P6uk Jun 2011 Qu
P6uk Jun 2011 Qu
P6uk Jun 2011 Qu
(United Kingdom)
Monday 6 June 2011
Time allowed
Reading and planning:
Writing:
15 minutes
3 hours
Paper P6 (UK)
SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
You should assume that the tax rates and allowances for the tax year 2010/11 and for the financial year to
31 March 2011 will continue to apply for the foreseeable future unless you are instructed otherwise.
Calculations and workings need only be made to the nearest .
All apportionments should be made to the nearest month.
All workings should be shown.
Basic rate
Higher rate
Additional rate
1 37,400
37,401 to 150,000
150,001 and over
Normal
rates
%
20
40
50
Dividend
rates
%
10
325
425
A starting rate of 10% applies to savings income where it falls within the first 2,440 of taxable income.
Personal allowances
Personal allowance
Standard
65 74
75 and over
6,475
9,490
9,640
22,900
100,000
%
5
10
255,000
1,800,000
3,600
40p
25p
20
10
Motor cars (purchases since 6 April 2009 (1 April 2009 for limited companies))
CO2 emissions up to 110 grams per kilometre
CO2 emissions between 111 and 160 grams per kilometre
CO2 emissions over 160 grams per kilometre
100
20
10
100
Industrial buildings
Writing-down allowance
Financial year
Small profits rate
Main rate
Lower limit
Upper limit
Standard fraction
Corporation tax
2008
21%
28%
2009
21%
28%
2010
21%
28%
1,300,000
1,500,000
1,300,000
1,500,000
1,300,000
1,500,000
7/400
7/400
7/400
Marginal Relief
Standard fraction x (U A) x N/A
Standard rate
Registration limit
Deregistration limit
175%
20%
70,000
68,000
Nil
40%
20%
Over
Over
Over
Over
3
4
5
6
but
but
but
but
less
less
less
less
than
than
than
than
4
5
6
7
Percentage
reduction
%
20
40
60
80
years
years
years
years
[P.T.O.
18%
28%
10,100
5,000,000
10%
Employee
%
Nil
110
110
Class 1
Employer
Nil
128
Class 1A
128
Class 2
Class 4
Nil
80
10
4%
3%
05%
Stamp duty land tax
150,000
150,001
250,001
500,001
%
Nil
1
3
4
or less (1)
250,000 (2)
500,000
or more
Stamp duty
Shares
05%
[P.T.O.
Your manager has sent you an email with two attachments in respect of a new client called Calisia. The first
attachment is an extract from a letter from Calisia, in which she has asked the firm to consider how she can increase
the income of her daughter, Farfisa, and to review her own inheritance tax position.
The second attachment is a schedule setting out what your manager wants you to do in order to prepare for a meeting
with Calisia.
Attachment 1 Extract from letter from Calisia
(a) Farfisa Additional income
My daughter, Farfisa, will leave home and start her first job on 1 October 2011 in London. She will be working
for Jelmini Ltd and will be paid a salary of 28,000 (gross) per year. Jelmini Ltd will also provide Farfisa with
an interest free loan of 2,700 in order for her to purchase suitable business clothing. The loan is to be repaid
on 30 September 2013.
We have estimated that Farfisas expenses will be 2,500 per month (of which 550 will be rent) so her salary
after tax will be insufficient. At present Farfisa has no other income so I have identified three possible transfers
of capital that I could make to her in order to generate the income she requires.
(i)
260,000
380,000
700,000
440,000
1,300,000
200,000
100,000
320,000
a fourth possibility (which I expect to be more tax efficient) whereby Calisia gifts the property to Farfisa
who then lives in it. Any shortfall in income could then be satisfied by renting out the second bedroom.
You should include a calculation of the minimum monthly rent that would need to be charged in order to
provide sufficient income for Farfisa.
Start by calculating the excess of Farfisas budgeted expenditure over her salary after all taxes for a 12-month
period. This will enable you to determine the value of shares she will need to be given under each of the
possibilities in order to provide her with the income she needs. Remember to take into account any income
tax due on the income received by Farfisa when calculating the income she will retain in respect of the assets
transferred.
