Bushuev A.S. «Golosui ili proigraesh'!»: predvybornaya kampaniya 1996 goda i rossiiskaya molodezh' ["Vote or Lose!": The 1996 Election Campaign and Russian Youth] // Vlast'. 2011. 6: 46–50. В статье охарактеризована динамика взглядов... more
Bushuev A.S. «Golosui ili proigraesh'!»: predvybornaya kampaniya 1996 goda i rossiiskaya molodezh' ["Vote or Lose!": The 1996 Election Campaign and Russian Youth] // Vlast'. 2011. 6: 46–50.
В статье охарактеризована динамика взглядов молодежи на ситуацию политического выбора в условиях президентской кампании 1996 г. Показано, как за короткий период в массовом сознании российской молодежи произошел перелом в пользу продолжения президентского курса Б. Ельцина.
The dynamics of youth's views on the situation of political choice in conditions of presidential campaign of 1996 is characterized in the article. It's shown how the mass youth consciousness change happened in favour of continuation of presidential course of B. Yeltsin at the short time of pre-election campaign.
In my brief response to The Cracked Mirror , a compilation of the debate between Gopal Guru and Sundar Sarukkai, I would like to examine the significance of bringing Dalit experience into the public debate with reference to the
practice of social sciences in particular and social
theory in general. I would also like to cite some
debates from Telugu society in India in the course
of my discussion.
Knowledge is inextricably bound to power in the context of settler colonialism where apprehension of the Other is a tool of domination. Tracing the development of the "settler colonial" paradigm, this article deconstructs Zionist and... more
Knowledge is inextricably bound to power in the context of settler colonialism where apprehension of the Other is a tool of domination. Tracing the development of the "settler colonial" paradigm, this article deconstructs Zionist and Israeli dispossession of Palestinian land and sovereignty, applying the sociology of knowledge production to the study of the Israeli-Palestinian case. The settler colonial paradigm, linked to Israeli critical sociology, post-Zionism, and postcolonialism, reemerged following changes in the political landscape from the mid-1990s that reframed the history of the Nakba as enduring, challenged the Jewish definition of the state, and legitimated Palestinians as agents of history. Palestinian scholars in Israel lead the paradigm's reformulation. This article offers a phenomenology of Palestinian positionality, a critical potential for decolonizing the settler colonial structure and exclusive Jewish sovereignty, to consolidate a field of study that shapes not only research into the Israeli-Palestinian case but approaches to decolonization and liberation.
Knowledge is inextricably bound to power in the context of settler colonialism where apprehension of the Other is a tool of domination. Tracing the development of the “settler colonial” paradigm, this article deconstructs Zionist and... more
Knowledge is inextricably bound to power in the context of settler colonialism where apprehension of the Other is a tool of domination. Tracing the development of the “settler colonial” paradigm, this article deconstructs Zionist and Israeli dispossession of Palestinian land and sovereignty, applying the sociology of knowledge production to the study of the Israeli-Palestinian case. The settler colonial paradigm, linked to Israeli critical sociology, post-Zionism, and postcolonialism, reemerged following changes in the political landscape from the mid-1990s that reframed the history of the Nakba as enduring, challenged the Jewish definition of the state, and legitimated Palestinians as agents of history. Palestinian scholars in Israel lead the paradigm’s reformulation. This article offers a phenomenology of Palestinian positionality, a critical potential for decolonizing the settler colonial structure and exclusive Jewish sovereignty, to consolidate a field of study that shapes not ...
