Abstract
Lifted Kramers spin degeneracy (LKSD) has been among the central topics of condensed-matter physics since the dawn of the band theory of solids1,2. It underpins established practical applications as well as current frontier research, ranging from magnetic-memory technology3,4,5,6,7 to topological quantum matter8,9,10,11,12,13,14. Traditionally, LKSD has been considered to originate from two possible internal symmetry-breaking mechanisms. The first refers to time-reversal symmetry breaking by magnetization of ferromagnets and tends to be strong because of the non-relativistic exchange origin15. The second applies to crystals with broken inversion symmetry and tends to be comparatively weaker, as it originates from the relativistic spinâorbit coupling (SOC)16,17,18,19. A recent theory work based on spin-symmetry classification has identified an unconventional magnetic phase, dubbed altermagnetic20,21, that allows for LKSD without net magnetization and inversion-symmetry breaking. Here we provide the confirmation using photoemission spectroscopy and ab initio calculations. We identify two distinct unconventional mechanisms of LKSD generated by the altermagnetic phase of centrosymmetric MnTe with vanishing net magnetization20,21,22,23. Our observation of the altermagnetic LKSD can have broad consequences in magnetism. It motivates exploration and exploitation of the unconventional nature of this magnetic phase in an extended family of materials, ranging from insulators and semiconductors to metals and superconductors20,21, that have been either identified recently or perceived for many decades as conventional antiferromagnets21,24,25.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
A recently developed spin-group-symmetry classification focusing on collinear magnets and, within the hierarchy of interactions, on the strong non-relativistic exchange has identified a third elementary type of magnetic phases, in addition to the conventional ferromagnets and antiferromagnets20,21. The exclusively distinct spin-symmetry characteristics of this emerging third, altermagnetic class are the opposite-spin sublattices connected by a real- space rotation transformation (proper or improper and symmorphic or non-symmorphic), but not connected by a translation or inversion20,21. By contrast, the conventional ferromagnetic (ferrimagnetic) class has one spin lattice or opposite-spin sublattices not connected by any symmetry transformation, and the conventional antiferromagnetic class has opposite-spin sublattices connected by a real-space translation or inversion. The three classes are described by mutually exclusive non-relativistic spin-group symmetries and the classification is complete for all collinear spin arrangements on crystals20,21.
For the case of inversion connecting the opposite-spin sublattices in conventional antiferromagnets, the Kramers spin degeneracy is protected even in the presence of the relativistic SOC26. For the translation connecting the opposite-spin sublattices in conventional antiferromagnets, LKSD requires both SOC and inversion-symmetry breaking in the crystal, in analogy to ordinary non-magnetic systems.
The unconventional nature of altermagnets is that the rotation symmetry connecting the opposite-spin sublattices protects an antiferromagnetic-like compensated magnetic order with a vanishing net magnetization while simultaneously enabling a ferromagnetic-like LKSD without SOC and inversion-symmetry breaking20,21. Here we will refer to this mechanism as âstrongâ altermagnetic LKSD.
Apart from the signature antiferromagnetic-like vanishing magnetization and ferromagnetic-like strong LKSD, whose presence have been traditionally considered as mutually exclusive in one physical system, altermagnets can host a range of new phenomena that are unparalleled in either the conventional ferromagnets or antiferromagnets20,21. A unique property associated with the alternating sign of the spin polarization in the Brillouin zone of the altermagnet is the presence of an even number of spin-degenerate nodal surfaces crossing the zone-centre (Î point) in the non-relativistic band structure. In Fig. 1a, we demonstrate that these spin degeneracies can be lifted by the relativistic SOC in altermagnets even without breaking the crystal inversion symmetry. We will refer to this mechanism as âweakâ altermagnetic LKSD. A comparison of the weak and strong altermagnetic LKSD is illustrated in Fig. 1a,b.
Both LKSD mechanisms can enrich fields ranging from spintronics, ultrafast magnetism, magnetoelectrics and magnonics, to topological matter, dissipationless quantum nanoelectronics and superconductivity20,21. For example, the strong altermagnetic LKSD has been theoretically shown to enable analogous spin-polarized currents to those used for reading and writing information in ferromagnetic memory devices while simultaneously removing the capacity and speed limitations imposed by a net magnetization20,21,27,28,29,30,31. The weak altermagnetic LKSD has been linked to Berry-phase physics governing the dissipationless anomalous Hall currents while, again, removing the roadblocks associated with magnetization for realizing robust quantum-topological variants of these effects14,21,22,32,33,34,35,36,37. Several of the predicted unconventional macroscopic time-reversal-symmetry-breaking responses accompanied by the vanishing magnetization have already been experimentally confirmed in altermagnetic RuO2 or MnTe (refs.â22,38,39,40,41). Here, using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES), we directly identify the weak and strong altermagnetic LKSD in the band structure of MnTe.