Conclude with a summary, showing the capital gains tax payable in respect of each of the four alternatives.
Please include a note of the stamp duty or stamp duty land tax implications of each proposal.
You should assume the following:
a sale or gift of the investment property will result in legal fees of 6,000;
all claims and elections necessary to reduce immediate tax liabilities will be made.
Further information
Calisia and Farfisa are resident and ordinarily resident in the UK.
Calisia is a higher rate taxpayer who makes sufficient capital gains every year to utilise her annual exempt
amount.
Calisia has not made a claim for entrepreneurs relief in the past.
(b) Calisia Inheritance tax
Calisia is domiciled in the UK and has not made any lifetime gifts. I want you to prepare a comprehensive
explanation of how Calisias inheritance tax liability would be calculated if she were to die today. Please try to
identify all of the issues that are relevant to Calisias situation together with any matters that need to be
confirmed with her in order for reliefs and/or exemptions to be available. I do not want you to perform any
calculations as we do not have sufficient information at present.
Further information
Calisias husband died in 2002. He had not made any lifetime gifts and he left the whole of his estate,
consisting principally of quoted shares and UK property, to Calisia.
Required:
(a) Farfisa Additional income
Prepare the notes and supporting calculations as set out in the schedule from your manager.
(21 marks)
(10 marks)
Professional marks will be awarded in question 1 for the effectiveness with which the information is communicated
and the extent to which the calculations are approached in a logical manner.
(3 marks)
(34 marks)
7
[P.T.O.
Your manager has sent you an email concerning a client, Petzold. An extract from the email together with two
schedules of information from Petzold are set out below.
Email from your manager
Petzold has owned 100% of the ordinary share capital of Glenz Ltd for many years. Glenz Ltd is a profitable trading
company that provides Petzold with the majority of his income. However, the company is currently suffering from
a short-term cash flow problem.
Petzold also owns 100% of the ordinary share capital of Clementi Ltd. Clementi Ltd has three wholly owned trading
subsidiaries but all of the companies in the group are very small. Petzold purchased Clementi Ltd in December
2010.
I want you to draft a letter to Petzold from me that deals with the following issues.
(a) Glenz Ltd Payments to the tax authorities
(i)
Calculations of the payments that will be made by Glenz Ltd to the tax authorities in respect of the three
months ended 30 June 2011 and the equivalent figure for the three months ended 30 September 2011
based on the companys budgeted figures as set out in Schedule 1 from Petzold.
Petzold is only interested in those payments which affect the companys cash flow position. Accordingly,
as the annual salaries shown represent the gross salaries earned there is no need to calculate the income
tax or employees national insurance contributions payable in respect of them.
Glenz Ltd is partially exempt for the purposes of value added tax (VAT) and was unable to recover all of
its input tax in the year ending 31 March 2011.
Please provide explanations of the amount of input tax recoverable by Glenz Ltd but do not include any
other narrative.
(ii) Confirmation, or otherwise, of the accuracy of Petzolds calculation of the companys corporation tax
liability for the year ending 31 March 2011 (see Schedule 1) including an explanation of any difference
and a reminder of when the tax is payable.
(b) Glenz Ltd Cash flow
(i)
The implications of the following suggestions from Petzold to improve the companys cash flow position.
Paying Glenz Ltds VAT liabilities in respect of the quarters ending 30 June 2011 and 30 September
2011 late. Glenz Ltds previous four VAT returns have been submitted on time with the exception of
the return for the three months ended 30 June 2010.
The retention by Glenz Ltd of a refund of corporation tax of 21,000 that it received from HM
Revenue and Customs in May 2011. Petzold has not been able to identify any reason for this refund.
(ii) I have suggested to Petzold that Glenz Ltd could improve its cash flow position by selling its warehouse
and then renting it back. I have agreed to provide him with a summary of the corporation tax implications
of this proposal together with supporting calculations.
