SQM-Crop Kit Mango L-En
SQM-Crop Kit Mango L-En
SQM-Crop Kit Mango L-En
28-11-2006 12:46:36
I hereby would like to thank Harmen Tjalling Holwerda (SQM Europe) for his
facilitation of the publication of this document.
Dr Steven A. Oosthuyse (PhD)
Mango CropKit_English 2
28-11-2006 12:46:38
Foreword
SQM is a major supplier of specialty plant nutrition products and related services
to distributors and growers around the world.
As part of its commitment to the agricultural community, SQM has developed a
comprehensive series of Crop Kits. Each Crop Kit consists of a Specialty Plant
Nutrition Management Guide, a PowerPoint presentation and a CD containing
many relevant pictures.
These guides compile the results of yearlong research and development activities,
as well as the practical experiences of the companys specialists from around
the world, in order to provide comprehensive Specialty Plant Nutrition
Management Information to SQMs distributors, agronomists, growers and
farmers.
This Mango Nutrition Management Guide summarizes the main market
requirements and the nutrient management needed to produce high yields of top
quality mangoes.
More information is available through SQM agronomists or SQMs alliance
partner Yara. SQM recognizes that there is no universal blueprint for mango production hence no detailed plant nutrition programme is included in this guide.
However, by working together with your local agronomist you can be sure to
achieve excellent crop performance. For area specific programmes consult your
local SQM distributor or agronomist.
This guide, which has been developed with the full support of the worlds leading
specialty plant nutrition specialists, is part of a range of the most comprehensive
Specialty Plant Nutrition Management Guides available.
Mango CropKit_English 3
28-11-2006 12:46:39
Table of Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1 Nutritional status as it relates to tree performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2 Key issues relating to mango tree culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.1 Nomenclature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.2 Rainfall, diseases and soil-water management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.3 Soil suitability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.4 Tree growth and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.5 Fruit harvest-maturation assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.6 Fruit quality assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3 Primary roles of the mineral nutrients requiring management in mango . . . 26
3.1 Nitrogen (N) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.2 Phosphorous (P) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.3 Potassium (K) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.4 Calcium (Ca) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.5 Magnesium (Mg) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.6 Sulphur (S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.7 Copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), boron (B)
and molybdenum (Mo) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
4 Nutrition management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.1 Guideline information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.2 Nutrition management of mango trees grown in soils
containing clay (> 20%) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
4.3 Nutrition management of mango trees grown in soils
containing little clay (< 10%) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
4.4 Favourable growth stages for spray applied nutrients . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4.5 Pre-plant soil preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
5 Visual symptoms of certain deficiency and excess imbalances . . . . . . . . . . 40
5.1 Some visual micro-nutrient deficiency symptoms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
5.2 Some visual macro- and major-nutrient deficiency symptoms . . . . . . 45
5.3 Some nutrient excess (toxicity) symptoms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Mango CropKit_English 4
28-11-2006 12:46:39
Mango CropKit_English 5
28-11-2006 12:46:39
Introduction
The aim of this Mango Nutrient-Status Management Guide is to provide
pertinent information enabling SQMs business partners to effectively manage
mango tree nutrient status. Information is also provided to enable the reader to
gain an understanding of mango tree culture.
Crop phenology, required growing conditions, and nutritional balance as it
relates to fruit quality, are dealt with. Consideration is given to the main roles
of the macro- and trace elements as they relate to tree growth and function.
Some nutrient deficiency and excess imbalances are also given attention. Tree
fertilization promoting the accomplishment of the ideal balance between the
essential nutrients is considered.
Chapter 1 provides the basis for nutrition management as it relates to orchard
performance in terms of revenue generation. Chapter 2 furnishes general
information concerning mango growth and development, soil and climatic
requirements, diseases, harvest maturity determination, and quality assessment.
The essential roles of the nutrients requiring management are presented in
Chapter 3. Guideline data enabling effective nutrition management is presented
in Chapter 4. Chapter 5 comprises photographs facilitating the diagnosis of
various visual excess and deficiency nutrient imbalances. Chapter 6 provides
practical information concerning tree fertilization for soils differing in a number of
key characteristics. In Chapter 7, some pertinent research results are presented.
The literature cited is presented in Chapter 8.
Mango CropKit_English 6
28-11-2006 12:46:40
1 Nutritional Status
as it Relates to
Tree Performance
Tree performance, considered in terms of revenue generation, relates
fundamentally to tree health, being in turn a function of the extent to which
nutrient levels in the various tissues are in balance for a particular growth stage.
A reduction in performance will occur if imbalance exists, both with respect to
deficiency (deficiency imbalance) and excess (excess imbalance). As a result of the
general removal of mineral nutrients from the orchard via fruit harvest, soil nutrient
leaching, the removal of prunings, and water run-off, nutrient replenishment is
generally required to rectify balance. Nutrient status management generally
entails the supply of the mineral nutrients requiring management in the correct
proportions and at opportune development stages.
