Freud, Sigmund - The Interpretation of Dreams (1900)

INTERPRETATION OF DREAMS 1
THE INTERPRETATION OF DREAMS

by
Sigmuend Freud
Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Flectere si nequeo Superos, Acheronta movebo
FOREWORD
In 1909, G. Stanley Hall invited me to Clark University, in Worcester, to give the first
lectures on psychoanalysis. In the same year, Dr Brill published the first of his
translations of my writings, which were soon followed by further ones. If psychoanalysis
now plays a role in American intellectual life, or if it does so in the future, a large part of
this result will have to be attributed to this and other activities of Dr Brill's.
His first translation of The Interpretation of Dreams appeared in 1913. Since then, much
has taken place in the world, and much has been changed in our views about the
neuroses. This book, with the new contribution to psychology which surprised the world
when it was published (1900), remains essentially unaltered. It contains, even according
to my present-day judgment, the most valuable of all the discoveries it has been my good
fortune to make. Insight such as this falls to one's lot but once in a lifetime.
FREUD
Vienna
March 15, 1931

The Interpretation of Dreams
Table of Contents:
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 5A
Chapter 5B
Chapter 5C
Chapter 5D
Chapter 6
Chapter 6A
Chapter 6B
Chapter 6C
Chapter 6D
Chapter 6E
Chapter 6F
Chapter 6G
Chapter 6H
Chapter 6I
Chapter 7
Chapter 7A
Chapter 7B
Chapter 7C
Chapter 7D
Chapter 7E
Chapter 7F

CHAPTER ONE
The Scientific Literature of Dream-Problems (up to 1900)
In the following pages, I shall demonstrate that there is a psychological technique which
makes it possible to interpret dreams, and that on the application of this technique, every
dream will reveal itself as a psychological structure, full of significance, and one which
may be assigned to a specific place in the psychic activities of the waking state. Further, I
shall endeavour to elucidate the processes which underlie the strangeness and obscurity
of dreams, and to deduce from these processes the nature of the psychic forces whose
conflict or co-operation is responsible for our dreams. This done, my investigation will
terminate, as it will have reached the point where the problem of the dream merges into
more comprehensive problems, and to solve these, we must have recourse to material of a
different kind.
I shall begin by giving a short account of the views of earlier writers on this subject and
of the status of the dream-problem in contemporary science; since in the course of this
treatise, I shall not often have occasion to refer to either. In spite of thousands of years of
endeavour, little progress has been made in the scientific understanding of dreams. This
fact has been so universally acknowledged by previous writers on the subject that it
seems hardly necessary to quote individual opinions. The reader will find, in many
stimulating observations, and plenty of interesting material relating to our subject, but
little or nothing that concerns the true nature of the dream, or that solves definitely any of
its enigmas. The educated layman, of course, knows even less of the matter.
The conception of the dream that was held in prehistoric ages by primitive peoples, and
the influence which it may have exerted on the formation of their conceptions of the
universe, and of the soul, is a theme of such great interest that it is only with reluctance
that I refrain from dealing with it in these pages. I will refer the reader to the well-known
works of Sir John Lubbock (Lord Avebury), Herbert Spencer, E. B. Tylor and other
writers; I will only add that we shall not realise the importance of these problems and
speculations until we have completed the task of dream interpretation that lies before us.
A reminiscence of the concept of the dream that was held in primitive times seems to
underlie the evaluation of the dream which was current among the peoples of classical
antiquity.1 They took it for granted that dreams were related to the world of the
supernatural beings in whom they believed, and that they brought inspirations from the
gods and demons. Moreover, it appeared to them that dreams must serve a special
purpose in respect of the dreamer; that, as a rule, they predicted the future. The
extraordinary variations in the content of dreams, and in the impressions which they
produced on the dreamer, made it, of course, very difficult to formulate a coherent
conception of them, and necessitated manifold differentiations and group-formations,
according to their value and reliability. The valuation of dreams by the individual

philosophers of antiquity naturally depended on the importance which they were prepared
to attribute to manticism in general.
In the two works of Aristotle in which there is mention of dreams, they are already
regarded as constituting a problem of psychology. We are told that the dream is not god-
sent, that it is not of divine but of daimonic origin. For nature is really daimonic, not
divine; that is to say, the dream is not a supernatural revelation, but is subject to the laws
of the human spirit, which has, of course, a kinship with the divine. The dream is defined
as the psychic activity of the sleeper, inasmuch as he is asleep. Aristotle was acquainted
with some of the characteristics of the dream-life; for example, he knew that a dream
converts the slight sensations perceived in sleep into intense sensations (òne imagines
that one is walking through fire, and feels hot, if this or that part of the body becomes
only quite slightly warm'), which led him to conclude that dreams might easily betray to
the physician the first indications of an incipient physical change which escaped
observation during the day.2
As has been said, those writers of antiquity who preceded Aristotle did not regard the
dream as a product of the dreaming psyche, but as an inspiration of divine origin, and in
ancient times, the two opposing tendencies which we shall find throughout the ages in
respect of the evaluation of the dream-life, were already perceptible. The ancients
distinguished between the true and valuable dreams which were sent to the dreamer as
warnings, or to foretell future events, and the vain, fraudulent and empty dreams, whose
object was to misguide him or lead him to destruction.
The pre-scientific conception of the dream which obtained among the ancients was, of
course, in perfect keeping with their general conception of the universe, which was
accustomed to project as an external reality that which possessed reality only in the life of
the psyche. Further, it accounted for the main impression made upon the waking life by
the morning memory of the dream; for in this memory the dream, as compared with the
rest of the psychic content, seems to be something alien, coming, as it were, from another
world. It would be an error to suppose that the theory of the supernatural origin of dreams
lacks followers even in our own times; for quite apart from pietistic and mystical writers -
- who cling, as they are perfectly justified in doing, to the remnants of the once
predominant realm of the supernatural until these remnants have been swept away by
scientific explanation -- we not infrequently find that quite intelligent persons, who in
other respects are averse to anything of a romantic nature, go so far as to base their
religious belief in the existence and co-operation of superhuman spiritual powers on the
inexplicable nature of the phenomena of dreams (Haffner). The validity ascribed to the
dream life by certain schools of philosophy -- for example, by the school of Schelling --
is a distinct reminiscence of the undisputed belief in the divinity of dreams which
prevailed in antiquity; and for some thinkers, the mantic or prophetic power of dreams is
still a subject of debate. This is due to the fact that the explanations attempted by
psychology are too inadequate to cope with the accumulated material, however strongly
the scientific thinker may feel that such superstitious doctrines should be repudiated.

To write a history of our scientific knowledge of the dream problem is extremely

difficult, because, valuable though this knowledge may be in certain respects, no real
progress in a definite direction is as yet discernible. No real foundation of verified results
has hitherto been established on which future investigators might continue to build. Every
new author approaches the same problems afresh, and from the very beginning. If I were
to enumerate such authors in chronological order, giving a survey of the opinions which
each has held concerning the problems of the dream, I should be quite unable to draw a
clear and complete picture of the present state of our knowledge on the subject. I have
therefore preferred to base my method of treatment on themes rather than on authors, and
in attempting the solution of each problem of the dream, I shall cite the material found in
the literature of the subject.
But as I have not succeeded in mastering the whole of this literature -- for it is widely
dispersed and interwoven with the literature of other subjects -- I must ask my readers to
rest content with my survey as it stands, provided that no fundamental fact or important
point of view has been overlooked.
In a supplement to a later German edition, the author adds:
I shall have to justify myself for not extending my summary of the literature of dream
problems to cover the period between first appearance of this book and the publication of
the second edition. This justification may not seem very satisfactory to the reader; none
the less, to me it was decisive. The motives which induced me to summarise the
treatment of dreams in the literature of the subject have been exhausted by the foregoing
introduction; to have continued this would have cost me a great deal of effort and would
not have been particularly useful or instructive. For the interval in question -- a period of
nine years -- has yielded nothing new or valuable as regards the conception of dreams,
either in actual material or in novel points of view. In most of the literature which has
appeared since the publication of my own work, the latter has not been mentioned or
discussed; it has, of course, received the least attention from the so-called `research
workers on dreams', who have thus afforded a brilliant example of the aversion to
learning anything new so characteristic of the scientist. `Les savants ne sont pas curieux',
said the scoffer, Anatole France. If there were such a thing in science as the right of
revenge, I, in my turn, should be justified in ignoring the literature which has appeared
since the publication of this book. The few reviews which have appeared in the scientific
journals are so full of misconceptions and lack of comprehension that my only possible
answer to my critics would be a request that they should read this book over again -- or
perhaps merely that they should read it!
And in a supplement to the fourth German edition which appeared in 1914, a year after I
published the first English translation of this work, he writes:
Since then, the state of affairs has certainly undergone a change; my contribution to the
ìnterpretation of dreams' is no longer ignored in the literature of the subject. But the new
situation makes it even more impossible to continue the foregoing summary. The
Interpretation of Dreams has evoked a whole series of new contentions and problems,

which have been expounded by the authors in the most varied fashions. But I cannot
discuss these works until I have developed the theories to which their authors have
referred. Whatever has appeared to me as valuable in this recent literature, I have
accordingly reviewed in the course of the following exposition.
1
The following remarks are based on Büchsenschütz's careful essay, Traum und
Traumdeutung im Altertum (Berlin, 1868).
2
The relationship between dreams and disease is discussed by Hippocrates in a chapter of
his famous work.

CHAPTER TWO
The Method of Dream Interpretation
THE ANALYSIS OF A SPECIMEN DREAM
The epigraph on the title-page of this volume* indicates the tradition to which I prefer to
ally myself in my conception of the dream. I am proposing to show that dreams are
capable of interpretation; and any contributions to the solution of the problem which have
already been discussed will emerge only as possible by-products in the accomplishment
of my special task. On the hypothesis that dreams are susceptible of interpretation, I at
once find myself in disagreement with the prevailing doctrine of dreams -- in fact, with
all the theories of dreams, excepting only that of Scherner, for `to interpret a dream', is to
specify its `meaning', to replace it by something which takes its position in the
concatenation of our psychic activities as a link of definite importance and value. But, as
we have seen, the scientific theories of the dream leave no room for a problem of dream-
interpretation; since, in the first place, according to these theories, dreaming is not a
psychic activity at all, but a somatic process which makes itself known to the psychic
apparatus by means of symbols. Lay opinion has always been opposed to these theories.
It asserts its privilege of proceeding illogically, and although it admits that dreams are
incomprehensible and absurd, it cannot summon up the courage to deny that dreams have
any significance. Led by a dim intuition, it seems rather to assume that dreams have a
meaning, albeit a hidden one; that they are intended as a substitute for some other
thought-process, and that we have only to disclose this substitute correctly in order to
discover the hidden meaning of the dream.
The unscientific world, therefore, has always endeavoured to ìnterpret' dreams, and by
applying one or the other of two essentially different methods. The first of these methods
envisages the dream-content as a whole, and seeks to replace it by another content, which
is intelligible and in certain respects analogous. This is symbolic dream-interpretation;
and of course it goes to pieces at the very outset in the case of those dreams which are not
only unintelligible but confused. The construction which the biblical Joseph placed upon
the dream of Pharaoh furnishes an example of this method. The seven fat kine, after
which came seven lean ones that devoured the former, were a symbolic substitute for
seven years of famine in the land of Egypt, which according to the prediction were to
consume all the surplus that seven fruitful years had produced. Most of the artificial
dreams contrived by the poets1 are intended for some such symbolic interpretation, for
they reproduce the thought conceived by the poet in a guise not unlike the disguise which
we are wont to find in our dreams.
The idea that the dream concerns itself chiefly with the future, whose form it surmises in
advance -- a relic of the prophetic significance with which dreams were once invested --
now becomes the motive for translating into the future the meaning of the dream which
has been found by means of symbolic interpretation.

A demonstration of the manner in which one arrives at such a symbolic interpretation

cannot, of course, be given. Success remains a matter of ingenious conjecture, of direct
intuition, and for this reason dream-interpretation has naturally been elevated into an art
which seems to depend upon extraordinary gifts.2 The second of the two popular methods
of dream-interpretation entirely abandons such claims. It might be described as the
`cipher method', since it treats the dream as a kind of secret code in which every sign is
translated into another sign of known meaning, according to an established key. For
example, I have dreamt of a letter, and also of a funeral or the like; I consult a `dream-
book', and I find that `letter' is to be translated by `vexation' and `funeral' by
èngagement'. It now remains to establish a connection, which I am again to assume as
pertaining to the future, by means of the rigmarole which I have deciphered. An
interesting variant of this cipher procedure, a variant in which its character of purely
mechanical transference is to a certain extent corrected, is presented in the work on
dream-interpretation by Artemidoros of Daldis.3 Here not only the dream-content, but
also the personality and social position of the dreamer are taken into consideration, so
that the same dream-content has a significance for the rich man, the married man, or the
orator, which is different from that which applies to the poor man, the bachelor, or, let us
say, the merchant. The essential point, then, in this procedure is that the work of
interpretation is not applied to the entirety of the dream, but to each portion of the dream-
content severally, as though the dream were a conglomerate in which each fragment calls
for special treatment. Incoherent and confused dreams are certainly those that have been
responsible for the invention of the cipher method.4
The worthlessness of both these popular methods of interpretation does not admit of
discussion. As regards the scientific treatment of the subject, the symbolic method is
limited in its application, and is not susceptible of a general exposition, In the cipher
method everything depends upon whether the `key', the dream-book, is reliable, and for
that all guarantees are lacking. So that one might be tempted to grant the contention of
the philosophers and psychiatrists, and to dismiss the problem of dream-interpretation as
altogether fanciful.5
I have, however, come to think differently. I have been forced to perceive that here, once
more, we have one of those not infrequent cases where an ancient and stubbornly retained
popular belief seems to have come nearer to the truth of the matter than the opinion of
modern science. I must insist that the dream actually does possess a meaning, and that a
scientific method of dream-interpretation is possible. I arrived at my knowledge of this
method in the following manner.
For years I have been occupied with the resolution of certain psychopathological
structures -- hysterical phobias, obsessional ideas, and the like -- with therapeutic
intentions. I have been so occupied, in fact, ever since I heard the significant statement of
Joseph Breuer, to the effect that in these structures, regarded as morbid symptoms,
solution and treatment go hand in hand.6 Where it has been possible to trace a
pathological idea back to those elements in the psychic life of the patient to which it
owed its origin, this idea has crumbled away, and the patient has been relieved of it. In
view of the failure of our other therapeutic efforts, and in the face of the mysterious

character of these pathological conditions, it seemed to me tempting, in spite of all the

difficulties, to follow the method initiated by Breuer until a complete elucidation of the
subject had been achieved. I shall have occasion elsewhere to give a detailed account of
the form which the technique of this procedure has finally assumed, and of the results of
my efforts. In the course of these psychoanalytic studies, I happened upon the question of
dream-interpretation. My patients, after I had pledged them to inform me of all the ideas
and thoughts which occurred to them in connection with a given theme, related their
dreams, and thus taught me that a dream may be interpolated in the psychic
concatenation, which may be followed backwards from a pathological idea into a
patient's memory. The next step was to treat the dream itself as a symptom, and to apply
to it the method of interpretation which had been worked out for such symptoms.
For this a certain psychic preparation on the part of the patient is necessary. A twofold
effort is made, to stimulate his attentiveness in respect of his psychic perceptions, and to
eliminate the critical spirit in which he is ordinarily in the habit of viewing such thoughts
as come to the surface. For the purpose of self-observation with concentrated attention it
is advantageous that the patient should take up a restful position and close his eyes; he
must be explicitly instructed to renounce all criticism of the thought formations which he
may perceive. He must also be told that the success of the psychoanalysis depends upon
his noting and communicating everything that passes through his mind, and that he must
not allow himself to suppress one idea because it seems to him unimportant or irrelevant
to the subject, or another because it seems nonsensical. He must preserve an absolute
impartiality in respect to his ideas; for if he is unsuccessful in finding the desired solution
of the dream, the obsessional idea, or the like, it will be because he permits himself to be
critical of them.
I have noticed in the course of my psychoanalytical work that the psychological state of a
man in an attitude of reflection is entirely different from that of a man who is observing
his psychic processes. In reflection there is a greater play of psychic activity than in the
most attentive self-observation; this is shown even by the tense attitude and the wrinkled
brow of the man in a state of reflection, as opposed to the mimic tranquillity of the man
observing himself. In both cases there must be concentrated attention, but the reflective
man makes use of his critical faculties, with the result that he rejects some of the thoughts
which rise into consciousness after he has become aware of them, and abruptly interrupts
others, so that he does not follow the lines of thought which they would otherwise open
up for him; while in respect of yet other thoughts he is able to behave in such a manner
that they do not become conscious at all -- that is to say, they are suppressed before they
are perceived. In self-observation, on the other hand, he has but one task -- that of
suppressing criticism; if he succeeds in doing this, an unlimited number of thoughts enter
his consciousness which would otherwise have eluded his grasp. With the aid of the
material thus obtained -- material which is new to the self-observer -- it is possible to
achieve the interpretation of pathological ideas, and also that of dream-formations. As
will be seen, the point is to induce a psychic state which is in some degree analogous, as
regards the distribution of psychic energy (mobile attention), to the state of the mind
before falling asleep -- and also, of course, to the hypnotic state. On falling asleep the
ùndesired ideas' emerge, owing to the slackening of a certain arbitrary (and, of course,

also critical) action, which is allowed to influence the trend of our ideas; we are
accustomed to speak of fatigue as the reason of this slackening; the merging undesired
ideas are changed into visual and auditory images. In the condition which it utilised for
the analysis of dreams and pathological ideas, this activity is purposely and deliberately
renounced, and the psychic energy thus saved (or some part of it) is employed in
attentively tracking the undesired thoughts which now come to the surface -- thoughts
which retain their identity as ideas (in which the condition differs from the state of falling
asleep). Ùndesired ideas' are thus changed into `desired' ones.
There are many people who do not seem to find it easy to adopt the required attitude
toward the apparently `freely rising' ideas, and to renounce the criticism which is
otherwise applied to them. The ùndesired ideas' habitually evoke the most violent
resistance, which seeks to prevent them from coming to the surface. But if we may credit
our great poet-philosopher Friedrich Schiller, the essential condition of poetical creation
includes a very similar attitude. In a certain passage in his correspondence with Körner
(for the tracing of which we are indebted to Otto Rank), Schiller replies in the following
words to a friend who complains of his lack of creative power: `The reason for your
complaint lies, it seems to me, in the constraint which your intellect imposes upon your
imagination. Here I will make an observation, and illustrate it by an allegory. Apparently
it is not good -- and indeed it hinders the creative work of the mind -- if the intellect
examines too closely the ideas already pouring in, as it were, at the gates. Regarded in
isolation, an idea may be quite insignificant, and venturesome in the extreme, but it may
acquire importance from an idea which follows it; perhaps, in a certain collocation with
other ideas, which may seem equally absurd, it may be capable of furnishing a very
serviceable link. The intellect cannot judge all these ideas unless it can retain them until it
has considered them in connection with these other ideas. In the case of a creative mind,
it seems to me, the intellect has withdrawn its watchers from the gates, and the ideas rush
in pell-mell, and only then does it review and inspect the multitude. You worthy critics,
or whatever you may call yourselves, are ashamed or afraid of the momentary and
passing madness which is found in all real creators, the longer or shorter duration of
which distinguishes the thinking artist from the dreamer. Hence your complaints of
unfruitfulness, for you reject too soon and discriminate too severely' (letter of December
1, 1788).
And yet, such a withdrawal of the watchers from the gates of the intellect, as Schiller puts
it, such a translation into the condition of uncritical self-observation, is by no means
difficult.
Most of my patients accomplish it after my first instructions. I myself can do so very

completely, if I assist the process by writing down the ideas that flash through my mind.
The quantum of psychic energy by which the critical activity is thus reduced, and by
which the intensity of self-observation may be increased, varies considerably according
to the subject-matter upon which the attention is to be fixed.
The first step in the application of this procedure teaches us that one cannot make the
dream as a whole the object of one's attention, but only the individual components of its

content. If I ask a patient who is as yet unpractised: `What occurs to you in connection
with this dream?' he is unable, as a rule, to fix upon anything in his psychic field of
vision. I must first dissect the dream for him; then, in connection with each fragment, he
gives me a number of ideas which may be described as the `thoughts behind' this part of
the dream. In this first and important condition, then, the method of dream-interpretation
which I employ diverges from the popular, historical and legendary method of
interpretation by symbolism and approaches more nearly to the second or `cipher
method'. Like this, it is an interpretation in detail, not en masse; like this, it conceives the
dream, from the outset, as something built up, as a conglomerate of psychic formations.
In the course of my psychoanalysis of neurotics I have already subjected perhaps more

than a thousand dreams to interpretation, but I do not wish to use this material now as an
introduction to the theory and technique of dream-interpretation. For quite apart from the
fact that I should lay myself open to the objection that these are the dreams of neuropaths,
so that the conclusions drawn from them would not apply to the dreams of healthy
persons, there is another reason that impels me to reject them. The theme to which these
dreams point is, of course, always the history of the malady that is responsible for the
neurosis. Hence every dream would require a very long introduction, and an investigation
of the nature and etiological conditions of the psychoneuroses, matters which are in
themselves novel and exceedingly strange, and which would therefore distract attention
from the dream-problem proper. My purpose is rather to prepare the way, by the solution
of the dream-problem, for the solution of the more difficult problems of the psychology
of the neuroses. But if I eliminate the dreams of neurotics, which constitute my principal
material, I cannot be too fastidious in my treatment of the rest. Only those dreams are left
which have been incidentally related to me by healthy persons of my acquaintance, or
which I find given as examples in the literature of dream-life. Unfortunately, in all these
dreams I am deprived of the analysis without which I cannot find the meaning of the
dream. My mode of procedure is, of course, less easy than that of the popular cipher
method, which translates the given dream-content by reference to an established key; I,
on the contrary, hold that the same dream-content may conceal a different meaning in the
case of different persons, or in different connections. I must, therefore, resort to my own
dreams as a source of abundant and convenient material, furnished by a person who is
more or less normal, and containing references to many incidents of everyday life. I shall
certainly be confronted with doubts as to the trustworthiness of these `self-analyses', and
it will be said that arbitrariness is by no means excluded in such analyses. In my own
judgment, conditions are more likely to be favourable in self-observation than in the
observation of others; in any case, it is permissible to investigate how much can be
accomplished in the matter of dream-interpretation by means of self-analysis. There are
other difficulties which must be overcome in my own inner self. One has a
comprehensible aversion to exposing so many intimate details of one's own psychic life,
and one does not feel secure against the misinterpretations of strangers. But one must be
able to transcend such considerations. `Tout psychologiste,' writes Delboeuf, èst obligé
de faire l'aveu même de ses faiblesses s'il croit par là jeter du jour sur quelque problème
obscur.' And I may assume for the reader that his initial interest in the indiscretions
which I must commit will very soon give way to an exclusive engrossment in the
psychological problems elucidated by them.7

I shall therefore select one of my own dreams for the purpose of elucidating my method
of interpretation. Every such dream necessitates a preliminary statement; so that I must
now beg the reader to make my interests his own for a time, and to become absorbed,
with me, in the most trifling details of my life; for an interest in the hidden significance of
dreams imperatively demands just such a transference.
Preliminary Statement -- In the summer of 1895 I had treated psycho-analytically a

young lady who was an intimate friend of mine and of my family. It will be understood
that such complicated relations may excite manifold feelings in the physician, and
especially the psychotherapist. The personal interest of the physician is greater, but his
authority less. If he fails, his friendship with the patient's relatives is in danger of being
undermined. In this case, however, the treatment ended in partial success; the patient was
cured of her hysterical anxiety, but not of all her somatic symptoms. At that time I was
not yet quite sure of the criteria which denote the final cure of an hysterical case, and I
expected her to accept a solution which did not seem acceptable to her. In the midst of
this disagreement we discontinued the treatment for the summer holidays. One day a
younger colleague, one of my most intimate friends, who had visited the patient -- Irma --
and her family in their country residence, called upon me. I asked him how Irma was, and
received the reply: `She is better, but not quite well.' I realise that these words of my
friend Otto's, or the tone of voice in which they were spoken, annoyed me. I thought I
heard a reproach in the words, perhaps to the effect that I had promised the patient too
much, and -- rightly or wrongly -- I attributed Otto's apparent `taking sides' against me to
the influence of the patient's relatives, who, I assumed, had never approved of my
treatment. This disagreeable impression, however, did not become clear to me, nor did I
speak of it. That same evening I wrote the clinical history of Irma's case, in order to give
it, as though to justify myself, to Dr M., a mutual friend, who was at that time the leading
personality in our circle. During the night (or rather in the early morning) I had the
following dream, which I recorded immediately after waking:8
Dream of July 23-24, 1895
A great hall -- a number of guests, whom we are receiving -- among them Irma, whom I
immediately take aside, as though to answer her letter, and to reproach her for not yet
accepting the `solution'. I say to her: Ìf you still have pains, it is really only your own
fault.' -- She answers: Ìf you only knew what pains I have now in the throat, stomach,
and abdomen -- I am choked by them.' I am startled, and look at her. She looks pale and
puffy. I think that after all I must be overlooking some organic affection. I take her to the
window and look into her throat. She offers some resistance to this, like a women who
has a set of false teeth. I think, surely, she doesn't need them. -- The mouth then opens
wide, end I find a large white spot on the right, and elsewhere I see extensive greyish-
white scabs adhering to curiously curled formations, which are evidently shaped like the
turbinal bones of the nose. -- I quickly call Dr M., who repeats the examination and
confirms it. . . . Dr M. looks quite unlike his usual self; he is very pale, he limps, and his
chin is clean-shaven. . . . Now my friend Otto, too, is standing beside her, and my friend
Leopold percusses her covered chest, and says: `She has a dullness below, on the left,'
and also calls attention to an infiltrated portion of skin on the left shoulder (which I can

feel, in spite of the dress). . . . M. says: `There's no doubt that it's an infection, but it
doesn't matter; dysentery will follow and the poison will be eliminated.'. . . . We know,
too, precisely how the infection originated. My friend Otto, not long ago, gave her, when
she was feeling unwell, an injection of a preparation of propyl . . . propyls . . . propionic
acid . . . trimethylamin (the formula of which I see before me, printed in heavy type). . . .
One doesn't give such injections so rashly. . . . Probably, too, the syringe was not clean.
This dream has an advantage over many others. It is at once obvious to what events of the
preceding day it is related, and of what subject it treats. The preliminary statement
explains these matters. The news of Irma's health which I had received from Otto, and the
clinical history, which I was writing late into the night, had occupied my psychic
activities even during sleep. Nevertheless, no one who had read the preliminary report,
and had knowledge of the content of the dream, could guess what the dream signified.
Nor do I myself know. I am puzzled by the morbid symptoms of which Irma complains
in the dream, for they are not the symptoms for which I treated her. I smile at the
nonsensical idea of an injection of propionic acid, and at Dr M.'s attempt at consolation.
Towards the end the dream seems more obscure and quicker in tempo than at the
beginning. In order to learn the significance of all these details I resolve to undertake an
exhaustive analysis.
ANALYSIS
The hall -- a number of guests, whom we are receiving. We were living that summer at
Bellevue, an isolated house on one of the hills adjoining the Kahlenberg. This house was
originally built as a place of entertainment, and therefore has unusually lofty, hall-like
rooms. The dream was dreamed in Bellevue, a few days before my wife's birthday.
During the day my wife had mentioned that she expected several friends, and among
them Irma, to come to us as guests for her birthday. My dream, then, anticipates this
situation: It is my wife's birthday, and we are receiving a number of people, among them
Irma, as guests in the large hall of Bellevue.
I reproach Irma for not having accepted the `solution', I say, Ìf you still have pains, it is
really your own fault.' I might even have said this while awake; I may have actually said
it. At that time I was of the opinion recognised (later to be incorrect) that my task was
limited to informing patients of the hidden meaning of their symptoms. Whether they
then accepted or did not accept the solution upon which success depended -- for that I
was not responsible. I am grateful to this error, which, fortunately, has now been
overcome, since it made life easier for me at a time when, with all my unavoidable
ignorance, I was expected to effect successful cures. But I note that in the speech which I
make to Irma in the dream I am above all anxious that I shall not be blamed for the pains
which she still suffers. If it is Irma's own fault, it cannot be mine. Should the purpose of
the dream be looked for in this quarter?
Irma's complaints -- pains in the neck, abdomen, and stomach; she is choked by them.
Pains in the stomach belonged to the symptom-complex of my patient, but they were not
very prominent; she complained rather of qualms and a feeling of nausea. Pains in the

neck and abdomen and constriction of the throat played hardly any part in her case. I
wonder why I have decided upon this choice of symptoms in the dream; for the moment I
cannot discover the reason.
She looks pale and puffy. My patient had always a rosy complexion. I suspect that here
another person is being substituted for her.
I am startled at the idea that I may have overlooked some organic affection. This, as the
reader will readily believe, is a constant fear with the specialist who sees neurotics almost
exclusively, and who is accustomed to ascribe to hysteria so many manifestations which
other physicians treat as organic. On the other hand, I am haunted by a faint doubt -- I do
not know whence it comes -- whether my alarm is altogether honest. If Irma's pains are
indeed of organic origin, it is not my duty to cure them. My treatment, of course, removes
only hysterical pains. It seems to me, in fact, that I wish to find an error in the diagnosis;
for then I could not be reproached with failure to effect a cure.
I take her to the window in order to look into her throat. She resists a little, like a woman
who has false teeth. I think to myself, she does not need them. I had never had occasion to
inspect Irma's oral cavity. The incident in the dream reminds me of an examination, made
some time before, of a governess who at first produced an impression of youthful beauty,
but who, upon opening her mouth, took certain measures to conceal her denture. Other
memories of medical examinations, and of petty secrets revealed by them, to the
embarrassment of both physician and patient, associate themselves with this case. -- `She
surely does not need them', is perhaps in the first place a compliment to Irma: but I
suspect yet another meaning. In a careful analysis one is able to feel whether or not the
arrière-pensées which are to be expected have all been exhausted. The way in which
Irma stands at the window suddenly reminds me of another experience. Irma has an
intimate woman friend of whom I think very highly. One evening, on paying her a visit, I
found her at the window in the position reproduced in the dream, and her physician, the
same Dr M., declared that she had a diphtheritic membrane. The person of Dr M. and the
membrane return, indeed, in the course of the dream. Now it occurs to me that during the
past few months I have had every reason to suppose that this lady too is hysterical. Yes,
Irma herself betrayed the fact to me. But what do I know of her condition? Only the one
thing, that like Irma in the dream she suffers from hysterical choking. Thus, in the dream
I have replaced my patient by her friend. Now I remember that I have often played with
the supposition that this lady, too, might ask me to relieve her of her symptoms. But even
at the time I thought it improbable since she is extremely reserved. She resists, as the
dream shows. Another explanation might be that she does not need it; in fact, until now
she has shown herself strong enough to master her condition without outside help. Now
only a few features remain, which I can assign neither to Irma nor to her friend; pale,
puffy, false teeth. The false teeth led me to the governess; I now feel inclined to be
satisfied with bad teeth. Here another person, to whom these features may allude, occurs
to me. She is not my patient, and I do not wish her to be my patient, for I have noticed
that she is not at her ease with me, and I do not consider her a docile patient. She is
generally pale, and once, when she had not felt particularly well, she was puffy.'9 I have
thus compared my patient Irma with two others, who would likewise resist treatment.

What is the meaning of the fact that I have exchanged her for her friend in the dream?
Perhaps that I wish to exchange her; either her friend arouses in me stronger sympathies,
or I have a higher regard for her intelligence. For I consider Irma foolish because she
does not accept my solution. The other woman would be more sensible, and would thus
be more likely to yield. The mouth then opens readily; she would tell more than Irma.10
What I see in the throat: a white spot and scabby turbinal bones. The white spot recalls
diphtheria, and thus Irma's friend, but it also recalls the grave illness of my eldest
daughter two years earlier, and all the anxiety of that unhappy time. The scab on the
turbinal bones reminds me of my anxiety concerning my own health. At that time I
frequently used cocaine in order to suppress distressing swellings in the nose, and I had
heard a few days previously that a lady patient who did likewise had contracted an
extensive necrosis of the nasal mucous membrane. In 1885 it was I who had
recommended the use of cocaine, and I had been gravely reproached in consequence. A
dear friend, who had died before the date of this dream, had hastened his end by the
misuse of this remedy.
I quickly call Dr M., who repeats the examination. This would simply correspond to the
position which M. occupied among us. But the word `quickly' is striking enough to
demand a special examination. It reminds me of a sad medical experience. By continually
prescribing a drug (sulphonal), which at that time was still considered harmless, I was
once responsible for a condition of acute poisoning in the case of a woman patient, and
hastily turned for assistance to my older and more experienced colleague. The fact that I
really had this case in mind is confirmed by a subsidiary circumstance. The patient, who
succumbed to the toxic effects of the drug, bore the same name as my eldest daughter. I
had never thought of this until now; but now it seems to me almost like a retribution of
fate -- as though the substitution of persons had to be continued in another sense; this
Matilda for that Matilda; an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. It is as though I were
seeking every opportunity to reproach myself for a lack of medical conscientiousness.
Dr M. is pale; his chin is shaven, and he limps. Of this so much is correct, that his
unhealthy appearance often arouses the concern of his friends. The other two
characteristics must belong to another person. An elder brother living abroad occurs to
me, for he, too, shaves his chin, and if I remember him rightly, the M. of the dream bears
on the whole a certain resemblance to him. And some days previously the news arrived
that he was limping on account of an arthritic affection of the hip. There must be some
reason why I fuse the two persons into one in my dream.
I remember that, in fact, I was on bad terms with both of them for similar reasons. Both
had rejected a certain proposal which I had recently made them.
My friend Otto is now standing next to the patient, and my friend Leopold examines her
and calls attention to a dullness low down on the left side. My friend Leopold also is a
physician, and a relative of Otto's. Since the two practise the same speciality, fate has
made them competitors, so that they are constantly being compared with one another.
Both of them assisted me for years, while I was still directing a public clinic for neurotic

children. There, scenes like that reproduced in my dream had often taken place. While I
would be discussing the diagnosis of a case with Otto, Leopold would examine the child
anew and make an unexpected contribution towards our decision. There was a difference
of character between the two men like that between Inspector Brasig and his friend Karl.
Otto was remarkably prompt and alert; Leopold was slow and thoughtful, but thorough. If
I contrast Otto and the cautious Leopold in the dream I do so, apparently, in order to extol
Leopold. The comparison is like that made above between the disobedient patient Irma
and her friend, who was believed to be more sensible. I now become aware of one of the
tracks along which the association of ideas in the dream proceeds: from the sick child to
the children's clinic. Concerning the dullness low on the left side, I have the impression
that it corresponds with a certain case of which all the details were similar, a case in
which Leopold impressed me by his thoroughness. I thought vaguely, too, of something
like a metastatic affection, but it might also be a reference to the patient whom I should
have liked to have in Irma's place. For this lady, as far as I can gather, exhibited
symptoms which imitated tuberculosis.
An infiltrated portion of skin on the left shoulder. I know at once that this is my own
rheumatism of the shoulder, which I always feel if I lie awake long at night. The very
phrasing of the dream sounds ambiguous: `Something which I can feel, as he does, in
spite of the dress.' `Feel on my own body' is intended. Further, it occurs to me how
unusual the phrase ìnfiltrated portion of skin' sounds. We are accustomed to the phrase
àn infiltration of the upper posterior left'; this would refer to the lungs, and thus, once
more, to tuberculosis.
In spite of the dress. This, to be sure, is only an interpolation. At the clinic the children
were, of course, examined undressed; here we have some contrast to the manner in which
adult female patients have to be examined. The story used to be told of an eminent
physician that he always examined his patients through their clothes. The rest is obscure
to me; I have, frankly, no inclination to follow the matter further.
Dr M. says: Ìt's an infection, but it doesn't matter; dysentery will follow, and the poison
will be eliminated.' This, at first, seems to me ridiculous; nevertheless, like everything
else, it must be carefully analysed; more closely observed it seems after all to have a sort
of meaning. What I had found in the patient was a local diphtheritis. I remember the
discussion about diphtheritis and diphtheria at the time of my daughter's illness.
Diphtheria is the general infection which proceeds from local diphtheritis. Leopold
demonstrates the existence of such a general infection by the dullness, which also
suggests a metastatic focus. I believe, however, that just this kind of metastasis does not
occur in the case of diphtheria. It reminds me rather of pyaemia.
It doesn't matter is a consolation. I believe it fits in as follows: The last part of the dream
has yielded a content to the effect that the patient's sufferings are the result of a serious
organic affection. I begin to suspect that by this I am only trying to shift the blame from
myself. Psychic treatment cannot be held responsible for the continued presence of a
diphtheritic affection. Now, indeed, I am distressed by the thought of having invented
such a serious illness for Irma, for the sole purpose of exculpating myself. It seems so

cruel. Accordingly, I need the assurance that the outcome will be benign, and it seems to
me that I made a good choice when I put the words that consoled me into the mouth of Dr
M. But here I am placing myself in a position of superiority to the dream; a fact which
needs explanation.
But why is this consolation so nonsensical?
Dysentery. Some sort of far-fetched theoretical notion that the toxins of disease might be
eliminated through the intestines. Am I thereby trying to make fun of Dr M.'s remarkable
store of farfetched explanations, his habit of conceiving curious pathological relations?
Dysentery suggests something else. A few months ago I had in my care a young man who
was suffering from remarkable intestinal troubles; a case which had been treated by other
colleagues as one of ànaemia with malnutrition'. I realised that it was a case of hysteria; I
was unwilling to use my psychotherapy on him, and sent him off on a sea-voyage. Now a
few days previously I had received a despairing letter from him; he wrote from Egypt,
saying that he had had a fresh attack, which the doctor had declared to be dysentery. I
suspect that the diagnosis is merely an error on the part of an ignorant colleague, who is
allowing himself to be fooled by the hysteria; yet I cannot help reproaching myself for
putting the invalid in a position where he might contract some organic affection of the
bowels in addition to his hysteria. Furthermore, dysentery sounds not unlike diphtheria, a
word which does not occur in the dream.
Yes, it must be the case that with the consoling prognosis, `Dysentery will develop, etc.',
I am making fun of Dr M., for I recollect that years ago he once jestingly told a very
similar story of a colleague. He had been called in to consult with him in the case of a
woman who was very seriously ill, and he felt obliged to confront his colleague, who
seemed very hopeful, with the fact that he found albumen in the patient's urine. His
colleague, however, did not allow this to worry him, but answered calmly: `That does not
matter, my dear sir; the albumen will soon be excreted!' Thus I can no longer doubt that
this part of the dream expresses derision for those of my colleagues who are ignorant of
hysteria. And, as though in confirmation, the thought enters my mind: `Does Dr M. know
that the appearances in Irma's friend, his patient, which gave him reason to fear
tuberculosis, are likewise due to hysteria? Has he recognised this hysteria, or has he
allowed himself to be fooled?'
But what can be my motive in treating this friend so badly? That is simple enough: Dr M.
agrees with my solution as little as does Irma herself. Thus, in this dream I have already
revenged myself on two persons: on Irma in the words, Ìf you still have pains, it is your
own fault,' and on Dr M. in the wording of the nonsensical consolation which has been
put into his mouth.
We know precisely how the infection originated. This precise knowledge in the dream is
remarkable. Only a moment before this we did not yet know of the infection, since it was
first demonstrated by Leopold.

My friend Otto gave her an injection not long ago, when she was feeling unwell. Otto had
actually related during his short visit to Irma's family that he had been called in to a
neighbouring hotel in order to give an injection to someone who had been suddenly taken
ill. Injections remind me once more of the unfortunate friend who poisoned himself with
cocaine. I had recommended the remedy for internal use only during the withdrawal of
morphia; but he immediately gave himself injections of cocaine.
With a preparation of propyl . . . propyls . . . propionic acid. How on earth did this occur
to me? On the evening of the day after I had written the clinical history and dreamed
about the case, my wife opened a bottle of liqueur labelled Ànanas',11 which was a
present from our friend, Otto. He had, as a matter of fact, a habit of making presents on
every possible occasion; I hope he will some day be cured of this by a wife.12 This liqueur
smelt so strongly of fusel oil that I refused to drink it. My wife suggested: `We will give
the bottle to the servants,' and I, more prudent, objected, with the philanthropic remark:
`They shan't be poisoned either.' The smell of fusel oil (amyl . . .) has now apparently
awakened my memory of the whole series: propyl, methyl, etc., which furnished the
preparation of propyl mentioned in the dream. Here, indeed, I have effected a
substitution: I dreamt of propyl after smelling amyl; but substitutions of this kind are
perhaps permissible, especially in organic chemistry.
Trimethylamin. In the dream I see the chemical formula of this substance -- which at all
events is evidence of a great effort on the part of my memory -- and the formula is even
printed in heavy type, as though to distinguish it from the context as something of
particular importance. And where does trimethylamin, thus forced on my attention, lead
me? To a conversation with another friend, who for years has been familiar with all my
germinating ideas, and I with his. At that time he had just informed me of certain ideas
concerning a sexual chemistry, and had mentioned, among others, that he thought he had
found in trimethylamin one of the products of sexual metabolism. This substance thus
leads me to sexuality, the factor to which I attribute the greatest significance in respect of
the origin of these nervous affections which I am trying to cure. My patient Irma is a
young widow; if I am required to excuse my failure to cure her, I shall perhaps do best to
refer to this condition, which her admirers would be glad to terminate. But in what a
singular fashion such a dream is fitted together! The friend who in my dream becomes
my patient in Irma's place is likewise a young widow.
I surmise why it is that the formula of trimethylamin is so insistent in the dream. So many
important things are centred about this one word: trimethylamin is an allusion, not merely
to the all-important factor of sexuality, but also to a friend whose sympathy I remember
with satisfaction whenever I feel isolated in my opinions. And this friend, who plays such
a large part in my life: will he not appear yet again in the concatenation of ideas peculiar
to this dream? Of course; he has a special knowledge of the results of affections of the
nose and the sinuses, and has revealed to science several highly remarkable relations
between the turbinal bones and the female sexual organs. (The three curly formations in
Irma's throat.) I got him to examine Irma, in order to determine whether her gastric pains
were of nasal origin. But he himself suffers from suppurative rhinitis, which gives me

concern, and to this perhaps there is an allusion in pyaemia, which hovers before me in
the metastasis of the dream.
One doesn't give such injections so rashly. Here the reproach of rashness is hurled
directly at my friend Otto. I believe I had some such thought in the afternoon, when he
seemed to indicate, by word and look, that he had taken sides against me. It was, perhaps:
`How easily he is influenced; how irresponsibly he pronounces judgment.' Further, the
above sentence points once more to my deceased friend, who so irresponsibly resorted to
cocaine injections. As I have said, I had not intended that injections of the drug should be
taken. I note that in reproaching Otto I once more touch upon the story of the unfortunate
Matilda, which was the pretext for the same reproach against me. Here, obviously, I am
collecting examples of my conscientiousness, and also of the reverse.
Probably too the syringe was not clean. Another reproach directed at Otto, but
originating elsewhere. On the previous day I happened to meet the son of an old lady of
eighty-two, to whom I am obliged to give two injections of morphia daily. At present she
is in the country, and I have heard that she is suffering from phlebitis. I immediately
thought that this might be a case of infiltration caused by a dirty syringe. It is my pride
that in two years I have not given her a single infiltration; I am always careful, of course,
to see that the syringe is perfectly clean. For I am conscientious. From the phlebitis I
return to my wife, who once suffered from thrombosis during a period of pregnancy, and
now three related situations come to the surface in my memory, involving my wife, Irma,
and the dead Matilda, whose identity has apparently justified my putting these three
persons in one another's places.
I have now completed the interpretation of the dream.13 In the course of this interpretation
I have taken great pains to avoid all those notions which must have been suggested by a
comparison of the dream-content with the dream-thoughts hidden behind this content.
Meanwhile the `meaning' of the dream has dawned upon me. I have noted an intention
which is realised through the dream, and which must have been my motive in dreaming.
The dream fulfils several wishes, which were awakened within me by the events of the
previous evening (Otto's news, and the writing of the clinical history). For the result of
the dream is, that it is not I who am to blame for the pain which Irma is still suffering, but
that Otto is to blame for it. Now Otto has annoyed me by his remark about Irma's
imperfect cure; the dream avenges me upon him, in that it turns the reproach upon
himself. The dream acquits me of responsibility for Irma's condition, as it refers this
condition to other causes (which do, indeed, furnish quite a number of explanations). The
dream represents a certain state of affairs, such as I might wish to exist; the content of the
dream is thus the fulfilment of a wish; its motive is a wish.
This much is apparent at first sight. But many other details of the dream become
intelligible when regarded from the standpoint of wish-fulfilment. I take my revenge on
Otto, not merely for too readily taking sides against me, in that I accuse him of careless
medical treatment (the injection), but I revenge myself also for the bad liqueur which
smells of fusel oil, and I find an expression in the dream which unites both these
reproaches: the injection of a preparation of propyl. Still I am not satisfied, but continue

to avenge myself by comparing him with his more reliable colleague. Thereby I seem to
say: Ì like him better than you.' But Otto is not the only person who must be made to feel
the weight of my anger. I take my revenge on the disobedient patient, by exchanging her
for a more sensible and more docile one. Nor do I pass over Dr M.'s contradiction; for I
express, in an obvious allusion, my opinion of him: namely, that his attitude in this case
is that of an ignoramus (`Dysentery will develop, etc.'). Indeed, it seems as though I were
appealing from him to someone better informed (my friend, who told me about
trimethylamin), just as I have turned from Irma to her friend, and from Otto to Leopold. It
is as though I were to say: Rid me of these three persons, replace them by three others of
my own choice, and I shall be rid of the reproaches which I am not willing to admit that I
deserve! In my dream the unreasonableness of these reproaches is demonstrated for me in
the most elaborate manner. Irma's pains are not attributable to me, since she herself is to
blame for them, in that she refuses to accept my solution. They do not concern me, for
being as they are of an organic nature, they cannot possibly be cured by psychic
treatment. -- Irma's sufferings are satisfactorily explained by her widowhood
(trimethylamin!); a state which I cannot alter. -- Irma's illness has been caused by an
incautious injection administered by Otto, an injection of an unsuitable drug, such as I
should never have administered. -- Irma's complaint is the result of an injection made
with an unclean syringe, like the phlebitis of my old lady patient, whereas my injections
have never caused any ill effects. I am aware that these explanations of Irma's illness,
which unite in acquitting me, do not agree with one another; that they even exclude one
another. The whole plea -- for this dream is nothing else -- recalls vividly the defence
offered by a man who was accused by his neighbour of having returned a kettle in a
damaged condition. In the first place, he said, he had returned the kettle undamaged; in
the second place it already had holes in it when he borrowed it; and in the third place, he
had never borrowed it at all. A complicated defence, but so much the better; if only one
of these three lines of defence is recognised as valid, the man must be acquitted.
Still other themes play a part in the dream, and their relation to my non-responsibility for
Irma's illness is not so apparent: my daughter's illness, and that of a patient with the same
name; the harmfulness of cocaine; the affection of my patient, who was travelling in
Egypt; concern about the health of my wife; my brother, and Dr M.; my own physical
troubles, and anxiety concerning my absent friend, who is suffering from suppurative
rhinitis. But if I keep all these things in view, they combine into a single train of thought,
which might be labelled: concern for the health of myself and others; professional
conscientiousness. I recall a vaguely disagreeable feeling when Otto gave me the news of
Irma's condition. Lastly, I am inclined, after the event, to find an expression of this
fleeting sensation in the train of thoughts which forms part of the dream. It is as though
Otto had said to me: `You do not take your medical duties seriously enough; you are not
conscientious; you do not perform what you promise.' Thereupon this train of thought
placed itself at my service, in order that I might give proof of my extreme
conscientiousness, of my intimate concern about the health of my relatives, friends and
patients. Curiously enough, there are also some painful memories in this material, which
confirm the blame attached to Otto rather than my own exculpation. The material is
apparently impartial, but the connection between this broader material, on which the

dream is based, and the more limited theme from which emerges the wish to be innocent
of Irma's illness, is, nevertheless, unmistakable.
I do not wish to assert that I have entirely revealed the meaning of the dream, or that my
interpretation is flawless.
I could still spend much time upon it; I could draw further explanations from it, and
discuss further problems which it seems to propound. I can even perceive the points from
which further mental associations might be traced; but such considerations as are always
involved in every dream of one's own prevent me from interpreting it farther. Those who
are over-ready to condemn such reserve should make the experiment of trying to be more
straightforward. For the present I am content with the one fresh discovery which has just
been made: If the method of dream-interpretation here indicated is followed, it will be
found that dreams do really possess a meaning, and are by no means the expression of a
disintegrated cerebral activity, as the writers on the subject would have us believe. When
the work of interpretation has been completed the dream can be recognised as a wish-
fulfilment.
*
[Virgil, Aeneid VII, 312]
1
In a novel Gradiva, by the poet W. Jensen, I chanced to discover several fictitious
dreams, which were perfectly correct in their construction, and could be interpreted as
though they had not been invented, but had been dreamt by actual persons. The poet
declared, upon my inquiry, that he was unacquainted with my theory of dreams. I have
made use of this agreement between my investigations and the creations of the poet as a
proof of the correctness of my method of dream-analysis (Der Wahn und die Träume in
W. Jensen's Gradiva, vol. i of the Schriften zur angewandten Seelenkunde, 1906, edited
by myself, Ges. Schriften, vol. ix).
2
Aristotle expressed himself in this connection by saying that the best interpreter of
dreams is he who can best grasp similarities. For dream-pictures, like pictures in water,
are disfigured by the motion (of the water), so that he hits the target best who is able to
recognise the true picture in the distorted one (Büchsenschütz, p. 65).
3
Artemidoros of Daldis, born probably in the beginning of the second century of our
calendar, has furnished us with the most complete and careful elaboration of dream-
interpretation as it existed in the Graeco-Roman world. As Gompertz has emphasised, he
ascribed great importance to the consideration that dreams ought to be interpreted on the
basis of observation and experience, and he drew a definite line between his own art and
other methods, which he considered fraudulent. The principle of his art of interpretation
is, according to Gompertz, identical with that of magic: i.e. the principle of association.
The thing dreamed meant what it recalled to the memory -- to the memory, of course, of
the dream-interpreter! This fact -- that the dream may remind the interpreter of various
things, and every interpreter of different things -- leads, of course, to uncontrollable
arbitrariness and uncertainty. The technique which I am about to describe differs from
that of the ancients in one essential point, namely, in that it imposes upon the dreamer

himself the work of interpretation. Instead of taking into account whatever may occur to
the dream-interpreter, it considers only what occurs to the dreamer in connection with the
dream-element concerned. According to the recent records of the missionary Tfinkdjit
(Anthropos, 1913), it would seem that the modern dream-interpreters of the Orient
likewise attribute much importance to the co-operation of the dreamer. Of the dream-
interpreters among the Mesopotamian Arabs this writer relates as follows: `Pour
interpreter exactement un songe les oniromanciens les plus habiles s'informent de ceux
qui les consultent de toutes les circonstances qu'ils regardent nécessaires pour la bonne
explication . . . En un mot, nos oniromanciens ne laissent aucune circonstance leur
échapper et ne donnent l'interprétation désiré avant d'avoir parfaitement saisi et reçu
toutes les interrogations désirables.' Among these questions one always finds demands
for precise information in respect to near relatives (parents, wife, children) as well as the
following formula: habistine in hac nocte copulam conjugalem ante vel post somnium? --
`L'idée dominante dans l'interprétation des songes consiste à expliquer le rêve par son
opposé.'
4
Dr Alfred Robitsek calls my attention to the fact that Oriental dream-books, of which
ours are pitiful plagiarisms, commonly undertake the interpretation of dream-elements in
accordance with the assonance and similarity of words. Since these relationships must be
lost by translation into our language, the incomprehensibility of the equivalents in our
popular `dream-books' is hereby explained. Information as to the extraordinary
significance of puns and the play upon words in the old Oriental cultures may be found in
the writings of Hugo Winckler. The finest example of a dream-interpretation which has
come down to us from antiquity is based on a play upon words. Artemidoros relates the
following (p. 225): `But it seems to me that Aristandros gave a most happy interpretation
to Alexander of Macedon. When the latter held Tyros encompassed and in a state of
siege, and was angry and depressed over the great waste of time, he dreamed that he saw
a Satyr dancing on his shield. It happened that Aristandros was in the neighbourhood of
Tyros, and in the escort of the king, who was waging war on the Syrians. By dividing the
word Satyros into σα and τνρος, he induced the king to become more aggressive in the
siege. And thus Alexander became master of the city.' (ΣαΤνρος = thine is Tyros.) The
dream, indeed, is so intimately connected with verbal expression that Ferenczi justly
remarks that every tongue has its own dream-language. A dream is, as a rule, not to be
translated into other languages.
5
After the completion of my manuscript, a paper by Stumpf came to my notice which
agrees with my work in attempting to prove that the dream is full of meaning and capable
of interpretation. But the interpretation is undertaken by means of an allegorising
symbolism, and there is no guarantee that the procedure is generally applicable.
6
Selected Papers on Hysteria and other Psychoneuroses. Monograph series, Journ. of
Nervous and Mental Diseases.
7
However, I will not omit to mention, in qualification of the above statement, that I have
practically never reported a complete interpretation of a dream of my own. And I was
probably right not to trust too far to the reader's discretion.

8
This is the first dream which I subjected to an exhaustive interpretation.
9
The complaint of pains in the abdomen, as yet unexplained, may also be referred to this
third person. It is my own wife, of course, who is in question; the abdominal pains
remind me of one of the occasions on which her shyness became evident to me. I must
admit that I do not treat Irma and my wife very gallantly in this dream, but let it be said,
in my defence, that I am measuring both of them against the ideal of the courageous and
docile female patient.
10
I suspect that the interpretation of this portion has not been carried far enough to follow
every hidden meaning. If I were to continue the comparison of the three women, I should
go far afield. Every dream has at least one point at which it is unfathomable; a central
point, as it were, connecting it with the unknown.
11
Ànanas', moreover, has a remarkable assonance with the family name of my patient
Irma.
12
In this the dream did not turn out to be prophetic. But in another sense it proved correct,
for the ùnsolved' stomach pains, for which I did not want to be blamed, were the
forerunners of a serious illness, due to gallstones.
13
Even if I have not, as might be expected, accounted for everything that occurred to me
in connection with the work of interpretation.

CHAPTER THREE
The Dream as a Wish-Fulfilment
When, after passing through a narrow defile, one suddenly reaches a height beyond
which the ways part and a rich prospect lies outspread in different directions, it is well to
stop for a moment and consider whither one shall turn next. We are in somewhat the
same position after we have mastered this first interpretation of a dream. We find
ourselves standing in the light of a sudden discovery. The dream is not comparable to the
irregular sounds of a musical instrument, which, instead of being played by the hand of a
musician, is struck by some external force; the dream is not meaningless, not absurd,
does not presuppose that one part of our store of ideas is dormant while another part
begins to awake. It is a perfectly valid psychic phenomenon, actually a wish-fulfilment; it
may be enrolled in the continuity of the intelligible psychic activities of the waking state;
it is built up by a highly complicated intellectual activity. But at the very moment when
we are about to rejoice in this discovery a host of problems besets us. If the dream, as this
theory defines it, represents a fulfilled wish, what is the cause of the striking and
unfamiliar manner in which this fulfilment is expressed? What transformation has
occurred in our dream-thoughts before the manifest dream, as we remember it on waking,
shapes itself out of them? How has this transformation taken place? Whence comes the
material that is worked up into the dream? What causes many of the peculiarities which
are to be observed in our dream-thoughts; for example, how is it that they are able to
contradict one another? (see the analogy of the kettle, p. 32). Is the dream capable of
teaching us something new concerning our internal psychic processes, and can its content
correct opinions which we have held during the day? I suggest that for the present all
these problems be laid aside, and that a single path be pursued. We have found that the
dream represents a wish as fulfilled. Our next purpose should be to ascertain whether this
is a general characteristic of dreams, or whether it is only the accidental content of the
particular dream (`the dream about Irma's injection') with which we have begun our
analysis; for even if we conclude that every dream has a meaning and psychic value, we
must nevertheless allow for the possibility that this meaning may not be the same in
every dream. The first dream which we have considered was the fulfilment of a wish;
another may turn out to be the realisation of an apprehension; a third may have a
reflection as its content; a fourth may simply reproduce a reminiscence. Are there, then,
dreams other than wish-dreams; or are there none but wish-dreams?
It is easy to show that the wish-fulfilment in dreams is often undisguised and easy to
recognise, so that one may wonder why the language of dreams has not long since been
understood. There is, for example, a dream which I can evoke as often as I please,
experimentally, as it were. If, in the evening, I eat anchovies, olives, or other strongly
salted foods, I am thirsty at night, and therefore I wake. The waking, however, is
preceded by a dream, which has always the same content, namely, that I am drinking. I
am drinking long draughts of water; it tastes as delicious as only a cool drink can taste
when one's throat is parched; and then I wake, and find that I have an actual desire to
drink. The cause of this dream is thirst, which I perceive when I wake. From this

sensation arises the wish to drink, and the dream shows me this wish as fulfilled. It
thereby serves a function, the nature of which I soon surmise. I sleep well, and am not
accustomed to being waked by a bodily need. If I succeed in appeasing my thirst by
means of the dream that I am drinking, I need not wake up in order to satisfy that thirst. It
is thus a dream of convenience. The dream takes the place of action, as elsewhere in life.
Unfortunately, the need of water to quench the thirst cannot be satisfied by a dream, as
can my thirst for revenge upon Otto and Dr M., but the intention is the same. Not long
ago I had the same dream in a somewhat modified form. On this occasion I felt thirsty
before going to bed, and emptied the glass of water which stood on the little chest beside
my bed. Some hours later, during the night, my thirst returned, with the consequent
discomfort. In order to obtain water, I should have had to get up and fetch the glass which
stood on my wife's bed-table. I thus quite appropriately dreamt that my wife was giving
me a drink from a vase; this vase was an Etruscan cinerary urn, which I had brought
home from Italy, and had since given away. But the water in it tasted so salt (apparently
on account of the ashes) that I was forced to wake. It may be observed how conveniently
the dream is capable of arranging matters. Since the fulfilment of a wish is its only
purpose, it may be perfectly egoistic. Love of comfort is really not compatible with
consideration for others. The introduction of the cinerary urn is probably once again the
fulfilment of a wish; I regret that I no longer possess this vase; it, like the glass of water
at my wife's side, is inaccessible to me. The cinerary urn is appropriate also in connection
with the sensation of an increasingly salty taste, which I know will compel me to wake.1
Such convenience-dreams came very frequently to me in my youth. Accustomed as I had

always been to working until late at night, early waking was always a matter of difficulty.
I used then to dream that I was out of bed and standing at the washstand. After a while I
could no longer shut out the knowledge that I was not yet up; but in the meantime I had
continued to sleep. The same sort of lethargy-dream was dreamed by a young colleague
of mine, who appears to share my propensity for sleep. With him it assumed a
particularly amusing form. The landlady with whom he was lodging in the
neighbourhood of the hospital had strict orders to wake him every morning at a given
hour, but she found it by no means easy to carry out his orders. One morning sleep was
especially sweet to him. The woman called into his room: `Herr Pepi, get up; you've got
to go to the hospital.' Whereupon the sleeper dreamt of a room in the hospital, of a bed in
which he was lying, and of a chart pinned over his head, which read as follows: `Pepi M.,
medical student, 22 years of age.' He told himself in the dream: Ìf I am already at the
hospital, I don't have to go there,' turned over, and slept on. He had thus frankly admitted
to himself his motive for dreaming.
Here is yet another dream of which the stimulus was active during sleep: One of my
women patients, who had been obliged to undergo an unsuccessful operation on the jaw,
was instructed by her physicians to wear by day and night a cooling apparatus on the
affected cheek; but she was in the habit of throwing it off as soon as she had fallen
asleep. One day I was asked to reprove her for doing so; she had again thrown the
apparatus on the floor. The patient defended herself as follows: `This time I really
couldn't help it; it was the result of a dream which I had during the night. In the dream I
was in a box at the opera, and was taking a lively interest in the performance. But Herr

Karl Meyer was lying in the sanatorium and complaining pitifully on account of pains in
his jaw. I said to myself, ``Since I haven't the pains, I don't need the apparatus either'';
that's why I threw it away.' The dream of this poor sufferer reminds me of an expression
which comes to our lips when we are in a disagreeable situation: `Well, I can imagine
more amusing things!' The dream presents these `more amusing things!' Herr Karl Meyer,
to whom the dreamer attributed her pains, was the most casual acquaintance of whom she
could think.
It is quite as simple a matter to discover the wish-fulfilment in several other dreams

which I have collected from healthy persons. A friend who was acquainted with my
theory of dreams, and had explained it to his wife, said to me one day: `My wife asked
me to tell you that she dreamt yesterday that she was having her menses. You will know
what that means.' Of course I know: if the young wife dreams that she is having her
menses, the menses have stopped. I can well imagine that she would have liked to enjoy
her freedom a little longer, before the discomforts of maternity began. It was a clever way
of giving notice of her first pregnancy. Another friend writes that his wife had dreamt not
long ago that she noticed milk-stains on the front of her blouse. This also is an indication
of pregnancy, but not of the first one; the young mother hoped she would have more
nourishment for the second child than she had for the first.
A young woman who for weeks had been cut off from all society because she was
nursing a child who was suffering from an infectious disease dreamt, after the child had
recovered, of a company of people in which Alphonse Daudet, Paul Bourget, Marcel
Prévost and others were present; they were all very pleasant to her and amused her
enormously. In her dream these different authors had the features which their portraits
give them. M. Prévost, with whose portrait she is not familiar, looked like the man who
had disinfected the sickroom the day before, the first outsider to enter it for a long time.
Obviously the dream is to be translated thus: Ìt is about time now for something more
entertaining than this eternal nursing.'
Perhaps this collection will suffice to prove that frequently, and under the most complex
conditions, dreams may be noted which can be understood only as wish-fulfilments, and
which present their content without concealment. In most cases these are short and simple
dreams, and they stand in pleasant contrast to the confused and overloaded dream-
compositions which have almost exclusively attracted the attention of the writers on the
subject. But it will repay us if we give some time to the examination of these simple
dreams. The simplest dreams of all are, I suppose, to be expected in the case of children
whose psychic activities are certainly less complicated than those of adults.
Child psychology, in my opinion, is destined to render the same services to the

psychology of adults as a study of the structure or development of the lower animals
renders to the investigation of the structure of the higher orders of animals. Hitherto but
few deliberate efforts have been made to make use of the psychology of the child for such
a purpose.

The dreams of little children are often simple fulfilments of wishes, and for this reason
are, as compared with the dreams of adults, by no means interesting. They present no
problem to be solved, but they are invaluable as affording proof that the dream, in its
inmost essence, is the fulfilment of a wish. I have been able to collect several examples of
such dreams from the material furnished by my own children.
For two dreams, one that of a daughter of mine, at that time eight and a half years of age,
and the other that of a boy of five and a quarter, I am indebted to an excursion to
Hallstatt, in the summer of 1896. I must first explain that we were living that summer on
a hill near Aussee, from which, when the weather was fine, we enjoyed a splendid view
of the Dachstein. With a telescope we could easily distinguish the Simony hut. The
children often tried to see it through the telescope -- I do not know with what success.
Before the excursion I had told the children that Hallstatt lay at the foot of the Dachstein.
They looked forward to the outing with the greatest delight. From Hallstatt we entered
the valley of Eschern, which enchanted the children with its constantly changing scenery.
One of them, however, the boy of five, gradually became discontented. As often as a
mountain came into view, he would ask: Ìs that the Dachstein?' whereupon I had to
reply: `No, only a foothill.' After this question had been repeated several times he fell
quite silent, and did not wish to accompany us up the steps leading to the waterfall. I
thought he was tired. But the next morning he came to me, perfectly happy, and said:
`Last night I dreamt that we went to the Simony hut.' I understood him now; he had
expected, when I spoke of the Dachstein, that on our excursion to Hallstatt he would
climb the mountain, and would see at close quarters the hut which had been so often
mentioned when the telescope was used. When he learned that he was expected to
content himself with foothills and a waterfall he was disappointed, and became
discontented. But the dream compensated him for all this. I tried to learn some details of
the dream; they were scanty. `You go up steps for six hours,' as he had been told.
On this excursion the girl of eight and a half had likewise cherished wishes which had to
be satisfied by a dream. We had taken with us to Hallstatt our neighbour's twelve-year-
old boy; quite a polished little gentleman, who, it seemed to me, had already won the
little woman's sympathies. Next morning she related the following dream: `Just think, I
dreamt that Emil was one of the family, that he said ``papa'' and ``mamma'' to you, and
slept at our house, in the big room, like one of the boys. Then mamma came into the
room and threw a handful of big bars of chocolate, wrapped in blue and green paper,
under our beds.' The girl's brothers, who evidently had not inherited an understanding of
dream-interpretation, declared, just as the writers we have quoted would have done: `That
dream is nonsense.' The girl defended at least one part of the dream, and from the
standpoint of the theory of the neuroses it is interesting to learn which part it was that she
defended: `That Emil was one of the family was nonsense, but that part about the bars of
chocolate wasn't.' It was just this latter part that was obscure to me, until my wife
furnished the explanation. On the way home from the railway-station the children had
stopped in front of a slot-machine, and had wanted exactly such bars of chocolate,
wrapped in paper with a metallic lustre, such as the machine, in their experience,
provided. But the mother thought, and rightly so, that the day had brought them enough
wish-fulfilments, and therefore left this wish to be satisfied in the dream. This little scene

had escaped me. That portion of the dream which had been condemned by my daughter I
understood without any difficulty. I myself had heard the well-behaved little guest
enjoining the children, as they were walking ahead of us, to wait until `papa' or `mamma'
had come up. For the little girl the dream turned this temporary relationship into a
permanent adoption. Her affection could not as yet conceive of any other way of enjoying
her friend's company permanently than the adoption pictured in her dream, which was
suggested by her brothers. Why the bars of chocolate were thrown under the bed could
not, of course, be explained without questioning the child.
From a friend I have learned of a dream very much like that of my little boy. It was
dreamed by a little girl of eight. Her father, accompanied by several children, had started
on a walk to Dornbach, with the intention of visiting the Rohrer hut, but had turned back,
as it was growing late, promising the children to take them some other time. On the way
back they passed a signpost which pointed to the Hameau. The children now asked him to
take them to the Hameau, but once more, and for the same reason, they had to be content
with the promise that they should go there some other day. Next morning the little girl
went to her father and told him, with a satisfied air: `Papa, I dreamed last night that you
were with us at the Rohrer hut, and on the Hameau.' Thus, in the dream her impatience
had anticipated the fulfilment of the promise made by her father.
Another dream, with which the picturesque beauty of the Aussee inspired my daughter, at
that time three and a quarter years of age, is equally straightforward. The little girl had
crossed the lake for the first time, and the trip had passed too quickly for her. She did not
want to leave the boat at the landing, and cried bitterly. The next morning she told us:
`Last night I was sailing on the lake.' Let us hope that the duration of this dream-voyage
was more satisfactory to her.
My eldest boy, at that time eight years of age, was already dreaming of the realisation of
his fancies. He had ridden in a chariot with Achilles, with Diomedes as charioteer. On the
previous day he had shown a lively interest in a book on the myths of Greece which had
been given to his elder sister.
If it can be admitted that the talking of children in their sleep belongs to the sphere of
dreams, I can relate the following as one of the earliest dreams in my collection: My
youngest daughter, at that time nineteen months old, vomited one morning, and was
therefore kept without food all day. During the night she was heard to call excitedly in
her sleep: Ànna F(r)eud, st'awbewy, wild st'awbewy, om'lette, pap!' She used her name
in this way in order to express the act of appropriation; the menu presumably included
everything that would seem to her a desirable meal; the fact that two varieties of
strawberry appeared in it was a demonstration against the sanitary regulations of the
household, and was based on the circumstance, which she had by no means overlooked,
that the nurse had ascribed her indisposition to an over-plentiful consumption of
strawberries; so in her dream she avenged herself for this opinion which met with her
disapproval. 2

When we call childhood happy because it does not yet know sexual desire, we must not
forget what a fruitful source of disappointment and renunciation, and therefore of
dreamstimulation, the other great vital impulse may be for the child.3 Here is a second
example. My nephew, twenty-two months of age, had been instructed to congratulate me
on my birthday, and to give me a present of a small basket of cherries, which at that time
of the year were scarce, being hardly in season. He seemed to find the task a difficult one,
for he repeated again and again: `Cherries in it', and could not be induced to let the little
basket go out of his hands. But he knew how to indemnify himself. He had, until then,
been in the habit of telling his mother every morning that he had dreamt of the white
soldier, an officer of the guard in a white cloak, whom he had once admired in the street.
On the day after the sacrifice on my birthday he woke up joyfully with the
announcement, which could have referred only to a dream: `He[r] man eaten all the
cherries!'4
What animals dream of I do not know. A proverb for which I am indebted to one of my
pupils professes to tell us, for it asks the question: `What does the goose dream of?' and
answers: Òf maize.'5 The whole theory that the dream is the fulfilment of a wish is
contained in these two sentences.6
We now perceive that we should have reached our theory of the hidden meaning of
dreams by the shortest route had we merely consulted the vernacular. Proverbial wisdom,
it is true, often speaks contemptuously enough of dreams -- it apparently seeks to justify
the scientists when it says that `dreams are bubbles'; but in colloquial language the dream
is predominantly the gracious fulfiller of wishes. Ì should never have imagined that in
my wildest dreams', we exclaim in delight if we find that the reality surpasses our
expectations.
1
The facts relating to dreams of thirst were known also to Weygandt, who speaks of them
as follows: Ìt is just this sensation of thirst which is registered most accurately of all; it
always causes a representation of quenching the thirst. The manner in which the dream
represents the act of quenching the thirst is manifold, and is specified in accordance with
some recent recollection. A universal phenomenon noticeable here is the fact that the
representation of quenching the thirst is immediately followed by disappointment in the
inefficacy of the imagined refreshment.' But he overlooks the universal character of the
reaction of the dream to the stimulus. If other persons who are troubled by thirst at night
awake without dreaming beforehand, this does not constitute an objection to my
experiment, but characterises them as persons who sleep less soundly. cf. here Isaiah
xxix, 8: Ìt shall even be as when an hungry man dreameth, and, behold, he eateth; but he
awaketh, and his soul is empty: or as when a thirsty man dreameth, and, behold he
drinketh; but he awaketh, and, behold he is faint. . . .'
2
The dream afterwards accomplished the same purpose in the case of the child's
grandmother, who is older than the child by about seventy years. After she had been
forced to go hungry for a day on account of the restlessness of her floating kidney, she
dreamed, being apparently translated into the happy years of her girlhood, that she had

been àsked out', invited to lunch and dinner, and had at each meal been served with the
most delicious titbits.
3
A more searching investigation into the psychic life of the child teaches us, of course,
that sexual motives, in infantile forms, play a very considerable part, which has been too
long overlooked, in the psychic activity of the child. This permits us to doubt to some
extent the happiness of the child, as imagined later by adults. cf. Three Contributions to
the Theory of Sex.
4
It should be mentioned that young children often have more complex and obscure
dreams, while, on the other hand, adults, in certain circumstances, often have dreams of a
simple and infantile character. How rich in unsuspected content the dreams of children no
more than four or five years of age may be is shown by the examples in my Analyse der
Phobie eines fünfjährigen Knaben (Jahrbuch von Blealer-Freud, vol. i, 1909), and Jung's
Èxperiences Concerning the Psychic Life of the Child', translated by Brill, American
Journal of Psychology, April, 1910. For analytically interpreted dreams of children, see
also von Hug-Hellmuth, Putnam, Raalte, Spielrein and Tausk; others by Banchieri,
Busemann, Doglia, and especially Wigam, who emphasises the wish-fulfilling tendency
of such dreams. On the other hand, it seems that dreams of an infantile type reappear with
especial frequency in adults who are transferred into the midst of unfamiliar conditions.
Thus Otto Nordenskjöld, in his book, Antarctic (1904, vol. i, p. 336), writes as follows of
the crew who spent the winter with him: `Very characteristic of the trend of our inmost
thoughts were our dreams, which were never more vivid and more numerous. Even those
of our comrades with whom dreaming was formerly exceptional had long stories to tell in
the morning, when we exchanged our experiences in the world of fantasy. They all had
reference to that outside world which was now so far removed from us, but they often
fitted into our immediate circumstances. An especially characteristic dream was that in
which one of our comrades believed himself back at school, where the task was assigned
to him of skinning miniature seals, which were manufactured especially for purposes of
instruction. Eating and drinking constituted the pivot around which most of our dreams
revolved. One of us, who was especially fond of going to big dinner-parties, was
delighted if he could report in the morning ``that he had had a three-course dinner''.
Another dreamed of tobacco, whole mountains of tobacco; yet another dreamed of a ship
approaching on the open sea under full sail. Still another dream deserves to be
mentioned: The postman brought the post and gave a long explanation of why it was so
long delayed; he had delivered it at the wrong address, and only with great trouble was he
able to get it back. To be sure, we were often occupied in our sleep with still more
impossible things, but the lack of fantasy in almost all the dreams which I myself
dreamed, or heard others relate, was quite striking. It would certainly have been of great
psychological interest if all these dreams could have been recorded. But one can readily
understand how we longed for sleep. That alone could afford us everything that we all
most ardently desired.' I will continue by a quotation from Du Prel (p. 231): `Mungo
Park, nearly dying of thirst on one of his African expeditions, dreamed constantly of the
well-watered valleys and meadows of his home. Similarly Trenck, tortured by hunger in
the fortress of Magdeburg, saw himself surrounded by copious meals. And George Back,

a member of Franklin's first expedition, when he was on the point of death by starvation,
dreamed continually and invariably of plenteous meals.'
5
A Hungarian proverb cited by Ferenczi states more explicitly that `the pig dreams of
acorns, the goose of maize.' A Jewish proverb asks: Òf what does the hen dream?' -- Òf
millet' (Sammlung jüd. Sprichw. u. Redensarten, edit. by Bernstein, 2nd ed., p. 116).
6
I am far from wishing to assert that no previous writer has ever thought of tracing a
dream to a wish. (cf. the first passages of the next chapter.) Those interested in the
subject will find that even in antiquity the physician Herophilos, who lived under the
First Ptolemy, distinguished between three kinds of dreams: dreams sent by the gods;
natural dreams -- those which come about whenever the soul creates for itself an image of
that which is beneficial to it, and will come to pass; and mixed dreams -- those which
originate spontaneously from the juxtaposition of images, when we see that which we
desire. From the examples collected by Scherner, J. Stärcke cites a dream which was
described by the author himself as a wish-fulfilment (p. 239). Scherner says: `The fantasy
immediately fulfils the dreamer's wish, simply because this existed vividly in the mind.'
This dream belongs to the èmotional dreams'. Akin to it are dreams due to `masculine
and feminine erotic longing', and to ìrritable moods'. As will readily be seen, Scherner
does not ascribe to the wish any further significance for the dream than to any other
psychic condition of the waking state; least of all does he insist on the connection
between the wish and the essential nature of the dream.

CHAPTER FOUR
Distortion in Dreams
If I now declare that wish-fulfilment is the meaning of every dream, so that there cannot
be any dreams other than wish-dreams, I know beforehand that I shall meet with the most
emphatic contradiction. My critics will object: `The fact that there are dreams which are
to be understood as fulfilments of wishes is not new, but has long since been recognised
by such writers as Radestock, Volkelt, Purkinje, Griesinger and others.1 That there can be
no other dreams than those of wish-fulfilments is yet one more unjustified generalisation;
which, fortunately, can be easily refuted. Dreams which present the most painful content,
and not the least trace of wish-fulfilment, occur frequently enough. The pessimistic
philosopher, Eduard von Hartmann, is perhaps most completely opposed to the theory of
wish-fulfilment. In his Philosophy of the Unconscious, Part II (Stereotyped German
edition, s. 344), he says: `Às regards the dream, with it all the troubles of waking life
pass over into the sleeping state; all save the one thing which may in some degree
reconcile the cultured person with life -- scientific and artistic enjoyment.. . .'' But even
less pessimistic observers have emphasised the fact that in our dreams pain and disgust
are more frequent than pleasure (Scholz, p. 33; Volkelt, p. 80, et al.). Two ladies, Sarah
Weed and Florence Hallam, have even worked out, on the basis of their dreams, a
numerical value for the preponderance of distress and discomfort in dreams. They find
that 58 per cent of dreams are disagreeable, and only 28.6 per cent positively pleasant.
Besides those dreams that convey into our sleep the many painful emotions of life, there
are also anxiety-dreams, in which this most terrible of all the painful emotions torments
us until we wake. Now it is precisely by these anxiety-dreams that children are so often
haunted (cf. Debacker on Pavor nocturnus); and yet it was in children that you found the
wish-fulfilment dream in its most obvious form.'
The anxiety-dream does really seem to preclude a generalisation of the thesis deduced
from the examples given in the last chapter, that dreams are wish-fulfilments, and even to
condemn it as an absurdity.
Nevertheless, it is not difficult to parry these apparently invincible objections. It is merely

necessary to observe that our doctrine is not based upon the estimates of the obvious
dream-content, but relates to the thought-content, which, in the course of interpretation, is
found to lie behind the dream. Let us compare and contrast the manifest and the latent
dream-content. It is true that there are dreams the manifest content of which is of the
most painful nature. But has anyone ever tried to interpret these dreams -- to discover
their latent thought-content? If not, the two objections to our doctrine are no longer valid;
for there is always the possibility that even our painful and terrifying dreams may, upon
interpretation, prove to be wish-fulfilments.2
In scientific research it is often advantageous, if the solution of one problem presents

difficulties, to add to it a second problem; just as it is easier to crack two nuts together
instead of separately. Thus, we are confronted not only with the problem: How can

painful and terrifying dreams be the fulfilments of wishes? but we may add to this a
second problem which arises from the foregoing discussion of the general problem of the
dream: Why do not the dreams that show an indifferent content, and yet turn out to be
wish-fulfilments, reveal their meaning without disguise? Take the exhaustively treated
dream of Irma's injection: it is by no means of a painful character, and it may be
recognised, upon interpretation, as a striking wish-fulfilment. But why is an interpretation
necessary at all? Why does not the dream say directly what it means? As a matter of fact,
the dream of Irma's injection does not at first produce the impression that it represents a
wish of the dreamer's as fulfilled. The reader will not have received this impression, and
even I myself was not aware of the fact until I had undertaken the analysis. If we call this
peculiarity of dreams -- namely, that they need elucidation -- the phenomenon of
distortion in dreams, a second question then arises: What is the origin of this distortion in
dreams?
If one's first thoughts on this subject were consulted several possible solutions might
suggest themselves: for example, that during sleep one is incapable of finding an
adequate expression for one's dream-thoughts. The analysis of certain dreams, however,
compels us to offer another explanation. I shall demonstrate this by means of a second
dream of my own, which again involves numerous indiscretions, but which compensates
for this personal sacrifice by affording a thorough elucidation of the problem.
Preliminary Statement -- In the spring of 1897 I learnt that two professors of our
university had proposed me for the title of Professor extraordinarius (assistant
professor). The news came as a surprise to me, and pleased me considerably as an
expression of appreciation on the part of two eminent men which could not be explained
by personal interest. But I told myself immediately that I must not expect anything to
come of their proposal. For some years past the Ministry had disregarded such proposals,
and several colleagues of mine, who were my seniors, and at least my equals in desert,
had been waiting in vain all this time for the appointment. I had no reason to suppose that
I should fare any better. I resolved, therefore, to resign myself to disappointment. I am
not, so far as I know, ambitious, and I was following my profession with gratifying
success even without the recommendation of a professorial title. Whether I considered
the grapes to be sweet or sour did not matter, since they undoubtedly hung too high for
me.
One evening a friend of mine called to see me; one of those colleagues whose fate I had
regarded as a warning. As he had long been a candidate for promotion to the professorate
(which in our society makes the doctor a demigod to his patients), and as he was less
resigned than I, he was accustomed from time to time to remind the authorities of his
claims in the hope of advancing his interests. It was after one of these visits that he called
on me. He said that this time he had driven the exalted gentleman into a corner, and had
asked him frankly whether considerations of religious denomination were not really
responsible for the postponement of his appointment. The answer was: His Excellency
had to admit that in the present state of public opinion he was not in a position, etc. `Now
at least I know where I stand', my friend concluded his narrative, which told me nothing

new, but which was calculated to confirm me in my resignation. For the same
denominational considerations would apply to my own case.
On the morning after my friend's visit I had the following dream, which was notable also
on account of its form. It consisted of two thoughts and two images, so that a thought and
an image emerged alternately. But here I shall record only the first half of the dream,
since the second half has no relation to the purpose for which I cite the dream.
I. My friend R. is my uncle -- I have a great affection for him.
II. I see before me his face, somewhat altered. It seems to be elongated; a yellow beard,
which surrounds it, is seen with peculiar distinctness.
Then follow the other two portions of the dream, again a thought and an image, which I
omit.
The interpretation of this dream was arrived at in the following manner:
When I recollected the dream in the course of the morning, I laughed outright and said,
`The dream is nonsense'. But I could not get it out of my mind, and I was pursued by it all
day, until at least, in the evening, I reproached myself in these words: Ìf in the course of
a dream-interpretation one of your patients could find nothing better to say than ``That is
nonsense'', you would reprove him, and you would suspect that behind the dream there
was hidden some disagreeable affair, the exposure of which he wanted to spare himself.
Apply the same thing to your own case; your opinion that the dream is nonsense probably
signifies merely an inner resistance to its interpretation. Don't let yourself be put off.' I
then proceeded with the interpretation.
R. is my uncle. What can that mean? I had only one uncle, my uncle Joseph.3 His story, to
be sure, was a sad one. Once, more than thirty years ago, hoping to make money, he
allowed himself to be involved in transactions of a kind which the law punishes severely,
and paid the penalty. My father, whose hair turned grey with grief within a few days,
used always to say that uncle Joseph had never been a bad man, but, after all, he was a
simpleton. If, then, my friend R. is my uncle Joseph, that is equivalent to saying: R. is a
simpleton. Hardly credible, and very disagreeable! But there is the face that I saw in the
dream, with its elongated features and its yellow beard. My uncle actually had such a face
-- long, and framed in a handsome yellow beard. My friend R. was extremely swarthy,
but when black-haired people begin to grow grey they pay for the glory of their youth.
Their black beards undergo an unpleasant change of colour, hair by hair; first they turn a
reddish brown, then a yellowish brown, and then definitely grey. My friend R.'s beard is
now in this stage; so, for that matter, is my own, a fact which I note with regret. The face
that I see in my dream is at once that of my friend R. and that of my uncle. It is like one
of those composite photographs of Galton's; in order to emphasise family resemblances
Galton had several faces photographed on the same plate. No doubt is now possible; it is
really my opinion that my friend R. is a simpleton -- like my uncle Joseph.

I have still no idea for what purpose I have worked out this relationship. It is certainly
one to which I must unreservedly object. Yet it is not very profound, for my uncle was a
criminal, and my friend R. is not, except in so far as he was once fined for knocking
down an apprentice with his bicycle. Can I be thinking of this offence? That would make
the comparison ridiculous. Here I recollect another conversation, which I had some days
ago with another colleague, N.; as a matter of fact, on the same subject. I met N. in the
street; he, too, has been nominated for a professorship, and having heard that I had been
similarly honoured he congratulated me. I refused his congratulations, saying: `You are
the last man to jest about the matter, for you know from your own experience what the
nomination is worth.' Thereupon he said, though probably not in earnest: `You can't be
sure of that. There is a special objection in my case. Don't you know that a woman once
brought a criminal accusation against me? I need hardly assure you that the matter was
put right. It was a mean attempt at blackmail, and it was all I could do to save the plaintiff
from punishment. But it may be that the affair is remembered against me at the Ministry.
You, on the other hand, are above reproach.' Here, then, I have the criminal, and at the
same time the interpretation and tendency of my dream. My uncle Joseph represents both
of my colleagues who have not been appointed to the professorship -- the one as a
simpleton, the other as a criminal. Now, too, I know for what purpose I need this
representation. If denominational considerations are a determining factor in the
postponement of my two friends' appointment, then my own appointment is likewise in
jeopardy. But if I can refer the rejection of my two friends' to other causes, which do not
apply to my own case, my hopes are unaffected. This is the procedure followed by my
dream: it makes the one friend, R., a simpleton, and the other, N., a criminal. But since I
am neither one nor the other, there is nothing in common between us. I have a right to
enjoy my appointment to the title of professor, and have avoided the distressing
application to my own case of the information which the official gave to my friend R.
I must pursue the interpretation of this dream still farther; for I have a feeling that it is not
yet satisfactorily elucidated. I still feel disquieted by the ease with which I have degraded
two respected colleagues in order to clear my own way to the professorship. My
dissatisfaction with this procedure has, of course, been mitigated since I have learned to
estimate the testimony of dreams at its true value. I should contradict anyone who
suggested that I really considered R. a simpleton, or that I did not believe N.'s account of
the blackmailing incident. And of course I do not believe that Irma has been made
seriously ill by an injection of a preparation of propyl administered by Otto. Here, as
before, what the dream expresses is only my wish that things might be so. The statement
in which my wish is realised sounds less absurd in the second dream than in the first; it is
here made with a skilful use of actual points of support in establishing something like a
plausible slander, one of which one could say `that there is something in it'. For at that
time my friend R. had to contend with the adverse vote of a university professor of his
own department, and my friend N. had himself, all unsuspectingly, provided me with
material for the calumny. Nevertheless, I repeat, it still seems to me that the dream
requires further elucidation.
I remember now that the dream contained yet another portion which has hitherto been
ignored by the interpretation. After it occurred to me that my friend R. was my uncle, I

felt in the dream a great affection for him. To whom is this feeling directed? For my
uncle Joseph, of course, I have never had any feelings of affection. R. has for many years
been a dearly loved friend, but if I were to go to him and express my affection for him in
terms approaching the degree of affection which I felt in the dream, he would
undoubtedly be surprised. My affection, if it was for him, seems false and exaggerated, as
does my judgment of his intellectual qualities, which I expressed by merging his
personality in that of my uncle; but exaggerated in the opposite direction. Now, however,
a new state of affairs dawns upon me.
The affection in the dream does not belong to the latent content, to the thoughts behind
the dream; it stands in opposition to this content; it is calculated to conceal the knowledge
conveyed by the interpretation. Probably this is precisely its function. I remember with
what reluctance I undertook the interpretation, how long I tried to postpone it, and how I
declared the dream to be sheer nonsense. I know from my psychoanalytic practice how
such a condemnation is to be interpreted. It has no informative value, but merely
expresses an affect. If my little daughter does not like an apple which is offered her, she
asserts that the apple is bitter, without even tasting it. If my patients behave thus, I know
that we are dealing with an idea which they are trying to repress. The same thing applies
to my dream. I do not want to interpret it because there is something in the interpretation
to which I object. After the interpretation of the dream is completed, I discover what it
was to which I objected; it was the assertion that R. is a simpleton. I can refer the
affection which I feel for R. not to the latent dream-thoughts, but rather to this
unwillingness of mine. If my dream, as compared with its latent content, is disguised at
this point, and actually misrepresents things by producing their opposites, then the
manifest affection in the dream serves the purpose of the misrepresentation; in other
words, the distortion is here shown to be intentional -- it is a means of disguise. My
dream-thoughts of R. are derogatory, and so that I may not become aware of this the very
opposite of defamation -- a tender affection for him -- enters into the dream.
This discovery may prove to be generally valid. As the examples in Chapter Three have
demonstrated, there are, of course, dreams which are undisguised wish-fulfilments.
Wherever a wish-fulfilment is unrecognisable and disguised there must be present a
tendency to defend oneself against this wish, and in consequence of this defence the wish
is unable to express itself save in a distorted form. I will try to find a parallel in social life
to this occurrence in the inner psychic life. Where in social life can a similar
misrepresentation be found? Only where two persons are concerned, one of whom
possesses a certain power while the other has to act with a certain consideration on
account of this power. The second person will then distort his psychic actions; or, as we
say, he will mask himself. The politeness which I practise every day is largely a disguise
of this kind; if I interpret my dreams for the benefit of my readers, I am forced to make
misrepresentations of this kind. The poet even complains of the necessity of such
misrepresentation: Das Beste, was du wissen kannst, darfst du den Buben doch nicht
sagen; `The best that thou canst know thou mayst not tell to boys.'
The political writer who has unpleasant truths to tell to those in power finds himself in a
like position. If he tells everything without reserve, the Government will suppress them --

retrospectively in the case of a verbal expression of opinion, preventively if they are to be

published in the press. The writer stands in fear of the censorship; he therefore moderates
and disguises the expression of his opinions. He finds himself compelled, in accordance
with the sensibilities of the censor, either to refrain altogether from certain forms of
attack, or to express himself in allusions instead of by direct assertions; or he must
conceal his objectionable statement in an apparently innocent disguise. He may, for
instance, tell of a contretemps between two Chinese mandarins, while he really has in
mind the officials of his own country. The stricter the domination of the censorship, the
more thorough becomes the disguise, and, often enough, the more ingenious the means
employed to put the reader on the track of the actual meaning.
The detailed correspondence between the phenomena of censorship and the phenomena
of dream-distortion justifies us in presupposing similar conditions for both. We should
then assume that in every human being there exist, as the primary cause of dream
formation, two psychic forces (tendencies or systems), one of which forms the wish
expressed by the dream, while the other exercises a censorship over this dream-wish,
thereby enforcing on it a distortion. The question is, what is the nature of the authority of
this second agency by virtue of which it is able to exercise its censorship? If we
remember that the latent dream-thoughts are not conscious before analysis, but that the
manifest dream-content emerging from them is consciously remembered, it is not a
farfetched assumption that admittance to the consciousness is the prerogative of the
second agency. Nothing can reach the consciousness from the first system which has not
previously passed the second instance; and the second instance lets nothing pass without
exercising its rights, and forcing such modifications as are pleasing to itself upon the
candidates for admission to consciousness. Here we arrive at a very definite conception
of the èssence' of consciousness; for us the state of becoming conscious is a special
psychic act, different from and independent of the process of becoming fixed or
represented, and consciousness appears to us as a sensory organ which perceives a
content proceeding from another source. It may be shown that psychopathology simply
cannot dispense with these fundamental assumptions. But we shall reserve for another
time a more exhaustive examination of the subject.
If I bear in mind the notion of the two psychic instances and their relation to the
consciousness, I find in the sphere of politics a perfectly appropriate analogy to the
extraordinary affection which I feel for my friend R., who is so disparaged in the dream-
interpretation. I refer to the political life of a State in which the ruler, jealous of his rights,
and an active public opinion are in mutual conflict. The people, protesting against the
actions of an unpopular official, demand his dismissal. The autocrat, on the other hand, in
order to show his contempt for the popular will, may then deliberately confer upon the
official some exceptional distinction which otherwise would not have been conferred.
Similarly, my second instance, controlling the access to my consciousness, distinguishes
my friend R. with a rush of extraordinary affection, because the wish-tendencies of the
first system, in view of a particular interest on which they are just then intent, would like
to disparage him as a simpleton.4

We may now perhaps begin to suspect that dream-interpretation is capable of yielding

information concerning the structure of our psychic apparatus which we have hitherto
vainly expected from philosophy. We shall not, however, follow up this trail, but shall
return to our original problem as soon as we have elucidated the problem of dream-
distortion. The question arose, how dreams with a disagreeable content can be analysed
as wish-fulfilments. We see now that this is possible where a dream-distortion has
occurred, when the disagreeable content serves only to disguise the thing wished for.
With regard to our assumptions respecting the two psychic instances, we can now also
say that disagreeable dreams contain, as a matter of fact, something which is disagreeable
to the second instance, but which at the same time fulfils a wish of the first instance.
They are wish-dreams in so far as every dream emanates from the first instance, while the
second instance behaves towards the dream only in a defensive, not in a constructive
manner.5 Were we to limit ourselves to a consideration of what the second instance
contributes to the dream we should never understand the dream, and all the problems
which the writers on the subject have discovered in the dream would have to remain
unsolved.
That the dream actually has a secret meaning, which proves to be a wish-fulfilment, must
be proved afresh in every case by analysis. I will therefore select a few dreams which
have painful contents, and endeavour to analyse them. Some of them are dreams of
hysterical subjects, which therefore call for a long preliminary statement, and in some
passages an examination of the psychic processes occurring in hysteria. This, though it
will complicate the presentation, is unavoidable.
When I treat a psychoneurotic patient analytically, his dreams regularly, as I have said,
become a theme of our conversations. I must therefore give him all the psychological
explanations with whose aid I myself have succeeded in understanding his symptoms.
And here I encounter unsparing criticism, which is perhaps no less shrewd than that
which I have to expect from my colleagues. With perfect uniformity my patients
contradict the doctrine that dreams are the fulfilments of wishes. Here are several
examples of the sort of dream-material which is adduced in refutation of my theory.
`You are always saying that a dream is a wish fulfilled,' begins an intelligent lady patient.
`Now I shall tell you a dream in which the content is quite the opposite, in which a wish
of mine is not fulfilled. How do you reconcile that with your theory? The dream was as
follows: I want to give a supper, but I have nothing available except some smoked
salmon. I think I will go shopping, but I remember that it is Sunday afternoon, when all
the shops are closed. I then try to ring up a few caterers, but the telephone is out of order.
Accordingly I have to renounce my desire to give a supper.'
I reply, of course, that only the analysis can decide the meaning of this dream, although I
admit that at first sight it seems sensible and coherent and looks like the opposite of a
wish-fulfilment. `But what occurrence gave rise to this dream?' I ask. `You know that the
stimulus of a dream always lies among the experiences of the preceding day.'

