Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Cie 15 2004

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 82
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses colorimetry standards and recommendations from the International Commission on Illumination (CIE).

It discusses current knowledge and recommendations regarding colorimetry from the CIE technical committee.

The International Commission on Illumination (CIE) is referenced.

By Authority Of

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


Legally Binding Document
By the Authority Vested By Part 5 of the United States Code 552(a) and
Part 1 of the Code of Regulations 51 the attached document has been duly
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE and shall be considered legally
binding upon all citizens and residents of the United States of America.
HEED THIS NOTICE: Criminal penalties may apply for noncompliance.
Official Incorporator:
THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Document Name:
CFR Section(s):
Standards Body:
e
CIE 15: Technical Report: Colorimetry, 3rd edition
10 CFR 430 Subpart B, App. R, 4.1.1
International Commission on Illumination
ISBN 3 901 906 33 9
COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE DE LECLAIRAGE
INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON ILLUMINATION
INTERNATIO NALE BELE UCHTU NGSKOMMISSI 0 N
CIE 15:2004
3rd Edition
UDC: 535.66
535.67
612.843.31
159.937.51
I
Descriptor: Colorimetry
Colour of objects
Colour vision
Perception of colour
CIE 15:2004
This Technical Report has been prepared by CIE Technical Committee 1-48 of Division 1
"Vision and Colour" and has been approved by the Board of Administration of the
Commission Internationale de l'Eciairage for study and application. The document reports on
current knowledge and experience within the specific field of light and lighting described, and
is intended to be used by the CIE membership and other interested parties. It should be
noted, however, that the status of this document is advisory and not mandatory. The latest
CIE proceedings or CIE NEWS should be consulted regarding possible subsequent
amendments.
Ce rapport technique a ete elabore par Ie Comite Technique CIE 1-48 de la Division 1 "Vision
et Couleur" et a ete approuve par Ie Bureau de la Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage,
pour etude et emploi. Le document expose les connaissances et I'experience actuelles dans
Ie domaine particulier de la lumiere et de I'eclairage decrit ici. II est destine a etre utilise par
les membres de la CIE et par tout les interesses. II faut cependant noter que ce document est
indicatif et non obligatoire. II faut consulter les plus recents comptes rend us de la CIE, ou Ie
CIE NEWS, en ce qui concerne des amendements nouveaux eventuels.
Dieser Technische Bericht ist vom CIE Technischen Komitee 1-48 der Division 1 "Sehen und
Farbe" ausgearbeitet und vom Vorstand der Commission Internationale de l'Eciairage gebilligt
worden. Das Dokument berichtet uber den derzeitigen Stand des Wissens und Erfahrung in
dem behandelten Gebiet von Licht und Beleuchtung; es ist zur Verwendung durch CIE-
Mitglieder und durch andere Interessierte bestimml. Es sollte jedoch beachtet werden, dar..
das Dokument eine Empfehlung und keine Vorschrift ist. Die neuesten CIE-Tagungsberichte
oder das CIE NEWS sollten im Hinblick auf mbgliche spatere Anderungen zu Rate gezogen
werden.
Any mention of organisations or products does not imply endorsement by the CIE. Whilst
every care has been taken in the compilation of any lists, up to the time of going to press,
these may not be comprehensive.
Toute mention d'organisme ou de produit n'implique pas une preference de la CIE. Malgre Ie
soin apporte a la compilation de tous les documents jusqu'a la mise sous presse, ce travail
ne saurait etre exhaustif.
Die Erwahnung von Organisationen oder Erzeugnissen bedeutet keine Billigung durch die
CIE. Obgleich gror..e Sorgfalt bei der Erstellung von Verzeichnissen bis zum Zeitpunkt der
Drucklegung angewendet wurde, ist es mbglich, dar.. diese nicht vollstandig sind.
CIE 2004 - All rights reserved
II
CIE 15:2004
This report has been prepared by the Technical Committee 1-48 "Revision of CIE document
15.2 Colorimetry" of CIE Division 1 "Colour and Vision" by using previously published material
of the CIE and considering resolutions of the CIE Division 1 meeting at Teddington 2000-04-
06 and Rochester 2001-06-22/23. This present publication replaces CIE 15.2-1986
"Colorimetry"l.
Members of the Technical Committee during the preparation of this report were:
P.J. Alessi USA
E.C. Carter USA
M.D. Fairchild USA
R.WG. Hunt United Kingdom
C.S. McCamy USA
B. Kranicz Hungary
J.R. Moore United Kingdom
L. Morren Belgium
J.H. Nobbs United Kingdom
Y.Ohno USA
M.R. Pointer United Kingdom
D.C. Rich USA
A R. Robertson Canada
J.D. Schanda (chair) Hungary
R. Seve France
P.W. Trezona United Kingdom
K. Witt Germany
H. Yaguchi Japan
The following Editorial Committee was responsible for the formulation of the document: E.C.
Carter, Y. Ohno, M.R. Pointer, AR. Robertson, R. Seve, J.D. Schanda, K. Witt.
Items of mainly historic importance have been placed into Appendix A
I According to the new CIE publication numbering policy - that indicates a new revised edition
only by the year of publication - this technical report has got the number of 15:2004 and not
15.3:2004.
III
CIE 15:2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY VII
RESUME
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG
VII
VII
1. SCOPE
2. PREFACE
3. RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING STANDARD PHYSICAL DATA OF
ILLUMINANTS AND SOURCES 2
3.1 Recommendations concerning standard physical data of illuminants 2
3.2 Artificial sources representative of illuminants 5
4. RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING STANDARD OF REFLECTANCE 5
5. RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING GEOMETRIC CONDITIONS FOR
COLORIMETRY 5
5.1 Recommended nomenclature for directional irradiation 6
5.1.1 Forty-five degree directional geometry (45x) 6
5.1.2 Forty-five degree annular geometry (45a) 6
5.1.3 Zero degree directional geometry (0) 6
5.1.4 Eight degree geometry W) 7
5.2 Recommended geometry for reflection measurements 7
5.2.1 Diffuse: eight-degree geometry, specular component included (di:8) 7
5.2.2 Diffuse: eight-degree geometry, specular component excluded (de:8) 7
5.2.3 Eight degree: diffuse geometry, specular component included W:di) 7
5.2.4 Eight degree: diffuse geometry, specular component excluded (8:de) 7
5.2.5 Diffuse / diffuse geometry (d:d) 7
5.2.6 Alternative diffuse geometry (d:OO) 7
5.2.7 Forty-five degree annular / normal geometry (45a:00) 7
5.2.8 Normal/forty-five degree annular geometry (0:45a) 8
5.2.9 Forty-five degree directional/normal geometry (45x:OO) 8
5.2.10 Normal/forty-five degree directional geometry (0:45x) 8
5.3 Recommended geometry for transmission measurements 8
5.3.1 Normal/normal geometry (0:0) 8
5.3.2 Diffuse / normal geometry, regular component included (di:OO) 9
5.3.3 Diffuse / normal geometry, regular component excluded (de:OO) 9
5.3.4 Normal/diffuse geometry, regular component included (oo:di) 9
5.3.5 Normal/diffuse geometry, regular component excluded (Oo:de) 9
5.3.6 Diffuse / diffuse geometry (d:d) 9
6. RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING STANDARD OBSERVER DATA 9
6.1 CIE 1931 standard colorimetric observer 9
6.2 CIE 1964 standard colorimetric observer 10
7. RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING THE CALCULATION OF TRISTIMULUS
VALUES AND CHROMATICITY COORDINATES 12
7.1 Calculation of tristimulus values 12
7.1.1 Secondary light sources (reflecting or transmitting objects) 12
7.1.2 Iliuminants and self-luminous objects 13
7.2 The use of abridged or truncated data 13
7.2.1 Abridgement 13
7.2.2 Truncation 14
7.2.3 Weighting factors 14
7.2.4 Numerical procedures 15
7.2.5 Bandwidth of a spectrometer 15
7.3 Calculation of chromaticity coordinates 15
7.4 Equations representing relationships between colour stimuli 16
IV
CIE 15:2004
8, RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING UNIFORM COLOUR SPACING AND
COLOUR DIFFERENCES 16
8,1 CIE 1976 uniform chromaticity scale diagram (UCS diagram) 16
8,2 CIE 1976 uniform colour spaces 16
8.2.1 CI E 1976 (L*a*b*) colour space; CI ELAB colour space 17
8.2.2 CI E 1976 (L *u*v*) colour space; CI ELUV colour space 18
8,2,3 Notes on CIE 1976 uniform colour spaces 19
8,3 Improved industrial colour difference evaluation 20
8,3,1 CIEDE2000 total colour difference formula 20
9 RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING MISCELLANEOUS COLORIMETRIC
PRACTICES AND FORMULAE 22
9,1 Dominant wavelength and purity 22
9,1,1 Dominant wavelength (of a colour stimulus), Ad 22
9,1.2 Complementary wavelength (of a colour stimulus), Ac 22
9,1,3 Colorimetric purity, Pc 22
9,1 A Excitation purity, Pe 22
9,2 Special metamerism indices 23
9.2.1 Special metamerism index: change in illuminant 23
9.2.2 Special metamerism index: change in observer 24
9,3 Assessment of the quality of a daylight simulator for colorimetry 25
9A The evaluation of whiteness 26
9,5 Calculation of correlated colour temperature 26
10, REFERENCES 27
11. TABLES 30
11,1 Table 1. 1, Relative spectral power distributions of CIE illuminants 30
11.2 Table T.2, Components 5 0 ) ~ ) , 51 (A), S2(A) 33
11,3 Table 1.3, Tristimulus values, chromaticity coordinates of CIE illuminants 35
11 A Table T.4. CIE 1931 standard colorimetric observer 36
11,5 Table T,5, CIE 1964 standard colorimetric observer 38
11,6 Table 1.6, Relative spectral power distributions of illuminants representing typical
fluorescent lamps, for wavelengths )" = 380 nm to 780 nm at 5 nm intervals 40
11,7 Table 1.7, High pressure discharge lamps, HP1: Standard high pressure sodium
lamp; HP2: Colour enhanced high pressure sodium lamp; HP3-5: Three types of
high pressure metal halide lamps 47
11,8 Table T,8, Colorimetric data for the fluorescent lamp illuminants of Table 1.6 49
11,9 Table 1.9, Colorimetric data for the high pressure illuminants of Table 1.7 50
11,10 Table T, 1 0, Values of the first deviation function used in the calculation of the
observer metamerism index 51
APPENDIX A OLD RECOMMENDATIONS, NOW OBSOLETE, AS WELL AS
REFERENCES TO NON-CIE COLOUR DIFFERENCE FORMULAE 52
Appendix A 1, Iliuminant B and Source B 52
Appendix A2, Iliuminant C and Source C 52
Appendix A3, CIE 1964 uniform colour space and colour difference formula 53
u, v uniform chromaticity scale (CIE 1960 UCS) diagram 53
1964 uniform space and colour difference formula 53
Appendix A.4. CIE 1994 colour difference formula (CIE94) 53
Appendix A5, CMC(I:c) colour difference formula 54
Appendix A6, DIN99 colour difference formula 54
References 54
APPENDIX B, DEFINITIONS OF THE r(A), g(A), b(A) COLOUR-MATCHING
FUNCTIONS, THE CIE RGB SYSTEM AND THE DERIVATION OF THE CIE XYZ
SYSTEM FROM THE CIE RGB SYSTEM FOR THE 1931 STANDARD OBSERVER 55
Appendix B, 1, Determination of the r(A), g(Je), b(}.) colour-matching functions 55
Appendix B.2, Derivation of the CIE XYZ trichromatic system from the CIE RGB
trichromatic system 56
V
CIE 15:2004
Appendix B.3. Definition of the colour-matching functions in the CIE 1964 trichromatic
~ ~ m ~
Reference 61
APPENDIX C. ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO DEFINE DAYLIGHT ILLUMINANTS-
METHOD OF CALCULATION, CORRECTED TABLES AND EQUATIONS (FOR
INFORMATION AND EVALUATION) 62
R ~ r e ~ ~
APPENDIX D. REVERSE TRANSFORMATION FROM VALUES L *, a*, b* TO
TRISTIMULUS VALUES X, Y, Z 66
Reference 66
APPENDIX E. INFORMATION ON THE USE OF PLANCK'S EQUATION FOR
STANDARD AIR 67
References 67
EXPLANATORY COMMENTS 68
VI
COLORIMETRY
SUMMARY
CIE 15:2004
This publication provides the recommendations of the CIE concerning basic colorimetry.
Specifically, it includes the use of the standard illuminants and the standard colorimetric
observers; the reference standard for reflectance; the illuminating and viewing conditions; the
calculation of tristimulus values, chromaticity coordinates, colour spaces and colour
differences; and the various other colorimetric practices and formulae.
This publication is consistent with the fundamental data and procedures described in
the CIE Standards on Colorimetry.
For further details of some of the phenomena discussed here the reader is directed to
the appropriate technical reports.
COLORIMETRIE
RESUME
Ce document donne les recommandations de la CIE pour la colorimetrie de base. Plus
particulierement il traite de I'emploi des illuminants normalises et des observateurs
colorimetriques normalises, de la reference normalisee pour Ie facteur de reflexion, des
conditions d'eclairage et d'observation, du calcul des composantes trichromatiques, des
coordonnees trichromatiques, des espaces chromatiques et des ecarts de couleur, ainsi que
de I'emploi de diverses autres pratiques et formules colorimetriques.
Cette publication est en accord avec les donnees et procedures de base qui sont
decrites dans les normes CIE de colorimetrie.
Pour des details complementaires relatifs aux questions traitees ici, Ie lecteur est
invite a consulter les rapports techniques appropries.
FARBMESSUNG
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG
Die hier wiedergegebenen Empfehlungen der CIE beziehen sich auf die Anwendung oder die
Benutzung der Normlichtarten und der Normalbeobachter, auf den Wei [l,standard, auf die
Beleuchtungs- und Beobachtungsbedingungen, auf die Berechnung von Normfarbwerten und
Normfarbwertanteilen, Farbenraumen und Farbabstanden, und auf verschiedene andere
farbmetrische Praktiken und Formeln.
Diese Ver6ffentlichung stimmt mit den grundlegenden Daten und Verfahren uberein,
die in CIE Normen fUr Farbmessung beschrieben sind.
Weitere Einzelheiten einiger hier diskutierter Phanomene findet der Leser in
geeigneten technischen Berichten.
VII
CIE 15:2004
VIII
CIE 15:2004
1. SCOPE
This report is intended to provide a consistent and comprehensive account of the
recommendations of the CIE for basic colorimetry, It summarises basic colorimetric data and
practices; it does not, however, deal with colour appearance specification,
2. PREFACE
By general consent in all countries the specification of basic standards for use in colorimetry
is the province of the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE), The first major
recommendations regarding colorimetric standards were made by the CIE in 1931, and these
formed the basis of modern colorimetry, The original recommendations of 1931 were
reviewed from time to time by the CIE Colorimetry Committee and later by CIE Division 1,
Vision and Colour, When necessary changes were made, New recommendations were
added to supplement the existing ones or to broaden the scope of colorimetry in accordance
with developments in practice and science,
The deliberations and recommendations made by the CIE Colorimetry Committee
and Division 1 are recorded in the Proceedings of the various Sessions of the CIE. However
the access to these Proceedings has always been rather limited and much of the material
published in the Proceedings is obsolete or inconsistent with current colorimetric practice,
The recommendations, while few in number, also present an incoherent picture, Many
recommendations are merely proposals of study or work on certain topiCS that were
considered important at the time,
For these reasons in 1971 the CI E published a special document on colorimetry to
provide a consistent and comprehensive account of basic colorimetric recommendations,
This document was not intended to be a textbook on colorimetry but rather a reference to the
basic standards that govern modern colorimetry, The document was issued as CIE
Publication No, 15 (CIE, 1971),
Since 1971 it has been necessary to add two supplements to the document [Suppl. 1
on Special metamerism index: change of iIIuminant (CIE, 1972) and SuppL 2 on
Recommendations on uniform colour spaces, colour-difference equations and psychometric
colour terms (CIE, 1978)]. Several Technical Reports were also published during the
intervening years, Publication CIE 15,2, published in 1986 (CIE, 1986b) incorporated the first
two supplements, Further amendments, described in detail in CIE 51-1981, A method for
assessing the quality of daylight simulators for colorimetry (CI E, 1981); CIE 80-1989, Special
metamerism index: observer metamerism (CIE, 1989); CIE 101-1993, Parametric effects in
colour difference evaluation (C I E, 1993); C IE 116-1995, Industrial colour difference evaluation
(CIE, 1995a); CIE 135/3, CIE TC 1-45 report: Supplement 1-1999 to CIE 51-1981, Virtual
metamers for assessing the quality of simulators of CIE iIIuminant 050 (CIE, 1999b) and CIE
142-2001, Improvement to industrial colour difference evaluation (CIE, 2001a) are all parts of
the CIE system of colorimetry, The present version, CIE 15:2004 summarises all CIE
recommendations on basic colorimetry, Short explanatory texts and a historic overview are
also included, Colour appearance models are not covered, for these see CIE 131-1998 (CIE,
1998a); CIE 159:2004 (CIE, 2004b) and CIE x014-1998 (CIE, 1998b),
In compiling this third edition the opportunity has been taken to incorporate all
relevant recommendations, The publications enumerated in the previous paragraph contain
background information on the single subjects, those interested in more detail about the
development of the recommendations and their background experiments are referred to these
publications, CIE 15:2004 is based on CIE standards containing the fundamental data on CIE
standard illuminants and standard observers, The presently official versions of these
standards are CIE S 005-1998, CIE standard illuminants for colorimetry (CIE, 1998c)
(published also as ISO 10526:1999) and CIE S 002-1986, CIE standard colorimetric
observers (CIE, 19868), (published also as CIE/ISO 10527:1991), These standards contain
the fundamental colorimetric data [see also CIE DS 014-2.2:2004 (CIE, 2004a)].
It is anticipated that further amendments of colorimetric practice and further
standards will be published, thus one should consult the latest CIE list of publications
published in CIE Proceedings, and in most recent Technical Reports; this information is also
available on the CIE world wide web home page (http://www.cie.co.atl).
CIE 15:2004
The wording of the original recommendations has been altered to be consistent with
modern nomenclature and in some cases the original recommendations have also been
modified in content to bring them into line with present day thinking and practice. The
versions given in this document are the recommendations now in force and supersede all
previous recommendations until such time as any amendments are published by the CIE.
The recommendations are divided into the following seven groups:
- Recommendations concerning standard physical data of illuminants and sources.
- Recommendations concerning the standard of reflectance.
- Recommendations concerning geometric conditions for colorimetry.
Recommendations concerning standard observer data.
Recommendations concerning the calculation of tristimulus values and chromaticity
coordinates.
- Recommendations concerning uniform colour spacing and colour difference.
- Recommendations concerning miscellaneous colorimetric practices and formulae.
The definitive data relating to standard colorimetric illuminants and observers are
those given at 1 nm intervals in the appropriate CIE standards [CIE, 1998c (to be replaced by
CIE, 2004a); CIE, 1986a]. The data have not been printed in the present report, but are
included in the accompanying CD-ROM. Abridged data, at 5 nm intervals, are given in
Section 11, and these may be used in those cases where calculation at the wider intervals is
unlikely to produce any significant error.
For all colorimetric calculations wavelength in standard air should be used" 1.
3. RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING STANDARD PHYSICAL DATA OF
ILLUMINANTS AND SOURCES
3.1 Recommendations concerning standard physical data of illuminants
2
It is recommended that the following illuminants, defined by relative spectral power
distributions given in Table 1 of CIE S 005-1998 (CIE, 1998c)"I, be used for general
colorimetry .
CIE standard illuminant A
The relative spectral power distribution S A , ~ ) is defined by the equation
1,435 x 10
7
5 exp------1
S (A) = 1 00 (560 J x 2 848 x 560
A A 1,435x10
7
exp 2848 A
(3.1 )
where A is the wavelength in nanometres and the numerical values in the two exponential
terms are definitive constants originating from the first definition of Iliuminant A in 1931
3
. This
spectral power distribution is normalized to the value 100 (exactly) at the wavelength 560 nm
(exactly).
CIE standard illuminant A is defined over the spectral region from 300 nm to 830 nmlv
in CIE S 005-1998 (CIE, 1998c) to six significant digits. Should higher precision be needed,
II Superscripts of Arabic numerals refer to Explanatory Comments given on page 68-72.
III The spectral power distribution tables published in the CIE Standard are reproduced on the
CD-ROM that accompanies this Technical Report.
IV The wavelength range for standard illuminants is 300 nm - 830 nm because, for evaluating
luminescent samples the UV spectral range is relevant. For most colorimetric investigations
the restricted wavelength range, 380 nm - 780 nm, can be used.
2
CIE 15:2004
values calculated using Equ. 3.1 should be used
v
Section 11 contains abridged tables that
can be used in most practical calculations. On the use of these tables see Section 7.2.
Note 1: The definition reproduced here is in accordance with the values of Iliuminant A
originally published in 1931, see CIE S 005-1998 (CIE, 1998c) and CIE OS 014-
2.2:2004 (CIE, 2004a).
Note 2: Despite the fact that Equ. 3.1 is based on Planck's equation for a vacuum, the
wavelengths are to be taken as being in standard air (dry air at 15C and 101325 Pa,
containing 0,03% by volume of carbon dioxide). This makes CIE standard illuminant A
compatible with other CIE colorimetric and photometric data.
CIE standard illuminant 065
The relative spectral power distribution representing a phase of daylight with a correlated
colour temperature of approximately 6500 K (called also nominal correlated colour
temperature of the daylight illuminant)4, symbol: S065(,1.). The official values of S065().) are as
given in CIE standard illuminants for colorimetry (CIE, 1998c)VI.
Note 1: Regarding the definition of correlated colour temperature (Tep) of an illuminant see
Section 9.5.
Note 2: Section 11 provides abridged tables that can be used in many practical calculations.
On the use of these tables see Section 7.2. The values of relative spectral power
distribution of CIE standard illuminant 065 given in Table T.1 at 5 nm intervals are
consistent with the values from 300 nm to 830 nm at 1 nm intervals and with six
significant figures given in CIE standard illuminants for colorimetry (CIE, 1998c). They
have been taken from the tables of the Standard.
Note 3: If values at other wavelengths than printed in Table 1 of the standard (CIE, 1998c) at
1 nm intervals are needed, linear interpolation should be used .
Other iIIuminants 0
It is recommended that, in the interest of standardization, 065 be used whenever possible.
When 065 cannot be used, it is recommended that one of the daylight illuminants 050, 055,
or 075 defined in Table T.1 be used. When none of these daylight illuminants can be used, a
daylight illuminant at a nominal correlated colour temperature (Tep) can be calculated using
the following equations. These equations will give an illuminant whose correlated colour
temperature is approximately equal to the nominal value, but not exactly S04.
(a) Chromaticity
The 1931 (x,y) chromaticity coordinates of the daylight (D) to be defined must satisfy the
following relation:
Yo = -3,000X02 + 2,870xo - 0,275 (3.2)
with Xo being within the range of 0,250 to 0,380. The correlated colour temperature Tep of
daylight 0 is related to Xo by the following formulae based on normals to the Planckian locus
on a uniform chromaticity diagram (see Section 9.5):
(i) for correlated colour temperatures from approximately 4000 K to 7000 K:
-4,6070x10
9
+ 2,9678x106 + 0,09911x103 +0,244063
(Tep r (Tep (Tep)
(3.3)
(ii) for correlated colour temperatures from greater than 7000 K to approximately 25 000 K:
v Terminology in this publication follows the traditional terminology used in colorimetry. A
separate publication on colorimetry will deal with the current "uncertainty" description of
stating measurement results and will recommend methods for calculating colorimetric
uncertainties.
VI The spectral power distribution tables published in the CIE Standard are reproduced on the
CD-ROM that accompanies this Technical Report.
3
CIE 15:2004
-2,0064x109 + 1,9018x10
6
+ 0,24748x10
3
+0,237040
(rep (rep (rep )
(b) Relative spectral power distribution
The relative spectral power distribution S(A) of daylight 0 is to be computed from
S(A) = o } ~ ) + M
1
S
1
(A) + M
2
S
2
(A)
(3.4)
(3.5)
where So(A), S1(A), S2(A) are functions of wavelength, I" given in Table T.2, and M
1
, M2 are
factors whose values are related to the chromaticity coordinates XD, YD as follows:
M1 = -1,3515-1,7703xD +5,9114YD
0,0241 + 0,2562xD - 0,7341YD
M2 = 0,0300-31,4424xD +30,0717YD
0,0241 + 0,256 2x D - 0,7341y D
Notes on standard illuminant 065 and other illuminants 0
(3.6)
Note 1: Seasonal and geographical variations in the spectral power distribution of daylight
occur, particularly in the ultraviolet spectral region, but this recommendation should
be used pending the availability of further information on these variations.
Note 2: The spectral power distributions of daylight illuminants 0 produced by this
recommendation are based on experimental observations over the wavelength range
330 nm to 700 nm, and on extrapolation in the wavelength ranges 300 nm to 330 nm
and 700 nm to 830 nm (see Judd et aI., 1964). The extrapolated values are believed
to be accurate enough for colorimetric purposes, but should not be used for other
purposes.
Note 3: If values at other wavelengths than those printed in Table T.2 are needed, linear
interpolation should be used (see also Appendix C).
Note 4: The relative spectral power distributions of the 0 illuminants given in Table T.1 and in
the CIE standard on illuminants for colorimetry (CIE, 1998c) were derived by the
procedure given above with some intermediate rounding and with some adjustments
for changes in the International Temperature Scales. Thus for historic reasons, the
tabulated values are slightly different from the calculated values. For the time being
the tabulated values are the official data. (Eventually these data may be superseded
by the method described in Appendix C, which provides a harmonised method of
calculation for trial that will produce congruent results if the modified tables and
equations are used.)
Note 5: 'Mlen samples exhibiting luminescence excited by ultraviolet radiation are involved,
one of the 0 illuminants defined in these recommendations should always be used to
represent daylight.
lIIuminant B
Intended to represent direct sunlight with a correlated colour temperature of approximately
4900 K.
Note: The use of this illuminant is deprecated, see Appendix A.
IIluminant C
Intended to represent average daylight with a correlated colour temperature of approximately
6800 K.
Note 1: Iliuminant C does not have the status of a CIE standard but its relative spectral power
distribution, tristimulus values and chromaticity coordinates are given in Table T.1
and Table T.3, as many practical measurement instruments and calculations still use
this illuminant.
Note 2: The tristimulus values and chromaticity coordinates of the illuminant C and of 050,
4
CIE 15:2004
D55, D75, calculated from the values of S(J,), given in Table T.2., are shown in Table
T.3. The reproduced tristimulus values are those of the perfect reflecting diffuser
irradiated by the respective illuminant, see Section 7.1.1. This table also includes
similar data for CIE standard illuminant A and D65.
3.2 Artificial sources representative of iIIuminants
It is recommended that the following artificial sources be used if it is desired to realise the
illuminants defined in Section 3.1 for actual laboratory inspection.
Source A
CIE standard illuminant A is to be realised by a gas-filled tungsten filament lamp operating at
a correlated colour temperature of 2856 K (C2 = 1 ,4388x1 0-
2
mK). If the source is also to be
used in the UV region, a lamp having an envelope or window made of fused-quartz or silica
must be used because glass absorbs the UV component of the radiation from the filament.
Source B
See Appendix A.
Source C
See Appendix A.
Source D65
At present no artificial source is recommended to realise CIE standard illuminant D65 or any
other illuminant D of different correlated colour temperature. It is hoped that new
developments in light sources and filters will eventually offer sufficient basis for a CIE
recommendation. Meanwhile the CI E has agreed on a formula to describe the quality of a
daylight simulator for colorimetry, see Section 9.3.
Notes on artificial sources representative of illuminants
Note 1: The artificial sources defined above and recommended as representative sources for
CIE illuminants are named "CIE sources for colorimetry".
Note 2: Whenever the highest accuracy of the spectral power distribution of a standard is
required, it is advisable to make a spectroradiometric calibration of the actual source
used, because the relative spectral power distribution of the source may not exactly
coincide at all wavelengths with that defining the corresponding illuminant.
Note 3: The spectrum of a D65 simulator fluorescent lamp is reproduced in Table T.6.2b as
FL3.15, see Section 9.3.
4. RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING STANDARD OF REFLECTANCE
6
The perfect reflecting diffuser is the reference standard for reflectance (CIE, 1986a). It is
defined as the ideal isotropic diffuser with a reflectance equal to unity. For real
measurements, reflectance standards, such as pressed barium sulphate or PTFE (known
also under the trade names Algoflon, Halon, Spectralon), must be calibrated in terms of the
perfect reflecting diffuser (see CIE, 1979a; CIE, 1979b) for the required geometry.
5. RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING GEOMETRIC CONDITIONS FOR
COLORIMETRy7
Colorimetric specifications are derived from spectral or tristimulus measurements. The
measured values depend on the geometric relationships between the measuring instrument
and the sample. These relationships are called "geometric conditions" or Simply "geometry".
Similarly, visual appraisals of coloured samples are affected by illuminating and viewing
geometry. The degree of correlation between measured values and visual appraisals
depends on the degree to which the geometric conditions of measurement simulate the
geometric conditions of viewing. (The use of the term "viewing" with reference to measuring
5
CIE 15:2004
instruments is deprecated because it blurs the important distinction between instrumental
measurements and visual observation.)
Terms and definitions used in this Section of CIE 15:2004 introduce a terminology not
used in previous versions of CIE 15, they are the following:
reference plane
plane in which the surface of a sample or standard is placed during measurements
For reflection measurements, the geometry is defined with respect to the reference
plane. For transmission measurements, there is a reference plane for the incident
light and a second reference plane, displaced by the sample thickness, for the
transmitted light. The recommendations of this publication are based on the
assumption of negligible thickness.
sampling aperture
area of the reference plane on which measurements are made
The sampling aperture is delimited by the area illuminated or by the area over which
the receiver senses flux, whichever is smaller. If the illuminated area is the larger, the
area measured is said to be "over filled"; if it is the smaller, the area measured is said
to be "under filled".
modulation
generic term for measured ratios such as reflectance, reflectance factor or
transmittance
irradiation or influx (illumination or incidence) geometry
angular distribution of irradiance at the centre of the sampling aperture
reflection/transmission or efflux (col/ection, measuring) geometry
angular distribution of receiver responsivity with respect to the centre of the sampling
aperture
Note: The influx and efflux geometry specify the geometric nature of the measurement.
It is recommended that the geometry used when determining the colorimetric
specification of diffusely reflecting samples corresponds to one of the following irradiating
(influx) and reflection/transmission (efflux) conditions vn
5.1 Recommended nomenclature for directional irradiation
5.1.1 Forty-five degree directional geometry (45x)
Irradiation of reflecting materials at 45 to the normal, at one azimuth angle, emphasizes
texture and directionality. The "x" in the symbol indicates that the azimuthal direction of the
incident beam is in the x direction on the reference plane.
5.1.2 Forty-five degree annular geometry (45a)
In measuring the colours of reflecting samples with 45 illumination, the effects of texture and
directionality are minimized by irradiating at 45 to the normal, from all azimuthal directions,
simultaneously. This irradiation (influx) geometry may be achieved by the use of a small
source and an elliptic ring reflector or other aspheric optics. This geometry is sometimes
approximated by the use of a number of light sources in a ring or a number of fibre bundles
illuminated by a single source and terminated in a ring. Such an approximation to annular
geometry is called circumferential geometry, symbol 45c.
5.1.3 Zero degree directional geometry (0)
Irradiation of reflecting materials at the normal.
VII Users of this report should check with the CIE list of publications for a technical report on
this subject.
6
CIE 15:2004
5.1.4 Eight degree geometry (8)
Irradiation of reflecting materials at 8 to the normal, at one azimuth angle. It is used to
substitute the zero-degree directional geometry in many practical applications, as in reflection
measurements it permits differentiation between specular component included and excluded
measurements.
5.2 Recommended geometry for reflection measurements
5.2.1 Diffuse: eight-degree geometry, specular component included (di:8)
For di:8 geometry, it is recommended that the sample be irradiated by an integrating
sphereS, that the measured area be overfilled, that the area of the sampling aperture be
uniformly irradiated, that it be irradiated uniformly from all directions within the hemisphere
bounded by its plane, that the responsivity of the receiver be uniform over the area of the
sampling aperture, that the axis of the reflected (efflux) beam be 8 off the normal to the
centre of the sample, and that radiation reflected at the sampling aperture be evaluated
uniformly at all directions within 5 of the axis of the collection (efflux) beam. The size of the
sampling aperture, area and angular uniformity of irradiation, angular displacement of the
collected (efflux) beam from the normal, and area and angular uniformity of responsivity of the
receiver can affect measured values and may be standardized in the future.
5.2.2 Diffuse: eight-degree geometry, specular component excluded (de:8)
It is recommended that the specifications for di:8 be met, except that there be no radiation
reflected in the direction of the receiver by a plane first-surface mirror at the sampling
aperture and that there be no rays specularly reflected within 1 of such rays, as an allowance
for instrumental scattering of stray light or misalignment. The amount of stray light specularly
reflected in the direction of the receiver may affect measured values and may be
standardized in the future.
5.2.3 Eight degree: diffuse geometry, specular component included (8:di)
It is recommended that the conditions for di:8be met, but with the light path reversed, so the
sampling aperture is irradiated under 8 and flux reflected at the sampling aperture is
collected at all angles in the hemisphere bounded by the reference plane. The sampling
aperture should be underfilled with radiation.
