Environmental Impact Assessment

http://www.unescap.org/drpad/vc/orientation/m8_1.htm http://www.miga.org/documents/EIA_Takoradi.
pdf
Environmental Impact Assessment Principles and Process
Figure 1: EIA concept and eight guiding principles
The eight guiding principles...

There are eight guilding principles that govern the entire process of EIA and they are as follows: Participation: An appropriate and timely access to the process for all interested parties. Transparency: All assessment decisions and their basis should be open and accessible. Certainty: The process and timing of the assessment should be agreed in advanced and followed by all participants. Accountability: The decision-makers are responsible to all parties for their action and decisions under the assessment process.
Credibility: Assessment is undertaken with professionalism and objectivity. Cost-effectiveness: The assessment process and environmental protection at the least cost to the society. its outcomes will ensure
Flexibility: The assessment process should be able to adapt to deal efficiently with any proposal and decision making situation. Practicality: The information and outputs provided by the assessment process are readily usable in decision making and planning.
Applying EIA...
EIA is considered as a project management tool for collecting and analyzing information on the environmental effects of a project. As such, it is used to: identify potential environmental impacts, examine the significance of environmental implications, assess whether impacts can be mitigated, recommend preventive and corrective mitigating measures, inform decision makers and concerned parties about the environmental implications, and advise whether development should go ahead.
EIA Process...
In EIA systems there are sequence of activities implemented in project in a logical sequence and are termed as EIA process. They are given in Figure 2. Figure 2: The EIA processes in sequences of application.
Project screening Not all development projects require EIA. Project screening will help identify the ones that actually do. Here in this section describes the various screening criteria. Scoping The process of scoping helps determine the coverage or 'scope' of the EIA. The methods of scoping is elaborated in this section. Baseline data collection A brief explanation on the concept of baseline data collection and its purposes. Identification of environmental impacts Described here are the various types of environmental impacts of development projects both beneficial and adverse. Impact prediction comparison of alternatives and determination of significance This sections covers the considerations for impact prediction, uncertainties in impact prediction and comparison of alternatives for impact prediction. Mitigation measures Described briefly under this section are the concept and objectives, types and interesting points, of mitigation measures. Public consultation and participation Public participation is a necessary component of the EIA. "Who are the public?", "How to involve them?", and "What are the benefits/disbenefits?" The answers can be found under this section. Environmental monitoring As one of the most important aspects of EIA, "Environmental Monitoring" is defined here along with explanations on monitoring
principles, types and institutional aspects. Environmental auditing You will find under this section, the various types of Environmental Auditing and when it should be carried out during the EIA.
EIA Benefits and Flaws

EIA generates huge benefits in selection of project location, process, design, development actions, and decision-making, however, in the current practice of EIA there are a number of flaws, shortcomings and deficiencies. The table below, summarizes apparent benefits and flaws of the EIA. Table 1: EIA benefits and flaws Benefits Flaws
Provides systematic methods of impact assessment
Time-consuming
Estimates the cost/benefit trade-off of alternative actions
Costly
Facilitates the public participation
Little public participation in actual implementation
Provides an effective mechanism for

Unavailability for reliable data (mostly in developing countries)
coordination environmental integration negotiations feed back
Top-level decision making
Too focused on scientific analysis (sometimes)
Triggers an institutional building
Poor presentation of EIA report
(bulky volumes, scientific explanation, difficult to understand)
Achieve a balance between the impact of developmental and environmental concern
Compliance monitoring after EIA is seldom carried out
Education and training...

One significant factor that could help improve the EIA process is good education and training. Currently, very few educational and training courses exist in developing countries that properly consider various EIA methodologies available in depth. Information on the legal and regulatory frameworks and institutional arrangements are also necessary. Education and training process are important since the fundamental factors behind all EIA predictions are still the best professional judgment and/or experiences with similar projects implemented elsewhere. Both short-term and long- term courses are necessary. These courses however, must be multidisciplinary, and the focus should be on the practical and operational aspects of EIA based on theoretical implications.

Environmental Impact Assessment

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Environmental Impact Assessment

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Environmental Impact Assessment

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

http://www.unescap.org/drpad/vc/orientation/m8_1.htm http://www.miga.org/documents/EIA_Takoradi.

Environmental Impact Assessment Principles and Process

Figure 1: EIA concept and eight guiding principles

The eight guiding principles...

EIA Benefits and Flaws

Provides systematic methods of impact assessment

Estimates the cost/benefit trade-off of alternative actions

Facilitates the public participation

Little public participation in actual implementation

Provides an effective mechanism for

Unavailability for reliable data (mostly in developing countries)

coordination environmental integration negotiations feed back

Top-level decision making

Too focused on scientific analysis (sometimes)

Triggers an institutional building

Poor presentation of EIA report

(bulky volumes, scientific explanation, difficult to understand)

Achieve a balance between the impact of developmental and environmental concern

Compliance monitoring after EIA is seldom carried out

Education and training...

You might also like