The Heresy of Salvation in A Moment - Late H.H. Pope Shenouda III
The Heresy of Salvation in A Moment - Late H.H. Pope Shenouda III
The Heresy of Salvation in A Moment - Late H.H. Pope Shenouda III
21
).
2. The phrase (not the removal of the filth of the
Is a reply to the phrase (baptism washes only the bodies).
The words "saves us, show that we are saved through
baptism as the Lord said in (Mk. 16:16). The same finds reply
in the words of Ananias of Damascus to Saul of Tarsus after
his conversion.
140
3. "Why are you waiting? Arise and be baptized and
away yours sins" (Acts 22:16).
It is evidently clear that the washing of the body is
washing away of the sins but the washing away of sins
a washing of the spirit, purification, cleansing, justi ...... Lv
and renewal of it. This finds support in the words of St. Paul:
4. "He saved us, through the washing of regeneration
renewing of the Holy Spirit" (Tit. 3:5).
S. The washing of the body alone may be true if the baptism
is of water only but it is of water and the Spirit.
Therefore the Lord Jesus Christ said, "Unless one is born
of water and the Spirit, he cannot see the kingdom of God"
(Jn. 3:5). It is not just plain water in which people are dipped
in but it contains the oil of the holy chrism, the
anomtment of the Holy Spirit (IJn. 2:20,27). Through
prayers, water takes a new nature so that any person born
of it may be born of water and of the Spirit.
6. If baptism had been just for the washing of the body,
St. Peter the Apostle would not have asked the Jews to be
baptized for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38).
Washing the body alone does not give remission of sins.
7. If baptism had been for the washing of the body only,
the Lord Jesus Christ would not have made it a means for
salvation as He said in (Mk. 16:16).
Washing the body alone does not save a person!
we conclude that the objection of the Plymouth Brethren does
141
uot coincide at all with the teaching of the Lord and the holy
1p0 ties as included in the Holy Bible.
It 1s a thing to be regretted to find that some people ignore
lh verses of the Bible and offer their own views instead or
mploy the verses to serve their views!
7. AGAIN ON BEING WASHED
IN BAPTISM
( )bjection:
They say it is the Blood, not baptism, that washes away
ins because it is stated in the Revelation about the Lord Jesus
hrist "To Him who loved us and washed us from our sins
in His own blood." (Rev. 1:5).
Refutation:
We do not deny at all that we are washed from our sins
by the blood of Christ but this is done in baptism .
When a believer washes away his sins in baptism according
to the Bible (Acts 22:16) he is in fact washed in the blood
of Christ . Both are the same as in baptism; he dies with Christ
and is buried with Him.
It is the Lord's will that your washing in the blood be
performed in the washing of baptism.
142
you should deny the verse that says, "Arise and
be wash away your sins" (Acts 22:16) and other
verses 1mplymg the same meaning.
. do they behave so, depending on one verse alone and
any other verses that complete the meaning? This
IS not the biblical truth; for half facts are not facts!
. In repentance as well, a person is washed from his sins
m the blood of Christ.
Wo.uld the Plymouth Brethren object also to the
effectiveness of repentance regarding washing away of sins
and say that we are only washed from our sins in the blood?!
Baptism takes its effectiveness from the deserts of the blood
and also takes from the deserts of the blood. The
Chnst1an life as a whole is based on the Blood of Christ and
grace, likewise, grants us from the deserts of the blood.
Would we then deny the effectiveness of baaptism
repentance and grace,and sing "washed in the Holy Blood";
Would we ignore the verses that speak about forgiveness!
Blood is the basis, while baptism, repetance and grace are
mere means. The blood is the redeeming divine action offered
us, while baptism and repentance are human actions required
so that may deserve the blood given for us.
To make it obvious, we simply say,
We are washed from our sins by the blood of Christ in
baptism. '
143
fhe same may be said about repentance and confession
wd also about Eurcharist.
However, the Plymouth Brethren and their followers give
mother objection regarding forgiveness
8. FORGIVENESS THROUGH FAITH
Objection:
They say that forgiveness is granted through faith as the
Lord says,
"... that they may receive forgiveness of sins... by faith
in Me" (Acts 26:18); and also the father apostles say, "To
Him all the prophets witness that, through His name, whoever
believes in Him will receive remission of sins" (Acts 10:43).
Refutation:
Of course when dealing with non-believers, concentration
should be laid on faith because the baptism of a non-believer
is wrong and even if he repents without believing on Christ,
he will not be forgiven, without the blood.
The two verses they use i.e. (Acts 26:18 and 10:43) were
said about the acceptance of the gentiles into faith. They had
to be preached faith before speaking to them about the creed
and doctrines.
144
Faith was the first step that led them to forgiveness.
However deep their repentance might be, they were
with the words of the Lord Christ, "If you do not
that I am He, you will die in your sins" (ln. 8:24) . But If
they believed, their repentance would be effective .. .
If those gentiles believed, their faith would lead them to
baptism and forgiveness.
Take as an example Saul of Tarsus from the Jews not from
the gentiles:
He met with the Lord Jesus Christ on the way
and spoke to Him face to face. He believed and srud,
what do you me to do?" (Acts 9:6) The Lord sent htm to
Ananias who said to him, "Brother Saul. .. why are
waiting? Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sms
(Acts 22:16).
If the sins of Saul were forgiven by faith, what need there
was for baptism to wash them away?!
Is not this a proof that Saul's sins, though he believed,
. b t ' ?
remained waiting to be washed away m ap Ism
"He who has ears to hear, let him hear!" (Lk. 14:3
I'd like to say to the Plymouth Breth ern: Put beside
verses on fogiveness though faith, the verses. on
though baptism. They are many, among whtch we
(Acts 2:38 and 22: 16). Put also the verses on repentance
as (Lk. 13:3,5 and Acts 11:18) and do not follow the
145
of using one single verse seperate from others because this
does not form a doctrine.
I'd like also to whisper in your ear a frank word:
You say that forgiveness is only through the Blood and
not through baptism nor repentance! Why do you say now
that forgiveness is through faith?!
Truly, forgiveness is through the Blood, while faith,
baptism and repentance are mere means but they are necessary
for forgiveness . We can put before us also the words of the
Lord, "Forgive, and you will be forgiven" (Lk. 6:37), "If
you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your
Father forgive you your trespasses" (Mt. 6:15). The last two
verses may be put within the scope of repentance but we
mention them just to give more details.
If a person believes but does not forgive his brother, would
he be forgiven?!
Do you not agree with me that only whole facts are the
right thing?
Truly, it is the blood that is the price of salvation, not
haptism or repentance or even faith because salvation is a
I rce gift as the Bible says, "Being justified freely by His grace
through the redemption ... " (Rom. 3:24), and "Without
\ltedding of blood there is no remission" (Heb. 9:22).
l lowever, faith, baptism and repentance are essential means
fur obtaining the deserts of the blood without which we do
nul benefit of the blood of Christ which is capable of forgiving
lhc sins of the whole world.
146
Look, here is the blood of Christ befo
p f re us capable
un every sin but the apostle refers to the condT
?f he says, "But if we walk in the li ht :,.:o;;;
we !ellowship with one and the
. " esus Chnst HIS Son cleanses us from all sin" (1 Jn
1. 7), 'I! we confess our sins, He is faithful andJ.USt t fi . .
us our sms and to l fi o org1ve
1:9) c eanse us rom aO unrighteousness" (JJn.
Then, forgiveness is through
conditions for such forgiveness
baptism and repentance .
the blood but there are
among which are faith
'
in the conditions also are: to forgive others to walk
1 e and to confess our sins as the Bible Th
atter pomts may be included WI.thi e
n repentance.
147
J. ON FORGIVENESS THROUGH BAPTISM
Objection:
Forgiveness through baptism is turned from an internal
feeling of repentance and faith into an outer action.
Refutation:
This may be true if baptism were without faith and without
repentance! But we require that the person to be baptized
have to declare his refusal of the devil (repentance) and to
confess faith .. If the person to be baptized is a child, one
of his parents will do so on his behalf ..
This is what St. Peter the Apostle did towards the Jews
who believed and were cut to the heart. he said to them after
they believed, "Repent, and let every one of you be baptized
in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins" (Acts
2:38.
Thus, the three were required to obtain forgiveness i.e.
faith, repentance and baptism.
148
10. FAITH AND RECEIVING OF THE
HOLY SPIRIT
Objection:
. As they try to do away with the sacrament of b .
Its effectiveness, they try likewise to do
sacrament of the holy Unction. WI t e
They say faith is a means for the coming down of
thhe Spmt depending on the words of the Lord ttc.r
w o believes in Me th S . ' ne
. . -as e cnpture has said out of h . h
WI/I /low nvers of living water. But this R k IS
:z: Spirit, those believing in Him
Holy Spirit was not yet given .. . ., (Jn. 7:38,39) Th
the Apostle in
h . . ' avmg e 1eved, you were sealed w "th
t e Holy Spirit of promise" (Eph. 1:13). I
Refutation:
h The. Holy Spirit is not received by a believer as soon as
buftt as a second after he believes .. This step
w a er a long penod.
The by the Plymouth Bretheren refers
same meanmg as It is stated "But th. R k to the
the Spirit, those in Zim e :::
1
:
the Holy spmt was not yet given" (Jn. 7:39). , fi
149
It means that those believers did not receive the Holy Spirit
ts soon as they believed but were to receive Him afterwards ...
When did they receive the Holy Spirit? ... They received
Him on the day of Pentecost with the father apostles or after
that with many other believers.
The Holy Spirit is a gift from God to a believer after his
believing and his being baptized. Therefore St. Peter the
Apostle said to the Jews who believed on the day of Pentecost,
"Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name
of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins and you shall receive
the gift of the Hbly Spirit" (Act 2:38).
Hence, faith, repentance and baptism arepreliminary to
the receiving of the Holy Spirit.
The Holy Spirit was given in the early apostolic era by the
laying on of the hands of the apostles, then He was given
through the Holy Unction as St. John the Apostle explained
in his first epistle, "But you have an anointing from the holy
One, (JJn. 2:20), "But the anointing which you have recieved
from Him abides in you" (JJn. 2:27).
The Acts give us two examples that demonstrate that the
Holy Spirit was not received with the declaration of faith
but as a completely separate gift that may be given after some
time. These two examples are: The belief of the Samaritans
(Acts 8) and that of the Ephesians (Acts 19).
a. Regarding Samaritans, it is said, "Now when the apostles
who were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the
word of God, they sent Peter and John to them, who, when
150
they had come down, prayed for them that they might receive
the Holy Spirit. For as yet He had fallen upon none of them.
They had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Then they laid hands on them and they received the Holy
Spirit .. (Acts 8:14-17).
Those who believed and were baptized, no one of tilem
received the Holy spirit but they received Him by the laying
of the bands of the apostles afterwards.
b. As for the Ephesians, St. Paul the Apostle asked them,
"Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed? .. They
answered him, "We have not so much as heard whether there
is a Holy Spirit .. (Acts 19:2). They were baptized into John's
baptism ... So, "they were baptized in the name of the Lord
Jesus And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit
came upon them .. (Acts 19:5,6).
They believed and in spite of this did not know that there
is tbe Holy Spirit and their faith did not give them the Spirit
as the Plymouth Brethren pretend!
So, they were first baptized, then received the Holy Spirit
by the laying on of the hands of St. Paul the Apostle. To
them, faith was seperate from baptism and from the receiving
of the Spirit ...
Faith is just a prepartion for receiving the Spirit. But no
one receives the Spirit except him who believes and is baptized.
When the apostle said, " .. having believed, you were sealed
with the Holy Spirit of promise .. (Eph. 1:13), he meant that
faith prepared them to be sealed with the spirit.
CHAPTER 7
WERE THOSE SAVED
IN A MOMENT?
- The tax-c JtJector
- The lost son.
- Zaccbaeus.
- The Philipp ian jailer.
-The bandit on the Lord's
right hand.
150
they had come down, prayed for them that they might receive
the Holy Spirit. For as yet He had fallen upon none of them.
They had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Then they laid hands on them and they received the Holy
Spirit'' (Acts
Those who telieved and were baptized, no one of tiJem
received the Holy spirit but they received Him by the laying
of the hands of the aposdes afterwards.
b. As for the Ephesians, St. Paul the Apostle asked them,
"Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?, They
answered him, "We have not so much as heard whether there
is a Holy Spirit, (Acts 19:2). They were baptized into John's
baptism ... So, "they were baptized in the name of the Lord
Jesus And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit
came upon them, (Acts 19:5,6).