An ideal fertilization programme is one that enables the nutrient-status balance
to be perfectly maintained during the organ building processes characterizing
mango tree growth and development. Guideline data, procured from focused
research, can be used to facilitate decisions concerning the supply of nutrients in
relative and quantitative terms. Guideline data can take the form of leaf nutrient
concentration norms. Such norms are relevant to leaves sampled at a particular
stage of maturation and according to a prescribed method.
Nutrient accumulation estimates, whether absolute or relative (nutrient accumulation in terms of inclusion in the various organs as growth and development occurs),
can also serve as valuable information to maintain balance. Soil attribute and
nutrient status norms are also useful. It is noteworthy that the provision of guidance
data be such that its procurement is from superior performing trees.
Fertilizers, whether applied on the above-ground parts (via spraying) or to the soil,
should be viewed as nutritional-balance management tools. Fertilizer formulations
differ vastly in their ability to alter plant nutrient status, certain of which are more
effective than others.
Tree revenue generation relates to yield and fruit quality. Fruit quality relates
directly to the attributes desired by the target market. Guideline data should be
procured from superior performing trees, in terms of revenue generation. Orchard
revenue bears a direct relation with the extent to which the target market preferences are met as well as orchard yield.
Mango CropKit_English 7
28-11-2006 12:46:40
Mango CropKit_English 8
28-11-2006 12:46:41
Figure 2. Tommy Atkins mango trees bearing fruits nearing the stage of harvest
maturation.
Mango CropKit_English 9
28-11-2006 12:46:42
10
Figure 3. Bacterial black spot lesions on an unripe Keitt mango. Star-like lesions
develop. Once developed they weep, exuding sap.
Mango CropKit_English 10
28-11-2006 12:46:43
11
Mango CropKit_English 11
28-11-2006 12:46:44
12
Mango CropKit_English 12
28-11-2006 12:46:45
Figure 9. Blight lesions on a young Keitt mango, and totally blighted fruitlets
(adjacent). Fruit-drop is often associated with partial blight fruit-colonization.
28-11-2006 12:46:46
14
Tree water demand varies appreciably in relation to growth stage during the
seasonal cycle. Demand is substantially increased in trees just having produced
a new flush, or being in flower, or having set a crop. The water need of trees
possessing newly developing inflorescences is particularly high. Water demand
monitoring (for example, with tensiometers) and water application (irrigation)
based on need during a particular stage are essential to avoid inflorescence wilt
or fruit drop. Tensiometer irrigation-scheduling (Figure 11) is superior in managing
soil water content where the soil clay content exceeds 10%. Scheduling based on
the data obtained from a Neutron Probe, Deviner or Class A Pan can be adopted
where the soil clay content is less than 10%.
Mango CropKit_English 14
28-11-2006 12:46:47
Figure 12. Mango leaves are susceptible to salinity damage (salt-burn). Irrigation
management, where the soil and water are saline, should be primarily geared to
salinity damage avoidance.
15
Mango CropKit_English 15
28-11-2006 12:46:48
16
Mango CropKit_English 16
28-11-2006 12:46:48
Soil pH levels from 5,5 to 7,0 are considered to be ideal (Nakasone and Paull,
1998). In acid soils, lime (calcitic, or dolomitic if the soil magnesium content is
low) should be incorporated to a sufficient depth (at least 80 cm) to rectify soil
pH prior to planting (Figure 14). Furthermore, the soil should contain sufficient
phosphate at planting. Applied phosphate should concurrently be incorporated
to the same depth.
Figure 14. Soil pH and the soil phosphorous content should, in particular,
be rectified before planting.
17
Mango CropKit_English 17
28-11-2006 12:46:49
18
Mango CropKit_English 18
28-11-2006 12:46:51
19
Mango CropKit_English 19
28-11-2006 12:46:51
20
Figure 18. After terminal inflorescence development, new shoots are produced
laterally from buds close to the point of inflorescence attachment.
Mango CropKit_English 20
28-11-2006 12:46:52
Figure 20. Fruits set on the inflorescences. Lateral buds are inhibited from
developing on fruit-bearing terminal shoots.
In the situation of adequate soil water availability and non-stressful evaporative
demand, ambient temperatures determine the frequency of flushing; new shoot
development becoming less frequent when daily temperatures drop during autumn
and winter. Mango trees can become exceptionally large, attaining heights in
excess of 25 metres. Yearly pruning (branch heading) of productive trees is
required to keep canopy-size in check, thereby preventing over-crowding and
yield decline. Canopies or canopy-sections, well exposed to sunlight 70 to 90% of
sunlight hours, are the most productive (Figure 21).
21
Mango CropKit_English 21
28-11-2006 12:46:53
22
Figure 21. Canopy height and width control will ensure perpetual cropping due
to sustained canopy exposure to sunlight.
