Project On Dainik Jagran Dushyant Dutt
Project On Dainik Jagran Dushyant Dutt
Project On Dainik Jagran Dushyant Dutt
AT
DAINIK JAGRAN
On
PREFACE
True learning is born out of experience and observation
practical experience is one of the best types of leanings
that one can remember throughout the life. After II
trimsters in learning theoretical aspects of administration
and management, the day come to apply these in
corporate world in content of modern industrial enterprise
that has to go through its different terminal to achieve
that corporate goals. The main object of practical training
is
to
develop
practical
knowledge,
experience
and
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Through
this
acknowledgement,
express
my
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Sr. No.
Contents
Preface
Acknowledgement
Declaration
Performance Appraisal
10
Analysis of Questionnaire
11
Conclusion
12
Bibliography
Page No.
INTRODUCTION
OF
DAINIK JAGRAN
Late Puran Chand Gupta was the founder. Started in Jhansi, then shifted
the Head Quarter to Kanpur.
Mr. Sanjay Gupta is the CEO & Whole Time Director Jagran
Prakashan Group
1979:Varanasi, Allahabad
and Lucknow
editions.
1984: -
Between 1997 and 2006, eighteen new editions were added, and through
2007-08, six new editions were launched.
2006 :Mumbai Mirror Afternoon edition launched
Offers Mumbai Mirror or Maharashtra Times as complimentary copy with
DJ at a price of Rs.4. Group MD, Mr Vineet Jain awarded the scroll of
honour for being the new age media guru - Hero Honda Indian TV
Academy AwardsTimescape the DJ Intranet portal re-launched - now
powered by SAP Netweaver BCCL goes live on SAP
systemMagicBricks.com launched in October 2006 targets the Online
Real Estate Space Smart Hire launched April 2006, is witnessing
stupendous growth with its focus on providing organisations with end-toend recruitment solutions. Ads2Book.com The Worlds Only Global Ad
Booking Engine - Relaunched in August 2006With intensive R&D, the Net2-Print classifieds booking system Ads2Book.com was created and imbued
with AI (artificial intelligence) that assisted users through the entire
process of Creating, Booking & Paying for their Print Classified Ads, all
from the comfort of their desktop.
Achievements
Dainik Jagrans iconic stature is supported not only by the undisputed
readership figures of the Indian Readership Survey, 2009 Round 1 (IRS
2009, R1), but also by its ranking as the largest read daily of India for the
last twelve consecutive rounds of the same study. In May 2006, Dainik
Jagran was voted as the
most credible source of news within the printmedia by a BBC-Reuters
study. If this fact by itself isnt a stunning achievement then the fact
of Dainik Jagran being the worlds single largest
newspaper almost certainly is (Source: World
Association of Newspapers).
When it comes to marketing acumen, it is no less a feat that Dainik
Jagran is far ahead of its nearest competitor.The gap now stands at a
resounding 21 million (Source: IRS 2009 R1). Interestingly, Dainik Jagran
is also the number one choice amongst people who can read English.
Even the combined readership of the TOI Group, the HT Media Group or
the Dainik Bhaskar Group does not surpass that of Dainik Jagran.
I Next is India's first bilingual compact Hindi daily targeted at the youth.
Its trendy content is designed especially for Indias open-to innovations
gen next. Circulated across nine cities in four states, I Next is rapidly
becoming the happening youth paper. City Plus is a weekly English tabloid
circulated in key urban markets. Its a lifestyle publication that focuses on
the local and sub-local level. With seventeen editions, City Plus now
covers Delhi, the national capital region (NCR), Bangalore and Pune.The
Group also publishes Sakhi, a premium womens magazine that targets.
Mission of DAINIK
JAGRAN:The Jagran Prakashan Group is the aggregator of content in
any form in the infotainment Industry. We collect & sell
content to right target audience.
YOU ARE
EMPOWERED
STAGES
OF
GROWTH: -
To
to live the
Performance
Appraisal:-
Meaning:
Performance Appraisal is the process of obtaining, analyzing
and recording information about the relative worth of an
employee. The focus of the performance appraisal is measuring
and improving the actual performance of the employee and
also the future potential of the employee. Its aim is to measure
what
an
employee
does.
of
the
employee.
It
helps
to
analyze
his
focusing
of
the
the
attention
overall
on
organizational
performance,
goals.
performance
OBJECTIVES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL: To review the performance of the employees over a given
period of time.
To judge the gap between the actual and the desired
performance.
To help the management in exercising organizational
control.