5.2.4 Eight degree: diffuse geometry, specular component excluded (8:de)
It is recommended that the geometric conditions for de:8 be met, but with the light path
reversed. The sampling aperture should be underfilled with radiation.
5.2.5 Diffuse / diffuse geometry (d:d)
It is recommended that for irradiation the specifications for di:8 be met, and flux reflected at
the sampling aperture is collected at all angles in the hemisphere bounded by the reference
plane. In this geometry the sampling aperture can be neither underfilled nor overfilled.
5.2.6 Alternative diffuse geometry (d:OO)
An alternative diffuse geometry is the strict specular excluded geometry defined when the
efflux direction is along the specimen normal.
5.2.7 Forty-five degree annular / normal geometry (45a:OO)
It is recommended that the sampling aperture be irradiated uniformly from all directions
between two right circular cones with their axes on the normal to the sampling aperture and
apices at the centre of the sampling aperture, the smaller cone having a half angle of 40 and
the larger of 50. It is recommended that the receiver uniformly collects and evaluates all
radiation reflected within a cone with its axis on the normal to the sampling aperture, apex at
the centre of the sampling aperture, and a half angle of 5. If this illuminating geometry is
approximated by the use of a number of light sources in a ring or a number of fibre bundles
illuminated by a single source and terminated in a ring, one gets the circumferential/normal
7
CIE 15:2004
geometry (45c:OO). The above angular specifications should also hold for this geometry.
These angular specifications and the surface and angular uniformity of irradiation and sensing
may affect measured values and may be standardized in the future.
5.2.8 Normal I farly-five degree annular geometry (0:45a)
It is recommended that the angular and spatial conditions for 45a:O be met, with the light
path reversed, so the sampling aperture is irradiated normally and reflected radiation is
collected within an annulus centred at 45to the normal.
5.2.9 Forty-five degree directional I normal geometry (45x:OO)
It is recommended that the angular and spatial conditions for 45a:0 be met with the
exception that irradiation is only at one azimuth angle, this excludes the specular component,
but emphasizes texture and directionality. The "x" in the symbol indicates that the azimuthal
direction of the incident beam is in the x direction on the reference plane.
5.2.10 Normal I forty-five degree directional geometry (O:45x)
It is recommended that the angular and spatial conditions for 45x:0 be met, with the light
path reversed, so the sampling aperture is irradiated normally and reflected radiation is
collected at one azimuth angle at 45to the normal.
Notes on recommended geometry for reflection measurements
Note 1: Conditions 5.2.1,5.2.2,5.2.6,5.2.7,5.2.8,5.2.9 and 5.2.10 give values of reflectance
factor, R(},). For directional measurement with a sufficiently small angular spread,
these values of reflectance factor become identical to values of radiance factor. For
condition 5.2.3, for measuring with an ideal sphere, reflectance is measured. Thus, in
the limit, the 45x:0 condition gives the radiance factor 13450; the 0:45x condition
gives the radiance factor /3045; the di:8 condition gives the factor fJdiS; that
approximates the radiance factor fJd:O; and the 8:di condition gives the reflectance p
(see CIE, 1987).
Note 2: It is important that the particular irradiating and measuring conditions used should be
specified even if they are within the range of one of these recommended standard
conditions. Measurements of some types of samples (for example retro-reflective
materials) may require different geometry or tolerances.
Note 3: When integrating spheres are used, they should be fitted with white-coated baffles to
prevent light passing directly between the sample and the spot of the sphere wall
irradiated or measured. When the regular component of reflection is to be included,
the sphere efficiency for that part of sphere wall that receives the regularly reflected
radiation component should be of the same reflectance value as the sphere wall. The
total area of the ports of the integrating sphere should not exceed 10 percent of the
internal reflecting sphere area.
Note 4: It should be noted that diffusing samples may scatter radiation in directions
approximately parallel to their surfaces, and such radiation should be included in the
measurement of diffuse reflectance.
Note 5: When integrating spheres are used for measuring luminescent samples, the spectral
power distribution of the irradiating system is altered by the reflected and emitted
power from the sample (see CIE, 1988). The use of the 45a:0, 45x:0 or 0:45a,
0:45x condition is therefore preferable (see Gundlach and Mallwitz, 1976; Alman
and Billmeyer, 1976).
5.3 Recommended geometry for transmission measurements
5.3.1 Normal I normal geometry (0:0)
It is recommended that the irradiating (influx) and measuring (efflux) geometry be of identical
right-circular conic form, with their axes on the normal to the centre of the sampling aperture,
and half-angle of 5, that the surface and angular irradiation of the sampling aperture be
8
CIE 15:2004
uniform, and that the surface and angular responsivity of the receiver be uniform. Deviation of
axes from normal and variations in surface and angular conditions may affect measured
values and may be standardized in the future.
5.3.2 Diffuse / normal geometry, regular component included (di:OO)
It is recommended that the sampling aperture be uniformly irradiated from all directions in the
hemisphere bounded by the first reference plane and that the measuring (efflux) beam be as
specified for 0:0 geometry. Deviation of the measuring (efflux) axis from normal and
variations in surface and angular conditions may affect measured values and may be
standardized in the future.
5.3.3 Diffuse / normal geometry, regular component excluded (de:OO)
It is recommended that the geometry be that specified for di:O except that, with the sampling
aperture open (i.e. no sample in place), there be no rays directed toward the receiver and no
rays within 1 of such rays, as measured at the centre of the sampling aperture.
5.3.4 Normal/diffuse geometry, regular component included (oo:di)
It is recommended that the geometry be the reverse of that specified for di:O geometry.
5.3.5 Normal/diffuse geometry, regular component excluded (Oo:de)
It is recommended that the geometry be the reverse of that specified for de:O geometry.
5.3.6 Diffuse / diffuse geometry (d:d)
It is recommended that the sampling aperture be uniformly irradiated at all angles within the
hemisphere bounded by the first reference plane and that the transmitted flux be uniformly
evaluated at all directions within the hemisphere bounded by the second reference plane.
Notes on recommended geometry for transmission measurements
Note 1: All the above conditions measure transmittance except for those where the regular
component is excluded when the quantity measured is transmittance factor.
Note 2: It is important that the particular irradiating and collecting conditions used are specified,
even if they are within the range of one of the conditions recommended here.
Measurements of some types of samples may require different geometry or tolerances.
Note 3: Integrating spheres shall be fitted with white-coated baffles to prevent radiation
passing directly from source to sample or reference in the case of diffuse irradiation
or directly from sample or reference to detector in the case of diffuse collection. The
total area of the ports of the integrating sphere should not exceed 10 percent of the
internal reflecting sphere area.
Note 4: The construction of an instrument for normal/normal measurements shall be such that
the irradiating (influx) and collecting (efflux) beams shall be equal whether there is a
sample in place or not.
Note 5: It should be noted that diffusing samples may scatter radiation in directions
approximately parallel to their surfaces. and such radiation should be included in the
measurement of diffuse transmittance.
Note 6: Multiple reflections between the sample and the incident beam optics if the incident
beam is normal to the sample surface may cause measurement errors. These can be
eliminated by slightly tilting the sample.
6. RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING STANDARD OBSERVER DATA
9
6.1 CIE 1931 standard colorimetric observer
For correlation with visual colour matching of fields subtending between about 1 and about
4 at the eye of the observer, it is recommended that colorimetric specifications of colour
9
CIE 15:2004
stimuli be based on the colour-matching functions x(.1,), Y(.1,), Z().) 10. A 2
0
visual field
represents a diameter of about 17 mm at a viewing distance of 0,5 m. These colour-matching
functions are given in the standard as values from 360 nm to 830 nm at 1 nm intervals with
seven significant figures, and they define the CIE 1931 standard colorimetric observer (in
technical applications often written as 2-standard colorimetric observer)VIIi. In the case where
more coarsely sampled data will produce no significant calculation error, the tables
reproduced in Section 11 may be used instead of the 1 nm interval data. The values given in
Table TA at 5 nm intervals are selected values from the standard, rounded to six decimal
places
11
.
Note 1: x(J,), y(J,), z(.1,) are the normalized tristimulus values of monochromatic radiations for
a set of reference stimuli [Xl, [V], [Z) required to match each wavelength of the equi-
energy spectrum. Their levels are such that the maximum of y(2) is unity and L x(J,)
= LZ(.1,) = LY(2). (The equi-energy spectrum is radiation whose spectral
concentration of power as a function of wavelength is constant.)
Note 2: The real reference stimuli [RJ, [G], [B] of the original trichromatic system lead, by
transformation, to [X], [V], [Z]. y(J,) is equated to V(.1,), the spectral luminous efficiency
function for photopic vision, defining the Cl E standard photometric observer for
photopic vision (for more details see Appendix B).
Note 3: The reference stimuli [X], [V], [Z] were chosen for reasons of convenience in
colorimetric computations. The colour-matching functions x(2) , y(.1,), z(2) are
commonly used to obtain the tristimulus values X, Y, Z of colour stimuli (see Section
7.1 for details).
Note 4: If the colour-matching functions at closer intervals than given in Table TA are required,
the values given in the CIE Standard S002 (CIE, 19868) should be used. For
interpolation at wavelength intervals smaller than 1 nm a linear interpolation should be
used.
Note 5: The chromaticity coordinates (see Section 7.3) x(J,), y(2), z(}.) of the spectral stimuli
are the ratios
x(.1,) = x(.1,)
x(2) + Y(.1,) + z(2)
Y(X)= y(2) (6.1)
x(2) + Y(.1,) + z(.1,)
z(.1,) = z().)
x(2) + y(.1,) + z(.1,)
x(.1,) and y(.1,) are given in Table 1.4.
Note 6: The chromaticity coordinates XE, YE, ZE of the equi-energy spectrum derived from the
sums LX(.1,),Ly(.1,),Lz(J.) ofTable1.4are
XE = 0,333 334
YE = 0,333 331
ZE = 0,333 335
(6.2)
The small differences between the values of the chromaticity coordinates XE, YE, ZE
are due to the limited number of decimal digits given in the table.
6.2 CIE 1964 standard colorimetric observer
For correlation with visual colour matching of fields of angular subtense greater than 4
0
at the
eye of the observer, it is recommended that colorimetric specifications of colour stimuli be
VIII Table 1 of CIE standard colorimetric observers (CIE, 1986a) is reproduced in the CD-ROM
that accompanies this Technical Report.
10
CIE 15:2004
based on the colour-matching functions X1Q(J,), Y1O(A), Z1Q(J,) published in the CIE Standard:
CIE standard colorimetric observers (CIE, 1986a). A 10visual field represents a diameter of
about 90 mm at a viewing distance of 0,5 m. These colour-matching functions are given in the
standard as values from 360 nm to 830 nm at 1 nm intervals with six significant figures, and
they define the CIE 1964 standard colorimetric observer (in technical applications often
written as 10-standard colorimetric observer)lx. In the case more coarsely sampled data will
produce no significant calculation error, the tables reproduced in Section 11 may be used
instead of the 1-nm interval data. The values given in Table T.5 at 5 nm intervals are selected
values from the standard, rounded to six decimal places.
Note 1: X
10
(A), Yd},), ZlO(J,) are the normalized tristimulus values of monochromatic
radiations for a set of reference stimuli [X
lO
], [YlO] , [ZlO] required to match each
wavelength of the equi-energy spectrum. Their levels are such that the maximum of
YdA) is unity and LX
10
(A) = LY10()') = LZ
10
(A) (The equi-energy spectrum is
radiation whose spectral concentration of power as a function of wavelength is
constant.)
Note 2: The real reference stimuli [R
lO
], [G
10
], [BlO] of the original trichromatic system are
related by transformation to the reference stimuli [X
10
], [Y
10
], [ZlO], which were
chosen for reasons of convenience in colorimetric computations (see Appendix B).
The colour-matching functions, X1Q(A), Y1Q(A), ZlO(A) are commonly used to obtain the
tristimulus values X
10
, Y
lO
, Z10 of colour stimuli.
Note 3: If the colour-matching functions of Table T.5 are required at closer intervals, the values
at 1 nm intervals given in the standard, CIE standard colorimetric observers (CIE,
1986a) should be used. For values at other than the 1 nm intervals see Note 4 to 6.1.
Note 4: The chromaticity coordinates X10(A), Y1O(A) , Z10(A) of the spectral stimuli are the ratios
(
") _ x10 (.-i)
x
10
/L -
x
10
(,1,) +Y10(,1,) + Z10(J,)
YlO(A) = Y10(}')
x
10
(J,) +Y10(;Q +Z10(..1)
X
10
(J,) +YlO(..1) + ZlO(,1,)
X1Q(,-i) and Y1O(}') are given in Table T.5.
(6.3)
Note 5: The chromaticity coordinates XlO,E, YlO,E, ZlO,E of the equi-energy spectrum derived
from the sums LX1Q(,1,), LY1o(,1,), LZ
lO
(A)ofTable T.5 are
XIO,E = 0,333298
YIO,E = 0,333 336
ZIO,E = 0,333 366
(6.4)
The small differences between the values of the chromaticity coordinates X10E, Y10E,
ZlOE are due to the limited number of decimal digits given in the table.
Note 6. The large-field colour matching data as defined by the CIE 1964 standard colorimetric
observer are intended to apply to matches where the luminance and the relative
spectral power distributions of the matched stimuli are such that no participation of
the rod receptors of the visual mechanism is to be expected. This condition of
observation is important as "rod intrusion" may upset the predictions of the standard
observer. For daylight, possible participation of rod vision in colour matches is likely
to diminish progressively above about 10 cdm-
2
and be entirely absent at about
200 cdm-
2
. For further details see 12
IX Table 2 of CIE standard colorimetric observers (CIE, 1986a) is reproduced on the CD-ROM
that accompanies this Technical Report.
11
CIE 15:2004
The CIE 1931 and 1964 standard colorimetric observers were both derived from
trichromatic systems based on real red [R], green [G] and blue [B] primaries, see Appendix B.
7. RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING THE CALCULATION OF TRISTIMULUS
VALUES AND CHROMATICITY COORDINATES
13
7.1 Calculation of tristimulus values
The CIE Standard (CIE, 1986a) on standard colorimetric observers recommends that the CIE
tristimulus values of a colour stimulus be obtained by multiplying at each wavelength the
value of the colour stimulus function I/JA(A) by that of each of the CIE colour-matching
functions and integrating each set of products over the wavelength range corresponding to
the entire visible spectrum, 360 nm to 830 nm. The integration can be carried out by
numerical summation at wavelength intervals, equal to 1 nm.
x = k
;.
y =
/.
XlO = klO ;. (A)XlO(A),dA
/.
Yjo = k
10
17 ;. (),lY10(A)LiA
).
ZlO = k
10
9;. (A)Z10(A),dA
A
(7.1)
In the above equations 9;.{).) denotes the spectral distribution of the colour stimulus
function, i.e. AA) = d(A)/dA, see CIE International Lighting Vocabulary item 845-01-17 (CIE,
1987). X, Y, Z are tristimulus values, X(A), y().), z().) are colour-matching functions of a
standard colorimetric observer, and k is a normalising constant defined below. Each of these
may be specified for the CIE 1931 standard colorimetric system by being written without a
subscript, orfor the CIE 1964 standard colorimetric system by the use of the subscript 10.
The fundamental colorimetric tables are the 1 nm tables in CIE standards. All
rigorous calculations should use these 1 nm tables. For most practical purposes, the
summation may be approximated by using wavelength intervals, equal to 5 nm over the
wavelength range 380 nm to 780 nm. Values of the CIE colour-matching functions at 5 nm
intervals suitable for use in summation over this range of wavelengths are given in Tables T.4
and T.5. When measurements have been made at smaller intervals than 5 nm, the
appropriate values from the tables in the standards should be used.
Tristimulus values are usually evaluated on a relative basis. In such cases the
relative colour stimulus function, 9 (A), may be used instead of the colour stimulus function,
;.(A) , but it is essential that, for stimuli that will be considered together, all the spectral
distributions involved be assessed on the same relative basis. The tristimulus values obtained
are then relative in the sense that all the values involved may be multiplied by the same single
arbitrary constant. In certain cases, however, k and klO must be chosen according to agreed
conventions; these are explained in Sections 7.1.1 and 7.1.2.
Tristimulus values evaluated on a relative basis may need to be supplemented by the
value of a suitable absolute photometric quantity.
7.1.1 Secondary light sources (reflecting or transmitting objects)
For reflecting or transmitting object colours, the colour stimulus function, A(A) , is replaced by
the relative colour stimulus function, (A), evaluated as
(A) = R(A)'S(),) or (A) = r(A),S(A)
where: R(A) is the spectral reflectance factor (or spectral radiance factor or spectral
reflectance) of the object colour (preferably evaluated for one of the geometric
conditions given in Section 5.2).
12
r(A) is the spectral transmittance of the object colour (preferably evaluated for one
of the geometric conditions given in Section 5.3).
S().) is the relative spectral power distribution of the illuminant (which, whenever
CIE 15:2004
possible, should be one of the CIE standard illuminants; see Section 3.1).
In this case, the constants, k and k10, are chosen so that Y = 100 for objects for which
R(A), or r(},) = 1 for all wavelengths, and hence
k = 100ILS(A)'y(A)ld
A
klO = 1 DOl L S(,AlY10 (},)LU
A
(7.2)
For other objects, the values of Yare then equal to the percentage values of
luminous reflectance factor or luminance factor or luminous reflectance [in the case of R(A)],
or luminous transmittance or luminous transmittance factor [in the case of r(A)]; this is
because the Y(A) function is identical to the CIE spectral luminous efficiency function V(A(
7.1.2 lIIuminants and self-luminous objects
For self-luminous objects and illuminants, the constants, k and klO, are usually chosen on the
grounds of convenience. If, however, in the CIE 1931 standard colorimetric system, the Y
value is required to be numerically equal to the absolute value of a photometric quantity, the
constant, k, must be put equal to the numerical value of Km, the maximum spectral luminous
efficacy (which is equal to 683 Im.W1) and 1/1;.(..1) must be the spectral concentration of the
radiometric quantity corresponding to the photometric quantity required.
7.2 The use of abridged or truncated data
The use of the tables published in the CIE standard on colorimetric observers (CIE, 19868)
requires that the colour stimulus function, (h(A) , or the relative colour stimulus function, (A),
be known at 1 nm wavelength intervals over the wavelength range 360 nm to 830 nm. In
practical applications, all the required data may not be available because the measurement
was made at intervals greater than 1 nm, or unequal wavelength intervals were used, or data
at the spectral extremes were omitted (truncation). Often it is possible to predict the needed
but unmeasured data. It is recognised that calculation from predicted, rather than from
measured, data, or from abridged or truncated data, may be inexact, but the investigator can
often be satisfied that the accuracy is sufficient for the intended use of the tristimulus values.
It is important to use the same wavelength interval and range throughout for any set of
calculations in which data for different colours are to be compared precisely. In particular, it
should be noted that the exact values obtained for the perfect diffuser for a given illuminant
depend on the wavelength interval and range used
14
7.2.1 Abridgement
Abridgement of colour stimulus data by the use of a larger sampling interval, for example
10 nm or 20 nm, will lead to errors in the computed tristimulus values. Such abridgement
should be used only when it can be demonstrated that these errors are negligibly small for the
intended use of the tristimulus values. If these errors are not negligible, it is recommended
that needed but unmeasured values of (h.l).), R(},) , or r{A) be predicted by adequate
interpolation.
Note 1: Spectral reflectance and transmittance curves are usually smooth enough and
continuous to permit interpolation, while e.g. spectral power distribution data of gas
discharge lamps are frequently not suited for interpolation. Using interpolated values
of spectral power distribution data of such lamps may lead to considerable errors.
x CIE Division 1 is currently investigating whether a V10().) function should be introduced,
where V
lO
(A) = Y10(A). Interested parties should check the latest CIE publication list or the
recent edition of the International Lighting Vocabulary on the introduction of such a new
definition. At the closing of the present edition of CIE 15 no V
1o
(A) function has been officially
agreed (for further details see Appendix 8).
13
CIE 15:2004
Note 2: Measurement errors also arise from the bandwidth of a spectrometer. Even if the data
interval is 1 nm, the colorimetric errors can be significant if the bandwidth of the
spectrometer is large. See 7.2.5 for bandwidth requirements.
7.2.1.1 Interpolation
Use one of the four following methods to calculate needed but unmeasured values of J2),
R(,1) or 1\,1) within the range of measurements: 1) the third-order polynomial interpolation
(Lagrange) from the four neighbouring data pOints around the point to be interpolated, or 2)
cubic spline interpolation formula, or 3) a fifth order polynomial interpolation formula from the
six neighboring data points around the point to be interpolated, or 4) a Sprague interpolation
(see Seve, 2003)XI
Note: Experiments have shown that for most samples showing smooth reflectance or
transmittance spectra, the computed tristimulus values will have an adequate
accuracy if measured data, illuminant and colour-matching function values at 5 nm
intervals are used. See also Note to Section 7.2.3.
7.2.2 Truncation
lMlere the measurement range is less than the practical range of summation, 380 nm to
780 nm, omission of values at the limits of the measurement range will lead to errors in the
computed tristimulus values. Such truncation should be used only when it can be demonstrated
that these errors are negligibly small for the intended use of the tristimulus values.
Note: If these errors due to limited measurement range are not negligibly small, the errors
might be reduced by adequate extrapolation of the needed but unmeasured values of
.2), R(J,) or 1\/"). The range of the summation is an essential part of the tristimulus
specification.
7.2.2.1 Extrapolation
Extrapolation is generally not recommended. However, when predicting needed but
unmeasured values of x(2) or (2) outside the range of measurements, in the absence of
other information, unmeasured values of ;.(,1), [(,1)] or of P(,1), f3 V,), or r(/") may, as a rough
approximation, be set equal to the nearest measured value of the appropriate quantity in
truncation.
7.2.3 Weighting factors
In the case of repetitive calculations from measurements at the same wavelengths, it is often
convenient to perform only once those calculations that are independent of the measured
data. This results in a table of weighting factors. Such weighting factors should give results
consistent with those from the normal calculations. It is recommended that tables of weighting
factors be calculated for the full range of wavelengths, 360 nm to 830 nm. This provides
tables that may be used for any degree of truncation by adding the weights at the
unmeasured wavelengths to those at the extreme measured wavelengths. The sum of the
weights at the unmeasured wavelengths is a measure of the maximum error introduced by
truncation.
Note: If it has been checked that measurement data obtained only at 10 nm or 20 nm
intervals satisfy the need of the observer, computation methods as described e.g. in
ASTM (1999) might be used. This publication contains weighting factors for both the
CIE 1931 standard colorimetric observer and the CIE 1964 standard colorimetric
observer and a number of illuminants and practical light sources used in colorimetry.
Its Table 5 has been developed for the case when the instrument manufacturer has
built in a correction to zero bandwidth (see Fairman, 1985). Its Table 6 provides
XI A CIE Technical Committee is currently working on a standardized method of interpolation,
interested parties should check the latest CIE publication list for more information. The CO-
RaM accompanying this report contains PC interpolation programs for linear, Lagrange,
spline and Sprague interpolation.
14
CIE 15:2004
weighting factors for the case when a correction to a zero bandwidth is required (see
also Venable, 1989; Li et aI., 2004; ASTM, 2001 and ASTM, 2003).
7.2.4 Numerical procedures
It is recommended that all numerical calculations be carried out using the full number of
significant digits provided by the data in the Tables published in the CIE standards of
colorimetry. Final results should be rounded to the number of significant digits indicated by
the precision of the measurements.
Note 1: For the purpose of calculating tristimulus values, the quantities involved for secondary
light sources shall be defined as points of a continuous distribution, each point
representing an infinitely narrow range of wavelengths. For primary light sources the
relative emitted power is regarded as emitted in a wavelength band equal to the
measuring interval and centred around the nominal wavelength.
Note 2: For colour stimulus functions of primary light sources that vary rapidly with
wavelength, the spectral bandwidth at half power of the measuring instrument used to
determine the colour stimulus function should be equal to, or an integer multiple of,
the measuring interval. For smoothly varying functions this restriction is less
important. For the highest accuracy, a bandwidth of 1 nm may be used for the
measuring instrument, but for most practical purposes a bandwidth and measurement
interval of 5 nm may be used. The use of bandwidths of 10 nm, or 20 nm is not
recommended; it can lead to considerable loss of accuracy, and if applied, should be
checked on typical spectra. For practical measurements a trade-off between
bandwidth and signal-to-noise ratio has to be found, as the latter will influence
photometric accuracy. A signal-to-noise ratio of 1 :10-
4
when measuring an ideal white
sample is adequate for most applications.
Note 3: The foregoing recommendations are based on measurements at equal intervals of
wavelength. It is, however, not intended to imply that summations may properly be
computed only with such intervals. Other summation procedures, including
specifically the method of selected ordinates, may be used providing that the
tristimulus values thus computed are consistent with those based on the above
recommendations.
7.2.5 Bandwidth of a spectrometer
When discussing errors associated with data intervals, it is also important to know
measurement errors (uncertainties) due to the bandwidth of a spectrometer because, in real
measurements, the data interval (scanning interval) and the bandwidth are closely related
with each other to affect the measurement results.
Measurement errors arising from the bandwidth of a spectrometer are generally much
larger (by an order of magnitude) than the calculation errors associated with data intervals.
Even if the data interval is 1 nm (or interpolated to 1 nm intervals), the colorimetric errors can
be significant if bandwidth of the spectrometer is large. See also Section 7.2.4 Note 2.
7.3 Calculation of chromaticity coordinates
It is recommended that chromaticity coordinates (x, y, z) be derived from the tristimulus
values (X, Y, Z) as follows:
x
X
X+Y+Z
Y
y=----
X+Y+Z
Z
z=----
X+Y+Z
(7.3)
Because of the relation x + y + z = 1, it suffices to quote x, y only. The diagram using
the chromaticity coordinates x, y is referred to as the CIE 1931 chromaticity diagram or the
CIE (x, y) (chromaticity) diagram.
15
CIE 15:2004
Note: The chromaticity coordinates XlO, Yl0, ZlO are computed similarly from the tristimulus
values X
lO
, Y
lO
, ZlO; the CIE 1964 chromaticity diagram is obtained using these
values.
7.4 Equations representing relationships between colour stimuli 16
When equations are used to represent relationships between colour stimuli, symbols of vector
notation should be used instead of those for numerical relationships. For example, one of the
following forms could be used:
[C] "" X[X] + Y[Yj + Z[Z]
or (7.4)
C =XX+YY+ZZ
where X, Y, Z are the tristimulus values of colour stimulus [C], or C. The unit vectors of the
reference stimuli are indicated either by [X], [Y], [Z], or by the boldface Roman letters X, Y, Z.
Note: In Equ. 7.4 the "",," and "=" signs mean "matches".
8. RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING UNIFORM COLOUR SPACING AND
COLOUR DIFFERENCES
16
8.1 CIE 1976 uniform chromaticity scale diagram (UCS diagram)
The use of the following chromaticity diagram is recommended whenever a projective
transformation of the (x,y)-diagram yielding colour spacing perceptually more uniform than
that of the (x,y)-diagram is desired. The chromaticity diagram is produced by plotting
u' = 4X I (X + 15 Y + 3Z)
as abscissa and (8.1 )
v' = 9Y I (X + 15Y +3Z)
as ordinate, in which X, Y, Z are tristimulus values. The third chromaticity coordinate w' is
equal to (1 - u' - v').
Note 1: The colour spacing afforded by this chromaticity diagram is known to be perceptually
more uniform than that of the CIE (x,y)-chromaticity diagram for observation of
samples having negligibly different luminances (e.g. for Y<0,5). This diagram is
intended to apply to comparisons of differences between object colours of the same
size and shape, viewed in identical white to middle-grey surroundings, by an observer
photopically adapted to a field of chromaticity not too different from that of average
daylight.
Note 2: The same chromaticity diagram is produced by plotting
u' = 4x I (-2x + 12y + 3) as abscissa and
v' = 9y I (-2x + 12y + 3) as ordinate,
where x, yare chromaticity coordinates.
(8.2)
Note 3: If the angle subtended at the eye by the pairs of specimens being compared is more
than 1 and less than about 4, the tristimulus values X, Y, Z (or chromaticity
coordinates x, y), calculated using the CIE 1931 standard colorimetric observer
should be used for the calculation of u' and v'. If the angle is greater than 4, the
tristimulus values X
10
, Y
lO
, Z10, (or chromaticity coordinates XlO, YlO) of the CIE 1964
standard colorimetric observer should be used to calculate U'lO and V'10.
Note 4: The CI E 1960 UCS diagram, now obsolete, is described briefly in Appendix A.3.
8.2 CIE 1976 uniform colour spaces
Pending the development of an improved coordinate system 17, the use of one of the following
coordinate systems is recommended whenever a three-dimensional spacing perceptually
more nearly uniform than that provided by the XYZ system is desired.
16
CIE 15:2004
8.2.1 CIE 1976 (L *a*b*) colour space; CIELAB colour space
8.2.1.1 Basic coordinates
Three-dimensional, approximately uniform, colour space produced by plotting in rectangular
coordinates, L *, a*, b*, quantities defined by the equations
L* = 116 f(YIY
n
)-16 (8.3)
a* = 500[f(XIXn) - f(YIY
n
)] (8.4)
b* = 200[f( YIY
n
) - f(llln)]
(8.5)
where
f(XIX
n
) = (XIX
n
) 113 if (XIX
n
) > (24/116)3 (8.6)
f(XIX
n
) = (841/108)(XIX
n
)+16/116 if (XIX
n
) :::; (24/116)3 (8.7)
and
f( YIY
n
) = (YIY
n
) 1/3 if (YIY
n
) > (24/116)3 (8.8)
f(YlY
n
) = (841/108)(YlY
n
) +161116 if (YIY
n
) :::; (24/116)3 (8.9)
and
f(llln) = (II In) 1/3 if (Illn) > (24/116)3 (8.10)
f(llln) = (841/108)(z/ln) +161116 if (II In) :::; (24/116)3 (8.11)
where X, Y,l are the tristimulus values of the test object colour stimulus considered and X
n
,
Yn, In are the tristimulus values of a specified white object colour stimulus. In most cases, the
specified white object colour stimulus should be light reflected from a perfect reflecting
diffuser illuminated by the same light source as the test object. In this case, X
n
, Yn, In are the
tristimulus values of the light source with Y
n
equal to 100
18
..
The informative annex Appendix D describes the recommended reverse
transformation of the L *, a*, b* coordinates to X, Y, I tristimulus values.
8.2.1.2 Correlates of lightness, chroma and hue
Approximate correlates of the perceived attributes lightness, chroma and hue are calculated
as follows
CIE 1976 lightness:
CIE 1976 a,b (CIELAB) chroma
CIE 1976 a,b (CIELAB) hue angle:
see Section 8.2.3 Note 1 and Note 2.
8.2.1.3 Colour differences
L* as defined in Equ. 8.3.
C* ab = (a*2 + b*2) 1/2
hab = arctan (b*/a*)
(8.12)
(8.13)
Euclidean distances in CIELAB colour space can be used to represent approximately the
perceived magnitude of colour differences between object colour stimuli of the same size and
shape, viewed in identical white to middle-grey surroundings, by an observer photopically
adapted to a field of chromaticity not too different from that of average daylight. In cases of
deviating conditions the correlation between calculated and perceived colour differences may
be impaired.
Differences between two samples (denoted by subscripts 0 and 1) shall be calculated
as follows:
CIELAB lightness difference: tJ.L* = L*1- L*o
tJ.a* = a*1 - a*o
flb* = b*1 - b*o
CIELAB chroma difference: tJ.C* ab = C*ab.l - C*ab.o
(8.14)
(8.15)
(8.16)
(8.17)
17
CIE 15:2004
CIELAB hue angle difference: (8.18)
If the line joining the two colours crosses the positive a * axis, Equ. 8.18 will give a value
outside the range 1800, in this case, the value of I'1hab must be corrected by adding or
subtracting 360to bring it within this range, see also Section 8.2.3 Note 4.
CIELAB hue difference I'1H* ab = 2( C* ab.1 C* ab.o) 1I2,sin(l'1.hab/2) (8.19)
for small colour differences away from the achromatic axis
t,H*ab = (C'ab,1,C*.b,O)1/2.t,hab (8.20)
where the value of I'1hab is in radians.
Note 1: The calculation of CIELAB hue and chroma differences is progressively less useful as
the absolute value of b.hab approaches 180.
Note 2: In information technology and other fields the subscript (R) is sometimes used for
reference and (T) for test instead of (0) and (1). Similarly in industrial evaluation of
small colour differences (s) is sometimes used for standard and (b) for batch.
CIE 1976 a,b (CIELAB) colour difference, I'1E*ab between two colour stimuli is calculated as
the Euclidean distance between the points representing them in the space:
(8.21)
or (8.22)
these two definitions of I'1E*ab are equivalent.
Alternative ways of calculating I'1.H*ab are:
(8.23)
where I'1E*ab is calculated from Equ. 8.21, and I'1H*ab has the same sign as I'1hab;
(8.24)
where k = -1 if a * 1 . b * 0 > a * 0 . b * 1 ' otherwise k = 1 ;
and (8.25)
More details on these alternative methods of calculating ,'\H*ab are given in Seve
(1991), Stokes and Brill (1992) and Seve (1996).
Note: In different practical applications it may be necessary to use different weightings for
I'1L *, I'1C*ab, and I'1H*ab. In 2001, the CIE recommended such weightings in a new
formula for industrial evaluation of small colour differences (CIE, 2001a), see Section
