Design of Steel Fibre Reinforced Segmental Lining For The Gold Coast Desal Tunnels
Design of Steel Fibre Reinforced Segmental Lining For The Gold Coast Desal Tunnels
Design of Steel Fibre Reinforced Segmental Lining For The Gold Coast Desal Tunnels
Design of Steel Fibre Reinforced Segmental Lining for the Gold Coast Desalination Tunnels
W Angerer1 and M Chappell2
ABSTRACT
This paper describes the design of the steel fibre reinforced precast concrete (SFRC) segmental lining for the intake and discharge tunnels for the Gold Coast desalination plant in Queensland. In addition, the key design requirements and design methods for the lining of these 2 km long, 2.8 m internal diameter tunnels, including structural, durability and maintenance requirements are discussed. Details of the segment configuration and erection process are presented along with information on the manufacture and trial testing of the concrete for the segments. The paper also gives a brief introduction to steel fibre reinforced concrete behaviour. Construction of the tunnels commenced in April 2007, and the authors believe this is the first application of this technology in Australia.
ALIGNMENT
The alignment of the tunnels (see Figure 1) starts at the desalination plant site adjacent to the Gold Coast Airport. Two shafts, 9.6 m internal diameter, of 70 m (intake) and 65 m (discharge) depth provide the access to the tunnels including the TBM launch chambers. The tunnels have a constantly rising grade of 0.1 per cent. The intake tunnel had to be lowered due to the expected poor rock conditions at the intake riser location. Initially the tunnels have a 15 m spacing, which continuously reduces to one diameter at the crossing of the Gold Coast Highway. After passing underneath Short Street the alignment diverges to the riser locations. The first 900 m are onshore with the remainder under the Pacific Ocean. The minimum curve radius is 400 m and the maximum 500 m. About 75 per cent of the tunnels are driven on a straight alignment.
GEOLOGY
The geology at the location of the plant is dominated by two stratigraphic successions, one from the Paleozoic Age, known as Neranleigh-Fernvale Formation, and the other from the Quaternary Age, which comprises estuarine deposits and marine alluvium. The Neranleigh Fernvale Formation comprises sedimentary rocks that were folded and slightly re-crystallised (or metamorphosed) to form steeply inclined strata of meta-sedimentary rocks. Its main rock types are Argillites and Arenites. Argillites (or phyllites) are hardened and slightly re-crystallised mudstone or shale, dark grey to black in colour, very fine grained with the bedding planes generally visible. Arenites are hardened and slightly re-crystallised greywacke rocks, fine- to coarse-grained sediments of mixed composition (moderately metamorphosed clayey sandstones). In the Quaternary Age these rocks were gradually overlain by estuarine deposits and marine alluvium. These materials, which can reach thicknesses of up to 35 m, derive from several sources, including former offshore river bar deposits, beach sands, windblown dunes also known as dune sands, plus estuarine deposits and marine alluvium with moderately over consolidated partly cemented silts, clays and sands.
1. 2.
Senior Tunnel Engineer, Halcrow Pacific Pty Ltd, Level 22, 68 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW 2000. Email: angererw@halcrow.com General Manager Tunnelling, Halcrow Pacific Pty Ltd, Level 1, 542 Station Street, Box Hill Vic 3128. Email: chappellm@halcrow.com
463
Consultation is ongoing to undertake these works by alternative means that remove the requirement for the tunnel to be dewatered.
ability to be erected with a vacuum erector; one-pass lining to reduce the tunnel construction program; minimisation of the number of moulds required to meet the
alignment design of the tunnels; and
100 year design life, severe exposure condition due to the environment and the
tunnel maintenance requirements, (both internal and external), and
to provide support to the rock loads and hydrostatic pressures to provide a watertight structure during maintenance periods.
