tourists become
recipients and conveyors of the diaspora’s political postulates – postulates for which
the diaspora is struggling to gain international moral and political support. Creating self-representations and engaging tourists in political activities for the Tibetan
cause takes place in Dharamshala in several arenas. These arenas include producing political souvenirs which refer to the “Free Tibet” slogan; creating educational experiences for tourists (for instance, awareness talks, movie screenings, and
meetings with former political prisoners); and organizing political reality/solidarity
tours around Dharamshala (see also Mahrouse, 2008).
Bloch researched another dimension of the intersections between tourism and
forced displacement in Hampi, a village in southern India, located within a UNESCO
World Heritage site. Hampi residents experienced eviction and their houses and
small tourism businesses were demolished in the name of protecting tangible
national heritage in its “splendid isolation” (Herzfeld, 2006, p. 143). The forcibly displaced residents struggled for their own vision of living heritage, as well as
their rights to housing, and the benefits accrued from tourism. Their allies in this
struggle were, again, tourists who expressed their solidarity in the media, organized online support campaigns, took videos, and crafted petitions for UNESCO
and the Indian government to stop evictions, thus developing – as Freya HigginsDesbiolles (2010, p. 200) calls it – a transnational solidarity-based activism (Bloch,
2016, 2017, 2018).
While researching the informal tourism sector in India, Bloch noticed that
many tourism service providers – workers and small-scale entrepreneurs – were
not “locals,” as it is usually imagined, but migrants (both settled and seasonal, international and domestic), IDPs (from draught-afflicted regions), so-called expats
(tourists-turned-migrants from the countries of the Global North) and refugees
(both newcomers and second-generation exiles). They all challenge the often
taken-for-granted “binary between mobile tourists and place-bound locals” (Salazar, 2012, p. 874). Moreover, these mobile tourism workers also engaged in leisure
14
Kathleen M. Adams and Natalia Bloch
activities, becoming tourists themselves – either by being invited by befriended
tourists or using social networks built with other tourism service providers to perform VFR (both in India and abroad). VFR facilitated their leisure mobilities,
making them more affordable and thus more accessible.
The informal, heterogeneous character of both tourist destinations where Bloch
conducted her ethnographic fieldwork enabled the “hosts” to develop unmediated,
close relationships with tourists beyond the service provider–customer framework.
For the “hosts,” these relationships were a source of alternative social networks that
sometimes resulted in marriage migration to the tourists’ home countries, usually located in the Global North; Tibetan refugees referred to them as “greener
pastures” in the West (see Bloch, 2020). In some cases, these intersections were
even more unexpected. For instance, Bloch analyzed the case of Tibetan refugees who – supported financially by befriended international tourists – provided
humanitarian aid to other forcibly displaced people, i.e., Indian climate IDPs from
draught-afflicted areas who lived in a slum alongside a riverbank in Dharamshala
(Bloch, 2021a).
Kathleen M. Adams’s path to this volume was fueled by a combination of personal and scholarly factors. Reared in a predominantly immigrant enclave in the
touristic city of San Francisco, Adams’ mother was a French immigrant and her
maternal grandmother had migrated at age 12 from Italy to Paris to toil in the garment industry, relocating again decades later to follow her daughter to California.
Like many of her classmates, Adams’ early childhood was animated by nostalgic
stories of lives in the homeland. For Adams, San Francisco was always “home,” but
other ancestral homes – Paris and Turin – were ever present in the fabric of family
life, enlivened by the aroma of her grandmother’s pasta simmering on the stove,
the arias of her mother’s beloved French operas, and the garden cage of live snails
awaiting transformation into escargot. These sensory experiences and subsequent
familial visits to French and Italian “homelands” fostered Adams’ abiding interest in
the interplay between mobility and identity.
Adams’ fieldwork in Indonesia and the United States has broadly focused on the
politics of tourism, heritage, and identity (e.g., Adams, 1984, 1995, 2003, 2011).
Her mid-1980s dissertation research on ethnic and artistic change in the context of
tourism was based in the Toraja highlands in Indonesia, at a time when anthropologists identified field sites as stationary and bounded (Adams, 1988). Yet, living with
a Toraja family in a carving village popular with tourists, Adams saw that mobility
beyond the homeland informed their lives (2006, p. 33). It quickly became apparent that tourism was entwined with other forms of mobility: not only did foreign
and domestic tourists flow through the village daily but also local guides formed
relationships with tourists, sometimes relocating abroad to pursue opportunities
presented by these relationships.9 Likewise, local carvers whose shops catered to
tourists participated in workshops and exhibit openings in Bali, Jakarta, and Japan.
Moreover, many families had children and other kin who studied or found jobs
off-island: villagers with disposable wealth occasionally visited these far-flung relatives and engaged in VFR tourism. In addition, these migrant relatives returned
Problematizing Siloed Mobilities 15
for rituals, vacations, and, sometimes, retirement. Some who acquired foreign language skills while abroad ultimately returned home and found employment in the
tourism sector. In short, Adams came to realize that the borders of tourism were
fuzzier than the classic scholarship suggested and that the varied human flows across
time and space – ethnoscapes in the language of Arjun Appadurai (1986, 1990,
1996) – were interconnected.
Adams’s 1988 dissertation and subsequent book (2006) examined how movements of tourists, anthropologists, art dealers, missionaries, and Torajans were
entangled with shifting Torajan perceptions of themselves and their arts. In these
works, she argued that Torajans were artfully deploying the touristic and anthropological interest in their culture to navigate a better position for themselves in
the hierarchy of Indonesian ethnic groups. Her recent research has focused more
directly on the intersections between tourism and migration. Some of this research
foregrounds the emotional terrain entailed in migrant return visits to the ancestral
homeland, visits that combine tourism with familial time (VFR), and demonstrates
that returning migrant visitors’ somatic, sensory experiences during their travels
home serve to reframe their understandings of their current-day identities (2019).
Another dimension of Adams’ research examines how entwined forms of
mobility (labor, educational, recreational, and cyber) pose new opportunities and
challenges for Indonesian families in translocal times. Marjorie Esman (1984), Dallen Timothy (1997), and others have underscored that people draw on “travel and
tourism to the ‘home country’ to (re)assert, reaffirm and perform their heritage”
(Coles and Timothy, 2004b, p. 12). Adams argued that it was not solely “heritage” in the generic ethnic sense that is being (re)affirmed via these travels but also
culturally specific ideas about the nature of the family. As she demonstrated via the
Toraja case, Toraja migrants and their foreign-reared children return to the homeland for funeral rituals and, simultaneously, tourism. While there, they tour not
only typical touristic sites but also specific ancestral houses and attend rituals with
hundreds of other members of their “house families.” For these migrants, tourism
becomes an integral dimension of the discovery, exploration, articulation, and,
sometimes, rejection of more expansive ancestral house-based notions of the family
(Adams, 2015). More broadly, Adams has argued that attending to “local knowledge” can destabilize our entrenched siloed conceptions of tourism and migration
and foster more nuanced understandings of mobility dynamics, as illustrated via
Toraja practices and the Malay concept of merantau (travel for financial and experiential enrichment), a commonly used term in Indonesia and Malaysia which does
not map neatly onto the Western siloed categories of tourism and migration (2020;
also see Adams, 2016 and Din, 2017).
A Roadmap to This Volume
The studies in this volume draw on original, predominantly ethnographic, research.
Each chapter presents a case study that challenges persistent dichotomous classifications (tourists vs. migrants; migrants vs. refugees; voluntary vs. forced migration;
16
Kathleen M. Adams and Natalia Bloch
leisure vs. work; etc.). The work presented here spans the globe. For instance, chapters analyze intersecting and overlapping mobilities between Cuba and Europe;
Vietnam and the United States; Sahrawi refugee camps and temporary homes in
Western Sahara and Spain; as well as Western countries and Palestinian camps in the
Middle East. Additional chapters address intersecting forms of mobility between
China, Brazil, and Portugal; Thailand, East Asia, and Europe; Panama and Europe;
and along the Balkan route refugees followed during Europe’s crisis of receiving
refugees. These mobility vectors are multi-directional: from the Global South to
the Global North, from the Global North to the Global South, and within these
regions. Collectively, the chapters chronicle both short- and long-term mobilities
prompted by various motives, desires, and aspirations. These include political, economic, and safety challenges, expulsion, leisure, earning possibilities, educational
opportunities, love, marriage, retirement, lifestyle aspirations, career advancement,
and investment possibilities.
Chapters 1 and 2 unveil the intersections of migration and tourism by analyzing the stories of Cuban return migrants occupying the status of tourists in their
own country and, at times, engaging in the tourism sector as entrepreneurs. On the
surface, their motivations to leave Cuba seem to be primarily economic; however,
Cuba’s economic struggles are tethered to its political regime (and the US embargo);
thus, the exile dimension also emerges. Many Cubans leaving the country adopt
the status of migrants, rather than refugees, to enable returns. The Cuban state plays
with mobility categories by imposing the category of (economic) migrants on those
who leave the country unless they migrate to the United States in which case they
are automatically considered exiles. Nadine T. Fernandez’s chapter focuses on longterm, mobile relationships between Cubans and Danes who move between both (and
sometimes additional) countries. Fernandez uses the lens of temporality and the life
course perspective to scrutinize the intersections and overlaps between peoples’ experiences of tourism and migration and the state policies that control and categorize
their movements. She shows how Cuban–Danish couples maneuver these temporal
regulations – visas, residencies, permits, and so on – revealing inequalities in terms of
people’s access to both mobility and residency. Valerio Simoni’s chapter also discusses
the experiences of Cubans living abroad in Europe during and after their return to
Cuba. His chapter spotlights the complex questions of when one is migrant, tourist,
or local and who imposes these designations. Simoni examines the potentials and
limitations of these categories for evoking different modes of belonging and identification and the emotions involved, when “you are less than a tourist, and less than
a Cuban,” in the words of one of his research participants. Returnees’ mobility and
their tourist/migrant/Cuban identifications are grounded in global inequalities across
a North–South divide. Returnees are aware of expectations of sharing (i.e., providing
material support) and feel exploited, much in the same way (foreign) tourists often
feel, which results in “downscaling” family and reconstructing social life, leading to
fragmentation and differentiation.
Chapters 3–6 scrutinize how exile intersects with other mobilities, namely,
return migration, deportation, VFR tourism, student mobility, solidarity tourism,
Problematizing Siloed Mobilities 17
justice tourism, and volunteer tourism. Long T. Bui discusses the involuntary and
voluntary returns of post-war South Vietnamese refugees from the United States,
analyzing the categories of repatriated deportees, incarcerated tourists, and retired
or working expats. The author juxtaposes cases of Vietnamese exiles sent back to
Vietnam by the US government against their will (due to old criminal records
or other infractions) with cases of US tourists of Vietnamese origin arrested and
expelled by the Vietnamese government. He also addresses voluntary returnees who
move to Vietnam either upon retirement or for work, thus transforming from exiles
to expats. Here, the blurred boundaries between exile, migrant, and tourist follow
the enduring Cold War line, distinguishing a friend from an enemy in a world of
global flows of ideas, capital, and bodies. VFR tourism, in this case, is a way for
the Vietnamese state to manage refugee/returnee politics. But at the same time,
the threat of being banished mitigates such tourism. Rita Reis, in her chapter on
young Sahrawi refugees, argues that educational mobility can work as a strategy for
escaping protracted exile and pursuing a better future. Via ethnographic stories,
Reis shows a typical trajectory for Sahrawi exiled youth from refugee camps to
Spain: first participating in the Holidays in Peace program (which offers Sahrawi
children an opportunity to spend their summer vacations in Europe), then being
fostered by one’s Spanish host family, studying abroad, and ultimately becoming
an economic migrant. These mobilities are accompanied by flows in the opposite
direction – the travels of Spanish host families to the refugee camps within the
framework of solidarity tourism. The mobilities she discusses are embedded in a
nation-building process that takes place in the diaspora. Rami K. Isaac’s chapter
explores the intersections between exile and tourism (as well as pilgrimage) through
the lens of justice tourism. He examines the motivations, perceptions, and experiences of international tourists attending alternative tours to the Segregation Wall
and Palestinian refugee camps in Bethlehem. Justice tourism here plays a similar role
to that seen in Bloch’s study of Tibetan refugees discussed earlier in this chapter: it
offers a platform for subaltern histories of exile and suffering which are not voiced
in mainstream tourism. Here, the otherwise silenced voice of Palestinian refugees
can be heard by tourists. The author discusses the potential of this form of tourism
to create empathy and solidarities between international tourists and Palestinian
refugees. Finally, Robert Rydzewski’s chapter shows how, during the first crisis of
receiving refugees in Europe in 2015–2016, refugee camps, bus and train stations,
and informal asylum seekers’ settlements in the Balkan route brought together two
mobile groups: refugees from the Global South and volunteers from the Global
North, the latter resembling tourists in their itinerant volunteerism. Asylum seekers
and the voluntourists Rydzewski accompanied in Serbia acted in concert with one
another, following each other and responding to each other’s needs. However, their
movements reflected unequal access to mobility: While the mobility of the former
was restricted, the latter enjoyed the privilege of unhampered mobility, moving
freely across nation-states’ borders. What emerged from encounters between these
two mobile groups were new forms of political activity and solidarity based on reciprocity that resulted in challenging the European Union’s border regime.
18 Kathleen M. Adams and Natalia Bloch
Intersections between tourism and migration are explored in Chapters 7–10.
Carla Guerrón Montero writes about migrants who are workers in the tourism sector, tourists who turn into lifestyle migrants, and diaspora roots tourists
in Panama. In particular, she focuses on Afro-Antilleans who since the mid-19th
century were treated as “temporary migrants” in Panama until tourism offered
them a platform for creating their self-representations and a degree of culturalpolitical autonomy from the national meta-narrative. At the same time, Panama
attracts lifestyle migrants – mostly from the United States – who were once tourists. Guerrón Montero demonstrates how cultural and economic capital gained
through interactions with those lifestyle migrants and tourists has the potential to
help undocumented “temporary migrants” working in the tourism sector overcome their status-related constraints. She also shows how migrants working in
the tourism sector can act as tourists both through VFR and traveling in dwelling. Finally, she indicates an additional dimension of overlapping mobilities, i.e.,
diasporic Afro-Antilleans visiting Panama as tourists within a framework of roots
tourism. In their chapter, Kosita Butratana, Alexander Trupp, and Karl Husa analyze tourism as an impetus for retirement migration and marriage migration in
the Thai context. Retired migrants in Thailand are mostly men from Europe,
North America, Australia, and some East Asian countries, who often live with a
local partner. This is a consumption-led migration that itself blurs the boundaries
between migration and tourism with regard to both motivations and destinations.
The counter-mobility of retirement migration, with converse selectivity, is the
cross-border marriage migration of young Thai women, who often are internal
migrants themselves working in the tourism sector. Upon migration, they join the
Thai diaspora in the Global North countries which, in turn, propels VFR tourism. Here, VFR tourism does not only mean return visits for leisure but reflects
the gender obligations of Thai women toward their family members (especially,
the parents). The authors argue that short-term stays for leisure often generate more
permanent mobility, i.e., that previous tourism experiences play an important role
in the migration decision-making and therefore they should be examined together.
Francesco Vietti’s chapter explores another dimension of overlaps between migration and tourism. He discusses migrants acting as tourist guides and migrant heritage as a tourist attraction in European cities. His case study offers a critical analysis
of the Migrantour project developed in 20 cities in cooperation with anthropologists to highlight migrants’ contributions to transforming these cities. As with the
case of solidarity tours to Palestinian refugee camps, tourism here offers first- and
second-generation migrants a platform for telling their stories about life in their
current cities – to both tourists and residents. These encounters between migrants
and tourists are aimed at transcending touristic folklorization and trivialization of
migrants’ otherness. Vietti discusses the categories of “transformative encounters,”
“traveling-in-dwelling,” and “daily multiculturalism” to explore their potential and
limitations for living together “in difference.” Finally, Lauren Miller Griffith scrutinizes the complex and overlapping mobilities of the transnational capoeira community. North American students travel to Brazil as tourists/pilgrims following
Problematizing Siloed Mobilities 19
their masters while capoeira teachers move in the opposite direction, engaging in
VFR tourism and other “touristy” activities. These movements enable both groups
to move up within capoeira’s internal hierarchy and sometimes lead to more-orless permanent migrations. Ultimately, Griffith shifts our gaze from the focus on
capoeira’s globalization to the movements of people who pursue it and, in so doing,
addresses issues of race and class inscribed in these mobilities.
The last two chapters of the book address blurred boundaries between migration and tourism in privileged mobilities. Magnus Öhlander, Katarzyna Wolanik
Boström, and Helena Pettersson analyze the international mobility of Swedish
scholars and physicians – highly skilled professionals – to problematize the multidimensional practices of their work-related mobility and tourism. The authors demonstrate how tourism imaginaries and opportunities figure into these professionals’
travel planning. In this case, professional and tourist gazes, as well as work and
tourist moments, overlap to the point that they are sometimes hard to distinguish,
converging in a professionals’ tourist gaze. Finally, Maria de Fátima Amante and
Irene Rodrigues observe how migration and tourism intertwine in the category
of foreign investor. Their case study focuses on the motivations and experiences
of Chinese and Brazilian Golden Visa holders in Portugal. They also demonstrate
how the state strategically deploys the country’s tourist attractiveness to entice
international investors. However, contrary to the state’s aims, these investors are
neither super-rich nor absent from the country. For many of them, the opportunity
to obtain a Golden Visa to this European Union country is an avenue for pursuing
a better life which exceeds the desire to expatriate capital. What a better life means
depends on the group under study; for Chinese investors, a less stressful educational
environment for their children and cleaner air were key, while for Brazilian Golden
Visa holders, a sense of personal security and a less stressful work environment were
most significant. Therefore, as the authors argue, these Golden Visa holders might
be best understood as lifestyle migrants rather than capital investors. Interestingly,
the political dimension can also be detected in this form of mobility – although
the mainland Chinese did not express this explicitly, the Brazilians were very vocal
about the unstable political and economic situation in their country of origin as
well as the banalization of violence that motivated them to relocate to Portugal as
investors.
Finally, Stephanie Malia Hom’s postscript addresses the varied ways in which
the COVID-19 pandemic has altered and “reshuffled” subjective experiences of
tourism, migration, and exile. Building on points elaborated in the volume’s chapters and interweaving her own cogent analyses of media stories in the COVID-19
era, Hom spotlights the mobility-related paradoxes wrought by the pandemic. She
chronicles how the pandemic’s rhetoric of contagion was cast onto tourists who
found themselves trapped and immobile while vacationing, prompting tourists to
adopt vocabularies of limbo, waiting, imprisonment, and uncertainty more typically associated with migrants and refugees. She also observes that the pandemic
brought reassessments of earlier associations between mobility and privilege: those
of means could choose to shelter in place thereby shielding themselves from the
20 Kathleen M. Adams and Natalia Bloch
virus, whereas those without “network capital” (Urry, 2007, cited by Hom) –
migrant agricultural farmworkers and food workers, in particular – were mobilized
as “essential workers” and exposed to the virus (for migrants, staying home means
the loss of income and their ability to send remittances). Ultimately, Hom’s chapter
underscores the importance of considering ethical issues and matters of biopolitics
underpinning intersecting forms of mobility in the COVID-19 era. Hom also
offers various suggestions for future research directions. As she suggests, scholars
interested in the intersections of tourism, migration, and exile in the (post-)pandemic era might want to examine the ethical dimensions of these shifting experiences of mobility. That is, we might ask who gains advantages from “deploying”
(im-)mobility and how? How might considering “variegated” mobilities foster new
paths toward mobility justice?
In raising these questions, Hom signals our broader hopes for this volume. In
recounting, juxtaposing, and analyzing stories of (im-)mobile lives – refugees’
and migrants’ returns, marriage migrants, voluntourists, migrant retirees, migrant
tourism workers and entrepreneurs, mobile investors and professionals, and refugees pursuing educational mobility – the chapters comprising this volume aim
to cultivate more nuanced insights into intersecting forms of mobility. Moreover, taken together, they invite reflections on the moral, economic, and cultural
dynamics of spatial mobility. It is our hope that these richer understandings will
foster not only empathy but also greater resolve for forging trails toward mobility
justice.
Notes
1
2
3
4
5
See La Caminata (The Long Walk). Available at: www.newday.com/film/la-caminata.
For example, Patrick O’Gilfoil Healy suggests that tourists’ activities on La Caminata
Nocternal can appear “crass, like Marie Antoinette playing peasant on the grounds of
Versailles” (2007, par. 12).
The idea for this volume was born at the 2019 Congress of the International Union
of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences (IUAES) held at the Adam Mickiewicz
University in Poznań, Poland. There, we (the volume editors) co-chaired a panel on
“The Intersections of Tourism, Migration, and Exile” which garnered much interest
from anthropologists working on mobility-related topics. Three of this book’s chapters
were presented as part of this panel (Chapters 1, 11, and 12). Additional chapters were
subsequently solicited with the aim of creating a broader geographical range of case
studies and fostering a more diverse array of contributors (in terms of gender, nationality,
ethnicity, and academic seniority).
Hilary Cunningham (2004) coined the expression “gated globe” to convey these inequities in access to mobility, drawing on the metaphor of gated communities.
It is estimated that in 2019 (just prior to the COVID-19 pandemic), 1.5 billion international tourist arrivals were recorded globally (www.unwto.org/international-tourismgrowth-continues-to-outpace-the-economy, accessed on: May 28, 2022). In the same
year, the number of international migrants worldwide reached nearly 272 million (www.
un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/migrationreport/
docs/InternationalMigration2019_Report.pdf, accessed on: May 28, 2022) and the
number of forcibly displaced reached 79.5 million (including 26 million people who
were granted refugee status and 45.7 million internally displaced persons; see www.
unhcr.org/flagship-reports/globaltrends/globaltrends2019/, accessed on: May 28,
Problematizing Siloed Mobilities 21
6
7
8
9
2022). The latter statistics have grown significantly in 2022, due to the Russian invasion
of Ukraine. Although difficult to calculate, the numbers for pilgrimages are also high
(estimated at 155 million annually in 2011), but they are not that widely distributed
around the world. Hindu and Sikh (primarily domestic) pilgrims comprise half the
total of pilgrims worldwide. Muslim travels to spiritual sites account for approximately
2.3 million pilgrimages annually (for data on pilgrimages, see: www.arcworld.org/
downloads/ARC%20pilgrimage%20statistics%20155m%2011-12-19.pdf, accessed on:
May 28, 2022).
