Ac Steady-State Analysis: Learning Goals
Ac Steady-State Analysis: Learning Goals
LEARNING GOALS
SINUSOIDS
Review basic facts about sinusoidal signals
SINUSOIDAL AND COMPLEX FORCING FUNCTIONS
Behavior of circuits with sinusoidal independent sources
and modeling of sinusoids in terms of complex exponentials
PHASORS
Representation of complex exponentials as vectors. It facilitates
steady-state analysis of circuits.
IMPEDANCE AND ADMITANCE
Generalization of the familiar concepts of resistance and
conductance to describe AC steady state circuit operation
PHASOR DIAGRAMS
Representation of AC voltages and currents as complex vectors
BASIC AC ANALYSIS USING KIRCHHOFF LAWS
ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
Extension of node, loop, Thevenin and other techniques
SINUSOIDS
x(t ) X M sin t
Adimensional plot
As function of time
Period x (t ) x (t T ), t
BASIC TRIGONOMETRY
ESSENTIAL IDENTITIES
sin( ) sin cos cos sin
(rads)
cos( ) cos
SOME DERIVED IDENTITIES
sin( ) sin cos cos sin
cos( ) cos cos sin sin
1
1
sin cos sin( ) sin( )
2
2
1
1
cos cos cos( ) cos( )
2
2
APPLICATIO NS
cos t sin( t )
2
sin t cos( t )
2
cos t cos( t )
sin t sin( t )
(degrees)
ACCEPTED EE CONVENTION
LEARNING EXAMPLE
cos( t 45)
cos( t 45 360)
cos( t 45)
cos( t 45 180)
cos( t )
Leads by 45 degrees
Lags by 315
LEARNING EXAMPLE
f ( Hz )
1000 sec1
159.2 Hz
2
To find phase angle we must express both sinusoids using the same
trigonometric function; either sine or cosine with positive amplitude
v1 leads v2 by 120
v2 lags v1 by 120
LEARNING EXTENSION
KVL : L
di
(t ) Ri (t ) v (t )
dt
di
*/ L
(t ) A1 sin t A2 cos t
dt
( LA1 RA2 ) sin t ( LA2 RA1 ) cos t
VM cos t
v (t ) A sin( t ) i SS (t ) B sin( t ) LA1 RA2 0 algebraic problem
LA2 RA1 VM
To determine the steady state solution
we only need to determine the parameters A1 RV M , A2 LVM
R 2 (L) 2
R 2 (L) 2
B,
Determining the steady state solution can
be accomplished with only algebraic tools!
A1
RV M
LVM
,
A
2
R 2 (L) 2
R 2 (L) 2
A
i (t )
A2
A1
VM
1 L
,
tan
R
R 2 (L) 2
VM
1 L
cos(
tan
)
2
2
R
R (L)
v (t ) VM cos t y (t ) A cos( t )
v (t ) VM sin t y(t ) A sin( t ) * / j (and add)
y(t )
VM e j t Ae j (t ) Ae j e j t
If everybody knows the frequency of the sinusoid
then one can skip the term exp(jwt)
VM Ae j
Learning Example
R jL R (L ) e
2
I M e j
v ( t ) V M e j t
Assume i ( t ) I M e ( j t )
di