Mango CropKit_English 22
28-11-2006 12:46:54
23
Mango CropKit_English 23
28-11-2006 12:46:55
24
Figure 23. The occurrence of clearly raised shoulders on the fruit indicates
readiness to harvest in many varieties. The degree to which fruit become round
from being oblong can also serve as an indication of stage of maturation.
Mango CropKit_English 24
28-11-2006 12:46:56
25
Mango CropKit_English 25
28-11-2006 12:46:57
26
Nutrient
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Potassium
Calcium
Mass in grams
1.000,00
215,79
1.568,26
182,60
Magnesium
141,25
Sulphur
123,40
Copper
1,56
Iron
8,54
Manganese
3,43
Zinc
2,99
Boron
4,12
Molybdenum
0,01
Mango CropKit_English 26
28-11-2006 12:46:57
Certain nutrients are mobile in the phloem (the living translocation system of the
tree), whereas others are not. Nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, magnesium and
molybdenum are phloem mobile, whereas sulphur, copper, iron, manganese, zinc
and boron are immobile or sparingly phloem-mobile. This aspect dictates whether
deficiency first occurs in young developing tissues or in older organs. As the
phloem mobile nutrients can be translocated from developed parts of the tree
to the sites of meristematic activity, their deficiency is always noted first in older
tissues, typically in the older leaves. The converse is true for the nutrients that are
phloem immobile; deficiency occurring first in the young developing tissues.
The nutrients requiring management are either used for the formation of organic
compounds (proteins, carbohydrates, enzymes, nucleic acids), or have a direct
regulatory role in tree growth and function. The following summarizes some of
their functions.
3.1 Nitrogen
Nitrogen is a component of many structural, regulatory and energy compounds,
it arising in amino acids, proteins, nucleotides, phospholipids, energy transfer
compounds (adenosine phosphates) and enzymes. It is also a component of
chlorophyll, which imparts stems and leaves with their green colour; chlorophyll
being a key component of the photosynthetic apparatus. Nitrogen supply is of
particular concern after harvest for the support of new shoot growth; these shoots
being accountable for carbohydrate reserve replenishment during the autumn
and winter months, as well as bearing the following seasons reproductive organs
(inflorescences and fruits). Nitrogen is mobile in the phloem, and hence, can be
translocated from older leaves to active meristems, for example.
3.2 Phosphorous
Phosphorous is a component of structural and energy transfer compounds, being
found in phospholipids and adenosine phosphates. It is also a component of
nucleotides, the building blocks of DNA and RNA. Phosphorous supply is of
particular concern during periods of root development and during flowering and
early fruit development. Phosphorous is mobile in the phloem, and hence, can be
translocated between tree organs.
27
Mango CropKit_English 27
28-11-2006 12:46:57
28
3.3 Potassium
Of the supplied nutrients, potassium is required in the greatest quantity by productive mango trees. Potassium does not become a structural component of a plantsynthesized compound. It has a highly significant role in facilitating the transport of
metabolites in plants, being involved in the transfer of carbohydrates from leaves
to expanding fruits (Figure 25) and in the movement of nitrogen in the phloem.
Its importance regarding metabolite transport is evidenced by its relatively high
concentration in the phloem. Potassium also plays an important role in stomata
aperture size regulation, and thus tree water loss. Its presence has been associated with increased fibre strength, enhanced photosynthesis, increased cold and
drought tolerance, and increased stem rigidity. Superior fruit quality, which in
turn bears a relation with efficient plant functionality, is associated with adequate
potassium uptake and favourable supply. Sufficient accumulation in the tree during
the period preceding flowering is vitally important, since root supply is unable to
meet demand during the rapid period of fruit growth. Potassium is highly mobile
in the phloem.
ml/plant
2.0
High in K
1.5
1.0
Low in K
0.5
0
30 60 90 120 150 180
minutes
Mango CropKit_English 28
28-11-2006 12:46:57
3.4 Calcium
Calcium is an essential component of the cell wall and membranes, imparting
integrity (resistance to breakdown or attack) to the cells. Hence, calcium should be
in sufficient supply at all of the sites of meristematic activity. Calcium is immobile in
living tissues, and for this reason, its supply throughout the plant is totally reliant
on the supply of root-acquired water. Breaks in water supply give rise to breaks in
calcium supply to the regions where growth and development is occurring. Calcium
has also a role to play in promoting the formation of proteins.
3.5 Magnesium
Magnesium is most well known for its position and role in being a component of the
chlorophyll molecule. Magnesium also has an important role to play in facilitating
the translocation of phosphorous. Magnesium is highly mobile in the phloem.
3.6 Sulphur
Sulphur is a component of the amino acids, methionine, cysteine, thiamine and
biotin, which often comprise many parts of proteins and enzymes. Sulphur is
involved in chlorophyll formation. It is relatively immobile in the phloem; its supply
to the growing parts of the plant thus being dependent on water distribution and
availability.