An early volume that highlighted the “converging interests” of mobile workers and
tourists merits mention here, namely, Jill Forshee et al. (1999).
www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=w
imm20 (Accessed on: May 13, 2022).
See Chapter 6, endnote 1, for an explanation regarding why the crisis of 2015–2016
was not a crisis of refugees but rather a crisis of receiving refugees marked by securitization, border control, and institutional violence (push-backs) or even a crisis of European
values (Buchowski, 2017, p. 521). Therefore, we opt to term this phenomenon a “crisis
of receiving refugees” (see Bloch, forthcoming).
For more on this dynamic elsewhere in Indonesia, see Dahles and Bras (1999).
References
Adams, K.M. (1984) ‘Come to Tana Toraja, “Land of the Heavenly Kings”: Travel agents as
brokers of ethnicity’, Annals of Tourism Research, 1(3), pp. 469–485.
Adams, K.M. (1988) Carving a new identity: Ethnic and artistic change in Tana Toraja. PhD thesis. Washington, DC, University of Washington.
Adams, K.M. (1995) ‘Making-up the Toraja? The appropriation of tourism, anthropology
and museums for politics in upland Sulawesi (Indonesia)’, Ethnology, 34(2), pp. 143–153.
Adams, K.M. (2003) ‘The politics of heritage in Tana Toraja, Indonesia: Interplaying the
local and the global’, Indonesia and the Malay World, 31(89), pp. 91–107.
Adams, K.M. (2006) Art as politics: Re-crafting identities, tourism, and power in Tana Toraja,
Indonesia. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Adams, K.M. (2011) ‘Public interest anthropology, political market squares and re-scripting dominance: From swallows to “race” in San Juan Capistrano, CA’, Journal of Policy
Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 3(2), pp. 147–169.
Adams, K.M. (2012) ‘Ethnographic methods’ in Dwyer, L., Gill, A. and Seetaram, N. (eds.)
Handbook of research methods in tourism. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar
Publishing, pp. 339–351.
Adams, K.M. (2015) ‘Families, funerals and Facebook: Reimag(in)ing and curating Toraja
kin in translocal times’, tRaNS: Trans – Regional and – National Studies of Southeast Asia,
3(2), pp. 239–266.
Adams, K.M. (2016) ‘Tourism and ethnicity in insular Southeast Asia: Eating, praying, loving and beyond’, Asian Journal of Tourism Research, 1(1), pp. 1–28.
Adams, K.M. (2019) “Being a tourist in (my own) home”: Negotiating identities and
belonging in Indonesian heritage tourism’ in Leite, N.M, Casteñeda, Q. and Adams,
K.M. (eds.) The ethnography of tourism: Edward Bruner and beyond. Lanham: Lexington
Books, pp. 147–165.
Adams, K.M. (2020) ‘What Western tourism concepts obscure: Intersections of migration
and tourism in Indonesia’, Tourism Geographies, 23(1), pp. 1–26.
Adams, K.M. and Sandarupa, D. (2018) ‘A room with a view: Local knowledge and tourism entrepreneurship in an unlikely Indonesian locale’, Asian Journal of Tourism Research,
3(1), pp. 1–26.
22 Kathleen M. Adams and Natalia Bloch
Adams, V. (1992) ‘Tourism and Sherpas, Nepal: Reconstruction of reciprocity’, Annals of
Tourism Research, 19(3), pp. 534–554.
Adams, V. (1996) Tigers of the snow and other virtual Sherpas: An ethnography of Himalayan
encounters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Åkerlund, U. and Sandberg, L. (2015) ‘Stories of lifestyle mobility: Representing self and
place in the search for the “good life”’, Social & Cultural Geography, 16(3), pp. 351–370.
Aleinikoff, T.A. (2015) From dependence to self-reliance: Changing the paradigm in protracted refugee situations. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
Allon, F., Anderson, K. and Bushell, R. (2003) ‘Mutant mobilities: Backpacker tourism in
“global” Sydney’, Mobilities, 3, pp. 73–94.
Alrawadieh, Z., Karayilan, E. and Cetin, G. (2019) ‘Understanding the challenges of refugee entrepreneurship in tourism and hospitality’, The Service Industries Journal, 39(9–10),
pp. 717–740.
Amit, V (2000) ‘Introduction: Constructing the field’ in Amit, V. (ed.) Constructing the
field: Ethnographic fieldwork in the contemporary world. London and New York: Routledge,
pp. 1–18.
Amit, V. (2007) Going first class: New approaches to privileged travel and movement. Oxford and
New York: Berghahn Books.
Appadurai, A. (1986) The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Appadurai, A. (1990) ‘Disjuncture and difference in the global economy’, Public Culture,
2(2), pp. 1–24.
Appadurai, A. (1996) Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
Ashtar, L., Shani, A. and Uriely, N. (2017) ‘Blending “home” and “away”: Young Israeli
migrants as VFR travelers’, Tourism Geographies, 19(4), pp. 658–672.
Ateljevic, I. and Doorne, S. (2000) ‘Staying within the fence’: Lifestyle entrepreneurship in
Tourism’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 8(5), pp. 378–392.
Baas, M. (2017) ‘The mobile middle: Indian skilled migrants in Singapore and the “middling” space between migration categories’, Transitions. Journal of Transient Migration, 1(1),
pp. 47–63.
Badone, E. and Roseman, S.R. (2004) Intersecting journeys: The anthropology of pilgrimage and
tourism. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Bakewell, O. (2021) ‘Unsettling the boundaries between forced and voluntary migration’ in
Carmel, E., Lenner, K. and Paul, R. (eds.) Handbook on the governance and politics of migration. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 124–136.
Bell, M. and Ward, G. (2000) ‘Comparing temporary mobility with permanent migration’,
Tourism Geographies, 2(3), pp. 87–107.
Benson, M. and O’Reilly, K. (eds.) (2009) Lifestyle migration: Expectations, aspirations and
experiences. Farnham: Ashgate.
Benson, M. and Osbaldiston, N. (eds.) (2014) Understanding lifestyle migration: Theoretical
approaches to migration and the quest for a better way of life. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bianchi, R.V. (2000) ‘Migrant tourist-workers: Exploring the “contact zones” of postindustrial tourism’, Current Issues in Tourism, 3(2), pp. 107–187.
Bianet Castellanos, M. (2010) A return to servitude: Maya migration and the tourist trade in
Cancún. Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Bloch, N. (2016) ‘Evicting heritage. Spatial cleansing and cultural legacy at the Hampi
UNESCO site in India’, Critical Asian Studies, 48(4), pp. 556–578.
Bloch, N. (2017) ‘Taxonomic panic and the art of “making do” at a heritage site. The case
of Hampi UNESCO site, India’, Anthropological Notebooks, 23(3), pp. 19–44.
Problematizing Siloed Mobilities 23
Bloch, N. (2018) ‘Making tourists engaged by vulnerable communities in India’ in Owsianowska, S. and Banaszkiewicz, M. (eds.) Anthropology of tourism in Central and Eastern
Europe. Bridging worlds. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 181–197.
Bloch, N. (2020) ‘Beyond a sedentary Other and a mobile tourist. Transgressing mobility categories in the informal tourism sector in India’, Critique of Anthropology, 40(2), pp. 218–237.
Bloch, N. (2021a) ‘Refugees as donors. “Rich” Tibetan refugees, evicted Indian slum dwellers and a smart city’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(2), pp. 1840–1858.
Bloch, N. (2021b) Encounters across difference. Tourism and overcoming subalternity in India. Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York and London: Lexington Books.
Bloch, N. (forthcoming) ‘Whose crisis? Between Othering and solidarity during the socalled refugee crisis in Europe’ in Luthra Sinha, B., Gopal, N.D. and Pandey, A.D. (eds.)
Dark ethnography, state and the vulnerable communities: Is solidarity a threat to nation states?
London and New York: Routledge.
Bodzan, M. (2020) ‘Cooking with refugees and migrants. Staging authenticity and traditionality for Warsaw’s culinary tourists’, Ethnologia Polona, 41, pp. 51–67.
Böss, M. (2006) ‘Theorising exile’ in Böss, M., Gilsenan Nordin, I. and Olinder, B. (eds.)
Re-mapping exile: Realities and metaphors in Irish literature and history. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, pp. 15–46.
Boyne, S., Carswell, F. and Hall, D. (2002) ‘Reconceptualising VFR tourism. Friends, relatives and migration in a domestic context’ in Hall, C.M. and Williams, A.M. (eds.) Tourism and migration: New relationships between production and consumption. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, pp. 241–256.
Brennan, D. (2004) What’s love got to do with it? Transnational desires and sex tourism in the
Dominican Republic. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bruner, E.M. (1995) ‘The ethnographer/tourist in Indonesia’ in Lanfant, M.-F., Allcock, J.B. and
Bruner, E.M. (eds.) International tourism: Identity and change. London: SAGE, pp. 224–241.
Bruner, E.M. (1996) ‘Tourism in Ghana: The representation of slavery and the return of the
black diaspora’, American Anthropologist, 98(2), pp. 290–304.
Bruner, E.M. (2005) Culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Buchowski, M. (2017) ‘A new tide of racism, xenophobia, and islamophobia in Europe:
Polish anthropologists swim against the current’, American Anthropologist, 119(3),
pp. 519–523.
Burns, P.M. and Novelli, M. (eds.) (2008) Tourism and mobilities: Local-global connections. Wallingford and Cambridge: CABI.
Burrai, E., Buda, D.-M. and Stevenson, E. (2022) ‘Tourism and refugee-crisis intersections:
Co-creating tour guide experiences in Leeds, England’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2022.2072851
Butler, R. (2003) ‘Relationships between tourism and diasporas: Influences and patterns’,
Espac Populations Sociétés, 2, pp. 317–326.
Carson, D.A., Carson, D.B. and Lundmark, L. (eds.) (2016) Tourism, mobilities, and development in sparsely populated areas. London and New York: Routledge.
Castellanos, M.B. (2010) A return to servitude: Maya migration and the tourist trade in Cancún.
Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Cetin, G., Altinay, L. and Alrawadieh, Z. (2022) ‘Entrepreneurial motives, entrepreneurial
success and life satisfaction of refugees venturing in tourism and hospitality’, International
Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(6), pp. 2227–2249.
Chatty, D., Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. and Crivello, G. (2010) ‘Identity with/out territory: Sahrawi refugee in transnational space’, in Chatty, D. (ed.) Deterritorialized youth – Sahrawi and
Afghan refugees at the margins of the Middle East. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 37–84.
24 Kathleen M. Adams and Natalia Bloch
Choedup, N. (2015) From Tibetan refugees to transmigrants: Negotiating cultural continuity and
economic mobility through migration. PhD thesis. Washington, DC: Washington University.
Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/643
Chtouris, S. and Miller, D.S. (2017) ‘Refugee flows and volunteers in the current humanitarian crisis in Greece’, Journal of Applied Security Research, 12(1), pp. 61–77.
Clifford, J. (1997) Routes: Travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Coates, J. (2017) ‘Idleness as method: Hairdressers and Chinese urban mobility in Tokyo’ in
Elliot, A., Norum, R. and Salazar, N.B. (eds.) Methodologies of mobility: Ethnography and
experiment. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 109–128.
Cohen, E. (1973) ‘Nomads from affluence: Notes on the phenomenon of drifter-tourism’,
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 14(1), pp. 89–103.
Cohen, E. (1992) ‘Pilgrimage and tourism: Convergence and divergence’, in Morinis,
E.A. (ed) Sacred journeys: The anthropology of pilgrimage. New York: Greenwood Press,
pp. 47–61.
Cohen, E. and Cohen, S. (2015) ‘Beyond Eurocentrism in tourism: A paradigm shift to
mobilities’, Tourism Recreation Research, 40(2), pp. 157–168.
Cole, S. (2004) ‘Shared benefits: Longitudinal research in Eastern Indonesia’ in Phillimore,
J. and Goodson, L. (eds) Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 292–310.
Cole, S. and Eriksson, J. (2010) ‘Tourism and human rights’, in Cole, S. and Morgan, N.J.
(eds.) Tourism and inequality: Problems and prospects. Wallingford and Cambridge: CABI
Publishing, pp. 107–125.
Coles, T. and Timothy, D.J. (eds.) (2004a) Tourism, diasporas and space. London and New
York: Routledge.
Coles, T. and Timothy, D.J. (2004b) ‘My field is the world: Conceptualizing diasporas, travel
and tourism’ in Coles, T and Timothy, D.J. (eds) Tourism, diasporas and space. London
and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–29.
Cooper, M.J. (2002) ‘Flexible labour markets, ethnicity and tourism-related migration in
Australia and New Zealand’ in Hall, C.M. and Williams, A.M. (eds.) Tourism and migration: New relationships between production and consumption. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
Publishers, pp. 73–86.
Cunningham, H. (2004) ‘Nations rebound? Crossing borders in a gated globe’, Identities:
Global Studies in Culture and Power, 11(3), pp. 329–350.
D’Andrea, A. (2009) Global nomads: Techno and New Age as transnational countercultures in Ibiza
and Goa. Abingdon: Routledge.
Dahles, H. and Bras, C.H. (1999) ‘Entrepreneurs in romance. Tourism in Indonesia’, Annals
of Tourism Research, 26(2), pp. 267–293.
Deshingkar, P. and Farrington, J. (eds.) (2009) Circular migration and multilocational livelihood
strategies in rural India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DiGiovine, M.A. and Choe, J. (2020) Pilgrimage beyond the officially sacred: Understanding the
geographies of religion and spirituality in sacred travel. Abingdon: Routledge.
Din, K. (2017) ‘Returning home: A reflection on the Malaysian practice of balik kampung’,
Asian Journal of Tourism Research, 2(1), pp. 36–49.
Duany, J. (2002) ‘Mobile livelihoods: The sociocultural practices of circular migrant
between Puerto Rico and the United States’, The International Migration Review, 36(2),
pp. 355–388.
Duncan, T., Cohen, S.A. and Thulemark, M. (2016) Lifestyle mobilities. Intersections of travel,
leisure and migration. London and New York: Routledge.
Problematizing Siloed Mobilities 25
Duval, D. (2003) ‘When hosts become guests: Return visits and diasporic identities in a Commonwealth eastern Caribbean community,’ Current Issues in Tourism, 6(4), pp. 267–308.
Dwyer, L., Seetaram, N., Forsyth, P. and King, B. (2014) ‘Is the migration-tourism relationship only about VFR?,’ Annals of Tourism Research, 46, pp. 130–143.
Eade, J. (1992) ‘Pilgrimage and tourism at Lourdes, France’, Annals of Tourism Research, 19,
pp. 18–32.
Ebron, P. (1999) ‘Tourists as pilgrims: Commercial fashioning of Trans-Atlantic politics’,
American Ethnologist, 26, pp. 910–932.
Elliot, A., Norum, R. and Salazar, N.B. (eds.) (2017) Methodologies of mobility: Ethnography
and experiment. New York: Berghahn Books.
Enloe, C. (1989) Bananas, beaches & bases: Making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Esman, M.R. (1984) ‘Tourism as ethnic preservation: The Cajuns of Louisiana’, Annals of
Tourism Research, 11, pp. 451–467.
Farah, R. (2010) ‘ “Knowledge in the service of the cause”: Education and the Sahrawi
struggle for self-determination’, Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 27(2), pp. 30–41.
Feldman, J. (1995) ‘ “It is my brothers whom I am seeking”: Israeli youths’ pilgrimages to
Poland of the Shoah’, Jewish Folklore and Ethnology Review, 17(1–2), pp. 33–37.
Fetterman, D.M. (2020) Ethnography step-by-step. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (2015) South-South educational migration, humanitarianism and development – Views from the Caribbean, North Africa and the Middle East. London: Routledge.
Forshee, J. (2001) Between the folds: Stories of cloth, lives, and travels from Sumba. Honolulu, HI:
University of Hawai’i Press.
Forshee, J. (2002) ‘Pushing the margins: Fabrics from Sumba, traders in Bali, and tourists
from everywhere’ in Swain, M. and Momsen, J.H. (eds.) Gender/Tourism/Fun(?). Elmsford: Cognizant Communication Corporation, pp. 134–140.
Forshee, J., Fink, C. and Cate, S. (eds.) (1999) Converging interests: Traders, travelers, and tourists
in Southeast Asia. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley Center for Southeast
Asian Studies.
Freedman, J. (2018) ‘Amateur humanitarianism, social solidarity and “volunteer tourism” in
the EU refugee “crisis”’ in Ahmad, A. and Smith, J. (eds.) Humanitarian action and ethics.
London: Zed Books, pp. 94–111.
Fregonese, S. and Ramadan, A. (2015) ‘Hotel geopolitics: A research agenda’, Geopolitics,
20(4), pp. 793–813.
García Agustín, Ó. and Jørgensen, M.B. (2019) ‘Autonomous solidarity: Hotel City Plaza’
in García Agustín, Ó. and Jørgensen, M.B. (eds.) Solidarity and the ‘refugee crisis’ in Europe.
Cham: Palgrave Pivot, pp. 49–72.
Ghodsee, K. (2005) The Red Riviera: Gender, tourism, and postsocialism on the Black Sea. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Geoffroy, C. and Sibley, R. (eds.) (2007) Going abroad: Travel, tourism, and migration. Crosscultural perspectives on mobility. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Glick Schiller, N. and Salazar, N.B. (2013) ‘Regimes of mobility across the globe’, Journal of
Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2), pp. 183–200.
Gogia, N. (2006) ‘Unpacking corporeal mobilities: The global voyages of labour and leisure’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38, pp. 359–375.
Graburn, N.H.H. (1983) To pray, pay and play: The cultural structure of Japanese domestic tourism.
Aix-en-Provence: Centre des Etudes Touristiques.
Graburn, N.H.H. (1989) ‘Tourism: The sacred journey’ in Smith, V.L. (ed.) Hosts and guests:
The anthropology of tourism. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 17–32.
Problematizing Siloed Mobilities
Adams, K.M. (1984) ‘Come to Tana Toraja, “Land of the Heavenly Kings”: Travel agents as
brokers of ethnicity’, Annals of Tourism Research, 1(3), pp. 469–485.
Adams, K.M. (1988) Carving a new identity: Ethnic and artistic change in Tana Toraja. PhD
thesis. Washington, DC, University of Washington.
Adams, K.M. (1995) ‘Making-up the Toraja? The appropriation of tourism, anthropology and
museums for politics in upland Sulawesi (Indonesia)’, Ethnology, 34(2), pp. 143–153.
Adams, K.M. (2003) ‘The politics of heritage in Tana Toraja, Indonesia: Interplaying the local
and the global’, Indonesia and the Malay World, 31(89), pp. 91–107.
Adams, K.M. (2006) Art as politics: Re-crafting identities, tourism, and power in Tana Toraja,
Indonesia. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Adams, K.M. (2011) ‘Public interest anthropology, political market squares and re-scripting
dominance: From swallows to “race” in San Juan Capistrano, CA’, Journal of Policy Research in
Tourism, Leisure and Events, 3(2), pp. 147–169.
Adams, K.M. (2012) ‘Ethnographic methods’ in Dwyer, L. , Gill, A. and Seetaram, N. (eds.)
Handbook of research methods in tourism. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar
Publishing, pp. 339–351.
Adams, K.M. (2015) ‘Families, funerals and Facebook: Reimag(in)ing and curating Toraja kin in
translocal times’, tRaNS: Trans – Regional and – National Studies of Southeast Asia, 3(2), pp.
239–266.
Adams, K.M. (2016) ‘Tourism and ethnicity in insular Southeast Asia: Eating, praying, loving
and beyond’, Asian Journal of Tourism Research, 1(1), pp. 1–28.
Adams, K.M. (2019) ‘“Being a tourist in (my own) home”: Negotiating identities and belonging in
Indonesian heritage tourism’ in Leite, N.M. , Casteñeda, Q. and Adams, K.M. (eds.) The
ethnography of tourism: Edward Bruner and beyond. Lanham: Lexington Books, pp. 147–165.
Adams, K.M. (2020) ‘What Western tourism concepts obscure: Intersections of migration and
tourism in Indonesia’, Tourism Geographies, 23(1), pp. 1–26.
Adams, K.M. and Sandarupa, D. (2018) ‘A room with a view: Local knowledge and tourism
entrepreneurship in an unlikely Indonesian locale’, Asian Journal of Tourism Research, 3(1), pp.
1–26.
Adams, V. (1992) ‘Tourism and Sherpas, Nepal: Reconstruction of reciprocity’, Annals of
Tourism Research, 19(3), pp. 534–554.
Adams, V. (1996) Tigers of the snow and other virtual Sherpas: An ethnography of Himalayan
encounters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Åkerlund, U. and Sandberg, L. (2015) ‘Stories of lifestyle mobility: Representing self and place
in the search for the “good life” ’, Social & Cultural Geography, 16(3), pp. 351–370.
Aleinikoff, T.A. (2015) From dependence to self-reliance: Changing the paradigm in protracted
refugee situations. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
Allon, F. , Anderson, K. and Bushell, R. (2003) ‘Mutant mobilities: Backpacker tourism in
“global” Sydney’, Mobilities, 3, pp. 73–94.
Alrawadieh, Z. , Karayilan, E. and Cetin, G. (2019) ‘Understanding the challenges of refugee
entrepreneurship in tourism and hospitality’, The Service Industries Journal, 39(9–10), pp.
717–740.
Amit, V (2000) ‘Introduction: Constructing the field’ in Amit, V. (ed.) Constructing the field:
Ethnographic fieldwork in the contemporary world. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–18.
Amit, V. (2007) Going first class: New approaches to privileged travel and movement. Oxford
and New York: Berghahn Books.
Appadurai, A. (1986) The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Appadurai, A. (1990) ‘Disjuncture and difference in the global economy’, Public Culture, 2(2),
pp. 1–24.
Appadurai, A. (1996) Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
Ashtar, L. , Shani, A. and Uriely, N. (2017) ‘Blending “home” and “away”: Young Israeli migrants
as VFR travelers’, Tourism Geographies, 19(4), pp. 658–672.
Ateljevic, I. and Doorne, S. (2000) ‘Staying within the fence’: Lifestyle entrepreneurship in
Tourism’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 8(5), pp. 378–392.
Baas, M. (2017) ‘The mobile middle: Indian skilled migrants in Singapore and the “middling”
space between migration categories’, Transitions. Journal of Transient Migration, 1(1), pp.
47–63.
