The teacher observed was Ms. Peng, teaching math to 11th grade students. She began the lesson by reviewing the concept of functions and showing examples. Students then analyzed graph expressions in groups to develop their understanding of functions in high school. The teacher used PowerPoint, the blackboard, worksheets and Geometer's Sketchpad to support the lesson. A variety of instructional methods were used, including lecture, inquiry, discussion and cooperative learning. Assessment was informal and through oral feedback. Classroom management was minimal as students stayed engaged throughout. Effective engagement strategies included briefly lecturing disengaged students.
The teacher observed was Ms. Peng, teaching math to 11th grade students. She began the lesson by reviewing the concept of functions and showing examples. Students then analyzed graph expressions in groups to develop their understanding of functions in high school. The teacher used PowerPoint, the blackboard, worksheets and Geometer's Sketchpad to support the lesson. A variety of instructional methods were used, including lecture, inquiry, discussion and cooperative learning. Assessment was informal and through oral feedback. Classroom management was minimal as students stayed engaged throughout. Effective engagement strategies included briefly lecturing disengaged students.
The teacher observed was Ms. Peng, teaching math to 11th grade students. She began the lesson by reviewing the concept of functions and showing examples. Students then analyzed graph expressions in groups to develop their understanding of functions in high school. The teacher used PowerPoint, the blackboard, worksheets and Geometer's Sketchpad to support the lesson. A variety of instructional methods were used, including lecture, inquiry, discussion and cooperative learning. Assessment was informal and through oral feedback. Classroom management was minimal as students stayed engaged throughout. Effective engagement strategies included briefly lecturing disengaged students.
The teacher observed was Ms. Peng, teaching math to 11th grade students. She began the lesson by reviewing the concept of functions and showing examples. Students then analyzed graph expressions in groups to develop their understanding of functions in high school. The teacher used PowerPoint, the blackboard, worksheets and Geometer's Sketchpad to support the lesson. A variety of instructional methods were used, including lecture, inquiry, discussion and cooperative learning. Assessment was informal and through oral feedback. Classroom management was minimal as students stayed engaged throughout. Effective engagement strategies included briefly lecturing disengaged students.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
EDUC 5312/3315-Curriculum and Instructional Design
Classroom Observation Assignment
Observation Form 1 Observation Date: March 7, 2016 Observation Time: Forty-five Minutes Class Period Teacher Observed: Ms. Peng Subject/Grade Level: MathGrade 11 School Observed: The Fifty-two High School of Beijing Observer: Xuesong Wu 1-What was/were the learning objectives/outcomes of the lesson? (Add state objectives if known) The learning objective was that given a plenty of examples from lives, the student will be able to recognize that the function is a type of corresponding from a nonempty collection to another non-empty collection, and state the three elements of function with no errors. 2-How did the teacher begin and end the lesson? At the beginning, Mr. Peng gave some examples of function in junior schools and reviewed the concept of function in that time about 2 minutes. Then Mr. Peng let students analyze the graph expression of function to get the concept of function in high schools about 10 minutes. And Mr. Peng assigned the specific things that the students discussed in groups and came to the conclusions about the new concept about 20 minutes. Mr. Peng gave some exercises to the students in order to enhance the understanding of the new concept about 10 minutes. In the end, Mr. Peng let the students summarize the contents of this class and think about if there are other ways of definitions to function about 3 minutes. 3-What did the teacher use for teaching materials or instructional aids/equipment? The teacher used computer, PowerPoint, blackboard, worksheet and the Geometer's Sketchpad. 4-Which instructional methods and strategies did the teacher use? ( lecture, inquiry, discovery learning, discussions, games or simulations, demonstrations, cooperative learning, integration of technology, socrative questioning, etc) The teacher used lecture, inquiry, discussion, and cooperative learning. 5-How did the teacher assess learning? (informal, formal, formative, summative, oral, open-ended, quiz, feedback etc) See Chapter 8 for more information on assessment methods The teacher used informal, oral, and feedback methods to assess learning. 6- What can you say about the teachers philosophy/beliefs and style? (Traditional, progressive, behaviorist, student-centered vs. teacher centered, authoritative etc) The teacher's style mostly liked traditional and student-centered because this class is a new concept's instructional. 7-How does the teacher manage classroom? Can you identify classroom management techniques used? Because most of students focused on their tasks, the teacher didn't utilize more management techniques. Only a student was reminded to go back to the task during the discussion. 8-Observe in the classroom setting and determine types of behavior students play when off-task. What do they do when they are not paying attention? How does the teacher re-direct them or get them back on task? The normal things were sleeping and talking about non-classroom contents when students didn't pay attention. Whereas in this class there weren't above conditions so much because most of students focused on their assignments and observers existed. The teacher only stood at the side of a student and continued to lecture a few seconds to re-direct him on task. 9-How does the teacher communicate with students (verbal, vocal, meta-
verbal or non-verbal communication such as facial, body language, use of space,
motion and time?) The teacher mostly used verbal communication and walked around the classroom when students discussed in groups. 10-Who were the students in the class? What did you notice about them? (Background, diversity, attitude, motivation, interaction, participation, etc) The students were mostly the same age in the high school. The number of girls was more than boys'. They were well engaged in their assignments without the help from the teacher. 11-What did you see that is effective in engaging students? What do you see that is ineffective in keeping students engaged? The effective way that I saw was the teacher stood at the side of a student's desk and lectured several seconds when the student didn't pay attention to his task. The most ineffective way in keeping students engaged was the teacher lectured all the time despite of the students' thought, but this class was fine without above this situation. 12-What are the two instructional strategies you observed and would like to apply in your classroom? I would use discussion in groups and summary by students. The discussion can bring every student's critical thinking. The summary that the students did by themselves can improve their abilities of analysis and synthesis. 13-What are two important classroom management strategies that you observed and would like to apply in your classroom? The one was standing at the side of a student's desk and lecturing several seconds when the student didn't pay attention. Another one was the rule made into the responsibilities of students at the beginning the curriculum such as the order of materials placed on the desk.
What Is Your Learning Style?: A Theoretical Study On Various Learning Style Models and Assessment Techniques To Evaluate Students Learning Styles For The Multimedia Supported E-Learning Environment
Peter Good Language For Those Who Have Nothing - Mikhail Bakhtin and The Landscape of Psychiatry Cognition and Language A Series in Psycholinguistics 2000 PDF