29
Mango CropKit_English 29
28-11-2006 12:46:58
30
Mango CropKit_English 30
28-11-2006 12:46:58
4 Nutrition Management
4.1 Guideline Information
Leaf nutrient-concentration norms should be determined with a view to orchard
revenue maximization. Revenue maximization directly relates to the quantity of
good quality fruits produced by an orchard. Fruit quality has a direct bearing
on target market preference. Tree nutrient balance, as referenced from the results
of leaf analysis, has been shown, by correlative analysis, to have a strong impact
on fruit quality as well as on the incidence of post-harvest diseases in mango
(Oosthuyse, 1997a).
Table 2 shows leaf norms (dry weight leaf concentrations) suitable for the Floridian
group of mango cultivars grown for the European market (Oosthuyse, 1998a). In
this group are varieties such as Tommy Atkins, Keitt, Kent, Haden and Sensation.
Table 2. Leaf norms (dry weight concentrations) appropriate for the Floridian
group of mango cultivars grown for the European market.
N
%
P
%
K
%
Ca
%
Mg
%
S
%
Cu
Fe
Mn
Zn
B
Mo
mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
1,0-
0,1-
0,8-
2,0-
0,2-
0,1-
9-
120-
170-
30-
40-
0,3-
1,2
0,2
1,2
3,3
0,3
0,2
18
190
450
75
80
0,6
In collecting a suitable leaf sample from an orchard block, a number of trees, well
distributed within the orchard block (10 to 20 per hectare), are marked for yearly
leaf sampling. Four to five leaves, located just behind the site of a fruit bearing
terminal inflorescence (Figure 26), are removed from four fruit-bearing terminal
shoots per tree.
31
Mango CropKit_English 31
28-11-2006 12:46:58
32
Figure 26. Leaves are sampled from a new terminal shoot bearing fruits.
These shoots are those that develop after harvest each year.
The shoots from which leaves are removed should be at shoulder height and
distributed to represent each tree-quadrant. The leaves from an orchard block
(usually 1 ha or smaller in area) are pooled and submitted to a laboratory for
nutrient-concentration analysis.
The leaf-analysis results will indicate existing deficiency and excess imbalances.
Application of nutrients in balance or deficient is made. Applications to meet
the nutrient demand for the season are made for the nutrients indicated to be in
balance. Added application is made in the case of the nutrients indicated to
be deficient. Application of a particular nutrient is withheld if a clear excess
imbalance of the nutrient is indicated. In fully-grown orchards, nutrient demand has
a direct bearing on expected yield.
Mango CropKit_English 32
28-11-2006 12:46:59
Plant roots absorb dissolved mineral nutrients in the soil solution; the soil solution
being the interface between storage-site and root hair (Figure 27). The dynamics
of ion exchange between clay particle (or colloid), soil solution and root hair are
complex. The influence of organic matter, including that of the micro-organisms
themselves, further complicates the nutrient exchange dynamics occurring within
the soil. Furthermore, the ability of the tree to take-up nutrients dissolved in the
soil solution varies in relation to tree-health, growing environment and the climatic
conditions being experienced.
Figure 27. Root hairs in association with the soil solution and soil particles. Roots
take up water and nutrients from the soil. Only nutrients that are dissolved in the
soil solution (soil water) can be utilized. Insoluble compounds cannot be accessed.
However, exchanges of elements between soil solution and insoluble (solid)
entities are continuous, being dictated by the chemical equilibrium state of the
soil solution.
In soils containing appreciable clay, the ability of an agronomist to predict nutrient
uptake following soil application of fertilizers is limited. This is particularly stated
in view of the soil having a marked ability to retain and fix nutrients, as well as to
release nutrients in accordance with events occurring in the soil solution over which
the agronomist can exert little control.
33
Mango CropKit_English 33
28-11-2006 12:46:59
34
Mango CropKit_English 34
28-11-2006 12:46:59
P
g
K
g
Ca
g
Mg
g
S
g
Cu
mg
Fe
mg
Mn
mg
Zn B
mg mg
Mo
mg
0,44 0,97
0,23
0,11
0,11
0,36 0,92
0,20
0,10
0,10
8,47 0,05
14
0,25 0,91
0,17
0,09
0,09
1,53
6,44 0,04
21
0,20 1,02
0,16
0,09
0,09
1,46
5,60 0,03
28
0,19 1,25
0,18
0,11
0,11
1,60
5,61 0,02
35
0,20 1,57
0,21
0,13
0,13
6,04 0,02
42
0,22 1,83
0,24
0,15
0,15
6,34 0,02
49
0,22 1,89
0,24
0,16
0,15
6,04 0,02
56
0,20 1,76
0,22
0,15
0,14
5,29 0,01
63
0,19 1,58
0,19
0,13
0,13
1,63
4,55 0,01
10
70
0,18 1,46
0,17
0,12
0,12
1,48
4,06 0,01
11
77
0,18 1,42
0,17
0,12
0,11
1,43
3,86 0,01
12
84
0,20 1,47
0,17
0,13
0,12
1,46
3,90 0,01
13
91
0,22 1,57
0,18
0,14
0,12
1,56
4,12 0,01
35
Mango CropKit_English 35
28-11-2006 12:47:00
36
Mango CropKit_English 36
28-11-2006 12:47:00
37
Mango CropKit_English 37
28-11-2006 12:47:01
38
Mango CropKit_English 38
28-11-2006 12:47:02
Figure 31. Spray applications of fertilizers when the trees are in flower is advantageous regarding uptake. The concentration and time of application should be
such that burn (phytotoxicity) does not occur.