The summary should include a detailed explanation of how the chargeable gain arising on the sale of the
warehouse could be relieved via rollover relief.
You should assume that any sale of the warehouse will take place on 1 July 2011 and that rent will be
paid from that date. Base your calculations on the figures provided by Petzold in Schedule 2.
I do not want you to address the VAT or the stamp duty land tax implications of this proposal.
Tax manager
360,000
24,500
365,000
23,400
40,000
950
800
41,750
42,000
2,200
1,500
45,700
Input tax:
Attributable to taxable supplies
Attributable to exempt supplies
Non-attributable
Total
Total annual salaries for the companys eight full-time employees 332,000
Corporation tax liability for the year ended 31 March 2011 17,535 (83,500 x 21%)
Schedule 2
The warehouse
Cost (1 February 2001)
Current market value
Estimated commercial annual rent payable to the new owner
180,000
330,000
22,000
Required:
Prepare the letter to Petzold requested in the email from your manager. The following marks are available.
(a) Glenz Ltd Payments to the tax authorities.
(12 marks)
(16 marks)
Professional marks will be awarded in question 2 for the appropriateness of the format of the letter and the
effectiveness with which the information is communicated.
(2 marks)
Note: The following figures from the Retail Prices Index should be used.
February 2001
July 2011
1720
2355 (assumed)
(30 marks)
[P.T.O.
Faure expects her new business to make a loss in its first trading period. She requires advice on the choice of year
end and on the difference between employing her husband in the business and running the business as a partnership.
The following information has been obtained from discussions with Faure.
Faure:
Is 44 years old and married to Ravel.
Has not had an income tax liability since the tax year 2002/03.
Intends to start a new business on 1 July 2011 under the trading name Bah-Tock.
Bah-Tock will be Faures only source of income.
The Bah-Tock business:
Is expected to make a loss throughout the first 12 months of trading.
Is expected to be profitable from 1 July 2012 onwards.
Structure of the Bah-Tock business:
The business will be unincorporated.
Faure and Ravel will both work full-time on the affairs of the business.
Faure will either employ Ravel, and pay him a commercial salary, or the two of them will run the business as a
partnership.
Ravel:
Is 47 years old.
Inherited a significant portfolio of quoted shares on the death of his mother in February 2003.
Has annual taxable income, after deduction of the personal allowance, of 35,000.
This income consists of bank interest and dividends only.
Required:
(a) Explain why a year end of 30 June, as opposed to 31 March, is likely to delay the first tax year in which the
Bah-Tock business makes a taxable profit rather than an allowable loss.
(4 marks)
(b) On the assumption that the Bah-Tock business will have a 30 June year end, analyse the issues that Faure
and Ravel should be aware of from a tax point of view if:
(i) Faure employs Ravel;
(ii) Faure and Ravel are partners in the business
and summarise your findings.
Notes in relation to part (b)
1
Your analysis should be based on the information provided and should be restricted to the situation where
the business is loss-making.
You should address the effect of the choice of business structure on:
10
Capstan requires advice on the transfer of a property to a trust, the sale of shares in respect of which relief has been
received under the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) and the sale of shares and qualifying corporate bonds
following a takeover.
The following information was obtained from a meeting with Capstan.
Capstan:
Expects to have taxable income in the tax year 2011/12 of 80,000.
Transferred a UK property to a discretionary trust on 1 May 2011.
Plans to sell ordinary shares in Agraffe Ltd and loan stock and ordinary shares in Pinblock plc.
Will make all available claims to reduce the tax due in respect of his planned disposals.
Entrepreneurs relief is not available in respect of any of these disposals.
Transfer of a UK property to a discretionary trust:
Capstan acquired the property in May 2003 for 285,000.
The market value of the property on 1 May 2011 was 425,000.
Capstan had used the property as a second home throughout his period of ownership.
Capstan will pay any inheritance tax due on the gift of the property to the trust.
Sale of ordinary shares in Agraffe Ltd:
Capstan subscribed for 18,000 shares in Agraffe Ltd for 32,000 on 1 February 2009.