Badone, E. and Roseman, S.R. (2004) Intersecting journeys: The anthropology of pilgrimage
and tourism. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Bakewell, O. (2021) ‘Unsettling the boundaries between forced and voluntary migration’ in
Carmel, E. , Lenner, K. and Paul, R. (eds.) Handbook on the governance and politics of
migration. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 124–136.
Bell, M. and Ward, G. (2000) ‘Comparing temporary mobility with permanent migration’, Tourism
Geographies, 2(3), pp. 87–107.
Benson, M. and O’Reilly, K. (eds.) (2009) Lifestyle migration: Expectations, aspirations and
experiences. Farnham: Ashgate.
Benson, M. and Osbaldiston, N. (eds.) (2014) Understanding lifestyle migration: Theoretical
approaches to migration and the quest for a better way of life. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bianchi, R.V. (2000) ‘Migrant tourist-workers: Exploring the “contact zones” of post-industrial
tourism’, Current Issues in Tourism, 3(2), pp. 107–187.
Bianet Castellanos, M. (2010) A return to servitude: Maya migration and the tourist trade in
Cancún. Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Bloch, N. (2016) ‘Evicting heritage. Spatial cleansing and cultural legacy at the Hampi UNESCO
site in India’, Critical Asian Studies, 48(4), pp. 556–578.
Bloch, N. (2017) ‘Taxonomic panic and the art of “making do” at a heritage site. The case of
Hampi UNESCO site, India’, Anthropological Notebooks, 23(3), pp. 19–44.
Bloch, N. (2018) ‘Making tourists engaged by vulnerable communities in India’ in Owsianowska,
S. and Banaszkiewicz, M. (eds.) Anthropology of tourism in Central and Eastern Europe.
Bridging worlds. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 181–197.
Bloch, N. (2020) ‘Beyond a sedentary Other and a mobile tourist. Transgressing mobility
categories in the informal tourism sector in India’, Critique of Anthropology, 40(2), pp. 218–237.
Bloch, N. (2021a) ‘Refugees as donors. “Rich” Tibetan refugees, evicted Indian slum dwellers
and a smart city’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(2), pp. 1840–1858.
Bloch, N. (2021b) Encounters across difference. Tourism and overcoming subalternity in India.
Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York and London: Lexington Books.
Bloch, N. (forthcoming) ‘Whose crisis? Between Othering and solidarity during the so-called
refugee crisis in Europe’ in Luthra Sinha, B. , Gopal, N.D. and Pandey, A.D. (eds.) Dark
ethnography, state and the vulnerable communities: Is solidarity a threat to nation states?
London and New York: Routledge.
Bodzan, M. (2020) ‘Cooking with refugees and migrants. Staging authenticity and traditionality
for Warsaw’s culinary tourists’, Ethnologia Polona, 41, pp. 51–67.
Böss, M. (2006) ‘Theorising exile’ in Böss, M. , Gilsenan Nordin, I. and Olinder, B. (eds.) Remapping exile: Realities and metaphors in Irish literature and history. Aarhus: Aarhus University
Press, pp. 15–46.
Boyne, S. , Carswell, F. and Hall, D. (2002) ‘Reconceptualising VFR tourism. Friends, relatives
and migration in a domestic context’ in Hall, C.M. and Williams, A.M. (eds.) Tourism and
migration: New relationships between production and consumption. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, pp. 241–256.
Brennan, D. (2004) What’s love got to do with it? Transnational desires and sex tourism in the
Dominican Republic. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bruner, E.M. (1995) ‘The ethnographer/tourist in Indonesia’ in Lanfant, M.-F. , Allcock, J.B. and
Bruner, E.M. (eds.) International tourism: Identity and change. London: SAGE, pp. 224–241.
Bruner, E.M. (1996) ‘Tourism in Ghana: The representation of slavery and the return of the
black diaspora’, American Anthropologist, 98(2), pp. 290–304.
Bruner, E.M. (2005) Culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago
Press.
Buchowski, M. (2017) ‘A new tide of racism, xenophobia, and islamophobia in Europe: Polish
anthropologists swim against the current’, American Anthropologist, 119(3), pp. 519–523.
Burns, P.M. and Novelli, M. (eds.) (2008) Tourism and mobilities: Local-global connections.
Wallingford and Cambridge: CABI.
Burrai, E. , Buda, D.-M. and Stevenson, E. (2022) ‘Tourism and refugee-crisis intersections: Cocreating tour guide experiences in Leeds, England’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2022.2072851
Butler, R. (2003) ‘Relationships between tourism and diasporas: Influences and patterns’,
Espac Populations Sociétés, 2, pp. 317–326.
Carson, D.A. , Carson, D.B. and Lundmark, L. (eds.) (2016) Tourism, mobilities, and
development in sparsely populated areas. London and New York: Routledge.
Castellanos, M.B. (2010) A return to servitude: Maya migration and the tourist trade in Cancún.
Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Cetin, G. , Altinay, L. and Alrawadieh, Z. (2022) ‘Entrepreneurial motives, entrepreneurial
success and life satisfaction of refugees venturing in tourism and hospitality’, International
Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(6), pp. 2227–2249.
Chatty, D. , Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. and Crivello, G. (2010) ‘Identity with/out territory: Sahrawi
refugee in transnational space’, in Chatty, D. (ed.) Deterritorialized youth – Sahrawi and Afghan
refugees at the margins of the Middle East. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 37–84.
Choedup, N. (2015) From Tibetan refugees to transmigrants: Negotiating cultural continuity and
economic mobility through migration. PhD thesis. Washington, DC: Washington University.
Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/643
Chtouris, S. and Miller, D.S. (2017) ‘Refugee flows and volunteers in the current humanitarian
crisis in Greece’, Journal of Applied Security Research, 12(1), pp. 61–77.
Clifford, J. (1997) Routes: Travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Coates, J. (2017) ‘Idleness as method: Hairdressers and Chinese urban mobility in Tokyo’ in
Elliot, A. , Norum, R. and Salazar, N.B. (eds.) Methodologies of mobility: Ethnography and
experiment. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 109–128.
Cohen, E. (1973) ‘Nomads from affluence: Notes on the phenomenon of drifter-tourism’,
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 14(1), pp. 89–103.
Cohen, E. (1992) ‘Pilgrimage and tourism: Convergence and divergence’, in Morinis, E.A. (ed)
Sacred journeys: The anthropology of pilgrimage. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 47–61.
Cohen, E. and Cohen, S. (2015) ‘Beyond Eurocentrism in tourism: A paradigm shift to
mobilities’, Tourism Recreation Research, 40(2), pp. 157–168.
Cole, S. (2004) ‘Shared benefits: Longitudinal research in Eastern Indonesia’ in Phillimore, J.
and Goodson, L. (eds) Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and
methodologies. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 292–310.
Cole, S. and Eriksson, J. (2010) ‘Tourism and human rights’, in Cole, S. and Morgan, N.J. (eds.)
Tourism and inequality: Problems and prospects. Wallingford and Cambridge: CABI Publishing,
pp. 107–125.
Coles, T. and Timothy, D.J. (eds.) (2004a) Tourism, diasporas and space. London and New
York: Routledge.
Coles, T. and Timothy, D.J. (2004b) ‘My field is the world: Conceptualizing diasporas, travel and
tourism’ in Coles, T and Timothy, D.J. (eds) Tourism, diasporas and space. London and New
York: Routledge, pp. 1–29.
Cooper, M.J. (2002) ‘Flexible labour markets, ethnicity and tourism-related migration in Australia
and New Zealand’ in Hall, C.M. and Williams, A.M. (eds.) Tourism and migration: New
relationships between production and consumption. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers,
pp. 73–86.
Cunningham, H. (2004) ‘Nations rebound? Crossing borders in a gated globe’, Identities: Global
Studies in Culture and Power, 11(3), pp. 329–350.
D’Andrea, A. (2009) Global nomads: Techno and New Age as transnational countercultures in
Ibiza and Goa. Abingdon: Routledge.
Dahles, H. and Bras, C.H. (1999) ‘Entrepreneurs in romance. Tourism in Indonesia’, Annals of
Tourism Research, 26(2), pp. 267–293.
Deshingkar, P. and Farrington, J. (eds.) (2009) Circular migration and multilocational livelihood
strategies in rural India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DiGiovine, M.A. and Choe, J. (2020) Pilgrimage beyond the officially sacred: Understanding the
geographies of religion and spirituality in sacred travel. Abingdon: Routledge.
Din, K. (2017) ‘Returning home: A reflection on the Malaysian practice of balik kampung ’, Asian
Journal of Tourism Research, 2(1), pp. 36–49.
Duany, J. (2002) ‘Mobile livelihoods: The sociocultural practices of circular migrant between
Puerto Rico and the United States’, The International Migration Review, 36(2), pp. 355–388.
Duncan, T. , Cohen, S.A. and Thulemark, M. (2016) Lifestyle mobilities. Intersections of travel,
leisure and migration. London and New York: Routledge.
Duval, D. (2003) ‘When hosts become guests: Return visits and diasporic identities in a
Commonwealth eastern Caribbean community,’ Current Issues in Tourism, 6(4), pp. 267–308.
Dwyer, L. , Seetaram, N. , Forsyth, P. and King, B. (2014) ‘Is the migration-tourism relationship
only about VFR?,’ Annals of Tourism Research, 46, pp. 130–143.
Eade, J. (1992) ‘Pilgrimage and tourism at Lourdes, France’, Annals of Tourism Research, 19,
pp. 18–32.
Ebron, P. (1999) ‘Tourists as pilgrims: Commercial fashioning of Trans-Atlantic politics’,
American Ethnologist, 26, pp. 910–932.
Elliot, A. , Norum, R. and Salazar, N.B. (eds.) (2017) Methodologies of mobility: Ethnography
and experiment. New York: Berghahn Books.
Enloe, C. (1989) Bananas, beaches & bases: Making feminist sense of international politics.
Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Esman, M.R. (1984) ‘Tourism as ethnic preservation: The Cajuns of Louisiana’, Annals of
Tourism Research, 11, pp. 451–467.
Farah, R. (2010) ‘ “Knowledge in the service of the cause”: Education and the Sahrawi struggle
for self-determination’, Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 27(2), pp. 30–41.
Feldman, J. (1995) ‘ “It is my brothers whom I am seeking”: Israeli youths’ pilgrimages to Poland
of the Shoah’, Jewish Folklore and Ethnology Review, 17(1–2), pp. 33–37.
Fetterman, D.M. (2020) Ethnography step-by-step. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (2015) South-South educational migration, humanitarianism and
development – Views from the Caribbean, North Africa and the Middle East. London:
Routledge.
Forshee, J. (2001) Between the folds: Stories of cloth, lives, and travels from Sumba. Honolulu,
HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Forshee, J. (2002) ‘Pushing the margins: Fabrics from Sumba, traders in Bali, and tourists from
everywhere’ in Swain, M. and Momsen, J.H. (eds.) Gender/Tourism/Fun(?). Elmsford:
Cognizant Communication Corporation, pp. 134–140.
Forshee, J. , Fink, C. and Cate, S. (eds.) (1999) Converging interests: Traders, travelers, and
tourists in Southeast Asia. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley Center for
Southeast Asian Studies.
Freedman, J. (2018) ‘Amateur humanitarianism, social solidarity and “volunteer tourism” in the
EU refugee “crisis” ’ in Ahmad, A. and Smith, J. (eds.) Humanitarian action and ethics. London:
Zed Books, pp. 94–111.
Fregonese, S. and Ramadan, A. (2015) ‘Hotel geopolitics: A research agenda’, Geopolitics,
20(4), pp. 793–813.
García Agustín, Ó. and Jørgensen, M.B. (2019) ‘Autonomous solidarity: Hotel City Plaza’ in
García Agustín, Ó. and Jørgensen, M.B. (eds.) Solidarity and the ‘refugee crisis’ in Europe.
Cham: Palgrave Pivot, pp. 49–72.
Ghodsee, K. (2005) The Red Riviera: Gender, tourism, and postsocialism on the Black Sea.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Geoffroy, C. and Sibley, R. (eds.) (2007) Going abroad: Travel, tourism, and migration. Crosscultural perspectives on mobility. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Glick Schiller, N. and Salazar, N.B. (2013) ‘Regimes of mobility across the globe’, Journal of
Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2), pp. 183–200.
Gogia, N. (2006) ‘Unpacking corporeal mobilities: The global voyages of labour and leisure’,
Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38, pp. 359–375.
Graburn, N.H.H. (1983) To pray, pay and play: The cultural structure of Japanese domestic
tourism. Aix-en-Provence: Centre des Etudes Touristiques.
Graburn, N.H.H. (1989) ‘Tourism: The sacred journey’ in Smith, V.L. (ed.) Hosts and guests:
The anthropology of tourism. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 17–32.
Griffin, T. (2017) ‘Immigrant hosts and intra-regional travel’, Tourism Geographies, 19(1), pp.
44–62.
Gustafson, P. (2002) ‘Tourism and seasonal retirement migration’, Annals of Tourism Research,
29(4), pp. 899–918.
Gustafson, P. (2014) ‘Business travel from the traveller’s perspective: Stress, stimulation and
normalization’, Mobilities, 9(1), pp. 63–83.
Hasian, M.A. , Maldonado, J.A. and Ono, K.A. (2015) ‘Thanatourism, Caminata Nocturna, and
the complex geopolitics of Mexico’s Parque EcoAlberto’, Southern Communication Journal,
80(4), pp. 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2015.1043138.
Hall, C.M. and Müller, D.K. (eds.) (2004) Tourism, mobility and second homes: Between elite
landscape and common ground. Clevedon: Channel View Pubs.
Hall, C.M. and Tucker, H. (eds.) (2004) Tourism and postcolonialism: Contested discourses,
identities and representations. London and New York: Routledge.
Hall, C.M. and Williams, A.M. (eds.) (2002) Tourism and migration. New relationships between
production and consumption. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Harrison, J. (2008) ‘Shifting positions,’ Tourist Studies, 8(1), pp. 41–60.
Harrison, J. (2010) ‘Belonging at the cottage’ in Scott, J. and Selwyn, T. (eds.) Thinking through
tourism. London: Routledge, pp. 71–92.
Healy, P.O. (2007) ‘Heads up: Hidalgo, Mexico; Run! Hide! The illegal border crossing
experience’. The New York Times, Feb. 4. Available at:
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/travel/04HeadsUp.html
Herzfeld, M. (2006) ‘Spatial cleansing: Monumental vacuity and the idea of the West’, Journal of
Material Culture, 11(1/2), pp. 127–149.
Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2009) ‘International solidarity movement: A case study in volunteer
tourism for justice’, Annals of Leisure Research, 12(3–4), pp. 333–339.
Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2010) ‘Justifying tourism: Justice through tourism’ in Cole, S. and
Morgan, N.J. (eds.) Tourism and inequality: Problems and prospects. Wallingford and
Cambridge: CABI, pp. 195–212.
Holsey, B. (2008) Routes of remembrance: Refashioning the slave trade in Ghana. Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
Horolets, A. (2018) ‘On holiday? Polish migrants visit their families in Poland’ in Ślusarczyk, M. ,
Pustułka, P. and Struzik, J. (eds.) Contemporary migrant families: Actors and issues. Newcastle
upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishers, pp. 117–136.
Isaac, R.K. (2010) ‘Alternative tourism: New forms of tourism in Bethlehem for the Palestinian
tourism industry’, Current Issues in Tourism, 13(1), pp. 21–36.
İstanbullu Dinçer, F.F. , Karayilan, E. and Aydoğan Çifçi, M. (2017) ‘Refugee crisis (RC) after
the Arab Spring (AS) and its impacts on Turkish tourism industry: The case of Istanbul’, Journal
of Tourismology, 3(1), pp. 2–12.
Jaakson, R. (1986) ‘Second-home domestic tourism’, Annals of Tourism Research, 13(3), pp.
367–391.
Jaisuekun, K. and Sunanta, S. (2021) ‘German migrants in Pattaya, Thailand: Gendered
mobilities and the blurring boundaries between sex tourism, marriage migration, and lifestyle
migration’ in Mora, C. and Piper, N. (eds.) The Palgrave handbook of gender and migration.
London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 137–149.
Janoschka, M. and Haas, H. (2014) Contested spatialities, lifestyle migration and residential
tourism. London and New York: Routledge.
Kassis, R. , Solomon, R. and Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2016) ‘Solidarity tourism in Palestine: The
Alternative Tourism Group of Palestine as a catalyzing instrument of resistance’ in Isaac, R.K. ,
Hall, C.M. and Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (eds) The politics and power of tourism in Palestine.
London: Routledge, pp. 37–52.
Kelner, S. (2010) Tours that bind: Diaspora, pilgrimage and Israeli birthright tourism. New York:
NYU Press.
Kingsley, P. (2015) ‘Kos: The Greek island where refugees and tourists share the same
beaches’, The Guardian, 5 September. Available at:
www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/05/refugees-and-holidaymakers-in-kos-patrick-kingsley
Koslowski, R. (ed.) (2011) Global mobility regimes: A conceptual reframing. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.
LeCompte, M.D. and Schensul, J.J. (2010) Designing and conducting ethnographic research:
An introduction. Lanham, MD: AltaMira.
Lehrer, E.T. (2013) Jewish Poland revisited: Heritage tourism in unquiet places. Indianopolis,
IN: University of Indiana Press.
Leite, N. (2005) ‘Travels to an ancestral past: On diasporic tourism, embodied memory, and
identity’, Anthropologicas, 9, pp. 273–304.
Leite, N. (2017) Unorthodox kin: Portuguese Marranos and the global search for belonging.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lenz, R. (2010) ‘”Hotel Royal” and other spaces of hospitality: Tourists and migrants in the
Mediterranean’ in Scott, J. and Selwyn, T. (eds.) Thinking through tourism. London: Routledge,
pp. 209–229.
Levitt, P. and Glick Schiller, N. (2004) ‘Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field
perspective on society’, International Migration Review, 38(3), pp. 1002–1039.
Lindquist, J. (2008) The anxieties of mobility: Migration and tourism in the Indonesian
borderlands. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Long, L.D. and Oxfeld, E. (eds.) (2004) Coming home? Refugees, migrants and those who
stayed behind. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Mahrouse, G. (2008) ‘Race-conscious transnational activists with cameras: Mediators of
compassion’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(1), pp. 87–105.
Makimoto, T. and Manners, D. (1997) Digital nomad. New York: Wiley.
Malkki, L.H. (1995a) ‘Refugees and exile: From “refugee studies” to the national order of things’,
Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, pp. 495–523.
Malkki, L.H. (1995b) Purity and exile. Violence, memory, and national cosmology among Hutu
refugees in Tanzania. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Manning, P. (2009) ‘The hotel/refugee camp Iveria: Symptom, monster, fetish, home’ in Assche,
K.V. , Salukvadze, J. and Shavishvili, N. (eds.) City culture and city planning in Tbilisi: Where
Europe and Asia meet. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, pp. 319–349.
Marcus, G. (1995) ‘Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited
ethnography’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), pp. 95–117.
Marschall, S. (2017) Tourism and memories of home. Migrants, displaced people, exiles and
diasporic communities. Bristol: Channel View Pubs.
Mason, P. (2002) ‘The “Big OE”: New Zealanders overseas experiences in Britain’ in Hall, C.M.
and Williams, A.M. (eds.) Tourism and migration: New relationships between production and
consumption. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 87–101.
McGuckin, E.A. (1997) Postcards from Shangri-la: Tourism, Tibetan refugees, and the politics of
cultural production. PhD thesis. New York: New York University.
McIntyre, N. Williams, D. and K. McHugh (eds.) (2006) Multiple dwelling and tourism:
Negotiating place, home and identity. Wallingford and Cambridge: CABI.
Moon, B.-Y. , Yang, S.-H. and Lee, T.J. (2019) ‘Married immigrant women’s VFR tourism as the
way to ethnic minority group acculturation’, Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 17, pp.
544–561.
Moss, L. (2006) The amenity migrants: Seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures.
Wallingford and Cambridge: CABI.
Nash, D. (1981) ‘Tourism as an anthropological subject’, Current Anthropology, 22, pp.
461–481.
Nguyen, T.H. and King, B. (1998) ‘Migrant homecoming: Viet kieu attitudes towards travelling
back to Vietnam,’ Pacific Tourism Review, 1, pp. 349–361.
Nowicka, M. (2007) ‘Mobile locations: Construction of home in a group of mobile transnational
professionals’, Global Networks. A Journal of Transnational Affiars, 7(1), pp. 69–86.
O’Reilly, K. (2003) ‘When is a tourist? The articulation of tourism and migration in Spain’s Costa
del Sol’, Tourist Studies, 3(3), pp. 301–317.
O’Reilly, K. (2007) ‘Emerging tourism futures: Residential tourism and its implications’ in
Geoffroy, C. and Sibley, R. (eds.) Going abroad: Travel, tourism, and migration. Cross-cultural
perspectives on mobility. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 144–157.
Okely, J. and Callaway, H. (eds.) (1992) Anthropology and autobiography. London and New
York: Routledge.
Ono, M. (2008) ‘Long-stay tourism and international retirement migration: Japanese retirees in
Malaysia’ in Haines, D.W. , Minami, M. and Yamashita, S. (eds.) Transnational migration in East
Asia: Japan in a comparative focus. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, pp. 151–162.
Pappas, N. and Papatheodorou, A. (2017) ‘Tourism and the refugee crisis in Greece:
Perceptions and decision-making of accommodation providers’, Tourism Management, 63, pp.
31–41.
Paraskevaidis, P. and Andriotis, K. (2021) ‘Medical volunteers as accidental tourists:
Humanitarianism and the European refugee crisis’, Tourism Recreation Research.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2021.2011591
Peters, J.D. (2006) ‘Exile, nomadism and diaspora: The stakes of mobility in the Western
canon’, in Morra, J. and Smith, M. (eds.) Visual culture: Spaces of visual culture. London: Taylor
and Francis, pp. 17–41.
Pfaffenberger, B. (1983) ‘Serious pilgrims and frivolous tourists. The chimera of tourism in the
pilgrimages of Sri Lanka’, Annals of Tourism Research, 10(1), pp. 57–74.
Pido, E.J. (2017) Migrant returns: Manila, development, and transnational connectivity. Durham,
NC: Duke University Press.
Popović, M. (2018) Tourism in contested regions: A typology of tourists visiting the refugee
camps of Western Sahara. MSc Thesis. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana.
