Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Earth 200 Million Years Ago

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 37

Earth ~200 million years ago

The Geologic
Time Scale
Based on
*Fossils
*Correlation
Later
*Calibrated
with
radiometric
dating
The Continental Drift Hypothesis

Proposed by Alfred Wegener in 1915.

Supercontinent Pangaea started to break up about


200 million years ago.

Continents "drifted" to their present positions.

Continents "plowed" through the ocean crust.


Continental Drift: Evidence
Geographic fit of South America and Africa

Fossils match across oceans

Rock types and structures match across oceans

Ancient glacial features


Continental
Drift:
Evidence

Tight fit of
the continents,
especially using
continental
shelves.
Continental Drift: Fossil critters and plants
Evidence
Continental
Drift:
Evidence

Correlation of
mountains with
nearly
identical rocks
and structures
Continental
Drift:
Evidence

Glacial features
of the same age
restore to a
tight polar
distribution.
Continental Drift: Reactions
Received well in Europe and southern hemisphere.

Rejected in U.S., where scientists staunchly preferred


induction (incremental progress built on
observation) over what they perceived as
speculative deduction.

Lack of a suitable mechanism crippled continental


drift’s widespread acceptance.

Conflict remained unresolved because seafloors were


almost completely unexplored.
The Rise of Plate Tectonics
WW II and the Cold War: Military Spending
U.S. Navy mapped seafloor with echo sounding (sonar)
to find and hide submarines. Generalized maps showed:
oceanic ridges—submerged mountain ranges
fracture zones—cracks perpendicular to ridges
trenches—narrow, deep gashes
abyssal plains—vast flat areas
seamounts—drowned undersea islands

Dredged rocks of the seafloor included only basalt,


gabbro, and serpentinite—no continental materials.
The Rise of
Plate Tectonics
Marine geologists found
that seafloor magnetism
has a striped pattern
completely unlike patterns
on land.
Mason & Raff, 1961

Black: normal polarity


White: reversed polarity
Both: very magnetic
The Rise of Plate Tectonics
Hypothesis: Stripes indicate periodic reversal
of the direction of Earth’s magnetic field.

To test this hypothesis, scientists determined


the eruptive ages AND the polarity of young
basalts using the newly developed technique of
K-Ar radiometric dating.

The study validated the reversal hypothesis...


The Rise of
Plate Tectonics
And then (1962-1963)
geologists realized that
the patterns are
SYMMETRICAL
across oceanic ridges.

The K-Ar dates


show the youngest
rocks at the ridge.
The Rise of Plate Tectonics
Meanwhile, U.S. military developed new, advanced
seismometers to monitor Soviet nuclear tests.

By the late 1950s, seismometers had been deployed in


over 40 allied countries and was recording 24 hrs/day,
365 days/year.

Besides the occasional nuclear test, it recorded every


moderate to large earthquake on the planet. With these
high-precision data, seismologists found that activity
happens in narrow bands.
Bands of seismicity—chiefly at trenches and oceanic ridges
The Theory of Plate Tectonics
“group authorship” in 1965-1970

Earth’s outer shell is broken into thin, curved plates


that move laterally atop a weaker underlying layer.

Most earthquakes and volcanic eruptions happen at


plate boundaries.

Three types of relative motions between plates:

divergent convergent transform


Tectonic Plates on Modern Earth
Divergent boundaries: Chiefly at oceanic ridges
(aka spreading centers)
How magnetic reversals form at a spreading center
Divergent
boundaries
also can rip
apart (“rift”)
continents
How rifting of a
continent could lead
to formation of
oceanic lithosphere.

e.g., East Africa Rift

e.g., Red Sea

e.g., Atlantic Ocean


Presumably,
Pangea was ripped
apart by such
continental
rifting & drifting.
Subduction zones form at convergent boundaries
if at least one side has oceanic (denser) material.
Modern examples: Andes, Cascades
Major features: trench, biggest
EQs, explosive volcanoes
Another subduction zone—this one with
oceanic material on both sides.
Modern example: Japan
Earthquake depth indicates subduction zones
Collison zones form where both sides of a convergent
boundary consist of continental (buoyant) material.
Modern example: Himalayas

This probably used to be a subduction zone,


but all the oceanic material was subducted.
Most transform
boundaries
are in the oceans.

Some, like the one


in California, cut
continents.

The PAC-NA plate


boundary is MUCH
more complex than
this diagram shows.
Hotspots, such as the one under Hawaii,
have validated plate tectonic theory.
Why do the plates move?
Two related ideas are widely accepted:

Slab pull: Denser, colder plate sinks at


subduction zone, pulls rest of plate behind it.

Mantle convection: Hotter mantle material


rises beneath divergent boundaries, cooler
material sinks at subduction zones.

So: moving plates, EQs, & volcanic eruptions


are due to Earth’s loss of internal heat.
How does convection
work? No one knows—
but they aren’t afraid to
propose models!

Whole-mantle convection

Two mantle convection cells

Complex convection
Field Trip Briefing
The California subduction zone (9’ seismic line)

Subduction to transform (Atwater animation)

Faults of the Bay Area (SF-SJ maps)

Rock types we’ll encounter


Landslide north of Mussel Rock
Occurred between 2 am and 8 am, 2/21/05

You might also like