MD 2Oo/Intercounty Contract A Segments D1D2: Connector
MD 2Oo/Intercounty Contract A Segments D1D2: Connector
CONTRACT - A
SEGMENTS D1D2
FINAL
STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT REPORT
January 2008
Prepared By:
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION ......... 1
1.1 Project Description..... ....... 1
1.2 Purpose and Scope ...... 1
2.0 METHODOLOGY. ......2
2.L Design Standards and Criteria..... ......2
2.1J Hydrology ..........2
2.1.2 Water Quality .........3
2.I.3 Water Quantity ...........3
2.I.4 Hydraulics ......4
3.0 ANALYSIS ........4
3.1 Description of Study Points ......... 4
3.1.1 Study Point D-1-1 ..........4
3.L.2 Study Point D-1-2 .........4
3.1.3 Study Point D-2-1 ...........5
3.I.4 Study Point D-2-2 ........5
3.1.5 Study Point D-2-3 ......5
3.1.6 Study Point D-2-4 ..............6
3.2 Water Quality Management... ...... 6
3.2.t Water Quality Volume .........6
3.2.2 Recharge Volume ........7
3.3 Water Quantity Management... ......... I
3.3.1 Study Point D-1-1 ,......9
3.3.2 Study Point D-2-2 ....,..9
3.3.3 Study Point D-2-3 ......,.,.10
3.4 Stormwater Management Summary .......... 13
4.0 STORMWATER THERMAL IMPACT REDUCTION ..,.....T4
4.1 Introduction.... ........t4
4.2 Studies ........L4
4.3 Approach for Segments Dl and D2 ...........15
4.3.1 Source Reduction ..........15
4.3.2 Delaying.Reducing Runoff...... ,...........15
4.3.3 Treating Runoff ...... ..................15
5,0 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS. ..........I7
6.0 POTENTIAL CHEMICAL SPILLS ..........18
7.0 REFERENCES... ........19
TABLES
APPENDICES
A Drainage Area Maps
B Hydrologic Computations
C Water Quality Summary Sheet and Water Quality Map
D Geotechnical Boring Logs
E BMP Sizing Computations
F Grass Channel Design Computations
G Storm Drainage Design Computations
H Photographs
1.O INTRODUCTION
The ICC is broken down into five different contracts (Contracts A, B, C, D and E). The
Intercounty Constructors and Parsons/Jacobs was selected by SHA as the Design/Build team
to design and construct the first contract - Contract A. KCI Technologies Inc. is the leading
consultant for Water Resource Engineering for Contract A.
Contract A is in the design phase and construction started in October, 2OO7. Contract A is the
first section, beginning 1000 feet west of MD 355 and ending 1700 feet east of MD 97, which
is a total of 6.3 miles (see Figure 1). The project also includes three interchanges - MD
200/Metro Access Road (MAR), MAR/Shady Grove Rd, and MD 200/MD 97 interchanges. Over
pass bridges will be proposed at Shady Grove Road and Crabbs Branch Way, while the ICC
will go under Redland Road, Needwood Road, Olde Mill Run, Muncaster Mill Road, and Emory
Lane. Bridges are also proposed at the major stream crossings of Rock Creek, North Branch,
and North Branch Tributary. The proposed ICC will be six (6) lanes with a 30 foot median
along existing I-37O. It will be six (6) lanes with a 36 foot median from the MD 200/MAR
interchange to Muncaster Mill Rd and forthe last 2000 feet of MD 200 at MD 97.It will be six
(6) lanes with a 50 foot median from Muncaster Mill Road to west of MD 97.
The majority of the project is located in the Rock Creek watershed. The area west of
Oakmont Avenue and north of I-37O drains to Muddy Branch (Drainage Area B-1-1) while the
area east of MD 97 drains to Northwest Branch watershed. The project is located entirely
within the Washington Metropolitan Area (MDE # O2-L4-O2). Except for Drainage Area B-1-1,
which is in a Use I water area, the entire project has a Maryland (COMAR 26.08.02.08) water
use designation of Use III and IV. The Nofth Branch of Rock Creek above Muncaster Mill Road
is a Use III water, while the remainder of Rock Creek and its tributaries are Use IV waters.
The project drains from nofth to south in vicinity of Mill Creek and Rock Creek and from
south to north in the area of the unnamed tributary to the North Branch of Rock Creek.
Contract A is divided into three major segments (Segments B, C and D), each with sub-
segments. Segment B includes sub-segments 81, 82, and 83. Segment C includes sub-
segments C1 and C2. Segment D includes sub-segments D1, D2, and D3. Three (3)
preliminary stormwater management reports have been provided for this project, one for
each segment. Final stormwater management reports will be provided for the eight sub-
segments based on the detailed design.
Stormwater management has been designed in accordance with the 2000 Maryland
Stormwater Design Manual, Volumes I &II and the Maryland Stormwater Management
Guidelines for State and Federal Projects dated July 2001.
2.L.L Hydrology
In accordance with the Stormwater Design Manual, peak discharges were developed
usÍng the TR-20 model by USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).
The hydrologic soil information for the project was obtained from the Soil Survey for
Montgomery County, Maryland, developed by the NRCS, dated July 1995.
The land uses for the project were developed using county topographic maps dated
April 2006 and information obtained during field investigations. For areas within the
right of way, land uses were categorized as impervious, open space, or woods.
Zoning information was used for the areas outside the right of way. Land uses were
obtained from GIS Hydro (May 2OO7) and correspond to Maryland Department of
Planning (2002).
Runoff curve numbers were developed using TR-55 Urban Hydrology for Small
Watersheds by the NRCS. Soil type, land use, and area were used to generate the
existing and proposed condition runoff curve numbers for the various study points.
Time of concentration flow paths were determined using topographic maps. Sheet
flow, shallow concentrated flow, gutter flow, pipe flow, and open channel flow were
the flow types used to calculate the time of concentration for each drainage area.
Stream velocities for channel flow for the various slopes were based on the SHA
Highway Drainage Manual (Table I, Page II-2-B-3).
Peak discharges for existing and proposed conditions were calculated for the l-year,
lO-year, and 100-year,24-hour storm events using TR-20.
2.I.2 Water Quality
2.r.2.7 General
Water quality BMPs have been designed in accordance with Chapter 3 of the
Stormwater Design Manual, except areas where thermal impact reduction is necessary
(Use III Waters and the Montgomery County Special Protection Area). In these
special areas, BMPs were selected based on thermal considerations and then modified
(as appropriate) to improve their thermal treatment capabilities (see Section 4 for
more information on thermal impact reduction measures). Chapter 5 of the
Stormwater Design Manual was used for any channels where grass channel credits
were taken.
Chapter 2 of the Stormwater Design Manual states that "Overbank flood protection for
the ten year storm shall only be required if local approval authorities have no control
of floodplain development, no control over infrastructure and conveyance system
design, or determine that downstream flooding will occur as a result of the proposed
development." Segments Dl and D2 are located within Montgomery County, where
lO-year water quantity management is only required if a history of downstream
flooding activíty exists. Since Segments Dl and D2 are located a short distance
upgradient of Lake Needwood, a regional stormwater management facility, 1O-year
water quantity management is not required.
Chapter 2 of the Stormwater Design Manual states that storage to attenuate the post
development 100-year, 24 hour peak discharge is generally not needed if the
downstream development is located out of the 100-year floodplain.
2.1.4 Hydraulics
3.O ANALYSIS
Under existing conditions, there are six study points in Segments Dl and D2 where
concentrated runoff leaves storm drain systems and discharges to streams, side
ditches, and proposed SWM facilities, Under proposed conditions, there are four study
points (due to combining some of the outfall points of some drainage areas).
Study Point D-1-1 is located about 300 feet right of Sta. L277+50 ICC and consists of
runoff from the left side of the ICC flowing across the SHA right-of-way. The land use
is predominantly agricultural with row crops and pastures, open spaces and wooded
areas. This area is defined as the runoff that leaves the SHA right-of-way (ROW)
through the unnamed tributary to the North Branch of Rock Creek.
Under proposed conditions, pavement drainage between Sta. 1269+a5 (high point)
and Sta. 1283+00 of the newly constructed ICC will be conveyed through grass
channels to 3 linear sand filters (D1-I, D1-J, and D1-K) and Sand Storage eMp óf -n,
ultimately discharging upgradient of a proposed culvert under the ICC. 3.8 acres of
new impervious area will be added at this study point. The drainage area will increase
by 0.8 acres. The time of concentration remains relatively unchanged,
Study Point D-1-2 is located about 280 feet right of Sta. 1266+00 of the ICC and
consists of runoff from the left side of the ICC flowing across the SHA right-of-way.
The land use is predominantly open spaces and wooded areas with agricultural land
outside the SHA right-of-way. This area is defined as the runoff that leaves the SHA
right-of-way through a well-defined swale on the south side of the ICC.
The proposed ICC effectively cuts Drainage Area D-L-z into 2 pieces, resulting in a
north section and a south section, each separated by the ICC. The north section
drains through 2 culverts beneath the ICC to the study point. The south section
drains directly to the study point. Under ultimate conditions (pavement in place),
runoff in the ICC ROW is collected and conveyed to a different study point outside
Segments D1 and D2. However, during interim conditions, the ROW area still drains
to Study Point D-1-2 and has been included in this report but without pavement in
place. Thus, the impervious area does not increase. The drainage area will decrease
by L'7 acres (to 13.6 acres). There is no change in the time of concentration.
3.1.3 Study Point D-2-1
Study Point D-2-1 is located about 240 feet right of Sta. 1290+70 of the ICC and
consists of runoff from the left side of the ICC flowing across the SHA right-of-way.
The land use is predominantly open spaces and wooded areas with pasture land
outside the SHA right-of-way.
Under proposed conditions, drainage north of the ICC is collected in a ditch at the toe
of the roadway embankment and conveyed to Study Point D-2-2. Further, runoff in
the ROW is collected in grass channels and BMPs and conveyed to Study point D-2-2.
Therefore, under proposed conditions, runoff no longer reaches Study Point D-2-1.
Changes in drainage area, impervious area, and time of concentration are considered
in Study Point D-2-2.
Study Point D-2-2 is located at the outfall on the east side of the North Branch of
Rock Creek at approximate Sta. 1296+00, 200 feet right, and consists of runoff from
the north side of the ICC flowing across the SHA right-of-way. The land use is
predominantly open spaces and wooded areas with pasture land outsÍde the SHA
right-of-way.
Under proposed conditions, runoff north of the ICC (including runoff from Drainage
Area D-2-1) is collected in a ditch at the toe of the roadway and conveyed to Study
Point D-2-2 through a 36-inch culvert. Runoff in the ROW from Sta. 1283+00 to Sta.
L292+0O (essentially, runoff from Drainage Area D-2-1) is conveyed through grass
channels to 3 linear sand filters (D1-L, D1-M, and D1-N), then to Sand Storage BMp
D1-8, and finally to Study Point D-2-2 via a 24-inch storm drain. Runoff in the ROW
from Sta. I292+OO to Bridge 20 is conveyed through grass channels to 4 linear sand
storage BMPs (D1-C, D1-D, D1-E1, and D1-E2) and 2 linear sand filters (D1-C1 and
D1-C2), and then to Study Point D-2-2 through a 24-inch storm drain. Runoff from
Bridge 20 is collected and routed through 2 storm filters that discharge into Linear
Sand Storage BMP Dl-D (westbound bridge deck) and Linear Sand Storage BMp Dl-
E2 (eastbound bridge deck).
Since runoff for Study Point D-2-1 is now being routed to Study Point D-2-2, there is
a significant increase in drainage area and impervious area. The drainage area
increases from 15.4 acres under existing conditions to 30.3 acres under proposed
conditions. Impervious area increases from 0 acres under existing conditions to 5.4
acres under proposed conditions. The time of concentration increases slightly as the
travel path increases when adding the drainage area of study point D-2-1.
Study Point D-2-3 is located at the outfall on the west side of the North Branch of
Rock Creek at approximate Sta. 1301+80, 150 feet right, and consists of runoff from
the north side of the ICC flowing across the SHA right-of-way. The land use is
predominantly wooded.
Under proposed conditions, runoff from Drainage Areas D-2-3 and D-2-4 will both
discharge at Study Point D-2-3. Runoff in the ROW from the east side of Bridge 20 to
the east side of Bridge 21 is conveyed through grass channels to 3 linear sand storage
BMPs (D1-F, D1-G, and D1-H) and 3 linear sand filters (D1-F1, D1-G1 and Dt-Hf),
and then to Study Point D-2-3 through a 24-inch storm drain. Runoff from Bridge 21
is collected and routed through 2 stormwater filters that discharge into Linear Sand
Filter D1-G1 (westbound bridge deck) and Linear Sand Filter Dl-H1 (eastbound bridge
deck).
Since runoff for Study Point D-2-4 is now being routed to Study Point D-2-3, there is
an increase in drainage area and impervious area. The drainage area increases from
2.7 acres under existing conditions to 3.9 acres under proposed conditions.
Impervious area increases from 0 acres under existing conditions to 2.7 acres under
proposed conditions. The time of concentration increases slightly as the travel path
increases when adding the drainage area of Study point D-2-4,
Study Point D-2-4 is located at the outfall to a tributary of the North Branch of Rock
Creek at approximate Sta. 1306+70, 150 feet left, and consists of runoff from the
south side of the ICC flowing across the SHA right-of-way to the north, The land use
is predominantly wooded.
Under proposed conditions, runoff from Study Point D-2-4 is routed to Study point D-
2-3 (see Study Point D-2-3 discussion above). Changes in drainage area, impervious
area, and time of concentration are considered in Study point D-2-3.
There is no impervious area within the project area under existing conditions. Thus,
there are no impervious areas that will be reconstructed or removed. Under proposed
conditions, 11.85 acres of new impervious area is added. Therefore, the total
impervious area afterconstruction will be 11.85 acres which is a net increase of 11.85
acres when compared to existing conditions. Table 1 summarizes this information.
Based on the impervious area information, the area requiring water quality treatment
is 11.85 acres (see Table 2 and Appendix C).
Existing Net
New Total Impervious
Study Existing Impervious Reconstructed Impervious Proposed Area
Point Impervious Area
Impervious Area
Impervious Increase/
Area (Ac) (Ac) Area (Ac) Removed
(Ac) Area (Ac) Decrease
(Ac)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (s) (6) = (2) + (7) = (6)
(3)-(s) (2\
D-1-1 0 3.78 0 0 3.78 3.78
D-T-2 0 0 0 0 0 0
D-2-L 0 0 0 0 0 0
D-2-2 0 s.39 0 0 5.39 5.39
D-2-3 0 2.68 0 0 2.68 2.68
D-2-4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total o 11.85 o o 11.85 11.85
Table 2: Area Requiring Water Quality Treatment
Existing Area Requiring
Loss of
New Reconstructed
Study Impervious Impervious Impervious Existing Treatment (ART)
Point Area
Water Quality = [
(2)-(4) + o.2 x
Area (Ac) Area (Ac) Removed {(3)+(4)} + sI
(Ac) (Ac) (Ac)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (s) (6)
D-1-1 3.78 0 0 0 3.78
D-L-2 0 0 0 0 0
D-2-7 0 0 0 0 0
D-2-2 5.39 0 0 0 5.39
D-2-3 2.68 0 0 0 2.68
D-2-4 0 0 0 0 0
Total 11.85 o o o 11.8s
Water quality treatment is provided by:
1. Grass channels in Study Points D-1-1, D-2-2, and D-2-3 (grass channels in Study
Point D-2-1 convey water to Study Point D-2-2 and grass channels in Study Point
D-2-4 convey water to Study Point D-2-3).
2. Four stormwater filters located in Study Points D-2-2 and D-2-3, which treat the
runoff from Bridges 20 and 21.
Grass channels have been designed in accordance with Section 5 of the Stormwater
Design Manual to ensure grass channel credit can be taken. Grass channels treat
3.78 acres of impervious area in Study Point D-1-L, 4.I5 acres in study Point D-2-2,
and 1.69 acres in Study Point D-2-3 (see Appendix G for calculations). Four
stormwater filters will be designed by the manufacturer to treat 1.24 acres of
impervious area in Study Point D-2-2 and 0.99 acres of impervious area in Study
Point D-2-3. The total impervious area treated by these grass channels and
stormwater filters is 11.85 acres. Note that sand storage BMPs, linear sand storage
BMPs and linear sand filters are not discussed here as they provide quantity control
and thermal treatment.
The total impervious area under proposed conditions is 11.85 acres, Of this area,
2.26 acres is from impervious area on and immediately adjacent to Bridges 20 and
27. The remaining 9.59 acres is from impervious areas outside of these bridges.
According to Section 5 of the Stormwater Design Manual, "use of a grass channel will
automatically meet the recharge volume requirements for impervious areas draining
into the channel." As 9.59 acres of impervious area drains to grass channels in
Segments Dl and D2, only the remaining 2.26 acres of impervious area must meet
recharge volume requirements.
Recharge volume for the 2.26 acres is provided beneath Linear Sand Storage BMPs
D1-D and D1-E2 and Linear Sand Filters D1-G1 and Dl-H1. These are the systems
receiving discharge water from the four stormwater filters that treat the impervious
area associated with Bridges 20 and 2L. The bottom 6 inch layer of gravel of these
systems is located below their underdrain outlets to promote infiltration and
groundwater recharge. The required recharge volume for the 2.26 acres of
impervious area is 2,000 cubic feet (see Appendix E for calculations).
3.3 Water Quantity Management
1/ l-year discharge using TR-20 was 0.0 cfs. Thus, used l-year discharge
from TR-55.
2/ Under proposed conditions, discharge from Study Point D-2-l is
included with discharge of Study Point D-2-2.
3/ Under proposed conditions, discharge from Study Point D-2-4 is
included with discharge of Study Point D-2-3.
In accordance with the Maryland Stormwater Management Guidelines for State and
Federal Proiects dated July 2001, a waiver can be requested for drainage areas where
the proposed condition peak discharge does not exceed 2 cfs for a l-year, 24-hour
storm event. For drainage areas where the proposed conditions do not result in an
increase of 0.5 acres of additional impervious area, a variance can be requested.
Using these criteria, a waiver can be requested for Study Points D-2-I and D-2-4
(based on Table 4 discharges) and a variance can be requested for Study Points D-1-
2, D-2-L, and D-2-4 (based on Table 1 impervious area increases). Study Points D-2-
1 and D-2-4 are eliminated by the proposed construction (being combined with Study
Points D-2-2 and D-2-3, respectively). Thus, a waiver or variance is not required for
these areas. However, a variance will be taken for Study Point D-1-2. The remaining
study points (D-1-1, D-2-2, and D-2-3) do not meet the waiver or variance criteria.
Therefore, they require water quantity control. In order to meet Cpv requirements for
these areas, seven (7) linear sand storage BMPs and two (2) sand storage BMPs have
been designed for these study points (see Appendix E for Cpv and BMP calculations).
Also, eleven (11) linear sand filters are provided for additional water quality storage
and to reduce thermal impacts of the runoff. The BMP controls are discussed below
based on study point location.
Runoff in the ROW will be conveyed through grass channels to three (3) linear
sand filters (D1-I, D1-J, and D1-K) and Sand Storage BMP D1-A. Sand Storage
BMP D1-A will provide the required Cpv, The linear sand filters are not necessary
for Cpv but are provided for thermal reduction purposes.
Drainage Area D-2-2 contains four (4) linear sand storage BMPs (Dl-C, D1-D, D1-
E1, and D1-E2), five (5) linear sand filters (D1-C1, DI-CZ, D1-L, D1-M, D1-N) and
9
sand storage BMP D1-8. Linear Sand storage BMps D1-c, D1-D, D1-E1, and Dl-
E2 and Sand Storage BMP Dl-B will provide the required Cpv. Linear Sand Filters
D1-C1, DI-C2, D1-L, D1-M, and Dl-N are not necessary for Cpv but are provided
for thermal reduction purposes.
Drainage Area D-2-3 contains three (3) linear sand storage BMps (Dl-F, D1-G,
D1-H) and three (3) linear sand filters (D1-F1, D1-G1, D1-H1). The linear sand
storage BMPs will provide the required Cpv. The linear sand filters are not
necessary for cpv but are provided for thermal reduction purposes.
Table 5 presents the Cpv required and the Cpv provided at each of the water quantity
BMPs.
The drainage areas, runoff curve numbers and time of concentrations for these three
study points under proposed conditions have been separated into 1) area draining
through the BMPs and 2) area bypassing the BMPs. This information is summarized
Table 6.
10
Tabfe 6: TR-2o Dataset summary for study points D-1-1, D-z-z and D-2-3 with
BMPs
Based on the above information, the TR-20 analysis for proposed conditions was re-
run for these study points with the BMPs in place. A summary of peak discharges for
the l-year, l0-year and 100-year flood events are given in the Table 7. Hydiologic
computations are given in Appendix B and E.
11
Table 7: Summary of Peak Discharges with BMps
D-2-2 o.7r/ 76.7 39.1 7.4 56.3 109.8 3.54/ 46.3 ro7.2
D-2-3 o.2t/ 4.0 9.2 7.7 19.5 29.2 o34s/ 19.5 29.2
L/ L-year discharge using TR-20 was 0.0 cfs. Thus, used l-year discharge from TR-55.
2/ Under proposed conditions, discharge from Study point D-2=1 is included with
discharge of Study Point D-2-2.
3/ Under proposed conditions, discharge from Study Point D-2-4 is included with
discharge of Study Point D-2-3.
4/ Sum of 1-year peak discharges for BMPs D1-B with bypass flow (3.1 cfs), D1-C (0.03
cfs), Dl-D (O.77 cfs), and DL-EI/E2 (0.18 cfs) = 3.5 cfs.
