Taking organization as always underway – as temporally stretched out – entails a relation with what is yet to come. Orthodox strategy theory, despite its inner diversity, may be read wholly as responsive to the problematics of...
moreTaking organization as always underway – as temporally stretched out – entails a relation with what is yet to come. Orthodox strategy theory, despite its inner diversity, may be read wholly as responsive to the problematics of understanding and explaining this crucial relation. And organizational sensemaking theory, although it flows from a critique of strategy theory, may be read as responsive to the same problematics. These prominent perspectives not only share a problematics, they are also thoroughly committed to organizational knowing as the basis for approaching it. However, the primacy of this epistemological commitment has itself become doubly problematic in an age of higher-order contingency. Organizational knowing can no longer be taken for granted as the sole, or even the most fundamental, basis for effecting and sustaining the crucial organizational engagement with what is yet to come. If knowing is always an attenuated means for effecting and sustaining this engagement, what gives rise to it as crucial? If not solely in knowing, where else might its sustenance be found? In response to this line of questioning the notion of organizational futurity is offered as a speculative opening.