Porter, L. (2015) ‘Refugee crisis: Greece – what can tourists do to help’, Telegraph, 25
September. Available at: www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/news/refugee-crisis-greece-what-cantourists-do-to-help/
Portes, A. and Jensen, L. (1989) ‘The enclave and the entrants: Patterns of ethnic enterprise in
Miami before and after Mariel’, American Sociological Review, 54(6), pp. 929–949.
Reis, R. (2019) ‘Mobilities from the exile: the Sahrawi student migrations’, in Rafik Khalil, R.M.
and Malit, F.T. (eds) Recent migrations and refugees in the MENA Region. London:
Transnational Press London, pp. 65–80.
Richards, G. (2015) ‘The new global nomads: Youth travel in a globalizing world’, Tourism
Recreation Research, 40, pp. 340–352.
Richards, G. and Wilson, J. (eds.) (2004) The global nomad: Backpacker travel in theory and
practice. Clevedon: Channel View Publications.
Said, E. (1984) ‘Reflections on exile’, Graizta, 13, pp. 159–172.
Salazar, N.B. (2012) ‘Tourism imaginaries. A conceptual approach’, Annals of Tourism
Research, 39(2), pp. 863–882.
Salazar, N.B. (2017) ‘Key figures of mobility: An introduction’, Social Anthropology, 25(1), pp.
5–12.
Salazar, N.B. (2020) ‘Labour migration and tourism mobilities: Time to bring sustainability into
the debate’, Tourism Geographies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1801827
Salazar, N.B. , Elliot, A. and Norum, R. (2017) ‘Studying mobilities: Theoretical notes and
methodological queries’ in Elliot, A. , Norum, R. and Salazar, N.B. (eds.) Methodologies of
mobility: Ethnography and experiment. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 1–24.
Sandri, E. (2017) ‘ “Volunteer humanitarianism”: Wolunteers and humanitarian aid in the Jungle
refugee camp Calais’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(1), pp. 65–80.
Schein, L. (1998) ‘Forged transnationality and oppositional cosmopolitanism’, in Smith, M. and
Guarnizo, L. (eds.) Transnationalism from below. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, pp.
291–313.
Schein, L. (2002) ‘Mapping Hmong media in diasporic space’ in Ginsburg, F.D. , Abu-Lughod, L.
and Larkin, B. (eds.) Media worlds: Anthropology on new terrains. Berkeley, CA: University of
California Press, pp. 229–244.
Schein, L. (2005) ‘Minorities, homelands and methods’ in Nyíri, P. and Breidenbach, J. (eds.)
China inside out: Contemporary Chinese nationalism and transnationalism. Budapest: Central
European University Press, pp. 99–140.
Schmidt, E. (2012) ‘Citizenship from below: Hñúhñú heritage in a transnational world’, Latino
Studies, 10(1–2), pp. 196–219.
Shamir, R. (2005) ‘Without borders? Notes on globalization as a mobility regime’, Sociological
Theory, 23(2), pp. 197–217.
Sheller, M. and Urry, J. (2006) ‘The new mobilities paradigm’, Environment and Planning A,
38(2), pp. 207–226.
Skeldon, R. (2012) ‘Going round in circles: Circular migration, poverty alleviation and
marginality’, International Migration, 50(3), pp. 43–60.
Smith, V.L. (ed.) (1977) Hosts and guests: The anthropology of tourism (1st edition). Oxford:
Blackwell.
Smith, V.L. (ed.) (1989) Hosts and guests: The anthropology of tourism (2nd edition).
Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Smith, V.L. (1992) ‘Pilgrimage and tourism: The quest in guest’, Annals of Tourism Research,
19, pp. 1–17.
Smith, V.L. (2005) ‘Anthropologists in the tourism workplace’, NAPA Bulletin, 23, pp. 252–269.
Snepenger, D.J. , Johnson, J.D. and Rasker, R. (1995) ‘Travel-stimulated entrepreneurial
migration’, Journal of Travel Research, 34(1), pp. 40–44.
Spradley, J. (2016) Participant observation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Stronza, A. (2001) ‘Anthropology of tourism: Forging new ground for ecotourism and other
alternatives’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, pp. 261–283.
Tesfahuney, M. (1998) ‘Mobility, racism and geopolitics’, Political Geography, 17(5), pp.
499–515.
Thompson, B.Y. (2019) ‘The digital nomad lifestyle: (Remote) work/leisure balance, privilege,
and constructed community,’ International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 2(1–2), pp.
27–42.
Tie, C. and Seaton, T. (2013) ‘Diasporic identity, heritage and “homecoming”: How SarawakianChinese feel on tour in Beijing,’ Tourism Analysis, 18(3), pp. 227–243.
Timothy, D.J. (1997) ‘Tourism and the personal heritage experience’, Annals of Tourism
Research, 34(3), pp. 751–754.
Timothy, D.J. and Olsen, D. (eds) (2006) Tourism, religion and spiritual journeys. New York and
Abingdon: Routledge.
Trihas, N. and Tsilimpokos, K. (2018) ‘Refugee crisis and volunteer tourism in Lesvos, Greece’,
Journal on Tourism & Sustainability, 2(1), pp. 42–56.
Tsartas, P. , Kyriakaki, A. , Stavrinoudis, T. , Despotaki, G. , Doumi, M. , Sarantajou, E. and
Tsilimpokos, K. (2020) ‘Refugees and tourism: A case study from the islands of Chios and
Lesvos, Greece’, Current Issues in Tourism, 23(11), pp. 1311–1327
Turner, B.S. (2007) ‘The enclave society. Towards a sociology of immobility’, European Journal
of Social Theory, 10(2), pp. 287–304.
Turner, V. and Turner, E. (1978) Image and pilgrimage in Christian culture. New York: Columbia
University Press.
Unger, O. , Uriely, N. and Fuchs, G. (2016) ‘The business travel experience’, Annals of Tourism
Research, 61, pp. 142–156.
Urry, J. (2007), Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Walsh, M.D. (2019) ‘Partiendo la madre: Borders, thresholds and transnational sites of
belonging’, Chiricú Journal: Latina/o Literatures, Arts, and Culture, 3(2), pp. 41–58.
Wauters, B. and Lambrecht, J. (2008) ‘Barriers to refugee entrepreneurship in Belgium:
Towards an explanatory model’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(6), pp. 895–915.
Williams, A.M. and Hall, C.M. (2002) ‘Tourism, migration, circulation and mobility. The
contingencies of time and place’ in Hall, C.M. and Williams, A.M. (eds.) Tourism and migration:
New relationships between production and consumption. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
Publishers, pp. 1–52.
Woube, A. (2014) Finding one’s place: An ethnological study of belonging among Swedish
migrants on the Costa del Sol in Spain. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Temporality and the Intersection of Tourism and Migration
Adams, K.M. (2019) ‘Being a tourist in my (own) home: Negotiating identity between tourism
and migration in Indonesia’ in Leite, N.M. , Castañeda, Q.E. and Adams, K.M. (eds.) The
ethnography of tourism: Edward Bruner and beyond. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp.
147–165.
Allon, F. , Anderson, K. and Bushell, R. (2008) ‘Mutant mobilities: Backpacker tourism in
“global” Sydney’, Mobilities, 3, pp. 73–94.
Bear, L. (2016) ‘Time as technique’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 45, pp. 487–502.
Cohen, J.H. and Sirkeci, I. (2011) Cultures of migration: The global nature of contemporary
mobility. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Cwerner, S.B. (2001) ‘The times of migration’, Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies, 27, pp.
7–36.
Eggebø, H. and Brekke, J.P. (2019) ‘Family migration and integration: The need for a new
research agenda’, Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 9(4), pp. 425–444.
Fernandez, N.T. (2013) ‘Moral boundaries and national borders: Cuban marriage migration to
Denmark’, Identities: Global Studies in Power and Culture, 20(3), pp. 270–287.
Gibson, H. and Yiannakis, A. (2002) ‘Tourist roles: Needs and the lifecourse’, Annals of Tourism
Research, 29(2), pp. 358–383.
Graburn, N.H.H. (2001) ‘Tourism as ritual: A general theory of tourism’ in Smith, V.L. and Brent,
M. (eds.) Hosts and guests revisited: Tourism issues of the 21st century. New York: Cognizant
Communications, pp. 42–52.
Griffiths, M. , Rogers, A. and Anderson, B. (2013) Migration, time and temporalities: Review and
prospect. Oxford: University of Oxford.
Hall, K. and Hardill, I. (2016) ‘Retirement migration, the “other” story: Caring for frail elderly
British citizens in Spain’, Ageing and Society, 36(3), pp. 562–585.
Hareven, T.K. (1996) ‘Life course’ in Birren, J.E. (ed.) Encyclopedia of gerontology. San Diego,
CA: Academic Press, pp. 31–40.
Holmes, S. (2013) Fresh fruit, broken bodies: Migrant farmworkers in the United States.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Iyer, P. (2013) ‘Where is home?’, TED Global 2013. Available
at:www.ted.com/talks/pico_iyer_where_is_home
King, R. , Thomson, M. , Fielding, T. and Warnes, T. (2004) Gender, age and generations.
Sussex: Sussex Centre for Migration and Population Studies, University of Sussex.
Lofgren, O. (1999) On holiday: A history of vacationing. Berkeley, CA: University of California
Press.
Malmberg, G. (1997) ‘Time and space in international migration’ in Hammar, T. , Brochmann, G.
, Tamas, K. and Faist, T. (eds.) International migration, immobility and development. Oxford:
Berg Press, pp. 21–48.
Oppermann, M. (1995) ‘Travel life cycle’, Annals of Tourism Research, 22(3), pp. 535–552.
Orlikowski, W.J. and Yates, J. (2002) ‘It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations’,
Organizational Science, 13(6), pp. 684–700.
Rabinow, P. (1984) The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon.
Robertson, S. (2015) ‘The temporalities of international migration: Implications for ethnographic
research’ in Castles, S. , Ozkul, D. and Cubas, M. (eds.) Social transformation and migration:
National and local experiences in South Korea, Turkey, Mexico and Australia. New York:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 45–60.
Rytter, M. (2012) ‘The semi-legal family life: Pakistani couples in the borderlands of Denmark
and Sweden’, Global Networks, 12(1), pp. 91–108.
Rytter, M. (2019) ‘Writing against integration: Danish imaginaries of culture, race and
belonging’, Ethnos, 84(4), pp. 678–697.
Schmidt, G. (2011) ‘Migration and marriage: Examples of border artistry and cultures of
migration?’, Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 1(2), pp. 55–59.
Selasi, T. (2014) ‘Don’t ask where I’m from, ask where I’m a local’, TED Global 2014. Available
at: www.ted.com/talks/taiye_selasi_don_t_ask_where_i_m_from_ask_where_i_m_a_local
Simoni, V. (2014) ‘The morality of friendship in touristic Cuba’, Suomen Antropologi: Journal of
the Finnish Anthropological Society, 39(1), pp. 19–36.
Staff (2020) ‘Locked out: When and how to let migrants move again’, The Economist,
436(9205), p. 7.
World Tourism Organization (2020) International tourism highlights (2020 edition). Madrid:
UNWTO. Available at:www.e-unwto.org/doi/book/10.18111/9789284422456
Yeoh, B. and Lin, W. (2013) ‘Chinese migration to Singapore: Discourses and discontents in a
globalizing nation-state’, Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 22(1), pp. 31–54.
Migrant, Tourist, Cuban
Adams, K.M. (2019) ‘ “Being a tourist in (my own) home”: Negotiating identities and belonging in
Indonesian heritage tourism’ in Leite, N. , Casteñeda, Q. and Adams, K.M. (eds.) The
ethnography of tourism: Edward Bruner and beyond. London: Lexington Books/Rowman and
Littlefield, pp. 148–165.
Adams, K.M. (2021) ‘What Western tourism concepts obscure: Intersections of migration and
tourism in Indonesia’, Tourism Geographies, 23(4), pp. 678–703.
Aja Díaz, A. , Rodríguez Soriano, M.O. , Orosa Busutil, R. and Albizu-Campos Espiñeira, J.C.
(2017) ‘La migración internacional de cubanos. Escenarios actuales’, Novedades en Población,
26, pp. 40–57.
Bastian, H. (2018) Everyday adjustments in Havana: Economic reforms, mobility, and emerging
inequalities. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Berg, M.L. (2011) Diasporic generations: Memory, politics and nation among Cubans in Spain.
New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Bidet, J. and Wagner, L. (2012) ‘Vacances au bled et appartenances diasporiques des
descendants d’immigrés algériens et marocains en France’, Tracés. Revue de Sciences
humaines, 23, pp. 113–130.
Candea, M. (2010) ‘Aonnymous introductions: Identity and belonging in Corsica’, Journal of the
Royal Anthropological Institute, 16(1), pp. 119–137.
Causey, A. (2003) Hard bargaining in Sumatra: Western travellers and Toba Bataks in the
marketplace of souvenirs. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Constable, N. (1999) ‘At home but not at home: Filipina narratives of ambivalent returns’,
Cultural Anthropology, 14(2), pp. 203–228.
De Gourcy, C. (2010) ‘Revenir sur les lieux de l’origine. De la quête de « racines » aux
épreuves du retour’, Ethnologie française, 40(2), pp. 349–356.
Eckstein, S.E. (2009) The immigrant divide: How Cuban Americans changed the US and their
homeland. New York and London: Routledge.
Eckstein, S.E. and Berg, M.L. (2009) ‘Cubans in the United States and Spain: The diaspora
generational divide’, Diaspora, 18(1–2), pp. 159–183.
Englund, H. (2006) Prisoners of freedom: Human rights and the African poor. Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
Englund, H. (2008) ‘Extreme poverty and existential obligations: Beyond morality in the
anthropology of Africa?’, Social Analysis, 52(3), pp. 33–50.
Espino, M.D. (2013) ‘Diaspora tourism: Performance and impact of nonresident nationals on
Cuba’s tourism sector’, Cuba in Transition, 23, pp. 416–423.
Ferguson, J. (2006) Global shadows: Africa in the neoliberal world order. Durham, NC: Duke
University Press.
Ferguson, J. (2015) Give a man a fish: Reflections on the new politics of distribution. Durham,
NC: Duke University Press.
Geschiere, P. (2009) The perils of belonging: Autochthony, citizenship, and exclusion. Chicago,
IL: University of Chicago Press.
Graburn, N.H.H. (1983) ‘The anthropology of tourism’, Annals of Tourism Research, 10(1), pp.
9–33.
Härkonen, H. (2015) ‘Negotiating wealth and desirability: Changing expectations on men in
post-soviet Havana’, Etnografica, 19(2), pp. 367–388.
Hodgson, D.L. (2002) ‘Introduction: Comparative perspectives on the indigenous rights
movement in Africa and the Americas’, American Anthropologist, 104(4), pp. 1037–1049.
Krull, C. and Stubbs, J. (2018a) ‘Decentering cubanidad: Commodification, cosmopolitanism
and diasporic engagement shaping the Cuban migration to post-1989 Western Europe’ in
Kapcia, A. (ed.) Rethinking past and present in Cuba: Essays in memory of Alistair Hennessy.
London: Institute of Latin American Studies, pp. 167–210.
Krull, C. and Stubbs, J. (2018b) ‘ “Not Miami”: The Cuban diasporas in Toronto and Montreal’ in
Fernández, L.R. , Wright, C. and Wylie, L. (eds.) Other diplomacies, other ties, Canada and
Cuba in the shadow of the US. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 267–303.
Leite, N. (2017) Unorthodox kin: Portuguese Marranos and the global search for belonging.
Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Li, T. (2000) ‘Articulating indigenous identity in Indonesia: Resource politics and the tribal slot’,
Comparative Studies in Society and History, 42(2), pp. 149–179.
Marschall, S. (2017) ‘Tourism and memories of home: Introduction’ in Marschall, S. (ed.)
Tourism and memories of home: Migrants, displaced people, exiles and diasporic communities.
Bristol: Channel View Publications, pp. 1–31.
Martín Fernandez, C. and Barcenas, J.A. (2015) ‘Reforma migratoria en Cuba e impacto
psicosocial en la sociedad cubana’, Novedades en Población, 21, pp. 26–37.
Meiu, P. (2020) ‘Panics over plastics: A matter of belonging in Kenya’, American Anthropologist,
122(2), pp. 222–235.
Olwig, K.F. (2012) ‘The “successful” return: Caribbean narratives of migration, family, and
gender’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18(4), pp. 828–845.
O’Reilly Herrera, A. (ed.) (2007) Cuba: Idea of a nation displaced. Albany, NY: State University
of New York Press.
Ortiz, F. (1964) ‘Cubanidad y cubanía’, Islas, 6(2), pp. 91–95.
Perelló Cabrera, J.P. (2016) ‘Desarrollo del turismo en Cuba: Tendencias, políticas e impactos
futuros’, Cuba in Transition, 26, pp. 229–233.
Safa, H. (2005) ‘The matrifocal family and patriarchal ideology in Cuba and the Caribbean’,
Journal of Latin American Anthropology, 10(2), pp. 314–338.
Said, E. (1984) ‘Reflections on exile’, Granta, 13, pp. 157–172.
Simoni, V. (2013) ‘Intimate stereotypes: The vicissitudes of being caliente in touristic Cuba’,
Civilisations. Revue Internationale d’Anthropologie et de Sciences Humaines, 62(1–2), pp.
181–197.
Simoni, V. (2014) ‘The morality of friendship in touristic Cuba’, Suomen Antropologi, 39(1), pp.
19–36.
Simoni, V. (2015) ‘Intimacy and belonging in Cuban tourism and migration’, The Cambridge
Journal of Anthropology, 33(2), pp. 26–41.
Simoni, V. (2016a) Tourism and informal encounters in Cuba. Oxford and New York: Berghahn
Books.
Simoni, V. (2016b) ‘Ethnography, mutuality, and the utopia of love and friendship in touristic
Cuba’, Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford, 8(1), pp. 143–167.
Simoni, V. (2019a) ‘Appartenances et identifications à l’épreuve. Migrants en visite de retour à
Cuba’, ethnographiques.org, 37. Available at:www.ethnographiques.org/2019/Simoni
Simoni, V. (2019b) ‘Tourism, migration, and back in Cuba’, American Anthropologist, 21(3), pp.
755–760.
Simoni, V. and Voirol, J. (2021) ‘Remittances and morality: Family obligations, development,
and the ethical demands of migration’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(11), pp.
2516–2536.
Sirna, F. (2015) ‘ “Torno a casa in vacanza.” L’esperienza del ritorno temporaneo al paese di
origine per i piemontesi ed i siciliani emigrati in Francia nel secondo dopoguerra’, Archivio
storico dell’emigrazione italiana, 11, pp. 80–88.
Smith, R.C. (2005) Mexican New York: Transnational lives of new immigrants. Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
Stoler, A.L. (1989) ‘Making empire respectable: The politics of race and sexual morality in 20th
century colonial cultures’, American Ethnologist, 16(4), pp. 634–660.
Sylvain, R. (2005) ‘Disorderly development: Globalization and the idea of “culture” in the
Kalahari’, American Ethnologist, 32(3), pp. 354–370.
Trémon, A.-C. (2018) ‘Sociodicies of (im)mobility: Moral evaluations of stasis, departure and
return in an emigrant village (Shenzhen, China)’, Mobilities, 13(1), pp. 157–170.
Wig, S. (2020) Into the light. Rifts and relations in Cuba’s market transformation. PhD thesis.
Oslo: University of Oslo.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2006) ‘Belonging and the politics of belonging’, Patterns of Prejudice, 40(3),
pp. 197–214.
Zelizer, V.A. (2005) The purchase of intimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zigon, J. (2018) Disappointment: Toward a critical hermeneutics of world building. New York:
Fordham University Press.
Zigon, J. (2019) A war on people: Drug user politics and a new ethics of community. Berkeley,
CA: University of California Press.
Diasporic Im/mobilities
Anderson, P. (2020) ‘Orange County man returns home, shares details of imprisonment in
Vietnam’, NBC Los Angeles, 28 October. Available
at:www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/orange-county-returns-home-shares-details-ofimprisonment-in-vietnam/2451326/
Blitz, B. , Sales, R. and Marzano, L. (2005) ‘Non-voluntary return? The politics of return to
Afghanistan’, Political Studies, 53(1), pp. 182–200.
Bloch, N. (2018) ‘Making a community embedded in mobility: Refugees, migrants, and tourists
in Dharamshala (India)’, Transfers, 8(3), pp. 36–54.
Bradford, A. (2016) ‘Remembering Pedro Pan: Childhood and collective memory making in
Havana and Miami, 1960–2000’, Cuban Studies, 44(1), pp. 283–308.
Bui, L. (2018) Returns of war: South Vietnam and the price of refugee memory. New York: New
York University Press.
Chau, H. (2018) ‘Xet xu ong William Nguyen’, Tuoi Tre Online, 13 July. Available at:
https://tuoitre.vn/20-7-xet-xu-ong-william-nguyen-20180713093631229.htm
Chow, G. (2005) ‘Exiled once again: Consequences of the congressional expansion of
deportable offenses on the Southeast Asian refugee community’, Asian Law Journal, 12(1), pp.
103–136.
Di Leonardo, M. (2018) The varieties of ethnic experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Djordjevic, B. (2013) Politics of return, inequality and citizenship in the post-Yugoslav space.
CITSEE Working Paper Series, 29.
Do, A. (2019) ‘Last year he went on vacation to Vietnam. Now he faces 12 years in prison’, Los
Angeles Times, 25 June. Available at: www.latimes.com/la-me-vietnamese-prison-nguyen20190625-story.html
Dunst, C. (2018) ‘The Deportees Caught in Trump’s Immigration War’, Southeast Asia Globe,
12 December. Available at: https://southeastasiaglobe.com/the-vietnamese-deportees-caughtin-trumps-immigration-war/
Duong, L. (2016) ‘Diasporic returns and the making of Vietnamese American ghost films in
Vietnam’, MELUS: Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States, 41(3), pp. 153–170.
Foxhall, E. (2018) ‘Houstonian will Nguyen returns to Twitter with defiance after arrest,
detention in Vietnam’, The Houston Chronicle, 27 July. Available at:
https://m.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Will-Nguyen-who-was-detained-in-Vietnamreturns-13111091.php?utm_campaign=twittermobile&utm_source=CMS%20Sharing%20Button&utm_medium=social
Gasviani, G. (2019) ‘The role of the Soviet past in contemporary Georgia’, Caucasus
International, 9(1–2), pp. 37–50.
Gosin, M. (2017) ‘ “Bitter diversion”: Afro-Cuban immigrants, race, and everyday-life resistance’,
Latino Studies, 15(1), pp. 4–28.