5/ Sum of l-year peak discharges for BMPs D1-F, Dl-G and Dl-H (0,01+0.15+0.18
=0.34 cfs).
72
3.4 Stormwater Management Summary
13
4.O STORMWATER THERMAL IMPACT REDUCTION
4.I Introduction
Segments D1 and D2 cross the Montgomery County SPA and Use III Waters. In these
areas, stormwater management has been designed and will be constructed to reduce
potential thermal impacts from discharge flows into receiving streams. Thermal
impacts derive from two primary sources. The first is from the first flush of runoff
over heated pavement surfaces. The second source is from solar heating of standing
water in stormwater management facilities such as detention ponds. Our approach
has been to mitigate the impacts of each of these sources,
4.2 Studies
Relatively little has been done in the way of creating design procedures to reduce
thermal impacts. However, research is beginning to occur in this field. A study by
the Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) in 2004 recommended the
following strategies to reduce the thermal impacts from stormwater runoff:
. Reduce surface temperatures by using light colored and more reflective
pavement and building materials and by shading impervious areas.
o Promote infiltration of stormwater into the soils.
¡ Promote temperature loss in underground pipes. Use pipe materials with a
higher convective heat transfer coefficient, such as concrete, to encourage heat
loss before the flow is discharged at the end walls.
. Reduce direct solar inputs by maximizing shade of standing water in SWM
facilities.
The study established that effective infiltration and adequate shading are the two key
design criteria for successful protection of cold water streams from thermal impacts.
These studies point to the need to prevent thermal loading from occurring where
possible, delaying and reducing discharges into streams, and treating any remaining
thermal impacts.
There is a third ongoing Transportation Research Board study (sponsored by SHA and
being completed by the University of Maryland) entitled "Improved Management of
Stormwater Runoff - Mitigation of Thermal Effects," This study will not be completed
until early 2008. This research project will develop a set of tools that the SHA can use
to predict the outlet temperature from stormwater management practices.
L4
4,3 Approach for Segments Dl and D2
The thermal stormwater management approach for Segments D1 and D2 has been to:
. reduce or prevent thermal loading from occurring (source reduction),
. delay or reduce thermal runoff into streams, and
. treat thermal impacts that do occur.
BMPs have been selected based on thermal considerations and then modified (as
appropriate) to improve their thermal treatment capabilities.
4.3.L Source Reduction
Because of the clear zone requirements, there is little opportunity to shade the ICC
pavement. However, substantial shade has been provided for the bike trail pavement.
Also, shade trees have been located along surface waters, including swales located
outside the clear zone, the riparian buffer planting zoner and sand storage BMps. In
fact, planting berms have been intentionally placed across the middle of each sand
storage BMP to allow planting of shade trees, thereby maximizing shade potential.
4.3.2 Delaying/Reducing Runoff
The stormwater management strategy has been to prevent runoff from impervious
surfaces directly into streams by directing sheet flow through vegetation and into
grass channels, which reduce runoff volume and velocities, and provides groundwater
recharge through infiltration. In fact, grass channels are located along the entire
alignment of Segments Dl and D2 except at the proposed bridges.
4.3.3 Treating Runoff
4.3.3.L General
Underground facilities have been the first choice when selecting BMPs and open water
surface facilities have been avoided intentionally to minimize the potential for solar
heating. Underground thermal treatment will be provided by the two (2) sand storage
BMPs, seven (7) linear sand storage BMPs, and eleven (11) linear sand filters. The
two surface sand BMPs and the seven linear sand storage BMPs are provided for
quantity control; however, because of their design, they also provide thermal
reduction. The eleven linear sand filters have been added solely to provide thermal
reduction of stormwater runoff. The storage volume provided by the filters and BMps
is 85,682 cubic feet while the Cpv required for segments D1 and D2 is 56,L77 cubic
feet. Thus, there is over 50 percent more cpv provided than is required.
Wherever possible, stormwater in grass channels is conveyed to buried, linear sand
filters and linear sand storage BMPs located along the roadway. Also, the four
stormwater filters treating Bridge 20 and 21 discharge directly to linear sand filters
and sand storage BMPs for thermal treatment reasons. The below grade sand storage
BMPs and linear sand filters reduce peak discharges, reduce thermal loads, and
promote groundwater recharge through infiltration. They have been designed to treat
a 1.S-inch rainfall event which includes at least 95 percent of annual storm events
(typical criteria is a l-inch event equating to 90 percent of annual storm events).
This will include capture of the "first flush" of runoff, which will be the most thermally
affected by heated pavement surfaces. They have been designed for 12 hour
extended detention of the one-year, 24 hour storm event (as opposed to the typical
24 hour extended detention) and will drain relatively quickly, avoiding solar heating.
15
4.3.3.2 Linear Sand Storage BMPs
The below grade linear sand storage BMPs are very similar to the rock cribs mentioned
in the thermal treatment studies above and are very effective at reducing thermal
impacts. The filters consist of a 6 inch bioretention soil layer and a 12 inch sand layer
over various layers of gravel (total gravel thickness of 5 feet 10 inches), As the water
passes through the media, the runoff temperature is reduced due to the heat
exchange capacity of the sand and gravel. An underdrain system collects the treated
water and slowly releases it to the storm drain system. The bottom 6 inch layer of
gravel is located below the underdrain outlet to promote infiltration and groundwater
recharge, which will supply cool, clean water for stream baseflow (see Drawing
D 1_DR_SW_DE-04 for deta i ls).
The sand storage BMPs have been modified so they are similar to rock cribs and to
minimize solar heating potential. They will have shade trees planted along the
perimeter and on the planting berm located across the middle. They consist of a 6
inch bioretention soil layer and a 12 inch sand layer over various layers of gravel
(total gravel thickness of 5 feet 10 inches). As the water passes through the sand
and gravel, the runoff temperature is reduced due to the heat exchange capacity of
the sand and gravel. An underdrain system collects the treated water and slowly
releases it to the storm drain system. The bottom layer of gravel (6 inches thick for
BMP D1-4, 10 inches thick for BMP Dl-B) is located below the underdrain outlet to
promote infiltration and groundwater recharge, which will supply cool, clean water for
stream baseflow. This is essentially a modified MDE surface sand filter where the
typical 18 inch thick sand layer has been replaced with a 6 feet 4 inch thick layer of
sand and gravel for thermal reduction capabilities. Since the thicker sand layer is
further below grade, it will remain cooler allowing for better thermal treatment of the
stormwater that passes through it (see Drawings D1_DR_SW_DE-O1 AND
D1_DR_SW_DE-02 for details).
The below grade linear sand filters consist of a 6 inch bioretention soil layer and a 12
inch sand layer over various layers of gravel (total gravel thickness of 20 inches). As
the water passes through the media, the runoff temperature is reduced due to the
heat exchange capacity of the sand and gravel. An underdrain system collects the
treated water and slowly releases it to the storm drain system. The bottom 6 inch
layer of gravel is located below the underdrain outlet to promote infiltration and
groundwater recharge, which will supply cool, clean water for stream baseflow (see
Drawing Dl_DR_SW_DE-03 for details).
Since pipe networks can affect stormwater temperature, storm sewer materials have
also been selected with thermal impacts in mind. Concrete pipe, which has a high
convective heat transfer coefficient, has been used to encourage heat loss before the
flow is discharged at the end walls.
Figure 3 provides a flow diagram for thermal treatment of stormwater through BMP
D1-H in Drainage Area D-2-3. Flow diagrams through other BMPs and for other study
points would be similar.
16
5.0 GEOTECHNICALINVESTIGATIONS
Geotechnical investigations have been performed near the linear sand filters, linear
storage BMPs, and sand storage BMPs. Table 9 summarizes the boring information,
while Appendix D provides boring logs.
D1-D
W-S-RB- STA. 313+98, Sand and
369.2 29.4 366.7 370.2
0025 0'Lt. sitt
Dl-E1, D1- sTA. 1295+95,
RDD2-87 Sandy Silt 368 20 353.8 368.7
E2 50'Rt. rcc
D1-J
W-S-RB- STA. 316+38,
o23 21',Rt.
S¡It 4t3.9 25.5 Dry 398.0
T7
Table 9: Summary of Geotechnical Investigations (Contd.)
Depth Water Bottom
BMP No. Material Ground
Bore Hole Boring
Descrip- Elev.
of Table Elev. of
Number Location (Ft) Boring Elev. BMP
tion (Ft) (Ft) (Ft)
sT4.1280+50, 4IO
D1-K RDD2-B3B Silty Sand 20 Dry 399.8
50'Rt. ICC
STA.12B3+00,
D1-K RDD2-84 Silty Sand 4L2 30 Dry 395.6
52',Rt. ICC
Sandy
ST4.1292+50,
D1-L RDD2-86 Silt/Sandy 396 15 Dry 374.2
25',Lt. ICC
Fat Clav
Sandy
sTA.1292+50,
D1-M RDD2-86 Silt/Sandy 396 15 Dry 374.6
25',Lt. ICC
Fat Clav
sTA.1291+40,
D1-N SWD2-88 Silty Sand 379 25 366 376.4
140',Rt. ICC
For Sand Storage BMP D1-8, borings indicate the presence of the water table at
elevations ranging from 363.9 feet to 368 feet. Thus, the bottom of the BMP (invert
underdrain) has been raised to an elevation of 368 feet and the storage volume
calculations adjusted accordingly. A gravel layer below the underdrain will be
constructed to promote groundwater recharge and further thermal treatment. For all
other BMPs, the water table was found to be at least 2 feet below the bottom
elevations of the stormwater management facilities.
Any chemical spills along the ICC would likely concentrate in the grass channels. The
grass channels have been designed to drain to BMPs and sand filters directly or
through the storm drain system. Because the channels will be vegetated, much of
the liquid would be bound and detained within the vegetation and soil with relatively
little contamination reaching the sand filters and BMPs. Any spills reaching the sand
filters or BMPs will be detained for !2 hours as these facilities have been designed for
a 12 hour extended detention time. This will afford the opportunity to remediate the
effects of the spill before discharging to a receiving stream.
1B
7.O REFERENCES
19
E}
Figure No. 2
Inter County Connector, Contract A
J-
-- Location Map - Segment D
--
T71T Not to Scale
Itrl
.N. \-, I
TECHNOLOGIES
Pavement Sheet Flow @ 130o F (Max.)
Length 100', Tc = 1 min.
OUTFALL
Total Tc = 12 Hours + 7 min.
Runoff Temperature at outfall = 65o F
(Assumed ground temperature)
4
4
0
44
4
39309
410 45
420
435
5 400 45
40 0
420
42
44
37
425
0
415 39 0
0
0
430
5
40
5
440
4139
0
40
425
38
5
420
42
375
400
445
420
38 365 420
415
37
0
5
415
5
0
415 42
415 42 415
40
410 0 410
3 365
40 90 445
420
5
5
430
45
0 420
41
420
39 3 41
DRAINAGE AREA MAP - SEGMENT D1-D2
0
38 75 5
415
39
5 5 415 430
0 41 425 420
'C'
39 4 Open Urban Land
415 410
0
0 00 410 41
0 05 41
430 5
400 405
EXISTING CONDITION 405
415
405
42
0
410
425
430
42
38 Water
41
5
370
40
40 4
370 385
5
0
430
0
45
'
5
43
450
40
5
390
0
' MD 200 / INTERCOUNTY CONNECTOR
41
405
41
5
44 390
5
39
390 395
42
440 5
5
5
5
42
39
420
425
5 395
36
42 395
410
410
405
400
'B'
5
39
410
425 415
405
0
Water
42
400
5
JANUARY 2008
00
40
'D'
410
' 400 42
405 4
0
0 425 0
41
'W
410 00 395
42 41
385
40
36
405
400
44
42 0
Medium Density Residential 0
385
0
42
36
5
5
425
36
430
0
420
36
360
420
43
4
44
5
42 Legend
425
43
0
5
42
5
415
0
5
0
39
Drainage Area Boundary Zoning High Density Residential 39
5
390
0
'C'
385
430
40
425
410
Deciduous Forest
425
385
Point of Investigation Agricultural Buildings Industrial 420
'
425
0
41
5
43
43
430
385
'
42
42 Tc_Path Bare Exposed Rock Institutional
5
0
425
420
37
41
405
0
420
415
0
39
Soil Boundary Low Density Residential
5
Bare Ground
43
370
390
385
410
435
415
38
390 Right of Way Brush Medium Density Residential
380
5
43 4
405
43
42
0
5
EX_Land_Use Commercial Mixed Forest
420
400
425
445
430
415
410
425
0
400
44
450
395
385
440
0
400
405
Pond Deciduous Forest Orchards
38
390
400
41
44
0
420
40
435
5
0
380
42 38 0
41
Wood & Grass Mixed Evergreen Forest 390 Pasture
430
5
44
43
5
435
0
44
425
0
41
'
0
390
Grass Extractive Water
'C'
42
44
D
5
'
38
430
41451
0
'B'
440
0
45 Impervious Feeding Operations
425
0 450 450 450
INTERCOUNTY CONSTRUCTORS
38 390
435
5
45 450 425
42
0
430 5
39
40 4
5
5
5
415 420 425 42 430
'B'
455
5
425
43
38
40
425
440
425 410
5
5
5 0
0
0
42
380
45 43 200 100 0 200 400 600 40
39
415 0
41 420
0 38
Feet TWO TAFT COURT * ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 20850 * 301-354-8600
400
5 415
46 0
420
44
390
425
0
450 38
0
395 405
41
400
40
450
43
5
400
42
'
0 400 410
0
455
0
Cropland
0
'C 45
39
405
46
0 44 425 42
0
0
5
40
420
39 00 395 0
5 00
0
46 410 415
43
39
40 4
38
0
4
0
460
0
0
'C'
360
4
370
390
40
41
44 0
0
0
43
45 395 Medium Density Residential
0
0 5
400
385
39
425
420
410
460
410
42
400
380
405
420
0
0
41
420
46
435
390
0
430
440
455
410
385
45
45
0
410
41
0
5
470
0
AN
45
380
38
450 450 0 43 M
455
41
425
TE
5
385
400
0
U
45
450
395
N
MI
0
390
45 5
5 46
475
360
0
39
'C' 'B'
5
47
470
400
395
370
41
400
400
430
0
42
46
5
0
39 0
0
47 44 0 5 43
455
405
'B'
0 0
46 43
460
45
370
0
5
5
42
45
465 5
42 0
360
43 42
465
Pasture
440
0
0
42
42
455
410
5
450
450
AN
0
465 43
43
410
390
450
M
44
0
445 440 E
UT ACE
0
43
5 425 425
46
0
5
41
A
MI ERR
41
B
42
460 405 0
42
420
T
440
5
46
41
0
45 455 450 415 410 420
0 410
460
425
44
430
0
440
42 43
380
440
5
5 0 445
43
380
43
430 45 400
0
0 370
41
435 410
0
420
430 400 0 390
425
5 39
43
460
1320
425
46
445
0
420
POI D-2-4
360
0
425
450
42 420 1315
43 410
425
460
420
38
420 43 37
0 420
425 320
0
38
0 40
1310
0
370
C 0
44
0 415 DA D-2-2 390
315 410
36
0
455
400
400
1305
440
DA
445
Institutional
A 0
410
0D
43 410 B 39 40
0
-2 -4 0
400
5
5 3
415
45
A
43
430
450
1300
0
B
DA
0
'1D'
38
0
0
0
45
39
390
390D
43
-
370
300
380 2-3
435
38
440
380
0
430
B
- '
R
-1 C 420 5
410
'
44
400 41 129
0
0
42
D -1
38
0
40
0 0
0
0
B 39
DA
O
2
39
C
5
- 370
'D'
44 A
0 42
0
D 390 2 5
9 A
43
DA
'D'
M
Deciduous Forest C
POI D-2-3
360
360
0
E
Mixed Forest 129
430
38
400
0
0
400
44
400
'C'
400 C
2 37
0
41 2- Medium Density Residential
0
-
410
0
ID
380
41 40
5
MON
0
42
128
390
40
PO
400
390
390
390
CT
410
MU
TY
420
41 C
NC
420
0
430
A ST
0
0
420
420 128
37
400
PR
E 4R
410
430
OM T
30 280
2- 1
35
420
40
M -
40
0
ON
0
39 ID
0
38
IL 400
C
410
'C'
PO
0
5
TO
127
36
Low Density Residential 10
L
430
RY
0
440
41
42
360
R 275 0
0
0
390
41
O 40
400
A 0 420
-1 -2 0 20 3
380 90
370
B 127 4
D
380
15
DA 400
410
D 350
42
A
39
42
270
0
430
0
37
D
36 400
420
370
1 -1
35
0
'B'
5 410 0
126 -
'C'
430
ID
420
42
41
PO
0 0
430
42
43
0
0
265 41
0
0
36
0
40
410
41
370
0
126 430
0
40
350
C
20
400
43
0
410
41
38
36
0
0
0
0
'CD-'1-2
36
42
'D'
420
0
5
125
35
41
380
0
37
37
42 0
0
1245
400 41 0
I
390
1250 0
255 400
390
390
PO 400
'
420
D
Pasture
'
420
0
400
41
36
0 245 250
390
410
39
380 0
0
420 0
25
41
37
0
37 0
430 38
0 38
390 410
41
400
0
0 43
42
37
0
0
350
380
37
0
370
40
0 40
36 400
0
360
0
41
40
380
0 0
0
42
390
420
380 390
36
35
'
0
400
C
39
0
'
380
0
38
'C'
390
35
0
PARK 410 39
0
Medium Density Residential 0
RY DRIVE 0
AVE 36
420
40
380 350 340
370
420
0
40
0
420
'B'
41
390
41
390
'C'
420
380
0
0
340
420 350 Low Density Residential
Pasture
33
0
390 0
41
38 39
0 0 ND
MAR YLA
37
400
340
0 350
36
115
40
370
360
360
' 36
0
410 0
C
Pasture
'
0
42
380
0
35
400
390
35
0
400
37
0
'
³
415 39 40
70
0
5 5
440
4139
40
0
4
43
4
425
38
5
420
42
410
375
400
445
420
38 365 420
415
37
0
5
415
5
0
415 42
415 42 415
410 0 410
40
3 365
40 90
420
5 445
0 430 420
41
420
39 3 41
0
38 75 5 415
39
5 5 415 430
0 41 425 420
'C'
39 4
415 410
0
0 00 410 41
0 05 41
430 Open Urban Land
DRAINAGE AREA MAP - SEGMENT D1-D2 5
405
400 405 40
415
5
405
0
42 410
425
430
42
38
41
5
370
40
40 4
370 385
Water
5
0
430
Cropland
'
5
43
PROPOSED CONDITION
40
5
390
0
'
41
405
41
5
44 390
5
39
390 395
42
405
440 5
5
5 5
5
42 40
39
420
425
5
MD 200 / INTERCOUNTY CONNECTOR 395
36
42 395
410
410
405
400
'B'
5
39
410
425 415
405
0
Water
42
400
5
00
40
' 410
400
' 42
405 4
D
400
0
Medium Density Residential 0
0
' 425
41
'W
410 00 395
42 41
385
40
36
405
4
400
5
42 0
0
385
0
42
Deciduous Forest
36
5
425
36
430 410
0
420
36
360
420
43
415
4
5
42
Legend
425
43
0
5
42
415
0
5
0
39
Drainage Area Boundary Zoning High Density Residential 5
39 420
390
0
'
385
430
40
425
410
425
C
385
Agricultural Buildings
0
41
5
43
43
430 425
385
Bare Exposed Rock
42
42 Point of Investigation Institutional
5
0
425
420
37
4
41
405
0
420 Bare Ground 415
0
39
Tc_Path Low Density Residential
43
370
390
385 430
410
0
Brush
435
415 Soil Boundary Medium Density Residential
38
390
380
5 435
43
405
43
42 Commercial
0 Right of Way Mixed Forest
5
420
400
425
445
430
415
410
425
0
400 PR_Land_Use Cropland Open Urban Land
44
0
44 0
410 Wood Deciduous Forest Orchards 44
395
385
440 400
405
38
390
400
41
44
440
0
420
40 Pond Evergreen Forest 0
435
5
0
Pasture
0
380
42 38
41
90
430
5 3
44
43
Wood & Grass Mixed Extractive
5
435 Water
0
44
425
0
41
'D'
0
390
' 435
42
44
Grass Feeding Operations
5
435
38
C
430
'
41451
0
'B'
440
0
425
450 450 450 Impervious
38 390
435
5
45 450 425
42
0 0
0 43
39
40
5
5 43 5
5
415 420 425 42 430
'
INTERCOUNTY CONSTRUCTORS
5
425
43
B
38
'
40
425 0
440
425 410 43
5
5
5 0
0
0
380
42
45 43 40
39
415 0
400 41 420 425
0 38 5 415
46 0
420
44
390
200
0 100 0 200 400 600
450 425 38
0
95 3 405
41
400
40 Feet TWO TAFT COURT * ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 20850 * 301-354-8600
450
5
43
40 040
42
'
0
410
0
0
455
0
0
'C 45
39
405
46
0 44 425 42
0
Cropland
0
5
40
420
420
39 00 395 0
5 00
0
410 415
43
39
40 4
38
4
420
0
420
0
'C'
360
370
390
40
41
44 0
0
0
43
45 395
0
0 5
400
385
39
425
420
410
460
42
410
42
0
400
380
405
420
0
0
41
E
420
46
IV
435
390
0
430
440
455 R
410
385
D
45
45
0
410
41
0
5
470
0
AN
45
380
38
450 450 0 43 M
455
41
425
TE
5
385
400
0
U
45
450
395
N
MI
0
390
45 5
5 46
475
360
0
39
' 'B'
5
47
470
400
'C
395
370
41
400
400
430
0
42
46
5 Medium Density Residential
0
39 0
0
47 44 0 5 43
455
405
'B'
0 0
46 43
460
45
0
370
5
5
42
45
465 5
42 0
360
43 42
465
Pasture
440
0
0
42
42
455
410
5
450
450
AN
0
465 43
43
410
390
450
M
44
0
445 440 E
UT ACE
0
43
5 425 425
46 A
0
5
41
MI ERR
41
B
42
460 405 0
42
420
T
440
5
46
41
0
45 455 450 415 410 420
0 410
460
425
44
430
0
440
42 43
380
440
440
5
5 0 445 43
380
43
45 400
0
0 370
41
435 410
0
425 420
430 400 0 390 1325
43
5 39
460
1320
425
46
Cropland
445
0
420
360
0
425 325
450
42 420 1315
43 410 D3-D
425
460
420
38
420 43 37
0 420
425 320
0
38
0 40
1310
0
370
D3-C 3 0
44 90
0 415 315 410
36
310 A
0
B
400
455
Institutional 400
1305
440
445
0 D1-
F
- 2 -3 C
410
43 39 40
0 410 A D
DA 3
0
400
5
05
415
45
-2 -2
G
D1-
430
450
1300 D
0
H
D D1-
'1D'
38
0
0
0
DA
45
39
390
43
370
300 390
435
38
Y
440
D1-
39
380
380
0
0
430
-
'C'
D
R
420 5 E
D -1
410
44
400 41 129
0
0
42 D
D1-
38
0
40
0 0
0
0
39
DA
O
39
5 370
'D'
44 0 C
0 42 390
43 295 POI D-2-3
M
L
0
D1- D1-
E
360
360
0
E
Mixed Forest 129 M E
430
D1-
38
Deciduous Forest 400
0
0
400
44 F
290 2
400
'C'
C
400 D1-
N
- 2- 37
0
41
0
ID
410
380
41 40
PO
5
MON
0
42
A 128
D1-
390
40
400
390
B
D1-
390
390
CT
410
MU
TY
420
I 285
D1-
41
NC
420
0
D
430
A ST
0
0 J
D1-
420
420 128
37
T
400
PR
OIN
E 4R
410
430
OM T
K
D1-
HP
30 280
35
420
40
M
40
0
ON
HIG
0
39
0
38
IL 400
C
410
'C'
0
5
TO
127
36
10
L
430
RY
0
440
41
42
360
275
R 0
0
38
0
390
41
O 40
400
A E 0 420
- 1 -2 0 20 3
380 90
370
B
D 127 4
DA
380
15
400
410
F 350
42
A
C
39
270
42
430
0
37
D
36 400
370
1 -1
35
0
LOW POINT
'B'
5 410 0
126 -
'C'
430
Medium Density Residential
ID
420
42
41
PO
0 0
430
42
43
0
0
265 41
0
0
36
0
40
410
41
370
0
126 430
0
40
350
20
400
43 260
0
410
41
38
D 36
0
0
0
0
'CD-'1-2
36
42
'
420
0
5
125
35
41
D
380
' 0
0
37
37
42 0
0
1245
400 41 0
I
390
1250 0
255 400
390
PO 400
'D'
420
Pasture
420
0
400
41
36
245 250
0
390
410
39
380 0
0
420 0
25
41
37
0
37 0
430 38
0 38
390 410
41
400
0
0 43
42
37
0
0
350
380
37
0
370
40
0 40
36 400
0
360
0
41
40 0
0
0
42
390
420
380 390
36
35
'
0
400
C
39
0
'
380
0
38
'C'
390
35
0
PARK 410 39
0
Medium Density Residential 0
RY DRIVE 0
AVE 36 Low Density Residential
420
40
380 350 340
370
420
0
40
0
420
'B'
41
390
41
390
' 410
420
380
0
0
340
420 Pasture
350
33
'C
0
390 0
41
39
0 ND
40
MAR YLA 0
400
340
350
36
115
40
370
360
360
'C'
36
0
410 0
39
0
38
42
380
0
35
0
400
390
Pasture 35
0
400
37
0
'C'
Low Density Residential
'B'
APPENDIX B
HYDROLOGIC COMPUTATIONS
Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff
NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flowtype can be used for each worksheet.
Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments
CN (weighted) = total product / total area = B27o.B | 11o.6s = 74.7 use cN =[Tl
2. Runoff
Storm #1 Storm *2 Storm #3
NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flowtype can be used for each worksheet.
Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments
l=El
18. Flow length, L ::::441;::,::
0.01198 mi2
NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet.
Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments
5. Land Slope, s
6. Tt = o.oo7(nL)ou / Pro's =li.o4¿l
"o'a
::::::::::i::::r:::::.:::.::::::::::::::::i:::
o Q) o)
L L
J
(Appendix A) o .9 .9
No. t- IL LL (acres)
INSIDE RIGHT OF WAY
'i'B 65 /Voods - (oood) 55 58.3
: ..tt 3 Cpen Space (oood) - orass >757o 61 105.€
,
'9,: t4 mperv. - paved parking lots,roofs,drives 98 rli0
2. Runoff
Storm #1 Storm #2 Storm *ß
NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flowtype can be used for each worksheet.
Include a map, schematic, or dascription of flow segments
5. Land Slope, s
6. Tt = o.oo7(nL¡o
8 s
/ Pro so
a
=l orr. I
l.=lQQlQJ{-l= 0.50
lulP = 0.19
V.ff. = 0.63
399.0
398.0
397.0
Ë
ll 396.0
¿ ?o< n
o
t-
394.0
tu
393.0
tu
392.0
391.0
390.0
389.0
0.000 0.400
STORAGE,ACRE FT.
CPVVOLI]ME 17087 CF
Orifice Sizing
Use Average Hydraulic Head Method
orifice:
Bottom elevation of d¡awdown 390.2Ft.
2-yearorifice:
hvertelevationof 390.2 Ft.
Maximumhead: 8 Ft.
Average hydraulic head : Maximum head I 2: 4 Ft.
:
Drawdown time for CPV 12 hou¡s
Required discharge through orifice: Volume / (12 hours x 3600) = 0.396 cfs
Orifice area, using Equation 11.1, rearranged A : Q / IC x(2 xgxh)%l
C:0.6; e:32.2
A: 0.395 /10.6x(64.4x+.5)%l: 0.041 Sq.Fr.
Required CPV orifice size: 3 inches (Area 0.049 Sq. Ft.)
ICC CONTRACTA SAND STORAGE D-1-A
Segment D1-D2
400
399
398
--*ø
397
I
o
i
t 3s6
E j
9
o
sss
t¡,J
394
!
I
393
392
391
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.oo 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00
Discharge, CFS
ICC CONTRACTA SAND STORAGE D-1-A
Segment D1-D2
lr
Q=xAu
SLOPE = BOTTOXI SLOPE ( FTlFTl
II = MANNING.S N
B= BOTTOI, UIDTH ( FT)
EXAM PLE
TURNING
LI NE SLOPE =.Ol s!5-37 Ì
fl = .OS
44t
â,0t8
B:l(f 6 ,,
=
X=-ñ l,Ã,1
SLOPE
.l
.09
.oe
.o7
.06
.o5 20
2.O
o4
t,
.03
-o I'.O2ã
''!z/ 30
.10
.o2 50
.o15
+/.o6 .2 GO
.o7
¿'/ -¿ o8 80
o9 .t
.to roo
.oo9
.oo8
.oo7
.oo6
.o2
.oos
_EguAflofl--
.004 .ol
.oo3
x=#:
.oo2
(i NOMOGRAPH INTENOED FOR USE TUHERE 8>6 FT.
r 16üRÉ ?--l
NOMOGRAPH ron ESTTMATTNG ttL
( Q=XAM
D = MAXIMUM DEPTH ( FT) 3'
B= BoTToM WTDTH (FT) 6' AREA
Z=SIDE SI-OPE = 2- (rr2)
AREA=BDtZDz = Vâ 50
gAMEtE-. 40
TURN I NG D/B = t.O "= ê )F
50
LINE Z=.æ.,,2
AREA =JÊûû FIz 3é 60
DlB
M=1.44/ 70
z 80
to 90
tCI
9 too
9
I I
7 7
150
6 6
5 5
eoo
4 ,ú 4
250
3 3 300
19p
2
500
\\\. 600
I \\_ 700
\--
800
. EQUATION -=--_ 900
- loo(
.9
.8
cf3 I
.7 LOG )
.6
ffi=
F-'; (,
+( 2DÆ ) t+22 )1 t50(
.4
.3
F tC+rqe L^L-
*****************80-80 LIST OF INPUT DATA FOR TR_20 HYDROLOGY******************
JOB TR-20 SUMI4ARY NOPLOTS
T]TLE BMP D1-1
TITLE FILE: BMPD1-1. DAT
3 STRUCT 01
8 390.2 0.00 0.000
I 391.00 I.25 0.041
8 392.00 7.94 0.092
I 393 . 00 2.45 0. 143
I 394.00 2.87 0.194
I 395.00 3.23 0.245
8 396.00 3.56 0.295
I 397.00 3.86 0.346
I 397.10 3.89 0.348
I 398.00 4.r4 0.503
I 398. s0 18.39 0.601
8 399.00 44.3s 0.709
9 ENDTBL
6 RUNOFF 1 001- 1 0.711_7'7 73.0 0.4I l- 1 1 1 1
6RUNOFFr002 2 0.71295 75.0 0.40 11111
6RUNOFF1003 3 0.01198 80.0 0.10 11111
6 RESVOR 2 07 3 4 11111
6 RUNOFF 1 004 5 0.1609'Ì 74.0 0.40 1111 1
6ADDHYD4OO5 456 1
6 REACH 3 006 6 1 44I.0 I.25 1.44 1 1
ENDAÎA
7 TNCREM 6 .10
7 COMPUT 7 001 006 0.0 2.6 1.0 22 1 01
ENDCMP 1
7 COMPUT 7 001 006 0.0 3.2 1.0 22 L 02
ENDCMP 1
7 COMPUT 7 001 006 0.0 5.1 1.0 22 1 10
ENDCMP 1
7 COMPUT 7 001 006 0.0 1.2 1.0 22 r 99
ENDCMP 1
ENDJOB 2
J-Z.JU LIJ 51.04 36.96 28 .02 22 .00 L'7.11 r4.8'7 rz.Yo l--L.o-L
13.10 CFS 10.55 9 .10 9.05 8.56 8.13 7.74 1.31 1.04
13. 90 CFS 6.'73 6.44 o.ro 5 .92 5.'72 5.56 5.44 5 . 33
14.70 CFS 5.23 5.13 s.04 ¿ q6 4.85 4.16 4 .61 4 .51
15.50 CFS 4 .41 4 .31 4.28 4.18 4.08 3. 98 3.88 3.78
1Á ?n atrc 3.1I 3.65 3. 61 3.5'7 3.53 ? /o 3.46 3.42
17.10 CFS 3.39 3.32 3.28 3.25 3.2r 3.18 3.I4
17.90 CFS 3.11 3.07 3. 03 3.00 2 .96 2.92 2.89 2.85
18.70 CFS 2.8r 2.1'l 2.14 2.10 2.66 2.62 2.58 2.55
19.50 CFS 2.5r 2.41 ) Àa 2.39 2.35 2.3r 2.27 2.24
20.30 cFS Z. ZI 2.19 2.L8 ) 17 2.76 2.1"6 z. !3 ¿. 14
21.10 CFS 2.13 2.13 2.L2 ¿-rz 2.II 2.10 2.r0 2.09
21. 90 CFS 2 .08 2 .08 2 .01 2.06 2.05 2 .05 2.04 2.03
22 .10 CFS 2 .03 z. v¿ 2.0r 2.0r 2.00 1 00 1.98 1.98
23.50 CFS L.91 1.96 r.96 1.95 I .94 1.93 r.82 I.4r
24.30 CFS Rq .48
DURATTON (HRS) 2 4 o 8 10 I2 13
FLOVí (CFS) 1 4 3 2 a
¿ 2 0
*** I^IARNïNG - XSECTTON 3, MAIN TIME INCREMENT TOO LARGE, COMPUTED PEAK
( 10.84) EXCEEDS ADJACENT COORDTNATE ( 10.19) BY 6 Z. ***
HYDROGRAPH POTNTS FOR ALTERNATE : 1, STORM : 1
HRS MA]N TIME TNCREMENT : ,1OO hr, DRAINAGE AREA : .01 SQ.MI.
11.50 CFS .34 .7s 1. 90 4.I5 9.88 t_0.19 4.10 2.I1_
12.30 CFS 1.73 1.48 7.23 1.05 .97 .9L .85 .19
13.10 CFS .'75 .1r .68 .65 .67 .59 .56 .54
13. 90 CFS q1 AO
(HRS) 2
DURATTON 2
FLOI/ü(CFS) 1 0
*** hTARNfNG _ MAIN TTME ]NCREMENT ( .1OO) ]S GREATER THAN 50? OF THE
T]ME OF CONCENTRATION ( .10) FOR SUBWATERSHED XSECTTON ?
TH]S Vf]LL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT _2.12.
(HRS) 2
DURATION 3
FLOVü(CFS) 1 0
(HRS) 2
DURATTON 4 6 8 10 I2 t_J
FLOVü(CFS) 9 6 4 3 3 3 0
DURÀT]ON (HRS) 2 A
o ó 10 t2 13
FLOVü (CFS ) 10 6 4 3 3 3 0
*** I^IARNING - XSECTION 3, MAIN TIME INCREMENT TOO LARGE, COMPUTED PEAK
( 15.90) EXCEEDS ADJACENT COORD]NATE ( 1A q?\ RY 6 I ***
TR20 ---- - SCS -
BMP D1-1 VERSÏON
0I/25/** FILE: BMPD1-1. DAT 2.04TEST
09:46:75 PASS 2 JOB NO. 1 PAGE 1
DURÄÎTON (HRS) 2 4
FLOVí (CFS ) 1 0
18.40 ELEV 390.41 390.41 390.41 390.41 390.40 390.40 390.40 390.39
J-Y.ZU UTò .30 .30 .29 .29 2A .28 .21 -21
19.20 ELEV 390.39 390.39 390.39 390.38 390.38 390.38 390.37 390.37
20.00 cFS .26 .26 .¿6 .25 .A
20. OO ELEV 390.37 390.37 390.36 390.36 390.36 390.36 390.36 390.36
20.80 cFS .24 .24 .24 a^ )A aÀ .24 .23
20.80 ELEV 390.36 390.35 390.35 390.35 390.35 390.35 390.35 390.35
Z-L.OU L-Eò .23 .23 .23 )? .23
21. 60 ELEV 390.35 390.35 390.35 390.3s 390.35 390.35 390.35 390.3s
22.40 CFS .23 . LZ .zz .22 t2 .zz
22.40 ELEV 390.35 390.34 390.34 390.34 390.34 ?on ?/ 390.34 390.34
23.20 CFS .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .22 .2L .ZI
23.20 ELEV 390.34 390.34 390.34 390.34 390.34 390.34 390.34 390.34
24.00 cFS .27 .L9 .12 nq .07 .06 .04
24.00 ELEV 390.34 390.32 390.30 390.28 390.26 390.25 390.24 390.23
24.80 CFS .03 n? .02 .02 .01
24.80 ELEV 390.22 390.22 390.21 390.27 390.27
RUNOFF ABOVE BASEFLOVü (BASEFLOVü : .OO CFS)
1.40 WATERSHED TNCHES; 11 CFS-HRS; . v ¡\LÌ1-E -r ÌlL r .
DURATTON (HRS) 2 4 4
FLOví (CFS ) 2 1 0
DURATTON(HRS) 2 4 6 I 10 12 13
FLOW(CFS) 9 5 4 3 3 2 0
I
TR20 ---- _ scs _
BMP D1-1 VERSION
01"/25/** FILE: BMPDI-1.DAT 2.04TEST
09:46:15 PASS 3 JOB NO. 1 PAGE 10
DURAT]ON (HRS ) 2 4 o I 10 T2 I4 15
FLOW (CFS) 2I L2 q 7 6 5 2 0
--- XSECTION 1, ALTERNATE I, STORM ].0, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD F]LE ---
DURATTON ( HRS ) 2 4 6 I 10 I2 14 76
FLOVü (CFS) 22 13 9 1 o 5 30
--- XSECTION 2, ALTERNATE I, STORM ].0, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FTLE ---
DURATTON (HRS) 2 4 b I 9
FLOVí (CFS ) 2 1 1 1 0
18.50 ELEV 390.59 390.58 390.58 390.57 390.57 390.56 390.56 390.55
19.30 cFS .54 .53 . s3 .52 .51 .50 .49 .48
19.30 ELEV 390.55 390. s4 390.54 390.53 390.53 390.52 390.51 390.51
20.70 cFS .48 .41 .46 .46 .45 .45 .45 .44
20.70 ELEV 390.50 390.50 390.50 390.49 390.49 390.49 390.49 390.48
20 .90 cFS .44 .44 .44 .43 .43 . 43 .43 ¿?
20 .90 ELEV 390.48 390.48 390.48 390.48 390.48 390.48 390.47 390 .4'7
2L.10 cFS .42 .42 - 42 .42 .42 .42 .4I .4r
2r .10 ELEV 390.41 390.41 390.41 390.41 390.41 390.47 390.41 390.46
22 .50 cFS .4r .41_ .4I .4L .40 . 40 .40 .40
22-50 ELEV 390.46 390.46 390.46 390.46 390.46 390.46 390.46 390.46
23.30 cFS .40 .40 .40 .39 .39 .39 .39
23.30 ELEV 390.45 390.45 390.45 390.45 390.45 390.45 390.45 390.45
24.r0 cFS .35 .29 .22 .17 .13 .10 .08 .06
24.10 ELEV 390.43 390.38 390.34 390.31 390.29 390.27 390.25 390.24
24 .90 cFS .05 .04 .03 .02 .02 .01 .01
TR20 ---- _ scs _
BMP D1-1 VERSÏON
0r/25/** FILE: BMPD1-1.DAT 2. O4TEST
09:46:15 PASS 3 JOB NO. 1 PAGE 13
DURATION(HRS) 2 4 6
FLOW(CFS) 3 2 1_ 1
DURATION (HRS) 2 4 o ö 10 I2 L4 15
FLOW (CFS ) 20 I2 I 'l 5 5 20
--- XSECTTON 4, ALTERNATE 7, STORM 10, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FTLE
--- xsEcTIoN 6, ALTERNATE 7, STORM 10, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD F]LE ---
16.60 CFS 15.04 14.86 r4.70 14.53 14.31 14.27 14.05 13.88
17.40 CFS L3 -12 13.56 13.40 13.24 13. 08 12 .91 72.15 12.59
18.20 CFS !2.42 12.26 12.10 11.93 tt.'77 11.60 77.44 77.21
19. 00 cFS 11.11 10.94 r0.'77 10.61 r0 .44 r0.28 10.11 9.94
19.80 CFS 9 .11 9 .6r 9 .44 9 .28 9. 13 9 .02 8.93 8.87
20.60 cFS 8.83 8.79 8.75 8 .12 8.68 8.65 8.62 8.59
21.40 CFS 8.55 8.52 8 .49 8 .46 8.43 8.39 8.36 8.33
22.20 CFS 8 .30 8.21 8.24 8.20 8.17 8.r4 8.11 8.07
23.00 cFs 8.04 8.01 7qR 1 .94 7 .9L 7.88 7.85 7.81
23.80 CFS 1 .18 7.'75 '7 .10 1 .21 5.73 3.70 2.01 1".12
24.60 CFS . o-L .33
DURÄTION ( HRS ) 2 A
6 8 10 1"2 14 76
FLOVí (CFS ) 35 20 I4 11 q I 1L
DURATION (HRS) 11
FLOVü (CFS ) 0
ZJ. JU L.E ) 8.17 8.13 8.10 8.07 8.03 8.00 1 .91 1.97
24.I0 CFS 1 .42 5.19 3. 65 2.00 1.08 .58 .31
DURAT]ON (HRS ) 2 4 6 I LO 1t 74 t6
FLOVü (CFS ) 36 27 15 L2 9 1 2
DURAT]ON (HRS) I1
FLOVí (CFS ) 0
DURÄ,TION(HRS) 2 4 6 8 10 I2 74 15
FLOW(CFS) 3 2 L 1 1 1 1 0
_-_ XSECTTON 3, ALTERNATE I, STORM 99, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
TP21 ---- - S1S -
BMP D1-1 VERS]ON
0r/25/** FILE: BMPD1-1.DAT 2. O4TEST
09:46:15 PASS 4 JOB NO. PAGE I1
*** I^TARNING _ MAIN TTME INCREMENT ( .1OO) TS GREATER THAN 503 OF THE
T]ME OF CONCENTRATION ( .10) FOR SUBVüATERSHED XSECT]ON
THIS h]TLL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT .88.
*** ü]ARNTNG - D]SCHARGE EXCEEDS H]GHEST RAT]NG PO]NT FOR STRUCTURE 1,
VALUE EXTRAPOLATED.
