Everest
Everest
Everest
In 2004 Vanessa Anderson as a mature student (2nd year, MA, Performance Sportswear Design) attended a conference on clothing for extremes. During an overview of initial research being carried out on the clothing recovered from the body of George Mallory, presenters, Mary Rose and Mike Parsons, appealed for anyone who might be able to help them in the creation of replicas of the garments. 20 years experience as a pattern cutter and garment technologist led Vanessa, sat in the audience, to think I could do that! Here she talks about how her knowledge allowed her to rediscover a little of textiles history.
On September 27th 2005 the first viewing of a replica outfit based upon that worn by George Mallory in 1924 was made at the annual Clothing for Extremes conference at Rheged Discovery Centre, Cumbria, UK. The body of George Mallory was found on 1st May 1999 by a joint Anglo-American Research Expedition on the North side of Mount Everest at 8155metres, seventy five years after George Mallory and Andrew Irvine were last seen heading for the summit of Everest. The controversial retrieval of the outfit was made prior to burying George Mallory on Everest. Artifacts, clothing and DNA were taken for the proof of the identity of the man found and to enable the archeological recording of the artifacts found on one of the most famous British climbers in 20th century mountaineering history.
Shows the original jacket front and sleeve remnants (out of picture) that were worked from. Photo by courtesy of T.C.C. Southampton University, UK. outfit, unusual for period clothing. By comparison a typical modern outfit to summit 8000 metre peaks, would weigh 4800 4900grams. The modern outfit results in several inches of thickness due to the insulation layering within the body suit. The trial on Everest proved the replica period outfit allowed for easier movement for cutting steps in the ice and gaining entry into the tunnel openings of the tents compared with the modern equivalent. Bulk, like weight, adds to the problems of movement at high altitude and low temperatures. The remains of all the original Mallory garments are very fragile. Seventy five years of freezing conditions, high winds, high altitude resulting in low oxygen and high levels of ultraviolet rays had deteriorated some or most of the garment exposed to the elements depending on the fibre content. However, these conditions also delayed the usual decay or deterioration from moisture, insect or pathogen organisms. The areas of the garments that had been sheltered by the position of George Mallorys body had remained in reasonable condition.
10
Vanessa checking the original jacket onto the toile (1st sample) to check positions of the fine detail. Photo by courtesy of T.C.C. Southampton University, UK. Trust. Aiming to gain a better understanding of the performance, construction, wind-proofing and insulation qualities of the clothing, they hoped the information gained would add new knowledge to the history of performance clothing. To understand the insulation properties and the windproof qualities of the fabrics, analysis was carried out by Dave Brook at the Performance Clothing Research Centre, University of Leeds, UK. The department, highly regarded in analysing modern textile performance gear and fabrics, used non invasive but thorough techniques to measure the TOG / CLO value. The layers together were equivalent to 3.5TOG. The same level of insulation worn when working hard in Antarctica in 1996 at -40C by Ranulph Fiennes and Mike Stroud. The outer layer Gabardine fabric test results proved to be close to the wind-proof qualities of Mitsuis Pertex fabric. Dave Brookss conclusion was, Mallory was sufficiently well insulated to survive on Everest, provided he was moving, though not for a bivouac. Proving the clothing to be an effective high performance layering system. A team led by Amber Rowe at the Textile Conservation Centre (Southampton University, UK) carried out noninvasive scientific primary fabric and fibre analysis including scanning electron microscopy, microphotography, spectrometry and x-ray spectroscopy.