Helps to strengthen the relationship and communication
between superior subordinates and management
employees.
To
diagnose
the
strengths
and
weaknesses
of
the
of
the
organization
such
as
recruitment,
ESTABLISHING
PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS
standards.
COMMUNICATING
THE
STANDARDS
from
them.
The
standards
should
also
be
MEASURING
THE
ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE
selection
of
the
appropriate
techniques
of
interfering
in
an
employees
work.
COMPARING
THE
ACTUAL
WITH
THE
DESIRED
PERFORMANCE
The actual performance is compared with the desired or the
standard performance. The comparison tells the deviations in
the performance of the employees from the standards set. The
result can show the actual performance being more than the
desired performance or, the actual performance being less than
the desired performance depicting a negative deviation in the
organizational performance. It includes recalling, evaluating
and analysis of data related to the employees performance.
DISCUSSING
RESULTS
employees
to
perform
better.
MAKING
Challenges of Performance Appraisal:In order to make a performance appraisal system effective and
successful, an organization comes across various challenges
and
problems.
The
main
challenges
involved
in
the
the
evaluation
criteria
rating
instrument
of
management
competence
should
choose
the
raters
or
the
in
rating
and
evaluation
Therefore,
the
employees
should
be
OBJECTIVE:
To inform the appraisee of his/her relative performance in
terms of targets and Key Result Areas(KRA)
To encourage meaningful and transparent communication
between the appraiser and appraisee.
To identify the training need for development.
GUIDELINES: -
The date and time for the appraisal interview has to be fixed
well in advance by mutual consent between the appraiser
and the appraisee to allow for adequate preparation.
A separate self-evaluation form has to be filled by every
executive/journalist on contract prior to the appraisal
interview and submitted to the appraiser. After the form is
filled, the appraiser should then proceed with the appraisal
interview.
During the appraisal interview the appraiser first do a Target
based review for the appraisee and he should appraise the
appraisee on the important parameters that have been
identified.
The appraiser should explain to the appraisee why he/she
has been given a particular score against a particular
DEFINITION OF SCORES:
Scores/ Rating
High Flier/Outstanding
(5)
Definition
Employee who truly
achieves outstanding
success in the given targets
and accomplishes much
more than the expected
tasks with efficiency and
effectiveness. Research
indicates that only 1% of
the total employee
population belongs to this
category.
Employees whose
Average Weighted score(A) range from 4.7 to 5
are
Highfliers/Outstanding.
Regularly Exceeds
Meets Requirement
Occasionally Meets
(2)
Employee whose
performance is adversely
(1)
SELF-EVALUATION FORM
NAME:
DEPARTMENT:
EMPLOYEE NUMBER:
DESIGNATION:
BRANCH:
What parts of the job do you have difficulties with, and are
there any obstacles which have caused you particular
problems?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hindering Factors
Are there any other points, which you would like to raise at
your appraisal?
Meets
Requireme
nts
Occasiona Fails to
lly Meets
meet
APPRAISEE
APPRAISER
Name:
Name:
Signature:
Signature:
Date:
Date:
TARGET WORKSHEET
Name:
Employee
Number:
Department:
Designation:
Date of Joining:
Age:
Please identify
your Work Goals
Please identify
the Key
Performance
Areas (KPAs)
Signature (Appraiser)
(Appraisee)
Signature
Date
.......
Date
Signature (Appraiser)
(Appraisee)..
Signature
Date:
..
Date:
...
Chart
Sr. No
Compa
ny
Pay
Roll ID
No
HR
Empl.
No
Branch
Employ
ee
Name
*Cont.
Departm
ent
Present
Designa
tion
Recomme
nded
Year of
last
Redesign
Redesigna
ation
tion
Perform
ance
Rating
Information Technology
2001
3001
4001
Training by Experts
Executives to Asst.