19.30 ELEV 390.12 390.71 390.71 390.70 390 .69 390. 68 390 .61 390.66
20.10 cFS .1I .10 .69 .68 .68 .61 .61 .66
20.10 ELEV 390.66 390. 65 390 .64 390. 64 390. 63 390. 63 390. 63 390 .62
20.90 cFS .66 .66 .65 .65 .65 .64 . 04 . o¿I
20.90 ELEV 390 .62 390 .62 390 .62 390 .62 390. 61 390. 61 390. 61 390.61
21.70 CFS . o¿l .63 .63 .63 .o¿ .62 .62
21.70 ELEV 390.61 390. 61 390.60 390. 60 390. 60 390. 60 390.60 390.60
22.50 CFS .62 .6r .61 .61 .60 .60 .60
22.50 ELEV 390. s9 390.59 390.59 390.59 390.59 390.59 390.58 390.58
23.30 CFS .60 .59 .59 6q .59 .58 .58 .58
23.30 ELEV 390.58 390.58 390.58 390.58 390.57 390.57 390.57 390.57
24.10 CFS .53 ¿? .33 .26 .ZU .16 .L2 .09
24.10 ELEV ?on qi4
390 .41 390.41 390.37 390.33 390.30 390 .28 390.26
24.90 CFS .07 .06 .04 .UJ .02 .02 .01
24.90 ELEV 390.25 390.24 390.23 390.22 390.22 390.2L 390.2r 390.27
DURÀT]ON(HRS) 2 4 6 ð 10 72 I4 15
FLOVü(CFS) 4 2 I 1 1 1 1 0
___ err¡ÞTr.rlrlrlu' 1, ALTERNATE I, STORM 99, HYDROGRÀ.PH ADDED TO READHD F]LE ---
22.00 cEs 7 .92 '7 .89 '7 .86 1.83 7.80 1.11 1.-Ì4 1.17
TR20 ---- - SCS -
D1-1
BMP VERSTON
01,/25/** FILE: BMPDI-I.DAT 2.04TEST
09:46:75 PASS 4 JOB NO. 1 PAGE 19
22.80 CES 1.68 '7.65 '7.62 7.59 7.55 "7.52 1.49 7.46
23.60 CFS '7.43 '7.40 7.3'7 7.34 1.28 6.80 5.33 3.37
24.40 CFS 1.83 .98 .53 .29
(HRS) 2
DURÃT]ON 4 6 I 10 12 14 16
FLOVí(CFS) 33 L9 L4 11 I 8 1 2
DURAT]ON (HRS) 71
FLOW (CFS) O
--- XSECTION 4, ALTERNATE I, STORM 99, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FTLE ---
--- XSECT]ON 6, ALTERNATE 1-, STORM 99, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
SUMMARY TABLE 1
ALTERNATE STORM
ALTERNATE STORM
SUMMARY TABLE 1
SUMMARY TABLE 2
BASEFLOVü ]S .0 CFS
ALTERNATE 1 STORM
ALTERNATE STORM 10
6 447 25l.) rz. r 256 12.1, 1,.25 t.44 .003 1.000 1.00?
ALTERNATE STORM 99
447 44'7 L2.1 441 12.7 r.25 r.44 .002 1.000 1.00?
TR20 ---- - SCS -
BMP D1-1 VERSION
0r/25/** FILE: BMPDI-1. DAT 2. O4TEST
09:.46215 SUMMARY, JOB NO. 1 PAGE 23
SUMMARY TABLE 3
XSECTTON/ DRAINAGE
STRUCTURE AREA STORM NUMBERS
rD (sQMT) 1 2 70 99
STRUCTURE 1 .01
ALTERNATE 1 A 10 tr,-l
XSECT]ON 1 .71
XSECTTON 2 .]-'7
XSECTTON 3 .01
ALTERNATE 1 11 16 34 55
XSECTION 4 .16
XSECTTON 5 .I1
ALTERNATE 1 60 10 0 258 4 4'7
XSECTTON 6 .11
iÍi::::::::::i:::::::::i:iij:i::::iÍ:1:
ñ- - :::::::::::::::ä*iä::l::::::::::::::
Project v ::::::::::::::*i¡¡4it::::::::::::::
Þ ,g Date 1l23l20Dg
Location Montgomery County Checked PS Date
Contract A- Existing Conditions
ffi- DAD-1-2
1. Runoff Curve Number (CNl
o.o23s7 mf
^ I
CN (weþhted) = total product / total area = 1071.8 115.U = 69.9 useoN=l
2. Runoff
Storm #1 Storm #2 Storm #3
NOTES: Space for as many as tr,¡ro segments per flow type can be used for each vr¡orksheet.
Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments
0.02133 mi2
:10
Frequency. .....Yr 1 ,100,
NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each u¡orksheet.
Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments
5. Land Slope, s
6. Tt = 0.007(nL¡08 / Pro5 so'a
DURATION(HRS) 2 4
FLOW(CFS) 1 O
--- XSECTION ]., ALTERNATE 1, STORM ]., HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
*** WAIUüING - MATN TIME TNCREMENT ( .1-OO) IS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TIME OF CONCENTRATION ( .1-5) FOR SUBWATERSHED XSECTION ]-.
THIS V\IILL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT 4-42- ***
DURATION(HRS) 2 3
FLOVü (CFS) 1_ 0
--- XSECTION 2, ALTERNATE 1-, STORM 1., HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD F]LE ---
*** hIAIU{ING - MÀTN TIME INCREMENT (
.1OO) TS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TIME OF CONCENTRATTON ( .15) FOR SUBVÙATERSHED XSECTION 2.
TH]S WILL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT 2.32. ***
DURATION (HRS) z 4 6 6
FLOVII (CFS) t_ 1- 1- 0
--- XSECTION ]-, ALTERNATE 1, STORM 2, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FTLE ---
*** \^IAIU{ING _ MAIN TTME INCREMENT ( .1OO) IS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TIME OF CONCENTRATION ( .1-5) FOR SUBVìIATERSHED XSECTION _1 .
TH]S WTLL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT -2.6%.
TR20 ---- - SCS -
D]--2
DA \¡ERSION
0L/24/** FILE:DADI--2.DAT 2.04TEST
07:.36:2'7 PASS 2 JOB NO. l- PAGE 3
DURATION (HRS) z 4 o
FLOI^I (CFS) t_ 0
--- XSECTTON 2, ALTERNATE 1-, STORM 2, HYDROGRÂPH ADDEÐ TO READHD FÏLE ---
*** I^IJ\IUùfNG - MA]N TIME INCREMENT ( .1-OO) TS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TIME OF CONCENTRATION ( .1-5) FOR SUBüIATERSHED XSECTION 2.
THTS WTLL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT -1,.42.
--- XSECTTON 1, ALTERNATE 1-, STORM ]-0, HYDROGRÄPH ADDED TO READHD FTLE ---
*** hIAIUùJNG _ MAIN TIME INCREMENT ( .1OO) TS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TIME OF CONCENTRÄTÏON ( .15) FOR SUBVüATERSHED XSECT]ON
THTS WTLL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT -.88. ***
DURATTON(HRS) 2 4 6 8 10 t2 1_3
FLOW(CFS) 2 1 L 1-l_10
--- XSECTTON 2, AJ.TERNATE L, STORM 1-0, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FTLE ---
*X* WATU{TNG - MATN TIME TNCREMENT ( .1OO) TS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
Tr¡{E OF CONCENTRATION ( .1-5) FOR SUBWATERSHED XSECTTON 2-
THIS WTLL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT .92. ***
21.60 CFS 1_. 1_3 1.13 1".1-2 1-.L2 1.L2 1_.1_1 t_. 1_1_ 1_.1_0
22-40 CFS 1_. l-0 t_.1_0 1_. 09 1_.09 r..08 1.08 t_. 07 L-07
23 -20 CFS r_. 06 1_.06 1.06 1.05 1.05 l_.04 1_. 04 r-. 03
24.00 cFS 1_. 03 .56 .1,L
scs -
DA D1-2 VERSION
0L/24/*x FILE:DADL-2.DAT 2. O4TEST
07 :36:2'l PASS 4 JOB NO. PAGE 6
-_- XSECTTON 1, ALTERNATE 1., STORM 99, HYDROGRÄPH ADDED TO READHD FTLE ---
*** WAIUü]NG _ MA]N TTME fNCREMENT ( .1OO) IS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TfME OF CONCENTRATION ( .1.5) FOR SUBWATERSHED XSECTION L.
THIS WILL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT _.22.
-_- XSECTION 2, ALTERNATE 1-, STORM 99, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FÏLE ---
TR20 ---- - SCS -
DA D].-2 VERSION
0L/24/** F]LE:DAD1-2.DAT 2. O4TEST
07:36:27 PASS 4 JOB NO. 1 PAGE 7
*** hIAIUÙ]NG - MATN TIME INCREMENT ( .1OO) IS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TTME OF CONCENTRÀ,TION ( .]-5) FOR SUBWATERSHED XSECTTON 2.
THIS WILL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT -.]-?". ***
SUMMARY TABLE 1
ALTERNATE 1. STORM
XSECTTON 1 qô
RUNOFF .02 1-2 .0L 9 450.0
XSECTION 2 RUNOFF .02 .54 1,2 .01_ 9 4s0.0
RAINFALL OF 3.20 inches AND 24-00 hr DUR-A,TION, BEGINS AT .0 hrs.
ALTERNATE 1 STORM
SI]MMARY TABLE 3
XSECTTON/ DRAINAGE
STRUCTI]RE AREA STORM NUMBERS
rD (sQMr) L 2 1_0 99
XSECTTON T .02
XSECTION 2 .02
ALTERNATE 1 9 1-6 4L 74
TR.20 ---- - SCS -
DA D]--2 VERSTON
0t/24/** FTLE:DADI--2.DAT 2.04TEST
By Date
Location Montgomery County Checked Date
Contract A- Existing Conditions DA D-2.1
1. Runoff Curve Number (CN)
Totals =
0.02020 mi2
CN (weighted) = total product / total area = 735.2 I 12.93 = 56.9 use cN =l-, I
2. Runoff
Storm #l Storm t2 Storm ffi
,tn:
Frequency. .....Yr 1 too
NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flowtype can be used for each r,rrorksheet.
Include a map, schematic, or description of flowsegments
5. Land Slope, s
6. Tt= 0.007(nL)o't/ Pro't"o =[ ri*-l
Shallow concentrated flow Segment
7- Surface Description: paved (P) or unpaved (U) ? ,i,i,i,:,iU'i':
8. Flow Length, L ::::::îf73:i::
9. Watercourse slope, s ft I
10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ftl 3.6
11. Tt= L/3600V 0.091 =l o"oer I
Channel flow Segment
a. Assumed Q:
b. Pipe (P) or Channel (C) ?
c. lf pipe, enter D (in):
d. lf channel, enter bottom width:
e. if channel, enter side slope 1 (_:1):
f. lf channel, enter side slope 2 (_:1):
12. Cross sectional flow area, a
13. Wetted perimete¡ rap
14. Hydraulicradius, r= a/wp
15. Channelslope, s
16. Manning's roughness æeff., n
17. V = 1.49 10'67 s0'5 / n Table ll-2-B-3
18. Flow length, L
19. T,= L/3600V =l-Jro I
20. Watershed or subarea T" or T, (add I in steps 6, 11, 1e) loål
Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff
0.00000 mi2
2. Runoff
Storm #1 Storm #2 Storm #3
t0 :lo0.'.:
Frequency. .....Yr 1
ENDATA
7 INCREM 6 .1-O
7 COMPUT 7 001 001_ 0.0 2.6 l-.0 22 1 01
ENDCMP ]-
7COMPUT700l_ 001 0.0 3-2 1.0 22 L 02
ENDCMP ]-
7COMPUT7001_ 001 0.0 5.1_ 1.0 22 1- l-0
ENDCMP ]-
7 COMPUT 7 001_ 001_ 0.0 7 -2 1-.0 22 t 99
ENDCMP 1
ENDJOB 2
DURATION(HRS) 2
FLOW(CFS) O
--- XSECTION 1, ALTERNATE 1-, STORM 2, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO REAÐHD FTLE ---
TR20 ---- - SCS -
DA D2-]. VERSTON
0L/24/** FILE: DAD2-]- . DAT 2.o4TEST
0'1 222 202 PASS 3 JOB NO. 1 PAGE 2
DURATTON(HRS) 2 4 6 I
FLOW (CFS) 1_ r- 1 0
--- XSECTION 1, A].TERNATE 1-, STORM 10, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
DURATTON(HRS) 2 4 6 I l-0 L2 13
FLOW(CFS) 3 2 1- L 1 1- 0
--- XSECTION 1, ALTERNATE 1, STORM 99, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FTLE ---
SUMMARY TABLE 1
A],TERNATE ]- STORM 1.
SUMMARY TABLE 3
XSECTfON/ DRÀINAGE
STRUCTURE AREA STORM NUMBERS.
TD (SQMI) 1 2r099
XSECTTON T .02
ALTERNATE ]- 3 16 37
TR20 ____ _ scs _
I
, DA D2_1, VERSION
\ NN Iõ^ I+*
vL/ Á+/ " F]LE: DAD2_1.DAT 2.O4TEST
Totals =
0.02403 mi2
CN (weighted) = total product / total area = 882,5/ 15.38= 57.4 usecN =[--l
2. Runoff
Storm #1 Storm tZ Storm #3
NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet.
Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments
5. Land Slope, s
6. Tt = 0.007(nL)
o't
/ Pro
t
"o
o
=l oiæ I
Shallow concentrated flow Segment
7. Su¡face Description: paved (P) or unpaved (U) ? :,u.
8. Flow Length, L
9. Watercourse slope, s ft lft
10. Average velocity, V (figure 3-1) ftt 3.4
11. T,=L/3600V o.134 =l or34 I
Channelflow Segment lD
a. Assumed Q:
b. Pipe (P) or Channel(C) ?
c. lf pipe, enter D (in):
d. lf channel, enter bottom width:
e. if channel, enter side slope 1 (_:1):
f. lf channel, enter side slope 2 (_:1):
12. Cross sectional flow area, a
13. Wetted perimeter, wp
14. Hydraulic radius, r = a /wp
15. Channelslope, s
16. Manning's roughness coeff., n
17. V= 1.4910'67s05/n
18. Flow length, L Table ll-2-B-3
19. Tt=L/3600V =l--ì,¡õ'-l
20. Watershed or subarea T" or T1 (add T, in steps 6, 11, 1e) I o3r-l
Worksheet 2: Runoff curye number and runoff
..C::
:4.:.:
Open Space (qood) - qrass >75Yo 74 ,0:8( 63.€
2. Runoff
Storm #l Storm #2 Storm #3
100
Frequency. .....Yr 1 1,4
NOTES: Space for as many as tr¡ro segments per flow type can be used for each vrorksheet.
Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments
0.00795 mi2
CN (weighted) = total product / total area = 412.6 / 5.09 = 81.1 usecN =l-;-l
2. Rúnoff
Storm #1 Storm tP Storm #3
to: :100::
Frequency. ,..... .....Yr 1
Runoff,q=(p-0.2s)2(p+0.8s). ....... In
1.0 3.1 5.0
S=(1000/CN)-10
Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff
C!I
(Ð
a
sI
(\¡ N
C\T
o g 0)
tt(E
(ApoendixA) .9) .ó) (acres)
No, t- Lr L¡.
2. Runoff
Storm #l Storm #2 Storm #3
1;4, ,:100
Frequency. .....Yr 1
NOTES: Space for as many as tr¡ro segments per flow type can,be used for each worksheet.
Include, a map, schematic, or description of flow segments
l"=200/CN-2- O.47
IJP = 0.18
VJV,= 0.63
378.0
. 376.0
F
]t
2 Tq.o -4
IF
$, uz.o
t¡l
J
t¡J
370.0
368.0
366.0
0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800 1 .000 1.200
CPVVOLUME 11659 CF
Orifice Sizing
Use Average Hydraulic Head Method
Bottomelevationofdrawdownorifice= 368 Ft.
Invertelevation of2-year orifice: 368 Ft.
Maximum head: 7.5 Ft.
Average hydraulic head: Maximum head / 2 = 3.75 FI.
Drawdown time for CPV: 12 hours
Required discharge through orifice: Volume / (12 hours x 3600) 0.270 cfs
Orifice area, usingEquation ll.l, rearranged A= Q / lCx(2x g x h)z']
C:0.6; g:32.2
A= 0.395 /[0.6x(64.4x4.s)/'1= 0.029 Sq.Ft.
Required CPV orifice size = 3 inches (Area 0.0a9 Sq. Ft.)
ICC CONTRACT A SAND STORAGE D-1-B
Segment D1-D2
378
377
376
¿
,-
375
E stq
I
tr ï
I
I
E
ó 373
!
I
fi ezz
I
I
J
371 T
i
I
17t'l
369
368
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 5o.oo 60.00 70.00
Discharge, CFS
ICC CONTRACT A SAND STORAGE D-1-B
Segment D1-D2
ENDATA
7 TNCREM 6 .1_0
7 COMPUT 7 001 00s 0.0 2.6 1-0 22 0L
ENDCMP 1_
*** IGSSAGE - XSECTION l_, NO PEAK COMPUTED (Omr,y 1 HT.DRoGRAPH POINT(S)). ***
RITNOFF ABOVE BASEFLOIV (BÀSEFLOVü = .00 CFS)
-00 ÌIüATERSHED INCHES; 132 CFS-HRS; .0 ACRE-FEET.
DURÀTION(HRS)2467
FLOV,I (CFS) 1- L 1 0
*** I^IAIUüING - XSECT]ON 3, ì4AIN TIME INCREMEIIT Too LARGE, CoMPUTED PEAK
( 7.62') EXCEEDS ADJACENT cooRDTNATE ( 7.L2) By 6 t. ***
HYDROGRAPH POINTS FOR ALTERNATE = 1, STORM = l_
HRs I'IATN Trl4E TNCREMENT = .100 hr, DRÀTNAGE AREA = -0L se.Mr-
l_1--50 cFs .21 .58 t-42 3.04 7.03 7.1,2 2-86 L-47
r.2.30 cFs L.20 l--03 .85 -73 .67 .63 -59 .55
1_3 . 1_0 CFS - 51_ .49
--- xsEcrroN 3, ALTERNATE 1., STORM 1-, HYDROGRAPH ADÐED TO READHD FILE ---
*** T^IA]ìT{ING - MATN ( .1.00) IS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TI}48 INCREMENT
TIME CoNCENTRATTON ( .10) FOR SITBUTATERSHED XSECTTON
oF 3.
THfS VüILL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOI]:I -5.58,
l_9.1_0 ELEV 368.11 368. 1_L 368. 1_1 368.1_l_ 368.1_0 368.1_0 368. L0 368. t 0
90
1_9 - CFS .14 .1-3 .L3 .13 .13 . 1_3 .l-3 .t2
19.90 ELEV 368.10 368.1_0 368. 09 368.09 368 - 09 368.09 368.09 368.09
20.70 cFS .L2 .12 .L2 .12 -L2 -L2 .L2 .1_2
20.70 ELEV 368.09 368.09 368.09 368.09 368. 09 368.09 368.09 368. 09
21.50 CFS .L2 .12 .L2 .1_2 -t2 -L2 .L2 -L2
21..50 ELEV 368.09 368.08 368.08 368.08 368. 08 368. 08 368.08 368.08
22.30 CFS -t2 .t2 .LL . L1_ .1_1 .1_1_ .l_1_ . 11
22.30 ELE¡f 368.08 368.08 368.08 368 - 08 368.08 368.08 368 - 08 368 - 08
23.10 CFS . 1_1- . l-l- . L1- . 1-1_ .11 .Lt . t_1_ .L'J_
23.1-O ELEV 368.08 368.08 368.08 368.08 368.08 368 - 08 368.08 368.08
23.90 CFS .l_1_ .1,L .L0 .08 .06 .0s .04 .03
23.90 ELEV 368. 08 368 - 08 368.07 368.06 368.04 368.03 368.03 368.02
24.70 CFS .02 -02 . 0l- . 01-
24.70 ELEV 368.O2 368.01 368.01 368.0r_
DIIRÀTION (HRS) 2 2
FLOW (CFS) L 0
--- STRUCTURE 1-, ALTERNATE 1-, STORM 1, HYDROGRÀPH ADDED TO READHD F]LE ---
DURATTON(HRS) 2
FLOVI (CFS) l_ 0
--- xsEcTroN 4, AITERNATE 1-, STORM ]-, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
DURATTON(HRS) 2 2
FLOW(CFS) 1_ 0
--- XSECTION 1, ALTERNATE 7-, STORM 2, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FTLE ---
1_9 .70 CFS .64 .63 .62 . ol- .60 _50 .59 -59
20.50 cFS .59 .58 .58 .58 .58 .58 .58 .57
21.30 CFS .57 -57 .57 .57 .57 .56 .56 .56
22. L0 CFS .56 .56 .56 .55 .55 .55 .55 .55
22.90 CFS .55 -54 .54 .54 .54 -54 .53 .53
23.70 CFS .53 .53 .53 -52 .46
--- xsEcTroN 2, A],TERNATE 1., STORM 2, HYÐROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
*** WAIU$ING _ XSECTTON 3, MAIN TIIVIE TNCREMENT TOO LARGE, COMPUTED PEAK
( 1L.08) EXCEEDS AD,IACENT COORDTNATE ( l_0.45) BY 5 8. ***
HYDROGRAPH POTNTS FOR AITERNATE = l-, =2STORM
HRS MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .100 hr, =
DRAINAGE AREA .01- SQ.MI.