Human Rights Watch (2016) Vietnam: Events of 2016. Available at: www.hrw.org/worldreport/2017/country-chapters/vietnam
Inhorn, M. (2011) ‘Diasporic dreaming: Return reproductive tourism to the Middle East’,
Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 23(5), pp. 582–591.
Keles, J. (2022) ‘Return mobilities of highly skilled young people to a post-conflict region: The
case of Kurdish-British to Kurdistan – Iraq’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(3), pp.
790–810.
King, R. and Christou, A. (2011) ‘Of counter-diaspora and reverse transnationalism: Return
mobilities to and from the ancestral homeland’, Mobilities, 6(4), pp. 451–466.
Kopf, D. (2017) ‘In one metric of diversity, China comes in dead last’, Quartz, 27 December.
Available at: https://qz.com/1163632/china-still-has-the-smallest-share-of-incoming-migrants-inthe-world/
Kwan, Y. (2019) ‘Providing asset-based support for Asian American refugees: Interrogating
transgenerational trauma, resistance, and affective capital’, New Directions for Higher
Education, 186, pp. 37–47.
Lam, A. (2018) ‘There and back again: A Vietnamese journey,’ Boom California, 21 March.
Available at: https://boomcalifornia.com/2018/03/21/there-and-back-again/
Lee, J. (2017) The politics of translingualism: After Englishes. London: Routledge.
Lum, L. (2018) ‘Group addresses incarceration among Asian Americans, Pacific Islanders’,
Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 1 May. Available at:
https://diverseeducation.com/article/115575/
Ly, P. (2003) ‘In Vietnam, finding the comforts of home’, Washington Post, 12 October.
Available at: www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2003/10/12/in-vietnam-finding-thecomforts-of-home/39fc9244-2182-4ae4-b1eb-bc970fe188b0/
Nadurata, E. (2019) Crip’in Migration: Examining the elderly migrant experience in Filipino
American literature. MA thesis. Los Angeles, CA: University of California.
Newton, N. (2012) A queer political economy of “community”: Gender, space, and the
transnational politics of community for Vietnamese lesbians (les) in Saigon. PhD thesis. Irvine,
CA: University of California.
Nguyen, L.T. (2021) Revolutionary others: Migratory subjects and Vietnamese radicalism in the
US during and after the Vietnam War. PhD thesis. San Diego, CA: University of California.
Nguyen, T. and King, B. (1998) ‘Migrant homecomings: Viet Kieu attitudes towards traveling
back to Vietnam’, Pacific Tourism Review, 1(4), pp. 349–361.
Nguyen, V. (2016) ‘Refugeography in “post-racial” America: Bao Phi’s activist poetry’, MELUS:
Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States, 41(3), pp. 171–193.
O’ Connell, T. (2018) ‘ “I argue to this day that I have done nothing wrong”, says arrested US
citizen’, Southeast Asia Global, 17 August. Available at: https://southeastasiaglobe.com/willnguyen-interview/
Pearson, J. (2018) ‘US seeks to deport thousands of Vietnamese protected by treaty: Former
Ambassador’, Reuters, 12 April. Available at: www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-vietnamdeportees/u-s-seeks-to-deport-thousands-of-vietnamese-protected-by-treaty-formerambassador-idUSKBN1HJ0OU
Pearce, P. and Moscardo, G. (2005) ‘Domestic and visiting friends and relatives tourism’ in
Buhalis, D. and Costa, C. (eds.) Tourism business frontiers. London: Routledge, pp. 70–77.
Phuong, T. (2017) ‘Saint, celebrity, and the self(ie): Body politics in late socialist Vietnam’,
Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique, 25(4), pp. 821–842.
Piña, D.A. (2022 ‘White supremacy in rainbow: Global pride and black lives matter in the era of
COVID’, New Sociology: Journal of Critical Praxis, 3, pp. 1-10.
Quy, N. (2020) ‘Vietnam among top 10 countries for retirement’, VN Express International, 6
January. Available at: https://e.vnexpress.net/news/news/vietnam-among-top-10-countries-forretirement-report-4037643.html
Randall (2020) ‘Vietnamese Am held prisoner in Vietnam for 2 years freed’, AsAmNews, 27
October. Available at: https://asamnews.com/2020/10/27/michael-nguyen-is-resting-with-familyin-orange-county-after-his-surprise-release-from-a-vietnamese-prison
Reyes, V. (2019) Global borderlands: Fantasy, violence, and empire in Subic Bay, Philippines.
Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Saraiva, A. and Sardinha, J. (2016) ‘ “My country, my pain; my child, my love”: Aging Azoreans
in San Jose, California and ancestral homeland return (Im) mobilities’, InterDISCIPLINARY
Journal of Portuguese Diaspora Studies, 5, pp. 7–23.
Schwenkel, C. (2015) ‘Socialist mobilities: Crossing new terrains in Vietnamese migration
histories’, Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 4(1), pp. 13–25.
Simal-González, B. (2014) ‘Andrew Lam’s narratives of return: From Viet Kieu nostalgia to
discrepant cosmopolitanisms’ in Oliver-Rotger, M. (ed.) Identity, diaspora and return in
American literature. New York: Routledge, pp. 93–114.
Small, I. (2013) ‘The Vietnamese transnational(s)’ in Barker, J. , Harms, E. and Lindquist, J.
(eds.) Figures of modernity in Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 72–75.
Su, P. (2017) ‘ “There’s no solidarity”: Nationalism and belonging among Vietnamese refugees
and immigrants in Berlin’, Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 12(1), pp. 73–100.
Tran, A. (2018a) ‘Vietnam: Workers protest proposed lease of economic zones to China’, The
News Lens, 24 July. Available at: https://international.thenewslens.com/article/10049
Tran, V. (2018b) ‘Freedom of assembly on trial in Vietnam’, New Naratif, 19 July. Available at:
https://newnaratif.com/journalism/freedom-assembly-trial-vietnam/
Valverde, K. (2012) Transnationalizing Viet Nam: Community, culture, and politics in the
diaspora. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
VietNamNet Bridge (2011) ‘Viet Kieu bring money, but also knowledge and technology’,
VietNamNet Bridge, 24 January. Available at: http://english.vietnamnet.vn/fms/specialreports/4011/viet-kieu-bring-money–but-also-knowledge-and-technology.html
VnExpress (2016) ‘Vietnam has one of the least powerful passports in Southeast Asia’,
VnExpress International, 18 September. Available at:
https://e.vnexpress.net/news/news/vietnam-has-one-of-the-least-powerful-passports-insoutheast-asia-3470103.html
Wang, C. (2013) ‘Politics of return: Homecoming stories of the Vietnamese diaspora’, Positions:
East Asia Cultures Critique, 21(1), pp. 161–187.
Winogrodzka, D. and Grabowska, I. (2021) ‘(Dis)ordered social sequences of mobile young
adults: Spatial, social and return mobilities’, Journal of Youth Studies, 24, pp. 1–17.
Zelnick, J. (2018) ‘Cambodian American deportable refugees and transnationalism’ in Howell, J.
, Altamirano, D. , Totah, F. and Keles, F. (eds.) Porous borders, invisible boundaries?
Ethnographic perspectives on the vicissitudes of contemporary migration. Arlington, VA:
American Anthropological Association, pp. 91–98.
Zhang, L. (2012) ‘Afterword: Flexible postsocialist assemblages from the margin’, Positions:
East Asia Cultures Critique, 20(2), pp. 659–667.
Zialcita, F. (1995) ‘State formation, colonialism and national identity in Vietnam and the
Philippines’, Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society, 23(2), pp. 77–117.
Student Migration as an Escape from Protracted Exile
Agier, M. (2008) On the margins of the world – The refugee experience today. Cambridge:
Polity Press.
Anderson, B. (2006) Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of
nationalism. London: Verso.
Bailey, A.J. , Wright, R.A. , Mountz, A. and Miyares, I.M. (2002) ‘(Re)producing Salvadoran
Transnational Geographies’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1), pp.
125–144.
Bartlett, L. , Rodríguez, D. and Oliveira, G. (2015) ‘Migration and education: Sociocultural
perspectives’, Educação e Pesquisa, 41, pp. 1153–1170.
Betts, A. , Loescher, G. and Milner, J. (2011) The United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees (UNHCR): The politics and practice of refugee protection. London and New York:
Routledge.
Bloch, N. (2014) ‘Constructing borders within Diaspora “born refugees”, newcomers and
bargaining Tibetan identity’, in Posern-Zieliński, A. and Mróz, L. (eds) Middle grounds,
ambiguous frontiers and intercultural spaces. Poznań: Instytut im. Oskara Kolberga, pp.
135–154.
Bloch, N. (2017) ‘Beyond integration. Tibetan Diaspora’s separation strategy in multicultural
India’, in Posern-Zieliński, A. (ed.) The world of encounters. The role of migration and ethnicity
in the contemporary world. Poznań: Instytut im. Oskara Kolberga, pp. 75–95.
Bloch, N. (2018) ‘Making a community embedded in mobility – Refugees, migrants, and tourists
in Dharamshala (India)’, Transfers, 8(3), pp. 36–54.
Bonilla Pérez, N. (2021) ‘Children’s rights promotion in Sahrawi refugee camps: A study on the
vacaciones en paz programme from a child rights-based approach’, Schriftenreihe Junges
Afrikazentrum (JAZ), 11, pp. 1–53.
Caratini, S. (2006) ‘La prisión del tiempo: los cambios sociales en los campamentos de
refugiados saharauís’, Cuadernos Bakeaz, 77, pp. 1–16.
Carling, J. and Collins, F. (2018) ‘Aspiration, desire and drivers of migration’, Journal of Ethnic
and Migration Studies, 44(6), pp. 909–926.
Caro Baroja, J. (2008) Estudios saharianos. Madrid: Catarata.
Chatty, D. , Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. and Crivello, G. (2010) ‘Identity with/out territory: Sahrawi
refugee in transnational space’, in Chatty, D. (ed.) Deterritorialized Youth – Sahrawi and afghan
refugees at the margins of the Middle East. New York: Berghahn Books (Studies in Forced
Migration, 29), pp. 37–84.
Corbet, A. (2018) ‘Au-delà de l’exil: mobilités des étudiants sahraouis et impacts de leur retour
dans les camps’, in Boulay, S. and Correale, F. (eds) Sahara occidental – conflit oublié,
population en mouvement. Tours: Presses universitaires François-Rebelais, pp. 337–352.
Crivello, G. (2009) ‘ “Becoming somebody”: Youth transitions through education and migrations
– evidence from Young Lives, Peru’, Young Lives – An International Study of Childhood
Poverty, Working Paper, 43, pp. 1–27.
Crivello, G. , Fiddian, E. and Chatty, D. (2006) ‘Mobility and the care of Sahrawi refugee youth’,
Anthropology News, 47(5), pp. 29–30.
Farah, R. (2010) ‘ “Knowledge in the service of the cause”: Education and the Sahrawi struggle
for self-determination’, Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 27(2), pp. 30–41.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (2012) ‘Invisible refugees and/or overlapping refugee Dom? Protecting
Sahrawis and Palestinians displaced by the 2011 Libyan uprising’, International Journal of
Refugee Law, 24(2), pp. 263–293.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (2014) The ideal refugees: Gender, Islam, and the Sahrawi politics of
survival. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (2015) South-South educational migration, humanitarianism and
development – views from the Caribbean, North Africa and the Middle East. London: Routledge.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (2020) ‘Introduction – Refugee in a moving world: Refugee and migrant
journeys across disciplines’, in Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (ed.) Refuge in a moving world – Tracing
refugee and migrant journeys across disciplines. London: UCL Press, pp. 1–19.
Gimeno Martín, J.C. (2007) Transformaciones socioculturales de un proyecto revolucionario: la
lucha del pueblo saharaui por la liberación. Caracas: Caracas, Programa Cultura,
Comunicación y Transformaciones Sociales, CIPOST, FaCES, Universidad Central de
Venezuela.
Gómez Martín, C. (2016) ‘De exilios a migraciones económicas. La movilidad espacial de los
saharauis como parte del “ingenio aguzado de la supervivencia” ’, in Barreñada, I. and Ojeda,
R. (eds) Sahara Occidental 40 años después. Madrid: Catarata, pp. 105–116.
Hansen, A.S. and Thogersen, S. (2015) ‘The anthropology of Chinese transnational educational
migration’, Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 44(3), pp. 3–14.
doi:10.1177/186810261504400301.
Holland, D.G. and Yousofi, M.H. (2014) ‘The only solution: Education, youth, and social change
in Afghanistan’, Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 45(3), pp. 241–259.
Holt, B. (2017) Western Sahara, Sahrawi Arab democratic republic: Protracted Sahrawi
displacement and camping. Abidjan: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Hudgins, K. (2010) ‘Student development tourism: A growing trend to what end?’, Anthropology
News, 51(8), pp. 29–29.
Jackson, M. (2008) ‘The shock of the new: On migrant imaginaries and critical transitions’,
Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, 73(1), pp. 57–72.
Koselleck, R. (2004) Futures past – On the semantics of historical time. New York: Columbia
University Press.
Malkki, L.H. (1995) Purity and exile: Violence, memory, and national cosmology among Hutu
refugees in Tanzania. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Mauss, M. (2001) Ensaio sobre a Dádiva (Edições 70). Lisbon: Edições 70 (Perspectivas do
Homem).
Milner, J. (2016) ‘Protracted refugee situations’, in Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. et al . (eds) The
Oxford handbook of refugee & forced migration studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.
151–162.
Oh, S.A. and van der Strouwe, M. (2008) ‘Education, diversity and inclusion refugee camps in
Thailand’, Comparative Education Review, 52(4), pp. 589–617.
Olwig, K.F. , Valentin, K. and Dalgas, K.M. (2010) Research project education, mobility and
citizenship. Århus: Danish School of Education – Århus University and Department of
Anthropology – University of Copenhagen, pp. 1–14.
Popović, M. (2018) Tourism in contested regions: A typology of tourists visiting the refugee
camps of Western Sahara. MSc Dissertation. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana.
Reis, R. (2019) ‘Mobilities from the Exile: the Sahrawi student migrations’, in Rafik Khalil, R.M.
and Malit, F.T. (eds) Recent migrations and refugees in the MENA region. London:
Transnational Press London, pp. 65–80.
Reis, R. (2020a) ‘Vacaciones en Paz: los refugiados saharauis entre el activismo político y la
solidariedad española’, in Schuster, P.K. and Valenzuela-Moreno, K.A. (eds) Trayectorias y
Jornadas: Transnacionalismo en Acción. London: Transnational Press London.
Reis, R. (2020b) ‘Sahrawi student mobilities: exile routes among young refugees’, Cahiers de
L’Ouest saharien, 12, pp. 55–74.
San Martín, P. (2010) Western Sahara – The refugee nation. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Schielke, S. (2009) ‘Ambivalent commitments: Troubles of morality, religiosity and aspiration
among young Egyptians’, Journal of Religion in Africa, 39(2), pp. 158–185.
Solana, V. (2016) ‘”No somos costosas, somos valiosas.” La lucha de las Mujeres Saharauis
Cuarenta Años Después’, in Barreñada, I. and Ojeda, R. (eds) Sahara Occidental 40 Años
Después. 1a . Madrid: Catarata, pp. 81–91.
Velloso Santisteban, A. and Vinagrero Ávila, J.A. (2016) Educación en Palestina, Sáhara
Occidental, Iraq, Guinea Ecuatorial y para refugiados. Madrid: UNED – Universidad Nacional de
Educación a Distancia.
Wilson, A. (2017) ‘Ambivalences of mobility: Rival state authorities and mobile strategies in a
Saharan conflict’, American Ethnologist, 44(1), pp. 77–90.
Wright, L.A. and Plasterer, R. (2010) ‘Beyond basic education: Exploring opportunities for
higher learning in Kenyan refugee camps’, Refuge, 27(2), pp. 42–56.
The Intersections Between Tourism and Exile
Adams, K. (2001) ‘Danger zone tourism: Potentials and problematics for tourism in tumultuous
times’ in Teo, P. Chong, H.K. and Chang, T.C. (eds.) Interconnected worlds: Southeast Asia
tourism in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Pergamon Press, pp. 267–281.
Adams, K. (2021) ‘What western tourism concepts obscure: Intersections of migration and
tourism in Indonesia’, Tourism Geographies, 23(4), pp. 678–703.
Applied Research Institute (2005) The Israeli assault on Bethlehem triangle. Jerusalem: Applied
Research Institute.
Banksy (2006) Wall and piece. London: Century.
Bloch, N. (2021) Encounters across difference. Tourism and overcoming subalternity in India.
Boulder, New York and London: Lexington.
Boyd, S.W. (2000) ‘Heritage tourism in Northern Ireland: Opportunity under peace’, Current
Issues in Tourism, 3(2), pp. 150–174.
Brin, E. (2006) ‘Politically-oriented tourism in Jerusalem’, Tourist Studies, 6(3), pp. 215–243.
Buda, M.D. (2012) ‘Hospitality, peace and conflict: “Doing fieldwork” in Palestine’, The Journal
of Tourism and Peace Research, 2(2), pp. 50–61.
Çakmak, E. and Isaac, R.K. (2012) ‘What destination marketers can learn from their visitors’
blogs: An image analysis of Bethlehem, Palestine’, Journal of Destination Marketing and
Management, 1, pp. 124–133.
Carter, J. (2006) Palestine: Peace not apartheid. London: Simon & Schuster.
Clarke, R. (2000) ‘Self-presentation in a contested city: Palestinian and Israeli political tourism
in Hebron’, Anthropology Today, 16(5), pp. 61–85.
Davis, T. (2018) Welcome to the walled off: A visit to Banksy’s hotel in Bethlehem. The
Jerusalem Post. Available at: www.jpost.com/jerusalem-report/welcome-to-the-Walled-off-avisit-to-banksys-hotel-in-bethlehem-544463.
Farmaki, A. (2013) ‘Dark tourism revisited: A supply/demand conceptualization’, International
Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 7(3) pp. 281–292.
Gelbman, A. and Keinan, O. (2007) ‘National and transnational borderlanders’ attitude towards
the security fence between Israel and the Palestinian Authority’, Geo Journal, 86(4), pp.
279–291.
Guia, J. (2021) ‘Conceptualizing justice tourism and the promise of posthumanism’, Journal of
Sustainable Tourism, 29 (2–3), pp. 503–520.
Halper, J. (2008) An Israeli in Palestine: Resisting dispossession, redeeming Israel. London:
Pluto Press.
Hazboun, S. (1992) ‘A socioeconomic study of the Beit-Jibrin refugee camp, Bethlehem’,
Journal of Arab Affairs, 11(1), pp. 54–66.
Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2008) ‘Justice tourism and alternative globalization’, Journal of
Sustainable Tourism, 16(3), pp. 345–364.
Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2009) ‘International solidarity movement: A case study in volunteer
tourism for justice’, Annals of Leisure Research, 12(3–4), pp. 333–339.
Holsti, O.R. (1969) Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, WI:
Addison-Wesley.
Isaac, R.K. (2010) ‘Alternative tourism: New forms of tourism in Bethlehem for the Palestinian
tourism industry’, Current Issues in Tourism, 13(1), pp. 21–36.
Isaac, R.K. (2021) ‘Pilgrimage tourism to Palestine: The ‘come and see’ initiative in Palestine’ in
Darius, L. (ed) Pilgrims: Values and identities. Wallingford: CABI Publishing, pp. 188–201.
Isaac, R.K. and Abu Eid, T. (2019) ‘Tourists’ destination image: An exploratory study of
alternative tourism in Palestine’, Current Issues in Tourism, 22(12), pp. 1499–1522.
Isaac, R.K. and Çakmak, E. (2016) ‘Understanding the motivations and emotions of visitors at
Tuol Sleng genocide prison museum (S-21) in Phnom Penh, Cambodia’, International Journal of
Tourism Cities, 2(3), pp. 232–247.
Isaac, R.K. and Hodge, D. (2011) ‘An exploratory study: Justice tourism in controversial areas.
The case of Palestine’, Tourism Planning & Development, 8(1), pp. 101–108.
Isaac, R.K. and Platenkamp, V. (2016) ‘Concrete u(dys)topia in Bethlehem: A city of two tales’,
Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 14(2), pp. 150–166.
Jamal, T. and Higham, J. (2021) ‘Justice and ethics: Towards a new platform for tourism and
sustainability’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(2–3), pp. 143–157.
Kassis, R. (2006) ‘The Palestinians and justice tourism: Another tourism is possible’. Available
at: http://atg.ps/study-center/articles.
Kassis, R. , Solomon, R. and Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2016) ‘Solidarity tourism in Palestine: The
alternative tourism group of Palestine as a catalysing instrument of resistance’ in Isaac, R.K. ,
Hall, C.M. and Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (eds) The politics and power of tourism in Palestine.
London: Routledge, pp. 37–52.
Khader, J. (2019) ‘Dystopian dark tourism, fan subculture and the ongoing Nakba in Banksy’s
Walled-Off heterotopia’ in Isaac, R.K. , Çakmak, E. and Butler, R. (eds.) Tourism and hospitality
in conflict-ridden destinations. New York: Routledge, pp. 137–152.
Lisle, D. (2016) Holidays in the danger zone: Entanglements of war and tourism. Minneapolis,
MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Masalha, N. (2003) The politics of denial: Israel and the Palestinian refugee problem. London:
Pluto Press.
Morris, B. (2004) The birth of the Palestinian refugee problem revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Oren, G. , Shani, A. and Poria, Y. (2021) ‘Dialectical emotions in a dark heritage site: A study at
the Auschwitz death camp’, Tourism Management, 82.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104239.
Scheyvens, R. (2002) Tourism for development: Empowering communities. London: Pearson.
Selwyn, T. (2010) ‘Ghettoizing matriarch and a city: An everyday story from the
Palestinian/Israeli borderlands’, Journal of Borderlands Studies, 24(1), pp. 39–55.
Shepherd, J. , Laven, D. and Shamma, L. (2020) ‘Autoethnographic journeys through contested
spaces’, Annals of Tourism Research, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.103004.
Thurlow, JDB (2007) Why are some learners more successful than others in the completion of
an ABET course? – A case study at a publishing company. Research report submitted as part
of the requirements of a master’s degree in education. School of Education Faculty of
Humanities University of the Witwatersrand. Available at:
https://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10539/4771/JThurlow-8704642G-MEdResearchReport.pdf?cv=1&isAllowed=y&sequence=1
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) (2010) ‘Shrinking
space: Urban contraction and rural fragmentation in the Bethlehem Governorate’, UNOCHA
Survey Report. Available at: www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-203128/.