He obtained EIS relief of 6,400 against his income tax liability.
Capstan intends to sell all of the shares for 20,000 on 1 July 2011.
Capstan will relieve the loss arising on the shares in the most tax efficient manner.
Sale of loan stock and ordinary shares in Pinblock plc:
Capstan will sell 8,000 7% Pinblock plc non-convertible loan stock for 10,600.
Capstan will also sell 12,000 shares in Pinblock plc for 69,000.
The sales will take place on 1 August 2011.
Capstans acquisition of loan stock and ordinary shares in Pinblock plc:
Capstan purchased 15,000 shares in Wippen plc for 26,000 on 1 May 2004.
Pinblock plc acquired 100% of the ordinary share capital of Wippen plc on 1 October 2007.
The takeover was for bona fide commercial reasons and was not for the avoidance of tax.
Capstan received 8,000 Pinblock plc non-convertible loan stock (a qualifying corporate bond) and 20,000
ordinary shares in Pinblock plc in exchange for his shares in Wippen plc.
The loan stock and the shares were worth 9,000 and 40,000 respectively as at 1 October 2007.
Required:
(a) Set out, together with supporting calculations, the inheritance tax and capital gains tax implications of the
transfer of the UK property to the trust and the date(s) on which any tax due will be payable.
(6 marks)
(b) Explain, with supporting calculations, in connection with the sale of shares in Agraffe Ltd
(c) Calculate Capstans taxable capital gains for the tax year 2011/12.
(7 marks)
(5 marks)
Note: in parts (a) and (b) you should clearly state any assumptions you have made together with any additional
information that you would need to confirm with Capstan before finalising your calculations.
(18 marks)
11
[P.T.O.
The Loriod plc group intends to acquire an overseas business. It requires advice on the relief available in respect of
any initial losses made by the business, the use of foreign tax credits and transfer pricing.
The following information has been obtained from the management of the Loriod plc group.
Loriod plc group:
Loriod plc is a UK resident trading company.
Loriod plc has a large number of wholly-owned UK resident trading subsidiary companies.
It should be assumed that all group companies pay corporation tax at the main rate of 28%.
Elivar Ltd, one of the Loriod plc group subsidiaries, is to acquire the Frager business.
The purchase of the Frager business will follow either Strategy A or Strategy B.
Elivar Ltd:
Makes gift aid payments of 2,000 each year.
Has taxable total profits of approximately 90,000 per year.
The
Frager business:
Is carried on in the country of Kuwata and is owned by Syme Inc, a company resident in Kuwata.
Manufactures components used by Elivar Ltd and other Loriod plc group companies.
Carries on the same trade as Elivar Ltd.
Is expected to make a loss in the year following its acquisition by Elivar Ltd.
Is expected to have taxable profits of 130,000 per year following the year of acquisition.
Strategy A:
Elivar Ltd will purchase the trade and all of the assets of Syme Inc such that Elivar Ltd will be carrying on the
Frager business through a permanent establishment in Kuwata.
The permanent establishment will be controlled from the UK.
Strategy B:
Elivar Ltd will purchase the whole of the share capital of Syme Inc such that Syme Inc will be a subsidiary of
Elivar Ltd resident in Kuwata.
It has been determined that Syme Inc would not be a controlled foreign company.
The
Required:
(a) Provide a detailed explanation of the relief available in respect of the expected loss to be made by the Frager
business depending on whether the purchase follows Strategy A or Strategy B.
(7 marks)
(b) For this part of the question it should be assumed that the purchase has followed Strategy A and that the
Frager business is now profitable.
Explain, with supporting calculations, how to determine the maximum loss that can be surrendered to Elivar
Ltd by the Loriod plc group companies if relief in respect of the tax suffered in Kuwata is not to be wasted.
(5 marks)
(c) For this part of the question it should be assumed that the purchase has followed Strategy B.
Explain the effect of the prices charged by the subsidiary in Kuwata to other companies in the Loriod plc
group on the total tax paid by the group and the implications of the transfer pricing legislation. (6 marks)
(18 marks)
12