1l_.40 cFs .43 .s1 1_.04 2.39 4.8L 1_0 45 L0.23 4.05
_
L2.20 CFS 2.05 L-67 \-43 1_. l_8 1.00 .92 .87 .8L
1-3 .00 cFs .75 .7L .67 -64 . 61_ .58 .55 - 53
1_3.80 CFS -f,L .48
DURÀTTON (HRS) 2 2
FLOV\I (CFS) l_ 0
l_0.20 cFS .04 .05 .06 .07 .08 .09 .1_L -\2
10.20 ELEV 368-03 368.04 368.04 368.05 368. 06 368.07 368.08 368.09
1_1.00 cFS 1Â . l_6 .1-9 .22 .26 .3L .4L -70
11-. OO ELEV 368 - 1_0 368 -12 368.r_3 368.1_6 368.L9 368.22 368.29 368.s0
1_1.80 CFS 1_.35 2 -01 2.73 3.03 3.03 2 -96 2.86 2.75
1_l_.80 ELEV 368 -97 370 - 0s 31L.48 372.25 372 -25 372.0s 371.80 371.53
l-2.60 cFs 2 -63 2 -5't- 2 -37 2 -24 2 -L2 1- -99 1__85 L.7L
12.60 ELEV 37L -24 370 -96 370.68 370.41 370.l_6 369.92 369.10 369 .49
1_3 .40 CFS 1_ .59 t_ .48 L -36 1_.18 1_.03 - 91- . 8t_ .73
13.40 ELEV 369.30 369.13 368.97 368.84 368.7 4 368.6s 368.58 368.52
1_4.20 CFS -67 .6L .51 .54 _ 5l_ .48 .46 .44
1-4.20 ELEV 368 - 48 368 .44 368.41 368.38 368 - 36 368.34 368.33 368.32
15 - 00 cFS .43 .4L .40 .39 -38 -37 .36 .35
]-5.00 ELEV 368.3L 368.30 368.29 368 .28 368.27 368 -26 368.26 368 -25
1_5. 80 CFS -34 .33 .32 .32 .31 .30 .30 .29
1-5.80 ELEV 368 -24 368.24 368.23 368.23 368.22 368.22 368.2L 368.2r
1_6.60 cFS -29 .28 .28 .27 .27 .27 .26 .26
].6.60 ELEV 368 -20 368 -20 368.20 368.20 368 - 19 368-19 368.19 368.1_9
l-7 .40 cFS .26 .25 -25 -25 -25 -24 -24 .24
1-7.40 ELEV 368 - 1_8 368.1_8 368. L8 368.1_8 368. r.8 368.1"7 368.17 368.L7
18.20 CFS .23 .23 .23 .22 .22 -22 .22 .2L
1-8.20 ELEV 368.1_7 368. L6 368.1_6 368.L6 368.L6 368.1_6 368.L5 368.r-5
19 - 00 cFs .2L -2L .20 -20 -20 .19 .19 .19
1.9.00 ELEV 368.15 368-15 368.1_5 368.14 368.1_4 368.1_4 368.1_4 368.13
19 80 CFS
- .19 .1_8 .L8 .18 .L7 .t7 .L7 .t7
19.80 ELEV 368.1_3 368.1_3 368.L3 368 - 13 368 -1-2 368.t2 368.L2 368.L2
20.60 cFs .L] .L7 .L6 -L6 -16 -L6 .1_6 .1_6
20.60 ELEV 368 -1,2 368.L2 368.L2 368.L2 368.12 368.L2 368.L2 368.1_1
2l_.40 cFS .L6 .1_6 .L6 .1_6 .L6 .L6 .L6 .L6
2L.40 ELE'I\7 368-1r- 368.1_1_ 368 - 1r_ 368.1r_ 368.1r_ 3 68 - 1_1_ 368 - 1_1 368.11
22.20 CFS .46 .1_5 .15 .1_5 . l_5 . l_5 - l_5 . t_5
22.20 ELFI/ 368 - 1L 368.1_1_ 368.11 3 68 . 1_1_ 368.11 3 68 - 1_1_ 368 - 11 368.1_1
23.00 cFS .L5 . l-5 .1_5 .1_5 .15 .L5 .1-5 .L5
23.00 ELEV 368.11 368. L1- 358. LL 368.11_ 368.11- 368.1L 368.11_ 368.1_0
23.80 CFS .15 -15 -L4 .1_3 .L1 .08 .06 .05
23.80 ELEV 368.1_0 368.10 368.1_0 368.09 368.08 368.06 368 - 05 368.04
24.60 cFs .04 .03 -02 -02 . 01_ .01
24.60 ELE'V 368.03 368.02 368.02 368.01 368.01_ 368.01
RUNOFF ABO\/E BASEFLOW (BASEFLOW = .00 cFs)
1-. 47 VÙATERSHED INCHES; 8 CFS-HRS; .6 ACRE-FEET.
ÐURÄTTON(HRS) 2 3
FLO!ü (CFS) 1_ 0
--_ STRUCTURE 1, A],TERNÀTE 1-, STORM 2, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO REAÐHD FTLE ---
DURATTON (HRS) 2 4
FLOW (CFS) 1_ 0
15 _70 CFS L.O2 .99 .97 .95 -92 .90 .89 -88
.50
1_6 CFS -87 .86 .85 .84 .83 .83 .82 .81
17.30 CFS .80 .19 .78 .78 .77 -76 -75 .74
i.8.l_0 cFs -13 -72 -72 .1L .70 .69 .68 .67
18.90 CFS .66 .65 .64 .63 .62 -62 -or -60
1-9 .70 CFS .59 .58 -51 .56 .55 .54 .54 .53
20.50 cFS .53 .53 .53 .53 .52 .52 .52 _52
21-.30 CFS -52 -52 -52 .5L .5L .51- - 51- .51-
22.L0 CFS . 51- .50 .50 .50 .50
--- xsEcrroN 1-, A],TERNATE L, STORM 10, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
--- XSECTION 2, ALTERNATE 1-, STORM ].0, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FTLE ---
TR20 ---- - scs -
BMP D2-2 VERSTON
Ot/26/** FILE: BMPD2-2.DAT 2.o4TEST
12:38:4L PASS 3 JOB NO. l- PAGE 9
DURATTON(HRS) 2 4 6
1
FLOVV (CFS) 1_ I 0
--- xsEcTroN 3, ATTERNATE 1., STORM 10, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
*** WAI{NING - MAIN TIME INCREMENT 1 .1OO) TS GREÀTER THAN 508 OF THE
TIME OF CONCENTRÀTION ( .10) FOR SUBWATERSHED XSECTION 3-
THTS V\IILL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOTII L-6ÍÈ- ***
12.60 ELEV 315.26 375.1_5 375.03 37 4 -88 37 4.73 374.57 37 4.23 373 .80
13 -40 CFS 3.42 3.29 3 .15 3 .01_ 2.88 2.74 2.6r 2 -47
1-3 .40 ELEV 373 .39 312 -99 372.59 372 -21- 371. 8s 37L.5L 37L.1_9 370.88
1_4 .20 CFS 2.33 2 -20 2.08 r_.95 1-.82 1-.70 1.59 1.49
14.20 ELEV 370.60 370.33 370 - 09 369.86 369.6s 369.46 369.30 369 -L4
1_5 .00 cFs 1_.40 L.24 1_. LL 1-. 01- .92 .86 .80 -75
1-5.00 ELEV 369.00 368.89 368.79 368 -72 368.66 368.61 368.57 368. s4
1_5. 80 CFS .7I .68 .64 .62 .60 .58 -56 .55
1-5.80 ELEV 368.51_ 368.48 368 .46 368.44 368.43 368 - 41_ 368.40 368.39
1_6.60 CFS .53 -52 .52 .51 .50 .49 .48 -48
16.60 ELEV 368.38 368.37 368.37 368.36 368.36 368.35 368 - 35 368.34
17.40 CFS .47 .47 .46 .45 .45 .44 -44 .43
]-7.40 ELEV 368.34 368.33 368 - 33 368 -32 368.32 368.32 368.31 368.31
1_8.20 CFS .43 -42 -4L -4]- .40 .40 .39 .39
]-8.20 ELEV 368.30 368.30 368.30 368.29 368.29 368.28 368.28 368.28
19.00 cFs .38 .38 .37 .36 .36 .35 .35 .34
1-9.00 ELEV 368 -27 368.27 368.26 368.26 368.26 368.25 368 -25 368.24
L9.80 CFS -34 .33 .33 -32 .31- .31_ .3L .30
].9.80 ELEV 368.24 368.24 368.23 368.23 368 -22 368.22 368.22 368.22
20.60 cFs .30 .30 .30 .30 .29 .29 .29 -29
20.60 ELEV 368 -22 368 -21, 368.2A 368.21 368.2L 368.2L 368 -2L 368.2L
21.40 CFS -29 -29 .29 .29 .28 .28 -28 .28
21-.40 ELEV 368 -21 368.2L 368.20 368.20 368 -20 368.20 368.20 368.20
22.20 CFS .28 .28 .28 .28 .28 .27 .27 .27
22 -20 F-LEI/ 368.20 368.20 368.20 368.20 368.20 368.20 368.20 368. r_9
23.00 cFs -27 .27 -27 -27 .27 .21 .26 -26
23.00 ELEV 368.19 368.1_9 368.1_9 368 - 1_9 368. r.9 368.l-9 368.1_9 368.19
23.80 CFS -26 -26 .26 .24 .19 .15 .L2 .09
23.80 ELEV 368.19 368.19 368.1_9 3 68. L7 368.14 368.11 368 _ 08 368.06
24.60 CFS .07 .05 .04 .03 .03 -02 .02 .01
24.60 ELEV 368.0s 368.04 368.03 368.02 368-02 368 - 01_ 368.01_ 368.01
DURATION (HRS) 2 4 6
FLOW (CFS) 3 t_ 0
_-- STRUCTI]RE L, ALTERNATE L, STORM 10, HYDROGRÀPH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
l_4 .10 cFS L .95 r_.88 1. 83 L -79 L.76 t -73 1-.70 L.67
1-4.90 CFS L -64 r. bl_ 1_.58 1_.55 L.52 7-49 r.46 L-42
.70
1-5 CFS 1_.39 1.36 L.32 r -29 L.26 L.23 L.21- t -20
16.50 CFS L.L9 1-. 18 t-L6 1-1_5 1.1_4 1.1_3 L.tz 1- 11_
1-7.30 CFS 1_ .1_0 L .09 1_. 08 1_ .06 L.05 L-04 l-.03 L.02
18.1_0 CFS 1.00 .99 .98 -97 .96 .94 .93 -92
18.90 CFS .91 .89 .88 .87 .86 .84 - 83 -82
19.70 CFS .80 .79 -78 -76 .15 .7 4 .7 4 -73
20.50 cFs .73 .73 -'t2 .72 -72 .12 -72 .]L
21_.30 CFS -7L -7 1- -71" -7t -70 -70 .70 .70
22 -]-O CFS .70 .69 -69 .69 .69 .68 .68 - 68
22.90 CFS .68 .68 -67 .67 -67 .67 .66 .66
23.70 CFS .66 .66 .65 -65 .57 .34
--- XSECTION 4, ALTERNATE L, STORM ]-0, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FILE -_-
1-2 . t_0 cFs 39. L0 31,.24 20 .60 l_4 .30 1_0 .75 8.42 6.88 5.89
L2.90 CFS 5 -24 4 -78 4 -43 4 .1-5 3 .91 3.71_ 3 .53 3 .36
1_3 .70 CFS 3.20 3 . 06 2.93 2 -80 2.68 2.51 2.50 2.44
14.50 CFS 2 -39 2 -34 2.30 2.26 2 -2L 2 -L7 2.L3 2.O9
15-30 CFS 2 -O4 2.00 l_.95 1 .91_ L.87 L.82 L.77 L.73 t
1. s4
i
1_6.10 CFS 1_.68 1_.65 1.62 1_.60 1_.58 1.56 L.53
16.90 CFS l-.51_ 1 . s0 1_.48 L-4t 1-.45 1.43 r.42 1.40
1_7 .70 CFS 1 .39 1-.31 L.35 I.34 1- -32 1_.30 L.29 L.27
18.50 CFS L.25 L .24 L -22 1.20 L.1_9 L.t] 1.15 L.1-4
1-9 .30 CFS 1- -L2 1_.1_0 L.08 1,.07 1- 05 1_.03 r.02 L . 00
20.10 cFs -98 .97 .96 .95 .95 -94 .94 .94
20.90 cFS .93 .93 .93 .93 -92 .92 .92 .91
21_.70 CFS .9L -9]- .90 .90 .90 .89 .89 .89
22-50 CFS .88 .88 .88 .88 .87 .81 -81 .86
23.30 CFS .86 .86 .85 .85 .85 -84 .84 .84
24.1_0 CFS -75 .50
--- XSECTTON 1, AITERNATE 1-, sroRM 99, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FTLE ---
24.60 CFS .1_0 .08 -06 .05 -04 .03 .02 -o2
24.60 ELEV 368-07 368.06 368-05 368. 04 368.03 368 -02 368.02 368.01
25.40 CFS _ 01 .01_
25.40 ELEV 368.01 368. 01
FLOVü (CFS) 4 3 2 I L1 0
--- XSECTION 4, A],TERNATE L, STORM 99, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
SUMMARY TABLE 1-
ALTERNATE STORM
SUMMARY TABLE ].
SUMMARY TABLE 3
XSECTION/ DRÀINAGE
STRUCTT]RE AREA STORM NUMBERS
rD (sQMr) r 2 10 99
STRUCTURE 1 .01
ALTERNATE 1- 729
XSECTTON 1 .02
ALTERNATE ]- 2 1-7 39
XSECTION 2 .05
A]]TERNÀTE 1 7 L7 56 1_1_0
XSECTION 3 .01_
ATTERNATE ]. 8L:1233l
XSECTTON 4 .03
ALTERNATE 1 1-? 4 24 56
XSECTION 5 .04
A],TERNATE ]- 73L8l-
TR20 ---- - SCS -
BMP D2-2 VERSION
0t/26/** FILE: BMPD2-2.DAT 2.O4TEST
O.OO427 mi2
CN (weighted) = total product / total area = 153.7 12.73 = 56.3 use cN =l *l-l
2. Runoff
Storm #l Storm #2 Storm #3
t0.
Frequency. .....Yr 1 l:0O::::
2.6
Rainfall,P(24-hour) .....In 5.1 7.2
NOTES: Space for as many as tr¡lo segments per flow type can be used for each r,vorksheet.
Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments
ICC-CONTRACTA D..
E, ¿@
:::::::::::i:::.lFljttì:::l::.:.:.::1i:::
V ::::::::i'ü:::!iji.¿git:::::::::i::+ Date 112312008
0.00606 mi2
Runoff,q=(p-0.2s)2(P+0.ss). ....... tn
1.4 3.7 5.7
g=(1000/CN)-10
Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (T.) or travel time (T)
NOTES: Space for as many as tr¡ro segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet.
Include a map, schematic, or dascription of flow segments
5. Land Slope, s
6. Tt = 0.007(nL)0'8 / pro's *o'a =l-;r12 I
*** MESSAGE - XSECTION ]-, NO PEAK COMPUTED (ONLY 1- HYDROGRAPH PO]NT(S) ) . ***
RUNOFF ABOVE BASEFLOVü (BASEFLOW OO CFS)
.00 INCHES; 126 CFS-HRS;
VùATERSHED .0 ACRE-FEET.
*** I^IAIU{ING - MAIN TIME INCREMENT ( .l-00) TS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
T]ME OF CONCENTRATTON ( .11) FOR SUBVüATERSHED XSECTTON l-.
THTS WTLL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT ****8. ***
HRS MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .100 hr, DRAINAGE AREA = .01- SQ.MI.
1-l-.50 cFs .43 .77 1.68 3.28 6.66 1-45 3.94 1-'72
12 .30 CFS 1.24 1. 03 . 86 -12 .65 . 60 . 56 .53
t_3 . 1_0 cFs .49
DURATION(HRS) 2
FLOW(CFS) O
--- XSECTTON 2, ALTERNATE 1-, STORM 1-, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
*** hTARf{ING - MATN TIME TNCREMENT ( .1OO) IS GREATER THAN 503 OF THE
TTME OF CONCENTRÀTTON ( .13) FOR SUBWATERSHED XSECTTON 2.
THTS WILL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT -3.58. ***
TR20 ---- - scs -
D2-3
DA VERSTON
0I/24/** FILE: DAD2-3.DAT 2.04TEST
08:34:15 PASS 2 JOB NO. l- PAGE 2
DUR.A'TTON(HRS) O
FLOW(CFS) O
--- XSECTTON 1-, ATTERNATE ]-, STORM 2, HYDROGRÀ,PH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
*** WARNING - MAIN TIME INCREMENT ( .1-OO) TS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TTME OF CONCENTR.A'TTON ( .1]-) FOR SUBWATERSHED XSECTÏON 1.
THTS WILL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT ****8. ***
DURATION(HRS) 2 2
FLOVU (CFS) l- 0
TR20 ---- - scs -
D2-3DA \¡ERS]ON
0L/24/** F]LE: DAD2-3.DAT 2.04TEST
08 :34 : l-5 PASS 2 JOB NO. 1 PAGE 3
1_1_.70 CFS .1_3 .80 3.03 3.94 L.9t .91 .78 .68
12.50 CFS .51 .49
DURATION(HRS) 2 L
FLOW (CFS ) 1- O
--- XSECTION 1, ALTERNATE L, STORM ]-0, HYDROGRÃPH ADDED TO READHD FTLE ---
*** Ì^IAIUÍING - MAIN TII4EINCREMENT ( .1-00) IS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TTME OF CONCENTRATION ( .11) FOR SUBWATERSHED XSECTTON ]-.
THIS VìI]LL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT -1.68. ***
r-3.50 cFS .9r- .87 .83 .79 .75 -72 -69 -67
1_4.30 CFS .66 -64 .63 .62 .6L .59 .58 .5'7
1-5.10 CFS .55 .54 .53 .52 .50 -49
DIIRATTON(HRS) 2 4 5
FLOW (CFS) 1- 1- 0
--- XSECTION 2, ALTERNATE ]., STORM ].0, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
*** hIATUÙTNG - MATN TTME TNCREMENT ( .1OO) TS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TIME OF CONCENTRATION ( .l-3 ) FOR SUBVìIATERSHED XSECTION 2 -
THIS Vü]LL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT 4.12. ***
DURATION(HRS) 2 2
FLOü] (CFS) 1- 0
--- XSECTION ]-, ALTERNATE L, STORM 99, HYDROGRÀPH ADDED TO READHD FILE --_
*** WAI{NING - }4AIN TTME INCREMENT ( .1OO) TS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TIME OF CONCENTRATION ( .1-].) FOR SUBWATERSHED XSECTTON L.
THIS WÍLL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT .62. ***
I
TR20 ---- - scs -
DA D2-3 VERSTON
0]/24/** FTLE: DAD2-3.DAT 2.O4TEST
08:34: l-5 PASS 4 JOB NO. 1 PAGE 5
I
OPERATION RUNOFF XSECTION
DURATTON(HRS)24689
FLOVü(CFS) 2 1, L L 0
--- XSECTfON 2, A],TERNATE 1, STORM 99, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD F]LE ---
*** Ì^IAIìIIING - MAIN TIME INCREMENT ( .100) IS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TIME OF CONCENTRATTON ( .]-3) FOR SUBWATERSHED XSECTION 2.
THTS W]LL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT 3.72. ***
SUI44ARY TABLE ]-
ALTERNATE 1. STORM
SUMMARY TABLE 3
xsECTroN l_ .00
A],TERNATE 1 t?4
XSECTION 2 .07
Project Date
Location Montgomery County Checked PS Date
Contract A- Existing Conditions ÐAD-24
l. Runoff Curue Number(CN)
0.00484 mi2
CN (weighted) = total product / total area = 179.9 I 3.1O = 58.0 usecN =l-;-l
2. Runoff
Storm #1 Storm #2 Storm #3
NOTES: Space for as many as tvro segments per flowtype can be used for each r,r¡orksheet.
Include a map, schematic, or description of flowsegments
ICC-CONTRACT A By Date
Lo""tion Checked Date
Contract A-Proposed Conditions ÐAD-2-4
1. Runoff Curve Number (CN)
0.00000 mi"
2. Runoff
Storm #1 Storm #2 Storm *h3
*** ¡',ÎESSAGE - XSECTION ]-, NO PEAK COMPUTED (ONLY 1 HYDROGRAPH PO]NT(S)). ***
RUNOFF ABOVE BASEFLOW (BASEFLOW OO CFS)
.00 WATERSHED INCHES; 127 CFS-HRS; .0 ACRE-FEET-
DURATION(HRS) O
FLOVü (CFS) 0
--- XSECTTON 1-, ALTERNATE T, STORM 2, HYDROGRÂ,PH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
*** WAIUü]NG - MATN TIME INCREMENT ( .1-OO) TS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TIME OF CONCENTRÀTION ( .12) FOR SUBI^IATERSHED XSECTION 1-.
THIS I/üTLL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT 2.32. ***
DUR.ATION(HRS) L
FLOW(CFS) O
--- XSECTION 1, A],TERNATE t, STORM 10, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FILE ---
*** WAIU\TING - MATN TIME INCREMENT ( .100) IS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TIME OF CONCENTRATION ( .T2) FOR SUBüIATERSHED XSECTION ]-.
THIS W]LL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT .92. ***
DURÄTION(HRS) 2 3
FLOv\r (CFS) 1 0
--- XSECTION ]-, ALTERNATE 1., STORM 99, HYDROGRAPH ADDED TO READHD FTLE ---
*** WART{ING - MATN TIME INCREMENT ( .1OO) IS GREATER THAN 508 OF THE
TI}48 OF CONCENTRATTON ( .L2 ) FOR SUBVVATERSHED XSECTION ]-.
THÏS WTLL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT .9?". ***
SUMMARY TABLE 1
ALTERNATE 1- STORM 1,
ALTERNATE ]- STORM 10
xsEcrroN 1 RUNOFF .00 1.22 l-l-.98 5 ********
RÀINFAIL OF 7.20 inches AND 24.00 hr DURATION, BEGINS AT .0 hrs.