Manager:
Manager:
Principle Centered
Leadership
Lateral Thinking
Listening Skills
Communication Skills
Performance
Presentation Skills
Management Skills
Coaching & Mentoring
Time Management
Assertiveness
Transactional Analysis
Interviewing Skills
Counselling Skills
Counselling Skills
Effective People
Art of Living & Stress
Management
(Sub Code-2003) Managing
Business & Strategy
includes the following
module for the rank above
Chief Manager:
Business Policy
Planning
Strategic Management
Marketing
Management
Operations Research
Finance for NonFinance
HR for Non-HR
TQM & BPR
Psychology
Emotional Intelligence
Training
Type of
Code
Training
1001
Information
Sub-Code
Training Need
Title
1001
Technology
MS
Office/Windows
1002
Internet Tools
1003
Oracle
1004
QurakXpress
1005
Adobe/Corel Draw
1006
Design and
Layout
Techniques
1007
Design and
Graphics
1008
Operations
System
1009
Ingres/Informix/S
ysbase
2001
MGR
Effectivenes
s
Programme
1010
Java/Perl/Cgi
1111
Others
2001
Managing Self
2002
Managing People
2003
Managing
Business &
Strategy
3001
Function
2004
Others
3001
Specific
Marketing
Programme
Concepts
3002
Industrial
Relations &
Labour laws
3003
Materials
Management &
Purchase
Management
3004
Financial
Accounting/Balan
ce sheet
3005
Taxation
3006
Customer
Relations
3007
Brand
Management
3008
Fire Risk
Management &
Electrical Skills
3009
Research
Methodologies
3010
Writing Skills
3111
Foundation
Course for
Journalism
4001
Training by
3112
Others
4001
International
Experts
Accounting
Norms/Standards
4002
Forex/
Futures/Swaps
4003
Capital Market
4004
Marketing/Media/
Advertising
4005
Macro/Micro
Economics
4006
Security and
Administration
4007
Others
Sr No.
Company
Branch
No.
NO
*Cont.
Employ
Departme
Prese
Recommend Year of
Performan
ee
nt
nt
ed
Last
ce Rating
Desig
Redesignati
Redesig
natio
on
nation
Name
Sl. No.
Term
Description
1.
2.
Measure(s)
Performance Standard
4.
Weightage(%)
5.
3.
3) Assessment by Appraiser
Post discussion with the employees, the Appraiser will fill in
the following information:
Comments
Appraiser
Assessed Level
Definition of Level
Assessed
Description of
Level
Level
Typical %
Achievement
KRA Performance
Overall Performance
of Results
Performance exceeds
Expectation, consistently
DE
Demonstrates
Greater than
Excellence
120%
Industry/ organizational
Standards of excellence.
EE
Exceeds
Between
Performance exceeds
Expectations
ME
Meets
Between
Performance meets
Overall Performance
Expectations
85% to 100%
Expectations.
NI
SME
Needs
Less than
Improvement
85%
Needs improvement.
Short of
Poor or
Performance demonstrated
Overall performance
Minimum
Insignificant
Expectations
Results
Expectations.
4) Performance Review
The Appraiser will forward the Worksheet duly assessed and
completed by him/her to the Reviewer (the immediate
supervisor of the Appraiser) for his/her review and validation.
Based on discussion with the Reviewer, the Assessed Level of
Overall Performance for the employee will be documented in
the Worksheet (based on the guidelines in the above table).
The reviewer and the appraiser shall document their overall
comments relating to the assessment of employee and sign off
at respective places in the worksheet.
5) Performance Calibration Process
After the completion of performance review, the Overall
Performance as assessed will be taken through the
Asses
sed
Level
DE
EE
ME
NI
SME
% of
Head
Count
10%
25%
50%
10%
5%
6) Feedback to Appraisee
Post calibration process, the Assessed Level of Overall
Performance will be communicated to the Appraisee by the
Appraiser. The Appraisee writes down his impressions and
views (including those regarding the objectivity of the
process), signs off the worksheet and hands it over back to
the Appraiser. The Appraiser then forwards the Worksheet to
the Functional Head.
(A)
Level
Sl.
Term
Description
No.
1
Key
Area
(B)
(C)
Development Review
Sl.
Term
Description
No.
Assessed
Proficiency
Level
Specific
Development
And
Needs
with
Proficiency
Level
More
desired
than Demonstrated
Desired
Level
of
Key
Behavior with Expected Consistency for
Current Job and Additionally Demonstrates
(M)
Key Behavior at Higher Level (s) than desired
on some occasions.
As desired (A)
Less
desired
Description
Demonstrates
Desired
Level
of
Key
Behaviors with Expected Consistency for
Current Job.
QUESTIONNAIRE
Name:
Age:
Department:
Designation:
Qualifications:
Number of Years of Service at
Dainik Jagran:
Contact Number:
Note:
Q.1
What type of
Organization?
Confidential Report
EPRF [Employee Performance Appraisal Review Form]
DOPA [Development Oriented Performance Appraisal]
Q. 2
Q. 3
Q. 4
Q.5
Do you think that the existing performance appraisal system
adequate enables you to
find out the areas of furthers improvement?
