Wearable Wings
Wearable Wings
Wearable Wings
D.Reid
PO Box 143 Oneroa, Waiheke Island, AUCKLAND 1840, New Zealand
Email: wearablewings@gmail.com, www.wearablewings.ning.com
OVERVIEW
Is it possible to fly like a bird, with wings that fold into a backpack? This paper looks at the possibility of creating personal
wings with sufficient performance to soar in most daytime weather conditions and concludes that this goal is indeed possible.
I describe the approach I have taken towards realising the dream of wearable folding wings for soaring flight. For good
penetration into headwinds and to fly between thermals, a lift to drag ratio of at least 30:1 is desirable. The threshold sinking
speed for unlimited soaring ability is about 0.3 m/s and at least 0.4 m/s is achievable with wearable folding wings.
The above graph compares sinking speeds of a peregrine falcon, paraglider, hang glider, Archaeopteryx glider and Wearable
Wings. The calculated performance of wearable wings with tip feathers extended is almost identical to the Archaeopteryx. With
tip feathers retracted, the weratble wings show much better penetration.
MINIMUM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS CROSS COUNTRY FLYING
Gliders design to utilise microlift are able to soar in weak Flying accross country involves two basic elements. The first
lift and so extend opportunities for reliable flight. Can a is circling in thermals to gain altitude. The second is straight
wearable wing glider be designed and built with this kind of line flying between thermals.
performance?
During cIrcling flight, the wing operates at a high lift coefficient
To further the wearable folding wing project I developed and at g > 1. A typical circling radius involver g ~ 1.2.
a spreadsheet to explore the range of possibilities. As
described in my CEAS2007 paper, “The Principles of the During this phase the ideal wing will have high camber and
Constant ‘g’ Stability System”, the spreadsheet can receive no twist. The wing-tip feathers will be fully extended and
a wide variety of inputs and calculate stability, stresses and fanned.
performance. For high speed inter-thermal flying, the wing-tip feathers
MICROLIFT SOARING ABILITY PREDICTED will be retracted and membrane tensioned held as high as
The calculations, using drag coefficients dereived from the possible. Here, minimum profile drag and surface want to be
Dereidactyl experments, demonstrate the potential to create at a minimum. A streamlined pilot enclosure is important for
folding wearable wings able to soar in microlift conditions. this high speed flight with minimum loss of altitude.
The wing plan shown above is the configuration of 1 september 2009. Here the wing spars are made from windsurfer masts.
The wing tip feathers are formed from polypropylene foam with bamboo shafts. The kaugis are foam with carbon fibre caps.
FOLDED SIZE
How compact should the the folded wings be? I wanted With a folding wing, the spar stiffness cannot be used to brace
wings that could be carried on a bus, worn as a backpack the wing. Instead lift forces can be used combined with a
on a bicycle and easily permit walking through doorways. leading edge tendon also found in nature. This pteroid tendon
Limiting joints to three per side and having retractable wing tip supports the wing leading edge and provides the counter-
feathers permits a full span of 8 metres with a folded height of force to balance membrane tension.
1.2 metres when worn as a backpack. Further sail tension comes from internal kaugis. Since sail
tension needs to increase with speed, these kaugis must
WING HINGE CONSTRAINTS have adjustable length. This length is set by the pilot’s speed
control.
Compact folding wings require joints that fold through almost
180 degrees so that spar tubes lie parallel when the wing is The wing tip kaugis is designed to take bending loads, unlike
folded. The hinges must resist both bending and torsion. the simpler Dereidactyl wing. This avoids high torsional loads
on the hand spar with its wide bracket making room for the
three sets of kaugi.
STRUCTURAL STRENGTH
Each spar element must have sufficient strength to sustain
bending and torsion loads over the complete flight envelope
with an adequate safety margin. Thanks to inherent bending
relief and the feedback stability system, flight loads are
limited to pilot manoeuvres. The stability system limits
imposed loads to defined values. Thus neither gusts nor
piloting can induce excessive flight loads.
THREE DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRY
In flight the wing spar is curved in three dimensions yet when MAJOR STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
folded need to lie compactly. This is achieved by adjusting
hinge axes.
TENSIONING THE WING
A membrane or sail wing has to be under tension to nylon feather sheath
function. On boat sails the wind force inflates the sail.
This ceases to be effective at low angles of attack;
the sail begins to luff and loses its designed shape. carbon hand spar
This is particularly serious for glider wings since at high
speed they fly at low angles of attack. Two solutions
to this problem include ribs or battens to retain sail carbon forearm spar
shape or tension applied to the fabric. The 15 metre
span Dereidactyl wing had 7 internal struts called backpack frame
“kaugis” plus a trailing edge wire tensioned to 30kg. carbon upper arm
feather sheath
forearm
hand
PACKFRAME, WING STRUCTURE AND SAIL WING FROM PORT AFT QUARTER, JANUARY 2009
FILMING STABILITY EXPERIMENTS BY THE AUSTRALIAN TV PROGRAM “BEYOND 2000” After moving from Ham-
ilton to Waiheke Island,
I started experiment-
ing with new ways of
achieving constant g
stability.