Weak altermagnetic LKSD in MnTe
A schematic crystal structure of α-MnTe is shown in Fig. 1c,d. The two crystal sublattices A and B of Mn atoms, whose magnetic moments order antiparallel below the transition temperature of 310âK, are connected by a non-symmorphic sixfold screw-axis rotation and are not connected by a translation or inversion20,22. The resulting non-relativistic electronic structure of this altermagnet is of the g-wave type20 with three spin-degenerate nodal planes parallel to the kz axis and crossing Î and K points, and a fourth kzâ=â0 nodal plane (Fig. 1a).
In Fig. 2, we show ARPES measurements42 at 15âK using a soft X-ray photon energy of 667âeV, performed on thin MnTe(0001) films grown by molecular-beam epitaxy on a single-crystal InP(111)A substrate22,43 (see Methods and Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). The measurements are within the kzâ=â0 nodal plane along kx (ÎâK path) and ky (ÎâM path). Figure 2a shows the measured raw data along the kx axis (bottom panel), compared with one-step ARPES simulation44,45 (top panel) considering the bulk MnTe electronic structure for the initial states (see Methods). The intense spectral weight around â3.5âeV binding energy, indicated by a dashed magenta line in the experimental and theoretical panels of Fig. 2a, corresponds to a resonance resulting from Mn d states. For a better visualization of the bulk electronic structure of MnTe, this spectral weight is filtered out in the experimental ARPES band maps shown in Fig. 2b,c. Refinements by the curvature mapping46 extracted from the area highlighted by a dashed white rectangle are shown in the insets of the top panels of Fig. 2b,c. These are compared with the corresponding relativistic ab initio electronic-structure calculations plotted in the bottom panels of Fig. 2b,c. The theoretical bands, with red and blue colours depicting opposite spin polarizations along the z axis, show the weak altermagnetic LKSD within the kzâ=â0 nodal plane. The relativistic band-structure calculations were performed assuming the Néel vector along the in-plane y axis (corresponding to the ÎâM axis), consistent with earlier magnetic and magnetotransport measurements of the Néel-vector easy axis in epitaxial thin films of MnTe (refs.â22,47). Altermagnetism and SOC thus generate in this case an unconventional spin polarization of bands that is orthogonal to the direction of the magnetic-order vector. Note that the exclusive spin-polarization component along the z axis of electronic states in the kzâ=â0 plane is protected by a relativistic (non-symmorphic) mirror symmetry of the magnetic crystal.
The experimental ARPES band maps in Fig. 2b,c are fully consistent with the ab initio band structures. This includes the overall band dispersions, as well as the substantially larger splitting of the top two bands along the kx axis (ÎâK path; Fig. 2b) than along the ky axis (ÎâM path; Fig. 2c). The splitting is highlighted in Fig. 2b by the red double arrow in the experimental curvature map and the two split bands have opposite spins in the corresponding ab initio band structure. The approximately 100-meV scale is comparable with the record values of relativistic spin splittings in non-centrosymmetric heavy-element crystals, such as BiTeI (ref.â48). The extraordinary quadratic band dispersion and spin splitting around the Î point (see also Fig. 3c), consistently observed in experiment and theory, further highlight the unconventional nature of this relativistic LKSD in altermagnetic MnTe. The even-in-momentum spin splitting reflects the inversion symmetry of the altermagnetic crystal. Moreover, the lowest even spin-splitting term we observe is quadratic, whereas the constant term, andâcorrespondinglyâthe spin splitting at the Î point, vanish. This is consistent with earlier observations that a relativistic net magnetization in MnTe owing to canting of the sublattice moments towards the z axis, allowed by the relativistic symmetry for the easy-axis orientation of the Néel vector, is extremely small22. It was estimated to be less than 2âÃâ10â4âµB per Mn from ab initio calculations and remained experimentally undetectable in the thin-film MnTe epilayers22. The vanishingly small relativistic net magnetization, nevertheless, does not prohibit the extraordinarily large magnitude of the relativistic spin splitting away from the Î point in the MnTe altermagnet. The absence of the constant and linear spin-splitting terms highlights the principal distinction of this altermagnetic mechanism of LKSD from the conventional ferromagnetic-like mechanism owing to a net magnetization or the relativistic mechanism in crystals with broken inversion symmetry. In Supplementary Fig. 3, we further corroborate the altermagnetic mechanism by comparing measurements at low temperature with room-temperature measurements enabled by ultraviolet (UV) ARPES. Note that soft X-ray ARPES measurements are not realistic around or above room temperature (MnTe Néel temperature). The reason is that the DebyeâWaller factor will substantially increase the incoherent spectral weight and wash out all features, resulting in a measurement of the momentum-integrated density of states49.