Analysis -- The patient's husband, an honest and capable meat salesman, had told her the
day before that he was growing too fat, and that he meant to undergo treatment for
obesity. He would rise early, take physical exercise, keep to a strict diet, and above all
accept no more invitations to supper. -- She proceeds jestingly to relate how her husband,
at a table d'hôte, had made the acquaintance of an artist, who insisted upon painting his
portrait, because he, the painter, had never seen such an expressive head. But her husband
had answered in his downright fashion, that while he was much obliged, he would rather
not be painted; and he was quite convinced that a bit of a pretty young girl's posterior
would please the artist better than his whole face.6 -- She is very much in love with her
husband, and teases him a good deal. She has asked him not to give her any caviar. What
can that mean?
As a matter of fact, she had wanted for a long time to eat a caviar sandwich every
morning, but had grudged the expense. Of course she could get the caviar from her
husband at once if she asked for it. But she has, on the contrary, begged him not to give
her any caviar, so that she might tease him about it a little longer.
(To me this explanation seems thin. Unconfessed motives are wont to conceal themselves
behind just such unsatisfying explanations. We are reminded of the subjects hypnotised
by Bernheim, who carried out a post-hypnotic order, and who, on being questioned as to
their motives, instead of answering Ì do not know why I did that', had to invent a reason
that was obviously inadequate. There is probably something similar to this in the case of
my patient's caviar. I see that in waking life she is compelled to invent an unfulfilled
wish. Her dream also shows her the non-fulfilment of her wish. But why does she need an
unfulfilled wish?)
The ideas elicited so far are insufficient for the interpretation of the dream. I press for
more. After a short pause, which corresponds to the overcoming of a resistance, she
reports that the day before she had paid a visit to a friend of whom she is really jealous
because her husband is always praising this lady so highly. Fortunately this friend is very
thin and lanky, and her husband likes full figures. Now of what did this thin friend speak?
Of course, of her wish to become rather plumper. She also asked my patient: `When are
you going to invite us again? You always have such good food.'
Now the meaning of the dream is clear. I am able to tell the patient: Ìt is just as though
you had thought at the moment of her asking you that: `Òf course, I'm to invite you so
that you can eat at my house and get fat and become still more pleasing to my husband! I
would rather give no more suppers!'' The dream then tells you that you cannot give a
supper, thereby fulfilling your wish not to contribute anything to the rounding out of your
friend's figure. Your husband's resolution to accept no more invitations to supper in order
that he may grow thin teaches you that one grows fat on food eaten at other people's
tables.' Nothing is lacking now but some sort of coincidence which will confirm the
solution. The smoked salmon in the dream has not yet been traced. -- `How did you come
to think of salmon in your dream?' -- `Smoked salmon is my friend's favourite dish,' she
replied. It happens that I know the lady, and am able to affirm that she grudges herself
salmon just as my patient grudges herself caviar.

This dream admits of yet another and more exact interpretation -- one which is actually
necessitated only by a subsidiary circumstance. The two interpretations do not contradict
one another, but rather dovetail into one another, and furnish an excellent example of the
usual ambiguity of dreams, as of all other psychopathological formations. We have heard
that at the time of her dream of a denied wish the patient was impelled to deny herself a
real wish (the wish to eat caviar sandwiches). Her friend, too, had expressed a wish,
namely, to get fatter, and it would not surprise us if our patient had dreamt that this wish
of her friend's -- the wish to increase in weight -- was not to be fulfilled. Instead of this,
however, she dreamt that one of her own wishes was not fulfilled. The dream becomes
capable of a new interpretation if in the dream she does not mean herself, but her friend,
if she has put herself in the place of her friend, or, as we may say, has identified herself
with her friend.
I think she has actually done this, and as a sign of this identification she has created for
herself in real life an unfulfilled wish. But what is the meaning of this hysterical
identification? To elucidate this a more exhaustive exposition is necessary. Identification
is a highly important motive in the mechanism of hysterical symptoms; by this means
patients are enabled to express in their symptoms not merely their own experiences, but
the experiences of quite a number of other persons; they can suffer, as it were, for a
whole mass of people, and fill all the parts of a drama with their own personalities. It will
here be objected that this is the well-known hysterical imitation, the ability of hysterical
subjects to imitate all the symptoms which impress them when they occur in others, as
though pity were aroused to the point of reproduction. This, however, only indicates the
path which the psychic process follows in hysterical imitation. But the path itself and the
psychic act which follows this path are two different matters. The act itself is slightly
more complicated than we are prone to believe the imitation of the hysterical to be; it
corresponds to an unconscious end-process, as an example will show. The physician who
has, in the same ward with other patients, a female patient suffering from a particular
kind of twitching, is not surprised if one morning he learns that this peculiar hysterical
affection has found imitators. He merely tells himself: The others have seen her, and have
imitated her; this is psychic infection. -- Yes, but psychic infection occurs somewhat in
the following manner: As a rule, patients know more about one another than the
physician knows about any one of them, and they are concerned about one another when
the doctor's visit is over. One of them has an attack today: at once it is known to the rest
that a letter from home, a recrudescence of lovesickness, or the like, is the cause. Their
sympathy is aroused, and although it does not emerge into consciousness they form the
following conclusion: Ìf it is possible to suffer such an attack from such a cause, I too
may suffer this sort of an attack, for I have the same occasion for it.' If this were a
conclusion capable of becoming conscious, it would perhaps express itself in dread of
suffering a like attack; but it is formed in another psychic region, and consequently ends
in the realisation of the dreaded symptoms. Thus identification is not mere imitation, but
an assimilation based upon the same etiological claim, it expresses a `just like', and refers
to some common condition which has remained in the unconscious.
In hysteria identification is most frequently employed to express a sexual community.

The hysterical woman identifies herself by her symptoms most readily -- though not

exclusively -- with persons with whom she had had sexual relations, or who have had
sexual intercourse with the same persons as herself. Language takes cognisance of this
tendency: two lovers are said to be òne'. In hysterical fantasy, as well as in dreams,
identification may ensue if one simply thinks of sexual relations; they need not
necessarily become actual. The patient is merely following the rules of the hysterical
processes of thought when she expresses her jealousy of her friend (which, for that
matter, she herself admits to be unjustified) by putting herself in her friend's place in her
dream, and identifying herself with her by fabricating a symptom (the denied wish). One
might further elucidate the process by saying: In the dream she puts herself in the place of
her friend, because her friend has taken her own place in relation to her husband, and
because she would like to take her friend's place in her husband's esteem. 7
The contradiction of my theory of dreams on the part of another female patient, the most
intelligent of all my dreamers, was solved in a simpler fashion, though still in accordance
with the principle that the non-fulfilment of one wish signified the fulfilment of another. I
had one day explained to her that a dream is a wish-fulfilment. On the following day she
related a dream to the effect that she was travelling with her mother-in-law to the place in
which they were both to spend the summer. Now I knew that she had violently protested
against spending the summer in the neighbourhood of her mother-in-law. I also knew that
she had fortunately been able to avoid doing so, since she had recently succeeded in
renting a house in a place quite remote from that to which her mother-in-law was going.
And now the dream reversed this desired solution. Was not this a flat contradiction of my
theory of wish-fulfilment? One had only to draw the inferences from this dream in order
to arrive at its interpretation. According to this dream, I was wrong; but it was her wish
that I should be wrong, and this wish the dream showed her as fulfilled. But the wish that
I should be wrong, which was fulfilled in the theme of the country house, referred in
reality to another and more serious matter. At that time I had inferred, from the material
furnished by her analysis, that something of significance in respect to her illness must
have occurred at a certain time in her life. She had denied this, because it was not present
in her memory. We soon came to see that I was right. Thus her wish that I should prove
to be wrong, which was transformed into the dream that she was going into the country
with her mother-in-law, corresponded with the justifiable wish that those things which
were then only suspected had never occurred.
Without an analysis, and merely by means of an assumption, I took the liberty of

interpreting a little incident in the life of a friend, who had been my companion through
eight classes at school. He once heard a lecture of mine, delivered to a small audience, on
the novel idea that dreams are wish-fulfilments. He went home, dreamt that he had lost
all his lawsuits -- he was a lawyer -- and then complained to me about it. I took refuge in
the evasion: Òne can't win all one's cases'; but I thought to myself: Ìf, for eight years, I
sat as primus on the first bench, while he moved up and down somewhere in the middle
of the class, may he not naturally have had the wish, ever since his boyhood, that I too
might for once make a fool of myself?'
Yet another dream of a more gloomy character was offered me by a female patient in
contradiction of my theory of the wish-dream. This patient, a young girl, began as

follows: `You remember that my sister has now only one boy, Charles. She lost the elder
one, Otto, while I was still living with her. Otto was my favourite; it was I who really
brought him up. I like the other little fellow, too, but, of course, not nearly so much as his
dead brother. Now I dreamt last night that I saw Charles lying dead before me. He was
lying in his little coffin, his hands folded, there were candles all about; and, in short, it
was just as it was at the time of little Otto's death, which gave me such a shock. Now tell
me, what does this mean? You know me -- am I really so bad as to wish that my sister
should lose the only child she has left? Or does the dream mean that I wish that Charles
had died rather than Otto, whom I liked so much better?'
I assured her that this latter interpretation was impossible. After some reflection, I was
able to give her the interpretation of the dream, which she subsequently confirmed. I was
able to do so because the whole previous history of the dreamer was known to me.
Having become an orphan at an early age, the girl had been brought up in the home of a
much older sister, and had met, among the friends and visitors who frequented the house,
a man who made a lasting impression upon her affections. It looked for a time as though
these barely explicit relations would end in marriage, but this happy culmination was
frustrated by the sister, whose motives were never completely explained. After the
rupture the man whom my patient loved avoided the house; she herself attained her
independence some time after the death of little Otto, to whom, meanwhile, her affections
had turned. But she did not succeed in freeing herself from the dependence due to her
affection for her sister's friend. Her pride bade her avoid him, but she found it impossible
to transfer her love to the other suitors who successively presented themselves. Whenever
the man she loved, who was a member of the literary profession, announced a lecture
anywhere, she was certain to be found among the audience; and she seized every other
opportunity of seeing him unobserved. I remembered that on the previous day she had
told me that the Professor was going to a certain concert, and that she too was going, in
order to enjoy the sight of him. This was on the day before the dream; and the concert
was to be given on the day on which she told me the dream. I could now easily see the
correct interpretation, and I asked her whether she could think of any particular event
which had occurred after Otto's death. She replied immediately: Òf course; the Professor
returned then, after a long absence, and I saw him once more beside little Otto's coffin.' It
was just as I had expected. I interpreted the dream as follows: Ìf now the other boy were
to die, the same thing would happen again. You would spend the day with your sister; the
Professor would certainly come to offer his condolences, and you would see him once
more under the same circumstances as before. The dream signifies nothing more than this
wish of yours to see him again -- a wish against which you are fighting inwardly. I know
that you have the ticket for today's concert in your bag. Your dream is a dream of
impatience; it has anticipated by several hours the meeting which is to take place today.'
In order to disguise her wish she had obviously selected a situation in which wishes of the
sort are commonly suppressed -- a situation so sorrowful that love is not even thought of.
And yet it is entirely possible that even in the actual situation beside the coffin of the
elder, more dearly loved boy, she had not been able to suppress her tender affection for
the visitor whom she had missed for so long.

A different explanation was found in the case of a similar dream of another patient, who
in earlier life had been distinguished for her quick wit and her cheerful disposition, and
who still displayed these qualities, at all events in the free associations which occurred to
her during treatment. In the course of a longer dream, it seemed to this lady that she saw
her fifteen year-old daughter lying dead before her in a box. She was strongly inclined to
use this dream-image as an objection to the theory of wish-fulfilment, although she
herself suspected that the detail of the box must lead to a different conception of the
dream. 8 For in the course of the analysis it occurred to her that on the previous evening
the conversation of the people in whose company she found herself had turned on the
English word `box', and upon the numerous translations of it into German such as
Schachtel (box), Loge (box at the theatre), Kasten (chest), Ohrfeige (box on the ear), etc.
From other components of the same dream it was now possible to add the fact that the
lady had guessed at the relationship between the English word `box' and the German
Büchse, and had then been haunted by the recollection that Büchse, is used in vulgar
parlance to denote the female genitals. It was therefore possible, treating her knowledge
of topographical anatomy with a certain indulgence, to assume that the child in the box
signified a child in the mother's womb. At this stage of the explanation she no longer
denied that the picture in the dream actually corresponded with a wish of hers. Like so
many other young women, she was by no means happy on finding that she was pregnant,
and she had confessed to me more than once the wish that her child might die before its
birth; in a fit of anger, following a violent scene with her husband, she had even struck
her abdomen with her fists, in order to injure the child within. The dead child was,
therefore, really the fulfilment of a wish, but a wish which had been put aside for fifteen
years, and it is not surprising that the fulfilment of the wish was no longer recognised
after so long an interval. For there had been many changes in the meantime.
The group of dreams (having as content the death of beloved relatives) to which belong
the last two mentioned will be considered again under the head of `Typical Dreams'. I
shall then be able to show by new examples that in spite of their undesirable content all
these dreams must be interpreted as wish-fulfilments. For the following dream, which
again was told me in order to deter me from a hasty generalisation of my theory, I am
indebted, not to a patient, but to an intelligent jurist of my acquaintance. Ì dream,' my
informant tells me, `that I am walking in front of my house with a lady on my arm. Here a
closed carriage is waiting; a man steps up to me, shows me his authorisation as a police
officer, and requests me to follow him. I ask only for time in which to arrange my affairs.'
The jurist then asks me: `Can you possibly suppose that it is my wish to be arrested?' --
Òf course not,' I have to admit. `Do you happen to know upon what charge you were
arrested?' -- `Yes; I believe for infanticide.' -- Ìnfanticide? But you know that only a
mother can commit this crime upon her new-born child?' -- `That is true.'9 -- Ànd under
what circumstances did you dream this? What happened on the evening before?' -- Ì
would rather not tell you -- it is a delicate matter.' -- `But I need it, otherwise we must
forgo the interpretation of the dream.' -- `Well, then, I will tell you. I spent the night, not
at home, but in the house of a lady who means a great deal to me. When we awoke in the
morning, something again passed between us. Then I went to sleep again, and dreamt
what I have told you.' -- `The woman is married?' -- `Yes.' -- Ànd you do not wish her to
conceive?' -- `No; that might betray us.' -- `Then you do not practice normal coitus?' -- Ì

take the precaution to withdraw before ejaculation.' -- Àm I to assume that you took this
precaution several times during the night, and that in the morning you were not quite sure
whether you had succeeded?' -- `That might be so.' -- `Then your dream is the fulfilment
of a wish. By the dream you are assured that you have not begotten a child, or, what
amounts to the same thing, that you have killed the child. I can easily demonstrate the
connecting-links. Do you remember, a few days ago we were talking about the troubles
of matrimony, and about the inconsistency of permitting coitus so long as no
impregnation takes place, while at the same time any preventive act committed after the
ovum and the semen meet and a foetus is formed is punished as a crime? In this
connection we recalled the medieval controversy about the moment of time at which the
soul actually enters into the foetus, since the concept of murder becomes admissible only
from that point onwards. Of course, too, you know the gruesome poem by Lenau, which
puts infanticide and birth-control on the same plane.' -- `Strangely enough, I happened, as
though by chance, to think of Lenau this morning.' -- Ànother echo of your dream. And
now I shall show you yet another incidental wish-fulfilment in your dream. You walk up
to your house with the lady on your arm. So you take her home, instead of spending the
night at her house, as you did in reality. The fact that the wish-fulfilment, which is the
essence of the dream, disguises itself in such an unpleasant form, has perhaps more than
one explanation. From my essay on the etiology of anxiety neurosis, you will see that I
note coitus interruptus as one of the factors responsible for the development of neurotic
fear. It would be consistent with this if, after repeated coitus of this kind, you were left in
an uncomfortable frame of mind, which now becomes an element of the composition of
your dream. You even make use of this uncomfortable state of mind to conceal the wish-
fulfilment. At the same time, the mention of infanticide has not yet been explained. Why
does this crime, which is peculiar to females, occur to you?' -- Ì will confess to you that I
was involved in such an affair years ago. I was responsible for the fact that a girl tried to
protect herself from the consequences of a liaison with me by procuring an abortion. I
had nothing to do with the carrying out of her plan, but for a long time I was naturally
worried in case the affair might be discovered.' -- Ì understand. This recollection
furnished a second reason why the supposition that you had performed coitus interruptus
clumsily must have been painful to you.'
A young physician, who heard this dream related in my lecture-room, must have felt that
it fitted him, for he hastened to imitate it by a dream of his own, applying its mode of
thinking to another theme. On the previous day he had furnished a statement of his
income; a quite straightforward statement, because he had little to state. He dreamt that
an acquaintance of his came from a meeting of the tax commission and informed him that
all the other statements had passed unquestioned, but that his own had aroused general
suspicion, with the result that he would be punished with a heavy fine. This dream is a
poorly disguised fulfilment of the wish to be known as a physician with a large income. It
also calls to mind the story of the young girl who was advised against accepting her suitor
because he was a man of quick temper, who would assuredly beat her after their
marriage. Her answer was: Ì wish he would strike me!' Her wish to be married was so
intense that she had taken into consideration the discomforts predicted for this marriage;
she had even raised them to the plane of a wish.

If I group together the very frequent dreams of this sort, which seem flatly to contradict
my theory, in that they embody the denial of a wish or some occurrence obviously
undesired, under the head of `counter-wish-dreams', I find that they may all be referred to
two principles, one of which has not yet been mentioned, though it plays a large part in
waking as well as dream-life. One of the motives inspiring these dreams is the wish that I
should appear in the wrong. These dreams occur regularly in the course of treatment
whenever the patient is in a state of resistance; indeed, I can with a great deal of certainty
count on evoking such a dream once I have explained to the patient my theory that the
dream is a wish-fulfilment.10 Indeed, I have reason to expect that many of my readers will
have such dreams, merely to fulfil the wish that I may prove to be wrong. The last dream
which I shall recount from among those occurring in the course of treatment once more
demonstrates this very thing. A young girl who had struggled hard to continue my
treatment, against the will of her relatives and the authorities whom they had consulted,
dreamt the following dream: At home she is forbidden to come to me any more. She then
reminds me of the promise I made to treat her for nothing if necessary, and I tell her: Ì
can show no consideration in money matters.'
It is not at all easy in this case to demonstrate the fulfilment of a wish, but in all cases of
this kind there is a second problem, the solution of which helps also to solve the first.
Where does she get the words which she puts into my mouth? Of course, I have never
told her anything of the kind; but one of her brothers, the one who has the greatest
influence over her, has been kind enough to make this remark about me. It is then the
purpose of the dream to show that her brother is right; and she does not try to justify this
brother merely in the dream; it is her purpose in life and the motive of her illness.
A dream which at first sight presents peculiar difficulties for the theory of wish-
fulfilment was dreamed by a physician (Aug. Stärcke) and interpreted by him: Ì have
and see on the last phalange of my left forefinger a primary syphilitic affection.'
One may perhaps be inclined to refrain from analysing this dream, since it seems clear
and coherent, except for its unwished-for content. However, if one takes the trouble to
make an analysis, one learns that `primary affection' reduces itself to `prima affectio'
(first love), and that the repulsive sore, in the words of Stärke, proves to be `the
representative of wish-fulfilments charged with intense emotion.'11
The other motive for counter-wish-dreams is so clear that there is a danger of overlooking
it, as happened in my own case for a long time. In the sexual constitution of many
persons there is a masochistic component, which has arisen through the conversion of the
aggressive, sadistic component into its opposite. Such people are called ìdeal' masochists
if they seek pleasure not in the bodily pain which may be inflicted upon them, but in
humiliation and psychic chastisement. It is obvious that such persons may have counter-
wish-dreams and disagreeable dreams, yet these are for them nothing more than wish-
fulfilments, which satisfy their masochistic inclinations. Here is such a dream: A young
man, who in earlier youth greatly tormented his elder brother, toward whom he was
homosexually inclined, but who has since undergone a complete change of character, has
the following dream, which consists of three parts: (1) He is `teased' by his brother. (2)

Two adults are caressing each other with homosexual intentions. (3) His brother has sold
the business, the management of which the young man had reserved for his own future.
From this last dream he awakens with the most unpleasant feelings; and yet it is a
masochistic wish-dream, which might be translated: It would serve me right if my brother
were to make that sale against my interests. It would be my punishment for all the
torments he has suffered at my hands.
I hope that the examples given above will suffice -- until some further objection appears -
- to make it seem credible that even dreams with a painful content are to be analysed as
wish-fulfilments.12 Nor should it be considered a mere matter of chance that in the course
of interpretation one always happens upon subjects about which one does not like to
speak or think. The disagreeable sensation which such dreams arouse is of course
precisely identical with the antipathy which would, and usually does, restrain us from
treating or discussing such subjects -- an antipathy which must be overcome by all of us
if we find ourselves obliged to attack the problem of such dreams. But this disagreeable
feeling which recurs in our dreams does not preclude the existence of a wish; everyone
has wishes which he would not like to confess to others, which he does not care to admit
even to himself. On the other hand, we feel justified in connecting the unpleasant
character of all these dreams with the fact of dream-distortion, and in concluding that
these dreams are distorted, and that their wish-fulfilment is disguised beyond recognition,
precisely because there is a strong revulsion against -- a will to repress -- the subject-
matter of the dream, or the wish created by it. Dream-distortion, then, proves in reality to
be an act of the censorship. We shall have included everything which the analysis of
disagreeable dreams has brought to light if we reword our formula thus: The dream is the
(disguised) fulfilment of a (suppressed, repressed) wish.13
Now there still remain to be considered, as a particular suborder of dreams with painful
content, the anxiety-dreams, the inclusion of which among the wish-dreams will be still
less acceptable to the uninitiated. But I can here deal very cursorily with the problem of
anxiety-dreams; what they have to reveal is not a new aspect of the dream-problem; here
the problem is that of understanding neurotic anxiety in general. The anxiety which we
experience in dreams is only apparently explained by the dream-content. If we subject
that content to analysis, we become aware that the dream-anxiety is no more justified by
the dream-content than the anxiety in a phobia is justified by the idea to which the phobia
is attached. For example, it is true that it is possible to fall out of a window, and that a
certain care should be exercised when one is at a window, but it is not obvious why the
anxiety in the corresponding phobia is so great, and why it torments its victims more than
its cause would warrant. The same explanation which applies to the phobia applies also to
the anxiety-dream. In either case the anxiety is only fastened on to the idea which
accompanies it, and is really derived from another source.
On account of this intimate relation of dream-anxiety to neurotic anxiety, the discussion

of the former obliges me to refer to the latter. In a little essay on Anxiety Neurosis,14
written in 1895, I maintain that neurotic anxiety has its origin in the sexual life, and
corresponds to a libido which has been deflected from its object and has found no
employment. The accuracy of this formula has since then been demonstrated with ever-

increasing certainty. From it we may deduce the doctrine that anxiety-dreams are dreams
of sexual content, and that the libido appertaining to this content has been transformed
into anxiety. Later on I shall have an opportunity of confirming this assertion by the
analysis of several dreams of neurotics. In my further attempts to arrive at a theory of
dreams I shall again have occasion to revert to the conditions of anxiety-dreams and their
compatibility with the theory of wish-fulfilment.
1
Already Plotinus, the neo-Platonist, said: `When desire bestirs itself, then comes fantasy,
and presents to us, as it were, the object of desire' (Du Prel, p. 276).
2
It is quite incredible with what obstinacy readers and critics have excluded this
consideration and disregarded the fundamental differentiation between the manifest and
the latent dream-content. Nothing in the literature of the subject approaches so closely to
my own conception of dreams as a passage in J. Sully's essay: Dreams as a Revelation
(and it is not because I do not think it valuable that I allude to it here for the first time). Ìt
would seem then, after all, that dreams are not the utter nonsense they have been said to
be by such authorities as Chaucer, Shakespeare, and Milton. The chaotic aggregations of
our night-fancy have a significance and communicate new knowledge. Like some letter in
cipher, the dream-inscription when scrutinised closely loses its first look of balderdash
and takes on the aspect of a serious, intelligible message. Or, to vary the figure slightly,
we may say that, like some pamphlets the dream discloses beneath its worthless surface-
characters traces of an old and precious communication' (p. 364).
3
It is astonishing to see how my memory here restricts itself -- in the waking state! -- for
the purposes of analysis. I have known five of my uncles and I loved and honoured one of
them. But at the moment when I overcame my resistance to the interpretation of the
dream, I said to myself: Ì have only one uncle, the one who is intended in the dream.'
4
Such hypocritical dreams are not rare, either with me or with others. While I have been
working at a certain scientific problem I have been visited for several nights, at quite
short intervals, by a somewhat confusing dream which has as its content a reconciliation
with a friend dropped long ago. After three or four attempts I finally succeeded in
grasping the meaning of this dream. It was in the nature of an encouragement to give up
the remnant of consideration still surviving for the person in question, to make myself
quite free from him, but it hypocritically disguised itself in its antithesis. I have recorded
a `hypocritical Oedipus dream' in which the hostile feelings and death-wishes of the
dream-thoughts were replaced by manifest tenderness (`Typisches Beispiel eines
verkappten Oedipusträumes,' Zentralblatt für Psychoanalyse, Bd. I, Heft 1-11, 1910).
Another class of hypocritical dreams will be recorded in another place (see Chap. vi, The
Dream-Work).
5
Later on we shall become acquainted with cases in which, on the contrary, the dream
expresses a wish of this second instance.
6
To sit for the painter. Goethe: Ànd if he has no backside, How can the nobleman sit?'

7
I myself regret the inclusion of such passages from the psychopathology of hysteria,
which, because of their fragmentary presentation, and because they are torn out of their
context, cannot prove to be very illuminating. If these passages are capable of throwing
any light upon the intimate relations between dreams and the psychoneuroses, they have
served the intention with which I have included them.
8
As in the dream of the deferred supper and the smoked salmon.
9
It often happens that a dream is told incompletely, and that a recollection of the omitted
portions appears only in the course of the analysis. These portions, when subsequently
fitted in, invariably furnish the key to the interpretation. cf. Chapter Seven, on forgetting
in dreams.
10
Similar `counter-wish-dreams' have been repeatedly reported to me within the last few
years, by those who attend my lectures, as their reaction to their first encounter with the
`wish-theory of dreams.'
11
Zentralblatt für Psychoanalyse, Jahrg. II, 1911-12.
12
I will here observe that we have not yet disposed of this theme; we shall discuss it again
later.
13
A great contemporary poet, who, I am told, will hear nothing of psychoanalysis and
dream-interpretation, has nevertheless derived from his own experience an almost
identical formula for the nature of the dream: Ùnauthorised emergence of suppressed
yearnings under false features and names' (C. Spitteler, Meine frühesten Erlebnisee, in
Süddeutsche Monatshefte, October, 1913). I will here anticipate by citing the
amplification and modification of this fundamental formula propounded by Otto Rank:
Òn the basis of and with the aid of repressed infantile-sexual material, dreams regularly
represent as fulfilled current, and as a rule also erotic, wishes in a disguised and symbolic
form' (Ein Traum, der sich selbst deutet). Nowhere have I said that I have accepted this
formula of Rank's. The shorter version contained in the text seems to me sufficient. But
the fact that I merely mentioned Rank's modification was enough to expose
psychoanalysis to the oftrepeated reproach that it asserts that all dreams have a sexual
content. If one understands this sentence as it is intended to be understood, it only proves
how little conscientiousness our critics are wont to display, and how ready our opponents
are to overlook statements if they do not accord with their aggressive inclinations. Only a
few pages back I mentioned the manifold wish-fulfilment of children's dreams (to make
an excursion on land or water, to make up for an omitted meal, etc.). Elsewhere I have
mentioned dreams excited by thirst and the desire to evacuate, and mere comfort- or
convenience-dreams. Even Rank does not make an absolute assertion. He says às a rule
also erotic wishes,' and this can be completely confirmed in the case of most dreams of
adults. The matter has, however, a different aspect if we employ the word `sexual' in the
sense of Èros', as the word is understood by psychoanalysts. But the interesting problem
of whether all dreams are not produced by `libidinal' motives (in opposition to
`destructive' ones) has hardly been considered by our opponents.

14
Selected Papers on Hysteria and other Psychoneuroses, p. 133, translated by A. A.
Brill, Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, Monograph Series.

CHAPTER FIVE
The Material and Sources of Dreams
Having realised, as a result of analysing the dream of Irma's injection, that the dream was
the fulfilment of a wish, we were immediately interested to ascertain whether we had
thereby discovered a general characteristic of dreams, and for the time being we put aside
every other scientific problem which may have suggested itself in the course of the
interpretation. Now that we have reached the goal on this one path, we may turn back and
select a new point of departure for exploring dream-problems, even though we may for a
time lose sight of the theme of wish-fulfilment, which has still to be further considered.
Now that we are able, by applying our process of interpretation, to detect a latent dream-
content whose significance far surpasses that of the manifest dream-content, we are
naturally impelled to return to the individual dream-problems, in order to see whether the
riddles and contradictions which seemed to elude us when we had only the manifest
content to work upon may not now be satisfactorily solved.
The opinions of previous writers on the relation of dreams to waking life, and the origin
of the material of dreams, have not been given here. We may recall however three
peculiarities of the memory in dreams, which have often been noted, but never explained:
1. That the dream clearly prefers the impressions of the last few days (Robert,
Strümpell, Hildebrandt; also Weed-Hallam);
2. That it makes a selection in accordance with principles other than those governing
our waking memory, in that it recalls not essential and important, but subordinate
and disregarded things;
3. That it has at its disposal the earliest impressions of our childhood, and brings to
light details from this period of life, which, again, seem trivial to us, and which in
waking life were believed to have been long since forgotten.1
These peculiarities in the dream's choice of material have, of course, been observed by
previous writers in the manifest dream-content.
1
It is evident that Robert's idea -- that the dream is intended to rid our memory of the
useless impressions which it has received during the day -- is no longer tenable if
indifferent memories of our childhood appear in our dreams with some degree of
frequency. We should be obliged to conclude that our dreams generally perform their
prescribed task very inadequately.

A -- RECENT AND INDIFFERENT IMPRESSIONS IN THE DREAM
If I now consult my own experience with regard to the origin of the elements appearing in
the dream-content, I must in the first place express the opinion that in every dream we
may find some reference to the experiences of the preceding day. Whatever dream I turn
to, whether my own or someone else's, this experience is always confirmed. Knowing
this, I may perhaps begin the work of interpretation by looking for the experience of the
preceding day which has stimulated the dream; in many cases this is indeed the quickest
way. With the two dreams which I subjected to a close analysis in the last chapter (the
dreams of Irma`s injection, and of the uncle with the yellow beard) the reference to the
preceding day is so evident that it needs no further elucidation. But in order to show how
constantly this reference may be demonstrated, I shall examine a portion of my own
dream-chronicle. I shall relate only so much of the dreams as is necessary for the
detection of the dream-source in question.
1. I pay a call at a house to which I gain admittance only with difficulty,

etc., and meanwhile I am keeping a woman waiting for me.
Source: A conversation during the evening with a female relative to the
effect that she would have to wait for a remittance for which she had
asked, until. . . etc.
2. I have written a monograph on a species (uncertain) of plant.

Source: In the morning I had seen in a bookseller's window a
monograph on the genus Cyclamen.
3. I see two women in the street, mother and daughter, the latter being a
patient.
Source: A female patient who is under treatment had told me in the
evening what difficulties her mother puts in the way of her continuing the
treatment.
4. At S. and R.'s bookshop I subscribe to a periodical which costs 20

florins annually.
Source: During the day my wife has reminded me that I still owe her 20
florins of her weekly allowance.
5. I receive a communication from the Social Democratic Committee, in

which I am addressed as a member.
Source: I have received simultaneous communications from the Liberal
Committee on Elections and from the president of the Humanitarian
Society, of which latter I am actually a member.
6. A man on a steep rock rising from the sea, in the manner of Böcklin.
Source: Dreyfus on Devil's Island; also news from my relatives in
England, etc.

The question might be raised, whether a dream invariably refers to the events of the
preceding day only, or whether the reference may be extended to include impressions
from a longer period of time in the immediate past. This question is probably not of the
first importance, but I am inclined to decide in favour of the exclusive priority of the day
before the dream (the dream-day). Whenever I thought I had found a case where an
impression two or three days old was the source of the dream, I was able to convince
myself after careful investigation that this impression had been remembered the day
before; that is, that a demonstrable reproduction on the day before had been interpolated
between the day of the event and the time of the dream: and further, I was able to point to
the recent occasion which might have given rise to the recollection of the older
impression. On the other hand, I was unable to convince myself that a regular interval of
biological significance (H. Swoboda gives the first interval of this kind as eighteen hours)
elapses between the dream-exciting daytime impression and its recurrence in the dream.
I believe, therefore, that for every dream a dream-stimulus may be found among those
experiences òn which one has not yet slept.'
Havelock Ellis, who has likewise given attention to this problem, states that he has not
been able to find any such periodicity of reproduction in his dreams, although he has
looked for it. He relates a dream in which he found himself in Spain; he wanted to travel
to a place called Daraus, Varaus, or Zaraus. On awaking he was unable to recall any
such place-names, and thought no more of the matter. A few months later he actually
found the name Zaraus; it was that of a railway-station between San Sebastian and
Bilbao, through which he had passed in the train eight months (250 days) before the date
of the dream.
Thus the impressions of the immediate past (with the exception of the day before the
night of the dream) stands in the same relation to the dream-content as those of periods
indefinitely remote. The dream may select its material from any period of life, provided
only that a chain of thought leads back from the experiences of the day of the dream (the
`recent' impressions) of that earlier period.
But why this preference for recent impressions? We shall arrive at some conjectures on
this point if we subject one of the dreams already mentioned to a more precise analysis. I
select the
Dream of the Botanical Monograph
I have written a monograph on a certain plant. The book lies before me; I am just turning
over a folded coloured plate. A dried specimen of the plant, as though from a herbarium,
is bound up with every copy.
Analysis -- In the morning I saw in a bookseller's window a volume entitled The Genus
Cyclamen, apparently a monograph on this plant.

The cyclamen is my wife's favourite flower. I reproach myself for remembering so

seldom to bring her flowers, as she would like me to do. In connection with the theme of
giving her flowers, I am reminded of a story which I recently told some friends of mine in
proof of my assertion that we often forget in obedience to a purpose of the unconscious,
and that forgetfulness always enables us to form a deduction about the secret disposition
of the forgetful person. A young woman who has been accustomed to receive a bouquet
of flowers from her husband on her birthday misses this token of affection on one of her
birthdays, and bursts into tears. The husband comes in, and cannot understand why she is
crying until she tells him: `Today is my birthday.' He claps his hand to his forehead, and
exclaims: Òh, forgive me, I had completely forgotten it!' and proposes to go out
immediately in order to get her flowers. But she refuses to be consoled, for she sees in
her husband's forgetfulness a proof that she no longer plays the same part in his thoughts
as she formerly did. This Frau L. met my wife two days ago, told her that she was feeling
well, and asked after me. Some years ago she was a patient of mine.
Supplementary facts: I did once actually write something like a monograph on a plant,
namely, an essay on the coca plant, which attracted the attention of K. Koller to the
anaesthetic properties of cocaine. I had hinted that the alkaloid might be employed as an
anaesthetic, but I was not thorough enough to pursue the matter farther. It occurs to me,
too, that on the morning of the day following the dream (for the interpretation of which I
did not find time until the evening) I had thought of cocaine in a kind of day-dream. If I
were ever afflicted with glaucoma, I would go to Berlin, and there undergo an operation,
incognito, in the house of my Berlin friend, at the hands of a surgeon whom he would
recommend. The surgeon, who would not know the name of his patient, would boast, as
usual, how easy these operations had become since the introduction of cocaine; and I
should not betray the fact that I myself had a share in this discovery. With this fantasy
were connected thoughts of how awkward it really is for a physician to claim the
professional services of a colleague. I should be able to pay the Berlin eye specialist, who
did not know me, like anyone else. Only after recalling this day-dream do I realise that
there is concealed behind it the memory of a definite event. Shortly after Koller's
discovery, my father contracted glaucoma; he was operated on by my friend Dr
Königstein, the eye specialist. Dr Koller was in charge of the cocaine anaesthetisation,
and he made the remark that on this occasion all the three persons who had been
responsible for the introduction of cocaine had been brought together.
My thoughts now pass on to the time when I was last reminded of the history of cocaine.
This was a few days earlier, when I received a Festschrift, a publication in which grateful
pupils had commemorated the jubilee of their teacher and laboratory director. Among the
titles to fame of persons connected with the laboratory I found a note to the effect that the
discovery of the anaesthetic properties of cocaine had been due to K. Koller. Now I
suddenly become aware that the dream is connected with an experience of the previous
evening. I had just accompanied Dr Königstein to his home, and had entered into a
discussion of a subject which excites me greatly whenever it is mentioned. While I was
talking with him in the entrance-hall Professor Gärtner and his young wife came up. I
could not refrain from congratulating them both upon their blooming appearance. Now
Professor Gärtner is one of the authors of the Festschrift of which I have just spoken, and

he may well have reminded me of it. And Frau L., of whose birthday disappointment I
spoke a little way back, had been mentioned, though of course in another connection, in
my conversation with Dr Königstein.
I shall now try to elucidate the other determinants of the dream-content. A dried
specimen of the plant accompanies the monograph, as though it were a herbarium. And
herbarium reminds me of the `gymnasium'. The director of our `gymnasium' once called
the pupils of the upper classes together, in order that they might examine and clean the
`gymnasium' herbarium. Small insects had been found -- book-worms. The director
seemed to have little confidence in my ability to assist, for he entrusted me with only a
few of the pages. I know to this day that there were crucifers on them. My interest in
botany was never very great. At my preliminary examination in botany I was required to
identify a crucifer, and failed to recognise it; had not my theoretical knowledge come to
my aid, I should have fared badly indeed. Crucifers suggest composites. The artichoke is
really a composite, and in actual fact one which I might call my favourite flower. My
wife, more thoughtful than I, often brings this favourite flower of mine home from the
market.
I see the monograph which I have written lying before me. Here again there is an
association. My friend wrote to me yesterday from Berlin: Ì am thinking a great deal
about your dream-book. I see it lying before me, completed, and I turn the pages.' How I
envied him this power of vision! If only I could see it lying before me, already
completed!
The folded coloured plate. When I was a medical student I suffered a sort of craze for
studying monographs exclusively. In spite of my limited means, I subscribed to a number
of the medical periodicals, whose coloured plates afforded me much delight. I was rather
proud of this inclination to thoroughness. When I subsequently began to publish books
myself, I had to draw the plates for my own treatises, and I remember one of them turned
out so badly that a well-meaning colleague ridiculed me for it. With this is associated, I
do not exactly know how, a very early memory of my childhood. My father, by way of a
jest, once gave my elder sister and myself a book containing coloured plates (the book
was a narrative of a journey through Persia) in order that we might destroy it. From an
educational point of view this was hardly to be commended. I was at the time five years
old, and my sister less than three, and the picture of us two children blissfully tearing the
book to pieces (I should add, like an artichoke, leaf by leaf), is almost the only one from
this period of my life which has remained vivid in my memory. When I afterwards
became a student, I developed a conspicuous fondness for collecting and possessing
books (an analogy to the inclination for studying from monographs, a hobby alluded to in
my dream-thoughts, in connection with cyclamen and artichoke). I became a book-worm
(cf. herbarium). Ever since I have been engaged in introspection I have always traced this
earliest passion of my life to this impression of my childhood: or rather, I have
recognised in this childish scene a `screen or concealing memory' for my subsequent
bibliophilia.1 And of course I learned at an early age that our passions often become our
misfortunes. When I was seventeen, I ran up a very considerable account at the
bookseller's, with no means with which to settle it, and my father would hardly accept it

as an excuse that my passion was at least a respectable one. But the mention of this
experience of my youth brings me back to my conversation with my friend Dr Königstein
on the evening preceding the dream; for one of the themes of this conversation was the
same old reproach -- that I am much too absorbed in my hobbies.
For reasons which are not relevant here I shall not continue the interpretation of this
dream, but will merely indicate the path which leads to it. In the course of the
interpretation I was reminded of my conversation with Dr Königstein, and, indeed, of
more than one portion of it. When I consider the subjects touched upon in this
conversation, the meaning of the dream immediately becomes clear to me. All the trains
of thought which have been started -- my own inclinations, and those of my wife, the
cocaine, the awkwardness of securing medical treatment from one's own colleagues, my
preference for monographical studies, and my neglect of certain subjects, such as botany
-- all these are continued in and lead up to one branch or another of this widely-ramified
conversation. The dream once more assumes the character of a justification, of a plea for
my rights (like the dream of Irma's injection, the first to be analysed); it even continues
the theme which that dream introduced, and discusses it in association with the new
subject-matter which has been added in the interval between the two dreams. Even the
dream's apparently indifferent form of expression at once acquires a meaning. Now it
means: Ì am indeed the man who has written that valuable and successful treatise (on
cocaine)', just as previously I declared in self-justification: Ì am after all a thorough and
industrious student'; and in both instances I find the meaning: Ì can allow myself this.'
But I may dispense with the further interpretation of the dream, because my only purpose
in recording it was to examine the relation of the dream-content to the experience of the
previous day which arouses it. As long as I know only the manifest content of this dream,
only one relation to any impression of the day is obvious; but after I have completed the
interpretation, a second source of the dream becomes apparent in another experience of
the same day. The first of these impressions to which the dream refers is an indifferent
one, a subordinate circumstance. I see a book in a shop window whose title holds me for
a moment, but whose contents would hardly interest me. The second experience was of
great psychic value; I talked earnestly with my friend, the eye specialist, for about an
hour; I made allusions in this conversation which must have ruffled the feelings of both
of us, and which in me awakened memories in connection with which I was aware of a
great variety of inner stimuli. Further, this conversation was broken off unfinished,
because some acquaintances joined us. What, now, is the relation of these two
impressions of the day to one another, and to the dream which followed during the night?
In the manifest dream-content I find merely an allusion to the indifferent impression, and
I am thus able to reaffirm that the dream prefers to take up into its content experiences of
a nonessential character. In the dream-interpretation, on the contrary, everything
converges upon the important and justifiably disturbing event. If I judge the sense of the
dream in the only correct way, according to the latent content which is brought to light in
the analysis, I find that I have unwittingly lighted upon a new and important discovery. I
see that the puzzling theory that the dream deals only with the worthless odds and ends of
the day's experiences has no justification; I am also compelled to contradict the assertion
that the psychic life of the waking state is not continued in the dream, and that hence, the

dream wastes our psychic energy on trivial material. The very opposite is true; what has
claimed our attention during the day dominates our dream-thoughts also, and we take
pains to dream only in connection with such matters as have given us food for thought
during the day.
Perhaps the most immediate explanation of the fact that I dream of the indifferent
impression of the day, while the impression which has with good reason excited me
causes me to dream, is that here again we are dealing with the phenomenon of dream-
distortion, which we have referred to as a psychic force playing the part of a censorship.
The recollection of the monograph on the genus cyclamen is utilised as though it were an
allusion to the conversation with my friend, just as the mention of my patient's friend in
the dream of the deferred supper is represented by the allusion `smoked salmon'. The
only question is, by what intermediate links can the impression of the monograph come
to assume the relation of allusion to the conversation with the eye specialist, since such a
relation is not at first perceptible? In the example of the deferred supper the relation is
evident at the outset; `smoked salmon', as the favourite dish of the patient's friend,
belongs to the circle of ideas which the friend's personality would naturally evoke in the
mind of the dreamer. In our new example we are dealing with two entirely separate
impressions, which at first glance seem to have nothing in common, except indeed that
they occur on the same day. The monograph attracts my attention in the morning: in the
evening I take part in the conversation. The answer furnished by the analysis is as
follows: Such relations between the two impressions as do not exist from the first are
established subsequently between the idea-content of the one impression and the idea-
content of the other. I have already picked out the intermediate links emphasised in the
course of writing the analysis. Only under some outside influence, perhaps the
recollection of the flowers missed by Frau L., would the idea of the monograph on the
cyclamen have attached itself to the idea that the cyclamen is my wife's favourite flower.
I do not believe that these inconspicuous thoughts would have sufficed to evoke a dream.
There needs no ghost, my lord, come from the grave

To tell us this,
as we read in Hamlet. But behold! in the analysis I am reminded that the name of the man
who interrupted our conversation was Gärtner (gardener), and that I thought his wife
looked blooming; indeed, now I even remember that one of my female patients, who
bears the pretty name of Flora, was for a time the main subject of our conversation. It
must have happened that by means of these intermediate links from the sphere of
botanical ideas the association was effected between the two events of the day, the
indifferent one and the stimulating one. Other relations were then established, that of
cocaine for example, which can with perfect appropriateness form a link between the
person of Dr Königstein and the botanical monograph which I have written, and thus
secure the fusion of the two circles of ideas, so that now a portion of the first experience
may be used as an allusion to the second.
I am prepared to find this explanation attacked as either arbitrary or artificial. What

would have happened if Professor Gärtner and his blooming wife had not appeared, and

if the patient who was under discussion had been called, not Flora, but Anna? And yet the
answer is not hard to find. If these thought-relations had not been available, others would
probably have been selected. It is easy to establish relations of this sort, as the jocular
questions and conundrums with which we amuse ourselves suffice to show. The range of
wit is unlimited. To go a step farther: if no sufficiently fertile associations between the
two impressions of the day could have been established, the dream would simply have
followed a different course; another of the indifferent impressions of the day, such as
come to us in multitudes and are forgotten, would have taken the place of the monograph
in the dream, would have formed an association with the content of the conversation, and
would have represented this in the dream. Since it was the impression of the monograph
and no other that was fated to perform this function, this impression was probably that
most suitable for the purpose. One need not, like Lessing's Hänschen Schlau, be
astonished that ònly the rich people of the world possess the most money.'
Still, the psychological process by which, according to our exposition, the indifferent
experience substitutes itself for the psychologically important one seems to us odd and
open to question. In a later chapter we shall undertake the task of making the peculiarities
of this seemingly incorrect operation more intelligible. Here we are concerned only with
the result of this process, which we were compelled to accept by constantly recurring
experiences in the analysis of dreams. In this process it is as though, in the course of the
intermediate steps, a displacement occurs -- let us say, of the psychic accent -- until ideas
of feeble potential, by taking over the charge from ideas which have a stronger initial
potential, reach a degree of intensity which enables them to force their way into
consciousness. Such displacements do not in the least surprise us when it is a question of
the transference of affective magnitudes or of motor activities. That the lonely spinster
transfers her affection to animals, that the bachelor becomes a passionate collector, that
the soldier defends a scrap of coloured cloth -- his flag -- with his life-blood, that in a
love-affair a clasp of the hands a moment longer than usual evokes a sensation of bliss, or
that in Othello a lost handkerchief causes an outburst of rage -- all these are examples of
psychic displacements which to us seem incontestable. But if, by the same means, and in
accordance with the same fundamental principles, a decision is made as to what is to
reach our consciousness and what is to be withheld from it -- that is to say, what we are to
think -- this gives us the impression of morbidity, and if it occurs in waking life we call it
an error of thought. We may here anticipate the result of a discussion which will be
undertaken later, namely, that the psychic process which we have recognised in dream-
displacement proves to be not a morbidly deranged process, but one merely differing
from the normal, one of a more primary nature.
Thus we interpret the fact that the dream-content takes up remnants of trivial experiences
as a manifestation of dream-distortion (by displacement), and we thereupon remember
that we have recognised this dream-distortion as the work of a censorship operating
between the two psychic instances. We may therefore expect that dream-analysis will
constantly show us the real and psychically significant source of the dream in the events
of the day, the memory of which has transferred its accentuation to some indifferent
memory. This conception is in complete opposition to Robert's theory, which
consequently has no further value for us. The fact which Robert was trying to explain

simply does not exist; its assumption is based on a misunderstanding, on a failure to

substitute the real meaning of the dream for its apparent meaning. A further objection to
Robert's doctrine is as follows: If the task of the dream were really to rid our memory, by
means of a special psychic activity, of the `slag' of the day's recollections, our sleep
would perforce be more troubled, engaged in more strenuous work, than we can suppose
it to be, judging by our waking thoughts. For the number of the indifferent impressions of
the day against which we should have to protect our memory is obviously immeasurably
large; the whole night would not be long enough to dispose of them all. It is far more
probable that the forgetting of the indifferent impressions takes place without any active
interference on the part of our psychic powers.
Still, something cautions us against taking leave of Robert`s theory without further
consideration. We have left unexplained the fact that one of the indifferent impressions of
the day -- indeed, even of the previous day -- constantly makes a contribution to the
dream-content. The relations between this impression and the real source of the dream in
the unconscious do not always exist from the outset; as we have seen, they are established
subsequently, while the dream is actually at work, as though to serve the purpose of the
intended displacement. Something, therefore, must necessitate the opening up of
connections in the direction of the recent but indifferent impression; this impression must
possess some quality that gives it a special fitness. Otherwise it would be just as easy for
the dream-thoughts to shift their accentuation to some inessential component of their own
sphere of ideas.
Experiences such as the following show us the way to an explanation: If the day has
brought us two or more experiences which are worthy to evoke a dream, the dream will
blend the allusion of both into a single whole: it obeys a compulsion to make them into a
single whole. For example: One summer afternoon I entered a railway carriage in which I
found two acquaintances of mine who were unknown to one another. One of them was an
influential colleague, the other a member of a distinguished family which I had been
attending in my professional capacity. I introduced the two gentlemen to each other; but
during the long journey they conversed with each other through me, so that I had to
discuss this or that topic now with one, now with the other. I asked my colleague to
recommend a mutual acquaintance who had just begun to practise as a physician. He
replied that he was convinced of the young man's ability, but that his undistinguished
appearance would make it difficult for him to obtain patients in the upper ranks of
society. To this I rejoined: `That is precisely why he needs recommendation.' A little
later, turning to my other fellow-traveller, I inquired after the health of his aunt -- the
mother of one of my patients -- who was at this time prostrated by a serious illness. On
the night following this journey I dreamt that the young friend whom I had asked one of
my companions to recommend was in a fashionable drawing-room, and with all the
bearing of a man of the world was making -- before a distinguished company, in which I
recognised all the rich and aristocratic persons of my acquaintance -- a funeral oration
over the old lady (who in my dream had already died) who was the aunt of my second
fellow traveller. (I confess frankly that I had not been on good terms with this lady.) Thus
my dream had once more found the connection between the two impressions of the day,
and by means of the two had constructed a unified situation.

In view of many similar experiences I am persuaded to advance the proposition that a

dream works under a kind of compulsion which forces it to combine into a unified whole
all the sources of dream-stimulation which are offered to it.2 In a subsequent chapter (on
the function of dreams) we shall consider this impulse of combination as part of the
process of condensation, another primary psychic process.
I shall now consider the question whether the dream-exciting source to which our
analysis leads us must always be a recent (and significant) event, or whether a subjective
experience -- that is to say, the recollection of a psychologically significant event, a train
of thought -- may assuem the role of a dream-stimulus. The very definite answer, derived
from numerous analyses, is as follows: The stimulus of the dream may be a subjective
transaction, which has been made recent, as it were, by the mental activity of the day.
And this is perhaps the best time to summarise in schematic form the different conditions
under which the dream-sources are operative.
The source of a dream may be:
a. A recent and psychologically significant event which is directly represented in the

dream. 3
b. Several recent and significant events, which are combined by the dream into a
single whole.4
c. One or more recent and significant events, which are represented in the dream-
content by allusion to a contemporary but indifferent event.5
d. A subjectively significant experience (recollection, train of thought), which is
constantly represented in the dream by allusion to a recent but indifferent
impression.6
As may be seen, in dream-interpretation the condition is always fulfilled that one

component of the dream-content repeats a recent impression of the day of the dream. The
component which is destined to be represented in the dream may either belong to the
same circle of ideas as the dream-stimulus itself (as an essential or even an inessential
element of the same), or it may originate in the neighbourhood of an indifferent
impression, which has been brought by more or less abundant associations into relation
with the sphere of the dream-stimulus. The apparent multiplicity of these conditions
results merely from the alternative, that a displacement has or has not occurred, and it
may here be noted that this alternative enables us to explain the contrasts of the dream
quite as readily as the medical theory of the dream explains the series of states from the
partial to the complete waking of the brain cells.
In considering this series of sources we note further that the psychologically significant
but not recent element (a train of thought, a recollection) may be replaced for the
purposes of dream-formation by a recent but psychologically indifferent element,
provided the two following conditions are fulfilled: (1) the dream-content preserves a
connection with things recently experienced; (2) the dream-stimulus is still a
psychologically significant event. In one single case (a) both these conditions are fulfilled

by the same impression. If we now consider that these same indifferent impressions,
which are utilised for the dream as long as they are recent, lose this qualification as soon
as they are a day (or at most several days) older, we are obliged to assume that the very
freshness of an impression gives it a certain psychological value for dream-formation,
somewhat equivalent to the value of emotionally accentuated memories or trains of
thought. Later on, in the light of certain psychological considerations, we shall be able to
divine the explanation of this importance of recent impressions in dream-formation.7
Incidentally our attention is here called to the fact that at night, and unnoticed by our
consciousness, important changes may occur in the material comprised by our ideas and
memories. The injunction that before making a final decision in any matter one should
sleep on it for a night is obviously fully justified. But at this point we find that we have
passed from the psychology of dreaming to the psychology of sleep, a step which there
will often be occasion to take.
At this point there arises an objection which threatens to invalidate the conclusions at
which we have just arrived. If indifferent impressions can find their way into the dream
only so long as they are of recent origin, how does it happen that in the dream-content we
find elements also from earlier periods of our lives, which at the time when they were
still recent possessed, as Strümpell puts it, no psychic value, and which, therefore, ought
to have been forgotten long ago; elements, that is, which are neither fresh nor
psychologically significant?
This objection can be disposed of completely if we have recourse to the results of the
psychoanalysis of neurotics. The solution is as follows: The process of shifting and
rearrangement which replaces material of psychic significance by material which is
indifferent (whether one is dreaming or thinking) has already taken place in these earlier
periods of life, and has since become fixed in the memory. Those elements which were
originally indifferent are in fact no longer so, since they have acquired the value of
psychologically significant material. That which has actually remained indifferent can
never be reproduced in the dream.
From the foregoing exposition the reader may rightly conclude that I assert that there are
no indifferent dream-stimuli, and therefore no guileless dreams. This I absolutely and
unconditionally believe to be the case, apart from the dreams of children, and perhaps the
brief dream-reactions to nocturnal sensations. Apart from these exceptions, whatever one
dreams is either plainly recognisable as being psychically significant, or it is distorted and
can be judged correctly only after complete interpretation, when it proves after all to be
of psychic significance. The dream never concerns itself with trifles; we do not allow
sleep to be disturbed by trivialities.8 Dreams which are apparently guileless turn out to be
the reverse of innocent if one takes the trouble to interpret them; if I may be permitted the
expression, they all show `the mark of the beast'. Since this is another point on which I
may expect contradiction, and since I am glad of an opportunity to show dream-distortion
at work, I shall here subject to analysis a number of `guileless dreams' from my
collection.

Dream 1
An intelligent and refined young woman, who in real life is distinctly reserved, one of
those people of whom one says that `still waters run deep', relates the following dream: Ì
dreamt that I arrived at the market too late, and could get nothing from either the butcher
or the greengrocer woman.' Surely a guileless dream, but as it has not the appearance of a
real dream I induce her to relate it in detail. Her report then runs as follows: She goes to
the market with her cook, who carries the basket. The butcher tells her, after she has
asked him for something: `That is no longer to be obtained,' and wants to give her
something else, with the remark: `That is good, too.' She refuses, and goes to the
greengrocer woman. The latter tries to sell her a peculiar vegetable, which is bound up
in bundles, and is black in colour. She says: Ì don't know that, I won't take it.'
The connection of the dream with the preceding day is simple enough. She had really
gone to the market too late, and had been unable to buy anything. The meat-shop was
already closed, comes into one's mind as a description of the experience. But wait, is not
that a very vulgar phrase which -- or rather, the opposite of which -- denotes a certain
neglect with regard to a man's clothing?9 The dreamer has not used these words; she has
perhaps avoided them; but let us look for the interpretation of the details contained in the
dream.
When in a dream something has the character of a spoken utterance -- that is, when it is
said or heard, not merely thought -- and the distinction can usually be made with certainty
-- then it originates in the utterances of waking life, which have, of course, been treated
as raw material, dismembered, and slightly altered, and above all removed from their
context.10 In the work of interpretation we may take such utterances as our starting point.
Where, then, does the butcher's statement, That is no longer to be obtained, come from?
From myself; I had explained to her some days previously `that the oldest experiences of
childhood are no longer to be obtained as such, but will be replaced in the analysis by
``transferences'' and dreams.' Thus, I am the butcher; and she refuses to accept these
transferences to the present of old ways of thinking and feeling. Where does her dream
utterance, I don't know that, I won't take it, come from? For the purposes of the analysis
this has to be dissected. Ì don't know that, she herself had said to her cook, with whom
she had a dispute on the previous day, but she had then added: Behave yourself decently.
Here a displacement is palpable; of the two sentences which she spoke to her cook, she
included the insignificant one in her dream; but the suppressed sentence, `Behave
yourself decently!' alone fits in with the rest of the dream-content. One might use the
words to a man who was making indecent overtures, and had neglected `to close his
meat-shop'. That we have really hit upon the trail of the interpretation is proved by its
agreement with the allusions made by the incident with the greengrocer woman. A
vegetable which is sold tied up in bundles (a longish vegetable, as she subsequently
adds), and is also black; what can this be but a dream-combination of asparagus and black
radish? I need not interpret asparagus to the initiated; and the other vegetable, too (think
of the exclamation: `Blacky, save yourself!'), seems to me to point to the sexual theme at
which we guessed in the beginning, when we wanted to replace the story of the dream by

`the meat-shop is closed'. We are not here concerned with the full meaning of the dream;
so much is certain, that it is full of meaning and by no means guileless.11
Dream 2
Another guileless dream of the same patient, which in some respects is a pendant to the
above. Her husband asks her: Òughtn't we to have the piano tuned?' She replies: Ìt's
not worth while, the hammers would have to be rebuffed as well.' Again we have the
reproduction of an actual event of the preceding day. Her husband had asked her such a
question, and she had answered it in such words. But what is the meaning of her
dreaming it? She says of the piano that it is a disgusting old box which has a bad tone; it
belonged to her husband before they were married,12 etc., but the key to the true solution
lies in the phrase: It isn't worth while. This has its origin in a call paid yesterday to a
woman friend. She was asked to take off her coat, but declined, saying: `Thanks, it isn't
worth while, I must go in a moment.' At this point I recall that yesterday, during the
analysis, she suddenly took hold of her coat, of which a button had come undone. It was
as though she meant to say: `Please don't look in, it isn't worth while.' Thus box becomes
chest, and the interpretation of the dream leads to the years when she was growing out of
her childhood, when she began to be dissatisfied with her figure. It leads us back, indeed,
to earlier periods, if we take into consideration the disgusting and the bad tone, and
remember how often in allusions and in dreams the two small hemispheres of the female
body take the place -- as a substitute and an antithesis -- of the large ones.
Dream 3
I will interrupt the analysis of this dreamer in order to insert a short, innocent dream
which was dreamed by a young man. He dreamt that he was putting on his winter
overcoat again; this was terrible. The occasion for this dream is apparently the sudden
advent of cold weather. On more careful examination we note that the two brief
fragments of the dream do not fit together very well, for what could be terrible about
wearing a thick or heavy coat in cold weather? Unfortunately for the innocency of this
dream, the first association, under analysis, yields the recollection that yesterday a lady
had confidentially confessed to him that her last child owed its existence to the splitting
of a condom. He now reconstructs his thoughts in accordance with this suggestion: A thin
condom is dangerous, a thick one is bad. The condom is a `pullover' (überzieher =
literally pullover), for it is pulled over something: and überzieher is the German term for
a light overcoat. An experience like that related by the lady would indeed be `terrible' for
an unmarried man.
We will now return to our other innocent dreamer.
Dream 4
She puts a candle into a candlestick; but the candle is broken, so that it does not stand
up. The girls at school say she is clumsy; but she replies that it is not her fault.

Here, too, there is an actual occasion for the dream; the day before she had actually put a
candle into a candlestick; but this one was not broken. An obvious symbolism has here
been employed. The candle is an object which excites the female genitals; its being
broken, so that it does not stand upright, signifies impotence on the man's part (it is not
her fault). But does this young woman, carefully brought up, and a stranger to all
obscenity, know of such an application of the candle? By chance she is able to tell how
she came by this information. While paddling a canoe on the Rhine, a boat passed her
which contained some students, who were singing rapturously, or rather yelling: `When
the Queen of Sweden, behind closed shutters, with the candles of Apollo . . .'
She does not hear or else understand the last word. Her husband was asked to give her the
required explanation. These verses are then replaced in the dream-content by the innocent
recollection of a task which she once performed clumsily at her boarding-school, because
of the closed shutters. The connection between the theme of masturbation and that of
impotence is clear enough. Àpollo' in the latent dream-content connects this dream with
an earlier one in which the virgin Pallas figured. All this is obviously not innocent.
Dream 5
Lest it may seem too easy a matter to draw conclusions from dreams concerning the
dreamer's real circumstances, I add another dream originating with the same person,
which once more appears innocent. Ì dreamt of doing something,' she relates, `which I
actually did during the day, that is to say, I filled a little trunk so full of books that I had
difficulty in closing it. My dream was just like the actual occurrence.' Here the dreamer
herself emphasises the correspondence between the dream and the reality. All such
criticisms of the dream, and comments on the dream, although they have found a place in
the waking thoughts, properly belong to the latent dream-content, as further examples
will confirm. We are told, then, that what the dream relates has actually occurred during
the day. It would take us too far afield to show how we arrive at the idea of making use of
the English language to help us in the interpretation of this dream. Suffice it to say that it
is again a question of a little box (cf. p. 62, the dream of the dead child in the box) which
has been filled so full that nothing can go into it.
In all these ìnnocent' dreams the sexual factor as the motive of the censorship is very
prominent. But this is a subject of primary significance, which we must consider later.
1
cf. The Psychopathology of Everyday Life.
2
The tendency of the dream at work to blend everything present of interest into a single
transaction has already been noticed by several authors, for instance, by Delage and
Delboeuf.
3
The dream of Irma's injection; the dream of the friend who is my uncle.
4
The dream of the funeral oration delivered by the young physician.

5
The dream of the botanical monograph.
6
The dreams of my patients during analysis are mostly of this kind.
7
cf. Chapter Seven on Transference.
8
Havelock Ellis, a kindly critic of The Interpretation of Dreams, writes in The World of
Dreams (p. 169): `From this point on, not many of us will be able to follow F.' But Mr
Ellis has not undertaken any analyses of dreams, and will not believe how unjustifiable it
is to judge them by the manifest dream-content.
9
Its meaning is: `Your fly is undone.' (TRANS.)
10
cf. what is said of speech in dreams in the chapter on The Dream-Work. Only one of the
writers on the subject -- Delboeuf -- seems to have recognised the origin of the speeches
heard in dreams, he compares them with cliches.
11
For the curious, I may remark that behind the dream there is hidden a fantasy of
indecent, sexually provoking conduct on my part, and of repulsion on the part of the lady.
If this interpretation should seem preposterous, I would remind the reader of the
numerous cases in which physicians have been made the object of such charges by
hysterical women, with whom the same fantasy has not appeared in a distorted form as a
dream, but has become undisguisedly conscious and delusional. -- With this dream the
patient began her psychoanalytical treatment. It was only later that I learned that with this
dream she repeated the initial trauma in which her neurosis originated, and since then I
have noticed the same behaviour in other persons who in their childhood were victims of
sexual attacks, and now, as it were, wish in their dreams for them to be repeated.
12
A substitute by the opposite, as will be clear after analysis.

B -- INFANTILE EXPERIENCES AS THE SOURCE OF DREAMS
As the third of the peculiarities of the dream-content, we have adduced the fact, in
agreement with all other writers on the subject (excepting Robert), that impressions from
our childhood may appear in dreams, which do not seem to be at the disposal of the
waking memory. It is, of course, difficult to decide how seldom or how frequently this
occurs, because after waking the origin of the respective elements of the dream is not
recognised. The proof that we are dealing with impressions of our childhood must thus be
adduced objectively, and only in rare instances do the conditions favour such proof. The
story is told by A. Maury, as being particularly conclusive, of a man who decides to visit
his birthplace after an absence of twenty years. On the night before his departure he
dreams that he is in a totally unfamiliar locality, and that he there meets a strange man
with whom he holds a conversation. Subsequently, upon his return home, he is able to
convince himself that this strange locality really exists in the vicinity of his home, and the
strange man in the dream turns out to be a friend of his dead father's, who is living in the
town. This is, of course, a conclusive proof that in his childhood he had seen both the
man and the locality. The dream, moreover, is to be interpreted as a dream of impatience,
like the dream of the girl who carries in her pocket her ticket for a concert, the dream of
the child whose father had promised him an excursion to the Hameau (p. 40), and so
forth. The motives which reproduce just these impressions of childhood for the dreamer
cannot, of course, be discovered without analysis.
One of my colleagues, who attended my lectures, and who boasted that his dreams were
very rarely subject to distortion, told me that he had sometime previously seen, in a
dream, his former tutor in bed with his nurse, who had remained in the household until
his eleventh year. The actual location of this scene was realised even in the dream. As he
was greatly interested, he related the dream to his elder brother, who laughingly
confirmed its reality. The brother said that he remembered the affair very distinctly, for
he was six years old at the time. The lovers were in the habit of making him, the elder
boy, drunk with beer whenever circumstances were favourable to their nocturnal
intercourse. The younger child, our dreamer, at that time three years of age, slept in the
same room as the nurse, but was not regarded as an obstacle.
In yet another case it may be definitely established, without the aid of dream-
interpretation, that the dream contains elements from childhood -- namely, if the dream is
a so-called perennial dream, one which, being first dreamt in childhood, recurs again and
again in adult years. I may add a few examples of this sort to those already known,
although I have no personal knowledge of perennial dreams. A physician, in his thirties,
tells me that a yellow lion, concerning which he is able to give the precisest information,
has often appeared in his dream-life, from his earliest childhood up to the present day.
This lion, known to him from his dreams, was one day discovered in natura, as a long-
forgotten china animal. The young man then learned from his mother that the lion had
been his favourite toy in early childhood, a fact which he himself could no longer
remember.

If we now turn from the manifest dream-content to the dream-thoughts which are
revealed only on analysis, the experiences of childhood may be found to recur even in
dreams whose content would not have led us to suspect anything of the sort. I owe a
particularly delightful and instructive example of such a dream to my esteemed colleague
of the `yellow lion'. After reading Nansen's account of his polar expedition, he dreamt
that he was giving the intrepid explorer electrical treatment on an ice-floe for the sciatica
of which the latter complained! During the analysis of this dream he remembered an
incident of his childhood, without which the dream would be wholly unintelligible. When
he was three or four years of age he was one day listening attentively to the conversation
of his elders; they were talking of exploration, and he presently asked his father whether
exploration was a bad illness. He had apparently confounded Reissen (journey, trips) with
Reissen (gripes, tearing pains), and the derision of his brothers and sisters prevented his
ever forgetting the humiliating experience.
We have a precisely similar case when, in the analysis of the dream of the monograph on
the genus cyclamen, I stumble upon a memory, retained from childhood, to the effect that
when I was five years old my father allowed me to destroy a book embellished with
coloured plates. It will perhaps be doubted whether this recollection really entered into
the composition of the dream-content, and it may be suggested that the connection was
established subsequently by the analysis. But the abundance and intricacy of the
associative connections vouch for the truth of my explanation: cyclamen-favourite
flower-favourite dish-artichoke; to pick to pieces like an artichoke, leaf by leaf (a phrase
which at that time one heard daily, àa propos of the dividing up of the Chinese empire);
herbarium-bookworm, whose favourite food is books. I can further assure the reader that
the ultimate meaning of the dream, which I have not given here, is most intimately
connected with the content of the scene of childish destruction.
In another series of dreams we learn from analysis that the very wish which has given rise
to the dream, and whose fulfilment the dream proves to be, has itself originated in
childhood, so that one is astonished to find that the child with all his impulses survives in
the dream.
I shall now continue the interpretation of a dream which has already proved instructive: I
refer to the dream in which my friend R. is my uncle. We have carried its interpretation
far enough for the wish-motive -- the wish to be appointed professor -- to assert itself
palpably; and we have explained the affection felt for my friend R. in the dream as the
outcome of opposition to, and defiance of, the two colleagues who appear in the dream-
thoughts. The dream was my own; I may, therefore, continue the analysis by stating that I
did not feel quite satisfied with the solution arrived at. I knew that my opinion of these
colleagues, who were so badly treated in my dream-thoughts, would have been expressed
in very different language in my waking life; the intensity of the wish that I might not
share their fate as regards the appointment seemed to me too slight fully to account for
the discrepancy between my dream-opinion and my waking opinion. If the desire to be
addressed by another title were really so intense it would be proof of a morbid ambition,
which I do not think I cherish, and which I believe I was far from entertaining. I do not
know how others who think they know me would judge me; perhaps I really was

ambitious; but if I was, my ambition has long since been transferred to objects other than
the rank and title of Professor extraordinarius.
Whence, then, the ambition which the dream has ascribed to me? Here I am reminded of
a story which I heard often in my childhood, that at my birth an old peasant woman had
prophesied to my happy mother (whose first-born I was) that she had brought a great man
into the world. Such prophecies must be made very frequently; there are so many happy
and expectant mothers, and so many old peasant women, and other old women who,
since their mundane powers have deserted them, turn their eyes toward the future; and the
prophetess is not likely to suffer for her prophecies. Is it possible that my thirst for
greatness has originated from this source? But here I recollect an impression from the
later years of my childhood, which might serve even better as an explanation. One
evening, at a restaurant on the Prater, where my parents were accustomed to take me
when I was eleven or twelve years of age, we noticed a man who was going from table to
table and, for a small sum, improvising verses upon any subject that was given him. I was
sent to bring the poet to our table, and he showed his gratitude. Before asking for a
subject he threw off a few rhymes about myself, and told us that if he could trust his
inspiration I should probably one day become a `minister'. I can still distinctly remember
the impression produced by this second prophecy. It was in the days of the `bourgeois
Ministry' my father had recently brought home the portraits of the bourgeois university
graduates, Herbst, Giskra, Unger, Berger and others, and we illuminated the house in
their honour. There were even Jews among them; so that every diligent Jewish schoolboy
carried a ministerial portfolio in his satchel. The impression of that time must be
responsible for the fact that until shortly before I went to the university I wanted to study
jurisprudence, and changed my mind only at the last moment. A medical man has no
chance of becoming a minister. And now for my dream: It is only now that I begin to see
that it translates me from the sombre present to the hopeful days of the bourgeois
Ministry, and completely fulfils what was then my youthful ambition. In treating my two
estimable and learned colleagues, merely because they are Jews, so badly, one as though
he were a simpleton, and the other as though he were a criminal, I am acting as though I
were the Minister; I have put myself in his place. What a revenge I take upon his
Excellency! He refuses to appoint me Professor extraordinarius, and so in my dream I
put myself in his place.
In another case I note the fact that although the wish that excites the dream is a
contemporary wish it is nevertheless greatly reinforced by memories of childhood. I refer
to a series of dreams which are based on the longing to go to Rome. For a long time to
come I shall probably have to satisfy this longing by means of dreams, since at the season
of the year when I should be able to travel Rome is to be avoided for reasons of health.1
Thus I once dreamt that I saw the Tiber and the bridge of Sant' Angelo from the window
of a railway carriage; presently the train started, and I realised that I had never entered the
city at all. The view that appeared in the dream was modelled after a well-known
engraving which I had casually noticed the day before in the drawing-room of one of my
patients. In another dream someone took me up a hill and showed me Rome half
shrouded in mist, and so distant that I was astonished at the distinctness of the view. The
content of this dream is too rich to be fully reported here. The motive, `to see the

promised land afar', is here easily recognisable. The city which I thus saw in the midst is
Lübeck; the original of the hill is the Gleichenberg. In a third dream I am at last in Rome.
To my disappointment the scenery is anything but urban: it consists of a little stream of
black water, on one side of which are black rocks, while on the other are meadows with
large white flowers. I notice a certain Herr Zucker (with whom I am superficially
acquainted), and resolve to ask him to show me the way into the city. It is obvious that I
am trying in vain to see in my dream a city which I have never seen in my waking life. If
I resolve the landscape into its elements, the white flowers point to Ravenna, which is
known to me, and which once, for a time, replaced Rome as the capital of Italy. In the
marshes around Ravenna we had found the most beautiful water-lilies in the midst of
black pools of water; the dream makes them grow in the meadows, like the narcissi of our
own Aussee, because we found it so troublesome to cull them from the water. The black
rock so close to the water vividly recalls the valley of the Tepl at Karlsbad. `Karlsbad'
now enables me to account for the peculiar circumstance that I ask Herr Zucker to show
me the way. In the material of which the dream is woven I am able to recognise two of
those amusing Jewish anecdotes which conceal such profound and, at times, such bitter
worldly wisdom, and which we are so fond of quoting in our letters and conversation.
One is the story of the `constitution'; it tells how a poor Jew sneaks onto the Karlsbad
express without a ticket; how he is detected, and is treated more and more harshly by the
conductor at each succeeding call for tickets; and how, when a friend whom he meets at
one of the stations during his miserable journey asks him where he is going, he answers:
`To Karlsbad -- if my constitution holds out.' Associated in memory with this is another
story about a Jew who is ignorant of French, and who has express instructions to ask in
Paris for the Rue Richelieu. Paris was for many years the goal of my own longing, and I
regarded the satisfaction with which I first set foot on the pavements of Paris as a warrant
that I should attain to the fulfilment of other wishes also. Moreover, asking the way is a
direct allusion to Rome, for, as we know, àll roads lead to Rome'. And further, the name
Zucker (sugar) again points to Karlsbad, whither we send persons afflicted with the
constitutional disease, diabetes (Zuckerkrankheit, sugar-disease). The occasion for this
dream was the proposal of my Berlin friend that we should meet in Prague at Easter. A
further association with sugar and diabetes might be found in the matters which I had to
discuss with him.
A fourth dream, occurring shortly after the last-mentioned, brings me back to Rome. I see
a street corner before me, and am astonished that so many German placards should be
posted there. On the previous day, when writing to my friend, I had told him, with truly
prophetic vision, that Prague would probably not be a comfortable place for German
travellers. The dream, therefore, expressed simultaneously the wish to meet him in Rome
instead of in the Bohemian capital, and the desire, which probably originated during my
student days, that the German language might be accorded more tolerance in Prague. As a
matter of fact, I must have understood the Czech language in the first years of my
childhood, for I was born in a small village in Moravia, amidst a Slav population. A
Czech nursery rhyme, which I heard in my seventeenth year, became, without effort on
my part, so imprinted upon my memory that I can repeat it to this day, although I have no
idea of its meaning. Thus in these dreams also there is no lack of manifold relations to the
impressions of my early childhood.

During my last Italian journey, which took me past Lake Trasimenus, I at length
discovered, after I had seen the Tiber, and had reluctantly turned back some fifty miles
from Rome, what a reinforcement my longing for the Eternal City had received from the
impressions of my childhood. I had just conceived a plan of travelling to Naples via
Rome the following year when this sentence, which I must have read in one of our
German classics, occurred to me:2 Ìt is a question which of the two paced to and fro in
his room the more impatiently after he had conceived the plan of going to Rome --
Assistant Headmaster Winckelmann or the great General Hannibal.' I myself had walked
in Hannibal's footsteps; like him I was destined never to see Rome, and he too had gone
to Campania when all were expecting him in Rome. Hannibal, with whom I had achieved
this point of similarity, had been my favourite hero during my years at the `gymnasium';
like so many boys of my age, I bestowed my sympathies in the Punic war not on the
Romans, but on the Carthaginians. Moreover, when I finally came to realise the
consequences of belonging to an alien race, and was forced by the anti-Semitic feeling
among my classmates to take a definite stand, the figure of the Semitic commander
assumed still greater proportions in my imagination. Hannibal and Rome symbolised, in
my youthful eyes, the struggle between the tenacity of the Jews and the organisation of
the Catholic Church. The significance for our emotional life which the anti-Semitic
movement has since assumed helped to fix the thoughts and impressions of those earlier
days. Thus the desire to go to Rome has in my dream-life become the mask and symbol
for a number of warmly cherished wises, for whose realisation one had to work with the
tenacity and single-mindedness of the Punic general, though their fulfilment at times
seemed as remote as Hannibal's lifelong wish to enter Rome.
And now, for the first time, I happened upon the youthful experience which even today
still expresses its power in all these emotions and dreams. I might have been ten or
twelve years old when my father began to take me with him on his walks, and in his
conversation to reveal his views on the things of this world. Thus it was that he once told
me the following incident, in order to show me that I had been born into happier times
than he: `When I was a young man, I was walking one Saturday along the street in the
village where you were born; I was well-dressed, with a new fur cap on my head. Up
comes a Christian, who knocks my cap into the mud, and shouts, ``Jew, get off the
pavement!'' ' -- Ànd what did you do?' -- Ì went into the street and picked up the cap,' he
calmly replied. That did not seem heroic on the part of the big, strong man who was
leading me, a little fellow, by the hand. I contrasted this situation, which did not please
me, with another, more in harmony with my sentiments -- the scene in which Hannibal's
father, Hamilcar Barcas, made his son swear before the household altar to take vengeance
on the Romans.3 Ever since then Hannibal has had a place in my fantasies.
I think I can trace my enthusiasm for the Carthaginian general still further back into my
childhood, so that it is probably only an instance of an already established emotional
relation being transferred to a new vehicle. One of the first books which fell into my
childish hands after I learned to read was Thiers' Consulate and Empire. I remember that
I pasted on the flat backs of my wooden soldiers little labels bearing the names of the
Imperial marshals, and that at that time Masséna (as a Jew, Menasse) was already my
avowed favourite.4 This preference is doubtless also to be explained by the fact of my

having been born a hundred years later, on the same date. Napoleon himself is associated
with Hannibal through the crossing of the Alps. And perhaps the development of this
martial ideal may be traced yet farther back, to the first three years of my childhood, to
wishes which my alternately friendly and hostile relations with a boy a year older than
myself must have evoked in the weaker of the two playmates.
The deeper we go into the analysis of dreams, the more often are we put on to the track of
childish experiences which play the part of dream-sources in the latent dream-content.
We have learned that dreams very rarely reproduce memories in such a manner as to
constitute, unchanged and unabridged, the sole manifest dream-content. Nevertheless, a
few authentic examples which show such reproduction have been recorded, and I can add
a few new ones, which once more refer to scenes of childhood. In the case of one of my
patients a dream once gave a barely distorted reproduction of a sexual incident, which
was immediately recognised as an accurate recollection. The memory of it had never
been completely lost in the waking life, but it had been greatly obscured, and it was
revivified by the previous work of analysis. The dreamer had at the age of twelve visited
a bedridden schoolmate, who had exposed himself, probably only by a chance movement
in bed. At the sight of the boy's genitals he was seized by a kind of compulsion, exposed
himself, and took hold of the member of the other boy who, however, looked at him in
surprise and indignation, whereupon he became embarrassed and let it go. A dream
repeated this scene twenty-three years later, with all the details of the accompanying
emotions, changing it, however, in this respect, that the dreamer played the passive
instead of the active role, while the person of the schoolmate was replaced by a
contemporary.
As a rule, of course, a scene from childhood is represented in the manifest dream-content

only by an illusion, and must be disentangled from the dream by interpretation. The
citation of examples of this kind cannot be very convincing, because any guarantee that
they are really experiences of childhood is lacking; if they belong to an earlier period of
life, they are no longer recognised by our memory. The conclusion that such childish
experiences recur at all in dreams is justified in psychoanalytic work by a great number
of factors, which in their combined results appear to be sufficiently reliable. But when,
for the purposes of dream-interpretation, such references to childish experiences are torn
out of their context, they may not perhaps seem very impressive, especially where I do
not even give all the material upon which the interpretation is based. However, I shall not
let this deter me from giving a few examples.
Dream 1
With one of my female patients all dreams have the character of `hurry'; she is hurrying
so as to be in time, so as not to miss her train, and so on. In one dream she has to visit a
girl friend; her mother had told her to ride and not walk; she runs, however, and keeps
on calling. The material that emerged in the analysis allowed one to recognise a memory
of childish romping, and, especially for one dream, went back to the popular childish
game of rapidly repeating the words of a sentence as though it was all one word. All these

harmless jokes with little friends were remembered because they replaced other less
harmless ones.5
Dream 2
The following dream was dreamed by another female patient: She is in a large room in
which there are all sorts of machines; it is rather like what she would imagine an
orthopaedic institute to be. She hears that I am pressed for time, and that she must
undergo treatment along with five others. But she resists, and is unwilling to lie down on
the bed -- or whatever it is -- which is intended for her. She stands in a corner, and waits
for me to say Ìt is not true.' The others, meanwhile, laugh at her, saying it is all
foolishness on her part. At the same time, it is as though she were called upon to make a
number of little squares.
The first part of the content of this dream is an allusion to the treatment and to the
transference6 to myself. The second contains an allusion to a scene of childhood; the two
portions are connected by the mention of the bed. The orthopaedic institute is an allusion
to one of my talks, in which I compared the treatment, with regard to its duration and its
nature, to an orthopaedic treatment. At the beginning of the treatment I had to tell her that
for the present I had little time to give her, but that later on I would devote a whole hour
to her daily. This aroused in her the old sensitiveness, which is a leading characteristic of
children who are destined to become hysterical. Their desire for love is insatiable. My
patient was the youngest of six brothers and sisters (hence, with five others), and as such
her father's favourite, but in spite of this she seems to have felt that her beloved father
devoted far too little time and attention to her. Her waiting for me to say Ìt is not true'
was derived as follows: A little tailor's apprentice had brought her a dress, and she had
given him the money for it. Then she asked her husband whether she would have to pay
the money again if the boy were to lose it. To tease her, her husband answered `Yes' (the
teasing in the dream), and she asked again and again, and waited for him to say Ìt is not
true.' The thought of the latent dream-content may now be construed as follows: Will she
have to pay me double the amount when I devote twice as much time to her? -- a thought
which is stingy or filthy (the uncleanliness of childhood is often replaced in dreams by
greed for money; the word `filthy' here supplies the bridge). If all the passage referring to
her waiting until I say Ìt is not true' is intended in the dream as a circumlocution for the
word `dirty', the standing-in-the-corner and not lying-down-on-the-bed are in keeping
with this world, as component parts of a scene of her childhood in which she had soiled
her bed, in punishment for which she was put into the corner, with a warning that papa
would not love her any more, whereupon her brothers and sisters laughed at her, etc. The
little squares refer to her young niece, who showed her the arithmetical trick of writing
figures in nine squares (I think) in such a way that on being added together in any
direction they make fifteen.
Dream 3
Here is a man's dream: He sees two boys tussling with each other; they are cooper's boys,
as he concludes from the tools which are lying about; one of the boys has thrown the

other down; the prostrate boy is wearing earrings with blue stones. He runs towards the
assailant with lifted cane, in order to chastise him. The boy takes refuge behind a woman,
as though she were his mother, who is standing against a wooden fence. She is the wife of
a day-labourer, and she turns her back to the man who is dreaming. Finally she turns
about and stares at him with a horrible look, so that he runs away in terror; the red flesh
of the lower lid seems to stand out from her eyes.
This dream has made abundant use of trivial occurrences from the previous day, in the
course of which he actually saw two boys in the street, one of whom threw the other
down. When he walked up to them in order to settle the quarrel, both of them took to
their heels. Cooper's boys -- this is explained only by a subsequent dream, in the analysis
of which he used the proverbial expression: `To knock the bottom out of the barrel.' Ear-
rings with blue stones, according to his observation, are worn chiefly by prostitutes. This
suggests a familiar doggerel rhyme about two boys: `The other boy was called Marie':
that is, he was a girl. The woman standing by the fence: after the scene with the two boys
he went for a walk along the bank of the Danube and, taking advantage of being alone,
urinated against a wooden fence. A little farther on a respectably dressed, elderly lady
smiled at him very pleasantly, and wanted to hand him her card with her address.
Since, in the dream, the woman stood as he had stood while urinating, there is an allusion
to a woman urinating, and this explains the `horrible look' and the prominence of the red
flesh, which can only refer to the genitals gaping in a squatting posture; seen in
childhood, they had appeared in later recollection as `proud flesh', as a `wound'. The
dream unites two occasions upon which, as a little boy, the dreamer was enabled to see
the genitals of little girls, once by throwing the little girl down, and once while the child
was urinating; and, as is shown by another association, he had retained in his memory the
punishment administered or threatened by his father on account of these manifestations of
sexual curiosity.
Dream 4
A great mass of childish memories, which have been hastily combined into a fantasy,
may be found behind the following dream of an elderly lady: She goes out in a hurry to
do some shopping. On the Graben7 she sinks to her knees as though she had broken
down. A number of people collect around her, especially cab-drivers, but no one helps
her to get up. She makes many vain attempts; finally she must have succeeded, for she is
put into a cab which is to take her home. A large, heavily laden basket (something like a
market-basket) is thrown after her through the window.
This is the woman who is always harassed in her dreams, just as she used to be harassed
when a child. The first situation of the dream is apparently taken from the sight of a fallen
horse, just as `broken down' points to horse-racing. In her youth she was a rider; still
earlier she was probably also a horse. With the idea of falling down is connected her first
childish reminiscence of the seventeen-year-old son of the hall porter, who had an
epileptic seizure in the street and was brought home in a cab. Of this, of course, she had
only heard, but the idea of epileptic fits, of falling down, acquired a great influence over

her fantasies, and later on influenced the form of her own hysterical attacks. When a
person of the female sex dreams of falling, this almost always has a sexual significance;
she becomes a `fallen woman', and, for the purpose of the dream under consideration, this
interpretation is probably the least doubtful, for she falls in the Graben, the street in
Vienna which is known as the concourse of prostitutes. The market-basket admits of
more than one interpretation; in the sense of refusal (German, Korb = basket = snub,
refusal) it reminds her of the many snubs which she at first administered to her suitors
and which, she thinks, she herself received later. This agrees with the detail: no one will
help her up, which she herself interprets as `being disdained'. Further, the market-basket
recalls fantasies which have already appeared in the course of analysis, in which she
imagines that she has married far beneath her station and now goes to the market as a
market-woman. Lastly, the market-basket might be interpreted as the mark of a servant.
This suggests further memories of her childhood -- of a cook who was discharged
because she stole; she, too, sank to her knees and begged for mercy. The dreamer was at
that time twelve years of age. Then emerges a recollection of a chambermaid, who was
dismissed because she had an affair with the coachman of the household, who,
incidentally, married her afterwards. This recollection, therefore, gives us a clue to the
cab-drivers in the dream (who, in opposition to the reality, do not stand by the fallen
woman). But there still remains to be explained the throwing of the basket; in particular,
why is it thrown through the window? This reminds her of the forwarding of luggage by
rail, to the custom of Fensterln8 in the country, and to trivial impressions of a summer
resort, of a gentleman who threw some blue plums into the window of a lady's room, and
of her little sister, who was frightened because an idiot who was passing looked in at the
window. And now, from behind all this emerges an obscure recollection from her tenth
year of a nurse in the country to whom one of the menservants made love (and whose
conduct the child may have noticed), and who was `sent packing', `thrown out', together
with her lover (in the dream we have the expression `thrown into'); an incident which we
have been approaching by several other paths. The luggage or box of a servant is
disparagingly described in Vienna as `seven plums'. `Pack up your seven plums and get
out!'
My collection, of course, contains a plethora of such patients' dreams, the analysis of

which leads back to impressions of childhood, often dating back to the first three years of
life, which are remembered obscurely, or not at all. But it is a questionable proceeding to
draw conclusions from these and apply them to dreams in general, for they are mostly
dreams of neurotic, and especially hysterical, persons; and the part played in these
dreams by childish scenes might be conditioned by the nature of the neurosis, and not by
the nature of dreams in general. In the interpretation of my own dreams, however, which
is assuredly not undertaken on account of grave symptoms of illness, it happens just as
frequently that in the latent dream-content I am unexpectedly confronted with a scene of
my childhood, and that a whole series of my dreams will suddenly converge upon the
paths proceeding from a single childish experience. I have already given examples of
this, and I shall give yet more in different connections. Perhaps I cannot close this chapter
more fittingly than by citing several dreams of my own, in which recent events and long-
forgotten experiences of my childhood appear together as dream-sources.