28-11-2006 12:47:03
40
Figure 32. General micro-nutrient deficiency resulting from a break in the supply
of micro-nutrients. Note the healthy lower leaves and deficient terminal leaves.
The shoots exhibiting deficiency are smaller and chlorotic. Slight leaf deformation
is apparent.
Mango CropKit_English 40
28-11-2006 12:47:04
Figure 33. Leaf curling and stunted growth resulting from manganese and
copper deficiency.
Figure 34. Reduced leaf size and chlorosis resulting from zinc and iron
deficiency.
41
Mango CropKit_English 41
28-11-2006 12:47:05
42
Figure 35. Stunted leaf growth and curling resulting from zinc, copper and
manganese deficiency.
Figure 36. Ribbed, small, marginally curled, chlorotic leaves resulting from iron,
zinc, copper and iron deficiency.
Mango CropKit_English 42
28-11-2006 12:47:07
Figure 37. Leaf back-bending and ribbing resulting from manganese and copper
deficiency.
Figure 38. General chlorosis and leaf deformation resulting from copper, iron,
manganese, zinc and boron deficiency.
43
Mango CropKit_English 43
28-11-2006 12:47:08
44
Figure 39. Terminal leaf chlorosis, necrosis and deformation resulting from
general micro-element deficiency.
Figure 40. Leaf curling and ribbing resulting from manganese and copper
deficiency.
Mango CropKit_English 44
28-11-2006 12:47:09
Figure 41. Yellowing (chlorosis) and marginal necrosis of leaves resulting from
nitrogen and potassium deficiency.
Figure 42. General leaf yellowing and wilting resulting from nitrogen deficiency
and prolonged soil water stress.
45
Mango CropKit_English 45
28-11-2006 12:47:11
46
Figure 43. Internal breakdown ("jelly seed") resulting from calcium deficiency
within the fruits themselves.
Figure 44. Extremely stunted new shoot development and leaf drop resulting
from boron toxicity.
Mango CropKit_English 46
28-11-2006 12:47:12
Figure 45. Leaf margin necrosis resulting from excess chloride uptake.
Figure 46. Inhibited tree growth resulting from excess sodium uptake.
Figure 47. Stunted new shoot development and leaf drop and branch
die-back resulting from excess sodium and chloride uptake.
47
Mango CropKit_English 47
28-11-2006 12:47:13
48
Figure 48. Where the soil pH is high (> 7,5), the incorporation of a large amount
of well composted manure, the inclusion of a large amount of manure, and of
gypsum and elemental sulphur is beneficial. 80 to 100 m3 of composted manure
can be incorporated per hectare. The quantities of ameliorants applied are
derived from the results of soil analysis.
Mango CropKit_English 48
28-11-2006 12:47:14
49
Mango CropKit_English 49
28-11-2006 12:47:14
UltrasolTM
6-6-44
kg
Ammonium
Nitrate
kg
UltrasolTM
Calcium
kg
UltrasolTM
Magnum P44
kg
UltrasolTM
Magsul
kg
UltrasolTM Micro
Rexene Cu15
g
UltrasolTM Micro
Rexene FeQ48
g
UltrasolTM Micro
Rexene Mn15
g
UltrasolTM Micro
Rexene Zn15
g
SpeedfolTM
B SP
g
SpeedfolTM
Mo
g
inflores. start
04-March 0
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
inflores. dev
11-March 1
5,77
3,44
1,06
0,49
1,35
16,5
225,90
41,9
31,7
38,5
0,0
inflores. dev
18-March 2
5,77
3,44
1,06
0,49
1,35
16,5
225,90
41,9
31,7
38,5
0,0
inflores. dev
25-March 3
5,77
3,44
1,06
0,49
1,35
16,5
225,90
41,9
31,7
38,5
0,0
inflores. dev
1-April
4
5,77
3,44
1,06
0,49
1,35
16,5
225,90
41,9
31,7
38,5
0,0
inflores. dev
8-April
5
11,54
6,87
2,12
0,97
2,70
32,9
451,90
83,7
63,3
77,0
0,1
full-bloom
15-April
6
11,54
6,87
2,12
0,97
2,70
32,9
451,90
83,7
63,3
77,0
0,1
full-flower
22-April
7
11,54
6,87
2,12
0,97
2,70
32,9
451,90
83,7
63,3
77,0
0,1
full-flower
29-April
8
11,54
6,87
2,12
0,97
2,70
32,9
451,90
83,7
63,3
77,0
0,1
fruit-set
6-May
9
17,32
10,31
3,19
1,46
4,05
49,4
677,80
125,6
95,0
115,5
0,1
fruit-set
13-May 10
23,09
13,74
4,25
1,95
5,40
65,9
903,80
167,5
126,6
154,0
0,1
marble fruits
20-May 11
28,86
17,18
5,31
2,43
6,75
82,3
1.129,70
209,3
158,3
192,5
0,1