Figure 2d shows a kzâ=â0 constant-energy map measured at the soft X-ray photon energy of 667âeV, obtained by integrating the measured data over a 50-meV interval of binding energies from the top of the valence band. The observed sixfold symmetry indicates that, within the probing area of this soft X-ray ARPES measurement (30âÃâ70âµm2), there is a comparable population of three Néel-vector easy axes, corresponding to the ÎâM1â3 axes, which are crystallographically equivalent in the ideal hexagonal lattice of MnTe. Our observation of a multidomain state is consistent with earlier magnetotransport measurements of the MnTe epilayers22,43. We point out that domains with all these three Néel-vector easy axes exhibit larger spin splitting along ÎâK1â3 paths than along ÎâM1â3 paths, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 4. Therefore, even when the population of the three domains is comparable within the sample probing area (X-ray spot position), a substantially larger splitting is expected for the ÎâK1â3 paths than for the ÎâM1â3 paths. This corroborates the excellent agreement between the experimentally observed and the calculated band splittings in Fig. 2b,c.
The top-left panel of Fig. 3a shows the refinement by the curvature mapping corresponding to Fig. 2d. Together with the one-step ARPES simulation assuming an equal population of the three easy axes, shown in the top-right panel of Fig. 3a, it confirms the sixfold symmetry of this constant-energy cut. In the series of panels in Fig. 3a, we then systematically explore the symmetry of the constant-energy maps measured and calculated at different binding energies, indicated by symbols AâD in the band dispersion shown in Fig. 3c. An analogous set of measurements and calculations is shown in Fig. 3b for a different probing area on the sample (different X-ray spot position; see also Supplementary Fig. 5). Although the maps in Fig. 3a show the sixfold symmetry for all binding energies, the maps in Fig. 3b have a lower twofold symmetry at energies near the top of the valence band (binding energies AâC). The sixfold symmetry is observed in Fig. 3b only deeper in the valence band (binding energy D). The one-step ARPES simulations in Fig. 3b were performed assuming a single-domain state with the Néel vector along the easy axis corresponding to the ÎâM1 axis. The agreement between experiment and theory for all of the studied constant-energy maps confirms that, in the probing area of the MnTe epilayer corresponding to Fig. 3b, there is a prevailing population of one of the three Néel-vector easy-axis domains (ÎâM1 axis). Note that, in Fig. 3b, the more prominent lowering of the symmetry from sixfold to twofold near the top of the valence band correlates with the dominant contribution of p orbitals of the heavy Te atoms, which markedly enhances the strength of SOC in this spectral range (see Supplementary Fig. 2).
Strong altermagnetic LKSD
As explained in the introduction and illustrated in Fig. 1, the strong altermagnetic LKSD can be identified in the electronic structure only outside the four nodal planes that are spin-degenerate in the non-relativistic limit. In Fig. 4, we compare the measured and simulated ARPES data inside and outside the nodal planes. Soft X-ray ARPES band maps for kzâ=â0.35âà â1 (X-ray photon energy of 368âeV) along a path parallel to ÎâK, that is, within one of the nodal planes, are shown in Fig. 4a,b. To highlight the finite kz value, we label the path as \(\overline{{\boldsymbol{\Gamma }}}-\overline{{\bf{K}}}\). Data for the same kz value and a path \(\overline{{\boldsymbol{\Gamma }}}-\overline{{\bf{M}}}\), that is, outside the nodal planes, are shown in Fig. 4c,d. In both experiment and theory, we observe a substantially larger band splitting in Fig. 4c,d (strong altermagnetic), reaching a half-eV scale, than Fig. 4a,b (weak altermagnetic) in the part of the spectrum labelled by B1 and B2. The spin-resolved one-step ARPES simulations of this part of the spectrum then suggest that a sizeable spin-polarization signal should be detectable by spin-resolved ARPES (SARPES). This applies in particular to the \(\overline{{\boldsymbol{\Gamma }}}-\overline{{\bf{M}}}\) path featuring the strong altermagnetic lifting of the spin degeneracy.