They believed and in spite of this did not know that there
is the Holy Spirit and their faith did not give them the Spirit ..
as the Plymouth Brethren pretend!
So, they were first baptized, then received the Holy Spirit
by the laying on of the hands of St. Paul the Apostle. To
them, faith was seperate from baptism and from the receiving
of the Spirit. ..
Faith is just a prepartion for receiving the Spirit. But no
one recdves the Spirit except him who L"elieves and is baptized.
When the apostle said, .. having believed, you were sealed
with the Holy Spirit of promise, (Eph. 1:13), he meant that
faith prepared them to be sealed with the spirit.
CHAPTER 7
WERE THOSE SAVED
IN A MOMENT?
- The tax-r Jdector
- The lost son.
- Zacchaeus.
- The Philipp ian jailer.
-The bandit on the Lord's
right hand.
152
A LEAFLET THAT CARRIES NO
SIGNATURE
Some Protestant showed me a Protestant leaflet entitled
"The heresy of salvation in moment", but within it is a
defence of this heresy. It ends with the words [Then, salvation
in a moment is an assured fact]!
I knew that the title given the leaflet was meant to give
it an orthodox outer appearance that may encourage the
Orthodox to read it thinking it is the work of their church?
while it includes an unorthodox teaching!!!
I am not going here to condemn this way of publishing
or to show how far it is spiritual or true in the faith (I Tim.
1 :2) ... But I shall treat the subject itself and discuss its main
points.
So I shall review the examples mentioned by the writer of
the leaflet successively beginning with the parables of the
tu-coUector and the lost son to see if each of them was saved
in a moment.
Another Aim Behind the two Parables:
The Lord Jesus Christ was not after explaining the doctrine
of salvation in these two parables but in one of them He
153
lt speaking about the importance of hull'\ility and ill the
"her about the importance of repentance.
n o then our Protestant brethren b -:it ilnd
' ? t Utuu y
h'llentance causes for salvation seeang ._at there iS no
uuntion in both parables about faith, redembtion, atotteJJlent
ur the blood of Christ! For each of the examPles bas
1
mother objective.
Why then do they use the texts of Bible in other
uccasions and what is the occasion of of
WAS THE TAX-COIJLECTO\t SAVl:V
IN A MOMENT?
St. Luke the Evangelist says in this about
"Also He spoke this parable to some who in
themselves that they were righteous, and des/)ised other: Two
men went up to the temple to pray, one a /)harisee Qntl the
other a tax collector ... " (Lk. 18:9,
1
0). ettded
with the words, " . .for everyone who exalts himself will be
abased, and he who humbles himself will be exalted''
Concentration in parable is laid
0
l\ the
between pride and humility or between and
humiliating oneself.. The parable how a is
abased and condemned through pnde anq exalting hifllSelf
and how is he justified through and pewtence.
However' the Protestant brethren, \Vho declare that
justification comes through faith alone, cot\centrate here on
154
the words "This man went down to his house justified rat
than the other" (Lk. 18:14), which words were said aho
the tax collector because of his humbleness and penitcnl:
Does this mean that they beUeve justification comes l'nru,u
humbleness?!
Humbleness is an action, penitence is also an action, a
confessing sin is likewise an action ... Would we say that 1
tax collector was saved through his works (actions)? whe
is the role of the grace here? where is the role of the bl
the atonement and redemption, for there is no mention
any of them here?!!
The words, "This man went down to his house justifil
rather than the other" simply mean that the Lord accept
the repentance of the humble and penitent in heart and refuse
the boasting of the proud. .. or mean that God exalts tho
humble and abase those who exalt themselves as the parable
concludes (Lk. 18:14).
Hence, we see that the Lord did not give this parable to
explain by it the question of salvation or to confirm that
salvation may be attained in a moment.
On the other hand, this parable includes two Orthodox
concepts:
The fli'St is confessing sins, and the second is the attachment
to the temp!e (i.e. the church).
The tax-collector went to the Lord's house, to confess his
sins and that he was not worthy. He stood afar off, would
155
ull so much as raise his eyes:a. to heaven, beat his breast and
onfessed his lins. He did nC)t claim any rights as some do!
hut rather asled for mercy in humility feeling he did not
dtserve anything ...
Here, some ttould commen-. that the tax collector was saved
without 1bapth111 or holy COJIInmunion!
We reply tlat in this pai'Silble it was impossible to speak
bout tile chllrch sacramelll ts because they were not yet
t lablisbed. 1be church sac ... ament are based on the blood
of Chris.t which at that t i l l l ~ was not yet sbtd!!
Baptism is <1eath with Christ and rising up with Him (Rom.
6: t,S), and when the Lord Said this parable He was not yet
I nd. So, the tax collector could not have said along with
th apostle, ''Buried with Him in baptism" (Col. 2:12). The
nme may be Said regarding the other sacrament for all are
b sed on the deserts of the blood of Christ. ..
Another JX)int is that the Objective of this parable was not
10 speak about the sacraments.
The objective was to rebuke those, "who trusted in
tlttmselves that they were righteous, and despised others".
However, we shall return to the main question and give
m answer t() it. The question is:
Can we cotaclude from the said parable that the tax collector
Uained salvation in a m01nent?
The penitence, humiliation and confession of the tax
collector anct his asking for mercy made him deserve
156
forgiveness as any of the similar cases in the Old Testament
But he was to wait like them for the blood of Christ to .
the wages of sin. pay
. If s.uch a h.umiliated, penitent and confessing tax collector
.n of Christ, he had to declare his faith in the
cructfted Lord Jesus Christ as soon as the Chruch had
been established after the redemption and coming down f
the Spirit. He had also to be baptised to the
of sms tf ever he wanted to gain salvation (Acts 2:38).
Thus, we cannot say that he was saved in a moment because
"Without shedding of blood there is no remission"
9:22). ,, .
such a tax-collector had lived and died before the
.of the Lord Jesus Christ, he would have waited
m Hades till the Lord brought him out with Adam th
propl' ets and the other saints. Thus also we cannot say'
he was saved in a moment. ..
WAS THE LOST SON SAVED IN
A MOMENT?
The objective of the parable of the tax collector was
humbleness not salvation (Lk. 18:9), likewise, the parable
of the lost son and even the whole chapter was about
repentance (Lk. 15), not salvation.
T?e and scribes murmured because the Lord
Chnst recetved tax collectors and sinners (Lk. 15:1 ,2), so the
Lord gave them three parables on the repentance of sinners.
-
-
157
llwse parables are the lost sheep, the lost coin and the lost
1111,.. They speak about the Lord seeking sinners to restore
lhclll into faith and His acceptance of those who return of
I hese are stories about repentance, not doctrinal rules for
11111vatlon .
llowever, the story of the lost son contains profound
11 mbols ...
I et us now contemplate on this parable and examine
1 as included in it. ..
J'he son experienced decisive moments in which he sat to
lumself, examined his own condition and destiny and decided
111 repent ...
These were certainly holy moments, decisive moments but
nut moments of salvation because salvation cannot be attained
In a moment or in moments!
To sit to oneself is something different from deciding one's
w.ly and from repentance ... Salvation still is something greater
1 han all this .. Here the difference between the Orthodox views
tnd the Protestant views appears to be profound and obvious.
According to the protestant view: salvation is just an
ndividual relation between man and God, So, they think it
\:lD be attained in a moment.
According to the Orthodox view: the church plays a role
In salvation as it is entrusted with the gifts of the Holy Spirit
In the holy sacraments.
.. .....,
f
158
Therefore priests have a part to do, seeing they are
of God (Tit. 1 :7). So, salvation is not attained in a
The lost son sat to himself, reivewed his bad condition
decided to repent .. However, those decisive holy
were not moments of salvation... why?
First: because he was still in a far country away from
Father and His bosom, and away from the bouse of the F
which is the church . Salvation was not to be attained
from the Father ..
The son knew this and knew how important it was, so
said, ttl will arise and go to my father, and will say to
Father, I have sinned' "{Lk. 15:18) .. Artd he arose and
to his Father ..
His return to the Father's bouse means his return to
church.. In fact, salvation is only attained in the
house. So the servants had a part in the story, for
repesent the priests.
The father said to his servants, uBring out the best
and put it on him, and put a ring on his hand and
on his feet. And bring the fatted calf here and kill it,
let us eat and be merry" The father said this before
jor this my son was dead and is alive again; he was
and is found" (Lk. 15:22-24).
What symbols and rituals do these details refer to?
on of tbe best robe refers to baptism and to
If the parable is to be taken about non-believers,
on of the best robe will refer to baptism. We can say
159
lh lo<tt son represents the gentiles who are estranged from
td In a far land while the elder son represents the Jews ...
J'ulling on of the best robe reminds us of the words of
th tpostle, ttFor as many of you as were baptized into Christ
Ill' put on Christ" {Gal. 3:27).
II the parable is to be taken about believers, the best robe
Ill re-fer to ttthe righteous acts of the saints" {Rev. 19:8;
1 de 16:10; Eph. 6,14) we notice that righteousness in
(I t k. 16) came after baptism and chrism: uy washed you
'" w ter" i.e. baptism, "I anointed you with oil" i.e. the
lutly chrism, then III clothed you ... " {Ezek. 16:9,10).
s for eating from the killed fatted calf, it refers to
I m dtarist.
1 n the parable of the lost son, this took place after
1 p ntance, confession and contrition of heart ... after he said,
1 ather, I have sinned ... and am no longer worthy to be
.tiled your son" ...
We notice also that the fatted calf was killed and served
hy the servants of the Father i.e. the men of Priesthood who
h td a part in the story.
1 he killing of the calf meant the shedding of blood. This
t minds us of the words of the apostle, uwithout shedding
of blood there is nor remission" {Heb. 9:22).
It was not possible for the lost son to have salvation before
llllng the fatted calf, shedding the blood and eating of it
r
f
160
The ring on his hand symbolizes that he was a son,
that his soul had become a bride of Christ.
The sandals on his feet refer to keeping of
commandments (Eph. 6:15).
Thus, we find that the story of the lost son included:
a. Coming to oneself, blaming oneself,
confession and humiliation.
b. The return to the church, the Father's house and t
Father's bosom.
C. Baptism and righteousness.
d. Eating of the Eucharist and keeping the commandments.
.,. . The service done by the servants of the father i.e. the
men of priesthood.
Obviously, all this was not performed in a rnoment "He
who has ears to hear, let him hear!,. (Mt. 13:9).
161
\\'AS ZACCHAEUS SAVED IN A MOMENT?
1 he story of Zacchaeus resembles that of the Philippian
jtllrr with respect to the words, "Today salvation has come
,,, this house, (Lk. 19:9). But there are more details tn the
1111 y of Zacchaeus that could not have taken place in a
woment.
Though !he word "today" does not mean "moment'', yet
w shall go into the details of the story to see what they
ll(nify ..
fhe story tells us that Zacchaeus sought to see Jesus Cluist..
11 tells us about his wish, his simplicity, how he up
lnlo a sycamore tree to see Him and how the Lord
him, "make haste and come down, for today I musr stay
11t your house, Zacchaeus made haste, came down and
1 cceived the Lord joyfully. But in spite of all this the Lord
did not say to him "Today salvation has come to this lzo'<se ....
Then when the Lord came to the house of Zacchaeus, the
people murmured saying "He has gone to be a guest with
a man who is a sinner, (Lk. 19:7).
Though it is obvious that the meeting beside the sycalnore
tree, the feelings that preceded it, the calling and the toing
to the house.. all this was not done in a moment, yet the
162
Lord bad not yet said "Today salvation has come to
house".. This was only said after the repentance
Zaccbaeous and after be bad confessed and decided to
to everyone what be bad taken from him Do aJI this
under the words "in a moment"?!
However we have three remarks on the words
salvation has come to this house.,: The first concerning
words uto this house., .. The people in the house could
have been saved in a moment after the repentance of
of them ... But rather the repentance of one was the oeg;mn1n
of a relation with the Lord that led to their salvation ..
could not have been achieved in a moment.
The second remark is that we cannot speak about
church sacraments in relation to this example because
were not yet established. The third remark is that Latccnael
was only saved after the crucniXion of the Lord O.rist Dec::aaq
without shedding of blood there is no remission (Heb.
The words of the Lord are mere promise of salvation
declaration that that house deserved the salvation which
be offered after some time on the cross ... Zacchaeus and
household received at that time a deed which they recei
only after the crucifixion of Christ and on certain
They must have been baptized and washed away their si
as Ananias advised Saul of Tarsus (Acts 22: 16). In fact,
deserve salvation is a thing different from attaining it. ..
