19.32 .128 15.20 Price Price Price
19.32 .128 15.20 Price Price Price
Coefficient
Std. Error
t-Statistic
Prob.
SQRFT
BDRMS
C
0.128436
15.19819
-19.31500
0.013824
9.483517
31.04662
9.290506
1.602590
-0.622129
0.0000
0.1127
0.5355
R-squared
Adjusted R-squared
S.E. of regression
Sum squared resid
Log likelihood
F-statistic
Prob(F-statistic)
0.631918
0.623258
63.04484
337845.4
-487.9989
72.96353
0.000000
293.5460
102.7134
11.15907
11.24352
11.19309
1.858074
n 88, R 2 .632
price
(ii) Holding square footage constant,
15.20, which means $15,200.
price
sqrft
price
bdrms,
= 15.20
and so
increases by
bdrms
(iii) Now
= .128
+ 15.20
= .128(140) + 15.20 = 33.12, or $33,120.
Because the size of the house is increasing, this is a much larger effect than in (ii).
(iv) About 63.2%.
(v) The predicted price is 19.32 + .128(2,438) + 15.20(4) = 353.544, or $353,544.
(vi) From part (v), the estimated value of the home based only on square footage and number
of bedrooms is $353,544. The actual selling price was $300,000, which suggests the buyer
underpaid by some margin. But, of course, there are many other features of a house (some that we
cannot even measure) that affect price, and we have not controlled for these.