I. After I have been travelling, and have gone to bed hungry and tired, the prime
necessities of life begin to assert their claims in sleep, and I dream as follows: I go into a
kitchen in order to ask for some pudding. There three women are standing, one of whom
is the hostess; she is rolling something in her hands, as though she were making
dumplings. She replies that I must wait until she has finished (not distinctly as a speech).
I become impatient, and go away affronted. I want to put on an overcoat; but the first I
try on is too long. I take it off, and am somewhat astonished to find that it is trimmed with
fur. A second coat has a long strip of cloth with a Turkish design sewn into it. A stranger
with a long face and a short, pointed beard comes up and prevents me from putting it on,
declaring that it belongs to him. I now show him that it is covered all over with Turkish
embroideries. He asks: `How do the Turkish (drawings, strips of cloth . . .) concern you?'
But we soon become quite friendly.
In the analysis of this dream I remember, quite unexpectedly, the first novel which I ever
read, or rather, which I began to read from the end of the first volume, when I was
perhaps thirteen years of age. I have never learned the name of the novel, or that of its
author, but the end remains vividly in my memory. The hero becomes insane, and
continually calls out the names of the three women who have brought the greatest
happiness and the greatest misfortune into his life. Pélagie is one of these names. I still do
not know what to make of this recollection during the analysis. Together with the three
women there now emerge the three Parcae, who spin the fates of men, and I know that
one of the three women, the hostess in the dream, is the mother who gives life and who,
moreover, as in my own case, gives the child its first nourishment. Love and hunger meet
at the mother's breast. A young man -- so runs an anecdote -- who became a great admirer
of womanly beauty, once observed, when the conversation turned upon the handsome
wet-nurse who had suckled him as a child, that he was sorry that he had not taken better
advantage of his opportunities. I am in the habit of using the anecdote to elucidate the
factor of retrospective tendencies in the mechanism of the psychoneuroses. -- One of the
Parcae, then, is rubbing the palms of her hands together, as though she were making
dumplings. A strange occupation for one of the Fates, and urgently in need of
explanation! This explanation is furnished by another and earlier memory of my
childhood. When I was six years old, and receiving my first lessons from my mother, I
was expected to believe that we are made of dust, and must, therefore, return to dust. But
this did not please me, and I questioned the doctrine. Thereupon my mother rubbed the
palms of her hands together -- just as in making dumplings, except that there was no
dough between them -- and showed me the blackish scales of epidermis which were thus
rubbed off, as a proof that it is of dust that we are made. Great was my astonishment at
this demonstration ad oculos, and I acquiesced in the idea which I was later to hear
expressed in the words: `Thou owest nature a death.'9 Thus the women to whom I go in
the kitchen, as I so often did in my childhood when I was hungry and my mother, sitting
by the fire, admonished me to wait until lunch was ready, are really the Parcae. And now
for the dumplings! At least one of my teachers at the University -- the very one to whom I
am indebted for my histological knowledge (epidermis) -- would be reminded by the
name Knödl (Knödl means dumpling), of a person whom he had to prosecute for
plagiarising his writings. Committing a plagiarism, taking anything one can lay hands on,
even though it belongs to another, obviously leads to the second part of the dream, in

which I am treated like the overcoat thief who for some time plied his trade in the lecture-
halls. I have written the word plagiarism -- without definite intention -- because it
occurred to me, and now I see that it must belong to the latent dream-content and that it
will serve as a bridge between the different parts of the manifest dream-content. The
chain of associations -- Pélagie--plagiarism--plagiostomi10 (sharks)--fish-bladder --
connects the old novel with the affair of Knödl and the overcoats (German: Überzieher =
pullover, overcoat or condom), which obviously refer to an appliance appertaining to the
technique of sex. This, it is true, is a very forced and irrational connection, but it is
nevertheless one which I could not have established in waking life if it had not already
been established by the dream-work. Indeed, as though nothing were sacred to this
impulse to enforce associations, the beloved name, Brücke (bridge of words, see above),
now serves to remind me of the very institute in which I spent my happiest hours as a
student, wanting for nothing. `So will you at the breasts of Wisdom every day more
pleasure find'), in the most complete contrast to the desires which plague me (German:
plagen) while I dream. And finally, there emerges the recollection of another dear
teacher, whose name once more sounds like something edible (Fleischl -- Fleisch = meat
-- like Knödl = dumplings), and of a pathetic scene in which the scales of epidermis play
a part (mother--hostess), and mental derangement (the novel), and a remedy from the
Latin pharmacopeia (Küche = kitchen) which numbs the sensation of hunger, namely,
cocaine.
In this manner I could follow the intricate trains of thought still farther, and could fully
elucidate that part of the dream which is lacking in the analysis; but I must refrain,
because the personal sacrifice which this would involve is too great. I shall take up only
one of the threads, which will serve to lead us directly to one of the dream-thoughts that
lie at the bottom of the medley. The stranger with the long face and pointed beard, who
wants to prevent me from putting on the overcoat, has the features of a tradesman of
Spalato, of whom my wife bought a great deal of Turkish cloth. His name was Popovic, a
suspicious name, which even gave the humorist Stettenheim a pretext for a suggestive
remark: `He told me his name, and blushingly shook my hand.'11 For the rest, I find the
same misuse of names as above in the case of Pélagie, Knödl, Brücke, Fleischl. No one
will deny that such playing with names is a childish trick; if I indulge in it the practice
amounts to an act of retribution, for my own name has often enough been the subject of
such feeble attempts at wit. Goethe once remarked how sensitive a man is in respect to
his name, which he feels that he fills even as he fills his skin; Herder having written the
following lines on his name:
Der du von Göttern abstammst, von Gothen oder vom Kote

So seid ihr Götterbilder auch zu Staub.
Thou who art born of the gods, of the Goths,

or of the mud.
Thus are thy god-like images even dust.
I realise that this digression on the misuse of names was intended merely to justify this
complaint. But here let us stop . . . The purchase at Spalato reminds me of another
purchase at Cattaro, where I was too cautious, and missed the opportunity of making an

excellent bargain. (Missing an opportunity at the breast of the wet-nurse; see above.) One
of the dream-thoughts occasioned by the sensation of hunger really amounts to this: We
should let nothing escape; we should take what we can get, even if we do a little wrong;
we should never let an opportunity go by; life is so short, and death inevitable. Because
this is meant even sexually, and because desire is unwilling to check itself before the
thought of doing wrong, this philosophy of carpe diem has reason to fear the censorship,
and must conceal itself behind a dream. And so all sorts of counter-thoughts find
expression, with recollections of the time when spiritual nourishment alone was
sufficient for the dreamer, with hindrances of every kind and even threats of disgusting
sexual punishments.
II. A second dream requires a longer preliminary statement:
I had driven to the Western Station in order to start on a holiday trip to the Aussee, but I
went on to the platform in time for the Ischl train, which leaves earlier. There I saw
Count Thun, who was again going to see the Emperor at Ischl. In spite of the rain he
arrived in an open carriage, came straight through the entrance-gate for the local trains,
and with a curt gesture and not a word of explanation he waved back the gatekeeper, who
did not know him and wanted to take his ticket. After he had left in the Ischl train, I was
asked to leave the platform and return to the waiting-room; but after some difficulty I
obtained permission to remain. I passed the time noting how many people bribed the
officials to secure a compartment; I fully intended to make a complaint -- that is, to
demand the same privilege. Meanwhile I sang something to myself, which I afterwards
recognised as the aria from The Marriage of Figaro:
If my lord Count would tread a measure, tread a measure,

Let him but say his pleasure,
And I will play the tune.
(Possibly another person would not have recognised the tune.)
The whole evening I was in a high-spirited, pugnacious mood: I chaffed the waiter and
the cab-driver, I hope without hurting their feelings; and now all kinds of bold and
revolutionary thought came into my mind, such as would fit themselves to the words of
Figaro, and to memories of Beaumarchais' comedy, of which I had seen a performance at
the Comédie Française. The speech about the great men who have taken the trouble to be
born; the seigneurial right which Count Almaviva wishes to exercise with regard to
Susanne; the jokes which our malicious Opposition journalists make on the name of
Count Thun (German, thun = do); calling him Graf Nichtsthun, Count Do-Nothing. I
really do not envy him; he now has a difficult audience with the Emperor before him, and
it is I who am the real Count Do-Nothing, for I am going off for a holiday. I make all
sorts of amusing plans for the vacation. Now a gentleman arrives whom I know as a
Government representative at the medical examinations, and who has won the flattering
nickname of `the Governmental bedfellow' (literally, `by-sleeper') by his activities in this
capacity. By insisting on his official status he secured half a first-class compartment, and
I heard one guard say to another: `Where are we going to put the gentleman with the first-

class half-compartment?' A pretty sort of favouritism! I am paying for a whole first-class

compartment. I did actually get a whole compartment to myself, but not in a through
carriage, so there was no lavatory at my disposal during the night. My complaints to the
guard were fruitless; I revenged myself by suggesting that at least a hole be made in the
floor of this compartment, to serve the possible needs of passengers. At a quarter to three
in the morning I wake, with an urgent desire to urinate, from the following dream:
A crowd, a students' meeting . . . A certain Count (Thun or Taaffe) is making a speech.

Being asked to say something about the Germans, he declares, with a contemptuous
gesture, that their favourite flower is coltsfoot, and he then puts into his buttonhole
something like a torn leaf, really the crumpled skeleton of a leaf. I jump up, and I jump
up,12 but I am surprised at my implied attitude. Then, more indistinctly: It seems as
though this were the vestibule (Aula); the exits are thronged, and one must escape. I
make my way through a suite of handsomely appointed rooms, evidently ministerial
apartments; with furniture of a colour between brown and violet, and at last I come to a
corridor in which a housekeeper, a fat, elderly woman, is seated. I try to avoid speaking
to her, but she apparently thinks I have a right to pass this way, because she asks whether
she shall accompany me with the lamp. I indicate with a gesture, or tell her, that she is to
remain standing on the stairs, and it seems to me that I am very clever, for after all I am
evading detection. Now I am downstairs, and I find a narrow, steeply rising path, which I
follow.
Again indistinctly: It is as though my second task were to get away from the city, just as
my first was to get out of the building. I am riding in a one-horse cab, and I tell the driver
to take me to a railway station. Ì can't drive with you on the railway line itself,' I say,
when he reproaches me as though I had tired him out. Here it seems as though I had
already made a journey in his cab which is usually made by rail. The stations are
crowded; I am wondering whether to go to Krems or to Znaim, but I reflect that the Court
will be there, and I decide in favour of Graz or some such place. Now I am seated in the
railway carriage, which is rather like a tram, and I have in my buttonhole a peculiar long
braided thing, on which are violet-brown violets of stiff material, which makes a great
impression on people. Here the scene breaks off.
I am once more in front of the railway station, but I am in the company of an elderly
gentleman. I think out a scheme for remaining unrecognised, but I see this plan already
being carried out. Thinking and experiencing are here, as it were, the same thing. He
pretends to be blind, at least in one eye, and I hold before him a male glass urinal (which
we have to buy in the city, or have bought). I am thus a sick-nurse, and have to give him
the urinal because he is blind. If the conductor sees us in this position, he must pass us by
without drawing attention to us. At the same time the position of the elderly man, and his
urinating organ, is plastically perceived. Then I wake with a desire to urinate.
The whole dream seems a sort of fantasy, which takes the dreamer back to the year of
revolution, 1848, the memory of which had been revived by the jubilee of 1898, as well
as by a little excursion to Wachau, on which I visited Emmersdorf, the refuge of the
student leader Fischof, 13 to whom several features of the manifest dream-content might

refer. The association of ideas then leads me to England, to the house of my brother, who
used in jest to twit his wife with the title of Tennyson's poem Fifty Years Ago, whereupon
the children were used to correct him: Fifteen Years Ago. This fantasy, however, which
attaches itself to the thoughts evoked by the sight of Count Thun, is, like the facade of an
Italian church, without organic connection with the structure behind it, but unlike such a
facade it is full of gaps, and confused, and in many places portions of the interior break
through. The first situation of the dream is made up of a number of scenes, into which I
am able to dissect it. The arrogant attitude of the Count in the dream is copied from a
scene at my school which occurred in my fifteenth year. We had hatched a conspiracy
against an unpopular and ignorant teacher; the leading spirit in this conspiracy was a
schoolmate who since that time seems to have taken Henry VIII of England as his model.
It fell to me to carry out the coup d'état, and a discussion of the importance of the Danube
(German, Donau) to Austria (Wachau!) was the occasion of an open revolt. One of our
fellow-conspirators was our only aristocratic schoolmate -- he was called `the giraffe' on
account of his conspicuous height -- and while he was being reprimanded by the tyrant of
the school, the professor of the German language, he stood just as the Count stood in the
dream. The explanation of the favourite flower, and the putting into a buttonhole of
something that must have been a flower (which recalls the orchids which I had given that
day to a friend, and also a rose of Jericho) prominently recalls the incident in
Shakespeare's historical play which opens the civil wars of the Red and the White Roses;
the mention of Henry VIII has paved the way to this reminiscence. Now it is not very far
from roses to red and white carnations. (Meanwhile two little rhymes, the one German,
the other Spanish, insinuate themselves into the analysis: Rosen, Tulpen, Nelken, alle
Blumen welken, and Isabelita, no llores, que se marchitan las flores. The Spanish line
occurs in Figaro.) Here in Vienna white carnations have become the badge of the anti-
Semites, red ones of the Social Democrats. Behind this is the recollection of an anti-
Semitic challenge during a railway journey in beautiful Saxony (Anglo-Saxon). The third
scene contributing to the formation of the first situation in the dream dates from my early
student days. There was a debate in a German students' club about the relation of
philosophy to the general sciences. Being a green youth, full of materialistic doctrines, I
thrust myself forward in order to defend an extremely one-sided position. Thereupon a
sagacious older fellow-student, who has since then shown his capacity for leading men
and organising the masses, and who, moreover, bears a name belonging to the animal
kingdom, rose and gave us a thorough dressing-down; he too, he said, had herded swine
in his youth, and had then returned repentant to his father's house. I jumped up (as in the
dream), became piggishly rude, and retorted that since I knew he had herded swine, I was
not surprised at the tone of his discourse. (In the dream I am surprised at my German
Nationalistic feelings.) There was a great commotion, and an almost general demand that
I should retract my words, but I stood my ground. The insulted student was too sensible
to take the advice which was offered him, that he should send me a challenge, and let the
matter drop.
The remaining elements of this scene of the dream are of more remote origin. What does
it mean that the Count should make a scornful reference to coltsfoot? Here I must
question my train of associations. Coltsfoot (German: Huflattich), Lattice (lettuce),
Salathund (the dog that grudges others what he cannot eat himself). Here plenty of

opprobrious epithets may be discerned: Gir-affe (German: Affe = monkey, ape), pig, sow,
dog; I might even arrive, by way of the name, at donkey, and thereby pour contempt upon
an academic professor. Furthermore, I translate coltsfoot (Huflattich) -- I do not know
whether I do so correctly -- by pisseen-lit. I get this idea from Zola's Germinal, in which
some children are told to bring some dandelion salad with them. The dog -- chien -- has a
name sounding not unlike the verb for the major function (chien, as pisser stands for the
minor one). Now we shall soon have the indecent in all its three physical categories, for
in the same Germinal, which deals with the future revolution, there is a description of a
very peculiar contest, which relates to the production of the gaseous excretions known as
flatus.14 And now I cannot but observe how the way to this flatus has been prepared a
long while since, beginning with the flowers, and proceeding to the Spanish rhyme of
Isabelita, to Ferdinand and Isabella, and, by way of Henry VIII, to English history at the
time of the Armada, after the victorious termination of which the English struck a medal
with the inscription: Flavit et dissipati sunt, for the storm had scattered the Spanish
fleet.15 I had thought of using this phrase, half jestingly, as the title of a chapter on
`Therapy', if I should ever succeed in giving a detailed account of my conception and
treatment of hysteria.
I cannot give so detailed an interpretation of the second scene of the dream, out of sheer
regard for the censorship. For at this point I put myself in the place of a certain eminent
gentleman of the revolutionary period, who had an adventure with an eagle (German:
Adler) and who is said to have suffered from incontinence of the bowels, incontinentia
alvi, etc.; and here I believe that I should not be justified in passing the censorship, even
though it was an aulic councillor (aula, consiliarius aulicus) who told me the greater part
of this history. The suite of rooms in the dream is suggested by his Excellency's private
saloon carriage, into which I was able to glance; but it means, as it so often does in
dreams, a woman (Frauenzimmer: German Zimmer -- room, is appended to Frauen --
woman, in order to imply a slight contempt).16 The personality of the housekeeper is an
ungrateful allusion to a witty old lady, which ill repays her for the good times and the
many good stories which I have enjoyed in her house. The incident of the lamp goes back
to Grillparzer, who notes a charming experience of a similar nature, of which he
afterwards made use in Hero and Leander (the waves of the sea and of love -- the
Armada and the storm).
I must forego a detailed analysis of the two remaining portions of the dream; I shall
single out only those elements which lead me back to the two scenes of my childhood for
the sake of which alone I have selected the dream. The reader will rightly assume that it
is sexual material which necessitates the suppression; but he may not be content with this
explanation. There are many things of which one makes no secret to oneself, but which
must be treated as secrets in addressing others, and here we are concerned not with the
reasons which induce me to conceal the solution, but with the motive of the inner
censorship which conceals the real content of the dream even from myself. Concerning
this, I will confess that the analysis reveals these three portions of the dream as
impertinent boasting, the exuberance of an absurd megalomania, long ago suppressed in
my waking life, which, however, dares to show itself, with individual ramifications, even
in the manifest dream-content (it seems to me that I am a cunning fellow), making the

high-spirited mood of the evening before the dream perfectly intelligible. Boasting of
every kind, indeed; thus, the mention of Graz points to the phrase: `What price Graz?'
which one is wont to use when one feels unusually wealthy. Readers who recall Master
Rabelais's inimitable description of the life and deeds of Gargantua and his son
Pantagruel will be able to enrol even the suggested content of the first portion of the
dream among the boasts to which I have alluded. But the following belongs to the two
scenes of childhood of which I have spoken: I had bought a new trunk for this journey,
the colour of which, a brownish violet, appears in the dream several times (violet-brown
violets of a stiff cloth, on an object which is known as a `girl-catcher' -- the furniture in
the ministerial chambers). Children, we know, believe that one attracts people's attention
with anything new. Now I have been told of the following incident of my childhood; my
recollection of the occurrence itself has been replaced by my recollection of the story. I
am told that at the age of two I still used occasionally to wet my bed, and that when I was
reproved for doing so I consoled my father by promising to buy him a beautiful new red
bed in N. (the nearest large town). Hence, the interpolation in the dream, that we had
bought the urinal in the city or had to buy it; one must keep one's promises. (One should
note, moreover, the association of the male urinal and the woman's trunk, box.) All the
megalomania of the child is contained in this promise. The significance of dreams of
urinary difficulties in the case of children has already been considered in the
interpretation of an earlier dream (cf. the dream on p.73 ff.). The psychoanalysis of
neurotics has taught us to recognise the intimate connection between wetting the bed and
the character trait of ambition.
Then, when I was seven or eight years of age another domestic incident occurred which I
remember very well. One evening, before going to bed, I had disregarded the dictates of
discretion, and had satisfied my needs in my parents' bedroom, and in their presence.
Reprimanding me for this delinquency, my father remarked: `That boy will never amount
to anything.' This must have been a terrible affront to my ambition, for allusions to this
scene recur again and again in my dreams, and are constantly coupled with enumerations
of my accomplishments and successes, as though I wanted to say: `You see, I have
amounted to something after all.' This childish scene furnishes the elements for the last
image of the dream, in which the roles are interchanged, of course for the purpose of
revenge. The elderly man, obviously my father, for the blindness in one eye signifies his
one-sided glaucoma,17 is now urinating before me as I once urinated before him. By
means of the glaucoma I remind my father of cocaine, which stood him in good stead
during his operation, as though I had thereby fulfilled my promise. Besides, I make sport
of him; since he is blind, I must hold the glass in front of him, and I delight in allusions to
my knowledge of the theory of hysteria, of which I am proud.18
If the two childish scenes of urination are, according to my theory, closely associated
with the desire for greatness, their resuscitation on the journey to the Aussee was further
favoured by the accidental circumstance that my compartment had no lavatory, and that I
must be prepared to postpone relief during the journey, as actually happened in the
morning when I woke with the sensation of a bodily need. I suppose one might be
inclined to credit this sensation with being the actual stimulus of the dream; I should,
however, prefer a different explanation, namely, that the dream-thoughts first gave rise to

the desire to urinate. It is quite unusual for me to be disturbed in sleep by any physical
need, least of all at the time when I woke on this occasion -- a quarter to four in the
morning. I would forestall a further objection by remarking that I have hardly ever felt a
desire to urinate after waking early on other journeys made under more comfortable
circumstances. However, I can leave this point undecided without weakening my
argument.
Further, since experience in dream-analysis has drawn my attention to the fact that even
from dreams the interpretation of which seems at first sight complete, because the dream-
sources and the wish-stimuli are easily demonstrable, important trains of thought proceed
which reach back into the earliest years of childhood, I had to ask myself whether this
characteristic does not even constitute an essential condition of dreaming. If it were
permissible to generalise this notion, I should say that every dream is connected through
its manifest content with recent experiences, while through its latent content it is
connected with the most remote experiences; and I can actually show in the analysis of
hysteria that these remote experiences have in a very real sense remained recent right up
to the present. But I still find it very difficult to prove this conjecture; I shall have to
return to the probable role in dream-formation of the earliest experiences of our
childhood in another connection (Chapter Seven).
Of the three peculiarities of the dream-memory considered above, one -- the preference
for the unimportant in the dream-content -- has been satisfactorily explained by tracing it
back to dream-distortion. We have succeeded in establishing the existence of the other
two peculiarities -- the preferential selection of recent and also of infantile material -- but
we have found it impossible to derive them from the motives of the dream. Let us keep in
mind these two characteristics, which we still have to explain or evaluate; a place will
have to be found for them elsewhere, either in the discussion of the psychology of the
sleeping state or in the consideration of the structure of the psychic apparatus -- which we
shall undertake later after we have seen that by means of dream-interpretation we are able
to glance as through an inspection-hole into the interior of this apparatus.
But here and now I will emphasise another result of the last few dream-analyses. The
dream often appears to have several meanings; not only may several wish-fulfilments be
combined in it, as our examples show, but one meaning or one wish-fulfilment may
conceal another, until in the lowest stratum one comes upon the fulfilment of a wish from
the earliest period of childhood; and here again it may be questioned whether the word
òften' at the beginning of this sentence may not more correctly be replaced by
`constantly'.19
1
I long ago learned that the fulfilment of such wishes only called for a little courage, and
I then became a zealous pilgrim to Rome.
2
The writer in whose works I found this passage was probably Jean Paul Richter.
3
In the first edition of this book I gave here the name `Hasdrubal', an amazing error,
which I explained in my Psychopathology of Everyday Life.

4
The Jewish descent of the Marshal is somewhat doubtful.
5
[In the original this paragraph contains many plays on the word Hetz (hurry chase,
scurry, game, etc.) -- TRANS.]
6
[This word is here used in the psychoanalytical sense. -- TRANS.]
7
[a street in Vienna -- TRANS.]
8
[Fensterln is the custom, now falling into disuse, found in rural districts of the German
Schwarzwald, of lovers who woo their sweethearts at their bedroom windows, to which
they ascend by means of a ladder, enjoying such intimacy that the relation practically
amounts to a trial marriage. The reputation of the young woman never suffers on account
of Fensterln unless she becomes intimate with too many suitors. -- TRANS.]
9
Both the affects pertaining to these childish scenes -- astonishment and resignation to the
inevitable -- appeared in a dream of slightly earlier date, which first reminded me of this
incident of my childhood.
10
I do not bring in the plagiostomi arbitrarily; they recall a painful incident of disgrace
before the same teacher.
11
Popo = backside, in German nursery language.
12
This repetition has crept into the text of the dream, apparently through absent-
mindedness, and I have left it because analysis shows that it has a meaning.
13
This is an error and not a slip, for I learned later that the Emmersdorf in Wachau is not
identical with the refuge of the revolutionist Fischof, a place of the same name.
14
Not in Germinal, but in La Terre -- a mistake of which I became aware only in the
analysis. -- Here I would call attention to the identity of letters in Huflattich and Flatus.
15
An unsolicited biographer, Dr F. Wittels, reproaches me for having omitted the name of
Jehovah from the above motto. The English medal contains the name of the Deity, in
Hebrew letters, on the background of a cloud, and placed in such a manner that one may
equally well regard it as part of the picture or as part of the inscription.
16
[translator's note]
17
Another interpretation: He is one-eyed like Odin, the father of the gods -- Odin's
consolation. The consolation in the childish scene: I will buy him a new bed.
18
Here is some more material for interpretation: Holding the urine-glass recalls the story
of a peasant (illiterate) at the optician's, who tried on now one pair of spectacles, now
another, but was still unable to read. -- (Peasant-catcher-girl-catcher in the preceding

portion of the dream.) -- The peasants' treatment of the feeble-minded father in Zola's La
Terre. -- The tragic atonement, that in his last days my father soiled his bed like a child;
hence, I am his nurse in the dream. -- `Thinking and experiencing are here, as it were,
identical'; this recalls a highly revolutionary closet drama by Oscar Panizza, in which
God, the Father, is ignominiously treated as a palsied greybeard. With Him will and deed
are one, and in the book he has to be restrained by His archangel, a sort of Ganymede,
from scolding and swearing, because His curses would immediately be fulfilled. --
Making plans is a reproach against my father, dating from a later period in the
development of the critical faculty, much as the whole rebellious content of the dream,
which commits lèse majesté and scorns authority, may be traced to a revolt against my
father. The sovereign is called the father of his country (Landesvater), and the father is
the first and oldest, and for the child the only authority, from whose absolutism the other
social authorities have evolved in the course of the history of human civilisation (in so far
as `mother-right' does not necessitate a qualification of this doctrine). -- The words which
occurred to me in the dream, `thinking and experiencing are the same thing,' refer to the
explanation of hysterical symptoms with which the male urinal (glass) is also associated.
-- I need not explain the principle of Gschnas to a Viennese; it consists in constructing
objects of rare and costly appearance out of trivial, and preferably comical and worthless
material -- for example, making suits of armour out of kitchen utensils, wisps of straw
and Salzstangeln (long rolls), as our artists are fond of doing at their jolly parties. I had
learned that hysterical subjects do the same thing; besides what really happens to them,
they unconsciously conceive for themselves horrible or extravagantly fantastic incidents,
which they build up out of the most harmless and commonplace material of actual
experience. The symptoms attach themselves primarily to these fantasies, not to the
memory of real events, whether serious or trivial. This explanation had helped me to
overcome many difficulties, and afforded me much pleasure. I was able to allude to it by
means of the dream-element `male urine-glass', because I had been told that at the last
Gschnas evening a position-chalice of Lucretia Borgia's had been exhibited, the chief
constituent of which had consisted of a glass urinal for men, such as is used in hospitals.
19
The stratification of the meanings of dreams is one of the most delicate but also one of
the most fruitful problems of dream-interpretation. Whoever forgets the possibility of
such stratification is likely to go astray and to make untenable assertions concerning the
nature of dreams. But hitherto this subject has been only too imperfectly investigated. So
far, a fairly orderly stratification of symbols in dreams due to urinary stimulus has been
subjected to a thorough evaluation only by Otto Rank.

C -- THE SOMATIC SOURCES OF DREAMS
If we attempt to interest a cultured layman in the problems of dreams, and if, with this
end in view, we ask him what he believes to be the source of dreams, we shall generally
find that he feels quite sure he knows at least this part of the solution. He thinks
immediately of the influence exercised on the formation of dreams by a disturbed or
impeded digestion (`Dreams come from the stomach'), an accidental position of the body,
a trifling occurrence during sleep. He does not seem to suspect that even after all these
factors have been duly considered something still remains to be explained.
In the introductory chapter1 we examined at length the opinion of scientific writers on the
role of somatic stimuli in the formation of dreams, so that here we need only recall the
results of this inquiry. We have seen that three kinds of somatic stimuli will be
distinguished: the objective sensory stimuli which proceed from external objects, the
inner states of excitation of the sensory organs, having only a subjective reality, and the
bodily stimuli arising within the body; and we have also noticed that the writers on
dreams are inclined to thrust into the background any psychic sources of dreams which
may operate simultaneously with the somatic stimuli, or to exclude them altogether. In
testing the claims made on behalf of these somatic stimuli we have learned that the
significance of the objective excitation of the sensory organs -- whether accidental stimuli
operating during sleep, or such as cannot be excluded from the dormant relation of these
dream-images and ideas to the internal bodily stimuli -- has been observed and confirmed
by experiment; that the part played by the subjective sensory stimuli appears to be
demonstrated by the recurrence of hypnagogic sensory images in dreams; and that,
although the broadly accepted relation of these dream-images and ideas to the internal
bodily stimuli cannot be exhaustively demonstrated, it is at all events confirmed by the
well-known influence which an excited state of the digestive, urinary and sexual organs
exercises upon the content of our dreams.
`Nerve stimulus' and `bodily stimulus' would thus be the anatomical sources of dreams;
that is, according to many writers, the sole and exclusive sources of dreams.
But we have already considered a number of doubtful points, which seem to question not
so much the correctness of the somatic theory as its adequacy.
However confident the representatives of this theory may be of its factual basis --
especially in respect of the accidental and external nerve-stimuli, which may without
difficulty be recognised in the dream-content -- nevertheless they have all come near to
admitting that the rich content of ideas found in dreams cannot be derived from the
external nerve-stimuli alone. In this connection Miss Mary Whiton Calkins tested her
own dreams, and those of a second person, for a period of six weeks, and found that the
element of external sensory perception was demonstrable in only 13.2 per cent and 6.7
per cent of these dreams respectively. Only two dreams in the whole collection could be
referred to organic sensations. These statistics confirm what a cursory survey of our own
experience would already have led us to suspect.

A distinction has often been made between `nerve-stimulus dreams' which have already
been thoroughly investigated, and other forms of dreams. Spitta, for example, divided
dreams into nerve-stimulus dreams and association-dreams. But it was obvious that this
solution remained unsatisfactory unless the link between the somatic sources of dreams
and their ideational content could be indicated.
In addition to the first objection, that of the insufficient frequency of the external sources
of stimulus, a second objection presents itself, namely, the inadequacy of the
explanations of dreams afforded by this category of dream-sources. There are two things
which the representatives of this theory have failed to explain: firstly, why the true nature
of the external stimulus is not recognised in the dream, but is constantly mistaken for
something else; and secondly, why the result of the reaction of the perceiving mind to this
misconceived stimulus should be so indeterminate and variable. We have seen that
Strümpell, in answer to these questions, asserts that the mind, since it turns away from the
outer world during sleep, is not in a position to give the correct interpretation of the
objective sensory stimulus, but is forced to construct illusions on the basis of the
indefinite stimulation arriving from many directions. In his own words (Die Natur und
Entstehung der Träume, p. 108):
When by an external or internal nerve-stimulus during sleep a feeling, or a

complex of feelings, or any sort of psychic process arises in the mind, and
is perceived by the mind, this process calls up from the mind perceptual
images belonging to the sphere of the waking experiences, that is to say,
earlier perceptions, either unembellished, or with the psychic values
appertaining to them. It collects about itself, as it were, a greater or lesser
number of such images, from which the impression resulting from the
nerve-stimulus receives its psychic value. In this connection it is
commonly said, as in ordinary language we say of the waking procedure,
that the mind interprets in sleep the impressions of nervous stimuli. The
result of this interpretation is the so-called nerve-stimulus dream -- that is,
a dream the components of which are conditioned by the fact that a nerve-
stimulus produces its psychical effect in the life of the mind in accordance
with the laws of reproduction.
In all essential points identical with this doctrine is Wundt's statement that the concepts
of dreams proceed, at all events for the most part, from sensory stimuli, and especially
from the stimuli of general sensation, and are therefore mostly fantastic illusions --
probably only to a small extent pure memory-conceptions raised to the condition of
hallucinations. To illustrate the relation between dream-content and dream-stimuli which
follows from this theory, Strümpell makes use of an excellent simile. It is às though the
ten fingers of a person ignorant of music were to stray over the keyboard of an
instrument.' The implication is that the dream is not a psychic phenomenon, originating
from psychic motives, but the result of a physiological stimulus, which expresses itself in
psychic symptomatology because the apparatus affected by the stimulus is not capable of
any other mode of expression. Upon a similar assumption is based the explanation of

obsessions which Meynert attempted in his famous simile of the dial on which individual
figures are most deeply embossed.
Popular though this theory of the somatic dream-stimuli has become, and seductive
though it may seem, it is none the less easy to detect its weak point. Every somatic
dream-stimulus which provokes the psychic apparatus in sleep to interpretation by the
formation of illusions may evoke an incalculable number of such attempts at
interpretation. It may consequently be represented in the dream-content by an
extraordinary number of different concepts.2 But the theory of Strümpell and Wundt
cannot point to any sort of motive which controls the relation between the external
stimulus and the dream-concept chosen to interpret it, and therefore it cannot explain the
`peculiar choice' which the stimuli òften enough make in the course of their productive
activity' (Lipps, Grundtatsachen des Seelenlebens, p. 170). Other objections may be
raised against the fundamental assumption behind the theory of illusions -- the
assumption that during sleep the mind is not in a condition to recognise the real nature of
the objective sensory stimuli. The old physiologist Burdach shows us that the mind is
quite capable even during sleep of a correct interpretation of the sensory impressions
which reach it, and of reacting in accordance with this correct interpretation, inasmuch as
he demonstrates that certain sensory impressions which seem important to the individual
may be excepted from the general neglect of the sleeping mind (as in the example of
nurse and child), and that one is more surely awakened by one's own name than by an
indifferent auditory impression; all of which presupposes, of course, that the mind
discriminates between sensations, even in sleep. Burdach infers from these observations
that we must not assume that the mind is incapable of interpreting sensory stimuli in the
sleeping state, but rather that it is not sufficiently interested in them. The arguments
which Burdach employed in 1830 reappear unchanged in the works of Lipps (in the year
1883), where they are employed for the purpose of attacking the theory of somatic
stimuli. According to these arguments the mind seems to be like the sleeper in the
anecdote, who, on being asked; Àre you asleep?' answers `No', and on being again
addressed with the words: `Then lend me ten florins', takes refuge in the excuse: Ì am
asleep.'
The inadequacy of the theory of somatic dream-stimuli may be further demonstrated in

another way. Observation shows that external stimuli do not oblige me to dream, even
though these stimuli appear in the dream-content as soon as I begin to dream -- supposing
that I do dream. In response to a touch- or pressure-stimulus experienced while I am
asleep, a variety of reactions are at my disposal. I may overlook it, and find on waking
that my leg has become uncovered, or that I have been lying on an arm; indeed,
pathology offers me a host of examples of powerfully exciting sensory and motor stimuli
of different kinds which remain ineffective during sleep. I may perceive the sensation
during sleep, and through my sleep, as it were, as constantly happens in the case of pain
stimuli, but without weaving the pain into the texture of a dream. And thirdly, I may
wake up in response to the stimulus, simply in order to avoid it. Still another, fourth,
reaction is possible: namely, that the nerve-stimulus may cause me to dream; but the
other possible reactions occur quite as frequently as the reaction of dream-formation.

This, however, would not be the case if the incentive to dreaming did not lie outside the
somatic dream-sources.
Appreciating the importance of the above-mentioned lacunae in the explanation of

dreams by somatic stimuli, other writers -- Scherner, for example, and, following him, the
philosopher Volkelt -- endeavoured to determine more precisely the nature of the psychic
activities which cause the many-coloured images of our dreams to proceed from the
somatic stimuli, and in so doing they approached the problem of the essential nature of
dreams as a problem of psychology, and regarded dreaming as a psychic activity.
Scherner not only gave a poetical, vivid and glowing description of the psychic
peculiarities which unfold themselves in the course of dream-formation, but he also
believed that he had hit upon the principle of the method the mind employs in dealing
with the stimuli which are offered to it. The dream, according to Scherner, in the free
activity of the fantasy, which has been released from the shackles imposed upon it during
the day, strives to represent symbolically the nature of the organ from which the stimulus
proceeds. Thus there exists a sort of dream-book, a guide to the interpretation of dreams,
by means of which bodily sensations, the conditions of the organs, and states of
stimulation, may be inferred from the dream-images. `Thus the image of a cat expressed
extreme ill-temper, the image of pale, smooth pastry the nudity of the body. The human
body as a whole is pictured by the fantasy of the dream as a house, and the individual
organs of the body as parts of the house. In ``toothache-dreams'' a vaulted vestibule
corresponds to the mouth, and a staircase to the descent from the pharynx to the
oesophagus; in the ``headache-dream'' a ceiling covered with disgusting toad-like spiders
is chosen to denote the upper part of the head.' `Many different symbols are employed by
our dreams for the same organ: thus the breathing lung finds its symbol in a roaring
stove, filled with flames, the heart in empty boxes and baskets, and the bladder in round,
bag-shaped or merely hollow objects. It is of particular significance that at the close of
the dream the stimulating organ or its function is often represented without disguise, and
usually on the dreamer`s own body. Thus the ``toothache-dream'' commonly ends by the
dreamer drawing a tooth out of his mouth.' It cannot be said that this theory of dream-
interpretation has found much favour with other writers. It seems, above all, extravagant;
and so Scherner`s readers have hesistated to give it even the small amount of credit to
which it is, in my opinion, entitled. As will be seen, it tends to a revival of dream-
interpretation by means of symbolism, a method employed by the ancients; only the
province from which the interpretation is to be derived is restricted to the human body.
The lack of a scientifically comprehensible technique of interpretation must seriously
limit the applicability of Scherner's theory. Arbitrariness in the interpretation of dreams
would appear to be by no means excluded, especially since in this case also a stimulus
may be expressed in the dream-content by several representative symbols; thus even
Scherner's follower Volkelt was unable to confirm the representation of the body as a
house. Another objection is that here again the dream-activity is regarded as a useless and
aimless activity of the mind, since, according to this theory, the mind is content with
merely forming fantasies around the stimulus with which it is dealing, without even
remotely attempting to abolish the stimulus.

Scherner's theory of the symbolisation of bodily stimuli by the dream is seriously

damaged by yet another objection. These bodily stimuli are present at all times, and it is
generally assumed that the mind is more accessible to them during sleep than in the
waking state. It is therefore impossible to understand why the mind does not dream
continuously all night long, and why it does not dream every night about all the organs. If
one attempts to evade this objection by positing the condition that special excitations
must proceed from the eye, the ear, the teeth, the bowels, etc., in order to arouse the
dream-activity, one is confronted with the difficulty of proving that this increase of
stimulation is objective; and proof is possible only in a very few cases. If the dream of
flying is a symbolisation of the upward and downward motion of the pulmonary lobes,
either this dream, as has already been remarked by Strümpell, should be dreamt much
oftener, or it should be possible to show that respiration is more active during this dream.
Yet a third alternative is possible -- and it is the most probable of all -- namely, that now
and again special motives are operative to direct the attention to the visceral sensations
which are constantly present. But this would take us far beyond the scope of Scherner's
theory.
The value of Scherner's and Volkelt's disquisitions resides in their calling our attention to
a number of characteristics of the dream-content which are in need of explanation, and
which seem to promise fresh discoveries. It is quite true that symbolisations of the bodily
organs and functions do occur in dreams: for example, that water in a dream often
signifies a desire to urinate, that the male genital organ may be represented by an upright
staff, or a pillar, etc. With dreams which exhibit a very animated field of vision and
brilliant colours, in contrast to the dimness of other dreams, the interpretation that they
are `dreams due to visual stimulation' can hardly be dismissed, nor can we dispute the
participation of illusion-formation in dreams which contain noise and a medley of voices.
A dream like that of Scherner's, that two rows of fair handsome boys stood facing one
another on a bridge, attacking one another, and then resuming their positions, until finally
the dreamer himself sat down on a bridge and drew a long tooth from his jaw; or a similar
dream of Volkelt's, in which two rows of drawers played a part, and which again ended in
the extraction of a tooth; dream-formations of this kind, of which both writers relate a
great number, forbid our dismissing Scherner's theory as an idle invention without
seeking the kernel of truth which may be contained in it. We are therefore confronted
with the task of finding a different explanation of the supposed symbolisation of the
alleged dental stimulus.
Throughout our consideration of the theory of the somatic sources of dreams, I have
refrained from urging the argument which arises from our analyses of dreams. If by a
procedure which has not been followed by other writers in their investigation of dreams
we can prove that the dream possesses intrinsic value as psychic action, that a wish
supplies the motive of its formation, and that the experiences of the previous day furnish
the most obvious material of its content, any other theory of dreams which neglects such
an important method of investigation -- and accordingly makes the dream appear a
useless and enigmatical psychic reaction to somatic stimuli -- may be dismissed without
special criticism. For in this case there would have to be -- and this is highly improbable -
- two entirely different kinds of dreams, of which only one kind has come under our

observation, while the other kind alone has been observed by the earlier investigators. It
only remains now to find a place in our theory of dreams for the facts on which the
current doctrine of somatic dream-stimuli is based.
We have already taken the first step in this direction in advancing the thesis that the
dream-work is under a compulsion to elaborate into a unified whole all the dream-stimuli
which are simultaneously present (p. 83). We have seen that when two or more
experiences capable of making an impression on the mind have been left over from the
previous day, the wishes that result from them are united into one dream; similarly, that
the impressions possessing psychic value and the indifferent experiences of the previous
day unite in the dream-material, provided that connecting ideas between the two can be
established. Thus the dream appears to be a reaction to everything which is
simultaneously present as actual in the sleeping mind. As far as we have hitherto
analysed the dream-material, we have discovered it to be a collection of psychic remnants
and memory-traces, which we were obliged to credit (on account of the preference shown
for recent and for infantile material) with a character of psychological actuality, though
the nature of this actuality was not at the time determinable. We shall now have little
difficulty in predicting what will happen when to these actualities of the memory fresh
material in the form of sensations is added during sleep. These stimuli, again, are of
importance to the dream because they are actual; they are united with the other psychic
actualities to provide the material for dream-formation. To express it in other words, the
stimuli which occur during sleep are elaborated into a wish-fulfilment, of which the other
components are the psychic remnants of daily experience with which we are already
familiar. This combination, however, is not inevitable; we have seen that more than one
kind of behaviour toward the physical stimuli received during sleep is possible. Where
this combination is effected, a conceptual material for the dream-content has been found
which will represent both kinds of dream-sources, the somatic as well as the psychic.
The nature of the dream is not altered when somatic material is added to the psychic
dream-sources; it still remains a wish-fulfilment, no matter how its expression is
determined by the actual material available.
I should like to find room here for a number of peculiarities which are able to modify the
significance of external stimuli for the dream. I imagine that a co-operation of individual,
physiological and accidental factors, which depend on the circumstances of the moment,
determines how one will behave in individual cases of more intensive objective
stimulation during sleep; habitual or accidental profundity of sleep, in conjunction with
the intensity of the stimulus, will in one case make it possible so to suppress the stimulus
that it will not disturb the sleeper, while in another case it will force the sleeper to wake,
or will assist the attempt to subdue the stimulus by weaving it into the texture of the
dream. In accordance with the multiplicity of these constellations, external objective
stimuli will be expressed more rarely or more frequently in the case of one person than in
that of another. In my own case, since I am an excellent sleeper, and obstinately refuse to
allow myself to be disturbed during sleep on any pretext whatever, this intrusion of
external causes of excitation into my dreams is very rare, whereas psychic motives
apparently cause me to dream very easily. Indeed, I have noted only a single dream in

which an objective, painful source of stimulation is demonstrable, and it will be highly

instructive to see what effect the external stimulus had in this particular dream.
I am riding a grey horse, at first timidly and awkwardly, as though I were merely carried
along. Then I meet a colleague, P., also on horseback, and dressed in rough frieze; he is
sitting erect in the saddle; he calls my attention to something (probably to the fact that I
have a very bad seat). Now I begin to feel more and more at ease on the back of my
highly intelligent horse; I sit more comfortably, and I find that I am quite at home up
here. My saddle is a sort of pad, which completely fills the space between the neck and
the rump of the horse. I ride between two vans, and just manage to clear them. After
riding up the street for some distance, I turn round and wish to dismount, at first in front
of a little open chapel which is built facing onto the street. Then I do really dismount in
front of a chapel which stands near the first one; the hotel is in the same street; I might
let the horse go there by itself, but I prefer to lead it thither. It seems as though I should
be ashamed to arrive there on horseback. In front of the hotel there stands a page-boy,
who shows me a note of mine which has been found, and ridicules me on account of it.
On the note is written, doubly underlined, Èat nothing', and then a second sentence
(indistinct): something like `Do not work'; at the same time a hazy idea that I am in a
strange city, in which I do not work.
It will not at once be apparent that this dream originated under the influence, or rather
under the compulsion, of a pain-stimulus. The day before, however, I had suffered from
boils, which made every movement a torture, and at last a boil had grown to the size of an
apple at the root of the scrotum, and had caused me the most intolerable pains at every
step; a feverish lassitude, lack of appetite, and the hard work which I had nevertheless
done during the day, had conspired with the pain to upset me. I was not altogether in a
condition to discharge my duties as a physician, but in view of the nature and the location
of the malady, it was possible to imagine something else for which I was most of all
unfit, namely riding. Now it is this very activity of riding into which I am plunged by the
dream; it is the most energetic denial of the pain which imagination could conceive. As a
matter of fact, I cannot ride; I do not dream of doing so; I never sat on a horse but once
and then without a saddle -- and I did not like it. But in this dream I ride as though I had
no boil on the perineum; or rather, I ride, just because I want to have none. To judge
from the description, my saddle is the poultice which has enabled me to fall asleep.
Probably, being thus comforted, I did not feel anything of my pain during the first few
hours of my sleep. Then the painful sensations made themselves felt, and tried to wake
me; whereupon the dream came and said to me, soothingly: `Go on sleeping, you are not
going to wake! You have no boil, for you are riding on horseback, and with a boil just
there no one could ride!' And the dream was successful; the pain was stifled, and I went
on sleeping.
But the dream was not satisfied with `suggesting away' the boil by tenaciously holding
fast to an idea incompatible with the malady (thus behaving like the hallucinatory
insanity of a mother who has lost her child, or of a merchant who has lost his fortune). In
addition, the details of the sensation denied and of the image used to suppress it serve the
dream also as a means to connect other material actually present in the mind with the

situation in the dream, and to give this material representation. I am riding on a grey
horse -- the colour of the horse exactly corresponds with the pepper-and-salt suit in
which I last saw my colleague P. in the country. I have been warned that highly seasoned
food is the cause of boils, and in any case it is preferable as an etiological explanation to
sugar, which might be thought of in connection with furunculosis. My friend P. likes to
`ride the high horse' with me ever since he took my place in the treatment of a female
patient, in whose case I had performed great feats (Kunststücke: in the dream I sit the
horse at first sideways, like a trick-rider, Kunstreiter), but who really, like the horse in the
story of the Sunday equestrian, led me wherever she wished. Thus the horse comes to be
a symbolic representation of a lady patient (in the dream it is highly intelligent). Ì feel
quite at home' refers to the position which I occupied in the patient's household until I
was replaced by my colleague P. Ì thought you were safe in the saddle up there,' one of
my few well-wishers among the eminent physicians of the city recently said to me, with
reference to the same household. And it was a feat to practise psychotherapy for eight to
ten hours a day, while suffering such pain, but I know that I cannot continue my
peculiarly strenuous work for any length of time without perfect physical health, and the
dream is full of dismal allusions to the situation which would result if my illness
continued (the note, such as neurasthenics carry and show to their doctors). Do not work,
do not eat. On further interpretation I see that the dream-activity has succeeded in finding
its way from the wish-situation of riding to some very early childish quarrels which must
have occurred between myself and a nephew, who is a year older than I, and is now
living in England. It has also taken up elements from my journeys in Italy; the street in
the dream is built up out of impressions of Verona and Siena. A still deeper interpretation
leads to sexual dream-thoughts, and I recall what the dream-allusions to that beautiful
country were supposed to mean in the dream of a female patient who had never been to
Italy (to Italy, German: gen Italien = Genitalien = genitals); at the same time there are
references to the house in which I preceded my friend P. as physician, and to the place
where the boil is located.
In another dream I was similarly successful in warding off a threatened disturbance of my

sleep; this time the threat came from a sensory stimulus. It was only chance, however,
that enabled me to discover the connection between the dream and the accidental dream-
stimulus, and in this way to understand the dream. One midsummer morning in a
Tyrolese mountain resort I woke with the knowledge that I had dreamed: The Pope is
dead. I was not able to interpret this short, non-visual dream. I could remember only one
possible basis of the dream, namely, that shortly before this the newspapers had reported
that His Holiness was slightly indisposed. But in the course of the morning my wife
asked me: `Did you hear the dreadful tolling of the church bells this morning?' I had no
idea that I had heard it, but now I understood my dream. It was the reaction of my need
for sleep to the noise by which the pious Tyroleans were trying to wake me. I avenged
myself on them by the conclusion which formed the content of my dream, and continued
to sleep, without any further interest in the tolling of the bells.
Among the dreams mentioned in the previous chapters there are several which might
serve as examples of the elaboration of so-called nerve-stimuli. The dream of drinking in
long draughts is such an example; here the somatic stimulus seems to be the sole source

of the dream, and the wish arising from the sensation -- thirst -- the only motive for
dreaming. We find much the same thing in other simple dreams, where the somatic
stimulus is able of itself to generate a wish. The dream of the sick woman who throws the
cooling apparatus from her cheek at night is an instance of an unusual manner of reacting
to a pain-stimulus with a wish-fulfilment; it seems as though the patient had temporarily
succeeded in making herself analgesic, and accompanied this by ascribing her pains to a
stranger.
My dream of the three Parcae is obviously a hunger-dream, but it has contrived to shift
the need for food right back to the child's longing for its mother's breast, and to use a
harmless desire as a mask for a more serious one that cannot venture to express itself so
openly. In the dream of Count Thun we were able to see by what paths an accidental
physical need was brought into relation with the strongest, but also the most rigorously
repressed impulses of the psychic life. And when, as in the case reported by Garnier, the
First Consul incorporates the sound of an exploding infernal machine into a dream of
battle before it causes him to wake, the true purpose for which alone psychic activity
concerns itself with sensations during sleep is revealed with unusual clarity. A young
lawyer, who is full of his first great bankruptcy case, and falls asleep in the afternoon,
behaves just as the great Napoleon did. He dreams of a certain G. Reich in Hussiatyn,
whose acquaintance he has made in connection with the bankruptcy case, but Hussiatyn
(German: husten, to cough) forces itself upon his attention still further; he is obliged to
wake, only to hear his wife -- who is suffering from bronchial catarrh -- violently
coughing.
Let us compare the dream of Napoleon I -- who, incidentally, was an excellent sleeper --
with that of the sleepy student, who was awakened by his landlady with the reminder that
he had to go to the hospital, and who thereupon dreamt himself into a bed in the hospital,
and then slept on, the underlying reasoning being as follows: If I am already in the
hospital, I needn't get up to go there. This is obviously a convenience-dream; the sleeper
frankly admits to himself his motive in dreaming; but he thereby reveals one of the
secrets of dreaming in general. In a certain sense, all dreams are convenience-dreams;
they serve the purpose of continuing to sleep instead of waking. The dream is the
guardian of sleep, not its disturber. In another place we shall have occasion to justify this
conception in respect to the psychic factors that make for waking; but we can already
demonstrate its applicability to the objective external stimuli. Either the mind does not
concern itself at all with the causes of sensations during sleep, if it is able to carry this
attitude through as against the intensity of the stimuli, and their significance, of which it
is well aware; or it employs the dream to deny these stimuli; or, thirdly, if it is obliged to
recognise the stimuli, it seeks that interpretation of them which will represent the actual
sensation as a component of a desired situation which is compatible with sleep. The
actual sensation is woven into the dream in order to deprive it of its reality. Napoleon is
permitted to go on sleeping; it is only a dream-memory of the thunder of the guns at
Arcole which is trying to disturb him.3
The wish to sleep, to which the conscious ego has adjusted itself, and which (together
with the dream-censorship and the `secondary elaboration' to be mentioned later)

represents the ego's contribution to the dream, must thus always be taken into account as
a motive of dream-formation, and every successful dream is a fulfilment of this wish. The
relation of this general, constantly present, and unvarying sleep-wish to the other wishes
of which now one and now another is fulfilled by the dream-content, will be the subject
of later consideration. In the wish to sleep we have discovered a motive capable of
supplying the deficiency in the theory of Strümpell and Wundt, and of explaining the
perversity and capriciousness of the interpretation of the external stimulus. The correct
interpretation, of which the sleeping mind is perfectly capable, would involve active
interest, and would require the sleeper to wake; hence, of those interpretations which are
possible at all only such are admitted as are acceptable to the dictatorial censorship of the
sleep-wish. The logic of dream situations would run, for example: Ìt is the nightingale,
and not the lark'. For if it is the lark, love's night is at an end. From among the
interpretations of the stimulus which are thus admissible, that one is selected which can
secure the best connection with the wish-impulses that are lying in wait in the mind. Thus
everything is definitely determined, and nothing is left to caprice. The misinterpretation is
not an illusion, but -- if you will -- an excuse. Here again, as in substitution by
displacement in the service of the dream-censorship, we have an act of deflection of the
normal psychic procedure.
If the external nerve-stimuli and the inner bodily stimuli are sufficiently intense to
compel psychic attention, they represent -- that is, if they result in dreaming at all, and
not in waking -- a fixed point for dream-formation, a nucleus in the dream-material, for
which an appropriate wish-fulfilment is sought, just as (see above) mediating ideas
between two psychical dream-stimuli are sought. To this extent it is true of a number of
dreams that the somatic element dictates the dream-content. In this extreme case even a
wish that is not actually present may be aroused for the purpose of dream-formation. But
the dream cannot do otherwise than represent a wish in some situation as fulfilled; it is, as
it were, confronted with the task of discovering what wish can be represented as fulfilled
by the given sensation. Even if this given material is of a painful or disagreeable
character, yet it is not unserviceable for the purposes of dream-formation. The psychic
life has at its disposal even wishes whose fulfilment evokes displeasure, which seems a
contradiction, but becomes perfectly intelligible if we take into account the presence of
two sorts of psychic instance and the censorship that subsists between them.
In the psychic life there exist, as we have seen, repressed wishes, which belong to the
first system, and to whose fulfilment the second system is opposed. We do not mean this
in a historic sense -- that such wishes have once existed and have subsequently been
destroyed. The doctrine of repression, which we need in the study of psychoneuroses,
asserts that such repressed wishes still exist, but simultaneously with an inhibition which
weighs them down. Language has hit upon the truth when it speaks of the `suppression'
(sub-pression, or pushing under) of such impulses. The psychic mechanism which
enables such suppressed wishes to force their way to realisation is retained in being and
in working order. But if it happens that such a suppressed wish is fulfilled, the
vanquished inhibition of the second system (which is capable of consciousness) is then
expressed as discomfort. And, in order to conclude this argument: If sensations of a
disagreeable character which originate from somatic sources are present during sleep, this

constellation is utilised by the dream-activity to procure the fulfilment -- with more or

less maintenance of the censorship -- of an otherwise suppressed wish.
This state of affairs makes possible a certain number of anxiety-dreams, while others of
these dream-formations which are unfavourable to the wish-theory exhibit a different
mechanism. For the anxiety in dreams may of course be of a psychoneurotic character,
originating in psychosexual excitation, in which case, the anxiety corresponds to
repressed libido. Then this anxiety, like the whole anxiety-dream, has the significance of
a neurotic symptom, and we stand at the dividing-line where the wish-fulfilling tendency
of dreams is frustrated. But in other anxiety-dreams the feeling of anxiety comes from
somatic sources (as in the case of persons suffering from pulmonary or cardiac trouble,
with occasional difficulty in breathing), and then it is used to help such strongly
suppressed wishes to attain fulfilment in a dream, the dreaming of which from psychic
motives would have resulted in the same release of anxiety. It is not difficult to reconcile
these two apparently contradictory cases. When two psychic formations, an affective
inclination and a conceptual content, are intimately connected, either one being actually
present will evoke the other, even in a dream; now the anxiety of somatic origin evokes
the suppressed conceptual content, now it is the released conceptual content,
accompanied by sexual excitement, which causes the release of anxiety. In the one case it
may be said that a somatically determined affect is psychically interpreted; in the other
case all is of psychic origin, but the content which has been suppressed is easily replaced
by a somatic interpretation which fits the anxiety. The difficulties which lie in the way of
understanding all this have little to do with dreams; they are due to the fact that in
discussing these points we are touching upon the problems of the development of anxiety
and of repression.
The general aggregate of bodily sensation must undoubtedly be included among the
dominant dream-stimuli of internal bodily origin. Not that it is capable of supplying the
dream-content; but it forces the dream-thoughts to make a choice from the material
destined to serve the purpose of representation in the dream-content, inasmuch as it
brings within easy reach that part of the material which is adapted to its own character,
and holds the rest at a distance. Moreover, this general feeling, which survives from the
preceding day, is of course connected with the psychic residues that are significant for the
dream. Moreover, this feeling itself may be either maintained or overcome in the dream,
so that it may, if it is painful, veer round into its opposite.
If the somatic sources of excitation during sleep -- that is, the sensations of sleep -- are
not of unusual intensity, the part which they play in dream-formation is, in my judgment,
similar to that of those impressions of the day which are still recent, but of no great
significance. I mean that they are utilised for the dream-formation if they are of such a
kind that they can be united with the conceptual content of the psychic dream-source, but
not otherwise. They are treated as a cheap ever-ready material, which can be used
whenever it is needed, and not as valuable material which itself prescribes the manner in
which it must be utilised. I might suggest the analogy of a connoisseur giving an artist a
rare stone, a piece of onyx, for example, in order that it may be fashioned into a work of
art. Here the size of the stone, its colour, and its markings help to decide what head or

what scene shall be represented; while if he is dealing with a uniform and abundant
material such as marble or sandstone, the artist is guided only by the idea which takes
shape in his mind. Only in this way, it seems to me, can we explain the fact that the
dream-content furnished by physical stimuli of somatic origin which are not unusually
accentuated does not make its appearance in all dreams and every night.4
Perhaps an example which takes us back to the interpretation of dreams will best
illustrate my meaning. One day I was trying to understand the significance of the
sensation of being inhibited, of not being able to move from the spot, of not being able to
get something done, etc., which occurs so frequently in dreams, and is so closely allied to
anxiety. That night I had the following dream: I am very incompletely dressed, and I go
from a flat on the ground-floor up a flight of stairs to an upper story. In doing this I jump
up three stairs at a time, and I am glad to find that I can mount the stairs so quickly.
Suddenly I notice that a servant-maid is coming down the stairs -- that is, towards me. I
am ashamed, and try to hurry away, and now comes this feeling of being inhibited; I am
glued to the stairs, and cannot move from the spot.
Analysis: The situation of the dream is taken from an everyday reality. In a house in
Vienna I have two apartments, which are connected only by the main staircase. My
consultation-rooms and my study are on the raised ground-floor, and my living-rooms are
on the first floor. Late at night, when I have finished my work downstairs, I go upstairs to
my bedroom. On the evening before the dream I had actually gone this short distance
with my garments in disarray -- that is, I had taken off my collar, tie and cuffs; but in the
dream this had changed into a more advanced, but, as usual, indefinite degree of undress.
It is a habit of mine to run up two or three steps at a time; moreover, there was a wish-
fulfilment recognised even in the dream, for the ease with which I run upstairs reassures
me as to the condition of my heart. Further, the manner in which I run upstairs is an
effective contrast to the sensation of being inhibited, which occurs in the second half of
the dream. It shows me -- what needed no proof -- that dreams have no difficulty in
representing motor actions fully and completely carried out; think, for example, of flying
in dreams!
But the stairs up which I go are not those of my own house; at first I do not recognise
them; only the person coming towards me informs me of their whereabouts. This woman
is the maid of an old lady whom I visit twice daily in order to give her hypodermic
injections; the stairs, too, are precisely similar to those which I have to climb twice a day
in this old lady's house.
How do these stairs and this woman get into my dream? The shame of not being fully
dressed is undoubtedly of a sexual character; the servant of whom I dream is older than I,
surly, and by no means attractive. These questions remind me of the following incident:
When I pay my morning visit at this house I am usually seized with a desire to clear my
throat; the sputum falls on the stairs. There is no spittoon on either of the two floors, and I
consider that the stairs should be kept clean not at my expense, but rather by the
provision of a spittoon. The housekeeper, another elderly, curmudgeonly person, but, as I
willingly admit, a woman of cleanly instincts, takes a different view of the matter. She

lies in wait for me, to see whether I shall take the liberty referred to, and if she sees that I
do I can distinctly hear her growl. For days thereafter, when we meet, she refuses to greet
me with the customary signs of respect. On the day before the dream the housekeeper's
attitude was reinforced by that of the maid. I had just finished my usual hurried visit to
the patient when the servant confronted me in the ante-room, observing: `You might as
well have wiped your shoes today, doctor, before you came into the room. The red carpet
is all dirty again from your feet.' This is the only justification for the appearance of the
stairs and the maid in my dream.
Between my leaping upstairs and my spitting on the stairs there is an intimate connection.
Pharyngitis and cardiac troubles are both supposed to be punishments for the vice of
smoking, on account of which vice my own housekeeper does not credit me with
excessive tidiness, so that my reputation suffers in both the houses which my dream fuses
into one.
I must postpone the further interpretation of this dream until I can indicate the origin of
the typical dream of being incompletely clothed. In the meantime, as a provisional
deduction from the dream just related, I note that the dream-sensation of inhibited
movement is always aroused at a point where a certain connection requires it. A peculiar
condition of my motor system during sleep cannot be responsible for this dream-content,
since a moment earlier I found myself, as though in confirmation of this fact, skipping
lightly up the stairs.
1
This part has been omitted from this text. Those who have a special interest in the
subject may read the original translation published by Macmillan Co., New York, and
Allen & Unwin, London.
2
I would advise everyone to read the exact and detailed records (collected in two
volumes) of the dreams experimentally produced by Mourly Vold in order to convince
himself how little the conditions of the experiments help to explain the content of the
individual dream, and how little such experiments help us towards an understanding of
the problems of dreams.
3
The two sources from which I know of this dream do not entirely agree as to its content.
4
Rank has shown, in a number of studies, that certain awakening-dreams provoked by
organic stimuli (dreams of urination and ejaculation) are especially calculated to
demonstrate the conflict between the need for sleep and the demands of the organic need,
as well as the influence of the latter on the dream-content.

D -- TYPICAL DREAMS
Generally speaking, we are not in a position to interpret another person's dream if he is

unwilling to furnish us with the unconscious thoughts which lie behind the dream-
content, and for this reason the practical applicability of our method of dream-
interpretation is often seriously restricted.1 But there are dreams which exhibit a complete
contrast to the individual's customary liberty to endow his dream-world with a special
individuality, thereby making it inaccessible to an alien understanding: there are a
number of dreams which almost everyone has dreamed in the same manner, and of which
we are accustomed to assume that they have the same significance in the case of every
dreamer. A peculiar interest attaches to these typical dreams, because, no matter who
dreams them, they presumably all derive from the same sources, so that they would seem
to be particularly fitted to provide us with information as to the sources of dreams.
With quite special expectations, therefore, we shall proceed to test our technique of
dream-interpretation on these typical dreams, and only with extreme reluctance shall we
admit that precisely in respect of this material our method is not fully verified. In the
interpretation of typical dreams we as a rule fail to obtain those associations from the
dreamer which in other cases have led us to comprehension of the dream, or else these
associations are confused and inadequate, so that they do not help us to solve our
problem.
Why this is the case, and how we can remedy this defect in our technique, are points
which will be discussed in a later chapter. The reader will then understand why I can deal
with only a few of the group of typical dreams in this chapter, and why I have postponed
the discussion of the others.
(a) The Embarrassment-Dream of Nakedness
In a dream in which one is naked or scantily clad in the presence of strangers, it

sometimes happens that one is not in the least ashamed of one's condition. But the dream
of nakedness demands our attention only when shame and embarrassment are felt in it,
when one wishes to escape or to hide, and when one feels the strange inhibition of being
unable to stir from the spot, and of being utterly powerless to alter the painful situation. It
is only in this connection that the dream is typical; otherwise the nucleus of its content
may be involved in all sorts of other connections, or may be replaced by individual
amplifications. The essential point is that one has a painful feeling of shame, and is
anxious to hide one's nakedness, usually by means of locomotion, but is absolutely
unable to do so. I believe that the great majority of my readers will at some time have
found themselves in this situation in a dream.
The nature and manner of the exposure is usually rather vague. The dreamer will say,
perhaps, Ì was in my chemise', but this is rarely a clear image; in most cases the lack of
clothing is so indeterminate that it is described in narrating the dream by an alternative: Ì
was in my chemise or my petticoat.' As a rule the deficiency in clothing is not serious
enough to justify the feeling of shame attached to it. For a man who has served in the

army, nakedness is often replaced by a manner of dressing that is contrary to regulations.

Ì was in the street without my sabre, and I saw some officers approaching', or Ì had no
collar', or Ì was wearing checked civilian trousers', etc.
The persons before whom one is ashamed are almost always strangers, whose faces
remain indeterminate. It never happens, in the typical dream, that one is reproved or even
noticed on account of the lack of clothing which causes one such embarrassment. On the
contrary, the people in the dream appear to be quite indifferent; or, as I was able to note
in one particularly vivid dream, they have stiff and solemn expressions. This gives us
food for thought.
The dreamer's embarrassment and the spectator's indifference constitute a contradiction

such as often occurs in dreams. It would be more in keeping with the dreamer's feelings if
the strangers were to look at him in astonishment, or were to laugh at him, or be outraged.
I think, however, that this obnoxious feature has been displaced by wish-fulfilment, while
the embarrassment is for some reason retained, so that the two components are not in
agreement. We have an interesting proof that the dream which is partially distorted by
wish-fulfilment has not been properly understood; for it has been made the basis of a
fairy-tale familiar to us all in Andersen's version of `The Emperor's New Clothes', and it
has more recently received poetical treatment by Fulda in The Talisman. In Andersen's
fairy-tale we are told of two impostors who weave a costly garment for the Emperor,
which shall, however, be visible only to the good and true. The Emperor goes forth clad
in this invisible garment, and since the imaginary fabric serves as a sort of touchstone, the
people are frightened into behaving as though they did not notice the Emperor's
nakedness.
But this is really the situation in our dream. It is not very venturesome to assume that the
unintelligible dream-content has provided an incentive to invent a state of undress which
gives meaning to the situation present in the memory. This situation is thereby robbed of
its original meaning, and made to serve alien ends. But we shall see that such a
misunderstanding of the dream-content often occurs through the conscious activity of a
second psychic system, and is to be recognised as a factor of the final form of the dream;
and further, that in the development of obsessions and phobias similar misunderstandings
-- still, of course, within the same psychic personality -- play a decisive part. It is even
possible to specify whence the material for the fresh interpretation of the dream is taken.
The impostor is the dream, the Emperor is the dreamer himself, and the moralising
tendency betrays a hazy knowledge of the fact that there is a question, in the latent
dream-content, of forbidden wishes, victims of repression. The connection in which such
dreams appear during my analyses of neurotics proves beyond a doubt that a memory of
the dreamer's earliest childhood lies at the foundation of the dream. Only in our
childhood was there a time when we were seen by our relatives, as well as by strange
nurses, servants and visitors, in a state of insufficient clothing, and at that time we were
not ashamed of our nakedness.2 In the case of many rather older children it may be
observed that being undressed has an exciting effect upon them, instead of making them
feel ashamed. They laugh, leap about, slap or thump their own bodies; the mother, or
whoever is present, scolds them, saying: `Fie, that is shameful -- you mustn't do that!'

Children often show a desire to display themselves; it is hardly possible to pass through a
village in country districts without meeting a two- or three-year-old child who lifts up his
or her blouse or frock before the traveller, possibly in his honour. One of my patients has
retained in his conscious memory a scene from his eighth year, in which, after undressing
for bed, he wanted to dance into his little sister's room in his shirt, but was prevented by
the servant. In the history of the childhood of neurotics exposure before children of the
opposite sex plays a prominent part; in paranoia the delusion of being observed while
dressing and undressing may be directly traced to these experiences; and among those
who have remained perverse there is a class in whom the childish impulse is accentuated
into a symptom: the class of exhibitionists.
This age of childhood, in which the sense of shame is unknown, seems a paradise when
we look back upon it later, and paradise itself is nothing but the mass-fantasy of the
childhood of the individual. This is why in paradise men are naked and unashamed, until
the moment arrives when shame and fear awaken; expulsion follows, and sexual life and
cultural development begin. Into this paradise dreams can take us back every night; we
have already ventured the conjecture that the impressions of our earliest childhood (from
the prehistoric period until about the end of the third year) crave reproduction for their
own sake, perhaps without further reference to their content, so that their repetition is a
wish-fulfilment. Dreams of nakedness, then, are exhibition-dreams.3
The nucleus of an exhibition-dream is furnished by one's own person, which is seen not
as that of a child, but as it exists in the present, and by the idea of scanty clothing which
emerges indistinctly, owing to the superimposition of so many later situations of being
partially clothed, or out of consideration for the censorship; to these elements are added
the persons in whose presence one is ashamed. I know of no example in which the actual
spectators of these infantile exhibitions reappear in a dream; for a dream is hardly ever a
simple recollection. Strangely enough, those persons who are the objects of our sexual
interest in childhood are omitted from all reproductions, in dreams, in hysteria or in
obsessional neurosis; paranoia alone restores the spectators, and is fanatically convinced
of their presence, although they remain unseen. The substitute for these persons offered
by the dream, the `number of strangers' who take no notice of the spectacle offered them,
is precisely the counter-wish to that single intimately-known person for whom the
exposure was intended. À number of strangers', moreover, often occur in dreams in all
sorts of other connections; as a counter-wish they always signify à secret'.4 It will be
seen that even that restitution of the old state of affairs that occurs in paranoia complies
with this counter-tendency. One is no longer alone; one is quite positively being watched;
but the spectators are à number of strange, curiously indeterminate people.'
Furthermore, repression finds a place in the exhibition-dream. For the disagreeable

sensation of the dream is, of course, the reaction on the part of the second psychic
instance to the fact that the exhibitionistic scene which has been condemned by the
censorship has nevertheless succeeded in presenting itself. The only way to avoid this
sensation would be to refrain from reviving the scene.

In a later chapter we shall deal once again with the feeling of inhibition. In our dreams it
represents to perfection a conflict of the will, a denial. According to our unconscious
purpose, the exhibition is to proceed; according to the demands of the censorship, it is to
come to an end.
The relation of our typical dreams to fairy-tales and other fiction and poetry is neither
sporadic nor accidental. Sometimes the penetrating insight of the poet has analytically
recognised the process of transformation of which the poet is otherwise the instrument,
and has followed it up in the reverse direction; that is to say, has traced a poem to a
dream. A friend has called my attention to the following passage in G. Keller's Der
Grüne Heinrich: Ì do not wish, dear Lee, that you should ever come to realise from
experience the exquisite and piquant truth in the situation of Odysseus, when he appears,
naked and covered with mud, before Nausicaa and her playmates! Would you like to
know what it means? Let us for a moment consider the incident closely. If you are ever
parted from your home, and from all that is dear to you, and wander about in a strange
country; if you have seen much and experienced much; if you have cares and sorrows,
and are, perhaps, utterly wretched and forlorn, you will some night inevitably dream that
you are approaching your home; you will see it shining and glittering in the loveliest
colours; lovely and gracious figures will come to meet you; and then you will suddenly
discover that you are ragged, naked, and covered with dust. An indescribable feeling of
shame and fear overcomes you; you try to cover yourself, to hide, and you wake up
bathed in sweat. As long as humanity exists, this will be the dream of the care-laden,
tempest-tossed man, and thus Homer has drawn this situation from the profoundest
depths of the eternal nature of humanity.'
What are the profoundest depths of the eternal nature of humanity, which the poet
commonly hopes to awaken in his listeners, but these stirrings of the psychic life which
are rooted in that age of childhood, which subsequently become prehistoric? Childish
wishes, now suppressed and forbidden, break into the dream behind the unobjectionable
and permissibly conscious wishes of the homeless man, and it is for this reason that the
dream which is objectified in the legend of Nausicaa regularly develops into an anxiety-
dream.
My own dream of hurrying upstairs, which presently changed into being glued to the
stairs, is likewise an exhibition-dream, for it reveals the essential ingredients of such a
dream. It must therefore be possible to trace it back to experiences in my childhood, and
the knowledge of these should enable us to conclude how far the servant's behaviour to
me (i.e. her reproach that I had soiled the carpet) helped her to secure the position which
she occupies in the dream. Now I am actually able to furnish the desired explanation. One
learns in a psychoanalysis to interpret temporal proximity by material connection; two
ideas which are apparently without connection, but which occur in immediate succession,
belong to a unity which has to be deciphered; just as an a and a b, when written in
succession, must be pronounced as one syllable, ab. It is just the same with the
interrelations of dreams. The dream of the stairs has been taken from a series of dreams
with whose other members I am familiar, having interpreted them. A dream included in
this series must belong to the same context. Now, the other dreams of the series are based

on the memory of a nurse to whom I was entrusted for a season, from the time when I
was still at the breast to the age of two and a half, and of whom a hazy recollection has
remained in my consciousness. According to information which I recently obtained from
my mother, she was old and ugly, but very intelligent and thorough; according to the
inferences which I am justified in drawing from my dreams, she did not always treat me
quite kindly, but spoke harshly to me when I showed insufficient understanding of the
necessity for cleanliness. Inasmuch as the maid endeavoured to continue my education in
this respect, she is entitled to be treated, in my dream, as an incarnation of the prehistoric
old woman. It is to be assumed, of course, that the child was fond of his teacher in spite
of her harsh behaviour.5
(b) Dreams of the Death of Beloved Persons
Another series of dreams which may be called typical are those whose content is that a
beloved relative, a parent, brother, sister, child, or the like, has died. We must at once
distinguish two classes of such dreams: those in which the dreamer remains unmoved,
and those in which he feels profoundly grieved by the death of the beloved person, even
expressing this grief by shedding tears in his sleep.
We may ignore the dreams of the first group; they have no claim to be reckoned as
typical. If they are analysed, it is found that they signify something that is not contained
in them, that they are intended to mask another wish of some kind. This is the case in the
dream of the aunt who sees the only son of her sister lying on a bier (p. 60). The dream
does not mean that she desires the death of her little nephew; as we have learned, it
merely conceals the wish to see a certain beloved person again after a long separation --
the same person whom she had seen after as long an interval at the funeral of another
nephew. This wish, which is the real content of the dream, gives no cause for sorrow, and
for that reason no sorrow is felt in the dream. We see here that the feeling contained in
the dream does not belong to the manifest, but to the latent dream-content, and that the
affective content has remained free from the distortion which has befallen the conceptual
content.
It is otherwise with those dreams in which the death of a beloved relative is imagined,
and in which a painful affect is felt. These signify, as their content tells us, the wish that
the person in question might die; and since I may here expect that the feelings of all my
readers and of all who have had such dreams will lead them to reject my explanation, I
must endeavour to rest my proof on the broadest possible basis.
We have already cited a dream from which we could see that the wishes represented as
fulfilled in dreams are not always current wishes. They may also be bygone, discarded,
buried and repressed wishes, which we must nevertheless credit with a sort of continued
existence, merely on account of their reappearance in a dream. They are not dead, like
persons who have died, in the sense that we know death, but are rather like the shades in
the Odyssey which awaken to a certain degree of life so soon as they have drunk blood.
The dream of the dead child in the box (p. 62) contained a wish that had been present
fifteen years earlier, and which had at that time been frankly admitted as real. Further --

and this, perhaps, is not unimportant from the standpoint of the theory of dreams -- a
recollection from the dreamer's earliest childhood was at the root of this wish also. When
the dreamer was a little child -- but exactly when cannot be definitely determined -- she
heard that her mother, during the pregnancy of which she was the outcome, had fallen
into a profound emotional depression, and had passionately wished for the death of the
child in her womb. Having herself grown up and become pregnant, she was only
following the example of her mother.
If anyone dreams that his father or mother, his brother or sister, has died, and his dream
expresses grief, I should never adduce this as proof that he wishes any of them dead now.
The theory of dreams does not go as far as to require this; it is satisfied with concluding
that the dreamer has wished them dead at some time or other during his childhood. I fear,
however, that this limitation will not go far to appease my critics; probably they will just
as energetically deny the possibility that they ever had such thoughts, as they protest that
they do not harbour them now. I must, therefore, reconstruct a portion of the submerged
infantile psychology on the basis of the evidence of the present.6
Let us first of all consider the relation of children to their brothers and sisters. I do not
know why we presuppose that it must be a loving one, since examples of enmity among
adult brothers and sisters are frequent in everyone's experience, and since we are so often
able to verify the fact that this estrangement originated during childhood, or has always
existed. Moreover, many adults who today are devoted to their brothers and sisters, and
support them in adversity, lived with them in almost continuous enmity during their
childhood. The elder child ill-treated the younger, slandered him, and robbed him of his
toys; the younger was consumed with helpless fury against the elder, envied and feared
him, or his earliest impulse toward liberty and his first revolt against injustice were
directed against his oppressor. The parents say that the children do not agree, and cannot
find the reason for it. It is not difficult to see that the character even of a well-behaved
child is not the character we should wish to find in an adult. A child is absolutely
egoistical; he feels his wants acutely, and strives remorselessly to satisfy them, especially
against his competitors, other children, and first of all against his brothers and sisters.
And yet we do not on that account call a child `wicked' -- we call him `naughty'; he is not
responsible for his misdeeds, either in our own judgment or in the eyes of the law. And
this is as it should be; for we may expect that within the very period of life which we
reckon as childhood, altruistic impulses and morality will awake in the little egoist, and
that, in the words of Meynert, a secondary ego will overlay and inhibit the primary ego.
Morality, of course, does not develop simultaneously in all its departments, and
furthermore, the duration of the amoral period of childhood differs in different
individuals. Where this morality fails to develop we are prone to speak of `degeneration';
but here the case is obviously one of arrested development. Where the primary character
is already overlaid by the later development it may be at least partially uncovered again
by an attack of hysteria. The correspondence between the so-called hysterical character
and that of a naughty child is positively striking. The obsessional neurosis, on the other
hand, corresponds to a super-morality, which develops as a strong reinforcement against
the primary character that is threatening to revive.

Many persons, then, who now love their brothers and sisters, and who would feel
bereaved by their death, harbour in their unconscious hostile wishes, survivals from an
earlier period, wishes which are able to realise themselves in dreams. It is, however, quite
especially interesting to observe the behaviour of little children up to their third and
fourth year towards their younger brothers or sisters. So far the child has been the only
one; now he is informed that the stork has brought a new baby. The child inspects the
new arrival, and expresses his opinion with decision: `The stork had better take it back
again!'7
I seriously declare it as my opinion that a child is able to estimate the disadvantages

which he has to expect on account of a newcomer. A connection of mine, who now gets
on very well with a sister, who is four years her junior, responded to the news of this
sister's arrival with the reservation: `But I shan't give her my red cap, anyhow.' If the
child should come to realise only at a later stage that its happiness may be prejudiced by a
younger brother or sister, its enmity will be aroused at this period. I know of a case where
a girl, not three years of age, tried to strangle an infant in its cradle, because she
suspected that its continued presence boded her no good. Children at this time of life are
capable of a jealousy that is perfectly evident and extremely intense. Again, perhaps the
little brother or sister really soon disappears, and the child once more draws to himself
the whole affection of the household; then a new child is sent by the stork; is it not
natural that the favourite should conceive the wish that the new rival may meet the same
fate as the earlier one, in order that he may be as happy as he was before the birth of the
first child, and during the interval after his death?8 Of course, this attitude of the child
towards the younger brother or sister is, under normal circumstances, a mere function of
the difference of age. After a certain interval the maternal instincts of the older girl will
be awakened towards the helpless new-born infant.
Feelings of hostility towards brothers and sisters must occur far more frequently in
children than is observed by their obtuse elders.9
In the case of my own children, who followed one another rapidly, I missed the
opportunity of making such observations. I am now retrieving it, thanks to my little
nephew, whose undisputed domination was disturbed after fifteen months by the arrival
of a feminine rival. I hear, it is true, that the young man behaves very chivalrously toward
his little sister, that he kisses her hand and strokes her; but in spite of this I have
convinced myself that even before the completion of his second year he is using his new
command of language to criticise this person, who, to him, after all, seems superfluous.
Whenever the conversation turns upon her he chimes in, and cries angrily: `Too (l)ittle,
too (l)ittle!' During the last few months, since the child has outgrown this disparagement,
owing to her splendid development, he has found another reason for his insistence that
she does not deserve so much attention. He reminds us, on every suitable pretext: `She
hasn't any teeth.'10 We all of us recollect the case of the eldest daughter of another sister
of mine. The child, who was then six years of age, spent a full half-hour in going from
one aunt to another with the question: `Lucie can't understand that yet, can she?' Lucie
was her rival -- two and a half years younger.