Surprising Discoveries
Two finds stood out. The first being the vest, it had the appearance of being shiny, looking similar to mercerized cotton. Analysis had revealed the garment to be a mixture of wool and silk. The combination of two denier gradients has been used in base layers for the last decade, on the original 1924 garment the plate knit fabric had wool on the inner and silk on the outer surface. The garment label located the original purchase to be from a Scottish Retailer, long since gone. John Smedley of Matlock, Derbyshire, UK, was asked to replicate the garment, they identified the original retailer as one of their previous customers. The garment was one of theirs! The second surprise - the jacket, an initial assumption was that this would be a Norfolk jacket style, the preferred sports jacket of the period. Clothing receipts of another Everest mountaineer had indicated windproofs had come from Burberry. The original artifacts fabric structure fitted the description of the light-weight Burberry windproof Gaberdine, the buttons had Burberry London carved on the
Burberry cotton gabardine being woven. Photo by courtesy of Jo Green, Managing Director, Woodrow Mills. hand turned and machine stitched, lined pockets distinctly attached with large L shaped corner supports, button holes and eyelets hand sewn with silk thread and several linen and canvas qualities of interlining sewn in, a story emerged. The buttons were wood ivory, a traditional menswear button carved from a coconut seed and having a similar appearance to ivory. The sleeve was a standard two piece with the pivot underarm detail. The underarm seam was positioned forward, thus allowing the cut to follow the arms natural forward motion when lifted. The construction of the sleeve to armhole was most interesting the sleeve was part set in (the sleeve head) and part laid onto the jacket (edge stitch
11
textiles
attached) over a standard cut armhole, this was notched down at the underarm to allow movement in the width of the pivot sleeve. The fabric, a Burberry Cotton Gaberdine, was traced to the Feather Weight quality originally designed for tents. The original was analysed by Woodrow Universal Mills (manufacturers of Burberry cloth) who had agreed to make the cloth for the project. Establishing weight and a consistent reading proved to be difficult as the original fabric had thinned out in many areas and any analysis had to be non invasive. The fabric had the appearance of green tweed, the warp being a mix of light and dark green and a tan and green in the weft. Discussions with Woodrow Mills regarding the process of the replica gaberdine highlighted the differences between the traditional weaving process and modern techniques. This early 20th century gaberdine was a balanced weave, resulting in a marginally higher count of ends to picks. The 1920s fabric pick count adjustment was at the specification limit of the Rapier loom used. Loom adjustments were not uncommon in the past to achieve the count, the looms were strengthened and weaving the cloth was a difficult job Haythornthwaight, the originator of Grenfell fabric. September 2005 launch of the outfit, showing the replica and the outfit worn in 2004 by Alan Hinks to the Summit of Everest. Photo by courtesy of Ester Inwood, MA student Derby University.
Trials
The jacket and plus-fours were trialed at two locations, initially at Heathersage, Derbyshire, UK and later on Mount Everest to 4877 metres (21,000 feet). The replicated jacket and plus fours being tested for articulation for climbing, in Heathersage, Derbyshire. Climber, Andrew Davison (Mountain Rescue).
Every garment in the outfit has a story of its own to tell, 15 garments have been recreated, the complete replica outfit is on exhibition at Rheged Discovery Centre, Cumbria, UK. The project proved the layering system worn by George Mallory was an innovative and sophisticated outfit, highlighting the importance of clothing manufacturers of the period and their roll in innovative and progressive performance design. The outfits worn by Mallory and Irvine were not a limiting factor in establishing the possibilities of success in reaching the summit of Everest. Graham Hoyland on Mount Everest testing the replica outfit (all layers) at 21,000 feet in 2006.
The UK trial showed the ease of movement for the leg and upper body for taking hold in the rock. The jacket pocket positions were noticeably well placed, as they did not bounce on the thigh, absorbing energy. Graham Hoyland, great nephew of Howard Somervell veteran of the 1922 and 1924 Everest Expeditions wore the replica garments on Everest. The trial at altitude proved consistent with the UK trial, exhibiting the effective windproof qualities of the outer layer and the comfort and ease of movement and the warmth of the fabrics when put on. One immediate problem would be fastening the button fly with cold fingers. It was suspected the fly would have been left undone, Graham noted there were enough layers to interleave. He continued in his comments that he could lift his arm to full extent without disturbing the warm layers of air. Working hard and cutting ice steps was hot work in the outfit. Grahams conclusion was that the outfit was more than adequate to climb to the summit.
The immediate replica team included: Vanessa Anderson Garment Technologist, Klowt; Amber Rowe University of Southampton; Dave Brook - University of Leeds; and John Angus - University of Derby. Joyce Meader (who was responsible for the knitwear) is a freelance historic knitter. The project was supported by: Woodrow Universal Mills, supplier of the outerwear fabric, donated by Burberry. Burberry, Castleford assisted with finishing the outerwear. John Smedley Ltd Matlock supplied the vest. Puttees (a strip of cloth wound around the lower leg, like a gaiter, used by the British Army up to the 1960s), hand woven by Simon Young. Wool flannel shirting, woven by Michael Banister, Banister Brothers. Shoulder pads donated by Helsa. Threads and advice from Coates Threads and Donnisthorpe. Financial support was very gratefully received from the Heritage Lottery Fund and the Pasold Research Fund.
12