Additional requirements specified by the Alliance tunnelling contractor, John Holland Tunnelling:
464
DESIGN OF STEEL FIBRE REINFORCED SEGMENTAL LINING FOR THE GOLD COAST DESALINATION TUNNELS
the smooth internal finish is conducive to vacuum erection; can be used with either bar reinforcement or fibre
reinforcement; and
Structural design
The structural design of segmental lining distinguishes between the construction loading and loadings for the serviceability such as rock load and water pressure. The construction loads comprise all load situations from the production of the segments until the installation in the tunnel and passing of all TBM trailers and train loads. It includes demoulding, trailer loads, stacking, handling, ram loads and annulus grouting. The construction loads are not combined with the serviceability loads, as the load cases do not occur at the same time. The loading of the rock mass onto the segmental lining is considered using three different approaches: 1. The rock load is determined using a convergenceconfinement approach. A ground reaction curve was established for the dominating rock conditions. The rock mass lining interaction is taken into account by calculating a support characteristic curve of the segmental lining at 1.2 m advance rate. The intersection of the ground reaction curve with the support characteristic curve defines the equilibrium of the rock mass liner system. This reduced in situ stress is then transferred into a closed form solution using the method proposed by Sir Alan Muir-Wood and modified by John Curtis (1976) to determine the maximum bending moments and maximum radial deflections. A further rock load is determined using Terzaghis rock load principles as a possible development of this failure due to the grouting annulus could not be disregarded. This is included in the design as a long geological failure zone was identified during the geotechnical investigations. To represent local failure, a series of wedge load cases developed to provide potential load scenarios, as geotechnical investigation did not provide joint information to determine critical rock wedges intersection of major joint set planes. are the set by
eccentricity of load. The eccentricity of load is then used to calculate resultant bending moments in the concrete section and compare them against the section capacity envelope. This analysis is undertaken for both the maximum axial load condition and the maximum deflection condition as predicted from the Muir-Wood/Curtis analysis. The ultimate limit state load combinations are then assessed against a steel fibre reinforced concrete moment thrust capacity curve derived in accordance with the principles of AS5100 (see Figure 2). The design moment of resistance is calculated in terms of residual tensile strength derived from standard beam tests, using the Japanese beam test value of Re,3, where dosage recommendations are available from steel fibre suppliers. To account for serviceability limit state, a calculation of the maximum tensile stresses in the concrete section for the SLS load combinations is carried out. Generally, it is impossible to reliably predict crack width in SFRC structures without conventional reinforcement since the crack widths are not related to stresses given by elastic analysis once the section capacity is exceeded and softening develops. In spite of this, crack width can be estimated using the method given in the RILEM - design guideline (2000). The results of the maximum serviceability stress analysis reveal a realistic flexural first crack strength limit in comparison to the ultimate limit state residual stresses. The first crack strength is therefore defined to keep the segments within its elastic boundaries and to avoid occurrence of cracking. This approach is also consistent with the durability requirement to not allow cracks bigger than 0.1 mm.
2.
3.
The rock loading is analysed in combination with the hydrostatic loads. The above methods do not explicitly take into account ring build shape tolerances and other potential deformations. In order to account for these deformations an analysis of the concrete section is undertaken by assuming that the segment acts as short columns. For this analysis, the axial loads and deflection results are taken from the rock load calculation and the additional imposed deflections are added to these results. The new total ring deformation is then applied to the circular lining, assuming the lining deforms into an approximate ellipse. Following this geometric deformation, it is assumed that the segment body is stiff compared to the joint, and all deformation occurs at the joints. Angular rotations are calculated and the axial loads are then applied. The elastic deformation of the concrete is calculated to give a resultant bearing area, stress distribution and
465
uniform. Subsequently, the load reduces as in Figure 3, if the loading is displacement controlled and no further cracks form. This response is similar to the response of concrete with less reinforcement than the minimum prescribed by design codes. No significant difference in behaviour would be noted in a load-controlled test between a plain concrete and a SFRC simply supported beam. The tensile capacity of the concrete is the main factor for the beam behaviour up to the first peak crack. The benefit of steel fibres arises solely from the ductility they add after cracking. The steel fibres therefore have a major impact on the brittleness of a failure.