Weizman, E. (2007) Hollow land: Israel’s architecture of occupation. London: Verso.
Crafting Activists from Tourists
Adams, K. (2001) ‘Danger zone tourism: Potentials and problematics for tourism in tumultuous
times’ in Teo, P. , Chang T.C. and Ho K.C. (eds.) Interconnected worlds: Southeast Asia
tourism in the 21st century. Cambridge: Pergamon Press, pp. 267–281.
Adams V. (1992) ‘Tourism and Sherpas, Nepal: Reconstruction of reciprocity’, Annals of
Tourism Research, 19(3), p. 534–554.
Afouxenidis, A. , Petrou, M. , Kandylis, G. , Tramountanis A. and Giannaki, D. (2017) ‘Dealing
with a humanitarian crisis: Asylum seekers on the eastern EU border of the Island of Lesvos’,
Journal of Applied Security Research, 12(1), pp. 7–39.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London and New York: Sage.
Beznec, B. , Speer, M. and Stojić Mitrović, M. (2016) ‘Governing the Balkan Route: Macedonia,
Serbia and the European Border Regime’, Research Paper Series of Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung
Southeast Europe, 5. Available at: www.rosalux.de/en/publication/id/14554/governing-thebalkan-route.
Birrell, J. (2010) ‘Before you pay to volunteer abroad, think of the harm you might do’, The
Guardian, 14 November. Available at:
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/nov/14/orphans-cambodia-aids-holidays-madonna.
Bloch, N. (2011) Urodzeni uchodźcy. Tożsamość Pokolenia młodych Tybetańczyków w Indiach.
Wrocław: Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej.
Bloch, N. (2020) ‘Beyond a sedentary other and a mobile tourist: Transgressing mobility
categories in the informal tourism sector in India’, Critique of Anthropology, 40(2), pp. 218–237.
Bornstein, E. (2003) The spirit of development: Protestant NGOs, morality, and economics in
Zimbabwe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bruner, E.M. (2005) Culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago
Press.
Butcher, J. (2003) The moralisation of tourism. Sun, sand … and saving the world? London and
New York: Routledge.
Cantat, C. (2016) ‘Rethinking mobilities: Solidarity and migrant struggles’, Intersections. EEJSP,
2(4), pp. 11–32.
Cantat, C. (2020) ‘The rise and fall of migration solidarity in Belgrade’, Movements. Journal for
Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies, 5(1), pp. 96–124.
Choudry, A. and Kapoor, D. (2013) NGOization: Complicity, contradictions and prospects.
London and New York: Zed Books.
Chtouris, S. and Miller, D.S. (2017) ‘Refugee flows and volunteers in the current humanitarian
crisis in Greece’, Journal of Applied Security Research, 12(1), pp. 61–77.
Cohen, E. (1979) ‘A phenomenology of tourist experience’, Sociology, 13, pp. 179–201.
Dass-Brailsford, P. , Thomley, R. and Hurtado de Mendoza, A. (2011) ‘Paying it forward: The
transformative aspects of volunteering after Hurricane Katrina’, Traumatology, 17(1), pp. 29–40.
De Genova, N. (2017) The borders of “Europe”: Autonomy of migration, tactics of bordering.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Fassin, D. (2012) Humanitarian reason: A moral history of the present. Berkeley, CA, Los
Angeles, CA and London: University of California Press.
Goldstein, D.M. (2014) ‘Lay the body on the line: Activist anthropology and the deportation of
the undocumented’, American Anthropologist, 116(4), pp. 839–849.
Guiraudon, V. (2018) ‘The 2015 refugee crisis was not a turning point: Explaining policy inertia
in EU border control’, European Political Science, 17, pp. 151–160.
Hale, C.R. (2006) ‘Activist research vs. Cultural critique: Indigenous land rights and the
contradictions of politically engaged anthropology’, Cultural Anthropology, 21(1), pp. 96–120.
Handy, F. , Brodeur, N. and Cnaan, R.A. (2006) ‘Summer on the island: Episodic volunteering’,
Volunteering Action, 7, pp. 31–42.
Helsloot, I. and Ruitenberg, A. (2004) ‘Citizen response to disasters: A survey of literature and
some practical implications’, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 12, pp. 98–111.
Hustinx, L. and Lammertyn, F. (2003) ‘Collective and reflexive styles of volunteering: A
sociological modernization perspective’, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and
Nonprofit Organizations, 14(2), pp. 167–187.
Kallius, A. , Monterescu, D. and Rajaram, P.K., (2016) ‘Immobilizing mobility: Border
ethnography, illiberal democracy, and the politics of the “refugee crisis” in Hungary’, American
Ethnologist, 3(1), pp. 25–37.
Kasparek, B. (2016) ‘Routes, corridors, and spaces of exception: governing migration and
Europe’, Near Futures Online 1, Europe at a Crossroads. Available at:
http://nearfuturesonline.org/routes-corridors-and-spaces-of-exception-govern-ing-migration-andeurope/.
Kasparek, B. and Speer, M. (2015) ‘Of hope. Hungary and the long summer of migration’, 9
September 2015. Available at: https://bordermonitoring.eu/ungarn/2015/09/of-hope-en.
Koca, B.T. (2016) ‘New social movements: “Asylum seekers welcome UK” ’, European Scientific
Journal, 12(2), pp. 96–108.
Malkki, L. (1996) ‘Speechless emissaries: Asylum seekers, humanitarianism, and
dehistoricization’, Cultural Anthropology, 11(3), pp. 377–404.
Mandić, D. (2018) ‘A migrant “hot potato” system: The transit camp and urban integration in a
bridge society’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 43(6), pp. 799–815.
Martin, D. , Minca, C. and Katz, I. (2020) ‘Rethinking the camp: On spatial technologies of
power and resistance’, Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), pp. 743–768.
Minn, P. (2007) ‘Toward an anthropology of humanitarianism’, The Journal of Humanitarian
Assistance. Available at: https://sites.tufts.edu/jha/archives/51.
Mitrović, S.M. (2014) ‘Presenting as a problem, acting as an opportunity: Four cases of sociopolitical conflicts taking the presence of migrants as a focal object in Serbia’, Glasnik
Etnografskog Instituta SANU, 62(1), pp. 67–81.
Mitrović, S.M. and Vilenica, A. (2019) ‘Enforcing and disrupting circular movement in an EU
Borderscape: housingscaping in Serbia’, Citizenship Studies, 23(6), pp. 540–558.
Mostafanezhad, M. (2014) ‘Volunteer tourism and the popular humanitarian gaze’, Geoforum,
54, pp. 111–118.
Mostafanezhad, M. (2016) Volunteer tourism popular humanitarianism in neoliberal times.
London and New York: Routledge.
Papataxiarchis, E. (2016) ‘Being “there”: At the front line of the “European refugee crisis” - part
1’, Anthropology Today, 32, pp. 5–9.
Rojek, C. (2001) ‘Leisure and life politics’, An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23(2), pp. 115–125.
Rydzewski, R. (2020a) ‘Hope, waiting, and mobility. Migrant movement in Serbia after the EUTurkey Deal’, movements. Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies, 5(1), pp.
75–96.
Rydzewski, R. (2020b) “Refugee crisis” – An anthropological case study of the Serbian part of
the western Balkan route. PhD dissertation. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University.
Sandri, E. (2017) ‘ “Volunteer humanitarianism”: Volunteers and humanitarian aid in the Jungle
refugee camp Calais’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(1), pp. 65–80.
Simsa, R. (2017) ‘Leaving emergency management in the refugee crisis to civil society? The
case of Austria’, Journal of Applied Security Research, 12(1), pp. 78–95.
Sin, H.L. (2009) ‘Volunteer tourism – ‘Involve me and I will learn’?’, Annals of Tourism
Research, 36(3), pp. 480–501.
Sin, H.L. , Oakes T. and Mostafanezhad, M. (2015) ‘Traveling for a cause: Critical examinations
of volunteer tourism and social justice’, Tourist Studies, 15(2), pp. 119–131.
Tesfahuney, M. (1998) ‘Mobility, racism and geopolitics’, Political Geography, 17(5), pp.
499–515.
Theodossopoulos, D. (2016) ‘Philanthropy or solidarity? Ethical dilemmas about
humanitarianism in crisis-afflicted Greece’, Social Anthropology, 24(2), pp. 167–184.
Vrasti, W. (2013) Volunteer tourism in the global south: Giving back in neoliberal times. New
York: Routledge.
Whittaker, J. , McLennan, B. and Handmer, J. (2015) ‘A review of informal volunteerism in
emergencies and disasters: Definition, opportunities and challenges’, International Journal of
Disaster Risk Reduction, 13, pp. 358–368.
Yiftachel, O. (2009) ‘ “Critical theory and gray space”, Mobilisation of the colonized’, City,
3(2–3), pp. 247–263.
Panama's Temporary Migrants in the Tourism Era
Adams, K.M. (2019) ‘”Being a tourist in my (own) home”: Negotiating identity between tourism
and migration in Indonesia’ in Leite, N. , Castañeda, Q , and Adams, K.M. (eds.) The
ethnography of tourism: Edward Bruner and beyond. Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York and
London: Lexington Books, pp. 148–165.
Adams, K.M. (2021) ‘What western tourism concepts obscure: Intersections of migration and
tourism in Indonesia’, Tourism Geographies, 23(4), pp. 678–703.
Andrews, G.R. (2004) Afro-Latin America, 1800–2000. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anim-Addo, A. (2013) ‘Steaming between the Islands: Nineteenth century maritime networks
and Caribbean archipelago’, Island Studies Journal,8(1), pp. 25–38.
Baldwin, J. (2005) ‘The contested beach: Resistance and resort development in Antigua, West
Indies’ in Cartier, C. and Lew, A.A. (eds.) Seductions of place: Geographical perspectives on
globalization and touristed landscapes. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 222–241.
Banks, S.P. (2004) ‘Identity narratives by American and Canadian retirees in Mexico’, Journal of
Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 19(4), pp. 361–381.
Benson, M. and O’Reilly, K. (2009) ‘Migration and the search for a better way of life: A critical
exploration of lifestyle migration’, Sociological Review, 57(4), pp. 608–625.
Benson, M. and O’Reilly, K. (2018) Lifestyle migration and colonial traces in Malaysia and
Panama. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bloch, N. (2020) ‘Beyond a sedentary other and a mobile tourist: Transgressing mobility
categories in the informal tourism sector in India’, Critique of Anthropology,40(2), pp. 218–237.
Burns, P. and Novelli, M. (2008) ‘Introduction’ in Burns, P. and Novelli, M. (eds.) Tourism and
mobilities: Local-global connections. Wallingford: CABI, pp. 1–14.
Carles, R.D. (1952) La Ciudad de Colón y la Costa de Oro. Panamá: El Independiente.
Causey, A. (2003) Hard Bargaining in Sumatra: Western travelers and Toba Bataks in the
marketplace of souvenirs. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
Chambers, E. (2009) Native tours: The anthropology of travel and tourism. Long Grove, IL:
Waveland Press.
Clifford, J. (1992) ‘Travelling cultures’ in Grossberg, L. , Nelson, C. and Treichler, P. (eds.)
Cultural studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 96–116.
Cohen, S.A. , Duncan, T. and Thulemark, M. (2013) ‘Introducing lifestyle mobilities’ in Cohen,
S.A. , Duncan, T. and Thulemark, M. (eds.) Lifestyle mobilities: Intersections of travel, leisure
and migration. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 1–18.
Colón, F. (1892) Historia del Almirante Don Cristóbal Colón en la cual se da particular y
verdadera relación de su vida y de sus hechos, y del descubrimiento de las Indias
Occidentales, llamadas nuevo-mundo. Madrid: Imprenta de Tomas Minuesa.
Cresswell, T. (2001) ‘The production of mobilities’, New Formations,43, pp. 11–25.
Cresswell, T. (2006) On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. London and New York:
Routledge.
Cresswell, T. (2010) ‘Towards a politics of mobility’, Environment and Planning D: Society and
Space,28(1), pp. 17–31.
De Genova, N. , Garelli, G. and Tazzioli, M. (2018) ‘Autonomy of asylum? The autonomy of
migration-undoing the refugee crisis script’, The South Atlantic Quarterly,117(2), pp. 239–265.
Dillette, A. (2021) ‘Roots tourism: A second wave of double consciousness for African
Americans’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism,29(2–3), pp. 412–427.
Diez Castillo, L.A. (1981) Los cimarrones y los negros antillanos en panamá.
Panamá:Impresora R. Mercado Rudas.
Dürr, E. and Jaffe, R. (2012) ‘Theorizing slum tourism: Performing, negotiating and transforming
inequality’, European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 93, pp. 113–123.
Fraser, J.F. (1913) Panama and what it means. London, New York, Toronto and Melbourne:
Cassell and Company.
Glissant, É. (2006) Tratado del todo-mundo. Barcelona: Editorial El Cobre.
Guerrón Montero, C. (2004) ‘Afro-Antillean cuisine and global tourism’, Food, Culture, and
Society,7(2), pp. 29–47.
Guerrón Montero, C. (2006) ‘Tourism and Afro-Antillean identity in Panama’, Journal of Tourism
and Cultural Change, 4(2), pp. 65–84.
Guerrón Montero, C. (2009) ‘The “three roots” of Panama’s cultural heritage: The construction
of racial and national identities in simulated tourism’ in Baud, M. and Ypeij, A. (eds.) Cultural
tourism in Latin America: The politics of space and imagery. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill
Academic Publishers, pp. 45–68.
Guerrón Montero, C. (2011) ‘On tourism and the constructions of ‘Paradise Islands’ in central
America and the Caribbean’, Bulletin of Latin American Research,30(1), pp. 21–34.
Guerrón Montero, C. (2015) ‘Tourism, cultural heritage and regional identities in the isle of
spice’, Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change,13(1), pp. 1–21.
Guerrón Montero, C. (2019) ‘Tourism’ in Oxford bibliographies in “anthropology.” Available at:
https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199766567/obo9780199766567-0025.xml
Guerrón Montero, C. (2020) From temporary migrants to permanent attractions: Tourism,
cultural heritage, and Afro-Antillean identities in Panama. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama
Press.
Hannam, K. , Sheller, M. and Urry, J. (2006) ‘Mobilities, immobilities and moorings’,
Mobilities,1(1), pp. 1–22.
Hardt, M. and Mezzadra, S. (2017) ‘October! To commemorate the future’, The South Atlantic
Quarterly,116(4), pp. 649–668.
Hayes, M. (2015) ‘Moving South: The economic motives and structural context of North
America’s emigrants in Cuenca, Ecuador’, Mobilities, 10(2), pp. 267–284.
Heckadon Moreno, S. (1980) ‘Nota al Lector’ in Reid, C. (ed.) Memorias de un criollo
bocatoreño. Panamá: Litho-Impresora Panamá, pp. 7–14.
Higginbotham, G. (2012) Seeking roots and tracing lineages: Constructing a framework of
reference for roots and genealogical tourism’, Journal of Heritage Tourism,7(3), pp. 189–203.
Hoey, B. (2005) ‘From Pi to Pie: Moral narratives of noneconomic migration and starting over in
the postindustrial Midwest’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34(5), pp. 586–624.
Kannisto, P. (2015) Global nomads and extreme mobilities. Farnham: Ashgate.
Korpela, M. (2009) ‘When a trip to adulthood becomes a lifestyle: Western lifestyle migrants in
Varanasi, India’ in Benson, M. and O’Reilly, K. (eds.) Lifestyle migrations: Expectations,
aspirations and experiences. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 15–30.
Marquardt, S. (2002) Pesticides, parakeets, and unions in the Costa Rican banana industry,
1938–1962’, Latin American Research Review, 37(2),pp. 3–36.
Mbembe, A. (2016) Crítica de la razón negra: Ensayo sobre el racismo contemporáneo.
Barcelona: Futuro Anterior Ediciones.
McIntyre, N. (2013) ‘Mobilities, lifestyles and imagined worlds: Exploring the terrain of lifestyle
migration’ in Cohen, S.A. , Duncan, T. and Thulemark, M. (eds.) Lifestyle mobilities:
Intersections of travel, leisure and migration. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 193–207.
Mezzadra, S. (2004) ‘The right to escape’, Ephemera, 4(3), pp. 267–275.
Mezzadra, S. (2005) derecho de fugal: Migraciones, caudatan y globalización. Madrid:
Traficantes de Sueños.
Mezzadra, S. (2012) ‘Capitalismo, migraciones y luchas sociales: La mirada de la Autonomía’,
Nueva Sociedad,237, pp. 159–178.
Papastergiadis, N. (2018) The turbulence of migration: Globalization, deterritorialization and
hybridity. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Patterson, T.R. and Kelley, R.D.G. (2000) ‘Unfinished migrations: Reflections on the African
diaspora and the making of the modern world’, African Studies Review,43(1), pp. 11–45.
Salazar, N. (2010) Envisioning Eden: Mobilizing imaginaries in tourism and beyond. New York
and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Sheller, M. and Urry, J. (2004) ‘Introduction: Places to play, places in play’ in Sheller, M. and
Urry, J. (eds.) Tourism mobilities: Places to play, places in play. London: Routledge, pp. 1–10.
Spalding, A.K. (2013) ‘Lifestyle migration to Bocas del Toro, Panama’, International Review of
Social Research, 3(1), pp. 67–86.
Stephens, C. (1987) ‘Bosquejo histórico del cultivo del banano en la provincia de bocas del toro
(1880–1980)’ in Moreno, S.H. (ed.) Publicaciones especiales revista panameña de
Antropología. Panamá: Asociación Panameña de Antropología, pp. 1–50.
Torkington, K. (2012) ‘Place and lifestyle migration: The discursive construction of “glocal”
place-identity’, Mobilities, 7(1), pp. 71–92.
Waisome, F.A. , Priestley, G. and Maloney, G. (1981) ‘Documento Central del Primer Congreso
del Negro Panameño’ in Maloney, G. (ed.) Memorias del Primer Congreso del Negro
Panameño. Panamá: Impresora de la Nación, pp. 62–103.
Walcott, D. (1986) Collected Poems: 1948–1984. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
Westerman, G. (1980) Los Inmigrantes Antillanos en Panamá. Panamá: Impresora de la
Nación.
Westerman, G. (n.d.) Papers, 1886–1988. Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture,
Manuscripts, Archives and Rare Books Division, Sc MG 505 [GWC, SCRBC].
Intersections of Tourism, Cross-border Marriage, and Retirement
Migration in Thailand
Adams, K.M. (1984) ‘Come to Tana Toraja, “Land of the heavenly kings”: Travel agents as
brokers in ethnicity’, Annals of Tourism Research, 11(3), pp. 469–485.
Adams, K.M. (2021) ‘What Western tourism concepts obscure: Intersections of migration and
tourism in Indonesia’, Tourism Geographies, 23(4), pp. 678–703.
Alpha Research (2012) Thailand in figures 2010–2011. Bangkok: Alpha Research.
Angeles, L.C. and Sunanta, S. (2009) ‘Demanding daughter duty: Gender, community, village
transformation, and transnational marriages in Northeast Thailand’, Critical Asian Studies,
41(4), pp. 549–574.
Appadurai, A. (1996) Modernity al large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, MN
and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Bell, M. and Ward, G. (2000) ‘Comparing temporary mobility with permanent migration’, Tourism
Geographies, 2(1), pp. 97–107.
Bender, D. , Hollstein, T. and Schweppe, C. (2018) ‘International retirement migration revisited:
From amenity seeking to precarity migration?’, Transnational Social Review, 8(10), pp. 98–102
Benson, M. and O’Reilly, K. (2016) Lifestyle migration: Expectations, aspirations and
experiences. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bishop, R. and Robinson, L.S. (1998) Night market: Sexual cultures and the Thai economic
miracle. New York and London: Routledge.
Bloch, N. (2020) ‘Beyond a sedentary other and a mobile tourist: Transgressing mobility
categories in the informal tourism sector in India’, Critique of Anthropology, 40(2), pp. 218–237.
Brennan, D. (2004) What’s love got to do with it? Transnational desires and sex tourism in the
Dominican Republic. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
Bui, H.T. and Trupp, A. (2020) ‘Asian tourism in Europe: Consumption, distinction, mobility, and
diversity’, Tourism Recreation Research, 45, pp. 4–18.
Butratana, K. and Trupp, A. (2011) ‘Thai communities in Vienna’, Austrian Journal of South-East
Asian Studies, 4(1), pp. 183–190.
Butratana, K. and Trupp, A. (2014) ‘Thai female migration to Austria’ in Husa, K. , Trupp, A. and
Wohlschlägl, H. (eds.) Southeast Asian mobility transitions: Issues and trends in migration and
tourism. Vienna: Department of Geography and Regional Research, University of Vienna, pp.
220–236.
Butratana, K. and Trupp, A. (2021) ‘Gender, class, and paradoxical mobilities of Thai marriage
migrants in Austria’, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 42(1), pp. 85–106.
Charsley, K. (2012) ‘Transnational marriage’ in Charsley, K. (ed.) Transnational marriage. New
perspectives from Europe and beyond. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 3–22.
Charsley, K. , Storer-Church, B. , Benson, M. and Van Hear, N. (2012) ‘Marriage-related
migration to the UK’, International Migration Review, 46, pp. 861–890.
Chipeniuk, R. (2008) Defining amenity migration: Results from a survey of experts. Smithers:
University of British Columbia.
Cohen, E. (2003) ‘Transnational marriage in Thailand: The dynamics of extreme heterogamy’ in
Bauer, T. (ed.) Sex and tourism: Journeys of romance, love, and lust. New York: The Haworth
Hospitality Press, pp. 57–82.
Constable, N. (2005) ‘Introduction: Cross-border marriages, gendered mobility, and global
hypergamy’ in Constable, N. (ed.) Cross-border marriages. Gender and mobility in transnational
Asia. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1–16.
Constable, N. (2011) Cross-border marriages: Gender and mobility in transnational Asia.
Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Dwyer, L. , Seetaram, N. , Forsyth, P. and King, B. (2014) ‘Is the migration-tourism relationship
only about VFR?’, Annals of Tourism Research, 46, pp. 130–143.
Fresnoza-Flot, A. (2021) ‘”Men are butterflies, women are hindlimbs of an elephant”: Thai
women’s gendered being in transnational spaces’, Gender, Place & Culture, 28(5), pp.
680–701.
Glick Schiller, N. and Salazar, N.B. (2013) ‘Regimes of mobility across the globe’, Journal of
Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39, pp. 183–200.
