The Islamic 666 Revisited
The Islamic 666 Revisited
The Islamic 666 Revisited
By servant@nazareneisrael.org
At present many people are studying about how Islam may fulfill the prophecies
over the Fourth Beast of Daniel, as well as at least one of the beasts of the Book
of Revelation. In this article, we will see evidence that Islam may fulfill at least
one aspect of the 666 as well.
Even though there is a great deal of evidence to support the idea that Islam may
be the Fourth Beast, we cannot say conclusively that Islam is the fulfillment of all
of the beasts of the Book of the Revelation, or that Islam is the only fulfillment of
the 666. Other suggested fulfillments of the 666 include barcodes and the
Internet, and other suggested fulfillments of the beasts of Revelation include the
Catholic Church and the United Nations. Additionally, there are questions about
the possibility of a secret link between Islam, the Catholic Church and the United
Nations. There is much evidence to support all of these theories, and only time
will tell which of these theories is correct. While it seems intelligent to be
educated and aware of how Islam may fulfill the prophecies in Daniel and
Revelation, we also need to be careful not to be ‘blown about by every wind of
doctrine,’ but to remain open to the possibility that YHWH may not have shown
us everything as of yet.
Although it may have a great deal of merit, the Islamic 666 theory is not without
some problems. Chief among these problems is that the face value of the text
calls for the beast to be a man (not a religion), whose ‘number’ is 666.
The Aramaic Peshitta spells out the 666 in longhand, “six hundred and sixty six”
()ומספרו שש מרות וששים ושש.
Reading from left to right, the first Greek letter, χ (pronounced “chi”) has a
numerical value of 600.
The middle Greek letter, ξ, is pronounced “xi”, and it has a numerical value of 60.
The third Greek letter, ς, is pronounced “stigma”. Although its numerical value
has changed since the first century, back in the first century, the stigma had a
numerical value of 6. We might also note that the stigma has a literal meaning of
“scar, mark, or badge of service”.
Proponents of a Greek inspiration point out that Yochanan (John) wrote the Book
of the Revelation on the Island of Patmos.
If we flip the Bismallah (the Name of Allah) diagonally, note the similarity to the
middle character (xi) of the hand-written Codex Vaticanus, which is believed to
be the oldest known Greek manuscript, dated circa 350 CE. The line above the
xi (under the words “A.D. 350”) in the Codex Vaticanus is allegedly not an
underline, but is part of the hand-written text. According to the Islamic 666
hypothesis, while the original inscription was in Arabic, since these particular
Islamic and Greek letters resemble each other, the image was eventually
recorded using Greek letters, along with some extra symbols.
In Islam, crossed swords are commonly used to denote conquest. Therefore, if
we add crossed swords to the left of the middle character (xi), and remember that
the stigma on the right has the meaning of ‘mark,’ we get crossed swords, the
Name of Allah, and the word ‘mark’ (Χξς).
ς (mark)
One can easily see the similarities between the crossed swords, the Name of
Allah (flipped) and the stigma, compared with the image recorded in the Codex
Vaticanus.
According to the Islamic 666 theory, the Greek letters do not have to be identical
to the Arabic Bismallah. That is because (according to the theory) Yochanan
originally recorded the Bismallah as a drawing of what he saw in the vision (and
perhaps he was aware that it was in Arabic, and perhaps he was not). The
Arabic letters were then put over into Greek at the same time the Hebrew and/or
Aramaic manuscripts were put over into Greek.
How do we count the number of an image? We cannot. That part of the Islamic
666 hypothesis does not seem to make sense.
Is the ‘wisdom’ to know that we are to calculate the gematria of the Bismallah?
That is circular reasoning. If we calculate the gematria of the Bismallah, we get
the Bismallah. By that line of reasoning, we could insert anything (including a
Greek 666, or a Roman papacy), and it would seem to prove itself.
Nonetheless, we are left with a striking similarity between the two images.
at ς (mark)