Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Continental Driftsfe

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 24

Adam C.

Simon
Ph.D., University of Maryland, 2003
Research Associate Department of Geology
University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742
p: 301 405 0235 f: 301 314 9661
e-mail: asimon@geol.umd.edu

Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics

From the time maps of the globe became available,


people wondered about the arrangement of the
continents and oceans. Hundreds of years later, valid
explanations were constructed.
Early Observations

Leonardo da Vinci and Francis Bacon wondered about the


possibility of the American and African continents having
broken apart, based on their shapes. This thinking
continued up into the early 20th century, to a
meteorologist named Alfred Wegener.
Pangaea
Wegener revived the early idea of continental drift,
contending that all of the present-day continents were
connected, side-by-side, as long ago as the Carboniferous
(~300 Myr). He called the supercontinental mass
Pangaea, Greek for all lands.
Continental Drift: Fossil Evidence

Mesosaurus: purely freshwater reptile Glossopteris:


seeds too large to be effectively wind-transported

Continental Drift: Glacial Evidence


Large ice masses carve grooves in the rocks over which
flow. Such masses tend to flow outward (generally
downhill) from a central locality.

Continental Drift: Rock Ages

Even before geochronology, the relative framework of


rock ages showed strong correlation across the Atlantic,
as did mountain ranges of similar age.

Mechanism of Continental Drift?

Wegener never lived to see the general acceptance of


continental drift, largely because of the lack of a
mechanism. Wegener considered the buoyant continents
to be plowing through the mantle, resulting in mountain
belts on continental edges.

Mantle Convection
Beginning just after Wegeners end, Arthur Holmes began
to describe mantle heat flow in terms of convection. Deep
materials, hotter than their surroundings (and hence
buoyant), would tend to flow upward. In approaching the
cool surface of the Earth, the material would lose its
thermal energy, cool and sink, having lost buoyancy.
The motion of mantle material put into action by
convection thus becomes a plausible mechanism for
moving rigid pieces of the crust over some more actively
flowing mantle material.

Materials that can flow tend to lose thermal energy by the


convection process. This explains circulation in a pot of
water that is being heated from below in the same way it
describes the cooling of the Earth.
Harry Hess and Marine Geology
From the 1940s to the 60s, Harry Hess made many key
intellectual contributions to the coming revolution
in geologic thought:

echo-sounding of sea floor revealed deep sea


features like guyots and seamounts, and the
topography of mid-ocean ridges
ridges are areas of high heat flow and volcanic
activity
young age of ocean floor, based on thickness of
sediment

He also speculated that the continents did not plow


through ocean crust, but that the two are linked and
move as a unit.

Topography and Age of the Sea Floor

As ocean crust ages, it cools and is less buoyant. The cool


mantle root on this crust helps pull it down into the
mantle, resulting in deeper sea floor progressively away
from the ridges.

Harry Hess and Sea Floor Spreading


Hess rationalized all of his observations into a system
linked by the old Holmes concept of mantle convection.
He conjectured that hot material rose at the oceanic
ridges, thus explaining the high heat flow and basaltic
volcanic activity, and why the ocean floor is bulged up at
the ridges.

The logical next step is that where continent and ocean


meet, at the trenches, ocean crust is being returned to
the mantle at the same rate it is being generated at the
ridges.

Sea Floor Spreading


Hess combined his observations with the earlier ideas of
Wegener and the mechanism of Holmes into the concept
of sea floor spreading, which lead to plate tectonics.

This hypothesis makes a number of testable predictions.


Earths Magnetic Field
The Earth has an invisible magnetic field, which has been
critical to the earliest nautical navigation: all free-floating
magnets at the Earths surface point to magnetic north.
Iron-rich minerals crystallizing from molten rock will
orient towards magnetic north when they cool below the
Curie point, the temperature above which permanent
magnetism is impossible (580oC for magnetite). Thus
lavas lock in the record of Earths magnetic field when
they form.

How do we measure the magnetism of a rock?


Magnetic Reversals
Interestingly, the polarity of the magnetic field shifts
every 0.5 - 1.0 Myr. That means rocks formed over time
will record either normal magnetic orientation (like
today), or reversed. Since this is a global phenomenon,
these changes can be used for global stratigraphic
correlation.

Taking magnetic
paleomagnetism.

stratigraphy

back

in

time

is

Geomagnetic reversals MECHANISM


How does the field reverse?
currents in outer core slowly change direction
new computer model demonstrates how
currents flow and field reverses
field weakens and loses dipolar form while
changing direction

Geomagnetic reversals CONSEQUENCES

Effects of a future reversal


solar wind will hit Earth more strongly
increased radiation will cause greater skin
cancer
Disaster is unlikelyEarth has survived
countless reversals in the past

Geomagnetic reversals ANOMALIES


Gothenburg flip
worldwide data shows a reversal around 10,500
B.C.
some data from same time shows no reversal
coincides with mass extinction and end of ice
age

Paleomagnetism on the Sea Floor


An amazing discovery was made when the magnetic
profile of the sea floor around the Mid-Atlantic Ridge was
mapped.

The maps showed parallel magnetic stripes that were


perfectly symmetrical across the ridge axis. Colored
stripes represent rocks with present-day magnetic
orientations (normal polarity), grey represents rocks
with reversed polarity.

Paleomagnetism and Sea Floor Spreading

Vine and Matthews interpreted the magnetic stripes as


products of steady creation of new ocean crust over
geologic time, supporting the hypothesis of Hess.

Magnetic Field: Direction and Inclination


Rock magnetism has two components: the direction of
magnetic pointing and the inclination of this with the
Earths surface. Magnetic inclination goes from nearly
horizontal at the equator to vertical at the magnetic pole.

Magnetic North vs True North


Thus, magnetic records give an indication of where the
rock was on the surface when it was magnetized.

Magnetism and Wandering Continents


Another key contribution to the geology thoughtrevolution came from paleomagnetic studies on the
continents. It was noticed that the magnetic pole
positions indicated by rocks of known age were not
constant.
If magnetic north remained in an essentially
similar position over Earth history (despite the periodic
polarity changes), then the different magnetic
orientations meant that the continents had moved.
These results showed that some rocks on
continents currently at equatorial positions had occupied
high latitudes in the past.
Apparent Polar Wander Paths

The Key Features of Plate Tectonics


1. The Earths crust is constantly being created
and destroyed (recycled).
2. Ocean crust, formed at divergent margins, is
mafic and dense.
3. As ocean crust ages and cools, its great density
relative to the continents results in subduction as
plates converge.[As a result, old ocean crust
cannot persist, whereas old parts of the buoyant
continents can survive for eons.]
4. The other kind of plate margins, transforms, are
parallel to the current motion of the plates.

Testing Plate Tectonics


Like any theory, plate tectonics has been rigorously
tested, and from a startling array of disciplines.
This model is consistent with the key tests thus far,
including:
sea floor spreading
paleomagnetic paths
age structure of the sea floor and continents
locations and focal depths of earthquakes
seismic tomography
hotspot tracks
Mechanisms of Plate Tectonics:

Mechanisms of Plate Tectonics:

Credits
Some of the images in this presentation come from:
Plummer, McGeary and Carlson, Physical Geology, 8/e;
Hamblin and Christiansen, Earths Dynamic Systems, 8/e;
Press and Siever, Understanding Earth, 3/e; Paul
Tomascak (University of Maryland)

Ebooking By: MualMaul


http://wingmanarrows.wordpress.com

You might also like