Technology Plan Evaluation
Technology Plan Evaluation
Technology Plan Evaluation
Technology Planning
FRIT 7232 Visionary Leadership in Instructional Technology
FALL 2013
Sunday, September 22, 2013
Statesboro, Georgia
Technology Planning 2
Technology Planning 3
The New Hampshire department of education school technology planning guide. (2005). Retrieved
September 12, 2013, from http://www.nheon.org/oet/tpguide/
This planning guide provides local school districts of New Hampshire a recommended outline for the districts
technology groups or committees to aid in creating, updating and implementing their technology plans. The
guide includes an outline of each of the six major sections to include in the technology plan, as well as subsections that are also needed. The six major sections are: introduction, goals, action plan, budgeting, evaluation
and policy/procedure. Sub-sections included in the plan under the action plan section are: access to
technology resources, technology/ICT literacy, professional development and community collaboration.
Georgia department of education technology services 3 year technology plan. (2013). Retrieved
September 12, 2013 from http://www.gadoe.org/Technology- Services/Pages/default.aspx
The Georgia Department of Educations 3-year technology plan provides a good overall example of what
Georgia districts plans should look like. The technology plan includes several main sections, covering areas
such as vision, goals, initiatives, which will be delivered in stages to ensure every Georgia student receives a
customized education. Although the state plan looks a bit different than many of the states district plans, the
same basic information is covered, including spending, professional learning. The bulk of the plan is the
initiatives broken down for each sub group including: teachers and administrators, students, parents and
business.
Florida department of education district technology plans: Essential components and e-rate plan criteria.
(n.d.). Retrieved September 13, 2013 from http://www.fldoe.org/bii/Instruct_Tech/Planning/local.asp
The Florida DOE Tehnology Plan Essential Components and E-Rate Plan Criteria is a guide for school districts
in Florida when completing the required technology plan. The plan maps our each major section (ten total) and
summarizes the essential components in each of those sections. Most of the major sections are very similar or
the same as many of the other state and national technology plans. The one area that is not as common is
section 10; E-rate planning criteria. This section goes into detail the requirements needed to participate in the
federal E-Rate program. The federal E-Rate program provides telecommunication services at a discount rate to
districts that participate in the program. One of the requirements to be considered for the E-rate program is to
have a technology plan. This document details the four sub-sections needed in the E-rate planning criteria
Technology Planning 4
section: 1) clear goals and realistic strategy, 2) professional development strategy, 3) assessment of the services,
hardware, software provided, and 4) an evaluation process.
Vanderlinde, R., Dexter, S., & van Braak, J. (2012). School-based ICT policy plans in primary
education: Elements, typologies and underlying processes. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 43(3), 505-519. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01191.x
This study on school-based ITC policy plans in primary education identified three types of ITC (informationcommunication technology) plans. The three types were: a plan as a vision blueprint, a plan as a technical
inventory, and a plan as a comprehensive policy plan. The study found that teachers and districts with
technology plans that stressed shared goals used educational technology more regularly in the classroom and
had more success implementing the plan criteria. The study also found that ITC plans were created in a variety
of ways. Some examples were ITC training activities, data-driven decision making processes and monitoring
processes. The study found that the use of data and the involvement of teachers led to a more complete and
elaborate plan.
Anderson, Larry S and John F. Perry, Jr. Technology Planning: Recipe for Success. March 1994.
Retrieved September 13, 2013 from http://www.nctp.com/html/tp_recipe.cfm
According to the National Center for Technology Planning (NCTP), the desired outcome of effective
technology planning is that the most appropriate technologies are infused in the most natural manner into a
maximally-effective instructional or administrative program. The NCTP determined that although many
schools have established technology plans, the plans themselves vary widely in size, appearance and scope.
This article attempts to define the essential principals for technology planning and steps to ensure its success. It
can be used as a planning document, reflective of interaction among all components in the planning cycle. It
also directs readers to their website as a place to acquire planning aids, public relations announcements,
checklists, and professional development opportunities.
Anderson, Dr. Larry S. Technology Planning: Its More Than Computers. Retrieved on September 14, 2013
from http://www.nctp.com/tech_plan_links.cfm
This article redefines technology planning. It reminds educators that planning is a comprehensive activity in
planning and not simply purchasing computers for classrooms. The author compares a great technology plan to
a road map. A good Technology Plan map should not only show the distances from one place to another but
also the type and form of infrastructure available for traversing those distances, the direction in which one is
Technology Planning 5
traveling, various points along the path a person would take in getting from one point to another, and a variety
of other descriptive, informative matter. Technology planners must recognize the power of computers; however,
they must know that technology involves so much more than the boxes, wires, and switches of hardware.
Planners must work diligently to make sure honest and effective ideas are manifested in the words of their
written technology planning document and action plan.
Ellmore, Douglas A. Sr. , et al. Reinventing Schools: The Technology is Now! (1995). Retrieved on
Section 2 Rubric
School System Technology Plans Rubric
Category
Goals
3
Exceeds
Standards
2
Meets
Standards
Goals are
wide-ranging
1
Does Not Meet Score
Comments and
Standards
Recommendations
Goals are absent
or seem to be
Technology Planning 6
Objectives
Professional
Development
focused on
technology
equipment.