I have never failed to come across this dream of the death of brothers or sisters, denoting
an intense hostility, e.g. I have met it in all my female patients. I have met with only one
exception, which could easily be interpreted into a confirmation of the rule. Once, in the
course of a sitting, when I was explaining this state of affairs to a female patient, since it
seemed to have some bearing on the symptoms under consideration that day, she
answered, to my astonishment, that she had never had such dreams. But another dream
occurred to her, which presumably had nothing to do with the case -- a dream which she
had first dreamed at the age of four, when she was the youngest child, and had since then
dreamed repeatedly. À number of children, all her brothers and sisters with her boy and
girl cousins, were romping about in a meadow. Suddenly they all grew wings, flew up,
and were gone.' She had no idea of the significance of this dream; but we can hardly fail
to recognise it as a dream of the death of all the brothers and sisters, in its original form,
and but little influenced by the censorship. I will venture to add the following analysis of
it: on the death of one out of this large number of children -- in this case the children of
two brothers were brought up together as brothers and sisters -- would not our dreamer, at
that time not yet four years of age, have asked some wise, grown-up person: `What
becomes of children when they are dead?' The answer would probably have been: `They
grow wings and become angels.' After this explanation, all the brothers and sisters and
cousins in the dream now have wings, like angels and -- this is the important point -- they
fly away. Our little angel-maker is left alone: just think, the only one out of such a crowd!
That the children romp about a meadow, from which they fly away, points almost
certainly to butterflies -- it is as though the child had been influenced by the same
association of ideas which led the ancients to imagine Psyche, the soul, with the wings of
a butterfly.
Perhaps some readers will now object that the inimical impulses of children toward their
brothers and sisters may perhaps be admitted, but how does the childish character arrive
at such heights of wickedness as to desire the death of a rival or a stronger playmate, as
though all misdeeds could be atoned for only by death? Those who speak in this fashion
forget that the child's idea of `being dead' has little but the word in common with our
own. The child knows nothing of the horrors of decay, of shivering in the cold grave, of
the terror of the infinite Nothing, the thought of which the adult, as all the myths of the
hereafter testify, finds so intolerable. The fear of death is alien to the child; and so he
plays with the horrid word, and threatens another child: Ìf you do that again, you will
die, just like Francis died'; at which the poor mother shudders, unable perhaps to forget
that the greater proportion of mortals do not survive beyond the years of childhood. Even
at the age of eight, a child returning from a visit to a natural history museum may say to
her mother: `Mamma, I do love you so; if you ever die, I am going to have you stuffed
and set you up here in the room, so that I can always, always see you!' So different from
our own is the childish conception of being dead.11
Being dead means, for the child, who has been spared the sight of the suffering that
precedes death, much the same as `being gone', and ceasing to annoy the survivors. The
child does not distinguish the means by which this absence is brought about, whether by
distance, or estrangement, or death. 12 If, during the child's prehistoric years, a nurse has
been dismissed, and if his mother dies a little while later, the two experiences, as we

discover by analysis, form links of a chain in his memory. The fact that the child does not
very intensely miss those who are absent has been realised, to her sorrow, by many a
mother, when she has returned home from an absence of several weeks, and has been
told, upon inquiry: `The children have not asked for their mother once.' But if she really
departs to `that undiscovered country from whose bourne no traveller returns', the
children seem at first to have forgotten her, and only subsequently do they begin to
remember their dead mother.
While, therefore, the child has its motives for desiring the absence of another child, it is
lacking in all those restraints which would prevent it from clothing this wish in the form
of a death-wish; and the psychic reaction to dreams of a death-wish proves that, in spite
of all the differences of content, the wish in the case of the child is after all identical with
the corresponding wish in an adult.
If, then, the death-wish of a child in respect of his brothers and sisters is explained by his
childish egoism, which makes him regard his brothers and sisters as rivals, how are we to
account for the same wish in respect of his parents, who bestow their love on him, and
satisfy his needs, and whose preservation he ought to desire for these very egoistical
reasons?
Towards a solution of this difficulty we may be guided by our knowledge that the very
great majority of dreams of the death of a parent refer to the parent of the same sex as the
dreamer, so that a man generally dreams of the death of his father, and a woman of the
death of her mother. I do not claim that this happens constantly; but that it happens in a
great majority of cases is so evident that it requires explanation by some factor of general
significance.13 Broadly speaking, it is as though a sexual preference made itself felt at an
early age, as though the boy regarded his father, and the girl her mother, as a rival in love
-- by whose removal he or she could but profit.
Before rejecting this idea as monstrous, let the reader again consider the actual relations
between parents and children. We must distinguish between the traditional standard of
conduct, the filial piety expected in this relation, and what daily observation shows us to
be the fact. More than one occasion for enmity lies hidden amidst the relations of parents
and children; conditions are present in the greatest abundance under which wishes which
cannot pass the censorship are bound to arise. Let us first consider the relation between
father and son. In my opinion the sanctity with which we have endorsed the injunctions
of the Decalogue dulls our perception of the reality. Perhaps we hardly dare permit
ourselves to perceive that the greater part of humanity neglects to obey the fifth
commandment. In the lowest as well as in the highest strata of human society, filial piety
towards parents is wont to recede before other interests. The obscure legends which have
been handed down to us from the primeval ages of human society in mythology and
folklore give a deplorable idea of the despotic power of the father, and the ruthlessness
with which it was exercised. Kronos devours his children, as the wild boar devours the
litter of the sow; Zeus emasculates his father14 and takes his place as ruler. The more
tyrannically the father ruled in the ancient family, the more surely must the son, as his
appointed successor, have assumed the position of an enemy, and the greater must have

been his impatience to attain to supremacy through the death of his father. Even in our
own middle-class families the father commonly fosters the growth of the germ of hatred
which is naturally inherent in the paternal relation, by refusing to allow the son to be a
free agent or by denying him the means of becoming so. A physician often has occasion
to remark that a son's grief at the loss of his father cannot quench his gratification that he
has at last obtained his freedom. Fathers, as a rule, cling desperately to as much of the
sadly antiquated potestas patris familias as still survives in our modern society, and the
poet who, like Ibsen, puts the immemorial strife between father and son in the foreground
of his drama is sure of his effect. The causes of conflict between mother and daughter
arise when the daughter grows up and finds herself watched by her mother when she
longs for real sexual freedom, while the mother is reminded by the budding beauty of her
daughter that for her the time has come to renounce sexual claims.
All these circumstances are obvious to everyone, but they do not help us to explain
dreams of the death of their parents in persons for whom filial piety has long since come
to be unquestionable. We are, however, preparing by the foregoing discussion to look for
the origin of a death-wish in the earliest years of childhood.
In the case of psychoneurotics, analysis confirms this conjecture beyond all doubt. For
analysis tells us that the sexual wishes of the child -- in so far as they deserve this
designation in their nascent state -- awaken at a very early age, and that the earliest
affection of the girl-child is lavished on the father, while the earliest infantile desires of
the boy are directed upon the mother. For the boy the father, and for the girl the mother,
becomes an obnoxious rival, and we have already shown, in the case of brothers and
sisters, how readily in children this feeling leads to the death-wish. As a general rule,
sexual selection soon makes its appearance in the parent; it is a natural tendency for the
father to spoil his little daughters, and for the mother to take the part of the sons, while
both, so long as the glamour of sex does not prejudice their judgment, are strict in
training the children. The child is perfectly conscious of this partiality, and offers
resistance to the parent who opposes it. To find love in an adult is for the child not merely
the satisfaction of a special need; it means also that the child's will is indulged in all other
respects. Thus the child is obeying its own sexual instinct, and at the same time
reinforcing the stimulus proceeding from the parents, when its choice between the parents
corresponds with their own.
The signs of these infantile tendencies are for the most part overlooked; and yet some of
them may be observed even after the early years of childhood. An eight-year-old girl of
my acquaintance, whenever her mother is called away from the table, takes advantage of
her absence to proclaim herself her successor. `Now I shall be Mamma; Karl, do you
want some more vegetables? Have some more, do,' etc. A particularly clever and lively
little girl, not yet four years of age, in whom this trait of child psychology is unusually
transparent, says frankly: `Now mummy can go away; then daddy must marry me, and I
will be his wife.' Nor does this wish by any means exclude the possibility that the child
may most tenderly love its mother. If the little boy is allowed to sleep at his mother's side
whenever his father goes on a journey, and if after his father's return he has to go back to
the nursery, to a person whom he likes far less, the wish may readily arise that his father

might always be absent, so that he might keep his place beside his dear, beautiful
mamma; and the father's death is obviously a means for the attainment of this wish; for
the child's experience has taught him that `dead' folks, like grandpapa, for example, are
always absent; they never come back.
While such observations of young children readily accommodate themselves to the

interpretation suggested, they do not, it is true, carry the complete conviction which is
forced upon a physician by the psychoanalysis of adult neurotics. The dreams of neurotic
patients are communicated with preliminaries of such a nature that their interpretation as
wish-dreams becomes inevitable. One day I find a lady depressed and weeping. She says:
Ì do not want to see my relatives any more; they must shudder at me.' Thereupon, almost
without any transition, she tells me that she has remembered a dream, whose significance,
of course, she does not understand. She dreamed it when she was four years old, and it
was this: A fox or a lynx is walking about the roof; then something falls down, or she falls
down, and after that, her mother is carried out of the house -- dead; whereat the dreamer
weeps bitterly. I have no sooner informed her that this dream must signify a childish wish
to see her mother dead, and that it is because of this dream that she thinks that her
relatives must shudder at her, than she furnishes material in explanation of the dream.
`Lynx-eye' is an opprobrious epithet which a street boy once bestowed on her when she
was a very small child; and when she was three years old a brick or tile fell on her
mother's head, so that she bled profusely.
I once had occasion to make a thorough study of a young girl who was passing through
various psychic states. In the state of frenzied confusion with which her illness began, the
patient manifested a quite peculiar aversion for her mother; she struck her and abused her
whenever she approached the bed, while at the same period she was affectionate and
submissive to a much older sister. Then there followed a lucid but rather apathetic
condition, with badly disturbed sleep. It was in this phase that I began to treat her and to
analyse her dreams. An enormous number of these dealt, in a more or less veiled fashion,
with the death of the girl's mother; now she was present at the funeral of an old woman,
now she saw herself and her sister sitting at a table, dressed in mourning; the meaning of
the dreams could not be doubted. During her progressive improvement hysterical phobias
made their appearance, the most distressing of which was the fear that something had
happened to her mother. Wherever she might be at the time, she had then to hurry home
in order to convince herself that her mother was still alive. Now this case, considered in
conjunction with the rest of my experience, was very instructive; it showed, in polyglot
translations, as it were, the different ways in which the psychic apparatus reacts to the
same exciting idea. In the state of confusion, which I regard as an overthrow of the
second psychic instance by the first instance, at other times suppressed, the unconscious
enmity towards the mother gained the upper hand, and found physical expression; then,
when the patient became calmer, the insurrection was suppressed, and the domination of
the censorship restored, and this enmity had access only to the realms of dreams, in
which it realised the wish that the mother might die; and after the normal condition had
been still further strengthened it created the excessive concern for the mother as a
hysterical counter-reaction and defensive phenomenon. In the light of these

considerations, it is no longer inexplicable why hysterical girls are so often extravagantly

attached to their mothers.
On another occasion I had an opportunity of obtaining a profound insight into the

unconscious psychic life of a young man for whom an obsessional neurosis made life
almost unendurable, so that he could not go into the streets, because he was tormented by
the fear that he would kill everyone he met. He spent his days in contriving evidence of
an alibi in case he should be accused of any murder that might have been committed in
the city. It goes without saying that this man was as moral as he was highly cultured. The
analysis -- which, by the way, led to a cure -- revealed, as the basis of this distressing
obsession, murderous impulses in respect of his rather over-strict father -- impulses
which, to his astonishment, had consciously expressed themselves when he was seven
years old, but which, of course, had originated in a much earlier period of his childhood.
After the painful illness and death of his father, when the young man was in his thirty-
first year, the obsessive reproach made its appearance, which transferred itself to
strangers in the form of this phobia. Anyone capable of wishing to push his own father
from a mountain-top into an abyss cannot be trusted to spare the lives of persons less
closely related to him; he therefore does well to lock himself into his room.
According to my already extensive experience, parents play a leading part in the infantile
psychology of all persons who subsequently become psychoneurotics. Falling in love
with one parent and hating the other forms part of the permanent stock of the psychic
impulses which arise in early childhood, and are of such importance as the material of the
subsequent neurosis. But I do not believe that psychoneurotics are to be sharply
distinguished in this respect from other persons who remain normal -- that is, I do not
believe that they are capable of creating something absolutely new and peculiar to
themselves. It is far more probable -- and this is confirmed by incidental observations of
normal children -- that in their amorous or hostile attitude toward their parents,
psychoneurotics do no more than reveal to us, by magnification, something that occurs
less markedly and intensively in the minds of the majority of children. Antiquity has
furnished us with legendary matter which corroborates this belief, and the profound and
universal validity of the old legends is explicable only by an equally universal validity of
the above-mentioned hypothesis of infantile psychology. I am referring to the legend of
King Oedipus and the Oedipus Rex of Sophocles. Oedipus, the son of Laius, king of
Thebes, and Jocasta, is exposed as a suckling, because an oracle had informed the father
that his son, who was still unborn, would be his murderer. He is rescued, and grows up as
a king's son at a foreign court, until, being uncertain of his origin, he, too, consults the
oracle, and is warned to avoid his native place, for he is destined to become the murderer
of his father and the husband of his mother. On the road leading away from his supposed
home he meets King Laius, and in a sudden quarrel strikes him dead. He comes to
Thebes, where he solves the riddle of the Sphinx, who is barring the way to the city,
whereupon he is elected king by the grateful Thebans, and is rewarded with the hand of
Jocasta. He reigns for many years in peace and honour, and begets two sons and two
daughters upon his unknown mother, until at last a plague breaks out -- which causes the
Thebans to consult the oracle anew. Here Sophocles' tragedy begins. The messengers

bring the reply that the plague will stop as soon as the murderer of Laius is driven from
the country. But where is he?
Where shall be found,

Faint, and hard to be known, the trace of the ancient
guilt?
The action of the play consists simply in the disclosure, approached step by step and
artistically delayed (and comparable to the work of a psychoanalysis) that Oedipus
himself is the murderer of Laius, and that he is the son of the murdered man and Jocasta.
Shocked by the abominable crime which he has unwittingly committed, Oedipus blinds
himself, and departs from his native city. The prophecy of the oracle has been fulfilled.
The Oedipus Rex is a tragedy of fate; its tragic effect depends on the conflict between the
all-powerful will of the gods and the vain efforts of human beings threatened with
disaster; resignation to the divine will, and the perception of one's own impotence is the
lesson which the deeply moved spectator is supposed to learn from the tragedy. Modern
authors have therefore sought to achieve a similar tragic effect by expressing the same
conflict in stories of their own invention. But the playgoers have looked on unmoved at
the unavailing efforts of guiltless men to avert the fulfilment of curse or oracle; the
modern tragedies of destiny have failed of their effect.
If the Oedipus Rex is capable of moving a modern reader or playgoer no less powerfully
than it moved the contemporary Greeks, the only possible explanation is that the effect of
the Greek tragedy does not depend upon the conflict between fate and human will, but
upon the peculiar nature of the material by which this conflict is revealed. There must be
a voice within us which is prepared to acknowledge the compelling power of fate in the
Oedipus, while we are able to condemn the situations occurring in Die Ahnfrau or other
tragedies of fate as arbitrary inventions. And there actually is a motive in the story of
King Oedipus which explains the verdict of this inner voice. His fate moves us only
because it might have been our own, because the oracle laid upon us before our birth the
very curse which rested upon him. It may be that we were all destined to direct our first
sexual impulses toward our mothers, and our first impulses of hatred and violence toward
our fathers; our dreams convince us that we were. King Oedipus, who slew his father
Laius and wedded his mother Jocasta, is nothing more or less than a wish-fulfilment --
the fulfilment of the wish of our childhood. But we, more fortunate than he, in so far as
we have not become psychoneurotics, have since our childhood succeeded in
withdrawing our sexual impulses from our mothers, and in forgetting our jealousy of our
fathers. We recoil from the person for whom this primitive wish of our childhood has
been fulfilled with all the force of the repression which these wishes have undergone in
our minds since childhood. As the poet brings the guilt of Oedipus to light by his
investigation, he forces us to become aware of our own inner selves, in which the same
impulses are still extant, even though they are suppressed. The antithesis with which the
chorus departs:
Behold, this is Oedipus,

Who unravelled the great riddle, and was first in power,

Whose fortune all the townsmen praised and envied;

See in what dread adversity he sank!
-- this admonition touches us and our own pride, us who since the years of our childhood
have grown so wise and so powerful in our own estimation. Like Oedipus, we live in
ignorance of the desires that offend morality, the desires that nature has forced upon us,
and after their unveiling we may well prefer to avert our gaze from the scenes of our
childhood.15
In the very text of Sophocles' tragedy there is an unmistakable reference to the fact that
the Oedipus legend had its source in dream-material of immemorial antiquity, the content
of which was the painful disturbance of the child's relations to its parents caused by the
first impulses of sexuality. Jocasta comforts Oedipus -- who is not yet enlightened, but is
troubled by the recollection of the oracle -- by an allusion to a dream which is often
dreamed, though it cannot, in her opinion, mean anything:
For many a man hath seen himself in dreams

His mother's mate, but he who gives no heed
To suchlike matters bears the easier life.
The dream of having sexual intercourse with one's mother was as common then as it is
today with many people, who tell it with indignation and astonishment. As may well be
imagined, it is the key to the tragedy and the complement to the dream of the death of the
father. The Oedipus fable is the reaction of fantasy to these two typical dreams, and just
as such a dream, when occurring to an adult, is experienced with feelings of aversion, so
the content of the fable must include terror and self-chastisement. The form which it
subsequently assumed was the result of an uncomprehending secondary elaboration of
the material, which sought to make it serve a theological intention.16 The attempt to
reconcile divine omnipotence with human responsibility must, of course, fail with this
material as with any other.
Another of the great poetic tragedies, Shakespeare's Hamlet, is rooted in the same soil as
Oedipus Rex. But the whole difference in the psychic life of the two widely separated
periods of civilisation, and the progress, during the course of time, of repression in the
emotional life of humanity, is manifested in the differing treatment of the same material.
In Oedipus Rex the basic wish-fantasy of the child is brought to light and realised as it is
in dreams; in Hamlet it remains repressed, and we learn of its existence -- as we discover
the relevant facts in a neurosis -- only through the inhibitory effects which proceed from
it. In the more modern drama, the curious fact that it is possible to remain in complete
uncertainty as to the character of the hero has proved to be quite consistent with the
overpowering effect of the tragedy. The play is based upon Hamlet's hesitation in
accomplishing the task of revenge assigned to him; the text does not give the cause or the
motive of this hesitation, nor have the manifold attempts at interpretation succeeded in
doing so. According to the still prevailing conception, a conception for which Goethe was
first responsible, Hamlet represents the type of man whose active energy is paralysed by
excessive intellectual activity: `Sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought.' According to
another conception, the poet has endeavoured to portray a morbid, irresolute character, on

the verge of neurasthenia. The plot of the drama, however, shows us that Hamlet is by no
means intended to appear as a character wholly incapable of action. On two separate
occasions we see him assert himself: once in a sudden outburst of rage, when he stabs the
eavesdropper behind the arras, and on the other occasion when he deliberately, and even
craftily, with the complete unscrupulousness of a prince of the Renaissance, sends the
two courtiers to the death which was intended for himself. What is it, then, that inhibits
him in accomplishing the task which his father's ghost has laid upon him? Here the
explanation offers itself that it is the peculiar nature of this task. Hamlet is able to do
anything but take vengeance upon the man who did away with his father and has taken
his father's place with his mother -- the man who shows him in realisation the repressed
desires of his own childhood. The loathing which should have driven him to revenge is
thus replaced by self-reproach, by conscientious scruples, which tell him that he himself
is no better than the murderer whom he is required to punish. I have here translated into
consciousness what had to remain unconscious in the mind of the hero; if anyone wishes
to call Hamlet an hysterical subject I cannot but admit that this is the deduction to be
drawn from my interpretation. The sexual aversion which Hamlet expresses in
conversation with Ophelia is perfectly consistent with this deduction -- the same sexual
aversion which during the next few years was increasingly to take possession of the
poet's soul, until it found its supreme utterance in Timon of Athens. It can, of course, be
only the poet's own psychology with which we are confronted in Hamlet; and in a work
on Shakespeare by Georg Brandes (1896) I find the statement that the drama was
composed immediately after the death of Shakespeare's father (1601) -- that is to say,
when he was still mourning his loss, and during a revival, as we may fairly assume, of his
own childish feelings in respect of his father. It is known, too, that Shakespeare's son,
who died in childhood, bore the name of Hamnet (identical with Hamlet). Just as Hamlet
treats of the relation of the son to his parents, so Macbeth, which was written about the
same period, is based upon the theme of childlessness. Just as all neurotic symptoms, like
dreams themselves, are capable of hyper-interpretation, and even require such hyper-
interpretation before they become perfectly intelligible, so every genuine poetical
creation must have proceeded from more than one motive, more than one impulse in the
mind of the poet, and must admit of more than one interpretation. I have here attempted
to interpret only the deepest stratum of impulses in the mind of the creative poet.17
With regard to typical dreams of the death of relatives, I must add a few words upon their
significance from the point of view of the theory of dreams in general. These dreams
show us the occurrence of a very unusual state of things; they show us that the dream-
thought created by the repressed wish completely escapes the censorship, and is
transferred to the dream without alteration. Special conditions must obtain in order to
make this possible. The following two factors favour the production of these dreams:
first, this is the last wish that we could credit ourselves with harbouring; we believe such
a wish `would never occur to us even in a dream'; the dream-censorship is therefore
unprepared for this monstrosity, just as the laws of Solon did not foresee the necessity of
establishing a penalty for patricide. Secondly, the repressed and unsuspected wish is, in
this special case, frequently met half-way by a residue from the day's experience, in the
form of some concern for the life of the beloved person. This anxiety cannot enter into
the dream otherwise than by taking advantage of the corresponding wish; but the wish is

able to mask itself behind the concern which has been aroused during the day. If one is
inclined to think that all this is really a very much simpler process, and to imagine that
one merely continues during the night, and in one's dream, what was begun during the
day, one removes the dreams of the death of those dear to us out of all connection with
the general explanation of dreams, and a problem that may very well be solved remains a
problem needlessly.
It is instructive to trace the relation of these dreams to anxiety-dreams. In dreams of the

death of those dear to us the repressed wish has found a way of avoiding the censorship --
and the distortion for which the censorship is responsible. An invariable concomitant
phenomenon, then, is that painful emotions are felt in the dream. Similarly, an anxiety-
dream occurs only when the censorship is entirely or partially overpowered, and on the
other hand, the overpowering of the censorship is facilitated when the actual sensation of
anxiety is already present from somatic sources. It thus becomes obvious for what
purpose the censorship performs its office and practices dream-distortion; it does so in
order to prevent the development of anxiety or other forms of painful affect.
I have spoken in the foregoing sections of the egoism of the child's psyche, and I now
emphasise this peculiarity in order to suggest a connection, for dreams too have retained
this characteristic. All dreams are absolutely egoistical; in every dream the beloved ego
appears, even though in a disguised form. The wishes that are realised in dreams are
invariably the wishes of this ego; it is only a deceptive appearance if interest in another
person is believed to have evoked a dream. I will now analyse a few examples which
appear to contradict this assertion.
Dream 1
A boy not yet four years of age relates the following dream: He saw a large garnished
dish, on which was a large joint of roast meat; and the joint was suddenly -- not carved --
but eaten up. He did not see the person who ate it.18
Who can he be, this strange person, of whose luxurious repast the little fellow dreams?
The experience of the day must supply the answer. For some days past the boy, in
accordance with the doctor's orders, had been living on a milk diet; but on the evening of
the `dream-day' he had been naughty, and, as a punishment, had been deprived of his
supper. He had already undergone one such hunger-cure, and had borne his deprivation
bravely. He knew that he would get nothing, but he did not even allude to the fact that he
was hungry. Training was beginning to produce its effect; this is demonstrated even by
the dream, which reveals the beginnings of dream-distortion. There is no doubt that he
himself is the person whose desires are directed toward this abundant meal, and a meal of
roast meat at that. But since he knows that this is forbidden him, he does not dare, as
hungry children do in dreams (cf. my little Anna's dream about strawberries, p. 41), to sit
down to the meal himself. The person remains anonymous.
Dream 2

One night I dream that I see on a bookseller's counter a new volume of one of those
collectors' series, which I am in the habit of buying (monographs on artistic subjects,
history, famous artistic centres, etc.). The new collection is entitled `Famous Orators' (or
Orations), and the first number bears the name of Dr Lecher.
On analysis it seems to me improbable that the fame of Dr Lecher, the long-winded

speaker of the German Opposition, should occupy my thoughts while I am dreaming. The
fact is that a few days ago I undertook the psychological treatment of some new patients,
and am now forced to talk for ten to twelve hours a day. Thus I myself am a long-winded
speaker.
Dream 3
On another occasion I dream that a university lecturer of my acquaintance says to me:

`My son, the myopic.' Then follows a dialogue of brief observations and replies. A third
portion of the dream follows, in which I and my sons appear, and so far as the latent
dream-content is concerned, the father, the son, and Professor M., are merely lay figures,
representing myself and my eldest son. Later on I shall examine this dream again, on
account of another peculiarity.
Dream 4
The following dream gives an example of really base, egoistical feelings, which conceal
themselves behind an affectionate concern: My friend Otto looks ill; his face is brown
and his eyes protrude.
Otto is my family physician, to whom I owe a debt greater than I can ever hope to repay,
since he has watched for years over the health of my children, has treated them
successfully when they have been ill, and, moreover, has given them presents whenever
he could find any excuse for doing so. He paid us a visit on the day of the dream, and my
wife noticed that he looked tired and exhausted. At night I dream of him, and my dream
attributes to him certain of the symptoms of Basedow's disease. If you were to disregard
my rules for dream-interpretation you would understand this dream to mean that I am
concerned about the health of my friend, and that this concern is realised in the dream. It
would thus constitute a contradiction not only of the assertion that a dream is a wish-
fulfilment, but also of the assertion that it is accessible only to egoistical impulses. But
will those who thus interpret my dream explain why I should fear that Otto has
Basedow's disease, for which diagnosis his appearance does not afford the slightest
justification? My analysis, on the other hand, furnishes the following material, deriving
from an incident which had occurred six years earlier. We were driving -- a small party of
us, including Professor R. -- in the dark through the forest of N., which lies at a distance
of some hours from where we were staying in the country. The driver, who was not quite
sober, overthrew us and the carriage down a bank, and it was only by good fortune that
we all escaped unhurt. But we were forced to spend the night at the nearest inn, where the
news of our mishap aroused great sympathy. A certain gentleman, who showed
unmistakable symptoms of morbus Basedowii -- the brownish colour of the skin of the

face and the protruding eyes, but no goitre -- placed himself entirely at our disposal, and
asked what he could do for us.
Professor R. answered in his decisive way, `Nothing, except lend me a nightshirt.'

Whereupon our generous friend replied: Ì am sorry, but I cannot do that,' and left us.
In continuing the analysis, it occurs to me that Basedow is the name not only of a
physician, but also of a famous pedagogue. (Now that I am wide awake, I do not feel
quite sure of this fact.) My friend Otto is the person whom I have asked to take charge of
the physical education of my children -- especially during the age of puberty (hence the
nightshirt) in case anything should happen to me. By seeing Otto in my dream with the
morbid symptoms of our above-mentioned generous helper, I clearly mean to say: Ìf
anything happens to me, he will do just as little for my children as Baron L. did for us, in
spite of his amiable offers.' The egoistical flavour of this dream should now be obvious
enough.19
But where is the wish-fulfilment to be found in this? Not in the vengeance wreaked on
my friend Otto (who seems to be fated to be badly treated in my dreams), but in the
following circumstance: Inasmuch as in my dream I represented Otto as Baron L., I
likewise identified myself with another person, namely, with Professor R.; for I have
asked something of Otto, just as R. asked something of Baron L. at the time of the
incident I have described. And this is the point. For Professor R. has gone his way
independently, outside academic circles, just as I myself have done, and has only in his
later years received the title which he had earned long before. Once more, then, I want to
be a professor! The very phrase ìn his later years' is a wish-fulfilment, for it means that I
shall live long enough to steer my boys through the age of puberty myself.
Of other typical dreams, in which one flies with a feeling of ease or falls in terror, I know
nothing from my own experience, and whatever I have to say about them I owe to my
psychoanalyses. From the information thus obtained one must conclude that these dreams
also reproduce impressions made in childhood -- that is, that they refer to the games
involving rapid motion which have such an extraordinary attraction for children. Where
is the uncle who has never made a child fly by running with it across the room with
outstretched arms, or has never played at falling with it by rocking it on his knee and then
suddenly straightening his leg, or by lifting it above his head and suddenly pretending to
withdraw his supporting hand? At such moments children shout with joy, and insatiably
demand a repetition of the performance, especially if a little fright and dizziness are
involved in the game; in after years they repeat their sensations in dreams, but in dreams
they omit the hands that held them, so that now they are free to float or fall. We know
that all small children have a fondness for such games as rocking and seesawing; and if
they see gymnastic performances at the circus their recollection of such games is
refreshed.20 In some boys a hysterical attack will consist simply in the reproduction of
such performances, which they accomplish with great dexterity. Not infrequently sexual
sensations are excited by these games of movement, which are quite neutral in
themselves.21 To express the matter in a few words: the èxciting' games of childhood are
repeated in dreams of flying, falling, reeling and the like, but the voluptuous feelings are

now transformed into anxiety. But, as every mother knows, the excited play of children
often enough culminates in quarrelling and tears.
I have therefore good reason for rejecting the explanation that it is the state of our dermal
sensations during sleep, the sensation of the movements of the lungs, etc., that evokes
dreams of flying and falling. I see that these very sensations have been reproduced from
the memory to which the dream refers -- and that they are, therefore, dream-content and
not dream-sources.
I do not for a moment deny, however, that I am unable to furnish a full explanation of this
series of typical dreams. Precisely here my material leaves me in the lurch. I must adhere
to the general opinion that all the dermal and kinetic sensations of these typical dreams
are awakened as soon as any psychic motive of whatever kind has need of them, and that
they are neglected when there is no such need of them. The relation to infantile
experiences seems to be confirmed by the indications which I have obtained from the
analyses of psychoneurotics. But I am unable to say what other meanings might, in the
course of the dreamer's life, have become attached to the memory of these sensations --
different, perhaps, in each individual, despite the typical appearance of these dreams --
and I should very much like to be in a position to fill this gap with careful analyses of
good examples. To those who wonder why I complain of a lack of material, despite the
frequency of these dreams of flying, falling, tooth-drawing, etc., I must explain that I
myself have never experienced any such dreams since I have turned my attention to the
subject of dream-interpretation. The dreams of neurotics which are at my disposal,
however, are not all capable of interpretation, and very often it is impossible to penetrate
to the farthest point of their hidden intention; a certain psychic force which participated in
the building up of the neurosis, and which again becomes active during its dissolution,
opposes interpretation of the final problem.
(c) The Examination-Dream
Everyone who has received his certificate of matriculation after passing his final
examination at school complains of the persistence with which he is plagued by anxiety-
dreams in which he has failed, or must go through his course again, etc. For the holder of
a university degree this typical dream is replaced by another, which represents that he has
not taken his doctor's degree, to which he vainly objects, while still asleep, that he has
already been practising for years, or is already a university lecturer or the senior partner
of a firm of lawyers, and so on. These are the ineradicable memories of the punishments
we suffered as children for misdeeds which we had committed -- memories which were
revived in us on the dies irae, dies illa of the gruelling examination at the two critical
junctures in our careers as students. The èxamination-anxiety' of neurotics is likewise
intensified by this childish fear. When our student days are over it is no longer our
parents or teachers who see to our punishment; the inexorable chain of cause and effect
of later life has taken over our further education. Now we dream of our matriculation, or
the examination for the doctor's degree -- and who has not been faint-hearted on such
occasions? -- whenever we fear that we may be punished by some unpleasant result
because we have done something carelessly or wrongly, because we have not been as

thorough as we might have been -- in short, whenever we feel the burden of

responsibility.
For a further explanation of examination-dreams I have to thank a remark made by a

colleague who had studied this subject, who once stated, in the course of a scientific
discussion, that in his experience the examination-dream occurred only to persons who
had passed the examination, never to those who had `flunked'. We have had increasing
confirmation of the fact that the anxiety-dream of examination occurs when the dreamer
is anticipating a responsible task on the following day, with the possibility of disgrace;
recourse will then be had to an occasion in the past on which a great anxiety proved to
have been without real justification, having, indeed, been refuted by the outcome. Such a
dream would be a very striking example of the way in which the dream-content is
misunderstood by the waking instance. The exclamation which is regarded as a protest
against the dream: `But I am already a doctor,' etc., would in reality be the consolation
offered by the dream, and should, therefore, be worded as follows: `Do not be afraid of
the morrow; think of the anxiety which you felt before your matriculation; yet nothing
happened to justify it, for now you are a doctor,' etc. But the anxiety which we attribute
to the dream really has its origin in the residues of the dream-day.
The tests of this interpretation which I have been able to make in my own case, and in
that of others, although by no means exhaustive, were entirely in its favour.22 For
example, I failed in my examination for the doctor's degree in medical jurisprudence;
never once has the matter worried me in my dreams, while I have often enough been
examined in botany, zoology, and chemistry, and I sat for the examinations in these
subjects with well-justified anxiety, but escaped disaster, through the clemency of fate, or
of the examiner. In my dreams of school examinations I am always examined in history,
a subject in which I passed brilliantly at the time, but only, I must admit, because my
good-natured professor -- my one-eyed benefactor in another dream -- did not overlook
the fact that on the examination paper which I returned to him I had crossed out with my
fingernail the second of three questions, as a hint that he should not insist on it. One of
my patients, who withdrew before the matriculation examination, only to pass it later, but
failed in the officer's examination, so that he did not become an officer, tells me that he
often dreams of the former examination, but never of the latter.
W. Stekel, who was the first to interpret the `matriculation dream', maintains that this
dream invariably refers to sexual experiences and sexual maturity. This has frequently
been confirmed in my experience.
1
The statement that our method of dream-interpretation is inapplicable when we have not
at our disposal the dreamer's association-material must be qualified. In one case our work
of interpretation is independent of these associations: namely, when the dreamer makes
use of symbolic elements in his dream. We then employ what is, strictly speaking, a
second or auxiliary method of dream-interpretation (see below).
2
The child appears in the fairy-tale also, for there a little child suddenly cries out: `But he
hasn't anything on at all!'

3
Ferenczi has recorded a number of interesting dreams of nakedness in women which
were without difficulty traced to the infantile delight in exhibitionism, but which differ in
many features from the `typical' dream of nakedness discussed above.
4
For obvious reasons the presence of `the whole family' in the dream has the same
significance.
5
A supplementary interpretation of this dream: To spit (spucken) on the stairs, since
spuken (to haunt) is the occupation of spirits (cf. English, spook), led me by a free
translation to esprit d'escalier. `Stair-wit' means unreadiness at repartee (Schlagfertigkeit
= literally: readiness to hit out), with which I really have to reproach myself. But was the
nurse deficient in Schlagfertigkeit?
6
cf. also: Analyse der Phobie eines fünfjährigen Knaben in the Jahrbuch für psychoanal.
und psychopath. Forschungen, Bd. i, 1909 (Ges. Schriften, Bd. viii), and über infantile
Sexualtheorien, in the Sammlung kleiner Schriften zur Neurosenlehre (Ges. Schriften, Bd.
v).
7
Hans, whose phobia was the subject of the analysis in the above-mentioned publication,
cried out at the age of three and a half, while feverish shortly after the birth of a sister:
`But I don't want to have a little sister.' In his neurosis, eighteen months later, he frankly
confessed the wish that his mother should drop the child into the bath while bathing it, in
order that it might die. With all this, Hans was a good-natured, affectionate child, who
soon became fond of his sister, and took her under his special protection.
8
Such cases of death in the experience of children may soon be forgotten in the family,
but psychoanalytical investigation shows that they are very significant for a later
neurosis.
9
Since the above was written a great many observations relating to the originally hostile
attitude of children toward their brothers and sisters, and toward one of their parents,
have been recorded in the literature of psychoanalysis. One writer, Spitteler, gives the
following peculiarly sincere and ingenuous description of this typical childish attitude as
he experienced it in his earliest childhood: `Moreover, there was now a second Adolf. A
little creature whom they declared was my brother, but I could not understand what he
could be for, or why they should pretend he was a being like myself. I was sufficient unto
myself: what did I want with a brother? And he was not only useless, he was also even
troublesome. When I plagued my grandmother, he too wanted to plague her; when I was
wheeled about in the baby-carriage he sat opposite me, and took up half the room, so that
we could not help kicking one another.'
10
The three-and-a-half-year-old Hans embodied his devastating criticism of his little sister
in these identical words (loc. cit.) He assumed that she was unable to speak on account of
her lack of teeth.

11
To my astonishment, I was told that a highly intelligent boy of ten, after the sudden
death of his father, said: Ì understand that father is dead, but I can't see why he does not
come home to supper.' Further material relating to this subject will be found in the
section Kinderseele, edited by Frau Dr von Hug-Hellmuth, in Imago, Bd. i-v, 1912-18.
12
The observation of a father trained in psychoanalysis was able to detect the very
moment when his very intelligent little daughter, aged four, realised the difference
between `being away' and `being dead'. The child was being troublesome at table, and
noted that one of the waitresses in the pension was looking at her with an expression of
annoyance. `Josephine ought to be dead,' she thereupon remarked to her father. `But why
dead?' asked the father, soothingly. `Wouldn't it be enough if she went away?' `No,'
replied the child, `then she would come back again.' To the uncurbed self-love
(narcissism) of the child every inconvenience constitutes the crime of lèsé majesté, and,
as in the Draconian code, the child's feelings prescribe for all such crimes the one
invariable punishment.
13
The situation is frequently disguised by the intervention of a tendency to punishment,
which in the form of a moral reaction, threatens the loss of the beloved parent.
14
At least in some of the mythological accounts. According to others, emasculation was
inflicted only by Kronos on his father Uranos. With regard to the mythological
significance of this motive, cf. Otto Rank's Der Mythus von der Geburt des Helden, in
Heft v of Schriften zur angew. Seelenkunde, 1909, and Das Inzestmotiv in Dichtung und
Sage, 1912, chap. ix, 2.
15
None of the discoveries of psychoanalytical research has evoked such embittered
contradiction, such furious opposition, and also such entertaining acrobatics of criticism,
as this indication of the incestuous impulses of childhood which survive in the
unconscious. An attempt has even been made recently, in defiance of all experience, to
assign only a `symbolic' significance to incest. Ferenczi has given an ingenious
reinterpretation of the Oedipus myth, based on a passage in one of Schopenhauer's letters,
in Imago, i, 1912. The Òedipus complex', which was first alluded to here in The
Interpretation of Dreams, has through further study of the subject, acquired an
unexpected significance for the understanding of human history and the evolution of
religion and morality. See Totem und Taboo.
16
c.f. the dream-material of exhibitionism, p. 137.
17
These indications in the direction of an analytical understanding of Hamlet were
subsequently developed by Dr Ernest Jones, who defended the above conception against
others which have been put forward in the literature of the subject. (The Problem of
Hamlet and the Oedipus Complex, 1911). The relation of the material of Hamlet to the
`myth of the birth of the hero' has been demonstrated by O. Rank. Further attempts at an
analysis of Macbeth will be found in my essay on Einige Charaktertypen, aus der
psychoanalytischen Arbeit, in Imago, iv, 1916, (Ges. Schriften, Bd. x), in L. Jekels's
Shakespeare's Macbeth, in Imago, v, 1918; and in The Oedipus Complex as an

Explanation of Hamlet's Mystery: a Study in Motive (American Journal of Psychology,

1910, vol. xxi).
18
Even the large, over-abundant, immoderate and exaggerated things occurring in dreams
may be a childish characteristic. A child wants nothing more intensely than to grow big,
and to eat as much of everything as grown-ups do; a child is hard to satisfy; he knows no
such word as ènough', and insatiably demands the practise moderation, to be modest and
resiged, only through training. As we know, the neurotic also is inclined to immoderation
and excess.
19
While Dr Ernest Jones was delivering a lecture before an American scientific society,
and was speaking of egoism in dreams, a learned lady took exception to this unscientific
generalisation. She thought the lecturer was entitled to pronounce such a verdict only on
the dreams of Austrians but had no right to include the dreams of Americans. As for
herself, she was sure that all her dreams were strictly altruistic.
In justice to this lady with her national pride it may, however, be remarked that the
dogma `the dream is wholly egoistic' must not be misunderstood. For inasmuch as
everything that occurs in preconscious thinking may appear in dreams (in the content as
well as the latent dream-thoughts) the altruistic feelings may possibly occur. Similarly,
affectionate or amorous feelings for another person, if they exist in the unconscious, may
occur in dreams. The truth of the assertion is therefore restricted to the fact that among
the unconscious stimuli of dreams one very often finds egoistical tendencies which seem
to have been overcome in the waking state.
20
Psychoanalytic investigation has enabled us to conclude that in the predilection shown
by children for gymnastic performances, and in the repetition of these in hysterical
attacks, there is, besides the pleasure felt in the organ, yet another factor at work (often
unconscious): namely, a memory-picture of sexual intercourse observed in human beings
or animals.
21
A young colleague, who is entirely free from nervousness, tells me, in this connection:
Ì know from my own experience that while swinging, and at the moment at which the
downward movement was at its maximum, I used to have a curious feeling in my
genitals, which, although it was not really pleasing to me, I must describe as a voluptuous
feeling.' I have often heard from patients that the first erections with voluptuous
sensations which they can remember to have had in boyhood occurred while they were
climbing. It is established with complete certainty by psychoanalysis that the first sexual
sensations often have their origin in the scufflings and wrestlings of childhood.

CHAPTER SIX
The Dream-Work
All other previous attempts to solve the problems of dreams have concerned themselves
directly with the manifest dream-content as it is retained in the memory. They have
sought to obtain an interpretation of the dream from this content, or, if they dispensed
with an interpretation, to base their conclusions concerning the dream on the evidence
provided by this content. We, however, are confronted by a different set of data; for us a
new psychic material interposes itself between the dream-content and the results of our
investigations: the latent dream-content, or dream-thoughts, which are obtained only by
our method. We develop the solution of the dream from this latent content, and not from
the manifest dream-content. We are thus confronted with a new problem, an entirely
novel task -- that of examining and tracing the relations between the latent dream-
thoughts and the manifest dream-content, and the processes by which the latter has grown
out of the former.
The dream-thoughts and the dream-content present themselves as two descriptions of the
same content in two different languages; or, to put it more clearly, the dream-content
appears to us as a translation of the dream-thoughts into another mode of expression,
whose symbols and laws of composition we must learn by comparing the origin with the
translation. The dream-thoughts we can understand without further trouble the moment
we have ascertained them. The dream-content is, as it were, presented in hieroglyphics,
whose symbols must be translated, one by one, into the language of the dream-thoughts.
It would of course be incorrect to attempt to read these symbols in accordance with their
values as pictures, instead of in accordance with their meaning as symbols. For instance, I
have before me a picture-puzzle (rebus) -- a house, upon whose roof there is a boat; then
a single letter; then a running figure, whose head has been omitted, and so on. As a critic
I might be tempted to judge this composition and its elements to be nonsensical. A boat is
out of place on the roof of a house, and a headless man cannot run; the man, too, is larger
than the house, and if the whole thing is meant to represent a landscape the single letters
of the alphabet have no right in it, since they do not occur in nature. A correct judgment
of the picture-puzzle is possible only if I make no such objections to the whole and its
parts, and if, on the contrary, I take the trouble to replace each image by a syllable or
word which it may represent by virtue of some allusion or relation. The words thus put
together are no longer meaningless, but might constitute the most beautiful and pregnant
aphorism. Now a dream is such a picture-puzzle, and our predecessors in the art of
dream-interpretation have made the mistake of judging the rebus as an artistic
composition. As such, of course, it appears

A. CONDENSATION
The first thing that becomes clear to the investigator when he compares the dream-
content with the dream-thoughts is that a tremendous work of condensation has been
accomplished. The dream is meagre, paltry and laconic in comparison with the range and
copiousness of the dream-thoughts. The dream, when written down, fills half a page; the
analysis, which contains the dream-thoughts, requires six, eight, twelve times as much
space. The ratio varies with different dreams; but in my experience it is always of the
same order. As a rule, the extent of the compression which has been accomplished is
underestimated, owing to the fact that the dream-thoughts which have been brought to
light are believed to be the whole of the material, whereas a continuation of the work of
interpretation would reveal still further thoughts hidden in the dream. We have already
found it necessary to remark that one can never be really sure that one has interpreted a
dream completely; even if the solution seems satisfying and flawless, it is always possible
that yet another meaning has been manifested by the same dream. Thus the degree of
condensation is -- strictly speaking -- indeterminable. Exception may be taken -- and at
first sight the objection seems perfectly plausible -- to the assertion that the disproportion
between dream-content and dream-thoughts justifies the conclusion that a considerable
condensation of psychic material occurs in the formation of dreams. For we often have
the feeling that we have been dreaming a great deal all night, and have then forgotten
most of what we have dreamed. The dream which we remember on waking would thus
appear to be merely a remnant of the total dream-work, which would surely equal the
dream-thoughts in range if only we could remember it completely. To a certain extent
this is undoubtedly true; there is no getting away from the fact that a dream is most
accurately reproduced if we try to remember it immediately after waking, and that the
recollection of it becomes more and more defective as the day goes on. On the other
hand, it has to be recognised that the impression that we have dreamed a good deal more
than we are able to reproduce is very often based on an illusion, the origin of which we
shall explain later on. Moreover, the assumption of a condensation in the dream-work is
not affected by the possibility of forgetting a part of dreams, for it may be demonstrated
by the multitude of ideas pertaining to those individual parts of the dream which do
remain in the memory. If a large part of the dream has really escaped the memory, we are
probably deprived of access to a new series of dream-thoughts. We have no justification
for expecting that those portions of the dream which have been lost should likewise have
referred only to those thoughts which we know from the analysis of the portions which
have been preserved.1
In view of the very great number of ideas which analysis elicits for each individual
element of the dream-content, the principal doubt in the minds of many readers will be
whether it is permissible to count everything that subsequently occurs to the mind during
analysis as forming part of the dream-thoughts -- in other words, to assume that all these
thoughts have been active in the sleeping state, and have taken part in the formation of
the dream. Is it not more probable that new combinations of thoughts are developed in the
course of analysis, which did not participate in the formation of the dream? To this
objection I can give only a conditional reply. It is true, of course, that separate
combinations of thoughts make their first appearance during the analysis; but one can

convince oneself every time this happens that such new combinations have been
established only between thoughts which have already been connected in other ways in
the dream-thoughts; the new combinations are, so to speak, corollaries, short-circuits,
which are made possible by the existence of other, more fundamental modes of
connection. In respect of the great majority of the groups of thoughts revealed by
analysis, we are obliged to admit that they have already been active in the formation of
the dream, for if we work through a succession of such thoughts, which at first sight seem
to have played no part in the formation of the dream, we suddenly come upon a thought
which occurs in the dream-content, and is indispensable to its interpretation, but which is
nevertheless inaccessible except through this chain of thoughts. The reader may here turn
to the dream of the botanical monograph, which is obviously the result of an astonishing
degree of condensation, even though I have not given the complete analysis.
But how, then, are we to imagine the psychic condition of the sleeper which precedes
dreaming? Do all the dream-thoughts exist side by side, or do they pursue one another, or
are there several simultaneous trains of thought, proceeding from different centres, which
subsequently meet? I do not think it is necessary at this point to form a plastic conception
of the psychic condition at the time of dream-formation. But let us not forget that we are
concerned with unconscious thinking, and that the process may easily be different from
that which we observe in ourselves in deliberate contemplation accompanied by
consciousness.
The fact, however, is irrefutable that dream-formation is based on a process of

condensation. How, then, is this condensation effected?
Now, if we consider that of the dream-thoughts ascertained only the most restricted
number are represented in the dream by means of one of their conceptual elements, we
might conclude that the condensation is accomplished by means of omission, inasmuch
as the dream is not a faithful translation or projection, point by point, of the dream-
thoughts, but a very incomplete and defective reproduction of them. This view, as we
shall soon perceive, is a very inadequate one. But for the present let us take it as a point
of departure, and ask ourselves: If only a few of the elements of the dream-thoughts make
their way into the dream-content, what are the conditions that determine their selection?
In order to solve this problem, let us turn our attention to those elements of the dream-
content which must have fulfilled the conditions for which we are looking. The most
suitable material for this investigation will be a dream to whose formation a particularly
intense condensation has contributed. I select the dream, cited on page 73 ff., of the
botanical monograph.
Dream 1
Dream-content: I have written a monograph upon a certain (indeterminate) species of

plant. The book lies before me. I am just turning over a folded coloured plate. A dried
specimen of the plant is bound up in this copy, as in a herbarium.

The most prominent element of this dream is the botanical monograph. This is derived
from the impressions of the dream-day; I had actually seen a monograph on the genus
Cyclamen in a bookseller's window. The mention of this genus is lacking in the dream-
content; only the monograph and its relation to botany have remained. The `botanical
monograph' immediately reveals its relation to the work on cocaine which I once wrote;
from cocaine the train of thought proceeds on the one hand to a Festschrift, and on the
other to my friend, the oculist, Dr Königstein, who was partly responsible for the
introduction of cocaine as a local anaesthetic. Moreover, Dr Königstein is connected with
the recollection of an interrupted conversation I had had with him on the previous
evening, and with all sorts of ideas relating to the remuneration of medical and surgical
services among colleagues. This conversation, then, is the actual dream-stimulus; the
monograph on cyclamen is also a real incident, but one of an indifferent nature; as I now
see, the `botanical monograph' of the dream proves to be a common mean between the
two experiences of the day, taken over unchanged from an indifferent impression, and
bound up with the psychically significant experience by means of the most copious
associations.
Not only the combined idea of the botanical monograph, however, but also each of its
separate elements, `botanical' and `monograph', penetrates farther and farther, by
manifold associations, into the confused tangle of the dream-thoughts. To botanical
belong the recollections of the person of Professor Gärtner (German: Gärtner = gardener),
of his blooming wife, of my patient, whose name is Flora, and of a lady concerning
whom I told the story of the forgotten flowers. Gärtner, again, leads me to the laboratory
and the conversation with Königstein; and the allusion to the two female patients belongs
to the same conversation. From the lady with the flowers a train of thoughts branches off
to the favourite flowers of my wife, whose other branch leads to the title of the hastily
seen monograph. Further, botanical recalls an episode at the `Gymnasium', and a
university examination; and a fresh subject -- that of my hobbies -- which was broached
in the abovementioned conversation, is linked up, by means of what is humorously called
my favourite flower, the artichoke, with the train of thoughts proceeding from the
forgotten flowers; behind àrtichoke' there lies, on the one hand, a recollection of Italy,
and on the other a reminiscence of a scene of my childhood, in which I first formed an
acquaintance -- which has since then grown so intimate -- with books. Botanical, then, is
a veritable nucleus, and, for the dream, the meeting-point of many trains of thought;
which, I can testify, had all really been brought into connection by the conversation
referred to. Here we find ourselves in a thought-factory, in which, as in The Weaver's
Masterpiece:
The little shuttles to and fro

Fly, and the threads unnoted flow;
One throw links up a thousand threads.
Monograph in the dream, again, touches two themes: the one-sided nature of my studies,
and the costliness of my hobbies.

The impression derived from this first investigation is that the elements `botanical' and
`monograph' were taken up into the dream-content because they were able to offer the
most numerous points of contact with the greatest number of dream-thoughts, and thus
represented nodal points at which a great number of the dream-thoughts met together,
and because they were of manifold significance in respect of the meaning of the dream.
The fact upon which this explanation is based may be expressed in another form: Every
element of the dream-content proves to be over-determined -- that is, it appears several
times over in the dream-thoughts.
We shall learn more if we examine the other components of the dream in respect of their
occurrence in the dream-thoughts. The coloured plate refers (cf. the analysis on p. 76) to
a new subject, the criticism passed upon my work by colleagues, and also to a subject
already represented in the dream -- my hobbies -- and, further, to a memory of my
childhood, in which I pull to pieces a book with coloured plates; the dried specimen of
the plant relates to my experience with the herbarium at the `Gymnasium', and gives this
memory particular emphasis. Thus I perceive the nature of the relation between the
dream-content and dream-thoughts: Not only are the elements of the dream determined
several times over by the dream-thoughts, but the individual dream-thoughts are
represented in the dream by several elements. Starting from an element of the dream, the
path of the association leads to a number of dream-thoughts; and from a single dream-
thought to several elements of the dream. In the process of dream-formation, therefore, it
is not the case that a single dream-thought, or a group of dream-thoughts, supplies the
dream-content with an abbreviation of itself as its representative, and that the next dream-
thought supplies another abbreviation as its representative (much as representatives are
elected from among the population); but rather that the whole mass of the dream-thoughts
is subjected to a certain elaboration, in the course of which those elements that receive
the strongest and completest support stand out in relief; so that the process might perhaps
be likened to election by the scrutin du liste. Whatever dream I may subject to such a
dissection, I always find the same fundamental principle confirmed -- that the dream-
elements have been formed out of the whole mass of the dream-thoughts, and that every
one of them appears, in relation to the dream-thoughts, to have a multiple determination.
It is certainly not superfluous to demonstrate this relation of the dream-content to the

dream-thoughts by means of a further example, which is distinguished by a particularly
artful intertwining of reciprocal relations. The dream is that of a patient whom I am
treating for claustrophobia (fear of enclosed spaces). It will soon become evident why I
feel myself called upon to entitle this exceptionally clever piece of dream-activity:
Dream 2 -- À Beautiful Dream'
The dreamer is driving with a great number of companions in X-- Street, where there is a
modest hostelry (which is not the case). A theatrical performance is being given in one of
the rooms of the inn. He is first spectator, then actor. Finally the company are told to
change their clothes, in order to return to the city. Some of the company are shown into
rooms on the ground floor, others to rooms on the first floor. Then a dispute arises. The
people upstairs are annoyed because those downstairs have not yet finished changing, so

that they cannot come down. His brother is upstairs; he is downstairs; and he is angry
with his brother because they are so hurried. (This part obscure.) Besides, it was already
decided, upon their arrival, who was to go upstairs and who down. Then he goes alone
up the hill towards the city, and he walks so heavily, and with such difficulty, that he
cannot move from the spot. An elderly gentleman joins him and talks angrily of the King
of Italy. Finally, towards the top of the hill, he is able to walk much more easily.
The difficulty experienced in climbing the hill was so distinct that for some time after
waking he was in doubt whether the experience was a dream or the reality.
Judged by the manifest content, this dream can hardly be eulogised. Contrary to the rules,
I shall begin the interpretation with that portion to which the dreamer referred as being
the most distinct.
The difficulty dreamed of, and probably experienced during the dream -- difficulty in
climbing, accompanied by dyspnoea -- was one of the symptoms which the patient had
actually exhibited some years before, and which, in conjunction with other symptoms,
was at the time attributed to tuberculosis (probably hysterically simulated). From our
study of exhibition-dreams we are already acquainted with this sensation of being
inhibited in motion, peculiar to dreams, and here again we find it utilised as material
always available for the purposes of any other kind of representation. The part of the
dream-content which represents climbing as difficult at first, and easier at the top of the
hill, made me think, while it was being related, of the well-known masterly introduction
to Daudet's Sappho. Here a young man carries the woman he loves upstairs; she is at first
as light as a feather, but the higher he climbs the more she weighs; and this scene is
symbolic of the progress of their relation, in describing which Daudet seeks to admonish
young men not to lavish an earnest affection upon girls of humble origin and dubious
antecedents.2 Although I knew that my patient had recently had a love-affair with an
actress, and had broken it off, I hardly expected to find that the interpretation which had
occurred to me was correct. The situation in Sappho is actually the reverse of that in the
dream; for in the dream climbing was difficult at the first and easy later on; in the novel
the symbolism is pertinent only if what was at first easily carried finally proves to be a
heavy burden. To my astonishment, the patient remarked that the interpretation fitted in
very well with the plot of a play which he had seen the previous evening. The play was
called Rund um Wien (`Round about Vienna'), and treated of the career of a girl who was
at first respectable, but who subsequently lapsed into the demi-monde, and formed
relations with highly-placed lovers, thereby climbing, but finally she went downhill faster
and faster. This play reminded him of another, entitled Von Stufe zu Stufe (`From Step to
Step'), the poster advertising which had depicted a flight of stairs.
To continue the interpretation: The actress with whom he had had his most recent and
complicated affair had lived in X-- Street. There is no inn in this street. However, while
he was spending part of the summer in Vienna for the sake of this lady, he had lodged
(German: abgestiegen = stopped, literally stepped off) at a small hotel in the
neighbourhood. When he was leaving the hotel, he said to the cab-driver: Ì am glad at all
events that I didn't get any vermin here!' (Incidentally, the dread of vermin is one of his

phobias.) Whereupon the cab-driver answered: `How could anybody stop there! That isn't
a hotel at all, it's really nothing but a pub!'
The `pub' immediately reminded him of a quotation:
Of a wonderful host
I was lately a guest.
But the host in the poem by Uhland is an apple-tree. Now a second quotation continues
the train of thought:
FAUST: (dancing with the young witch).

A lovely dream once came to me;
I then beheld an apple-tree,
And there two fairest apples shone:
They lured me so, I climbed thereon.
THE FAIR ONE:

Àpples have been desired by you,
Since first in Paradise they grew;
And I am moved with joy to know
That such within my garden grow.3
There is not the slightest doubt what is meant by the apple-tree and the apples. A
beautiful bosom stood high among the charms by which the actress had bewitched our
dreamer.
Judging from the context of the analysis, we had every reason to assume that the dream
referred to an impression of the dreamer's childhood. If this is correct, it must have
referred to the wet-nurse of the dreamer, who is now a man of nearly thirty years of age.
The bosom of the nurse is in reality an inn for the child. The nurse, as well as Daudet's
Sappho, appears as an allusion to his recently abandoned mistress.
The (elder) brother of the patient also appears in the dream-content; he is upstairs, while
the dreamer himself is downstairs. This again is an inversion, for the brother, as I happen
to know, has lost his social position, while my patient has retained his. In relating the
dream-content, the dreamer avoided saying that his brother was upstairs and that he
himself was downstairs. This would have been too obvious an expression, for in Austria
we say that a man is on the ground floor when he has lost his fortune and social position,
just as we say that he has come down. Now the fact that at this point in the dream
something is represented as inverted must have a meaning; and the inversion must apply
to some other relation between the dream-thoughts and the dream-content. There is an
indication which suggests how this inversion is to be understood. It obviously applies to
the end of the dream, where the circumstances of climbing are the reverse of those
described in Sappho. Now it is evident what inversion is meant: In Sappho the man
carries the woman who stands in a sexual relation to him; in the dream-thoughts,

conversely, there is a reference to a woman carrying a man; and, as this could occur only
in childhood, the reference is once more to the nurse who carries the heavy child. Thus
the final portion of the dream succeeds in representing Sappho and the nurse in the same
allusion.
Just as the name Sappho has not been selected by the poet without reference to a Lesbian
practice, so the portions of the dream in which people are busy upstairs and downstairs,
àbove' and `beneath', point to fancies of a sexual content with which the dreamer is
occupied, and which, as suppressed cravings, are not unconnected with his neurosis.
Dream-interpretation itself does not show that these are fancies and not memories of
actual happenings; it only furnishes us with a set of thoughts and leaves it to us to
determine their actual value. In this case real and imagined happenings appear at first as
of equal value -- and not only here, but also in the creation of more important psychic
structures than dreams. A large company, as we already know, signifies a secret. The
brother is none other than a representative, drawn into the scenes of childhood by
`fancying backwards', of all of the subsequent rivals for women's favours. Through the
medium of an experience indifferent in itself, the episode of the gentleman who talks
angrily of the King of Italy refers to the intrusion of people of low rank into aristocratic
society. It is as though the warning which Daudet gives to young men were to be
supplemented by a similar warning applicable to a suckling child.4
In the two dreams here cited I have shown by italics where one of the elements of the
dream recurs in the dream-thoughts, in order to make the multiple relations of the former
more obvious.
Since, however, the analysis of these dreams has not been carried to completion, it will
probably be worth while to consider a dream with a full analysis, in order to demonstrate
the manifold determination of the dream-content. For this purpose I shall select the dream
of Irma's injection (see p. 19). From this example we shall readily see that the
condensation-work in the dream-formation has made use of more means than one.
The chief person in the dream-content is my patient Irma, who is seen with the features
which belong to her in waking life, and who therefore, in the first instance, represents
herself. But her attitude, as I examine her at the window, is taken from a recollection of
another person, of the lady for whom I should like to exchange my patient, as is shown
by the dream-thoughts. Inasmuch as Irma has a diphtheritic membrane, which recalls my
anxiety about my eldest daughter, she comes to represent this child of mine, behind
whom, connected with her by the identity of their names, is concealed the person of the
patient who died from the effects of poison. In the further course of the dream the
significance of Irma's personality changes (without the alteration of her image as it is
seen in the dream): she becomes one of the children whom we examine in the public
dispensaries for children's diseases, where my friends display the differences in their
mental capacities. The transition was obviously effected by the idea of my little daughter.
Owing to her unwillingness to open her mouth, the same Irma constitutes an allusion to
another lady who was once examined by me, and, also in the same connection, to my

wife. Further, in the morbid changes which I discover in her throat I have summarised
allusions to quite a number of other persons.
All these people whom I encounter as I follow up the associations suggested by Ìrma' do
not appear personally in the dream; they are concealed behind the dream-person Ìrma',
who is thus developed into a collective image, which, as might be expected, has
contradictory features. Irma comes to represent these other persons, who are discarded in
the work of condensation, inasmuch as I allow anything to happen to her which reminds
me of these persons, trait by trait.
For the purposes of dream-condensation I may construct a composite person in yet

another fashion, by combining the actual features of two or more persons in a single
dream-image. It is in this fashion that the Dr M. of my dream was constructed; he bears
the name of Dr M., and he speaks and acts as Dr M. does, but his bodily characteristics
and his malady belong to another person, my eldest brother; a single feature, paleness, is
doubly determined, owing to the fact that it is common to both persons. Dr R., in my
dream about my uncle, is a similar composite person. But here the dream-image is
constructed in yet another fashion. I have not united features peculiar to the one person
with the features of the other, thereby abridging by certain features the memory-picture of
each; but I have adopted the method employed by Galton in producing family portraits;
namely, I have superimposed the two images, so that the common features stand out in
stronger relief, while those which do not coincide neutralise one another and become
indistinct. In the dream of my uncle the fair beard stands out in relief, as an emphasised
feature, from a physiognomy which belongs to two persons, and which is consequently
blurred; further, in its reference to growing grey the beard contains an allusion to my
father and to myself.
The construction of collective and composite persons is one of the principal methods of
dream-condensation. We shall presently have occasion to deal with this in another
connection.
The notion of dysentery in the dream of Irma's injection has likewise a multiple
determination; on the one hand, because of its paraphasic assonance with diphtheria, and
on the other because of its reference to the patient whom I sent to the East, and whose
hysteria had been wrongly diagnosed.
The mention of propyls in the dream proves again to be an interesting case of

condensation. Not propyls but amyls were included in the dream-thoughts. One might
think that here a simple displacement had occurred in the course of dream-formation.
This is in fact the case, but the displacement serves the purposes of the condensation, as
is shown from the following supplementary analysis: If I dwell for a moment upon the
word propylen (German) its assonance with the word propylaeum suggests itself to me.
But a propylaeum is to be found not only in Athens, but also in Munich. In the latter city,
a year before my dream, I had visited a friend who was seriously ill, and the reference to
him in trimethylamin, which follows closely upon propyls, is unmistakable.

I pass over the striking circumstance that here, as elsewhere in the analysis of dreams,
associations of the most widely differing values are employed for making thought-
connections as though they were equivalent, and I yield to the temptation to regard the
procedure by which amyls in the dream-thoughts are replaced in the dream-content by
propyls as a sort of plastic process.
On the one hand, here is the group of ideas relating to my friend Otto, who does not
understand me, thinks I am in the wrong, and gives me the liqueur that smells of amyls;
on the other hand, there is the group of ideas -- connected with the first by contrast --
relating to my Berlin friend who does understand me, who would always think that I was
right, and to whom I am indebted for so much valuable information concerning the
chemistry of sexual processes.
What elements in the Otto group are to attract my particular attention are determined by
the recent circumstances which are responsible for the dream; amyls belong to the
element so distinguished, which are predestined to find their way into the dream-content.
The large group of ideas centring upon William is actually stimulated by the contrast
between William and Otto, and those elements in it are emphasised which are in tune
with those already stirred up in the Òtto' group. In the whole of this dream I am
continually recoiling from somebody who excites my displeasure towards another person
with whom I can at will confront the first; trait by trait I appeal to the friend as against the
enemy. Thus àmyls' in the Otto group awakes recollections in the other group, also
belonging to the region of chemistry; `trimethylamin', which receives support from
several quarters, finds its way into the dream-content. Àmyls', too, might have got into
the dream-content unchanged, but it yields to the influence of the `William' group,
inasmuch as out of the whole range of recollections covered by this name an element is
sought out which is able to furnish a double determination for àmyls'. `Propyls' is closely
associated with àmyls'; from the `William' group comes Munich with its propylaeum.
Both groups are united in `propyls--propylaeum'. As though by a compromise, this
intermediate element then makes its way into the dream-content. Here a common mean
which permits of a multiple determination has been created. It thus becomes palpable that
a multiple determination must facilitate penetration into the dream-content. For the
purpose of this mean-formation a displacement of the attention has been unhesitatingly
effected from what is really intended to something adjacent to it in the associations.
The study of the dream of Irma's injection has now enabled us to obtain some insight into
the process of condensation which occurs in the formation of dreams. We perceive, as
peculiarities of the condensing process, a selection of those elements which occur several
times over in the dream-content, the formation of new unities (composite persons, mixed
images), and the production of common means. The purpose which is served by
condensation, and the means by which it is brought about, will be investigated when we
come to study in all their bearings the psychic processes at work in the formation of
dreams. Let us for the present be content with establishing the fact of dream-condensation
as a relation between the dream-thoughts and the dream-content which deserves attention.

The condensation-work of dreams becomes most palpable when it takes words and names
as its objects. Generally speaking, words are often treated in dreams as things, and
therefore undergo the same combinations as the ideas of things. The results of such
dreams are comical and bizarre word-formations.
1. A colleague sent an essay of his, in which he had, in my opinion, overestimated the

value of a recent physiological discovery, and had expressed himself, moreover, in
extravagant terms. On the following night I dreamed a sentence which obviously referred
to this essay: `That is a truly norekdal style.' The solution of this word-formation at first
gave me some difficulty; it was unquestionably formed as a parody of the superlatives
`colossal', `pyramidal'; but it was not easy to say where it came from. At last the monster
fell apart into the two names Nora and Ekdal, from two well-known plays by Ibsen. I had
previously read a newspaper article on Ibsen by the writer whose latest work I was now
criticising in my dream.
2. One of my female patients dreams that a man with a fair beard and a peculiar
glittering eye is pointing to a signboard attached to a tree which reads: uclamparia --
wet.5
Analysis. -- The man was rather authoritative-looking, and his peculiar glittering eye at
once recalled the church of San Paolo, near Rome, where she had seen the mosaic
portraits of the Popes. One of the early Popes had a golden eye (this is really an optical
illusion, to which the guides usually call attention). Further associations showed that the
general physiognomy of the man corresponded with her own clergyman (pope), and the
shape of the fair beard recalled her doctor (myself), while the stature of the man in the
dream recalled her father. All these persons stand in the same relation to her; they are all
guiding and directing the course of her life. On further questioning, the golden eye
recalled gold -- money -- the rather expensive psychoanalytic treatment, which gives her
a great deal of concern. Gold, moreover, recalls the gold cure for alcoholism -- Herr D.,
whom she would have married, if it had not been for his clinging to the disgusting
alcohol habit -- she does not object to anyone's taking an occasional drink; she herself
sometimes drinks beer and liqueurs. This again brings her back to her visit to San Paolo
(fuori la mura) and its surroundings. She remembers that in the neighbouring monastery
of the Tre Fontane she drank a liqueur made of eucalyptus by the Trappist monks of the
monastery. She then relates how the monks transformed this malarial and swampy region
into a dry and wholesome neighbourhood by planting numbers of eucalyptus trees. The
word ùclamparia' then resolves itself into eucalyptus and malarie, and the word wet
refers to the former swampy nature of the locality. Wet also suggests dry. Dry is actually
the name of the man whom she would have married but for his over-indulgence in
alcohol. The peculiar name of Dry is of Germanic origin (drei = three) and hence, alludes
to the monastery of the Three (drei) Fountains. In talking of Mr Dry's habit she used the
strong expression: `He could drink a fountain.' Mr Dry jocosely refers to his habit by
saying: `You know I must drink because I am always dry' (referring to his name). The
eucalyptus refers also to her neurosis, which was at first diagnosed as malaria. She went
to Italy because her attacks of anxiety, which were accompanied by marked rigors and

shivering, were thought to be of malarial origin. She bought some eucalyptus oil from the
monks, and she maintains that it has done her much good.
The condensation uclamparia--wet is therefore the point of junction for the dream as well
as for the neurosis.
3. In a rather long and confused dream of my own, the apparent nucleus of which is a sea-
voyage, it occurs to me that the next port is Hearsing, and next after that Fliess. The latter
is the name of my friend in B., to which city I have often journeyed. But Hearsing is put
together from the names of the places in the neighbourhood of Vienna, which so
frequently end in ìng': Hietzing, Liesing, Moedling (the old Medelitz, meae deliciae, `my
joy'; that is, my own name, the German for `joy' being Freude), and the English hearsay,
which points to calumny, and establishes the relation to the indifferent dream-stimulus of
the day -- a poem in Fliegende Blätter about a slanderous dwarf, `Sagter Hatergesagt'
(Saidhe Hashesaid). By the combination of the final syllable ing with the name Fliess,
Vlissingen is obtained, which is a real port through which my brother passes when he
comes to visit us from England. But the English for Vlissingen is Flushing, which
signifies blushing, and recalls patients suffering from erythrothobia (fear of blushing),
whom I sometimes treat, and also a recent publication of Bechterew's, relating to this
neurosis, the reading of which angered me.6
4. Upon another occasion I had a dream which consisted of two separate parts. The first
was the vividly remembered word Àutodidasker': the second was a faithful reproduction
in the dream-content of a short and harmless fancy which had been developed a few days
earlier, and which was to the effect that I must tell Professor N., when I next saw him:
`The patient about whose condition I last consulted you is really suffering from a
neurosis, just as you suspected.' So not only must the newly-coined Àutodidasker' satisfy
the requirement that it should contain or represent a compressed meaning, but this
meaning must have a valid connection with my resolve -- repeated from waking life -- to
give Professor N. due credit for his diagnosis.
Now Autodidasker is easily separated into author (German, Autor), autodidact, and
Lasker, with whom is associated the name Lasalle. The first of these words leads to the
occasion of the dream -- which this time is significant. I had brought home to my wife
several volumes by a well-known author who is a friend of my brother's, and who, as I
have learned, comes from the same neighbourhood as myself (J. J. David). One evening
she told me how profoundly impressed she had been by the pathetic sadness of a story in
one of David's novels (a story of wasted talents), and our conversation turned upon the
signs of talent which we perceive in our own children. Under the influence of what she
had just read, my wife expressed some concern about our children, and I comforted her
with the remark that precisely such dangers as she feared can be averted by training.
During the night my thoughts proceeded farther, took up my wife's concern for the
children, and interwove with it all sorts of other things. Something which the novelist had
said to my brother on the subject of marriage showed my thoughts a bypath which might
lead to representation in the dream. This path led to Breslau; a lady who was a very good
friend of ours had married and gone to live there. I found in Breslau Lasker and Lasalle,

two examples to justify the fear lest our boys should be ruined by women, examples
which enabled me to represent simultaneously two ways of influencing a man to his
undoing.7 The Cherchez la femme, by which these thoughts may be summarised, leads
me, if taken in another sense, to my brother, who is still unmarried and whose name is
Alexander. Now I see that Alex, as we abbreviate the name, sounds almost like an
inversion of Lasker, and that this fact must have contributed to send my thoughts on a
detour by way of Breslau.
But the playing with names and syllables in which I am here engaged has yet another
meaning. It represents the wish that my brother may enjoy a happy family life, and this in
the following manner: In the novel of artistic life, L'Oeuvre, which, by virtue of its
content, must have been in association with my dream-thoughts, the author, as is well
known, has incidentally given a description of his own person and his own domestic
happiness, and appears under the name of Sandoz. In the metamorphosis of his name he
probably went to work as follows: Zola, when inverted (as children are fond of inverting
names) gives Aloz. But this was still too undisguised; he therefore replaced the syllable
Al, which stands at the beginning of the name Alexander, by the third syllable of the same
name, sand, and thus arrived at Sandoz. My autodidasker originated in a similar fashion.
My fantasy -- that I am telling Professor N. that the patient whom we have both seen is
suffering from a neurosis -- found its way into the dream in the following manner:
Shortly before the close of my working year I had a patient in whose case my powers of
diagnosis failed me. A serious organic trouble -- possibly some alterative degeneration of
the spinal cord -- was to be assumed, but could not be conclusively demonstrated. It
would have been tempting to diagnose the trouble as a neurosis, and this would have put
an end to all my difficulties, but for the fact that the sexual anamnesis, failing which I am
unwilling to admit a neurosis, was so energetically denied by the patient. In my
embarrassment I called to my assistance the physician whom I respect most of all men (as
others do also), and to whose authority I surrender most completely. He listened to my
doubts, told me he thought them justified, and then said: `Keep on observing the man, it
is probably a neurosis.' Since I know that he does not share my opinions concerning the
etiology of the neuroses, I refrained from contradicting him, but I did not conceal my
scepticism. A few days later I informed the patient that I did not know what to do with
him, and advised him to go to someone else. Thereupon, to my great astonishment, he
began to beg my pardon for having lied to me; he had felt so ashamed; and now he
revealed to me just that piece of sexual etiology which I had expected, and which I found
necessary for assuming the existence of a neurosis. This was a relief to me, but at the
same time a humiliation; for I had to admit that my consultant, who was not disconcerted
by the absence of anamnesis, had judged the case more correctly. I made up my mind to
tell him, when next I saw him, that he had been right and I had been wrong.
This is just what I do in the dream. But what sort of a wish is fulfilled if I acknowledge
that I am mistaken? This is precisely my wish; I wish to be mistaken as regards my fears -
- that is to say, I wish that my wife, whose fears I have appropriated in my dream-
thoughts, may prove to be mistaken. The subject to which the fact of being right or wrong
is related in the dream is not far removed from that which is really of interest to the

dream-thoughts. We have the same pair of alternatives, of either organic or functional

impairment caused by a woman, or actually by the sexual life -- either tabetic paralysis or
a neurosis -- with which latter the nature of Lasalle's undoing is indirectly connected.
In this well-constructed (and on careful analysis quite transparent) dream, Professor N.

appears not merely on account of this analogy, and my wish to be proved mistaken, or the
associated references to Breslau and to the family of our married friend who lives there,
but also on account of the following little dialogue which followed our consultation:
After he had acquitted himself of his professional duties by making the above-mentioned
suggestion. Dr N. proceeded to discuss personal matters. `How many children have you
now?' -- `Six.' -- A thoughtful and respectful gesture. -- `Girls, boys?' -- `Three of each.
They are my pride and my riches.' -- `Well, you must be careful; there is no difficulty
about the girls, but the boys are a difficulty later on as regards their upbringing.' I replied
that until now they had been very tractable: obviously this prognosis of my boys' future
pleased me as little as his diagnosis of my patient, whom he believed to be suffering only
from a neurosis. These two impressions, then, are connected by their contiguity, by their
being successively received; and when I incorporate the story of the neurosis into the
dream, I substitute it for the conversation on the subject of upbringing, which is even
more closely connected with the dream-thoughts, since it touches so closely upon the
anxiety subsequently expressed by my wife. Thus, even my fear that N. may prove to be
right in his remarks on the difficulties to be met with in bringing up boys is admitted into
the dream-content, inasmuch as it is concealed behind the representation of my wish that
I may be wrong to harbour such apprehensions. The same fantasy serves without
alteration to represent both the conflicting alternatives.
Examination-dreams present the same difficulties to interpretation that I have already

described as characteristic of most typical dreams. The associative material which the
dreamer supplies only rarely suffices for interpretation. A deeper understanding of such
dreams has to be accumulated from a considerable number of examples. Not long ago I
arrived at a conviction that reassurances like `But you already are a doctor', and so on,
not only convey a consolation but imply a reproach as well. This would have run: `You
are already so old, so far advanced in life, and yet you still commit such follies, are guilty
of such childish behaviour.' This mixture of self-criticism and consolation would
correspond with the examination-dreams. After this it is no longer surprising that the
reproaches in the last analysed examples concerning `follies' and `childish behaviour'
should relate to repetitions of reprehensible sexual acts.
The verbal transformations in dreams are very similar to those which are known to occur
in paranoia, and which are observed also in hysteria and obsessions. The linguistic tricks
of children, who at a certain age actually treat words as objects, and even invent new
languages and artificial syntaxes, are a common source of such occurrences both in
dreams and in the psychoneuroses.
The analysis of nonsensical word-formations in dreams is particularly well suited to

demonstrate the degree of condensation effected in the dream-work. From the small
number of the selected examples here considered it must not be concluded that such

material is seldom observed or is at all exceptional. It is, on the contrary, very frequent,
but owing to the dependence of dream-interpretation on psychoanalytic treatment very
few examples are noted down and reported, and most of the analyses which are reported
are comprehensible only to the specialist in neuropathology.
When a spoken utterance, expressly distinguished as such from a thought, occurs in a

dream, it is an invariable rule that the dream-speech has originated from a remembered
speech in the dream-material. The wording of the speech has either been preserved in its
entirety or has been slightly altered in expression; frequently the dream-speech is pieced
together from different recollections of spoken remarks; the wording has remained the
same, but the sense has perhaps become ambiguous, or differs from the wording. Not
infrequently the dream-speech serves merely as an allusion to an incident in connection
with which the remembered speech was made.8
1
References to the condensation in dreams are to be found in the works of many writers
on the subject. Du Prel states in his Philospohie der Mystik that he is absolutely certain
that a condensation-process of the succession of ideas has occurred.
2
In estimating the significance of this passage we may recall the meaning of dreams of
climbing stairs, as explained in the chapter on Symbolism.
3
Translated by Bayard Taylor.
4
The fantastic nature of the situation relating to the dreamer's wet-nurse is shown by the
circumstance, objectively ascertained, that the nurse in this case was his mother. Further,
I may call attention to the regret of the young man in the anecdote related on p. 105 (that
he had not taken better advantage of his opportunities with his wet-nurse) as the probable
source of this dream.
5
Given by translator, as the author's example could not be translated.
6
The same analysis and synthesis of syllables -- a veritable chemistry of syllables --
serves us for many a jest in waking life. `What is the cheapest method of obtaining
silver? You go to a field where silver-berries are growing and pick them; then the berries
are eliminated and the silver remains in a free state.' [Translator's example.] The first
person who read and criticised this book made the objection -- with which other readers
will probably agree -- `that the dreamer often appears too witty.' That is true, so long as it
applies to the dreamer; it involves a condemnation only when its application is extended
to the interpreter of the dream. In waking reality I can make very little claim to the
predicate `witty'; if my dreams appear witty, this is not the fault of my individuality, but
of the peculiar psychological conditions under which the dream is fabricated, and is
intimately connected with the theory of wit and the comical. The dream becomes witty
because the shortest and most direct way to the expression of its thoughts is barred for it;
the dream is under constraint. My readers may convince themselves that the dreams of
my patients give the impression of being quite as witty (at least, in intention), as my own,

and even more so. Nevertheless, this reproach impelled me to compare the technique of
wit with the dream-work.
7
Lasker died of progressive paralysis; that is, of the consequences of an infection caught
from a woman (syphilis); Lasalle, also a syphilitic, was killed in a duel which he fought
on account of the lady whom he had been courting.
8
In the case of a young man who was suffering from obsessions, but whose intellectual
functions were intact and highly developed, I recently found the only exception to this
rule The speeches which occurred in his dreams did not originate in speeches which he
had heard or had made himself, but corresponded to the undistorted verbal expression of
his obsessive thoughts, which came to his waking consciousness only in an altered form.

B. THE WORK OF DISPLACEMENT
Another and probably no less significant relation must have already forced itself upon our
attention while we were collecting examples of dream-condensation. We may have
noticed that these elements which obtrude themselves in the dream-content as its essential
components do not by any means play this same part in the dream-thoughts. As a
corollary to this, the converse of this statement is also true. That which is obviously the
essential content of the dream-thoughts need not be represented at all in the dream. The
dream is, as it were, centred elsewhere; its content is arranged about elements which do
not constitute the central point of the dream-thoughts. Thus, for example, in the dream of
the botanical monograph the central point of the dream-content is evidently the element
`botanical'; in the dream-thoughts we are concerned with the complications and conflicts
resulting from services rendered between colleagues which place them under mutual
obligations; later on with the reproach that I am in the habit of sacrificing too much time
to my hobbies; and the element `botanical' finds no place in this nucleus of the dream-
thoughts, unless it is loosely connected with it by antithesis, for botany was never among
my favourite subjects. In the Sappho-dream of my patient, ascending and descending,
being upstairs and down, is made the central point; the dream, however, is concerned
with the danger of sexual relations with persons of `low' degree; so that only one of the
elements of the dream-thoughts seems to have found its way into the dream-content, and
this is unduly expanded. Again, in the dream of my uncle, the fair beard, which seems to
be its central point, appears to have no rational connection with the desire for greatness
which we have recognised as the nucleus of the dream-thoughts. Such dreams very
naturally give us an impression of a `displacement'. In complete contrast to these
examples, the dream of Irma's injection shows that individual elements may claim the
same place in dream-formation as that which they occupy in the dream-thoughts. The
recognition of this new and utterly inconstant relation between the dream-thoughts and
the dream-content will probably astonish us at first. If we find in a psychic process of
normal life that one idea has been selected from among a number of others, and has
acquired a particular emphasis in our consciousness, we are wont to regard this as proof
that a peculiar psychic value (a certain degree of interest) attaches to the victorious idea.
We now discover that this value of the individual element in the dream-thoughts is not
retained in dream-formation, or is not taken into account. For there is no doubt which of
the elements of the dream-thoughts are of the highest value; our judgment informs us
immediately. In dream-formation the essential elements, those that are emphasised by
intensive interest, may be treated as though they were subordinate, while they are
replaced in the dream by other elements, which were certainly subordinate in the dream-
thoughts. It seems at first as though the psychic intensity1 of individual ideas were of no
account in their selection for dream-formation, but only their greater or lesser multiplicity
of determination. One might be inclined to think that what gets into the dream is not what
is important in the dream-thoughts, but what is contained in them several times over; but
our understanding of dream-formation is not much advanced by this assumption; to begin
with, we cannot believe that the two motives of multiple determination and intrinsic value
can influence the selection of the dream otherwise than in the same direction. Those ideas
in the dream-thoughts which are most important are probably also those which recur most
frequently, since the individual dream-thoughts radiate from them as centres. And yet the

dream may reject these intensively emphasised and extensively reinforced elements, and
may take up into its content other elements which are only extensively reinforced.
This difficulty may be solved if we follow up yet another impression received during the
investigation of the over-determination of the dream-content. Many readers of this
investigation may already have decided, in their own minds, that the discovery of the
multiple determination of the dream-elements is of no great importance, because it is
inevitable. Since in analysis we proceed from the dream-elements, and register all the
ideas which associate themselves with these elements, is it any wonder that these
elements should recur with peculiar frequency in the thought-material obtained in this
manner? While I cannot admit the validity of this objection, I am now going to say
something that sounds rather like it: Among the thoughts which analysis brings to light
are many which are far removed from the nucleus of the dream, and which stand out like
artificial interpolations made for a definite purpose. Their purpose may readily be
detected; they establish a connection, often a forced and far-fetched connection, between
the dream-content and the dream-thoughts, and in many cases, if these elements were
weeded out of the analysis, the components of the dream-content would not only not be
over-determined, but they would not be sufficiently determined. We are thus led to the
conclusion that multiple determination, decisive as regards the selection made by the
dream, is perhaps not always a primary factor in dream-formation, but is often a
secondary product of a psychic force which is as yet unknown to us. Nevertheless, it must
be of importance for the entrance of the individual elements into the dream, for we may
observe that in cases where multiple determination does not proceed easily from the
dream-material it is brought about with a certain effort.
It now becomes very probable that a psychic force expresses itself in the dream-work
which, on the one hand, strips the elements of the high psychic value of their intensity
and, on the other hand, by means of over-determination, creates new significant values
from elements of slight value, which new values then make their way into the dream-
content. Now if this is the method of procedure, there has occurred in the process of
dream-formation a transference and displacement of the psychic intensities of the
individual elements, from which results the textual difference between the dream-content
and the thought-content. The process which we here assume to be operative is actually
the most essential part of the dream-work; it may fitly be called dream-displacement.
Dream-displacement and dream-condensation are the two craftsmen to whom we may
chiefly ascribe the structure of the dream.
I think it will be easy to recognise the psychic force which expresses itself in dream-
displacement. The result of this displacement is that the dream-content no longer has any
likeness to the nucleus of the dream-thoughts, and the dream reproduces only a distorted
form of the dream-wish in the unconscious. But we are already acquainted with dream-
distortion; we have traced it back to the censorship which one psychic instance in the
psychic life exercises over another. Dream-displacement is one of the chief means of
achieving this distortion. Is fecit, cui profuit. We must assume that dream-displacement is
brought about by the influence of this censorship, the endopsychic defence.2

The manner in which the factors of displacement, condensation and over-determination

interact with one another in dream-formation -- which is the ruling factor and which the
subordinate one -- all this will be reserved as a subject for later investigation. In the
meantime, we may state, as a second condition which the elements that find their way
into the dream must satisfy, that they must be withdrawn from the resistance of the
censorship. But henceforth, in the interpretation of dreams, we shall reckon with dream-
displacement as an unquestionable fact.
1
The psychic intensity or value of an idea -- the emphasis due to interest -- is of course to
be distinguished from perceptual or conceptual intensity.
2
Since I regard the attribution of dream-distortion to the censorship as the central point of
my conception of the dream, I will here quote the closing passage of a story, Träumen
wie Wachen, from Phantasien eines Realisten, by Lynkeus (Vienna, second edition,
1900), in which I find this chief feature of my doctrine reproduced:
`Concerning a man who possesses the remarkable faculty of never dreaming nonsense . .
.'
`Your marvellous faculty of dreaming as if you were awake is based upon your virtues,
upon your goodness, your justice, and your love of truth; it is the moral clarity of your
nature which makes everything about you intelligible to me.'
`But if I really give thought to the matter,' was the reply, Ì almost believe that all men
are made as I am, and that no one ever dreams nonsense! A dream which one remembers
so distinctly that one can relate it afterwards, and which, therefore, is no dream of
delirium, always has a meaning; why, it cannot be otherwise! For that which is in
contradiction to itself can never be combined into a whole. The fact that time and space
are often thoroughly shaken up, detracts not at all from the real content of the dream,
because both are without any significance whatever for its essential content. We often do
the same thing in waking life; think of fairytales, of so many bold and pregnant creations
of fantasy, of which only a foolish person would say: ``That is nonsense! For it isn't
possible.'' '
Ìf only it were always possible to interpret dreams correctly, as you have just done with
mine!' said the friend.
`That is certainly not an easy task, but with a little attention it must always be possible to
the dreamer. -- You ask why it is generally impossible? In your case there seems to be
something veiled in your dreams, something unchaste in a special and exalted fashion, a
certain secrecy in your nature, which it is difficult to fathom; and that is why your dreams
so often seem to be without meaning or even nonsensical. But in the profoundest sense,
this is by no means the case; indeed it cannot be, for a man is always the same person,
whether he wakes or dreams.'

C. THE MEANS OF REPRESENTATION IN DREAMS
Besides the two factors of condensation and displacement in dreams, which we have
found to be at work in the transformation of the latent dream-material into the manifest
dream-content, we shall, in the course of this investigation, come upon two further
conditions which exercise an unquestionable influence over the selection of the material
that eventually appears in the dream. But first, even at the risk of seeming to interrupt our
progress, I shall take a preliminary glance at the processes by which the interpretation of
dreams is accomplished. I do not deny that the best way of explaining them, and of
convincing the critic of their reliability, would be to take a single dream as an example, to
detail its interpretation, as I did (in Chapter Two) in the case of the dream of Irma's
injection, but then to assemble the dream-thoughts which I had discovered, and from
them to reconstruct the formation of the dream -- that is to say, to supplement dream-
analysis by dream-synthesis. I have done this with several specimens for my own
instruction; but I cannot undertake to do it here, as I am prevented by a number of
considerations (relating to the psychic material necessary for such a demonstration) such
as any right-thinking person would approve. In the analysis of dreams these
considerations present less difficulty, for an analysis may be incomplete and still retain its
value, even if it leads only a little way into the structure of the dream. I do not see how a
synthesis, to be convincing, could be anything short of complete. I could give a complete
synthesis only of the dreams of such persons as are unknown to the reading public. Since,
however, neurotic patients are the only persons who furnish me with the means of
making such a synthesis, this part of the description of dreams must be postponed until I
can carry the psychological explanation of the neuroses far enough to demonstrate their
relation to our subject.1 This will be done elsewhere.
From my attempts to construct dreams synthetically from their dream-thoughts, I know

that the material which is yielded by interpretation varies in value. Part of it consists of
the essential dream-thoughts, which would completely replace the dream and would in
themselves be a sufficient substitute for it, were there no dream-censorship. To the other
part one is wont to ascribe slight importance, nor does one set any value on the assertion
that all these thoughts have participated in the formation of the dream; on the contrary,
they may include notions which are associated with experiences that have occurred
subsequently to the dream, between the dream and the interpretation. This part comprises
not only all the connecting-paths which have led from the manifest to the latent dream-
content, but also the intermediate and approximating associations by means of which one
has arrived at a knowledge of these connecting-paths during the work of interpretation.
At this point we are interested exclusively in the essential dream-thoughts. These

commonly reveal themselves as a complex of thoughts and memories of the most
intricate possible construction, with all the characteristics of the thought-processes known
to us in waking life. Not infrequently they are trains of thought which proceed from more
than one centre, but which are not without points of contact; and almost invariably we
find, along with a train of thought, its contradictory counterpart, connected with it by the
association of contrast.

The individual parts of this complicated structure naturally stand in the most manifold
logical relations to one another. They constitute foreground and background, digressions,
illustrations, conditions, lines of argument and objections. When the whole mass of these
dream-thoughts is subjected to the pressure of the dream-work, during which the
fragments are turned about, broken up and compacted, somewhat like drifting ice, the
question arises, what becomes of the logical ties which had hitherto provided the
framework of the structure? What representation do ìf, `because', às though', àlthough',
èither -- or' and all the other conjunctions, without which we cannot understand a phrase
or a sentence, receive in our dreams?
To begin with, we must answer that the dream has at its disposal no means of
representing these logical relations between the dream-thoughts. In most cases it
disregards all these conjunctions, and undertakes the elaboration only of the material
content of the dream-thoughts. It is left to the interpretation of the dream to restore the
coherence which the dream-work has destroyed.
If dreams lack the ability to express these relations, the psychic material of which they
are wrought must be responsible for this defect. As a matter of fact, the representative
arts -- painting and sculpture -- are similarly restricted, as compared with poetry, which is
able to employ speech; and here again the reason for this limitation lies in the material by
the elaboration of which the two plastic arts endeavour to express something. Before the
art of painting arrived at an understanding of the laws of expression by which it is bound,
it attempted to make up for this deficiency. In old paintings little labels hung out of the
mouths of the persons represented, giving in writing the speech which the artist despaired
of expressing in the picture.
Here, perhaps an objection will be raised, challenging the assertion that our dreams
dispense with the representation of logical relations. There are dreams in which the most
complicated intellectual operations take place; arguments for and against are adduced,
jokes and comparisons are made, just as in our waking thoughts. But here again
appearances are deceptive; if the interpretation of such dreams is continued it will be
found that all these things are dream-material, not the representation of intellectual
activity in the dream. The content of the dream-thoughts is reproduced by the apparent
thinking in our dreams, but not the relations of the dream-thoughts to one another, in the
determination of which relations thinking consists. I shall give some examples of this.
But the fact which is most easily established is that all speeches which occur in dreams,
and which are expressly designated as such, are unchanged or only slightly modified
replicas of speeches which occur likewise among the memories in the dream-material.
Often the speech is only an allusion to an event contained in the dream-thoughts; the
meaning of the dream is quite different.
However, I shall not dispute the fact that even critical thought-activity, which does not
simply repeat material from the dream-thoughts, plays a part in dream-formation. I shall
have to explain the influence of this factor at the close of this discussion. It will then
become clear that this thought activity is evoked not by the dream-thoughts, but by the
dream itself, after it is, in a certain sense, already completed.

Provisionally, then, it is agreed that the logical relations between the dream-thoughts do
not obtain any particular representation in the dream. For instance, where there is a
contradiction in the dream, this is either a contradiction directed against the dream itself
or a contradiction contained in one of the dream-thoughts; a contradiction in the dream
corresponds with a contradiction between the dream-thoughts only in the most indirect
and intermediate fashion.
But just as the art of painting finally succeeded in depicting, in the persons represented, at
least the intentions behind their words -- tenderness, menace, admonition, and the like by
other means than by floating labels, so also the dream has found it possible to render an
account of certain of the logical relations between its dream-thoughts by an appropriate
modification of the peculiar method of dream-representation. It will be found by
experience that different dreams go to different lengths in this respect; while one dream
will entirely disregard the logical structure of its material, another attempts to indicate it
as completely as possible. In so doing the dream departs more or less widely from the
text which it has to elaborate; and its attitude is equally variable in respect to the temporal
articulation of the dream-thoughts, if such has been established in the unconscious (as,
for example, in the dream of Irma's injection).
But what are the means by which the dream-work is enabled to indicate those relations in
the dream-material which are difficult to represent? I shall attempt to enumerate these,
one by one.
In the first place, the dream renders an account of the connection which is undeniably
present between all the portions of the dream-thoughts by combining this material into a
unity as a situation or a proceeding. It reproduces logical connection in the form of
simultaneity; in this case it behaves rather like the painter who groups together all the
philosophers or poets in a picture of the School of Athens, or Parnassus. They never were
assembled in any hall or on any mountain-top, although to the reflective mind they do
constitute a community.
The dream carries out in detail this mode of representation. Whenever it shows two
elements close together, it vouches for a particularly intimate connection between their
corresponding representatives in the dream-thoughts. It is as in our method of writing: to
signifies that the two letters are to be pronounced as one syllable; while t with o
following a blank space indicates that t is the last letter of one word and o the first letter
of another. Consequently, dream-combinations are not made up of arbitrary, completely
incongruous elements of the dream-material, but of elements that are pretty intimately
related in the dream-thoughts also.
For representing causal relations our dreams employ two methods, which are essentially
reducible to one. The method of representation more frequently employed -- in cases, for
example, where the dream-thoughts are to the effect: `Because this was thus and thus, this
and that must happen' -- consists in making the subordinate clause a prefatory dream and
joining the principal clause on to it in the form of the main dream. If my interpretation is

correct, the sequence may likewise be reversed. The principal clause always corresponds
to that part of the dream which is elaborated in the greatest detail.
An excellent example of such a representation of causality was once provided by a

female patient, whose dream I shall subsequently give in full. The dream consisted of a
short prologue, and of a very circumstantial and very definitely centred dream-
composition. I might entitle it `Flowery language'. The preliminary dream is as follows:
She goes to the two maids in the kitchen and scolds them for taking so long to prepare à
little bite of food'. She also sees a very large number of heavy kitchen utensils in the
kitchen turned upside down in order to drain, even heaped up in stacks. The two maids go
to fetch water, and have, as it were, to climb into a river, which reaches up to the house
or into the courtyard.
Then follows the main dream, which begins as follows: She is climbing down from a
height over a curiously shaped trellis, and she is glad that her dress doesn't get caught
anywhere, etc. Now the preliminary dream refers to the house of the lady's parents. The
words which are spoken in the kitchen are words which she has probably often heard
spoken by her mother. The piles of clumsy pots and pans are taken from an unpretentious
hardware shop located in the same house. The second part of this dream contains an
allusion to the dreamer's father, who was always pestering the maids, and who during a
flood -- for the house stood close to the bank of the river -- contracted a fatal illness. The
thought which is concealed behind the preliminary dream is something like this: `Because
I was born in this house, in such sordid and unpleasant surroundings . . .' The main dream
takes up the same thought, and presents it in a form that has been altered by a wish-
fulfilment: Ì am of exalted origin.' Properly then: `Because I am of such humble origin,
the course of my life has been so and so.'
As far as I can see, the division of a dream into two unequal portions does not always
signify a causal relation between the thoughts of the two portions. It often seems as
though in the two dreams the same material were presented from different points of view;
this is certainly the case when a series of dreams, dreamed the same night, end in a
seminal emission, the somatic need enforcing a more and more definite expression. Or
the two dreams have proceeded from two separate centres in the dream material, and they
overlap one another in the content, so that the subject which in one dream constitutes the
centre co-operates in the other as an allusion, and vice versa. But in a certain number of
dreams the division into short preliminary dreams and long subsequent dreams actually
signifies a causal relation between the two portions. The other method of representing the
causal relation is employed with less comprehensive material, and consists in the
transformation of an image in the dream into another image, whether it be of a person or
a thing. Only where this transformation is actually seen occurring in the dream shall we
seriously insist on the causal relation; not where we simply note that one thing has taken
the place of another. I said that both methods of representing the causal relation are really
reducible to the same method; in both cases causation is represented by succession,
sometimes by the succession of dreams, sometimes by the immediate transformation of
one image into another. In the great majority of cases, of course, the causal relation is not

represented at all, but is effaced amidst the succession of elements that is unavoidable
even in the dream-process.
Dreams are quite incapable of expressing the alternative èither -- or'; it is their custom to
take both members of this alternative into the same context, as though they had an equal
right to be there. A classic example of this is contained in the dream of Irma's injection.
Its latent thoughts obviously mean: I am not responsible for the persistence of Irma's
pains; the responsibility rests either with her resistance to accepting the solution or with
the fact that she is living under unfavourable sexual conditions, which I am unable to
change, or her pains are not hysterical at all, but organic. The dream, however, carries out
all these possibilities, which are almost mutually exclusive, and is quite ready to add a
fourth solution derived from the dream-wish. After interpreting the dream, I then inserted
the either -- or in its context in the dream-thoughts.
But when in narrating a dream the narrator is inclined to employ the alternative either --
or: Ìt was either a garden or a living-room,' etc., there is not really an alternative in the
dream-thoughts, but an ànd' -- a simple addition. When we use either -- or we are as a
rule describing a quality of vagueness in some element of the dream, but a vagueness
which may still be cleared up. The rule to be applied in this case is as follows: The
individual members of the alternative are to be treated as equal and connected by an
ànd'. For instance, after waiting long and vainly for the address of friend who is
travelling in Italy, I dream that I receive a telegram which gives me the address. On the
telegraph form I see printed in blue letters: the first word is blurred -- perhaps via
or villa; the second is distinctly Sezerno,

or even (Casa).
The second word, which reminds me of Italian names, and of our discussions on
etymology, also expresses my annoyance in respect of the fact that my friend has kept his
address a secret from me; but each of the possible first three words may be recognised on
analysis as an independent and equally justifiable starting-point in the concatenation of
ideas.
During the night before the funeral of my father I dreamed of a printed placard, a card or
poster rather like the notices in the waiting-rooms of railway stations which announce
that smoking is prohibited. The sign reads either:
You are requested to shut the eyes
or
You are requested to shut one eye
an alternative which I am in the habit of representing in the following form:
the
You are requested to shut eye(s).

one
Each of the two versions has its special meaning, and leads along particular paths in the
dream-interpretation. I had made the simplest possible funeral arrangements, for I knew
what the deceased thought about such matters. Other members of the family, however,
did not approve of such puritanical simplicity; they thought we should feel ashamed in
the presence of the other mourners. Hence one of the wordings of the dream asks for the
`shutting of one eye', that is to say, it asks that people should show consideration. The
significance of the vagueness, which is here represented by an either -- or, is plainly to be
seen. The dream-work has not succeeded in concocting a coherent and yet ambiguous
wording for the dream-thoughts. Thus the two principal trains of thought are separated
from each other, even in the dream-content.
In some few cases the division of a dream into two equal parts expresses the alternative
which the dream finds it so difficult to present.
The attitude of dreams to the category of antithesis and contradiction is very striking.
This category is simply ignored; the word `No' does not seem to exist for a dream.
Dreams are particularly fond of reducing antitheses to uniformity, or representing them as
one and the same thing. Dreams likewise take the liberty of representing any element
whatever by its desired opposite, so that it is at first impossible to tell, in respect of any
element which is capable of having an opposite, whether it is contained in the dream-
thoughts in the negative or the positive sense.2 In one of the recently cited dreams, whose
introductory portion we have already interpreted (`because my origin is so and so'), the
dreamer climbs down over a trellis, and holds a blossoming bough in her hands. Since
this picture suggests to her the angel in paintings of the Annunciation (her own name is
Mary) bearing a lily-stem in his hand, and the white-robed girls walking in procession on
Corpus Christi Day, when the streets are decorated with green boughs, the blossoming
bough in the dream is quite clearly an allusion to sexual innocence. But the bough is
thickly studded with red blossoms, each of which resembles a camellia. At the end of her
walk (so the dream continues) the blossoms are already beginning to fall; then follow
unmistakable allusions to menstruation. But this very bough, which is carried like a lily-
stem and as though by an innocent girl, is also an allusion to Camille, who, as we know,
usually wore a white camellia, but a red one during menstruation. The same blossoming
bough (`the flower of maidenhood' in Goethe's songs of the miller's daughter) represents
at once sexual innocence and its opposite. Moreover, the same dream, which expresses
the dreamer's joy at having succeeded in passing through life unsullied, hints in several
places (as in the falling of the blossom) at the opposite train of thought, namely, that she
had been guilty of various sins against sexual purity (that is, in her childhood). In the
analysis of the dream we may clearly distinguish the two trains of thought, of which the
comforting one seems to be superficial, and the reproachful one more profound. The two
are diametrically opposed to each other, and their similar yet contrasting elements have
been represented by identical dream-elements.
The mechanism of dream-formation is favourable in the highest degree to only one of the
logical relations. This relation is that of similarity, agreement, contiguity, `just as'; a
relation which may be represented in our dreams, as no other can be, by the most varied

expedients. The `screening' which occurs in the dream-material, or the cases of `just as',
are the chief points of support for dream-formation, and a not inconsiderable part of the
dream-work consists in creating new `screenings' of this kind in cases where those that
already exist are prevented by the resistance of the censorship from making their way into
the dream. The effort towards condensation evinced by the dream-work facilitates the
representation of a relation of similarity.
Similarity, agreement, community, are quite generally expressed in dreams by contraction

into a unity, which is either already found in the dream-material or is newly created. The
first case may be referred to as identification, the second as composition. Identification is
used where the dream is concerned with persons, composition where things constitute the
material to be unified; but compositions are also made of persons. Localities are often
treated as persons.
Identification consists in giving representation in the dream-content to only one of two or

more persons who are related by some common feature, while the second person or other
persons appear to be suppressed as far as the dream is concerned. In the dream this one
`screening' person enters into all the relations and situations which derive from the
persons whom she screens. In cases of composition, however, when persons are
combined, there are already present in the dream-image features which are characteristic
of, but not common to, the persons in question, so that a new unity, a composite person,
appears as the result of the union of these features. The combination itself may be
effected in various ways. Either the dream-person bears the name of one of the persons to
whom he refers -- and in this case we simply know, in a manner that is quite analogous to
knowledge in waking life, that this or that person is intended -- while the visual features
belong to another person; or the dream-image itself is compounded of visual features
which in reality are derived from the two. Also, in place of the visual features, the part
played by the second person may be represented by the attitudes and gestures which are
usually ascribed to him by the words he speaks, or by the situations in which he is placed.
In this latter method of characterisation the sharp distinction between the identification
and the combination of persons begins to disappear. But it may also happen that the
formation of such a composite person is unsuccessful. The situations or actions of the
dream are then attributed to one person, and the other -- as a rule the more important -- is
introduced as an inactive spectator. Perhaps the dreamer will say: `My mother was there
too' (Stekel). Such an element of the dream-content is then comparable to a determinative
in hieroglyphic script which is not meant to be expressed, but is intended only to explain
another sign.
The common feature which justifies the union of two person -- that is to say, which
enables it to be made -- may either be represented in the dream or it may be absent. As a
rule identification or composition of persons actually serves to avoid the necessity of
representing this common feature. Instead of repeating: À is ill-disposed towards me,
and so is B', I make, in my dream, a composite person of A and B; or I conceive A as
doing something which is alien to his character, but which is characteristic of B. The
dream-person obtained in this way appears in the dream in some new connection, and the
fact that he signifies both A and B justifies my inserting that which is common to both

persons -- their hostility towards me -- at the proper place in the dream-interpretation. In

this manner I often achieve a quite extraordinary degree of condensation of the dream-
content; I am able to dispense with the direct representation of the very complicated
relations belonging to one person, if I can find a second person who has an equal claim to
some of these relations. It will be readily understood how far this representation by
means of identification may circumvent the censoring resistance which sets up such harsh
conditions for the dream-work. The thing that offends the censorship may reside in those
very ideas which are connected in the dream-material with the one person; I now find a
second person, who likewise stands in some relation to the objectionable material, but
only to a part of it. Contact at that one point which offends the censorship now justifies
my formation of a composite person, who is characterised by the indifferent features of
each. This person, the result of combination or identification, being free of the
censorship, is now suitable for incorporation in the dream-content. Thus, by the
application of dream-condensation, I have satisfied the demands of the dream-censorship.
When a common feature of two persons is represented in a dream, this is usually a hint to
look for another concealed common feature, the representation of which is made
impossible by the censorship. Here a displacement of the common feature has occurred,
which in some degree facilitates representation. From the circumstance that the
composite person is shown to me in the dream with an indifferent common feature, I
must infer that another common feature which is by no means indifferent exists in the
dream-thoughts.
Accordingly, the identification or combination of persons serves various purposes in our

dreams; in the first place, that of representing a feature common to two persons;
secondly, that of representing a displaced common feature; and, thirdly, that of
expressing a community of features which is merely wished for. As the wish for a
community of features in two persons often coincides with the interchanging of these
persons, this relation also is expressed in dreams by identification. In the dream of Irma's
injection I wish to exchange one patient for another -- that is to say, I wish this other
person to be my patient, as the former person has been; the dream deals with this wish by
showing me a person who is called Irma, but who is examined in a position such as I
have had occasion to see only the other person occupy. In the dream about my uncle this
substitution is made the centre of the dream; I identify myself with the minister by
judging and treating my colleagues as shabbily as he does.
It has been my experience -- and to this I have found no exception -- that every dream
treats of oneself. Dreams are absolutely egoistic.3 In cases where not my ego but only a
strange person occurs in the dream-content, I may safely assume that by means of
identification my ego is concealed behind that person. I am permitted to supplement my
ego. On other occasions, when my ego appears in the dream the situation in which it is
placed tells me that another person is concealing himself, by means of identification,
behind the ego. In this case I must be prepared to find that in the interpretation I should
transfer something which is connected with this person -- the hidden common feature --
to myself. There are also dreams in which my ego appears together with other persons
who, when the identification is resolved, once more show themselves to be my ego.