The spin-resolved measurements were performed by UV SARPES50 on bulk-crystal samples of MnTe (see Methods and Supplementary Figs. 6â9). The consistency between the electronic structures of the MnTe thin-film and bulk-crystal samples was confirmed by soft X-ray ARPES band maps shown in Supplementary Fig. 2a,b, accompanied by the corresponding one-step ARPES simulations in Supplementary Fig. 2c. (Note that, in both the experimental and theoretical band maps, we consistently observe that the photoemission final-state effects almost completely suppress the band mapping for Î2 and Î4.) The coloured stripes in the experimental panels of Supplementary Fig. 2 highlight resonances owing to Te states (purple) and Mn states (yellowâgreen), also observed in the simulations. In Supplementary Fig. 2d,e, we accompany the ARPES data by plotting corresponding atomic-orbital projections of ab initio bands and the density of states, consistently showing that the Te p orbitals dominate the top of the valence band, whereas the spectral weight of Mn d orbitals becomes substantial below â3âeV.
UV ARPES measurements of the MnTe bulk crystal at a photon energy of 24âeV and the corresponding simulation of the constant-energy map for non-zero kz (kzâ=â0.12âà â1) are shown in Fig. 4e,f. The lowered twofold symmetry confirms the prevailing population of one of the three easy-axis domains in the UV ARPES probing area (â300âµm diameter scale) of the measured bulk-crystal sample. In the UV ARPES band map along the \(\overline{{\boldsymbol{\Gamma }}}-\overline{{\bf{M}}}\) path, plotted in the left panel of Fig. 4g, we identify the analogous spectral features to those labelled as B1 and B2 in Fig. 4c,d, whose expected spin polarization is a result of the strong altermagnetic LKSD. The spin polarization is experimentally confirmed by the UV SARPES measurements in Fig. 4g. In the middle panel of Fig. 4g, we plot the measured total-intensity energy-distribution curve. The right panel of Fig. 4g shows the corresponding SARPES signal for a negative value of the momentum component along the \(\overline{{\boldsymbol{\Gamma }}}-\overline{{\bf{M}}}\) path, highlighted by a dashed purple line in the left panel of Fig. 4g. As expected, we observe the alternating sign of the spin-polarization component along the Néel vector, consistent with the presence of the strong altermagnetic LKSD for the \(\overline{{\boldsymbol{\Gamma }}}-\overline{{\bf{M}}}\) path (for complementary sets of consistent experimental and theoretical SARPES data, see Supplementary Figs. 10 and 11).
The agreement between the spin-split band structure observed in ARPES and that obtained from density functional theory (DFT) confirms the prediction20,21 that altermagnetism can originate directly from crystal symmetries, without requiring strong electronic correlations. The crystal-symmetry basis makes altermagnetism one of the elementary phases of matter, whichâremarkablyâhas been omitted for nearly a century of the band theory of solids. Our results highlight the strength of the spin-group-symmetry classification in unravelling new magnetic phases and in describing the hierarchy of energy scales that underpin their rich phenomenology and potential applications20,21.
Methods
MnTe thin-film growth
MnTe(0001) epilayers of 200ânm thickness were grown by molecular-beam epitaxy on single-crystalline In-terminated InP(111) substrates using elemental Mn and Te sources. The less than 1% lattice mismatch results in single-crystalline hexagonal MnTe growth with the c axis (z axis) perpendicular to the surface. Two-dimensional growth of α-MnTe is achieved at substrate temperatures of 370â450â°C.
MnTe thin-film characterization and sample transfer to ARPES
Details on sample characterization can be found in ref.â47. For ARPES experiments, the samples were transferred after growth into a ultrahigh-vacuum suitcase, in which they were transported to the ARPES station at the synchrotron without breaking ultrahigh-vacuum conditions.
MnTe bulk single-crystal growth
For the growth of bulk MnTe single crystals using the self-flux method, pure manganese (99.9998%) and tellurium (99.9999%) in the molar composition Mn33Te67 were placed in an alumina (99.95%) crucible and, together with a catch crucible filled with quartz wool, sealed in a fused-silica tube under vacuum. The sample was first heated up to 1,050â°C and then cooled down to 760â°C for four days. At 760â°C, the sample was quickly put into a centrifuge, in which the crystals were separated from the remaining melt. The crystals were in forms of flat plates with lateral dimensions of several millimetres and thicknesses of hundreds of micrometres.
