Lectures 1&2&3
Lectures 1&2&3
Lectures 1&2&3
What is research
Research is the process of going up alleys to see if
they are blind
Marston Bates, American writer
Research is what I am doing when I don’t know what I
am doing
Von Braun, American engineer
If you steal from one author, it’s plagiarism; if you
steal from many, it’s research.
Wilson Mizner, American dramatist
What is research?
Research is a systematic process of inquiry
consisting of three elements or components:
A question, a problem or a hypothesis
Data
Analysis and interpretation of data
(Nunan 1992)
Research process
A process of formulating questions, problems, or
hypothesis, collecting data or evidence relevant to
these questions, problems or hypothesis and
analyzing or interpreting data (Nunan 1992).
Two views:
External truths independent of the
researcher/observer
Research traditions
Psychometric
Interaction analysis
Discourse analysis
Ethnography
Seclectivity
Reliability
The consistency of the results obtained from a piece
of research
Internal reliability: consistency of data collection,
analysis and interpretation
External reliability: similar results can be reproduced
by independent researcher
Validity
The extent to which piece of research actually
investigates what the researcher purports to
investigate
Internal validity: the interpretability of a research
External validity: the extent to which the results can
be generalised from samples to population
Construct
A psychological quality that cannot be observed but can only
be assumed to exit and can be explained through
observable behaviours (intelligence, proficiency,
motivation, aptitude etc.)
2. Type of scale
Nominal scale
Ordinal scale
Interval scale
Ratio scale
True-experiment:
- Randomly assigning the subjects into control and
experimental groups
- Administering both pre- and post-treatment tests
(Highly controlled, highly selective)
Quasi-experiment:
- No random arrangement of subjects
Pre-experiment
- Only pre-treatment test
The Logic of Statistical Inference
Mean X
Standard Deviation SD
Standard Error SE
The standard deviation of sample means: placing a single
sample mean in relation to the population mean
Estimating: Dividing SD of a single sample by the square
root of the number of observations in the sample (N)
SE = SD : チ ã N
Questions for Tutorial 2
Question: Find a report of an experimental study in applied linguistics and give
your comments on the following checklist:
I. Introduction: Is the framework for the study clear?
A. Literature review: can you tell where the study fits in?
1. Is the background or rationale provided?
2. Is the relationship to previous research clear?
B. Statement of purpose: can you tell where the study is heading? Are any of the
following included?
1. Purpose
2. Research question
3. Research hypothesis
II. Method: Is the study replicable?
A. Subjects
1. Is the description of participants adequate?
2. Is the method of selection clear?
B. Materials
1. Is there a description of tests, questionnaires, rating scales, and so forth?
2. Do the variables represent reasonable operational definitions of the underlying
constructs or characteristics involved?
3. Is there a description of any equipment (when applicable)?
C. Procedures
1. Is there a description of the preparation of material, administration, scoring and so on?
2. Is there a description of the conditions during study?
D. Analyses
1. Is there a description of the arrangement and grouping of the data?
2. Are the statistical tests listed in order of use?
III. Results
A. Are all the statistical tests previously listed represented as results ?
B. Is there a prose explanation (optional)?
IV. Discussion/Conclusion
A. Is the original research question, or questions, answered ?
B. Is there an explanation of why the results were as they were?
1. If the conclusion is based on previous research, is it well supported and reasoned?
2. If the conclusion is speculative, is it qualified as such and well reasoned?
C. Are suggestions for further research provided?
V. References, Notes, or Footnotes
A. Are all the references cited in the text included ?
B. Are nay pertinent references missing?
VI. Appendixes
A. Are they necessary?
B. Are they complete?
Lecture 3
ETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH
Compulsory Readings
Nunan. D. 1992. Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: CUP (P. 52 - 73)
Brown, J.D& Rodgers T.S. Doing Second Language Research. OUP. 2002 (P.53-112)
Coffey, A. & Atkinson, P. 1996, Making Sense of Qualitative Data, Complementary
Research Strategies, CA: SAGE Publications.