KVL : L (t ) Ri (t ) v (t )
dt
di
(t ) jI M e ( j t )
dt
di
L (t ) Ri (t ) jLI M e ( j t ) RI M e ( j t )
dt
( jL R) I M e
( j t )
( jL R) I M e j e jt
( j L R ) I M e j e j t V M e j t
VM
R jL
I M e j
*/
jL R
R jL
I M e j
VM ( R jL)
R 2 (L) 2
IM
VM
R 2 (L ) 2
VM
R2 (L )2
tan 1
L
R
tan 1
L
R
, tan 1
L
R
v (t ) VM cos t Re{VM e j t }
i (t ) Re{ I M e ( j t ) } I M cos( t )
C P
x jy re j
r x 2 y 2 , tan 1
x r cos , y r sin
x
y
PHASORS
ESSENTIAL CONDITION
ALL INDEPENDENT SOURCES ARE SINUSOIDS OF THE SAME FREQUENCY
BECAUSE OF SOURCE SUPERPOSITION ONE CAN CONSIDER A SINGLE SOURCE
u(t ) U M cos( t )
THE STEADY STATE RESPONSE OF ANY CIRCUIT VARIABLE WILL BE OF THE FORM
y(t ) YM cos( t )
SHORTCUT 1
u(t ) U M e j ( t ) y(t ) YM e
Re{U M e j ( t ) } Re{YM e
j ( t )
j ( t )
U M e j ( t ) U M e j e jt u U M e j y YM e j
SHORTCUT IN NOTATION
NEW IDEA:
Learning Extensions
Learning Example
A cos(t ) A
A sin(t ) A 90
V VM 0
v Ve jt
I I M
jt
di
i
Ie
L (t ) Ri (t ) v
dt
L( jIe jt ) RIe jt Ve jt
In terms of phasors one has
jLI RI V
V
I
R jL
V11 V1
(1 2 )
V2 2 V2
VM e ( j t ) RI M e ( j t )
VM e j RI M e j
INDUCTORS
d
( I M e ( j t ) )
dt
jLI M e ( j t )
VM e ( j t ) L
VM e j jLI M e j
V jLI
Learning Example
The relationship between
phasors is algebraic
For the geometric view
use the result
j 190 e j 90
V LI90
377
1220
I
( A)
V 1220
L90
V
12
I
I
70( A)
jL
377 20 103
i (t )
12
cos(377 t 70)
3
377 20 10
CAPACITORS
I M e ( j t ) C
d
(VM e ( j t ) )
dt
I M e j jCe j
I CV90
I jCV
Learning Example
314
V 10015
I C 190 10015
I jCV
I 314 100 10 6 100105( A)
i (t ) 3.14cos(314t 105)( A)
LEARNING EXTENSIONS
2 f 120
I jCV V
I
jC
3.6 145
120 150 106 190
200
V
235
v (t )
200
cos(120 t 235)
Z ( ) R( ) jX ( )
R( ) Resistive component
X ( ) Reactive component
| Z | R 2 X 2
X
z tan 1
R
(INPUT) IMPEDANCE
V V V
Z M v M ( v i ) | Z | z
I I M i I M
(DRIVING POINT IMPEDANCE)
The units of impedance are OHMS
Impedance is NOT a phasor but a complex
number that can be written in polar or
Cartesian form. In general its value depends
on the frequency
I
Z
C
j C
j C
v2 (t )
v1 ( t )
v3 ( t )
i0 (t )
i1 (t )
i2 ( t )
i3 (t )
KVL: v1(t ) v2 (t ) v3 (t ) 0
KCL : i0 (t ) i1 (t ) i2 (t ) i3 (t ) 0
vi (t ) VMie j ( t i ) , i 1,2,3
ik (t ) I Mk e j ( t k ) , k 0,1,2,3
In a similar way, one shows ...
KVL : (VM 1e j1 VM 2e j 2 VM 3e j 3 )e jt 0
VM11 VM 2 2 VM 3 3 0
V1 V2 V3 0 Phasors!