Hence, it is impossible to say that Zacchaeus attai
salvation in a moment.
163
I u say that someone bad attained salvation the
I tlh lllxion of Christ is an express doing away with the
llut Crlne of salvation through the blood which our Protestant
,.,.,chren believe in!
It good to have this belief but it is rather better to apply
I lliOperly.
I i Ot right to hold to one of the verses of the
t & n Is, t t d In
I li eral way because uthe letter kil as. It IS s a e .
or 3:6). We should put beside a verse the nght theological
tnc pt of it. Otherwise literal treatment of a text would lead
1 t(l shallowness.
"l{e who has ears to hear, let him hear!" (Mt. 11:15).
AS THE PHILIPPIAN JAILER SAVED
IN A MOMENT?
In the story of the philippian jailer' Paul and Silas. said
lum uBelieve on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you Will be
;, d, and your household, (Acts 16:31).
Uld the faith of the jailer save his household in a moment?
llteologically and practically speaking, it is impossible to
Chat this happened in a moment.
Uut the faith of a person may lead to the salvation of
h msehold if this encourages them to believe and follow his
1 ps. Then his faith is c_9nsidered the first step that leads
1 ) nlvation after some time.
166
of Christ on the cross... That is because the wages of
is death 6:23). It was necessary for Christ to die
in order that the bandit might be saved
It is known that the Lord Jesus Christ remained on
cross for about two hours after uttering His promise to
bandit because that promise was the second word of the
words uttered by the Lord on the cross.
He may have uttered it at the first hour of the three
He spent on the cross from the sixth hour to the ninth ..
was the bandit saved immediately after the death of
The answer is:
2. The bandit bad to die with Christ in order to be
And his death with Christ is considered a baptism in
deepest meaning.
For what is baptism? The apostle says, uor do you
know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ
were baptized into His death? Therefore we were ouried
Him through baptism into death. ,, (Rom. 6:3); and also,
if we have been united together in the likeness of His
certainly we also shall be in the likeness of His resurT'eclzon.
knowing this, that our old man was crucified with Him,
the body of sin might be done away with ... " (Rom. 6:5,
It is obvious that the bandit was actually crucified wi
Christ and die with Him a real death and not just uin t
likeness of His death". Hence the death of the bandit
an ideal baptism, a model of any other baptism.
167
lluw dare then any one say that the bandit was not
11 d11 . .
ho had this great blessing with Chrtst IS
p r o;on w S p u1 the Apostle
in an ideal position. Perhaps t. a .
lubl._dly h .d "/have been crucified With
h I It very much, so e sat
{\( (Gal. 2:20).
t in the whole world who
I ht only one among the sam. s . of course the bandit
" tty this in word and meanmg IS
lltlll was on the Lord's right hand. . .
f f they did not dte wtth
I hl saintly they were considered
h st actually but te
1 h.we died with Him. .
b li d and were martyred before bemg
I hose who e eve . d b tized the baptism of blood
I lpllzed in water are constdere. ap
mg that they died with Htm.
k
hen did the bandit gain this baptism
llere we may as w
111c1 die on the cross?
. l that the Lord Christ died at the
It is stated m the .s k. 15:33-37; Lk. 33:44-46).
1
unlh hour (Mt. 27 .45-50 M
. ht down from the cross at
fhe body of Chnst the Apostle says, "When
lite. eleventh hour, for St. 7'' d St Mark says "Now
" (Mt 275 /. an
vening ha.d come it was the Preparation Day,
when evemng had come, S bbath, (Mk. 42); St. Luke says
'hat is, the day before the a t on and the Sabbath drew
tlso, " That day was the Prepahra I , "Because it was the
u!ar" (Lk. 23:54); and St. Jo n says,
168
Prepartion that the bodies should not remain on
cross on the Sabbath ... (Jn. 19:3).
When the body of Christ was brought down, the
bandits were not yet dead, so the soldiers broke their
uBut when they came to Jesus and saw that He was
they did not break His (Jn. 19:33).
Then, we conclude that the bandJt died after the
hour i.e. after two hours of the death of Christ.
be attained salvation only at that time after his death
took place nearly four hours after the divine promise
admitting him into Paradise.
Thus, the bandit was not saved in a moment, nor dJd
enter Paradise immediately after the dJvine promJse but
hours after.
This proves that the bandit was not saved in a ........... L ...
nor without baptism. There remains the third objecti
concerning the church and priesthood to be discussed;
The bandit attained salvation through Christ, the head
the Cbruch and the chief high priest who represented
at that time when neither the Christian priesthood nor
church have Bet yet been established .
CHAPTER 8
DO THESE VERSES PROVE
111
_.._,
THAT SALVATION MAY BE
ATTAINED IN A MOMENT?
(ln. 1:12) "As many as received Hi , '
(Is. 45:22) "Look to Me, and sav d .he
( lets 17:30, Heb. 3:8) verses mcludl g
word "today"
6 2 R 13:11) "now" (1Cor. : , om.
f
168
Prepartion Day, that the bodies should not remain on
cross on the Sabbath ... ,, (Jn. 19:3).
When the body of Christ was brought down, the t
bandits were not yet dead, so the soldiers broke their
uBut when they came to Jesus and saw that He was
dead, they did not break His legs,, (Jn. 19:33).
Then, we conclude that the bandit died after the eleven
hour i.e. after two hours of the death of Christ.
be attained salvation only at that time after his death
took place nearly four hours after the divine promise
admitting him into Paradise.
Thus, the bandit was not saved in a moment, nor did
enter Paradise immediately after the divine promise but
hours after.
This proves that the bandit was not saved in a moment,
nor without baptism. There remains the third obj
concerning the church and priesthood to be discussed:
The bandit attained salvation through Christ, the bead
the Cbrucb and the chief high priest who represented church
at that time when neither the Christian priesthood nor the
church have Bot yet been established ...
CHAPTER 8
DO THESE VERSES PROVE
THAT SALVATION MAY BE
ATTAINED IN A MOMENT?
ed Hi " , , "As many as rece1v
(111. and be sav d'
5 22) "Look to , h
4 : H b 38) verses includl g e
(.1cts 17:30 , e
" d '""
wnrd to aJ '' "now"
(1Cor. 6:2, Rom.
170
l. MERELY TO ACCEPT CHRIST
Misunderstanding and its Danger:
Those who declare that salvation may be attained in a
moment, make it depend on accepting Christ! According to
them 't
' I IS enough for you, in order to attain' salvation to
accept Christ as Redeemer and Savior' and the matter i; all
over!!
. Acceptance according to their own point of view-as is stated
m book entitled "Discipleship" -is to believe that you are
; smner and you deserve to die, and believe that Christ died
or you and to accept Him as a Redeemer and Savior ...
. such acceptance-they say- a person gains
renewal, regeneration from high and remission
o sms and he moves from death to life!!
It means that a person bt . . . .
f
. o aJns JUstification renewal
orgaveness and salv .. : ' '
auon as soon as be accepts Cb . t I
words, without baptism, church, sacrame::s.
pnest ood!
of them, all this is attained-without mediation
f
t el upon acceptance. Hence rose the heresy
o sa vahon m a moment. ..
171
In their magazine (The Spring) or in Arabic (AI Yanboua)
ucd in January 1978, they say: Suffice you to look at Christ
111 1 he Cross, the soldier piercing Him with the spear and
"" will be justified at the moment!
llow strange! Just to look at Him, without repenting,
1 unfessing or being absolved or partaking of the Eucharist. ..
lu'l by accepting Christ you are saved! Thus completely
tholishing the church and the holy sacraments ... !
l'he only means of salvation becomes: Have you accepted
c 'hrlst as Redeemer and savior?!
It is a well known expression borrowed from the
llnorthodox who concentrate on acceptance alone .. It is
uoteworthy that the Bible print distributed by the Gideons
1ndudes at the end a declaration of accepting Christ as
Rtdeemer and Savior. A person has to sign it as if such
h.laration is alone sufficient to give him salvation .. . !
They support their view with the words,
'But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right
to become children of God ... " (Jn. 1:12).
l hus, they believe that the regeneration is achieved as soon
a person accepts Christ!
lhfutation:
tet us see what the verse (Jn. 1: 12) signifies and what
r lation it has to becoming children of God .. Does it prove
1
' alvation in a moment"i' .
We notice first regarding those who received Him that:
172
It is not said 'tbey become children of God" but '
them He gave the right to become " It . tb
means at
were only given tbe right but bow did they actuaJJ
chlldren? Undoubtedly through rebirth from high f Y
and tbe Spirit (Jn. 3:3,5). ' rom
.This is what the Lord metnioned while s k.
Nicodemus, for He said assureA'
1
pea mg
. b uly, say to you
Z?e orn of water and the Spirit he cannot e,;ter
is"! (Jn. 3:5). Hence, without baptism there
Those who believe that rebirth takes pl .
accepti Ch (. ace JUSt upon
ng nst I.e. believing on Him) in fact d b .
and move away from the Orthodox ;reed. eny aptlsm
Another point concerning the same verse is:
What is tbe meanin f "
tb
g
0
as many as received Him"? Wb
are ey who received Him?
0
Certainly those wbo received u J
. un, a so received and
accepted HIS teaching ..
His teaching does not say "Just believe" b t "J:Ie
who believes a d b . u says 17.1
n IS aptlzed will be saved" (Mk. 16:16).
If you had only believed but was not baptized seeing that
you would not have followed the
of God... or . . . ou do not deserve to become a child
accepts Christ, should accept His Bible Hs
urc ; His stewards, the stewards of the mysteries of
173
111d all the holy sacraments He left us as means of salvation.
ALceptance is not a mere feeling .. .
Did Saul of Tarsus attain salvation in a moment as soon
ns he accepted Christ?! No, but the Lord sent him to tbe
daurch and the church ordered him to be baptized and wash
&away his sins (Acts 22:16). It means his sins remained after
he accepted Christ waiting for baptism to wash them away ...
Also the Jews who believed on th day of Pentecost, were
lhey saved at the moment they were cut to the heart? No,
hut the Church said to them on the mouth of St. Peter the
Apostle, "Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in
the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins" (Acts
1:38).
What can we say of the salvation of Cornelius and the
a-:thiopian eunuch?
Were they saved as soon as they accepted Christ as
Redeemer and Savior without baptism, sacraments or
priesthood... in a moment?!
To accept the Lord, to believe in Him and to know Him
are only steps preliminary to salvation ... while salvation is
the story of the whole life.
Salvation is the story of faith, repentance and baptism;
the story of obedience, sanctity, communion of the Holy
Spirit, effectiveness of the divine sacraments, the work of
grace with the human will, steadfastness in love and keeping
of the commandment and withstanding diabolic wars.
174
Each of those who received Him asked, "Lord, what do
You want me to do?" as did Saul of Tarsus. The Jews who
accepted the Lord on the day of Pentecost did the same.
asked the apostles, "Men and brethren, what shall we do
(Acts. 2:37).
This shows that there is something to be done after
acceptance.
Cornelius did not become a child of God immediately after
his accepting Christ, but the angel ordered him to- go to the
church and send for Peter the Apostle to tell him what he
had to do (Acts 10:6).
The Ethiopian eunuch as well did not become a child of
God as soon as he accepted the Lord though he believed with
all his heart (Acts 8:37) ... But only when he was baptized,
he went on his way rejoicing. This raises the question, 'why
did he wish earnestly to be baptized?' ...
Concentration on accepting Christ-as Redeemer was only
done by the apostles in calling non-believers because it is the
only way for salvation.
But why do they publish leaflets to call beiJevers to accept
Christ as Redeemer and Savior? Do they not believe yet that
He is the Savior?!
Have not the believers who receive the leaflets accepted
yet Christ-as their Redeemer? Those who follow this way in
preaching the word of God do not really discriminate between
believers and non-believers!
175
. th leaflet be published by a group
c >r what does tt mean :t aouth of the Coptic Orthodox
who call (Th . Y cce t Christ to be saved
( lu uch) calling behevers JUSt to a P mention of the
. rfe without even any
Mml to attam the ne": 1 that is in the Lord Jesus
raments and the nghteousness
( lu ist?
176
1. ''LOOK (TURN) TO ME, AND BE SAVED'
(Is. 45:11)
Among the verses on which those who declare that salvation
may be attained in a moment depend is the verse said by
the Lord in Isaiah "Look Turn to Me, and be saved, all you
ends of the ef!rth!, (Is. 45:22). They lay stress on the word
"Look (TurnF' and say that this verse proves that salvation
is attained at that trun (look) i.e. in a moment!! But does
the verse mean so?