8.3.
8.2.2 CIE 1976 (L *u*v*) colour space; CIELUV colour space
Three-dimensional, approximately uniform, colour space produced by plotting in rectangular
coordinates, L *, u*, v*, quantities defined by the equations
L* = 116 f(YIY
n
) -16
See also Equ. 8.3, where
18
(8.26)
if (YlY
n
) > 1 ~ ~ r
(8.27)
and
f(YIY
n
) = (841/108)(Y/Yn) +161116
u* = 13L*(u' - u'n)
v* = 13L *(v' - v'n)
CIE 15:2004
(8.28)
(8.29)
(8.30)
where Y, u', v' describe the colour stimulus considered and Yn, u'n. v'n describe a specified
white object colour stimulus.
Approximate correlates of lightness, saturation, chroma, and hue may be calculated
as follows:
CIE 1976 lightness:
CIE 1976 u, v (CIELUV) saturation:
CIE 1976 u,v (CIELUV) chroma:
CIE 1976, u, v (CIELUV) hue-angle:
See 8.2.3, Note 2.
L * as defined in Section 8.2.1.1
and Equ. 8.26.
su.v = 13 [(u' - U'n)2 + (v'_v'n)2]112
C\v = (U*2 + V*2)112 = L*suv
huv = arctan[(v' - v'n)/(U' - u'n)]
= arctan(v*lu*)
(8.31 )
(8.32)
(8.33)
CIE 1976 u, v (CIELUV) hue-difference: t,.H* uv = 2( C\v.1 . C\vo) 1/2sin(t,.h
u
j2) (8.34)
where 1 and 0 refer to the two samples between which the colour difference is to be
calculated and t,.h
uv
= h
uv
.
1
- huv,o (see Seve, 1991).
CIELUV colour difference t,.E* uv between two colour stimuli is calculated as the Euclidean
distance between the points representing them in the space:
(8.35)
For an alternative ways to calculate t,.H* uv , see the description in 8.2.1, but change a*
to u* and b* to v*.
8.2.3 Notes on CIE 1976 uniform colour spaces
Note 1: lMlen the linear formulae (Equ.'s 8.7, 8.9 or 8.11) are used for XlXn, Y/Ynor ZIZ
n
,
anomalous values of hab may be obtained (McLaren, 1980). Anomalous values are
unlikely to occur for surface colours but may occur for transparent object colours of
low luminance factor lying close to the spectrum locus or purple line.
Note 2: hab (or huv) lies between 0
0
and 90
0
if a* and b* (or u* and v*) are both positive,
between 90
0
and 180
0
if b* (v*) is positive and a* (u*) is negative, between 180
0
and
270
0
if b* and a* (v* and u*) are both negative, and between 270
0
and 360
0
if b* (v*)
is negative and a* (u*) is positive.
Note 3: CI E 1976 a,b and u, v hue-differences are introduced so that a colour difference t,.E*
can be broken up into components t,.L *, t,.C*, and t,.H* whose squares sum to the
square of t,.E*. Differences in CIE 1976 a,b or u,v hue-angle, /\hab (or t,.h
uv
) , do not
have this property.
Note 4: If the line joining the two colours crosses the positive a* (or u*) axis, the value of t,.h
ab
(or t,.h
uv
) must be corrected by adding or subtracting 360 to bring it into the range
1800.
Note 5: These spaces are intended to apply to comparisons of differences between object
colours of the same size and shape, viewed in identical white to middle-grey
surroundings, by an observer photopically adapted to a field of chromaticity not too
different from that of average daylight.
Note 6: If the angle subtended at the eye by the pairs of object colours being compared is
between about 1
0
and 4
0
the tristimulus values X, Y, Z calculated with respect to the
CIE 1931 standard colorimetric observer should be used for the calculation of L *, a*,
b *, u*, v* and hence t,.E* ab, C* ab, Suv, C\v, hab' huv, t,.H'ab, L\H\v. If the angle is greater
19
CIE 15:2004
than 4, the tristimulus values X
lO
, Y
lO
, Z10 calculated with respect to the CIE 1964
standard colorimetric observer should be used to calculate L*10, a*10, b*10, U*lO, V*lO,
and hence ,\E*ab,10, C*ab,10, Suv,10, C\v,10, hab,10, huv.10, I .... H*ab,10, /\H\v,10'
Note 7: The obsolete CIE 1964 uniform colour space and colour difference formula are
described briefly in the Appendix A.
Note 8: In different practical applications it may be necessary to use different weightings for
I1L*, ,,,>C*, and I1H*, see Section 8.3.
Note 9: Equ.'s 8.21 to 8.25 and 8.35 have been replaced for small colour differences by the
new recommendation of the CIE, see Section 8.3.
8.3 Improved industrial colour difference evaluation
8.3.1 CIEDE2000 total colour difference formula
The CIE 1976 uniform colour spaces provide for the calculation of colour differences as
vector distances in those spaces. Industrial practice with small colour differences has shown
non-uniform effects with calculated values in different ranges and different directions in those
spaces. Moreover, a change of external observing conditions may change the perceived
magnitude of the colour difference in a sample pair. The work documented in CIE 101-1993
(CI E, 1993) describes a number of external parameters of a visual task that affect the
correlation of visual magnitude judgements of colour differences with their colorimetric
measures. The outcome of those studies was the definition of reference conditions of a visual
task to which a colour-difference formula should be adapted. Experimental data sets must
now be chosen to meet reference conditions or to clearly define quantified deviations from
them.
The CIEDE2000 total colour difference formula corrects for the non-uniformity of the
CIELAB colour space for small colour differences under reference conditions. Improvements
to the calculation of total colour difference for industrial colour difference evaluation are made
through corrections for the effects of lightness dependence, chroma dependence, hue
dependence and hue-chroma interaction on perceived colour difference. The scaling along
the a* axis is modified to correct for a non-uniformity observed with grey colours. The
resulting recommendation is as follows (CIE, 2001a)xl!:
(8.36)
A localized modification of the scaling along the a* (red-green opponent) axis is made
to improve agreement with visual colour-difference perception for neutral colours. The
modification increases the magnitudes of a' values compared to a* values for colours at low
chroma. The transformation is as follows:
L'= L*
a'=a*(1+G) (8.37)
b' = b*
(8.38)
The transformed L', a', b' values are used in calculation of hue angle, chroma and
lightness, chroma and hue differences and these quantities are designated by a prime mark
in the equations.
XII We follow here the terminology used in CIE 142-2001 (CIE, 2001a), and omit the subscript
"10", although CIEDE2000 is recommended for sample size larger than 4 degrees and thus
the 10 degree observer has to be used.
20
CIE 15:2004
Weighting functions, SL, Sc, SH adjust the total colour-difference for variation in
perceived magnitude with variation in the location of the colour-difference pair in L', a', b'
coordinates.
S
- 1 0,015 (['-50 L
L - + r==='===,=
~ 2 + (['-50L
(8.39)
Sc = 1 + 0,045C '
SH = 1+ 0,015C'T
T = 1- 0,17 COS(h'-30)+ 0,24 COS{2h')+ 0,32 COS(3h'+6)- 0,20 cos(4h'-63)
(8.40)
(8.41 )
(8.42)
Visual colour-difference perception data show an interaction between chroma
difference and hue difference in the blue region that is observed as a tilt of the major axis of a
colour-difference ellipsoid from the direction of constant hue angle. To account for this effect,
a rotation function is applied to weighted hue and chroma differences.
Rr = -sin(2t.e)Rc (8.43)
(8.44)
R = 2 ~
c ~ ~
(8.45)
Mean hue angle and M9 values are in degree units.
Note 1: All quantities with a super-position bar indicate the mean of the values for each of the
samples of a colour-difference pair.
Note 2: The parametric factors, k
L
, kc, kH are correction terms for variation in experimental
conditions. Under reference conditions they are all set at 1. For other choices see
(CIE, 1993). The reference conditions are:
Illumination:
Illuminance:
Observer:
Background field:
Viewing mode:
Sample size:
Sample separation:
Sample colour-
source simulating the spectral relative irradiance of CIE
standard illuminant 065.
1000 Ix.
normal colour vision.
uniform, neutral grey with L * = 50.
object.
greater than 4 degrees subtended visual angle.
minimum sample separation achieved by placing the sample
pair in direct edge contact.
difference magnitude: 0 to 5 CIELAB units.
Sample structure: homogeneous colour without visually apparent pattern or non-
uniformity.
Note 3: An alternative colour difference formula (CMC formula) not developed by the CIE, but
used by some ISO committees, is briefly described in Appendix A.5 for reference
purposes.
Note 4: A further colour difference formula based on a modified colour space derived from
CIELAB is the DIN 99 formula (DIN, 2003), see Appendix A 6.
21
CIE 15:2004
9 RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING MISCELLANEOUS COLORIMETRIC
PRACTICES AND FORMULAE
9.1 Dominant wavelength and purity19
VVhen it is desired to express chromaticity in terms of dominant (or complementary)
wavelength and purity, it is recommended that the evaluations be carried out as follows.
9.1.1 Dominant wavelength (of a colour stimulus), }'{j
Wavelength of the monochromatic stimulus that, when additively mixed in suitable proportions
with the specified achromatic stimulus, matches the colour stimulus considered.
Note: For stimuli whose chromaticities lie between those of the specified achromatic
stimulus and the two ends of the spectrum, complementary wavelength is used
instead of dominant wavelength.
9.1.2 Complementary wavelength (of a colour stimulus), Ac
Wavelength of the monochromatic stimulus that, when additively mixed in suitable proportions
with the colour stimulus considered, matches the specified achromatic stimulus.
Note: See note to dominant wavelength.
9.1.3 Colorimetric purity, Pc
Quantity, Pc, defined by the relation
Pc = Li(Ld + Ln) (9.1)
where Ld and Ln are, respectively, the luminances of the monochromatic stimulus and of the
specified achromatic stimulus that match the colour stimulus considered in an additive
mixture.
Note 1: In the case of stimuli characterized by complementary wavelength, suitable mixtures
of light from the two ends of the spectrum are used instead of the monochromatic
stimulus, and colorimetric purity should then be calculated using the equation given in
Note 2.
Note 2: In the CIE 1931 standard colorimetric system, colorimetric purity is related to
excitation purity (see 9.1.4), Pe, by the equation
Pc = PeYd /y (9.2)
where Yd and yare the y-chromaticity coordinates, respectively, of the monochromatic
stimulus and the colour stimulus considered.
Note 3: In the CIE 1964 standard colorimetric system, the colorimetric purity, Pc.l0 is defined
by the relation given in Note 2, but using Pe.l0, Yd.l0, and Y10 instead of Pe, Yd, and y.
9.1.4 Excitation purity, Pe
Quantity, Pe, defined by the ratio NC/ND of two collinear distances on the chromaticity
diagram of the CIE 1931 or 1964 standard colorimetric system, the first distance being that
between the point C representing the colour stimulus considered and the point N representing
the specified achromatic stimulus; the second distance being that between the point Nand
the point D on the spectrum locus at the dominant wavelength of the colour stimulus
considered. The definition leads to the following expressions:
Pe
Y - Yn
Yd - Y
n
x-x
or P
e
= __ n_
Xd - xn
(9.3)
where (x, y), (x
n
, Yn), (Xd, Yd) are the x, Y chromaticity coordinates of the points C, Nand D,
respectively.
Note 1: For colour stimuli for which no dominant wavelength exists, see Note 1 under
colorimetric purity (Section 9.1.3).
22
CIE 15:2004
Note 2: The formulae in x and yare equivalent but the use of that which has the greater value
in the numerator results in greater precision.
Note 3: Excitation purity is related to colorimetric purity by the equation:
Pe = Pc ylYd, or Pe.1D = Pc.1D Y1D
/
Yd.1D
9.2 Special metamerism indices
20
Two specimens having identical tristimulus values for a given reference illuminant and
reference observer are metameric if their spectral radiance distributions differ within the
visible spectrum. The procedures concerned with a special metamerism index for a change
from a reference illuminant to a test illuminant of different spectral composition, or that for a
change from a reference observer to a test observer of different colour-matching functions are
called the determination of special metamerism indices.
A measure of the metamerism for the two specimens is the colour difference between
the two metameric specimens caused by substituting an illuminant, "special metamerism
index: change in illuminant", and caused by substituting an observer, "special metamerism
index: change in observer". The colour difference is evaluated using a CIE colour difference
formula and it must be clearly stated which formula has been used.
It is recommended that for two specimens whose corresponding tristimulus values
(X1 = X
2
, Y
1
= Y
2
, Z1 = Z2) are identical with respect to a reference illuminant and observer,
the metamerism index, M, be set equal to the colour difference liE*ab between the two
specimens computed for the test illuminant or for the test observer.
9.2.1 Special metamerism index: change in illuminant
This procedure defines a special metamerism index M
i1m
for a change from a reference
illuminant to a test illuminant of different spectral composition.
Note: The metamerism index M
ilm
is not suitable for determining the resultant colour shift or
specifying the colour constancy of a single object colour when the illuminant is
changed.
9.2.1.1 Tristimulus values under reference illuminant
For a pair of metameric object colours, their tristimulus values X',i, Y',i, Z',i (i = 1, 2) under a
reference illuminant are computed by the usual CIE recommendation (see Section 7) as
Xm,i = k L ptA.) S(lo) X(A) liA
A
(9.4)
Zm,i = k I piCA) S{.),) Z(A) liA
A
for m=r (reference illuminant), where pl:1) is the spectral reflectance of the metameric pair
( i = 1,2), SeA) is the spectral power distribution of the reference illuminant, and x(:1), y(:1),
z(:1) are the colour-matching functions of either the CIE 1931 or 1964 standard colorimetric
observers. It should be stated which observer has been used, and
k
100
(9.5)
IS(),)Y(A).LU
},
The preferred reference illuminant is CIE standard illuminant 065. If another
illuminant is used as reference, this should be noted.
For the set of the tristimulus values Xu, Y
r
,;, Zr.; (i = 1,2), the following relation holds by
definition.
(9.6)
23
CIE 15:2004
If Equ. 9.6 fails to hold exactly, a suitable account should be taken of this failure. The
nature of such account should be completely specified and the size of the failure recorded.
See Note 1 after 9.2.2.3.
9.2.1.2 Tristimulus values under test illuminant
For the same pair of metameric object colours, their tristimulus values Xu, Yt,j,Zt,i (i = 1, 2)
under test illuminant are computed from Equ. 9.4 with m=t, by inserting the spectral power
distribution of the test illuminant into S(A).
Suitable test illuminants include CIE standard illuminant A and the FL- and HP-
illuminants defined in Table T.6 and T.7.
The FL-illuminants represent typical fluorescent lamps21. Colorimetric data for these
illuminants are given in Table T.8. For the colour rendering index calculation the method as
described in CIE 13.3 (CIE, 1995b) was used. The most appropriate choice of test illuminant
depends upon application, but where only a few typical FL-illuminants are to be selected,
FL2, FL7 and FL 11 should take priority.
The HP-illuminants are typical high-pressure lamp spectra used at the time of
publishing this repo2 It may be useful to determine the metamerism index with respect to
several test illuminants. The specific test illuminant used must be identified as a subscript to
M, e.g. MA,ilm or M FL11 ,ilm, etc.
9.2.1.3 Colour difference and metamerism index
The colour difference t:.E*ab is computed between the tristimulus values Xt,1, Y\,1, Zt,1 of object
colour 1, and X
t
,2, Yt.2, Zt,2 of object colour 2. Then the metamerism index M
ilrn
is defined as
(9.7)
If colour difference formulas other than CI ELAB are used, this should be noted.
9.2.2 Special metamerism index: change in observer
The CIE 1931 and 1964 standard colorimetric observers represent the colour vIsion
properties of the average population reasonably well. Nevertheless it is well known that
individual deviations in the colour-matching functions occur among colour normal observers.
The special metamerism index: change in observer (CIE, 1989) was introduced to
describe the average degree of mismatch found among metameric colours if the colour-
matching functions of one of the standard colorimetric observers are changed to those of a
standard deviate observer of normal colour vision.
9.2.2.1 Tristimulus values for standard colorimetric observers
For a pair of metameric object colours, their tristimulus values Xu, Yr,j,Zr,i (i = 1, 2) for the
standard colorimetric (reference) observers are computed from Equ. 9.4, with m=r, by use of
either the CIE 1931 or 1964 colour-matching functions.
If the two metameric object colours fail to be a precise match with respect to the
standard colorimetric observer, a suitable account should be taken of this failure. The nature
of such account should be completely specified and the size of the failure recorded. See Note
1 after 9.2.2.3.
9.2.2.2 Tristimulus values for standard deviate observer
For the same pair of metameric object colours, their tristimulus values Xt,i, Yt,i,Zt,i (i = 1, 2) for
the standard deviate (test) observer are computed from Equ. 9.4, with m=t, by inserting the
colour-matching functions xd(A), Yd(A), Zd(A) of the standard deviate observer. The colour-
matching functions x
d
(},), Yd(A), Z d . ~ ) are given by
24
Xd(A) = x(A) + 6X(A)
Yd(A) = y(A) + t,.Y(A)
zd(A)= z(A) + t,.z(},)
CIE 15:2004
(9.8)
where t,. x(A) , t,. y(ll) , t,. z(),) are the so-called first deviation functions defined in Table 1.1 of
(CIE, 1989) and are reproduced in Table T.1 O.
9.2.2.3 Colour difference and metamerism index
The colour difference t,.E*ab is computed between the tristimulus values Xu, Vi.l, Zt.l of object
colour 1, and X
t
.
2
, Y
t
.
2
, Zt.2 of object colour 2. Then the metamerism index MobS is defined as
(9.9)
If a colour difference formula other than CIELAB is used, this should be included in
the parenthesis as e.g. Mobs (u*v*).
Notes on special metamerism indices
Note 1: When the samples are not exactly metameric, that is Xr1 *- Xr
2
, Y
r
.
1
*- Yr
2
,
Zr.1 *- Zr.2, then the tristimulus values X
t
,2, Yt.2, Zt.2 are adjusted by the multiplicative
method as follows.
(9.10)
Note 2: Each colour normal observer shows a colour difference t,.E*i for a sample pair
metameric with respect to a reference observer and an irradiating illuminant. About
95 % of 6E*s for colour normal observers are usually found to be within 2 6M
obs
(a*b*
or u*v*).
Note 3: Further characterization of the observer metamerism can be done by calculating the
range of colour mismatch, see (CIE, 1989).
9.3 Assessment of the quality of a daylight simulator for colorimetry23
The quality of simulators of CIE daylight illuminants 050,055,065 and 075 can be assessed
by calculating the special metamerism index for change in illuminant, employing specified
samples that are metameric matches for the CIE illuminants 050, 055, 065 and 075,
respectively, and the CI E 1964 standard colorimetric observer. The purpose of this
assessment is to quantify the suitability of a test source as a practical reproduction of CIE
standard illuminant 050, 055, 065, or 075 for colorimetric tasks 24
The basis for the assessment is the special metamerism index: change in illuminant
(see Section 9.2.1), employing specified samples that are metameric matches for the
standard daylight illuminant and the CIE 1964 standard colorimetric observer. The method
quantifies the mismatch resulting when samples that are a match under the standard daylight
illuminant are viewed under the illumination of the test source, the CIE 1964 standard
colorimetric observer being used throughout.
A visible range metamerism index is employed to evaluate the colorimetric suitability
of the test source for the visible wavelength range. Tables of spectral reflection radiance
factor define the metameric samples.
An ultraviolet range metamerism index is employed with a second set of metameric
samples to evaluate the suitability of the test source in relation to ultraviolet-excited
luminescent colours. The metameric sample pairs for this assessment are comprised of a
luminescent and a non-luminescent sample, which are spectrally identical matches for the
standard daylight illuminant. The non-luminescent sample in each metameric pair is specified
by values of spectral reflection radiance factor for each standard daylight illuminant (050,
055, 065, and 075).
25
CIE 15:2004
The luminescent sample in each metameric pair is specified by values of spectral
reflection radiance factor, relative spectral distribution of radiance emitted by fluorescence,
and spectral external radiant efficiency.
The ultraviolet range metamerism index quantifies the failure of the spectrally
identical match between the luminescent and the non-luminescent sample pairs resulting
from changing the illuminating source from a standard daylight illuminant to a test source.
Detailed description of the test method, including the tables needed for calculating
the quality index, and a computer program of the calculation method on disk, are published in
CIE 51.2-1999 (CIE, 1999c), see also (CIE, 2001 b).
9.4 The evaluation of whiteness
25
To promote uniformity of practice in the evaluation of whiteness of surface colours, it is
recommended that the formulae for whiteness, Wor W
lO
, and for tint, Twor T
w
.
10
, given below,
be used for comparisons of the whiteness of samples evaluated for CIE standard illuminant
065. The application of the formulae is restricted to samples that are called "white"
commercially, that do not differ much in colour and fluorescence, and that are measured on
the same instrument at nearly the same time. Within these restrictions, the formulae provide
relative, but not absolute, evaluations of whiteness, that are adequate for commercial use,
when employing measuring instruments having suitable modern and commercially available
facilities.
W Y + 800(xn - x) + 1700(Yn - y)
Y10 + 800(Xn,10 - XlO) + 1700(Yn,10 - YIO)
1000(xn-x) - 650(Yn - y)
TW10 900(Xn.10 - X10) - 650(Yn1o - Y1O)
(9.11 )
where Y is the Y-tristimulus value of the sample, x and yare the x, Y chromaticity coordinates
of the sample, and X
n
, Yn are the chromaticity coordinates of the perfect diffuser, all for the
CI E 1931 standard colorimetric observer; Y
10
, X10 , Y10, Xn.10 and Yn,10 are similar values for the
CI E 1964 standard colorimetric observer.
Note 1: The higher the value of Wor W
1O
, the greater is the indicated whiteness. The more
positive the value of Twor T
w
,10, the greener the tint; the more negative the value of Tw
or T
w10
, the redder the tint. For the perfect diffuser Wand W10 are equal to 100, and
Twand T
w
,10 are equal to zero.
Note 2: Linear whiteness formulae are applicable only within a restricted volume of the colour
solid. These formulae may be used only for samples whose values of Wor W
10
and
Tw or T
w
,10 lie within the following limits:
greater than 40 and less than 5Y - 280, or 5Y
10
- 280;
greater than -4 and less than +2.
Note 3: The tint formulae are based on the empirical results that lines of equal tint run
approximately parallel to lines of dominant wavelength 466 nm in the x, Y and X1O, Y10
chromaticity diagrams.
Note 4: Equal differences in Wor W10 do not always represent equal perceptual differences in
whiteness, nor do equal differences in Twor T
w
,10 always represent equal perceptual
differences in greenishness or reddishness of whites. Measures of whiteness and tint
that correlate uniformly with these perceptual attributes would require more
complicated formulae, which is beyond present knowledge.
9.5 Calculation of correlated colour temperature
26
The concept of correlated colour temperature used to be based on visual observations.
Recent investigations have shown (see Borbely et aI., 2001) that no metrological definition
can be based on such perceptual investigations. Therefore a new definition has been
proposed. The definition agrees with the previously recommended calculation method and
thus does not cause any changes to calculated values.
26
CIE 15:2004
correlated colour temperature (Tep)
temperature of a Planckian radiator having the chromaticity nearest the chromaticity
associated with the given spectral distribution on a diagram where the (CI E 1931 standard
observer based) u', 2/3v' coordinates of the Planckian 10CUS
XIII
and the test stimulus are
depicted
Note 1: The concept of correlated colour temperature should not be used if the chromaticity of
the test source differs more than L'lC = [(u't-U'p)2+ ,(v't_V'p)2]1/2 = 5.10-
2
from the
9
Planckian radiator, where u't, V't refer to the test source, u'p,v'p to the Planckian
radiator.
Note 2: Correlated colour temperature can be calculated by a simple minimum search
computer program that searches for that Planckian temperature that provides the
smallest chromaticity difference between the test chromaticity and the Planckian
locus, or e.g. by a method recommended by Robertson (1968).
10. REFERENCES
ALMAN, DH, BILLMEYER, F.W. JR., 1976. Integrating sphere errors in the colorimetry of
fluorescent materials. Color Res. Appl, 1, 141-145, 1976.
ASTM, 1999. American Society for Testing and Materials Standard E 308. Standard practice
for computing the colors of objects by using the CIE system, 1999.
ASTM, 2001. American Society for Testing and Materials E-2022-01. Standard practice for
calculation of weighting factors for tristimulus integration, 2001.
ASTM, 2003. American Society for Testing and Materials Standard E2022-01. Standard
practice for calculating of weighting factors for tristimulus integration, 2003. see e.g. ASTM
Book of Standards Vol. 06.01
BORBELY, A., SAMSON, A., SCHANDA, J., 2001. The concept of correlated colour
temperature revisited. Color Res. Appl., 26/6, 450-457, 2001.
CIE. 1931. Proc. of the 8th Session ofCIE, Cambridge, 19-29, 1931.
CI E, 1948. Proc. of the 11th Session of CIE, Paris, 16, 1948.
CIE, 1951. Proc. of the 12th Session ofCIE, Stockholm, Vol. 3, 63,1951.
CIE. 1955. Proc. of the 13th Session of CIE, Zurich, Vol. 1, Section 1.3.1, 12-13, 1955.
CIE, 1957. CIE Bulletin No.3, 16, 1957.
CIE, 1959. Proc. ofthe 14th Session ofCIE, Brussels, Vol. A, 91-109,1959.
CIE, 1963. Proc. of the 15th Session ofCIE, Vienna, Vol. A, 35, 1963.
CIE, 1967. Proc. of the 16th Session ofCIE, Washington, D.C., Vol. A, 95-97,1967.
CIE, 1971. CIE 15-1971. Colorimetry, 1971.
CIE, 1972. Supplement No. 1 to CIE 15-1971. Special metamerism index: Change in
illuminant, 1972.
CIE, 1978. Supplement No.2 to CIE 15-1971. Recommendations on uniform colour spaces,
colour-difference equations, psychometric colour terms, 1978.
CI E, 1979a. CI E 44-1979. Absolute methods for reflection measurements, 1979.
CI E, 1979b. CI E 46-1979. A review of publications on properties and reflection values of
material reflection standards, 1979.
XIII In calculating the chromaticity coordinates of the Planckian radiator the C2 value according
to ITC-90 has to be used (C2 = 1,4388) in Planck's equation for standard air, but assuming
n=1. See Appendix E.
27
CIE 15:2004
CIE, 1981. CIE 51-1981. A method for assessing the quality of daylight simulators for
colorimetry, 1981.
CI E, 1986a. CI E S002-1986. CIE standard colorimetric observers, 1986. (Published also as
CIEIISO 10527:1991).
CIE, 1986b. CIE 15.2-1986. Colorimetry, Second Edition, 1986.
CIE, 1987. CIE 17.4-1987. International Lighting Vocabulary, 1987.
CIE, 1988. CIE 76-1988. Intercomparison on measurement of (total) spectral radiance factor
of luminescent specimens, 1988.
CIE, 1989. CIE 80-1989. Special metamerism index: Change in observer, 1989.
CIE, 1993. CIE 101-1993. Parametric effects in colour difference evaluation, 1993.
CIE, 1995a. CIE 116-1995. Industrial colour difference evaluation, 1995.
CIE, 1995b. CIE 13.3-1995. Method of measuring and specifying colour rendering properties
of light sources, 1995.
CIE, 1998a. CIE 131-1998. The CIE 1997 interim colour appearance model (simple version),
CIECAM97s, 1998.
CIE, 1998b. CIE x014-1998. Proc. ofthe CIE expert symposium '97 on colour standards for
imaging technology, 1998.
CIE, 1998c. Standard CIE S005/E-1998. CIE standard iIIuminants for colorimetry, 1998.
(Published also as ISO 10526/CIE S 005/E-1999).
CIE, 1998d. CIE 130-1998. Practical methods for the measurement of reflectance and
transmittance, 1998.
CIE, 1999a. CIE 135/4-1999. Some recent developments in colour difference evaluation,
1999.
CIE, 1999b. CIE 135/3-1999. Supplement 1-1999 to CIE 51-1981, Virtual metamers for
assessing the quality of simulators of CIE iIIuminant 050, 1999.
CIE, 1999c. CIE 51.2-1999. A method for assessing the quality of daylight simulators for
colorimetry, 1999.
CIE, 2001 a. CIE 142-2001. Improvement to industrial colour-difference evaluation, 2001.
CIE, 2001 b. CIE OS 012:2001. Standard method of assessing the spectral quality of daylight
simulators for visual appraisal and measurement of colour, 2001.
CIE, 2004a. CIE OS 014-2.2:2004 Colorimetry- Part 2. CIE Standard lIIuminants, 2004.
CIE, 2004b. CIE 159:2004. A colour appearance model for colour management systems:
CIECAM02, 2004.
01 N, 2003. DIN 6176:2003. Colorimetric determination of colour differences of surface colours
using the DIN 99 formula, 2003.
FAIRMAN, H.S., 1985. The calculation of weight factors for tristimulus integration. Color Res.
Appl., 10, 199-203, 1985.
GUNDLACH, D., MALLWlTZ, E., 1976. Fragen der Probenbeleuchtung und Mei3geometrie in
der Farbmessung. Die Farbe, 25, 113-130, 1976.
JIS, 1991. JIS 8716. Fluorescent lamp as a simulator of CIE standard illuminant 0
65
for a
visual comparison of surface colours - Type and characteristics, 1991.
JUDD, 0.8., MACADAM, D.L., WfSZECKI, G., 1964. with the collaboration of BUDDE, H.W,
CONDIT, HR, HENDERSON, S.T., SIMONDS, J.L. Spectral distribution oftypical daylight as
a function of correlated color temperature. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 1031-1040, 1964.
LE GRAND, Y., 1968. Light, Colour and Vision. Second Edition. London, Chapman and Hall,
1-564, 1968.
28
CIE 15:2004
LI, C.J., LUO, M.R., RIGG, B., 2004. A new method for computing optimum weights for
calculating CIE Tristimulus Values. Color Res. Appl., 29,91-103,2004.
MCLAREN, K., 1980. CIELAB hue-angle anomalies at low tristimulus ratios. Color Res. App/.,
5,139-143,1980.
PAULI, H., 1976. Proposed extension of the CIE recommendation on "Uniform color spaces,
color difference equations, and metric color terms". J. Opt. Soc. Am., 66, 866-867, 1976.
ROBERTSON, A.R., 1968. Computation of correlated color temperature and distribution
temperature. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 58, 1528-35, 1968.
ROBERTSON, A.R., 1978. CIE guidelines for coordinated research on colour difference
evaluation. Color Res. Appl., 3, 149-151, 1978.
SEVE, R., 1991. New formula for the computation of CIE 1976 hue difference. Color Res.
App/., 16,217-218,1991.
SEVE, R., 1996. Practical formula for the computation of CIE 1976 hue difference. Color Res.
Appl., 21, 314,1996.
SEVE, R., DUVAL, B., 2003. Interpolation procedure: Proposals and comments. In CIE
152:2003, Proc. CIE 25
th
Session Vol. 1. 01-74-77,2003.
STOKES, M., BRILL, M.H., 1992. Efficient computation of L'..H*ab. Color Res. Appl., 17,410-
411,1992.
VENABLE, WH., 1989. Accurate tristimulus values from spectral data. Color Res. Appl., 14,
260-267, 1989.
WYSZECKI, G., 1968. Recent agreements reached by the Colorimetry Committee of the
Commission Internationale de l'Eciairage, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 58,290-292,1968.
WYSZECKI, G., STILES, WS., 1982. Color Science - Concepts and Methods, Quantitative
Data and Formulae. 2nd Edition. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1982.
29
CIE 15:2004
11. TABLES
This Section of the report contains tables of abridged and truncated colorimetric data. The full
tables - recommended for general use - are found in the CIE standards on colorimetrl
lV
The tables presented here are intended for use, only when the highest precision is not
required. Users should check before using these tables whether the level of precision meets
their needs.
The illuminant tables in this section are provided for the range between 300 nm and
780 nm. The tables of other colorimetric functions are provided for the range between 380 nm
and 780 nm. All tables are at 5 nm intervals.
11.1 Table T.1. Relative spectral power distributions of CIE illuminants
Relative spectral power distributions [S(A)] of CIE standard illuminants A and 065, as well as
CIE illuminants C, 050, 055 and 075 for wavelengths A = 300 nm to 780 nm at 5 nm
intervals
xv
A, nm
Standard Standard Iliuminant IIluminant Iliuminant Iliumina
IIluminantA Iliuminant 065 C 050 055 075
300 0,930483 0,0341000 0,00 0,019 0,024 0,043
305 1,12821 1,66430 0,00 1,035 1,048 2,588
310 1,35769 3,29450 0,00 2,051 2,072 5,133
315 1,62219 11,7652 0,00 4.914 6,648 17,470
320 1,92508 20,2360 0,01 7,778 11,224 29,808
325 2,26980 28,6447 0,20 11,263 15,936 42,369
330 2,65981 37,0535 0,40 14,748 20,647 54,930
335 3,09861 38,501 1 1,55 16,348 22,266 56,095
340 3,58968 39,9488 2,70 17,948 23,885 57,259
345 4,13648 42,4302 4,85 19,479 25,851 60,000
350 4,74238 44,911 7 7,00 21,010 27,817 62,740
355 5,41070 45,7750 9,95 22,476 29,219 62,861
360 6,14462 46,6383 12,90 23,942 30,621 62,982
365 6,94720 49,3637 17,20 25,451 32,464 66,647
370 7,82135 52,0891 21,40 26,961 34,308 70,312
375 8,76980 51,0323 27,50 25,724 33,446 68,507
380 9,79510 49,9755 33,00 24,488 32,584 66,703
385 10,8996 52,311 8 39,92 27,179 35,335 68,333
390 12,0853 54,6482 47,40 29,871 38,087 69,963
395 13,3543 68,701 5 55,17 39,589 49,518 85,946
400 14,7080 82,7549 63,30 49,308 60,949 101,929
405 16.1480 87,1204 71,81 52,910 64,751 106,911
410 17,6753 91,4860 80,60 56,513 68,554 111,894
415 19,2907 92,4589 89,53 58,273 70,065 112,346
420 20,9950 93,431 8 98,10 60,034 71,577 112,798
XIV These tables can also be found on the accompanying CO-ROM.
xv Standard illuminant A and standard illuminant 065 data are every fifth value from the CIE
Standard. The illuminant C data are unchanged from CIE 15.2-1986. The 050,055 and 075
data are calculated according to the present version of CI E 15.
30
CIE 15:2004
Standard Standard Iliuminant Iliuminant Ilium
1 I 1 ~
i.:Lnm
C 050 055
425 22,7883 90,0570 105,80 58,926 69,746 107,945
430 24,6709 86,6823 112,40 57,818 67,914 103,092
435 26,6425 95,7736 117,75 66,321 76,760 112,145
440 28,7027 104,865 121,50 74,825 85,605 121,198
445 30,8508 110,936 123,45 81,036 91,799 127,104
450 33,0859 117,008 124,00 87,247 97,993 133,010
455 35,4068 117,410 123,60 88,930 99,228 132,682
460 37,8121 117,812 123,10 90,612 100,463 132,355
465 40,3002 116,336 123,30 90,990 100,188 129,838
470 42,8693 114,861 123,80 91,368 99,913 127,322
475 45,5174 115,392 124,09 93,238 101,326 127,061
480 48,2423 115,923 123,90 95,109 102,739 126.800
485 51,0418 112,367 122,92 93,536 100,409 122.291
490 53,9132 108,811 120,70 91,963 98,078 117,783
495 56,8539 109,082 116,90 93,843 99,379 117,186
500 59,861 1 109.354 112,10 95,724 100,680 116,589
505 62,9320 108,578 106,98 96,169 100,688 115,146
510 66,0635 107,802 102,30 96,613 100,695 113,702
515 69,2525 106,296 98,81 96,871 100,341 111,181
520 72,4959 104,790 96,90 97,129 99,987 108,659
525 75,7903 106,239 96,78 99,614 102,098 109,552
530 79,1326 107,689 98,00 102,099 104,210 110,445
535 82,5193 106,047 99,94 101,427 103,156 108,367
540 85,9470 104,405 102,10 100,755 102,102 106.289
545 89,4124 104,225 103,95 101,536 102,535 105,596
550 92,9120 104,046 105,20 102,317 102,968 104,904
555 96,4423 102,023 105,67 101,159 101,484 102,452
560 100,000 100,000 105,30 100,000 100,000 100,000
565 103,582 98,167 1 104,11 98,868 98,608 97,808
570 107,184 96,3342 102,30 97,735 97,216 95,616
575 110,803 96,061 1 100,15 98,327 97,482 94,914
580 114,436 95,7880 97,80 98,918 97,749 94,213
585 118,080 92,2368 95,43 96,208 94,590 90,605
590 121,731 88,6856 93,20 93,499 91,432 86,997
595 125,386 89,3459 91,22 95,593 92,926 87,112
600 129,043 90,0062 89,70 97,688 94,419 87,227
605 132,697 89,8026 88,83 98,478 94,780 86,684
610 136,346 89,5991 88,40 99,269 95,140 86,140
615 139,988 88,6489 88,19 99,155 94,680 84,861
620 143,618 87,6987 88,10 99,042 94,220 83,581
625 147,235 85,4936 88,06 97,382 92,334 81,164
630 150,836 83,2886 88,00 95,722 90,448 78,747
31
CIE 15:2004