V2
V1
V3
I 0 I1 I 2 I3 0
I0
I1
I2
I3
SPECIAL APPLICATION:
IMPEDANCES CAN BE COMBINED USING THE SAME RULES DEVELOPED
FOR RESISTORS
V1
Z1
I
V2
I
Zs Z1 Z2
Z2
Z1
Z2 V
1
1
k
Zp
Zk
Z s k Zk
LEARNING EXAMPLE
Zp
Z1Z 2
Z1 Z 2
120 , V 5030, Z R 25
ZR R
Z L jL
ZC
1
jC
1
j120 50 106
Z L j 7.54, ZC j53.05
Z L j120 20 103 , ZC
Z s Z R Z L ZC 25 j 45.51
V
5030
5030
( A)
( A)
Z s 25 j 45.51
51.93 61.22
LEARNING EXTENSION
FIND i (t )
377
Z R 20
Z L j 377 40 10 3 j15.08
V 120(60 90)
ZC
Z eq ZC || ( Z R Z L )
j
j53.05
377 50 106
V
120 30
3.876 39.924( A)
Z eq 30.9639.239
(COMPLEX) ADMITTANCE
Y p Yk
1
G jB (Siemens)
Z
G conductanc e
YR 0.1S
YC
B Suceptanc e
1
1
R jX
R jX
2
Z R jX
R jX R X 2
L
C
V jLI
1
V
I
j C
0.1S
Y p 0.1 j1( S )
1
1
Ys k Yk
R
R2 X 2
X
B 2
R X2
1
j1( S )
j1
ZR
Z j L
Z
1
j C
Admittance
1
Y G
R
1
Y
j L
Y j C
j 0.1S
1
1
1
Ys 0.1 j 0.1
10 j10
0. 1 j 0 .1 0 . 1 j 0 . 1
1
10 j10
Ys
10 j10
200
Ys 0.05 j 0.05 S
Ys
LEARNING EXTENSION
FIND Y p , I
Y p YR YL
0.5 j 0.25
2 j4
2 j4
Yp
0.5 j 0.25( S )
2 j4
j8
I Y pV 0.901433.69 1020
I 9.01453.79( A)
Zp
LEARNING EXAMPLE
SERIES-PARALLEL REDUCTIONS
Z3 4 j 2
1
2 j4
2
2 j 4 (2) (4) 2
1
4 j2
Y34
4 j2
20
Y2
1 j 0.5
Z1
1 (0.5)2
Z1 0.8 j 0.4()
Z4
j 4 ( j 2) 8
j4 j2
j2
Y2 0.1 j 0.2( S )
Y34 0.2 j 0.1
Z2 2 j6 j 2 2 j 4
Z34 4 j 2
Z 234
1
Y234
1
0.3 j 0.1
0.3 j 0.1
0.1
Z 2 Z34
3 j1
Z 2 Z34
Z1 4 j 6 j 4
Z1 4 j 2
Y12 Y1 Y2
( R P ) Z1 4.47226.565
Y1 0.224 26.565
( P R)Y1 0.200 j 0.100
Z 2 2 j 2 ( R P ) Z 2 2.82845
Y2 0.354 45
( P R)Y2 0.250 j 0.250
1
4 j2
ZT 2 (1.384 j1077) 3.383 j1.077
Y1
2
4 j 2 (4) (2) 2
1
2 j2
Y2
2
2 j 2 (2) (2) 2
1
1
0.45 j 0.35
Z12
1
Z12
Y12
PHASOR DIAGRAMS
Display all relevant phasors on a common reference frame
Very useful to visualize phase relationships among variables.
Especially if some variable, like the frequency, can change
LEARNING EXAMPLE
KCL : I S
V
V
jCV
R jL
(capacitive)
| I L || I C |
| I L || I C |
IC jCV
IL
V
jl
(inductive)
INDUCTIVE CASE
CAPACITIVE CASE
LEARNING EXAMPLE
377( s 1 )
| VL VC || VR |
VR RI
VL jLI
It is convenient to select
1
the current as reference
VC
I
jC
VS VR VL VC
1. DRAW ALL THE PHASORS
| VL || VC |
VL 18135(V )
I 345( A)
VR 1245(V )
(Pythagora s)
VC 6 45
LEARNING BY DOING
v (t )
L
PHASOR DIAGRAM
jLI
1
I
jC
RI
1
I jLI RI
jC
1
1
0 2
jC
LC
1
9
4
10
3
.
162
10
(rad / s)
3
6
10 10
f
5.033 103 Hz
2
LEARNING EXTENSION
j4
4 90
I
445
2 j4
4.472 63.435
I1 3.57818.435( A)
I1
I2
Current
divider
1
20
I
445
2 j4
4.472 63.435
Node analysis
Loop analysis
Superposit ion
Source transforma tion
Thevenin' s and Norton' s theorems
MATLAB
PSPICE
LEARNING EXAMPLE
Compute I1
Use current divider for I2 , I3
Ohm' s law for V1 , V2
V1 690 I 2
Z eq 4 ( j 6 || 8 j 4)
V1 16.2678.42(V )
24 j 48 32 j8 24 j 48
Z eq 4
8 j2
8 j2
V2 7.2815(V )
56 j 56
79.19645
9.60430.964()
8 j2
8.24614.036
V
2460
I1 S
2.49829.036( A)
Z eq 9.60430.964
Z eq
j6
690
I1
2.49829.036( A)
8 j2
8.24614.036
8 j4
8.944 26.565
I2
I1
2.49829.036( A)
8 j2
8.24614.036
I3
I1 2.529.06
I 2 2.71 11.58
V2 4 90 I 3
I3 1.82105
LEARNING EXTENSION
IF VO 845, COMPUTE VS
THE PLAN...