Through these identifications I shall then have to connect with my ego certain ideas to
which the censorship has objected. I may also give my ego multiple representation in my
dream, either directly or by means of identification with other people. By means of
several such identifications an extraordinary amount of thought material may be
condensed.4 That one's ego should appear in the same dream several times or in different
forms is fundamentally no more surprising than that it should appear, in conscious
thinking, many times and in different places or in different relations: as, for example, in
the sentence: `When I think what a healthy child I was.'
Still easier than in the case of persons is the resolution of identifications in the case of
localities designated by their own names, as here the disturbing influence of the all-
powerful ego is lacking. In one of my dreams of Rome (p.96) the name of the place in
which I find myself is Rome; I am surprised, however, by a large number of German
placards at a street corner. This last is a wish-fulfilment, which immediately suggests
Prague; the wish itself probably originated at a period of my youth when I was imbued
with a German nationalistic spirit which today is quite subdued. At the time of my dream
I was looking forward to meeting a friend in Prague; the identification of Rome with
Prague is therefore explained by a desired common feature; I would rather meet my
friend in Rome than in Prague; for the purpose of this meeting I should like to exchange
Prague for Rome.
The possibility of creating composite formations is one of the chief causes of the fantastic
character so common in dreams, in that it introduces into the dream-content elements
which could never have been objects of perception. The psychic process which occurs in
the creation of composite formations is obviously the same as that which we employ in
conceiving or figuring a dragon or a centaur in our waking senses. The only difference is
that in the fantastic creations of waking life the impression intended is itself the decisive
factor, while the composite formation in the dream is determined by a factor -- the
common feature in the dream-thoughts -- which is independent of its form. Composite
formations in dreams may be achieved in a great many different ways. In the most artless
of these methods only the properties of the one thing are represented, and this
representation is accompanied by a knowledge that they refer to another object also. A
more careful technique combines features of the one object with those of the other in a
new image, while it makes skilful use of any really existing resemblances between the
two objects. The new creation may prove to be wholly absurd, or even successful as a
fantasy, according as the material and the wit employed in constructing it may permit. If
the objects to be condensed into a unity are too incongruous, the dream-work is content
with creating a composite formation with a comparatively distinct nucleus, to which are
attached more indefinite modifications. The unification into one image has here been to
some extent unsuccessful; the two representations overlap one another, and give rise to
something like a contest between the visual images. Similar representations might be
obtained in a drawing if one were to attempt to give form to a unified abstraction of
disparate perceptual images.
Dreams naturally abound in such composite formations; I have given several examples of
these in the dreams already analysed, and will now cite more such examples. In the

dream on p. 199, which describes the career of my patient ìn flowery language', the
dream-ego carries a spray of blossom in her hand which, as we have seen, signifies at
once sexual innocence and sexual transgression. Moreover, from the manner in which the
blossoms are set on, they recall cherry-blossom; the blossoms themselves, considered
singly, are camellias, and finally the whole spray gives the dreamer the impression of an
exotic plant. The common feature in the elements of this composite formation is revealed
by the dream-thoughts. The blossoming spray is made up of allusions to presents by
which she was induced or was to have been induced to behave in a manner agreeable to
the giver. So it was with cherries in her childhood, and with a camellia-tree in her later
years; the exotic character is an allusion to a much-travelled naturalist, who sought to win
her favour by means of a drawing of a flower. Another female patient contrives a
composite meaning out of bathing machines at a seaside resort, country privies, and the
attics of our city dwelling-houses. A reference to human nakedness and exposure is
common to the first two elements; and we may infer from their connection with the third
element that (in her childhood) the garret was likewise the scene of bodily exposure. A
dreamer of the male sex makes a composite locality out of two places in which
`treatment' is given -- my office and the assembly rooms in which he first became
acquainted with his wife. Another, a female patient, after her elder brother has promised
to regale her with caviare, dreams that his legs are covered all over with black beads of
caviare. The two elements, `taint' in a moral sense and the recollection of a cutaneous
eruption in childhood which made her legs look as though studded over with red instead
of black spots, have here been combined with the beads of caviare to form a new idea --
the idea of `what she gets from her brother.' In this dream parts of the human body are
treated as objects, as is usually the case in dreams. In one of the dreams recorded by
Ferenczi there occurs a composite formation made up of the person of a physician and a
horse, and this composite being wears a nightshirt. The common feature in these three
components was revealed in the analysis, after the nightshirt had been recognised as an
allusion to the father of the dreamer in a scene of childhood. In each of the three cases
there was some object of her sexual curiosity. As a child she had often been taken by her
nurse to the army stud, where she had the amplest opportunity to satisfy her curiosity, at
that time still uninhibited.
I have already stated that the dream has no means of expressing the relation of
contradiction, contrast, negation. I shall now contradict this assertion for the first time. A
certain number of cases of what may be summed up under the word `contrast' obtain
representation, as we have seen, simply by means of identification -- that is, when an
exchange, a substitution, can be bound up with the contrast. Of this we have cited
repeated examples. Certain other of the contrasts in the dream-thoughts, which perhaps
come under the category of ìnverted, turned into the opposite', are represented in dreams
in the following remarkable manner, which may almost be described as witty. The
ìnversion' does not itself make its way into the dream-content, but manifests its presence
in the material by the fact that a part of the already formed dream-content which is, for
other reasons, closely connected in context is -- as it were subsequently -- inverted. It is
easier to illustrate this process than to describe it. In the beautiful Ùp and Down' dream
(p. 176) the dream-representation of ascending is an inversion of its prototype in the
dream-thoughts: that is, of the introductory scene of Daudet's Sappho; in the dream

climbing is difficult at first and easy later on, whereas in the novel it is easy at first, and
later becomes more and more difficult. Again, àbove' and `below', with reference to the
dreamer's brother, are reversed in the dream. This points to a relation of inversion or
contrast between two parts of the material in the dream-thoughts, which indeed we found
in them, for in the childish fantasy of the dreamer he is carried by his nurse, while in the
novel, on the contrary, the hero carries his beloved. My dream of Goethe's attack on Herr
M. (to be cited later) likewise contains an inversion of this sort, which must be set right
before the dream can be interpreted. In this dream Goethe attacks a young man, Herr M.;
the reality, as contained in the dream-thoughts, is that an eminent man, a friend of mine,
has been attacked by an unknown young author. In the dream I reckon time from the date
of Goethe's death; in reality the reckoning was made from the year in which the paralytic
was born. The thought which influences the dream-material reveals itself as my
opposition to the treatment of Goethe as though he were a lunatic. Ìt is the other way
about,' says the dream; ìf you don't understand the book it is you who are feeble-minded,
not the author.' All these dreams of inversion, moreover, seem to me to imply an allusion
to the contemptuous phrase, `to turn one's back upon a person' (German: einem die
Kehrseite zeigen, lit. to show a person one's backside): cf. the inversion in respect of the
dreamer's brother in the Sappho dream. It is further worth noting how frequently
inversion is employed in precisely those dreams which are inspired by repressed
homosexual impulses.
Moreover, inversion, or transformation into the opposite, is one of the most favoured and
most versatile methods of representation which the dream-work has at its disposal. It
serves, in the first place, to enable the wish-fulfilment to prevail against a definite
element of the dream-thoughts. Ìf only it were the other way about!' is often the best
expression for the reaction of the ego against a disagreeable recollection. But inversion
becomes extraordinarily useful in the service of the censorship, for it effects, in the
material to be represented, a degree of distortion which at first simply paralyses our
understanding of the dream. It is therefore always permissible, if a dream stubbornly
refuses to surrender its meaning, to venture on the experimental inversion of definite
portions of its manifest content. Then, not infrequently, everything becomes clear.
Besides the inversion of content, the temporal inversion must not be overlooked. A
frequent device of dream-distortion consists in presenting the final issue of the event or
the conclusion of the train of thought at the beginning of the dream, and appending at the
end of the dream, and appending at the end of the dream the premises of the conclusion,
or the causes of the event. Anyone who forgets this technical device of dream-distortion
stands helpless before the problem of dream-interpretation.5
In many cases, indeed, we discover the meaning of the dream only when we have
subjected the dream-content to a multiple inversion, in accordance with the different
relations. For example, in the dream of a young patient who is suffering from obsessional
neurosis, the memory of the childish death-wish directed against a dreaded father
concealed itself behind the following words: His father scolds him because he comes
home so late, but the context of the psychoanalytic treatment and the impressions of the
dreamer show that the sentence must be read as follows: He is angry with his father, and

further, that his father always came home too early (i.e. too soon). He would have
preferred that his father should not come home at all, which is identical with the wish
(see p. 143 ff.) that his father would die. As a little boy, during the prolonged absence of
his father, the dreamer was guilty of a sexual aggression against another child, and was
punished by the threat: `Just you wait until your father comes home!'
If we should seek to trace the relations between the dream-content and the dream-
thoughts a little farther, we shall do this best by making the dream itself our point of
departure, and asking ourselves: What do certain formal characteristics of the dream-
presentation signify in relation to the dream-thoughts? First and foremost among the
formal characteristics which are bound to impress us in dreams are the differences in the
sensory intensity of the single dream-images, and in the distinctness of various parts of
the dream, or of whole dreams as compared with one another. The differences in the
intensity of individual dream images cover the whole gamut, from a sharpness of
definition which one is inclined -- although without warrant -- to rate more highly than
that of reality, to a provoking indistinctness which we declare to be characteristic of
dreams, because it really is not wholly comparable to any of the degrees of indistinctness
which we occasionally perceive in real objects. Moreover, we usually describe the
impression which we receive of an indistinct object in a dream as `fleeting', while we
think of the more distinct dream-images as having been perceptible also for a longer
period of time. We must now ask ourselves by what conditions in the dream-material
these differences in the distinctness of the individual portions of the dream-content are
brought about.
Before proceeding farther, it is necessary to deal with certain expectations which seem to
be almost inevitable. Since actual sensations experienced during sleep may constitute part
of the dream-material, it will probably be assumed that these sensations, or the dream-
elements resulting from them, are emphasised by a special intensity, or conversely, that
anything which is particularly vivid in the dream can probably be traced to such real
sensations during sleep. My experience, however, has never confirmed this. It is not true
that those elements of a dream which are derivatives of real impressions perceived in
sleep (nerve stimuli) are distinguished by their special vividness from others which are
based on memories. The factor of reality is inoperative in determining the intensity of
dream-images.
Further, it might be expected that the sensory intensity (vividness) of single dream-
images is in proportion to the psychic intensity of the elements corresponding to them in
the dream-thoughts. In the latter, intensity is identical with psychic value; the most
intense elements are in fact the most significant, and these constitute the central point of
the dream-thoughts. We know, however, that it is precisely these elements which are
usually not admitted to the dream-content, owing to the vigilance of the censorship. Still,
it might be possible for their most immediate derivatives, which represent them in the
dream, to reach a higher degree of intensity without, however, for that reason constituting
the central point of the dream-representation. This assumption also vanishes as soon as
we compare the dream and the dream-material. The intensity of the elements in the one
has nothing to do with the intensity of the elements in the other; as a matter of fact, a

complete `transvaluation of all psychic values' takes place between the dream-material
and the dream. The very element of the dream which is transient and hazy, and screened
by more vigorous images, is often discovered to be the one and only direct derivative of
the topic that completely dominates the dream-thoughts.
The intensity of the dream-elements proves to be determined in a different manner: that

is, by two factors which are mutually independent. It will readily be understood that those
elements by means of which the wish-fulfilment expresses itself are those which are
intensely represented. But analysis tells us that from the most vivid elements of the dream
the greatest number of trains of thought proceed, and that those which are most vivid are
at the same time those which are best determined. No change of meaning is involved if
we express this latter empirical proposition in the following formula: The greatest
intensity is shown by those elements of the dream for whose formation the most
extensive condensation-work was required. We may, therefore, expect that it will be
possible to express this condition, as well as the other condition of the wish-fulfilment in
a single formula.
I must utter a warning that the problem which I have just been considering -- the causes
of the greater or lesser intensity or distinctness of single elements in dreams -- is not to be
confounded with the other problem -- that of variations in the distinctness of whole
dreams or sections of dreams. In the former case the opposite of distinctness is haziness;
in the latter, confusion. It is, of course, undeniable that in both scales the two kinds of
intensities rise and fall in unison. A portion of the dream which seems clear to us usually
contains vivid elements; an obscure dream, on the contrary, is composed of less vivid
elements. But the problem offered by the scale of definition, which ranges from the
apparently clear to the indistinct or confused, is far more complicated than the problem of
the fluctuations in vividness of the dream-elements. For reasons which will be given
later, the former cannot at this stage be further discussed. In isolated cases one observes,
not without surprise, that the impression of distinctness or indistinctness produced by a
dream has nothing to do with the dream-structure, but proceeds from the dream-material,
as one of its ingredients. Thus, for example, I remember a dream which on waking
seemed so particularly well-constructed, flawless and clear that I made up my mind,
while I was still in a somnolent state, to admit a new category of dreams -- those which
had not been subject to the mechanism of condensation and distortion, and which might
thus be described as `fantasies during sleep.' A closer examination, however, proved that
this unusual dream suffered from the same structural flaws and breaches as exist in all
other dreams; so I abandoned the idea of a category of `dream-fantasies'.6 The content of
the dream, reduced to its lowest terms, was that I was expounding to a friend a difficult
and long-sought theory of bisexuality, and the wish-fulfilling power of the dream was
responsible for the fact that this theory (which, by the way, was not communicated in the
dream) appeared to be so lucid and flawless. Thus, what I believed to be a judgment as
regards the finished dream was a part, and indeed the most essential part, of the dream-
content. Here the dream-work reached out, as it were, into my first waking thoughts, and
presented to me, in the form of a judgment of the dream, that part of the dream-material
which it had failed to represent with precision in the dream. I was once confronted with
the exact counterpart of this case by a female patient who at first absolutely declined to

relate a dream which was necessary for the analysis `because it was so hazy and
confused', and who finally declared, after repeatedly protesting the inaccuracy of her
description, that it seemed to her that several persons -- herself, her husband, and her
father -- had occurred in the dream, and that she had not known whether her husband was
her father, or who really was her father, or something of that sort. Comparison of this
dream with the ideas which occurred to the dreamer in the course of the sitting showed
beyond a doubt that it dealt with the rather commonplace story of a maidservant who has
to confess that she is expecting a child, and hears doubts expressed as to `who the father
really is'.7 The obscurity manifested by this dream, therefore, was once more a portion of
the dream-exciting material. A fragment of this material was represented in the form of
the dream. The form of the dream or of dreaming is employed with astonishing frequency
to represent the concealed content.
Glosses on the dream, and seemingly harmless comments on it, often serve in the most
subtle manner to conceal -- although, of course, they really betray -- a part of what is
dreamed. As, for example, when the dreamer says: Here the dream was wiped out, and
the analysis gives an infantile reminiscence of listening to someone cleaning himself after
defecation. Or another example, which deserves to be recorded in detail: A young man
has a very distinct dream, reminding him of fantasies of his boyhood which have
remained conscious. He found himself in a hotel at a seasonal resort; it was night; he
mistook the number of his room, and entered a room in which an elderly lady and her two
daughters were undressing to go to bed. He continues: `Then there are some gaps in the
dream; something is missing; and at the end there was a man in the room, who wanted to
throw me out, and with whom I had to struggle.' He tries in vain to recall the content and
intention of the boyish fantasy to which the dream obviously alluded. But we finally
become aware that the required content had already been given in his remarks concerning
the indistinct part of the dream. The `gaps' are the genital apertures of the women who are
going to bed: `Here something is missing' describes the principal characteristic of the
female genitals. In his young days he burned with curiosity to see the female genitals, and
was still inclined to adhere to the infantile sexual theory which attributes a male organ to
women.
A very similar form was assumed in an analogous reminiscence of another dreamer. He

dreamed: I go with Fräulein K. into the restaurant of the Volksgarten . . . then comes a
dark place, an interruption . . . then I find myself in the salon of a brothel, where I see two
or three women, one in a chemise and drawers.
Analysis. -- Fräulein K. is the daughter of his former employer; as he himself admits, she
was a sister-substitute. He rarely had the opportunity of talking to her, but they once had
a conversation in which òne recognised one's sexuality, so to speak, as though one were
to say: I am a man and you are a woman.' He had been only once to the above-mentioned
restaurant, when he was accompanied by the sister of his brother-in-law, a girl to whom
he was quite indifferent. On another occasion he accompanied three ladies to the door of
the restaurant. The ladies were his sister, his sister-in-law, and the girl already mentioned.
He was perfectly indifferent to all three of them, but they all belonged to the `sister
category'. He had visited a brothel but rarely, perhaps two or three times in his life.

The interpretation is based on the `dark place', the ìnterruption' in the dream, and
informs us that on occasion, but in fact only rarely, obsessed by his boyish curiosity, he
had inspected the genitals of his sister, a few years his junior. A few days later the
misdemeanour indicated in the dream recurred to his conscious memory.
All dreams of the same night belong, in respect of their content, to the same whole; their
division into several parts, their grouping and number, are all full of meaning and may be
regarded as pieces of information about the latent dream-thoughts. In the interpretation of
dreams consisting of several main sections, or of dreams belonging to the same night, we
must not overlook the possibility that these different and successive dreams mean the
same thing, expressing the same impulses in different material. That one of these
homologous dreams which comes first in time is usually the most distorted and most
bashful, while the next dream is bolder and more distinct.
Even Pharaoh's dream of the ears and the kine, which Joseph interpreted, was of this
kind. It is given by Josephus in greater detail than in the Bible. After relating the first
dream, the King said: Àfter I had seen this vision I awaked out of my sleep, and, being
in disorder, and considering with myself what this appearance should be, I fell asleep
again, and saw another dream much more wonderful than the foregoing, which still did
more affright and disturb me.' After listening to the relation of the dream, Joseph said:
`This dream, O King, although seen under two forms, signifies one and the same event of
things.'8
Jung, in his Beitrag sur Psychologie des Gerüchtes, relates how a veiled erotic dream of a
schoolgirl was understood by her friends without interpretation, and continued by them
with variations, and he remarks, with reference to one of these narrated dreams, `that the
concluding idea of a long series of dream-images had precisely the same content as the
first image of the series had endeavoured to represent. The censorship thrust the complex
out of the way as long as possible by a constant renewal of symbolic screenings,
displacements, transformations into something harmless, etc.' Scherner was well
acquainted with this peculiarity of dream-representation, and describes it in his Leben des
Traumes in terms of a special law in the Appendix to his doctrine of organic stimulation:
`But finally, in all symbolic dream-formations emanating from definite nerve stimuli, the
fantasy observes the general law that at the beginning of the dream it depicts the
stimulating object only by the remotest and freest allusions, but towards the end, when
the graphic impulse becomes exhausted, the stimulus itself is nakedly represented by its
appropriate organ or its function; whereupon the dream, itself describing its organic
motive, achieves its end . . .'
A pretty confirmation of this law of Scherner's has been furnished by Otto Rank in his
essay Ein Traum, der sich selbst deutet. This dream, related to him by a girl, consisted of
two dreams of the same night, separated by an interval of time, the second of which
ended with an orgasm. It was possible to interpret this orgastic dream in detail in spite of
the few ideas contributed by the dreamer, and the wealth of relations between the two
dream-contents made it possible to recognise that the first dream expressed in modest
language the same thing as the second, so that the latter -- the orgastic dream -- facilitated

a full explanation of the former. From this example, Rank very justifiably argues the
significance of orgastic dreams for the theory of dreams in general.
But in my experience it is only in rare cases that one is in a position to translate the
lucidity or confusion of a dream, respectively, into a certainty or doubt in the dream-
material. Later on I shall have to disclose a hitherto unmentioned factor in dream-
formation, upon whose operation this qualitative scale in dreams is essentially dependent.
In many dreams in which a certain situation and environment are preserved for some
time, there occur interruptions which may be described in the following words: `But then
it seemed as though it were, at the same time, another place, and there such and such a
thing happened.' In these cases what interrupts the main action of the dream, which after
a while may be continued again, reveals itself in the dream-material as a subordinate
clause, an interpolated thought. Conditionality in the dream-thoughts is represented by
simultaneity in the dream-content (wenn or wann = if or when, while).
We may now ask, What is the meaning of the sensation of inhibited movement which so
often occurs in dreams, and is so closely allied to anxiety? One wants to move, and is
unable to stir from the spot; or wants to accomplish something, and encounters obstacle
after obstacle. The train is about to start, and one cannot reach it; one's hand is raised to
avenge an insult, and its strength fails, etc. We have already met with this sensation in
exhibition-dreams, but have as yet made no serious attempt to interpret it. It is
convenient, but inadequate, to answer that there is motor paralysis in sleep, which
manifests itself by means of the sensation alluded to. We may ask: `Why is it, then, that
we do not dream continually of such inhibited movements?' And we may permissibly
suspect that this sensation, which may at any time occur during sleep, serves some sort of
purpose for representation, and is evoked only when the need of this representation is
present in the dream-material.
Inability to do a thing does not always appear in the dream as a sensation; it may appear
simply as part of the dream-content. I think one case of this kind is especially fitted to
enlighten us as to the meaning of this peculiarity. I shall give an abridged version of a
dream in which I seem to be accused of dishonesty. The scene is a mixture made up of a
private sanatorium and several other places. A manservant appears, to summon me to an
inquiry. I know in the dream that something has been missed, and that the inquiry is
taking place because I am suspected of having appropriated the lost article. Analysis
shows that inquiry is to be taken in two senses; it includes the meaning of medical
examination. Being conscious of my innocence, and my position as consultant in this
sanatorium, I calmly follow the manservant. We are received at the door by another
manservant who says, pointing at me, `Have you brought him? Why, he is a respectable
man.' Thereupon, and unattended, I enter a great hall where there are many machines,
which reminds me of an inferno with its hellish instruments of punishment. I see a
colleague strapped to an appliance; he has every reason to be interested in my
appearance, but he takes no notice of me. I understand that I may now go. Then I cannot
find my hat, and cannot go after all.

The wish that the dream fulfils is obviously the wish that my honesty shall be
acknowledged, and that I may be permitted to go; there must therefore be all sorts of
material in the dream-thoughts which comprise a contradiction of this wish. The fact that
I may go is the sign of my absolution; if, then, the dream provides at its close an event
which prevents me from going, we may readily conclude that the suppressed material of
the contradiction is asserting itself in this feature. The fact that I cannot find my hat
therefore means: `You are not after all an honest man.' The inability to do something in
the dream is the expression of a contradiction, a `No'; so that our earlier assertion, to the
effect that the dream is not capable of expressing a negation, must be revised
accordingly.9
In other dreams in which the inability to do something occurs, not merely as a situation,
but also as a sensation, the same contradiction is more emphatically expressed by the
sensation of inhibited movement, or a will to which a counter-will is opposed. Thus the
sensation of inhibited movement represents a conflict of will. We shall see later on that
this very motor paralysis during sleep is one of the fundamental conditions of the psychic
process which functions during dreaming. Now an impulse which is conveyed to the
motor system is none other than the will, and the fact that we are certain that this impulse
will be inhibited in sleep makes the whole process extraordinarily well-adapted to the
representation of a will towards something and of a `No' which opposes itself thereto.
From my explanation of anxiety, it is easy to understand why the sensation of the
inhibited will is so closely allied to anxiety, and why it is so often connected with it in
dreams. Anxiety is a libidinal impulse which emanates from the unconscious and is
inhibited by the preconscious.10 Therefore, when a sensation of inhibition in the dream is
accompanied by anxiety, the dream must be concerned with a volition which was at one
time capable of arousing libido; there must be a sexual impulse.
As for the judgment which is often expressed during a dream: Òf course, it is only a
dream', and the psychic force to which it may be ascribed, I shall discuss these questions
later on. For the present I will merely say that they are intended to depreciate the
importance of what is being dreamed. The interesting problem allied to this, as to what is
meant if a certain content in the dream is characterised in the dream itself as having been
`dreamed' -- the riddle of a `dream within a dream' -- has been solved in a similar sense
by W. Stekel, by the analysis of some convincing examples. Here again the part of the
dream `dreamed' is to be depreciated in value and robbed of its reality; that which the
dreamer continues to dream after waking from the `dream within a dream' is what the
dream-wish desires to put in place of the obliterated reality. It may therefore be assumed
that the part `dreamed' contains the representation of the reality, the real memory, while,
on the other hand, the continued dream contains the representation of what the dreamer
merely wishes. The inclusion of a certain content in à dream within a dream' is therefore
equivalent to the wish that what has been characterised as a dream had never occurred. In
other words: when a particular incident is represented by the dream-work in a `dream', it
signifies the strongest confirmation of the reality of this incident, the most emphatic
affirmation of it. The dream-work utilises the dream itself as a form of repudiation, and
thereby confirms the theory that a dream is a wish-fulfilment.

1
I have since given the complete analysis and synthesis of two dreams in the Bruchstück
einer Hysterieanalyse, 1905 (Ges. Schriften, Bd. viii). Fragment of an Analysis of a Case
of Hysteria, translated by Strachey, Collected Papers, vol. iii, Hogarth Press, London. O.
Rank's analysis, Ein Traum der sich selbst deutet, deserves mention as the most complete
interpretation of a comparatively long dream.
2
From a work of K. Abel's Der Gegensinn der Urworte, 1884 (see my review of it in the
Bleuler-Freud Jahrbuch, ii, 1910 (Ges. Schriften, Bd. x), I learned the surprising fact,
which is confirmed by other philologists, that the oldest languages behaved just as
dreams do in this regard. They had originally only one word for both extremes in a series
of qualities or activities (strong-weak, old-young, far-near, bind-separate), and formed
separate designations for the two opposites only secondarily, by slight modifications of
the common primitive word. Abel demonstrates a very large number of those
relationships in ancient Egyptian, and points to distinct remnants of the same
development in the Semitic and Indo-Germanic languages.
3
cf. here the observations made on pp. 161ff.
4
If I do not know behind which of the persons appearing in the dream I am to look for my
ego, I observe the following rule: That person in the dream who is subject to an emotion
which I am aware of while asleep is the one that conceals my ego.
5
The hysterical attack often employs the same device of temporal inversion in order to
conceal its meaning from the observer. The attack of a hysterical girl, for example,
consists in enacting a little romance, which she has imagined in the unconscious in
connection with an encounter in a tram. A man, attracted by the beauty of her foot,
addresses her while she is reading, whereupon she goes with him and a passionate love-
scene ensues. Her attack begins with the representation of this scene by writhing
movements of the body (accompanied by movements of the lips and folding of the arms
to signify kisses and embraces), whereupon she hurries into the next room, sits down on a
chair, lifts her skirt in order to show her foot, acts as though she were about to read a
book, and speaks to me (answers me). Cf. the observation of Artemidorus: Ìn
interpreting dreamstories one must consider them the first time from the beginning to the
end, and the second time from the end to the beginning.'
6
I do not know today whether I was justified in doing so.
7
Accompanying hysterical symptoms, amenorrhoea and profound depression were the
chief troubles of this patient.
8
Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, book ii, chap. v, trans. by Wm. Whiston, David
McKay, Philadelphia.
9
A reference to an experience of childhood emerges, in the complete analysis, through
the following connecting links: `The Moor has done his duty, the Moor can go.' And then
follows the waggish question: `How old is the Moor when he has done his duty?' -- À

year, then he can go (walk).' (It is said that I came into the world with so much black
curly hair that my mother declared that I was a little Moor.) The fact that I cannot find
my hat is an experience of the day which has been exploited in various senses. Our
servant, who is a genius at stowing things away, had hidden the hat. A rejection of
melancholy thoughts of death is concealed behind the conclusion of the dream: Ì have
not nearly done my duty yet; I cannot go yet.' Birth and death together -- as in the dream
of Goethe and the paralytic, which was a little earlier in date.
10
This theory is not in accordance with more recent views.

D. REGARD FOR REPRESENTABILITY
We have hitherto been concerned with investigating the manner in which our dreams
represent the relations between the dream-thoughts, but we have often extended our
inquiry to the further question as to what alterations the dream-material itself undergoes
for the purposes of dream-formation. We now know that the dream-material, after being
stripped of a great many of its relations, is subjected to compression, while at the same
time displacements of the intensity of its elements enforce a psychic transvaluation of this
material. The displacements which we have considered were shown to be substitutions of
one particular idea for another, in some way related to the original by its associations, and
the displacements were made to facilitate the condensation, inasmuch as in this manner,
instead of two elements, a common mean between them found its way into the dream. So
far no mention has been made of any other kind of displacement. But we learn from the
analyses that displacement of another kind does occur, and that it manifests itself in an
exchange of the verbal expression for the thought in question. In both cases we are
dealing with a displacement along a chain of associations, but the same process takes
place in different psychic spheres, and the result of this displacement in the one case is
that one element is replaced by another, while in the other case an element exchanges its
verbal shape for another.
This second kind of displacement occurring in dream-formation is not only of great

theoretical interest, but is also peculiarly well-fitted to explain the appearance of fantastic
absurdity in which dreams disguise themselves. Displacement usually occurs in such a
way that a colourless and abstract expression of the dream-thought is exchanged for one
that is pictorial and concrete. The advantage, and along with it the purpose, of this
substitution is obvious. Whatever is pictorial is capable of representation in dreams and
can be fitted into a situation in which abstract expression would confront the dream-
representation with difficulties not unlike those which would arise if a political leading
article had to be represented in an illustrated journal. Not only the possibility of
representation, but also the interests of condensation and of the censorship, may be
furthered by this exchange. Once the abstractly expressed and unserviceable dream-
thought is translated into pictorial language, those contacts and identities between this
new expression and the rest of the dream-material which are required by the dream-work,
and which it contrives whenever they are not available, are more readily provided, since
in every language concrete terms, owing to their evolution, are richer in associations than
are abstract terms. It may be imagined that a good part of the intermediate work in
dream-formation, which seeks to reduce the separate dream-thoughts to the tersest and
most unified expression in the dream, is effected in this manner, by fitting paraphrases of
the various thoughts. The one thought whose mode of expression has perhaps been
determined by other factors will therewith exert a distributive and selective influence on
the expressions available for the others, and it may even do this from the very start, just
as it would in the creative activity of a poet. When a poem is to be written in rhymed
couplets, the second rhyming line is bound by two conditions: it must express the
meaning allotted to it, and its expression must permit of a rhyme with the first line. The
best poems are, of course, those in which one does not detect the effort to find a rhyme,

and in which both thoughts have as a matter of course, by mutual induction, selected the
verbal expression which, with a little subsequent adjustment, will permit of the rhyme.
In some cases the change of expression serves the purposes of dream-condensation more
directly, in that it provides an arrangement of words which, being ambiguous, permits of
the expression of more than one of the dream-thoughts. The whole range of verbal wit is
thus made to serve the purpose of the dream-work. The part played by words in dream-
formation ought not to surprise us. A word, as the point of junction of a number of ideas,
possesses, as it were, a predestined ambiguity, and the neuroses (obsessions, phobias)
take advantage of the opportunities for condensation and disguise afforded by words
quite as eagerly as do dreams.1 That dream-distortion also profits by this displacement of
expression may be readily demonstrated. It is indeed confusing if one ambiguous word is
substituted for two with single meanings, and the replacement of sober, everyday
language by a plastic mode of expression baffles our understanding, especially since a
dream never tells us whether the elements presented by it are to be interpreted literally or
metaphorically, whether they refer to the dream-material directly, or only by means of
interpolated expressions. Generally speaking, in the interpretation of any element of a
dream it is doubtful whether it
(a) is to be accepted in the negative or the positive sense (contrast

relation);
(b) is to be interpreted historically (as a memory);
(c) is symbolic; or whether
(d) its valuation is to be based upon its wording.
In spite of this versatility, we may say that the representation effected by the dream-work,
which was never even intended to be understood, does not impose upon the translator any
greater difficulties than those that the ancient writers of hieroglyphics imposed upon their
readers.
I have already given several examples of dream-representations which are held together
only by ambiguity of expression (`her mouth opens without difficulty', in the dream of
Irma's injection; Ì cannot go yet after all', in the last dream related, etc.). I shall now cite
a dream in the analysis of which plastic representation of the abstract thoughts plays a
greater part. The difference between such dream-interpretation and the interpretation by
means of symbols may nevertheless be clearly defined; in the symbolic interpretation of
dreams the key to the symbolism is selected arbitrarily by the interpreter, while in our
own cases of verbal disguise these keys are universally known and are taken from
established modes of speech. Provided one hits on the right idea on the right occasion,
one may solve dreams of this kind, either completely or in part, independently of any
statements made by the dreamer.

A lady, a friend of mine, dreams: She is at the opera. It is a Wagnerian performance,

which has lasted until 7.45 in the morning. In the stalls and pit there are tables, at which
people are eating and drinking. Her cousin and his young wife, who have just returned
from their honeymoon, are sitting at one of these tables; beside them is a member of the
aristocracy. The young wife is said to have brought him back with her from the
honeymoon quite openly, just as she might have brought back a hat. In the middle of the
stalls there is a high tower, on the top of which there is a platform surrounded by an iron
railing. There, high overhead, stands the conductor, with the features of Hans Richter,
continually running round behind the railing, perspiring terribly; and from this position
he is conducting the orchestra, which is arranged round the base of the tower. She
herself is sitting in a box with a friend of her own sex (known to me). Her younger sister
tries to hand her up, from the stalls, a large lump of coal, alleging that she had not
known that it would be so long, and that she must by this time be miserably cold. (As
though the boxes ought to have been heated during the long performance.)
Although in other respects the dream gives a good picture of the situation, it is, of course,
nonsensical enough: the tower in the middle of the stalls, from which the conductor leads
the orchestra, and above all the coal which her sister hands up to her. I purposely asked
for no analysis of this dream. With some knowledge of the personal relations of the
dreamer, I was able to interpret parts of it independently of her. I knew that she had felt
intense sympathy for a musician whose career had been prematurely brought to an end by
insanity. I therefore decided to take the tower in the stalls verbally. It then emerged that
the man whom she wished to see in the place of Hans Richter towered above all the other
members of the orchestra. This tower must be described as a composite formation by
means of apposition; by its substructure it represents the greatness of the man, but by the
railing at the top, behind which he runs round like a prisoner or an animal in a cage (an
allusion to the name of the unfortunate man2 ), it represents his later fate. `Lunatic-tower'
is perhaps the expression in which the two thoughts might have met.
Now that we have discovered the dream's method of representation, we may try, with the
same key, to unlock the meaning of the second apparent absurdity, that of the coal which
her sister hands up to the dreamer. `Coal' should mean `secret love'.
No fire, no coal so hotly glows

As the secret love of which no one knows.
She and her friend remain seated3 while her younger sister, who still has a prospect of
marrying, hands her up the coal `because she did not know that it would be so long.'
What would be so long is not told in the dream. If it were an anecdote, we should say `the
performance'; but in the dream we may consider the sentence as it is, declare it to be
ambiguous, and add `before she married'. The interpretation `secret love' is then
confirmed by the mention of the cousin who is sitting with his wife in the stalls, and by
the open love-affair attributed to the latter. The contrasts between secret and open love,
between the dreamer's fire and the coldness of the young wife, dominate the dream.
Moreover, here once again there is a person ìn a high position' as a middle term between
the aristocrat and the musician who is justified in raising high hopes.

In the above analysis we have at last brought to light a third factor, whose part in the
transformation of the dream-thoughts into the dream-content is by no means trivial:
namely, consideration of the suitability of the dream-thoughts for representation in the
particular psychic material of which the dream makes use -- that is, for the most part in
visual images. Among the various subordinate ideas associated with the essential dream-
thoughts, those will be preferred which permit of visual representation, and the dream-
work does not hesitate to recast the intractable thoughts into another verbal form, even
though this is a more unusual form, provided it makes representation possible, and thus
puts an end to the psychological distress caused by strangulated thinking. This pouring of
the thought-content into another mould may at the same time serve the work of
condensation, and may establish relations with another thought which otherwise would
not have been established. It is even possible that this second thought may itself have
previously changed its original expression for the purpose of meeting the first one half-
way.
Herbert Silberer4 has described a good method of directly observing the transformation of
thoughts into images which occurs in dream-formation, and has thus made it possible to
study in isolation this one factor of the dream-work. If while in a state of fatigue and
somnolence he imposed upon himself a mental effort, it frequently happened that the
thought escaped him, and in its place there appeared a picture in which he could
recognise the substitute for the thought. Not quite appropriately, Silberer described this
substitution as àuto-symbolic'. I shall cite here a few examples from Silberer's work, and
on account of certain peculiarities of the phenomena observed I shall refer to the subject
later on.
Example 1. -- I remember that I have to correct a halting passage in an

essay.
Symbol. -- I see myself planing a piece of wood.
Example 5. -- I endeavour to call to mind the aim of certain metaphysical

studies which I am proposing to undertake.
This aim, I reflect, consists in working one's way through, while seeking
for the basis of existence, to ever higher forms of consciousness or levels
of being.
Symbol. -- I run a long knife under a cake as though to take a slice out of
it.
Interpretation. -- My movement with the knife signifies `working one's

way through'. . . . The explanation of the basis of the symbolism is as
follows: At table it devolves upon me now and again to cut and distribute
a cake, a business which I perform with a long, flexible knife, and which
necessitates a certain amount of care. In particular, the neat extraction of
the cut slices of cake presents a certain amount of difficulty; the knife

must be carefully pushed under the slices in question (the slow `working
one's way through' in order to get to the bottom). But there is yet more
symbolism in the picture. The cake of the symbol was really a `dobos-
cake' -- that is, a cake in which the knife has to cut through several layers
(the levels of consciousness and thought).
Example 9. -- I lost the thread in a train of thought. I make an effort to

find it again, but I have to recognise that the point of departure has
completely escaped me.
Symbol. -- Part of a form of type, the last lines of which have fallen out.'
In view of the part played by witticisms, puns, quotations, songs, and proverbs in the
intellectual life of educated persons, it would be entirely in accordance with our
expectations to find disguises of this sort used with extreme frequency in the
representation of the dream-thoughts. Only in the case of a few types of material has a
generally valid dream-symbolism established itself on the basis of generally known
allusions and verbal equivalents. A good part of this symbolism, however, is common to
the psychoneuroses, legends, and popular usages as well as to dreams.
In fact, if we look more closely into the matter, we must recognise that in employing this
kind of substitution the dream-work is doing nothing at all original. For the achievement
of its purpose, which in this case is representation without interference from the
censorship, it simply follows the paths which it finds already marked out in unconscious
thinking, and gives the preference to those transformations of the repressed material
which are permitted to become conscious also in the form of witticisms and allusions,
and with which all the fantasies of neurotics are replete. Here we suddenly begin to
understand the dream-interpretations of Scherner, whose essential correctness I have
vindicated elsewhere. The preoccupation of the imagination with one's own body is by no
means peculiar to or characteristic of the dream alone. My analyses have shown me that it
is constantly found in the unconscious thinking of neurotics, and may be traced back to
sexual curiosity, whose object, in the adolescent youth or maiden, is the genitals of the
opposite sex, or even of the same sex. But, as Scherner and Volkelt very truly insist, the
house does not constitute the only group of ideas which is employed for the
symbolisation of the body, either in dreams or in the unconscious fantasies of neurosis.
To be sure, I know patients who have steadily adhered to an architectural symbolism for
the body and the genitals (sexual interest, of course, extends far beyond the region of the
external genital organs) -- patients for whom posts and pillars signify legs (as in the Song
of Songs), to whom every door suggests a bodily aperture (`hole'), and every water-pipe
the urinary system, and so on. But the groups of ideas appertaining to plant-life, or to the
kitchen, are just as often chosen to conceal sexual images;5 in respect of the former
everyday language, the sediment of imaginative comparisons dating from the remotest
times, has abundantly paved the way (the `vineyard' of the Lord, the `seed' of Abraham,
the `garden' of the maiden in the Song of Songs). The ugliest as well as the most intimate
details of sexual life may be thought or dreamed of in apparently innocent allusions to
culinary operations, and the symptoms of hysteria will become absolutely unintelligible if

we forget that sexual symbolism may conceal itself behind the most commonplace and
inconspicuous matters as its safest hiding-place. That some neurotic children cannot look
at blood and raw meat, that they vomit at the sight of eggs and macaroni, and that the
dread of snakes, which is natural to mankind, is monstrously exaggerated in neurotics --
all this has a definite sexual meaning. Wherever the neurosis employs a disguise of this
sort, it treads the paths once trodden by the whole of humanity in the early stages of
civilisation -- paths to whose thinly veiled existence our idiomatic expressions, proverbs,
superstitions, and customs testify to this day.
I here insert the promised `flower-dream' of a female patient, in which I shall print in
Roman type everything which is to be sexually interpreted. This beautiful dream lost all
its charm for the dreamer once it had been interpreted.
(a) Preliminary dream: She goes to the two maids in the kitchen and scolds them for
taking so long to prepare à little bite of food'. She also sees a very large number of
heavy kitchen utensils in the kitchen, heaped into piles and turned upside down in order
to drain. Later addition: The two maids go to fetch water, and have, as it were, to climb
into a river which reaches up to the house or into the courtyard.6
(b) Main dream:7 She is descending from a height 8 over curiously constructed railings, or
a fence which is composed of large square trelliswork hurdles with small square
apertures.9 It is really not adapted for climbing; she is constantly afraid that she cannot
find a place for her foot, and she is glad that her dress doesn't get caught anywhere, and
that she is able to climb down it so respectably.10 As she climbs she is carrying a big
branch in her hand,11 really like a tree, which is thickly studded with red flowers; a
spreading branch, with many twigs.12 With this is connected the idea of cherry-blossoms
(Blüten = flowers), but they look like fully opened camellias, which of course do not grow
on trees. As she is descending, she first has one, then suddenly two, and then again only
one.13 When she has reached the ground the lower flowers have already begun to fall.
Now that she has reached the bottom she sees an òdd man' who is combing -- as she
would like to put it -- just such a tree, that is, with a piece of wood he is scraping thick
bunches of hair from it, which hang from it like moss. Other men have chopped off such
branches in a garden, and have flung them into the road, where they are lying about, so
that a number of people take some of them. But she asks whether this is right, whether
she may take one, too.14 In the garden there stands a young man (he is a foreigner, and
known to her) toward whom she goes in order to ask him how it is possible to transplant
such branches in her own garden. 15 He embraces her, whereupon she struggles and asks
him what he is thinking of, whether it is permissible to embrace her in such a manner. He
says there is nothing wrong in it, that it is permitted.16 He then declares himself willing to
go with her into the other garden, in order to show her how to put them in, and he says
something to her which she does not quite understand: `Besides this I need three metres
(later she says: square metres) or three fathoms of ground.' It seems as though he were
asking her for something in return for his willingness, as though he had the intention of
indemnifying (reimbursing) himself in her garden, as though he wanted to evade some
law or other, to derive some advantage from it without causing her an injury. She does
not know whether or not he really shows her anything.

The above dream, which has been given prominence on account of its symbolic elements,
may be described as a `biographical' dream. Such dreams occur frequently in
psychoanalysis, but perhaps only rarely outside it.17
I have, of course, an abundance of such material, but to reproduce it here would lead us
too far into the consideration of neurotic conditions. Everything points to the same
conclusion, namely, that we need not assume that any special symbolising activity of the
psyche is operative in dream-formation; that, on the contrary, the dream makes use of
such symbolisations as are to be found ready-made in unconscious thinking, since these,
by reason of their ease of representation, and for the most part by reason of their being
exempt from the censorship, satisfy more effectively the requirements of dream-
formation.
1
cf. Wit and its Relation to the Unconscious.
2
Hugo Wolf.
3
[The German sitzen geblieben is often applied to women who have not succeeded in
getting married. -- TRANS.]
4
Bleuler-Freud Jahrbuch, i, 1909.
5
A mass of corroborative material may be found in the three supplementary volumes of
Edward Fuchs's Illustrierte Sittengeschichte; privately printed by A. Lange, Munich.
6
For the interpretation of this preliminary dream, which is to be regarded as `causal', see
p. 199.
7
Her career.
8
Exalted origin, the wish-contrast to the preliminary dream.
9
A composite formation, which unites two localities, the so-called garret (German: Boden
= floor, garret) of her father's house, in which she used to play with her brother, the
object of her later fantasies, and the farm of a malicious uncle, who used to tease her.
10
Wish-contrast to an actual memory of her uncle's farm, to the effect that she used to
expose herself while she was asleep.
11
Just as the angel bears a lily-stem in the Annunciation.
12
For the explanation of this composite formation, see pp. 202-03; innocence,
menstruation, La Dame aux Camélias.
13
Referring to the plurality of the persons who serve her fantasies.

14
Whether it is permissible to masturbate. [`Sich einen herunterreissen' means `to pull off'
and colloquially `to masturbate'. -- TRANS.]
15
The branch (Ast) has long been used to represent the male organ, and, moreover,
contains a very distinct allusion to the family name of the dreamer
16
Refers to matrimonial precautions, as does that which immediately follows.
17
An analogous `biographical' dream is recorded on p. 242, among the examples of dream
symbolism.

E. REPRESENTATION IN DREAMS BY SYMBOLS: SOME FURTHER

TYPICAL DREAMS
The analysis of the last biographical dream shows that I recognised the symbolism in
dreams from the very outset. But it was only little by little that I arrived at a full
appreciation of its extent and significance, as the result of increasing experience, and
under the influence of the works of W. Stekel, concerning which I may here fittingly say
something.
This author, who has perhaps injured psychoanalysis as much as he has benefited it,
produced a large number of novel symbolic translations, to which no credence was given
at first, but most of which were later confirmed and had to be accepted. Stekel's services
are in no way belittled by the remark that the sceptical reserve with which these symbols
were received was not unjustified. For the examples upon which he based his
interpretations were often unconvincing, and, moreover, he employed a method which
must be rejected as scientifically unreliable. Stekel found his symbolic meanings by way
of intuition, by virtue of his individual faculty of immediately understanding the symbols.
But such an art cannot be generally assumed; its efficiency is immune from criticism, and
its results have therefore no claim to credibility. It is as though one were to base one's
diagnosis of infectious diseases on the olfactory impressions received beside the sick-bed,
although of course there have been clinicians to whom the sense of smell -- atrophied in
most people -- has been of greater service than to others, and who really have been able
to diagnose a case of abdominal typhus by their sense of smell.
The progressive experience of psychoanalysis has enabled us to discover patients who

have displayed in a surprising degree this immediate understanding of dream-symbolism.
Many of these patients suffered from dementia praecox, so that for a time there was an
inclination to suspect that all dreamers with such an understanding of symbols were
suffering from that disorder. But this did not prove to be the case; it is simply a question
of a personal gift or idiosyncrasy without perceptible pathological significance.
When one has familiarised oneself with the extensive employment of symbolism for the
representation of sexual material in dreams, one naturally asks oneself whether many of
these symbols have not a permanently established meaning, like the signs in shorthand;
and one even thinks of attempting to compile a new dream-book on the lines of the cipher
method. In this connection it should be noted that symbolism does not appertain
especially to dreams, but rather to the unconscious imagination, and particularly to that of
the people, and it is to be found in a more developed condition in folklore, myths,
legends, idiomatic phrases, proverbs, and the current witticisms of a people than in
dreams. We should have, therefore, to go far beyond the province of dream-interpretation
in order fully to investigate the meaning of symbolism, and to discuss the numerous
problems -- for the most part still unsolved -- which are associated with the concept of the
symbol.1 We shall here confine ourselves to say that representation by a symbol comes
under the heading of the indirect representations, but that we are warned by all sorts of
signs against indiscriminately classing symbolic representation with the other modes of
indirect representation before we have clearly conceived its distinguishing characteristics.

In a number of cases the common quality shared by the symbol and the thing which it
represents is obvious, in others it is concealed; in these latter cases the choice of the
symbol appears to be enigmatic. And these are the very cases that must be able to
elucidate the ultimate meaning of the symbolic relation; they point to the fact that it is of
a genetic nature. What is today symbolically connected was probably united, in primitive
times, by conceptual and linguistic identity.2 The symbolic relationship seems to be a
residue and reminder of a former identity. It may also be noted that in many cases the
symbolic identity extends beyond the linguistic identity, as had already been asserted by
Schubert (1814).3
Dreams employ this symbolism to give a disguised representation to their latent thoughts.
Among the symbols thus employed there are, of course, many which constantly, or all but
constantly, mean the same thing. But we must bear in mind the curious plasticity of
psychic material. Often enough a symbol in the dream-content may have to be interpreted
not symbolically but in accordance with its proper meaning; at other times the dreamer,
having to deal with special memory-material, may take the law into his own hands and
employ anything whatever as a sexual symbol, though it is not generally so employed.
Wherever he has the choice of several symbols for the representation of a dream-content,
he will decide in favour of that symbol which is in addition objectively related to his
other thought-material; that is to say, he will employ an individual motivation besides the
typically valid one.
Although since Scherner's time the more recent investigations of dream-problems have
definitely established the existence of dream-symbolism -- even Havelock Ellis
acknowledges that our dreams are indubitably full of symbols -- it must yet be admitted
that the existence of symbols in dreams has not only facilitated dream-interpretation, but
has also made it more difficult. The technique of interpretation in accordance with the
dreamer's free associations more often than otherwise leaves us in the lurch as far as the
symbolic elements of the dream-content are concerned. A return to the arbitrariness of
dream-interpretation as it was practised in antiquity, and is seemingly revived by Stekel's
wild interpretations, is contrary to scientific method. Consequently, those elements in the
dream-content which are to be symbolically regarded compel us to employ a combined
technique, which on the one hand is based on the dreamer's associations, while on the
other hand the missing portions have to be supplied by the interpreter's understanding of
the symbols. Critical circumspection in the solution of the symbols must coincide with
careful study of the symbols in especially transparent examples of dreams in order to
silence the reproach of arbitrariness in dream-interpretation. The uncertainties which still
adhere to our function as dream-interpreters are due partly to our imperfect knowledge
(which, however, can be progressively increased) and partly to certain peculiarities of the
dream-symbols themselves. These often possess many and varied meanings, so that, as in
Chinese script, only the context can furnish the correct meaning. This multiple
significance of the symbol is allied to the dream's faculty of admitting over-
interpretations, of representing, in the same content, various wish-impulses and thought-
formations, often of a widely divergent character.

After these limitations and reservations I will proceed. The Emperor and the Empress
(King and Queen)4 in most cases really represent the dreamer's parents; the dreamer
himself or herself is the prince or princess. But the high authority conceded to the
Emperor is also conceded to great men, so that in some dreams, for example, Goethe
appears as a father-symbol (Hitschmann). -- All elongated objects, sticks, tree-trunks,
umbrellas (on account of the opening, which might be likened to an erection), all sharp
and elongated weapons, knives, daggers, and pikes, represent the male member. A
frequent, but not very intelligible symbol for the same is a nail-file (a reference to
rubbing and scraping?). -- Small boxes, chests, cupboards, and ovens correspond to the
female organ; also cavities, ships, and all kinds of vessels. -- A room in a dream generally
represents a woman; the description of its various entrances and exits is scarcely
calculated to make us doubt this interpretation.5 The interest as to whether the room is
òpen' or `locked' will be readily understood in this connection. (Cf. Dora's dream in
Fragment of an Analysis of Hysteria.) There is no need to be explicit as to the sort of key
that will unlock the room; the symbolism of `lock and key' has been gracefully if broadly
employed by Uhland in his song of the Graf Eberstein. -- The dream of walking through
a suite of rooms signifies a brothel or a harem. But, as H. Sachs has shown by an
admirable example, it is also employed to represent marriage (contrast). An interesting
relation to the sexual investigations of childhood emerges when the dreamer dreams of
two rooms which were previously one, or finds that a familiar room in a house of which
he dreams has been divided into two, or the reverse. In childhood the female genitals and
anus (the `behind'6 ) are conceived of as a single opening according to the infantile cloaca
theory, and only later is it discovered that this region of the body contains two separate
cavities and openings. Steep inclines, ladders, and stairs, and going up or down them, are
symbolic representations of the sexual act.7 Smooth walls over which one climbs, facades
of houses, across which one lets oneself down -- often with a sense of great anxiety --
correspond to erect human bodies, and probably repeat in our dreams childish memories
of climbing up parents or nurses. `Smooth' walls are men; in anxiety dreams one often
holds firmly to `projections' on houses. Tables, whether bare or covered, and boards, are
women, perhaps by virtue of contrast, since they have no protruding contours. `Wood',
generally speaking, seems, in accordance with its linguistic relations, to represent
feminine matter (Materie). The name of the island Madeira means `wood' in Portuguese.
Since `bed and board' (mensa et thorus) constitute marriage, in dreams the latter is often
substituted for the former, and as far as practicable the sexual representation-complex is
transposed to the eating-complex. -- Of articles of dress, a woman's hat may very often be
interpreted with certainty as the male genitals. In the dreams of men one often finds the
necktie as a symbol for the penis; this is not only because neckties hang down in front of
the body, and are characteristic of men, but also because one can select them at pleasure,
a freedom which nature prohibits as regards the original of the symbol. Persons who
make use of this symbol in dreams are very extravagant in the matter of ties, and possess
whole collections of them.8 All complicated machines and appliances are very probably
the genitals -- as a rule the male genitals -- in the description of which the symbolism of
dreams is as indefatigable as human wit. It is quite unmistakable that all weapons and
tools are used as symbols for the male organ: e.g. ploughshare, hammer, gun, revolver,
dagger, sword, etc. Again, many of the landscapes seen in dreams, especially those that
contain bridges or wooded mountains, may be readily recognised as descriptions of the

genitals. Marcinowski collected a series of examples in which the dreamer explained his
dream by means of drawings, in order to represent the landscapes and places appearing in
it. These drawings clearly showed the distinction between the manifest and the latent
meaning of the dream. Whereas, naively regarded, they seemed to represent plans, maps,
and so forth, closer investigation showed that they were representations of the human
body, of the genitals, etc., and only after conceiving them thus could the dream be
understood.9 Finally, where one finds incomprehensible neologisms one may suspect
combinations of components having a sexual significance. -- Children, too, often signify
the genitals, since men and women are in the habit of fondly referring to their genital
organs as `little man', `little woman', `little thing'. The `little brother' was correctly
recognised by Stekel as the penis. To play with or to beat a little child is often the dream's
representation of masturbation. The dream-work represents castration by baldness, hair-
cutting, the loss of teeth, and beheading. As an insurance against castration, the dream
uses one of the common symbols of a penis in double or multiple form; and the
appearance in a dream of a lizard -- an animal whose tail, if pulled off, is regenerated by a
new growth -- has the same meaning. Most of those animals which are utilised as genital
symbols in mythology and folklore play this part also in dreams: the fish, the snail, the
cat, the mouse (on account of the hairiness of the genitals), but above all the snake, which
is the most important symbol of the male member. Small animals and vermin are
substitutes for little children, e.g. undesired sisters or brothers. To be infected with
vermin is often the equivalent for pregnancy. -- As a very recent symbol of the male
organ I may mention the airship, whose employment is justified by its relation to flying,
and also, occasionally, by its form. -- Stekel has given a number of other symbols, not yet
sufficiently verified, which he has illustrated by examples. The works of this author, and
especially his book Die Sprache des Traumes, contain the richest collection of
interpretations of symbols, some of which were ingeniously guessed and were proved to
be correct upon investigation, as, for example, in the section on the symbolism of death.
The author's lack of critical reflection, and his tendency to generalise at all costs, make
his interpretations doubtful or inapplicable, so that in making use of his works caution is
urgently advised. I shall therefore restrict myself to mentioning a few examples.
Right and left, according to Stekel, are to be understood in dreams in an ethical sense.
`The right-hand path always signifies the way to righteousness, the left-hand path the
path to crime. Thus the left may signify homosexuality, incest, and perversion, while the
right signifies marriage, relations with a prostitute, etc. The meaning is always
determined by the individual moral standpoint of the dreamer' (loc. cit., p. 466). Relatives
in dreams generally stand for the genitals (pp. 373 ff.). Here I can confirm this meaning
only for the son, the daughter, and the younger sister -- that is, wherever `little thing'
could be employed. On the other hand, verified examples allow us to recognise sisters as
symbols of the breasts, and brothers as symbols of the larger hemispheres. To be unable
to overtake a carriage is interpreted by Stekel as regret at being unable to catch up with a
difference in age (p. 479). The luggage of a traveller is the burden of sin by which one is
oppressed (ibid.). But a traveller's luggage often proves to be an unmistakable symbol of
one's own genitals. To numbers, which frequently occur in dreams, Stekel has assigned a
fixed symbolic meaning, but these interpretations seem neither sufficiently verified nor of
universal validity, although in individual cases they can usually be recognised as

plausible. We have, at all events, abundant confirmation that the figure three is a symbol
of the male genitals. One of Stekel's generalisations refers to the double meaning of the
genital symbols. `Where is there a symbol,' he asks, `which (if in any way permitted by
the imagination) may not be used simultaneously in the masculine and the feminine
sense?' To be sure, the clause in parenthesis retracts much of the absolute character of this
assertion, for this double meaning is not always permitted by the imagination. Still, I
think it is not superfluous to state that in my experience this general statement of Stekel's
requires elaboration. Besides those symbols which are just as frequently employed for the
male as for the female genitals, there are others which preponderantly, or almost
exclusively, designate one of the sexes, and there are yet others which, so far as we know,
have only the male or only the female signification. To use long, stiff objects and
weapons as symbols of the female genitals, or hollow objects (chests, boxes, etc.) as
symbols of the male genitals, is certainly not permitted by the imagination.
It is true that the tendency of dreams, and of the unconscious fantasy, to employ the
sexual symbols bisexually, reveals an archaic trait, for in childhood the difference in the
genitals is unknown, and the same genitals are attributed to both sexes. One may also be
misled as regards the significance of a bisexual symbol if one forgets the fact that in some
dreams a general reversal of sexes takes place, so that the male organ is represented by
the female, and vice versa. Such dreams express, for example, the wish of a woman to be
a man.
The genitals may even be represented in dreams by other parts of the body: the male
member by the hand or the foot, the female genital orifice by the mouth, the ear, or even
the eye. The secretions of the human body -- mucus, tears, urine, semen, etc. -- may be
used in dreams interchangeably. This statement of Stekel's, correct in the main, has
suffered a justifiable critical restriction as the result of certain comments of R. Reitler's
(Internat. Zeitschr. für Psych., i, 1913). The gist of the matter is the replacement of an
important secretion, such as the semen, by an indifferent one.
These very incomplete indications may suffice to stimulate others to make a more
painstaking collection.10 I have attempted a much more detailed account of dream-
symbolism in my Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis (trans. by Joan Riviere; Allen
and Unwin, London).
I shall now append a few instances of the use of such symbols, which will show how
impossible it is to arrive at the interpretation of a dream if one excludes dream-
symbolism, but also how in many cases it is imperatively forced upon one. At the same
time, I must expressly warn the investigator against overestimating the importance of
symbols in the interpretation of dreams, restricting the work of dream-translation to the
translation of symbols, and neglecting the technique of utilising the associations of the
dreamer. The two techniques of dream-interpretation must supplement one another;
practically, however, as well as theoretically, precedence is retained by the latter process,
which assigns the final significance to the utterances of the dreamer, while the symbol-
translations which we undertake play an auxiliary part.

1. The hat as the symbol of a man (of the male genitals):11 (A fragment from the dream of
a young woman who suffered from agoraphobia as the result of her fear of temptation.)
Ì am walking in the street in summer; I am wearing a straw hat of peculiar shape, the
middle piece of which is bent upwards, while the side pieces hang downwards (here the
description hesitates), and in such a fashion that one hangs lower than the other. I am
cheerful and in a confident mood, and as I pass a number of young officers I think to
myself: You can't do anything to me.'
As she could produce no associations to the hat, I said to her: `The hat is really a male
genital organ, with its raised middle piece and the two downward-hanging side pieces.' It
is perhaps peculiar that her hat should be supposed to be a man, but after all one says:
Unter die Haube kommen (to get under the cap) when we mean: to get married. I
intentionally refrained from interpreting the details concerning the unequal dependence of
the two side pieces, although the determination of just such details must point the way to
the interpretation. I went on to say that if, therefore, she had a husband with such
splendid genitals she would not have to fear the officers; that is, she would have nothing
to wish from them, for it was essentially her temptation-fantasies which prevented her
from going about unprotected and unaccompanied. This last explanation of her anxiety I
had already been able to give her repeatedly on the basis of other material.
It is quite remarkable how the dreamer behaved after this interpretation. She withdrew
her description of the hat, and would not admit that she had said that the two side pieces
were hanging down. I was, however, too sure of what I had heard to allow myself to be
misled, and so I insisted that she did say it. She was quiet for a while, and then found the
courage to ask why it was that one of her husband's testicles was lower than the other,
and whether it was the same with all men. With this the peculiar detail of the hat was
explained, and the whole interpretation was accepted by her.
The hat symbol was familiar to me long before the patient related this dream. From other
but less transparent cases I believed that I might assume the hat could also stand for the
female genitals.12
2. The `little one' as the genital organ. Being run over as a symbol of sexual intercourse.
(Another dream of the same agoraphobic patient.)
`Her mother sends away her little daughter so that she has to go alone. She then drives
with her mother to the railway station, and sees her little one walking right along the
track, so that she is bound to be run over. She hears the bones crack. (At this she
experiences a feeling of discomfort but no real horror.) She then looks out through the
carriage window, to see whether the parts cannot be seen behind. Then she reproaches
her mother for allowing the little one to go out alone.'
Analysis. -- It is not an easy matter to give here a complete interpretation of the dream. It
forms part of a cycle of dreams, and can be fully understood only in connection with the

rest. For it is not easy to obtain the material necessary to demonstrate the symbolism in a
sufficiently isolated condition. The patient at first finds that the railway journey is to be
interpreted historically as an allusion to a departure from a sanatorium for nervous
diseases, with whose director she was of course in love. Her mother fetched her away,
and before her departure the physician came to the railway station and gave her a bunch
of flowers; she felt uncomfortable because her mother witnessed this attention. Here the
mother, therefore, appears as the disturber of her tender feelings, a role actually played by
this strict woman during her daughter's girlhood. -- The next association referred to the
sentence: `She then looks to see whether the parts cannot be seen behind.' In the dream-
facade one would naturally be compelled to think of the pieces of the little daughter who
had been run over and crushed. The association, however, turns in quite a different
direction. She recalls that she once saw her father in the bathroom, naked, from behind;
she then begins to talk about sex differences, and remarks that in the man the genitals can
be seen from behind, but in the woman they cannot. In this connection she now herself
offers the interpretation that `the little one' is the genital organ, and her little one (she has
a four-year-old daughter) her own organ. She reproaches her mother for wanting her to
live as though she had no genitals, and recognises this reproach in the introductory
sentence of the dream: the mother sends her little one away, so that she has to go alone.
In her fantasy, going alone through the streets means having no man, no sexual relations
(coire = to go together), and this she does not like. According to all her statements, she
really suffered as a girl through her mother's jealousy, because her father showed a
preference for her.
The deeper interpretation of this dream depends upon another dream of the same night, in
which the dreamer identifies herself with her brother. She was a `tomboy', and was
always being told that she should have been born a boy. This identification with the
brother shows with especial clearness that `the little one' signifies the genital organ. The
mother threatened him (her) with castration, which could only be understood as a
punishment for playing with the genital parts, and the identification, therefore, shows that
she herself had masturbated as a child, though she had retained only a memory of her
brother's having done so. An early knowledge of the male genitals, which she lost later,
must, according to the assertions of this second dream, have been acquired at this time.
Moreover, the second dream points to the infantile sexual theory that girls originate from
boys as a result of castration. After I had told her of this childish belief, she at once
confirmed it by an anecdote in which the boy asks the girl: `Was it cut off?' to which the
girl replies: `No, it's always been like that.' Consequently the sending away of `the little
one', of the genital organ, in the first dream refers also to the threatened castration.
Finally, she blames her mother for not having borne her as a boy.
That `being run over' symbolises sexual intercourse would not be evident from this dream
if we had not learned it from many other sources.
3. Representation of the genitals by buildings, stairs, and shafts.
(Dream of a young man inhibited by a father complex.)

`He is taking a walk with his father in a place which is certainly the Prater, for one can
see the Rotunda, in front of which there is a small vestibule to which there is attached a
captive balloon; the balloon, however, seems rather limp. His father asks him what this is
all for; he is surprised at it, but he explains it to his father. They come into a courtyard in
which lies a large sheet of tin. His father wants to pull off a big piece of this, but first
looks round to see if anyone is watching. He tells his father that all he needs to do is to
speak to the overseer, and then he can take as much as he wants to without any more ado.
From this courtyard a flight of stairs leads down into a shaft, the walls of which are
softly upholstered, rather like a leather armchair. At the end of this shaft there is a long
platform, and then a new shaft begins . . . '
Analysis. -- This dreamer belonged to a type of patient which is not at all promising from
a therapeutic point of view; up to a certain point in the analysis such patients offer no
resistance whatever, but from that point onwards they prove to be almost inaccessible.
This dream he analysed almost independently. `The Rotunda,' he said, ìs my genitals, the
captive balloon in front is my penis, about whose flaccidity I have been worried.' We
must, however, interpret it in greater detail: the Rotunda is the buttocks, constantly
associated by the child with the genitals; the smaller structure in front is the scrotum. In
the dream his father asks him what this is all for -- that is, he asks him about the purpose
and arrangement of the genitals. It is quite evident that this state of affairs should be
reversed, and that he ought to be the questioner. As such questioning on the part of the
father never occurred in reality, we must conceive the dream-thought as a wish, or
perhaps take it conditionally, as follows. Ìf I had asked my father for sexual
enlightenment . . . ' The continuation of this thought we shall presently find in another
place.
The courtyard in which the sheet of tin is spread out is not to be conceived symbolically
in the first instance, but originates from his father's place of business. For reasons of
discretion I have inserted the tin for another material in which the father deals without,
however, changing anything in the verbal expression of the dream. The dreamer had
entered his father's business, and had taken a terrible dislike to the somewhat
questionable practices upon which its profit mainly depended. Hence the continuation of
the above dream-thought (ìf I had asked him') would be: `He would have deceived me
just as he does his customers.' For the `pulling off', which serves to represent commercial
dishonesty, the dreamer himself gives a second explanation, namely, masturbation. This
is not only quite familiar to us (see above, p. 229), but agrees very well with the fact that
the secrecy of masturbation is expressed by its opposite (one can do it quite openly).
Thus, it agrees entirely with our expectations that the auto-erotic activity should be
attributed to the father, just as was the questioning in the first scene of the dream. The
shaft he at once interprets as the vagina, by referring to the soft upholstering of the walls.
That the action of coition in the vagina is described as a going down instead of in the
usual way as a going up agrees with what I have found in other instances.13
The details -- that at the end of the first shaft there is a long platform, and then a new
shaft -- he himself explains biographically. He had for some time had sexual intercourse
with women, but had given it up on account of inhibitions, and now hopes to be able to

begin it again with the aid of the treatment. The dream, however, becomes indistinct
towards the end, and to the experienced interpreter it becomes evident that in the second
scene of the dream the influence of another subject has already begun to assert itself;
which is indicated by his father's business, his dishonest practices, and the vagina
represented by the first shaft, so that one may assume a reference to his mother.
4. The male organ symbolised by persons and the female by a landscape.
(Dream of a woman of the lower class, whose husband is a policeman, reported by B.

Dattner.)
`. . . Then someone broke into the house and she anxiously called for a policeman. But he
went peacefully with two tramps into a church,14 to which a great many steps led up;15
behind the church there was a mountain16 on top of which there was a dense forest.17 The
policeman was provided with a helmet, a gorget, and a cloak.18 The two vagrants, who
went along with the policeman quite peaceably, had sack-like aprons tied round their
loins.19 A road led from the church to the mountains. This road was overgrown on each
side with grass and brushwood, which became thicker and thicker as it reached the top of
the mountain, where it spread out into quite a forest.'
5. Castration dreams of children.
(a) À boy aged three years and five months, for whom his father's return from military
service is clearly inconvenient, wakes one morning in a disturbed and excited state, and
constantly repeats the question: Why did Daddy carry his head on a plate? Last night
Daddy carried his head on a plate.'
(b) À student who is now suffering from a severe obsessional neurosis remembers that in
his sixth year he repeatedly had the following dream: He goes to the barber to have his
hair cut. Then a large woman with severe features comes up to him and cuts off his head.
He recognises the woman as his mother.'
6. A modified staircase dream.
To one of my patients, a sexual abstainer, who was very ill, whose fantasy was fixated
upon his mother, and who repeatedly dreamed of climbing stairs while accompanied by
his mother, I once remarked that moderate masturbation would probably have been less
harmful to him than his enforced abstinence. The influence of this remark provoked the
following dream:
His piano teacher reproaches him for neglecting his piano-playing, and for not
practising the Etudes of Moscheles and Clementi's Gradus ad Parnassum. With reference
to this he remarked that the Gradus, too, is a stairway, and that the piano itself is a
stairway, as it has a scale.

It may be said that there is no class of ideas which cannot be enlisted in the representation
of sexual facts and wishes.
7. The sensation of reality and the representation of repetition.
A man, now thirty-five, relates a clearly remembered dream which he claims to have had
when he was four years of age: The notary with whom his father's will was deposited --
he had lost his father at the age of three -- brought two large Emperor-pears, of which he
was given one to eat. The other lay on the windowsill of the living-room. He woke with
the conviction of the reality of what he had dreamt, and obstinately asked his mother to
give him the second pear; it was, he said, still lying on the windowsill. His mother
laughed at this.
Analysis. -- The notary was a jovial old gentleman who, as he seems to remember, really
sometimes brought pears with him. The window-sill was as he saw it in the dream.
Nothing else occurs to him in this connection, except, perhaps, that his mother has
recently told him a dream. She has two birds sitting on her head; she wonders when they
will fly away, but they do not fly away, and one of them flies to her mouth and sucks at
it.
The dreamer's inability to furnish associations justifies the attempt to interpret it by the
substitution of symbols. The two pears -- pommes ou poires -- are the breasts of the
mother who nursed him; the window-sill is the projection of the bosom, analogous to the
balconies in the dream of houses. His sensation of reality after waking is justified, for his
mother had actually suckled him for much longer than the customary term, and her breast
was still available. The dream is to be translated: `Mother, give (show) me the breast
again at which I once used to drink.' The ònce' is represented by the eating of the one
pear, the àgain' by the desire for the other. The temporal repetition of an act is habitually
represented in dreams by the numerical multiplication of an object.
It is naturally a very striking phenomenon that symbolism should already play a part in
the dream of a child of four, but this is the rule rather than the exception. One may say
that the dreamer has command of symbolism from the very first.
The early age at which people make use of symbolic representation, even apart from the
dream-life, may be shown by the following uninfluenced memory of a lady who is now
twentyseven: She is in her fourth year. The nursemaid is driving her, with her brother,
eleven months younger, and a cousin, who is between the two in age, to the lavatory, so
that they can do their little business there before going for their walk. As the oldest, she
sits on the seat and the other two on chambers. She asks her (female) cousin: Have you a
purse, too? Walter has a little sausage, I have a purse. The cousin answers: Yes, I have a
purse, too. The nursemaid listens, laughing, and relates the conversation to the mother,
whose reaction is a sharp reprimand.
Here a dream may be inserted whose excellent symbolism permitted of interpretation

with little assistance from the dreamer:

8. The question of symbolism in the dreams of normal persons.20
An objection frequently raised by the opponents of psychoanalysis -- and recently also by

Havelock Ellis21 -- is that, although dream-symbolism may perhaps be a product of the
neurotic psyche, it has no validity whatever in the case of normal persons. But while
psychoanalysis recognises no essential distinctions, but only quantitative differences,
between the psychic life of the normal person and that of the neurotic, the analysis of
those dreams in which, in sound and sick persons alike, the repressed complexes display
the same activity, reveals the absolute identity of the mechanisms as well as of the
symbolism. Indeed, the natural dreams of healthy persons often contain a much simpler,
more transparent, and more characteristic symbolism than those of neurotics, which,
owing to the greater strictness of the censorship and the more extensive dream-distortion
resulting therefrom, are frequently troubled and obscured, and are therefore more difficult
to translate. The following dream serves to illustrate this fact. This dream comes from a
non-neurotic girl of a rather prudish and reserved type. In the course of conversation I
found that she was engaged to be married, but that there were hindrances in the way of
the marriage which threatened to postpone it. She related spontaneously the following
dream:
I arrange the centre of a table with flowers for a birthday. On being questioned she states
that in the dream she seemed to be at home (she has no home at the time) and
experienced a feeling of happiness.
The `popular' symbolism enables me to translate the dream for myself. It is the
expression of her wish to be married: the table, with the flowers in the centre, is symbolic
of herself and her genitals. She represents her future wishes as fulfilled, inasmuch as she
is already occupied with thoughts of the birth of a child; so the wedding has taken place
long ago.
I call her attention to the fact that `the centre of a table' is an unusual expression, which
she admits; but here, of course, I cannot question her more directly. I carefully refrain
from suggesting to her the meaning of the symbols, and ask her only for the thoughts
which occur to her mind in connection with the individual parts of the dream. In the
course of the analysis her reserve gave way to a distinct interest in the interpretation, and
a frankness which was made possible by the serious tone of the conversation. -- To my
question as to what kind of flowers they had been, her first answer is èxpensive flowers;
one has to pay for them'; then she adds that they were lilies-of-the-valley, violets, and
pinks or carnations. I took the word lily in this dream in its popular sense, as a symbol of
chastity; she confirmed this, as purity occurred to her in association with lily. Valley is a
common feminine dream-symbol. The chance juxtaposition of the two symbols in the
name of the flower is made into a piece of dream-symbolism, and serves to emphasise the
preciousness of her virginity -- expensive flowers; one has to pay for them -- and
expresses the expectation that her husband will know how to appreciate its value. The
comment, expensive flowers, etc., has, as will be shown, a different meaning in every one
of the three different flower-symbols.

I thought of what seemed to me a venturesome explanation of the hidden meaning of the

apparently quite asexual word violets by an unconscious relation to the French viol. But
to my surprise the dreamer's association was the English word violate. The accidental
phonetic similarity of the two words violet and violate is utilised by the dream to express
in `the language of flowers' the idea of the violence of defloration (another word which
makes use of flowersymbolism), and perhaps also to give expression to a masochistic
tendency on the part of the girl. -- An excellent example of the word bridges across which
run the paths to the unconscious. Òne has to pay for them' here means life, with which
she has to pay for becoming a wife and a mother.
In association with pinks, which she then calls carnations, I think of carnal. But her
association is colour, to which she adds that carnations are the flowers which her fiancé
gives her frequently and in large quantities. At the end of the conversation she suddenly
admits, spontaneously, that she has not told me the truth; the word that occurred to her
was not colour, but incarnation, the very word I expected. Moreover, even the word
`colour' is not a remote association; it was determined by the meaning of carnation (i.e.
flesh-colour) -- that is, by the complex. This lack of honesty shows that the resistance
here is at its greatest because the symbolism is here most transparent, and the struggle
between libido and repression is most intense in connection with this phallic theme. The
remark that these flowers were often given her by her fiancé is, together with the double
meaning of carnation, a still further indication of their phallic significance in the dream.
The occasion of the present of flowers during the day is employed to express the thought
of a sexual present and a return present. She gives her virginity and expects in return for
it a rich love-life. But the words: èxpensive flowers; one has to pay for them' may have a
real, financial meaning. -- The flower-symbolism in the dream thus comprises the
virginal female, the male symbol, and the reference to violent defloration. It is to be noted
that sexual flower-symbolism, which, of course, is very widespread, symbolises the
human sexual organs by flowers, the sexual organs of plants; indeed, presents of flowers
between lovers may perhaps have this unconscious significance.
The birthday for which she is making preparations in the dream probably signifies the
birth of a child. She identifies herself with the bridegroom, and represents him preparing
her for a birth (having coitus with her). It is as though the latent thoughts were to say: Ìf
I were he, I would not wait, but I would deflower the bride without asking her; I would
use violence.' Indeed, the word violate points to this. Thus even the sadistic libidinal
components find expression.
In a deeper stratum of the dream the sentence I arrange, etc., probably has an auto-erotic,
that is, an infantile significance.
She also has a knowledge -- possible only in the dream -- of her physical need; she sees
herself flat like a table, so that she emphasises all the more her virginity, the costliness of
the centre (another time she calls it a centre-piece of flowers). Even the horizontal
element of the table may contribute something to the symbol. -- The concentration of the
dream is worthy of remark; nothing is superfluous, every word is a symbol.

Later on she brings me a supplement to this dream: Ì decorate the flowers with green
crinkled paper.' She adds that it was fancy paper of the sort which is used to disguise
ordinary flowerpots. She says also: `To hide untidy things, whatever was to be seen
which was not pretty to the eye; there is a gap, a little space in the flowers. The paper
looks like velvet or moss.' With decorate she associates decorum, as I expected. The
green colour is very prominent, and with this she associates hope, yet another reference to
pregnancy. -- In this part of the dream the identification with the man is not the dominant
feature, but thoughts of shame and frankness express themselves. She makes herself
beautiful for him; she admits physical defects, of which she is ashamed and which she
wishes to correct. The associations velvet and moss distinctly point to crines pubis.
The dream is an expression of thoughts hardly known to the waking state of the girl;
thoughts which deal with the love of the senses and its organs; she is `prepared for a
birthday', i.e. she has coitus; the fear of defloration and perhaps the pleasurably toned
pain find expression; she admits her physical defects and overcompensates them by
means of an over-estimation of the value of her virginity. Her shame excuses the
emerging sensuality by the fact that the aim of it all is the child. Even material
considerations, which are foreign to the lover, find expression here. The affect of the
simple dream -- the feeling of bliss -- shows that here strong emotional complexes have
found satisfaction.
I close with the --
9. Dream of a chemist.
(A young man who has been trying to give up his habit of masturbation by substituting
intercourse with a woman.)
Preliminary statement: On the day before the dream he had been instructing a student as
to Grignard's reaction, in which magnesium is dissolved in absolutely pure ether under
the catalytic influence of iodine. Two days earlier there had been an explosion in the
course of the same reaction, in which someone had burned his hand.
Dream I. He is going to make phenylmagnesiumbromide; he sees the apparatus with

particular distinctness, but he has substituted himself for the magnesium. He is now in a
curious, wavering attitude. He keeps on repeating to himself: `This is the right thing, it is
working, my feet are beginning to dissolve, and my knees are getting soft.' Then he
reaches down and feels for his feet, and meanwhile (he does not know how) he takes his
legs out of the carboy, and then again he says to himself: `That can't be . . . Yes, it has
been done correctly.' Then he partially wakes, and repeats the dream to himself, because
he wants to tell it to me. He is positively afraid of the analysis of the dream. He is much
excited during this state of semi-sleep, and repeats continually: `Phenyl, phenyl.'
Dream II. He is in . . . with his whole family. He is supposed to be at the Schottentor at

half-past eleven in order to keep an appointment with the lady in question, but he does
not wake until half-past eleven. He says to himself: Ìt is too late now; when you get there

it will be half-past twelve.' The next moment he sees the whole family gathered about the
table -- his mother and the parlour-maid with the soup-tureen with peculiar distinctness.
Then he says to himself: `Well, if we are sitting down to eat already, I certainly can't get
away.'
Analysis. He feels sure that even the first dream contains a reference to the lady whom he
is to meet at the place of rendezvous (the dream was dreamed during the night before the
expected meeting). The student whom he was instructing is a particularly unpleasant
fellow; the chemist had said to him: `That isn't right, because the magnesium was still
unaffected,' and the student had answered, as though he were quite unconcerned: `Nor it
is.' He himself must be this student; he is as indifferent to his analysis as the student is to
his synthesis; the he in the dream, however, who performs the operation, is myself. How
unpleasant he must seem to me with his indifference to the result!
Again, he is the material with which the analysis (synthesis) is made. For the question is
the success of the treatment. The legs in the dream recall an impression of the previous
evening. He met a lady at a dancing class of whom he wished to make a conquest; he
pressed her to him so closely that she once cried out. As he ceased to press her legs he
felt her firm, responding pressure against his lower thighs as far as just above the knees,
the spot mentioned in the dream. In this situation, then, the woman is the magnesium in
the retort, which is at last working. He is feminine towards me, as he is virile towards the
woman. If he succeeds with the woman, the treatment will also succeed. Feeling himself
and becoming aware of his knees refers to masturbation, and corresponds to his fatigue of
the previous day . . . The rendezvous had actually been made for half-past eleven. His
wish to oversleep himself and to keep to his sexual object at home (that is, masturbation)
corresponds to his resistance.
He says, in respect to the repetition of the name phenyl, that all these radicals ending in yl
have always been pleasing to him; they are very convenient to use: benzyl, acetyl, etc.
That, however, explained nothing. But when I proposed the root Schlemihl22 he laughed
heartily, and told me that during the summer he had read a book by Prévost which
contained a chapter: Les exclus de l'amour, and in this there was some mention of
Schlemilies; and in reading of these outcasts he said to himself: `That is my case.' He
would have played the Schlemihl if he had missed the appointment.
It seems that the sexual symbolism of dreams has already been directly confirmed by
experiment. In 1912 Dr K. Schrötter, at the instance of H. Swoboda, produced dreams in
deeply hypnotised persons by suggestions which determined a large part of the dream-
content. If the suggestion proposed that the subject should dream of normal or abnormal
sexual relations, the dream carried out these orders by replacing sexual material by the
symbols with which psychoanalytic dream-interpretation has made us familiar. Thus,
following the suggestion that the dreamer should dream of homosexual relations with a
lady friend, this friend appeared in the dream carrying a shabby travelling-bag, upon
which there was a label with the printed words: `For ladies only'. The dreamer was
believed never to have heard of dream-symbolisation or of dream-interpretation.
Unfortunately, the value of this important investigation was diminished by the fact that

Dr Schrötter shortly afterwards committed suicide. Of his dream-experiments he gave us

only a preliminary report in the Zentralblatt für Psychoanalyse.
Similar results were reported in 1923 by G. Roffenstein. Especially interesting were the
experiments performed by Betlheim and Hartmann, because they eliminated hypnosis.
These authors told stories of a crude sexual content to confused patients suffering from
Korsakoff's psychosis, and observed the distortions which appeared when the material
related was reproduced.23 It was shown that the reproduced material contained symbols
made familiar by the interpretation of dreams (climbing stairs, stabbing and shooting as
symbols of coitus, knives and cigarettes as symbols of the penis). Special value was
attached to the appearance of the symbol of climbing stairs, for, as the authors justly
observed, à symbolisation of this sort could not be effected by a conscious wish to
distort.'
Only when we have formed a due estimate of the importance of symbolism in dreams can
we continue the study of the typical dreams which was interrupted in an earlier chapter
(p. 161). I feel justified in dividing these dreams roughly into two classes: first, those
which always really have the same meaning, and second, those which despite the same or
a similar content must nevertheless be given the most varied interpretations. Of the
typical dreams belonging to the first class I have already dealt fairly fully with the
examination-dream.
On account of their similar affective character, the dreams of missing a train deserve to
be ranked with the examination-dreams; moreover, their interpretation justifies this
approximation. They are consolation-dreams, directed against another anxiety perceived
in dreams -- the fear of death. `To depart' is one of the most frequent and one of the most
readily established of the death-symbols. The dream therefore says consolingly:
`Reassure yourself, you are not going to die (to depart)', just as the examination-dream
calms us by saying: `Don't be afraid; this time, too, nothing will happen to you.' The
difficulty in understanding both kinds of dreams is due to the fact that the anxiety is
attached precisely to the expression of consolation.
The meaning of the `dreams due to dental stimulus' which I have often enough had to
analyse in my patients escaped me for a long time because, much to my astonishment,
they habitually offered too great a resistance to interpretation. But finally an
overwhelming mass of evidence convinced me that in the case of men nothing other than
the masturbatory desires of puberty furnish the motive power of these dreams. I shall
analyse two such dreams, one of which is also a `flying dream'. The two dreams were
dreamed by the same person -- a young man of pronounced homosexuality which,
however, has been inhibited in life.
He is witnessing a performance of Fidelio from the stalls of the opera-house; he is sitting

next to L., whose personality is congenial to him, and whose friendship he would like to
have. Suddenly he flies diagonally right across the stalls; he then puts his hand in his
mouth and draws out two of his teeth.

He himself describes the flight by saying that it was as though he were thrown into the
air. As the opera performed was Fidelio, he recalls the words:
He who a charming wife acquires . . .
But the acquisition of even the most charming wife is not among the wishes of the
dreamer. Two other lines would be more appropriate:
He who succeeds in the lucky (big) throw

The friend of a friend to be . . .
The dream thus contains the `lucky (big) throw', which is not, however, a wish-fulfilment
only. For it conceals also the painful reflection that in his striving after friendship he has
often had the misfortune to be `thrown out', and the fear lest this fate may be repeated in
the case of the young man by whose side he has enjoyed the performance of Fidelio. This
is now followed by a confession, shameful to a man of his refinement, to the effect that
once, after such a rejection on the part of a friend, his profound sexual longing caused
him to masturbate twice in succession.
The other dream is as follows: Two university professors of his acquaintance are treating
him in my place. One of them does something to his penis; he is afraid of an operation.
The other thrusts an iron bar against his mouth, so that he loses one or two teeth. He is
bound with four silk handkerchiefs.
The sexual significance of this dream can hardly be doubted. The silk handkerchiefs
allude to an identification with a homosexual of his acquaintance. The dreamer, who has
never achieved coition (nor has he ever actually sought sexual intercourse) with men,
conceives the sexual act on the lines of masturbation with which he was familiar during
puberty.
I believe that the frequent modifications of the typical dream due to dental stimulus --
that, for example, in which another person draws the tooth from the dreamer's mouth --
will be made intelligible by the same explanation.24 It may, however, be difficult to
understand how `dental stimulus' can have come to have this significance. But here I may
draw attention to the frequent `displacement from below to above' which is at the service
of sexual repression, and by means of which all kinds of sensations and intentions
occurring in hysteria, which ought to be localised in the genitals, may at all events be
realised in other, unobjectionable parts of the body. We have a case of such displacement
when the genitals are replaced by the face in the symbolism of unconscious thought. This
is corroborated by the fact that verbal usage relates the buttocks to the cheeks,25 and the
labia minora to the lips which enclose the orifice of the mouth. The nose is compared to
the penis in numerous allusions, and in each case the presence of hair completes the
resemblance. Only one feature -- the teeth -- is beyond all possibility of being compared
in this way; but it is just this coincidence of agreement and disagreement which makes
the teeth suitable for purposes of representation under the pressure of sexual repression.