ALTERNATE ]. STORM 99
xsEcrroN l- RUNoFF .00 2.54 LL.97 11 ********
TR20 ---- - SCS -
DA D2-4 VERSION
01_/23/** FILE: DAD2-4.DAT 2. O4TEST
l-0:59:15 SUMMARY, JOB NO. 1 PAGE 5
SU¡ß{ARY TABLE 3
XSECTTON/ DRA]NAGE
STRUCTURE AREA STORM NUMBERS
rD (sQMT) 1- 2 r_0 99
xsEcrroN 1 .00
A B c D E I F G H J K L M
REDEVEL9PMEN]
ruieiinoùg ¡nee
:::
. POST. : :: ::EXlSnt¡q:: :: ÁREAREAUIRINC TREAiEDÊV ::
NETV::: Loss oF ExtSTtNG iMPERVIôUsAREA WATERQUALfTY WATER OUALTY
TREATI¡ENT
OUTFÁLL I¡UMBER IMPERVIOUS AREA
DEVELOPMENT
DE\'ËLOPÚENT re, co¡srnúciÈ¡ ¡MPERVIOUS ÁREA
.WÁTER.AUALTTY. :. t(o! F) + OR NON. . " rRe¡iËo av BUP
. PAVEIIENI OEHCTfCREDT
IIIPERVIOUS AREA RÊI,övEó NUMBER
. : (ACRES) (AGRES) ::: (AcREs) N¡ÞERVIOUs AREA
(AcREs) (AcREs) , 0.2(E+F)+ol sTRUcruÉÁL
STRUCTUR.AL BMP REMOVÁL fl+J+L-H¡
(ACRE3) (ACRE9) (AcRqs)
.6xolûdln9 :::{AÇRES) .. CREDIT IACRES)
: colunn L : ... (AcRq!)::::
0-00 11.82 11 Ãt o-00 0.00 nnn 11-A2 c_5c t9a nnn 0.00 0.00
WATER QUALITY CREDTT/DEBIT O.OO ACRES IN THE WASHINGTON METROPOLTTAN WATERSHED (O2-f4.O2)
ßl
üflnoDIII(oilSnUfloü
.0ORRIÐ@R PAffiD{ER$
SHA Highway Hydraulics D¡vls¡on, Chlef MDE Plan Revlew Divlslon, Ch¡ef ICC Colridor Partners
³
WATER QUALITY MAP - SEGMENT D1-D2
PROPOSED CONDITION
MD 200 / INTERCOUNTY CONNECTOR
INTERCOUNTY CONSTRUCTORS
Right of Way
D1-C
D1-D
D1-C2 D1-F
D1-G1
1325
D1-F1
1320
1315 325
320
1310
D1-C1 310
315
1305
5
-2 -3
D1-A D
DA 3 0 5
-2 -2 1300
D
DA 300 D1-H1
D1-L
- 1 -1 129
5
DA
D D1-I
295 POI D-2-3 D1-H
0
0
129
290
- 2-2 D1-E2
ID
PO D1-G
5
128
285
0
128
280
D1-E1
5
10 127
275
D1-B
D - 1 -2 127
0 D1-N
15
DA
270
D1-M
126
5
- 1-1
ID
265 PO
D1-K
0
126
D1-J
20
260
5
125
2
D-1 -
1250 255 I
PO
245 250
25
APPENDIX I)
GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG
ProJecß lnÞrcounty Connedors - Cor¡factA BorinoNumben SWD2-Bí
Segment Ð2. Gonta ct Number: 07120080.D2
Montgornery County, Maryland Sh€et t of 1
BoringContracto¡: GEOMECTüANICS, INC- G¡ounùmter Observations
ELIZABETH. PENNSYLVANIA
I Date I nme I Depth I Gastng I Carred
Boring Foreman: Matt Hart
Encountered U6 2-.21PM Dry
Schnabel Representatiw: P. Hud¡ins
Drilling EquipmenÈ BK 51 Manual Track Gompleüon 816 221PM Dry 23.9
Drilling Method: $1/4" lD HollorStemAuger caslng Rrlled V. U6 2.4áPM t3-5' 15.5'
Changies to brown
i SPT
t 1
=ï44%
ML f''r0
G
F
1E5 359.5
SILTY SAND, moist, bmwn and yellow, SPT
contalns mha
100%
SM
Changes to no roots
t}6+8
89%
ML c
to09ô
l@6
25.O 100%
I Gaved
Boring Foreman: G Hanes
EncounÞred Y ül 8:35 Att¡l 9.0 8.5'
Schnabel Representativq B Ghss
Drilling Equipmenb D¡edtió t>.s0$rack) Gompletbn V 8Il &,fSAM 2,4
Drilting Method: T1t4'lO Hollinú Stem A¡Spr Gas¡EPr¡lþd.y. ül 8:f)AM 12.5' 18.5'
8-5 364.5 q
SAhIDY SILT, molsL orangdsh blrwn sPr
5+6
¡È16i'¡aW;O)
c
5,SPÏ
8+9
iG={I (0%)
L'lL
6, SPT
tss96)
SPT
ML c
Changes to bown, while, and bbdr
UATERUIL DESGRIPTION
0.0ft Ræ¡dual
SILTY SAf.lD, mobt, bror¡rn
5.0
SILT, rno¡sL brorun and gray, cor¡talns
Drilling Equipmen* Dieddctr Þ50 (ATV) Gompleüon V 8/6 2lOPM 24.9 ?3.8
Drilling Method: &1/¿f lD Hollor Stern Auger
Gasing Puited I 8/6 22OPM 17-î 195
AfferDrilling ! 8[r 218 PM 8.0' 8.5'
HammerType: A¡¡toilammer(f4Ob) .
Daras Started: UGl07 Finished: EU6/07
Stat¡on: 129(Þ25 Ofiseü +3(Ð
1m9ð
67%
c
Charges to Sardy, wt¡ite and broum
zß
192 353.8
SILTY SAÎ,|D, molst, brown and white,
contains mica 8S%
SM
25.î 8396
8.5
SILTY SAND. molsl. orargeish brown,
contalns mha
-¡ SFT
10ûË
SM
c
13.5
SAI¡DYSILT, molsl orangelsh brcwn
.,rj SPT
a
4'Z:yc
i
Ghançs to yellowish brown and urhlte, SPT
conta¡ns m¡ca ML
j Ef¡9S
-traJ 100%
5.0
SANDY SILT, moisl rcddish orange, SPT
cor¡tains mba
tfþtó
c
13.5 365.5
SILTY SAND, molst.reddlsh oranç sPf
100%
WT
l+11
1fþ96
ELEV STRAISA¡UPLTNG
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL TESTS REMAR¡(s
(ñ) ruM
I orerul DAIA
{fr)
I 110ryf
J lREcs(60%).
Cllanges to gray
u
ll***t
-f
5.0 fr Shelby
W]
ùrbe attønpted at
llH'uoo"t $feetbut
maþdd wasbo
dense
L
&6 fE Arger ard
Botbm of bodng at8-6fr. spoon reñ,¡sal
A¡Ssreft¡sal at8.6ff.
sHA 73.0,{6 MARYLAND STATE HIGHWAY ADMI NISTRATION
8-2$2000
FOUNDATIONS BORING LOG
Sheet 1of 1
Boring of
kil
339.78 SILT. Little Fine Sand. l-our Mim 11
,a 30
I 31
32
Bottom of Borilrg @ 29.4 feet 33
34
35
36
37
38
3S
40
41
Project Intercounty.Conr¡ectors - Contract A Bo¡insNumbe" RDD2-B7
;/Ennabel
Cñã6ãiE,'-æãñ; "ã=*ÌL
LOG
Segrnent D2
Iíontgomery County, Maryland
Gonhact Number: 07120080.t)2
Sheet: I of t
Boring Gontrac'ton Gonnelly And Associates, tnc. G roundwater Observatlons
Frederic-k, Maryland
Boring Forernan: G Hanes
I Date I Time I Depth lCasing I Gared
3,
(67%)
4.5
contalns roclc fragments, mlca
:,ljj 9119+U
REC=16! &Xtå
4.5-6.5fr
"'fi'
sllty sand, moist, reddlsh brown, DR s.(l Dlslntegrated
contalns rock fragments, mica 23+39+32
REÈ176T% Roc*
6.5
SILTY SAND, fine to coarse grained 6.5 - 17.5 fr
sand, moisL yellowísh brorrn, contalns ResHual
mica
94
5+5+6
REC=18'1æ%
10.0fr Bag
l,f'
samplebken
,.F
95
67Uo
Boring No. W-S-RB{27 Statiorfoffset 323+50.58 / 1.9- Lefr Coordinates N 531460 E 1284182
DEPTH
¡TATERIAL DESCHPnON SYIIBOL
ELE\' STRÁ iAMPUNG
TESTS
(ft) (fr) RETIIARKS
TUM
DEPTHI DATA
u,ó TOPSOIL 4 incùes 390.7 0.0-2.0È
LEAl.t CLAY, mc¡isL broyvn, contai¡¡s CL ResHual
REC=16'8996
rock fraqments: roots. sand
2.0 389.0
DISINTEGRATED ROCK sampled as 1.9 ft R¡s
qn{v iÊân ¡lav nalcl hrm anlaino 92
DR 100f?
rockfragmenb, roots REC=1'¡12i6 z0-4.5fr
Dblntegrated
4.5
SILTYSAND, rnoisL reddish brorrn, -386.5_
conÞins mica 93 45-12.Oft
l2l1(Þ15 Resitual
SM
12.O v/9.0
DISINTEGRATED ROC( sampled as 1LO-2,.0È.
silty sand, mobt gra¡ codains rodr D¡shtegrated
fiagmenb Rodß
Chaæe.s to reOd¡sh brourn and banded 12.5 È Rig
bladt úatþr.
DR
17.0fr R¡g
dtatterf auger
grinding
97
Boüom ofbodng at 22.0 n" RECcCr96
AugEr and spoon rctusal at 22.0#eL
.TEST Projecg lntercounty @nnectors - Confad A
SWD2-Bí0
BOR¡NG SegmentD2 -Þpri¡sNumben
Conùact Numben 07l,200æ.ù2
LOG Montgorlery County, Maryhnd |
Sheets of I
BoringContracton GEOMECTI,ANICS,INC. Groundwater OboerEüons
EUZABETH, PENNSYLVANTA
Boring Foreman: Mat Halt I D.t I ltme I o"pn I casing I Carrcd
8.5 gn.s
SILTYSAIID, mobt brwmish orange SPT
and lþhtyellow
78C6
SM
c
r3.5 372.5
SANDY SILT' moist yellorlsh orarge SPT
and white "t0
7896
ML
18.5 367.5
SILTY SAND. moist, brown 98ÀSPT
Ghanges to orange and rviite t2+f6118
REÈ1S&t%
958, SPT
SM
'. sPr
þll+ã,
25.O È{r 949å
20 380 0f)
MO|SI ìton, Keqolslþþfown,
Sandy GLAY
sl z-'l
,
(r.{}
{6 I 4-lncìês lopsorl 1
2
I (a-6) t
tesr----- I S¿ 3-3
/t
2.5-
¿ô 12 NMG= 16.8%
3
4
Mois! Sttff, Red and Bro,Yn, 5
3ÀñË ããã'siir, iã"; õi"ú. ffi 5.{Þ 6
T¡ace G¡avel, Tnce Organics, s-3 7 65 't6
Low Mlca 7
(44X0) s4 7.5- I
94 a qo 10 NMC = 23.67o 9
tRSI
t0-o 372-OO
¡Sample S-2 Medium Stifi t H 't0.(Þ
10
T-1
l5.G l6
17.0 24 NMC=24.8% 17
Sample S-7: Medlum Dense s-7 +g 17.9- 18
7 {ÂÂ 18 Nfr4C = 20%
19
Sarple 98: Medlum Dense $8 4-5 18.5-
Ê 4tñ ¡ì 18 m
21
22
23
21
Sample S-9: Medium Dense 99 +5 23.5-
7 ?ao 18 25
2A.O 456-oo GAVED@ 25FT @24 2ß
Mois{, Medium Denso, Red and HRS 27
Broryn, SILT and SAND. T¡ecs
28
Cla¡ Trace Graræl
4€ 28.5. 29
(A4X0) s-f 0 qn
30.0 a52-OO o 18 NMG = l9.f % 30
31
Boring No. W-S-RB-022 Station/Offset 316+26.37/ 83.4 Left Coordinates N 531694 E 1281932
Borlng No. W€-RB-023 Statlon/Offset 316+37.71 /21.2 Right Coordlnates N 531589 E 1281939
DRYAND CAVED @ 24
Sample 97: Very Stifi 8-11 24.O- 22.8 FT@24 HRS
tÃ6 388-37 s-7 ,tá. t^E t8 NMC = 23.5%
2A
Bottom of Bo¡fng @ 25.5 feet
27
2ß
n
30
31
g2
33
u
35
36
37
38
3S
4
41
TEST Project Intercounty Connectors - ContractA RDD2-B3B
4\nntbet BORIN Segment D2
Borinq Numben
ContractNumber: 07120080.D2
Sheet 1 of I
LOG Montgomery County, Maryland
Bor¡ng Contractor: CONNELLY AND ASSOCIATES, lNC. Groundwater Observations
FREDERICK, MARYLAND I Date I Time I Depth I Casing I Caved
Boring Foreman: Cody Hanes
Encountered 8/6 9:00 AM Dry
Schnabel Representative¡ P. Hutchins
Drilling Equ¡pmen[ Diedrich D-50 (ATV) Complètion 8/6 9:204M Dry 18.5'
Drilling Method: 3-1/4' lD Hollow Stem Auger Casing Pulled 8/6 9:30 AM Dry 16.0'
-" ll
Changes to brown and gray, trace rock \/l+s, ser
fragments )l/xl12+15+22
\REC=10" 5 6o/o
c
SM
S-4, SPT
9+16+20
REC=10" ro-Æ
0
DR D
391.5
SILTY ROCK FRAGMENTS, moist, | rsrvl -6, SPT 18.5 fr: Residual
gray I ^.. c +8+10
brown and tEC=7" 39o/o
ML
440h
MG = 7.9%
12
14%
7-0 405.0
SILTY SAND, brown, hace rock
fragrÞnts, (A-5)
7.0fr Bag
Sample hom 7 to
lJ-=42 12-fe€t
c t1 PL=33
789É
MC=11.2%
SM
19.0 393.0
DISINTEGRATED ROCK, sampled as
silt, moist, brown, contairs míca
19143+45 19.0ft
1009å Disintegrated
Rock
Changes to gray
DR D
10096
DEPTH
MATERIAL DESCR|PNON SYMBOL
ELEl/ STRA SAMPUNG
TESTS
(ft) (ft) REMARKS
TUM
DEPTHI DATA
0.3 TOPSOII- 4 inches 3( SPT 0.0 ft Residual
'9
SANDY SILT, moist, brown, conta¡ns 4{71 lo/o
rod< fragnrents
5.0
SANDY FAT ClâY, dark bown, -5 SPT LL=55 5.0 fr: lron
(A-76) Þ9
29Þ
PL=25 velns/sta¡ns b
=117 MC=21.2o 1S-feet
c 6.0fr Bag
sample from 5to
1ÞÞet
SPT MG=29-1%
CH
00%
t2.5
DISINTEGRATED ROCK sampled as I SPT 13.5fr
silt, moistr ori¡nge and green DR D Disintegrated
l6n I tt- Ll5 So/õ
Raojt
Bottom of boring at 15.0 ft.
Boring oßet 3-feet southwest ffom the staked location.
APPENDIX E
0.0117O mi2
CN (weighted) = total product / total area = 599.0 I 7.49 = 80.0 use cN =¡-o I
2. Runoff
Storm #1 Storm *É2 Storm #3
Frequency. .....Yr 1 î0
2.6
Rainfall, P(2Çhour) .....ln 5.1 7.2
0.0O795 mi2
CN (weighted) = total product / total area = 412.6 / 5.09 = 81.1 use cN =l ,,, I
2. Runoff
0.00114 mi2
O.OO272 miz
CN (weighted) = total product / total area = l5ô.5 | 1.74 = 89.9 usecN =l9; l
2. Runoff
Storm #1 Storm #2 Storm #3
Runofl Q=(P-0.2S)?(P+0.8S).,...... In
1.6 4.O 6.0
S=(1000/CN)-10
Worksheet 2: Runoff curve number and runoff
O.OO275 miz
CN (weighted) = total product / total area = 1ô0.5 | 1.76 = 91.2 use cN =l n,, I
2. Runoff
Storm #1 Storm #2 Storm #3
0.00069 mi2
CN (weighted) = total product / total area = 31.1 | O.M = 70.7 usecN =l;-l
2. Runoff
Storm #l Storm *É2 Storm #3
0.00256 mi2
CN (weighted) = total product / total area = 144.0 I 1.64 = 87.8 use cN =[-, I
2. Runoff
ev
:;:::i:::i:::::::::::::+:::i
O.OO278 mi2
CN (weighted) = total product / total area = 162.2 | '1.78 = 91.1 use cN =l-,' I
2. Runoff
Storm #l Storm #2 Storm #3
l"=200/CN-2- 0.50
l^lP = 0.19
V"ff' = 0.63
l.=200/CN-2- 0.47
l.lP = 0.18
VJV, = 0.63
l"=200/CN-2- 0.70
l^lP = 0'27
VJV, = 0.63
Storage depth for the Extended Detention Volume: 6.83 ft Ponding: I ft.
Storage Volume = 1314 cf
Therefore, the required orifice area (,\) for extended detention design is:
Area SS-D1-D
l"=200/CN-2- 0.22
l^lP = 0.09
VJV. = 0.63
storage depth for the Extended Detention Volume: 6.83 ft ponding: 1 ft.
Storage Volume = 7464 cf
Therefore, the required orifice area (Ao) for extended detention design is:
l"=200/CN-2- 0.20
l"lP = 0.08
VJV, = 0.63
Storage depth for the Extended Detention Volume: 6.83 ft Ponding: 1 ft.
Storage Volume = 7464 cf
Therefore, the required orifice area (fu) for extended detention design is:
Areä SS-D1-F
l"=200/CN-2- 0.82
l.lP = 0.31
VJV, = 0.63
storage depth for the Extended Detention volume: 6.83 ft ponding: I ft.
Storage Volume = 597 cf
Therefore, the required orifice area (Ao) for extended detention design is:
Area SS-D1-G
l"=200/CN-2- 0.27
l^lP = 0.10
V.ff,. = 0.63
Storage depth for the Extended Detention Volume: 6.83 ft Ponding: 1 ft.
Storage Volume = 6158 cf
Therefore, the required orifice area (Ao) for extended detention design is:
Area SS-D1-H
l"=200/CN-2- O.2O
talP -- 0.08
VJV, = 0.63
Storage depth for the Extended Detention Volume: 6.83 ft Ponding: 1 ft.