MnTe bulk single-crystal characterization
For the characterization data, see Supplementary Figs. 6â9. The structural quality of MnTe bulk single crystals was confirmed by X-ray diffraction. Single-crystal X-ray-diffraction measurements were performed with a Rigaku SmartLab with 9âkW Cu rotating anode, Ge two-bounce monochromator and Hypix detector. Powder diffraction measurements for the lattice parameter determination were performed using a Panalytical Empyrean with Cu tube in BraggâBrentano geometry. Powder diffraction simulations were performed using the xrayutilities tool for reciprocal-space conversion of scattering data51.
Magnetization measurements by a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) verified the compensated magnetic ordering with the Néel temperature at 310âK and the Néel vector in the z plane, consistent with earlier reports on bulk crystals25 and also consistent with the magnetic characteristics of our thin MnTe films. The magnetometry measurements were performed in a Quantum Design SQUID magnetometer using the reciprocating sample option for increased measurement sensitivity. Temperature-dependent susceptibility measurements were taken in a magnetic field of 50âmT.
For the X-ray diffraction and SQUID magnetometry investigations, samples were cleaned in aqua regia to remove a parasitic MnTe2 phase formed at the surface during the final phases of the growth. No traces of this phase could be detected in the X-ray diffraction investigations of the single crystals after this cleaning procedure. Cleaving the MnTe platelets for ARPES measurements, therefore, also exposes a pristine α-MnTe(0001) surface.
MnTe bulk single-crystal transfer to ARPES
Because the sample holder at the COPHEE endstation at the Swiss Light Source was not compatible with the Omicron plate used in the vacuum suitcase, and the system did not allow for decapping the MnTe surface, we performed the SARPES measurements on in situ-cleaved bulk-crystal samples.
ARPES
ARPES was used for investigating the electronic structure of MnTeâincluding the Fermi surface, band structure and one-electron spectral function A(Ï,âk)âwhich are resolved in electron momentum k (see ref.â52 for more details). The extension of photon energies into the soft X-ray range from a few hundred eV to approximately 2âkeV reduces the cross-section of surface states compared with the UV ARPES (ref.â53) and enhances the probing depth of this technique, characterized by the photoelectron escape depth λ, by a factor of 3â5 compared with the UV ARPES (ref.â54). This enables access to the intrinsic bulk properties, which is essential for 3D materials such as MnTe. The increase of λ reduces the intrinsic broadening δkz of the out-of-plane momentum kz, defined by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle as δkzâââλâ1 (ref.â55). Combined with the free-electron dispersion of high-energy final states, the resulting precise definition of kz allows accurate determination of the 3D electronic structure. As in the case of MnTe, this advantage of soft X-ray ARPES has also been demonstrated on, for example, ferroelectric Rashba semiconductors18, transition-metal dichalcogenides55,56, high-fold chiral fermion systems57 etc. The detection of bulk MnTe states in our soft X-ray ARPES measurements is confirmed in Supplementary Fig. 2 by the observed band dispersions along the kz axis, corresponding to the crystal axis normal to the film surface.
The soft X-ray ARPES experiments were conducted in the photon energy range 350â700âeV at the soft X-ray ARPES endstation42 of the ADRESS beamline at the Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland58. All presented data were acquired with Ï-polarized X-rays. The photoelectrons were detected using the PHOIBOS 150 analyser with an angular resolution of approximately 0.1° and using a deflector mode without changing the sample angles. The combined (beamline and analyser) energy resolution varied between 50 and 100âmeV in the above energy range. The experiments were performed in a vacuum of better than 1âÃâ10â10âmbar and at a sample temperature of around 15âK. In the presented data, the coherent spectral fraction was enhanced by subtracting the angle-integrated spectral intensity as seen in Fig. 2aâc. The constant-energy-surface maps were integrated within a range ±50âmeV. The conversion of the measured photoelectron kinetic energies and emission angles to binding energies and momenta was accomplished using the kinematic formulas that account for the photon momentum42.