I will not assert that the interpretation of dreams due to dental stimulus as dreams of
masturbation (the correctness of which I cannot doubt) has been freed of all obscurity. 26 I
carry the explanation as far as I am able, and must leave the rest unsolved. But I must
refer to yet another relation indicated by a colloquial expression. In Austria there is in use
an indelicate designation for the act of masturbation, namely: `To pull one out', or `to pull
one off'.27 I am unable to say whence these colloquialisms originate, or on what
symbolisms they are based; but the teeth would very well fit in with the first of the two.
Dreams of pulling teeth, and of teeth falling out, are interpreted in popular belief to mean
the death of a connection. Psychoanalysis can admit of such a meaning only at the most
as a joking allusion to the sense already indicated.
To the second group of typical dreams belong those in which one is flying or hovering,
falling, swimming, etc. What do these dreams signify? Here we cannot generalise. They
mean, as we shall learn, something different in each case; only, the sensory material
which they contain always comes from the same source.
We must conclude from the information obtained in psychoanalysis that these dreams
also repeat impressions of our childhood -- that is, that they refer to the games involving
movement which have such an extraordinary attraction for children. Where is the uncle
who has never made a child fly by running with it across the room, with outstretched
arms, or has never played at falling with it by rocking it on his knee and then suddenly
straightening his leg, or by lifting it above his head and suddenly pretending to withdraw
his supporting hand? At such moments children shout with joy and insatiably demand a
repetition of the performance, especially if a little fright and dizziness are involved in it.
In after years they repeat their sensations in dreams, but in dreams they omit the hands
that held them, so that now they are free to float or fall. We know that all small children
have a fondness for such games as rocking and seesawing; and when they see gymnastic
performances at the circus their recollection of such games is refreshed. In some boys the
hysterical attack consists simply in the reproduction of such performances, which they
accomplish with great dexterity. Not infrequently sexual sensations are excited by these
games of movement, innocent though they are in themselves. To express the matter in a
few words: it is these romping games of childhood which are being repeated in dreams of
flying, falling, vertigo, and the like, but the pleasurable sensations are now transformed
into anxiety. But, as every mother knows, the romping of children often enough ends in
quarrelling and tears.
I have therefore good reason for rejecting the explanation that it is the condition of our
cutaneous sensations during sleep, the sensation of the movements of the lungs, etc., that
evoke dreams of flying and falling. As I see it, these sensations have themselves been
reproduced from the memory to which the dream refers -- that they are therefore dream-
content, and not dream-sources.28
This material, consisting of sensations of motion, similar in character, and originating

from the same sources, is now used for the representation of the most manifold dream-
thoughts. Dreams of flying or hovering, for the most part pleasurably toned, will call for

the most widely differing interpretations -- interpretations of a quite special nature in the
case of some dreamers, and interpretations of a typical nature in that of others. One of my
patients was in the habit of dreaming very frequently that she was hovering a little way
above the street without touching the ground. She was very short of stature, and she
shunned every sort of contamination involved by intercourse with human beings. Her
dream of suspension -- which raised her feet above the ground and allowed her head to
tower into the air -- fulfilled both of her wishes. In the case of other dreamers of the same
sex, the dream of flying had the significance of the longing: Ìf only I were a little bird!'
Similarly, others become angels at night, because no one has ever called them angels by
day. The intimate connection between flying and the idea of a bird makes it
comprehensible that the dream of flying, in the case of male dreamers, should usually
have a coarsely sensual significance;29 and we should not be surprised to hear that this or
that dreamer is always very proud of his ability to fly.
Dr Paul Federn (Vienna) has propounded the fascinating theory that a great many flying
dreams are erection dreams, since the remarkable phenomenon of erection, which
constantly occupies the human fantasy, cannot fail to be impressive as an apparent
suspension of the laws of gravity (cf. the winged phalli of the ancients).
It is a noteworthy fact that a prudent experimenter like Mourly Vold, who is really averse
to any kind of interpretation, nevertheless defends the erotic interpretation of the dreams
of flying and hovering.30 He describes the erotic element as `the most important motive
factor of the hovering dream', and refers to the strong sense of bodily vibration which
accompanies this type of dream, and the frequent connection of such dreams with
erections and emissions.
Dreams of falling are more frequently characterised by anxiety. Their interpretation,

when they occur in women, offers no difficulty, because they nearly always accept the
symbolic meaning of falling, which is a circumlocution for giving way to an erotic
temptation. We have not yet exhausted the infantile sources of the dream of falling;
nearly all children have fallen occasionally, and then been picked up and fondled; if they
fell out of bed at night, they were picked up by the nurse and taken into her bed.
People who dream often, and with great enjoyment, of swimming, cleaving the waves,
etc., have usually been bedwetters, and they now repeat in the dream a pleasure which
they have long since learned to forgo. We shall soon learn, from one example or another,
to what representations dreams of swimming easily lend themselves.
The interpretation of dreams of fire justifies a prohibition of the nursery, which forbids
children to `play with fire' so that they may not wet the bed at night. These dreams also
are based on reminiscences of the enuresis nocturna of childhood. In my Fragment of an
Analysis of Hysteria31 I have given the complete analysis and synthesis of such a dream
of fire in connection with the infantile history of the dreamer, and have shown for the
representation of what maturer impulses this infantile material has been utilised.

It would be possible to cite quite a number of other `typical' dreams, if by such one
understands dreams in which there is a frequent recurrence, in the dreams of different
persons, of the same manifest dream-content. For example: dreams of passing through
narrow alleys, or a whole suite of rooms; dreams of burglars, in respect of whom nervous
people take measures of precaution before going to bed; dreams of being chased by wild
animals (bulls, horses); or of being threatened with knives, daggers, and lances. The last
two themes are characteristic of the manifest dream-content of persons suffering from
anxiety, etc. A special investigation of this class of material would be well worth while.
In lieu of this I shall offer two observations, which do not, however, apply exclusively to
typical dreams.
The more one is occupied with the solution of dreams, the readier one becomes to
acknowledge that the majority of the dreams of adults deal with sexual material and give
expression to erotic wishes. Only those who really analyse dreams, that is, those who
penetrate from their manifest content to the latent dream-thoughts, can form an opinion
on this subject; but never those who are satisfied with registering merely the manifest
content (as, for example, Näcke in his writings on sexual dreams). Let us recognise at
once that there is nothing astonishing in this fact, which is entirely consistent with the
principles of dream-interpretation. No other instinct has had to undergo so much
suppression, from the time of childhood onwards, as the sexual instinct in all its
numerous components:32 from no other instinct are so many and such intense unconscious
wishes left over, which now, in the sleeping state, generate dreams. In dream-
interpretation this importance of the sexual complexes must never be forgotten, though
one must not, of course, exaggerate it to the exclusion of all other factors.
Of many dreams it may be ascertained, by careful interpretation, that they may even be
understood bisexually, inasmuch as they yield an indisputable over-interpretation, in
which they realise homosexual impulses -- that is, impulses which are contrary to the
normal sexual activity of the dreamer. But that all dreams are to be interpreted bisexually,
as Stekel33 maintains, and Adler,34 seems to me to be a generalisation as insusceptible of
proof as it is improbable, and one which, therefore, I should be loth to defend; for I
should, above all, be at a loss to know how to dispose of the obvious fact that there are
many dreams which satisfy other than erotic needs (taking the word in the widest sense),
as, for example, dreams of hunger, thirst, comfort, etc. And other similar assertions, to
the effect that `behind every dream one finds a reference to death' (Stekel), or that every
dream shows àn advance from the feminine to the masculine line' (Adler), seem to me to
go far beyond the admissible in the interpretation of dreams. The assertion that all
dreams call for a sexual interpretation, against which there is such an untiring polemic in
the literature of the subject, is quite foreign to my Interpretation of Dreams. It will not be
found in any of the eight editions of this book, and is in palpable contradiction to the rest
of its contents.
We have stated elsewhere that dreams which are conspicuously innocent commonly
embody crude erotic wishes, and this we might confirm by numerous further examples.
But many dreams which appear indifferent, in which we should never suspect a tendency
in any particular direction, may be traced, according to the analysis, to unmistakably

sexual wish-impulses, often of an unsuspected nature. For example, who, before it had
been interpreted, would have suspected a sexual wish in the following dream? The
dreamer relates: Between two stately palaces there stands, a little way back, a small
house, whose doors are closed. My wife leads me along the little bit of road leading to
the house and pushes the door open, and then I slip quickly and easily into the interior of
a courtyard that slopes steeply upwards.
Anyone who has had experience in the translating of dreams will, of course, at once be
reminded that penetration into narrow spaces and the opening of locked doors are among
the commonest of sexual symbols, and will readily see in this dream a representation of
attempted coition from behind (between the two stately buttocks of the female body). The
narrow, steep passage is, of course, the vagina; the assistance attributed to the wife of the
dreamer requires the interpretation that in reality it is only consideration for the wife
which is responsible for abstention from such an attempt. Moreover, inquiry shows that
on the previous day a young girl had entered the household of the dreamer; she had
pleased him, and had given him the impression that she would not be altogether averse to
an approach of this sort. The little house between the two palaces is taken from the
reminiscence of the Hradschin in Prague, and once more points to the girl, who is a native
of that city.
If, in conversation with my patients, I emphasise the frequency of the Oedipus dream --
the dream of having sexual intercourse with one's mother -- I elicit the answer: Ì cannot
remember such a dream.' Immediately afterwards, however, there arises the recollection
of another, an unrecognisable, indifferent dream, which the patient has dreamed
repeatedly, and which on analysis proves to be a dream with this very content -- that is,
yet another Oedipus dream. I can assure the reader that disguised dreams of sexual
intercourse with the dreamer's mother are far more frequent than undisguised dreams to
the same effect.35
There are dreams of landscapes and localities in which emphasis is always laid upon the
assurance: Ì have been here before.' But this `déja vu' has a special significance in
dreams. In this case the locality is always the genitals of the mother; of no other place can
it be asserted with such certainty that one `has been here before.' I was once puzzled by
the account of a dream given by a patient afflicted with obsessional neurosis. He dreamed
that he called at a house where he had been twice before. But this very patient had long
ago told me of an episode of his sixth year. At that time he shared his mother's bed, and
had abused the occasion by inserting his finger into his mother's genitals while she was
asleep.
A large number of dreams, which are frequently full of anxiety, and often have for
content the traversing of narrow spaces, or staying long in the water, are based upon
fantasies concerning the intra-uterine life, the sojourn in the mother's womb, and the act
of birth. I here insert the dream of a young man who, in his fantasy, has even profited by
the intra-uterine opportunity of spying upon an act of coition between his parents.

`He is in a deep shaft, in which there is a window, as in the Semmering tunnel. Through
this he sees at first an empty landscape, and then he composes a picture in it, which is
there all at once and fills up the empty space. The picture represents a field which is
being deeply tilled by an implement, and the wholesome air, the associated idea of hard
work, and the bluish-black clods of earth make a pleasant impression on him. He then
goes on and sees a work on education lying open . . . and is surprised that so much
attention is devoted in it to the sexual feelings (of children), which makes him think of
me.'
Here is a pretty water-dream of a female patient, which was turned to special account in
the course of treatment.
At her usual holiday resort on the -- Lake, she flings herself into the dark water at a place
where the pale moon is reflected in the water.
Dreams of this sort are parturition dreams; their interpretation is effected by reversing the
fact recorded in the manifest dream-content; thus, instead of `flinging oneself into the
water', read `coming out of the water' -- that is, `being born'.36 The place from which one
is born may be recognised if one thinks of the humorous sense of the French `la lune'.
The pale moon thus becomes the white `bottom', which the child soon guesses to be the
place from which it came. Now what can be the meaning of the patient's wishing to be
born at a holiday resort? I asked the dreamer this, and she replied without hesitation:
`Hasn't the treatment made me as though I were born again?' Thus the dream becomes an
invitation to continue the treatment at this summer resort -- that is, to visit her there;
perhaps it also contains a very bashful allusion to the wish to become a mother herself.37
Another dream of parturition, with its interpretation, I take from a paper by E. Jones. `She
stood at the seashore watching a small boy, who seemed to be hers, wading into the
water. This he did till the water covered him and she could only see his head bobbing up
and down near the surface. The scene then changed to the crowded hall of an hotel. Her
husband left her, and she `èntered into conversation with'' a stranger.
`The second half of the dream was discovered in the analysis to represent flight from her
husband, and the entering into intimate relations with a third person, behind whom was
plainly indicated Mr X.'s brother, mentioned in a former dream. The first part of the
dream was a fairly evident birth-fantasy. In dreams as in mythology, the delivery of a
child from the uterine waters is commonly represented, by way of distortion, as the entry
of the child into water; among many other instances, the births of Adonis, Osiris, Moses,
and Bacchus are well-known illustrations of this. The bobbing up and down of the head
in the water at once recalled to the patient the sensation of quickening which she had
experienced in her only pregnancy. Thinking of the boy going into the water induced a
reverie in which she saw herself taking him out of the water, carrying him into the
nursery, washing and dressing him, and installing him in her household.
`The second half of the dream, therefore, represents thoughts concerning the elopement,
which belonged to the first half of the underlying latent content; the first half of the

dream corresponded with the second half of the latent content, the birth fantasy. Besides
this inversion in the order, further inversions took place in each half of the dream. In the
first half the child entered the water, and then his head bobbed; in the underlying dream-
thoughts the quickening occurred first, and then the child left the water (a double
inversion). In the second half her husband left her; in the dream-thoughts she left her
husband.'
Another parturition dream is related by Abraham -- the dream of a young woman

expecting her first confinement: From one point of the floor of the room a subterranean
channel leads directly into the water (path of parturition--amniotic fluid). She lifts up a
trap in the door, and there immediately appears a creature dressed in brownish für,
which almost resembles a seal. This creature changes into the dreamer's younger
brother, to whom her relation has always been maternal in character.
Rank has shown from a number of dreams that parturition-dreams employ the same
symbols as micturition-dreams. The erotic stimulus expresses itself in these dreams as an
urethral stimulus. The stratification of meaning in these dreams corresponds with a
change in the significance of the symbol since childhood.
We may here turn back to the interrupted theme (see p. 37) of the part played by organic,
sleep-disturbing stimuli in dream-formation. Dreams which have come into existence
under these influences not only reveal quite frankly the wish-fulfilling tendency, and the
character of convenience-dreams, but they very often display a quite transparent
symbolism as well, since waking not infrequently follows a stimulus whose satisfaction
in symbolic disguise has already been vainly attempted in the dream. This is true of
emission dreams as well as those evoked by the need to urinate or defecate. The peculiar
character of emission dreams permits us directly to unmask certain sexual symbols
already recognised as typical, but nevertheless violently disputed, and it also convinces us
that many an apparently innocent dream-situation is merely the symbolic prelude to a
crudely sexual scene. This, however, finds direct representation, as a rule, only in the
comparatively infrequent emission dreams, while it often enough turns into an anxiety-
dream, which likewise leads to waking.
The symbolism of dreams due to urethral stimulus is especially obvious, and has always
been divined. Hippocrates had already advanced the theory that a disturbance of the
bladder was indicated if one dreamt of fountains and springs (Havelock Ellis). Scherner,
who has studied the manifold symbolism of the urethral stimulus, agrees that `the
powerful urethral stimulus always turns into the stimulation of the sexual sphere and its
symbolic imagery . . . The dream due to urethral stimulus is often at the same time the
representative of the sexual dream.'
O. Rank, whose conclusions (in his paper on Die Symbolschichtung im Wecktraum) I

have here followed, argues very plausibly that a large number of `dreams due to urethral
stimulus' are really caused by sexual stimuli, which at first seek to gratify themselves by
way of regression to the infantile form of urethral erotism. Those cases are especially
instructive in which the urethral stimulus thus produced leads to waking and the

emptying of the bladder, whereupon, in spite of this relief, the dream is continued, and
expresses its need in undisguisedly erotic images.38
In a quite analogous manner dreams due to intestinal stimulus disclose the pertinent
symbolism, and thus confirm the relation, which is also amply verified by ethno-
psychology, of gold and feces.39 `Thus, for example, a woman, at a time when she is
under the care of a physician on account of an intestinal disorder, dreams of a digger for
hidden treasure who is burying a treasure in the vicinity of a little wooden shed which
looks like a rural privy. A second part of the dream has as its content how she wipes the
posterior of her child, a little girl, who has soiled herself.'
Dreams of `rescue' are connected with parturition dreams. To rescue, especially to rescue
from the water, is, when dreamed by a woman, equivalent to giving birth; this sense is,
however, modified when the dreamer is a man.40
Robbers, burglars, and ghosts, of which we are afraid before going to bed, and which
sometimes even disturb our sleep, originate in one and the same childish reminiscence.
They are the nightly visitors who have waked the child in order to set it on the chamber,
so that it may not wet the bed, or have lifted the coverlet in order to see clearly how the
child is holding its hands while sleeping. I have been able to induce an exact recollection
of the nocturnal visitor in the analysis of some of these anxiety-dreams. The robbers were
always the father; the ghosts more probably corresponded to female persons in white
nightgowns.
1
Cf. the works of Bleuler and his Zurich disciples, Maeder, Abraham, and others, and of
the non-medical authors (Kleinpaul and others) to whom they refer. But the most
pertinent things that have been said on the subject will be found in the work of O. Rank
and H. Sachs, Die Bedeutung der Psychoanalyse für die Geisteswissenschaft, 1913, chap.
i; also E. Jones, Die Theorie der Symbolik Intern. Zeitschr. für Psychoanalyse, v. 1919.
2
This conception would seem to find an extraordinary confirmation in a theory advanced
by Hans Sperber (Über den Einfluss sexueller momente auf Entstehung und Entwicklung
der Sprache, in Imago, i, 1912). Sperber believes that primitive words denoted sexual
things exclusively, and subsequently lost their sexual significance and were applied to
other things and activities, which were compared with the sexual.
3
For example, a ship sailing on the sea may appear in the urinary dreams of Hungarian
dreamers, despite the fact that the term of `to ship', for `to urinate', is foreign to this
language (Ferenczi). In the dreams of the French and the other romance peoples `room'
serves as a symbolic representation for woman', although these peoples have nothing
analogous to the German Frauenzimmer. Many symbols are as old as language itself,
while others are continually being coined (e.g. the aeroplane, the Zeppelin).
4
[In the USA the father is represented in dreams as `the President', and even more often
as `the Governor' -- a title which is frequently applied to the parent in everyday life. --
trans.]

5
À patient living in a boarding-house dreams that he meets one of the servants, and asks
her what her number is; to his surprise she answers: 14. He has in fact entered into
relations with the girl in question, and has often had her in his bedroom. She feared, as
may be imagined, that the landlady suspected her, and had proposed, on the day before
the dream, that they should meet in one of the unoccupied rooms. In reality this room had
the number 14, while in the dream the woman bore this number. A clearer proof of the
identification of woman and room could hardly be imagined.' (Ernest Jones, Intern.
Zeitschr. f. Psychoanalyse, ii, 1914) (cf. Artemidorus, The Symbolism of Dreams
[German version by F. S. Krauss, Vienna, 1881, p. 110]: `Thus, for example, the
bedroom signifies the wife, supposing one to be in the house.')
6
cf. `the cloaca theory' in Three Contributions to the Theory of Sex.
7
I may here repeat what I have said in another place (Die Zukünftigen Chancen der
psychoanalytischen Therapie, Zentralblatt für Psychoanalyse, i, No. 1 and 2, 1910, and
Ges. Schriften, Bd. vi): `Some time ago I learned that a psychologist who is unfamiliar
with our work remarked to one of my friends that we were surely overestimating the
secret sexual significance of dreams. He stated that his most frequent dream was that of
climbing a flight of stairs, and that there was surely nothing sexual behind this. Our
attention having been called to this objection, we directed our investigations to the
occurrence in dreams of flights of stairs, ladders, and steps, and we soon ascertained that
stairs (or anything analogous to them) represent a definite symbol of coitus. The basis for
this comparison is not difficult to find; with rhythmical intervals and increasing
breathlessness one reaches a height, and may then come down again in a few rapid
jumps. Thus the rhythm of coitus is reproduced in climbing stairs. Let us not forget to
consider the colloquial usage. This tells us that `mounting' is, without further addition,
used as a substitutive designation for the sexual act. In French, the step of a staircase is
called la marche; un vieux marcheur corresponds exactly to the German, ein alter
Steiger.'
8
cf. in the Zentralblatt für Psychoanalyse, ii, 675, the drawing of a nineteen-year-old
manic patient: a man with a snake as a neck-tie, which is turning towards a girl. Also the
story Der Schamhaftige (Anthropophyteia, vi, 334): A woman entered a bathroom, and
there came face to face with a man who hardly had time to put on his shirt. He was
greatly embarrassed, but at once covered his throat with the front of his shirt, and said:
`Please excuse me, I have no necktie.'
9
cf. Pfister's works on cryptography and picture-puzzles.
10
In spite of all the differences between Scherner's conception of dream-symbolism and
the one developed here, I must still insist that Scherner should be recognised as the true
discoverer of symbolism in dreams, and that the experience of psychoanalysis has
brought his book (published in 1861) into posthumous repute.
11
From Nachträge zur Traumdeutung in Zentralblatt für Psychoanalyse, i, Nos. 5 and 6,
1911.

12
cf. Kirchgraber for a similar example (Zentralblatt für Psychoanalyse, iii, 1912, p. 95).
Stekel reported a dream in which the hat with an obliquely-standing feather in the middle
symbolised the (impotent) man.
13
cf. comment in the Zentralblatt für Psychoanalyse, 1; and see above, p. 229, note 34.
14
or chapel = vagina.
15
symbol of coitus.
16
mons Veneris.
17
crines pubis.
18
Demons in cloaks and hoods are, according to the explanation of a specialist, of a
phallic character.
19
The two halves of the scrotum.
20
Alfred Robitsek in the Zentralblatt für Psychoanalyse, ii, 1911, p. 340.
21
The World of Dreams, London, 1911, p. 168.
22
[This Hebrew word is well known in German-speaking countries, even among Gentiles,
and signifies an unlucky, awkward person. -- trans.]
23
Über Fehlreaktionen bei der Korsakoffschen Psychose, Arch. f. Psychiatrie, Bd. lxxii.
1924.
24
The extraction of a tooth by another is usually to be interpreted as castration (cf. hair-
cutting; Stekel). One must distinguish between dreams due to dental stimulus and dreams
referring to the dentist, such as have been recorded, for example, by Coriat (Zentralblatt
für Psychoanalyse, iii, 440).
25
[In German Backen = cheeks and Hinterbacken (lit. `hindcheeks') = buttocks. -- trans.]
26
According to C. G. Jung, dreams due to dental stimulus in the case of women have the
significance of parturition dreams. E. Jones has given valuable confirmation of this. The
common element of this interpretation with that represented above may be found in the
fact that in both cases (castration--birth) there is a question of removing a part from the
whole body.
27
cf. the `biographical' dream on pp. 228-9.
28
This passage, dealing with dreams of motion, is repeated on account of the context. cf.
p. 165.

29
[A reference to the German slang word vogeln (to copulate) from Vogel (a bird). --
trans.]
30
Über den Traum, Ges. Schriften, Bd. iii.
31
Collected Papers, vol. iii, trans. by Alix and James Strachey, Hogarth Press, London.
32
cf. Three Contributions to the Theory of Sex.
33
W. Stekel, Die Sprache des Traumes, 1911.
34
Alf. Adler, Der Psychische Hermaphroditismus im Leben und in der Neurose, in
Fortschritte der Medizin, 1910, No. 16, and later papers in the Zentralblatt für
Psychoanalyse, i, 1910-11.
35
I have published a typical example of such a disguised Oedipus dream in No. 1 of the
Zentralblatt für Psychoanalyse (see below); another, with a detailed analysis, was
published in No. 4 of the same journal by Otto Rank. For other disguised Oedipus dreams
in which the eye appears as a symbol, see Rank (Int. Zeitschr. für Ps.A., i, 1913). Papers
upon eye dreams and eye symbolism by Eder, Ferenczi, and Reitler will be found in the
same issue. The blinding in the Oedipus legend and elsewhere is a substitute for
castration. The ancients, by the way, were not unfamiliar with the symbolic interpretation
of the undisguised Oedipus dream (see O. Rank, Jahrb. ii, p. 534: `Thus, a dream of
Julius Caesar's of sexual relations with his mother has been handed down to us, which the
oneiroscopists interpreted as a favourable omen signifying his taking possession of the
earth (Mother Earth). Equally well known is the oracle delivered to the Tarquinii, to the
effect that that one of them would become the ruler of Rome who should be the first to
kiss his mother (osculum matri tulerit), which Brutus conceived as referring to Mother
Earth (terram osculo contigit, scilicet quod ea communis mater omnium mortalium esset,
Livy, I, lxi).' Cf. here the dream of Hippias in Herodotus, VI, 107: `But Hippias led the
barbarians to Marathon after he had had the following dream-vision the previous night. It
had seemed to Hippias that he was sleeping with his own mother. He concluded from this
dream that he would return home to Athens, and would regain power, and that he would
die in his fatherland in his old age.' These myths and interpretations point to a correct
psychological insight. I have found that those persons who consider themselves preferred
or favoured by their mothers manifest in life that confidence in themselves, and that
unshakable optimism, which often seem heroic, and not infrequently compel actual
success.
Typical example of a disguised Oedipus dream:
A man dreams: He has a secret affair with a woman whom another man wishes to marry.
He is concerned lest the other should discover this relation and abandon the marriage;
he therefore behaves very affectionately to the man; he nestles up to him and kisses him. -
- The facts of the dreamer's life touch the dream-content only at one point. He has a secret
affair with a married woman, and an equivocal expression of her husband, with whom he

is on friendly terms, aroused in him the suspicion that he might have noticed something
of this relationship. There is, however, in reality, yet another factor, the mention of which
was avoided in the dream, and which alone gives the key to it. The life of the husband is
threatened by an organic malady. His wife is prepared for the possibility of his sudden
death, and our dreamer consciously harbours the intention of marrying the young widow
after her husband's decease. It is through this objective situation that the dreamer finds
himself transferred into the constellation of the Oedipus dream; his wish is to be enabled
to kill the man, so that he may win the woman for his wife; his dream gives expression to
the wish in a hypocritical distortion. Instead of representing her as already married to the
other man, it represents the other man only as wishing to marry her, which indeed
corresponds with his own secret intention, and the hostile wishes directed against the man
are concealed under demonstrations of affection, which are reminiscences of his childish
relations to his father.
36
For the mythological meaning of water-birth, see Rank: Der Mythus von der Geburt des
Helden, 1909.
37
It was not for a long time that I learned to appreciate the significance of the fantasies
and unconscious thoughts relating to life in the womb. They contain the explanation of
the curious dread, felt by so many people, of being buried alive, as well as the
profoundest unconscious reason for the belief in a life after death, which represents only
the projection into the future of this mysterious life before birth. The act of birth,
moreover, is the first experience attended by anxiety, and is thus, the source and model of
the affect of anxiety.
38
`The same symbolic representations which in the infantile sense constitute the basis of
the vesical dream appear in the ``recent'' sense in purely sexual significance: water =
urine = semen = amniotic fluid; ship = ``to pump ship'' (urinate = seed-capsule; getting
wet = enuresis = coitus = pregnancy; swimming = full bladder = dwelling-place of the
unborn; rain = urination = symbol of fertilization; travelling (journeying-alighting) =
getting out of bed = having sexual intercourse (honeymoon journey); urinating = sexual
ejaculation' (Rankin, I, c.).
39
Freud, Charakter und Analerotik; Rank, Die Symbolschictung, etc.; Dattner, Intern.
Zeitschr. f. Psych. i, 1913; Reik, Intern. Zeitschr., iii, 1915.
40
For such a dream see Pfister, Ein Fall von psychoanalytischer Seelensorge und
Seelenheilung, in Evangelische Freiheit, 1909. Concerning the symbol of `rescuing', see
my paper, Die Zukünftigen Chancender psychoanalytischen Therapie, in Zentralblatt für
Psychoanalyse, i, 1910. Also Beitrage zur Psychologie des Liebeslebens, i. Über einen
besonderen Typus der objektwahl beim Manne, in Jahrbuch für Ps.A., Bd. ii, 1910 (Ges.
Schriften, Bd. v). Also Rank, Beilege zur Rettungsphantasie in the Zentralblatt für
Psychoanalyse, i, 1910, p. 331; Reik, Zur Rettungssymbolic; ibid., p. 299.

F. EXAMPLES -- ARITHMETIC AND SPEECH IN DREAMS
Before I proceed to assign to its proper place the fourth of the factors which control the
formation of dreams, I shall cite a few examples from my collection of dreams, partly for
the purpose of illustrating the cooperation of the three factors with which we are already
acquainted, and partly for the purpose of adducing evidence for certain unsupported
assertions which have been made, or of bringing out what necessarily follows from them.
It has, of course, been difficult in the foregoing account of the dream-work to
demonstrate my conclusions by means of examples. Examples in support of isolated
statements are convincing only when considered in the context of an interpretation of a
dream as a whole; when they are wrested from their context, they lose their value; on the
other hand, a dream-interpretation, even when it is by no means profound, soon becomes
so extensive that it obscures the thread of the discussion which it is intended to illustrate.
This technical consideration must be my excuse if I now proceed to mix together all sorts
of things which have nothing in common except their reference to the text of the
foregoing chapter.
We shall first consider a few examples of very peculiar or unusual methods of

representation in dreams. A lady dreamed as follows: A servant-girl is standing on a
ladder as though to clean the windows, and has with her a chimpanzee and a gorilla cat
(later corrected, angora cat). She throws the animals on to the dreamer; the chimpanzee
nestles up to her, and this is very disgusting. This dream has accomplished its purpose by
a very simple means, namely, by taking a mere figure of speech literally, and
representing it in accordance with the literal meaning of its words. `Monkey', like the
names of animals in general, is an opprobrious epithet, and the situation of the dream
means merely `to hurl invectives'. This same collection will soon furnish us with further
examples of the employment of this simple artifice in the dream-work.
Another dream proceeds in a very similar manner: A woman with a child which has a
conspicuously deformed cranium; the dreamer has heard that the child acquired this
deformity owing to its position in its mother's womb. The doctor says that the cranium
might be given a better shape by means of compression, but that this would injure the
brain. She thinks that because it is a boy it won't suffer so much from deformity. This
dream contains a plastic representation of the abstract concept `childish impressions',
with which the dreamer has become familiar in the course of the treatment.
In the following example the dream-work follows rather a different course. The dream
contains a recollection of an excursion to the Hilmteich, near Graz: There is a terrible
storm outside; a miserable hotel -- the water is dripping from the walls, and the beds are
damp. (The latter part of the content was less directly expressed than I give it.) The dream
signifies `superfluous'. The abstract idea occurring in the dream-thoughts is first made
equivocal by a certain abuse of language; it has perhaps been replaced by òverflowing',
or by `fluid' and `super-fluid (-fluous)', and has then been brought to representation by an
accumulation of like impressions. Water within, water without, water in the beds in the
form of dampness -- everything fluid and `super' fluid. That for the purposes of dream-

representation the spelling is much less considered than the sound of words ought not to
surprise us when we remember that rhyme exercises a similar privilege.
The fact that language has at its disposal a great number of words which were originally
used in a pictorial and concrete sense, but are at present used in a colourless and abstract
fashion, has, in certain other cases, made it very easy for the dream to represent its
thoughts. The dream has only to restore to these words their full significance, or to follow
their change of meaning a little way back. For example, a man dreams that his friend,
who is struggling to get out of a very tight place, calls upon him for help. The analysis
shows that the tight place is a hole, and that the dreamer symbolically uses these very
words to his friend: `Be careful, or you'll get yourself into a hole.'1 Another dreamer
climbs a mountain from which he obtains an extraordinarily extensive view. He identifies
himself with his brother, who is editing a `review' dealing with the Far East.
In a dream in Der Grüne Heinrich a spirited horse is plunging about in a field of the
finest oats, every grain of which is really à sweet almond, a raisin and a new penny
wrapped in red silk and tied with a bit of pig's bristle.' The poet (or the dreamer)
immediately furnishes the meaning of this dream, for the horse felt himself pleasantly
tickled, so that he exclaimed: `The oats are pricking me' (Ì feel my oats').
In the old Norse sagas (according to Henzen) prolific use is made in dreams of
colloquialisms and witty expressions; one scarcely finds a dream without a double
meaning or a play upon words.
It would be a special undertaking to collect such methods of representation and to arrange

them in accordance with the principles upon which they are based. Some of the
representations are almost witty. They give one the impression that one would have never
guessed their meaning if the dreamer himself had not succeeded in explaining it.
1. A man dreams that he is asked for a name, which, however, he cannot recall. He
himself explains that this means: Ì shouldn't dream of it.'
2. A female patient relates a dream in which all the persons concerned were singularly
large. `That means,' she adds, `that it must deal with an episode of my early childhood,
for at that time all grown-up people naturally seemed to me immensely large.' She herself
did not appear in the dream.
The transposition into childhood is expressed differently in other dreams -- by the

translation of time into space. One sees persons and scenes as though at a great distance,
at the end of a long road, or as though one were looking at them through the wrong end of
a pair of opera-glasses.
3. A man who in waking life shows an inclination to employ abstract and indefinite
expressions, but who otherwise has his wits about him, dreams, in a certain connection,
that he reaches a railway station just as a train is coming in. But then the platform moves
towards the train, which stands still; an absurd inversion of the real state of affairs. This

detail, again, is nothing more than an indication to the effect that something else in the
dream must be inverted. The analysis of the same dream leads to recollections of picture-
books in which men were represented standing on their heads and walking on their hands.
4. The same dreamer, on another occasion, relates a short dream which almost recalls the
technique of a rebus. His uncle gives him a kiss in an automobile. He immediately adds
the interpretation, which would never have occurred to me: it means auto-erotism. In the
waking state this might have been said in jest.
5. At a New Year's Eve dinner the host, the patriarch of the family, ushered in the New
Year with a speech. One of his sons-in-law, a lawyer, was not inclined to take the old
man seriously, especially when in the course of his speech he expressed himself as
follows: `When I open the ledger for the Old Year and glance at its pages I see everything
on the asset side and nothing, thank the Lord, on the side of liability; all you children
have been a great asset, none of you a liability.' On hearing this the young lawyer thought
of X, his wife's brother, who was a cheat and a liar, and whom he had recently extricated
from the entanglements of the law. That night, in a dream, he saw the New Year's
celebration once more, and heard the speech, or rather saw it. Instead of speaking, the old
man actually opened the ledger, and on the side marked àssets' he saw his name amongst
others, but on the other side, marked `liability', there was the name of his brother-in-law,
X. However, the word `Liability' was changed into `Lie-Ability', which he regarded as
X.'s main characteristic.2
6 A dreamer treats another person for a broken bone. The analysis shows that the
fracture represents a broken marriage vow, etc.
7. In the dream-content the time of day often represents a certain period of the dreamer's
childhood. Thus, for example, 5.15 a.m. means to one dreamer the age of five years and
three months; when he was that age, a younger brother was born.
8. Another representation of age in a dream: A woman is walking with two little girls;
there is a difference of fifteen months in their ages. The dreamer cannot think of any
family of her acquaintance in which this is the case. She herself interprets it to mean that
the two children represent her own person, and that the dream reminds her that the two
traumatic events of her childhood were separated by this period of time (3½ and 4¾
years).
9. It is not astonishing that persons who are undergoing psychoanalytic treatment

frequently dream of it, and are compelled to give expression in their dreams to all the
thoughts and expectations aroused by it. The image chosen for the treatment is as a rule
that of a journey, usually in a motorcar, this being a modern and complicated vehicle; in
the reference to the speed of the car the patient's ironical humour is given free play. If the
ùnconscious', as an element of waking thought, is to be represented in the dream, it is
replaced, appropriately enough, by subterranean localities, which at other times, when
there is no reference to analytic treatment, have represented the female body or the
womb. Below in the dream very often refers to the genitals, and its opposite, above, to the

face, mouth or breast. By wild beasts the dream-work usually symbolises passionate
impulses; those of the dreamer, and also those of other persons of whom the dreamer is
afraid; or thus, by means of a very slight displacement, the persons who experience these
passions. From this it is not very far to the totemistic representation of the dreaded father
by means of vicious animals, dogs, wild horses, etc. One might say that wild beasts serve
to represent the libido, feared by the ego, and combated by repression. Even the neurosis
itself, the sick person, is often separated from the dreamer and exhibited in the dream as
an independent person.
One may go so far as to say that the dream-work makes use of all the means accessible to
it for the visual representation of the dream-thoughts, whether these appear admissible or
inadmissible to waking criticism, and thus exposes itself to the doubt as well as the
derision of all those who have only hearsay knowledge of dream-interpretation, but have
never themselves practised it. Stekel's book, Die Sprache des Traumes, is especially rich
in such examples, but I avoid citing illustrations from this work as the author's lack of
critical judgment and his arbitrary technique would make even the unprejudiced observer
feel doubtful.
10. From an essay by V. Tausk (Kleider und Farben im Dienste der Traumdarstellung, in
Interna. Zeitschr. für Ps.A. ii, 1914):
(a) A. dreams that he sees his former governess wearing a dress of black lustre, which fits
closely over her buttocks. -- That means he declares this woman to be lustful.
(b) C. in a dream sees a girl on the road to X, bathed in a white light and wearing a white
blouse.
The dreamer began an affair with a Miss White on this road.
11. In an analysis which I carried out in the French language I had to interpret a dream in
which I appeared as an elephant. I naturally had to ask why I was thus represented. `Vous
me trompez', answered the dreamer (Trompe = trunk).
The dream-work often succeeds in representing very refractory material, such as proper
names, by means of the forced exploitation of very remote relation. In one of my dreams
old Brücke has set me a task. I make a preparation, and pick something out of it which
looks like crumpled tinfoil. (I shall return to this dream later). The corresponding
association, which is not easy to find, is stanniol, and now I know that I have in mind the
name of the author Stannius, which appeared on the title-page of a treatise on the nervous
system of fishes, which in my youth I regarded with reverence. The first scientific
problem which my teacher set me did actually relate to the nervous system of a fish -- the
Ammocoetes. Obviously, this name could not be utilised in the picture-puzzle.
Here I must not fail to include a dream with a curious content, which is worth noting also
as the dream of a child, and which is readily explained by analysis. A lady tells me. Ì can
remember that when I was a child I repeatedly dreamed that God wore a conical paper

hat on His head. They often used to make me wear such a hat at table, so that I shouldn't
be able to look at the plates of the other children and see how much they had received of
any particular dish. Since I had heard that God was omniscient, the dream signified that I
knew everything in spite of the hat which I was made to wear.'
What the dream-work consists in, and its unceremonious handling of its material, the
dream-thoughts, may be shown in an instructive manner by the numbers and calculations
which occur in dreams. Superstition, by the way, regards numbers as having a special
significance in dreams. I shall therefore give a few examples of this kind from my
collection.
1. From the dream of a lady, shortly before the end of her treatment:
She wants to pay for something or other; her daughter takes 3 florins 65 kreuzer from her
purse; but the mother says: `What are you doing? It costs only 21 kreuzer.' This fragment
of the dream was intelligible without further explanation owing to my knowledge of the
dreamer's circumstances. The lady was a foreigner, who had placed her daughter at
school in Vienna, and was able to continue my treatment as long as her daughter
remained in the city. In three weeks the daughter's scholastic year would end, and the
treatment would then stop. On the day before the dream the principal of the school had
asked her whether she could not decide to leave the child at school for another year. She
had then obviously reflected that in this case she would be able to continue the treatment
for another year. Now, this is what the dream refers to, for a year is equal to 365 days; the
three weeks remaining before the end of the scholastic year, and of the treatment, are
equivalent to 21 days (though not to so many hours of treatment). The numerals, which in
the dream-thoughts refer to periods of time, are given money values in the dream, and
simultaneously a deeper meaning finds expression -- for `time is money'. 365 kreuzer, of
course, are 3 florins 65 kreuzer. The smallness of the sums which appear in the dream is a
self-evident wish-fulfilment; the wish has reduced both the cost of the treatment and the
year's school fees.
2. In another dream the numerals are involved in even more complex relations. A young
lady, who has been married for some years, learns that an acquaintance of hers, of about
the same age, Elise L., has just become engaged. Thereupon she dreams: She is sitting in
the theatre with her husband, and one side of the stalls is quite empty. Her husband tells
her that Elise L. and her fiance had also wished to come to the theatre, but that they only
could have obtained poor seats; three for 1 florin 50 kreuzer, and of course they could
not take those. She thinks they didn't lose much, either.
What is the origin of the 1 florin 50 kreuzer? A really indifferent incident of the previous
day. The dreamer's sister-in-law had received 150 florins as a present from her husband,
and hastened to get rid of them by buying some jewelery. Let us note that 150 florins is
100 times 1 florin 50 kreuzer. But whence the 3 in connection with the seats in the
theatre? There is only one association for this, namely, that the fiance is three months
younger than herself. When we have ascertained the significance of the fact that one side
of the stalls is empty we have the solution of the dream. This feature is an undisguised

allusion to a little incident which had given her husband a good excuse for teasing her.
She had decided to go to the theatre that week; she had been careful to obtain tickets a
few days beforehand, and had had to pay the advance booking-fee. When they got to the
theatre they found that one side of the house was almost empty; so that she certainly need
not have been in such a hurry.
I shall now substitute the dream-thoughts for the dream: Ìt surely was nonsense to marry
so early; there was no need for my being in such a hurry. From Elise L.'s example I see
that I should have got a husband just the same -- and one a hundred times better -- if I had
only waited (antithesis to the haste of her sister-in-laws), I could have bought three such
men for the money (the dowry)!' -- Our attention is drawn to the fact that the numerals in
this dream have changed their meanings and their relations to a much greater extent than
in the one previously considered. The transforming and distorting activity of the dream
has in this case been greater -- a fact which we interpret as meaning that these dream-
thoughts had to overcome an unusual degree of endo-psychic resistance before they
attained to representation. And we must not overlook the fact that the dream contains an
absurd element, namely, that two persons are expected to take three seats. It will throw
some light on the question of the interpretation of absurdity in dreams if I remark that this
absurd detail of the dream-content is intended to represent the most strongly emphasised
of the dream-thoughts: Ìt was nonsense to marry so early.' The figure 3, which occurs in
a quite subordinate relation between the two persons compared (three months' difference
in their ages), has thus been adroitly utilised to produce the idea of nonsense required by
the dream. The reduction of the actual 150 florins to 1 florin 50 kreuzer corresponds to
the dreamer's disparagement of her husband in her suppressed thoughts.
3. Another example displays the arithmetical powers of dreams, which have brought them
into such disrepute. A man dreams: He is sitting in the B.s' house (the B.s are a family
with which he was formerly acquainted), and he says: Ìt was nonsense that you didn't
give me Amy for my wife.' Thereupon, he asks the girl: `How old are you?' Answer: Ì
was born in 1882.' Àh, then you are 28 years old.'
Since the dream was dreamed in the year 1898, this is obviously bad arithmetic, and the
inability of the dreamer to calculate may, if it cannot be otherwise explained, be likened
to that of a general paralytic. My patient was one of those men who cannot help thinking
about every woman they see. The patient who for some months came next after him in
my consulting-room was a young lady; he met this lady after he had constantly asked
about her, and he was very anxious to make a good impression on her. This was the lady
whose age he estimated at 28. So much for explaining the result of his apparent
calculation. But 1882 was the year in which he had married. He had been unable to
refrain from entering into conversation with the two other women whom he met at my
house -- the two by no means youthful maids who alternately opened the door to him --
and as he did not find them very responsive, he had told himself that they probably
regarded him as elderly and `serious'.
Bearing in mind these examples, and others of a similar nature (to follow), we may say:
The dream-work does not calculate at all, whether correctly or incorrectly; it only strings

together, in the form of a sum, numerals which occur in the dream-thoughts, and which
may serve as allusions to material which is insusceptible of representation. It thus deals
with figures, as material for expressing its intentions, just as it deals with all other
concepts, and with names and speeches which are only verbal images.
For the dream-work cannot compose a new speech. No matter how many speeches and
answers, which may in themselves be sensible or absurd, may occur in dreams, analysis
always shows us that the dream has merely taken from the dream-thoughts fragments of
speeches which have really been delivered or heard, and has dealt with them in the most
arbitrary fashion. It has not only torn them from their context and mutilated them,
accepting one fragment and rejecting another, but it has often fitted them together in a
novel manner, so that the speech which seems coherent in dream is dissolved by analysis
into three or four components. In this new application of the words the dream has often
ignored the meaning which they had in the dream-thoughts, and has drawn an entirely
new meaning from them.3 Upon closer inspection he more distinct and compact
ingredients of the dream-speech may be distinguished from others, which serve as
connectives, and have probably been supplied, just as we supply omitted letters and
syllables in reading. The dream-speech thus has the structure of breccia, in which the
larger pieces of various material are held together by a solidified cohesive medium.
Strictly speaking, of course, this description is correct only for those dream-speeches
which have something of the sensory character of a speech, and are described as
`speeches'. The others, which have not, as it were, been perceived as heard or spoken
(which have no accompanying acoustic or motor emphasis in the dream) are simply
thoughts, such as occur in our waking life, and find their way unchanged into many of
our dreams. Our reading, too, seems to provide an abundant and not easily traceable
source for the indifferent speech-material of dreams. But anything that is at all
conspicuous as a speech in a dream can be referred to actual speeches which have been
made or heard by the dreamer.
We have already found examples of the derivation of such dream-speeches in the

analyses of dreams which have been cited for other purposes. Thus, in the ìnnocent
market-dream' (pp. 86-7) where the speech: That is no longer to be had serves to identify
me with the butcher, while a fragment of the other speech: I don't know that, I don't take
that, precisely fulfils the task of rendering the dream innocent. On the previous day the
dreamer, replying to some unreasonable demand on the part of her cook, had waved her
aside with the words: I don't know that, behave yourself properly, and she afterwards
took into the dream the first, indifferent sounding part of the speech in order to allude to
the latter part, which fitted well into the fantasy underlying the dream, but which might
also have betrayed it.
Here is one of many examples which all lead to the same conclusion:
A large courtyard in which dead bodies are being burned. The dreamer says, Ì'm going,
I can't stand the sight of it.' (Not a distinct speech.) Then he meets two butcher boys and

asks, `Well, did it taste good?' And one of them answers, `No, it wasn't good.' As though
it had been human flesh.
The innocent occasion of this dream is as follows: After taking supper with his wife, the
dreamer pays a visit to his worthy but by no means appetising neighbour. The hospitable
old lady is just sitting down to her own supper, and presses him (among men a
composite, sexually significant word is used jocosely in the place of this word) to taste it.
He declines, saying that he has no appetite. She replies: `Go on with you, you can manage
it all right', or something of the kind. The dreamer is thus forced to taste and praise what
is offered him. `But that's good!' When he is alone again with his wife, he complains of
his neighbour's importunity, and of the quality of the food which he has tasted. Ì can't
stand the sight of it', a phrase that in the dream, too, does not emerge as an actual speech,
is a thought relating to the physical charms of the lady who invites him, which may be
translated by the statement that he has no desire to look at her.
The analysis of another dream -- which I will cite at this stage for the sake of a very
distinct speech, which constitutes its nucleus, but which will be explained only when we
come to evaluate the affects in dreams -- is more instructive. I dream very vividly: I have
gone to Brücke's laboratory at night, and on hearing a gentle knocking at the door, I
open it to (the deceased) Professor Fleischl, who enters in the company of several
strangers, and after saying a few words sits down at his table. Then follows a second
dream: My friend Fl. has come to Vienna, unobtrusively, in July; I meet him in the street,
in conversation with my (deceased) friend P., and I go with them somewhere, and they sit
down facing each other as though at a small table, while I sit facing them at the narrow
end of the table. Fl. speaks of his sister, and says: Ìn three-quarters of an hour she was
dead,' and then something like `That is the threshold.' As P. does not understand him, Fl.
turns to me, and asks me how much I have told P. of his affairs. At this, overcome by
strange emotions, I try to tell Fl. that P. (cannot possibly know anything, of course,
because he) is not alive. But noticing the mistake myself, I say: `Non vixit.' Then I look
searchingly at P., and under my gaze he becomes pale and blurred, and his eyes turn a
sickly blue and at last he dissolves. I rejoice greatly at this; I now understand that Ernst
Fleischl, too, is only an apparition, a revenant, and I find that it is quite possible that
such a person should exist only so long as one wishes him to, and that he can be made to
disappear by the wish of another person.
This very pretty dream unites so many of the enigmatical characteristics of the dream-
content -- the criticism made in the dream itself, inasmuch as I myself notice my mistake
in saying Non vixit instead of Non vivit, the unconstrained intercourse with deceased
persons, whom the dream itself declares to be dead, the absurdity of my conclusion, and
the intense satisfaction which it gives me -- that Ì would give my life' to expound the
complete solution of the problem. But in reality I am incapable of doing what I do in the
dream, i.e. of sacrificing such intimate friends to my ambition. And if I attempted to
disguise the facts, the true meaning of the dream, with which I am perfectly familiar,
would be spoiled. I must therefore be content to select a few of the elements of the dream
for interpretation, some here, and some at a later stage.

The scene in which I annihilate P. with a glance forms the centre of the dream. His eyes
become strange and weirdly blue, and then he dissolves. This scene is an unmistakable
imitation of a scene that was actually experienced. I was a demonstrator at the
Physiological Institute; I was on duty in the morning, and Brücke learned that on several
occasions I had been unpunctual in my attendance at the students' laboratory. One
morning, therefore, he arrived at the hour of opening, and waited for me. What he said to
me was brief and to the point; but it was not what he said that mattered. What
overwhelmed me was the terrible gaze of his blue eyes, before which I melted away -- as
P. does in the dream, for P. has exchanged roles with me, much to my relief. Anyone who
remembers the eyes of the great master, which were wonderfully beautiful even in his old
age, and has ever seen him angered, will readily imagine the emotions of the young
transgressor on that occasion.
But for a long while I was unable to account for the Non vixit with which I pass sentence
in the dream. Finally, I remembered that the reason why these two words were so distinct
in the dream was not because they were heard or spoken, but because they were seen.
Then I knew at once where they came from. On the pedestal of the statue of the Emperor
Joseph in the Vienna Hofburg are inscribed the following beautiful words:
Saluti patriae vixit

non diu sed totus.4
From this inscription I had taken what fitted one inimical train of thought in my dream-
thoughts, and which was intended to mean: `That fellow has nothing to say in the matter,
he is not really alive.' And I now recalled that the dream was dreamed a few days after
the unveiling of the memorial to Fleischl, in the cloisters of the University, upon which
occasion I had once more seen the memorial to Brücke, and must have thought with
regret (in the unconscious) how my gifted friend P., with all his devotion to science, had
by his premature death forfeited his just claim to a memorial in these halls. So I set up
this memorial to him in the dream; Josef is my friend P.'s baptismal name.5
According to the rules of dream-interpretation, I should still not be justified in replacing

non vivit, which I need, by non vixit, which is placed at my disposal by the recollection of
the Kaiser Josef memorial. Some other element of the dream-thoughts must have
contributed to make this possible. Something now calls my attention to the fact that in the
dream scene two trains of thought relating to my friend P. meet, one hostile, the other
affectionate -- the former on the surface, the latter covered up -- and both are given
representation in the same words: non vixit. As my friend P. has deserved well of science,
I erect a memorial to him; as he has been guilty of a malicious wish (expressed at the end
of the dream), I annihilate him. I have here constructed a sentence with a special cadence,
and in doing so I must have been influenced by some existing model. But where can I
find a similar antithesis, a similar parallel between two opposite reactions to the same
person, both of which can claim to be wholly justified, and which nevertheless do not
attempt to affect one another? Only in one passage which, however, makes a profound
impression upon the reader -- Brutus's speech of justification in Shakespeare's Julius
Caesar. Às Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he

was valiant, I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him.' Have we not here the
same verbal structure, and the same antithesis of thought, as in the dream-thoughts? So I
am playing Brutus in my dream. If only I could find in my dream-thoughts another
collateral connection to confirm this! I think it might be the following: `My friend Fl.
comes to Vienna in July.' This detail is not the case in reality. To my knowledge, my
friend has never been in Vienna in July. But the month of July is named after Julius
Caesar, and might therefore very well furnish the required allusion to the intermediate
thought -- that I am playing the part of Brutus.6
Strangely enough, I once did actually play the part of Brutus. When I was a boy of
fourteen, I presented the scene between Brutus and Caesar in Schiller's poem to an
audience of children: with the assistance of my nephew, who was a year older than I, and
who had come to us from England -- and was thus a revenant -- for in him I recognise the
playmate of my early childhood. Until the end of my third year we had been inseparable;
we had loved each other and fought each other and, as I have already hinted, this childish
relation has determined all my later feelings in my intercourse with persons of my own
age. My nephew John has since then had many incarnations, which have revivified first
one and then another aspect of a character that is ineradicably fixed in my unconscious
memory. At times he must have treated me very badly, and I must have opposed my
tyrant courageously, for in later years I was often told of a short speech in which I
defended myself when my father -- his grandfather -- called me to account: `Why did you
hit John?' Ì hit him because he hit me.' It must be this childish scene which causes non
vivit to become non vixit, for in the language of later childhood striking is known as
wichsen (German: wichsen = to polish, to wax, i.e. to thrash); and the dream-work does
not disdain to take advantage of such associations. My hostility towards my friend P.,
which has so little foundation in reality -- he was greatly my superior, and might
therefore have been a new edition of my old playmate -- may certainly be traced to my
complicated relations with John during our childhood. I shall, as I have said, return to this
dream later on.
1
[Given by translator, as the author's example could not be translated.]
2
Reported by Brill in his Fundamental Conceptions of Psychoanalysis.
3
Analyses of other numerical dreams have been given by Jung, Marcinowski and others.
Such dreams often involve very complicated arithmetical operations, which are none the
less solved by the dreamer with astonishing confidence. Cf. also Ernest Jones, über
unbewusste Zahlenbehandlung, Zentralb. für Psychoanalyse, 4, ii, 1912, p. 241).
Neurosis behaves in the same fashion. I know a patient who -- involuntarily and
unwillingly -- hears (hallucinates) songs or fragments of songs without being able to
understand their significance for her psychic life. She is certainly not a paranoiac.
Analysis shows that by exercising a certain licence she gave the text of these songs a
false application. Òh, thou blissful one! Oh, thou happy one!' This is the first line of a
Christmas carol, but by not continuing it to the word `Christmastide', she turns it into a
bridal song, etc. The same mechanism of distortion may operate, without hallucination,
merely in association.

4
The inscription in fact reads: Saluti publicae vixit non diu sed totus. The motive of the
mistake: patriae for publicae, has probably been correctly divined by Wittels.
5
As an example of over-determination: My excuse for coming late was that after working
late into the night, in the morning I had to make the long journey from Kaiser-Josef-
Strasse to Währinger Strasse.
6
And also, Caesar = Kaiser.

G. ABSURD DREAMS -- INTELLECTUAL PERFORMANCES IN DREAMS
Hitherto, in our interpretation of dreams, we have come upon the element of absurdity in
the dream-content so frequently that we must no longer postpone the investigation of its
cause and its meaning. We remember, of course, that the absurdity of dreams has
furnished the opponents of dream-interpretation with their chief argument for regarding
the dream as merely the meaningless product of an attenuated and fragmentary activity of
the psyche.
I will begin with a few examples in which the absurdity of the dream-content is apparent
only, disappearing when the dream is more thoroughly examined. These are certain
dreams which -- accidentally, one begins by thinking -- are concerned with the dreamer's
dead father.
Dream 1. Here is the dream of a patient who had lost his father six years before the date
of the dream:
His father had been involved in a terrible accident. He was travelling by the night
express when the train was derailed, the seats were telescoped, and his head was crushed
from side to side. The dreamer sees him lying on his bed; from his left eyebrow a wound
runs vertically upwards. The dreamer is surprised that his father should have met with an
accident (since he is dead already, as the dreamer adds in relating his dream). His
father's eyes are so clear.
According to the prevailing standards of dream-criticism, this dream-content would be

explained as follows: At first, while the dreamer is picturing his father's accident, he has
forgotten that his father has already been many years in his grave; in the course of the
dream this memory awakens, so that he is surprised at his own dream even while he is
dreaming it. Analysis, however, tells us that it is quite superfluous to seek for such
explanations. The dreamer had commissioned a sculptor to make a bust of his father, and
he had inspected the bust two days before the dream. It is this which seems to him to
have come to grief (the German word means `gone wrong' or `met with an accident'). The
sculptor has never seen his father, and has had to work from photographs. On the very
day before the dream the son had sent an old family servant to the studio in order to see
whether he, too, would pass the same judgment upon the marble bust -- namely, that it
was too narrow between the temples. And now follows the memory-material which has
contributed to the formation of the dream: The dreamer's father had a habit, whenever he
was harassed by business cares or domestic difficulties, of pressing his temples between
his hands, as though his head was growing too large and he was trying to compress it.
When the dreamer was four years old, he was present when a pistol was accidentally
discharged, and his father's eyes were blackened (his eyes are so clear). When his father
was thoughtful or depressed, he had a deep furrow in his forehead just where the dream
shows his wound. The fact that in the dream this wrinkle is replaced by a wound points to
the second occasion for the dream. The dreamer had taken a photograph of his little
daughter; the plate had fallen from his hand, and when he picked it up it revealed a crack
which ran like a vertical furrow across the child's forehead, extending as far as the

eyebrow. He could not help feeling a superstitious foreboding, for on the day before his
mother's death the negative of her portrait had been cracked.
Thus, the absurdity of this dream is simply the result of a carelessness of verbal
expression, which does not distinguish between the bust or the photograph and the
original. We are all accustomed to making remarks like: `Don't you think it's exactly your
father?' The appearance of absurdity in this dream might, of course, have been easily
avoided. If it were permissible to form an opinion on the strength of a single case, one
might be tempted to say that this semblance of absurdity is admitted or even desired.
Dream 2. Here is another example of the same kind from my own dreams (I lost my
father in the year 1896): --
After his death my father has played a part in the political life of the Magyars, and has
united them into a political whole; and here I see, indistinctly, a little picture: a number of
men, as though in the Reichstag; a man is standing on one or two chairs; there are others
round about him. I remember that on his death-bed he looked so like Garibaldi, and I am
glad that this promise has really come true.
Certainly this is absurd enough. It was dreamed at the time when the Hungarians were in
a state of anarchy, owing to Parliamentary obstruction, and were passing through the
crisis from which Koloman Széll subsequently delivered them. The trivial circumstance
that the scenes beheld in dreams consist of such little pictures is not without significance
for the elucidation of this element. The customary visual dream-representations of our
thoughts present images that impress us as being life-size; my dream-picture, however, is
the reproduction of a wood-cut inserted in the text of an illustrated history of Austria,
representing Maria Theresa in the Reichstag of Pressburg -- the famous scene of
Moriamur pro rege nostro.1 Like Maria Theresa, my father, in my dream, is surrounded
by the multitude; but he is standing on one or two chairs (Stühlen), and is thus, like a
Stuhlrichter (presiding judge). (He has united them; here the intermediary is the phrase:
`We shall need no judge.') Those of us who stood about my father's death-bed did
actually notice that he looked very like Garibaldi. He had a post-mortem rise of
temperature; his cheeks shone redder and redder . . . involuntarily we continue: Ànd
behind him, in unsubstantial (radiance), lay that which subdues us all -- the common fate.'
This uplifting of our thoughts prepares us for the fact that we shall have to deal with this
`common fate'. The post-mortem rise in temperature corresponds to the words àfter his
death' in the dream-content. The most agonising of his afflictions had been a complete
paralysis of the intestines (obstruction) during the last few weeks of his life. All sorts of
disrespectful thoughts associate themselves with this. One of my contemporaries, who
lost his father while still at the `gymnasium' -- upon which occasion I was profoundly
moved, and tendered him my friendship -- once told me, derisively, of the distress of a
relative whose father had died in the street, and had been brought home, when it
appeared, upon undressing the corpse, that at the moment of death, or post-mortem, an
evacuation of the bowels (Stuhlentleerung) had taken place. The daughter was deeply
distressed by this circumstance, because this ugly detail would inevitably spoil her

memory of her father. We have now penetrated to the wish that is embodied in this
dream. To stand after one's death before one's children great and undefiled: who would
not wish that? What now has become of the absurdity of this dream? The appearance of
absurdity was due only to the fact that a perfectly permissible figure of speech, in which
we are accustomed to ignore any absurdity that may exist as between its components, has
been faithfully represented in the dream. Here again we can hardly deny that the
appearance of absurdity is desired and has been purposely produced.
The frequency with which dead persons appear in our dreams as living and active and
associating with us has evoked undue astonishment, and some curious explanations,
which afford conspicuous proof of our misunderstanding of dreams. And yet the
explanation of these dreams is close at hand. How often it happens that we say to
ourselves: Ìf my father were still alive, what would he say to this?' The dream can
express this if in no other way than by his presence in a definite situation. Thus, for
instance, a young man whose grandfather has left him a great inheritance dreams that the
old man is alive, and calls his grandson to account, reproaching him for his lavish
expenditure. What we regard as an objection to the dream on account of our better
knowledge that the man is already dead, is in reality the consoling thought that the dead
man does not need to learn the truth, or satisfaction over the fact that he can no longer
have a say in the matter.
Another form of absurdity found in dreams of deceased relatives does not express scorn
and derision; it serves to express the extremest repudiation, the representation of a
suppressed thought which one would like to believe the very last thing one would think
of. Dreams of this kind appear to be capable of solution only if we remember that a
dream makes no distinction between desire and reality. For example, a man who nursed
his father during his last illness, and who felt his death very keenly, dreamed some time
afterwards the following senseless dream: His father was again living, and conversing
with him as usual, but (and this was the remarkable thing) he had nevertheless died,
though he did not know it. This dream is intelligible if, after `he had nevertheless died',
we insert in consequence of the dreamer's wish, and if after `but he did not know it,' we
add that the dreamer had entertained this wish. While nursing him, the son had often
wished that his father was dead; that is, he had had the really compassionate thought that
it would be a good thing if death would at last put an end to his sufferings. While he was
mourning his father's death, even this compassionate wish became an unconscious
reproach, as though it had really contributed to shorten the sick man's life. By the
awakening of the earliest infantile feelings against his father, it became possible to
express this reproach as a dream; and it was precisely because of the extreme antithesis
between the dream-instigator and the day-thoughts that this dream had to assume so
absurd a form. 2
As a general thing, the dreams of a deceased person of whom the dreamer has been fond
confront the interpreter with difficult problems, the solution of which is not always
satisfying. The reason for this may be sought in the especially pronounced ambivalence
of feeling which controls the relation of the dreamer to the dead person. In such dreams it
is quite usual for the deceased person to be treated at first as living; then it suddenly

appears that he is dead; and in the continuation of the dream he is once more living. This
has a confusing effect. I at last divined that this alternation of death and life is intended to
represent the indifference of the dreamer. (Ìt is all one to me whether he is alive or
dead'). This indifference, of course, is not real, but wished; its purpose is to help the
dreamer to deny his very intense and often contradictory emotional attitudes, and so it
becomes the dream-representation of his ambivalence. For other dreams in which one
meets with deceased persons the following rule will often be a guide: If in the dream the
dreamer is not reminded that the dead person is dead, he sets himself on a par with the
dead; he dreams of his own death. The sudden realisation or astonishment in the dream
(`but he has long been dead!') is a protest against this identification, and rejects the
meaning that the dreamer is dead. But I will admit that I feel that dream-interpretation is
far from having elicited all the secrets of dreams having this content.
Dream 3. In the example which I shall now cite, I can detect the dream-work in the act of
purposely manufacturing an absurdity for which there is no occasion whatever in the
dream-material. It is taken from the dream which I had as a result of meeting Count Thun
just before going away on a holiday. Ì am driving in a cab, and I tell the driver to drive
to a railway station. `Òf course, I can't drive with you on the railway track itself,'' I say,
after the driver has reproached me, as though I had worn him out; at the same time, it
seems as though I had already made with him a journey that one usually makes by train.'
Of this confused and senseless story analysis gives the following explanation: During the
day I had hired a cab to take me to a remote street in Dornbach. The driver, however, did
not know the way, and simply kept on driving, in the manner of such worthy people, until
I became aware of the fact and showed him the way, indulging in a few derisive remarks.
From this driver a train of thought led to the aristocratic personage whom I was to meet
later on. For the present, I will only remark that one thing that strikes us middle-class
plebeians about the aristocracy is that they like to put themselves in the driver's seat.
Does not Count Thun guide the Austrian `car of State'? The next sentence in the dream,
however, refers to my brother, whom I thus also identify with the cab-driver. I had
refused to go to Italy with him this year (Òf course, I can't drive with you on the railway
track itself'), and this refusal was a sort of punishment for his accustomed complaint that
I usually wear him out on this tour (this finds its way into the dream unchanged) by
rushing him too quickly from place to place, and making him see too many beautiful
things in a single day. That evening my brother had accompanied me to the railway
station, but shortly before the carriage had reached the Western station of the
Metropolitan Railway he had jumped out in order to take the train to Purkersdorf. I
suggested to him that he might remain with me a little longer, as he did not travel to
Purkersdorf by the Metropolitan but by the Western Railway. This is why, in my dream, I
made in the cab a journey which one usually makes by train. In reality, however, it was
the other way about: what I told my brother was: `The distance which you travel on the
Metropolitan Railway you could travel in my company on the Western Railway.' The
whole confusion of the dream is therefore due to the fact that in my dream I replace
`Metropolitan Railway' by `cab', which, to be sure, does good service in bringing the
driver and my brother into conjunction. I then elicit from the dream some nonsense which
is hardly disentangled by elucidation, and which almost constitutes a contradiction of my
earlier speech (Òf course, I cannot drive with you on the railway track itself'). But as I

have no excuse whatever for confronting the Metropolitan Railway with the cab, I must
intentionally have given the whole enigmatical story this peculiar form in my dream.
But with what intention? We shall now learn what the absurdity in the dream signifies,
and the motives which admitted it or created it. In this case the solution of the mystery is
as follows: In the dream I need an absurdity, and something incomprehensible, in
connection with `driving' (Fahren = riding, driving) because in the dream-thoughts I have
a certain opinion that demands representation. One evening, at the house of the witty and
hospitable lady who appears, in another scene of the same dream, as the `housekeeper', I
heard two riddles which I could not solve. As they were known to the other members of
the party. I presented a somewhat ludicrous figure in my unsuccessful attempts to find the
solutions. They were two puns turning on the words Nachkommen (to obey orders--
offspring) and Vorfahren (to drive--forefathers, ancestry). They ran, I believe, as follows:
`The coachman does it

At the master's behests;
Everyone has it;
In the grave it rests.'
(Vorfahren)
A confusing detail was that the first halves of the two riddles were identical:
`The coachman does it

At the master's behests;
Not everyone has it;
In the grave it rests.'
(Nachkommen)
When I saw Count Thun drive up (vorfahren) in state, and fell into the Figaro-like mood,
in which one finds that the sole merit of such aristocratic gentlemen is that they have
taken the trouble to be born (to become Nachkommen), these two riddles became
intermediary thoughts for the dream-work. As aristocrats may readily be replaced by
coachmen, and since it was once the custom to call a coachman `Herr Schwäger' (brother-
in-law), the work of condensation could involve my brother in the same representation.
But the dream-thought at work in the background is as follows: It is nonsense to be proud
of one's ancestors (Vorfahren). I would rather be an ancestor (Vorfahr) myself. On
account of this opinion, ìt is nonsense', we have the nonsense in the dream. And now the
last riddle in this obscure passage of the dream is solved -- namely that I have driven
before (vorher gefahren, vorgefahren) with this driver.
Thus, a dream is made absurd if there occurs in the dream-thoughts, as one of the
elements of the contents, the opinion: `That is nonsense'; and, in general, if criticism and
derision are the motives of one of the dreamer's unconscious trains of thought. Hence
absurdity is one of the means by which the dream-work represents contradiction; another

means is the inversion of material relation between the dream-thoughts and the dream-
content; another is the employment of the feeling of motor inhibition. But the absurdity
of a dream is not to be translated by a simple `no'; it is intended to reproduce the
tendency of the dream-thoughts to express laughter or derision simultaneously with the
contradiction. Only with this intention does the dream-work produce anything ridiculous.
Here again it transforms a part of the latent content into a manifest form.3
As a matter of fact, we have already cited a convincing example of this significance of an

absurd dream. The dream (interpreted without analysis) of the Wagnerian performance
which lasted until 7.45 a.m., and in which the orchestra is conducted from a tower, etc.
(see p. 223) is obviously saying: It is a crazy world and an insane society. He who
deserves a thing doesn't get it, and he who doesn't care for it does get it. In this way the
dreamer compares her fate with that of her cousin. The fact that dreams of a dead father
were the first to furnish us with examples of absurdity in dreams is by no means
accidental. The conditions for the creation of absurd dreams are here grouped together in
a typical fashion. The authority proper to the father has at an early age evoked the
criticism of the child, and the strict demands which he has made have caused the child, in
self-defence, to pay particularly close attention to every weakness of his father's; but the
piety with which the father's personality is surrounded in our thoughts, especially after
his death, intensifies the censorship which prevents the expression of his criticism from
becoming conscious.
Dream 4. Here is another absurd dream of a deceased father:
I receive a communication from the town council of my native city concerning the cost of
accommodation in the hospital in the year 1851. This was necessitated by a seizure from
which I was suffering. I make fun of the matter for, in the first place, I was not yet born in
1851, and in the second place, my father, to whom the communication might refer, is
already dead. I go to him in the adjoining room, where he is lying in bed, and tell him
about it. To my surprise he remembers that in the year 1851 he was once drunk and had
to be locked up or confined. It was when he was working for the firm of T. `Then you, too,
used to drink?' I ask. `You married soon after?' I reckon that I was born in 1856, which
seems to me to be immediately afterwards.
In the light of the foregoing exposition, we shall translate the insistence with which this
dream exhibits its absurdities as a sure sign of a particularly embittered and passionate
polemic in the dream-thoughts. All the greater, then, is our astonishment when we
perceive that in this dream the polemic is waged openly, and that my father is denoted as
the person who is made a laughing-stock. Such frankness seems to contradict our
assumption of a censorship controlling the dream-work. The explanation is that here the
father is only an interposed figure, while the quarrel is really with another person, who
appears in the dream only in a single allusion. Whereas a dream usually treats of revolt
against other persons, behind whom the father is concealed, here it is the other way
about: the father serves as the man of straw to represent another, and hence the dream
dares to concern itself openly with a person who is usually hallowed, because there is
present the certain knowledge that he is not in reality intended. We learn of this condition

of affairs by considering the occasion of the dream. It was dreamed after I had heard that
an older colleague, whose judgment was considered infallible, had expressed disapproval
and astonishment on hearing that one of my patients had already been undergoing
psychoanalytic treatment at my hands for five years. The introductory sentences of the
dream allude in a transparently disguised manner to the fact that this colleague had for a
time taken over the duties which my father could no longer perform (statement of
expenses, accommodation in the hospital); and when our friendly relations began to alter
for the worse I was thrown into the same emotional conflict as that which arises in the
case of a misunderstanding between father and son (by reason of the part played by the
father, and his earlier functions). The dream-thoughts now bitterly resent the reproach
that I am not making better progress, which extends itself from the treatment of this
patient to other things. Does my colleague know anyone who can get on any faster? Does
he not know that conditions of this sort are usually incurable and last for life? What are
four or five years in comparison to a whole lifetime, especially when life has been made
so much easier for the patient during the treatment?
The impression of absurdity in this dream is brought about largely by the fact that
sentences from different divisions of the dream-thoughts are strung together without any
reconciling transition. Thus, the sentence, I go to him in the adjoining room, etc., leaves
the subject from which the preceding sentences are taken, and faithfully reproduces the
circumstances under which I told my father that I was engaged to be married. Thus the
dream is trying to remind me of the noble disinterestedness which the old man showed at
that time, and to contrast this with the conduct of another newly-introduced person. I now
perceive that the dream is allowed to make fun of my father because in the dream-
thoughts, in the full recognition of his merits, he is held up as an example to others. It is
in the nature of every censorship that one is permitted to tell untruths about forbidden
things rather than the truth. The next sentence, to the effect that my father remembers that
he was once drunk, and was locked up in consequence, contains nothing that really relates
to my father any more. The person who is screened by him is here a no less important
personage than the great Meynert, in whose footsteps I followed with such veneration,
and whose attitude towards me, after a short period of favouritism, changed into one of
undisguised hostility. The dream recalls to me his own statement that in his youth he had
at one time formed the habit of intoxicating himself with chloroform, with the result that
he had to enter a sanatorium; and also my second experience with him, shortly before his
death. I had an embittered literary controversy with him in reference to masculine
hysteria, the existence of which he denied, and when I visited him during his last illness,
and asked him how he felt, he described his condition at some length, and concluded with
the words: `You know, I have always been one of the prettiest cases of masculine
hysteria.' Thus, to my satisfaction, and to my astonishment, he admitted what he so long
and so stubbornly denied. But the fact that in this scene of my dream I can use my father
to screen Meynert is explained not by any discovered analogy between the two persons,
but by the fact that it is the brief yet perfectly adequate representation of a conditional
sentence in the dream-thoughts which, if fully expanded, would read as follows: Òf
course, if I belonged to the second generation, if I were the son of a professor or a privy
councillor, I should have progressed more rapidly.' In my dream I make my father a
professor and a privy councillor. The most obvious and most annoying absurdity of the

dream lies in the treatment of the date 1851, which seems to me to be indistinguishable
from 1856, as though a difference of five years meant nothing whatever. But it is just this
one of the dream-thoughts that requires expression. Four or five years -- that is precisely
the length of time during which I enjoyed the support of the colleague mentioned at the
outset; but it is also the duration of time I kept my fiancee waiting before I married her;
and by a coincidence that is eagerly exploited by the dream-thoughts, it is also the time I
have kept my oldest patient waiting for a complete cure. `What are five years?' ask the
dream-thoughts. `That is no time at all to me, that isn't worth consideration. I have time
enough ahead of me, and just as what you wouldn't believe came true at last, so I shall
accomplish this also.' Moreover, the number 51, when considered apart from the number
of the century, is determined in yet another manner and in an opposite sense; for which
reason it occurs several times over in the dream. It is the age at which man seems
particularly exposed to danger; the age at which I have seen colleagues die suddenly,
among them one who had been appointed a few days earlier to a professorship for which
he had long been waiting.
Dream 5. Another absurd dream which plays with figures:
An acquaintance of mine, Herr M., has been attacked in an essay by no less a person
than Goethe and, as we all think, with unjustifiable vehemence. Herr M. is, of course,
crushed by this attack. He complains of it bitterly at a dinner-party; but his veneration
for Goethe has not suffered as a result of this personal experience. I try to elucidate the
temporal relations a little, as they seem improbable to me. Goethe died in 1832; since his
attack upon M. must, of course, have taken place earlier, M. was at the time quite a
young man. It seems plausible to me that he was 18 years old. But I do not know exactly
what the date of the present year is, and so the whole calculation lapses into obscurity.
The attack, by the way, is contained in Goethe's well-known essay on `Nature'.
We shall soon find the means of justifying the nonsense of this dream. Herr M., with
whom I became acquainted at a dinnerparty, had recently asked me to examine his
brother, who showed signs of general paralysis. The conjecture was right; the painful
thing about this visit was that the patient gave his brother away by alluding to his youthful
pranks, though our conversation gave him no occasion to do so. I had asked the patient to
tell me the year of his birth, and had repeatedly got him to make trifling calculations in
order to show the weakness of his memory -- which tests, by the way, he passed quite
well. Now I can see that I behave like a paralytic in the dream (I do not know exactly
what the date of the present year is). Other material of the dream is drawn from another
recent source. The editor of a medical periodical, a friend of mine, had accepted for his
paper a very unfavourable `crushing' review of the last book of my Berlin friend, Fl., the
critic being a very youthful reviewer, who was not very competent to pass judgment. I
thought I had a right to interfere, and called the editor to account; he greatly regretted his
acceptance of the review, but he would not promise any redress. I thereupon broke off my
relations with the periodical, and in my letter of resignation I expressed the hope that our
personal relations would not suffer as a result of the incident. The third source of this
dream is an account given by a female patient -- it was fresh in my memory at the time --
of the psychosis of her brother who had fallen into a frenzy crying `Nature, Nature.' The

physicians in attendance thought that the cry was derived from a reading of Goethe's
beautiful essay, and that it pointed to the patient's overwork in the study of natural
philosophy. I thought, rather, of the sexual meaning in which even our less cultured
people use the word `Nature', and the fact that the unfortunate man afterwards mutilated
his genitals seems to show that I was not far wrong. Eighteen years was the age of this
patient at the time of this access of frenzy.
If I add, further, that the book of my so severely criticised friend (Òne asks oneself
whether the author or oneself is crazy' had been the opinion of another critic) treats of the
temporal conditions of life, and refers the duration of Goethe's life to the multiple of a
number significant from the biological point of view, it will readily be admitted that in
my dream I am putting myself in my friend's place. (I try to elucidate the temporal
relations a little.) But I behave like a paretic, and the dream revels in absurdity. This
means that the dream-thoughts say, ironically: `Naturally, he is the fool, the lunatic, and
you are the clever people who know better. Perhaps, however, it is the other way about?'
Now, `the other way about' is abundantly represented in my dream, inasmuch as Goethe
has attacked the young man, which is absurd, while it is perfectly possible even today for
a young fellow to attack the immortal Goethe and inasmuch as I reckon from the year of
Goethe's death, while I made the paretic reckon from the year of his birth.
But I have further promised to show that no dream is inspired by other than egoistical
motives. Accordingly, I must account for the fact that in this dream I make my friend's
cause my own, and put myself in his place. My critical conviction in waking life would
not justify my doing so. Now, the story of the eighteen-year-old patient, and the divergent
interpretations of his cry, `Nature', allude to the fact that I have put myself into
opposition to the majority of physicians by claiming a sexual etiology for the
psychoneuroses. I may say to myself: `You will meet with the same kind of criticism as
your friend; indeed you have already done so to some extent'; so that I may now replace
the `he' in the dream-thoughts by `we'. `Yes, you are right; we two are the fools.' That
mea res agitur is clearly shown by the mention of the short, incomparably beautiful essay
of Goethe's for it was a popular lecture on this essay which induced me to study the
natural sciences when I left the gymnasium, and was still undecided as to my future.
Dream 6. I have to show that yet another dream in which my ego does not appear is none
the less egoistic. On p. 163 I referred to a short dream in which Professor M. says: `My
son, the myopic . . .'; and I stated that this was only a preliminary dream, preceding
another in which I play a part. Here is the main dream, previously omitted, which
challenges us to explain its absurd and unintelligible word-formation.
On account of something or other that is happening in Rome it is necessary for the

children to flee, and this they do. The scene is then laid before a gate, a double gate in
the ancient style (the Porta Romana in Siena, as I realise while I am dreaming). I am
sitting on the edge of a well, and I am greatly depressed; I am almost weeping. A woman
-- a nurse, a nun -- brings out the two boys and hands them over to their father, who is
not myself. The elder is distinctly my eldest son, but I do not see the face of the other boy.
The woman asks the eldest boy for a parting kiss. She is remarkable for a red nose. The

boy refuses her the kiss, but says to her, extending her his hand in parting, Àuf Geseres',
and to both of us (or to one of us) Àuf Ungeseres.' I have the idea that this indicates a
preference.
This dream is built upon a tangle of thoughts induced by a play I saw at the theatre, called
Das neue Ghetto (`The New Ghetto'). The Jewish question, anxiety as to the future of my
children, who cannot be given a fatherland, anxiety as to educating them so that they may
enjoy the privileges of citizens -- all these features may easily be recognised in the
accompanying dream-thoughts.
`By the waters of Babylon we sat down and wept.' Siena, like Rome, is famous for its
beautiful fountains. In the dream I have to find some sort of substitute for Rome (cf. p.
94) from among localities which are known to me. Near the Porta Romana of Siena we
saw a large, brightly-lit building, which we learned was the Manicomio, the insane
asylum. Shortly before the dream I had heard that a co-religionist had been forced to
resign a position, which he had secured with great effort, in a state asylum.
Our interest is aroused by the speech: Àuf Geseres', where one might expect, from the
situation continued throughout the dream, Àuf Wiedersehen' (Au revoir), and by its quite
meaningless antithesis: Àuf Ungeseres.' (Ùn' is a prefix meaning `not'.)
According to information received from Hebrew scholars, Geseres is a genuine Hebrew

word, derived from the verb goiser, and may best be rendered by òrdained sufferings,
fated disaster'. From its employment in the Jewish jargon one would take it to mean
`wailing and lamentation'. Ungeseres is a coinage of my own, and is the first to attract my
attention, but for the present it baffles me. The little observation at the end of the dream --
that Ungeseres indicates an advantage over Geseres -- opens the way to the associations,
and therewith to understanding. This relation holds good in the case of caviare; the
unsalted kind4 is more highly prized than the salted. `Caviare to the general' -- `noble
passions'. Herein lies concealed a jesting allusion to a member of my household, of
whom I hope -- for she is younger than I -- that she will watch over the future of my
children; this, too, agrees with the fact that another member of my household, our worthy
nurse, is clearly indicated by the nurse (or nun) of the dream. But a connecting-link is
wanting between the pair, salted-unsalted and Geseres-Ungeseres. This is to be found in
gesauert and ungesauert (leavened and unleavened). In their flight or exodus from Egypt
the children of Israel had not time to allow their dough to become leavened, and in
commemoration of this event they eat unleavened bread at Passover to this day. Here,
too, I can find room for the sudden association which occurred to me in this part of the
analysis. I remembered how we, my friend from Berlin and myself, had strolled about the
streets of Breslau, a city which was strange to us, during the last days of Easter. A little
girl asked me the way to a certain street; I had to tell her that I did not know it; I then
remarked to my friend, Ì hope that later on in life the child will show more perspicacity
in selecting the persons whom she allows to direct her.' Shortly afterwards a sign caught
my eye: `Dr Herod, consulting hours . . .' I said to myself: Ì hope this colleague does not
happen to be a children's specialist.' Meanwhile, my friend had been developing his views
on the biological significance of bilateral symmetry, and had begun a sentence with the

words: Ìf we had only one eye in the middle of the forehead, like Cyclops . . .' This leads
us to the speech of the professor in the preliminary dream: `My son, the myopic.' And
now I have been led to the chief source for Geseres. Many years ago, when this son of
Professor M.'s, who is today an independent thinker, was still sitting on his school-bench,
he contracted an affection of the eye which, according to the doctor, gave some cause for
anxiety. He expressed the opinion that so long as it was confined to one eye it was of no
great significance, but that if it should extend to the other eye it would be serious. The
affection subsided in the one eye without leaving any ill effects; shortly afterwards,
however, the same symptoms did actually appear in the other eye. The boy's terrified
mother immediately summoned the physician to her distant home in the country. But the
doctor was now of a different opinion (took the other side). `What sort of ``Geseres'' is
this you are making?' he asked the mother, impatiently. Ìf one side got well, the other
will, too.' And so it turned out.
And now as to the connection between this and myself and my family. The school-bench
upon which Professor M.'s son learned his first lessons has become the property of my
eldest son; it was given to him by the boy's mother, and it is into his mouth that I put the
words of farewell in the dream. One of the wishes that may be connected with this
transference may now be readily guessed. This school-bench is intended by its
construction to guard the child from becoming shortsighted and one-sided. Hence myopia
(and behind it the Cyclops), and the discussion about bilateralism. The fear of one-
sidedness has a twofold significance; it might mean not only physical one-sidednes, but
intellectual one-sidedness also. Does it not seem as though the scene in the dream, with
all its craziness, were contradicting precisely this anxiety? When on the one hand the boy
has spoken his words of farewell, on the other hand he calls out the very opposite, as
though to establish an equilibrium. He is acting, as it were, in obedience to bilateral
symmetry!
Thus, a dream frequently has the profoundest meaning in the places where it seems most
absurd. In all ages those who have had something to say and have been unable to say it
without danger to themselves have gladly donned the cap and bells. He for whom the
forbidden saying was intended was more likely to tolerate it if he was able to laugh at it,
and to flatter himself with the comment that what he disliked was obviously absurd.
Dreams behave in real life as does the prince in the play who is obliged to pretend to be a
madman, and hence we may say of dreams what Hamlet said of himself, substituting an
unintelligible jest for the actual truth: Ì am but mad north-northwest; when the wind is
southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw' (Act II, sc. ii).5
Thus, my solution of the problem of absurdity in dreams is that the dream-thoughts are
never absurd -- at least, not those of the dreams of sane persons -- and that the dream-
work produces absurd dreams, and dreams with individually absurd elements, when the
dream-thoughts contain criticism, ridicule, and derision, which have to be given
expression. My next concern is to show that the dream-work is exhausted by the co-
operation of the three factors enumerated -- and of a fourth which has still to be
mentioned -- that it does no more than translate the dream-thoughts, observing the four
conditions prescribed, and that the question whether the mind goes to work in dreams

with all its intellectual faculties, or with only part of them, is wrongly stated, and does not
meet the actual state of affairs. But since there are plenty of dreams in which judgments
are passed, criticisms made, and facts recognised in which astonishment at some
individual element of the dream appears, and explanations are attempted, and arguments
adduced, I must meet the objections deriving from these occurrences by the citation of
selected examples.
My answer is as follows: Everything in dreams which occurs as the apparent functioning

of the critical faculty is to be regarded, not as the intellectual performance of the dream-
work, but as belonging to the substance of the dream-thoughts, and it has found its way
from these, as a completed structure, into the manifest dream-content. I may go even
farther than this! I may even say that the judgments which are passed upon the dream as
it is remembered after waking, and the feelings which are aroused by the reproduction of
the dream, belong largely to the latent dream-content, and must be fitted into place in the
interpretation of the dream.
1. One striking example of this has already been given. A female patient does not wish to
relate her dream because it was too vague. She saw a person in the dream, and does not
know whether it was her husband or her father. Then follows a second dream-fragment,
in which there occurs a `manure-pail', with which the following reminiscence is
associated. As a young housewife she once declared jestingly, in the presence of a young
male relative who frequented the house, that her next business would be to procure a new
manure-pail. Next morning one was sent to her, but it was filled with lilies of the valley.
This part of the dream served to represent the phrase, `Not grown on my own manure'.6 If
we complete the analysis, we find in the dream-thoughts the after-effect of a story heard
in youth; namely, that a girl had given birth to a child, and that it was not clear who was
the father. The dream-representation here overlaps into the waking thought, and allows
one of the elements of the dream-thoughts to be represented by a judgment, formed in the
waking state, of the whole dream.
2. A similar case: One of my patients has a dream which strikes him as being an
interesting one, for he says to himself, immediately after waking: Ì must tell that to the
doctor.' The dream is analysed, and shows the most distinct allusion to an affair in which
he had become involved during the treatment, and of which he had decided to tell me
nothing.7
3. Here is a third example from my own experience:
I go to the hospital with P., through a neighbourhood in which there are houses and
gardens. Thereupon I have an idea that I have already seen this locality several times in
my dreams. I do not know my way very well; P. shows me a way which leads round a
corner to a restaurant (indoor); here I ask for Frau Doni, and I hear that she is living at
the back of the house, in a small room, with three children. I go there, and on the way I
meet an undefined person with my two little girls. After I have been with them for a while,
I take them with me. A sort of reproach against my wife for having left them there.

On waking I am conscious of a great satisfaction, whose motive seems to be the fact that
I shall now learn from the analysis what is meant by Ì have already dreamed of this.'8
But the analysis of the dream tells me nothing about this; it shows me only that the
satisfaction belongs to the latent dream-content, and not to a judgment of the dream. It is
satisfaction concerning the fact that I have had children by my marriage. P.'s path
through life and my own ran parallel for a time; now he has outstripped me both socially
and financially, but his marriage has remained childless. Of this the two occasions of the
dream give proof on complete analysis. On the previous day I had read in the newspaper
the obituary notice of a certain Frau Dona A--y (which I turn into Doni), who had died in
childbirth; I was told by my wife that the dead woman had been nursed by the same
midwife whom she herself had employed at the birth of our two youngest boys. The name
Dona had caught my attention, for I had recently met with it for the first time in an
English novel. The other occasion for the dream may be found in the date on which it was
dreamed; this was the night before the birthday of my eldest boy, who, it seems, is
poetically gifted.
4. The same satisfaction remained with me after waking from the absurd dream that my
father, after his death, had played a political role among the Magyars. It is motivated by
the persistence of the feeling which accompanied the last sentence of the dream: Ì
remember that on his deathbed he looked so like Garibaldi, and I am glad that it has
really come true . . .' (Followed by a forgotten continuation.) I can now supply from the
analysis what should fill this gap. It is the mention of my second boy, to whom I have
given the baptismal name of an eminent historical personage who attracted me greatly
during my boyhood, especially during my stay in England. I had to wait for a year before
I could fulfil my intention of using this name if the next child should be a son, and with
great satisfaction I greeted him by this name as soon as he was born. It is easy to see how
the father's suppressed desire for greatness is, in his thoughts, transferred to his children;
one is inclined to believe that this is one of the ways by which the suppression of this
desire (which becomes necessary in the course of life) is effected. The little fellow won
his right to inclusion in the text of this dream by virtue of the fact that the same accident -
- that of soiling his clothes (quite pardonable in either a child or in a dying person) -- had
occurred to him. Compare with this the allusion Stuhlrichter (presiding judge) and the
wish of the dream: to stand before one's children great and undefiled.
5. If I should now have to look for examples of judgments or expressions of opinion

which remain in the dream itself, and are not continued in, or transferred to, our waking
thoughts, my task would be greatly facilitated were I to take my examples from dreams
which have already been cited for other purposes. The dream of Goethe's attack on Herr
M. appears to contain quite a number of acts of judgment. I try to elucidate the temporal
relations a little, as they seem improbable to me. Does not this look like a critical impulse
directed against the nonsensical idea that Goethe should have made a literary attack upon
a young man of my acquaintance? Ìt seems plausible to me that he was 18 years old.'
That sounds quite like the result of a calculation, though a silly one; and the Ì do not
know exactly what is the date of the present year' would be an example of uncertainty or
doubt in dreams.