Standard Iliuminant Iliuminant

, nm Iliuminant A Iliuminant D65 C D50 D55 D
18 83,4939 87,86 97,290 91,389 78,587
157.979 83,6992 87,80 98,857 92,330 78,428
645 161,516 81,8630 87,99 97,262 90,592 76,614
650 165,028 80,0268 88,20 95,667 88,854 74,801
655 168,510 80,1207 88,20 96,929 89,586 74,562
660 171,963 80,2146 87,90 98,190 90,317 74,324
665 175,383 81,2462 87,22 100,597 92,133 74,873
670 178,769 82,277 8 86,30 103,003 93,950 75,422
675 182,118 80,2810 85,30 101,068 91,953 73,499
680 185,429 78,2842 84,00 99,133 89,956 71,576
685 188,701 74,0027 82,21 93,257 84,817 67,714
690 191,931 69,7213 80,20 87,381 79,677 63,852
695 195,118 70,6652 78,24
I QO A92
81,258 64,464
700 198,261 71,609 1 76,30 91,604 82,840 65,076
705 201,359 72,9790 74,36 92,246 83,842 66,573
710 204,409 74,3490 72,40 92,889 84,844 68,070
715 207,411 67,9765 70,40 84,872 77,539 62,256
720 210,365 61,6040 68,30 76,854 70,235 56,443
725 213,268 65,7448 66,30 81,683 74,768 60,343
730 216,120 69,8856 64,40 86,511 79,301 64,242
735 218,920 72,4863 62,80 89,546 82,147 66,697
740 221,667 75,0870 61,50 92,580 84,993 69,151
745 224,361 69,3398 60,20 85,405 78,437 63,890
750 227,000 63,5927 59,20 78,230 71,880 58,629
755 229,585 55,0054 58,50 67,961 62,337 50,623
760 232,115 46,4182 58,10 57,692 52,793 42,617
765 234,589 56,611 8 58,00 70,307 64,360 51,985
770 237,008 66,8054 58,20 82,923 75,927 61,352
775 239,370 65,0941 58,50 80,599 73,872 59,838
780 241,675 63,3828 59,10 78,274 71,818 58,324
32
CIE 15:2004
11.2 Table T.2. Components So(A), S1(A), S2(A)
Components SO(A) , S1(A), SZ(A) of daylight used in the calculation of relative spectral power
distributions of CIE daylight illuminants of different correlated colour temperatures, for
wavelengths }, = 300 nm to 830 nm at 5 nm intervals.
I
A, nm
I
SoV,)
I
S1(}')
I
S2(.1,)
I
}., nm So(.1,) SM) S2V,)
300 0,04 0,02 0,00 490 113,50 20,10 -1,80
305 3,02 2,26 1,00 495 113,30 18,15 -1,65
310 6,00 4,50 2,00 500 113,10 16,20 -1,50
315 17,80 13,45 3,00 505 111,95 14,70 -1,40
320 29,60 22,40 4,00 510 110,80 13,20 -1,30
325 42,45 32,20 6,25 515 108,65 10,90 -1,25
330 55,30 42,00 8,50 520 106,50 8,60 -1,20
335 56,30 41,30 8,15 525 107,65 7,35 -1,10
340 57,30 40,60 7,80 530 108,80 6,10 -1,00
345 59,55 41,10 7,25 535 107,05 5,15 -0,75
350 61,80 41,60 6,70 540 105,30 4,20 -0,50
355 61,65 39,80 6,00 545 104,85 3,05 -0,40
360 61,50 38,00 5,30 550 104,40 1,90 -0,30
365 65,15 40,20 5,70 555 102,20 0,95 -0,15
370 68,80 42,40 6,10 560 100,00 0,00 0,00
375 66,10 40,45 4,55 565 98,00 -0,80 0,10
380 63,40 38,50 3,00 570 96,00 -1,60 0,20
385 64,60 36,75 2,10 575 95,55 -2,55 0,35
390 65,80 35,00 1,20 580 95,10 -3,50 0,50
395 80,30 39,20 0.05 585 92,10 -3,50 1,30
400 94,80 43,40 -1.10 590 89,10 -3,50 2,10
405 99,80 44,85 -0,80 595 89,80 -4,65 2,65
410 104,80 46,30 -0,50 600 90,50 -5,80 3,20
415 105,35 45,10 -0,60 605 90,40 -6,50 3,65
420 105,90 43,90 -0,70 610 90,30 -7,20 4,10
425 101,35 40,50 -0,95 615 89,35 -7,90 4,40
430 96,80 37,10 -1,20 620 88,40 -8,60 4,70
435 105,35 36,90 -1,90 625 86,20 -9,05 4,90
440 113,90 36,70 -2,60 630 84,00 -9,50 5,10
445
I
119,75 36,30 -2,75 I
635 84,55 -10,20 5,90
450 125,60 35,90 -2,90 640 85,10 -10,90 6,70
455 125,55 34,25 -2,85 645 83,50 -10,80 7,00
460
I
125,50 32,60 -2,80 650 81,90 -10,70 7,30
465 123,40 30,25 -2,70 655 82,25 -11,35 7,95
470 121,30 27,90 -2,60 660 82,60 -12,00 8,60
475 121,30 26,10 -2,60 665 83,75 -13,00 9,20
480 121,30 24,30 -2,60 670 84,90 -14,00 9,80
485 117,40 22,20 -2,20 675 ',au 10,00
33
CIE 15:2004
A nm .C:UJ)
S1()') S2( SO(,1) S1(.1) S2(.1)
680 81,30 -13,60 10,20 58,15 -9,50 6,30
685 76,60 -12,80 9,25 770 68,60 -11,20 7,40
690 71,90 -12,00 8,30 775 66,80 -10,80 7,10
695 73,10 -12,65 8,95 780 65,00 -10,40 6,80
700 74,30 -13,30 9,60 785 65,50 -10,50 6,90
705 75,35 -13,10 9,05 790 66,00 -10,60 7,00
710 76,40 -12,90 8,50 795 63,50 -10,15 6,70
715 69,85 -11,75 7,75 800 61,00 -9,70 6,40
720 63,30 -10,60 7,00 805 57,15 -9,00 5,95
725 67,50 -11,10 7,30 810 53,30 -8,30 5,50
730 71,70 -11,60 7,60 815 56,10 -8,80 5,80
735 74,35 -11,90 7,80 820 58,90 -9,30 6,10
740 77,00 -12,20 8,00 825 60,40 -9,55 6,30
745 71,10 -11,20 7,35 830 61,90 -9,80 6,50
750 65,20 -10,20 6,70
755 56,45 -9,00 5,95
760 47,70 -7,80 5,20
34
CIE 15:2004
11.3 Table T.3. Tristimulus values, chromaticity coordinates of CIE iIIuminants
Tristimulus values, X, Y, Z, and chromaticity coordinates x, y, and u', v' for CIE standard
illuminants A and D65, as well as for CIE illuminants C, D50, D55 and D75 computed for the
1931 and 1964 standard colorimetric observers.
1. For the CIE 1931 standard colorimetric observer as defined in Table T.4 and illuminants
as defined in Table T.1 (5 nm intervals over the range 380 nm to 780 nm).
I Standard
Standard
Iliuminant Illuminant Iliuminant Iliuminant
Illuminant
C D50 D55 D75
1"luminant A
D65
X 109,85 95,04 98,07 96,42 95,68 94,97
Y 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00
Z 35,58 108,88 118,22 82,51 92,14 122,61
x 0,44758 0,31272 0,31006 0,34567 0,33243 0,29903
Y
0,40745 0,32903 0,31616 0,35851 0,34744 0,31488
u' 0,25597 0,19783
I
0,20089 0,20916 0,20443 0,19353
v' 0,52429 0,46834 0,46089 0,48808 0,48075 0,45853
2. For the CIE 1964 standard colorimetric observer as defined in Table T.5 and illuminants
as defined in Table T.1 (5 nm intervals over the range 380 nm to 780 nm).
Standard Standard IIlu'" . n lIIuminant Iliuminant II
Illuminant A IIluminant D65 C D50 D55 D
X
10
111,14 94,81 97,29 96,72 95,80 94,42
Y
lO
100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00 100,00
Z10 35,20 107,32 116,14 81,43 90,93 120,64
X10 0,451 17 0,31381 0,31039 0,34773 0,33412 0,29968
Y10
0,40594 0,33098 0,31905 0,35952 0,34877 0,31740
U'10 0,25896 0,19786 0,20000 0,21015 0,20507 0,19305
V'10 0,52425 0,46954 0,46255 0,48886 0,481 65 0,46004
35
CIE 15:2004
11.4 Table T.4. CIE 1931 standard colorimetric observer
Truncated set of colour-matching functions x(/l), y(/l), z(/l) and corresponding chromaticity
coordinates x(/l), yV") for ). = 380 nm to 780 nm at 5 nm intervals, rounded to 6
and 5 decimal places respectively. VI

x(it) Y(J) z(it) X(A) Y(A)
380 0,001368 0,000039 0,006450 0.17411 0,00496
385 0,002236 0,000064 0,010550 0,17401 0,00498
390 0,004243 0,000120 0,020050 0,17380 0,00492
395 0,007650 0,000217 0,036210 0,17356 0,00492
400 0,014310 0,000396 0,067850 0,17334 0,00480
405 0,023190 0,000640 0,110200 0,17302 0,00478
410 0,043510 0,001 210 0,207400 0,17258 0,00480
415 0,077 630 0,002180 0,371300 0.17209 0,00483
420 0,134380 0,004000 0,645600 0.17141 0,00510
425 0,214770 0,007300 1,039050 0,17030 0,00579
430 0,283900 0,011 600 1,385600 0,16888 0,00690
435 0,328500 0,016840 1,622960 0,16690 0,00856
440 0,348280 0,023000 1,747060 0,16441 0,01086
445 0,348060 0,029800 1,782600 0,161 10 0,01379
450 0,336200 0,038000 1,772 110 0,15664 0,01770
455 0,318700 0,048000 1,744100 0,15099 0,02274
460 0,290800 0,060000 1,669200 0,14396 0,02970
465 0,251 100 0,073900 1,528100 0,13550 0,03988
470 0,195360 0,090980 1,287640 0,12412 0,05780
475 0,142100 0,112600 1,041900 0,10959 0,08684
480 0,095640 0,139020 0,812950 0,09129 0,13270
485 0,057950 0,169300 0,616200 0,06871 0,20072
490 0,032010 0,208020 0,465180 0,04539 0,29498
495 0,014700 0,258600 0,353300 0,02346 0,41270
500 0,004900 0,323000 0,272000 0,00817 0,53842
505 0,002400 0,407300 0,212300 0,00386 0,65482
510 0,009300 0,503000 0,158200 0,01387 0,75019
515 0,029100 0,608200 0,111 700 0,03885 0,81202
520 0,063270 0,710000 0,078250 0,07430 0,83380
525 0,109600 0,793200 0,057250 0,11416 0,82621
530 0,165500 0,862000 0,042160 0,15472 0,80586
535 0,225750 0,914850 0,029840 0,19288 0,78163
540 0,290400 0,954000 0,020300 0,22962 0,75433
545 0,359700 0,980 0,013400 0,26578 0,72432
550 0,433450 0,994950 0,008750 0,30160 0,69231
XVI Chromaticity coordinates have been calculated from the non-rounded values published in
(CIE, 1986a).
36
CIE 15:2004
A, nm
)("(.1) y(2) z(}o)
'(AI
Y(A)
555 0,512050 1,000000 0,005750 0,33736 0,65885
560 0,594500 0,995000 0,003900 0,37310 0,62445
565 0,678400 0,978600 0,002750 0,40874 0,58961
570 0,762100 0,952000 0,002100 0,44406 0,55471
575 0,842500 0,915400 0,001800 0,47877 0,52020
580 0,916300 0,870000 0,001650 0,51249 0,48659
585 0,978600 0,816300 0,001400 0,54479 0,45443
590 1,026300 0,757000 0,001 100 0,57515 0,42423
595 1,056700 0,694900 0,001000 0.60293 0,39650
600 1,062200 0,631000 0,000800 0,62704 0,37249
605 1,045600 0,566800 0,000600 0,64823 0,35139
610 1,002600 0,503000 0,000340 0,66576 0,33401
615 0,938400 0,441200 0,000240 0,68008 0,31975
620 0,854450 0,381000 0,000190 0.691 50 0,30834
625 0,751 400 0,321000 0,000100 0,70061 0,29930
630 0,642400 0,265000 0,000050 0,70792 0,29203
635 0,541900 0,217000 0,000030 0,71403 0,28593
640 0,447900 0,175000 0,000020 0,71903 ~ ~ ~ . 93
645 0,360800 0,138200 0,000010 0,72303 0,27695
650 0,283500 0,107000 0,000000 0.72599 0,27401
655 0,218700 0,081600 0,000000 0,72827 0,27173
660 0,164900 0,061000 0,000000 0,72997 0,27003
665 0,121200 0,044 580 0,000000 0,731 09 0,26891
670 0,087400 0,032000 0,000000 0,731 99 0,26801
675 0,063600 0,023200 0,000000 0,73272 0,26728
680 0,046770 0,017000 0,000000 0,73342 0,26658
685 0,032900 0,011 920 0,000000 0,73405 0,26595
690 0,022700 0,008210 0,000000 0,73439 0,26561
95 0,015840 0,005723 0,000000 0,73459 0,26541
700 0,011 359 0,004102 0,000000 0,73469 0,26531
705 0,008111 0,002929 0,000000 0,73469 0,26531
710 0,005790 0,002091 0,000000 0,73469 0,26531
715 0,004109 0,001484 0,000000 0,73469 0,26531
720 0,002899 0,001047 0,000000 0,73469 0,26531
725 0,002049 0,000740 0,000000 0,73469 0,26531
730 0,001440 0,000520 0,000000 0,73469 0,26531
735 0,001000 0,000361 0,000000 0,73469 0,26531
740 0,000690 0,000249 0,000000 0,73469 0,26531
745 0,000476 0,000172 0,000000 0,73469 0,26531
750 0,000332 0,000120 0,000000 0,734 69 0,26531
755 0,000235 0,000085 0,000000 0,734 69 0,26531
760 0,000166 0,000060 0,000000 0.73469 0,26531
37
CIE 15:2004
;t, nm X(A) Y(A) Z(A) x(;t)
y( "
II
765 0,000117 0,000 042 0,000 000 0,73469 0,26531
770 0,000 083 0,000 030 0,000 000 0,73469 0,26531
775 0,000 059 0,000 021 0,000000 0,73469 0,26531
780 0,000042 0,000 015 0,000000 0,73469 0,26531
Summation at 5 nm intervals:
LX(A) = 21 ,371524 LY(A) = 21 ,371327 LZ(A)=21,371540
11.5 Table T.5. CIE 1964 standard colorimetric observer
Truncated set of colour-matching functions XlO(A), Y1O(A), Z10(A) and chromaticity
coordinates X10(A), Y1O(A) for wavelengths A = 380 nm to 780 nm at 5 nm intervals, rounded to
6 decimal places and 5 decimal places respectiveil
vil
.

Z10(A) x
1
o(,1,)