The SARPES measurements were conducted at 24âeV at COPHEE experimental station at the Swiss Light Source SIS beamline50,59 on in situ-cleaved bulk single crystals at 21âK. Combined with an angle-resolving photoelectron spectrometer, it produces complete datasets consisting of photoemission intensities (Fig. 4e), as well as spin-polarization curves (Fig. 4g) with the combined experimental resolutions of approximately 25âmeV and approximately 100âmeV, respectively.
Calculations
The experimental results were compared with ab initio electronic-structure calculations, performed for bulk MnTe crystal in P63/mmc (space group: 194) symmetry using the lattice parameter as determined from the X-ray diffraction measurements47.
We calculated the electronic structure of MnTe in Figs. 1 and 2 with the pseudo-potential DFT code Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP)60. We used PerdewâBurkeâErnzerhof (PBE)â+âSOCâ+âU (ref.â61), a spherically invariant type of Hubbard parameter22 with a 8âÃâ8âÃâ5 k-point grid and a 520âeV energy cutoff.
The calculations in Figs. 2, 3 and 4 were carried out using spin-polarized fully relativistic KorringaâKohnâRostoker (SPRKKR) Greenâs function method in the atomic-sphere approximation, within the rotationally invariant GGAâ+âU scheme as implemented in the SPRKKR formalism44,62. The screened on-site Coulomb interaction U and exchange interaction J of Mn are set to 4.80âeV and 0.80âeV, respectively. The angular-momentum expansion of the s, p, d, f orbital wavefunctions has been used for each atom on a 28âÃâ28âÃâ15 k-point grid. The energy-convergence criterion has been set to 10â5âRy. Lloydâs formula has been used for accurate determination of the Fermi level62,63,64.
The photoemission calculations for a semi-infinite surface of MnTe(0001) with Mn atoms as the termination layer at the surface were performed within the one-step model of photoemission in the spin-density-matrix formulation as implemented in the SPRKKR package45, considering the bulk SPRKKR electronic structure for the initial states. The one-step model describes the essential physics of the photoemission process taking into account light-induced effects within the considered experimental geometry, including the photoelectron angular distribution, matrix elements and final states constructed as the time-reversed LEED states. A small, constant imaginary value of Viâ=â0.05âeV was considered for the initial state to account for the impurity scattering. The final-state damping was described by means of a constant imaginary value of Viâ=â1.0âeV, which has been chosen in a phenomenological way to simulate finite inelastic mean free path for excitation energies in the ARPES soft X-ray regime.
Data availability
All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials. Further data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
In the manuscript, we used two ab initio DFT-based packages. The SPRKKR multiple scattering package is freely available (no costs apply) under the specific user license and the package can be downloaded following registration at https://www.ebert.cup.uni-muenchen.de/index.php/en/software-en. The Python-based interface, ase2sprkr, is published under the MIT license at https://github.com/ase2sprkkr/. The Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) used for several simulations can be purchased from https://www.vasp.at/. All input files, post-processing procedures and scripts used to evaluate experimental and theoretical data are available from the authors on request.
References
Kramers, H. A. Théorie générale de la rotation paramagnétique dans les cristaux. Proc. Amsterdam Akad. 33, 959â972 (1930).
Wigner, E. P. Ãber die Operation der Zeitumkehr in der Quantenmechanik. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Gottingen, Math. Phys. Kl. 1932, 546â559 (1932).
Chappert, C., Fert, A. & Van Dau, F. N. The emergence of spin electronics in data storage. Nat. Mater. 6, 813â823 (2007).
Ralph, D. C. & Stiles, M. D. Spin transfer torques. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 1190â1216 (2008).
Bader, S. D. & Parkin, S. Spintronics. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 71â88 (2010).
Bhatti, S. et al. Spintronics based random access memory: a review. Mater. Today 20, 530â548 (2017).
Manchon, A. et al. Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035004 (2019).
Nagaosa, N., Sinova, J., Onoda, S., MacDonald, A. H. & Ong, N. P. Anomalous Hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539â1592 (2010).
Franz, M. & Molenkamp, L. (eds) Topological Insulators Vol. 6 (Elsevier, 2013).
Å mejkal, L., Mokrousov, Y., Yan, B. & MacDonald, A. H. Topological antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nat. Phys. 14, 242â251 (2018).
Zang, J., Cros, V. & Hoffmann, A. (eds) Topology in Magnetism (Springer, 2018).
Tokura, Y., Yasuda, K. & Tsukazaki, A. Magnetic topological insulators. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 126â143 (2019).
