Bloom Taxonomy
Bloom Taxonomy
Bloom Taxonomy
Learning Domains
Bloom's Taxonomy was created in 1956 under the leadership of
educational psychologist Dr Benjamin Bloom in order to promote higher
forms of thinking in education, such as analyzing and
evaluating concepts, processes, procedures, and principles , rather than
just remembering facts (rote learning). It is most often used when
designing educational, training, and learning processes.
Since the work was produced by higher education, the words tend to be a
little bigger than we normally use. Domains may be thought of as
categories. Instructional designers, trainers, and educators often refer to
these three categories as KSA
(Knowledge [cognitive], Skills [psychomotor], and Attitudes [affective]).
This taxonomy of learning behaviors may be thought of as the goals of
the learning process. That is, after a learning episode, the learner should
have acquired a new skill, knowledge, and/or attitude.
While the committee produced an elaborate compilation for the cognitive
and affective domains, they omitted the psychomotor domain. Their
explanation for this oversight was that they have little experience in
teaching manual skills within the college level. However, there have been
at least three psychomotor models created by other researchers.
Their compilation divides the three domains into subdivisions, starting
from the simplest cognitive process or behavior to the most complex. The
divisions outlined are not absolutes and there are other systems or
hierarchies that have been devised, such as the Structure of Observed
Learning Outcome (SOLO). However, Bloom's taxonomy is easily
understood and is probably the most widely applied one in use today.
Cognitive Domain
The cognitive domain involves
knowledge and the development of intellectual skills (Bloom, 1956). This
includes the recall or recognition of specific facts, procedural patterns,
and concepts that serve in the development of intellectual abilities and
skills. There are six major categories of cognitive an processes, starting
from the simplest to the most complex (see the table below for an indepth coverage of each category):
Knowledge
Comprehension
Application
Analysis
Synthesis
Evaluation
The categories can be thought of as degrees of difficulties. That is, the
first ones must normally be mastered before the next one can take place.
B l o o m ' s R e v i s e d Ta x o n o m y
Lorin Anderson, a former student of Bloom, and David Krathwohl revisited
the cognitive domain in the mid-nineties and made some changes, with
perhaps the three most prominent ones being (Anderson, Krathwohl,
Airasian, Cruikshank, Mayer, Pintrich, Raths, Wittrock, 2000):
Ta b l e o f t h e R e v i s e d C o g n i t i v e
Domain
Category
Remembering: Recall or
retrieve previous learned
information.
Understanding:
Comprehending the
meaning, translation,
interpolation, and
interpretation of
instructions and problems.
State a problem in one's
own words.
Analyzing: Separates
material or concepts into
component parts so that its
organizational structure
may be understood.
Distinguishes between
facts and inferences.
Evaluating: Make
Examples: Select the most effective
judgments about the value solution. Hire the most qualified
of ideas or materials.
candidate. Explain and justify a new
budget.
Key Words: appraises, compares,
concludes, contrasts, criticizes, critiques,
defends, describes, discriminates,
Creating: Builds a
structure or pattern from
diverse elements. Put parts
Key Words: categorizes, combines,
together to form a whole,
compiles, composes, creates, devises,
with emphasis on creating
designs, explains, generates, modifies,
a new meaning or
organizes, plans, rearranges,
structure.
reconstructs, relates, reorganizes, revises,
rewrites, summarizes, tells, writes
Technologies: Create a new model, write
an essay, network with others
Metacognitive Knowledge of
cognition in general, as well as
awareness and knowledge of ones
own cognition.
When the cognitive and knowledge dimensions are arranged in a matrix,
as shown below, it makes a nice performance aid for creating
performance objectives:
The Cognitive Dimension
The
Knowledge Remember Understand Apply Analyze Evaluate Create
Dimension
Factual
Conceptual
Procedural
Metacognitive
However, others have identified five contents or artifacts (Clark, Chopeta,
2004; Clark, Mayer, 2007):
Facts
Concepts
Processes
Procedures
Principles
Metacognitive
An example matrix that has been filled in might look something like this:
The
Knowledge Remember Understand
Apply
Dimension
Facts
list
paraphrase classify
Concepts recall
Explains
demonstrate
Processes outline
Estimate
produce
give
an
Procedures reproduce example
relate
Principles state
Converts
solve
Metacognitive proper use Interpret
discover
Analyze
Evaluate
Create
outline
contrast
diagram
rank
criticize
defend
categorize
modify
design
identify
critique
plan
Next Steps
Affective Domain
Psychomotor Domain
Original Cognitive Domain (old
version)
SOLO Taxonomy
Review
Introduction
The Three Domains of Learning
Cognitive Domain
Revised Taxonomy of the Cognitive
Domain
Cognitive Process and Levels of
Knowledge Matrix
Useful Links
Learning Strategies: Using Bloom's
Taxonomy
Instructional Design Toolkit
References
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer,
R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., Wittrock, M.C. (2001).A Taxonomy for
Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of
Educational Objectives. New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl,
D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I : The
Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.
Clark, R., Chopeta, L. (2004). Graphics for Learning : Proven Guidelines
for Planning, Designing, and Evaluating Visuals in Training Materials .
Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
Notes