One of the pillars of the STEM project is higher education and improving the capacity of earth science programs to deliver effective curricular and pedagogical practices within the project’s partner universities, and technical and...
moreOne of the pillars of the STEM project is higher education and improving the capacity of earth science programs to deliver effective curricular and pedagogical practices within the project’s partner universities, and technical and vocational education training institutions which are located in the capital of Addis Abeba, and the state of Tigray.
The research and report for the study was completed by academics from Canada and Ethiopia with backgrounds in adult learning, gender equality, human resource development, literacy and and teaching and learning within higher education. Cindy Hanson is a full professor and director of the Adult Education, Community Engagement and Human Resource Development Unit at the University of Regina. The Ethiopian researchers from Mekelle Univeristy in Ethiopia include Dr. Fesseha Abadi Weldemichael,
an assistant professor in Education and Teaching English as a Foreign Language, and Mebrat Haftu, the department head of Educational Planning and Management at Mekelle University in Ethiopia. The research team is grateful to the 169 students, faculty, administrators and department heads who participated through interviews, focus groups and other means during the field visits.
The study reviewed the current pedagogical practices in the partner institutions through an examination of training documents, a series of eight focus group discussions – four with students and four with faculty of the partner institutions; four classroom observations and key informant interviews with administrators, department heads, TVET bureau training departments and the director of the pedagogical institute at Mekelle University. The research questions were adapted and in some cases, such as focus groups, were supported by a participatory process adapted from a SWOT(L) analysis to ensure wider participation of study participants and get at some of the nuances in responses to the questions. The key research questions were:
1. What kinds of capacities do the universities involved in this project (STEM) have to deliver mining-related knowledge and skills to a diverse group of male and female students?
Prompts included: a) curriculum, b) resources and c) facilities
2. What kind of pedagogical practices would improve the capacity of faculty to improve the delivery and design of practical skills and knowledge related to the mining sector?
The data collected was sorted into categories of pedagogy/curriculum; human and material resources; and gender-based responsiveness. The findings from the assessment are augmented with recent literature on higher education in Ethiopia. Best practices in higher education often refer to teaching and learning practices that are student- or learner-focused. Good pedagogy for example, includes effective content; good teaching and learning strategies; active learning instructional practices; and timely and effective feedback, and assessment around learning outcomes. As the literature states, without good training in how to teach in HEI, instructors rely on their own experience and traditional lecture is common because that is how they were taught (Kassie, 2018), although a willingness to create changes was evident during the data collection phase. Our recommendations for changes are divided into primary and secondary recommendations as they are both the responsibility of STEM and of the HEI and government bodies consulted.
Our findings, which resonate with the literature, were that most learning in Ethiopia’s higher education institutions is teacher-led and instructional techniques are dominated by lecture, memorization, observation and question and answer. Although most faculty (or staff/teachers as they are referred to in Ethiopia) use teacher-led approaches there is an acknowledgement that additional pedagogical training – both longer term programs and short term workshops would assist them in providing more quality instruction. A longer pedagogical program is already offered through the Higher Education Diploma Program (HDP) and we suggest several adaptations to the HDP including an locally-derived action research project that will assess how it can make inroads into learner-centered teaching and assessment. Similarly, at the level of TVETs, we suggest additional pedagogical research and a re-vamping of the training resources. We recognize training workshops, using a TOT approach, may provide more-immediate interventions that can introduce new instructional practices – for example, it can build 1) differentiated instruction; 2) participatory methodologies of instruction, and 3) capacity to provide effective feedback. A TOT using this building approach will require supports (for example, some follow-up and mentoring), but also demonstrate sustainability if teachers can show they are using alternative pedagogies. Therefore we recommend that participants in the STEM-led TOT who show evidence of building pedagogical change will receive a certificate of acknowledgement.
A series of shorter, more specific and targeted workshops dealing with topics that will lead to student-led pedagogies is also recommended. It might consist of a weekend workshop on participatory methodologies for working with a large class, questioning techniques, critical thinking, student-led assessments and so on. We recognize that the short term solutions will only lead to longer, sustainable change if there are also structural changes including, but not limited to the following:
• Improved internet access and library materials;
• improved leadership for collaboration;
• faculty exchanges between Addis-based and Northern cluster HEI;
• resource applications for practical aspects of work including labs and field visits;
• continued policy development toward student-centered learning; and
• enhanced opportunities for hiring women and understanding gender equality broadly, and gender-responsive pedagogies, more specifically.
The study demonstrated that without adequate resources and materials the success of the learning and teaching pedagogies are mitigated as there are fewer opportunities to learn the practical aspects of the courses. Although many faculty lament that they are teaching so that students can pass the exams, and consequently many students feel bored or unmotivated, there is an acknowledgement that continuous improvement will only occur if it is internally driven and supported. Those supports are required from within the institution itself, from the government bureaus, and the Ministry. Students for example, are concerned that mining programs in the HEI are not well supported outside of the university and that they are essentially an extension of geology. Additional supports might include memorandums of understanding with the Ministry, communities and industry; continuous pedagogical planning, and resource services and materials for laboratory and fieldwork.