Performance specification
The best available guidance for the performance of SFRC is supplied by fibre manufacturers in the form of published data
sheets, but these cannot be expected to be specific to each individual concrete mix. Testing of the SFRC is required to confirm that the design parameters are met and also allows for optimisation of the fibre content during production. Design by performance testing, or proof testing, is an approved method contained in all structural codes. It is applicable to repetitive units, where a large number of items are required for a particular purpose and therefore fit for the purpose of segment manufacture. The target fibre content is determined on the basis of experience and suppliers guidelines. Representative completed units are then tested during trial testing to demonstrate the ability to achieve the specified flexural and tensile strength of the concrete. The production fibre content should be chosen with care, to avoid considerable changes in quantities, which would lead to the necessity of re-approval of the mix with all the
466
DESIGN OF STEEL FIBRE REINFORCED SEGMENTAL LINING FOR THE GOLD COAST DESALINATION TUNNELS
specified testing. Changes of 5 kg or less are considered to not have sufficient impact on the concrete mix to warrant re-testing and re-approval. The flexural strength test on this project is defined as the ASTM C1609 beam test. First crack strength is defined as 4.6 MPa and a residual flexural strength of 3.2 MPa is required. In addition, the tensile strength is defined as 4.2 MPa. The design parameters were achieved by using 35 kg/m3 of Dramix 80/60 fibres with a concrete mix using 480 kg/m3 cementitious material. Silica fume, fly ash and Portland Cement are required as cementitious materials in the specification.
production or transportation would lead to rejection of the segment. Cracks occurring after ring build are repaired with materials that provide similar durability resistance to the segment concrete. Furthermore, in order to assess the potential of hammer drilling to induce cracks bigger than the recommended 0.1 mm, drill tests were carried out. The specimens were petrographically examined for cracks and the results allowed hammer drilling of up to 16 mm drill size to be approved.
Durability modelling
From a corrosion propagation point of view, SFRC is at least as durable as normal reinforced concrete and unlike conventional concrete, spalling due to reinforcement corrosion is considered unlikely. However, it is prudent to make provision for possible corrosion of the fibres in the long term. The durability modelling must consider the boundaries derived from the maintenance regime and the construction program. Deterministic modelling of carbonation and chloride ingress by diffusion and under a pressure head was undertaken, and the effect of the different conditions upon corrosion of the fibres was assessed. As the tunnel will be full of water in service, carbonation is considered to be largely confined to the construction period. Corrosion should be very slow due to the low availability of oxygen to the intrados during operation and the extrados during construction and operation. This was accounted for in the carbonation modelling. Chloride modelling is based on a diffusion coefficient acknowledging an ageing effect. The different levels of chloride exposure in the intake and discharge tunnels are taken into account. Temperature effects during the service life were considered. It should be pointed out that outages are extremely important, as these will permit much higher rates of corrosion due to the higher availability of oxygen in concrete containing levels of chloride above the corrosion threshold. Corrosion can be controlled by specifying a minimum frequency and duration of those maintenance periods. Outages at a later time during the structure life have a higher impact on corrosion than outages at a young age. Based on this modelling, a loss of fibres of 25 mm on the intrados and 15 mm on the extrados is considered for design. This reduces the lining thickness considerably in comparison to the 40 to 50 mm to each exposed face as industry standard without advanced durability modelling. The oxygen diffusion coefficient and the chloride diffusion coefficient are main features of the concrete specifications to allow for this thickness reduction.
Durability
The minimum design life for the permanent tunnelling and marine riser structures is 100 years. There is limited information available on the long-term durability of SFRC due to its lesser incidence of use and the time over which it has been used. The limited availability of data has tended to confine the application of SFRC to less adverse environmental conditions outside the tunnelling industry. However, there is considerable evidence of satisfactory, durable performance of SFRC from short to medium term and accelerated testing. A general review of the properties of SFRC relative to conventionally reinforced concrete is given in Table 1. TABLE 1
Summary of properties of steel fibre reinforced concrete.
Issue Abrasion Carbonation Chloride ingress Corrosion Cracking Handling damage Impact Shrinkage Steel fibre reinforced concrete compared to reinforced concrete Improved due to reduced bleeding Fibres in the immediate surface layer corrode Reduction of chloride levels at surface No galvanic corrosion or spalling Corrosion of fibres for width >0.1 mm Improved Improved due to control of crack propagation Cracking reduced
For a long-term view for use in tunnels, it is appropriate to extrapolate performance from its use in aggressive conditions such as marine environments.