3 ,000 160 ,000 017 0,000705 0,18133 0,01969
385 0,000 662 0,000 072 0,002928 0,18091 0,01954
390 0,002362 0.000253 0,010482 0,18031 0,01935
395 0,007242 0,000769 0,032344 0,17947 0,01904
400 0,019110 0,002004 0,086 011 0,17839 0,01871
405 0,043400 0,004509 0,197120 0,17712 0,01840
410 0,084736 0,008756 0,389366 0,17549 0,01813
415 0,140638 0,014456 0,656760 0,17323 0,01781
420 0,204492 0,021 391 0,972542 0,17063 0,01785
425 0,264737 0,029497 1,282500 0,16790 0,01871
430 0,314679 0,038676 1,553480 0,165 03 0,020 28
435 0,357719 0,049602 1,798500 0,16217 0,02249
440 0,383734 0,062077 1,967280 0,15902 0,02573
445 0,386726 0,074704 2,027300 0,15539 0,03002
450 0,370702 0,089456 1,994800 0,15100 0,03644
455 0,342957 0,106256 1,900700 0,14594 0,04522
460 0,302273 0,128201 1,745370 0,13892 0,05892
465 0,254085 0,152761 1,554900 0,12952 0,077 87
470 0,195618 0,185190 1,317560 0,11518 0,10904
475 0,132349 0,219940 1,030 200 0,09573 0,159 09
480 0,080 507 0,253589 0,772125 0,07278 0,22924
485 0,041 072 0,297665 0,570 060 0,04519 0,32754
490 0,016172 0,339133 0,415254 0,020 99 0,440 11
495 0,005132 0,395379 0,302356 0,00730 0,56252
XVII Chromaticity coordinates have been calculated from the non-rounded values published in
(CIE,1986a).
38
CIE 15:2004
A,nm x
10
()) Y10(2)
1
10
(2)
XlO(A) Y10(A)
500 0,003816 0,460777 0,218502 0,00559 0,67454
505 0,015444 0,531360 0,159249 0,02187 0,75258
510 0,037465 0,606741 0,112044 0,04954 0,80230
515 0,071358 0,685660 0,082248 0,08502 0,81698
520 0,117749 0,761 757 0,060709 0,12524 0,81019
525 0,172 953 0,823330 0,043 050 0,16641 0,79217
530 0,236491 0,875211 0,030 451 0,20706 0,76628
535 0,304213 0,923810 0,020584 0,24364 0,73987
540 0,376772 0,961988 0,013676 0,27859 0,711 30
545 0,451 584 0,982200 0,007918 0,31323 0,68128
550 0,529826 0,991 761 0,003988 0,34730 0,65009
555 0,616053 0,999110 0,001 091 0,381 16 0,61816
560 0,705224 0,997340 0,000 000 0,41421 0,58579
565 0,793832 0,982380 0,000000 0,44692 0,55308
570 0,878655 0,955552 0,000 000 0,479 04 0,52096
575 0,951 162 0,915175 0,000000 0,50964 0,49036
580 1,014 160 0,868934 0,000000 0,53856 0,461 44
585 1,074300 0,825623 0,000 000 0,56544 0,43456
590 1,118520 0,777 405 0,000000 0,58996 0,41004
595 1,134300 0,720353 0,000 000 0,611 60 0,38840
600 1,123990 0,658341 0,000000 0,63063 0,36937
605 1,089100 0,593878 0,000000 0,64713 0,35287
610 1,030480 0,527963 0,000000 0,66122 0,33878
615 0,950 740 0,461 834 0,000 000 0,67306 0,32694
620 0,856297 0,398057 0,000000 0,68266 0,31734
625 0,754930 0,339554 0,000 000 0,68976 0,31024
630 0,647467 0,283493 0,000000 0,69548 0,30452
635 0,535110 0,228254 0,000000 0,70099 0,29901
640 0,431567 0,179828 0,000000 0,70587 0,29413
645 0,343690 0,140211 0,000000 0,71025 0,28975
650 0,268329 0,107633 0,000000 0,71371 0,28629
655 0,204300 0,081 187 0,000 000 0,71562 0,28438
660 0,152568 0,060281 0,000000 0,71679 0,28321
665 0,112210 0,044096 0,000000 0,71789 0,282 11
670 0,081 261 0,031800 0,000000 0,71873 0,28127
675 0,057930 0,022602 0,000000 0,71934 0,28066
680 0,040 851 0,015905 0,000 000 0,71976 0,280 24
685 0,028623 0,011 130 0,000 000 0,720 02 0,27998
690 0,019941 0,007749 0,000 000 0,72016 0,27984
695 0,013842 0,005375 0,000000 0,720 30 0,27970
700 0,009577 0,003718 0,000000 0,720 36 0,27964
705 0,006605 0,002565 0,000000 0,72032 0,27968
39
CIE 15:2004
A,nm x
10
()") Y10(A) Z10(A) XlO(A)
II
. II
710 0,004553 0,001768 0,000000 0,72023 0,27977
715 0,003145 0,001222 0,000000 0,72009 0,27991
720 0,002175 0,000846 0,000000 0,71991 0,28009
725 0,001506 0,000586 0,000000 0,71969 0,28031
730 0,001045 0,000407 0,000000 0,71945 0,280 55
735 0,000 727 0,000284 0,000 000 0,71919 0,280 81
740 0,000 508 0,000199 0,000000 0,71891 0,28109
745 0,000356 0,000140 0,000000 0,71861 0,28139
750 0,000 251 0,000098 0,000000 0,71829 0,281 71
755 0,000 178 0,000070 0,000000 0,71796 0,28204
760 0,000126 0,000050 0,000000 0,71761 0,28239
765 0,000090 0,000036 0,000000 0,71724 0,28276
770 0,000065 0,000025 0,000000 0,71686 0,28314
775 0,000046 0,000018 0,000000 0,71646 0,28354
780 0,000033 0,000013 0,000000 0,71606 0,28394
Summation at 5 nm intervals:
LY10(A) = 23,332036
11.6 Table T.6. Relative spectral power distributions of illuminants representing
typical fluorescent lamps, for wavelengths A = 380 nm to 780 nm at 5 nm
intervals
Table T6. 1. Fluorescent lamps FLt-12, already published in CIE 15.2 as F1_F12xVIH
FL 1-6: standard; FL7-9: broad-band; FL 10-12: narrow band fluorescent lamps.
395
400
405
34,10 32,62
12,42 ! 10,77
0,46
0,37
-----
1,29
12,68
1,59
0,40
0,33
1,19
12,48
1,12
XVIII IIluminants FL2*, FL7* and FL 11* should take priority over others when a few typical
fluorescent lamp illuminants are to be selected.
40
CIE 15:2004
FL5
2,55 10,32
2,70 10,91
2,82 11,40
2,91 11,83 6,25
~ ~ ..
465 2,99 12,17 6,41
470 2,10
1,91
3,01
14,29 10,83
14,96 11,88
10,44 8,97
5,94 4,72
3,34 2,33
2,35 1,47
...... -
1,88 1,10 0,71
520 11,22 3,41 0,60
--"--
525 11,05 3,90 0,63
530 , 11,03 4,69 1,10
535 11,18
540 11,53
545
550
555
560
18,53
19,43
21,97
23,01
11,60 13,34 14,39 I 44,12
14,04 16,00 11,35 13,61 14,40 ! 34,55 42,58 53,02
12,45 14,42 8,29 10,25 11,12 13,87 14,47 12,09 13,18 14,67
10,95 i 12,56 7,32 8,95 10,95 14,07 14,62 12,15 13,16! 14,38
10,93 6,41 7,74 10,52 12,26 14,71
4,43 5,11
41
CIE 15:2004
3,02 i 9,87
}------+............ j.-_ ..... .
2,81
2,00 2,14 2,42
10,99 10,57 1,52 1,54 1,64
9,98 9,18 1,35 1,33 1,36
5,83 9,22 8,25 1,49
2,14
2,34
1,42
1,61
735 3,36 2,86
740 0,73 3,09 2,64 0,24 0,24 i 0,28
745 0,68 2,85 2,43 i 0.24 0,24 0,28
750 0,69 2,65 2,26 0,21 0,20 0,21
755 2,51 2,14 0,17 0,24 0,17
-_. - ~ .......
760 2,37 2,02 0,21 0,32 0,21
......... ......_._.__ ...-
765 0,41 2,15 1,83 0,22
0,33 1,17 1,89 1,61
0,26 0,99 1,61 1,38
0,40 0.21 0,81 1,32 1,12
42
CIE 15:2004
Table T.6.2.a. New set of fluorescent lamps. Fl3.1-3: Standard halophosphate lamps;
Fl3.4-6: Deluxe type lamps; Fl3.7-8: Three band fluorescent lamps.
I ~
FL3.1 FL3.2 FL3.3 FL3.4 FL3.5 FL3.6 FL3.7 FL3.8
2.39 5,80 8,94 3,46 4,72 5,53 3,79 4,18
I 385 2,93 6,99 11,21 3,86 5,82 6,63 2,56 2,93
390 3,82 8,70 14,08 4,41 7,18 8,07 1,91 2,29
395 4,23 9,89 16,48 4,51 8,39 9,45 1,42 1,98
400 4,97 11,59 19,63 4,86 9,96 11,28 1,51 2,44
405 86,30 94,53 116,33 71,22 58,86 61,47 73,64 70,70
410 11,65 20,80 32,07 8,72 15,78 17,80 7,37 10,19
415 7,09 16,52 29,72 5,36 15,10 17,47 4,69 9,79
420 7,84 18,30 33,39 5,61 17,30 20,12 5,33 13,21
I 425 8,59 20,33 36,94 5,91 19,66 23,05 6,75 17,79
430 9,44 22,00 40,33 6,42 22,43 26,37 8,51 22,98
435 196,54 231,90 262,66 192,77 176,00 186,01 181,81 191,43
440 10,94 25,81 46,87 7,77 28,67 33,94 11,71 31,76
445 11,38 27,63 49,79 8,37 31,92 37,98 11,96 33,35
450 11,89 29,10 52,46 9,22 35,38 42,12 12,18 33,87
455 12,37 30,61 54,81 10,18 38,73 46,38 11,90 32,89
460 12,81 31,92 56,81 11,18 41,98 50,30 11,16 30,60
465 13,15 33,11 58,44 12,28 44,92 53,95 11,22 28,28
470 13,39 33,83 59,52 13,38 47,49 56,94 9,83 24,81
475 13,56 34,70 60,12 14,54 49,58 59,48 8,94 21,60
480 13,59 35,02 60,24 15,74 51,21 61,36 12.08 23,40
485 13,56 35,22 59,88 17,09 52,36 62,68 52,56 68,99
490 14,07 35,81 59,88 19,60 53,99 64,34 55,42 70,85
495 13,39 35,14 58,60 21,05 53,78 63,90 31,69 42,29
500 13,29 35,14 57,85 23,96 54,04 63,85 16,03 22,67
505 13,25 34,90 56,29 27,77 53,88 63,24 6.72 11,08
510 13,53 34,70 54,81 32,68 53,62 62,46 4,59 7,66
515 14,24 35,02 53,42 38,29 53,25 61,41 3,67 6,07
520 15,74 36,13 52,70 43,76 53,09 60,47 3,02 5,07
525 18,26 37,92 52,50 47,72 52,88 59,48 3,21 4,88
530 22,28 40,62 53,30 50,27 52,99 58,65 4,90 6,26
535 27,97 44,70 54,89 51,78 53,15 57,93 19,05 20,29
540 35,70 49,63 57,61 52,68 53,67 57,49 177,64 204,67
545 148,98 154,16 182,75 167,36 167,93 175,17 347,34 390,25
550 56,55 62,21 65,27 55,29 55,61 57,27 116,80 135,69
555 68,68 68,92 69,41 56,94 56,82 57,49 31,87 34,57
560 79,99 75,83 73,28 59,30 58,39 57,99 16,37 15,71
565 91,47 81,95 76,56 62,15 60,22 58,76 14,92 12,60
570 101,32 86,95 78,67 65,26 62,21 59,64 14,12 11,05
575 123,16 103,54 95,74 84,26 81,45 78,77 29,50 25,05
580 129,53 109,94 97,22 89,22 84,96 81,26 61,40 54,98
585 115,05 91,95 76,79 75,79 68,71 63,18 85,05 82,84
43
CIE 15:2004
i I ~ nm+ FL3.1 FL3.2 FL3.3 FL3.4 FL3.5 FI ~ R FL3.7
S
590 113,48 89,85 73,36 79,19 70,70 64,29 64,86 58,22
595 110,08 87,15 69,33 82,80 73,01 65,78 65,01 53,06
600 104,28 83,26 64,23 85,76 74,69 66,77 53,17 41,44
605 97,98 78,93 58,92 88,62 76,26 67,77 34,22 25,26
610 89,60 73,93 53,38 91,12 77,68 68,60 427,27 329,89
615 80,74 68,84 47,91 93,43 78,67 69,10 201,10 161,29
620 71,92 63,44 42,61 96,89 80,14 70,15 58,63 54,19
625 63,50 58,84 37,74 101,45 81,71 71,69 72,01 66,30
630 55,46 53,84 33,11 103,65 82,08 71,97 88,19 71,43
635 47,97 49,43 29,04 100,30 79,98 69,81 20,07 15,74
640 41,39 45,54 25,29 97,89 78,15 68,05 13,10 10,22
645 35,50 41,53 22,10 96,59 76,52 66,66 12,92 10,68
650 30,32 38,31 19,31 106,21 79,20 69,70 24,54 20,32
655 25,79 34,62 16,84 109,97 79,51 70,37 15,94 14,13
660 21,84 31,80 14,68 117,49 81,08 72,47 13,56 11,72
665 18,53 29,02 12,89 96,04 70.76 62,30 13,38 11,75
670 15,67 26,72 11,37 80,15 62,58 54,45 8,42 7,87
675 13,22 24,22 9,97 70,42 56,87 49,20 6,57 6,38
680 11,14 22,19 8,82 65,01 52,83 45,60 7,18 7,23
685 9,40 20,41 7,86 60,15 49,11 42,40 9,90 8,94
690 8,65 19,10 7,78 56,04 46,28 40,02 11,47 9,79
695 6,75 16,79 6,30 50,92 42,24 36,48 8,88 7,26
700 5,69 15,13 5,67 46,26 38,58 33,28 3,05 2,59
705 4,87 13,82 5,15 42,60 35,59 30,84 22,04 17,03
710 4,29 12,63 4,91 38,85 32,76 28,30 42,79 33,69
715 3,54 11,39 4,31 35,09 29,61 25,65 14,40 12,02
720 3,03 10,32 3,99 31,73 26,89 23,33 1,88 1,68
725 2,62 9,21 3,67 28,77 24,53 21,23 1,60 1,50
730 2,28 8,89 3,43 25,76 22,17 19,29 1,42 1,31
735 1,94 7,50 3,19 23,16 20,02 17,41 1,05 1,01
740 1,70 6,71 2,95 21,30 18,45 16,31 1,23 1,16
745 1,50 6,11 2,75 18,55 16,09 14,21 1,76 1,59
750 1,36 5,40 2,63 17,74 15,62 14,04 0,74 0,79
755 1,16 4,80 2,43 14,74 13,10 11,55 0,52 0,67
760 4,91 8,70 7,14 12,93 11,69 10,39 4,10 4,82
765 0,95 4,01 2,19 13,63 12,42 11,28 0,46 0,61
770 1,50 4,09 2,71 10,43 9,43 8,51 0,99 1,25
775 0,89 3,30 2,00 9,67 8,96 8,24 0.43 0,79
780 0,68 2,82 1,80 8,07 7,39 7,02 0,00 0,58
+ This table gives the representative data of these lamps only in the 380 nm to 780 nm
region for colorimetric purposes, though many fluorescent lamps emit power outside this
spectral region, especially in the near ultraviolet. Other sources of data must be consulted if
information is required below 380 nm or above 780 nm.
44
CIE 15:2004
Table T.6.2b. New set of fluorescent lamps, cant. FL3.9-11: Three band fluorescent lamps;
FL3.12-14: Multi-band fluorescent lamps; FL3.15: 065 simulator lamp.
Ie, nm
+
FL3.9 FL3.10 FL3.11 FL3.12 FL3.13 FL3.14 FL3.15
380 3,77 0,25 3,85 1,62 2,23 2,87 300,00
385 2,64 0 2,91 2,06 2,92 3,69 286,00
390 2,06 0 2,56 2,71 3,91 4,87 268,00
395 1,87 0 2,59 3,11 4,55 5,82 244,00
400 2,55 0,69 3,63 3,67 5,46 7,17 304,00
405 71,68 21,24 74,54 74,60 77,40 72,21 581,00
410 12,05 2,18 14,69 8,88 11,25 13,69 225,00
415 13,57 1,86 17,22 4,77 7,69 11,12 155,00
420 19,60 3,1 24,99 4,72 8,29 12,43 152,00
425 27,33 5 34,40 4,72 8,98 13,90 170,00
430 35,39 7,03 44,57 4,94 10,01 15,82 295,00
435 211,82 45,08 228,08 150,29 204,45 200,99 1417,00
440 49,02 16,78 61,53 6,08 13,75 21,72 607,00
445 51,83 12,28 65,31 7,13 16,88 26,33 343,00
450 52,50 13,31 66,35 9,10 21,73 32,85 386,00
455 50,73 13,66 64,37 11,76 27,96 40,80 430,00
460 46,93 13,69 59,81 14,96 34,92 49,23 469,00
465 42,42 13,13 54,24 18,54 41,96 57,39 502,00
470 37,16 12,28 47,42 22,48 48,62 65,26 531,00
475 31,84 11,42 41,10 26,76 54,33 71,99 552,00
480 31,94 11,66 40,04 31,66 59,49 78,25 567,00
485 77,74 22,04 85,54 40,93 67,91 88,85 572,00
490 79,45 26,17 86,55 45,83 70,01 91,67 575,00
495 47,93 18,57 53,47 46,00 66,40 86,81 561,00
500 26,24 11,36 30,91 45,26 62,07 80,42 548,00
505 13,15 6,83 17,41 43,16 56,95 73,82 527,00
510 8,80 5,58 12,56 41,63 52,70 69,12 507,00
515 6,70 4,88 10,10 39,75 48,54 63,69 482,00
520 5,38 4,31 8,48 37,83 44,80 58,44 461,00
525 4,93 3,76 7,74 36,16 41,75 53,57 438,00
530 6,06 3,61 8,58 35,25 39,77 49,66 418,00
535 19,76 5,62 21,39 37,04 40,50 48,44 404,00
540 215,94 38,59 220,12 59,86 59,27 72,56 429,00
545 412,13 100 417,35 183,53 184,09 200,42 1016,00
550 142,39 36,54 146,13 59,03 59,06 65,00 581,00
555 34,74 10,57 36,67 47,93
I
49,95 47,49 370,00
560 14.76 2,98 16,51 48,67 50,90 44,14 368,00
565 10,99 2,05 12,56 52,69 54,51 44,71 371,00
570 9,25 1,84 10.81 57,24 58,33 46,01 377,00
575 23,50 6,09 25,31 77,75 77,49 63,52 490,00
580 53,05 17,27 53,31 87,81 85,78 71,73 525,00
585 81.90 21,77 80,75 80,55 76,20 63,52 402,00
45
CIE 15:2004
FL3.9 FL3.10 FL3.11 FL3.12 FL3.13 FL3.14 FL3.15
590 54,92 18,72 53,56 84,83 78,73 64,13 404,00
595 47,80 10,15 44,02 86,84 78,95 63,74 412,00
600 36,65 7,26 33,05 91,44 81,48 66,82 418,00
605 21,82 5,17 20,26 96,51 84,57 70,65 425,00
610 285,69 56,66 233,61 105,25 87,75 79,29 428,00
615 139,94 49,39 118,20 106,74 89,56 80,77 432,00
620 53,37 18,57 51,66 108,53 91,36 83,59 433,00
625 64,30 14,21 61,27 106,92 89,00 82,59 431,00
630 64,04 14,01 55,15 101,54 83,67 77,60 427,00
635 13,79 5,99 12,95 95,20 78,26 72,47 420,00
640 9,06 2,68 8,93 89,34 73,19 68,34 410,00
645 9,83 3,14 9,77 82,95 67,61 63,82 399,00
650 18,60 6,25 17,12 75,78 61,42 58,57 385,00
655 13,38 5,78 13,01 68,65 55,49 53,18 370,00
660 10,99 6,75 10,45 61,70 49,78 47,97 352,00
665 10,77 5,16 10,33 55,23 44,46 43,14 336,00
670 7,57 3,03 7,70 48,58 39,13 38,19 317,00
675 6,19 1,57 6,34 42,90 34,45 33,85 298,00
680 7,09 1,72 7,35 37,74 30,28 29,94 277,00
685 8,54 1,54 8,22 32,93 26,37 26,24 260,00
690 8,77 1,71 7,93 29,65 23,88 23,90 242,00
695 6,41 1,1 5,70 25,19 20,10 20,33 223,00
700 2,26 0,28 2,23 21,69 17,40 17,42 202,00
705 15,02 3,65 12,43 19,28 15,29 15,64 187,00
710 29,39 7,54 24,24 17,36 13,62 14,34 167,00
715 10,22 2,34 8,74 14,74 11,68 12,21 152,00
720 1,42 0,05 1,39 12,86 10,31 10,65 136,00
725 1,23 0,04 1,23 11,28 9,11 9,43 125,00
730 1,10 0,04 1,10 9,97 8,03 8,34 113,00
735 0,84 0,03 0,84 8,88 7,13 7,52 103,00
740 0,97 0,03 0,94 7,78 6,31 6,73 93,00
745 1,35 0,02 1,23 7,04 5,67 6,08 84,00
750 0,65 0,02 0,68 6,30 5,11 5,52 75,00
755 0,13 0,01 0,52 5,55 4,55 5,00 66,00
760 4,22 0,01 4,60 10,15 9,06 9,47 58,00
765 0,10 0 0,45 4,50 3,74 4,08 51,00
770 0,68 0 1,04 4,81 4,04 4,43 46,00
775 0.16 0 0,45 3,72 3,14 3,39 41,00
780 0,00 0 0,00 3,28 2,75 3,17 37,00
+ This table gives the representative data of these lamps only in the 380 nm to 780 nm
region for colorimetric purposes, though many fluorescent lamps emit power outside this
spectral region, especially in the near ultraviolet. Other sources of data must be consulted if
information is required below 380 nm or above 780 nm.
46
CIE 15:2004
11.7 Table T.7. High pressure discharge lamps. HP1: Standard high pressure sodium
lamp; HP2: Colour enhanced high pressure sodium lamp; HP3-5: Three types of
high pressure metal halide lamps
-1, nm+ HP1 HP2 HP3 HP4 HP5
380 1,90 2,64 3,15 9,80 0,34
385 2,20 2,77 7,49 13,30 7,11
390 2,50 3,42 10,87 19,97 11,49
395 2,70 3,68 12,57 25,81 14,97
400 3,10 4,33 12,97 24,69 14,95
405 4,30 5,50 21,29 47,66 29,14
410 3,80 5,94 26,29 54,44 38,08
415 4,20 7,20 30,18 63,82 51,56
420 4,80 9,02 43,06 85,52 62,56
425 5,19 10,27 29,58 60,54 55,61
430 5,89 12,48 23,18 38,37 41,98
435 7,39 16,82 35,28 88,20 50,02
440 7,89 16,04 26,29 44,94 42,14
445 5,69 15,26 24,29 35,64 39,04
450 12,89 22,58 22,91 30,75 40,52
455 6,69 20,07 26,20 33,77 45,29
460 4,30 15,13 29,31 40,81 51,01
465 20,78 25,27 25,30 33,77 49,18
470 12,99 28,04 28,14 35,28 49,05
475 6.69 15,99 24,05 32,55 46,12
480 1,40 10,40 21,82 29,44 45,73
485 1,50 11,10 20,51 26,16 39,46
490 3,20 13,44 23,05 29,96 44,39
495 18,18 22,62 26,98 32,83 46,14
500 56,24 49,71 30,96 33,58 49,54
505 2,90 17,21 30,72 41,16 59,76
510 2,10 17,12 27,13 32,93 48,47
515 13,39 27,26 29,55 32,13 48,38
520 2,10 20,02 34,22 34,45 48,70
525 2,00 21,54 29,98 30,12 44,25
530 2,20 23,36 41,21 41,13 54,42
535 2,30 25,66 173,14 187,10 128,93
540 2,60 29,69 141,37 101,37 81,26
5 5,10 43,12 64,98 123,96 67,36
550 11,39 98,30 33,83 42,47 48,48
555 15,48 125,60 34,26 34,73 51,41
560 20,78 134,57 33,32 31,82 48,88
565 55,64 149,70 52,80 54,67 68,52
570 254,03 166,12 74,29 57,45 80,85
575 56,14 98,77 47,97 70,43 65,96
80 111,78 30,47 49,20 69,50 59,43
47
CIE 15:2004
A, nm
+
HP1 HP2 HP3 HP4 HP5
585 297,98 1,17 96,07 49,37 67,57
590 142,55 0,39 85,41 183,35 128,34
595 334,84 1,65 175,18 162,15 131,85
600 189,40 21,41 153,73 109,35 101,70
605 117,78 76,11 120,22 72,38 77,05
610 79,92 126,16 98,90 70,60 66,27
615 108,09 161,96 90,22 58,08 77,09
620 46,85 160,06 70,07 44,13 60,51
625 38,16 158,19 66,84 50,20 65,23
630 32,47 153,69 57,61 40,80 57,86
635 28,37 147,40 53,03 37,91 56,20
640 25,37 140,60 49,85 36,71 54,32
645 22,98 134,92 48,16 38,30 56,34
650 20,38 127,59 42,76 31,24 45,74
655 19,78 124,65 50,64 35,31 50,79
660 17,78 118,02 48,42 45,62 56,66
665 16,78 113,94 41,27 35,82 51,99
670 19,18 118,10 43,44 89,91 84,31
675 17,98 115,16 40,48 36,01 47,48
680 13,69 102,85 35,16 32,57 47,46
685 9,99 90,54 34,94 39,26 61,78
690 8,19 83,34 24,68 23,27 34,51
695 7,59 79,44 24,70 25,30 38,74
700 6,99 76,97 21,49 20,02 30,98
705 6,79 74,85 19,49 17,54 25,45
710 6,49 73,12 18,48 16,25 22,88
715 6,39 71,51 17,55 15,20 20,82
720 6,09 70,13 17,36 15,15 21,05
725 5,99 69,04 17,09 15,22 20,81
730 5,79 67,48 16,32 14,26 18,69
735 5,79 66,70 16,07 12,63 17,54
740 5,79 66,31 16,58 14,75 19,58
745 5,79 65,14 15,78 13,19 16,42
750 6,39 65,70 17,66 17,63 23,77
755 5,99 64,79 20,46 23,38 35,39
760 5,59 64,10 16,59 16,02 21,37
765 31,97 83,04 17,81 24,46 34,58
770 27,87 86,25 16,07 22,05 30,21
775 5,89 63,93 14,83 16,11 19,71
780 6,69 64,92 14,61 12,91 15,61
+ The relative spectral power distribution of the HP-illuminants given here can only be used
over the spectral range from 380 nm to 780 nm. Although many high pressure gas discharge
lamps emit power outside this spectral range, especially in the near ultraviolet, other sources
of data must be consulted if information is required below 380 nm or above 780 nm.
48
CIE 15:2004
11.8 Table T.B. Colorimetric data for the fluorescent lamp iIIuminants of Table T.G
Table T.8.1. IIluminants as published in Table T.6.1.
Lamp Chromaticity coordinates Correlated colour General colour
x y
temperature, (Tep) rendering index, Ra
(kelvins)
FL 1 0,3131 0,3371 6430 76
FL 2 0,3721 0,3751 4230 64
FL3 0,4091 0,3941 3450 57
FL4 0,4402 0,4031 2940 51
FL 5 0,3138 0,3452 6350 72
FL6 0,3779 0,3882 4150 59
FL 7 0,3129 0,3292 6500 90
FL 8 0,3458 0,3586 5000 95
FL 9 0,3741 0,3727 4150 90
FL10 0,3458 0,3588 5000 81
FL 11 0,3805 0,3769 4000 83
FL 12 0,4370 0,4042 3000 83
Table T.8.2. IIluminants as published in Table T.6.2.
FL3.1 FL3.2 FL3.3 FL3.4 FL3.5 FL3.6 FL
x= 0,4407 0,3808 0,3153 0,4429 0,3749 0,3488 0,4384
y= 0,4033 0,3734 0,3439 0,4043 0,3672 0,36 0,4045
Tep= 2932 K 3965 K 6280 K 2904 K 4086 K 4894 K 2979 K
Special Rendering Indexes:
No.1 = 42 65 64 91 97 97 97
No.2 = 69 80 80 89 97 97 94
NO.3 = 89 89 89 79 92 93 54
NO.4 = 39 66 69 88 94 97 88
NO.5 = 41 66 69 88 97 97 86
NO.6 = 52 71 74 82 95 95 81
NO.7 = 66 79 81 88 94 96 87
NO.8 = 13 48 49 89 94 96 64
NO.9 = -109 -37 -63 76 88 93 -9
No. 10 = 29 51 52 69 90 90 51
No. 11 = 19 56 62 88 95 97 76
No. 12 = 21 59 68 63 90 92 50
No. 13 = 47 68 68 91 97 98 98
No. 14 = 93 94 93 87 95 95 69
General Colour Rendering Index
R = a
51 70 72 87 95 96 82
49
CIE 15:2004
Table T.8.2 cont. IIluminants as published in Table 1.6.2.
I I
FL3.8
I
FL3.9
I
FL3.10
I
FL3.11
I
FL3.12
I
FL3.13
I
FL3.14 I FL3.15 I
x= 0,382 0,3499 0,3455 0,3245 0,4377 0,383 0,3447 0,3127
y= 0,3832 0,3591 0,356 0,3434 0,4037 0,3724 0,3609 0,3288
Tep= 4006 K 4853 K 5000 K 5854 K 2984 K 3896 K 5045 K 6509 K
Special Rendering Indices
No.1 = 94 94 99 90 95 98 93 99
No.2 = 89 89 97 86 98 97 94 99
NO.3 = 50 48 63 49 92 98 97 96
No.4 = 85 84 92 82 95 97 94 98
NO.5 = 83 84 92 81 94 99 94 99
NO.6 = 73 72 85 70 97 97 93 100
NO.7 = 86 85 92 85 93 94 97 98
NO.8 = 72 78 86 79 83 88 97 98
NO.9 = 5 22 46 24 58 71 93 96
No. 10 = 40 38 62 34 88 99 91 99
No. 11 = 68 68 78 64 93 94 95 100
No. 12 = 48 51 72 50 85 89 85 95
No. 13 = 95 95 97 90 97 99 92 98
No. 14 = 67 66 75 67 94 98 97 98
General Colour Rendering Index
Ra = 79 79 88 78 93 96 95 98
11.9 Table T.9. Colorimetric data for the high pressure illuminants of Table T.7
I I
HP1
I
HP2
I I
HP3
I
HP4
I
HP5
I
x= 0,533 0,4778 0,4302 0,3812 0,3776
y= 0,415 0,4158 0,4075 0,3797 0,3713
Tep= 1959 K 2506 K 3144 K 4002 K 4039 K
Special Rendering Indices
No.1 = -3 98 87 75 87
No.2 = 61 89 92 85 94
NO.3 = 40 73 87 84 97
No.4= -27 89 89 78 89
NO.5 = -4 88 85 75 89
NO.6 = 52 71 90 79 94
NO.7 = 21 81 82 77 85
NO.8 = -75 72 50 42 64
NO.9 = -260 52 -29 -60 10
No. 10 = 43 66 71 56 85
No. 11 = -52 66 89 77 90
No. 12 = 27 55 72 64 90
No. 13 = 7 90 90 79 90
No. 14 = 61 82 91 91 98
General Colour Rendering Index
Ra = 8 83 83 74 87
50
CIE 15:2004
11.10 Table T.10. Values of the first deviation function used in the calculation of the
observer metamerism index
A. nm t. x(A) t.Y(,1)
t.;if )\ II
., II
I A, nm I
t. x(,1)
I
t.Y(,1}
I
t.Z(A)
I
380 -0,0001 0,0000 -0,0002 585 -0,0637 -0,0162 -0,0011
385 -0,0003 0,0000 -0,0010 590 -0,0656 -0,0196 -0,0009
390 -0,0009 -0,0001 -0,0036 595 -0,0638 -0,0199 -0,0008
395 -0,0026 -0,0004 -0,0110 600 -0,0595 -0,0187 -0,0006
400 -0,0069 -0,0009 -0,0294 605 -0,0530 -0,0170 -0,0005
405 -0,0134 -0,0015 -0,0558 610 -0,0448 -0,0145 -0,0004
410 -0,0197 -0,0019 -0,0820 615 -0,0346 -0,0112 0,0000
415 -0,0248 -0,0022 -0,1030 620 -0,0242 -0,0077 0,0002
420 -0,0276 -0,0021 -0,1140 625 -0,0155 -0,0048
I
0,0000
425 -0,0263 -0,0017 -0,1079 630 -0,0085 -0,0025 -0,0002