Storage Volume = 7837 cf
Therefore, the required orifice area (Ao) for extended detention design is:
1447 12720.758 8249 0 0 20969 0.r181 60.7 0.60 0.10 0.40 4 o 20.o 0.016 0.89 93.40 0.26 950 0.64 3.25 1.41 6.50 0.22 0.15 0.64 0.45 OK
t-448 1649s 0 0 27741 0.637 59.5 0.59 0.10 o.41 4 10 10 I c.o 0.016 t.Ð 0.88 93.17 o.27 947 0.83 3.40 1.94 9.69 o.20 0.15 0.83 0.43 OK
t449 12731.39 12675 U 0 25406 0_583 50.1 0.50 0.10 0.51 4 o 4 20.o 0.016 1.5 0.75 91.19 0.u 895 0.61 3.12 1.38 Þ.oc o.21 0.15 0.61 0.44 OK
33109 23213 n 3512.3 59834 1.374 55.3 0.55 0.10 o.42 4 4 o 20.o 0.0156 1.5 o.82 0.28 943 | .oo 4.97 2.51 4.23 0.31 0.13 tob 0.66 OK
t451 43035.1 25112
1 0 4354 72501 1.664 59.4 0.58 0.10 0.38 4 10 10 15.6 0.0156 1.5 0.88 93.15 o.25 954 z.1t 5.06 3.46 12.48 0.28 0.13 2.17 0.63 OK
t 452 33494.574 28266 0 4768.6 66529 1.527 50.3 0.50 0.10 0.47 4 4 o 20.0 0.0156 1q 0.75 91.25 0.31 926 1.67 4.98 2.52 8.24 0.31 ô l? 1.67 0.66 OK
t-465 30557 29805 0 796.11 61158 1.404 50.0 0.50 0.10 0.51 4 4 o 20.0 0.0234 lq 0.75 91.16 0.34 905 1.4S 4.36 2.11 7.71 0.27 0.14 1.49 0.70 OK
t-¿166 ?oÃo^ 27002 0 0 66598 1.529 59.5 0_59 0.10 o.41 4 10 10 Ð.o o.0234 1.5
| 0.8E 93.17 0.27 947 1.99 4.53 2.94 11.59 o.25 0.13 1.99 0.68 OK
t-Æ7 30818.821 20584 0 0 51402 1.180 60.0 0.59 0.10 0.40 4 4 o 20.0 0.0234 1.5 0.88 93.26 o.27 950 4Ãt 4.44 2.16 7.78 0.28 o.14 1.55 o.72 OK
t-468-A 23345.74 10414 0 33759 o.775 69.2 0.67 0.10 0.31 4 4 4 20.4 0.0008 tq 1.O1 o.21 972 1 .19 6.34 3.23 8.36 0.39 0.11 0.67 o.37 OK
1468-B 37710.152 1477 0 0 39187 0.900 96.2 0.92 0.10 0.07 4 4 4 20.4 0.0008 1.5 1.37 on on 0.05 1010 1.95 7.56 4.10 9.19 0.45 0.09 1.12 0.48 OK
t-469-A 26174.O04 13027 0 39201 0.900 66.8 0_6s 0.10 0.33 4 4 4 24.0 0.0008 0.9E 94.53 o.22 965 1.32 7.95 4.41 9_46 o.47 0.08 1.32 0.30 OK
t469-B 31239.232 4880 0 0 361 19 0.829 86.5 0.83 0.10 0.15 4 4 4 24.0 0.0008 l4 1.24 97.62 0_10 1010 1.63 8.46 4.81 9.81 0.49 0.08 1.63 0.34 OK
1470-A 4535.830€ 11293 0 0 15829 0.363 24.7 0.31 0.10 0.79 4 b 12.O 0_0008 o.Æ 85.25 0.53 508 0.13 3.10 t'_39 o.21 0.15 0.13 0.10 OK
t-470-B 0 15814 0.363 't0.0 o.14 0.10 1.09 4 o 12.0 0.008 1.5 o.21 77.O3 U.IJ 508 0.06 1.00 0.36 4.77 0.08 0.15 0_06 o.17 OK
t-476 62484 11815 408.64 74707 1-715 83.6 0_80 U.]U o.17 4 + 4 20.0 0.0089 1.20 97.22 o.12 1006 3.25 7.23 3.86 8_97 o¿? 0.10 3.25 0.84 OK
t-477 44756 f469l 7799 71293 1.637 68.4 0.67 0.10 o.26 4 z 2 20.9 0.0089 t.c 't.00 94.83 o.17 983 2.51 6.96 2.99 6.59 0.45 0.10 2.51 0.84 OK
t478 4920 11591 0 2807 19318 o.443 25.5 o.28 0.10 0.73 4 b 12.O 0.0089 1.5 o.42 84.13 0.49 575 o.17 1.80 0.70 5.39 n l? 0.15 o.17 0.24 OK
NOTE:
1 . Time of concentration is assumed to be 0.1 0 hr for all the 'K' inlets
2. When sand storage BMP is proposed the actual bottom of grass channel may be wider but 4' is used for all WQ
computations and 10-YR storm computation
3. When inlet is located at the sump an average slope of 50'from inlet to upstream is used for channel design
Draìnage Area and Channel Data 1O-YR Channel Capicity and Velocity
Outlet "/o Inrttal Kunofi Volum(
Grass Area (sf) Total Total Volumetr¡c Channel s= Unit Peak 1O-yr Peak Assr rmed Cross Wet Hydraulic Manning's O-yr
Point Area Area Runoff Tc (hr)
Abstration 1O- YR
1000/cN -
ea = (p- CN lalP
Mannino's
1
Area (sf) Discharge Discharge Flow. Section Perimeter Radius - Equation Velocity Remark
B c D (sr) (ac)
Area
Coef. (Rv)
la=
B (ft)
SS1 SS2 ìlope S P (in) 0.2-s) 2I n
I (21:1 (22:1\ Depth (in) 'ftlft) 10
lP+0.8*sl tinl
qu (csm/in (cfs) Depth (in) A(sf) P (ft) R a (cfs) (fps)
t447 12720.755 8249 0 0 20969 0.481 60.7 0.60 0.t0 0.40 4 6 3 20.o 0.016 5.0 2.O 3.22 83.4 0.079 1010 2.44 3.28 1.43 6.52 o.22 0.04 2.44 1.71 OK
t448 16495 11246 0 0 27741 0.637 59.5 0.59 0_10 0.41 4 10 10 I c.o 0.016 5.0 2.O 3.17 0.082 1010 3.19 3.44 1.97 9.76 0.20 0.04 3.19 1.62 OK
1449 12731.39 0 0 254Q6 0.583 50.1 0.50 0.10 0.51 4 o 4 20.o 0.016 5.0 2.6 2.85 79.5 0.103 1010 2.62 3.38 t.c¿ 6.87 0.22 0.04 2.62 1.73 OK
t-450 33109 23213 0 3512.3 59834 1.374 5s.3 0.55 U.1U 0.42 4 4 6 20.0 0.0156 5.0 2.',| 3.13 82.6 0.084 1010 6.80 J-bb 3.00 8.81 o.34 0.04 6.80 2.27 OK
t-451 43035.1 15 25112 0 4354 72501 1.664 59.4 0.58 0.10 0.38 4 10 15.6 0.0156 5.0 1.9 3.28 44.1 0.076 1010 8.62 5.6s 4.09 15.¿+o 0.30 0.04 8.62 2.10 OK
t-452 33494.574 28266 0 4768_6 1.527 50.3 0.50 0.10 0.47 4 4 6 20.0 0.0156 2.3 2.98 81.0 0.0s4 f010 7.19 5.83 3.'l ROq ñ?Ã 0.04 7.19 2.31 OK
l-2f65 0 796.11 61158 1.404 50.0 0.50 0.10 0.51 4 4 6 20.o o.0234 5.0 2.5 2.87 79.7 o.10.2 1010 o.Jt) 4.91 2.48 8.18 0.30 0.04 6.36 2.57 OK
t-466 39596 27002 0 0 66598 1.529 59.5 0.59 0.10 0.41 4 10 10 15.6 o.0234 5.0 2.O 3.17 83.0 0.082 1010 7.66 4.44 3.24 12.10 o.27 0.04 7.66 2.37 OK
t-Æ7 30818.821 20584 0 0 51402 1.180 60.0 0.59 0.10 0.40 4 4 o 20.0 0.0234 5.0 2.O 3.19 43.2 0.081 r 010 5.94 4.74 2.36 8.03 0.29 0.04 5.94 2.52 OK
t-468-A 23345.747 10414 0 0 33759 o.775 69.2 o-67 0-10 0.31 4 4 4 20.4 0.0008 5.0 1.5 3.53 86.6 0.062 1010 4.31 9.91 6.03 10.E1 0.56 0.04 4.31 o.71 OK
0 0 39187 0.900 96.2 0.92 0.10 0.07 4 4 4 20.4 0.0008 5.0 0.4 4.60 96.6 0.014 1010 6.53 12.17 8.17 12.36 0.66 0.04 6.53 0.80 OK
t'469-A 26174.OO4 13027 0 0 39201 0.900 66.8 0.65 0.10 0.33 4 4 4 24.O 0.0008 5_0 1.7 3.44 eÃ7 0.067 1010 4.88 10.55 6.61 11.25 0_59 0.04 4_88 o.74 OK
t469-B 31239.233 4880 0 0 36119 0.829 86.5 0.83 0.10 0.1s 4 4 4 24.0 0.0008 5.0 0.8 4.20 93.0 0.030 1010 5.49 11.18 7.20 11.68 0.62 0.04 5.49 0.76 OK
1470-A 4535.830S 1253 0 1 5829 28.7 0.31 0.10 0.79 4 5 o 12.O 0.o008 Ã^ 4.O 2-17 71.6 0.159 991 1.22 5_08 2.50 7.91 0.32 0.04 1.22 0.49 OK
t470-B 1583.9292 14230 0 0 15814 0.363 10.0 o.14 0.10 1-O9 4 qÃ
o '12.0 0.008 5.0 1.63 64.7 0.218 969 0.90 2.27 o.92 5.75 0.16 0.04 0.90 0.9E OK
t476 62ß4 11815 0 408.64 74707 1.715 E3.6 0.80 0.10 0.17 4 4 4 20.o 0.0089 5.0 0.9 4.09 92.1 0.035 1010 11.08 8.70 5.00 9_98 0_50 0.04 1 1-08 2.22 OK
1477 48796 14698 0 7799 71293 1.637 68.4 0.67 0.10 o.26 4 2 20.9 (fì .l 2.
2 0.0089 3.71 aa.4 0.052 1010 9.s8 8.86 4.04 7.30 0.55 0.04 9.58 2.37 OK
1478 4520 1591 0 2AO7 19318 o.443 25.5 0.28 0.10 0.73 4 J o 12.O 0.0089 5.0 3.7 2.30 73.2 o.147 995 I _58 3.03 1-30 6.33 0.20 0.04 1.58 1.22 OK
NOTE:
I . Time of concentration is assumed to be 0.1 0 hr for all the 'K' inlets
2. When sand storage BMP is proposed the actual bottom of grass channel may be wider but 4' is used for all WQ
computations and 1O-YR storm computation
3. When inlet is located at the sump an average slope of 50'from inlet to upstream is used for channel design
ì '\ ì \ .s '.
,)')) t--'--*",,'ii(fii,l,:¡',r.,,i¡lriäi¡iiiti))ii
& *-
-k_-r^\*ês*- \
:;-lß DlltJlïliÌ
!
X¡
,) ì
\,, -'.. '--l_r,',,'r,,,:2fi;lll,2i--:\-''----1) .i iii!:{ i i í i
\, ",.'3,,'¡ iÌiiî'ììlììì.'
(ìq
D;¡iilN'
(Þ
./ -/ jjiiijljjijflii\\ \\ ó
'., ¡ r;;,ii¡i/¡¡rr=
---/ì
,/''ì
--+Þ' ^i i
-'_-_r---.- \,ì i
..-:-:-\ -//
t-';a------ \-- ,---- \-- I iiçI I) i
_./ --- -/
\-/-'-..- 1+ .p_C_+:
-C_
wÏäi
',ZZZiiil',1i,,Íií1,1ffi
/, ," .t')
zr/
/ ,/',r/r/',
r' ¿u ,/
)
L
I
,t
q.
SEGMENT D1D2
ISSUED FOR REVIEW
STA'TE OF MARYTAND
DEPAR'IMÉNT OF TRANSPOFTA'TION
STATE HIGI-MAY ADMINIS'IRATION
HIGI.WAY DESIGN DMSION
INTERCOUNTY CONNECTOR
CONTRACT A
wlc
FACILIry Û-F, G, H FINAL DESIGN
REVISIoNS
¡óo
z
I
<t
=t^
ñÁ
o UGf. õñ
os
êêor
cå
N6:
ãs
{
z 2'
sç
;2
Èg
XE
) SÈ
(
Yh
\"t
I
---.tvu
l//
/
\'/+ 8
a." I
c-
-..!-- (/ o
\l
l.----
I
Ì\
-==--. n (J
c-=
va
o
-.
o
q
-*-+l+/
t\\
\ (J
{
|\ È
ui
I
1-¡ ---S,
r'X \ o
-----l-*---.-. -=,
o
W
F
(J
lt.
|
+\ \._. t4
tg
f
o
'----': t. E
-.--./- |
l-- =,
-'-,- Ê
-r-t)*---
\
-''Q
_^--_-.) ,, Y
,--\-zrrt
------\ \ J,
4,00-
/ \--/
tr---
4À,/)À-
i\:
,'
vzt;tØØJ:^8
4
1t'a'/t"- --.---- -t /-
(
I
cl- 2a
7úß
ì'
)
\\!\'\ì\,;)
-j*r.**iYi _'[ffi
\ì
tt :F -i-
\ì
\,)
i ì / ¡ /\i')t'.,-t't.
i;'rX( ì,,',,\,\+i ¡i {
\Fl
Or
\ \i lii
//l fi
i' jl^,,:,'
Ì::jl ft,,)
IA
./ È' ,,'
'/,/ i,l.,i,:j):ii
),' l¡ ,',,'if','r';::'l;þ' f3,,) ,,ì )jT
) i ,1 ,,,",,',,,
l' iI
," ." ," I I i
,,, ,) ,,' ,,',,t L
-: ,'1 .) ,j ,r)r,):F;.:r', 'i
:::,:,',"_,--
' . -',- -' --'--*rj.r)'rir,,jl..'.1.:_: t'
)i,,:.1:71,,;:)' r",,,'1,í,,",,",,'i,,/¡1,''',, I I f
:--:;Îj::-r:;tüçfiitit:ë. ii/i;*í:,i,i,: \, \
,/
.i 'i,
t::::;a:i:i-"r;:l::i/i{2t-, 7/::11;1,- -.e:_¡r,'r!'1' ,/' (*';(,' .í'
) ..'
..') l,ir!
) 'if: ( Ir'
SEGMENT D1D2
ISSUED FOR REVIEW
STATE OF MARYLAND
DEPARIMENT OF'TMNSPOFITATION
STATE HIGI-TWAY ADMINIS'TRATON
HIGI-MAY OESIGN DMSION
INTERCOUNTY CONNECTOR
CONTRACT A
FACILITY D1-F, G, H FINAL DESIGN
s
C\
o-
C'
ñ
ñ
;m ]rc
wlc
INTERCOUNTY CON$RUCTORS
TF@UM'RæMÆ,MD æIø-@
PLOTTE0, HEDESOAY, JANUARY 9, 2øæ AI øW3 AÁ
scaLE
DESIGNED
DRAYINBY
BY
CHECKED BY
INTET DRAINAGE AREA
r = im' oATE OCf.æ07 CONTRACT NO.
MR
YA
PS
F.a.p. NO. AH,¡FH6-1(1)N
F¡LEr C!\PU-TORKINC-XH\PTG\Cøø39124\Or5ø4236\P5!-01-DA-3-ICC-A0GN
COUNTY
LOGMILE
4T3765960
,' lili',( i
*--." ùç<t-niz,'
,lw
---ìs
--i,i ll,,'ll'W .,'l ,,'r',) !,t,,',i,r',) ,i ,-," ,/ìr'*J,i. ;\ /
(
--J\\ <"
^il't' ./ ;
I
/ ì\ì
z' - ii'12,ft',i! -, í'*t
tit,
J2*t7//',.
--l.,7-td+
S¡ìJ
W
¿ iL
-\ ---+¿
i i l,t,
'{=)Æ
?z=r: m
-#
I
F*-^ -3r*1
I
--.---2
\rî\
- -F6=37^
\_-.-\ (
\__/ )
-ì=*--.-- \È\-
'.r\
SEGMENT D1D2
ISSUED FOR REVIEW
SÏA'TE OF MARYLAND
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOffTANON
STA'TE HIGHWAY ADMINISTFATION
HIGIIWAY DESIGN DMSION
INTERCOUNTY CONNECTOR
CONTRACT A
wlc
FACILITY D1-F, G, H FINAL DESIGN
REVISIONS
+ ;ì.ììjiììi)
I
),) ) \ )ii)$r
/,4y
fr
li I
(/,ii
-r\$l-
\" \ ( 'it¡ ,i \/
,/ \ \!-/
it- )!\ rì
\
( \, ¿'
ììl\ì\1$\\.\È{í,;,7=\--.-\-'.'
,
R,'
s. ìì. ..'.ììitài\i\.\ìä Siiì.'1 ììù.
-.-:--x-:.\..:-\ //\ (--r
SEGMENT D1D2
ISSUED FOR REVIEW
STA'ÍE OF MARYTAND
DEPAff'ÍMENT OF'ÍRANSPORIATION
STA'IE HIGFTWAY ADMINIS'TRA'IION
HIGI.IWAY DESIGN DMSION
INTERCOUNTY CONNECTOR
CONTRACT A
wlc
FACILITY D1-F, G, H FINAL DESIGN
REVISIONS
EW-440 STD TYPE'C'ENDWALL - 24" P¡PE rcc 1279+25 411 a1 139.00' LT 387.90 24" RCP 147 0n 387.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
MH-441 48" MANHOLE FOR 24" PIPE tcc 1281+25 408.19 111 00' LT 388.93 13.56 24" RCP eee oe 387.90 202.OO 0.51 1.03 402.49
t-442 STD TYPE'K INLET -SINGLE OPENING tcc 1281+82 40730 159.00' LT 389.50 8.5Q 24" RCP 389.50 389.r3 74 0.5 0.37 398;00
EW-446 STD ÏYPE'C' ENDWALL - 24' PIPE rcc 1283+00 405.33 1 37.00' LT 397,00 24" RCP 397.00 397.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 398.82
tM7 STD TYPE !K' INLFT -SINGLE OPENING tcc 1283+00 405.33 83.00' LT 397.27 5.55 24" RCP 397.27 397;00 55.00 0.50 0.28 402.82
t,-448 STD TYPE'K' INLET.SINGLE OPENING tcc 1283+00 405.33 0.00' MED 397.72 5.71 24" RCP 397.72 207 ?n 83.00 0.51 0.42 403.43
1449 STD TYPE'K' INLEÍ -SINGLE OPENING rcc 1283+00 405.33 83.00' .RT 398.32 4.50 24" RCP 398.32 397.90 83.00 0.51 0.42 402.82
r:450 STD TYPE'K' INLET.-SINGLE OPENING .lcc 1279+25 411,31 83:001 LT 402.80 6:01 241 RCP 402,80 397.30 375.00 1.47 5.50 408i80
t451 STD TYPE:K INLET -SINGLE OPENING tcc 1279+25 411.31 0;001 MED 404.61 4,80 24" RCP 404.61 404.11 83.00 0.60 0.50 409.41
l-452. STD TYPE'K INLET -SINGLE OPENING rcc 1279+25 4'11.31 83.00' RT 405;30 :': 3:50 24', RCP 405.30 404.81 83.00 0.60 0.50 408.80
Ew=459 STD:I-YPE fC' ENDWALL - 36' PIPE rcc 1295+82 378.92 145.50: RT 361.00 36" RCP 36r.00 361.00 0,00 2.50 0.00
1.460 STD. COMBINATION'S' INLET tcc 1294+07 380.51 108.001 LT 368.7s 4.69 361' RCP 368.75 361.00 310.00 2.50 7.75 373.44
ES-461 END SECTION FOR24I RCP 1294+93 379.47 r49,00'. RT 365:77 24" RCP 365.77 365,"77 0.00 0.00 0.00
MH-Æ2 ¿18'MANHOLE FOR 24" PIPE 1292+50 383.62 1',t7.00' RT 366.99 13,83 24" RCP 366.99 365.77 243.O0 0.50 1.22 380.82
t-463 RISER STRUCTURE rcc 1290+94 387.27 157.00' RT 368.00 8.00 24',i RCP 368.00 367.19 163.00 0.50 0.82 376,00
ES-464 STD TYPE'C' ENDWALL - 24' PIPE rcc 1290+56 388,16 154.00! RT 375.00 24" KUT 375:00 375:00 0.00 1:00 0.00
t-465 STD TYPE'K INLET.SINGLE OPENING tce 1292+00 384.79 83.00' ' RT 376.29 5.99 24 RCF 376:.29 375.00 160.00 0.81 1.29 382.28
t-466 STD TYPE iK INLF¡ -SINGLE OPENING rcc 1292+00 384.79 0:00' MED 377.32 5.57 24" RCP 377.32 376:49 83.00 1.00 0.83 382.89
t-467 STD TYPE:K.INLET -SINGLE OPENING tcc 1292+00 384.79 85;00' LT 378.35 , 3.93 RCP 378.35 37,7;52 83:00 l:00 O:83 382.28
1-468 STD:TYPE'K INLET -SINGLE OPENING fcc 1296+38 378.80 79,00' RT JOT.TJ 7.69 24' RCP 367.79 361:00 80.00 8.49 6.79 375.48
t-469 STD TYPE'K INLET -SINGLE OPENING tcc I 296+38 378.80 0:00' MED 368:82 7 -38 24" RCP 368.82 aA7 00 83.00 1,00 0.83 376.20
".-. 1470 STD TYPE'K INLET -SINGLE OPENING tcc 1296+38 378.80 83.00' LT 369.85 7.50 24" RCP 369.85 369.02 83.00 1.00 0.83 377.35
t 471 WATERQUALITY INLET rcc 1297+70 379.36 71.00' RÏ 373.44 5.00 12" CSP 373.44 372.86 116.00 0.50 0.58 378.44
t'472 WATER QUALITY INLET tcG 1 298+08 379.70 15.00' LT 374.90 5.00 12" CSP 374.90 374.40 l0t .00 0.50 0.51 379.90
EW-475 STD TYPE'C: ENDWALL - 24'PIPE I 301 +79 382.99 155.00' RT 355.02 24 RCP 355.02 355.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
t4lo STD ryPE'K INLET -SINGLE OPENING rcc I 302+50 383.62 83.00' RT 372.03 8.40 24" RCP 372.03 355.02 100.00 17.O1 17.O1 380.43
t-477 STD TYPE'K INLET -SINGLE OPENING rcc 1 302+50 383.62 0.00' MED 373.06 v -34 24" RCP 373.06 372.23 83.00 1.00 0.83 380-40
t-478 STD TYPE 'K' INLET -SINGLE OPENING rcc 1 302+50 383.62 85.00' LT 374.09 8.32 24" RCP 374.09 373.26 83.00 1.00 0.83 382.41
t-479 WATER QUALTTY INLET tcc 1 307+65 388.18 71.00' RT 382.26 5.00 12" CSP 5óZ-¿O 380.99 255.00 0.50 1.28 387.26
l-¿180 WATER QUALITY INLET tcc I 308+33 388.78 15.00' LT 383.15 5.00 12" csP 383.1 5 381.51 328.00 0.50 | .b4 388.15
PIICC-A\60O_Technical\607_Drainage\Calculation\D1\INLETCOM_D1_final.xls
IIC CONTACT-A SEGMENT D1D2 INLET COMPUTATIONS
INLET T,OCATION DAINFORMATION UPSTREAM
INLETS BYPASS Q
RUNOFF (CFS) % PICKU
OFFSET BYPASS Q (cFS) 25+ Year lmpervious Grass Grass Grass
INLETNO TYPE BASELINE STATION Elevation
(Fr)
LT/RT AREA (SF) AREA(AC) 'c' (CFS) "c"
AREA (SF)
Area B c D
t:447 . STD TYPE'K INLET -SINGLE OPENING rcc 1283+00 405.33 83 LÏ, 20969.48 , 0.48 0.58 0.00 1.51 l00o/o 0;00 0.66 20969 12721 ?24s 0 0
l-4'48 STD TYPE'K'INLET -SINGLE OPENING tcc 1283+00 405.33 0.00 MEDI, 27741.43 0.64 0.s8 0-00 r.97 t00% 0.00 0.65 27741 16495 11246 ñ 0
:
t:449 .. ,lCG, 1283+00 405.33 83 RT 2s4os.96 0'58 0.51 0.00 l;60 100% 0.00 0.58 25406 12731 i2çl,s 0 0
r,t:r:j :r:i : .r.:, i..i
l¿4:50' SiliÞ IYPE,:K' INLETi:Sl¡lGtEl O-PENlNc tcc 1279ì+25 411.31 83 LT. 59834.33 t.5 t .0.55 0.00 4.08 100% 0.00 0.63 59834 I ::t,s21,1 0 3512
1t"451 sio IYPE'K' TNLET:stNGLE opENtNG rcÇ 1279+25 411.31 0 , MED 72500.88 1:66 0.58 0.00 5.20 l00yo 0.00 0.66 72s01 43035 25112 0 4354
t-465 i rcc t1292i00 384.79 83 ßr þl.x11|6? 1.40 0.51 0.00 3.86 t00% 0.00 0:58 61 158 , sosw;,, 0 796
i,29805 I
l-466rr STD TYPE'K' l¡lmr -S|wCLE OPENIÌ\IG ICC .!:292t0Q 384.79 0 iMED
6.0194$:, .1,53 0.58 i 0.00 t4:v4 100% 0.00 0.65 66598 . 9s80
:
_zlolq o 0.
t467 Stq,,ryÞ¡,'¡,iìrlúft aslñ"ar-q onçru!ryé tcc, 384.79 85 ]LT 11492is? 1,r18, 0:58 ,0.00 3:68 '100% 0.00 0:66 s1402 äöärö, 20584 0
ì-¿és"i STD TYPE'K'INLET -SINGLE OPENING rcc l,ZSø+SB 378.8 79 RT 48638;12. t.t2 0.70 , 0:00 4tl8 L0Q,o/s 0,00 0;78 48639 7837 , 0,.,,; ',:.4954
l146ti' fcÇ 1296+38 378.8 , 0 54815.34 1.26 0.64 0.00 4..35 1009/o 0.00 0.72 54815 0,,1 7479
loc '1296+_39 378.8 83 .LT ilo+¡.oo 4.73 0.32 0,00 t.24 t00% 0.00 0.37 3t643 0 9156
'0:69
lcc 1302+50 383.62 83 RT 4s31,sj2e 1:13 .