Crack control
Where cracking intercepts fibres then some corrosion of the fibres is expected. Reviews by others of a number of durability studies concluded that steel fibre reinforced concrete will be as durable as conventionally reinforced concrete and that a restriction in crack widths to that normally specified for conventional reinforced concrete will lead to a satisfactory design with much of the flexural strength retained. However, field exposure of cracked specimens reinforced with steel fibre has identified corrosion and performance loss with cracks greater than 0.1 mm width leading to significant rates of corrosion. Previous experience suggests that crack widths over 0.2 mm should be avoided, and show that the depth of the crack has a considerable impact. In view of the long design life and severe service conditions it is recommended for this project that crack width should be restricted to 0.1 mm. The SLS design aims to provide a first crack limit above the design scenarios, and that cracks occurring during segment
467
the production due to absence of test data. Overall, it is considered that at least three months are required to establish a mix design that allows for efficient production. As problems with concrete mixes generally arise from the choice of aggregate, a comprehensive pre-approval program for the fine and coarse aggregates is established. The program is based upon the AS2758.1 requirements. The coarse aggregate is defined to be basalt. The main hardened concrete tests are summarised in Table 2. TABLE 2
Hardened concrete testing as per specification.
Test Drying shrinkage Flexural testing Tensile splitting strength Compressive strength Long-term strength gain Chlorides and chloride penetration Oxygen diffusion test Standard AS1012.13 ASTM1609 AS1012.10 AS1012.9 AS1012 AS1012, AASHTO T277-83, AASHTO T259 (replaced with NTB 492) Test procedure as defined in specification
The lining is equipped with a gasket groove for an elastomeric gasket towards the extrados of the joint contact area. The rings are designed for the use of Phoenix gasket profile M 385 41a. The working pressure is defined as seven bar. Two different gasket grooves are provided on the radial circumferential joints due to the gasket pressure limitation. The use of a packer on the circumferential joint influences the gap parameter, which is counterbalanced by an adapted groove depth. The lining joint detail is further equipped with a caulking groove on the intrados. The caulking groove and gasket groove are designed to provide a symmetric contact area at the joints. This reduces the bearing and bursting stresses at the joint and centralises the line of thrust. Twelve circumferential dowels are arranged in six pairs spaced on a 30 degree angle around the centre to provide the drifting system for the ring build. The dowels are arranged to suit the TBM rams. They have been designed to provide tensile resistance to the potential opening pressures imposed by gasket compression as well as shear resistance for installed segments with no ram load applied and prior to the ring being completed. The high groundwater pressures of up to seven bar necessitate high gasket compression. This leads to restrictions in the choice of the drifting system, as the compressive forces lead to considerable pull-out resistance being required on the circumferential dowels. The Sofrasar Sof-fix system provides this capacity but is geometrically more suited to a rectangular ring layout. The length of the dowels leads to restrictions on the ring build. To minimise this effect, a number of circumferential dowels were shortened in length. Although this locally reduces the pull-out capacity, the compression forces are distributed over all 12 dowels to achieve the necessary capacity. No increased circumferential joint openings at the location of the shortened dowels have been registered during construction to date. Primary grouting of the segments is carried out through the grout socket in the segments. The grout socket is also designed to act as a shear cone for the vacuum erector, together with a second recess provided symmetrically around the centre of gravity of the segment. The grout sockets are carried out without concrete cover on the extrados to reduce grouting drill times and potential cracking of the SFRC concrete during the drilling works. The grout system type ZU by Sofrasar was applied with a non-return valve on the extrados and a grout plug with O-ring seal on the intrados. The choice of ring layout is confirmed during construction with ring build times of constantly below 15 min being achieved.