Vergniory, M. G. et al. A complete catalogue of high-quality topological materials. Nature 566, 480â485 (2019).
Å mejkal, L., MacDonald, A. H., Sinova, J., Nakatsuji, S. & Jungwirth, T. Anomalous Hall antiferromagnets. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 482â496 (2022).
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Electrodynamics of Continuous Media 2nd edn (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1984).
Winkler, R. SpinâOrbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems (Springer, 2003).
Armitage, N. P., Mele, E. J. & Vishwanath, A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018).
Krempaský, J. et al. Disentangling bulk and surface Rashba effects in ferroelectric α-GeTe. Phys. Rev. B 94, 205111 (2016).
Sante, D. D., Barone, P., Bertacco, R. & Picozzi, S. Electric control of the giant Rashba effect in bulk GeTe. Adv. Mater. 25, 509â513 (2013).
Å mejkal, L., Sinova, J. & Jungwirth, T. Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: a phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry. Phys. Rev. 12, 031042 (2022).
Å mejkal, L., Sinova, J. & Jungwirth, T. Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism. Phys. Rev. 12, 040501 (2022).
Gonzalez Betancourt, R. D. et al. Spontaneous anomalous Hall effect arising from an unconventional compensated magnetic phase in a semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 036702 (2023).
Mazin, I. I. Altermagnetism in MnTe: origin, predicted manifestations, and routes to detwinning. Phys. Rev. B 107, L100418 (2023).
Néel, L. Magnetism and local molecular field. Science 174, 985â992 (1971).
Kunitomi, N., Hamaguchi, Y. & Anzai, S. Neutron diffraction study on manganese telluride. J. Phys. 25, 568â574 (1964).
Šmejkal, L., Železný, J., Sinova, J. & Jungwirth, T. Electric control of Dirac quasiparticles by spin-orbit torque in an antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 106402 (2017).
Naka, M. et al. Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets. Nat. Commun. 10, 4305 (2019).
González-Hernández, R. et al. Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021).
Naka, M., Motome, Y. & Seo, H. Perovskite as a spin current generator. Phys. Rev. B 103, 125114 (2021).
Ma, H.-Y. et al. Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current. Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021).
Šmejkal, L., Hellenes, A. B., González-Hernández, R., Sinova, J. & Jungwirth, T. Giant and tunneling magnetoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromagnets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling. Phys. Rev. X 12, 011028 (2022).
Šmejkal, L., González-Hernández, R., Jungwirth, T. & Sinova, J. Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020).
Samanta, K. et al. Crystal Hall and crystal magneto-optical effect in thin films of SrRuO3. J. Appl. Phys. 127, 213904 (2020).
Naka, M. et al. Anomalous Hall effect in κ-type organic antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 102, 075112 (2020).
Hayami, S. & Kusunose, H. Essential role of the anisotropic magnetic dipole in the anomalous Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 103, L180407 (2021).
Mazin, I. I., Koepernik, K., Johannes, M. D., González-Hernández, R. & Šmejkal, L. Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e2108924118 (2021).
Naka, M., Motome, Y. & Seo, H. Anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnetic perovskites. Phys. Rev. B 106, 195149 (2022).
Feng, Z. et al. An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide. Nat. Electron. 5, 735â743 (2022).
Bose, A. et al. Tilted spin current generated by an antiferromagnet. Nat. Electron. 5, 263â264 (2022).
Bai, H. et al. Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear antiferromagnet RuO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 197202 (2022).
Karube, S. et al. Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic RuO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137201 (2022).
Strocov, V. N. et al. Soft-X-ray ARPES facility at the ADRESS beamline of the SLS: concepts, technical realisation and scientific applications. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 21, 32â44 (2014).
Kriegner, D. et al. Multiple-stable anisotropic magnetoresistance memory in antiferromagnetic MnTe. Nat. Commun. 7, 11623 (2016).
Ebert, H., Ködderitzsch, D. & Minár, J. Calculating condensed matter properties using the KKR-Greenâs function methodârecent developments and applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 096501 (2011).
Braun, J., Minár, J. & Ebert, H. Correlation, temperature and disorder: recent developments in the one-step description of angle-resolved photoemission. Phys. Rep. 740, 1â34 (2018).
Zhang, P. et al. A precise method for visualizing dispersive features in image plots. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 043712 (2011).
Kriegner, D. et al. Magnetic anisotropy in antiferromagnetic hexagonal MnTe. Phys. Rev. B 96, 214418 (2017).