The answer is that the verse bas no relation whatever with
the subject of salvation in a moment. But it calls for stopping
the worship of idols and returning to God's worship ..
I wish whoever quotes from the Bible texts, to be careful
about what he quotes to know the accasion on which the
verse was said? and to whom? and not cut the text out or
include it seperate from other verses ...
A true theologian, or a true believer does not try to subject
verses to his own concepts bot subject himself to the concept
of verses.
Now, let us explain the verses quoted from Isaiah in the
light of the following facts:
A The rest of the verse. Why did not he mention it complete?
B The rest of the chapter including the verse (Is. 45) . .
(' The contents of the chapters 43 to 48 of Isaiah.
We find that all these chapters call people to forsake the_,
gods.
They all call for the worship of the true God alone and .
thsregarding other gods. We find repeated in them the words
uf the Lord, "/, am the Lord, and besides Me there is no
wvior", "/ am the Lord, and there is no other", "/ am,
and there is no one else besides Me" "Before Me there was
110 God formed, nor shall there be after Me".
In these chaptes, God asserts that salvation is only through
I lim. So they had to tum to Him alone not to other strange
KOds are idols .. He says, "Look to Me, and be saved, all
you ends of the earth! For I am God, and there is no
(Is. 45:22).
This verse is preceded by another which carries the same
meaning, "Have not I, the Lord? And there is no other
beiseds Me, a Just God and a Savior, there is none besides
Me" (Is. 45:21) Then He followed it with the words, "Look
to Me, and be saved".
Is it not strange to hold to part of the verse and leave out
the rest of the verse, what precedes and what follows it giving
it a special meaning desired by the writer!
God's message here is 'Look (trun) to Me, not to other
gods and you will be saved .. because I am God and no other .
I am the Savior not anyone else'.
f
178
Or, in otber words turn your hearts towards Me.. not
towards idols.
If we read the whole chapter we shall come by other words
of the Lord that confirm the meaning, H that you may know
that/, the Lord, who call you by your name .. (Is. 45:3);
H though you have not known Me. I am the Lord and there
is no other. There is no God besides Me. I will gird you,
though you have not known Me" (45:4,5); H that they may
know from the rising of the sun to its setting that there is
none besides me. I am the Lord and there is no other" (45:6);
HI, the Lord, do all these things" (45:7); HI, the Lord, have
created it" (45:8), HJ have made the earth and created man
on it. It was /-My hands that stretched out the heavens,
and all their host .. , (45:12); HGod .. and there is no other .. ,
(45:14).
Having asserted tbat He is alone God, tbe Lord speaks
about savlation and bow it is through Him alone. He says,
HBut Israel shall be saved by the Lord with an everlasting
salvation" (Is. 45:17); HJ am the Lord, and there is no other,
(45:18); HI, the Lord .. (45:19); HThey have no knowledge,
who carry the wood of their carved image, and pray to a
god that cannot save" (45:20), HHave not/, the Lord? And
there is no other God besides Me, a Just God and a Savior,
there is none besides Me. Look to Me, and be saved ... ,
(45:21,22).
It is a caD to forsake the worsbJp of idols and believe in
God alone.
And of course Israel did not -in a moment- forsake the
worship of idols and turn to God to be saved .
This was only achieved through great efforts on the
nf the prophets and through blows from God, :
was their falling in captivity. God delivered Israel to t e an s
. . to affl1. ct them then He suffered them long
of theu enemtes ' h d 1
until they looked to Him and gave their backs tot e 1 o s ...
Even those who turned to God to be saved, were not saved
h h the blood of Christ which was shed 800 years except t roug
after that time.
They died in hope as the other fathers and waited ...
They did not attain salvation merely with a or in a
moment.
All they have attained was a promise of salvation.
nl ed wben they believed and forsook the They were o Y sav
worship of idols.
Tbey were saved only when the fulness of time bad come.
Not just by a look, but after long generations HHe
has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches .
f
Ill( I
3. VERSES INCLUDING THE WORJ)
(TODAY) AND (NOW)
Verses:
Those who declare that salvation
moment support their . b may be attained in
1 "B VIew Y the following verses:
. ehold, now is the accepted t
day of salvation" (.'"C 6. lme; behold, now is
.& or. .2).
2. "Now it is high time to a
our salvation is nearer than h wake out of sleep, /or now
83:11). w en we first believed" (Rom.
J. "Today if you will hear n
hearts" (Heb. 3:8). IS VOice, do not harden your
4 "T. I
ru :,Y, these times of i n
now commands all men g orance God overlooked, but
. 5 "14 everywhere to repent" (Acts 1730)
oday salvation has c .
In all these verses, thiS house" (Lk. 19:9)
and "now". n es on the words "today"
The word "Today":
. It is quJte evident that the u
of the word ''moment'' fort: of the word implies aboUsbing
regarding time. ey are completely contradicting
181
tuuin cause for our refutation of the heresy of salvation
ltlllllCnt is the impossibility of performing all the church
1 uncnt s necessary for salvation in a moment. .. It is
, for a person to believe and be baptized in a
''" nt, or to repent, confess and get absolution and partake
I 1 he holy communion in a moment. Practically, this is
II nee, the word implies an express denial of
lh importance of sacraments, priesthood and church in
tl vation.
So, the verses including the word Htoday" brings the debate
111 an end because believing and practising the sacraments
111 be done on a day ...
In one day, one can believe and be baptized ... One can
.tlso repent, confess and partake on the same day and thus
the church carries out its part and the sacraments necessary
for salvation are performed through the ministry of
priesthood .. .
On one day, Philip preached the eunuch, so the eunuch
blieved and was baptized (Acts 8).
On one day, Cornelius sent for St. Peter the Apostle, heard
his preaching, believed and was baptized, he and all who were
present (Act 10).
However, we shall try to understand together the meaning
of the verses they quoted to support their view:
"Now is the accepted time Now is the day of salvation"
(1 Cor. 6:1).
182
The phrases "Now is the time, and "Now is the day"
do not mean at all 'Now is a moment' .. He did not say 'Now
is the moment of salvation' or 'Now is the accepted
moment' ... However, we say:
The word "Now" here means not to delay or postpone ..
It does not mean that they were saved in a moment because
the apostle sent his epistle to "the church of God which is
at Corinth, with all the saints who are in all Achaia, (2Cor.
1:1). He was not speaking to non-believers nor did he speak
to them about faith, redemption or baptism.
He spoke to them about repentance and how they ought
not to postpone it .
Repentance is acceptable now and at any time, for God
says, "The one who comes to Me I will by no means cast
out" (Jn. 6:37) .. And St. Paul was speaking to them, in a
previous epistle, about the divisions among them (I Cor. 3:3)
and described them as carnal (l Cor. 3:1,4). Then he rebuked
them, condemned the sinner and judged him (lCor. 5:1-5).
He ordered them "Put away from yourselves that wicked
person" (1 Cor. 5:13). He blamed them also for resorting
to courts of law (I Cor. 6:1,5) and for many other sins ... In
the second epistle which we treat here, the apostle forgave
the sinner he previously condemned (2Cor. 2:7) saying,
"Now I rejoice, not that you were made so"y, but that
your sorrow led to repentance . For godly sorrow produces
repentance to salvation" (2Cor. 7:9,10).
183
He was then speaking to them about repentance and
f m the1r sins which matter ought not to be
,alvatiOn ro ' ' . d
d So it was the accepted time for 1t an to get nd
day was much better, was a salvation ..
Does all this have any thing to do salvatiOn m momeQt
though the apostle did not use this phrase at all ...
He was calling them for saying, "Be
., d t God" (.1Cor 520). So havmg been affected,
reconc1.e o
they ought not to postpone repentance for that was an
accepted time ...
The same was intended by the apostle when he said,
"Now it is high time to awake out of sleep".
Spiritual vigil is required at any time and it is ?ot right
d I
't for it is necessary now.. But what relation there
to e ay 1 ,
is between vigils and salvation ID a moment.
A person who awakes seeks to be saved as the lost son
did. When he came to himself he thought what would he
do and he decided, "/ will arise and go to. my father and
.
11
t hlm I have sinned agamst heaven and
w1 say o ,
before you' ,, (Lk. 15:17,18).
A ak
ess then is foDowed by other steps. So, the apostle
w en . h . 'tual "''"'
explained to them what would they do ID sue spm ''5U
H
d "Now it is high time to awake out of sleep,
esru, k d
Therefore let us cast off the works of dar ness, an us
the ar
mor oif light. Let us walk properly, as m the
put on
1
. t' d
day, not in revelry and drunkennes, not m lcen wusness an
184
lewdness, not in strife and envy. But put on the Lord Jesus
Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, tofu/fill its lusts"
(Rom. 13:11-14).
The aposde in this part laid down' before them a spiritual
program which perhaps needed spiritual struggle and time.
It was not then a speech about salvation in a moment.
He was speaking to believers, so, in the same verse he said,
~ ~ o w it is high time to awake out of sleep, for now our
salvation is nearer than when we first believed" (Rom. 13:11).
It is abvious then that they were believers and they had
accepted Christ as Redeemer and Saviour ... But at that time
they were stumbling in their sins and needed to repent.
Repentance was not to be postponed but it had to be at that
same time .. Their salvation from their sins through repentance
was at that time easier than at the time when they accepted
faith ...
The same calling was addressed by the apostle to the
Hebrews regarding repentance:
"Today, if you will hear His voice, do not harden your
hearts" (Heb. 3:7,8).
He was not speaking about salvation in a moment but he
called them to open their hearts for God and to repent. They
had to respond to God's work within them lest His wrath
should fall on them as had happened to their fathers in the
wilderness (Heb. 3:8-10).
They apostle described straying from God and not
185
responding to His voice as heart-hardness .. So, he said to
them, "Today... do not harden your hearts" ...
I wonder what relation there is between this verse and
salvation in a moment!
What relation in there also between this and the following
verse:
"God .. now commands all men everywhere to repent".
"Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now
commands all men everywhere to repent" (Acts 17:30).
Does it mean, to call people to repent, that they are to
be saved in a moment. He calls them now but they may
respond or not... Those who respond may take some time
to get rid of their sins, it may be gradual. They may also
repent but fall again... However in their repentance God
overlooks the times of ignorance ...
God calls people now to repent but does this mean that
they will be saved in a moment just because there is the word
unow"?!
Even if it is so . . ! the words of the apostle are, "God ..
now commands", not 'people are now saved' ...
Even the words 'Now are saved' do not mean in a
moment ...
Yet, we may not mix up the words "repentance" and
11
Salvation" for there are differences which we shall explain
in the next chapter entitled "Concepts".
186
"Today salvation has come".
The words "Today salvation has come to this house" (Lk.
19:9) were said by the Lord about Zacchaeus and his
household. They are explained in chapt!r 7 under the title
"Was Zachaeus saved in a moment" page 161.
Besides, the word "Today' ' has no relation to the subject
as we have explained.
Repentance and Salvation:
The other verses (including the same words) are all about
repentance not salvation.
Repentance is in fact a small part of the subject of
salvation, and those who say that salvation rnay be attained
in a moment cannot say that repentance means this. The verses
did not include any mention of faith, blood, redemption,
atonement or baptism. So, theY do not pertain to salvation
and have no relation to our subject ..
CHAPTERt 9
CONCEPTS
Mixin& up and
Mi:dn& up !lange and salvatiion.
Blessed IDOIII;ts not moments
salvation.
Forgiveness the crucifixion.
Faith and
Justification sanctification.
To answer 'ih oae
is not
Which are meantT!
186
"Today salvation has come".
The words uToday salvation has come to this house (Lk.
19:9) were said by the Lord about Zacchaeus and hi1
household. They are explained in c h p t ~ r 7 under the title
"Was Zachaeus saved in a moment " page 161.
Besides, the word "Today" has no relation to the subject
as we have explained.
Repentance and Salvation:
The other verses (including the same words) are all about
repentance not salvation.
Repentance is in fact a small part of the subject of
salvation, and those who say that salvation may be attained
in a moment cannot say that repentance means this. The verses
did not include any mention of faith, blood, redemption,
atonement or baptism. So, they do not pertain to salvation
and have no relation to our subject..
CHAPTER 9
THEOLOGICAL
CONCEPTS
Mixing up repentance and salvation.
Mixing up change and salvation.
Blessed moments not moments of
salvation.
Forgiv;ness before the crucifixion.
l'altb and salvation.
Justification and sanctification.
To answer witb one verse
Is not sufficient.
Which moments are meant?!
188
MIXING UP REPENTANCE AND
SALVATION
1. Many people mix up repentance and salvation, and so
when one repents and his life is changed they say he is saved.
He himself says;'I am saved' and records the date in his diary.
He may be inivited to come to the pulpit and tell his experience
or the story of his salvation so that others may benefit .. !
2. This may be incomplete repentance i.e. repentance over
a certain sin that he is tired of or over the main sin in his life.
It may be the outstanding sin in his life which makes him
feel out of the scope of God's children. It may be adultery,
drinking wine, gambling, stealing... etc.. and when he is
affected in his heart and repents stopping such dreadful sin,
he thinks he is saved and tells the people so!
3. But though he is saved of such sin, he may have other
sins!
He may be overcome by anger for example, love of praise
and vain glory, some tongue sins or being not acute in his
conduct. .. etc ... Yet he says 'I am saved' just because he
stopped drinking, gambling or falling in adultery!
189
4. Here comes to my mind a story I read in a book:
The author was speaking about the possibility of attaining
salvation in a moment and he mentioned a story told by some
known priest about a person addicted to smoking. When that
person came to himself and found that he was wasting his
power and health, he decided to stop smoking ... He threw
away the cigarette packet saying 'away, without return'.
That person who repented said, 'And since that moment
1 never returned to smoking. The author considered this a
proof of the possibility of salvation in a moment? Or a proof
of salvation in a moment from the love of sin!!
The strange thing is that the said author repeated the same
story twice in his book as if it were a strong evidence! I
wonder if salvation according to him lies in stopping smoking?
Or salvation from the love of sin is just to stop smoking?
That person may have other sins which need strong
resistance, to blood (Heb. 12:4) and need great help from
the grace ...
Many persons got rid of such sins and told their experience
but in a moment they fell in the sin of anger and rage and
could not get rid of that ..
Even if they get rid of anger, there may be other sins and
other weak points in their lives .. , for everyone has points
to be reformed in his life.
5. They themselves say that ''sactification'' takes the whole
life ... ! would we then consider stopping smoking an evidence
190
of salvation in a moment?! or include it under j
or sanctification?! Does this take from the deserts of the
and redemption? How and when is it included?
6. Salvation has a broad meaning, and repentace is j
part of it or one of the means leading to it.
We should not therefore speak about repentance,
complete or partial, while we speak about salvation. There
are other things pertaining to salvation that must be
mentioned such as as faith, baptism, blood, atonement and
redemption besides other matters like the act of grace or the
Holy Spirit regarding salvation.. Or is it right to consider
giving up one sin, salvation .. !
7. The concept of salvation ought to be obvious in its broad
mf anJng .
It is the salvation which the Lord worked and still works
for ... It is salvation for which we strive with all our power
and with the help of grace to attain after we had tasted part
of it and we put before us the words of the apostle, uwork
out your own salvation with/ear and trembling" (Phil. 2:12) ..
It is the salvation for which, ..,we do not wrestle against
flesh and blood, but against principalities . . against spiritual
hosts of wickedness" (Eph. 6:12); and for which we need
the whole armor of God,that we may be ablF to withstand
and to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked one ... (Eph.
6:13,16).
191
. f one or more sins, for
8. It is not the positive side
I his is the negative SI e an
which place is not here... .
h
' d salvation is a broad subject and
But as we ave sat , .
rtpentance represents only part of It .. .
Repentance also is a broad subject, It has the
of it; contrite repentant heart as anot er P :
of heart . rt dislike of sin as a fourth part,
Kiving sm as a absolution are other elements of
confessmg, . an h h t kes part by helping a person
l epentance m which the c . urc a
to repent and have forgiveness. .
It is evident that all these elements do not take place m
a moment.
He who bas ears to bear' let him bear.
. be the wide concept
This talk about the difference tween us to another
of salvation and the concept of repentance leads
. . "
similar topiC, I.e.
192
MIXING UP CHANGE AND SALVATION
1. I read in a book a paragraph which says, 'When
the king was anointed by Samuel the Prophet, Samuel said
to him, "The Spirit of the Lord will come upon you .. and
be turned into another man" (1 Sam. 10:6). The same
happened to Saul in a moment, for the Bible says, "And
so it was, when he had turned his back to go from Samuel,
that God gave him another heart" (1 Sam. w?at
the Bible says, "when he had turned his back which thmg
does not take time'.
In fact 1 cannot find in this story an evidence of
in a moment but rather an evidence of the opos1te
King Saul actually changed, and in a moment. God
him another heart and worked within him, so he VLJ .......... .
among the prophets and the people exclaimed in ast1:>rulm
h t
?"
"Is Saul also among the Prop e s. .
This actually happened but what was Sauls' end?
2 This Saul who changed in a moment, upon who
Spirlt of the Lord Came and who prophesied never
salvation, but perished!
His life ended a tragic end as the divine revelati
us, "But the Spirit of the Lord departed from Saul,
193
distressing spirit from the Lord troubled him" (1Sam. 16:14).
He needed David to play on the harp for him that he may
become well "And the Lord regretted that He had made Saul
King over Israel" (1Sam. 15:35). And when Samuel the
Prophet mourned for Saul, the Lord said to him, "How long
will you mourn for Saul, seeing I have rejected him ... ?"
(JSam. 16:1).
Indeed, change is something different from salvation .. We
ought not to take a speech about change as concerning
salvation.
King Saul was not saved though he changed, the Spirit of
the Lord came upon him, had the gift of phrophesying and
had the holy anointing by Samuel the Prophet!! He perished
at the end. Therefore the Bible does not lay stress on the
changes that happen to the saints, nor call this salvation but
it is stated, "Considering the outcome of their conduct" (Heb.
13:7).
4. How easy it is to find that a change for better is followed
hy a change to worse .. The life of man is always changeable
an d what is important is how his days of sojourning in this
world end.
Hence, the example of King Saul in his quick change does
n ,I serve the heresy of salvation in a moment but disproves
II ompletely.
'h same may be said regarding change due to repentance
u though it takes place in a moment .. . !
194
5. A person may change in a moment from a sinner into
a repentant! But this does not mean that he is saved, for
he may lose his repentance.
His repentance may turn him from death to life! then he
returns to death again if he does not continue in repentance
or if he returns to sin because the wages of sin is death (Rom.
6:23).
But, repentance may be very strong and the work of grace
very strong ...
6. In this case a sinner turns, by repentance, into a saint
and again may lose his saintliness and fall. Thus he cannot
be said to have been saved in a moment!
We shall let aside the point that the word "saint" was given
in the Bible to all believers as st. Paul the Apostle said, "Greet
every saint in Christ Jesus" (Phil. 4:21); " ... being watchful
to this end with all perseverance and supplication for all the
saints" (Eph. 6:18). He also addressed his epistles to, "To
all the saints in Christ Jesus who are in Philippi, with thl
bishops and deacons" (Phil. 1:1); "to the church of God.
with all the saints who are in all Achaia" (2Cor. 1:1), '
the saints .. who are in Colosse" (Col. 1:2)(See also Phil. 4
Heb. 13:24; 1Cor. 1:2; 2Cor. 13:13).
Notwithstanding this, we say: how many of the saints
fall and lose the first step in their life that turned thena
saints and needed to repent anew and change again ...
David the Prophet was a saint, but he fell and
repentance and tears. Samson was a saint and of the
195
of faith (Heb. 11 :32) but he fell and needed repentance to
be saved. Solomon was a saint, he talked many times with
God and God appeared to him in Gibeon and gave him a
wise and understanding heart so that there had not been
anyone like him before nor arose anyone like him after (lKgs.
3:5-12). Then God reappeared to Solomon after dedicating
the Temple and told him that He had heard his prayer (lKgs.
9:2,3) .. But, in spite of all this Solomon fell (1Kgs. 11 :4)
and needed repentance.
The time is lacking to mention the saints listed in the
history who fell and needed repentance to be saved such as
Jacob the Striver; Moses the anchorite; Baeisa .. and many
others.
Then, to attain saintliness is one thing and to attain
salvation is another different thing ... for saintliness may be
easily lost as man is always changeable.
7. In other words, a person may change from a sinner to
11 saint but is not saved yet, for he needs to be steadfast in
nintliness not just turn to it ..
fhe apostle says in this regard, Therefore, having these
I'' omises, beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness
f the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God"
<'or. 7:1); and " .. so that He may establish your hearts
lumeless in holiness" (JThess. 3:13).
H. So, we say that salvation is the life story in which a
non experiences faith, repentance, baptism and
nteds to be steadfast.
196
A person changes from one condition to another, but he
has to be steadfast in the best condition he attains and not
think that mere change is salvation . ..
9. Some may change and are saved but not at the time
of their changing.
An example is Saul of Tarsus whose heart changed from
a persecutor of the church to a believer and then a chosen
vessel of the Lord (Acts 9). However, he was not saved at
the moment he met the Lord or at the moment of change.
The Lord sent him to Ananias who addressed him,
Saul... why are you waiting? Arise and be baptized, and wash
away your sins, (Acts 22:16) ...
This shows that his sins were not yet washed away till that
time, only when he was baptized he was washed away of them
and was saved (Mk. 16:16).
So, the time of change is not the time of salvation. Beside1
many persons need a long time to change .
10. There are many changes in one's life but not every
change is salvation .. You may be affected by a sermon o
a certain reading and something changes in your life or
whole life changes but such change is not salvation .. ..
\
Perhaps a certain psalm or verse changes your life,
certain miracle changes your life into repentance or per
into consecration ....
11. But consecration is one thing, and salvation Is
different thing.
197
A single verse heard by St. Anthony changed his life, so
he went and sold all his property giving everything to the
poor and he entered into the life of monasticism ... Would
anyone dare say that St. Anthony attained salvation the
moment he heard the verse and was changed?!
It is actual change indeed but monasticism is something
different from salvation.
We should not consider every change salvation!
12. St. Augustine likewise sat to himself in spiritual
contemplation and this led him to repentance and changed
his life. It was a decisive historical confrontation, yet he did
not obtain salvation at that time .. He read a book about the
li fe of St. Anthony and was much affected by it. . However,
this also and the change that followed was not salvation for
him but just a step on the way.
To confront oneself is important and may lead to a change
nr to striving for repentance but all of this is mere steps
towards God.
Such steps are not salvation but they lead to it.
l'his confrontation may give you a power from God and
Mt lll'C to help you in your life .. It may end with interior
olution to repent. All this is good and useful, yet it is not
Mlvntion but mere media.. . Thus, saints used to sit to
hemselves or go deep within themselves. Yet they did not
lhun salvation at Such moment but were given a gift and
I
198
Some of those who changed and gained salvation through
faith, repentance and baptism had an opposite change and
fell away.
There are many examples of such falling away in the Bible
among which are: The story of Demas, one of the assistants
of St. Paul the Apostle (Col. 4: 14). St. Paul even mentioned
him once before St. Lk. (Philem. 24). Yet even this changed
and fell away as St. Paul tells us " .. for Demas has forsaken
me, having loved this present world, (2Tim. 4:10).
Others like Demas were mentioned by the apostle in (Phil.
3:18), "For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and
now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the
cross of Christ".
Falling away is a proof given to those who put the word
"change" in place of the word "salvation". How easy it is
for a person to change in a moment from a sinner into u
repentant or even into a saint and turn from darkness to light
and from death to life, gaining power . .. but what after?
Such a person may change to the opposite again and ma
perish also at the end!
199
BLESSED MOMENTS
NOT MOMENTS OF SALVATION
1. Undoubtedly, in the life of every one there are blessed
moments:
These may be blessed or holy moments;
Decisive moments;
Glorified moments;
Moments of change in thought and decisions;
Moments of promises to God,
Moments of repentance or reconciliation with God;
or Moments of contemplation.
But none of them may be described as salvation.
I shall try here to give examples of these or of some of
tlwm:
? . The moment when St. Anthony looked at the corpse
tl his father and said, [where is your greatness, your power
nd authority?! You have departed from this world against
0111 will .. but I, shall leave it with my own will, before they
t lug me out by force].
lr was a moment of asceticism, a decisive moment but not
moment of salvation. We cannot say that St. Anthony
Halvation at that moment.
200
He becomes in a spiritual state that makes him feel in the
Kingdom of heavens as the Lord said, "For indeed. the
Kingdom of God is within you, (Lk. 17:21) .
The visit of grace is a holy moment but not a moment
of salvation.
In such a visit, one enjoys God, feels His presence, and
feels His work within one.. But such a moment does not
continue.. It is just a taste of the Kingdom and after tha
a person returnes to his original state or perhaps to a little
better state, but never continues in such kingdom all his life ...
7. As we explained before, a person may experience
moments of repentance or change but they are not moments
of salvation.
A person may feel the necessity to repent now and not
to postpone at all. This happened to St. Augustine and to
the lost son .. but repentance is not salvation yet.. It is just
an element that needs steps afterwards. A person may also
falj away and return to sin after his repentance. The devil
may also leave a person but "until an opportune time, (Lk.
4:13), then return to tempt him.
A certain psalm may change tbe life of a person and
attaches him to God Then a temptation may cast him away
afterwards. Thus he may pass by many changes until he rests
in God's bosom, but not in a moment!
8. Also, a person may experience moments of promises
to God. He becomes in such a spiritual state that he gives
Ot
We can rather say that it was a blessed moment, a uhiu1 111
ul contemplation in which St. Anthony became awuro ol lh
prishability of this world and laid down for us the he tutllul
.angelic way ...
3. Likewise, the moments in which the lost son
lumself amidst the swine in the far country, became aw"
of his bad condition and decided to repent and return In h 11
l1llhers house ...
They were decisive moments which changed the lift ur thr
lc1st son and made him return to his father's house. Due thnr,
wlls not among them a moment of salvation for that w11
Impossible in a far country!
4. It was also a blessed moment, that in which St. August inc
.1t to himself as well as the hours when he was affected hy
the story he read about St. Anthony ... Yet none of thc111
w.ls a moment of salvation.
He was not saved while reading about St. Anthony!
5. Again a person may experience moments of repentance
111 which he feels hatred towards sin or thinks that love of
111 has been completely removed from his heart and he no
1110re longs for it-whether it is sin in general pr a certain sin ...
But none of these moments is a moment of salvation.
It is a moment of repentance, not salvation and it is so
nsy for him to return to sin again though he felt that love
ul sin has been removed from his heart.
6. A person may also experience holy moments in which
h enjoys the visit of grace and hears God's voice in his heart.
202
promises to God and say, "Accept, I pray, the free will
offerings of my mouth, 0 Lord" (Ps. 119:108). But many
are the promises which a person gives but breaks as I say
in one of my poems.
[Many times I promised
God, but did not fulfill the promise.
I wish, for fear of my weakness
I had not promised].
In fact, if the heart is convinced, you can reach an
agreement with God in a moment if you want. ..
However to hold an agreement or to promise is one thing
and to carry out your promise is another different thing. You
may make an agreement or promise in a moment, then break
it in other moments.
9. There are also holy moments that may lead to faith.
Certainly it was a holy moment full of blessing in which St.
Mark sat with Inianus the shoe-mender to mend his shoes
But the moement of mending the shoes was not the
of his salvation but the beginning of a long talk through wh
Inianus believed and was baptized. This was not of
done in a moment.
However, it was a holy blessed moment, the beginn
a spiritual course in which this shoe-mender was convl
of the falsity of paganism and was convinced of the c
faith. It is impossible to say that such faith took
a moment.
203
10. A person may experience moments of internal spiritual
action.
They may be moments of prayer, talk or wrestling with
God in which a person says to Him, 0 Lord, I return to
you after a long time of sojourning away from you. I want
to be always with You ... I want to sit to You, reconcile with
You, under any conditions'.
It is a beautiful prayer and a wish for reconciliation but
not a moment of salvation.
Many obstacles may hinder such reconciliation, and a
person may face practical hindrances, internal or external wars
till he attains reconciliation and keeps steadfast in it .. . Indeed
a person may easily reconcile with God then makes Him angry
.tgain.
11. Among the holy moments is the moment of forgiveness.
At the moment the Lord Jesus Christ gave Himself on the
r nss, He offered a general forgiveness. That is on His part,
hut on the part of people, they did not attain forgiveness
I I hat moment. Everyone benefited of it seperately or among
vroup through the ministry of the word and preaching, after
It ncssing miracles and wonders, after explanation and
mvincing and after they believed, repented and were
ptucd. No one attained forgiveness in a moment.
I ht re is a difference between God's action perfected in
nmment and the action done by a person.
t l11d is able to forgive in a moment, but to deserve such
I\ tncss, you may need a long struggle and a long time.
204
However, God in some cases forgave, then punished.
One of the outstanding examples for this is the story
the indebted servant whom his master left ten
talents. But when another servant could not pay a hundred
denarii he owed him, he threw him into prison. Thereupon
the Bible says,
"Then his master, after he had called him, said to him,
'You wicked servant! I forgave you all that debt because you
begged me. Should you not also have had compassion on
your fellow servant, just as I had pity on you? And his master
was angry, and delivered him to the torturers until he should
pay all that was due to him. ' So, My heavenly Father also
will do to you if each of you, from his heart, does not forgive
his brother his trespasses" (Mt. 18:24-35).
Lastly we say that there is a glorified moment that equals
a whole life ...
Such a moment is that in which Moses and Elijah stood
with the Lord Christ on the mount of transfiguration ... Such
also are the moments of revelation in which John the Beloved
saw God's throne and the heavenly hosts. Such also is the
moment in which Jacob the Partiarch saw a ladder reachina
from earth to heavens and the angels coming up and down
it, or the moment in which Moses stood before the bush or
before the divided sea ...
'fhey are all glorified moments but not moments of
salvation.
205
In conclusion we say that we should not take any sentence
including the word "moment" as an evidence of salvation
in a moment!! Every word or phrase has its meaning and
usage which may have no relation at all with the subject of
salvation.
Every word in the theological sphere needs deep unders-
tanding because every word differs completely from the other.
He who has ears to hear let him hear (Lk. 14:35).
206
FORGIVENESS BEFORE THE CRUCIFIXION
The Protestant Brethren concentrate - in regard to
salvation - on some verses by which they want to prove that
forgiveness is given in a moment, without interference of the
church, without the sacraments or priesthood! What are those
verses that we may understand them?
Verses we have to understand:
1. The words of the Lord to the paralytic, u your sins
are forgiven you" (Mk. 2:5).
2. The words of the Lord to the sinful woman, "Your sins
are forgiven,, (Lk. 7:48) .
3. The words of the Lord about Zacchaeus, "Today
salvation has come to this house" (Lk. 19:9).
4. The words of the Lord about the tax-collector, '
man went down to his house justified rather than the othtr
(Lk. 18:14).
The rule is to understand the holy texts in the light of
proper theological concept lest there should be
contradiction between texts and established
concepts. What then are the theological rules we
207
observe in order to have a proper understanding of such
verses?
The first rule is, "Without shedding of blood there is no
remission" (Heb. 9:22). This rule is the basis of redemption
according to all views.
Such remission was given when the Lord Christ shed His
blood on the cross for us after "He had on Him the iniquity
of us all" (/sa. 53:6). Thus He took away the sin of the world
and died as atonement for the whole world (Jn. 1:29, lJn.
2:2).
Here, we come out with another theological rule which is:
No one attained salvation before the crucifixion of Christ,
not even the fathers and prophets.
St. Paul the Apostle tells us about all the heroes of faith
whether fathers or prophets, "These all died in faith, not
having received the promises, but having seen them ajar off
were assured of them, embraced them .. " (Heb. 11:13).
All the fathers and prophets waited in hades in hope but
did not attain salvation until Christ transmitted them to
larndlse after His crucifixion. When Christ died and paid
the wages of sin which in death (Rom. 6:23), "He descended
lflo the lower parts of the earth", "He led captivity captive"
ph. 4:9,8). Then "He went and preached to the spirits in
lwn" (!Pet. 3:19). Thus He gave the salvation which, "the
J J ~ t t s have inquired and searched diligently" (I Pet. 1:10);
h snlvation no one attained except through the blood
'lu i11t who indeed, "was foreordained before the
208
foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times
for you'' (JPet. 1:20).
Hence, whoever proclaims that there was salvation and
forgiveness before the crucifixion of Christ, in fact denies
the doctrine of Redemption and announces that Christ's
incarnation was in vain and for no aim!
We say that if the Lord was to give salvation and
forgiveness by a word, without blood and redemption, why
then was there incarnation, crucifixion, passions and
Golgotha? where would be the divine justice?
Indeed God can do everything and can give forgiveness
by a word .. but He does not do this sacrificing His justice!
God's justice requires the payment of the price of sin, which
is death. This death took place on the cross. Therefore any
forgiveness was postponed till redemption was perfected on
the cross .. Then, how can we understand any forgiveness given
before the crucifixion?
Any forgiveness given before the crucifixion is merely 1
promise or a deed of forgiveness. But forgiveness itself wal
given when Christ died on the cross.
On the cross, the Lord forgave the sin of the
the sins of the sinful woman, and the sins of Zacchaeus
the tax-collector. On the cross also, on the cross
forgiveness was given to all those who had a promise
deed of forgiveness in the Old Testament through tho
offering and the tresspass offering or the burnt offerinat
the words of the priests and prophets.
209
Thus salvation from sin was not given in a moment to the
paralytic, the sinful woman, the tax collector, Zaccbaeus and
others ...
They only had a deed of forgiveness but forgiveness itself
was attained on the cross.
They deserved forgiveness by the word of Christ which
word is in fact a divine license and a divine grace ... However,
there is a difference between deserving forgiveness and
attaining it.
If the paralytic, the tax collector or Zacchaeus had died
before the crucifixion of Christ, he would have waited in
Hades till Christ transmitted him to Paradise according to
I lis promise after the crucifixion and redemption.
Another point or another theological concept to add is:
If those who heard the promise of forgiveness had lived
1111 the foundation of the church and the sacraments, they
\\ maid have had to be baptized and practise the other gifts
;I fhe church sacraments according to the Lord's words, "He
tlw believes and is baptized will be saved" (Mk 16:16); and,
I trless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His
loocl, you have no life in you" (Jn. 6:53).
H ing forgiven by the Lord before His crucifixion, does
I llll'l m that they break the teaching He entrusted to them
11 lie said, "Go therefore and make disciples of all the
baptizing them ... teaching them to observe all things
I have commanded you'' (Mt. 28:19,20).
When those were promised forgiveness, the church
sacraments were not yet established and they were not required
to be baptized because baptism is death with christ (Rom.
6:3,4) and He had not yet died ...
The church sacraments were established on the deserts of
the blood of Christ; that blood was not yet shed at that time ..
There was no need then to speak about those sacraments and
require that they be practised before they existed ...
Should anyone comment that in all the previous examples,
there was not mention of the church, the priesthood and the
sacraments, we would say there was no need for that!!. We
add that there was no mention also of redemption, blood,
atonement and believing on Christ as Redeemer and Savior ..
was not this also necessary?!
FAITH AND SALVATION
No one argues regarding the necessity of faith for salvation.
All agree that whoever does not believe, will perish. The Lord
Jesus Christ says, "He who does not believe will be
condemned" (Mk. 16:16). It is stated also in the Bible, "He
who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not
believe is condemned already, because he has not believed
m the name of the only begotten Son of God" (Jn. 3:18)
(See also Jn. 3:36). There is no need to mention all the verses
on faith because the necessity of faith is not disputed.
But an unacceptable matter is the teaching that salvation
I uttained through faith alone without any regard to other
1 rctnlrements taught by the Lord Christ Himself!
11 is the Lord Christ who said, He who believes and is
'l'fi'l.ed will be saved" (Mk. 16:16). He did not say He
lw bl'lieves is saved", deleting baptism. He also said about
11/unce, "Unless your repent you will all likewise perish"
11:3,5) About works, the Lord also said, Not everyone
fl Jays to Me 'Lord, Lord', shall enter the Kingdom of
', 11. but he who does the will of My Father in heaven"
J 1).
hy Uum do they concentrate on faith alone regarding
...... u., lacnoring baptism, repentance and works, which are
212
aJI mentioned in the teaching of Christ?! Partaldng also
the flesh and blood of Christ is among His teaching (Jn. v .,.,._
It is a kind of extremism to be enthusiastic for somethi
and consider it everything while anything else is nothing .
Faith is important, baptism is also important, repentance
as well and any other requirements have their importance
likewise .. Why then denial of everything and insisting on the
phrase 'Just believe' while the Bible sets many other things
besides faith ...
We lay stress on faith, only when we preach non-believers ...
The father apostles did the same when they preached the
gospel to non believers, seeing that any good works they did
without believing cannot save them. They had to believe in
redemption and in Christ as Redeemer and savior.
Such faith was tl)e frist step that led to other steps which
are part of the Christian faith.
The apostles could not have told non believers about
baptism and its necessity for salvation. But, when they
believed, they spoke to them about that and baptized them.
They could not have begun talk with non believers about
partaking of the flesh and blood of Christ, but they had to
believe first in Christ and in His sacrifice on the cross, then
the apostles would tell them about the flesh and blood of
Christ ... This is the logical sequence of teaching.
