The Chapter 11 Trustee filed a motion to vacate two docket entries that established deadlines for filing prepetition claims against TelexFree. The Trustee seeks to vacate the entries because the Debtors have not filed required documents, notice of the deadlines may not have reached all potential claimants exceeding 1 million, and the Trustee intends to determine an appropriate claims process after addressing deficiencies. Vacating the entries would avoid confusion and allow the Trustee to administer claims in an orderly manner.
The Chapter 11 Trustee filed a motion to vacate two docket entries that established deadlines for filing prepetition claims against TelexFree. The Trustee seeks to vacate the entries because the Debtors have not filed required documents, notice of the deadlines may not have reached all potential claimants exceeding 1 million, and the Trustee intends to determine an appropriate claims process after addressing deficiencies. Vacating the entries would avoid confusion and allow the Trustee to administer claims in an orderly manner.
The Chapter 11 Trustee filed a motion to vacate two docket entries that established deadlines for filing prepetition claims against TelexFree. The Trustee seeks to vacate the entries because the Debtors have not filed required documents, notice of the deadlines may not have reached all potential claimants exceeding 1 million, and the Trustee intends to determine an appropriate claims process after addressing deficiencies. Vacating the entries would avoid confusion and allow the Trustee to administer claims in an orderly manner.
The Chapter 11 Trustee filed a motion to vacate two docket entries that established deadlines for filing prepetition claims against TelexFree. The Trustee seeks to vacate the entries because the Debtors have not filed required documents, notice of the deadlines may not have reached all potential claimants exceeding 1 million, and the Trustee intends to determine an appropriate claims process after addressing deficiencies. Vacating the entries would avoid confusion and allow the Trustee to administer claims in an orderly manner.
TELEXFREE, LLC, TELEXFREE, INC. TELEXFREE FINANCIAL, INC.
Debtors.
Chapter 11 Cases
14-40987-MSH 14-40988-MSH 14-40989-MSH
J ointly Administered
MOTION BY CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE TO VACATE DOCKET ENTRIES RESPECTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF DEADLINES FOR THE FILING OF PREPETITION CLAIMS
Stephen B. Darr, the duly appointed Chapter 11 trustee (the "Trustee") of the bankruptcy estates (the Estates) of TelexFree, LLC, TelexFree, Inc., and TelexFree Financial, Inc. (collectively, the Debtors), respectfully moves for an order vacating two entries placed on the docket [entries 2 and 81] (the Docket Entries) prior to the transfer of the cases to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts respecting the establishment of deadlines for the filing of prepetition claims. The Debtors have not filed schedules and statements or a matrix of claimants. Upon information and belief, potential claimants in the case may exceed 1,000,000. Given the unique facts and circumstances of these cases, the establishment of a bar date for the filing of claims is premature. The Trustee intends, after addressing the Debtors deficiencies and determining an appropriate protocol for noticing parties-in-interest to separately move to establish a bar date for the filing of prepetition claims. In further support of this motion, the Trustee states as follows: Case 14-40987 Doc 298 Filed 07/02/14 Entered 07/02/14 14:38:19 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5 1L)w.'"!V 1440987140702000000000001 Docket #0298 Date Filed: 7/2/2014 2
FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1. On April 13, 2014 (the Petition Date), each of the Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada (the Nevada Bankruptcy Court). 2. The Debtors stated that they operated a telecommunications business that used multi-level marketing to assist in the distribution of voice over internet protocol telephone services. Individuals, referred to by the Debtors as promoters, were allegedly promised substantial returns for placing TelexFree advertisements and for recruiting additional individuals. The principals of the Debtors as of the Petition Date were Carlos Wanzeler and J ames Merrill. Upon information and belief, Mr. Wanzeler is no longer in the United States. Mr. Merrill was taken into federal custody and, upon information and belief, has been released. 3. Shortly following the Petition Date, on April 15, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) initiated a suit against the Debtors, their principals, and others, captioned as Securities and Exchange Commission v. TelexFree, Inc., et al, Civ. Action No. 14-11858 (the SEC Action) alleging that the Debtors operated a pyramid scheme in violation of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act of 1934. Upon information and belief, in connection with the SEC Action, the Commission seized substantial sums from the Debtors and their principals and substantially all of the Debtors books and records. 4. On May 6, 2014, the motion of the Commission to transfer venue of the Debtors cases to this Court was allowed and the cases were transferred to the District of Massachusetts on May 9, 2014. On May 30, 2014, this Court approved the motion by the Office of the United States Trustee to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee, and the Trustee was appointed on J une 6, 2014. Case 14-40987 Doc 298 Filed 07/02/14 Entered 07/02/14 14:38:19 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 5 3