Ishizaka, K. et al. Giant Rashba-type spin splitting in bulk BiTeI. Nat. Mater. 10, 521â526 (2011).
Braun, J. et al. Exploring the XPS limit in soft and hard x-ray angle-resolved photoemission using a temperature-dependent one-step theory. Phys. Rev. B 88, 205409 (2013).
Hoesch, M. et al. Spin-polarized Fermi surface mapping. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 124, 263â279 (2002).
Kriegner, D., Wintersberger, E. & Stangl, J. Xrayutilities: a versatile tool for reciprocal space conversion of scattering data recorded with linear and area detectors. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 46, 1162â1170 (2013).
Damascelli, A., Hussain, Z. & Shen, Z.-X. Angle-resolved photoemission studies of the cuprate superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 473â541 (2003).
Strocov, V. Photoemission response of 2D electron states. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 229, 100â107 (2018).
Powell, C. J. & Jablonski, A. Surface sensitivity of Auger-electron spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Surf. Anal. 17, 170â176 (2011).
Strocov, V. N. et al. Three-dimensional electron realm in VSe2 by soft-x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: origin of charge-density waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 086401 (2012).
Weber, F. et al. Three-dimensional Fermi surface of 2HâNbSe2: implications for the mechanism of charge density waves. Phys. Rev. B 97, 235122 (2018).
Schröter, N. et al. Observation and control of maximal Chern numbers in a chiral topological semimetal. Science 369, 179â183 (2020).
Strocov, V. N. et al. High-resolution soft X-ray beamline ADRESS at the Swiss Light Source for resonant inelastic X-ray scattering and angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopies. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 17, 631â643 (2010).
Dil, J. H. Spin and angle resolved photoemission on non-magnetic low-dimensional systems. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 403001 (2009).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169â11186 (1996).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396â1396 (1996).
Minár, J. Correlation effects in transition metals and their alloys studied using the fully self-consistent KKR-based LSDA + DMFT scheme. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23, 253201 (2011).
Lloyd, P. Wave propagation through an assembly of spheres: II. The density of single-particle eigenstates. Proc. Phys. Soc. 90, 207 (1967).
Lloyd, P. & Smith, P. Multiple scattering theory in condensed materials. Adv. Phys. 21, 69â142 (1972).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge fruitful discussions with K. Výborný. This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation grant no. 19-28375X, the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic grants CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004594, LNSM-LNSpin and LM2018140 and the Neuron Endowment Fund grant. L.S. acknowledges support from the Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz TopDyn initiative. J.S. acknowledge funding from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grant no. TRR 173 268565370 (project A03). L.S. and A.B.H. acknowledge funding from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grant no. TRR 288 - 422213477 (Projects A09 and B05). S.W.D. and J.M. thank the QM4ST project financed by the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic grant no. CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004572, co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund. W.R.P. acknowledges support from the Swiss National Science Foundation grant no. 200021_185037. K.U. acknowledges the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic grant no. LM2023065. D.K. acknowledges the support from the Czech Academy of Sciences (project no. LQ100102201) and the Czech Science Foundation grant no. 22-22000M. M.H. and G.S. acknowledge Austrian Science Fund grants P30960-N27 and I-4493-N. D.U. thanks the Swiss National Science Foundation for financial support within the grant 200021_197157, and F.A. for the grant 200020B-188709.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.K., L.S., S.W.D., M.H., G.S., J.M., J.H.D. and T.J. conceived the idea and proposed the experimental and modelling design. L.S., S.W.D., R.G.-H., A.B.H., Z.J., J.S., J.M. and T.J. carried out and/or analysed the band structure and ARPES simulations. M.H., G.S., K.U., H.R., Z.S., R.D.G.B., P.W. and D.K. prepared the samples and/or conducted the material characterization. J.K., M.H., F.A., P.C.C., V.S., D.U., W.R.P. and J.H.D. performed and/or analysed ARPES measurements. M.H. performed and analysed temperature-dependent ARPES measurements. J.K., L.S., J.H.D. and T.J. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to data analysis and read and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks Carmine Autieri, Ryo Noguchi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisherâs note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information
This file contains experimental figures (Supplementary Figs. 1â11), supplementary text describing characterization of bulk MnTe samples and supplementary references.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articleâs Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the articleâs Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Krempaský, J., Å mejkal, L., DâSouza, S.W. et al. Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy. Nature 626, 517â522 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06907-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06907-7