Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Photographs As Document

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

History of Photography

Photograph as Document / Concept as Photograph

Points for Consideration


1) What things did documentary photographers consider worthy of documenting? Did
their interests change over time? If so, how and why?
2) What sorts of things should a viewer question when looking at a documentary
photograph? Are these things different from what should be considered when looking
at other types of photographs? If so, how?
3) Are photographs that document the physical appearance of a place different from
photographs that are intended to provoke social change? If so, how? If not, what is the
common element between them?
4) Why do you think conceptual art in general and conceptual photography in particular
has become so popular in the late 20th and early 21st century?
5) Some contemporary artists use the camera or other photographic means to record
ephemeral or durational events, to document art created outside the gallery
environment, and to examine ways in which we use photography. Do you consider
these artists to be photographers? Why or why not?
6) Is a conceptual photograph that is a document of an art event (as described above in
question #5) a documentary photograph? Why or why not?

Terms and Names


Eugene Atget

O. Winston Link

John Pfahl

Jacob Riis

Steve McCurry

Andy Goldsworthy

Lewis Hine

Nicholas Nixon

Gregory Crewdson

Dorothea Lange

Eileen Cowin

ParkeHarrison

Walker Evans

Eleanor Antin

Laurie Simmons

Arthur Rothstein

Oliver Herring

Sandy Skoglund

Edward Curtis

Anne Hamilton

Tokohiro Sato

E. J. Bellocq

Roni Horn

Abelardo Morell

August Sander

Janine Antoni

Brian Ulrich

Mike Disfarmer

Ken Josephson

Jason Salavon

You might also like