0.00 . 4.22 t00% 0.00 0.78 493r6 374Eor 11815 0 22
l¿zz, rcG 1 302+50 383.62 0 MED 62602.82 L.44 0.62 0.00 4-78 100% 0.00 0.70 62603 , 4010_6i ,¡losa ,
0 '7199
r.¡!79.i!, ,ilG.9 1 302+50 383.62 85 LT 1SSZ0,OO l 0.44 0.35 0.00 0-,83 100% 0-00 o.A1 ß32n 4920.,, iltjei 0 2809
m:9004\01042542\WR\INLETCOM D1 final.xls
MARYLAND STATE HIGHWAY ADIII
STORM DRAIN DESIGN
n
C Area
A iir Rainfall
tc Time Conc. Mann- S. h Travel T¡me Capac. Full
From To
(#)
Area tcA Min
lntens. Q cfs Size (in) Type
Slope
Vo Vel. fps f-"nS.
ac. ^cA 'A in./hr.
ing's %
Ft.
Min cfs
Goef.
l-452 , I=451 0'5'1,8i 1,;5¡21 i0,791 ìlri527 0.791 5ì00 7:00 , 5.54 %A',t.,. RCP .o.lì13 ,
0.6 3.0', :83 0,46 17.6
I:45'l I;450 0.580! í.i664 iiO;966,1 3il:92 tr,.757 :r1,5i46 1,6:90, 12.12 24, RCP '0:0ïi3 Oi6 '3;9,. :',.83 0:36 l7;6
I,450 t447 (]-55: 1,:37 ; 0.758 4i565 ,,,2;511. 5-8.2 ;.6,81 1:7|13 24 RCP 0.013. 1.466 5;5' 375 :. 1',1r5 27:4
Ir449,,tt:l I..448 0r510t 0.583 0i298ìl t).5t|:.j fI29t 5_Ofl V;:OO 2t:ø 24 RCP 0.013 0.5.1 r:,3i0 i83 0:46 16:2:
1448 1447: 0.57€2 0.637 0.367 1't22Q o.665 5;46 :,6,90,, 4i59.:':ì ;:24:,:: I RCP 0,013 0,51 3.0 ,83 0.46 ,,1612:,,)
.f) 5Il¿ 0,481 '1ô267 6:97 ,22.67 ;
144,1,,:,', ::|EUl446:,|,, Oi:28i1 3_462 ,6i55 '24"";" RCP 0.o13 O.5,r ,.V:2 55 0,Í3 l,6rOii
F,W¡446 10.8 5',:9V;.V 6 i6ì55Ìfl ;.ttf::.1
7:2
'?:67.
'':li{iíií:ìì],: '$!it
,::::k46al:t:,:l 0i5v.9v 1':1lB 0.684, llrl,80 :r,ioi684 5ÌCI0 Z.O0:,r' .tl':24t: RCP ,01013 .l 3i0, 83 0.46 'zz"tV,ttt'
'.:L;:466 t465i, 0i576 tr,;529 0.881, 2,,709 1,565 5'.46 6:90 70 79' 24: RCP,,,' ,,r,0:0,1.3 I 3¡4,",: 83 0.40 22.7
Í=465';,:t: ì,iiEìItr¿64:-' 0.510€ ,1.,404 0,7,17', ',4:7,1t3 2.292 ,5,:86 :,6i80r'Ìì, ì:.:1 5; 511 r
:t:;24it::: RCP ; ,0:013 0:806 t:.1;).:4':9 160 . o;54 '20å
ES;464 4.11'3 2.282 5.€ 6-80 ,li5.5l
L:463 j'I\{I{#62.i:i o:529 4:e ;,:2,i539 4.800 r2:539 6_40 '6ì68:i 1'6,jg6 :'24,' RCPi 0.013, ,:Oi5,,,,,i :'tt5i4 163 0.50 16:0, i
lvfrl462 i:i..4i800 asæ 6-41 6.68 ; ''l:6196 '',:24 RCP r0:013,, o.5 ::;,5:4,:,: t24:3 o:75 í6:0,,.iì
:':ES*461 :4i800 2.539 6.4C 6::68. li6:96 .24 RCP, ,0iO11'3ì: 0 tlt:tt5!4 0.00 0,0,.
:I¿47A
1469 0l3185 0:.726, Ait23t1 ;:,:,,4'.:726 o.231, 5.0c 7.0.0,t 1:62l ,.ì,24 RCP . 0ì013,1 1 3i0 :83 ::;O'.11.6 :22¡7:,;",
;tr;469.: ;"':1l;68: 0t6422 1.25:e o.808, 1.985 1.040 5-4C .6r90ii; t,:iLi,t1':V:l ,:24',,. :,RGFì: 0.0131 1 ,3i0 ;83 iO:46,, 22,t7,".
'f468 rM s9.:' .0:6955 1.117 ,:3':l0l 1.816 5i.92 6::7.9,,:t :.'24:.:.t RCP ,0r013,: .9V3V5 ,.3:9 :8( 0.34, :::t7ï:;:7i:t::
':1:2132::ttl
,:,81V.459:l 3.101 1:,816 5.92 6:79i'. 35.32 ,,gg;,r,
RGP ii0:01,3, ,5.0,ii 0
14781 t+47i|,: 0i34-99 0:;4:44 :0¡1155 , o.444 0i155 5;00 7.00 1.09 :
:124 RCP 0.O{3, 1 ..,3:0 83 lr,0i46 22.7:
,,,t1/,77',,,1,:, L47,6 A:6:1:8i4 1::4?i7 0.889 :1.881 1.ß44 5:4€ 6:90;:, :.:,1,:l:;2ßi;li 24 ROP 0i0lgi 1 3.0 83 0.46 22.7'
Wtil6;t:,: Erü 75 0ì692 1,,;:.1,32 0,783 ,',:3.013 1,82V 5;92 :6.79 12,40 '24t' RGP 010.1,3'r: :;.i,.:7,Vt:Oi.1 3.9 ,
lo0 0.42' 93;5iÌ.
8W475.ì 3.013 1::t827 5:92 6.79 12AO'. 24 RGP ,0i013
":,3r9
r44Z h/fff#1 0i51:741 7:'46 3i860 7¿60 3.860 7'4Q 6.54 2,5:24
',,24ì.:, 11.;.RGF
10:013 ,,i0i5 8i0i.ì 74 0:15 l.OiO
lÆI:44lrr:ì EW440 7.460 3i860 zìCIo i6l5-4:,,,i ','25.24 24:,:,; RCP 0;01,3Ì 0.51 8.0 242 a:42 16'.2
EWi440 vA60 3'860 7ì0c 6.54 25,24 |24 RCP - 0.013
flf n
C Area A Area tc Time L
Rainfall Size Mann- S" Sr Slope Vr Vel. dn Normal Depth Angle INV Elev
From To
(#) TA Conc.
Intens.
Q cfs
(in)
Type
ing's Slope ol
% IPù
Leng.
(0)
Kb Hb (ft) Hf (ft) INV IN
OUT
Elev. Out Top Elev
Min Ft.
ft tn
in./hr. Coef.
þ452 t-!,51 0.52,1 1.527 0.791 1:527 :01791 ì 5.00 633 24' RCP '0i0i3 0.6 0.08 3.0 83 0,8a, ':0 o,SO ö:07 ,. 0;06 40.5.30 4t{;.81 ¿106.46 406.53 ¿108.80
lr9o' ,
i.:.,
r-450 0.58 1.664 0.966- r'r 3.192 1.75V 5.46 7,'ß6:¡,1 :tr3:82' 24: RCP 0.013 ,,9.6;i'i 0.37 :,4,.4 83 ì,g4 t, 90 l:;50 i0.45 , 03i 4a.+.61 4ctf;x1 405.94 406.40 40:9.41
t-447
^ÃE
q'798 4.565 :2i:.sløt,t;, 5-82 I.tb . iB.51 ¿+ RCP 0.013 1;496 . 0.74 375 1-?5' on 1.50 0.90 2:78 | 397,30 404.05 q4.94 408.80
9¡?
l:a:::.,)
l-447 ":: I 0.665 5.46 : ,7:86 ,'i:/à RCP o 013 ',.O.51' 0ig5l
,tiai i ôrs, ',i '.Ío i
o,áo i0;07 ',o.04.i 397.i2 ãsi,so; '¿100:36 400.43 øs,a3
EW.446':'Ì 1.701 '0.946 .6'97:li 26.67 , tL..r. 'RCP 0.0r3 0;5 j 1.3.: ',,8.6: .-.
þði
:
400.32 ''q2ß2
,if¡?6 -:!r : 9.elnqq
I I ar,liì:iìirì ì:Ì:aÌìi i
ì,i+as unÀøz: nà t'Àiíti,
, 5.00 8.00.¡t : zto:st.::,, '2A RCP 0:013 0.80 163 L
äilttto
,:0r32 t.rr 368-00 .367,.19 371.65 i46,q0..
^4-g0o
qs-aer i
..' ')
'..¡.n'
'9.4þ ,2ô.31 24 O:0f 3 0:80 ;6.6 24s àt';: 0:46r ,ö.s0, 365.71 ,169,72 370-O2 380;èi
. is-¿or 20.31 24 RCP,: 0:013 0 0.80 6:5 i'ljti ,365;.77 365,?i 367.77 367.77
.Ìt
,.t.¿69 0.32 0.231; 0.226' 0.231 .5.00 l 8.00 I -e 24 ROP.i 0.0r3 1 0.01 3.0 83 . 0.39 0 0,:59 9rorTii,
, o.ot i |ra,& 369.02 3V0.24 370.31 377.g5:
i
.,7.86
:i:.;irlat¡ o:64 '1'ZS} 0,80s, i,öes 1.040 5.46 8.17 .¿1 ßeP- 0.013 1 0.r3 ,
3,0 .
0.83 l 't.Æ 1;13 368r82 367.99, 369.65 369i81 376.20 |
i. ìii468 I EVV.-459;, ' 1.117 o.777 3..,t01 .1.816 5:9.2 ' 7.72 14.03 24 RCP' 0.0i 3 8"Æ75 038 UF 80 .9.63
,:0 nÃñ 367.79 36r.00 368i,42 368.57 375.4
i.Èw;ise 3.101 1.816, 5-92' 361:00 361.00 363.00 363,00
,.r.¿ia t-477 | 0f55 0r',44 0.r55 5.00 8.00 1,.24 24 RCP 0.013 1 0:00 .3'0 83:'; v q.50 d.oz 374.0 ,373.26' 374.41 374.48 ssz:4a
^aE '9'444 9.00 ,
,".1Þ476 EW-475 0.69'l 1:'.132 0,743 i 3.0t3 1.827 C.V¿ 7.72 14.12 24 RCP 0.0:l3 17,.01 0.39 '4,5.: . 100 .0.53. 0 0.50 0.16 '0.39 372.03 355.02 372.56 372.71 380,43
,1
,; t442 MH-441 0:52' 7.460 3:860 7.460 3.860 5:00 8.00 30.88 24 BCP 0:013 0.5 1.86 9.8 74 2.00 0 0.50 naR : 1.37 ?Âo qn 389.,13 396.1 I 396.93 398.00
: rÀrl441 EW"440 o tt 44 ?o? A6
30.88 ¿4 RCP 0-013 0.51 1.86 202 2,O0 48 .O,,77 3.V5 388.93 387.90 394.80 402.49
EW-440 30.88 24 RCP 0.013 0 1.86 9.8 0 0 387.90 387.90 389.90 389.90
PIPECOM_D1.xlsV5-YR l of 1
ICC CONTRACT A. SEGMENT D1D2
STORM DRAIN DESIGN
DESIGNED BY: MB 112412008 CONTRACT: 4T3765960 RAINFALL FACTOR 1 RET. PERIOD: 100
CHECKED BY: KH 112512008 TITLE: ICCCONTRACTA-D1D2 DURATION: 0-10 10.1-40 40.1-150
ltf n
A tc Time òt L dn
Rainfall Size Mann- S. Vr Vel. Angle INV INV Top
From To C Area (#) Area tcA Conc. Q cfs (in)
Type
Slope ol Slope Leng. Normal (0)
Kb Hb (ft) Hf (ft) Elev. Out Elev Higl
^cA 'A Min
lntens. ing's o/o
Fr. Depth ft
IN OUT Elev
in./hr. Coef.
l:451. 0t791 i,lni QrVgi 5,000 9,50 7.52i 2A RCP: 0.6 0.11 3.0
i'0 . 405¡30 aoo,so '4Ð8.iii
Ít
:l-.45Q:rl ì.ooä. 0,966, 1.757 ,,,t.461 s.41 16.53 l 24 RCP iülffi 0.6. 0-53 .5.3 83 '90 f,50 j 0.65;
:tt t
494.61 4oö,ao
,
WP:.:,1
05831 ò'Zeer, '.q röä
-q:ooo i 9r59 2-83 , .24.. RÇP ,0.013 9,;F,Íi
:""i'.
1 ;0.02 i, 3,0 :¡t0i::',j
ffi ; ô-i01 i ,s,!.,e'si sserso igi.øz
t,3gr$'90; agg.eã
..';:11
'
æ'Ð",..æ.
'fu{:,1.1çi',.,, lilä,i ii r.i$:,. ',*9,50 6.5Q ' -24 RgP n nl?' ó'u
^^..-l òùpì '.ö,oi,ji
, I
jti',:atl
iq''98ll I
ffi
ft,w RCP. 0-42; t6iií 1?rti iit{,iîiiii 37.7:3! 37e:.55:,: s-ef,eö
iiÞrrf '¡a: : ri ffii
,:ffiin6.:
#'ffi', io.ois 0:88- ,roo I i:þ , si6.2e 375.00 .378:77,
,'*i t
tl..,t"
i1 ;'1'ri7': .;' )
.:, t:t-G
'"t;
37,,:,5;9,q ;.377i00
y,ffiÊÅ
:l','i ,,1set j,"24
l,iot:s¡ 0.5 'r i.öo ,'11..+'i '':i,h', :óra¿ 365.77 37Q.73 i
-Oæs F9P ?.Þ7 966-e€
0i '¡li
tri e:äoä 23.31 24 BfF, 0.013 r
llio :l;06 vt4 .0,00 365.77 361:!f, -1
+ià oitss ,,.0i, 1,47. ,nGn 0-00 3.0 aì.1: ô,à5t 0.00 374-09 37,3.26 374:51
,''i-9;50 à4,,'.,,
PrQ19 : 1o.io, - 9,0i
W7;6;,;.;;1 1.881 iird.iiij: iw 24 :1 0.013: 4 0.19 3.1 A?i 0.92; ' ' 0117,,
-,,0ì16,
373.06 372.23. 374.15
ifu1çi:¡ 0.783 3:013 9.32 17.O2 24' .RCP] 0.013 .17.01 0.56 ,
c:4 I
lr00 0.58' ,Ci.l 0.50' o,is itisÉ; 372103 355:02 ,372.61 372.84
j;..j:-iiiN
3.013 5.922 24 RCP 0.013 0 ol ii|rt,1, 355.02 3rjs;oä, :357:00 357.00
r',ri++ì ¡
' o',sli 1
v:46' : 3.860 7.460 '3:860 :t,7.O00 9.00 34.74 24 RCP 0...013 2-35 11.1 7;4 2.00 0 0:50 '0.eÞ 1.74 ?eo Ân 389:13 397.85 398.79 3e8.00:
iun¿+l 'Ewigot,:; 7,460 3.8,90 34.74 .¿4 RCF ,0i013 0.51 2-35 44 4 202 2:00 4Sl 1.46, 4.75 ?ae o? 387:90 äe4:os 396.1 1 402.49
ì.., ,;?.9oci 9-77,
, EW.440 _ .:.| 7.460 3.860 7.000 34.74 24 RCP 0.013 0 ¿-JC 11.1 0 0 387.90 387.90 389.90 389.90
Q'o: CFS
Vlo: FPS
NORMAL DEPTH:
OLIFALL DITCH OR
REFER TO 1994 MD STD AND SPEC FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL, SECTION F-18
r,: ¡'
Dso: 3.0 'ii,, INCH usE sHA cLASS llili lnp-nap
Dso : 9.5 INCH
Dloo: 19 INCH
f,-l
THICKNESS: t9 INCH
APRON LENGTH: FT
r-t
a
APRON WIDTH:
RIP-RAP QUANTITY: SY
SUBJECT:ICC CONTRACT A DESIGN MB DATE U2412008
CONTRACT NO. 4T3765960 CHECK KH DATE 1t2st2008
--
---
T.7-T
---
-h- f\-, I
TECHNOLOGIES
Qro: CFS
Vlo: FPS
NORMAL DEPTH:
BOTTOM: FT
REFER TO 1994 MD STD AND SPEC FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. SECTION F-18
Dloo: 15 INCH
t9
F.t
THICKNESS= INCH
APRON LENGTH: FT
APRON WIDTH: FI FT
KCI
CONTRACT NO.AT3765960 CHECK KH DATE 1t2s/2008
TECIINOLOGIES
Qto: CFS
Vro: FPS
NORMALDEPTH:W FT
OUTFALLDITCH tt*": m OR
BOTTOM:
SIDE SLOPE Sl : 2:l SIDE SLOPES2: 2:l DEPTH:
TAILWATER CONDITION MINMIJM TAILV/ATER
REFER TO,I994 MD STD AND SPEC FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL, SECTION F-18
KCI
CONTRACT NO. AT3765960 CHECK KH DATE U2st2008
TECHNOLOGIES
Q'o: CFS
NORMAL DEPTH:
OUTFALL DITCH SLOPE: ffiffigffi
BOTTOM= 2 FT
SIDE SLOPE S1 : 2:1 SIDE SLOPES2: 2:T DEPTH:
TAILWATER CONDITION MAXIMUM TAILWATER
REFER .TO 1994 MD STD AND SPEC FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. SECTION F-i8
i:.,r .i
:: )t: j) "
:
lff-r
Dso:,r';3i0;irr',. INCH usE sHA CLASS I ffir lnn-nar
L
APRON WIDTH: FI FT
Qto: CFS
Vro: FPS
NORMAL DEPTH:
OUTFALL DITCH SLOPE: OR TO BMP
BOTTOM:
SIDE SLOPE S1 : SIDE SLOPE 52: DEPTH=
TAILWATER CONDITION MAXIMTIM TAILWATER
REFER TO 1994 MD STD AND SPEC FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDMENT CONTROL, SECTION
F-I8
Dso: 4.0 , INCH USE SHA CLASS t..Tt
l; t ,,, lnn_nan,
Dso: 9.5 INCH
Droo: 19 INCH
THICKNESS: 19 INCH
APRON LENGTH = t-''-l FT
PIPESIZE: W INCH
Q,o:
%
W CFS
Vro:
NORMAL DEPTH =
OI-NFALL DITCH SLOPE: OR
BOTTOM:
SIDE SLOPE S1 : 2:1 SIDE SLOPES2: 2:I DEPTH: 1'
REFER TO 1994 MD STD AND SPEC FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. SECTION F-18
PI{OTOGRAPHS
Photographs 1 and 2 - SP D-1-1 Looking U/S and D/S Respectively
Photographs 3 and 4- SP D-1-2 Looking U/S and D/S Respectively
Photographs 5 and 6- SP D-2-1 Looking U/S and D/S Respectively
Photographs 7 and 8- SP D-2-2 Looking U/S and D/S Respectively
Photographs 9 and 10- SP D-2-3 Looking U/S and D/S Respectively
Photographs 11 and 12- SP D-2-4 Looking U/S and D/S Respectively