REFERENCES
Bennett, S. C. (2000) Pterosaur flight: the role of actinofibrils in wing function. Hist. Biol. 14,255 -284.
Bennett, S. C. (2006). Articulation and function of the pteroid bone of pterosaurs, J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 26,41A .
Boermans, L.M.M. (2006), Research on sailplane aerodynamics at Delft University of Technology, recent and present
developments. Presented to the Netherlands Association of Aeronautical Engineers, (NVvL)
Bramwell, C. D. and Whitfield, G. R, (1974) Biomechanics of Pteranodon, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 267,503
-581
Brower, J. C. (1983) The aerodynamics of Pteranodon and Nyctosaurus, J. Vertebr.Paleontol. 3, 84-124.
Cyr, S. and Newman, B. G. (1996) Flow past two-dimensional membrane aerofoils with rear separation, J. Wind Eng. Ind.
Aerodyn. 63,1 -16
Greenhalgh, S., Curtiss, H. C. and Smith, B. (1984), Aerodynamic properties of a two-dimensional inextensible flexible
airfoil. AIAA J. 22,865 -870.
K. P. Dial1, A. A. Biewener, B. W. Tobalske1 & D. R. Warrick (1997), Mechanical power output of bird flight Nature 390,
67-70, doi:10.1038/363301
Kroo, I (1982), Hang Soaring, Cross Country Soaring Performance of Hang Gliders, Hang Gliding Magazine, pp. 42-44, April
Kroo, I., Beckman, E. (1991) Development of the SWIFT: A Tailless Foot-Launched Sailplane, Hang Gliding.
La Roche, U. and L.(2000) ,Induced Drag Reduction with the WINGGRID, Proceedings CEAS Potsdam , European
DragNet, NNFM 76, Springer, ISBN 3-540-41911-0
Lockwood, R.,(1998), Avian Wingtip Shape Reconsidered, Journal of Avian Biology, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 273-292
Marchaj, C. A. (1988) Aero-hydrodynamics of Sailing, London: Adlard Coles Nautical.
Newman, B. G. (1987) Aerodynamic theory for membranes and sails. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 24, 1-27
Nielsen, J. N. (1963) Theory of flexible aerodynamic surfaces, J. Appl. Mech. 3, 435-442.
Padian, K. and Rayner, J. M. V. (1993) The wings of pterosaurs, Am. J. Sci. 293,91 -166
Pennycuick, C. J. (1971) Gliding flight of the dog-faced bat observed in a wind tunnel, J. Exp. Biol. 55,833 -845
Pennycuick, C. J. (1988) On the reconstruction of pterosaurs and their manner of flight, Biol. Rev. 63,299 -331.
Piero Morelli, (2004) DEVELOPMENT OF THE MICROLIFT GLIDER OSTIV Sailplane Development Panel, Annual
meeting on February 28th, 2004, the FAI International Gliding Commission, IGC
Piero Morelli (2003) Why Microlift Soaring? XXVII OSTIV Congress, Leszno, Poland.
Reuven Yosef, Lorenzo Fornasari and Anna Giordano, (2000) SOARING MIGRANTS AND THE 1% PRINCIPLE
ABSTRACT Ring 22, 2: 79-84
Reid, D, (2007), The Principles of the Constant ‘g’ Stability System, 1st CEAS European Air and Space Conference, CEAS-
2007-307.
Ruppert, Archaeopteryx Foot Launch Glider, www.ruppert-composite.ch
Short, G. H. (1914) Wing adjustments of pterodactyls, Aeronaut. J. 18,336 -343.
Sneyd, A. D., Bundock, M. S. & Reid, D. (1982), POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF WING FLEXIBILITY ON THE AERODYNAMICS
OF PTERANODON. Am. Nat. 120, 455-477
TUCKER.V.A.,(1998), GLIDING BIRDS: REDUCTION OF INDUCED DRAG BY WING TIP SLOTS BETWEEN THE
PRIMARY FEATHERS, J. exp. Biol. 180, 285-310
Tucker, V. A. (1987) Gliding birds: the effect of variable wing span, J. Exp. Biol. 133, 33-58.
Wilkinson, M. T., Unwin, D. M. and Ellington, C. P. (2006) High lift function of the pteroid bone and forewing of pterosaurs.
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 273,119 -126.
Wilkinson, M. T., (2007), Sailing the skies: the improbable aeronautical success of the pterosaurs, Journal of Experimental