They talked to the Philippian jailer first about believing
in Christ as the way for salvation ... When he believed, they
213
talked to him about baptism, then baptized him and all his
household (Acts 16:30-33).
The talk of the apostles about faith did not abolish the
1mportance of the Chruch, for faith is received through the
chruch.
How did faith reach the world? Is it not through the
church? Is it not through the teachers who spread faith
through the whole world? Those teachers are first the
apostles, then the bishops and priests and then teachers m
the church in our generation.
St. Paul the Apostle says in this Tegard, whoever calls
upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. How then shall
they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how
shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And
how shall tlley hear without a preacher? And how shall they
preach? unless they are sent?" (Rom. 10:13-15) .
What is to be said then of those who received faith through
the church wishing to be saved, but when they believed, they
denied the importance of the church for salvation!
There remains a point concerning the relation of faith to
baptism:
Some sects prevent children from being baptized under the
pretext that they still do not have conscious faith. They wait
till they grow up in order to be baptized!
What is the end of those children who do not receive
. h?l
baptism, nor faith .. Would we leave them to pens
214
There is a long chapter in my book "Comparative
Theology'' about baptism of children, I advise you to read.
Here, I say that nothing hinders the baptism of children.
We baptize them according to the faith of their parents so
that they may be saved as the firstborn children were saved
because of the faith of their parents who put the blood of
the passover on their doors (Ex. 12). We remember also the
children saved while crossing the Red Sea through the faith
of their parents, and those circumcised on the eighth day of
their birth (Gen. 17), which was a symbol of baptism (Col.
2:11, 12). This was also due to the faith of their parents.
We baptize children to ensure for them salvation "Unless
one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the
Kingdom of God" (Jn. 3:5; Mk. 16:16). Through baptism
they enter into church and receive faith since their early years.
There they experience living faith not just mental faith.
But if we prevent children from baptism, and from the
membership of the church, from taking part in its life and
enjoying the action of the-Holy Spirit in its sacraments,
in fact deprive them of the practical faith which
experience only through practising and through life in t
church ... !
Those who object to the baptism of children ask, '
if a child grows up and does not believe or deviates?'
We reply that teaching him faith is the responsibility
his parents and the church. If he rejects faith when he
up, he is considered as any one who draws back (Heb.
215
But we would have performed our duty towards him and
did not deprive him of the means of salvation; and at the
same time we did not force him to anything against his free
will ...
Here, I'd like to note the following regarding "conscious
faith":
Are all grown-ups spiritually and mentally mature, and the
expression "conscious faith" applies to them? Are not there
many grown ups who do not have such consciousness or
maturity and do not even know except simple things about
faith, not grasping much of the depths and facts of faith?
What are the measures of such conscious faith?
How far does it apply to the social classes that need a long
I ime to attain such consciousness and perhaps do not attain
It at all ... ! But in spite of this they get baptized, seeing that
I hl'Y are old enough .. though regarding knowledge they are
I ht same like the young .. ! Can we prevent those also from
h lng baptized? Or why do we concentrate on children while
I h I .ord Christ said concerning them, .. Let the little children
'"''' to Me, and do not forbid them; for of such is the
lnstlom of heaven" (Mt. 19:14).
216
JUSTIFICATION OR SANCTIFICATION
They say, 'When we speak about salvation in a moment,
we mean justification not sanctification, for sanctification
takes one's whole life .. '
We answer them that we are speaking here about salvation
~ in general and not referring to justification or sanctification.
If you mean only justification, you should speak definitely
and say 'We mean justification in a moment, not salvation
in a moment'.
Yet if you mean by justification deliverance from the
original sin and sins committed before baptism, not the
righteousness that is in the Lord Christ (Gal. 3:27); if so,
we ask the following question:
Is this justification also given in a moment?
Seeing that faith and baptism are a must according to the
words of the Lord Jesus Christ, uHe who believes and is
baptized will be saved, (Mk. 16:16) .. and repentance is
necessary according to the words of St. Peter the Apostle
on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:38), how then do the three:
faith, repentance and baptism take place in a moment?
Hence, this justification also cannot in any way take place
in a moment
217
If we say that it takes place at (the moment of baptism),
we disregard faith and repentance which ought to precede
haptism.
If we say that it t k ~ s place at (the moment of believing),
we disregard baptism and repentace ...
Besides,. neither faith nor baptism takes places in a moment
tl S we have previously explained on page 102.
--
--
--
-
--
218
TO ANSWER WITH ONE VERSE
IS NOT SUFFICIENT
Some used, in theological matters, to give a question that
requires one verse as an answer. They try to convince .the
(simple) and ignorant that this is the teaching of the Btble
or it is truly biblical...
Among those are the Adventists who did the same in their
book "God Speaks", and many other writers of leaflets and
books contradicting doctrines. We say to those:
A single verse - in disputed matters - is not sufficient, nor
does it give the biblical truth. This is 11 rovided by i v i n ~ all
the verses pertaining to the subject, to have a complete v1ew,
[See my book "Salvation in the Orthodox Concept"
th title "The danger of using one single verse"] Here, I
give some examples to show that it is wrong to answer
one verse:
1. Suppose someone asked you how one is to be born of
Can you answer with this verse, "If you know thai
is righteous, you know that everyone who
righteousness is born of Him" (JJn. 2:29)!! Does. thia
alone give us a bibbical teaching that a person IS
219
God when he practises righteousness! what about faith and
baptism!!
Or can you answer the same question with the verse that
says, "Of His own will He brought us forth by the word
of truth" (las. 1:17) Thus rebirth takes place just by the word
of truth without any mention of acceptance, faith, baptism
and repentance .. . !
You should rather state all the verses on rebirth when
answering the said question
Take for example the words of the Lord Jesus Christ
'
"Unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter
the Kingdom of God" (Jn. 3:5); and also, " . . but according
to His mercy He saved us, through the washing of
tegeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit" (Tit. 3:5).
2. Suppose that someone asked you what acceptable religion
before God .
Can you answer him with one single verse which is, "Pure
md undefiled religion before God and the Father is this: to
' lw orphans and widows in their trouble, and to keep oneself
mpotted from the world" (Jas. 1:27). Does this verse
P csent the biblical truth without speaking about proper
II h'/
11 n inly you will not do this, why then use the same way
lh one verse in other places to support your views?!
If Hmneone asked you how a sinner may be tranHftrrrd
dr.afh to Ufe .. .
220
Can you confine your answer to one verse alone, that verse
said by St. John the Beloved, "We know that we have passed
from death to life, because we love the brethren" (JJn. 3:14).
Does this verse alone express the teaching of the Bible and
the truth regarding passing from death to life without giving
any hint of redemption, atonement, crucifixion, repentance,
faith and baptism?
No one agrees to do so, but we should give other verses
relating to the subject such as, "Even when we were dead
in trespasses,(He) made us alive together with Christ" (Eph.
2:5); you, being dead in your trespasses ... He has made
alive together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses,
having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was
against us ... having nailed it to the cross" (Col. 2:13,/4),
... buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised
with Him" (Col. 2:12).
11
Therefore we were buried with Him
through baptism into death, that }u.st as Christ was raised
from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also
should walk in newness of life. For if we have been united
together in the likeness of His death, certainly we also shall
be in the likeness of His resurrection" (Rom. 6:4)).
4. Likewise if anyone asked you how to be saved.
Can you put before him one verse only such as, "Take
heed to yourself and to the doctrine. Continue in them, for
in doing this you will save both yourself and those who hear
you .. (1 Tim. 4: 16)?
Is this verse alone a sufficient answer for how to be saved?
221
f
h baptism
1 1
.md without any mention of the blood, rut or
1 guess you refuse this, and you are right.
. u/fyou
The same applies if you give another smgle verse, .
I'Onfess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe m
heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you Wl e
,aved" (Rom. 10:9).
It is a verse of tbe Bible, but alone is not !
'lhould put beside it the verse, "He who believes an lS
baptized will be saved" (Mk. 16:16)
1
.. while the ark was
Or put beside it another verse a so, d
being prepared in which a few, that is, eight souls, were save
. which now saves
through water. There is also an antltype ...
liS, namely baptism" (JPet. 3:20,21).
Thus the biblical truth is shown completely our
, f
1
ng certain verses
\ on science does not blame us or concea 1 ff
hy which we conceal parts of the truth so that we may o er
uur own concept not the concept of the Bible!!
b
ssed and cannot
A question that makes me always em ara
lind an answer to, is:
Those brethren who say they proclaim the teaching of
Bable and defend the biblical truth, why do not they mlenhtlon
h
? h do they concea t em
rhese verses beside the ot ers. w Y . ll?
1
mtentionally? Are not these verses of the Btble as we .
111st inquire ...
222
WHICH MOMENTS
Those who speak about salvation in a moment hesitate
sometimes which moment is a moment of salvation and when
does it occur?
1 Is it the moment of believing? or the moment of
?
accepting the Lord Christ as Redeemer and SaVIor
But we must take into consideration that faith does not
occur in a moment but it is the outcome of the work of. grace
and ministry of the word which perhaps takes a Ionge time.
2. Or is it the moment of baptism? Yet we know
baptism has certain rituals that may not be performed m
moment!
3. Is it the moment of repentance? But repentance
not come upon a person in a moment. It is rather a
convinced of spiritual life and getting rid of the love of
and all this is not born in a moment!
4. Or is it the moment of the coming of the mind
consciousness? or the moment of the beaming of
darkness? But all this comes gradually. Some people
recognize it or rather did not recognize its depths .. l
223
5. Is it the turning moment regarding thoughts, decisions
and conduct as some would say. But no one turns in a
moment in his thought, else he is described as emotional or
shallow who turns easily to the opposite ...
6. Or is it the moment when the effectiveness of baptism
burst out as people say. Even if this expression is true, it
occurs gradually and may take the whole life ...
7. Or is it the moment of recognizing? as in the case of
St. Peter when he recognized the Lord while he was fishing
after the Resurrection (Jn. 21 :7), or the disciples of Emmaus
when their eyes opened and knew that it was Christ speaking
to them (Lk. 24:31) or the moment Jacob awoke from his
'tlc.cp after seeing the heavenly ladder and said, "Surely the
I ord is in this place, and I did not know of it" (Gen. 28:16).
!'hough all these cases have no relation whatsoever to
tlvntion, for Peter was not saved at that time, nor the
B t I pies of Emmaus nor even Jacob ... yet this did not occur
11 1 ndden, in a moment. This is obvious from the story
I th disciples of Emmaus (Lk. 24:31,32,35).
llowtver, all such suppositions concerning the meaning of
It moment" shows uncertainity of belief in it. This
m I tnt cs also that it is imposed forcibly, then an
IH tnlion or a justification is sought for it. It means that
I uo c.stablished theological rule in this regard.
h lh n do they hold to the idea of the "moment" and
r I, In vnin, to find an interpretation for it or try to
out of their place to support this view and kceJ')
rttllllliJ nway? Why for. .1
1
CHAPTER 10
ELECTION
The believers and the elect.
Did God choose certain people?.
Option in the hand of mao. ("
Objections and refutations.
f
226
THE BELIEVERS AND THE L F ~ ~
The idea of "Salvation in a moment" is based on
thought that a believer is saved the moment he believe
cannot perish afterwards. This thought of 1 he
perishability of a believer is a mixing up of the
"believers" and "elect" as if they were one word!
But we say that though all the elect are believers, y t
all believers are elect because a believer may fall aw1y
perish ..
In this last case, it cannot be said that a believer i!l
at the moment he believes but is saved if he continues In
all his life. A believer is not in a constant condition
may pass by times of weakness or slackness or times of
and break down and may also draw back from faith 11
Bible say, .. Now the just shall live by faith; but 1/ an
draws back, My soul has no pleasure in Him, (Heb. 10
This verse demonstrates that a believer may draw
The stories about drawing back from faith are multipe
example of these is Demas (2Tim. 4: 10); another c
is those of whom St. Paul said, "For many walk, oj
I have told you often, and now tell you even weepin}l,
, they are the enemies of the cross of Christ" (Phil. r
227
u c nlso many prophesies about drawing back from
h 1111 h ' these mentioned in (1 Tim 4:2, 2Thess. 2:3). An
1
pl ,f tailing away also is the branch that bears no fruit,
111 111d thrown into the fire (Jn. 15:6). The aposlte warns
11 1 1 hs \..lying, " .. toward you, goodness if you continue
1/h s:oodness" (Rom. 11:22).