Gorvett, J. (2010) ‘Southeast Asia lures retirees with affordable luxury’, The International Herald
Tribune, 22, p. 12.
Gustafson, P. (2002) ‘Tourism and seasonal retirement migration’, Annals of Tourism Research,
29(4), pp. 899–918.
Hall, C.M. and Williams, A.M. (2002) ‘Conclusions. Tourism-migration relationships’ in Hall,
C.M. and Williams, A.M. (eds.) Tourism and migration. New relationships between production
and consumption. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 277–289.
Horn, V. , Bender, D. , Hollstein, T. and Schweppe, C. (2016) ‘ “Moving (for) elder care abroad”:
The fragile promises of old-age care facilities for elderly Germans in Thailand’ in Horn, V. and
Schweppe, C. (eds.) Transnational aging: Current insights and future challenges. New York and
London: Routledge, pp. 163–177.
Howard, R.W. (2008) ‘Western retirees in Thailand: Motives, experiences, wellbeing,
assimilation and future needs’, Ageing & Society, 28, pp. 145–163.
Husa, K. , Vielhaber, C. , Jöstl, J. , Veress, K. and Wieser, B. (2014) ‘Searching for paradise?
international retirement migration to Thailand – A case study of Hua Hin and Cha-am’ in Husa,
K. , Trupp, A. and Wohlschlägl, H. (eds.) Southeast Asian mobility transitions: Issues and trends
in migration and tourism. Vienna: Department of Geography and Regional Research, University
of Vienna, pp. 137–167.
Ishii, S.K. (2016) ‘Marriage migrants as multi-marginalized transnational diaspora’ in Ishii, S.K.
(ed.) Marriage migration in Asia. Emerging minorities at the frontier of nation-states. Singapore:
NUS Press and Kyoto University Press, pp. 1–23.
Jaisuekun, K. and Sunanta, S. (2016) ‘Lifestyle migration in Thailand: A case study of German
migrants in Pattaya’, Thammasat Review, 19(2), pp. 89–103.
Jones, G. and Shen, H. (2008) ‘International marriage in East and Southeast Asia: Trends and
research emphases’, Citizenship Studies, 12, pp. 9–25.
Kitiarsa, P. (2010) ‘An ambiguous intimacy: Farang as Siamese occidentalism’ in Harrison, R.V.
and Jackson, P.A. (eds.) The ambiguous allure of the west. Traces of the colonial in Thailand.
New York: Cornell University Press, pp. 57–74.
Koch-Schulte, J. (2008) Planning for international retirement migration and expats: A case study
of Udon Thani. Thailand: University of Manitoba.
Koslowski, R. (ed.) (2011) Global mobility regimes: A conceptual reframing. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Lapanun, P. (2012) ‘Social relations and tensions in transnational marriage for rural women in
Isan, Thailand’ in Hayami, Y. , Koizumi, J. , Songsamphan, C. and Tosakul, R. (eds.) The family
in flux in Southeast Asia. Institution, ideology, practice. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books, pp.
483–503.
McHugh, K.E. , Hogan, T.D. and Happel, S.K. (1995) ‘Multiple residence and cyclical migration:
A life course perspective’ The Professional Geographer, 47(3), pp. 251–267.
Meyer, W. (1988) Beyond the mask. Saarbrücken: Verlag Breitenbach.
Ministry of Tourism and Sports (2020) Tourism Statistics. Bangkok: Ministry of Tourism and
Sports. Available at: www.mots.go.th/more_news_new.php?cid=411 .
Mills, M.B. (1997) ‘Contesting the margins of Thai modernity’, American Ethnologist, 24(1), pp.
37–61.
Mix, P.R. and Piper, N. (2003) ‘Does marriage ‘liberate’ women from sex work? Thai women in
Germany’ in Piper, N. and Roces, M. (eds.) Wife or worker? Asian women and migration.
Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 53–72.
Moon, B.-Y. , Yang, S.-H. and Lee, T.J. (2019) ‘Married immigrant women’s VFR tourism as the
way to ethnic minority group acculturation’, Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 17, pp.
544–561.
Ono, M. (2008) ‘Long-stay tourism and international retirement migration: Japanese retirees in
Malaysia’ in Haines, D.W. , Minami, M. and Yamashita, S. (eds.) Transnational migration in East
Asia: Japan in a comparative focus. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, pp. 151–162.
O’Reilly, K. (2007) ‘The rural Idyll, residential tourism, and the spirit of lifestyle migration’ in
Conference proceedings of thinking through tourism (Association of Social Anthropologists).
London: London Metropolitan University.
Rainer, G. (2019) ‘Amenity/lifestyle migration to the Global South: Driving forces and sociospatial implications in Latin America’, Third World Quarterly, 40(7), pp. 1359–1377.
Salazar, N.B. (2022) ‘Labour migration and tourism mobilities: Time to bring sustainability into
the debate’, Tourism Geographies, 24(1), pp. 141–151.
Stallmann, J.I. and Espinoza, M.C. (1996) Tourism and retirement migration (Faculty Paper
Series 97/3). College Station: A&M University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
Statham, P. , Scuzzarello, S. , Sunanta, S. and Trupp, A. (2020) ‘Globalising Thailand through
gendered ‘both-ways’ migration pathways with ‘the West’: Cross-border connections between
people, states, and places’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(8), pp. 1513–1542.
Statham, P. , Scuzzarello, S. , Sunanta, S. and Trupp, A. (eds.) (2021) Thai-western mobilities
and migration: Intimacy within cross-border connections. New York and London: Routledge.
Statistik Austria (2020) STATcube Statistische Datenbank. Vienna: Statistik Austria.
Tosakul, R. (2010) ‘Cross-border marriages: Experiences of village women from Northeastern
Thailand with Western men’ in Yang, W.-S. and Lu, M.C.-W. (eds.) Asian cross-border marriage
migration: Demographic patterns and social issues. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press,
pp. 179–199.
Toyota, M. and Xiang, B. (2012) ‘The emerging transnational “retirement industry” in Southeast
Asia’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(11/12), pp. 708–719.
Trupp, A. and Bui, H.T. (2015) ‘Thai outbound tourism to Austria: Trends and issues’, SDU
Research Journal Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(1), pp. 1–14.
UNWTO (2019) UNWTO tourism highlights. Madrid: UNWTO.
UNWTO (2020) UNWTO tourism highlights. Madrid: UNWTO.
Urry, J. (2002) The tourist gaze. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Veress, K. (2011) ‘Vom Sextouristen zum Strandpensionisten?’ in Husa, K. , Nissel, H. and
Wohlschlägl, H. (eds.) Südost- und Südasien. Demographische, soziale und regionale
Transformationen. Vienna: Department of Geography and Regional Research, University of
Vienna, pp. 203–248.
Vielhaber, C. , Husa, K. , Jöstl, J. , Veress, K. and Wieser, B. (2014) ‘Paradise found?
Experiences of Farang retirement migrants in Hua Hin and Cha-am, Thailand’ in Husa, K. ,
Trupp, A and Wohlschlägl, H. (eds.) Southeast Asian mobility transitions: Issues and trends in
migration and tourism. Vienna: Department of Geography and Regional Research, University of
Vienna, pp. 168–195.
Vogler, C.M. (2015) Receiving and providing care abroad. Interactions between international
retirement migration and the elderly care sector in Chiang Mai, Thailand. MA thesis. Vienna:
University of Vienna.
Week, L. (2012) ‘I am not a tourist: Aims and implications of “traveling” ’, Tourist Studies, 12(2),
pp. 186–203.
Williams, A.M. and Hall, C.M. (2002) ‘Tourism, migration, circulation and mobility. The
contingencies of time and place’ in Hall, C.M. and Williams, A.M. (eds.) Tourism and migration.
new relationships between production and consumption. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–52.
Williams, A.M. , King, R. and Warnes, A.M. (1997) ‘A place in the sun. International retirement
migration from northern to Southern Europe’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 4(2), pp.
115–134.
Williams, L. (2012) ‘Transnational marriage migration and marriage migration. An overview’ in
Charsley, K. (ed.) Transnational marriage. New perspectives from Europe and beyond. New
York: Routledge, pp. 23–40.
Wong, B.K.M. , Musa, G. and Taha, A.Z. (2017) ‘Malaysia my second home: The influence of
push and pull motivations on satisfaction’, Tourism Management, 61, pp. 394–410.
Zimmermann, C. (2014) “Love me, love me forever” – Thai women’s pre-migrational hopes,
dreams, and images of love and marriages with western men, in Husa, K. , Trupp, A. and
Wohlschlägl, H. (eds.) Southeast Asian mobility transitions: Issues and trends in migration and
tourism. Vienna: Department of Geography and Regional Research, University of Vienna, pp.
196–219.
The Tourist, the Migrant, and the Anthropologist
Adams, K.M. (2005) ‘Public interest anthropology in heritage sites: Writing culture and righting
wrongs’, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 11(5), pp. 433–439.
Appadurai, A. (1996) Modernity at large. Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, MN:
University of Minnesota Press.
Ashworth, G. and Tunbridge, J. (1996) Dissonant heritage: The management of the past as a
resource in conflict. Chichester: Wiley
Aytar, V. and Rath, J. (eds.) (2012) Selling ethnic neighborhoods: The rise of neighborhoods as
places of leisure and consumption. New York and London: Routledge.
Basso Peressut, L. and Pozzi, C. (eds.) (2012) Museums in an age of migrations. Milan:
Politecnico di Milano.
Biesta, G. (2012) ‘Becoming public: public pedagogy, citizenship and the public sphere,’ Social
& Cultural Geography, 13(7), pp. 683–697.
Blanchard, P. , Boëtsch, G. and Jacomijn Snoep, N. (eds.) (2011) Exhibitions. L’invention du
sauvage. Paris: Actes Sud.
Brown, W. (2009) Regulating aversion: Tolerance in the age of identity and empire. Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press.
Çağlar, A. and Glick Schiller, N. (2018) Migrants and city-making: Multiscalar perspectives on
dispossession and urban regeneration. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Cabot, H. and Lenz, R. (2012) ‘Borders of (in)visibility in the Greek Aegean’ in NoguésPedregal, A.M. (ed.) Culture and society in tourism contexts. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing
Limited, pp. 159–179.
Campos-Delgado, A. (2019) Counter-mapping migration: Irregular migrants’ stories through
cognitive mapping’, Mobilities, 4, pp. 488–504.
Castles, S. , de Haas, H. and Miller, M.J. (2014) The age of migration: International population
movements in the modern world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chambers, E. (1987) ‘Applied anthropology in the post-Vietnam era: Anticipations and ironies’,
Annual Review of Anthropology, 16, pp. 309–337.
Cheng, W. , Barraclough, L. and Pulido, L. (2010) ‘Radicalising teaching and tourism: A
people’s guide as active and activist history’, Left History, 15(1), pp. 109–125.
Clifford, J. (1997) Routes: Travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, MA
and London: Harvard University Press.
Council of Europe (2005) Council of Europe framework convention on the value of cultural
heritage for society. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/1680083746.
Cunningham, K. (2010) ‘Putting the anthropological toolkit to use in international and
intercultural learning’, Practicing Anthropology, 32(3), pp. 23–26.
Dill, J.S. (2013) The longings and limits of global citizenship education: The moral pedagogy of
schooling in a cosmopolitan age. New York and London: Routledge.
Glick Schiller, N. and Salazar, N.B. (2013) ‘Regimes of mobility across the globe’, Journal of
Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39, pp. 183–200.
Gouriévidis, L. (ed.) (2014) Museum and migration. History, memory and politics. London and
New York: Routledge.
Hall, C.M. and Williams, A.M. (eds.) (2002) Tourism and migration. New relationships between
production and consumption. Dordrecht: Springer.
Harrison, R. (2010) ‘Heritage as social action’ in West, S. (ed.) Understanding heritage in
practice. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 240–276.
Heap, C. (2009) Slumming. Sexual and racial encounters in American nightlife, 1885–1940.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hemer, O. , Povrzanović Frykman, M. and Ristilammi, P.M. (eds.) (2020) Conviviality at the
crossroads. The poetics and politics of everyday encounters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hintermann, C. and Johansson, C. (eds.) (2010) Migration and memory: Representations of
migration in Europe since 1960. Innsbruck, Wien and Bozen: StudienVerlag.
Hooks, B. (2003) Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York and London: Routledge.
International Conference on Responsible Tourism in Destinations (2002) The Cape Town
declaration. Available at: https://responsibletourismpartnership.org/cape-town-declaration-onresponsible-tourism/.
Koslowski, R. (ed.) (2011) Global mobility regimes: A conceptual reframing. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Koven, S. (2004) Slumming. Sexual and social politics in Victorian London. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Lauth Bacas, J. and Kavanagh, W. (eds.) (2013) Border encounters – Asymmetry and proximity
at Europe’s frontiers. New York: Berghahn Books.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1977) New York in 1941. The view from afar. New York: Basic Books.
Lin, J. (1998) Reconstructing Chinatown: Ethnic enclave, global change. Minneapolis, MN:
University of Minnesota Press.
Low, S.M. (2011) ‘Claiming space for engaged anthropology: Spatial inequality and social
exclusion’, American Anthropologist, 113(3), pp. 389–407.
Mazzara, F. (2015) ‘Spaces of visibility for the migrants of Lampedusa: The counter narrative of
the aesthetic discourse’, Italian Studies, 70(4), pp. 449–464.
Nowicka, M. and Vertovec, S. (2014) ‘Comparing convivialities: Dreams and realities of livingwith-difference’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(4), pp. 341–356.
Ormond, M. and Vietti, F. (2022) ‘Beyond multicultural “tolerance”: Guided tours and
guidebooks as transformative tools for civic learning’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(2–3),
pp. 533–549.
Ortner, S.B. (2016) ‘Dark anthropology and its others: Theory since the eighties’, HAU: Journal
of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), pp. 47–73.
Pastore F. and Ponzo, I. (eds.) (2016) Inter-group relations and migrant integration in European
cities. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rath, J. (ed.) (2007) Tourism, ethnic diversity and the city. New York and London: Routledge.
Riis, J. (1971) How the other half lives. Studies among the tenements of New York. Dover:
Dover Publications.
Sennett, R. (2018) Building and dwelling: Ethics for the city. London: Penguin Books.
Shamir, R. (2005) ‘Without borders? Notes on globalization as a mobility regime’, Sociological
Theory, 23(2), pp. 197–217.
Shaw, S. , Bagwell, S. and Karmowska, J. (2004) ‘Ethnoscapes as spectacle: Reimaging
multicultural districts as new destinations for leisure and tourism consumption’, Urban Studies,
41(10), pp. 1983–2000.
Sheller, M. (2018) ‘Theorising mobility justice’, Tempo Social, 30(2), pp. 17–34.
Spivak, G.C. (1990) The post-colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues. New York and
London: Routledge.
The New York Times. (1884) ‘Slumming in this town; a fashionable London mania reaches New
York. Slumming parties to be the rage this winter. Good districts to visit’, September 14, p. 4.
Urry, J. (2000) Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. New York and
London: Routledge.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Wise, A. and Velayutham, S. (eds.) (2009) Everyday multiculturalism. London: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Wong, B.P. and Chee-Beng, T. (eds.) (2013) Chinatowns around the world. Gilded ghetto,
ethnopolis, and cultural diaspora. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Zagato, L. (2015) ‘The notion of ‘heritage community’ in the Council of Europe’s faro
convention. Its impact on the European legal framework’ in Adell, N. , Bendix, R. , Bortolotto, C.
and Tauschek, M. (eds.) Between imagined communities and communities of practice.
Participation, territory, and the making of heritage. Göttingen: Universität Verlag Göttingen, pp.
141–168.
In and out of Brazil
Appadurai, A. (1996) Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, MN:
University of Minnesota Press.
Contreras Islas, D.S. (2021) ‘Mexican capoeira is not diasporic! On glocalization, migration and
the North-South divide’, Martial Arts Studies, 11, pp. 57–71.
Delamont, S. and Stephens, N. (2008) ‘Up on the roof: The embodied habitus of diasporic
capoeira’, Cultural Sociology, 2(1), pp. 57–74.
Delamont, S. , Campos, C. and Stephens, N. (2010) ‘I’m your teacher! I’m Brazilian’, Sport,
Education and Society, 15(1), pp. 103–120.
Delamont, S. , Stephens, N. and Campos, C. (2017) Embodying Brazil: An ethnography of
diasporic capoeira. New York and London: Routledge.
González Varela, S. (2019) Capoeira, mobility, and tourism: Preserving an Afro-Brazilian
tradition in a globalized world. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Griffith, L.M. (2016) In search of legitimacy: How outsiders become part of an Afro-Brazilian
tradition. New York: Berghahn Books.
Griffith, L.M. (2017) ‘Virtually legitimate: Using disembodied media to position oneself in an
embodied community’, Martial Arts Studies, 4, pp. 36–45.
Griffith, L.M. and Marion, J.S. (2018) Apprenticeship pilgrimage: Developing expertise through
travel and training. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Hamera, J. (2006) Dancing communities: Performance, difference and connection in the global
city. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
Head, S. and Gravina, H. (2012) ‘Blackness in movement: Identifying with capoeira Angola in
and out of Brazil’, African and Black Diaspora, 5(2), pp. 194–210.
Höfling, A.P. (2015) ‘Staging capoeira, samba, maculelê, and candomblé: Viva Bahia’s
choreographies of Afro-Brazilian folklore for the global stage’ in Albuquerque, S.J. and BishopSanchez, K. (eds.) Performing Brazil: Essays on culture, identity, and the performing arts.
Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 98–125.
Joseph, J. (2012) ‘The practice of capoeira: Diasporic Black culture in Canada’, Ethnic and
Racial Studies, 35(6), pp. 1078–1095.
Uriely, N. (2010) ‘ “Home” and “away” in VFR tourism’, Annals of Tourism Research, 37(3), pp.
854–857.
Intersections of Professional Mobility and Tourism Among Swedish
Physicians and Researchers
Ackers, L. (2010) ‘Internationalisation and equality: The contribution of short stay mobility to
progression in science careers’, Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques, 41(1), pp.
83–103.
Ackers, L. and Gill, B. (2008) Moving people and moving knowledge: Scientific mobility in an
enlarging European union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Åkerlund, U. and Sandberg, L. (2015) ‘Stories of lifestyle mobility: Representing self and place
in the search for the “good life” ’, Social & Cultural Geography, 16(3), pp. 351–370.
Benson, M. and O’Reilly, K. (2009) ‘Migration and the search for a better way of life: A critical
exploration of lifestyle migration’, Sociological Review, 57(4), pp. 608–625.
Burns, P.M. and Novelli, M. (2008) ‘Introduction’ in Burns, P.M. and Novelli, M. (eds.) Tourism
and mobilities: Local-global connections. Wallingford and Cambridge: CABI, pp. xvii–xxvi.
Cary, S.H. (2004) ‘The tourist moment’, Annals of Tourism Research, 31(1), pp. 61–77.
Connell, J. (2011) Medical tourism. Wallingford: CABI.
Culler, J. (1988) Framing the sign: Criticism and its institutions. Norman and London: University
of Oklahoma Press.
Doherty, C. , Patton, W. and Shield, P. (2015) Family mobility: Reconciling career opportunities
and educational strategy. London and New York: Routledge.
Doherty, N. , Dickmann, M. and Mills, T. (2011) ‘Exploring the motives of company-backed and
self-initiated expatriates’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(3), pp.
595–611.
Graburn, N.H.H. (1983) ‘The anthropology of tourism’, Annals of Tourism Research, 10(1), pp.
9–33.
Gustafson, P. (2002) ‘Tourism and seasonal retirement migration’, Annals of Tourism Research,
29(4), pp. 899–918.
Hall, M.C. (2008) ‘Of time and space and other things: Laws of tourism and the geographies of
contemporary mobilities’ in Burns, P.M. and Novelli, M. (eds.) Tourism and mobilities: Localglobal connections. Wallingford and Cambridge: CABI, pp. 15–32.
Harris, A. (2014) ‘Encountering the familiar unknown: The hidden work of adjusting medical
practice between local settings’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(3), pp. 259–282.
Holloway, D. , Green, L. and Holloway, D.A. (2011) ‘The intra tourist gaze: Grey nomads and
“other tourists” ’, Tourist Studies, 11(3), pp. 235–252.
Jansson, A. (2016) ‘Mobile elites: Understanding the ambiguous lifeworlds of sojourners,
dwellers and homecomers’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 19(5), pp. 421–434.
Klekowski von Koppenfels, A. (2014) Migrants or expatriates? Americans in Europe. New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Kreber, C. and Hounsell, J. (2014) ‘Being an international academic: A phenomenological study
of academic migrants adjusting to working and living in Scotland’ in Maadad, N. and Tight, M.
(eds.) Academic mobility. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 9–33.
Löfgren, O. (2015) ‘Modes and moods of mobility: Tourists and commuters’, Culture Unbound,
7, pp. 175–195.
Mäkelä, L. , De Cieri, H. and Mockaitis, A. (2015) ‘International business traveler, is work
always on your mind? An investigation of the relationship between sources of social support
and satisfaction with work-related international travel: The moderating role of over-commitment’
in Mäkelä, L. and Suutari, V. (eds.) Work and family interface in the international career context.
New York and London: Springer, pp. 181–195.
Mostafanezhad, M. (2014a) ‘Volunteer tourism and the popular humanitarian gaze’, Geoforum,
54, pp. 111–118.
Mostafanezhad, M. (2014b) ‘Locating the tourist in volunteer tourism’, Current Issues in
Tourism, 17(4), pp. 381–384.
O’Reilly, K. (2003) ‘When is a tourist? The articulation of tourism and migration in Spain’s Costa
del Sol’, Tourist Studies, 3(3), pp. 301–317.
Öhlander, M. , Wolanik Boström, K. and Pettersson, H. (2020) ‘Knowledge transfer work: A
case of internationally mobile medical professionals’, Nordic Journal of Migration Research,
10(2), pp. 36–49.
Riaño, Y. , Limacher, K. , Aschwanden, A. , Hirsig, S. and Wastl-Walter, D. (2015) ‘Shaping
gender inequalities: Critical moments and critical places’, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An
International Journal, 34(2), pp. 155–167.
Salazar, N.B. , Graburn, N.H.H. and Baptista, J.A. (2014) Tourism imaginaries: Anthropological
approaches. New York: Berghahn.
Schwartz, K.C. (2018) ‘Volunteer tourism and the intratourist gaze’, Tourism Recreation
Research, 43(2), pp. 186–196.
