Decision Center
1 Follower
Recent papers in Decision Center
Özet: Türkiye, tarih boyunca göç rotasında bulunan bir ülke olduğundan ülkesinden ayrılan ya da ayrılmak zorunda kalan kişiler için kimi zaman geçiş ülkesi, kimi zaman da varış ülkesi olmuştur. Özellikle Arap Baharı ile başlayan süreç... more
Özet: Türkiye, tarih boyunca göç rotasında bulunan bir ülke olduğundan ülkesinden ayrılan ya da ayrılmak zorunda kalan kişiler için kimi zaman geçiş ülkesi, kimi zaman da varış ülkesi olmuştur. Özellikle Arap Baharı ile başlayan süreç sonrasında, Ortadoğu ülkelerindeki iç karışıklıklar sonucunda ülkesinden ayrılmak zorunda kalan kişiler için Türkiye, güvenli bir sığınma ülkesi konumundadır. Bu noktada, Türk iltica sisteminin tarihî gelişimi için atılan adımların her biri çok değerlidir. Bu adımlardan yeni bir iltica sistemi modeli olan "Karar Merkezi Model/"nin hayata geçirilmesi ise ayrıca kıymetlidir.“Karar Merkezi Modeli", Türk iltica sistemi açısından, karşılaşılan göç hareketliliğinin çok büyük olması, buna karşın beşerî kaynaklar başta olmak üzere kaynakların sınırlılığı karşısında, var olan tüm kaynakların nasıl daha etkin ve verimli kullanılabileceğini göstermesi ve bunu yaparken ülke genelindeki iltica işlemlerinde kalite ve standardizasyonun artırılarak uzmanlaşmanın nasıl daha fazla sağlanabileceğini ortaya koyması açısından önemlidir.Bundan hareketle çalışmanın amacı, Türk iltica sisteminde "Karar Merkezi" adı ile uygulamaya konulan bu yeni sistemin, kendine has ve yenilikçi yönlerini, karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemek ve yine "Karar Merkezi Modeli" ile henüz uygulama alanı bulan "Branş Bazında Ortak Komisyon Kararı Yöntemi"nin, iltica dosyalarındaki uzmanlaşmaya nasıl katkı sağladığını incelemektir.Buna göre çalışma, 3 bölümden oluşmaktadır. Birinci bölümde Karar Merkezi Modeli'ne giden süreç incelenmiş, ikinci bölümde örnek uygulamalarla Karar Merkezi çalışma sistemin özellikleri ve "Branş Bazında Ortak Komisyon Kararı Yöntemi"nin etkileri değerlendirilmiş, üçüncü ve son bölümde ise Karar Merkezi çalışmalarının Türk İltica Sistemi'ndeki etkilerine değinilmiştir.Ele alınan konu; yerli-yabancı monografi, makale, belge, tez ve mevzuat incelenerek değerlendirilmiş, metin ise Yapısalcı-Fonksiyonalist bir bakış açısıyla betimlenmiştir.
Abstract: Throughout history, Turkey is always a country in migration paths. For migrants and displaced persons, Turkey was transit country through their destination or final destination. Especially after Arab Spring, Turkey is a safe country for the individuals who escaped from conflicts in their countries. In this context, every measure is very important on the way of development. As one of the latest concepts, "Decision Centre Model", is a unique institutional endeavour.Regarding to the Turkish Asylum System, Decision Centre Model is very important due to its efficiency by means of resources with respect to the large- scale migration flow and capacity to develop a uniform and enhanced high- quality asylum procedures. Upon the information above, purpose of this study is to analyse specific characteristics and innovative aspects of Decision Centre Model by comparative means and analyse the contribution of newly used Branch Based Joint Commission Decision concept to the expertizing in asylum cases.Study consists of three chapter. In first chapter, the period for the establishing of Decision Centre Model was explained. In second chapter, properties of the practice of the Decision Centre Model was be reviewed upon samples. Impact of the Branch Based Joint Commission Decision concept was also have reviewed in second chapter. In chapter three, the impact of Decision Centre Model on Turkish National Asylum System was be analysed. During the study, national-international monographies, articles, documents, thesis and legislation were be examined. Study was be depicted by a structural-functionalist perspective.
Abstract: Throughout history, Turkey is always a country in migration paths. For migrants and displaced persons, Turkey was transit country through their destination or final destination. Especially after Arab Spring, Turkey is a safe country for the individuals who escaped from conflicts in their countries. In this context, every measure is very important on the way of development. As one of the latest concepts, "Decision Centre Model", is a unique institutional endeavour.Regarding to the Turkish Asylum System, Decision Centre Model is very important due to its efficiency by means of resources with respect to the large- scale migration flow and capacity to develop a uniform and enhanced high- quality asylum procedures. Upon the information above, purpose of this study is to analyse specific characteristics and innovative aspects of Decision Centre Model by comparative means and analyse the contribution of newly used Branch Based Joint Commission Decision concept to the expertizing in asylum cases.Study consists of three chapter. In first chapter, the period for the establishing of Decision Centre Model was explained. In second chapter, properties of the practice of the Decision Centre Model was be reviewed upon samples. Impact of the Branch Based Joint Commission Decision concept was also have reviewed in second chapter. In chapter three, the impact of Decision Centre Model on Turkish National Asylum System was be analysed. During the study, national-international monographies, articles, documents, thesis and legislation were be examined. Study was be depicted by a structural-functionalist perspective.
Turkey is a country which has been subject to various migratory movements for very long years, due to its geographical location. Turkey has become a safe haven for people who have been displaced due to civil wars, chaos, ethnic and/or... more
Turkey is a country which has been subject to various migratory movements for very long years, due to its geographical location. Turkey has become a safe haven for people who have been displaced due to civil wars, chaos, ethnic and/or religious conflict that have taken place in the Middle East especially after 2010;
and they have migrated to our country. Following the increased migratory flows of 2011, Turkey, with its human resources, has shown the greatest effort in providing rights and services to foreigners and stateless persons who have sought refuge within the premises of international protection; as it has done in all areas of migration. This study will analyze the developments experienced in this period by Turkey, as the country that currently hosts the largest number of refugees, within the context of international protection. The analysis will be followed by recommendations within this framework. In particular, “The Provincial Interview and Decision Center” or “Decision Center” or in its formal name “The International Protection Bureau”, which carries new and distinctive features, will be discussed in relation to its connection to the “Lean Method” (Lean Thinking Method) and its place within the Turkish Asylum System.
and they have migrated to our country. Following the increased migratory flows of 2011, Turkey, with its human resources, has shown the greatest effort in providing rights and services to foreigners and stateless persons who have sought refuge within the premises of international protection; as it has done in all areas of migration. This study will analyze the developments experienced in this period by Turkey, as the country that currently hosts the largest number of refugees, within the context of international protection. The analysis will be followed by recommendations within this framework. In particular, “The Provincial Interview and Decision Center” or “Decision Center” or in its formal name “The International Protection Bureau”, which carries new and distinctive features, will be discussed in relation to its connection to the “Lean Method” (Lean Thinking Method) and its place within the Turkish Asylum System.