COMPUTE I3
COMPUTE V1
COMPUTE I2 , I1
COMPUTE VS
VO
( A) 445( A)
2
V1 (2 j 2) I 3 8 45 445
V1 11.3140(V )
I3
I2
V1 11.3140
5.657 90( A)
j2
290
I1 I 2 I3 5.657 90 445
I1 j5.657 (2.828 j 2.828)( A)
I1 2.828 j 2.829( A)
ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
PURPOSE: TO REVIEW ALL CIRCUIT ANALYSIS TOOLS DEVELOPED FOR
RESISTIVE CIRCUITS; I.E., NODE AND LOOP ANALYSIS, SOURCE SUPERPOSITION,
SOURCE TRANSFORMATION, THEVENINS AND NORTONS THEOREMS.
COMPUTE I0
V2 60
V
20 V2 2 0
1 j1
1 j1
1
1
6
V2
1
1 j1
1 j1
1 j1
V2
(1 j1)(1 j1)
1 j1
V2
1. NODE ANALYSIS
V1
V
V
20 2 2 0
1 j1
1 1 j1
V1 V2 60
I0
V2
( A)
1
4
8 j2
1 j
V2
(4 j )(1 j )
2
3
5
I 0 j ( A)
2
2
I 0 2.92 30.96
2. LOOP ANALYSIS
ONE COULD ALSO USE THE SUPERMESH
TECHNIQUE
LOOP 1 : I1 20
I2
I 0 I3
LOOP 2 : (1 j )( I1 I 2 ) 60 (1 j )( I 2 I3 ) 0
LOOP 3 : (1 j )( I 2 I3 ) I3 0
CONSTRAINT : I1 I 2 20
SUPERMESH : (1 j ) I1 60 ( I 2 I 3 ) 0
MUST FIND I3
2 I 2 (1 j ) I3 6 (1 j )(2)
(1 j ) I 2 (2 j ) I3 0
(1 j )
/* (1 j )
/* (2)
2( 2 j ) I 3 (1 j )(8 2 j )
5 3
10 6 j
I
j ( A)
I3
0
2 2
4
2
MESH 3 : ( I 3 I 2 ) (1 j ) I 3 0
I 0 I 2 I3
NEXT: SOURCE SUPERPOSITION
3. SOURCE SUPERPOSITION
I 0' 10( A)
Z ' (1 j ) || (1 j )
(1 j )(1 j )
1
(1 j ) (1 j )
V1"
Z"
Z"
"
"
60(V ) I 0 "
60( A)
Z 1 j
Z 1 j
1 j
1 j
I 0"
6
2
j
(
1
j
)
j
I 0"
6 ( A)
1 j
6 6
"
1 j
I
j ( A)
0
2 j
4 4
5 3
I 0 I 0' I 0" j ( A)
2 2
Z"
Z" 1 || (1 j )
4. SOURCE TRANSFORMATION
IS
82j
1 j
Z (1 j ) || (1 j ) 1
V ' 8 2 j
NEXT: THEVENIN
I0
I S 4 j (4 j )(1 j ) 5 3 j
2 1 j (1 j )(1 j )
2
5. THEVENIN ANALYSIS
Voltage Divider
VOC
1 j
10 6 j
(8 2 j )
(1 j ) (1 j )
2
ZTH (1 j ) || (1 j ) 1
8 2j
I0
53j
( A)
2
NEXT: NORTON
6. NORTON ANALYSIS
ZTH (1 j ) || (1 j ) 1
I0
BY SUPERPOSTI ON
I SC 20
60 8 2 j
( A)
1 j
1 j
I SC 4 j (4 j )(1 j ) 5 3 j
2
1 j (1 j )(1 j )
2
KCL @ Supernode
40
V3 V0 V3 V2 V1 V2 V3
0
1
1
j
j
KCL@V2
V2 V1
V V3
2I x 2
0
j
1
NODES
KCL@ V0
V0 V0 V3
40 0 V3 2V0 4
1
1
V1 V3 12
Controlling variable
V1 2V0 16