goen fruits
27-May 12
34,63
20,61
6,37
2,92
8,10
98,8
1.355,60
251,2
189,9
231,0
0,2
frt growth index 0
3-June
13
40,40
24,05
7,43
3,41
9,45
115,2
1.581,60
293,1
221,6
269,5
0,2
frt growth index 1
10-June 14
46,18
27,48
8,49
3,89
10,81
131,7
1.807,50
334,9
253,2
308,0
0,2
frt growth index 2
17-June 15
51,95
30,92
9,56
4,38
12,16
148,2
2.033,50
376,8
284,9
346,4
0,3
frt growth index 3
24-June 16
57,72
34,35
10,62
4,87
13,51
164,6
2.259,40
418,7
316,6
384,9
0,3
frt growth index 4
1-July
17
51,95
30,92
9,56
4,38
12,16
148,2
2.033,50
376,8
284,9
346,4
0,3
frt growth index 5
8-July
18
46,18
27,48
8,49
3,89
10,81
131,7
1.807,50
334,9
253,2
308,0
0,2
frt growth index 6
15-July
19
40,40
24,05
7,43
3,41
9,45
115,2
1.581,60
293,1
221,6
269,5
0,2
frt growth index 7
22-July 20
34,63
20,61
6,37
2,92
8,10
98,8
1.355,60
251,2
189,9
231,0
0,2
frt growth index 8
29-July 21
28,86
17,18
5,31
2,43
6,75
82,3
1.129,70
209,3
158,3
192,5
0,1
frt growth index 9
5-August 22
23,09
13,74
4,25
1,95
5,40
65,9
903,80
167,5
126,6
154,0
0,1
frt growth index 10 12-August 23
17,32
10,31
3,19
1,46
4,05
49,4
677,80
125,6
95,0
115,5
0,1
frt growth index 11 19-August 24
17,32
10,31
3,19
1,46
4,05
49,4
677,80
125,6
95,0
115,5
0,1
full-size 12
26-August 25
17,32
10,31
3,19
1,46
4,05
49,4
677,80
125,6
95,0
115,5
0,1
maturation
2-Sept
26
11,54
6,87
2,12
0,97
2,70
32,9
451,90
83,7
63,3
77,0
0,1
maturation-harvest
9-Sept
27
11,54
6,87
2,12
0,97
2,70
32,9
451,90
83,7
63,3
77,0
0,1
maturation-harvest
16-Sept 28
11,54
6,87
2,12
0,97
2,70
32,9
451,90
83,7
63,3
77,0
0,1
maturation-harvest
23-Sept 29
11,54
6,87
2,12
0,97
2,70
32,9
451,90
83,7
63,3
77,0
0,1
maturation-harvest
30-Sept 30
11,54
6,87
2,12
0,97
2,70
32,9
451,90
83,7
63,3
77,0
0,1
maturation-harvest
7-Oct
31
5,77
3,44
1,06
0,49
1,35
16,5
225,90
41,9
31,7
38,5
0,0
maturation-harvest
14-Oct 32
5,77
3,44
1,06
0,49
1,35
16,5
225,90
41,9
31,7
38,5
0,0
maturation-harvest
21-Oct 33
5,77
3,44
1,06
0,49
1,35
16,5
225,90
41,9
31,7
38,5
0,0
maturation-harvest
28-Oct 34
5,77
3,44
1,06
0,49
1,35
16,5
225,90
41,9
31,7
38,5
0,0
winter cold
4-Nov
35
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
winter cold
11-Nov 36
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
winter cold
18-Nov 37
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
winter cold
25-Nov 38
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
winter cold
2-Dec
39
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
winter cold
9-Dec
40
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
winter cold
16-Dec
41
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
winter cold
23-Dec 42
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
winter cold
30-Dec 43
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
winter cold
1-Jan
44
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
winter cold
8-Jan
45
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
winter cold
15-Jan
46
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
winter cold
22-Jan
47
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
flower break out
29-Jan 48
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
flower break out
5-Feb
49
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
flower break out
12-Feb 50
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
dormant bud
19-Feb
51
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
dormant bud
26-Feb 52
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,00
0,0
0,00
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
Totals 727 433
134 61
170
2.074
28.469 5.275 3.989 4.850 4
growth stage
date
week
Table 4. Fertigation programme for 3,5 m high mango trees growing in a calcareous, sandy soil, and irrigated with drip-lines (dates relevant
for the northern hemisphere). Desert environment. 20 MT per ha approximated yield. Applications per week per hectare.