Selwyn, T. (ed.) (1996) The tourist image: Myths and myth making in tourism. Chichester:
Wiley.
Urry, J. and Larsen, J. (2011) The tourist gaze 3.0. London: Sage.
Wagner, I. (2006) ‘Career coupling: Career making in the elite world of musicians and
scientists’, Qualitative Sociology Review, 2(3), pp. 26–35.
Welch, D.E. , Welch, L.S. and Worm, V. (2007) ‘The international business traveler: A neglected
but strategic human resource’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(2),
pp. 173–183.
Williams, A.M. and Hall, C.M. (2000) ‘Tourism and migration: New relationships between
production and consumption’, Tourism Geographies, 2(1), pp. 5–27.
Willis, C. , Ladkin, A. , Jain, J. and Clayton, W. (2017) ‘Present whilst absent: Home and the
business tourist gaze’, Annals of Tourism Research, 63, pp. 48–59.
Wolanik Boström, K. (2018) ‘Complex professional learning: Physicians in aid organisations’,
Professions and Professionalism, 18(1), pp. 1–15.
Wolanik Boström, K. and Öhlander, M. (2015) ‘Mobile physicians making sense of culture(s):
On mobile everyday ethnography’, Ethnologia Europaea, 45(1), pp. 7–24.
Wolanik Boström, K. , Öhlander, M. and Pettersson, H. (2018) ‘Temporary international mobility,
family timing, dual career and family democracy: A case of Swedish medical professionals’,
Migration Letters, 15(1), pp. 99–111.
Woube, A. (2014) Finding one’s place: An ethnological study of belonging among Swedish
migrants on the Costa del Sol in Spain. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Mobility Through Investment
Adorno, S. (2002) ‘Exclusão socioeconómica e violência urbana’, Sociologias, 8, pp. 84–135.
Amante, M.F. and Rodrigues, I. (2020) ‘Mobility regimes and the crisis: The changing face of
Chinese migration due to the Portuguese golden visa policy’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration
Studies, 47(17), pp. 4081–4099.
Amit, V. (ed.) (2007) Going first class: New approaches to privileged travel and movement. New
York: Berghahn Books.
Ampudia de Haro, F. and Gaspar, S. (2019) ‘Visados dorados para inversores en España y
Portugal: residencia a cambio de dinero’, Arbor, 195(791). Available at:
https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2019.791n1008.
Benson, M. (2013) ‘Postcoloniality and privilege in new lifestyle flows: The case of North
Americans in Panama’, Mobilities, 8(3), pp. 313–330.
Benson, M. and O’Reilly, K. (2009a) ‘Migration and the search for a better way of life: A critical
exploration of lifestyle migration’, The Sociological Review, 57(4), pp. 608–625.
Benson, M. and O’Reilly, K. (eds.) (2009b) Lifestyle migration: Expectations, aspirations and
experiences. Farnham: Ashgate.
Benson, M. and O’Reilly, K. (2018) Lifestyle migration and colonial traces in Malaysia and
Panama. London: Palgrave McMillan.
Benson, M. and Osbaldiston, N. (eds.) (2014) Understanding lifestyle migration: Theoretical
approaches to migration and the quest for a better way of life. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bourdieu, P. (2010) Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
Brubaker, R. (2013) ‘Categories of analysis and categories of practice: A note on the study of
Muslims in European countries of immigration’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(1), pp. 1–8.
Brubaker, R. and Cooper, F. (2000) ‘Beyond identity’, Theory and Society, 29, pp. 1–47.
Cohen, S. , Duncan, T. and Thulemark, M. (2015) ‘Lifestyle mobilities: The crossroads of travel,
leisure and migration’, Mobilities, 10(1), pp. 155–172.
Croucher, S. (2012) ‘Privileged mobility in an age of globality’, Societies, 2, pp. 1–13.
Džankić, J. (2018) ‘Immigrant investor programs in the European Union (EU)’, Journal of
Contemporary European Studies, 26(1), pp. 64–80.
European Commission (2019) Investor citizenship and residence schemes in the European
Union. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=COM:2019:0012:FIN.
França, T. and Padilla, B. (2018) ‘Imigração brasileira para Portugal: entre o surgimento e a
construção mediática de uma nova vaga’, Cadernos de Estudos Sociais, 33(2). Available at:
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/302960634.pdf.
Gamlen, A. , Kutarna, C. and Monk, A. (2019) ‘Citizenship as sovereign wealth: Re-thinking
investor immigration’, Global Policy, 10(4), pp. 527–541.
Gaspar, S. (2017) ‘Chinese migration to Portugal. Trends and perspectives’, Journal of Chinese
Overseas, 13(1), pp. 48–69.
Gaspar, S. (2019) ‘Chinese descendants’ professional pathways: Moving to new businesses?’,
Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 18(1), pp. 91–108.
Jackson, R.T. (1990) ‘VFR tourism: Is it underestimated?’, Journal of Tourism Studies, 1(2), pp.
10–17.
Knowles, C. and Harper, D. (2009) Hong Kong: Migrant lives, landscapes and journeys.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Krähmer, K. and Santangelo, M. (2018) ‘Gentrification without gentrifiers? Tourism and real
estate investment in Lisbon’, Sociabilidades Urbanas – Revista de Antropologia e Sociologia,
2(6), pp. 151–165.
Kunz, S. (2016) ‘Privileged mobilities: Locating the expatriate in migration scholarship’,
Geography Compass, 10(3), pp. 89–101.
Larkins, E. (2015) The spectacular favela: Violence in modern Brazil. Berkeley, CA: University
of California Press.
Li, P.S. (2005) ‘The rise and fall of Chinese immigration to Canada: Newcomers from Hong
Kong special administrative region of China and mainland China, 1980–2000’, International
Migration, 43(3), pp. 9–34.
McCabe, S. (2005) ‘Who is a tourist?’ A critical review’, Tourism Studies, 5(1), pp. 85–106.
McWatters, M. (2009) Residential tourism. (De)constructing paradise. Bristol: Channel View
Publications.
Mendes, L. (2017) ‘Gentrificação turística em Lisboa: neoliberalismo, financeirização e
urbanismo austeritário em tempos de pós-crise capitalista 2008–2009’, Cadernos Metrópole,
19(39), pp. 479–512.
Monk, J. and Alexander, C. (1986) ‘Free port fallout: Gender, employment and migration on
Margarita Island’, Annals of Tourism Research, 13, pp. 393–413.
Montezuma, J. and McGarrigle, J. (2019) ‘What motivates international homebuyers? Investor
to lifestyle ‘migrants’ in a tourist city’, Tourism Geographies, 21(2), pp. 214–234.
Morrison, A.M. , Hsieh, S. and O’Leary, J.T. (1995) ‘Segmenting the visiting friends and
relatives’ market by holiday activity participation’, Journal of Tourism Studies, 6(1), pp. 48–63.
Moss, L. (2006) The amenity migrants. Oxfordshire: CAB Institute.
Nader, L. (1972) ‘Up the Anthropologist: Perspectives gained from studying up’. Available at:
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED065375.
O’Reilly, K. (2003) ‘When is a tourist? The articulation of tourism and migration in Spain’s Costa
del Sol’, Tourism Studies, 3(3), pp. 301–317.
Ortner, S.B. (2010) ‘Access: Reflections on studying up in Hollywood’, Ethnography, 11(2), pp.
211–233.
Padilla, B. (2006) ‘Brazilian migration to Portugal: Social networks and ethnic solidarity’, CIES eWorking Papers. Available at: https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstream/10071/175/4/CIESWP12_Padilla_.pdf.
Parker, O. (2017) ‘Commercializing citizenship in crisis EU: The case of immigrant investor
programs’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(2), pp. 332–384.
Peixoto, J. (2002) ‘Strong markets, weak states: The case of recent foreign immigration in
Portugal’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(3), pp. 483–497.
Penglase, R.B. (2011) ‘Lost bullets: Fetishes of urban violence in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil’,
Anthropological Quarterly, 84(2), pp. 411–438.
Pinho, F. (2014) Transformações na emigração brasileira para Portugal. De profissionais a
trabalhadores. Lisbon: ACM-IP.
Powdermaker, H. (1966) Stranger and friend. The way of an anthropologist. New York: W.W.
Norton & Company.
Robertson, S. and Rogers, D. (2017) ‘Education, real estate, immigration: Brokerage
assemblages and Asian mobilities’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(14), pp.
2393–2407.
Robins, D. (2019) ‘Lifestyle migration from the Global South to the Global North: Individualism,
social class, and freedom in a centre of “superdiversity” ’, Popul Space Place, 25. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2236.
Rodrigues, I. (2012) ‘Ser laowai: o estrangeiro antropólogo e o estrangeiro para os migrantes
chineses entre Portugal e a China’, Etnográfica, 16(3), pp. 547–567.
Rodrigues, I. (2013) Flows of fortune: The economy of Chinese migration to Portugal. PhD
thesis. Lisbon: University of Lisbon.
Rodriguez, V. (2001) ‘Tourism as a recruiting post for retirement migration’, Tourism
Geographies, 3(1), pp. 52–63.
Rogers, D. , Lee, C.L. and Yan, D. (2015) ‘The politics of foreign investment in Australian
housing: Chinese investors, translocal sales agents and local resistance’, Housing Studies,
30(5), pp. 730–748.
Rose, N. and Miller, P. (1992) ‘Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government’,
BJS, 43(2), pp. 173–205.
Sayad, A. (2004) The suffering of the immigrant. Cambridge, MA and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Scheper-Hughes, N. (2006) Dangerous and endangered youth: Social structures and
determinants of violence. London: Routledge.
Schrooten, M. , Salazar, N. and Dias, G. (2016) ‘Living in mobility: Trajectories of Brazilians in
Belgium and the UK’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(7), pp. 1199–1215.
Scuzzarello, S. (2020) ‘Practicing privilege. How settling in Thailand enables older Western
migrants to enact privilege over local people’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(8),
pp. 1606–1628.
SEF (2013–2018) ‘Relatório de Imigração, Fronteiras e Asilo (RIFA)’. Oeiras: Serviço de
Estrangeiros e Fronteiras. Available at: https://sefstat.sef.pt/forms/Home.aspx
SEF (2019) ‘Autorização de Residência para Atividade de Investimento (ARI)’. Oeiras: Serviço
de Estrangeiros e Fronteiras. Available at: https://www.sef.pt/pt/pages/conteudodetalhe.aspx?nID=93
SEF (2020) ‘Autorização de Residência para Atividade de Investimento (ARI)’. Oeiras: Serviço
de Estrangeiros e Fronteiras. Available at: https://www.sef.pt/pt/pages/conteudodetalhe.aspx?nID=93
SEF (2021) ‘Autorização de Residência para Atividade de Investimento (ARI)’. Oeiras: Serviço
de Estrangeiros e Fronteiras. Available at: https://www.sef.pt/pt/pages/conteudodetalhe.aspx?nID=93
Souleles, D. (2018) ‘How to study people who do not want to be studied: Practical reflections on
studying up’, PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 41(1), pp. 51–68.
Torkington, K. (2012) ‘Place and lifestyle migration: The discursive construction of ‘glocal’ placeidentity’, Mobilities, 7(1), pp. 71–92.
Torresan, A. (2011) ‘Strange bedfellows: Brazilian immigrants negotiating friendship in Lisbon’,
Ethnos, 76(2), pp. 233–253.
Tsang, E.Y. (2013) ‘The quest for higher education by the Chinese middle class: Retrenching
social mobility’, Higher Education, 66, pp. 653–668.
Wacquant, L. (2003) ‘Toward a dictatorship over the poor? Notes on the penalization of poverty
in Brazil’, Punishment & Society, 5(2), pp. 197–205.
Waters, J.L. (2006) ‘Geographies of cultural capital: Education, international migration and
family strategies between Hong Kong and Canada’, Transactions of the Institute of British
Geographers, 31, pp. 179–192.
Williams, A. and Hall, M.C. (2000) ‘Tourism and migration: New relationships between
production and consumption’, Tourism Geographies, 2(1), pp. 5–27.
Williams, A.M. and Hall, C.M. (2002) ‘Tourism, migration, circulation and mobility. The
contingencies of time and place’ in Hall, C.M. and Williams, A.M. (eds.) Tourism and migration.
New relationships between production and consumption. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1–52.
Pandemic Postscript
Adams, K. (2006) Art as politics: Re-crafting identities, tourism, and power in Tana Toraja,
Indonesia. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Adey, P. , Hannam, K. , Sheller, M. and Tyfield, D. (2021) ‘Pandemic (Im)mobilities’, Mobilities,
16(1), pp. 1–19.
Agamben, G. (1998) Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University
Press.
Agamben, G. (1999) Remnants of Auschwitz: The witness and the archive. Stanford: Stanford
University Press.
Agier, M. (2011) Managing the undesirables: Refugee camps and humanitarian government.
Cambridge: Polity Press.
Agier, M. (2020) ‘Borders of the pandemic: Against epistemological nationalism’. Paper
presented at the Virtual Workshop: Migration and Borders in the Age of the Pandemic.
University of the Aegean. Available at: https://summer-schools.aegean.gr/MigBord2021/VirtualWorkshop.
Andersson, R. (2014) Illegality Inc.: Clandestine migration and the business of bordering
Europe. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Baldacchino, G. (2021) ‘Forced immobility: Undocumented migrants, boats, Brussels, and
islands’, Transfers, 11(1), pp. 76–91.
Bloch, N. (2020) ‘Beyond a sedentary other and a mobile tourist: Transgressing mobility
categories in the informal tourism sector in India’, Critique of Anthropology, 40(2), pp. 218–237.
Block, F. (2022) ‘Private jet travel soared in 2021’, Barron’s, 25 January. Available at:
www.barrons.com/articles/private-jet-travel-soared-in-2021-01643152417.
Brady, E. (2022) ‘World’s 10 richest men got richer during the pandemic, worth combined $1.5
trillion: report’, Newsweek, 17 January. Available at: www.newsweek.com/worlds-10-richestmen-got-richer-during-pandemic-worth-combined-15-trillion-report-1670126.
Buckley, J. (2021) ‘These dolphins took a day trip up Venice’s Grand Canal’, CNN, 23 March.
Available at: www.cnn.com/travel/article/venice-canal-dolphins/index.html.
Chio, J. (2014) A landscape of travel: The work of tourism in rural ethnic China. Washington,
DC: University of Washington Press.
Connell, J. (2011) Medical tourism. Wallingford: CABI.
Corrado, A. and Palumbo, L. (2021) ‘Essential farmworkers and the pandemic crisis: Migrant
labour conditions, and legal and political responses in Italy’ in Trianafyllidou, A. (ed.) Migration
and pandemics: Spaces of solidarity and spaces of exception. New York: Springer, pp.
145–166.
Diken, B. and Laustsen, C.B. (2005) The culture of exception: Sociology facing the camp. New
York and London: Routledge.
Elliott, A. and Urry, J. (2010) Mobile lives. York and London: Routledge.
Eskenazi, B. , Mora, A.M. , Lewnard, J. , Cuevas, M. and Nkowcha, O. (2020) Prevalence and
predictors of Sars-COV-2 infection among farmworkers in Monterey County, California.
Summary report. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley School of Public Health.
Esposito, R. (2011) Immunitas: The protection and negation of life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Feng, L. (2020) ‘Coronavirus lockdown leaves international tourists stranded in Australia’, ABC
News Daily, 19 May. Available at: www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus-lockdownleaves-tourists-stranded-in-australia/12265658.
Fuller, T. , Eligon, J. and Gross, J. (2020) ‘Cruise ship, floating symbol of America’s fear of
coronavirus docks in Oakland’, The New York Times, 9 March. Available at:
www.nytimes.com/2020/03/09/us/coronavirus-cruise-ship-oakland-grand-princess.html
Gatrell, A. (2011) Mobilities and health. Farnham: Ashgate.
Goffard, C. (2020) ‘We called it voyage of the damned’: Days of despair on the Grand Princess’,
The Los Angeles Times, 23 December. Available at: www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-1223/covid-19-spread-despair-grand-princess.
Graburn, N. (ed.) (1976) Ethnic and tourist arts: Cultural expressions from the fourth world.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Graburn, N. (1983) ‘The anthropology of tourism’, Annals of Tourism Research, 10, pp. 9–33.
Graburn, N. (2017) ‘Key figure of mobility: The tourist’, Social Anthropology, 25(1), pp. 83–96.
Gravari-Barbas, M. and Graburn, N. (eds.) (2016) Tourism imaginaries at the disciplinary
crossroads: Place, practice, media. New York and London: Routledge.
Hartman, T. , Marshall, M. , Stocks, T. , McKay, R. , Bennett, K. , Butter, S. , Miller, J. , Hyland,
P. , Levita, L. , Martinez, A. , Mason, L. , McBride, O. , Murphy, J. , Shevlin, M. , Vallières, F.
and Bentall, R. (2021) ‘Different conspiracy theories have different psychological and social
determinants: Comparison of three theories about the origins of the Covid-19 virus in a
representative sample of the UK population’, Frontiers in Political Science, 3, pp. 1–17.
Hollinshead, K. (1998) ‘Tourism, hybridity, and ambiguity: The relevance of Bhabha’s ‘third
space’ cultures’, Journal of Leisure Research, 30(1), pp. 121–156.
Hom, S.M. (2015) The beautiful country: Tourism and the impossible state of destination Italy.
Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Hom, S.M. (2019) Empire’s mobius strip: Historical echoes in Italy’s crisis of migration and
detention. New York: Cornell University Press.
Islam, M.S. , Sarkar, T. , Khan, S.H. , Kamal, A-H., Hasan, S.M. , Kabir, A. , Yeasmin, D. ,
Islam, M. , Chowdhury, K. , Anwar, K. , Chughtai, A. and Seale, H. (2020) ‘Covid-19-related
infodemic and its impact on public health: A global social media analysis’, The American Journal
of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 104(4), pp. 1621–1629.
James, N. and Hanson, E. (2021) ‘Reported increase in hate crimes against Asian Americans’,
Congressional Research Service. Available at:
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11622
Keeney, A. , Quandt, A. , Villaseñor, M. , Flores, D. and Flores, Jr., L. (2022) ‘Occupational
stressors and access to Covid-19 resources among commuting and residential Hispanic/Latino
farmworkers in a U.S.-Mexico border region’, International Journal of Environmental Research
and Public Health, 19(763). Available at: www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/763
Kotnala, G. , Mandal, T.K. , Sharma, S.K. and Kotnala, R.K. (2020) ‘Emergence of blue sky over
Delhi due to coronavirus disease (Covid-19) lockdown implications’, Aerosol Science and
Engineering, 4(3), pp. 228–238.
Logue, J. (2020) ‘ “We are abandoned”: These tourists stranded in the U.S. because of
coronavirus want to go home’, NBC News, 14 May. Available at:
www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/we-are-abandoned-these-tourists-stranded-u-s-becausecoronavirus-n1206386.
Lucht, H. (2011) Darkness before daybreak: African migrants living on the margins in southern
Italy today. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
MacCannell, D. (1999) The tourist: A new theory of the leisure class. Berkeley, CA: University of
California Press.
Mahale, P. , Rothfuss, C. , Bly, S. , Kelly, M. , Bennett, S. , Huston, S. and Robinson, S. (2020)
‘Multiple Covid-19 outbreaks linked to a wedding reception in rural Maine – August 7-September
14, 2020’, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(45), pp. 1686–1690.
McNicholas, C. and Poydock, M. (2020) ‘Who are essential workers? A comprehensive look at
their wages, demographics, and unionization rates’, Economics Policy Institute, 19 May.
Available at: www.epi.org/blog/who-are-essential-workers-a-comprehensive-look-at-theirwages-demographics-and-unionization-rates/
Meyer, A. (2021) ‘ “I tried to barter with God”: Family ravaged by Covid after gathering’, KXAN
NBC News, 8 August. Available at: www.kxan.com/news/i-tried-to-barter-with-god-familyravaged-by-covid-after-gathering/
Murray, T. (2020) ‘Tourists stranded across Europe as Covid-19 lockdowns kick in’, Euronews,
16 March. Available at: www.euronews.com/2020/03/16/tourists-stranded-across-europe-ascovid-19-lockdowns-kick-in.
Mzezewa, T. (2020) ‘Americans stranded abroad: “I feel completely abandoned” ’, The New
York Times, 18 March. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2020/03/18/travel/coronavirusamericans-stranded.html
Nguyen, A. and Catalan-Matamoros, D. (2020) ‘Digital mis/disinformation and public
engagement with health and science controversies: Fresh perspectives from Covid-19’, Media
and Communication, 8(2), pp. 323–328.
Presser, B. (2020) ‘Luxury hotels become home for some rich folks looking for a Covid haven’,
The Los Angeles Times, 3 September. Available at: www.latimes.com/business/story/2020-0903/pandemic-luxury-hotels-become-home
Salazar, N. (2009) ‘Imaged or imagined? Cultural representations and the “tourismification” of
peoples and places’, Cahiers d’Études Africaines, 49(193–194), pp. 49–71.
Salazar, N. (2012) ‘Tourism imaginaries: A conceptual approach’, Annals of Tourism Research,
39(2), pp. 863–882.
Salazar, N. (2020) Covid-19, mobilities, and futures. 2020 John Urry Memorial Lecture with T.
Cresswell and M. Sheller. Center for Mobilities Research, Lancaster University. Available at:
www.lancaster.ac.uk/cemore/4566-2/.
Salazar, N. and Graburn, N. (eds.) (2014) Tourism imaginaries, anthropological approaches.
New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Sheller, M. (2018) Mobility justice: The politics of movement in an age of extremes. London:
Verso.
Tulley, T. (2020) ‘Coronavirus ravages 7 members of a single New Jersey family, killing 4’, The
New York Times, 18 March. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2020/03/18/nyregion/new-jerseyfamily-coronavirus.html.
Urry, J. (2007) Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Villareal, L. (2008) ‘Are viruses alive?’, Scientific American. Available at:
www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-viruses-alive-2004/.
Wald, P. (2008) Contagious: Cultures, carriers, and the outbreak narrative. Durham, NC: Duke
University Press.
Wilson, C. (2020) ‘Coronavirus: Brits stranded abroad due to the virus’, BBC News, 27 March.
Available at: www.bbc.com/news/uk-52053325.
Zhuang, Y. and Cave, D. (2022) ‘At an Australian hotel, Djokovic is not the only cause of
controversy’, The New York Times, 8 January. Available at:
www.nytimes.com/2022/01/08/world/asia/australia-djokovic-refugees-hotel.html.