V3 V0
Ix
1
V3 V0 V0 4
j (V2 2V0 16) 2(V0 4) (V2 2V0 4) 0
LOOP ANALYSIS
I 2 40
I3 2 I x
I3 2( I 4 4)
MESH 1 :
jI1 120 1( I1 I3 ) 0
MESH 4 :
1( I 4 I 2 ) 1 I 4 j ( I 4 I3 ) 0
CONTROLLIN G VARIABLE : I x I 4 I 2
VARIABLE OF INTEREST : V0 1 I 4 (V )
MESH CURRENTS ARE ACCEPTABLE
I 4 4 I 4 j ( I 4 2( I 4 4)) 0
( 2 j ) I 4 ( 4 8 j ) I 4
V0
8 4j
1 2 j
48 j j
2 j
j
THEVENIN
ZTH
I "x
Vtest
I "x
KVL
I x' 40
ZTH 1 j
2I x
80
VOC 4 8 j (V )
V0
1
(4 8 j )(V )
2 j
Supernode constraint
V1 V3 12
V1 V3 120
NORTON
KCL@ Supernode
V3 V3 V3 V2 V1 V2
40 0 / j
1
j
1
j
V2 V3 V2 V1
0 / ( j )
1
j
V
Controlling Variable: I x''' 3
1
KCL@ V2 : 2 I X'''
I SC
I x'''
V3
( A)
1
I SC I x''' 4
USE NODES
(1 j )V2 2 jV3 12 4 j
4j
48j
(1 j )V3 4 j V3
I SC
1 j
1 j
I SC
(4 8 j ) j
8 4j
(1 j ) j
1 j
ZTH
I SC
V0 (1) I 0 (V )
1 j 8 4 j
(V ) Current Divider
2 j 1 j
EQUIVALENCE OF SOLUTIONS
Using Nortons method
V0
Using Thevenins
V0
V0
12 4 j
(8 4 j )(1 j )
3 j
(1 2 j )(1 j )
48j j
j
2 j
8 4j
1 2 j
LEARNING EXTENSION
COMPUTE V0
USE THEVENIN
V1
4j
VOC
V1 1230 V1 V1 V1 V0
0 / 2 j
2
1 j2
j
3 4 j 4 j (2 6 j )
2 j2 2 6 j
40
3
1 || j 2
j2
1230
1230
2 (1 || j 2)
2(1 2 j ) 2 j
24120 12120
26j
1 3 j
ZTH 2 || 1 || j 2
VOC
V0 V1 V0
0 V1 (1 j )V0
j
1
ZTH
2.1275(V )
44j
5.6645
j1
VOC
+
-
V0
V0
1
VOC
ZTH 1 j
USING NODES
V1
V1 240
V1
290
0
2
22j
2
V0
V1
22j
2
240
222j
CONSTRAINT
I1 I 2 290 I1 I 2 2 j
V0V
SUPERMESH
240 2 I1 2 jI 2 2 I 2 0
V0I 2
2( I 2 2 j ) (2 2 j ) I 2 24 (4 2 j ) I 2 24 4 j
V0 2 I 2
24 4 j
24.339.46
10.8636.03
2 j
2.24 26.57
2
290
42j
V0 V0V V0I
LEARNING EXTENSION
COMPUTE V0
2V
V0"
V0 V0' V0"
1. USING SUPERPOSITION
2 || (2 2 j )
V2
V1
V1
2 || (2 2 j )
(120)
j 2 (2 || 2 2 j )
V0'
V0'
2
V1
22j
(2 j ) || (2 2 j )
240
2 (2 j || (2 2 j )
V0"
2
V2
22j
2j
I eq
I1
2 V0
I eq 120 6 90 12 6 j
I1
V0 2I1
j 2
120 2
I1 2
j 2 6 90
Z 2 || j 2
Z
I eq
Z 22j
V0
j2
I1
I SC
ZTH 2 || j 2
ZTH
I1
2 V0
ZTH
I SC
ZTH 2 2 j
V0 2I1
120
6 90
I SC
LEARNING EXAMPLE
Frequency domain