May, T. (ed) 2002, Qualitative Research in Action, London: Sage Publications.
McMillan, j. & S.Schumacher, Research in Education, A Conceptual Introduction,
Harper Collins College Publishers.
Wajnryb, R. 1992, Classroom Observation Tasks, Cambridge: CUP.
Newman, P. & Ratliff, M. 2001, Linguistics Fieldwork, Cambridge: CUP
What is ethnography?
Ethnography, which seeks to understand and represent the points of view of the members
of a particular culture, is a primary approach to data collection and analysis in
anthropology and sociology.
Ethnographic research
Ethnographic research is one form of qualitative research which concerns with studying
human behavior within the context in which that behavior would occur naturally and in
which the role of the researcher would not affect the normal behavior of the subjects.
Ethnographic research
Ethnography research requires:
- much training, skill and dedication
- a great store on the collection and interpretation of data
- question and hypothesis emerge during the course of investigation,
rather than beforehand
• Organic: ethnographers may obtain data which do not support their original
questions or hypothesis but are suggestive of others.
Principles of ethnography
Two sets of hypotheses about human behaviours:
• naturalistic-ecological
• qualitative – phynomenological
Naturalistic-ecological
• Investigating natural contexts: field research, real life situation, real world
Qualitative-phenomenological
Principles of ethnography
• The use of participant and non-participant observation
• A focus on natural settings
• Use of subjective views and belief systems of the participant in the research
process
• Not to manipulate the study variables
• Holism and thick explanation
External reliability
• To what extent can the findings from a study carried out in a particular site be
generalized to other sites?
• Threat:
Based on detailed description of a particular context/ situation → difficult for outsiders
to conduct another research
To overcome this:
Explicit about 5 key aspects
• Status of researcher
• Choice of informants
• Social situation & conditions
• Constructs & premises
• Method of data collection & analysis
Questions to be asked:
• Is the status of the researcher made explicit?
• Does the researcher provide a detailed description of subjects?
• Does the research provide a detailed description of the context and conditions
under which the research was carried out?
• Are constructs and premises explicitly defined?
• Are data collection and analysis methods presented in detail?
Internal reliability
• Can an independent researcher come to the same conclusion as the original
investigators when he/ she analyzes the same primary data?
• Threat
Ethnographer rarely uses standardized instruments → difficult for independent
researcher to reanalyze data themselves
To overcome this:
• Use low inference descriptors
• Multiple researchers/ participant researchers
• Peer examination
• Use mechanically recorded data
Questions to be asked:
• Does the research use low inference descriptors?
• Does it employ more than one researcher/ collaborator?
• Does the researcher invite peer examination or cross-site corroboration?
• Are data mechanically recorded?
Internal validity
To overcome this:
Employ data collection and analysis techniques:
+ ethnographer as a participant
+ informants interviewing
+ participant observation
+ ethnographic analysis
Questions to be asked:
• Is it likely that maturational changes occurring during the course of the research
will affect outcomes?
• Is there bias in the selection of informants?
• Is the growth or attrition of informants over time likely to affect outcomes?
• Have alternative explanations for the phenomena been rigorously examined and
excluded?
External validity
To overcome this:
Describe phenomena explicitly so that they can be compared with other studies/ carry
out multiple-site investigation
Questions to be asked:
• Are some phenomena unique to a particular group or site and therefore non-
comparable?
• Are outcomes due in part to the presence of the research?
• Are cross-group comparisons invalidated by unique historical experiences of
particular groups?
• To what extent are abstract terms and constructs shared across different groups
and research sites?
6. What analysis strategies were developed and used? What levels and types of context
attended to in interpretation?
7. What recurrent patterns are described?
8. What cultural interpretation is provided?
9. What is the contribution of the study to our knowledge of socio-cultural factors
involved in schooling in second language and culture?
10. What are the stated implications for teaching?