50
Mango CropKit_English 50
28-11-2006 12:47:14
Figure 49. Good quality fruits are generally considered to be those that are free
of disease, show complete skin ground colouration from green to yellow, and are
free of internal break-down, by consumers in the European Union.
Table 5 presents a fertilization programme for mango trees growing in soils
tending to be acidic and containing appreciable clay (clay imparts soils with the
ability to store and release nutrients into the soil solution from where root nutrient
uptake takes place).
51
Mango CropKit_English 51
28-11-2006 12:47:15
52
Stage of
yearly cycle
Fertilizer
Small
tree
1 2,5
m high
Medium
tree
2,6 3,5
m high
Large
tree
3,6 6
m high
Post-harvest
Soil-Ammonium nitrate
Soil-QropTM Calcium
Soil-QropTM MAP
100 g
320 g
150 g
200 g
650 g
300 g
300 g
960 g
450 g
Month prior
to flowering
Soil-QropTM SOP
Qrop BoronatTM 32
Soil-UltrasolTM Magsul
375 g
30 g
100 g
750 g
50 g
200 g
1.130 g
70 g
300 g
During
flowering
*Spray-SpeedfolTM
Amino Flower & Fruit SC
(x 2 sprays, first anthesis,
second full-bloom)
300 ml
300 ml
300 ml
1.000 g
1.000 g
1.000 g
Spray- UltrasolTM K
(x 2 sprays, first anthesis,
second full-bloom)
2.000 g
2.000 g
2.000 g
300 g
500 g
800 g
Start of fruit
growth and
development
Soil-Calcium sulphate
*Spraying should not be carried out during the heat of the day.
Mango CropKit_English 52
28-11-2006 12:47:15
Nutrient
Low pH - soil/water
High pH - soil/water
N
Ammonium nitrate
Ammonium sulphate
Ammonium nitrate
P
Mono-potassium phosphate Phosphoric acid
Mono-ammonium phosphate Urea phosphate
K
Potassium nitrate
Potassium nitrate
Potassium sulphate
Ca
Calcium nitrate
Calcium nitrate
Mg
Magnesium sulphate
Magnesium sulphate
S
Comments
Ammonium sulphate is
most acidifying.
A high degree of solubility
is required to ensure
maximal macro-pore
penetration. Acidifying
phosphates are beneficial
in high pH soils.
Nitrate uptake reduces the
effect of chloride and
favours cationic nutrient
uptake.
As for K.
Magnesium sulphate is
suitable for high and
low pH soils in view of Mg
being required in far lesser
amounts than N and K.
S is present in certain of
the above fertilizers.
53
Mango CropKit_English 53
28-11-2006 12:47:16
54
Mango CropKit_English 54
Comments
Foliar rectification is
possible.
Do not spray apply
with metal based
pesticides or fungicides.
Success in rectifying
Fe deficiency with
sprays is limited.
Do not mix with metal
based pesticides or
fungicides.
Foliar rectification is
possible.
Do not mix with
metal based
pesticides or
fungicides.
Foliar rectification is
possible.
Zinc nitrate is
generally not
compatible with other
spray-products.
Do not mix with
metal based
pesticides or
fungicides.
B should preferably
be applied to the soil
due to its immobility
in the phloem in
most crop plants.
Mo fertilizer products
are most effective in
meeting the need for
Mo when they are
spray applied.
28-11-2006 12:47:16
55
Mango CropKit_English 55
28-11-2006 12:47:16
56
Figure 50. Stem-end cavity formation considered to result from reduced fruit calcium levels relative to those of nitrogen and potassium, as well as to water status
fluctuations occurring during the fruit growth and development period. Internal
cavities are often associated with internal breakdown.
Mango CropKit_English 56
28-11-2006 12:47:17
Spray application of calcium has been found to increase bacterial black spot
(Xanthomonas campestris) incidence in Sensation mango (Oosthuyse, 1997b).
This presumably occurs when a calcium excess imbalance already exists.
Both deficiency and excess nutrient imbalances negatively impact on productivity,
this having been shown in carrying out multivariate statistical analyses (Oosthuyse,
1997a).
Oosthuyse (1993a) reported an increase in fruit retention and tree yield after
spraying flowering Tommy Atkins mango trees with potassium nitrate. Figures 52
and 53 show the effect in an additional study (Oosthuyse, 1994, unpublished)
where the varieties Tommy Atkins, Kent and Heidi were included. Similar increases
were found in the varieties Kent and Heidi. In the latter varieties, best results were
found when two 2% sprays were made, whereas in Tommy Atkins, one 4% spray
resulted in the greatest increase in fruit retention and yield. 2% KNO3 application at the commencement of anthesis (flower opening), followed by 2% KNO3
application when the trees are in full-bloom, is generally recommended.