430 -0,0216 -0,0009 -0,0872 635 -0,0044 -0,0012 -0,0002
435 -0,0122 0,0005 -0,0455 640 -0,0019 -0,0006 0,0000
440 -0,0021
I
0,0015 -0,0027 645 -0,0001 0,0000 0,0000
445 0,0036 0,0008 0,0171 650 0,0010 0,0003 0,0000
450 0,0092 -0,0003 0,0342 655 0,0016 0,0005 0,0000
455 0,0186 -0,0005 0,0703 660 0,0019 0,0006 0,0000
460 0,0263 -0,0011 0,0976 665 0,0019 0,0006 0,0000
465 0,0256 -0,0036 0,0859 670 0,0017 0,0006 0,0000
470 0,0225 -0,0060 0,0641 675 0,0013 0,0005 0,0000
475 0,0214 -0,0065 0,0547 680 0,0009 0,0003 0,0000
480 0,0205 -0,0060 0,0475 685 0,0006 0,0002 0,0000
485 0,0197 -0,0045 0,0397 690 0,0004 0,0001 0,0000
490 0,0187 -0,0031 0,0319 695 0,0003 0,0001 0,0000
495 0,0167 -0,0037 0,0228 700 0,0002 0,0001 0,0000
500 0,0146 -0,0047 0,0150 705 0,0001 0,0000 0,0000
505 0,0133 -0,0059 0,0117 710 0,0001 0,0000 0,0000
510 0,0118 -0,0060 0,0096 715 0,0001 0,0000 0,0000
515 0,0094 -0,0025 0,0062 720 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000
520 0,0061 0,0010 0,0029 725 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000
525 0,0017 0,0005 0,0005 730 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000
530 -0,0033 -0,0011 -0,0012 735 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000
535 -0,0085 -0,0020 -0,0020 740 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000
540 -0,0139 -0,0028 -0,0022 745 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000
545 -0,0194 -0,0039 -0,0024 750 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000
550 -0,0247 -0,0044 -0,0024 755 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000
555 -0,0286 -0,0027 -0,0021 760 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000
560 -0,0334 -0,0022 -0,0017 765 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000
565 -0,0426 -0,0073 -0,0015 770 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000
570 -0,0517 -0,0127 -0,0014 775 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000
575 -0,0566 -0,0129 -0,0013 780 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000
580 -0,0600 -0,0126 -0,0013
51
CIE 15:2004
APPENDIX A. OLD RECOMMENDATIONS, NOW OBSOLETE, AS WELL AS
REFERENCES TO NON-CIE COLOUR DIFFERENCE FORMULAE
Appendix A.1. lIIuminant B and Source B
II/uminant B
This illuminant was intended to represent direct sunlight with a correlated colour temperature
of approximately 4900 K.
Source B
Iliuminant 6 was realized by source A, combined with a filter consisting of a layer, one
centimetre thick, of each of two solutions 6
1
and 6
2
, contained in a double cell made of
colourless optical glass. The solutions were made up as follows:
Solution 61:
Copper Sulphate (CUS04 . 5H
2
O) 2,452 g
Mannite [C6HS (OH)6] 2,452 g
Pyridine (CsHsN) 30,0 ml
Distilled water to make 1000,0 ml
Solution 62:
Cobalt Ammonium Sulphate [CoS0
4
) (NH4)z S04' 6H
2
0)] 21,71 g
Copper Sulphate (CUS04 .' 5H
2
0) 16,11 g
Sulphuric Acid (density 1,835 gmr
1
) 10,0 ml
Distilled water to make 1000,0 ml
Appendix A.2. IIluminant C and Source C
lIIuminant C
Representing average daylight with a correlated colour temperature of about 6800 K. The
spectral power distribution of Iliuminant C is reproduced in Table T.1.
Note: In Table 1.1 the values for 775 nm and 780 nm have been added by extrapolation.
Source C
Iliuminant C is to be realized by source A, combined with a filter consisting of a layer, one
centimetre thick, of each of two solutions C
1
and C
2
, contained in a double cell made of
colourless optical glass. The solutions are to be made up as follows:
Solution C 1 :
Copper Sulphate (CUS04 . 5H
2
0)
Mannite C6HS (OH)6
Pyridine (CSH5N)
Distilled water to make
Solution C2
3,412 9
3,412 9
30,0 ml
1000,0 ml
Cobalt Ammonium Sulphate [CoS0
4
. (NH4hS04. 6H
2
0] 30,58 9
52
Copper Sulphate (CUS04. 5H
2
0) 22,52 9
Sulphuric Acid (density 1,835 gmr
1
)
Distilled water to make
10,0
1000,0
ml
ml
Appendix A.3. elE 1964 uniform colour space and colour difference formula
u, v uniform chromaticity scale (CIE 1960 UCS) diagram
CIE 15:2004
This approximately uniform chromaticity diagram was produced by plotting
u = 4X/(X + 15 Y + 3Z) as abscissa and v = 6 Y/(X + 15 Y + 3Z) as ordinate; u and v are related
to u' and 1/ of the CI E 1976 UCS diagram by the equations u = u' and v = 21//3.
1964 uniform space and colour difference formula
This approximately uniform colour space was produced by plotting along three orthogonal
axes
W = 25y
1I3
- 17
U* = 13W (u - un)
V* = 13W (v- v
n
)
The associated colour difference formula was:
t"E = [(U*1 - u*2l + (V*1 - V"2)2 + (W1 - W2)2j1/2
The coordinates in this system bear the following approximate relationships to the
coordinates of the CIELUV space:
W ~ L
U* ~ u*
V" ~ 2/3 v*
Appendix A.4. CIE 1994 colour difference formula (CIE94)
Based on the work documented in CIE 101-1993 (CIE, 1993), where experiments are
described that pointed out that a number of external parameters of a visual task affect the
correlation of visual magnitude judgements of colour differences with their colorimetric
measures, CIE started investigations with carefully selected data sets and reported a new
colour-difference formula that introduced weighting factors to the lightness, chroma and hue
differences, t"L*, t"C*ab and t"H*ab, of the CIELAB - formula. The resulting recommendation
was as follows (CIE, 1995):
The weighting functions, SL, Sc, SH adjust the internal non-uniform structure of the
CIELAB - formula using
Sl = 1
Sc = 1 + 0,045 C*ab
SH = 1 + 0,015 C*ab
If the standard of a sample pair is not clearly defined, C*ab may be replaced by the
geometric mean (C*ab,1' C*ab,2)1/2.
Note 1: The parametric factors, kL' kc, kH are correction terms for variation in experimental
conditions. Under reference conditions they are all set at 1. For other choices see
(CIE,1993).
Note 2: An alternative colour difference formula used by some ISO committees, but never
endorsed by CIE is briefly described in Appendix A.5.
Note 3: The CIE 1994 colour difference formula is now obsolete and has been superseded by
the CIEDE2000 formula.
53
CIE 15:2004
Appendix A.S. CMC(I:c) colour difference formula
The Colour Measurement Committee of the Society of Dyers and Colourists (UK)
recommended a colour difference formula that has been integrated into some ISO standards.
It is a forerunner to CIE94 and was a model for developing the CIE94 formula. The main
deviations from CIE94 are found in the weighting factors that are much more complicated
mathematically in that they contain hue-dependent correction terms. They are defined as
follows (Clarke et aI., 1984):
where
SL = 0,040 975 L1 */(1 + 0,01765 L1 *), unless L1 * < 16 when SL = 0,511
Sc = 0,063 8 C*ab,1/(1 + 0,0131 C*ab.1) + 0,638
SH = Sc (Tf + 1 - f)
f= {(C\b1)4/[(C*ab1)4 + 1900]}1/2
T= 0,36 + 10,4 cos (h
ab
,1 + 35) I
unless h
ab
,1 is between 164
0
and 345
0
when
T = 0,56 + 10,2 cos (h
ab
,1 +168) I
The parametric factors are defined as follows:
kL = I
kc = C
kH = 1
The parametric factors are mostly chosen c = 1 and I varied between 1 and 2. The
choice of I and c must be indicated by setting the right numbers in the name of the formula,
e.g. for textiles a choice of CMC(2: 1) is in common use.
CIE recommends the use of the CIEDE2000 formula whenever in the past the CIE 94
or CMC formula were used
xlx
.
Appendix A.S. DIN99 colour difference formula
The preceding colour difference formulae including the CI EDE2000 colour difference formula
are non-vectorial transformations from CIELAB space, and do not define a space for colour
differences. A new formula for colour differences was developed to cope with this problem:
the DIN99 colour difference formula published in DIN 6176 Colorimetric determination of
colour differences of surface colours using the DIN 99 formula (DIN, 2003).
References
CIE, 1993. CIE 101-1993. Parametric effects in colour difference evaluation, 1993.
CIE, 1995. CIE 116-1995. Industrial colour difference evaluation, 1995.
CLARKE, F.J.J., MCDONALD, R. and RIGG, B., 1984. Modification to the JPC79 colour
difference formula. JSoc.Dyers Col. 100,128-131,1984.
DIN, 2003. DIN 6176. Colorimetric determination of colour differences of surface colours
using the DIN 99 formula, 2003.
XIX The recommended use of CIEDE2000 is in agreement with the persons who developed
the CMC formula.
54
CIE 15:2004
APPENDIX B. DEFINITIONS OF THE r(A), g(A), t(A) COLOUR-MATCHING FUNCTIONS,
THE CIE RGB SYSTEM AND THE DERIVATION OF THE CIE XYZ SYSTEM FROM THE
CIE RGB SYSTEM FOR THE 1931 STANDARD OBSERVER
The colour-matching functions X(A), Y(A), Z(A) were originally derived from colour-matching
functions r(A), g{,?t,), b().) referring to spectral reference stimuli [R], [G], [B]. These reference
stimuli were specified as stimuli of wavelengths 700,0 nm, 546,1 nm, and 435,8 nm,
respectively. Their units were chosen to make a mixture of equal quantities of the three
reference stimuli match the equi-energy spectrum. The luminances of the units of the three
spectral stimuli were in the ratios 1,0000 : 4,5907 : 0,0601.
Appendix B.1. Determination of the r(A), g()"), b(A) colour-matching functions
This determination results from two conventions originally adopted in 1931.
The first convention was to adopt the ratios of the luminance of the reference colour
stimuli [R], [G], [B] as values.
The second convention was to attribute to the monochromatic stimuli constituting the
colour-matching functions a luminance equal to the spectral luminous efficiency V(A).
It follows from these conventions that
1,0000 iV) + 4,5907 g(A) + 0,0601 b(},) = V(}") B.1
Since for any stimulus
Rlr= Gig = Bib = VI B.2
where I is the characteristic luminance of the chromaticity whose expression for
monochromatic stimuli reads
I(A) = 1,00000 r(A) + 4,5907 g(A) + 0,0601 b(A) B.3
it follows that, with L = V(A)
These COlour-matching functions as well as the corresponding chromaticity
coordinates, are given in Table B.1.
The colour-matching functions X(A), y().) , z()") given in Table T.4 agree closely
with those defined originally in 1931. Three minor changes have been introduced. If rounded
to four decimal places, at A =775 nm the new value of X(A) is 0,0001 instead of 0,0000; at
A = 555 nm yeA) is 1,0000 instead of 1,0002; and at A = 740 nm Y(A) is 0,0002 instead of
0,0003. These changes are considered insignificant in most colorimetric calculations.
It has been realized at an early stage that the 1924 V(A) function is too low in the blue
part of the spectrum. A corrected VM(A) function has been officially accepted by the CIE in
1988 (CIE, 1990). However, the XV"), YeA), Z(A) colour-matching functions have not been
modified. A CIE Technical Committee is currently investigating the question of obtaining
visually meaningful colour-matching functions, see e.g. (Schanda, 1998).
55
CIE 15:2004
Appendix B.2. Derivation of the CIE XYZ trichromatic system from the CIE RGB
trichromatic system
The derivation of the XYZ system from the RGB system had to fulfil a certain number of
requirements. Their fulfilment led to the establishment of a set of three linear equations
relating the reference stimuli [XL [V], [Z] to the reference stimuli [R], [G], [B] as follows:
[X]=0,418455[R] -0,091165[G] +0,000921 [B]
[Y] = -0,158657 [R] + 0,252 426 [G] - 0,002 550 [B] B.5
[Z] = -0,082 832 [R] + 0,015 705 [G] + 0,178 595 [B]
Another set of three linear equations yield, for any stimulus, the tristimulus values X,
Y, Z as function of the tristimulus values R, G, B:
X= 2,768 892 R
Y = 1,000 000 R
Z=O
+ 1,751748G
+ 4,590700 G
+ 0,056508 G
+ 1,130160 B
+ 0,060100B
+ 5,594292 B
B.6
These sets B. 5 and B. 6 are not independent, each one may be mathematically
derived from the other. The set B. 6 was developed first and its coefficients are exact values
(Morren, 2000). This set may be considered as more appropriate in the present context, but
the set B. 5 is more basic. Since colour-matching functions are a particular case of tristimulus
values, the set B. 6 gives directly three equations providing x(,,{), y(,,{), z(,,{) as a function of
r(,,{), g(,,{), b("{).
The second of these equations:
y(,,{) = 1,000000 r(,,{) + 4,590700 g(,,{) + 0,060100 b("{)
is particularly interesting: it reproduces the left-hand side of equation B. 1 under Section B. 1
and thus immediately leads to y(,,{) = V(V
Note: However, the same conclusion may be obtained by considering other features of the
XYZ system. The transformation between reference stimuli attributes to the
luminance Ly the value 1. Moreover, since the reference stimuli [X] and [Z] are
located on the alychne of the system, leading to Lx = Lz = 0, one has for any stimulus
L = Y and I = Y B.7
Consequently, equations similar to B. 4 lead to
B.8
These expressions are simpler than those given by the set B. 6.
In deriving the CIE XYZ colorimetric system a fundamental criterion was to link the
system to photometry. The units of the RGB system, the RGB primaries, were already
determined by their luminance. Furthermore this was done by using a transformation from the
RGB system to the XYZ system where y(}.) became equivalent to V("{) , determined by flicker
photometry. Although y(,,{) was intended to be a brightness correlate, it is actually a
luminance correlate, i.e. it does not describe the brightness relationship between coloured
lights. It does, however, provide a good estimate for the visibility of fine detail.
56
CIE 15:2004
Appendix B.3. Definition of the colour-matching functions in the CIE 1964 trichromatic
system
The colour-matching functions )(10(}.), Y10(}')' z10(A) defining the CIE 1964 standard
colorimetric observer given in Table T.5 were derived from colour-matching functions referring
to matching stimuli lRlOJ, [G
10
i, 1810]. These are stimuli specified in terms of wavenumbers ( v)
15 500 cm'\ 19 000 cm'\ and 22 500 cm,1 (corresponding approximately to wavelengths
645,2 nm, 526,3 nm, and 444,4 nm), and their amounts are given in power units.
The three reference stimuli IRlOL [G
10
!' [B101 have the same power and the colour-
matching functions glO(V), b;o(v) are defined as monochromatic stimuli whose power
equates to that of the reference stimuli. The g10(V), b;o(v) colour matching functions
are reproduced in Table B.2.
The derivation of the [X
1o
L IY
10
], IZ101 system from the [RlOL [G
10
], [B101 system is
based on principles that lead to a coordinate system similar to the system associated with the
CIE 1931 standard colorimetric observer. The following transformation equations relate very
closely the glO(v), b;o(v) values of Table B.2 to X10(V), Y1O(V), zw(v) values:
)(10(v) = 0,341 080 +0,189145 g10(V) +0,387529 b
10
(v)
Y10(V) = 0,139 058 ;:;o(v) + 0,837460 g10(V) + 0,073316 b
10
(v)
Z10(V) = 0,000 000 Go(v) + 0,039553 g10(V) + 2,026200 b
10
(v)
Chromaticity coordinates XlO( v), Y10( v), Z10( v) were then computed from
x
10
(v) = )(10(v)
xdv ) + YlO(v) + Z10(v)
Y1O(v)
x
lO
(v) + YlO(v) + ZlO(I')
Z10(V)
Table 2 of CIE standard colorimetric observers (CIE, 1986) contains the official
colour-matching functions X
lO
(A), Y10(A), ZlO(A) and chromaticity coordinates XlO(}o), Y10(A),
ZlO(A) on a wavelength basis obtained by interpolation and extrapolation of the functions
X10(}o), Y10(A), Z10(A) and XlO(A), YlO(.4), ZlO(A) at intervals of 1 nm. Table T.5 contains every
fifth value of this table.
The above transformation equations deviate somewhat from those originally
published (CIE, 1959), which related the un smoothed values of Go(v), g10{v), b
10
{v) with
the unsmoothed values of )(10(A), Yi0(}o), Z10(}')' The values published in CIE 15.2 (Table
2.6) are reproduced in this Appendix as Table B. 2.
In deriving the CIE 1964 standard colorimetric observer no direct photometric
measurements were required. The large-field colour matching data as defined by the CIE
1964 standard colorimetric observer are intended to apply to matches where the luminance
and relative spectral power distributions of the matched stimuli are such that no participation
of the rod receptors of the visual mechanism is to be expected. This condition of observation
is important as "rod intrusion" may upset the predictions of the standard observer.
In obtaining the RGB-XYZ transformation CIE tried to get the Yi0(A) function as near
as possible to a 10 degree spectral luminosity function based on flicker photometry. The CIE
is currently investigating the possibility of introducing on this basis a V
10
()o) function.
57
CIE 15:2004
Table B.1. Colour-matching functions iV,), gp.), b(A) and corresponding chromaticity
coordinates r(.l), gp.), b().) for wavelength 380 nm to 780 nm at 5 nm intervals for
the 1931 standard observer.
~
r(},) g(A)
b(A) I r(J,)
~
380 0,00003 -0,00001 0,00117 0,0272 -0,0115 0,9843
385 0,00005 -0,00002 0,00189 0,0268 -0,0114 0,9846
390 0,00010 -0,00004 0,00359 0,0263 -0,0114 0,9851
395 0,00017 -0,00007 0,00647 0,0256 -0,0113 0,9857
400 0,00030 -0,00014 0,01214 0,0247 -0,0112 0,9865
405 0,00047 -0,00022 0,01969 0,0237 -0,0111 0,9874
410 0,00084 -0,00041 0,03707 0,0225 -0,0109 0,9884
415 0,00139 -0,00070 0,06637 0,0207 -0,0104 0,9897
420 0,00211 -0,00110 0,11541 0,0181 -0,0094 0,9913
425 0,00266 -0,00143 0,18575 0,0142 -0,0076 0,9934
430 0,00218 -0,00119 0,24769 0,0088 -0,0048 0,9960
435 0,00036 -0,00021 0,29012 0,0012 -0,0007 0,9995
440 -0,00261 0,00149 0,31228 -0,0084 0,0048 1,0036
445 -0,00673 0,00379 0,31860 -0,0213 0,0120 1,0093
450 -0,01213 0,00678 0,31670 -0,0390 0,0218 1,0172
455 -0,01874 0,01046 0,31166 -0,0618 0,0345 1,0273
1
460 -0,02608 0,01485 0,29821 -0,0909 0,0517 1,0392
465 -0,03324 0,01977 0,27295 -0,1281 0,0762 1,0519
470 -0,03933 0,02538 0,22991 -0,1821 0,1175 1,0646
475 -0,04471 0,03183 0,18592 -0,2584 0,1840 1,0744
480 -0,04939 0,03914 0,14494 -0,3667 0,2906 1,0761
485 -0,05364 0,04713 0,10968 -0,5200 0,4568 1,0632
490 -0,05814 0,05689 0,08257 -0,7150 0,6996 1,0154
495 -0,06414 0,06948 0,06246 -0,9459 1,0247 0,9212
500 -0,07173 0,08536 0,04776 -1,1685 1,3905 0,7780
505 -0,08120 0,10593 0,03688 -1,3182 1,7195 0,5987
510 -0,08901 0,12860 0,02698 -1,3371 1,9318 0,4053
515 -0,09356 0,15262 0,01842 -1,2076 1,9699 0,2377
520 -0,09264 0,17468 0,01221 -0,9830 1,8534 0,1296
525 -0,08473 0,19113 0,00830 -0,7386 1,6662 0,0724
530 -0,07101 0,20317 0,00549 -0,5159 1,4761 0,0398
535 -0,05316 0,21083 0,00320 -0,3304 1,3105 0.0199
540 -0,03152 0,21466 0,00146 -0,1707 1,1628 0,0079
545 -0,00613 0,21487 0,00023 -0,0293 1,0282 0,0011
550 0,02279 0,21178 -0,00058 0,0974 0,9051 -0,0025
555 0,05514 0,20588 -0,00105 0,2121 0,7919 -0,0040
560 0,09060 0,19702 -0,00130 0,3164 0,6881 -0,0045
565 0,12840 0,18522 -0,00138 0,4112 0,5932 -0,0044
570 0,16768 0,17087 -0,00135 0,4973 0,5067 -0,0040
575 0,20715 0,15429 -0,00123 0,5751 0,4283 -0,0034
580 0,24526 0,13610 -0,00108 0,6449 0,3579 -0,0028
58
CIE 15:2004
I ~ A
g(A) b(A) r(A) g(}") b(
585 0,27989 0,11686 -0,00093 0,7071 0,2952 -0,0023
590 0,30928 0,09754 -0,00079 0,7617 0,2402 -0,0019
595 0,33184 0,07909 -0,00063 0,8087 0,1928 -0,0015
600 0,34429 0,06246 -0,00049 0,8475 0,1537 -0,0012
605 0,34756 0,04776 -0,00038 0,8800 0,1209 -0,0009
610 0,33971 0,03557 -0,00030 0,9059 0,0949 -0,0008
615 0,32265 0,02583 -0,00022 0,9265 0,0741 -0,0006
620 0,29708 0,01828 -0,00015 0,9425 0,0580 -0,0005
625 0,26348 0,01253 -0,00011 0,9550 0,0454 -0,0004
630 0,22677 0,00833 -0,00008 0,9649 0,0354 -0,0003
635 0,19233 0,00537 -0,00005 0,9730 0,0272 -0,0002
640 0,15968 0,00334 -0,00003 0,9797 0,0205 -0,0002
645 0,12905 0,00199 -0,00002 0,9850 0,0152 -0,0002
650 0,10167 0,00116 -0,00001 0,9888 0,0113 -0,0001
655 0,07857 0,00066 -0,00001 0,9918 0,0083 -0,0001
660 0,05932 0,00037 0,00000 0,9940 0,0061 -0,0001
665 0,04366 0,00021 0,00000 0,9954 0,0047 -0,0001
670 0,03149 0,00011 0,00000 0,9966 0,0035 -0,0001
675 0,02294 0,00006 0,00000 0,9975 0,0025 0,0000
680 0,01687 0,00003 0,00000 0,9984 0,0016 0,0000
685 0,01187 0,00001 0,00000 0,9991 0,0009 0,0000
690 0,00819 0,00000 0,00000 0,9996 0,0004 0,0000
695 0,00572 0,00000 0,00000 0,9999 0,0001 0,0000
700 0,00410 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
705 0,00291 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
710 0,00210 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
715 0,00148 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
720 0,00105 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0.0000 0,0000
725 0,00074 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
730 0,00052 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
735 0,00036 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0.0000
740 0,00025 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
745 0,00017 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
750 0,00012 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
755 0,00008 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
760 0,00006 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
765 0,00004 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
770 0,00003 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
775 0,00001 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
780 0,00000 0,00000 0,00000 1,0000 0,0000 0,0000
59
CIE 15:2004
Table B.2. CIE 1964 standard colorimetric observer. Colour-matching functions ;;o(v),
g10(V), b
lo
(v) and corresponding chromaticity coordinates (1Q( v), g10( v), b
10
( v)
for wavenumbers v = 27 750 to 12 250 cm-
1
at 250 cm-
1
intervals.
v,cm
-1
(10(V) g10(V)
-
b
10
(v) (10( v) g10( v) b
1O
( v)
27750 0,000000079100 -0.000000021447 0,000000307299 0,21674 -0,05877 0,84203
27500 0,00000029891 -0,00000008125 0,00000116475 0,21622 -0,05877 0,84255
27250 0,00000108348 -0,00000029533 0,00000423733 0,21560 -0,05877 0,84317
27000 0,0000037522 -0,0000010271 0,0000147506 0,21471 -0,05877

