Mathematics For Language - Language For Mathematics
Mathematics For Language - Language For Mathematics
Mathematics For Language - Language For Mathematics
Overview CLIL Mathematics for English English for Mathematics Pre-service CLIL teachertraining
Do Coyles' 4C
multiple focus, safe and enriching learning environment, authenticity, active learning, scaffolding (building on students existing knowledge, skills and experience; responding to different learning styles; fostering creative and critical thinking; challenging the students to take a step forward.) Mehisto, 2008
Variety of communicative situations (thanks to variety of topics and assignments...) Need of using the language precisely Symbolic and iconic language
Natural acquisition Dealing with vocabulary/grammatical structures only when you need them Specific linguistic structures hypothesizing, argumentation, proving Real context Enhanced motivation: more risk-taking
SHAPES
12 years old learners, groupwork no previous CLIL experience English: pre-intermediate level
L1: label, define L2: compare, contrast, examine, select formulate, argue
,
Cooperation of department of Mathematics and English Language Supervised by one teacher from each department st For 1 year Master students of any combination of subjects
Students have already had the subject-specific and general didactics courses They have had previous teaching practice
Aims
Balanced approach (language + content) Appropriate level of both content and language
Cooperation
Adequate level of teacher's language Evaluation, feedback Real teaching experience Reflection
(2) Theoretical background (1) Design a lesson plan; anticipated problems, discuss in groups (3) Peer teaching videostudy, peerreview, self-reflection (1) model lessons, expanding on selfreflections (1) Collective reflection on videostudy (3) Redesigning the lesson plan, teaching at school, reflection (1) Group-work: poster of good practices
Group
4 + mathematics, 2 + humanities 1 + music 1 + German language Original plans and anticipations, selfreflections after peer teaching, reviews, revised lesson plan, final reflection
Portfolios
What changed?
Time management Organisation of work (groups, pairs) Visual aid Attention to non-specific vocabulary BALANCE BETWEEN THE TWO COMPONENTS
Observing the good practices Peer teaching, peer reviews Cooperation with content subject teachers (in the non-MA students)
Only after the CLIL training were the teacher trainees capable of designing a well-balanced CLIL lesson Cooperation is essential There is a need of designing an inservice teacher training for CLIL to be more widespread.