1 h 1 1rd Jesus Christ said to St. Peter, "Satan has asked
toll, thai he may sift you as wheat. But I have prayed
t 011, that your faith should not fail" (Lk. 22:31,32). It
11111 thuf his faith was liable to faill It is indeed a lesson
lltu who think they are saved in a moment and have
uuong the elect i.e. they would not fall away ... !
now discuss the subject of the elect in the light of
h 11 due "election" mean according to those who believe
tee It l)ucs it mean that God has chosen certain people to
t J&hlcous and gain Paradise! And if so what merit do they
u y lltas (;od also chosen others to be wicked and go to
IMth 1 And what evil did they do to deserve this? In this
"t would have the right to say:
1 1 lct'flon in this sense is partiality to the righteous and
It I", slnn to the wicked.
1 ,, h" it from God, for "There is no partiality with Him"
IJII fl , V); "But in every nation whoever fears Him and. works
lu ruuness is accepted by Him, (Acts. 10:35). It IS also
228
written, "Whoever calls upon the name of the Lord shall
be saved" (Rom. 10:13).
The apostle laid down a rule that:
2. God loves all and, "desires all men to be saved
and to come to the knowledge of the truth" (lTim. 2:4).
God sent His Only son to the world because He loved the
whole world. He gave His son that believes in Him
should not perish" (Jn. 3:16). Thus He was an atonement,
propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also
for the whole world" (1Jn. 2:2).
God does not want anyone to perish as He said,
11
I have
no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that the wicked
turn from his way and live" (Ezek. 33:11).
3. Even if God condemned a sinner to death, but that sinner
turned from his sin and repented, God would turn from His
judgement and let the sinner live and not die.
The Lord Himself said, .. Again, when I say to the wicked,
#you shall surely die' if he turns from his sin and does what
is lawful and right ... He shall surely live; he shall not die"
(Ezek. 33:14-16); instant I speak concerning a nation
and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, to pull down, and
to destroy it, if that nation against whom I have spoken turns
from its evil, I will relent of the disaster that I thought to
bring upon it" (Jer. 18:7,8). That was what God did
concerning Nineveh (Jon. 3).
229
4. If there is election, why are the commandments set? why
the holy scriptures, tbe prophets, the apostles and the
w rning?
Why did the Lord ptt in His church .. some evangelists,
and some pastors and teachers ... for the work of ministry,
Jur the edifying of the body of Christ" (Eph. 4:11,12). What
n cd there would be for those and what is the use of their
work if the elect are known and the rejected are known? ..
why did God send some to do the ministry of reconciliation
uch as St. Paul the Apostle who said, (God) has given
liS the ministry of reconciliation... Therefore we ore
ambassadors for Christ, as though God were pleading through
tH; we implore you on Christ's behalf, be reconciled to God"
(1Cor. 5:18-20).
s. If there is electiCJil, why does the devil try hard?
Why does the devil try hard to tempt the righteous since
he is an elect and willtlver draw back or perish. He is finally
ved, what is the use then of fighting him? Why does the
de il try hard to make the unelect fall smce they are rejected
n consequently will surely perish without being fought?!
(). What is the use of the whole armor of God mentioned
hy the apostle in Epb. 6?
What use there is of fighting since there are elect and
ri.'JCCted whose destiny is well known?
1 suppose we can say expressly:
The doctrine of election makes the sinners desperate and
the righteous slacken!!
230
1. Besides, what is the role of grace towards who peristes?
what is its responsibility?
As long as election is invitable, imposed by God, according
to His will, what can grace do? Anything will be in vain ... !
8. If there is election, what is the meaning of the reward
and punishment? what relation does this have to God's justice,
love and goodness?
How can it be that God chooses someone for punishment,
then punishes him? where is the justice in this case? where
is love, if God choases some people to be eternally tormented?
according to His option?! Does this conform with God's
goodness: to choose some people to be wicked?! Far be it
from God to do so ...
9. This principle of election does not conform with the
freedom of will .
God created man free, made him choose his own destiny
as it is stated in Deuteronomy, "See, I have set before you
today life and good, death and evil .. . I have set before you
life and death, blessing and cursing; therefore choose life that
both you and your descendants may live" (Deut. 30:15, 19)
10. So, God bas put option in the hand of man.
231
OPTION IN THE HAND OF MAN
Man can be among the elect or not.
. If he becomes away from the elect, it means that through
Ius conduct, he has no wish to be elect ...
Hear the Lord blaming Jerusalem saying, "0 Jerusalem,
ltrusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those
who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your
fu/dren together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings,
lmt you were not willing/ See! Your house is left to you
lit 'iolate , (Mt. 23:37,38).
I he that God wants, but people are not willing.
!i lruction then ts not due to God's will but to the refusal
man of God's good will.
I he Lord here rebukes the Jews who refused Him saying,
.,111 you are not willing to come to Me that you may have
" (Jn. 5:40).
I II 1 the cause mentioned by the Lord for condemning
I I cd, not that God rejected them and did not choose
11 hut , "This is the condemnation, that the light has come
"''' world, and men loved darkness rather than light,
11 /lu/r deeds were evil" (Jn. 3:19).
232
11. The light did not reject them, but they rejechd llalll
The Bible states in this regard concerning the 1 J
Christ, "He came to His own, and His own did not ,.,.... ., ....
Him. But as many as received Him, to them //(' gm
right to become children of God, even to those who ,,,.,j,
in His name'' (Jn. 1:11,12). Thus we see that acccplll
refusal came from man not from God.
God stands at the door and knocks. Man may open or n
He says to all people, "If anyone hears My voice and
door, I will come in to him and dine with him'' (N
3:20). If anyone opens ... anyone ... the opportunity is 1&1
to all people .. .
2. God gives the choice and it depends on man' w
The Lord says, "lf anyone desires to come after }.1
him deny himself, and take up his cross .. (Mt. /6:24)
you want to be perfect, go, sell what you have and gh
the poor .. " (Mt. 19:21) "lf anyone desires to come afttr M
let him deny himself. .. For whoever desires to save Ill\ 1
will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will
it" (Lk. 9:23,24) ...
13. In the previous verses there is man's will and acllo
fit for it ...
God shows the way leading to the choice but man J f
to choose it or not. The way may be difficult anc no
can walk in it if for example a person refuses to deny 1 u 1
and take up his cross, or refuses to give what he has to (
233
1 , 1 cl uses to lose his life in order to save i it, or refuses
1l 1luough the narrow gate leading to (Mt. 7:14) ..
I 1 w are faced with a terrifying verse:
/Itt. wt-dding is ready, but those who were invited were
t 11 urthy" (Mt. 22:8).
1 uppose that this verse expresses truly ththe subject of
11 Hl : The wedding is ready, the Lord His servants
II those who were invited but they refuse a and the Bible
"But they made light of it and went ways, one
Ill own farm, another to his business ... , (Mt. 22:3-5).
1 vcn "were not willing to come" (Mt. .. Can we
1 h n that God chose certain people for e life or
hcmld rather say:
1 nd Invited all people to the wedding but so._ me "were not
1 ,, to come", Therefore tbe Lord says to tlthe sick, "Do
tWill to be made well?" (Jn. 5:6).
11 1s man himself who decides his own in life .. ,
t llltl y depends on his works. Therefore apostle says,
1 11 who sows to his flesh will of t!Jt.,e flesh reap
llfJflon, but he who sows to the Spirit wilfi.L of the Spirit
\trlasting life" (Gal. 6:8) ...
1uld a person who sows to his flesh dare say 'God did
234
OBJECTIONS AND REFUTATIONS
I. There is an objection that God chose Jacob and refused
Esau while still in their mother's womb, "Two nations are
in your womb... the older shall serve the younger" (Gen.
25:23). It is expressly stated, "Jacob I have loved, but Esau
I have hated" (Rom. 9:12,13).
Undoubtedly this choice was based on God's foreknowledge.
He knew how Jacob would be with his free will and how
Esau would be 'jornicator or profane person" (He b. 12: 16)
and that he would despise his birthright and sell it for stew
of lentils (Gen. 25:34). However, in all this, God did not
lead Esau to the way of perdition nor did He force Jacob
to do good. The choice is only based on God's foreknowledge
as St. Paul the Apostle explains,
"For whom he foreknew, He also predestined" (Rom.
8:29).
God knows what will His creation do in future with their
free will, and how they will behave. Thereupon, He chooses
the right person for the proper work .. and may give him gifts
to assist him as He did for John the Baptist, Jeremiah the
prophet and Jacob whom He chose from the mothers' wombs
and gave gifts ...
235
However, there are some persons whom God gave gifts
but they perished
Even the devil had gifts and began well as an archangel..
hut he led himself to perdition. God did not choose him for
evil but he turned himself to a devil.. Judas was among the
1 welve: he was entrusted with the money box and sat near
the Lord at the table . . but he betrayed Him and perished.!
The chance was given to all but some perished by their
own will though they had the chance and choice ...
2. They establish their objection on the words, '' .. things
which God hils prepared/or those who love Him" (]Cor. 2:9).
It is well that the verse says, "for those who love Him"
not }or those whom He loves'.. It means that God has
prepared for those eternal happiness because of the holy
feelings in their hearts towards God whom they love ...
3. They support their objection by the words of the apostle,
"it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of
God who shows mercy" (Rom. 9: 16).
This verse reminds us of a similar verse which says, "I
planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the increase. So then
neither he who plants is any thing nor he who waters, but
God who gives the increase" (lCor. 3:6,7). But of o u r ~ e
God does not increase nothingness but increases what IS
planted and watered ... The same applies to the said verse,
"It is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of
God who shows mercy".
236
But to whom God shows mercy? God shows mercy to
who wills and him who runs. It means then that man'
alone is not sufficient nor his running without God's
exactly as planting and watering alone are not
without God giving the increase
The verse then does not mean t hat God refuses a holy
or a whole running and shows mercy to a person who d
not will or run. Certainly not; but God's work with as I
the most important so that no one may boast of his work
4. They argue by giving the verse, ''Will the thing jormll
say to him who formed it, ' why have you made me likl
this?' " (Rom. 9:20).
Of course man cannot say to his Creator, 'why have you
made me like this?' He may have gifts or not. .. it is the same
and this does not affect his eternity and his salvation . ..
He may be a vessel for dishonor on the earth but in eternity
it differs as lazarus the poor. But being a vessel for dishono
does not mean to be a vessel for wickedness because the Great
Potter never makes vessels for wickedness and eviL God 1
not the source of evil.
5. However, God often made some people vessels for
honour on the earth, but they changed their own destiny
finally or for some time.
The Spirit of the Lord came upon Saul the Benjamite and
he prophesied and became another man (I Sam. 10). He was
anointed with the holy oil by Samuel the prophet, but he
turned himself by his own will into a vessel for dishonor when
237
t t1 vluted from God. So the Spirit of tile Lord departed
l11u1 hint (lSam. 16).
It,,, m as well was a vessel for honollr, He prophesied
1 ut the Lord Jesus Christ and he washonoured by the
~ htt (Num. 22-24), but he turned himseu into a vessel for
IIHhnnor when he deviated and taught Balak to put a
ll11nhling block before the children of l1rael (Rev. 2:14).
N unson was a vessel for honor; the SPirit of the Lord came
tqmn him and led him (Jud. 13), but he changed himself into
, vc .,el for dishonor for some time whenhe lost his honor
11111 broke his vow (Jud. 16). Yet he retul'!led to be a vessel
t
1
u honor and was counted among thelllen of faith (Heb.
II : l 2).
, Let them be elect as they think hllt I wish they would
1 tc:n to the words of the apostle, ''Thtrtfore, brethren, be
' ' ~ ' ~ ' more diligent to make your calling end election sure"
t J I ~ t 1:10).
239
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
The story of this book ........................ .............. .......... 5
Introduction.
The importance of doctrine and teaching it 7
'HAPTER 1:
The heresy of salvation in a moment.
Its history and its danger .............. .................................... . 13
'HAPTER 2:
Baptism and repentance.
Their necessity for salvation and the role of the
church
.........
29
CHAPTER 3:
Works and their position in the subject of
salvation. .......................... ................................................... 67
CHAPTER 4:
The so-called stages of salvation. ....... .............. H 1
240
CHAPTER 5:
Salvation is the story of the whole life. .............. 10.5
CHAPTER 6:
Objections and refutations ............................... ................... 12.5
CHAPTER 7:
Were they saved in a moment?. ............. ..................... 151
CHAPTER 8:
Do these verses prove that salvation may be
attained in a moment?. .......................................................... 169
CHAPTER 9:
Theological concepts.
..............................................................
187
CHAPTER 10:
Election. .................................................................................................. 225
+++