Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views13 pages

BTK Quality Check

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 13

Creating Value Through Technology and People™

Quality of Bacillus thuringiensis

Dirk Avé
Business Technical Support Manager
Valent BioSciences Corporation

ABIM, Oct 26, 2010


Creating Value Through Technology and People™

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt)

ƒ Bt-based insecticides are complex entities


ƒ Using the science and art of fermentation,
Bt strains produce a mixture of specific
insecticidal proteins as active ingredient
ƒ Bt mode of action is unique and different
from any chemical insecticide, with
commercially proven efficacy for over
40 years.
ƒ Bt biological insecticides are used in IPM,
Organic and Low Residue insect control

2
October 2010
Creating Value Through Technology and People™

B.t. Insecticidal Crystal Proteins

Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki Bacillus thuringiensis aizawai

Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis Bacillus thuringiensis tenebrionis


5,000 X

3
October 2010
Creating Value Through Technology and People™

Bt Manufacturing at VBC

From large scale (100 000 L) fermentation to downstream processing,


manufacturing is geared to producing and preserving the best Bt active
ingredient mixture at the most economical cost.

4
October 2010
Creating Value Through Technology and People™

Manufacturing Requirements
Regulatory Agencies provide the framework Æ
Æ Manufacturer sets the standards

i.e. US EPA approves the product AND the process


9 All tox/path and environmental tests related to process
9 Processes carried out as filed with EPA
9 Batch records shipping, inventory, disposal records kept

Valent BioSciences sets it’s own high standards


9 Frequent in-process sampling for quality
9 Potency checks after each major process step
9 On-site insect bioassay facilities
9 Decades history with Btk and Bta standards

5
October 2010
Creating Value Through Technology and People™

Commercial QC of Bt products
Commercially, bioassay is the basic QC method.
VBC formulates at least at the labeled potency.
Example: Potency of XenTari® on cabbage looper,
Trichoplusia ni, is 15 000 IU/mg product. Below are
QC bioassay results from 35 large scale XenTari®
production runs over several years.
Potency

Inside a Bt fermentor,
commonly 100 000 liters per
batch.

6
October 2010
Creating Value Through Technology and People™

Secondary Analytical Methods for Bt Products

1. SDS-PAGE (electrophoresis
method) to quantify Bt toxin
proteins
2. HPLC (liquid chromatography
method) to separate and
quantify individual Bt toxin
proteins
3. Gene profiling of Bt toxins
4. Genomotyping (cooperation
with TNO, Zeist, the
Netherlands)

7
October 2010
Creating Value Through Technology and People™

Large Variability in Bt Quality, Asian Market


Clearly labeled as Btk SDS-PAGE analysis
but no Cry2 present (LC50 in µg/ml on cabbage looper)
Lane:
1. Molecular Weight Marker
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 2. DiPel® Standard 0.7µg
3. DiPel® Standard 2.1µg
4. DiPel® Standard 4.1µg
Bt toxin proteins (Cry1 type)
5. no sample Blank lane
6. XenTari® (Control)
7. Product 1 SE Asia (LC50: 73.6)
Bt toxin proteins (Cry2 type) 8. Product 2 SE Asia (LC50: 38.8)
9. Product 3 SE Asia (LC50: 64.9)
10. Product 4 SE Asia (LC50: 45.3)
11. Product 5 SE Asia (LC50: 74.4)
12. Product 6 SE Asia (LC50: 78.7)
13. Product 7 SE Asia (LC50: 26.5)
Although 2 Bt products of 14. DiPel® DF (Control) (LC50: 14.3)
16000 IU/mg, they have 15. Molecular Weight Marker
suspiciously low Cry toxin SE Asia Products 1 and 4 were labeled 16000
Exp 435others
IU/mg, 081805g2 VBC IU/mg (except XenTari )
at 32000
protein content

8
October 2010
Creating Value Through Technology and People™

SDS-PAGE analysis of a competitive Bt product

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Increasing
amounts of DiPel®
Btk Standard DF

Cry1 toxins

Cry2 toxin -180 -220 -221

3 Lots, each as
samples A & B, from a
European competitive
Bt product code KG-
0601

9
October 2010
Creating Value Through Technology and People™

DiPel® DF compared to competitive Bt product


Tomato fields – July 13, 2006

Plot 1 Plot 2

Field Rep: Michael Crop: Industry tomato (organic Harvest Date: 20 +


Schröder farming) 21/09/2006
Investigator: Germán Pest: Helicoverpa armigera Plot size: > 1 ha
Martinez Application Date: 5 applications Site: Finca Huescar,
on 20/07, 04/08, 10/08, 18/08, and Granada
01/09/2006 with a field boom, 600 Country: Spain
– 1000 L/ha, 1 kg/ha

10
October 2010
Creating Value Through Technology and People™

Tomato Yield in kg / ha, DiPel® DF vs Competitive Bt


50000
45000
40000
35000
30000
kg / ha

25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
kg/ha w ithout damage Total kg/ha

DIPEL DF KG-0601

Kg Tomatoes per ha Total Kg of


without damage Tomatoes per ha
DIPEL DF 37 450 44 441
Competitive Bt 28 206 36 231

11
October 2010
Creating Value Through Technology and People™

Conclusions

1. Worldwide and within Europe significant differences in


quality of Bt products exist. In Asia and Latin America we
have found Bt illegally “enhanced” with a chemical
insecticide. In Australia and Europe, we have found Bt
products with very little toxin protein, and corresponding
very low potencies.
2. Maintaining the quality of Bt products is left up to the
manufacturer. As bio-pesticide manufacturers, we should
work together to ensure a certain level of quality based on
simple guidelines.
a) repercussions for companies that ameliorate Bt with
chemical insecticides
b) certain minimum levels of Bt toxin protein weight in the
product based on label potency

12
October 2010
Creating Value Through Technology and People™

Thank you

13

You might also like