26750 0,0000123776 -0,0000034057 0,0000489822 0,21358 -0,05877 0,84519
26500 0,000038728 -0,000010728 0,000154553 0,21215 -0,05877 0,84662
26250 0,000114541 -0,000032004 0,000462055 0,21032 -0,05877 0,84844
26000 0,00031905 -0,00009006 0,00130350 0,20819 -0,05877 0,85058
25750 0,00083216 -0,00023807 0,00345702 0,20542 -0,05877 0,85335
25500 0,00201685 -0,00058813 0,00857776 0,20155 -0,05877 0,85722
25250 0,0045233 -0,0013519 0,0198315 0,19664 -0,05877 0,86213
25000 0,0093283 -0,0028770 0,0425057 0,19054 -0,05877 0.86823
24750 0,0176116 -0,0056200 0.0840402 0,18339 -0,05852 0.87513
24500 0,030120 -0,010015 0,152451 0,17455 -0,05804 0.88349
24250 0,045571 -0,016044 0,251453 0,16219 -0,05710 0,89491
24000 0,060154 -0,022951 0,374271 0,14619 -0,05578 0,90959
23750 0,071261 -0,029362 0,514950 0,12797 -0,05273 0,92476
23500 0,074212 -0,032793 0,648306 0,10760 -0,04755 0,93995
23250 0,068535 -0,032357 0,770262 0,08498 -0,04012 0,95514
23000 0,055848 -0,027996 0,883628 0,06127 -0,03071 0,96944
22750 0,033049 -0,017332 0,965742 0.03367 -0,01766 0,98399
22500 0,000000 0,000000 1,000000 0,00000 0,00000 1,00000
22250 -0,041570 0,024936 0,987224 -0,04283 0,02569 1,01714
22000 -0,088073 0,057100 0,942474 -0,09662 0,06264 1,03398
21750 -0,143959 0,099886 0,863537 -0,17567 0,12189 1,05378
21500 -0,207995 0,150955 0,762081 -0,29501 0,21411 1,08090
21250 -0,285499 0,218942 0,630116 -0,50660 0,38850 1,11810
21000 -0,346240 0,287846 0,469818 -0,84156 0,69963 1,14193
20750 -0,388289 0,357723 0,333077 -1,28355 1,18251 1,10104
20500 -0,426587 0,435138 0,227060 -1,81056 1,84685 0,96371
20250 -0,435789 0,513218 0,151027 -1,90754 2,24646 0,66108
20000 -0,438549 0,614637 0,095840 -1,61274 2,26029 0,35245

-0,404927 0,720251 0,057654 -1,08566 1,93108 0.15458
19500 -0,333995 0,830003 0,029877 -0,63511 1,57830 0,05681
19250 -0,201889 0,933227 0,012874 -0,27128 1,25398 0,01730
19000 0,000000 1,000000 0,000000 0,00000 1,00000 0,00000
18750 0,255754 1,042957 -0,008854 0,19828 0,80858 -0.00686
18500 0,556022 1,061343 -0,014341 0,34686 0,66209 -0,00895
18250 0,904637 1,031339 -0,017422 0,47152 0,53756 -0,00908
18000 1,314803 0,976838 -0,018644 0,57844 0,42976 -0,00820
17750 1,770322 0,887915 -0,017338 0,67035 0,33622 -0,00657
17500 2,236809 0,758780 -0,014812 0,75041 0,25456 -0,00497
17250 2,641981 0,603012 -0,011771 0,81714 0,18650 -0,00364
17000 3,002291 0,452300 -0,008829 0,87130 0,13126 -0,00256
60
CIE 15:2004
v, cm-
1
(10(V) 910(v)
-
EiiJI
b
10
(v) r1O( v) 910( v)
16750 3,159249 0,306869 -0,005990 0,91304 0,08869 -0,0
16500 3,064234 0,184057 -0,003593 0,94438 0,05673
16250 2,717232 0,094471 -0,001844 0,96704 0,03362 -0,00066
16000 2,191156 0,041693 -0,000815 0,98169 0,01868 -0,00037
15750 1,566864 0,013407 -0,000262 0,99168 0,00849 -0,00017
15500 1,000000 0,000000 0,000000 1,00000 0,00000 0,00000
15250 0,575756 -0,002747 0,000054 1,00470 -0,00479 0,00009
15000 0,296964 -0,002029 0,000040 1,00674 -0,00688 0,00014
14750 0,138738 -0,001116 0,000022 1,00795 -0,00811 0,00016
14500 0,0602209 -0,0005130 0,0000100 1,00842 -0,00859 0,00017
14250 0,0247724 -0,0002152 0,0000042 1,00859 -0,00876 0,00017
14000 0,00976319 -0,00008277 0,00000162 1,00838 -0,00855 0,00017
13750 0,00375328 0,00003012 0,00000059 1,00793 -0,00809 0,00016
13500 0,00141908 -0,00001051 0,00000021 1,00731 -0,00746 0,00015
13250 0,000533169 -0,000003543 0,000000069 1,00656 -0,00669 0,00013
13000 0,000199730 -0,000001144 0,000000022 1,00565 -0,00576 0,00011
12750 0,0000743522 -0,0000003472 0,0000000068 1,00460 -0,00469 0,00009
12500 0,0000276506 -0,0000000961 0,0000000019 1,00342 -0,00349 0,00007
I 12250 0,0000102123 -0,0000000220 0,0000000004 1,00212 -0,00216 0,00004
Reference
CIE, 1959, Proc, of the 14th Session ofC/E, Brussels, Vol. A, 91-109,1959,
CIE, 1986, CIE S002-1986, GtE standard colorimetric observers, 1986, (Published also as
CIE/ISO 10527:1991),
CIE, 1990, CIE 86-1990, GIE 1988 2 spectral luminous efficiency function for photopic vision,
1990,
MORREN L, 2000, Private communication, calculations done for the GIE TC 1-48,
SCHANDA, J" 1998. Current CIE work to achieve physiologically correct colour metrics, in
Color Vision, Perspectives from different disciplines, eds.: Backhaus, W.G.K" Kliegl, R.,
Werner, J.S. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin - New York, 1998.
61
CIE 15:2004
APPENDIX C. ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO DEFINE DAYLIGHT ILLUMINANTS -
METHOD OF CALCULATION, CORRECTED TABLES AND EQUATIONS (FOR
INFORMATION AND EVALUATION)
If one tries to apply the calculation procedure for other illuminants 0, which is described in
Section 3.1 to 065, one has to follow a rounding process for computing the coefficients M1
and M2 and then a peculiar practice for rounding the final results. These unusual procedures
explain the slight deviations sometimes observed in comparison with the official table for
standard illuminant 065. These changes are negligible for colorimetric calculations, but are
annoying if tables are compared, see (Kn3nicz and Schanda, 2000).
Daylight illuminant spectral power distribution tables are based on the work of Judd
and co-workers (Judd et ai., 1964), who proposed the calculation method of daylight
illuminants based on the So, S1, S2 component functions. Judd and co-workers published the
So, S1, S2 functions at 10 nm increments: from these the table accepted by the CIE and
reproduced in Table T.2 was calculated using linear interpolation. (Also Table 1 of the CIE
standard (CIE, 1998) was calculated using linear interpolation.)
Using the equations in Section 3.1 without following carefully the details of use may
lead to slightly different results if the original 10 nm tables, or the 5 nm tables as reproduced
in Section 11. Tables, or the 1 nm tables of the standard are used. To overcome this problem
- and to harmonise colorimetric practice - an alternative method is recommended for
evaluation. Since the interpolation of all other colorimetric functions from their original 10 nm
values has been done by non-linear interpolation, these new tables have been derived by a
Lagrange interpolation method
xx
. The table containing the Lagrange interpolated SOLag, S1Lag
and S2Lag values of the So, S1, S2 functions at 1 nm increments is included on the
accompanying CD-ROM. The original Judd and co-workers' 10 nm data were used as input
data. Table C. 1 shows the 5 nm sampled set of values.
The starting point for Daylight IIluminant calculation is the set of Equ.'s 3.2, 3.3 and
3.4 of the main publication.
First one has to calculate the Xo chromaticity coordinate of the daylight phase
required using Equ. 3.3 for daylight illuminant correlated colour temperatures from
approximately 4000 K to 7000 K, or Equ. 3.4 for daylight illuminant correlated colour
temperatures from larger than 7000 K to approximately 25000 K.
Then Yo is calculated using Equ. 3.2.
These Equ.'s are regarded as defining the daylight chromaticity.
The next step is to calculate the Daylight Iliuminant relative spectral power distribution
using these Xo, Yo values and Equ. 3.5:
xxl
(3.5)
The official CIE method uses the So()o), S1(A), S2(A) functions as defined in Table T.2.
These component spectra were originally determined at the full 10 nm increments, and later
linearly interpolated to every 5 nm.
To calculate S(A) one has to know the M
1
, M2 factors. The original Judd publication
defines these as functions of Xo, Yo as reproduced in Equ. 3.6:
xXI
-1,3515 -1,7703xo + 5,9114yo
0,0241 + O,2562xD - 0,7341yo
M2 = O,0300-31,4424xD +30,0717YD
0,0241 + 0,2562xo - 0,7341yo
(3.6)
xx To be able to determine So, S1, S2 values at any desired wavelength, the accompanying
CD-ROM contains a Lagrange interpolation program.
XXI Equ.'s 3.5 and 3.6 are taken from Section 3 of the present document.
62
CIE 15:2004
The constants in these Equ.'s depend, however, on the sampling of the S functions,
see (Kranicz and Schanda, 2000). The main publication overcomes this difficulty by stating
that calculations have to be done at 10 nm increments with subsequent linear interpolation.
The M
1
, M2 functions can be written in a general form:
M =9n
x
o+
h
nYo+in
n jxo + kyo + I
where n = 1 for Equ. M1 and n = 2 for Equ. M
2
.
9, h, i, j, k and I are obtained as the tristimulus values of the So(.-1), S1(}'), S2(A)
functions. and recommended values are listed in Table C 2. Thus e.g.
= 1000 B002 - Bpo
91 0 2
o
where e.g.
A,,-,.,
Bo = I SO(A) Y(A)L\A and