But I know from analysis that these acts of judgment, which seem to have been
performed in the dream for the first time, admit of a different construction, in the light of
which they become indispensable for interpreting the dream, while at the same time all
absurdity is avoided. With the sentence Ì try to elucidate the temporal relations a little,' I
put myself in the place of my friend, who is actually trying to elucidate the temporal
relations of life. The sentence then loses its significance as a judgment which objects to
the nonsense of the previous sentences. The interposition, `Which seems improbable to
me,' belongs to the following: Ìt seems plausible to me.' With almost these identical
words I replied to the lady who told me of her brother's illness: Ìt seems improbable to
me' that the cry of `Nature, Nature', was in any way connected with Goethe; it seems
much more plausible to me that it has the sexual significance which is known to you. In
this case, it is true, a judgment was expressed, but in reality, not in a dream, and on an
occasion which is remembered and utilised by the dream-thoughts. The dream-content
appropriates this judgment like any other fragment of the dream-thoughts.
The number 18 with which the judgment in the dream is meaninglessly connected still
retains a trace of the context from which the real judgment was taken. Lastly, the Ì do
not know exactly what is the date of the present year' is intended for no other purpose
than that of my identification with the paralytic, in examining whom this particular fact
was established.
In the solution of these apparent acts of judgment in dreams, it will be well to keep in
mind the above-mentioned rule of interpretation, which tells us that we must disregard
the coherence which is established in the dream between its constituent parts as an
unessential phenomenon, and that every dream-element must be taken separately and
traced back to its source. The dream is a compound, which for the purposes of
investigation must be broken up into its elements. On the other hand, we become alive to
the fact that there is a psychic force which expresses itself in our dreams and establishes
this apparent coherence; that is, the material obtained by the dream-work undergoes a
secondary elaboration. Here we have the manifestations of that psychic force which we
shall presently take into consideration as the fourth of the factors which co-operate in
dream-formation.
6. Let us now look for other examples of acts of judgment in the dreams which have
already been cited. In the absurd dream about the communication from the town council,
I ask the question, `You married soon after?' I reckon that I was born in 1856, which
seems to me to be directly afterwards. This certainly takes the form of an inference. My
father married shortly after his attack, in the year 1851. I am the eldest son, born in 1856,
so this is correct. We know that this inference has in fact been falsified by the
wishfulfilment, and that the sentence which dominates the dream-thoughts is as follows:
Four or five years -- that is no time at all -- that need not be counted. But every part of
this chain of reasoning may be seen to be otherwise determined from the dream-thoughts,
as regards both its content and its form. It is the patient of whose patience my colleague
complains who intends to marry immediately the treatment is ended. The manner in
which I converse with my father in this dream reminds me of an examination or cross-
examination, and thus of a university professor who was in the habit of compiling a

complete docket of personal data when entering his pupils' names: You were born when?
-- 1856. -- Patre? -- Then the applicant gave the Latin form of the baptismal name of the
father and we students assumed that the Hofrat drew inferences from the father's name
which the baptismal name of the candidate would not always have justified. Hence, the
drawing of inferences in the dream would be merely the repetition of the drawing of
inferences which appears as a scrap of material in the dream-thoughts. From this we learn
something new. If an inference occurs in the dream-content, it assuredly comes from the
dream-thoughts; but it may be contained in these as a fragment of remembered material,
or it may serve as the logical connective of a series of dream-thoughts. In any case, an
inference in the dream represents an inference taken from the dream-thoughts.9
It will be well to continue the analysis of this dream at this point. With the inquisition of
the professor is associated the recollection of an index (in my time published in Latin) of
the university students; and further, the recollection of my own course of study. The five
years allowed for the study of medicine were, as usual, too little for me. I worked
unconcernedly for some years longer; my acquaintances regarded me as a loafer, and
doubted whether I should `get through'. Then, suddenly, I decided to take my
examinations, and I `got through' in spite of the postponement. A fresh confirmation of
the dream-thoughts with which I defiantly meet my critics: Èven though you won't
believe it, because I am taking my time, I shall reach the conclusion (German, Schluss =
end. conclusion, inference). It has often happened like that.'
In its introductory portion this dream contains several sentences which, we can hardly
deny, are of the nature of an argument. And this argument is not at all absurd; it might
just as well occur in my waking thoughts. In my dream I make fun of the communication
from the town council, for in the first place I was not yet born in 1851, and in the second
place my father, to whom it might refer, is already dead. Not only is each of these
statements perfectly correct in itself, but they are the very arguments that I should employ
if I received such a communication. We know from the foregoing analysis (p. 289) that
this dream has sprung from the soil of deeply embittered and scornful dream-thoughts;
and if we may also assume that the motive of the censorship is a very powerful one, we
shall understand that the dream-thought has every occasion to create a flawless refutation
of an unreasonable demand, in accordance with the pattern contained in the dream-
thoughts. But the analysis shows that in this case the dream-work has not been required to
make a free imitation, but that material taken from the dream-thoughts had to be
employed for the purpose. It is as though in an algebraic equation there should occur,
besides the figures, plus and minus signs, and symbols of powers and of roots, and as
though someone, in copying this equation, without understanding it, should copy both the
symbols and the figures, and mix them all up together. The two arguments may be traced
to the following material: It is painful to me to think that many of the hypotheses upon
which I base my psychological solution of the psychoneuroses will arouse scepticism and
ridicule when they first became known. For instance, I shall have to assert that
impressions of the second year of life, and even the first, leave an enduring trace upon the
emotional life of subsequent neuropaths, and that these impressions -- although greatly
distorted and exaggerated by the memory -- may furnish the earliest and profoundest
basis of a hysterical symptom. Patients to whom I explain this at a suitable moment are

wont to parody my explanation by offering to search for reminiscenes of the period when
they were not yet born. My disclosure of the unsuspected part played by the father in the
earliest sexual impulses of female patients may well have a similar reception. (Cf. the
discussion on pp. 150 ff.) Nevertheless, it is my well-founded conviction that both
doctrines are true. In confirmation of this I recall certain examples in which the death of
the father occurred when the child was very young, and subsequent incidents, otherwise
inexplicable, proved that the child had unconsciously preserved recollections of the
person who had so early gone out of its life. I know that both my assertions are based
upon inferences whose validity will be attacked. It is the doing of the wish-fulfilment that
precisely the material of those inferences, which I fear will be contested, should be
utilised by the dream-work for establishing incontestable conclusions.
7. In one dream, which I have hitherto only touched upon, astonishment at the subject
emerging is distinctly expressed at the outset.
`The elder Brücke must have set me some task or other; strangely enough, it relates to the
preparation of the lower part of my own body, the pelvis and legs, which I see before me
as though in the dissecting-room, but without feeling the absence of part of my body, and
without a trace of horror. Louise N. is standing beside me, and helps me in the work. The
pelvis is eviscerated; now the upper, now the lower aspect is visible, and the two aspects
are commingled. Large fleshy red tubercles are visible (which, even in the dream, make
me think of haemorrhoids). Also something lying over them had to be carefully picked off,
it looked like crumpled tinfoil.10 Then I was once more in possession of my legs, and I
made a journey through the city, but I took a cab (as I was tired). To my astonishment,
the cab drove into the front door of a house, which opened and allowed it to pass into a
corridor, which was broken off at the end, and eventually led on into the open.11 Finally I
wandered through changing landscapes, with an Alpine guide, who carried my things. He
carried me for some distance, out of consideration for my tired legs. The ground was
swampy; we went along the edge; people were sitting on the ground, like Red Indians or
gypsies; among them a girl. Until then I had made my way along on the slippery ground,
in constant astonishment that I was so well able to do so after making the preparation. At
last we came to a small wooden house with an open window at one end. Here the guide
set me down, and laid two planks, which stood in readiness, on the window-sill so as to
bridge the chasm which had to be crossed from the window. Now I grew really alarmed
about my legs. Instead of the expected crossing, I saw two grown-up men lying upon
wooden benches which were fixed on the walls of the hut, and something like two
sleeping children next to them; as though not the planks but the children were intended to
make the crossing possible. I awoke with terrified thoughts.
Anyone who has been duly impressed by the extensive nature of dream-condensation will
readily image what a number of pages the exhaustive analysis of this dream would fill.
Fortunately for the context, I shall make this dream only the one example of astonishment
in dreams, which makes its appearance in the parenthetical remark, `strangely enough'.
Let us consider the occasion of the dream. It is a visit of this lady, Louise N., who helps
me with my work in the dream. She says: `Lend me something to read.' I offer her She,
by Rider Haggard. À strange book, but full of hidden meaning,' I try to explain; `the

eternal feminine, the immortality of our emotions --' Here she interrupts me: Ì know that
book already. Haven't you something of your own?' `No, my own immortal works are
still unwritten.' `Well, when are you going to publish your so-called ``latest revelations'',
which, you promised us, even we should be able to read?' she asks, rather sarcastically. I
now perceive that she is a mouthpiece for someone else, and I am silent. I think of the
effort it cost me to make public even my work on dreams, in which I had to surrender so
much of my own intimate nature. (`The best that you know you can't tell the boys.') The
preparation of my own body which I am ordered to make in my dream is thus the self-
analysis involved in the communication of my dreams. The elder Brücke very properly
finds a place here; in the first years of my scientific work it so happened that I neglected
the publication of a certain discovery until his insistence forced me to publish it. But the
further trains of thought, proceeding from my conversation with Louise N., go too deep
to become conscious; they are side-tracked by way of the material which has been
incidentally awakened in me by the mention of Rider Haggard's She. The comment
`strangely enough' applies to this book, and to another by the same author, The Heart of
the World' and numerous elements of the dream are taken from these two fantastic
romances. The swampy ground over which the dreamer is carried, the chasm which has
to be crossed by means of planks, come from She; the Red Indians, the girl, and the
wooden house, from The Heart of the World. In both novels a woman is the leader, and
both treat of perilous wandering; She has to do with an adventurous journey to an
undiscovered country, a place almost untrodden by the foot of man. According to a note
which I find in my record of the dream, the fatigue in my legs was a real sensation from
those days. Probably a weary mood corresponded with this fatigue, and the doubting
question: `How much farther will my legs carry me?' In She the end of the adventure is
that the heroine meets her death in the mysterious central fire, instead of winning
immortality for herself and for others. Some related anxiety has mistakably arisen in the
dream-thoughts. The `wooden house' is assuredly also a coffin -- that is, the grave. But in
representing this most unwished-for of all thoughts by means of a wish-fulfilment, the
dream-work has achieved its masterpiece. I was once in a grave, but it was an empty
Etruscan grave near Orvieto -- a narrow chamber with two stone benches on the walls,
upon which were lying the skeletons of two adults. The interior of the wooden house in
the dream looks exactly like this grave, except that stone has been replaced by wood. The
dream seems to say: Ìf you must already sojourn in your grave, let it be this Etruscan
grave', and by means of this interpolation it transforms the most mournful expectation
into one that is really to be desired. Unfortunately, as we shall learn, the dream is able to
change into its opposite only the idea accompanying an affect, but not always the affect
itself. Hence, I awake with `thoughts of terror', even after the idea that perhaps my
children will achieve what has been denied to their father has forced its way to
representation: a fresh allusion to the strange romance in which the identity of a character
is preserved through a series of generations covering two thousand years.
8. In the context of another dream there is a similar expression of astonishment at what is

experienced in the dream. This, however, is connected with such a striking, far-fetched,
and almost intellectual attempt at explanation that if only on this account I should have to
subject the whole dream to analysis, even if it did not possess two other interesting
features. On the night of the eighteenth of July 1 was travelling on the Southern Railway,

and in my sleep I heard someone call out: `Hollthum, 10 minutes.' I immediately think of
Holothuria -- of a natural history museum -- that here is a place where valiant men have
vainly resisted the domination of their overlord. -- Yes, the counter-reformation in
Austria! -- As though it were a place in Styria or the Tyrol. Now I see indistinctly a small
museum, in which the relics or the acquisitions of these men are preserved. I should like
to leave the train, but I hesitate to do so. There are women with fruit on the platform;
they squat on the ground, and in that position invitingly hold up their baskets. -- I
hesitated, in doubt as to whether we have time, but here we are still stationary. -- I am
suddenly in another compartment, in which the leather and the seats are so narrow that
one's spine directly touches the back.12 I am surprised at this, but I may have changed
carriages while asleep. Several people, among them an English brother and sister; a row
of books plainly on a shelf on the wall. -- I see `The Wealth of Nations', and `Matter and
Motion' (by Maxwell), thick books bound in brown linen. The man asks his sister about a
book of Schiller's, whether she has forgotten it. These books seem to belong now to me,
now to them. At this point I wish to join in the conversation in order to confirm or
support what is being said . . . I wake sweating all over, because all the windows are shut.
The train stops at Marburg.
While writing down the dream, a part of it occurs to me which my memory wished to
pass over. I tell the brother and sister (in English), referring to a certain book: Ìt is from
. . .' but I correct myself: Ìt is by . . .' The man remarks to his sister: `He said it
correctly.'
The dream begins with the name of a station, which seems to have almost waked me. For
this name, which was Marburg, I substitute Hollthurn. The fact that I heard Marburg the
first, or perhaps the second time it was called out, is proved by the mention of Schiller in
the dream; he was born in Marburg, though not the Styrian Marburg. 13 Now on this
occasion, although I was travelling first class, I was doing so under very disagreeable
circumstances. The train was overcrowded; in my compartment I had come upon a lady
and gentleman who seemed very fine people, and had not the good breeding, or did not
think it worth while, to conceal their displeasure at my intrusion. My polite greeting was
not returned, and although they were sitting side by side (with their backs to the engine),
the woman before my eyes hastened to pre-empt the seat opposite her, and next to the
window, with her umbrella; the door was immediately closed, and pointed remarks about
the opening of windows were exchanged. Probably I was quickly recognised as a person
hungry for fresh air. It was a hot night, and the atmosphere of the compartment, closed on
both sides, was almost suffocating. My experience as a traveller leads me to believe that
such inconsiderate and overbearing conduct marks people who have paid for their tickets
only partly, or not at all. When the conductor came round, and I presented my dearly
bought ticket, the lady exclaimed haughtily and almost threateningly: `My husband has a
pass.' She was an imposing-looking person, with a discontented expression, in age not far
removed from the autumn of feminine beauty; the man had no chance to say anything; he
sat there motionless. I tried to sleep. In my dream I take a terrible revenge on my
disagreeable travelling companions; no one would suspect what insults and humiliations
are concealed behind the disjointed fragments of the first half of the dream. After this
need has been satisfied, the second wish, to exchange my compartment for another,

makes itself felt. The dream changes its scene so often, and without making the slightest
objection to such changes, that it would not have seemed at all remarkable had I at once,
from my memories, replaced my travelling companions by more agreeable persons. But
here was a case where something or other opposes the change of scene, and finds it
necessary to explain it. How did I suddenly get into another compartment? I could not
positively remember having changed carriages. So there was only one explanation: I must
have left the carriage while asleep -- an unusual occurrence, examples of which,
however, are known to neuropathologists. We know of persons who undertake railway
journeys in a crepuscular state, without betraying their abnormal condition by any sign
whatever, until at some stage of their journey they come to themselves, and are surprised
by the gap in their memory. Thus, while I am still dreaming, I declare my own case to be
such a case of automatisme ambulatoire.
Analysis permits of another solution. The attempt at explanation, which so surprises me if

I am to attribute it to the dream-work, is not original, but is copied from the neurosis of
one of my patients. I have already spoken in another chapter of a highly cultured and
kindly man who began, shortly after the death of his parents, to accuse himself of
murderous tendencies, and who was distressed by the precautionary measures which he
had to take to secure himself against these tendencies. His was a case of severe
obsessional idea with full insight. To begin with, it was painful to him to walk through
the streets, as he was obsessed by the necessity of accounting for all the persons he met;
he had to know whither they had disappeared; if one of them suddenly eluded his
pursuing glance, he was left with a feeling of distress and the idea that he might possibly
have made away with the man. Behind this obsessive idea was concealed, among other
things, a Cain-fantasy, for àll men are brothers'. Owing to the impossibility of
accomplishing this task, he gave up going for walks, and spent his life imprisoned within
his four walls. But reports of murders which had been committed in the world outside
were constantly reaching his room by way of the newspapers, and his conscience
tormented him with the doubt that he might be the murderer for whom the police were
looking. The certainty that he had not left the house for weeks protected him for a time
against these accusations, until one day there dawned upon him the possibility that he
might have left his house while in an unconscious state, and might thus have committed
murder without knowing anything about it. From that time onwards he locked his front
door, and gave the key to his old housekeeper, strictly forbidding her to give it into his
hands, even if he demanded it.
This, then, is the origin of the attempted explanation that I may have changed carriages
while in an unconscious state; it has been taken into the dream ready-made, from the
material of the dream-thoughts, and is evidently intended to identify me with the person
of my patient. My memory of this patient was awakened by natural association. My last
night journey had been made a few weeks earlier in his company. He was cured, and we
were going into the country together to his relatives, who had sent for me; as we had a
compartment to ourselves, we left all the windows open throughout the night, and for as
long as I remained awake we had a most interesting conversation. I knew that hostile
impulses towards his father in childhood, in a sexual connection, had been at the root of
his illness. By identifying myself with him I wanted to make an analogous confession to

myself. The second scene of the dream really resolves itself into a wanton fantasy to the
effect that my two elderly travelling companions had acted so uncivilly towards me
because my arrival on the scene had prevented them from exchanging kisses and
embraces during the night, as they had intended. This fantasy, however, goes back to an
early incident of my childhood when, probably impelled by sexual curiosity, I had
intruded into my parents' bedroom, and was driven thence by my father's emphatic
command.
I think it would be superfluous to multiply such examples. They would all confirm what
we have learned from those already cited: namely, that an act of judgment in a dream is
merely the repetition of an original act of judgment in the dream-thoughts. In most cases
it is an unsuitable repetition, fitted into an inappropriate context; occasionally, however,
as in our last example, it is so artfully applied that it may almost give one the impression
of independent intellectual activity in the dream. At this point we might turn our attention
to that psychic activity which, though it does not appear to co-operate constantly in the
formation of dreams, yet endeavours to fuse the dream-elements of different origin into a
flawless and significant whole. We consider it necessary, however, first of all to consider
the expressions of affect which appear in dreams, and to compare these with the affects
which analysis discovers in the dream-thoughts.
1
I have forgotten in what author I found a reference to a dream which was overrun with
unusually small figures, the source of which proved to be one of the engravings of
Jacques Callot, which the dreamer had examined during the day. These engravings
contain an enormous number of very small figures; a whole series of them deals with the
horrors of the Thirty Years War.
2
cf. Formulierungen über die zwei Prinzipien des seelischen Geschehens, in Jahrbuch f.
Ps.A., iii, 1, 1911 (Ges. Schriften, Bd. v).
3
Here the dream-work parodies the thought which it qualifies as ridiculous, in that it
creates something ridiculous in relation to it. Heine does the same thing when he wishes
to deride the bad rhymes of the King of Bavaria. He does it by using even worse rhymes:
Herr Ludwig ist ein grosser Poet

Und singt er, so stürzt Apollo
Vor ihm auf die Knie und bittet und fleht,
Halt ein, ich werde sonst toll, oh!
4
[Note the resemblance of Geseres and Ungeseres to the German words for salted and
unsalted -- gesalzen and ungesalzen; also to the words gesauert and ungesauert, leavened
and unleavened. -- TRANS.]
5
This dream furnishes a good example in support of the universally valid doctrine that
dreams of the same night, even though they are separated in the memory, spring from the
same thought-material. The dream-situation in which I am rescuing my children from the
city of Rome, moreover, is distorted by a reference back to an episode of my childhood.

The meaning is that I envy certain relatives who years ago had occasion to transplant
their children to the soil of another country.
6
[This German expression is equivalent to our saying: Ì am not responsible for that',
`That's not my funeral', or `That's not due to my own efforts'. -- TRANS.]
7
The injunction or resolve already contained in the dream: Ì must tell that to the doctor',
when it occurs in dreams during psychoanalytic treatment, is constantly accompanied by
a great resistance to confessing the dream, and is not infrequently followed by the
forgetting of the dream.
8
A subject which has been extensively discussed in recent volumes of the Revue
Philosophique (paramnesia in dreams).
9
These results correct at several points my earlier statements concerning the
representation of logical relations (pp. 194 ff.). These described the general procedure of
the dream-work, but overlooked its most delicate and most careful operations.
10
Stanniol, allusion to Stannius; the nervous system of fishes; cf. p. 271.
11
The place in the corridor of my apartment-house where the perambulators of the other
tenants stand; it is also otherwise hyper-determined several times over.
12
This description is not intelligible even to myself, but I follow the principle of
reproducing the dream in those words which occur to me while I am writing it down. The
wording itself is a part of the dream-representation.
13
Schiller was not born in one of the Marburgs, but in Marbach, as every German
schoolboy knows, and as I myself knew. This again is one of those errors which creep in
as substitutes for an intentional falsification in another place and which I have
endeavoured to explain in The Psychopathology of Everyday Life.

H. THE AFFECTS IN DREAMS
A shrewd remark of Stricker's called our attention to the fact that the expressions of
affects in dreams cannot be disposed of in the contemptuous fashion in which we are
wont to shake off the dream-content after we have waked. Ìf I am afraid of robbers in my
dreams, the robbers, to be sure, are imaginary, but the fear of them is real'; and the same
thing is true if I rejoice in my dream. According to the testimony of our feelings, an affect
experienced in a dream is in no way inferior to one of like intensity experienced in
waking life, and the dream presses its claim to be accepted as part of our real psychic
experiences, by virtue of its affective rather than its ideational content. In the waking
state we do not put the one before the other, since we do not know how to evaluate an
affect psychically except in connection with an ideational content. If an affect and an idea
are ill-matched as regards their nature or their intensity, our waking judgment becomes
confused.
The fact that in dreams the ideational content does not always produce the affective result
which in our waking thoughts we should expect as its necessary consequence has always
been a cause of astonishment. Strümpell declared that ideas in dreams are stripped of
their psychic values. But there is no lack of instances in which the reverse is true; when
an intensive manifestation of affect appears in a content which seems to offer no occasion
for it. In my dream I may be in a horrible, dangerous, or disgusting situation, and yet I
may feel no fear or aversion; on the other hand, I am sometimes terrified by harmless
things, and sometimes delighted by childish things.
This enigma disappears more suddenly and more completely than perhaps any other
dream-problem if we pass from the manifest to the latent content. We shall then no longer
have to explain it, for it will no longer exist. Analysis tells us that the ideational contents
have undergone displacements and substitutions, while the affects have remained
unchanged. No wonder, then, that the ideational content which has been altered by
dream-distortion no longer fits the affect which has remained intact; and no cause for
wonder when analysis has put the correct content into its original place.1
In a psychic complex which has been subjected to the influence of the resisting
censorship, the affects are the unyielding constituent, which alone can guide us to the
correct completion. This state of affairs is revealed in the psychoneuroses even more
distinctly than in dreams. Here the affect is always in the right, at least as regards its
quality; its intensity may, of course, be increased by displacement of the neurotic
attention. When the hysterical patient wonders that he should be so afraid of a trifle, or
when the sufferer from obsessions is astonished that he should reproach himself so
bitterly for a mere nothing, they are both in error, inasmuch as they regard the conceptual
content -- the trifle, the mere nothing -- as the essential thing, and they defend themselves
in vain, because they make this conceptual content the starting-point of their thought-
work. Psychoanalysis, however, puts them on the right path, inasmuch as it recognises
that, on the contrary, it is the affect that is justified, and looks for the concept which
pertains to it, and which has been repressed by a substitution. All that we need assume is
that the liberation of affect and the conceptual content do not constitute the indissoluble

organic unity as which we are wont to regard them, but that the two parts may be welded
together, so that analysis will separate them. Dream-interpretation shows that this is
actually the case.
I will first of all give an example in which analysis explains the apparent absence of
affect in a conceptual content which ought to compel a liberation of affect.
Dream 1. The dreamer sees three lions in a desert, one of which is laughing, but she is
not afraid of them. Then, however, she must have fled from them, for she is trying to
climb a tree. But she finds that her cousin, the French teacher, is already up in the tree,
etc.
The analysis yields the following material: The indifferent occasion of dream was a
sentence in the dreamer's English exercise: `The lion's greatest adornment is his mane.'
Her father used to wear a beard which encircled his face like a mane. The name of her
English teacher is Miss Lyons. An acquaintance of hers had sent her the ballads of Loewe
(Loewe = lion). These, then, are the three lions; why should she be afraid of them? She
has read a story in which a negro who has incited his fellows to revolt is hunted with
bloodhounds, and climbs a tree to save himself. Then follow fragmentary recollections in
the merriest mood, such as the following directions for catching lions (from Die
Fliegende Blätter): `Take a desert and put it through a sieve; the lions will be left behind.'
Also a very amusing, but not very proper anecdote about an official who is asked why he
does not take greater pains to win the favour of his chief, and who replies that he has
been trying to creep into favour, but that his immediate superior was already up there.
The whole matter becomes intelligible as soon as one learns that on the dream-day the
lady had received a visit from her husband's superior. He was very polite to her, and
kissed her hand, and she was not at all afraid of him, although he is a `big bug' (Grosses
Tier = big animal) and plays the part of a `social lion' in the capital of her country. This
lion is, therefore, like the lion in A Midsummer Night's Dream, who is unmasked as Snug
the joiner; and of such stuff are all the dream-lions of which one is not afraid.
Dream 2. As my second example, I will cite the dream of the girl who saw her sister's
little son lying as a corpse in his coffin, but who, it may be added, was conscious of no
pain or sorrow. Why she was unmoved we know from the analysis. The dream only
disguised her wish to see once more the man she loved; the affect had to be attuned to the
wish, and not to its disguisement. There was thus no occasion for sorrow.
In a number of dreams the affect does at least remain connected with the conceptual
content which has replaced the content really belonging to it. In others, the dissolution of
the complex is carried farther. The affect is entirely separated from the idea belonging to
it, and finds itself accommodated elsewhere in the dream, where it fits into the new
arrangement of the dream-elements. We have seen that the same thing happens to acts of
judgment in dreams. If an important inference occurs in the dream-thoughts, there is one
in the dream also; but the inference in the dream may be displaced to entirely different
material. Not infrequently this displacement is effected in accordance with the principal
of antithesis.

I will illustrate the latter possibility by the following dream, which I have subjected to the
most exhaustive analysis.
Dream 3. A castle by the sea; afterwards it lies not directly on the coast, but on a narrow
canal leading to the sea. A certain Herr P. is the governor of the castle. I stand with him
in a large salon with three windows, in front of which rise the projections of a wall, like
battlements of a fortress. I belong to the garrison, perhaps as a volunteer naval officer.
We fear the arrival of enemy warships, for we are in a state of war. Herr P. intends to
leave the castle; he gives me instructions as to what must be done if what we fear should
come to pass. His sick wife and his children are in the threatened castle. As soon as the
bombardment begins, the large hall is to be cleared. He breathes heavily, and tries to get
away; I detain him, and ask him how I am to send him news in case of need. He says
something further, and immediately afterwards he sinks to the floor dead. I have
probably taxed him unnecessarily with my questions. After his death, which makes no
further impression upon me, I consider whether the widow is to remain in the castle,
whether I should give notice of the death to the higher command, whether I should take
over the control of the castle as the next in command. I now stand at the window, and
scrutinise the ships as they pass by; they are cargo steamers, and they rush by over the
dark water; several with more than one funnel, others with bulging decks (these are very
like the railway stations in the preliminary dream, which has not been related). Then my
brother is standing beside me, and we both look out of the window on to the canal. At the
sight of one ship we are alarmed, and call out: `Here comes the warship!' It turns out,
however, that they are only the ships which I have already seen, returning. Now comes a
small ship, comically truncated, so that it ends amidships; on the deck one sees curious
things like cups or little boxes. We call out as with one voice: `That is the breakfast ship.'
The rapid motion of the ships, the deep blue of the water, the brown smoke of the funnels
-- all these together produce an intense and gloomy impression.
The localities in this dream are compiled from several journeys to the Adriatic
(Miramare, Duino, Venice, Aquileia). A short but enjoyable Easter trip to Aquileia with
my brother, a few weeks before the dream, was still fresh in my memory; also the naval
war between America and Spain, and associated with this my anxiety as to the fate of my
relatives in America, play a part in the dream. Manifestations of affect appear at two
places in this dream. In one place an affect that would be expected is lacking: it is
expressly emphasised that the death of the governor makes no impression upon me; at
another point, when I see the warships, I am frightened, and experience all the sensations
of fright in my sleep. The distribution of affects in this well-constructed dream has been
effected in such a way that any obvious contradiction is avoided. For there is no reason
why I should be frightened at the governor's death, and it is fitting that, as the commander
of the castle, I should be alarmed by the sight of the warship. Now analysis shows that
Herr P. is nothing but a substitute for my own ego (in the dream I am his substitute). I am
the governor who suddenly dies. The dream-thoughts deal with the future of my family
after my premature death. No other disagreeable thought is to be found among the dream
thoughts. The alarm which goes with the sight of the warship must be transferred from it
to this disagreeable thought. Inversely, the analysis shows that the region of the dream-

thoughts from which the warship comes is laden with most cheerful reminiscences. In
Venice, a year before the dream, one magically beautiful day, we stood at the windows of
our room on the Riva Schiavoni and looked out over the blue lagoon, on which there was
more traffic to be seen than usual. Some English ships were expected; they were to be
given a festive reception; and suddenly my wife cried, happy as a child: `Here comes the
English warship!' In the dream I am frightened by the very same words; once more we
see that speeches in dreams have their origin in speeches in real life. I shall presently
show that even the element Ènglish' in this speech has not been lost for the dream-work.
Here, then, between the dream-thoughts and the dream-content, I turn joy into fright, and
I need only point to the fact that by means of this transformation I give expression to part
of the latent dream-content. The example shows, however, that the dream-work is at
liberty to detach the occasion of an affect from its connections in the dream-thoughts, and
to insert it at any other place it chooses in the dream-content.
I will take the opportunity which is here incidentally offered of subjecting to a closer
analysis the `breakfast ship', whose appearance in the dream so absurdly concludes a
situation that has been rationally adhered to. If I look more closely at this dream-object, I
am impressed after the event by the fact that it was black, and that by reason of its
truncation at its widest beam it achieved, at the truncated end, a considerable resemblance
to an object which had aroused our interest in the museums of the Etruscan cities. This
object was a rectangular cup of black clay, with two handles, upon which stood things
like coffee-cups or tea-cups, very similar to our modern service for the breakfast table.
Upon inquiry we learned that this was the toilet set of an Etruscan lady, with little boxes
for rouge and powder; and we told one another jestingly that it would not be a bad idea to
take a thing like that home to the lady of the house. The dream-object, therefore, signifies
a `black toilet' (toilette = dress), or mourning, and refers directly to a death. The other end
of the dream-object reminds us of the `boat' (German, Nachen, from the Greek root,
vexus, as a philological friend informs me), upon which corpses were laid in prehistoric
times, and were left to be buried by the sea. This is associated with the return of the ships
in the dream.
`Silently on his rescued boat the old man drifts into harbour.'
It is the return voyage after the shipwreck (German: Schiff-bruck = ship-breaking); the
breakfast ship looks as though it were broken off amidships. But whence comes the name
`breakfast' ship? This is where Ènglish' comes in, which we have left over from the
warships. Breakfast, a breaking of the fast. Breaking again belongs to shipwreck (Schiff-
bruch), and fasting is associated with the black (mourning).
But the only thing about this breakfast ship which has been newly created by the dream is
its name. The thing existed in reality, and recalls to me one of the merriest moments of
my last journey. As we distrusted the fare in Aquileia, we took some food with us from
Goerz, and bought a bottle of the excellent Istrian wine in Aquileia; and while the little
mail-steamer slowly travelled through the canale delle Mee and into the lonely expanse
of lagoon in the direction of Grado, we had breakfast on deck in the highest spirits -- we
were the only passengers -- and it tasted to us as few breakfasts have ever tasted. This,

then, was the `breakfast ship', and it is behind this very recollection of the gayest joie de
vivre that the dream hides the saddest thoughts of an unknown and mysterious future.
The detachment of affects from the groups of ideas which have occasioned their
liberation is the most striking thing that happens to them in dream-formation, but it is
neither the only nor even the most essential change which they undergo on the way from
the dream-thoughts to the manifest dream. If the affects in the dream-thoughts are
compared with those in the dream, one thing at once becomes clear. Wherever there is an
affect in the dream, it is to be found also in the dream-thoughts; the converse, however, is
not true. In general, a dream is less rich in affects than the psychic material from which it
is elaborated. When I have reconstructed the dream-thoughts, I see that the most intense
psychic impulses are constantly striving in them for self-assertion, usually in conflict
with others which are sharply opposed to them. Now, if I turn back to the dream, I often
find it colourless and devoid of any very intensive affective tone. Not only the content,
but also the affective tone of my thoughts is often reduced by the dream-work to the level
of the indifferent. I might say that a suppression of the affects has been accomplished by
the dream-work. Take, for example, the dream of the botanical monograph. It
corresponds to a passionate plea for my freedom to act as I am acting, to arrange my life
as seems right to me, and to me alone. The dream which results from this sounds
indifferent; I have written a monograph; it is lying before me; it is provided with coloured
plates, and dried plants are to be found in each copy. It is like the peace of a deserted
battlefield; no trace is left of the tumult of battle.
But things may turn out quite differently; vivid expressions of affect may enter into the
dream itself; but we will first of all consider the unquestioned fact that so many dreams
appear indifferent, whereas it is never possible to go deeply into the dream-thoughts
without deep emotion.
The complete theoretical explanation of this suppression of affects during the dream-
work cannot be given here; it would require a most careful investigation of the theory of
the affects and of the mechanism of repression. Here I can put forward only two
suggestions. I am forced -- for other reasons -- to conceive the liberation of affects as a
centrifugal process directed towards the interior of the body, analogous to the processes
of motor and secretory innervation. Just as in the sleeping state the emission of motor
impulses towards the outer world seems to be suspended, so the centrifugal awakening of
affects by unconscious thinking during sleep may be rendered more difficult. The
affective impulses which occur during the course of the dream-thoughts may thus in
themselves be feeble, so that those that find their way into the dream are no stronger.
According to this line of thought, the `suppression of the affects' would not be a
consequence of the dream-work at all, but a consequence of the state of sleep. This may
be so, but it cannot possibly be all the truth. We must remember that all the more
complex dreams have revealed themselves as the result of a compromise between
conflicting psychic forces. On the one hand, the wish-forming thoughts have to oppose
the contradiction of a censorship; on the other hand, as we have often seen, even in
unconscious thinking, every train of thought is harnessed to its contradictory counterpart.
Since all these trains of thought are capable of arousing affects, we shall, broadly

speaking, hardly go astray if we conceive the suppression of affects as the result of the
inhibition which the contrasts impose upon one another, and the censorship upon the
urges which it has suppressed. The inhibition of affects would accordingly be the second
consequence of the dream-censorship, just as dream-distortion was the first consequence.
I will here insert an example of a dream in which the indifferent emotional tone of the
dream-content may be explained by the antagonism of the dream-thoughts. I must relate
the following short dream, which every reader will read with disgust.
Dream 4. Rising ground, and on it something like an open-air latrine; a very long bench,
at the end of which is a wide aperture. The whole of the back edge is thickly covered with
little heaps of excrement of all sizes and degrees of freshness. A thicket behind the bench.
I urinate upon the bench, a long stream of urine rinses everything clean, the patches of
excrement come off easily and fall into the opening. Nevertheless, it seems as though
something remained at the end.
Why did I experience no disgust in this dream?
Because, as the analysis shows, the most pleasant and gratifying thoughts have co-
operated in the formation of this dream. Upon analysing it, I immediately think of the
Augean stables which were cleansed by Hercules. I am this Hercules. The rising ground
and the thicket belong to Aussee, where my children are now staying I have discovered
the infantile etiology of the neuroses, and have thus guarded my own children from
falling ill. The bench (omitting the aperture, of course) is the faithful copy of a piece of
furniture of which an affectionate female patient has made me a present. This reminds me
how my patients honour me. Even the museum of human excrement is susceptible of a
gratifying interpretation. However much it disgusts me, it is a souvenir of the beautiful
land of Italy, where in the small cities, as everyone knows, the privies are not equipped in
any other way. The stream of urine that washes everything clean is an unmistakable
allusion to greatness. It is in this manner that Gulliver extinguishes the great fire in
Lilliput; to be sure, he thereby incurs the displeasure of the tiniest of queens. In this way,
too, Gargantua. the superman of Master Rabelais, takes vengeance upon the Parisians,
straddling Notre-Dame and training his stream of urine upon the city. Only yesterday I
was turning over the leaves of Garnier's illustrations to Rabelais before I went to bed.
And, strangely enough, here is another proof that I am the superman! The platform of
Notre-Dame was my favourite nook in Paris; every free afternoon I used to go up into the
towers of the cathedral and there clamber about between the monsters and gargoyles. The
circumstance that all the excrement vanishes so rapidly before the stream of urine
corresponds to the motto: Afflavit et dissipati sunt, which I shall some day make the title
of a chapter on the therapeutics of hysteria.
And now as to the affective occasion of the dream. It had been a hot summer afternoon;
in the evening, I had given my lecture on the connection between hysteria and the
perversions, and everything which I had to say displeased me thoroughly, and seemed
utterly valueless. I was tired; I took not the least pleasure in my difficult work, and
longed to get away from this rummaging in human filth; first to see my children, and then

to revisit the beauties of Italy. In this mood I went from the lecture-hall to a café to get
some little refreshment in the open air, for my appetite had forsaken me. But a member of
my audience went with me; he begged for permission to sit with me while I drank my
coffee and gulped down my roll, and began to say flattering things to me. He told me
how much he had learned from me, that he now saw everything through different eyes,
that I had cleansed the Augean stables of error and prejudice, which encumbered the
theory of the neuroses -- in short, that I was a very great man. My mood was ill-suited to
his hymn of praise; I struggled with my disgust, and went home earlier in order to get rid
of him; and before I went to sleep I turned over the leaves of Rabelais, and read a short
story by C. F. Meyer entitled Die Leiden eines Knaben (The Sorrows of a Boy).
The dream had originated from this material, and Meyer's novel had supplied the
recollections of scenes of childhood.2
The day's mood of annoyance and disgust is continued in the dream, inasmuch as it is
permitted to furnish nearly all the material for the dream-content. But during the night the
opposite mood of vigorous, even immoderate self-assertion awakened and dissipated the
earlier mood. The dream had to assume such a form as would accommodate both the
expressions of self-depreciation and exaggerated self-glorification in the same material.
This compromise-formation resulted in an ambiguous dream-content, but, owing to the
mutual inhibition of the opposites, in an indifferent emotional tone.
According to the theory of wish-fulfilment, this dream would not have been possible had
not the opposed, and indeed suppressed, yet pleasure-emphasised megalomaniac train of
thought been added to the thoughts of disgust. For nothing painful is intended to be
represented in dreams; the painful elements of our daily thoughts are able to force their
way into our dreams only if at the same time they are able to disguise a wish-fulfilment.
The dream-work is able to dispose of the affects of the dream-thoughts in yet another
way than by admitting them or reducing them to zero. It can transform them into their
opposites. We are acquainted with the rule that for the purposes of interpretation every
element of the dream may represent its opposite, as well as itself. One can never tell
beforehand which is to be posited; only the context can decide this point. A suspicion of
this state of affairs has evidently found its way into the popular consciousness; the dream-
books, in their interpretations, often proceed according to the principle of contraries. This
transformation into the contrary is made possible by the intimate associative ties which in
our thoughts connect the idea of a thing with that of its opposite. Like every other
displacement, this serves the purposes of the censorship, but it is often the work of wish-
fulfilment, for wish-fulfilment consists in nothing more than the substitution of an
unwelcome thing by its opposite. Just as concrete images may be transformed into their
contraries in our dreams, so also may the affects of the dream-thoughts, and it is probable
that this inversion of affects is usually brought about by the dream-censorship. The
suppression and inversion of affects is useful even in social life, as is shown by the
familiar analogy of the dream-censorship and, above all, hypocrisy. If I am conversing
with a person to whom I must show consideration while I should like to address him as
an enemy, it is almost more important that I should conceal the expression of my affect

from him than that I should modify the verbal expression of my thoughts. If I address him
in courteous terms, but accompany them by looks or gestures of hatred and disdain, the
effect which I produce upon him is not very different from what it would have been had I
cast my unmitigated contempt into his face. Above all, then, the censorship bids me
suppress my affects, and if I am a master of the art of dissimulation I can hypocritically
display the opposite affect -- smiling where I should like to be angry, and pretending
affection where I should like to destroy.
We have already had an excellent example of such an inversion of affect in the service of
the dream-censorship. In the dream òf my uncle's beard' I feel great affection for my
friend R. while (and because) the dream-thoughts berate him as a simpleton. From this
example of the inversion of affects we derived our first proof of the existence of the
censorship. Even here it is not necessary to assume that the dream-work creates a
counter-affect of this kind that is altogether new; it usually finds it lying ready in the
material of the dream-thoughts, and merely intensifies it with the psychic force of the
defence-motives until it is able to predominate in the dream-formation. In the dream of
my uncle, the affectionate counter-affect probably has its origin in an infantile source (as
the continuation of the dream would suggest), for owing to the peculiar nature of my
earliest childhood experiences the relation of uncle and nephew has become the source of
all my friendships and hatred (cf. analysis on p. 279).
An excellent example of such a reversal of affect is found in a dream recorded by

Ferenczi.3
An elderly gentleman was awakened at night by his wife, who was frightened because he
laughed so loudly and uncontrollably in his sleep. The man afterwards related that he had
had the following dream: I lay in my bed, a gentleman known to me came in, I wanted to
turn on the light, but I could not; I attempted to do so repeatedly, but in vain. Thereupon
my wife got out of bed, in order to help me, but she, too, was unable to manage it; being
ashamed of her néligé in the presence of the gentleman, she finally gave it up and went
back to her bed; all this was so comical that I had to laugh terribly. My wife said: `What
are you laughing at, what are you laughing at?' but I continued to laugh until I woke.
The following day the man was extremely depressed, and suffered from headache: `From
too much laughter, which shook me up,' he thought.
Analytically considered, the dream looks less comical. In the latent dream-thoughts the
`gentleman known' to him who came into the room is the image of death as the `great
unknown', which was awakened in his mind on the previous day. The old gentleman, who
suffers from arteriosclerosis, had good reason to think of death on the day before the
dream. The uncontrollable laughter takes the place of weeping and sobbing at the idea
that he has to die. It is the light of life that he is no longer able to turn on. This mournful
thought may have associated itself with a failure to effect sexual intercourse, which he
had attempted shortly before this, and in which the assistance of his wife en négligé was
of no avail; he realised that he was already on the decline. The dream-work knew how to
transform the sad idea of impotence and death into a comic scene, and the sobbing into
laughter.

There is one class of dreams which has a special claim to be called `hypocritical', and
which severely tests the theory of wishfulfilment. My attention was called to them when
Frau Dr M. Hilferding proposed for discussion by the Psychoanalytic Society of Vienna a
dream recorded by Rosegger, which is here reprinted:
In Waldheimat, vol. xi, Rosegger writes as follows in his story, Fremd gemacht (p. 303):
I usually enjoy healthful sleep, yet I have gone without repose on many a night; in
addition to my modest existence as a student and literary man, I have for long years
dragged out the shadow of a veritable tailor's life -- like a ghost from which I could not
become divorced.
It is not true that I have occupied myself very often or very intensely with thoughts of my
past during the day. A stormer of heaven and earth who has escaped from the hide of the
Philistine has other things to think about. And as a gay young fellow, I hardly gave a
thought to my nocturnal dreams; only later, when I had formed the habit of thinking
about everything, or when the Philistine within me began to assert itself a little, did it
strike me that -- when I dreamed at all -- I was always a journeyman tailor, and that in
that capacity I had already worked in my master's shop for a long time without any pay.
As I sat there beside him, and sewed and pressed, I was perfectly well aware that I no
longer belonged there, and that as a burgess of the town I had other things to attend to;
but I was always on a holiday, or away in the country, and so I sat beside my master and
helped him. I often felt far from comfortable about it, and regretted the waste of time
which I might have employed for better and more useful purposes. If anything was not
quite correct in measure and cut I had to put up with a scolding from my master. Of
wages there was never a question. Often, as I sat with bent back in the dark workshop, I
decided to give notice and make myself scarce. Once I actually did so, but the master
took no notice of me, and next time I was sitting beside him again and sewing.
How happy I was when I woke up after such weary hours! And I then resolved that, if
this intrusive dream should ever occur again, I would energetically throw it off, and
would cry aloud: Ìt is only a delusion, I am lying in bed, and I want to sleep' . . . And the
next night I would be sitting in the tailor's shop again.
So it went on for years, with dismal regularity. Once, when the master and I were
working at Alpelhofer's, at the house of the peasant with whom I began my
apprenticeship, it happened that my master was particularly dissatisfied with my work. Ì
should like to know where in the world your thoughts are?' he cried, and looked at me
sullenly. I thought the most sensible thing to do would be to get up and explain to the
master that I was working with him only as a favour, and then take my leave. But I did
not do this. I even submitted when the master engaged an apprentice, and ordered me to
make room for him on the bench. I moved into the corner, and kept on sewing. On the
same day another journeyman was engaged; a bigoted fellow; he was the Bohemian who
had worked for us nineteen years earlier, and then had fallen into the lake on his way
home from the public-house. When he tried to sit down there was no room for him. I
looked at the master inquiringly, and he said to me: `You have no talent for tailoring; you

may go; you're a stranger henceforth.' My fright on that occasion was so overpowering
that I woke.
The grey of morning glimmered through the clear windows of my familiar home. Objects
d'art surrounded me; in the tasteful bookcase stood the eternal Homer, the gigantic
Dante, the incomparable Shakespeare, the glorious Goethe -- all radiant and immortal.
From the adjoining room resounded the clear little voices of the children, who were
waking up prattling to their mother. I felt as though I had rediscovered that idyllically
sweet, peaceful, poetical and spiritualised life in which I have so often and so deeply
been conscious of contemplative human happiness. And yet I was vexed that I had not
given my master notice first, but had been dismissed by him.
And how remarkable this seems to me: since that night, when my master `made a
stranger' of me, I have enjoyed restful sleep; I no longer dream of my tailoring days,
which now lie in the remote past; which in their unpretentious simplicity were really so
cheerful, but which, none the less, have cast a long shadow over the later years of my life.
In this series of dreams of a poet who, in his younger years, had been a journeyman tailor,
it is hard to recognise the domination of the wish-fulfilment. All the delightful things
occurred in his waking life, while the dream seemed to drag along with it the ghost-like
shadow of an unhappy existence which had long been forgotten. Dreams of my own of a
similar character enable me to give some explanation of such dreams. As a young doctor,
I worked for a long time in the Chemical Institute without being able to accomplish
anything in that exacting science, so that in the waking state I never think about this
unfruitful and actually somewhat humiliating period of my student days. On the other
hand, I have a recurring dream to the effect that I am working in the laboratory, making
analyses, and experiments, and so forth: these dreams, like the examination-dreams, are
disagreeable, and they are never very distinct. During the analysis of one of these dreams
my attention was directed to the word ànalysis' which gave me the key to an
understanding of them. since then I have become an ànalyst'. I make analyses which are
greatly praised -- psychoanalyses, of course. Now I understand: when I feel proud of
these analyses in my waking life, and feel inclined to boast of my achievements, my
dreams hold up to me at night those other, unsuccessful analyses, of which I have no
reason to be proud; they are the punitive dreams of the upstart, like those of the
journeyman tailor who became a celebrated poet. But how is it possible for a dream to
place itself at the service of self-criticism in its conflict with parvenu pride, and to take as
its content a rational warning instead of a prohibited wish-fulfilment? I have already
hinted that the answer to this question presents many difficulties. We may conclude that
the foundation of the dream consisted at first of an arrogant fantasy of ambition; but that
in its stead only its suppression and abasement has reached the dream-content. One must
remember that there are masochistic tendencies in mental life to which such an inversion
might be attributed. I see no objection to regarding such dreams as punishment-dreams,
as distinguished from wish-fulfilling dreams. I should not see in this any limitation of the
theory of dreams hitherto as presented, but merely a verbal concession to the point of
view to which the convergence of contraries seems strange. But a more thorough
investigation of individual dreams of this class allows us to recognise yet another

element. In an indistinct, subordinate portion of one of my laboratory dreams, I was just

at the age which placed me in the most gloomy and most unsuccessful year of my
professional' career; I still had no position, and no idea how I was going to support
myself, when I suddenly found that I had the choice of several women whom I might
marry! I was, therefore, young again and, what is more, she was young again -- the
woman who has shared with me all these difficult years. In this way, one of the wishes
which constantly gnaws at the heart of the ageing man was revealed as the unconscious
dream-instigator. The conflict raging in other psychic strata between vanity and self-
criticism had certainly determined the dream-content, but the more deeply-rooted wish
for youth had alone made it possible as a dream. One often says to oneself even in the
waking state: `To be sure, things are going well with you today, and once you found life
very hard; but, after all, life was sweet in those days, when you were still so young.'4
Another group of dreams, which I have often myself experienced, and which I have
recognised to be hypocritical, have as their content a reconciliation with persons with
whom one has long ceased to have friendly relations. The analysis constantly discovers
an occasion which might well induce me to cast aside the last remnants of consideration
for these former friends, and to treat them as strangers or enemies. But the dream chooses
to depict the contrary relation.
In considering dreams recorded by a novelist or poet, we may often enough assume that
he has excluded from the record those details which he felt to be disturbing and regarded
as unessential. His dreams thus set us a problem which could be readily solved if we had
an exact reproduction of the dream-content.
O. Rank has called my attention to the fact that in Grimm's fairy-tale of the valiant little
tailor, or Seven at one Stroke, there is related a very similar dream of an upstart. The
tailor, who has become a hero, and has married the king's daughter, dreams one night
while lying beside the princess, his wife, about his trade; having become suspicious, on
the following night she places armed guards where they can listen to what is said by the
dreamer, and arrest him. But the little tailor is warned, and is able to correct his dream.
The complicated processes of removal, diminution, and inversion by which the affects of
the dream-thoughts finally become the affects of the dream may be very well surveyed in
suitable syntheses of completely analysed dreams. I shall here discuss a few examples of
affective manifestations in dreams which will, I think, prove this conclusively in some of
the cases cited.
Dream 5. In the dream about the odd task which the elder Brücke sets me -- that of
preparing my own pelvis -- I am aware in the dream itself of not feeling appropriate
horror. Now this is a wish-fulfilment in more senses than one. The preparation signifies
the self-analyses which I perform, as it were, by publishing my book on dreams, which I
actually found so painful that I postponed the printing of the completed manuscript for
more than a year. The wish now arises that I may disregard this feeling of aversion, and
for that reason I feel no horror (Grauen, which also means `to grow grey') in the dream. I
should much like to escape `Grauen' in the other sense too, for I am already growing

quite grey, and the grey in my hair warns me to delay no longer For we know that at the
end of the dream this thought secures representation: Ì shall have to leave my children to
reach the goal of their difficult journey without my help.'
In the two dreams that transfer the expression of satisfaction to the moments immediately
after waking, this satisfaction is in the one case motivated by the expectation that I am
now going to learn what is meant by Ì have already dreamed of this', and refers in reality
to the birth of my first child, and in the other case it is motivated by the conviction that
`that which has been announced by a premonitory sign' is now going to happen, and the
satisfaction is that which I felt on the arrival of my second son. Here the same affects that
dominated in the dream-thoughts have remained in the dream, but the process is probably
not quite so simple as this in any dream. If the two analyses are examined a little more
closely it will be seen that this satisfaction, which does not succumb to the censorship,
receives reinforcement from a source which must fear the censorship and whose affect
would certainly have aroused opposition if it had not screened itself by a similar and
readily admitted affect of satisfaction from the permitted source, and had, so to speak,
sneaked in behind it. I am unfortunately unable to show this in the case of the actual
dream, but an example from another situation will make my meaning intelligible. I will
put the following case: Let there be a person near me whom I hate so strongly that I have
a lively impulse to rejoice should anything happen to him. But the moral side of my
nature does not give way to this impulse; I do not dare to express this sinister wish, and
when something does happen to him which he does not deserve I suppress my
satisfaction, and force myself to thoughts and expressions of regret. Everyone will at
some time have found himself in such a position. But now let it happen that the hated
person, through some transgression of his own, draws upon himself a well-deserved
calamity; I shall now be allowed to give free rein to my satisfaction at his being visited
by a just punishment, and I shall be expressing an opinion which coincides with that of
other impartial persons. But I observe that my satisfaction proves to be more intense than
that of others, for it has received reinforcement from another source -- from my hatred,
which was hitherto prevented by the inner censorship from furnishing the affect, but
which, under the altered circumstances, is no longer prevented from doing so. This case
generally occurs in social life when antipathetic persons or the adherents of an unpopular
minority have been guilty of some offence. Their punishment is then usually
commensurate not with the guilt, but with their guilt plus the ill-will against them that has
hitherto not been put into effect. Those who punish them doubtless commit an injustice,
but they are prevented from becoming aware of it by the satisfaction arising from the
release within themselves of a suppression of long standing. In such cases the quality of
the affect is justified, but not its degree; and the selfcriticism that has been appeased in
respect of the first point is only too ready to neglect to scrutinise the second point. Once
you have opened the doors more people enter than it was your original intention to admit.
A striking feature of the neurotic character, namely, that in it causes capable of evoking
affect produce results which are qualitatively justified but quantitatively excessive, is to
be explained on these lines, in so far as it admits of a psychological explanation at all.
But the excess of affect proceeds from unconscious and hitherto suppressed affective
sources which are able to establish an associative connection with the actual occasion,

and for whose liberation of affect the unprotested and permitted source of affects opens
up the desired path. Our attention is thus called to the fact that the relation of mutual
inhibition must not be regarded as the only relation obtaining between the suppressed and
the suppressing psychic institution. The cases in which the two institution bring about a
pathological result by co-operation and mutual reinforcement deserve just as much
attention. These hints regarding the psychic mechanism will contribute to our
understanding of the expressions of affects in dreams. A gratification which makes its
appearance in a dream, and which, of course, may readily be found in its proper place in
the dream-thoughts, may not always be fully explained by means of this reference. As a
rule, it is necessary to search for a second source in the dream-thoughts, upon which the
pressure of the censorship rests, and which, under this pressure, would have yielded not
gratification but the contrary affect, had it not been enabled by the presence of the first
dream-source to free its gratification-affect from repression, and reinforce the
gratification springing from the other source. Hence affects which appear in dreams
appear to be formed by the confluence of several tributaries, and are over-determined in
respect of the material of the dream-thoughts. Sources of affect which are able to furnish
the same affect combine in the dream-work in order to produce it.5
Some insight into these involved relations is gained from the analysis of the admirable
dream in which `non vixit' constitutes the central point (cf. p. 277). In this dream
expressions of affect of different qualities are concentrated at two points in the manifest
content. Hostile and painful impulses (in the dream itself we have the phrase òvercome
by strange emotions') overlap one another at the point where I destroy my antagonistic
friend with a couple of words. At the end of the dream I am greatly pleased, and am quite
ready to believe in a possibility which I recognise as absurd when I am awake, namely,
that there are revenants who can be swept away by a mere wish.
I have not yet mentioned the occasion of this dream. It is an important one, and leads us
far down into the meaning of the dream. From my friend in Berlin (whom I have
designed as Fl.) I had received the news that he was about to undergo an operation, and
that relatives of his living in Vienna would inform me as to his condition. The first few
messages after the operation were not very reassuring, and caused me great anxiety. I
should have liked to go to him myself, but at that time I was afflicted with a painful
complaint which made every movement a torment. I now learn from the dream-thoughts
that I feared for this dear friend's life. I knew that his only sister, with whom I had never
been acquainted, had died young, after a very brief illness. (In the dream Fl. tells me
about his sister, and says: Ìn three-quarters of an hour she was dead.') I must have
imagined that his own constitution was not much stronger, and that I should soon be
travelling, in spite of my health, in response to far worse news -- and that I should arrive
too late, for which I should eternally reproach myself.6 This reproach, that I should arrive
too late, has become the central point of the dream, but it has been represented in a scene
in which the revered teacher of my student years -- Brücke -- reproaches me for the same
thing with a terrible look from his blue eyes. What brought about this alteration of the
scene will soon become apparent: the dream cannot reproduce the scene itself as I
experienced it. To be sure, it leaves the blue eyes to the other man, but it gives me the
part of the annihilator, an inversion which is obviously the work of the wish-fulfilment.

My concern for the life of my friend, my self-reproach for not having gone to him, my
shame (he had come to me in Vienna unobtrusively), my desire to consider myself
excused on account of my illness -- all this builds up an emotional tempest which is
distinctly felt in my sleep, and which rages in that region of the dream-thoughts.
But there was another thing in the occasion of the dream which had quite the opposite
effect. With the unfavourable news during the first days of the operation I received also
an injunction to speak to no one about the whole affair, which hurt my feelings, for it
betrayed an unnecessary distrust of my discretion. I know, of course, that this request did
not proceed from my friend, but that it was due to clumsiness or excessive timidity on the
part of the messenger; yet the concealed reproach affected me very disagreeably, because
it was not altogether unjustified. As we know, only reproaches which `have something in
them' have the power to hurt. Years ago, when I was younger than I am now, I knew two
men who were friends, and who honoured me with their friendship; and I quite
superfluously told one of them what the other had said of him. This incident, of course,
had nothing to do with the affairs of my friend Fl., but I have never forgotten the
reproaches to which I had to listen on that occasion. One of the two friends between
whom I made trouble was Professor Fleischl; the other one I will call by his baptismal
name, Josef, a name which was borne also by my friend and antagonist P., who appears
in this dream.
In the dream the element unobtrusively points to the reproach that I cannot keep anything
to myself, and so does the question of Fl. as to how much of his affairs I have told P. But
it is the intervention of that old memory which transposes the reproach for arriving too
late from the present to the time when I was working in Brücke's laboratory; and by
replacing the second person in the annihilation scene of the dream by a Josef, I enable
this scene to represent not only the first reproach -- that I have arrived too late -- but also
that other reproach, more strongly affected by the repression, to the effect that I do not
keep secrets. The work of condensation and displacement in this dream, as well as the
motives for it, are now obvious.
My present trivial annoyance at the injunction not to divulge secrets draws reinforcement
from springs that flow far beneath the surface, and so swells to a stream of hostile
impulses towards persons who are in reality dear to me. The source which furnishes the
reinforcement is to be found in my childhood. I have already said that my warm
friendships as well as my enmities with persons of my own age go back to my childish
relations to my nephew, who was a year older than I. In these he had the upper hand, and
I early learned how to defend myself; we lived together, were inseparable, and loved one
another, but at times, as the statements of older persons testify, we used to squabble and
accuse one another. In a certain sense, all my friends are incarnations of this first figure;
they are all revenants. My nephew himself returned when a young man, and then we
were like Caesar and Brutus. An intimate friend and a hated enemy have always been
indispensable to my emotional life; I have always been able to create them anew, and not
infrequently my childish ideal has been so closely approached that friend and enemy have
coincided in the same person; but not simultaneously, of course, nor in constant
alternation, as was the case in my early childhood.

How, when such associations exist, a recent occasion of emotion may cast back to the
infantile occasion and substitute this as a cause of affect, I shall not consider now. Such
an investigation would properly belong to the psychology of unconscious thought, or a
psychological explanation of the neuroses. Let us assume, for the purposes of dream-
interpretation, that a childish recollection presents itself, or is created by the fantasy with,
more or less, the following content: We two children quarrel on account of some object --
just what we shall leave undecided, although the memory, or illusion of memory, has a
very definite object in view -- and each claims that he got there first, and therefore has
the first right to it. We come to blows; Might comes before Right; and, according to the
indications of the dream, I must have known that I was in the wrong (noticing the error
myself); but this time I am the stronger, and take possession of the battlefield; the
defeated combatant hurries to my father, his grandfather, and accuses me, and I defend
myself with the words, which I have heard from my father: Ì hit him because he hit me.'
Thus, this recollection, or more probably fantasy, which forces itself upon my attention in
the course of the analysis -- without further evidence I myself do not know how --
becomes a central item of the dream-thoughts, which collects the affective impulses
prevailing in the dream-thoughts, as the bowl of a fountain collects the water that flows
into it. From this point the dream-thoughts flow along the following channels: Ìt serves
you right that you have had to make way for me; why did you try to push me off? I don't
need you; I'll soon find someone else to play with,' etc. Then the channels are opened
through which these thoughts flow back again into the dream-representation. For such an
òte-toi que je m'y mette' I once had to reproach my deceased friend Josef. He was next to
me in the line of promotion in Brücke's laboratory, but advancement there was very slow.
Neither of the two assistants budged from his place, and youth became impatient. My
friend, who knew that his days were numbered, and was bound by no intimate relation to
his superior, sometimes gave free expression to his impatience. As this superior was a
man seriously ill, the wish to see him removed by promotion was susceptible of an
obnoxious secondary interpretation. Several years earlier, to be sure, I myself had
cherished, even more intensely, the same wish -- to obtain a post which had fallen vacant;
wherever there are gradations of rank and promotion the way is opened for the
suppression of covetous wishes. Shakespeare's Prince Hal cannot rid himself of the
temptation to see how the crown fits, even at the bedside of his sick father. But, as may
readily be understood, the dream inflicts this inconsiderate wish not upon me, but upon
my friend.7
Às he was ambitious, I slew him.' As he could not expect that the other man would make
way for him, the man himself has been put out of the way. I harbour these thoughts
immediately after attending the unveiling of the memorial to the other man at the
University. Part of the satisfaction which I feel in the dream may therefore be interpreted:
A just punishment; it serves you right.
At the funeral of this friend a young man made the following remark, which seemed
rather out of place: `The preacher talked as though the world could no longer exist
without this one human being.' Here was a stirring of revolt in the heart of a sincere man,
whose grief had been disturbed by exaggeration. But with this speech are connected the
dream-thoughts: `No one is really irreplaceable; how many men have I already escorted

to the grave! But I am still alive; I have survived them all; I claim the field.' Such a
thought, at the moment when I fear that if I make a journey to see him I shall find my
friend no longer among the living, permits only of the further development that I am glad
once more to have survived someone; that it is not I who have died but he; that I am
master of the field, as once I was in the imagined scene of my childhood. This
satisfaction, infantile in origin, at the fact that I am master of the field, covers the greater
part of the affect which appears in the dream. I am glad that I am the survivor; I express
this sentiment with the naive egoism of the husband who says to his wife: Ìf one of us
dies, I shall move to Paris.' My expectation takes it as a matter of course that I am not the
one to die.
It cannot be denied that great self-control is needed to interpret one's dreams and to report
them. One has to reveal oneself as the sole villain among all the noble souls with whom
one shares the breath of life. Thus, I find it quite comprehensible that revenants should
exist only as long as one wants them, and that they can be obliterated by a wish. It was
for this reason that my friend Josef was punished. But the revenants are the successive
incarnations of the friend of my childhood; I am also gratified at having replaced this
person for myself over and over again, and a substitute will doubtless soon be found even
for the friend whom I am now on the point of losing. No one is irreplaceable.
But what has the dream-censorship been doing in the meantime? Why does it not raise
the most emphatic objection to a train of thoughts characterised by such brutal
selfishness, and transform the satisfaction inherent therein into extreme discomfort? I
think it is because other unobjectionable trains of thought referring to the same persons
result also in satisfaction, and with their affect cover that proceeding from the forbidden
infantile sources. In another stratum of thought I said to myself, at the ceremony of
unveiling the memorial: Ì have lost so many dear friends, some through death, some
through the dissolution of friendship; is it not good that substitutes have presented
themselves, that I have gained a friend who means more to me than the others could, and
whom I shall now always retain, at an age when it is not easy to form new friendships?'
The gratification of having found this substitute for my lost friend can be taken over into
the dream without interference, but behind it there sneaks in the hostile feeling of
malicious gratification from the infantile source. Childish affection undoubtedly helps to
reinforce the rational affection of today; but childish hatred also has found its way into
the representation.
But besides this, there is in the dream a distinct reference to another train of thoughts
which may result in gratification. Some time before this, after long waiting, a little
daughter was born to my friend. I knew how he had grieved for the sister whom he had
lost at an early age, and I wrote to him that I felt that he would transfer to this child the
love he had felt for her, that this little girl would at last make him forget his irreparable
loss.
Thus this train also connects up with the intermediary thoughts of the latent dream-
content, from which paths radiate in the most contrary directions: `No one is
irreplaceable. See, here are only revenants; all those whom one has lost return.' And now

the bonds of association between the contradictory components of the dream-thoughts are
more tightly drawn by the accidental circumstance that my friend's little daughter bears
the same name as the girl playmate of my own youth, who was just my own age, and the
sister of my oldest friend and antagonist. I heard the name `Pauline' with satisfaction, and
in order to allude to this coincidence I replaced one Josef in the dream by another Josef,
and found it impossible to suppress the identical initials in the name Fleischl and Fl.
From this point a train of thought runs to the naming of my own children. I insisted that
the names should not be chosen according to the fashion of the day, but should be
determined by regard for the memory of those dear to us. The children's names make
them `revenants'. And, finally, is not the procreation of children for all men the only way
of access to immortality?
I shall add only a few observations as to the affects of dreams considered from another
point of view. In the psyche of the sleeper an affective tendency -- what we call a mood --
may be contained as its dominating element, and may induce a corresponding mood in
the dream. This mood may be the result of the experiences and thoughts of the day, or it
may be of somatic origin; in either case it will be accompanied by the corresponding
trains of thought. That this ideational content of the dream-thoughts should at one time
determine the affective tendency primarily, while at another time it is awakened in a
secondary manner by the somatically determined emotional disposition, is indifferent for
the purposes of dream-formation. This is always subject to the restriction that it can
represent only a wish-fulfilment, and that it may lend its psychic energy to the wish
alone. The mood actually present will receive the same treatment as the sensation which
actually emerges during sleep (cf. p. 133), which is either neglected or reinterpreted in
the sense of a wish-fulfilment. Painful moods during sleep become the motive force of
the dream, inasmuch as they awake energetic wishes which the dream has to fulfil. The
material in which they inhere is elaborated until it is serviceable for the expression of the
wish-fulfilment. The more intense and the more dominating the element of the painful
mood in the dream-thoughts, the more surely will the most strongly suppressed wish-
impulses take advantage of the opportunity to secure representation; for thanks to the
actual existence of discomfort, which otherwise they would have to create spontaneously,
they find that the more difficult part of the work necessary to ensure representation has
already been accomplished; and with these observations we touch once more upon the
problem of anxiety-dreams, which will prove to be the boundary-case of dream-activity.
1
If I am not greatly mistaken, the first dream which I was able to elicit from my grandson
(aged 20 months) points to the fact that the dream-work had succeeded in transforming its
material into a wish-fulfilment, while the affect which belonged to it remained unchanged
even in the sleeping state The night before its father was to return to the front the child
cried out, sobbing violently: `Papa, Papa -- Baby.' That may mean: Let Papa and Baby
still be together; while the weeping takes cognisance of the imminent departure. The
child was at the time very well able to express the concept of separation. `Fort' (= away,
replaced by a peculiarly accented, long-drawn out ooooh) had been his first word, and for
many months before this first dream he had played at àway' with all his toys; which went
back to his early self-conquest in allowing his mother to go away.

2
cf. the dream about Count Thun, last scene.
3
Internat. Zeitschr. f. Psychoanalyse, iv, 1916.
4
Ever since psychoanalysis has dissected the personality into an ego and a super-ego
(Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, trans. by James Strachey, Intern.
Psychoanalytic Press, London) it has been easy to recognise in these punishment-dreams
wish-fulfilments of the super-ego.
5
I have since explained the extraordinary effect of pleasure produced by tendency wit on
analogous lines.
6
It is this fancy from the unconscious dream-thoughts which pre-emptorily demands non
vivit instead of non vixit. `You have come too late, he is no longer alive.' The fact that the
manifest situation of the dream aims at the non vivit has been mentioned on p. 277.
7
It will have been obvious that the name Josef plays a great part in my dreams (see the
dream about my uncle). It is particularly easy for me to hide my ego in my dreams behind
persons of this name, since Joseph was the name of the dream-interpreter in the Bible.

I. THE SECONDARY ELABORATION
We will at last turn our attention to the fourth of the factors participating in dream-
formation.
If we continue our investigation of the dream-content on the lines already laid down --
that is, by examining the origin in the dream-thoughts of conspicuous occurrences -- we
come upon elements that can be explained only by making an entirely new assumption. I
have in mind cases where one manifests astonishment, anger, or resistance in a dream,
and that, too, in respect of part of the dream-content itself. Most of these impulses of
criticism in dreams are not directed against the dream-content, but prove to be part of the
dream-material, taken over and fittingly applied, as I have already shown by suitable
examples. There are, however, criticisms of this sort which are not so derived: their
correlatives cannot be found in the dream-material. What, for instance, is meant by the
criticism not infrequent in dreams: Àfter all, it's only a dream'? This is a genuine
criticism of the dream, such as I might make if I were awake. Not infrequently it is only
the prelude to waking; even oftener it is preceded by a painful feeling, which subsides
when the actuality of the dream-state has been affirmed. The thought: Àfter all, it's only
a dream' in the dream itself has the same intention as it has on the stage on the lips of
Offenbach's Belle Hélène; it seeks to minimise what has just been experienced, and to
secure indulgence for what is to follow. It serves to lull to sleep a certain mental agency
which at the given moment has every occasion to rouse itself and forbid the continuation
of the dream, or the scene. But it is more convenient to go on sleeping and to tolerate the
dream, `because, after all, it's only a dream'. I imagine that the disparaging criticism:
Àfter all, it's only a dream,' appears in the dream at the moment when the censorship,
which is never quite asleep, feels that it has been surprised by the already admitted
dream. It is too late to suppress the dream, and the agency therefore meets with this
remark the anxiety or painful emotion which rises into the dream. It is an expression of
the esprit d'escalier on the part of the psychic censorship.
In this example we have incontestable proof that everything which the dream contains
does not come from the dream-thoughts, but that a psychic function, which cannot be
differentiated from our waking thoughts, may make contributions to the dream-content.
The question arises, does this occur only in exceptional cases, or does the psychic agency
which is otherwise active only as the censorship play a constant part in dream-formation?
One must decide unhesitatingly for the latter view. It is indisputable that the censoring
agency, whose influence we have so far recognised only in the restrictions of and
omissions in the dream-content, is likewise responsible for interpolations in and
amplifications of this content. Often these interpolations are readily recognised; they are
introduced with hesitation, prefaced by an às if'; they have no special vitality, of their
own, and are constantly inserted at points where they may serve to connect two portions
of the dream-content or create a continuity between two sections of the dream. They
manifest less ability to adhere in the memory than do the genuine products of the dream-
material; if the dream is forgotten, they are forgotten first, and I strongly suspect that our
frequent complaint that although we have dreamed so much we have forgotten most of

the dream, and have remembered only fragments, is explained by the immediate falling
away of just these cementing thoughts. In a complete analysis these interpolations are
often betrayed by the fact that no material is to be found for them in the dream-thoughts.
But after careful examination I must describe this case as the less usual one; in most cases
the interpolated thoughts can be traced to material in the dream-thoughts which can claim
a place in the dream neither by its own merits nor by way of over-determination. Only in
the most extreme cases does the psychic function in dream-formation which we are now
considering rise to original creation; whenever possible it makes use of anything
appropriate that it can find in the dream-material.
What distinguishes this part of the dream-work, and also betrays it, is its tendency. This
function proceeds in a manner which the poet maliciously attributes to the philosopher:
with its rags and tatters it stops up the breaches in the structure of the dream. The result
of its efforts is that the dream loses the appearance of absurdity and incoherence, and
approaches the pattern of an intelligible experience. But the effort is not always crowned
with complete success. Thus, dreams occur which may, upon superficial examination,
seem faultlessly logical and correct; they start from a possible situation, continue it by
means of consistent changes, and bring it -- although this is rare -- to a not unnatural
conclusion. These dreams have been subjected to the most searching elaboration by a
psychic function similar to our waking thought; they seem to have a meaning, but this
meaning is very far removed from the real meaning of the dream. If we analyse them, we
are convinced that the secondary elaboration has handled the material with the greatest
freedom, and has retained as little as possible of its proper relations. These are the dreams
which have, so to speak, already been once interpreted before we subject them to waking
interpretation. In other dreams this tendentious elaboration has succeeded only up to a
point; up to this point consistency seems to prevail, but then the dream becomes
nonsensical or confused; but perhaps before it concludes it may once more rise to a
semblance of rationality. In yet other dreams the elaboration has failed completely; we
find ourselves helpless, confronted with a senseless mass of fragmentary contents.
I do not wish to deny to this fourth dream-forming power, which will soon become
familiar to us -- it is in reality the only one of the four dream-creating factors which is
familiar to us in other connections -- I do not wish to deny to this fourth factor the faculty
of creatively making new contributions to our dreams. But its influence is certainly
exerted, like that of the other factors, mainly in the preference and selection of psychic
material already formed in the dream-thoughts. Now there is a case where it is to a great
extent spared the work of building, as it were, a facade to the dream by the fact that such
a structure, only waiting to be used, already exists in the material of the dream-thoughts. I
am accustomed to describe the element of the dream-thoughts which I have in mind as
`fantasy'; I shall perhaps avoid misunderstanding if I at once point to the daydream as an
analogy in waking life.1 The part played by this element in our psychic life has not yet
been fully recognised and revealed by psychiatrists; though M. Benedikt has, it seems to
me, made a highly promising beginning. Yet the significance of the daydream has not
escaped the unerring insight of the poets; we are all familiar with the description of the
daydreams of one of his subordinate characters which Alphonse Daudet has given us in
his Nabab. The study of the psychoneuroses discloses the astonishing fact that these

fantasies or daydreams are the immediate predecessors of symptoms of hysteria -- at

least, of a great many of them; for hysterical symptoms are dependent not upon actual
memories, but upon the fantasies built up on a basis of memories. The frequent
occurrence of conscious day-fantasies brings these formations to our ken; but while some
of these fantasies are conscious, there is a superabundance of unconscious fantasies,
which must perforce remain unconscious on account of their content and their origin in
repressed material. A more thorough examination of the character of these day-fantasies
shows with what good reason the same name has been given to these formations as to the
products of nocturnal thought -- dreams. They have essential features in common with
nocturnal dreams; indeed, the investigation of daydreams might really have afforded the
shortest and best approach to the understanding of nocturnal dreams.
Like dreams, they are wish-fulfilments; like dreams, they are largely based upon the
impressions of childish experiences; like dreams, they obtain a certain indulgence from
the censorship in respect of their creations. If we trace their formation, we becomes aware
how the wish-motive which has been operative in their production has taken the material
of which they are built, mixed it together, rearranged it, and fitted it together into a new
whole. They bear very much the same relation to the childish memories to which they
refer as many of the baroque palaces of Rome bear to the ancient ruins, whose hewn
stones and columns have furnished the material for the structures built in the modern
style.
In the `secondary elaboration' of the dream-content which we have ascribed to our fourth
dream-forming factor, we find once more the very same activity which is allowed to
manifest itself, uninhibited by other influences, in the creation of daydreams. We may
say, without further preliminaries, that this fourth factor of ours seeks to construct
something like a daydream from the material which offers itself. But where such a
daydream has already been constructed in the context of the dream-thoughts, this factor
of the dream-work will prefer to take possession of it, and contrive that it gets into the
dream-content. There are dreams that consist merely of the repetition of a day-fantasy,
which has perhaps remained unconscious -- as, for instance, the boy's dream that he is
riding in a war-chariot with the heroes of the Trojan war. In my Àutodidasker' dream the
second part of the dream at least is the faithful repetition of a day-fantasy -- harmless in
itself -- of my dealings with Professor N. The fact that the exciting fantasy forms only a
part of the dream, or that only a part of it finds its way into the dream-content, is due to
the complexity of the conditions which the dream must satisfy at its genesis. On the
whole, the fantasy is treated like any other component of the latent material: but it is
often still recognisable as a whole in the dream. In my dreams there are often parts which
are brought into prominence by their producing a different impression from that produced
by the other parts. They seem to me to be in a state of flux, to be more coherent and at the
same time more transient than other portions of the same dream. I know that these are
unconscious fantasies which find their way into the context of the dream, but I have never
yet succeeded in registering such a fantasy. For the rest, these fantasies, like all the other
component parts of the dream-thoughts, are jumbled together, condensed, superimposed,
and so on; but we find all the transitional stages, from the case in which they may
constitute the dream-contrary or at least the dream-facade, unaltered, to the most contrary

case, in which they are represented in the dream-content by only one of their elements, or
by a remote allusion to such an element. The fate of the fantasies in the dream-thoughts is
obviously determined by the advantages they can offer as against the claims of the
censorship and the pressure of condensation.
In my choice of examples for dream-interpretation I have, as far as possible, avoided

those dreams in which unconscious fantasies play a considerable part, because the
introduction of this psychic element would have necessitated an extensive discussion of
the psychology of unconscious thought. But even in this connection I cannot entirely
avoid the `fantasy', because it often finds its way into the dream complete, and still more
often perceptibly glimmers through it. I might mention yet one more dream, which seems
to be composed of two distinct and opposed fantasies, overlapping here and there, of
which the first is superficial, while the second becomes, as it were, the interpretation of
the first.2
The dream -- it is the only one of which I possess no careful notes -- is roughly to this
effect: The dreamer -- a young unmarried man -- is sitting in his favourite inn, which is
seen correctly; several persons come to fetch him, among them someone who wants to
arrest him. He says to his table companions, Ì will pay later, I am coming back.' But they
cry, smiling scornfully: `We know all about that; that's what everybody says.' One guest
calls after him: `There goes another one.' He is then led to a small place where he finds a
woman with a child in her arms. One of his escorts says: `This is Herr Müller.' A
commissioner or some other official is running through a bundle of tickets or papers,
repeating Müller, Müller, Müller. At last the commissioner asks him a question, which he
answers with a `Yes.' He then takes a look at the woman, and notices that she has grown
a large beard.
The two component parts are here easily separable. What is superficial is the fantasy of
being arrested; this seems to be newly created by the dream-work. But behind it the
fantasy of marriage is visible, and this material, on the other hand, has been slightly
modified by the dream-work, and the features which may be common to the two fantasies
appear with special distinctness, as in Galton's composite photographs. The promise of
the young man, who is at present a bachelor, to return to his place at his accustomed table
-- the scepticism of his drinking companions, made wise by their many experiences --
their calling after him: `There goes (marries) another one' -- are all features easily
susceptible of the other interpretation, as is the affirmative answer given to the official.
Running through a bundle of papers and repeating the same name corresponds to a
subordinate but easily recognised feature of the marriage ceremony -- the reading aloud
of the congratulatory telegrams which have arrived at irregular intervals, and which, of
course, are all addressed to the same name. In the personal appearance of the bride in this
dream the marriage fantasy has even got the better of the arrest fantasy which screens it.
The fact that this bride finally wears a beard I can explain from information received -- I
had no opportunity of making an analysis. The dreamer had, on the previous day, been
crossing the street with a friend who was just as hostile to marriage as himself, and had
called his friend's attention to a beautiful brunette who was coming towards them. The

friend had remarked: `Yes, if only these women wouldn't get beards as they grow older,
like their fathers.'
Of course, even in this dream there is no lack of elements with which the dream-
distortion has done deep work. Thus, the speech, Ì will pay later', may have reference to
the behaviour feared on the part of the father-in-law in the matter of a dowry. Obviously
all sorts of misgivings are preventing the dreamer from surrendering himself with
pleasure to the fantasy of marriage. One of these misgivings -- that with marriage he
might lose his freedom -- has embodied itself in the transformation of a scene of arrest.
If we once more return to the thesis that the dream-work prefers to make use of a ready-
made fantasy, instead of first creating one from the material of the dream-thoughts, we
shall perhaps be able to solve one of the most interesting problems of the dream. I have
related the dream of Maury, who is struck on the back of the neck by a small board, and
wakes after a long dream -- a complete romance of the period of the French Revolution.
Since the dream is produced in a coherent form, and completely fits the explanation of
the waking stimulus, of whose occurrence the sleeper could have had no foreboding, only
one assumption seems possible, namely, that the whole richly elaborated dream must
have been composed and dreamed in the short interval of time between the falling of the
board on Maury's cervical vertebrae and the waking induced by the blow. We should not
venture to ascribe such rapidity to the mental operations of the waking state, so that we
have to admit that the dream-work has the privilege of a remarkable acceleration of its
issue.
To this conclusion, which rapidly became popular, more recent authors (Le Lorrain,
Egger, and others) have opposed emphatic objections; some of them doubt the
correctness of Maury's record of the dream, some seek to show that the rapidity of our
mental operations in waking life is by no means inferior to that which we can, without
reservation, ascribe to the mental operations in dreams. The discussion raises
fundamental questions, which I do not think are at all near solution. But I must confess
that Egger's objections, for example, to Maury's dream of the guillotine, do not impress
me as convincing. I would suggest the following explanation of this dream: Is it so very
improbable that Maury's dream may have represented a fantasy which had been preserved
for years in his memory, in a completed state, and which was awakened -- I should like to
say, alluded to -- at the moment when he became aware of the waking stimulus? The
whole difficulty of composing so long a story, with all its details, in the exceedingly short
space of time which is here at the dreamer's disposal then disappears; the story was
already composed. If the board had struck Maury's neck when he was awake, there would
perhaps have been time for the thought: `Why, that's just like being guillotined.' But as he
is struck by the board while asleep, the dream-work quickly utilises the incoming
stimulus for the construction of a wish-fulfilment, as if it thought (this is to be taken quite
figuratively): `Here is a good opportunity to realise the wish-fantasy which I formed at
such and such a time while I was reading.' It seems to me undeniable that this dream-
romance is just such a one as a young man is wont to construct under the influence of
exciting impressions. Who has not been fascinated -- above all, a Frenchman and a
student of the history of civilisation -- by descriptions of the Reign of Terror, in which

the aristocracy, men and women, the flower of the nation, showed that it was possible to
die with a light heart, and preserved their ready wit and the refinement of their manners
up to the moment of the last fateful summons? How tempting to fancy oneself in the
midst of all this, as one of these young men who take leave of their ladies with a kiss of
the hand, and fearlessly ascend the scaffold! Or perhaps ambition was the ruling motive
of the fantasy -- the ambition to put oneself in the place of one of those powerful
personalities who, by their sheer force of intellect and their fiery eloquence, ruled the city
in which the heart of mankind was then beating so convulsively; who were impelled by
their convictions to send thousands of human beings to their death, and were paving the
way for the transformation of Europe; who, in the meantime, were not sure of their own
heads, and might one day lay them under the knife of the guillotine, perhaps in the role of
a Girondist or the hero Danton? The detail preserved in the memory of the dream,
àccompanied by an enormous crowd', seems to show that Maury's fantasy was an
ambitious one of just this character.
But the fantasy prepared so long ago need not be experienced again in sleep; it is enough
that it should be, so to speak, `touched off'. What I mean is this: If a few notes are struck,
and someone says, as in Don Juan: `That is from Figaro's Wedding by Mozart', memories
suddenly surge up within me, none of which I can recall to consciousness a moment later.
The phrase serves as a point of irruption from which a complete whole is simultaneously
put into a condition of stimulation. It may well be the same in unconscious thinking.
Through the waking stimulus the psychic station is excited which gives access to the
whole guillotine fantasy. This fantasy, however, is not run through in sleep, but only in
the memory of the awakened sleeper. Upon waking, the sleeper remembers in detail the
fantasy which was transferred as a whole into the dream. At the same time, he has no
means of assuring himself that he is really remembering something which was dreamed.
The same explanation -- namely, that one is dealing with finished fantasies which have
been evoked as wholes by the waking stimulus -- may be applied to other dreams which
are adapted to the waking stimulus -- for example, to Napoleon's dream of a battle before
the explosion of a bomb. Among the dreams collected by Justine Tobowolska in her
dissertation on the apparent duration of time in dreams,3 I think the most corroborative is
that related by Macario (1857) as having been dreamed by a playwright, Casimir
Bonjour. Bonjour intended one evening to witness the first performance of one of his
own plays, but he was so tired that he dozed off in his chair behind the scenes just as the
curtain was rising. In his sleep he went through all the five acts of his play, and observed
all the various signs of emotion which were manifested by the audience during each
individual scene. At the close of the performance, to his great satisfaction, he heard his
name called out amidst the most lively manifestations of applause. Suddenly he woke. He
could hardly believe either his eyes or his ears; the performance had not gone beyond the
first lines of the first scene; he could not have been asleep for more than two minutes. As
for the dream, the running through the five acts of the play and the observing the attitude
of the public towards each individual scene need not, we may venture to assert, have been
something new, produced while the dreamer was asleep; it may have been a repetition of
an already completed work of the fantasy. Tobowolska and other authors have
emphasised a common characteristic of dreams that show an accelerated flow of ideas:
namely, that they seem to be especially coherent, and not at all like other dreams, and that

the dreamer's memory of them is summary rather than detailed. But these are precisely
the characteristics which would necessarily be exhibited by ready-made fantasies touched
off by the dream-work -- a conclusion which is not, of course, drawn by these authors. I
do not mean to assert that all dreams due to a waking stimulus admit of this explanation,
or that the problem of the accelerated flux of ideas in dreams is entirely disposed of in
this manner.
And here we are forced to consider the relation of this secondary elaboration of the
dream-content to the other factors of the dream-work. May not the procedure perhaps be
as follows? The dream-forming factors, the efforts at condensation, the necessity of
evading the censorship, and the regard for representability by the psychic means of the
dream first of all create from the dream-material a provisional dream-content, which is
subsequently modified until it satisfies as far as possible the exactions of a secondary
agency. -- No, this is hardly probable. We must rather assume that the requirements of
this agency constitute from the very first one of the conditions which the dream must
satisfy, and that this condition, as well as the conditions of condensation, the opposing
censorship, and representability, simultaneously influence, in an inductive and selective
manner, the whole mass of material in the dream-thoughts. But of the four conditions
necessary for dream-formation, the last recognised is that whose exactions appear to be
least binding upon the dream. The following consideration makes it seem very probable
that this psychic function, which undertakes the so-called secondary elaboration of the
dream-content, is identical with the work of our waking thought: Our waking
(preconscious) thought behaves towards any given perceptual material precisely as the
function in question behaves towards the dream-content. It is natural to our waking
thought to create order in such material, to construct relations, and to subject it to the
requirements of an intelligible coherence. Indeed, we go rather too far in this respect; the
tricks of conjurers befool us by taking advantage of this intellectual habit of ours. In the
effort to combine in an intelligible manner the sensory impressions which present
themselves we often commit the most curious mistakes, and even distort the truth of the
material before us. The proofs of this fact are so familiar that we need not give them
further consideration here. We overlook errors which make nonsense of a printed page
because we imagine the proper words. The editor of a widely read French journal is said
to have made a bet that he could print the words `from in front' or `from behind' in every
sentence of a long article without any of his readers noticing it. He won his bet. Years
ago I came across a comical example of false association in a newspaper. After the
session of the French Chamber in which Dupuy quelled the panic, caused by the
explosion of a bomb thrown by an anarchist, with the courageous words, `La séance
continue', the visitors in the gallery were asked to testify as to their impressions of the
outrage. Among them were two provincials. One of these said that immediately after the
end of a speech he had heard a detonation, but that he had thought that it was the
parliamentary custom to fire a shot whenever a speaker had finished. The other, who had
apparently already listened to several speakers, had got hold of the same idea, but with
this variation, that he supposed the shooting to be a sign of appreciation following a
specially successful speech.

Thus, the psychic agency which approaches the dream-content with the demand that it
must be intelligible, which subjects it to a first interpretation, and in doing so leads to the
complete misunderstanding of it, is none other than our normal thought. In our
interpretation the rule will be, in every case, to disregard the apparent coherence of the
dream as being of suspicious origin and, whether the elements are confused or clear, to
follow the same regressive path to the dream-material.
At the same time, we note those factors upon which the above-mentioned (p. 211) scale
of quality in dreams -- from confusion to clearness -- is essentially dependent. Those
parts of the dream seem to us clear in which the secondary elaboration has been able to
accomplish something; those seem confused where the powers of this performance have
failed. Since the confused parts of the dream are often likewise those which are less
vividly presented, we may conclude that the secondary dream-work is responsible also
for a contribution to the plastic intensity of the individual dream-structures.
If I seek an object of comparison for the definitive formation of the dream, as it manifests
itself with the assistance of normal thinking, I can think of none better than those
mysterious inscriptions with which Die Fliegende Blätter has so long amused its readers.
In a certain sentence which, for the sake of contrast, is in dialect, and whose significance
is as scurrilous as possible, the reader is led to expect a Latin inscription. For this purpose
the letters of the words are taken out of their syllabic groupings, and are rearranged. Here
and there a genuine Latin word results; at other points, on the assumption that letters have
been obliterated by weathering, or omitted, we allow ourselves to be deluded about the
significance of certain isolated and meaningless letters. If we do not wish to be fooled we
must give up looking for an inscription, must take the letters as they stand, and combine
them, disregarding their arrangement, into words of our mother tongue.
The secondary elaboration is that factor of the dream-work which has been observed by
most of the writers on dreams, and whose importance has been duly appreciated.
Havelock Ellis gives an amusing allegorical description of its performances: Às a matter
of fact, we might even imagine the sleeping consciousness as saying to itself: ``Here
comes our master, Waking Consciousness, who attaches such mighty importance to
reason and logic and so forth. Quick! gather things up, put them in order -- any order will
do -- before he enters to take possession.'' '4
The identity of this mode of operation with that of waking thought is very clearly stated
by Delacroix in his Sur la structure logique du rêve (p. 526): `Cette fonction
d'interpretation n'est pas particuliëre au rêve; c'est le même travail de coordination
logique que nous faisons sur nos sensations pendant la veille.'
J. Sully is of the same opinion; and so is Tobowolska: `Sur ces successions incohèrentes
d'hallucinations, l'esprit s'efforce de faire le même travail de coordination logique qu'il
fait pendant la veille sur les sensations. Il relie entre elles par un lien imaginaire toutes
ces images dècousues et bouche les ècarts trop grands qui se trouvaient entre elles' (p.
93).

Some authors maintain that this ordering and interpreting activity begins even in the
dream and is continued in the waking state. Thus Paulhan (p. 547): `Cependant j'ai
souvent pensè qu'il pouvait y avoir une certain dèformation, ou plutôt reformation du
rêve dans le souvenir . . . La tendence systématisante de l'imagination pourrait fort bien
achever après le réveil ce qu'elle a ébauché pendant le sommeil. De la sorte, la rapidité
réelle de la pensée serait augmentée en apparence par les perfectionnements dûs à
l'imagination éveillée.'
Leroy and Tobowolska (p. 592): `Dans le rêve, au contraire, I'interprétation et la

coordination se font non seulement à l'aide des données du rêve, mais encore à l'aide de
celles de la veille . . .'
It was therefore inevitable that this one recognised factor of dream-formation should be
over-estimated, so that the whole process of creating the dream was attributed to it. This
creative work was supposed to be accomplished at the moment of waking, as was
assumed by Goblot, and with deeper conviction by Foucault, who attributed to waking
thought the faculty of creating the dream out of the thoughts which emerged in sleep.
In respect to this conception Leroy and Tobowolska express themselves as follows: Òn a
cru pouvoir placer le rêve au moment du reveil et ils ont attribué à la pensée de la veille
la fonction de construire le rêve avec les images présentes dans la pensée du sommeil.'
To this estimate of the secondary elaboration I will add the one fresh contribution to the
dream-work which has been indicated by the sensitive observations of H. Silberer.
Silberer has caught the transformation of thoughts into images in flagranti, by forcing
himself to accomplish intellectual work while in a state of fatigue and somnolence. The
elaborated thought vanished, and in its place there appeared a vision which proved to be a
substitute for -- usually abstract -- thoughts. In these experiments it so happened that the
emerging image, which may be regarded as a dream-element, represented something
other than the thoughts which were waiting for elaboration: namely, the exhaustion itself,
the difficulty or distress involved in this work; that is, the subjective state and the manner
of functioning of the person exerting himself rather than the object of his exertions.
Silberer called this case, which in him occurred quite often, the `functional phenomenon',
in contradistinction to the `material phenomenon' which he expected.
For example: one afternoon I am lying, extremely sleepy, on my sofa, but

I nevertheless force myself to consider a philosophical problem. I
endeavour to compare the views of Kant and Schopenhauer concerning
time. Owing to my somnolence I do not succeed in holding on to both
trains of thought, which would have been necessary for the purposes of
comparison. After several vain efforts, I once more exert all my will-
power to formulate for myself the Kantian deduction in order to apply it to
Schopenhauer's statement of the problem. Thereupon, I directed my
attention to the latter, but when I tried to return to Kant, I found that he
had again escaped me, and I tried in vain to fetch him back. And now this
fruitless endeavour to rediscover the Kantian documents mislaid

somewhere in my head suddenly presented itself, my eyes being closed, as

in a dream-image, in the form of a visible, plastic symbol: I demand
information of a grumpy secretary, who, bent over a desk, does not allow
my urgency to disturb him; half straightening himself, he gives me a look
of angry refusal.5
Other examples, which relate to the fluctuation between sleep and waking:
Example 2 -- Conditions: Morning, while awaking. While to a certain

extent asleep (crepuscular state), thinking over a previous dream, in a way
repeating and finishing it, I feel myself drawing nearer to the waking state,
yet I wish to remain in the crepuscular state.
Scene: I am stepping with one foot over a stream, but I at once pull it back
again and resolve to remain on this side.6
Example 6 -- Conditions the same as in Example 4 (he wishes to remain in

bed a little longer without oversleeping). I wish to indulge in a little longer
sleep.
Scene: I am saying goodbye to somebody, and I agree to meet him (or her)
again before long.
I will now proceed to summarise this long disquisition on the dream-work. We were
confronted by the question whether in dream-formation the psyche exerts all its faculties
to their full extent, without inhibition, or only a fraction of them, which are restricted in
their action. Our investigations lead us to reject such a statement of the problem as
wholly inadequate in the circumstances. But if, in our answer, we are to remain on the
ground upon which the question forces us, we must assent to two conceptions which are
apparently opposed and mutually exclusive. The psychic activity in dream-formation
resolves itself into two achievements: the production of the dream-thoughts and the
transformation of these into the dream-content. The dream-thoughts are perfectly
accurate, and are formed with all the psychic profusion of which we are capable; they
belong to the thoughts which have not become conscious, from which our conscious
thoughts also result by means of a certain transposition. There is doubtless much in them
that is worth knowing, and also mysterious, but these problems have no particular
relation to our dreams, and cannot claim to be treated under the head of dream-problems.7
On the other hand we have the process which changes the unconscious thoughts into the
dream-content, which is peculiar to the dream-life and characteristic of it. Now, this
peculiar dream-work is much farther removed from the pattern of waking thought than
has been supposed by even the most decided depreciators of the psychic activity in
dream-formation. It is not so much that it is more negligent, more incorrect, more
forgetful, more incomplete than waking thought; it is something altogether different,
qualitatively, from waking thought, and cannot therefore be compared with it. It does not
think, calculate, or judge at all, but limits itself to the work of transformation. It may be
exhaustively described if we do not lose sight of the conditions which its product must

satisfy. This product, the dream, has above all to be withdrawn from the censorship, and
to this end the dream-work makes use of the displacement of psychic intensities, even to
the transvaluation of all psychic values; thoughts must be exclusively or predominantly
reproduced in the material of visual and acoustic memory-traces, and from this
requirement there proceeds the regard of the dream-work for representability, which it
satisfies by fresh displacements. Greater intensities have (probably) to be produced than
are at the disposal of the night dream-thoughts, and this purpose is served by the
extensive condensation to which the constituents of the dream-thoughts are subjected.
Little attention is paid to the logical relations of the thought-material; they ultimately find
a veiled representation in the formal peculiarities of the dream. The affects of the dream-
thoughts undergo slighter alterations than their conceptual content. As a rule, they are
suppressed; where they are preserved, they are freed from the concepts and combined in
accordance with their similarity. Only one part of the dream-work -- the revision, variable
in amount, which is effected by the partially awakened conscious thought -- is at all
consistent with the conception which the writers on the subject have endeavoured to
extend to the whole performance of dream-formation.
1
Rêve, petit roman = daydream, story.
2
I have analysed an excellent example of a dream of this kind, having its origin in the
stratification of several fantasies, in the Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria
(Collected Papers, vol. iii). I undervalued the significance of such fantasies for dream-
formation as long as I was working principally on my own dreams, which were rarely
based upon daydreams but most frequently upon discussions and mental conflicts. With
other persons it is often much easier to prove the complete analogy between the nocturnal
dream and the daydream. In hysterical patients an attack may often be replaced by a
dream; it is then obvious that the daydream fantasy is the first step for both these psychic
formations.
3
Etude sur les illusions de temps dans les rêves du sommeil normal, 1900, p. 53.
4
The World of Dreamstituting for the manifes
5
dr am its meaning as
6
fou d by interpretat
7
on, many of them are guilty of another mistake, to which they adhere just as stubb rnly.
They look for the essence of the dream in this latent content, and thereby overlook the
distinction between latent dream-thoughts and the dream-work. The dream is
fundamentally nothing more than a special form of our thinking, which is made possible
by the conditions of the sleeping state. It is the dream-work which prostituting for the
manifest dream its meaning as found by interpretation, many of them are guilty of
another mistake, to which they adhere just as stubbornly. They look for the essence of the
dream in this latent content, and thereby overlook the distinction between latent dream-
thoughts and the dream-work. The dream is fundamentally nothing more than a special

form of our thinking, which is made possible by the conditions of the sleeping state. It is
the dream-work which produces this form, and it alone is the essence of dreaming -- the
only explanation of its singularity. I say this in order to correct the reader's judgment of
the notorious `prospective tendency' of dreams. That the dream should concern itself with
efforts to perform the tasks with which our psychic life is confronted is no more
remarkable than that our conscious waking life should so concern itself, and I will only
add that this work may be done also in the preconscious, a fact already familiar to us.