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither Agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Q. 6
system influential
in
Strongly influential
Some what influential
Not at all influential
Q.7
Strongly fulfilled
Some what fulfilled
Not at all fulfilled
Q. 8
Do you think that external factors that affect your performance are
accounted for?
Yes
No
Q. 9
Strongly influential
Somewhat influential
Not at all influential
Q. 10 Do you think that you are perfectly being evaluated by the present
performance appraisal system?
Yes
No
Q. 11
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither Agree nor Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Q. 14 Job and role clarity plays a vital role in individuals performance, how
clearly are these two defined at Dainik Jagran?
Analysis of Questionnaire
Classification of Respondent:-
Male
18
Female
Total
25
30
25
25
20
18
15
10
5
0
Male
Female
Total
28%
72%
Male
Female
Confidential Report
23
30
25
23
25
20
15
10
5
0
2
c.r.
0
EPRF
DOPA
Total
8%
92%
confidential
report
EPRF
DOPA
Important
Very Important
16
Not Important
30
25
25
20
16
15
10
5
0
Important
very Imp
Not0Imp
Total
36%
64%
Important
very Imp
Not Imp
Q-3
Sufficient
15
Insufficient
Needs Improvement
Total
25
30
25
25
20
15
15
9
10
5
0
1
Sufficient
Insuf.
Need imv
Total
36%
4%
60%
Sufficient
Insuf.
Need imv
in following diagram.
Q-4 Do you think that external factors that affect your performance
are accounted and Considered during the Performance Appraisal?
Yes
No
Total
18
7
25
30
25
25
20
18
15
10
5
0
Yes
No
Total
Above diagram shows the external factors that affect your performance
are accounted and Considered during the Performance Appraisal. Here, out of
25 persons 18 says Yes and 7 says No. And percentage wise
classifications are shown in following diagram.
28%
72%
Yes
No
Q-7
Apart from the performance appraisal system, are there any other factors
that help to fulfil the above objective?
Yes
No
19
30
25
25
19
20
15
10
5
0
Yes
No
Total
24%
Yes
76%
No
Q-8 Do you think, the past performance behavioural records and critical
incident are considered during the performance appraisal?
Not Considered
11
11
25
30
25
25
20
15
11
11
consider
Adeq con
10
5
0
3
Not cons
Total
12%
Not cons
44%
44%
consider
Adeq con
Q-9 How far is the present performance appraisal system influential in keeping
high Motivational level?
Strongly influential
Somewhat influential
Not influential
Leads to stress
Total
12
3
1
25
30
25
25
20
15
10
12
9
5
0
Total
Chart Title
Strongly
12% 4%
48%
36%
Somewhat
Not influ.
lead stres
Q-10 Do you think that you are perfectly evaluated by the present appraisal
system?
Yes
No
Total
18
7
25
30
25
25
20
18
15
10
5
0
Yes
No
Total
28%
72%
Yes
No
Q-11 How do you find the behaviour of the appraiser at the time of Appraisal
Interviews?
15
5
5
0
0
25
30
25
25
15
Bi
as
ed
M
ot
iv
at
e
Su
pp
or
tiv
e
Fa
ir
20%
20%
To
ta
l
10
fu
l
15
St
re
ss
20
Fair
60%
Motivate
Supportive
Biased
Stressful
Q-12 Is the system at Dainik Jagran adequately justifies your potential through
job rotations and other tools?
Yes
No
19
6
Total
25
30
25
25
20
19
15
10
5
0
Yes
No
Total
24%
Yes
76%
No
Q-13 Do you think the performance appraisal system adequately appraises the
potential of employee?
Yes
No
Total
20
5
25
30
25
25
20
20
15
10
5
5
0
Yes
No
Total
20%
Yes
80%
No
Q-14 Job and role clarity plays a vital role in individuals performance, how
clearly are these two defined at JAGRAN Group?
15
9
1
25
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
25
15
9
To
ta
l
Cl
ea
r
Very
much
Clear
4%
36%
ot
at
al
l
Cl
ea
r
M
od
er
at
er
y
Ve
ry
uc
h
Cl
ea
r
60%
Moderater
y Clear
Not at all
Clear
Yes
No
Total
22
3
25
30
25
25
22
20
15
10
3
5
0
Yes
No
Total
12%
Yes
88%
No
Q-16 How Far is the performance appraisal system armed with an efficient
feedback system to assist you in improving performance?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
6
4
9
5
1
Total
25
10
9
8
7
6
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Excellent
Yery good
20%
4%
Good
24%
Fair
Poor
Excellent
Yery good
16%
36%
Good
Fair
Poor