B2 = IS2(J.) y(J.)L\J.
Amin1

and the 0 symbols refer to the sum of the three tristimulus values of the form as shown by the
B equations for the Y tristimulus values of the So, S1 and S2 functions.
The tristimulus values will depend on the method of summation, and thus also the 9,
h, i, j, k and I coefficients will depend on them. This ultimately will have an influence on the Xs,
Ys chromaticity coordinates of the daylight phases calculated from the S(A) spectral power
distribution according to Equ. 3.5. If these Xs, Ys values deviate from the xo, Yo values used as
the input values in the calculation, a user may feel unsure as to whether he or she has
followed the procedure correctly. To avoid such confusion, values of 9n, hn, in, j, k and I have
to be calculated for the summation used for calculating SeA). Table C.2 shows the
recommended values for the CIE 1931 and CIE 1964 standard observers using the 1 nm
standard tables and the Lagrange interpolated SOLag, S1Lag, S2Lag tables, both for 1 nm and 5
nm abridged and truncated colour matching tables. Using these 91 ... I coefficients the Xs, Ys
values agree with the Xo, YD values to five decimal places.
63
CIE 15:2004
Table C.1. SOLag, S1Lag and S2Lag 5 nm sampled spectra.
lA, nml SOLag
I
S1Lag
I
S2Lsg
I
IIA, nm SOLag S1
~
300 0,04000 0,02000 0,00000 490 113,50000 20,10000 -1,80000
305 -0,15625 -0,15000 1,15625 495 112,95625 18,07500 -1,61250
310 6,00000 4,50000 2,00000 500 113,10000 16,20000 -1,50000
315 16,56625 12,50500 2,84375 505 112,19375 14,74375 -1,38750
320 29,60000 22,40000 4,00000 510 110,80000 13,20000 -1,30000
325 43,80000 33,40625 6,41875 515 108,36250 10,86875 -1,25000
330 55,30000 42,00000 8,50000 520 106,50000 8,60000 -1,20000
335 57,62500 42,46250 8,50000 525 107,60000 7,18125 -1,12500
340 57,30000 40,60000 7,80000 530 108,80000 6,10000 -1,00000
345 59,69375 41,23750 7,29375 535 107,25000 5,13750 -0,75000
350 61,80000 41,60000 6,70000 540 105,30000 4,20000 -0,50000
355 61,47500 39,58750 5,88125 545 104,90625 3,05000 -0,38750
360 61,50000 38,00000 5,30000 550 104,40000 1,90000 -0,30000
365 65,46875 40,21875 5,80625 555 102,39375 0,90625 -0,15000
370 68,80000 42,40000 6,10000 560 100,00000 0,00000 0,00000
375 66,40625 40,94375 4,71250 565 97,78125 -0,80000 0,10000
380 63,40000 38,50000 3,00000 570 96,00000 -1,60000 0,20000
385 62,45000 35,98125 2,05000 575 95,67500 -2,65000 0,26250
390 65,80000 35,00000 1,20000 95,10000 -3,50000 0,50000
395 79,82500 38,80000 -0,10000 91,95625 -3,47500 1,25000
400 94,80000 43,40000 -1,10000 89,10000 -3,50000 2,10000
405 101,54375 45,52500 -0,93125 595 89,43750 -4,56250 2,69375
410 104,80000 46,30000 -0,50000 600 90,50000 -5,80000 3,20000
415 106,54375 45,70625 -0,53125 605 90,60625 -6,55625 3,68125
420 105,90000 43,90000 -0,70000 610 90,30000 -7,20000 4,10000
425 100,35000 40,37500 -0,87500 615 89,61250 -7,93125 4,43125
430 96,80000 37,10000 -1,20000 620 88,40000 -8,60000 4,70000
435 104,05000 36,52500 -1,91250 625 86,01250 -9,05000 4,83750
440 113,90000 36,70000 -2,60000 630 84,00000 -9,50000 5,10000
445 120,82500 36,48125 -2,84375 635 84,47500 -10,26875 5,88750
450 125,60000 35,90000 -2,90000 640 85,10000 -10,90000 6,70000
455 126,54375 34,49375 -2,88125 645 83,52500 -10,80625 7,01875
460 125,50000 32,60000 -2,80000 650 81,90000 -10,70000 7,30000
465 123,39375 30,26875 -2,69375 655 81,90625 -11,21250 7,91250
470 121,30000 27,90000 -2,60000 660 82,60000 -12,00000 8,60000
475 121,52500 26,06875 -2,63750 665 84,01875 -13,10625 9,25625
480 121,30000 24,30000 -2,60000 670 84,90000 -14,00000 9,80000
485 117,42500 22,21875 -2,21875 675 83,83125 -14,02500 10,19375
64
CIE 15:2004
SOLag
I
S1Lag
~
lA, nml SOLag
I
S1Lag
I
S2Lsg
680 81,30000 -13,60000 10,20000 760 47,70000 -7,80000 5,20000
685 76,22500 -12,69375 9,19375 765 57,28125 -9,40000 6,24375
690 71,90000 -12,00000 8,30000 770 68,60000 -11,20000 7,40000
695 72,38125 -12,57500 8,90000 775 68,04375 -11,00000 7,22500
700 74,30000 -13,30000 9,60000 780 65,00000 -10,40000 6,80000
705 76,31875 -13,32500 9,22500 785 65,58750 -10,50625 6,90000
710 76,40000 -12,90000 8,50000 790 66,00000 -10,60000 7,00000
715 69,45625 -11,66250 7,64375 795 64,04375 -10,25000 6,76875
720 63,30000 -10,60000 7,00000 800 61,00000 -9,70000 6,40000
725 66,35000 -10,91875 7,18125 805 56,48750 -8,88125 5,87500
730 71,70000 -11,60000 7,60000 810 53,30000 -8,30000 5,50000
--
735 75,61250 -12,08750 7,91875 815 55,43125 -8,68125 5,71875
740 77,00000 -12,20000 8,00000 820 58,90000 -9,30000 6,10000
745 72,52500 -11,38750 7,46875 825 61,71875 -9,79375 6,43125
750 65,20000 -10,20000 6,70000 830 61,90000 -9,80000 6,50000
755 54,40625 -8,66250 5,73125
Table C.2. g1 to I coefficients for CIE 1931 and 1964 standard observers and 1 nm standard
tables using the Lagrange interpolated So, $1 and S2 functions both for 1 nm and 5 nm
sampling,
CIE 1931 St. CIE 1964 St. CIE 1931 St. CIE 1964 St.
Coeff.s
Obs. Obs. Obs. Obs.
1 nm sampling 1 nm sampling 5 nm sampling 5 nm sampling
g1 -1,77864 -1,57049 -1,77861 -1,57049
h1 5,90745 5,56450 5,90757 5,56460
11 -1,34666 -1,31211 -1,34674 -1,31215
g2 -31,44505 -30,15166 -31,44464 -30,15139
h2 30,06408 31,07906 30,06400 31,07931
i2 0,03656 -0,73912 0,03638 -0,73928
j 0,25540 0,21249 0,25539 0,21250
k -0,73218 -0,71591 -0,73217 -0,71592
I 0,02387 0,04663 0,02387 0,04663
References
CIE, 1998. CIE S005/E:1998. CIE standard illuminants for colorimetry. (Published also as ISO
10526:1999(E)/CIE S 005-1998),1998.
JUDD, D.B., MACADAM, D.L. and \NYSZECKI, G., 1964. with the collaboration of BUDDE,
H.W, CONDIT, H.R, HENDERSON, S.T, and SIMONDS, J.L. Spectral distribution of typical
daylight as a function of correlated color temperature. J Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 1031-1040, 1964.
KRANICZ, B. and SCHANDA, J., 2000. Re-evaluation of daylight spectral distributions. Color
Res. Appl., 25 (4), 250-259, 2000.
65
I
CIE 15:2004
APPENDIX D. REVERSE TRANSFORMATION FROM VALUES L*, a*, b* TO
TRISTIMULUS VALUES X, Y, Z
In Information Technology (IT) transformations are necessary from the tristimulus values X, Y,
Z to the values L *,a*,b* and in the reverse [R] direction. Therefore it was decided at the TC
meetings in Veszprem in August 2002 to include a proposed reverse transformation into CIE-
Publication 15 "Colorimetry". The first transformations are given in the main part of the
document (see Section 8.2.1) and the reverse transformations are in this Appendix D.
Reverse transformation:
Calculate from the values L*, a*, b*
f(YIYn)= (L*+ 16) 1 116
f(XIXn)=a*1 500 +f(YIY
n
)
f(ZIZn)=f( YIYn)-b*/200
Calculate then the tristimulus values X, Y, Z from:
X=Xn[f(XIXn)]
3
if f(XIXn) > 24/116
X=Xn[f(XIXn) -16/116]x(108/841) if f(XIXn):S; 24/116
Y= Yn[f( YIYn)]3 if f(YIYn) > 24/116 or L*> 8
Y= Yn[f( YIYn) - 16/116]x( 108/841) if f(YIYn):S; 24/1160rL*:S; 8
Z=Zn[f(ZIZn)]3 if f(Z/Zn) > 24/116
Z=Zn[f(Z/Zn) -16/116]x(108/841) if f(Z/Zn) :s; 24/116
(0.1)
(0.2)
(0.3)
(0.4)
(0.5)
(0.6)
(0.7)
(0.8)
(0.9)
Note: Integer ratios, e. g. 16/116,841/108, 108/841, are used for both transformations to
avoid rounding errors. The break point between the non-linear and the linear part of
the values L* is at L* =8 as proposed by Pauli (1976).
Reference
PAULI, H., 1976. Proposed extension of the CIE recommendation on "Uniform color spaces,
color difference equations, and metric color terms". J. Opt. Soc. Am., 66,866-867, 1976.
66
CIE 15:2004
APPENDIX E.INFORMATION ON THE USE OF PLANCK'S EQUATION FOR STANDARD
AIR
According to the Planck's law, the spectral radiance of a blackbody at thermodynamic
temperature T [K] in a medium having index of refraction n is given by
L ,(A T) = c
1
n
2
X-O [ex ~ ) _1]-1
e./, ' P 'T
7t n/,
(E.1 )
where C1 = 2nhc
2
, C2 = hclk, h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light in vacuum, k is the
Boltzmann constant, and } ~ is the wavelength in the medium, Since T is measured on the
International Temperature Scale, the value of C2 used in colorimetry should follow that
adopted in the current International Temperature Scale (ITS-90) (Preston-Thomas, 1990;
Mielenz et aI., 1991), namely C2= 1,4388 x 10.
2
m K. The official value of C1 is provided by the
Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA), and is C1 = 3,741771 x 10.
16
W m
2
(Mohr and Taylor, 2000). The value of C1, however, is not relevant in colorimetry where
only the relative spectral distribution of Planck's radiation is used.
The value of n of air depends on the partial pressure of each constituent of the air
and is also wavelength dependent, but for standard air (dry air at 15C and 101 325 Pa,
containing 0,03 percent by volume of carbon dioxide), it is approximately 1,00028 throughout
the visible region. This value has been used in photometry and radiometry for a number of
years (Blevin, 1972), and is confirmed from the latest physical data showing n more precisely
as a function of wavelength (Cohn et aI., 2003).
Using Equ. E.1 with n = 1,00028, CIE standard illuminant A can be calculated, with
negligible differences from the published values (1 count or less in the 6th significant digit), by
SA()') = Le.A{A, T)
L
e
.
2
(560 nm, T)
(E.2)
where C2 = 1,4388 X 10.
2
mK (ITS-90) and T = 2854,742 K. This temperature T is the value
assigned to CIE standard illuminant A in the Planck's equation for standard air. This implies
that correlated colour temperature of CIE standard illuminant A should be -2855 K, a change
of -1 K from the previous value (2856 K). However, TC 1-48 did not come to a consensus at
this time to revise the definition of correlated colour temperature using n = 1,00028, because
the form of Planck's equation in vacuum (n is equal to exactly 1) has been used historically
and it was concerned that such a revision would cause a small discontinuity from the values
obtained in the past (though the difference is practically insignificant and matters only in
rigorous calculations). It was also concerned that the revision still would not describe Planck's
radiation in air perfectly; the value of n is slightly wavelength dependent, which would bring
the CIE standard illuminant A deviating very slightly off from a perfect Planckian radiator
{though the deviation would be less than 0,005 % - calculated using data in Cohn et aI.,
2003.
Therefore, in the current recommendation in CIE 15:2004, colour temperature and
correlated colour temperature are calculated using Equ. E.1 with n = 1 (exactly 1), thus no
change from the previous practice. This recommendation may be subject to change in the future.
References
BLEVIN, WR., 1972. Corrections in Optical Pyrometry and Photometry for the Refractive
Index of Air. Metrologia, 8, 140-147, 1972.
COHN, E.R., LlDE, D.R. and TRIGG, G.L., Editors, 2003. AlP Physics Desk Reference. Third
Edition. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
MIELENZ, K.D., SAUNDERS, RD., PARR, A.C. and HSIA, J.J., 1991. The New International
Temperature Scale of 1990 and its Effect on Radiometric, Photometric, and Colorimetric
Measurements and Standards. In CIE 91-1991. Proc. ofthe 22
nd
Session of the CIE, 02,65-
68,1991.
MOHR, P.J. and TAYLOR, B.N., 2000. CODATA recommended values of the fundamental
physical constants: 1998. Reviews of Modern Physics, 72/2, 351-495, 2000.
67
CIE 15:2004
PRESTON-THOMAS, H., 1990. The International Temperature Scale of 1990, Metr%gia 27,
3-10,1990.
EXPLANATORY COMMENTS
CIE Division 1 (at its meeting in Rochester in 2001) and CIE Division 2 (at its meeting
in Gaithersburg in 2001) confirmed that wavelengths measured in standard air (dry air
at 15C and 101 325 Pa, containing 0,03 percent by volume of carbon dioxide) should
be used in all CIE publications.
2 This recommendation deviates from earlier recommendations regarding CIE sources
A, S, C (CIE, 1931; CIE, 1951). A distinction is made between illuminantand source.
The term source refers to a physical emitter of light, such as a lamp or the sun and
sky. The term illuminant refers to a specific spectral power distribution, not
necessarily provided directly by a source, and not necessarily realizable as a source.
The present recommendation first defines illuminants by relative spectral power
distributions and then sources. The definition of the sources is considered secondary,
as it is conceivable that new developments in lamps and filters will bring about
improved sources that represent the illuminants more accurately and are more
suitable for laboratory use. At present, no recommendation has been made for a
source representing standard illuminant D65. The original recommendations
regarding standard illuminant D65 (originally called D
65
) and other illuminants D
representing daylight of different correlated colour temperatures are given in CIE
Proceedings (CIE, 1963; CIE, 1967).
In 1968 the Comite International des Poids et Mesures modified the "International
Practical Temperature Scale, 1948 (amended 1960)" and the value of the radiation
constant C2 was set equal to 1,4388.10.
2
mK This modification has affected the
colour temperature or correlated colour temperature of the CIE illuminants and
sources.
3 Equation 3.1 is equivalent to and can be derived from the expression
68
S(A) = 100 Me,A(A, T) I Me,A( 560, T),
where
-5 -1
Me,J.JA,T) = c
1
} [exp(c
2
/),T) -1] ,
}. is the wavelength (in nanometres), and the ratio C2 IT is given by
C2 IT = 1,435 x 10
7
/2848 nm
(EN.1)
(EN.2)
(EN.3)
Since the numerical value of C1 cancels out of Equ. E.1, this definition of CIE standard
illuminant A involves no assumptions about the numerical values of C1, C2, and T other
than the ratio defined in Equ. E.3. (See CIE 1998c).
CIE standard illuminant A was originally defined in 1931 as the relative spectral
power distribution of a Planckian radiator of temperature
TCIE 1931 = 2 848 K, (EN.4)
the value of the second radiation constant C2 then being taken as
C2. CIE 1931 = 1,4350 x 10-
2
mK (EN.5)
The form of the definition as now printed was carefully chosen to ensure that CIE
standard illuminant A was defined as a relative spectral power distribution and not as
a function of temperature; as explained above, the. definition of the relative spectral
power distribution has not changed since 1931 and Equ. 3.1 simply expresses it in a
general form.
What has changed is the temperature assigned to this distribution. The value of C2
given in Equ. E.5 and used by the CIE in 1931 is different from the respective values,
C2.ITS-27 = 14350 IJmK, C2.IPTS-48 = 14380 IJmK, and C2.IPTS-68 = C2.ITS-90 = 14388 IJmK,
that were assigned to this constant in the International Temperature Scales of 1927,
CIE 15:2004
1948, 1968 and 1990, respectively. Although this has had no effect on the relative
spectral power distribution of CIE standard illuminant A, the correlated colour
temperatures of sources recommended for laboratory realizations have been
different, over the years, depending on the values of C2 used. As may be seen from
Equ. E.3, the colour temperatures associated with CIE standard iIIuminant A on the
various international temperature scales referred to above were T27 = 2 848 K, T48 =
2 854 K, and T68 = Teo = 2 856 K, respectively.
Another change over the years has been the explicit decision that the wavelengths in
Equ.'s 3.1, E.1 and E.2 should be taken as being in standard air despite the fact that
the equations are derived from the form of Planck's equation in vacuum. The Planck's
equation requires a refractive index term if the wavelengths refer to a medium other
than vacuum. IIluminant A was originally defined in 1931 as the relative spectral
distribution of a Planckian radiator but, historically, wavelengths in standard air have
always been used in photometry and colorimetry. Despite this, CIE/ISO 10526:1991
and its revision, ISO 1 0526:1999(E)/CIE S 005-1998, stated that the term A denoted a
wavelength in vacuum. This was inconsistent with previous CIE publications, but the
situation was not addressed until recently. CIE Division 1 and Division 2 agreed in
2001 that all wavelengths used in CIE Publications should be in standard air
(explanatory comment 1). The current document follows this decision. ISO
10526:1999/CIE S 005-1998 is also to be revised to reflect this change (CIE S 014-2
to be published). The use of standard air wavelengths means that the colour
temperature of illuminant A is very slightly different from the values of T used in the
above equations but the difference is insignificant for all practical purposes. See
Appendix E for further information on the use of Planck's equation for standard air.
It is important to note that the numerical values defined for CIE standard illuminant A
have never changed. The only issues have been the change of temperature scale
and the use of standard air. The 1 nm tables given in CIE standard S005 and
reproduced on the CD-ROM accompanying this report are consistent with Equ. 3.1. In
cases where calculation at 5 nm intervals is found to produce no significant error, the
data in Table T.1 can be used.
The rounded values of S(,.1,) for CIE standard illuminant A given in Table T.1 show, in
several instances, small and insignificant discrepancies of one unit in the last decimal
from corresponding values commonly used in various publications. The values given
in Table T.1 are the correctly rounded values and agree with those of the standard.
4 The correlated colour temperatures are affected by the numerical value of the
radiation constant C2. In accordance with the International Practical Temperature
Scale, 1948, amended 1960 which was in use at the time when the procedure for
calculating daylight illuminants was adopted by the CIE, the value of C2 was equal to
1,4380 x 10- m-K. With this value, the correlated colour temperature of illuminant
065 is approximately equal to 6500 K. The change of C2 to the value of 1,438 8 x 10-
2
mK (International Practical Temperature Scale, 1968) increases the correlated colour
temperatures of illuminant 065 by the factor 1,4388/1,4380. Thus the correlated
colour temperature increases by approximately 4 K.
5 The method required to calculate the values for the relative spectral power
distributions of illuminants 050, 055, 065, and 075, in Table T.1 is as follows
1. Multiply the nominal correlated colour temperature (5000 K, 5500 K, 6500 K or
7500 K) by 1,4388/1,4380.
2. Calculate X
D
and YD using the equations given in the text.
3. Calculate Ml and M2 using the equations given in the text.
4. Round Ml and Mz to three decimal places.
5. Calculate S(,.1,) every 10 nm by S(,.1,) = So(,.1,) + M
1
S
1
(A) + M
2
S
2
(,.1,) using values of
SO(A), S1(A) and S2(,1) from Table T.2.
6. Interpolate the 10 nm values of S().) linearly to obtain values at intermediate
wavelengths.
69
CIE 15:2004
This method should also be followed to calculate the relative spectral power
distribution of illuminants at other nominal correlated colour temperatures.
6 This recommendation supersedes the original (CIE, 1931) and is in accordance with
a later agreement (CIE, 1959).
7 This recommendation has been changed from the original (CIE, 1931) method
several times, see joint meeting of E-1.3.1, E-1.3.2 and E-1.2 on June 28, 1967 in
Washington (CIE, 1967). The present version is the result of a major updating, as
colorimetric practice has shown that more precise definitions of measuring geometry
are needed. Regarding practical measurements see also (CIE, 1998d).
8 Where single-beam integrating spheres are used, a correction for the reduction of
sphere efficiency caused by sample absorption is necessary. Without such a
correction, the instrument will give a non-linear output. The corrected reflectance is
given by:
where R(A) is the uncorrected reflectance of the sample referred to the perfect
reflecting diffuser, Pw(it) is the diffuse/diffuse spectral reflectance of the sphere wall, f;
is the fractional area of the i th port, fs is the fractional area of the sample port, and
Pr(A) is the reflectance of the reference standard. The above equation assumes ideal
integrating characteristics for the sphere and that the other ports have zero effective
reflectance.
9 These recommendations are based on the originals (CIE, 1931; CIE, 1959; CIE,
1963).
The recommendations given in this document regarding the CIE 1931 standard
colorimetric observer data deviate from the originals in several ways. The CIE 1931
standard colorimetric observer is now defined by the colour-matching functions X(A),
Y(A), Z(A) from 360 nm to 830 nm at 1 nm intervals (see Table 1 in CIE, 1986a).
From these data the abridged data reproduced in Table T.4. have been derived by
selecting every fifth value and rounding to six decimal figures.
10 Colour-matching functions X(A), Y(A), Z(A) are relative tristimulus values of
monochromatic radiators of equal radiant power related to a set of reference stimuli
[X], [Y], [Z].
11 The colour-matching functions X(A) , y()") , Z(A) given in Table T.4 agree closely
with those defined originally in 1931. Three minor changes have been introduced: at
)" =775 nm the new values of X(A) is 0,000 059 instead of 0,0000; at it = 555 nm
Y(;n is 1,0000 instead of 1,0002; and at A = 740 nm y ) ~ ) is 0,000249 instead of
0,0003. These changes are considered insignificant in most colorimetric
computations. From these corrected tables the CIE standard colorimetric observer
(CIE, 1986a) was determined.
12 For daylight illuminant 0652,464 scotopic trolands corresponds to 1 photopic troland
(see Wyszecki & Stiles, 1982, p. 104). Rod saturation in 9 extrafoveal vision occurs
at about 2000-5000 scotopic trolands (see Wyszecki & Stiles, 1982, p. 547). Thus rod
saturation would occur at a photopic light level of between 812-2029 trolands.
Working from the Table in Le Grand (1968, p. 106) that takes into account variation of
pupil size with light level and the Stiles-Crawford effect, this would correspond to 130-
380 cd/m2 (kind contribution by J. Pokorny).
13 These recommendations formalise procedures for practical colorimetric calculations.
14 CIE 15:2004 states only the facts on abridgement and truncation. A forthcoming
publication of a tutorial nature will detail the procedures, with examples showing good
practice.
70
CIE 15:2004
15 This recommendation is based on the original (CIE, 1955) amended in CIE Bulletin
No.3, (CIE, 1957). The use of boldface Roman letters as symbols for vector
notations is another alternative which was added in the first edition of this publication.
In the present 3rd edition of the document the recommendation to use "Gothic letters"
has been dropped.
16 These recommendations are based on those given in supplement No.2 to the 1st
edition of this publication (CIE 1978), the publication on "Industrial colour difference
evaluation" (CIE 1995a) and the publication "Improvement to industrial colour
difference evaluation" (CIE, 2001a), with some amendments agreed at TC 1-48 and
TC 1-59 meetings in Veszprem, 2002 and San Diego, 2003.
17 In June 1967 the CIE colorimetry committee recommended to the National
Committees of the CIE a detailed working program for pursuing the problem of colour
difference calculations (Wyszecki, 1968). Further guidelines were published in 1978
(Robertson, 1978). The parametric effects in colour difference evaluation were
summarised in 1993 (CIE, 1993), and an advanced colour difference calculation
method was published in 1995 (CIE, 1995a). Recent findings are summarized in
(CIE, 1999a). The currently recommended colour difference formula is described in
(CIE,2001a).
18 Equations (8.7), (8.9) and (8.11) are based on a suggestion by Pauli (1976),
according to which below L *=8 a linear L *=f(Y) dependence should be followed. In
CIE 15.2 decimal approximations were used. This brought the break point of YN
n
=
(
J
3 1 (116 \ 2
~ to 0,008856, and the exact value of - x -I to 7,787. At the Technical
116 3 24;
Committee TC 1-48 meeting in Veszprem, 2002, the committee agreed that to secure
the continuity at the break between the two parts of the equations f(Ai / A.n), where
A
1
= X, A
2
= Y, A3= Z, ~ J 3 should be written instead of its approximate value of
116
0,008856, and similarly -'!'x(116J2 = 841 should be used instead of 7,787 in Equ.'s
3 24 108
(8.7), (8.9) and (8.11).
19 This recommendation is essentially the same as the original (CIE, 1948).
20 Previous two publications Special metamerism index: Change in il/uminant
(Supplement No.1 to 1st edition of CIE 15-1971 (CIE, 1971) and Special metamerism
index: Change in observer (CIE, 1989) have been combined in this version of CIE 15.
CIE 80-1989 is, however, still current, and provides more details on the subject.
21 Table T.6 gives the relative spectral power distributions of 15 Fl-illuminants that
represent 15 different types of fluorescent lamps.
The Fl1 to Fl12 group of lamps were also included in 15.2 (there as F1 to F12). The
further spectra are enumerated by starting with the number 3, reflecting that they
have been first introduced when elaborating version 3 of CIE 15. Each of the relative
spectral power distributions in the standard halophosphate ("St-Halo") group (Fl3.1-
3.3) consists of two semi-broadband emissions of antimony and manganese
activations in a calcium halo-phosphate phosphor. The "Deluxe" group (Fl 3.4-3.6)
are more or less enhanced in colour rendering properties as compared to the
"St-Halo" group, usually using multiple phosphors. Relative spectral power
distributions of the "Deluxe" group are flatter and have a wider range in the visible
spectrum than the "St-Halo" group. Re!ative spectral power distributions of the
"Three-band" group (Fl3. 7 -3.11) consist mostly of three narrow-band emissions in
the red, green, and blue wavelength regions. In most cases the narrow-band
emissions are caused by ternary compositions of rare-earth phosphors. Fl3.12-3.14
represent modern multi band fluorescent lamp spectra. Fl3.15 is the spectrum of a
fluorescent lamp developed commercially to simulate 065, taken from JIS 8716 (JIS,
1991 ).
71
CIE 15:2004
22 In many applications high-pressure metal-halide and sodium lamps are gaining in
importance. Spectra, as reproduced in Table T.7, with colorimetric data shown in
Table T.9, are representative spectra of these classes of sources and could be used
for checking colorimetric properties of objects when illuminated with such lamps.
23 This is a new Section in the document based on CIE 51, first published in 1981 for
assessing illuminants D55, D65 and D75 (CIE, 1981), and amended in 1999 with a
technique to assess the quality of D50 illuminants (CIE, 1999b).
24 The daylight simulators having suitable categories, as assessed by the method in this
report, can be used to simulate standard illuminants D50, D55, D65 and D75 for visual
matching of object-colour samples, and for reproducing the spectral total radiance
factor of samples for instrumental colorimetry and spectrophotometry; the samples
may be non-fluorescent or fluorescent.
The daylight simulators may also be used for the visual appraisal of the colour
rendering properties of other light sources, though the present method of evaluation
for daylight simulators does not directly relate to the evaluation of colour rendering
properties.
25 This recommendation was published for the first time in the edition 15.2-1986 of this
publication.
26 This section has been updated according to the decisions of CIE Division 1 obtained
at its meeting in Rochester, USA, 2001.
72

You might also like