468
DESIGN OF STEEL FIBRE REINFORCED SEGMENTAL LINING FOR THE GOLD COAST DESALINATION TUNNELS
The testing for this project was finally carried out in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and Western Australia in order to provide all the testing required. The contractor was faced with a major challenge in finding laboratories that had the capacity and know-how to carry out testing with the frequencies and limits as required. Also, the test results are required to be fed back into the production as soon as possible to reduce the risk of non-conformances and provide the feedback required for the manufacture of the segments. These market restraints were not known of prior to the project and this restraint needs to be taken on board for any potential future application of a similar design. Also, it has been suggested at recent Concrete Technology Conferences (eg Merretz, Smith and Borgert, n/d) that designers are over-designing the testing regime for concrete similar to that used on this project and that testing should be based on compressive strength testing only. It is true that correlations between the compressive strength with the majority of hardened concrete properties exist. The authors believe these correlations are not adequately reliable to satisfy current client durability requirements. Also optimisations in lining thicknesses, such as were achieved with the application of chloride and carbonation modelling cannot be validated in this way.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Halcrow would like to take this opportunity to thank the Gold Coast Alliance, and in particular the John Holland Marine and Tunnelling Team led by Tony Bermingham, for the very productive and open-minded working environment. During this project, the team has focused on delivering safe, technically sound and innovative engineering solutions to ensure that the final product achieved the client requirements in a high performance construction environment. We believe that meeting and surpassing all the major milestones of the project so far is a result of this successful teamwork. The authors wish also to thank their colleagues Don Wimpenny (Durability Consultant), Christian Goritschnig (Geologist) and James Garnier (Project Manager), all part of the Halcrow Gold Coast design and site team, for their support in producing this paper.
REFERENCES
Austrian Society for Concrete and Construction Technology (Oesterreichischen Vereinigung fuer Beton und Bautechnik), 2002. March, Richtlinie Faserbeton. British Tunnelling Society and the Institution of Civil Engineers, 2000. Specification for tunnelling. Carranza-Torres, C and Fairhurst, C, 2000. Application of the convergence-confinement method of tunnel design to rock masses that satisfy the Hoek-Brown failure criterion, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 15(2):187-213. Curtis, D J and Muir Wood, A M, 1976. Discussion on: The circular tunnel in elastic ground, Geotechnique, 26:231-237. DBV-Recommendation (German Concrete Association), 1992. Design principles of steel fibre reinforced concrete for tunnelling works, pp 19-29, September. Translation of: DVB Merkblaetter Faserbeton Technologie des Stahlfaserbetons und Stahlfaserspritzbetons Bemessungsgrundlagen fuer Stahlfaserbeton im Tunnelbau. Fournier, B, 2002. The role of fly ash in controlling alkali-silica reaction in concrete, presented to Seventh International Conference on Gypsum and Fly Ash, Toronto, June. Granju, J L and Balouch, S U, 2005. Corrosion of steel fibre reinforced concrete from the cracks, Cement and Concrete Research, 35:572-577. King, M R and Alder, A J, 2001. The practical specification of steel fibre reinforced concrete (SFRC) for tunnel linings, presented to Underground Construction Conference, London.
469
Komiya, K, Soga, K, Akagi, H, Hagiware, T and Bolton, M D, 1999. Finite element modelling of excavation and advancement processes of a shield tunnelling machine, Soils and Foundations (Japanese Geotechnical Society), 39(3):37-52. Kramer, G J E, Gregor, T, Ghazi, M and Herbert, C D, 2003. Segment design for tunnelling productivity, in RETC Proceedings, Chapter 62, pp 697-710. Mangat, P S, Molloy, B T and Gurusamy, K, n/d. Marine durability of steel fibre reinforced concrete of high water/cement ratio, University of Aberdeen, Taywood Ltd. Merretz, W, Smith, G and Borgert, J, n/d. Chloride diffusion in concrete specification A contractual minefield, Structural Concrete Industries (Aust) Pty Ltd.
Moens, J, 1990. State-of-the-art report on the durability of FRC, November, N V Bekaert Zwevegem. Rilem, T C, 2000. RILEM TC 162-TDF: Test and design methods for steel fibre reinforced concrete Recommendations, Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, 33:75-81. The Concrete Society, 1993. Technical report No 41, Microsilica in concrete, UK. The Concrete Society, 2003. Technical report No 34, Concrete industrial ground floors A guide to their design and construction, UK. The Concrete Society, 2007. Technical report No 63, Guidance for the design of steel-fibre-reinforced concrete, UK.
470