5. The Debtors have not filed schedules or statements and do not appear to have filed a complete matrix of creditors. Moreover, due to the circumstances set forth herein, the Trustee has not been able to obtain or review the bulk of the Debtors books and records. Upon information and belief, (i) the number of parties who may assert claims against the Debtors may exceed 1,000,000; (ii) many of the alleged claimants reside outside the United States; and (iii) the Debtors records may not contain physical addresses for many claimants, but only electronic contact information. 6. On the Petition Date, the Nevada Bankruptcy Court issued a notice [docket no. 2] which includes a notice of the Debtors meeting of creditors to be held on May 15, 2014 and a notice of deadline for creditors to file prepetition claims 90 days thereafter and for governmental units to file claims 180 days thereafter (the First Notice). Based upon the circumstances set forth in paragraph 5, it is unclear which parties received the First Notice. 7. On April 24, 2014, the Nevada Bankruptcy Court issued a second notice [docket no. 81] which includes a notice of the Debtors meeting of creditors to be held on May 22, 2014 and a notice of deadline for creditors to file prepetition claims 90 days thereafter and for governmental units to file claims 180 days thereafter (the Second Notice). Pursuant to the Second Notice, parties were directed to file claims with Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC, the Debtors claims and noticing agent [see docket no. 231] (KCC), not the Nevada Bankruptcy Court. KCC filed a certificate of service indicating that the Second Notice was served on certain creditors, promoters, and parties-in-interest [docket no. 142]. The list of parties who received the Second Notice is incomplete. 8. The meeting of creditors did not occur since the cases were transferred to the District of Massachusetts prior to the scheduled meeting dates. Case 14-40987 Doc 298 Filed 07/02/14 Entered 07/02/14 14:38:19 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 5 4
9. Neither the Debtors nor the Trustee have moved for the establishment of a separate or extended bar date pursuant to Fed.R.Bank.P. 3003. REQUEST TO VACATE 10. The Trustee requests that the Court vacate the Docket Entries from the docket in this matter in order to avoid confusion among potential claimants of the Estates and to allow the Trustee to administer claims and distributions in an orderly manner in the exercise of his duties. 11. Claims administration is likely to be a significant undertaking, as the Trustee seeks to determine the meritorious claims among the Estates many potential claimants and effectuate distributions to those with allowed claims. The Trustee is presently accepting proposals respecting retention of a claims and noticing agent. As referenced above, once the Trustee has determined the pool of potential claimants, the Trustee intends to develop a protocol for the filing and administration of claims consistent with the circumstances of the cases. Such protocol will include a new bar date, procedures for the noticing of the bar date and requirements for submission of claims. The Docket Entries do not address the Trustees concerns and, moreover, the Trustee cannot ensure that all potential claimants and interested parties received adequate notice and information with respect to the filing of claims as directed by the Docket Entries. 12. Given the due process considerations with respect to the adequacy of notice of the Docket Entries, and the claims filing and administrative issues to be addressed by the Trustee, good cause exists to vacate the Docket Entries. WHEREFORE, the Trustee respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order, (a) vacating the Docket Entries [docket nos. 2 and 81] from the docket in this matter; and Case 14-40987 Doc 298 Filed 07/02/14 Entered 07/02/14 14:38:19 Desc Main Document Page 4 of 5 5
(b) granting such other and further relieve as is necessary and property under the circumstances.
STEPHEN B. DARR, CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE,
By his proposed counsel,
/s/ Andrew G. Lizotte Harold B. Murphy (BBO #326610) Andrew G. Lizotte (BBO #559609) Christopher M. Condon (BBO #652430) Murphy & King, Professional Corporation One Beacon Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 (617) 423-0400 hmurphy@murphyking.com alizotte@murphyking.com Dated: J uly 2, 2014 671990 Case 14-40987 Doc 298 Filed 07/02/14 Entered 07/02/14 14:38:19 Desc Main Document Page 5 of 5
HARIHAR Files EMERGENCY Motion for the Removal of Disqualified MA Superior Court Judge - Hon. Janice W. Howe, Including NEW Claims against Defendant - Commonwealth of Massachusetts in Related Fed Lawsuit (Ref. HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880)
Receivership Specialists Unauthorized Practice of Law Kevin Singer Receiver - Whistleblower Leak Judge Wynne Carvill Alameda County Superior Court - Alameda County District Attorney - California Attorney General Kamala Harris - California State Bar Jayne Kim Chief Trial Counsel - California Supreme Court - Receivership Specialists Gregg Foster, John Rachlin, Richard Marquis, Kevin Singer - Office of the Chief Trial Counsel State Bar of California - Commission on Judicial Performance Victoria B. Henley
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas