Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

black tiger prawn
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

64
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 100948
Author(s):  
Minami Kawasaki ◽  
Ting Him Wallace Lo ◽  
Viviana Lazzarotto ◽  
Matthew Briggs ◽  
Richard P. Smullen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Khalilisamani ◽  
P. C. Thomson ◽  
H. W. Raadsma ◽  
M. S. Khatkar

AbstractGenotypic errors, conflict between recorded genotype and the true genotype, can lead to false or biased population genetic parameters. Here, the effect of genotypic errors on accuracy of genomic predictions and genomic relationship matrix are investigated using a simulation study based on population and genomic structure comparable to black tiger prawn, Penaeus monodon. Fifty full-sib families across five generations with phenotypic and genotypic information on 53 K SNPs were simulated. Ten replicates of different scenarios with three heritability estimates, equal and unequal family contributions were generated. Within each scenario, four SNP densities and three genotypic error rates in each SNP density were implemented. Results showed that family contribution did not have a substantial impact on accuracy of predictions across different datasets. In the absence of genotypic errors, 3 K SNP density was found to be efficient in estimating the accuracy, whilst increasing the SNP density from 3 to 20 K resulted in a marginal increase in accuracy of genomic predictions using the current population and genomic parameters. In addition, results showed that the presence of even 10% errors in a 10 and 20 K SNP panel might not have a severe impact on accuracy of predictions. However, below 10 K marker density, even a 5% error can result in lower accuracy of predictions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 298 ◽  
pp. 113585
Author(s):  
Tuan Viet Nguyen ◽  
Luke W. Ryan ◽  
Josephine Nocillado ◽  
Marc Le Groumellec ◽  
Abigail Elizur ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 100751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Van Quyen ◽  
Han Ming Gan ◽  
Yin Peng Lee ◽  
Dinh Duy Nguyen ◽  
Thi Hoa Nguyen ◽  
...  

Export Citation Format

Share Document