57
Mango CropKit_English 57
28-11-2006 12:47:17
58
Mango CropKit_English 58
28-11-2006 12:47:18
59
Mango CropKit_English 59
28-11-2006 12:47:19
60
Mango CropKit_English 60
28-11-2006 12:47:19
61
Mango CropKit_English 61
28-11-2006 12:47:20
62
8 Literature
Davenport, T.L. and Nunez-Elisea, R. 1997. Reproductive physiology. In: The mango: Botany,
production and uses. Litz, R.E. ed. CAB International, pp. 69-146.
Maas, E.F. 1989. In Nicaragua; Potassium nitrate foliar spray induces bloom in mango
orchard. Better Crops International 5:4-5.
Mossak, I.I. 1996. A study of early flowering in mango, Part 1. Tropical Fruits Newsletter
21:6-8.
Nakasone, H.Y. and Paull, R.E. 1998. Mango. In: Tropical Fruits, CAB International, pp.
208-269.
Oosthuyse, S.A. 1991. Stages of development of the mango panicle. S.A. Mango Growers
Assoc. Yearbook 11:59-61.
Oosthuyse, S.A. 1993a. Effect of spray application of KNO3, urea and growth regulators on
the yield of Tommy Atkins mango. S.A. Mango Growers Assoc.Yearbook 13:58-62.
Oosthuyse, S.A. 1993b. Research on mango aimed at increasing orchard productivity and
export fruit quality. S.A. Mango Growers Assoc.Yearbook 13:40-44.
Oosthuyse, S.A. 1996. Changes in mango fruit quality in relation to stage of maturation.
Research project, Merensky Holdings, South Africa, 1996.
Oosthuyse, S.A. 1997a. Relationship between leaf nutrient concentrations and cropping or
fruit quality in mango. S.A. Mango Growers Assoc. Yearbook 17:1-5.
Oosthuyse, S.A. 1997b. The effect of calcium and magnesium chelate sprays at flowering on
fruit quality and physiological disorders in mango. S.A. Mango Growers Assoc. Yearbook
17:29-32.
Oosthuyse, S.A. 1998a. Determination of optimum leaf nutrient concentration norms for a
number of mango cultivars: Year I. S.A. Mango Growers Assoc. Yearbook 18:1-5.
Oosthuyse, S.A. 1998b. Cost reduction of powdery mildew control in mango with mono
potassium phosphate. S.A. Mango Growers Assoc. Yearbook 18:40 42.
Oosthuyse, S.A. 1999. Weekly nutrient content changes of developing Tommy Atkins
mangoes until harvest maturation. Research project, Agrofert Fertilizers, South Africa,
1999.
Mango CropKit_English 62
28-11-2006 12:47:20
Mango CropKit_English 63
28-11-2006 12:47:22
SQM S.A.
Los Militares 4290
Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
Tel: (56 2) 425 2000
Fax: (56 2) 425 2416
E-mail: spn-chile@sqm.com
Soquimich Comercial S.A.
Los Militares 4290, Piso 3
Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
Tel: (56 2) 425 2525
Fax: (56 2) 425 2266
E-mail: servicioalcliente@sqm.com
SQM Brasil
Alameda Tocantis 75, Sexto Andar
Alphaville, Barueri, CEP, 06455-020
Sao Paulo, Brasil
Tel: (55 11) 413 37210
Fax: (55 11) 413 37205
E-mail: spn-brasil@sqm.com
SQM Ecuador S.A.
Avda. Juan Tanca Marengo y Avda. Jos
Orranta, Edificio Executive Center, Piso 3
Of. 307, Guayaquil, Ecuador
Tel & Fax: (593 4) 269 0639
E-mail: spn-ecuador@sqm.com
SQM Per S.A.
Avda. Camino Real N 348
Oficina 701, Torre el Pilar
San Isidro, Lima, Per
Tel: (511) 611 2121
Fax: (511) 611 2122
E-mail: servicioclienteperu@sqm.com
SQM Comercial de Mxico S.A. de C.V.
Industria Elctrica s/n Lote 30, Manzana A
Parque Industrial Bugambilias, C.P. 45645,
Tlajomulco de Ziga, Jalisco, Mxico
Tel: (52 33) 354 01100
Fax: (52 33) 354 01101
E-mail: infomexico@sqm.com.mx
SQM North America
3101 Towercreek Parkway
Suite 450, Atlanta, GA 30339 USA
Tel: (1 770) 916 9400
Fax: (1 770) 916 9401
E-mail: spn-northamerica@sqm.com
SQM Europe, Middle East & Africa
Sint Pietersvliet 7, bus 8
2000 Antwerpen - Belgium
Tel: (32 3) 203 9700/20
Fax: (32 3) 203 9772
E-mail: spn-emea@sqm.com
SQM China
C610, Beijing Lufthansa Center, N50
Liangmaquiao Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing.
Tel: (86 10) 64618950
Fax: (86 10) 84540885
E-mail: spn-china@sqm.com
SQM Asia Pacific
Sint Pietersvliet 7, bus 8
2000 Antwerpen - Belgium
Tel: (32 3) 203 9700/20
Fax: (32 3) 203 9772
E-mail: spn-asia@sqm.com
www.sqm.com