This paper was presented at the Ruskin Research Seminar of the Ruskin Library and Research Centre at the University of Lancaster. This study examines excerpts from Praeterita, but with its main focus being centred around the...
moreThis paper was presented at the Ruskin Research Seminar of the Ruskin Library and Research Centre at the University of Lancaster.
This study examines excerpts from Praeterita, but with its main focus being centred around the theologically significant chapter entitled "The Grande Chartreuse", in which Ruskin discusses a range of issues from biblical interpretation to the Catholic-Protestant divide, as well as monastic orders, catechism, the divine aesthetics of nature, and his own so-called "un-conversion" experience at Turin in 1858. Ruskin's style throughout Praeterita is sometimes digressive and excursive, yet contains elements of intensive and forensic analysis. As autobiography it is unconventional, attempting to interrogate some of the rules of the genre, especially in terms of religious confession. Despite this, the influence of other genre persist, and whilst he inverts the confessional flow from conversion to un-conversion, his polemic betrays an unconscious confessional which reveals aspects of a working theology that he has not necessarily deliberately outlined clearly. Ruskin's Praeterita is not a thesis, but a retroactive diary, in which he is seemingly sometimes trying out ideas or appealing to the reader to come to the "right" conclusion that he has not yet found, and other times trying to remould and rework his life events to suit an ideological term he is trying to establish. Throughout the often messy form of the theology presented, Ruskin reveals some glimmers of an anti-doctrinal and progressive universalist faith that has likely been developing before and beyond his "putting away" of Evangelicalism. At other points, Ruskin's discussion unravels through deconstruction, and we find in Praeterita a more coherent incoherence of this progressive theology. In this paper I will attempt to trace out how Ruskin intermittently and half-consciously reveals this theology and suggest ways in which it can inform thinking on Christian development.