This case involves a petition for declaratory relief filed by respondents regarding lands on Boracay Island. The Secretary of DENR opposed the petition, arguing that Boracay Island was unclassified public land. The Court of Appeals and Regional Trial Court ruled in favor of the respondents. The issues revolve around whether unclassified public lands are automatically alienable and available for disposition. The Supreme Court rules that there must be a positive act by the government, such as a proclamation, to classify land as alienable before it can be disposed of. Under the Regalian Doctrine, all public lands belong to the state unless proven otherwise.
This case involves a petition for declaratory relief filed by respondents regarding lands on Boracay Island. The Secretary of DENR opposed the petition, arguing that Boracay Island was unclassified public land. The Court of Appeals and Regional Trial Court ruled in favor of the respondents. The issues revolve around whether unclassified public lands are automatically alienable and available for disposition. The Supreme Court rules that there must be a positive act by the government, such as a proclamation, to classify land as alienable before it can be disposed of. Under the Regalian Doctrine, all public lands belong to the state unless proven otherwise.
This case involves a petition for declaratory relief filed by respondents regarding lands on Boracay Island. The Secretary of DENR opposed the petition, arguing that Boracay Island was unclassified public land. The Court of Appeals and Regional Trial Court ruled in favor of the respondents. The issues revolve around whether unclassified public lands are automatically alienable and available for disposition. The Supreme Court rules that there must be a positive act by the government, such as a proclamation, to classify land as alienable before it can be disposed of. Under the Regalian Doctrine, all public lands belong to the state unless proven otherwise.
This case involves a petition for declaratory relief filed by respondents regarding lands on Boracay Island. The Secretary of DENR opposed the petition, arguing that Boracay Island was unclassified public land. The Court of Appeals and Regional Trial Court ruled in favor of the respondents. The issues revolve around whether unclassified public lands are automatically alienable and available for disposition. The Supreme Court rules that there must be a positive act by the government, such as a proclamation, to classify land as alienable before it can be disposed of. Under the Regalian Doctrine, all public lands belong to the state unless proven otherwise.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
Secretary of DENR vs Yap
Natural Resources Regalian Doctrine
and
HELD: Environmental
Laws:
GR No. 167707; Oct 8, 2008
FACTS: This petition is for a review on certiorari of the decision of the Court of Appeals (CA) affirming that of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) in Kalibo Aklan, which granted the petition for declaratory relief filed by respondents-claimants Mayor Jose Yap et al, and ordered the survey of Boracay for titling purposes. On Nov. 10, 1978, President Marcos issued Proclamation No. 1801 declaring Boracay Island as a tourist zone and marine reserve. Claiming that Proc. No. 1801 precluded them from filing an application for a judicial confirmation of imperfect title or survey of land for titling purposes, respondents-claimants filed a petition for declaratory relief with the RTC in Kalibo, Aklan. The Republic, through the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) opposed the petition countering that Boracay Island was an unclassified land of the public domain. It formed part of the mass of lands classified as public forest, which was not available for disposition pursuant to section 3(a) of PD No. 705 or the Revised Forestry Code.
ISSUE: Whether unclassified lands of the public
domain are automatically deemed agricultural land, therefore making these lands alienable.
No. To prove that the land subject of an application
for registration is alienable, the applicant must establish the existence of a positive act of the government such as a presidential proclamation or an executive order, an administrative action, investigative reports of the Bureau of Lands investigators, and a legislative act or statute. A positive act declaring land as alienable and disposable is required. In keeping with the presumption of state ownership, the Court has time and again emphasized that there must be a positive act of the government, such as an official proclamation, declassifying inalienable public land into disposable land for agricultural or other purposes. The Regalian Doctrine dictates that all lands of the public domain belong to the State, that the State is the source of any asserted right to ownership of land and charged with the conservation of such patrimony.
All lands not otherwise appearing to be clearly
within private ownership are presumed to belong to the State. Thus, all lands that have not been acquired from the government, either by purchase or by grant, belong to the State as part of the inalienable public domain.