Goals are
difficult to
understand.
Objectives are
missing or
inadequate; are
unrealistic or
difficult to
comprehend.
Plan supports
Plan does not
staff within
support the staff
school/district.
or allow
Collaboration
collaboration
with peers is
with peers to
used to ensure ensure meeting
meeting the
the individual
individual
learner needs.
learner needs.
Identifies needs
Assessment of
assessment
Telecommunication
strategies
for
Services, Hardware,
technical
Software, and other
support,
services needed
Accessibility of
Technology
Resources
Identifies
strategies for
basic
troubleshooting
assistance and
concerning
maintenance;
technology
individualize
issues, support
technology
system,
support training, process, and
Accurate
schedule of
documentation maintenance.
of maintenance
is clearly
identified.
Missing
technical
support
strategies and
guidelines.
Provides a
Provides a
detailed plan for vague plan for
the Americans the Americans
with Disabilities
with
No plan is
provided for the
Americans with
Disabilities Act.
Technology Planning 7
Act.
Budget
Provides a
ranked list of
major tech plan
pricing and
timelines.
Provides
detailed budget
summary
estimate of
expenses.
Budget and
timelines are
realistic and
consistent with
goals.
Disabilities Act.
Provides most,
Budget is
but not all,
missing;
budgets and
provides little or
timelines.
unclear
Budget is
information on
consistent with
budgets and
goals.
timelines; budget
is not relevant
and impractical.
Ongoing Evaluation
The monitoring
process of the
technology plan
is absent.
Conclusion and
Recommendations
Clearly
recognizes the
most important
needs and
challenges
confronting the
district.
Recommendations are stated.
Conclusions
and
Conclusions and
recommendations
are missing.
recommendations
are reasonable
although the
basis of some
conclusions are
not completely
clear.
Marietta, Georgia
http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marietta-city.org%2Ffiles%2Ftechnology%2FMCS%2520Technology
%2520Plan.pdf%23search%3D%2522technology%2520plan%2522&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGtr1zm7F27Xg0TZtZORuQoSo3e5Q
3
Exceeds
Standards
2
Meets
Standards
1
Does Not Meet Score
Comments and
Standards
Recommendations
Technology Planning 8
Goals
Objectives
Professional
Development
Goals are
Few goals are Goals are absent
wide-ranging
based on
or seem to be
and realistic for teaching and
focused on
teaching and
learning goals.
technology
learning. Goals
equipment.
clearly state
Goals are
when and what
difficult to
will be done.
understand.
Identifies needs
Assessment of
assessment
Telecommunication
strategies
for
Services, Hardware,
Objectives are
missing or
inadequate; are
unrealistic or
difficult to
comprehend.
Plan supports
Plan does not
staff within
support the staff
school/district.
or allow
Collaboration
collaboration
with peers is
with peers to
used to ensure ensure meeting
meeting the
the individual
individual
learner needs.
learner needs.
Identifies
strategies for
basic
Missing
technical
support
Goals are
relevant to
infrastructure
needs. Goals
need to be more
specific, focusing
more on meeting
the needs for all
stakeholders.
Goals also need
a clear timeline
for assessment
and
achievement.
Objectives are
shown but are
not clearly
defined from
goals. Steps
should be
included to show
how the
objectives will be
used to achieve
goals.
Professional
Development is
compliant and
stated. Additional
classes are
needed to focus
on using new
technology in the
classroom, as well
as how the PL can
improve teaching
and learning.
A trouble
shooting
schedule is
Technology Planning 9
Software, and other
services needed
technical
troublesupport,
shooting
assistance and
concerning
maintenance;
technology
individualize
issues, support
technology
system,
support training, process, and
Accurate
schedule of
documentation maintenance.
of maintenance
is clearly
identified.
strategies and
guidelines.
Accessibility of
Technology
Resources
Provides a
Provides a
No plan is
detailed plan for vague plan for provided for the
the Americans the Americans Americans with
with Disabilities
with
Disabilities Act.
Act.
Disabilities Act.
Budget
Provides a
Provides most,
Budget is
ranked list of
but not all,
missing;
major tech plan
budgets and
provides little or
pricing and
timelines.
unclear
timelines.
Budget is
information on
Provides
consistent with
budgets and
detailed budget
goals.
timelines; budget
summary
is not relevant
estimate of
and impractical.
expenses.
Budget and
timelines are
realistic and
consistent with
goals.
Ongoing Evaluation
The monitoring
process of the
technology plan
is absent.
shown. Specific
school site
improvements
and
documentation
should be
included for
accountability.
There is no plan is
provided for the
Americans with
Disabilities Act.
This should be
included in the
objectives and
inserted into the
report.
Budget specifics
are not clearly
specified.
Although timelines
for
goals/objectives
are labeled, those
too are vague.
More detail is
needed for
accountability.
Technology Planning 10
Conclusion and
Recommendations
Clearly
Conclusions Conclusions and
recommendations
recognizes the
and
are missing.
most important recommendations
are
needs and
reasonable
challenges
although the
confronting the
basis of some
district.
conclusions
are
Recommendations
not completely
are stated.
clear.
There is no
section for
conclusions or
recommendation.
One needs to be
added for future
reference and
continuing
monitoring.