CHAPTER SEVEN
The Psychology of the Dream-Processes
Among the dreams which have been communicated to me by others there is one which is
at this point especially worthy of our attention. It was told me by a female patient who
had heard it related in a lecture on dreams. Its original source is unknown to me. This
dream evidently made a deep impression upon the lady, since she went so far as to
imitate it, i.e. to repeat the elements of this dream in a dream of her own; in order, by this
transference, to express her agreement with a certain point in the dream.
The preliminary conditions of this typical dream were as follows: A father had been
watching day and night beside the sick-bed of his child. After the child died, he retired to
rest in an adjoining room, but left the door ajar so that he could look from his room into
the next, where the child's body lay surrounded by tall candles. An old man, who had
been installed as a watcher, sat beside the body, murmuring prayers. After sleeping for a
few hours the father dreamed that the child was standing by his bed, clasping his arm and
crying reproachfully: `Father, don't you see that I am burning?' The father woke up and
noticed a bright light coming from the adjoining room. Rushing in, he found that the old
man had fallen asleep, and the sheets and one arm of the beloved body were burnt by a
fallen candle.
The meaning of this affecting dream is simple enough, and the explanation given by the
lecturer, as my patient reported it, was correct. The bright light shining through the open
door on to the sleeper's eyes gave him the impression which he would have received had
he been awake: namely, that a fire had been started near the corpse by a falling candle. It
is quite possible that he had taken into his sleep his anxiety lest the aged watcher should
not be equal to his task.
We can find nothing to change in this interpretation; we can only add that the content of
the dream must be over-determined, and that the speech of the child must have consisted
of phrases which it had uttered while still alive, and which were associated with
important events for the father. Perhaps the complaint, Ì am burning', was associated
with the fever from which the child died, and `Father, don't you see?' to some other
affective occurrence unknown to us.
Now, when we have come to recognise that the dream has meaning, and can be fitted into
the context of psychic events, it may be surprising that a dream should have occurred in
circumstances which called for such an immediate waking. We shall then note that even
this dream is not lacking in a wish-fulfilment. The dead child behaves as though alive; he
warns his father himself; he comes to his father's bed and clasps his arm, as he probably
did in the recollection from which the dream obtained the first part of the child's speech.
It was for the sake of this wish-fulfilment that the father slept a moment longer. The
dream was given precedence over waking reflection because it was able to show the child

still living. If the father had waked first, and had then drawn the conclusion which led
him into the adjoining room, he would have shortened the child's life by this one moment.
There can be no doubt about the peculiar features in this brief dream which engage our
particular interest. So far, we have endeavoured mainly to ascertain wherein the secret
meaning of the dream consists, how it is to be discovered, and what means the dream-
work uses to conceal it. In other words, our greatest interest has hitherto been centred on
the problems of interpretation. Now, however, we encounter a dream which is easily
explained, and the meaning of which is without disguise; we note that nevertheless this
dream preserves the essential characteristics which conspicuously differentiate a dream
from our waking thoughts, and this difference demands an explanation. It is only when
we have disposed of all the problems of interpretation that we feel how incomplete is our
psychology of dreams.
But before we turn our attention to this new path of investigation, let us stop and look
back, and consider whether we have not overlooked something important on our way
hither. For we must understand that the easy and comfortable part of our journey lies
behind us. Hitherto, all the paths that we have followed have led, if I mistake not, to light,
to explanation, and to full understanding; but from the moment when we seek to
penetrate more deeply into the psychic processes in dreaming, all paths lead into
darkness. It is quite impossible to explain the dream as a psychic process, for to explain
means to trace back to the known, and as yet we have no psychological knowledge to
which we can refer such explanatory fundamentals as may be inferred from the
psychological investigation of dreams. On the contrary, we shall be compelled to advance
a number of new assumptions, which do little more than conjecture the structure of the
psychic apparatus and the play of the energies active in it; and we shall have to be careful
not to go too far beyond the simplest logical construction, since otherwise its value will
be doubtful. And even if we should be unerring in our inferences, and take cognisance of
all the logical possibilities, we should still be in danger of arriving at a completely
mistaken result, owing to the probable incompleteness of the preliminary statement of our
elementary data. We shall not be able to arrive at any conclusions as to the structure and
function of the psychic instrument from even the most careful investigation of dreams, or
of any other isolated activity; or, at all events, we shall not be able to confirm our
conclusions. To do this we shall have to collate such phenomena as the comparative
study of a whole series of psychic activities proves to be reliably constant. So that the
psychological assumptions which we base on the analysis of the dream-processes will
have to mark time, as it were, until they can join up with the results of other
investigations which, proceeding from another starting-point, will seek to penetrate to the
heart of the same problem.

A. THE FORGETTING OF DREAMS
I propose, then, that we shall first of all turn our attention to a subject which brings us to
a hitherto disregarded objection, which threatens to undermine the very foundation of our
efforts at dream-interpretation. The objection has been made from more than one quarter
that the dream which we wish to interpret is really unknown to us, or, to be more precise,
that we have no guarantee that we know it as it really occurred.
What we recollect of the dream, and what we subject to our methods of interpretation, is,
in the first place, mutilated by the unfaithfulness of our memory, which seems quite
peculiarly incapable of retaining dreams, and which may have omitted precisely the most
significant parts of their content. For when we try to consider our dreams attentively, we
often have reason to complain that we have dreamed much more than we remember; that
unfortunately we know nothing more than this one fragment, and that our recollection of
even this fragment seems to us strangely uncertain. Moreover, everything goes to prove
that our memory reproduces the dream not only incompletely but also untruthfully, in a
falsifying manner. As, on the one hand, we may doubt whether what we dreamed was
really as disconnected as it is in our recollections, so on the other hand we may doubt
whether a dream was really as coherent as our account of it; whether in our attempted
reproduction we have not filled in the gaps which really existed, or those which are due
to forgetfulness, with new and arbitrarily chosen material; whether we have not
embellished the dream, rounded it off and corrected it, so that any conclusion as to its real
content becomes impossible. Indeed, one writer (Spitta)1 surmises that all that is orderly
and coherent is really first put into the dream during the attempt to recall it. Thus we are
in danger of being deprived of the very object whose value we have undertaken to
determine.
In all our dream-interpretations we have hitherto ignored these warnings. On the contrary,
indeed, we have found that the smallest, most insignificant, and most uncertain
components of the dream-content invited interpretations no less emphatically than those
which were distinctly and certainly contained in the dream. In the dream of Irma's
injection we read: Ì quickly called in Dr M.,' and we assumed that even this small
addendum would not have got into the dream if it had not been susceptible of a special
derivation. In this way we arrived at the history of that unfortunate patient to whose
bedside I `quickly' called my older colleague. In the seemingly absurd dream which
treated the difference between fifty-one and fifty-six as a quantité négligeable the number
fifty-one was mentioned repeatedly. Instead of regarding this as a matter of course, or a
detail of indifferent value, we proceeded from this to a second train of thought in the
latent dream-content, which led to the number fifty-one, and by following up this clue we
arrived at the fears which proposed fifty-one years as the term of life in the sharpest
opposition to a dominant train of thought which was boastfully lavish of the years. In the
dream `Non vixit' I found, as an insignificant interpolation, that I had at first overlooked
the sentence: Às P. does not understand him, Fl. asks me,' etc. The interpretation then
coming to a standstill, I went back to these words, and I found through them the way to
the infantile fantasy which appeared in the dream-thoughts as an intermediate point of
junction. This came about by means of the poet's verses:

Selten habit ihr mich verstanden,

Selten auch verstand ich Euch,
Nur wenn wir im Kot uns fanden
So verstanden wir uns gleich!
(Seldom have you understood me,

Seldom have I understood you,
But when we found ourselves in the mire,
We at once understood each other!)
Every analysis will afford evidence of the fact that the most insignificant features of the
dream are indispensable to interpretation, and will show how the completion of the task is
delayed if we postpone our examination of them. We have given equal attention, in the
interpretation of dreams, to every nuance of verbal expression found in them; indeed,
whenever we were confronted by a senseless or insufficient wording, as though we had
failed to translate the dream into the proper version, we have respected even these defects
of expression. In brief, what other writers have regarded as arbitrary improvisations,
concocted hastily to avoid confusion, we have treated like a sacred text. This
contradiction calls for explanation.
It would appear, without doing any injustice to the writers in question, that the
explanation is in our favour. From the standpoint of our newly-acquired insight into the
origin of dreams, all contradictions are completely reconciled. It is true that we distort the
dream in our attempt to reproduce it; we once more find therein what we have called the
secondary and often misunderstanding elaboration of the dream by the agency of normal
thinking. But this distortion is itself no more than a part of the elaboration to which the
dream-thoughts are constantly subjected as a result of the dream-censorship. Other
writers have here suspected or observed that part of the dream-distortion whose work is
manifest; but for us this is of little consequence, as we know that a far more extensive
work of distortion, not so easily apprehended, has already taken the dream for its object
from among the hidden dream-thoughts. The only mistake of these writers consists in
believing the modification effected in the dream by its recollection and verbal expression
to be arbitrary, incapable of further solution, and consequently liable to lead us astray in
our cognition of the dream. They underestimate the determination of the dream in the
psyche. Here there is nothing arbitrary. It can be shown that in all cases a second train of
thought immediately takes over the determination of the elements which have been left
undetermined by the first. For example, I wish quite arbitrarily to think of a number; but
this is not possible; the number that occurs to me is definitely and necessarily determined
by thoughts within me which may be quite foreign to my momentary purpose.2 The
modifications which the dream undergoes in its revision by the waking mind are just as
little arbitrary. They preserve an associative connection with the content, whose place
they take, and serve to show us the way to this content, which may itself be a substitute
for yet another content.
In analysing the dreams of patients I impose the following test of this assertion, and never
without success. If the first report of a dream seems not very comprehensible, I request

the dreamer to repeat it. This he rarely does in the same words. But the passages in which
the expression is modified are thereby made known to me as the weak points of the
dream's disguise; they are what the embroidered emblem on Siegfried's raiment was to
Hagen. These are the points from which the analysis may start. The narrator has been
admonished by my announcement that I intend to take special pains to solve the dream,
and immediately, obedient to the urge of resistance, he protects the weak points of the
dream's disguise, replacing a treacherous expression by a less relevant one. He thus calls
my attention to the expressions which he has discarded. From the efforts made to guard
against the solution of the dream, I can also draw conclusions about the care with which
the raiment of the dream has been woven.
The writers whom I have mentioned are, however, less justified when they attribute so
much importance to the doubt with which our judgment approaches the relation of the
dream. For this doubt is not intellectually warranted; our memory can give no guarantees,
but nevertheless we are compelled to credit its statements far more frequently than is
objectively justifiable. Doubt concerning the accurate reproduction of the dream, or of
individual data of the dream, is only another offshoot of the dream-censorship, that is, of
resistance to the emergence of the dream-thoughts into consciousness. This resistance has
not yet exhausted itself by the displacements and substitutions which it has effected, so
that it still clings, in the form of doubt, to what has been allowed to emerge. We can
recognise this doubt all the more readily in that it is careful never to attack the intensive
elements of the dream, but only the weak and indistinct ones. But we already know that a
transvaluation of all the psychic values has taken place between the dream-thoughts and
the dream. The distortion has been made possible only by devaluation; it constantly
manifests itself in this way and sometimes contents itself therewith. If doubt is added to
the indistinctness of an element of the dream-content, we may, following this indication,
recognise in this element a direct offshoot of one of the outlawed dream-thoughts. The
state of affairs is like that obtaining after a great revolution in one of the republics of
antiquity or the Renaissance. The once powerful, ruling families of the nobility are now
banished; all high posts are filled by upstarts; in the city itself only the poorer and most
powerless citizens, or the remoter followers of the vanquished party, are tolerated. Even
the latter do not enjoy the full rights of citizenship. They are watched with suspicion. In
our case, instead of suspicion we have doubt. I must insist, therefore, that in the analysis
of a dream one must emancipate oneself from the whole scale of standards of reliability;
and if there is the slightest possibility that this or that may have occurred in the dream, it
should be treated as an absolute certainty. Until one has decided to reject all respect for
appearances in tracing the dream-elements, the analysis will remain at a standstill.
Disregard of the element concerned has the psychic effect, in the person analysed, that
nothing in connection with the unwished ideas behind this element will occur to him.
This effect is really not self-evident; it would be quite reasonable to say, `Whether this or
that was contained in the dream I do not know for certain; but the following ideas happen
to occur to me.' But no one ever does say so; it is precisely the disturbing effect of doubt
in the analysis that permits it to be unmasked as an offshoot and instrument of the psychic
resistance. Psychoanalysis is justifiably suspicious. One of its rules runs: Whatever
disturbs the progress of the work is a resistance.3

The forgetting of dreams, too, remains inexplicable until we seek to explain it by the
power of the psychic censorship. The feeling that one has dreamed a great deal during the
night and has retained only a little of it may have yet another meaning in a number of
cases: it may perhaps mean that the dream-work has continued in a perceptible manner
throughout the night, but has left behind it only one brief dream. There is, however, no
possible doubt that a dream is progressively forgotten on waking. One often forgets it in
spite of a painful effort to recover it. I believe, however, that just as one generally
overestimates the extent of this forgetting, so also one overestimates the lacunae in our
knowledge of the dream due to the gaps occurring in it. All the dream-content that has
been lost by forgetting can often be recovered by analysis; in a number of cases, at all
events, it is possible to discover from a single remaining fragment, not the dream, of
course -- which, after all, is of no importance -- but the whole of the dream-thoughts. It
requires a greater expenditure of attention and self-suppression in the analysis; that is all;
but it shows that the forgetting of the dream is not innocent of hostile intention.4
A convincing proof of the tendentious nature of dream-forgetting -- of the fact that it

serves the resistance -- is obtained on analysis by investigating a preliminary stage of
forgetting.5 It often happens that in the midst of an interpretation an omitted fragment of
the dream suddenly emerges which is described as having been previously forgotten. This
part of the dream that has been wrested from forgetfulness is always the most important
part. It lies on the shortest path to the solution of the dream, and for that very reason it
was most exposed to the resistance. Among the examples of the dreams that I have
included in the text of this treatise, it once happened that I had subsequently to interpolate
a fragment of dream-content. The dream is a dream of travel, which revenges itself on
two unamiable travelling companions; I have left it almost entirely uninterpreted, as part
of its content is crudely obscene. The part omitted reads: Ì said, referring to a book of
Schiller's: `Ìt is from . . .'' but corrected myself, as I realised my mistake: `Ìt is by . . .''
Whereupon the man remarked to his sister, ``Yes, he said it correctly.'' '6
Self-correction in dreams, which to some writers seems so wonderful, does not really call
for consideration. But I will draw from my own memory an instance typical of verbal
errors in dreams. I was nineteen years of age when I visited England for the first time,
and I spent a day on the shore of the Irish Sea. Naturally enough, I amused myself by
picking up the marine animals left on the beach by the tide, and I was just examining a
starfish (the dream begins with Hollthurn--Holothurian) when a pretty little girl came up
to me and asked me: Ìs it starfish? Is it alive?' I replied, `Yes, he is alive,' but then felt
ashamed of my mistake, and repeated the sentence correctly. For the grammatical mistake
which I then made, the dream substitutes another which is quite common among German
people. `Das Buch ist von Schiller' is not to be translated by `the book is from,' but by `the
book is by'. That the dream-work accomplishes this substitution, because the word from,
owing to its consonance with the German adjective fromm (pious, devout) makes a
remarkable condensation possible, should no longer surprise us after all that we have
heard of the intentions of the dream-work and its unscrupulous selection of means. But
what relation has this harmless recollection of the seashore to my dream? It explains, by
means of a very innocent example, that I have used the word -- the word denoting gender,
or sex or the sexual (he) -- in the wrong place. This is surely one of the keys to the

solution of the dream. Those who have heard of the derivation of the book-title Matter
and Motion (Molière in Le Malade Imaginaire: La Matière est-elle laudable? -- A
Motion of the bowels) will readily be able to supply the missing parts.
Moreover, I can prove conclusively, by a demonstratio ad oculos, that the forgetting of

the dream is in a large measure the work of the resistance. A patient tells me that he has
dreamed, but that the dream has vanished without leaving a trace, as if nothing had
happened. We set to work, however; I come upon a resistance which I explain to the
patient; encouraging and urging him, I help him to become reconciled to some
disagreeable thought; and I have hardly succeeded in doing so when he exclaims: `Now I
can recall what I dreamed!' The same resistance which that day disturbed him in the work
of interpretation caused him also to forget the dream. By overcoming this resistance I
have brought back the dream to his memory.
In the same way the patient, having reached a certain part of the work, may recall a
dream which occurred three, four, or more days ago, and which has hitherto remained in
oblivion.7
Psychoanalytical experience has furnished us with yet another proof of the fact that the
forgetting of dreams depends far more on the resistance than on the mutually alien
character of the waking and sleeping states, as some writers have believed it to depend. It
often happens to me, as well as to other analysts, and to patients under treatment, that we
are waked from sleep by a dream, as we say, and that immediately thereafter, while in
full possession of our mental faculties, we begin to interpret the dream. Often in such
cases I have not rested until I have achieved a full understanding of the dream, and yet it
has happened that after waking I have forgotten the interpretation work as completely as I
have forgotten the dream-content itself, though I have been aware that I have dreamed
and that I had interpreted the dream. The dream has far more frequently taken the result
of the interpretation with it into forgetfulness than the intellectual faculty has succeeded
in retaining the dream in the memory. But between this work of interpretation and the
waking thoughts there is not that psychic abyss by which other writers have sought to
explain the forgetting of dreams. -- When Morton Prince objects to my explanation of the
forgetting of dreams on the ground that it is only a special case of the amnesia of
dissociated psychic states, and that the impossibility of applying my explanation of this
special amnesia to other types of amnesia makes it valueless even for its immediate
purpose, he reminds the reader that in all his descriptions of such dissociated states he has
never attempted to discover the dynamic explanation underlying these phenomena. For
had he done so, he would surely have discovered that repression (and the resistance
produced thereby) is the cause not of these dissociations merely, but also of the amnesia
of their psychic content.
That dreams are as little forgotten as other psychic acts, that even in their power of
impressing themselves on the memory they may fairly be compared with the other
psychic performances, was proved to me by an experiment which I was able to make
while preparing the manuscript of this book. I had preserved in my notes a great many
dreams of my own which, for one reason or another, I could not interpret, or, at the time

of dreaming them, could interpret only very imperfectly. In order to obtain material to
illustrate my assertion, I attempted to interpret some of them a year or two later. In this
attempt I was invariably successful; indeed, I may say that the interpretation was effected
more easily after all this time than when the dreams were of recent occurrence. As a
possible explanation of this fact, I would suggest that I had overcome many of the
internal resistances which had disturbed me at the time of dreaming. In such subsequent
interpretations I have compared the old yield of dream-thoughts with the present result,
which has usually been more abundant, and I have invariably found the old dream-
thoughts unaltered among the present ones. However, I soon recovered from my surprise
when I reflected that I had long been accustomed to interpret dreams of former years that
had occasionally been related to me by my patients as though they had been dreams of
the night before; by the same method, and with the same success. In the section on
anxiety-dreams I shall include two examples of such delayed dream-interpretations.
When I made this experiment for the first time I expected, not unreasonably, that dreams
would behave in this connection merely like neurotic symptoms. For when I treat a
psychoneurotic, for instance, an hysterical patient, by psychoanalysis, I am compelled to
find explanations for the first symptoms of the malady, which have long since
disappeared, as well as for those still existing symptoms which have brought the patient
to me; and I find the former problem easier to solve than the more exigent one of today.
In the Studies in Hysteria,8 published as early as 1895, I was able to give the explanation
of a first hysterical attack which the patient, a woman over forty years of age, had
experienced in her fifteenth year.9
I will now make a few rather unsystematic remarks relating to the interpretation of
dreams, which will perhaps serve as a guide to the reader who wishes to test my
assertions by the analysis of his own dreams.
He must not expect that it will be a simple and easy matter to interpret his own dreams.
Even the observation of endoptic phenomena, and other sensations which are commonly
immune from attention, calls for practice, although this group of observations is not
opposed by any psychic motive. It is very much more difficult to get hold of the
ùnwished ideas'. He who seeks to do so must fulfil the requirements laid down in this
treatise, and while following the rules here given, he must endeavour to restrain all
criticism, all preconceptions, and all affective or intellectual bias in himself during the
work of analysis. He must be ever mindful of the precept which Claude Bernard held up
to the experimenter in the physiological laboratory: `Travailler comme une bete' -- that is,
he must be as enduring as an animal, and also as disinterested in the results of his work.
He who will follow this advice will no longer find the task a difficult one. The
interpretation of a dream cannot always be accomplished in one session; after following
up a chain of associations you will often feel that your working capacity is exhausted; the
dream will not tell you anything more that day; it is then best to break off, and to resume
the work the following day. Another portion of the dream-content then solicits your
attention, and you thus obtain access to a fresh stratum of the dream-thoughts. One might
call this the `fractional' interpretation of dreams.

It is most difficult to induce the beginner in dream-interpretation to recognise the fact that
his task is not finished when he is in possession of a complete interpretation of the dream
which is both ingenious and coherent, and which gives particulars of all the elements of
the dream-content. Besides this, another interpretation, an over-interpretation of the same
dream, one which has escaped him, may be possible. It is really not easy to form an idea
of the wealth of trains of unconscious thought striving for expression in our minds, or to
credit the adroitness displayed by the dream-work in killing -- so to speak -- seven flies at
one stroke, like the journeyman tailor in the fairy-tale, by means of its ambiguous modes
of expression. The reader will constantly be inclined to reproach the author for a
superfluous display of ingenuity, but anyone who has had personal experience of dream-
interpretation will know better than to do so.
On the other hand, I cannot accept the opinion first expressed by H. Silberer, that every
dream -- or even that many dreams, and certain groups of dreams -- calls for two different
interpretations, between which there is even supposed to be a fixed relation. One of these,
which Silberer calls the psychoanalytic interpretation, attributes to the dream any
meaning you please, but in the main an infantile sexual one. The other, the more
important interpretation, which he calls the anagogic interpretation, reveals the more
serious and often profound thoughts which the dream-work has used as its material.
Silberer does not prove this assertion by citing a number of dreams which he has
analysed in these two directions. I am obliged to object to this opinion on the ground that
it is contrary to facts. The majority of dreams require no over-interpretation, and are
especially insusceptible of an anagogic interpretation. The influence of a tendency which
seeks to veil the fundamental conditions of dream-formation and divert our interest from
its instinctual roots is as evident in Silberer's theory as in other theoretical efforts of the
last few years. In a number of cases I can confirm Silberer's assertions; but in these the
analysis shows me that the dream-work was confronted with the task of transforming a
series of highly abstract thoughts, incapable of direct representation, from waking life
into a dream. The dream-work attempted to accomplish this task by seizing upon another
thought-material which stood in loose and often allegorical relation to the abstract
thoughts, and thereby diminished the difficulty of representing them. The abstract
interpretation of a dream originating in this manner will be given by the dreamer
immediately, but the correct interpretation of the substituted material can be obtained
only by means of the familiar technique.
The question whether every dream can be interpreted is to be answered in the negative.
One should not forget that in the work of interpretation one is opposed by the psychic
forces that are responsible for the distortion of the dream. Whether one can master the
inner resistances by one's intellectual interest, one's capacity for self-control, one's
psychological knowledge, and one's experience in dream-interpretation depends on the
relative strength of the opposing forces. It is always possible to make some progress; one
can at all events go far enough to become convinced that a dream has meaning, and
generally far enough to gain some idea of its meaning. It very often happens that a second
dream enables us to confirm and continue the interpretation assumed for the first. A
whole series of dreams, continuing for weeks or months, may have a common basis, and
should therefore be interpreted as a continuity. In dreams that follow one another we

often observe that one dream takes as its central point something that is only alluded to in
the periphery of the next dream, and conversely, so that even in their interpretations the
two supplement each other. That different dreams of the same night are always to be
treated, in the work of interpretation, as a whole, I have already shown by examples.
In the best interpreted dreams we often have to leave one passage in obscurity because
we observe during the interpretation that we have here a tangle of dream-thoughts which
cannot be unravelled, and which furnishes no fresh contribution to the dream-content.
This, then, is the keystone of the dream, the point at which it ascends into the unknown.
For the dream-thoughts which we encounter during the interpretation commonly have no
termination, but run in all directions into the net-like entanglement of our intellectual
world. It is from some denser part of this fabric that the dream-wish then arises, like the
mushroom from its mycelium.
Let us now return to the facts of dream-forgetting. So far, of course, we have failed to
draw any important conclusion from them. When our waking life shows an unmistakable
intention to forget the dream which has been formed during the night, either as a whole,
immediately after waking, or little by little in the course of the day, and when we
recognise as the chief factor in this process of forgetting the psychic resistance against the
dream which has already done its best to oppose the dream at night, the question then
arises: What actually has made the dream-formation possible against this resistance? Let
us consider the most striking case, in which the waking life has thrust the dream aside as
though it had never happened. If we take into consideration the play of the psychic
forces, we are compelled to assert that the dream would never have come into existence
had the resistance prevailed at night as it did by day. We conclude, then, that the
resistance loses some part of its force during the night; we know that it has not been
discontinued, as we have demonstrated its share in the formation of dreams -- namely, the
work of distortion. We have therefore to consider the possibility that at night the
resistance is merely diminished, and that dream-formation becomes possible because of
this slackening of the resistance; and we shall readily understand that as it regains its full
power on waking it immediately thrusts aside what it was forced to admit while it was
feeble. Descriptive psychology teaches us that the chief determinant of dream-formation
is the dormant state of the psyche; and we may now add the following explanation: The
state of sleep makes dream-formation possible by reducing the endopsychic censorship.
We are certainly tempted to look upon this as the only possible conclusion to be drawn
from the facts of dream-forgetting, and to develop from this conclusion further
deductions as to the comparative energy operative in the sleeping and waking states. But
we shall stop here for the present. When we have penetrated a little farther into the
psychology of dreams we shall find that the origin of dream-formation may be differently
conceived. The resistance which tends to prevent the dream-thoughts from becoming
conscious may perhaps be evaded without suffering reduction. It is also plausible that
both the factors which favour dream-formation, the reduction as well as the evasion of
the resistance, may be simultaneously made possible by the sleeping state. But we shall
pause here, and resume the subject a little later.

We must now consider another series of objections against our procedure in dream-
interpretation. For we proceed by dropping all the directing ideas which at other times
control reflection, directing our attention to a single element of the dream, noting the
involuntary thoughts that associate themselves with this element. We then take up the
next component of the dream-content, and repeat the operation with this; and, regardless
of the direction taken by the thoughts, we allow ourselves to be led onwards by them,
rambling from one subject to another. At the same time, we harbour the confident hope
that we may in the end, and without intervention on our part, come upon the dream-
thoughts from which the dream originated. To this the critic may make the following
objection: That we arrive somewhere if we start from a single element of the dream is not
remarkable. Something can be associatively connected with every idea. The only thing
that is remarkable is that one should succeed in hitting upon the dream-thoughts in this
arbitrary and aimless excursion. It is probably a self-deception; the investigator follows
the chain of associations from the one element which is taken up until he finds the chain
breaking off, whereupon he takes up a second element; it is thus only natural that the
originally unconfined associations should now become narrowed down. He has the
former chain of associations still in mind, and will therefore in the analysis of the second
dream-idea hit all the more readily upon single associations which have something in
common with the associations of the first chain. He then imagines that he has found a
thought which represents a point of junction between two of the dream-elements. As he
allows himself all possible freedom of thought-connection, excepting only the transitions
from one idea to another which occur in normal thinking, it is not difficult for him finally
to concoct out of a series of ìntermediary thoughts', something which he calls the dream-
thoughts; and without any guarantee, since they are otherwise unknown, he palms these
off as the psychic equivalent of the dream. But all this is a purely arbitrary procedure, an
ingenious-looking exploitation of chance, and anyone who will go to this useless trouble
can in this way work out any desired interpretation for any dream whatever.
If such objections are really advanced against us, we may in defence refer to the
impression produced by our dream-interpretations, the surprising connections with other
dream-elements which appear while we are following up the individual ideas, and the
improbability that anything which so perfectly covers and explains the dream as do our
dream-interpretations could be achieved otherwise than by following previously
established psychic connections. We might also point to the fact that the procedure in
dream-interpretation is identical with the procedure followed in the resolution of
hysterical symptoms, where the correctness of the method is attested by the emergence
and disappearance of the symptoms -- that is, where the interpretation of the text is
confirmed by the interpolated illustrations. But we have no reason to avoid this problem -
- namely, how one can arrive at a pre-existent aim by following an arbitrarily and
aimlessly meandering chain of thoughts -- since we shall be able not to solve the
problem, it is true, but to get rid of it entirely.
For it is demonstrably incorrect to state that we abandon ourselves to an aimless

excursion of thought when, as in the interpretation of dreams, we renounce reflection and
allow the involuntary ideas to come to the surface. It can be shown that we are able to
reject only those directing ideas which are known to us, and that with the cessation of

these the unknown -- or, as we inexactly say, unconscious -- directing ideas immediately
exert their influence, and henceforth determine the flow of the involuntary ideas.
Thinking without directing ideas cannot be ensured by any influence we ourselves exert
on our own psychic life; neither do I know of any state of psychic derangement in which
such a mode of thought establishes itself.10 The psychiatrists have here far too
prematurely relinquished the idea of the solidity of the psychic structure. I know that an
unregulated stream of thoughts, devoid of directing ideas, can occur as little in the realm
of hysteria and paranoia as in the formation or solution of dreams. Perhaps it does not
occur at all in the endogenous psychic affections, and, according to the ingenious
hypothesis of Lauret, even the deliria observed in confused psychic states have meaning
and are incomprehensible to us only because of ommissions. I have had the same
conviction whenever I have had an opportunity of observing such states. The deliria are
the work of a censorship which no longer makes any effort to conceal its sway, which,
instead of lending its support to a revision that is no longer obnoxious to it, cancels
regardlessly anything to which it objects, thus causing the remnant to appear
disconnected, This censorship proceeds like the Russian censorship of the frontier, which
allows only those foreign journals which have had certain passages blacked out to fall
into the hands of the readers to be protected.
The free play of ideas following any chain of associations may perhaps occur in cases of
destructive organic affections of the brain. What, however, is taken to be such in the
psychoneuroses may always be explained as the influence of the censorship on a series of
thoughts which have been pushed into the foreground by the concealed directing ideas.11
It has been considered an unmistakable sign of free association unencumbered by
directing ideas if the emerging ideas (or images) appear to be connected by means of the
so-called superficial associations -- that is, by assonance, verbal ambiguity, and temporal
coincidence, without inner relationship of meaning; in other words, if they are connected
by all those associations which we allow ourselves to exploit in wit and in playing upon
words. This distinguishing mark holds good with associations which lead us from the
elements of the dream-content to the intermediary thoughts, and from these to the dream-
thoughts proper; in many analyses of dreams we have found surprising examples of this.
In these no connection was too loose and no witticism too objectionable to serve as a
bridge from one thought to another. But the correct understanding of such surprising
tolerance is not far to seek. Whenever one psychic element is connected with another by
an obnoxious and superficial association, there exists also a correct and more profound
connection between the two, which succumbs to the resistance of the censorship.
The correct explanation for the predominance of the superficial associations is the
pressure of the censorship, and not the suppression of the directing ideas. Whenever the
censorship renders the normal connective paths impassable, the superficial associations
will replace the deeper ones in the representation. It is as though in a mountainous region
a general interruption of traffic, for example an inundation, should render the broad
highways impassable: traffic would then have to be maintained by steep and inconvenient
tracks used at other times only by the hunter.

We can here distinguish two cases which, however, are essentially one. In the first case,
the censorship is directed only against the connection of two thoughts which, being
detached from one another, escape its opposition. The two thoughts then enter
successively into consciousness; their connection remains concealed; but in its place
there occurs to us a superficial connection between the two which would not otherwise
have occurred to us, and which as a rule connects with another angle of the conceptual
complex instead of that from which the suppressed but essential connection proceeds. Or,
in the second case, both thoughts, owing to their content, succumb to the censorship; both
then appear not in their correct form but in a modified, substituted form; and both
substituted thoughts are so selected as to represent, by a superficial association, the
essential relation which existed between those that they have replaced. Under the
pressure of the censorship, the displacement of a normal and vital association by one
superficial and apparently absurd has thus occurred in both cases.
Because we know of these displacements, we unhesitatingly rely upon even the

superficial associations which occur in the course of dream-interpretation.12
The psychoanalysis of neurotics makes abundant use of the two principles: that with the
abandonment of the conscious directing ideas the control over the flow of ideas is
transferred to the concealed directing ideas; and that superficial associations are only a
displacement-substitute for suppressed and more profound ones. Indeed, psychoanalysis
makes these two principles the foundation stones of its technique. When I request a
patient to dismiss all reflection, and to report to me whatever comes into his mind, I
firmly cling to the assumption that he will not be able to drop the directing idea of the
treatment, and I feel justified in concluding that what he reports, even though it may seem
to be quite ingenuous and arbitrary, has some connection with his morbid state. Another
directing idea of which the patient has no suspicion is my own personality. The full
appreciation, as well as the detailed proof of both these explanations, belongs to the
description of the psychoanalytic technique as a therapeutic method. We have here
reached one of the junctions, so to speak, at which we purposely drop the subject of
dream-interpretation.13
Of all the objections raised, only one is justified and still remains to be met: namely, that
we ought not to ascribe all the associations of the interpretation-work to the nocturnal
dream-work. By interpretation in the waking state we are actually opening a path running
back from the dream-elements to the dream-thoughts. The dream-work has followed the
contrary direction, and it is not at all probable that these paths are equally passable in
opposite directions. On the contrary, it appears that during the day, by means of new
thought-connections, we sink shafts that strike the intermediary thoughts and the dream-
thoughts now in this place, now in that. We can see how the recent thought-material of
the day forces its way into the interpretation-series, and how the additional resistance
which has appeared since the night probably compels it to make new and further detours.
But the number and form of the collaterals which we thus contrive during the day are,
psychologically speaking, indifferent, so long as they point the way to the dream-
thoughts which we are seeking.

1
Similar views are expressed by Foucault and Tannery.
2
cf. The Psychopathology of Everyday Life.
3
This peremptory statement: `Whatever disturbs the progress of the work is a resistance'
might easily be misunderstood. It has, of course, the significance merely of a technical
rule, a warning for the analyst. It is not denied that during an analysis events may occur
which cannot be ascribed to the intention of the person analysed. The patient's father may
die in other ways than by being murdered by the patient, or a war may break out and
interrupt the analysis. But despite the obvious exaggeration of the above statement there
is still something new and useful in it. Even if the disturbing event is real and
independent of the patient, the extent of the disturbing influence does often depend only
on him, and the resistance reveals itself unmistakably in the ready and immoderate
exploitation of such an opportunity.
4
As an example of the significance of doubt and uncertainty in a dream with a
simultaneous shrinking of the dream-content to a single element I will cite from my
Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis the following dream, the analysis of which was
successful, despite a short postponement:
A sceptical lady patient has a rather long dream, in which it happens that certain persons
tell her of my book on Wit, and praise it highly. Then something is said about a `channel',
perhaps another book in which `channel' occurs, or something else to do with `channel', .
. . she doesn't know; it is quite vague.
You will, of course, be inclined to think that the element `channel' will resist analysis,
because it is so indeterminate. You are right in assuming this difficulty, but it is not
difficult because it is vague; it is vague for the reason that makes the interpretation
difficult. The dreamer could associate nothing with `channel'; and of course I could not
suggest anything. A little while later -- the following day, to be precise -- she stated that
something did occur to her which perhaps referred to `channel'. It was, as a matter of
fact, a witticism which she had heard someone repeat. On a steamer running between
Dover and Calais a well-known writer was talking to an Englishman, who in a certain
connection quoted the aphorism: Du sublime au ridicule il n'y a qu'un pas. The writer
retorted: Oui, le pas de Calais, whereby he wished to imply that he thought France
sublime and England ridiculous. But the Pas de Calais is a channel, the Canal la Manche
(the sleeve channel). Do I think that this association has anything to do with the dream? I
certainly do; it really furnishes the solution of this enigmatical dream-element. Can you
doubt that this witticism already existed, before the dream, as the unconscious of the
element `channel'; can you assume that it was subsequently invented as an association?
The association testifies to the scepticism concealed behind her obtrusive admiration, and
the resistance is, of course, the common reason for both her hesitation in finding an
association and the indefinite character of the corresponding dream-element. Note the
relation of the dream-element to the unconscious in this case. It is like a fragment of this
unconscious, like an allusion to it; by its isolation it has become quite unintelligible.

5
Concerning the intention of forgetting in general, see my The Psychopathology of
Everyday Life.
6
Such corrections in the use of foreign languages are not rare in dreams, but they are
usually attributed to foreigners. Maury, while he was studying English, once dreamed
that he informed someone that he had called on him the day before in the following
words: Ì called for you yesterday.' The other answered, correctly: `You mean: I called on
you yesterday.'
7
Ernest Jones describes an analogous case of frequent occurrence; during the analysis of
one dream another dream of the same night is often recalled which until then was not
merely forgotten, but was not even suspected.
8
Translated by A. A. Brill, Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases Publishing Co., New
York.
9
Dreams which have occurred during the first years of childhood, and which have
sometimes been retained in the memory for decades with perfect sensorial freshness, are
almost always of great importance for the understanding of the development and the
neurosis of the dreamer. The analysis of them protects the physician from errors and
uncertainties which might confuse him even theoretically.
10
Only recently has my attention been called to the fact that Ed. von Hartmann took the
same view with regard to this psychologically important point: Incidental to the
discussion of the role of the unconscious in artistic creation (Philos. d. Unbew., Bd. 1,
Abschn. B., Kap. V) Eduard von Hartmann clearly enunciated the law of association of
ideas which is directed by unconscious directing ideas, without however realising the
scope of this law. With him it was a question of demonstrating that èvery combination of
a sensuous idea when it is not left entirely to chance, but is directed to a definite end, is in
need of help from the unconscious', and that the conscious interest in any particular
thought-association is a stimulus for the unconscious to discover from among the
numberless possible ideas the one which corresponds to the directing idea. Ìt is the
unconscious that selects, and appropriately, in accordance with the aims of the interest:
and this holds true for the associations in abstract thinking (as sensible representations
and artistic combinations as well as for flashes of wit).' Hence, a limiting of the
association of ideas to ideas that evoke and are evoked in the sense of pure association-
psychology is untenable. Such a restriction `would be justified only if there were states in
human life in which man was free not only from any conscious purpose, but also from the
domination or co-operation of any unconscious interest, any passing mood. But such a
state hardly ever comes to pass, for even if one leaves one's train of thought seemingly
altogether to chance, or if one surrenders oneself entirely to the involuntary dreams of
fantasy, yet always other leading interests, dominant feelings and moods prevail at one
time rather than another, and these will always exert an influence on the association of
ideas.' (Philos. d. Unbew., 11e Aufl. i, 246). In semi-conscious dreams there always
appear only such ideas as correspond to the (unconscious) momentary main interest. By
rendering prominent the feelings and moods over the free thought-series, the methodical

procedure of psychoanalysis is thoroughly justified even from the standpoint of

Hartmann's Psychology (N. E. Pohorilles, Internat. Zeitschrift. f. Ps.A., 1, 1913, p. 605). -
- Du Prel concludes from the fact that a name which we vainly try to recall suddenly
occurs to the mind that there is an unconscious but none the less purposeful thinking,
whose result then appears in consciousness (Philos. d. Mystik, p. 107).
11
Jung has brilliantly corroborated this statement by analyses of dementia praecox. (cf.
The Psychology of Dementia Praecox, translated by A. A. Brill. Monograph Series,
Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases Publishing Co., New York.)
12
The same considerations naturally hold good of the case in which superficial
associations are exposed in the dream-content, as, for example, in both the dreams
reported by Maury (p. 50, pélerinage-pelletier-pelle, kilometre-kilograms-gilolo, Lobelia-
Lopez-Lotto). I know from my work with neurotics what kind of reminiscence is prone to
represent itself in this manner. It is the consultation of encyclopedias by which most
people have satisfied their need of an explanation of the sexual mystery when obsessed
by the curiosity of puberty.
13
The above statements, which when written sounded very improbable, have since been
corroborated and applied experimentally by Jung and his pupils in the Diagnostiche
Assoziationsstudien.

B. REGRESSION
Now that we have defended ourselves against the objections raised, or have at least
indicated our weapons of defence, we must no longer delay entering upon the
psychological investigations for which we have so long been preparing. Let us summarise
the main results of our recent investigations: The dream is a psychic act full of import; its
motive power is invariably a wish craving fulfilment; the fact that it is unrecognisable as
a wish, and its many peculiarities and absurdities, are due to the influence of the psychic
censorship to which it has been subjected during its formation. Besides the necessity of
evading the censorship, the following factors have played a part in its formation: first, a
need for condensing the psychic material; second, regard for representability in sensory
images; and third (though not constantly), regard for a rational and intelligible exterior of
the dream-structure. From each of these propositions a path leads onward to
psychological postulates and assumptions. Thus, the reciprocal relation of the wish-
motives, and the four conditions, as well as the mutual relations of these conditions, must
now be investigated; the dream must be inserted in the context of the psychic life.
At the beginning of this section we cited a certain dream in order that it might remind us
of the problems that are still unsolved. The interpretation of this dream (of the burning
child) presented no difficulties, although in the analytical sense it was not given in full.
We asked ourselves why, after all, it was necessary that the father should dream instead
of waking, and we recognised the wish to represent the child as living as a motive of the
dream. That there was yet another wish operative in the dream we shall be able to show
after further discussion. For the present, however, we may say that for the sake of the
wish-fulfilment the thought-process of sleep was transformed into a dream.
If the wish-fulfilment is cancelled out, only one characteristic remains which

distinguishes the two kinds of psychic events. The dream-thought would have been: Ì see
a glimmer coming from the room in which the body is lying. Perhaps a candle has fallen
over, and the child is burning!' The dream reproduces the result of this reflection
unchanged, but represents it in a situation which exists in the present and is perceptible
by the senses like an experience of the waking state. This, however, is the most common
and the most striking psychological characteristic of the dream: a thought, usually the one
wished for, is objectified in the dream, and represented as a scene, or -- as we think --
experienced.
But how are we now to explain this characteristic peculiarity of the dream-work, or -- to
put it more modestly -- how are we to bring it into relation with the psychic processes?
On closer examination, it is plainly evident that the manifest form of the dream is marked
by two characteristics which are almost independent of each other. One is its
representation as a present situation with the omission of `perhaps'; the other is the
translation of the thought into visual images and speech.
The transformation to which the dream-thoughts are subjected because the expectation is
put into the present tense is, perhaps, in this particular dream not so very striking. This is

probably due to the special and really subsidiary role of the wish-fulfilment in this dream.
Let us take another dream, in which the dream-wish does not break away from the
continuation of the waking thoughts in sleep; for example, the dream of Irma's injection.
Here the dream-thought achieving representation is in the conditional: Ìf only Otto could
be blamed for Irma's illness!' The dream suppresses the conditional, and replaces it by a
simple present tense: `Yes, Otto is to blame for Irma's illness.' This, then, is the first of
the transformations which even the undistorted dream imposes on the dream-thoughts.
But we will not linger over this first peculiarity of the dream. We dispose of it by a
reference to the conscious fantasy, the day-dream, which behaves in a similar fashion
with its conceptual content. When Daudet's M. Joyeuse wanders unemployed through the
streets of Paris while his daughter is led to believe that he has a post and is sitting in his
office, he dreams, in the present tense, of circumstances that might help him to obtain a
recommendation and employment. The dream, then, employs the present tense in the
same manner and with the same right as the day-dream. The present is the tense in which
the wish is represented as fulfilled.
The second quality peculiar to the dream alone, as distinguished from the daydream, is
that the conceptual content is not thought, but is transformed into visual images, to which
we give credence, and which we believe that we experience. Let us add, however, that
not all dreams show this transformation of ideas into visual images. There are dreams
which consist solely of thoughts, but we cannot on that account deny that they are
substantially dreams. My dream Àutodidasker -- the day-fantasy about Professor N.' is
of this character; it is almost as free of visual elements as though I had thought its content
during the day. Moreover, every long dream contains elements which have not undergone
this transformation into the visual, and which are simply thought or known as we are
wont to think or know in our waking state. And we must here reflect that this
transformation of ideas into visual images does not occur in dreams alone, but also in
hallucinations and visions, which may appear spontaneously in health, or as symptoms in
the psychoneuroses. In brief, the relation which we are here investigating is by no means
an exclusive one; the fact remains, however, that this characteristic of the dream,
whenever it occurs, seems to be its most noteworthy characteristic, so that we cannot
think of the dream-life without it. To understand it, however, requires a very exhaustive
discussion.
Among all the observations relating to the theory of dreams to be found in the literature
of the subject, I should like to lay stress upon one as being particularly worthy of
mention. The famous G. T. H. Fechner makes the conjecture,1 in a discussion as to the
nature of the dreams, that the dream is staged elsewhere than in the waking ideation. No
other assumption enables us to comprehend the special peculiarities of the dream-life.
The idea which is thus put before us is one of psychic locality. We shall wholly ignore the
fact that the psychic apparatus concerned is known to us also as an anatomical
preparation, and we shall carefully avoid the temptation to determine the psychic locality
in any anatomical sense. We shall remain on psychological ground, and we shall do no
more than accept the invitation to think of the instrument which serves the psychic
activities much as we think of a compound microscope, a photographic camera, or other

apparatus. The psychic locality, then, corresponds to a place within such an apparatus in
which one of the preliminary phases of the image comes into existence. As is well
known, there are in the microscope and the telescope such ideal localities or planes, in
which no tangible portion of the apparatus is located. I think it superfluous to apologise
for the imperfections of this and all similar figures. These comparisons are designed only
to assist us in our attempt to make intelligible the complication of the psychic
performance by dissecting it and referring the individual performances to the individual
components of the apparatus. So far as I am aware, no attempt has yet been made to
divine the construction of the psychic instrument by means of such dissection. I see no
harm in such an attempt; I think that we should give free rein to our conjectures, provided
we keep our heads and do not mistake the scaffolding for the building. Since for the first
approach to any unknown subject we need the help only of auxiliary ideas, we shall
prefer the crudest and most tangible hypothesis to all others.
Accordingly, we conceive the psychic apparatus as a compound instrument, the

component parts of which we shall call instances, or, for the sake of clearness, systems.
We shall then anticipate that these systems may perhaps maintain a constant partial
orientation to one another, very much as do the different and successive systems of lenses
of a telescope. Strictly speaking, there is no need to assume an actual spatial arrangement
of the psychic system. It will be enough for our purpose if a definite sequence is
established, so that in certain psychic events the system will be traversed by the
excitation in a definite temporal order. This order may be different in the case of other
processes; such a possibility is left open. For the sake of brevity, we shall henceforth
speak of the component parts of the apparatus as `ψ-systems'.
The first thing that strikes us is the fact that the apparatus composed of ψ-systems has a
direction. All our psychic activities proceed from (inner or outer) stimuli and terminate in
innervations. We thus ascribe to the apparatus a sensory and a motor end; at the sensory
end we find a system which receives the perceptions, and at the motor end another which
opens the sluices of motility. The psychic process generally runs from the perceptive end
to the motor end. The most general scheme of the psychic apparatus has therefore the
following appearance as shown in Fig. 1 on page 379. But this is only in compliance with
the requirement, long familiar to us, that the psychic apparatus must be constructed like a
reflex apparatus. The reflex act remains the type of every psychic activity as well.
FIG. 1
We now have reason to admit a first differentiation at the sensory end. The percepts that
come to us leave in our psychic apparatus a trace, which we may call a memory-trace.
The function related to this memory-trace we call `the memory'. If we hold seriously to
our resolution to connect the psychic processes into systems, the memory-trace can
consist only of lasting changes in the elements of the systems. But, as has already been
shown elsewhere, obvious difficulties arise when one and the same system is faithfully to
preserve changes in its elements and still to remain fresh and receptive in respect of new

occasions of change. In accordance with the principle which is directing our attempt, we
shall therefore ascribe these two functions to two different systems. We assume that an
initial system of this apparatus receives the stimuli of perception but retains nothing of
them -- that is, it has no memory; and that behind this there lies a second system, which
transforms the momentary excitation of the first into lasting traces. The following would
then be the diagram of our psychic apparatus:
FIG. 2
We know that of the percepts which act upon the P-system, we retain permanently
something else as well as the content itself. Our percepts prove also to be connected with
one another in the memory, and this is especially so if they originally occurred
simultaneously. We call this the fact of association. It is now clear that, if the P-system is
entirely lacking in memory, it certainly cannot preserve traces for the associations; the
individual P-elements would be intolerably hindered in their functioning if a residue of a
former connection should make its influence felt against a new perception. Hence we
must rather assume that the memory-system is the basis of association. The fact of
association, then, consists in this -- that in consequence of a lessening of resistance and a
smoothing of the ways from one of the mem-elements, the excitation transmits itself to a
second rather than to a third mem-element.
On further investigation we find it necessary to assume not one but many such mem-
systems, in which the same excitation transmitted by the P-elements undergoes a
diversified fixation. The first of these mem-systems will in any case contain the fixation
of the association through simultaneity, while in those lying farther away the same
material of excitation will be arranged according to other forms of combination; so that
relationships of similarity, etc., might perhaps be represented by these later systems. It
would, of course, be idle to attempt to express in words the psychic significance of such a
system. Its characteristic would lie in the intimacy of its relations to elements of raw
material of memory -- that is (if we wish to hint at a more comprehensive theory) in the
gradations of the conductive resistance on the way to these elements.
An observation of a general nature, which may possibly point to something of

importance, may here be interpolated. The P-system, which possesses no capacity for
preserving changes, and hence no memory, furnishes to consciousness the complexity
and variety of the sensory qualities. Our memories, on the other hand, are unconscious in
themselves; those that are most deeply impressed form no exception. They can be made
conscious, but there is no doubt that they unfold all their activities in the unconscious
state. What we term our character is based, indeed, on the memory-traces of our
impressions, and it is precisely those impressions that have affected us most strongly,
those of our early youth, which hardly ever become conscious. But when memories
become conscious again they show no sensory quality, or a very negligible one in
comparison with the perceptions. If, now, it can be confirmed that for consciousness

memory and quality are mutually exclusive in the ψ-systems, we have gained a most
promising insight into the determinations of the neuron-excitations.2
What we have so far assumed concerning the composition of the psychic apparatus at the
sensible end has been assumed regardless of dreams and of the psychological
explanations which we have hitherto derived from them. Dreams, however, will serve as
a source of evidence for our knowledge of another part of the apparatus. We have seen
that it was impossible to explain dream-formation unless we ventured to assume two
psychic ìnstances', one of which subjected the activities of the other to criticism, the
result of which was exclusion from consciousness.
We have concluded that the criticising ìnstance' maintains closer relations with the
consciousness than the ìnstance' criticised. It stands between the latter and the
consciousness like a screen. Further, we have found that there is reason to identify the
criticising ìnstance' with that which directs our waking life and determines our voluntary
conscious activities. If, in accordance with our assumptions, we now replace these
ìnstances' by systems, the criticising system will therefore be moved to the motor end.
We now enter both systems in our diagram, expressing, by the names given them, their
relation to consciousness.
FIG 3
The last of the systems at the motor end we call the preconscious (Pcs.) to denote that the
exciting processes in this system can reach consciousness without any further detention,
provided certain other conditions are fulfilled, e.g. the attainment of a definite degree of
intensity, a certain apportionment of that function which we must call attention, etc. This
is at the same time the system which holds the keys of voluntary motility. The system
behind it we call the unconscious (Ucs.), because it has no access to consciousness except
through the preconscious, in the passage through which the excitation-process must
submit to certain changes.3
In which of these systems, then, do we localise the impetus to dream-formation? For the
sake of simplicity, let us say in the system Ucs. We shall find, it is true, in subsequent
discussions, that this is not altogether correct; that dream-formation is obliged to make
connection with dream-thoughts which belong to the system of the preconscious. But we
shall learn elsewhere, when we come to deal with the dream-wish, that the motive power
of the dream is furnished by the Ucs., and on account of this factor we shall assume the
unconscious system as the starting-point for dream-formation. This dream-excitation, like
all the other thought-structures, will now strive to continue itself in the Pcs., and thence
to gain admission to the consciousness.
Experience teaches us that the path leading through the preconscious to consciousness is
closed to the dream-thoughts during the day by the resisting censorship. At night they
gain admission to consciousness; the question arises, In what way and because of what

changes? If this admission were rendered possible to the dream-thoughts by the

weakening, during the night, of the resistance watching on the boundary between the
unconscious and the preconscious, we should then have dreams in the material of our
ideas, which would not display the hallucinatory character that interests us at present.
The weakening of the censorship between the two systems, Ucs. and Pcs., can explain to
us only such dreams as the Àutodidasker' dream, but not dreams like that of the burning
child, which -- as will be remembered -- we stated as a problem at the outset in our
present investigations.
What takes place in the hallucinatory dream we can describe in no other way than by
saying that the excitation follows a retrogressive course. It communicates itself not to the
motor end of the apparatus, but to the sensory end, and finally reaches the system of
perception. If we call the direction which the psychic process follows from the
unconscious into the waking state progressive, we may then speak of the dream as having
a regressive character.4
This regression is therefore assuredly one of the most important psychological

peculiarities of the dream-process; but we must not forget that it is not characteristic of
the dream alone. Intentional recollection and other component processes of our normal
thinking likewise necessitate a retrogression in the psychic apparatus from some complex
act of ideation to the raw material of the memory-traces which underlie it. But during the
waking state this turning backwards does not reach beyond the memory-images; it is
incapable of producing the hallucinatory revival of the perceptual images. Why is it
otherwise in dreams? When we spoke of the condensation-work of the dream we could
not avoid the assumption that by the dream-work the intensities adhering to the ideas are
completely transferred from one to another. It is probably this modification of the usual
psychic process which makes possible the cathexis5 of the system of P to its full sensory
vividness in the reverse direction to thinking.
I hope that we are not deluding ourselves as regards the importance of this present
discussion. We have done nothing more than give a name to an inexplicable
phenomenon. We call it regression if the idea in the dream is changed back into the visual
image from which it once originated. But even this step requires justification. Why this
definition if it does not teach us anything new? Well, I believe that the word regression is
of service to us, inasmuch as it connects a fact familiar to us with the scheme of the
psychic apparatus endowed with direction. At this point, and for the first time, we shall
profit by the fact that we have constructed such a scheme. For with the help of this
scheme we shall perceive, without further reflection, another peculiarity of dream-
formation. If we look upon the dream as a process of regression within the hypothetical
psychic apparatus, we have at once an explanation of the empirically proven fact that all
thought-relations of the dream-thoughts are either lost in the dream-work or have
difficulty in achieving expression. According to our scheme, these thought-relations are
contained not in the first mem-systems, but in those lying farther to the front, and in the
regression to the perceptual images they must forfeit expression. In regression the
structure of the dream-thoughts breaks up into its raw material.

But what change renders possible this regression which is impossible during the day? Let
us here be content with an assumption. There must evidently be changes in the cathexis
of the individual systems, causing the latter to become more accessible or inaccessible to
the discharge of the excitation; but in any such apparatus the same effect upon the course
of the excitation might be produced by more than one kind of change. We naturally think
of the sleeping state, and of the many cathectic changes which this evokes at the sensory
end of the apparatus. During the day there is a continuous stream flowing from the ψ-
system of the P toward the motility end; this current ceases at night, and can no longer
block the flow of the current of excitation in the opposite direction. This would appear to
be that `seclusion from the outer world' which according to the theory of some writers is
supposed to explain the psychological character of the dream. In the explanation of the
regression of the dream we shall, however, have to take into account those other
regressions which occur during morbid waking states. In these other forms of regression
the explanation just given plainly leaves us in the lurch. Regression occurs in spite of the
uninterrupted sensory current in a progressive direction.
The hallucinations of hysteria and paranoia, as well as the visions of mentally normal
persons, I would explain as corresponding, in fact, to regressions, i.e. to thoughts
transformed into images; and would assert that only such thoughts undergo this
transformation as are in intimate connection with suppressed memories, or with
memories which have remained unconscious. As an example I will cite the case of one of
my youngest hysterical patients -- a boy of twelve, who was prevented from falling
asleep by `green faces with red eyes', which terrified him. The source of this
manifestation was the suppressed, but once conscious memory of a boy whom he had
often seen four years earlier, and who offered a warning example of many bad habits,
including masturbation, for which he was now reproaching himself. At that time his
mother had noticed that the complexion of this ill-mannered boy was greenish and that he
had red (i.e. red-rimmed) eyes. Hence his terrifying vision, which merely determined his
recollection of another saying of his mother's, to the effect that such boys become
demented, are unable to learn anything at school, and are doomed to an early death. A
part of this prediction came true in the case of my little patient; he could not get on at
school, and, as appeared from his involuntary associations, he was in terrible dread of the
remainder of the prophecy. However, after a brief period of successful treatment his sleep
was restored, his anxiety removed, and he finished his scholastic year with an excellent
record.
Here I may add the interpretation of a vision described to me by an hysterical woman of

forty, as having occurred when she was in normal health. One morning she opened her
eyes and saw her brother in the room, although she knew him to be confined in an insane
asylum. Her little son was asleep by her side. Lest the child should be frightened on
seeing his uncle, and fall into convulsions, she pulled the sheet over his face. This done,
the phantom disappeared. This apparition was the revision of one of her childish
memories, which, although conscious, was most intimately connected with all the
unconscious material in her mind. Her nurserymaid had told her that her mother, who had
died young (my patient was then only eighteen months old), had suffered from epileptic
or hysterical convulsions, which dated back to a fright caused by her brother (the patient's

uncle) who appeared to her disguised as a spectre with a sheet over his head. The vision
contains the same elements as the reminiscence, viz. the appearance of the brother, the
sheet, the fright, and its effect. These elements, however, are arranged in a fresh context,
and are transferred to other persons. The obvious motive of the vision, and the thought
which it replaced, was her solicitude lest her little son, who bore a striking resemblance
to his uncle, should share the latter's fate.
Both examples here cited are not entirely unrelated to the state of sleep, and may for that
reason be unfitted to afford the evidence for the sake of which I have cited them. I will,
therefore, refer to my analysis of an hallucinatory paranoiac woman patient6 and to the
results of my hitherto unpublished studies on the psychology of the psychoneuroses, in
order to emphasise the fact that in these cases of regressive thought-transformation one
must not overlook the influence of a suppressed memory, or one that has remained
unconscious, this being usually of an infantile character. This memory draws into the
regression, as it were, the thoughts with which it is connected, and which are kept from
expression by the censorship -- that is, into that form of representation in which the
memory itself is psychically existent. And here I may add, as a result of my studies of
hysteria, that if one succeeds in bringing to consciousness infantile scenes (whether they
are recollections or fantasies) they appear as hallucinations, and are divested of this
character only when they are communicated. It is known also that even in persons whose
memories are not otherwise visual, the earliest infantile memories remain vividly visual
until late in life.
If, now, we bear in mind the part played in the dream-thoughts by the infantile
experiences, or by the fantasies based upon them, and recollect how often fragments of
these re-emerge in the dream-content, and how even the dream-wishes often proceed
from them, we cannot deny the probability that in dreams, too, the transformation of
thoughts into visual images may be the result of the attraction exercised by the visually
represented memory, striving for resuscitation, upon the thoughts severed from
consciousness and struggling for expression. Pursuing this conception, we may further
describe the dream as the substitute for the infantile scene modified by transference to
recent material. The infantile scene cannot enforce its own revival, and must therefore be
satisfied to return as a dream.
This reference to the significance of the infantile scenes (or of their fantastic repetitions)
as in a certain degree furnishing the pattern for the dream-content renders superfluous the
assumption made by Scherner and his pupils concerning inner sources of stimuli.
Scherner assumes a state of `visual excitation', of internal excitation in the organ of sight,
when the dreams manifest a special vividness or an extraordinary abundance of visual
elements. We need raise no objection to this assumption; we may perhaps content
ourselves with assuming such a state of excitation only for the psychic perceptive system
of the organ of vision; we shall, however, insist that this state of excitation is a
reanimation by the memory of a former actual visual excitation. I cannot, from my own
experience, give a good example showing such an influence of an infantile memory; my
own dreams are altogether less rich in perceptual elements than I imagine those of others
to be; but in my most beautiful and most vivid dream of late years I can easily trace the

hallucinatory distinctness of the dream-contents to the visual qualities of recently

received impressions. On page 314 I mentioned a dream in which the dark blue of the
water, the brown of the smoke issuing from the ship's funnels, and the sombre brown and
red of the buildings which I saw made a profound and lasting impression upon my mind.
This dream, if any, must be attributed to visual excitation, but what was it that had
brought my organ of vision into this excitable state? It was a recent impression which had
joined itself to a series of former impressions. The colours I beheld were in the first place
those of the toy blocks with which my children had erected a magnificent building for my
admiration, on the day preceding the dream. There was the sombre red on the large
blocks, the blue and brown on the small ones. Joined to these were the colour impressions
of my last journey in Italy: the beautiful blue of the Isonzo and the lagoons, the brown
hue of the Alps. The beautiful colours seen in the dream were but a repetition of those
seen in memory.
Let us summarise what we have learned about this peculiarity of dreams: their power of
recasting their idea-content in visual images. We may not have explained this character of
the dream-work by referring it to the known laws of psychology, but we have singled it
out as pointing to unknown relations, and have given it the name of the regressive
character. Wherever such regression has occurred, we have regarded it as an effect of the
resistance which opposes the progress of thought on its normal way to consciousness, and
of the simultaneous attraction exerted upon it by vivid memories.7 The regression in
dreams is perhaps facilitated by the cessation of the progressive stream flowing from the
sense-organs during the day; for which auxiliary factor there must be some
compensation, in the other forms of regression, by the strengthening of the other
regressive motives. We must also bear in mind that in pathological cases of regression,
just as in dreams, the process of energy transference must be different from that occurring
in the regressions of normal psychic life, since it renders possible a full hallucinatory
cathexis of the perceptive system. What we have described in the analysis of the dream-
work as `regard for representability' may be referred to the selective attraction of visually
remembered scenes touched by the dream-thoughts.
As to the regression, we may further observe that it plays a no less important part in the
theory of neurotic symptom-formation than in the theory of dreams. We may therefore
distinguish a threefold species of regression: (a) a topical one, in the sense of the scheme
of the ψ-systems here expounded; (b) a temporal one, in so far as it is a regression to
older psychic formations; and (c) a formal one, when primitive modes of expression and
representation take the place of the customary modes. These three forms of regression
are, however, basically one, and in the majority of cases they coincide, for that which is
older in point of time is at the same time formally primitive and, in the psychic
topography, nearer to the perception-end.
We cannot leave the theme of regression in dreams without giving utterance to an

impression which has already and repeatedly forced itself upon us, and which will return
to us reinforced after a deeper study of the psychoneuroses: namely, that dreaming is on
the whole an act of regression to the earliest relationships of the dreamer, a resuscitation
of his childhood, of the impulses which were then dominant and the modes of expression

which were then available. Behind this childhood of the individual we are then promised
an insight into the phylogenetic childhood, into the evolution of the human race, of which
the development of the individual is only an abridged repetition influenced by the
fortuitous circumstances of life. We begin to suspect that Friedrich Nietzsche was right
when he said that in a dream `there persists a primordial part of humanity which we can
no longer reach by a direct path', and we are encouraged to expect, from the analysis of
dreams, a knowledge of the archaic inheritance of man, a knowledge of psychical things
in him that are innate. It would seem that dreams and neuroses have preserved for us
more of the psychical antiquities than we suspected; so that psychoanalysis may claim a
high rank among those sciences which endeavour to reconstruct the oldest and darkest
phases of the beginnings of mankind.
It is quite possible that we shall not find this first part of our psychological evaluation of
dreams particularly satisfying. We must, however, console ourselves with the thought
that we are, after all, compelled to build out into the dark. If we have not gone altogether
astray, we shall surely reach approximately the same place from another starting-point,
and then, perhaps, we shall be better able to find our bearings.
1
Psychophysik, Part II, p. 520.
2
Since writing this, I have thought that consciousness occurs actually in the locality of the
memory-trace. (cf. Notiz über den Wünderblock, 1925, Ges. Schriften, Bd. vi.)
3
The further elaboration of this linear diagram will have to reckon with the assumption
that the system following the Pcs. represents the one to which we must attribute
consciousness (Cs.), so that P = Cs.
4
The first indication of the element of regression is already encountered in the writings of
Albertus Magnus. According to him the imaginatio constructs the dream out of the
tangible objects which it has retained. The process is the converse of that operating in the
waking state. Hobbes states (Leviathan, 1651): Ìn sum our dreams are the reverse of our
imagination, the motion, when we are awake, beginning at one end, and when we dream
at another' (quoted by Havelock Ellis, loc. cit., p. 112).
5
[From the Greek kathekho, to occupy, used here in place of the author's term Besetzung,
to signify a charge or investment of energy. -- TRANS.]
6
Selected Papers on Hysteria and other Psychoneuroses, p. 165, translated by A. A. Brill,
Monograph Series, Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases Publishing Co.
7
In a statement of the theory of repression it should be explained that a thought passes
into repression owing to the co-operation of two of the factors which influence it. On the
one side (the censorship of Cs.) it is pushed, and from the other side (the Ucs.) it is
pulled, much as one is helped to the top of the Great Pyramid. (cf. the Chapter Die
Verdrängung in Ges. Schriften, Bd. v.)

C. THE WISH-FULFILMENT
The dream of the burning child (cited above) affords us a welcome opportunity for
appreciating the difficulties confronting the theory of wish-fulfilment. That a dream
should be nothing but a wish-fulfilment must undoubtedly seem strange to us all -- and
not only because of the contradiction offered by the anxiety-dream. Once our first
analyses had given us the enlightenment that meaning and psychic value are concealed
behind our dreams, we could hardly have expected so unitary a determination of this
meaning. According to the correct but summary definition of Aristotle, the dream is a
continuation of thinking in sleep. Now if, during the day, our thoughts perform such a
diversity of psychic acts -- judgments, conclusions, the answering of objections,
expectations, intentions, etc. -- why should they be forced at night to confine themselves
to the production of wishes only? Are there not, on the contrary, many dreams that
present an altogether different psychic act in dream-form -- for example, anxious care --
and is not the father's unusually transparent dream of the burning child such a dream?
From the gleam of light that falls upon his eyes while he is asleep the father draws the
apprehensive conclusion that a candle has fallen over and may be burning the body; he
transforms this conclusion into a dream by embodying it in an obvious situation enacted
in the present tense. What part is played in this dream by the wish-fulfilment? And how
can we possibly mistake the predominance of the thought continued from the waking
state or evoked by the new sensory impression?
All these considerations are justified, and force us to look more closely into the role of
the wish-fulfilment in dreams, and the significance of the waking thoughts continued in
sleep.
It is precisely the wish-fulfilment that has already caused us to divide all dreams into two
groups. We have found dreams which were plainly wish-fulfilments; and others in which
the wish-fulfilment was unrecognisable and was often concealed by every available
means. In this latter class of dreams we recognised the influence of the dream-censorship.
The undisguised wish-dreams were found chiefly in children; short, frank wish-dreams
seemed (I purposely emphasise this word) to occur also in adults.
We may now ask whence in each case does the wish that is realised in the dream
originate? But to what opposition or to what diversity do we relate this `whence'? I think
to the opposition between conscious daily life and an unconscious psychic activity which
is able to make itself perceptible only at night. I thus find a threefold possibility for the
origin of a wish. Firstly, it may have been excited during the day, and owing to external
circumstances may have remained unsatisfied; there is thus left for the night an
acknowledged and unsatisfied wish. Secondly, it may have emerged during the day, only
to be rejected; there is thus left for the night an unsatisfied but suppressed wish. Thirdly,
it may have no relation to daily life, but may belong to those wishes which awake only at
night out of the suppressed material in us. If we turn to our scheme of the psychic
apparatus, we can localise a wish of the first order in the system Pcs. We may assume
that a wish of the second order has been forced back from the Pcs. system into the Ucs.
system, where alone, if anywhere, can it maintain itself; as for the wish-impulse of the

third order, we believe that it is wholly incapable of leaving the Ucs. system. Now, have
the wishes arising from these different sources the same value for the dream, the same
power to incite a dream?
On surveying the dreams at our disposal with a view to answering this question, we are at
once moved to add as a fourth source of the dream-wish the actual wish-impetus which
arises during the night (for example, the stimulus of thirst, and sexual desire). It then
seems to us probable that the source of the dream-wish does not affect its capacity to
incite a dream. I have in mind the dream of the child who continued the voyage that had
been interrupted during the day, and the other children's dreams cited in the same chapter;
they are explained by an unfulfilled but unsuppressed wish of the daytime. That wishes
suppressed during the day assert themselves in dreams is shown by a great many
examples. I will mention a very simple dream of this kind. A rather sarcastic lady, whose
younger friend has become engaged to be married, is asked in the daytime by her
acquaintances whether she knows her friend's fiancé, and what she thinks of him. She
replies with unqualified praise, imposing silence on her own judgment, although she
would have liked to tell the truth, namely, that he is a commonplace fellow -- one meets
such by the dozen (Dutzendmensch). The following night she dreams that the same
question is put to her, and that she replies with the formula: Ìn case of subsequent
orders, it will suffice to mention the reference number.' Finally, as the result of numerous
analyses, we learn that the wish in all dreams that have been subject to distortion has its
origin in the unconscious, and could not become perceptible by day. At first sight, then, it
seems that in respect of dream-formation all wishes are of equal value and equal power.
I cannot prove here that this is not really the true state of affairs, but I am strongly
inclined to assume a stricter determination of the dream-wish. Children's dreams leave us
in no doubt that a wish unfulfilled during the day may instigate a dream. But we must not
forget that this is, after all, the wish of a child; that it is a wish-impulse of the strength
peculiar to childhood. I very much doubt whether a wish unfulfilled in the daytime would
suffice to create a dream in an adult. It would rather seem that as we learn to control our
instinctual life by intellection we more and more renounce as unprofitable the formation
or retention of such intense wishes as are natural to childhood. In this, indeed, there may
be individual variations; some retain the infantile type of the psychic processes longer
than others; just as we find such differences in the gradual decline of the originally vivid
visual imagination. In general, however, I am of the opinion that unfulfilled wishes of the
day are insufficient to produce a dream in adults. I will readily admit that the wish-
impulses originating in consciousness contribute to the instigation of dreams, but they
probably do no more. The dream would not occur if the preconscious wish were not
reinforced from another source.
That source is the unconscious. I believe that the conscious wish becomes effective in
exciting a dream only when it succeeds in arousing a similar unconscious wish which
reinforces it. From the indications obtained in the psychoanalysis of the neuroses I
believe that these unconscious wishes are always active and ready to express themselves
whenever they find an opportunity of allying themselves with an impulse from
consciousness, and transferring their own greater intensity to the lesser intensity of the

latter.1 It must, therefore, seem that the conscious wish alone has been realised in the
dream; but a slight peculiarity in the form of the dream will put us on the track of the
powerful ally from the unconscious. These ever-active and, as it were, immortal wishes
of our unconscious recall the legendary Titans who, from time immemorial, have been
buried under the mountains which were once hurled upon them by the victorious gods,
and even now quiver from time to time at the convulsions of their mighty limbs. These
wishes, existing in repression, are themselves of infantile origin, as we learn from the
psychological investigation of the neurouses. Let me, therefore, set aside the view
previously expressed, that it matters little whence the dream-wish originates, and replace
it by another, namely: the wish manifested in the dream must be an infantile wish. In the
adult it originates in the Ucs., while in the child, in whom no division and censorship
exist as yet between the Pcs. and Ucs., or in whom these are only in process of formation,
it is an unfulfilled and unrepressed wish from the waking state. I am aware that this
conception cannot be generally demonstrated, but I maintain that it can often be
demonstrated even where one would not have suspected it, and that it cannot be generally
refuted.
In dream-formation, the wish-impulses which are left over from the conscious waking
life are, therefore, to be relegated to the background. I cannot admit that they play any
part except that attributed to the material of actual sensations during sleep in relation to
the dream-content. If I now take into account those other psychic instigations left over
from the waking life of the day, which are not wishes, I shall merely be adhering to the
course mapped out for me by this line of thought. We may succeed in provisionally
disposing of the energetic cathexis of our waking thoughts by deciding to go to sleep. He
is a good sleeper who can do this; Napoleon I is reputed to have been a model of this
kind. But we do not always succeed in doing it, or in doing it completely. Unsolved
problems, harassing cares, overwhelming impressions, continue the activity of our
thought even during sleep, maintaining psychic processes in the system which we have
termed the preconscious. The thought-impulses continued into sleep may be divided into
the following groups:
1. Those which have not been completed during the day, owing to some accidental
cause.
2. Those which have been left uncompleted because our mental powers have failed
us, i.e. unsolved problems.
3. Those which have been turned back and suppressed during the day. This is
reinforced by a powerful fourth group --
4. Those which have been excited in our Ucs. during the day by the workings of the
Pcs.; and finally we may add a fifth, consisting of --
5. The indifferent impressions of the day, which have therefore been left unsettled.
We need not underrate the psychic intensities introduced into sleep by these residues of
the day's waking life, especially those emanating from the group of the unsolved issues. It
is certain that these excitations continue to strive for expression during the night, and we
may assume with equal certainty that the state of sleep renders impossible the usual
continuance of the process of excitation in the preconscious and its termination in

becoming conscious. In so far as we can become conscious of our mental processes in the
ordinary way, even during the night, to that extent we are simply not asleep. I cannot say
what change is produced in the Pcs. system by the state of sleep,2 but there is no doubt
that the psychological characteristics of sleep are to be sought mainly in the cathectic
changes occurring just in this system, which dominates, moreover, the approach to
motility, paralysed during sleep. On the other hand, I have found nothing in the
psychology of dreams to warrant the assumption that sleep produces any but secondary
changes in the conditions of the Ucs. system. Hence, for the nocturnal excitations in the
Pcs. there remains no other path than that taken by the wish-excitations from the Ucs.;
they must seek reinforcement from the Ucs., and follow the detours of the unconscious
excitations. But what is the relation of the preconscious day-residues to the dream? There
is no doubt that they penetrate abundantly into the dream; that they utilise the dream-
content to obtrude themselves upon consciousness even during the night; indeed, they
sometimes even dominate the dream-content, and impel it to continue the work of the
day; it is also certain that the day-residues may just as well have any other character as
that of wishes. But it is highly instructive, and for the theory of wish-fulfilment of quite
decisive importance, to see what conditions they must comply with in order to be
received into the dream.
Let us pick out one of the dreams cited above, e.g. the dream in which my friend Otto
seems to show the symptoms of Basedow's disease (p. 163). Otto's appearance gave me
some concern during the day, and this worry, like everything else relating to him, greatly
affected me. I may assume that this concern followed me into sleep. I was probably bent
on finding out what was the matter with him. During the night my concern found
expression in the dream which I have recorded. Not only was its content senseless, but it
failed to show any wish-fulfilment. But I began to search for the source of this
incongruous expression of the solicitude felt during the day, and analysis revealed a
connection. I identified my friend Otto with a certain Baron L. and myself with a
Professor R. There was only one explanation of my being impelled to select just this
substitute for the day-thought. I must always have been ready in the Ucs. to identify
myself with Professor R., as this meant the realisation of one of the immortal infantile
wishes, viz. the wish to become great. Repulsive ideas respecting my friend, ideas that
would certainly have been repudiated in a waking state, took advantage of the
opportunity to creep into the dream; but the worry of the day had likewise found some
sort of expression by means of a substitute in the dream-content. The day-thought, which
was in itself not a wish, but on the contrary a worry, had in some way to find a
connection with some infantile wish, now unconscious and suppressed, which then
allowed it -- duly dressed up -- to àrise' for consciousness. The more domineering the
worry the more forced could be the connection to be established; between the content of
the wish and that of the worry there need be no connection, nor was there one in our
example.
It would perhaps be appropriate, in dealing with this problem, to inquire how a dream
behaves when material is offered to it in the dream-thoughts which flatly opposes a wish-
fulfilment; such as justified worries, painful reflections and distressing realisations. The
many possible results may be classified as follows: (a) The dream-work succeeds in

replacing all painful ideas by contrary ideas, and suppressing the painful affect belonging
to them. This, then, results in a pure and simple satisfaction-dream, a palpable `wish-
fulfilment', concerning which there is nothing more to be said. (b) The painful ideas find
their way into the manifest dream-content, more or less modified, but nevertheless quite
recognisable. This is the case which raises doubts about the wish-theory of dreams, and
thus calls for further investigation. Such dreams with a painful content may either be
indifferent in feeling, or they may convey the whole painful affect, which the ideas
contained in them seem to justify, or they may even lead to the development of anxiety to
the point of waking.
Analysis then shows that even these painful dreams are wish-fulfilments. An unconscious
and repressed wish, whose fulfilment could only be felt as painful by the dreamer's ego,
has seized the opportunity offered by the continued cathexis of painful day-residues, has
lent them its support, and has thus made them capable of being dreamed. But whereas in
case (a) the unconscious wish coincided with the conscious one, in case (b) the discord
between the unconscious and the conscious -- the repressed material and the ego -- is
revealed, and the situation in the fairy-tale, of the three wishes which the fairy offers to
the married couple, is realised (see [note 32] below, p. 434). The gratification in respect
of the fulfilment of the repressed wish may prove to be so great that it balances the
painful affects adhering to the day-residues; the dream is then indifferent in its affective
tone, although it is on the one hand the fulfilment of a wish, and on the other the
fulfilment of a fear. Or it may happen that the sleep ego plays an even more extensive
part in the dream-formation, that it reacts with violent resentment to the accomplished
satisfaction of the repressed wish, and even goes so far as to make an end of the dream by
means of anxiety. It is thus not difficult to recognise that dreams of pain and anxiety are,
in accordance with our theory, just as much wish-fulfilments as are the straightforward
dreams of gratification.
Painful dreams may also be `punishment dreams'. It must be admitted that the recognition
of these dreams adds something that is, in a certain sense, new to the theory of dreams.
What is fulfilled by them is once more an unconscious wish -- the wish for the
punishment of the dreamer for a repressed, prohibited wish-impulse. To this extent these
dreams comply with the requirement here laid down: that the motive-power behind the
dream-formation must be furnished by a wish belonging to the unconscious. But a finer
psychological dissection allows us to recognise the difference between this and the other
wish-dreams. In the dreams of group (b) the unconscious dream-forming wish belonged
to the repressed material. In the punishment-dreams it is likewise an unconscious wish,
but one which we must attribute not to the repressed material but to the ègo'.
Punishment-dreams point, therefore, to the possibility of a still more extensive

participation of the ego in dream-formation. The mechanism of dream-formation
becomes indeed in every way more transparent if in place of the antithesis `conscious'
and ùnconscious', we put the antithesis: ègo' and `repressed'. This, however, cannot be
done without taking into account what happens in the psychoneuroses, and for this reason
it has not been done in this book. Here I need only remark that the occurrence of
punishment-dreams is not generally subject to the presence of painful day-residues. They

originate indeed most readily if the contrary is true, if the thoughts which are day-
residues are of a gratifying nature, but express illicit gratifications. Of these thoughts
nothing then finds its way into the manifest dream except their contrary, just as was the
case in the dreams of group (a). Thus it would be the essential characteristic of
punishment-dreams that in them it is not the unconscious wish from the repressed
material (from the system Ucs.) that is responsible for dream-formation, but the punitive
wish reacting against it, a wish pertaining to the ego, even though it is unconscious (i.e.
preconscious).3
I will elucidate some of the foregoing observations by means of a dream of my own, and
above all I will try to show how the dream-work deals with a day-residue involving
painful expectation:
Indistinct beginning. I tell my wife I have some news for her, something very special. She
becomes frightened, and does not wish to hear it. I assure her that on the contrary it is
something which will please her greatly, and I begin to tell her that our son's Officers'
Corps has sent a sum of money (5,000 k.?) . . . something about honourable mention . . .
distribution . . . at the same time I have gone with her into a small room, like a
storeroom, in order to fetch something from it. Suddenly I see my son appear; he is not in
uniform but rather in a tight-fitting sports suit (like a seal?) with a small cap. He climbs
onto a basket which stands to one side near a chest, in order to put something on this
chest: I address him; no answer. It seems to me that his face or forehead is bandaged, he
arranges something in his mouth, pushing something into it. Also his hair shows a glint of
grey. I reflect: Can he be so exhausted? And has he false teeth? Before I can address him
again I awake without anxiety, but with palpitations. My clock points to 2.30 a.m.
To give a full analysis is once more impossible. I shall therefore confine myself to
emphasising some decisive points. Painful expectations of the day had given occasion for
this dream; once again there had been no news for over a week from my son, who was
fighting at the front. It is easy to see that in the dream-content the conviction that he has
been killed or wounded finds expression. At the beginning of the dream one can observe
an energetic effort to replace the painful thoughts by their contrary. I have to impart
something very pleasing, something about sending money, honourable mention, and
distribution. (The sum of money originates in a gratifying incident of my medical
practice; it is therefore trying to lead the dream away altogether from its theme.) But this
effort fails. The boy's mother has a presentiment of something terrible and does not wish
to listen. The disguises are too thin; the reference to the material to be suppressed shows
through everywhere. If my son is killed, then his comrades will send back his property; I
shall have to distribute whatever he has left among his sisters, brothers and other people.
Honourable mention is frequently awarded to an officer after he has died the `hero's
death'. The dream thus strives to give direct expression to what it at first wished to deny,
whilst at the same time the wishfulfilling tendency reveals itself by distortion. (The
change of locality in the dream is no doubt to be understood as threshold symbolism, in
line with Silberer's view.) We have indeed no idea what lends it the requisite motive-
power. But my son does not appear as `falling' (on the field of battle) but `climbing'. --
He was, in fact, a daring mountaineer. -- He is not in uniform, but in a sports suit; that is,

the place of the fatality now dreaded has been taken by an accident which happened to
him at one time when he was ski-running, when he fell and fractured his thigh. But the
nature of his costume, which makes him look like a seal, recalls immediately a younger
person, our comical little grandson; the grey hair recalls his father, our son-in-law, who
has had a bad time in the War. What does this signify? But let us leave this: the locality, a
pantry, the chest, from which he wants to take something (in the dream, to put something
on it), are unmistakable allusions to an accident of my own, brought upon myself when I
was between two and three years of age. I climbed on a foot-stool in the pantry, in order
to get something nice which was on a chest or table. The foot-stool tumbled over and its
edge struck me behind the lower jaw. I might very well have knocked all my teeth out. At
this point, an admonition presents itself: it serves you right -- like a hostile impulse
against the valiant warrior. A profounder analysis enables me to detect the hidden
impulse, which would be able to find satisfaction in the dreaded mishap to my son. It is
the envy of youth which the elderly man believes that he has thoroughly stifled in actual
life. There is no mistaking the fact that it was the very intensity of the painful
apprehension lest such a misfortune should really happen that searched out for its
alleviation such a repressed wish-fulfilment.
I can now clearly define what the unconscious wish means for the dream. I will admit
that there is a whole class of dreams in which the incitement originates mainly or even
exclusively from the residues of the day; and returning to the dream about my friend
Otto, I believe that even my desire to become at last a professor extraordinarius would
have allowed me to sleep in peace that night, had not the day's concern for my friend's
health continued active. But this worry alone would not have produced a dream; the
motive-power needed by the dream had to be contributed by a wish, and it was the
business of my concern to find such a wish for itself, as the motive power of the dream.
To put it figuratively, it is quite possible that a day-thought plays the part of the
entrepreneur in the dream; but the entrepreneur, who, as we say, has the idea, and feels
impelled to realise it, can do nothing without capital; he needs a capitalist who will
defray the expense, and this capitalist, who contributes the psychic expenditure for the
dream, is invariably and indisputably, whatever the nature of the waking thoughts, a wish
from the unconscious.
In other cases the capitalist himself is the entrepreneur; this, indeed, seems to be the
more usual case. An unconscious wish is excited by the day's work, and this now creates
the dream. And the dream-processes provide a parallel for all the other possibilities of the
economic relationship here used as an illustration. Thus the entrepreneur may himself
contribute a little of the capital, or several entrepreneurs may seek the aid of the same
capitalist, or several capitalists may jointly supply the capital required by the
entrepreneurs. Thus there are dreams sustained by more than one dream-wish, and many
similar variations, which may be readily imagined, and which are of no further interest to
us. What is still lacking to our discussion of the dream-wish we shall only be able to
complete later on.
The tertium comparationis in the analogies here employed, the quantitative element of
which an allotted amount is placed at the free disposal of the dream, admits of a still

closer application to the elucidation of the dream-structure. As shown on pp. 190 ff., we
can recognise in most dreams a centre supplied with a special sensory intensity. This is as
a rule the direct representation of the wish-fulfilment; for if we reverse the displacements
of the dream-work we find that the psychic intensity of the elements in the dream-
thoughts is replaced by the sensory intensity of the elements in the dream-content. The
elements in the neighbourhood of the wish-fulfilment have often nothing to do with its
meaning, but prove to be the offshoots of painful thoughts which are opposed to the wish.
But owing to their connection with the central element, often artificially established, they
secure so large a share of its intensity as to become capable of representation. Thus, the
representative energy of the wish-fulfilment diffuses itself over a certain sphere of
association, within which all elements are raised to representation, including even those
that are in themselves without resources. In dreams containing several dynamic wishes
we can easily separate and delimit the spheres of the individual wish-fulfilments, and we
shall find that the gaps in the dream are often of the nature of boundary-zones.
Although the foregoing remarks have restricted the significance of the day-residues for
the dream, they are none the less deserving of some further attention. For they must be a
necessary ingredient in dream-formation, inasmuch as experience reveals the surprising
fact that every dream shows in its content a connection with a recent waking impression,
often of the most indifferent kind. So far we have failed to understand the necessity for
this addition to the dream-mixture (p. 84). This necessity becomes apparent only when
we bear in mind the part played by the unconscious wish, and seek further information in
the psychology of the neuroses. We shall then learn that an unconscious idea, as such, is
quite incapable of entering into the preconscious, and that it can exert an influence there
only by establishing touch with a harmless idea already belonging to the preconscious, to
which it transfers its intensity, and by which it allows itself to be screened. This is the
fact of transference, which furnishes the explanation of so many surprising occurrences
in the psychic life of neurotics. The transference may leave the idea from the
preconscious unaltered, though the latter will thus acquire an unmerited intensity, or it
may force upon this some modification derived from the content of the transferred idea. I
trust the reader will pardon my fondness for comparisons with daily life, but I feel
tempted to say that the situation for the repressed idea is like that of the American dentist
in Austria, who may not carry on his practice unless he can get a duly installed doctor of
medicine to serve him as a signboard and legal `cover'. Further, just as it is not exactly
the busiest physicians who form such alliances with dental practitioners, so in the psychic
life the choice as regards covers for repressed ideas does not fall upon such preconscious
or conscious ideas as have themselves attracted enough of the attention active in the
preconscious. The unconscious prefers to entangle with its connections either those
impressions and ideas of the preconscious which have remained unnoticed as being
indifferent or those which have immediately had attention withdrawn from them again
(by rejection). It is a well-known proposition of the theory of associations, confirmed by
all experience, that ideas which have formed a very intimate connection in one direction
assume a negative type of attitude towards whole groups of new connections. I have even
attempted at one time to base a theory of hysterical paralysis on this principle.

If we assume that the same need of transference on the part of the repressed ideas, of
which we have become aware through the analysis of the neurosis, makes itself felt in
dreams also, we can at once explain two of the problems of the dream: namely, that every
dream-analysis reveals an interweaving of a recent impression, and that this recent
element is often of the most indifferent character. We may add what we have already
learned elsewhere, that the reason why these recent and indifferent elements so frequently
find their way into the dream-content as substitutes for the very oldest elements of the
dream-thoughts is that they have the least to fear from the resisting censorship. But while
this freedom from censorship explains only the preference shown to the trivial elements,
the constant presence of recent elements points to the necessity for transference. Both
groups of impressions satisfy the demand of the repressed ideas for material still free
from associations, the indifferent ones because they have offered no occasion for
extensive associations, and the recent ones because they have not had sufficient time to
form such associations.
We thus see that the day-residues, among which we may now include the indifferent
impressions, not only borrow something from the UCS. when they secure a share in
dream-formation -- namely, the motive-power at the disposal of the repressed wish -- but
they also offer to the unconscious something that is indispensable to it, namely, the points
of attachment necessary for transference. If we wished to penetrate more deeply into the
psychic processes, we should have to throw a clearer light on the play of excitations
between the preconscious and the unconscious, and indeed the study of the
psychoneuroses would impel us to do so; but dreams, as it happens, give us no help in
this respect.
Just one further remark as to the day-residues. There is no doubt that it is really these that
disturb our sleep, and not our dreams which, on the contrary, strive to guard our sleep.
But we shall return to this point later.
So far we have discussed the dream-wish; we have traced it back to the sphere of the
UCS., and have analysed its relation to the day-residues, which, in their turn, may be
either wishes, or psychic impulses of any other kind, or simply recent impressions. We
have thus found room for the claims that can be made for the dream-forming significance
of our waking mental activity in all its multifariousness. It might even prove possible to
explain, on the basis of our train of thought, those extreme cases in which the dream,
continuing the work of the day, brings to a happy issue an unsolved problem of waking
life. We merely lack a suitable example to analyse, in order to uncover the infantile or
repressed source of wishes, the tapping of which has so successfully reinforced the efforts
of the preconscious activity. But we are not a step nearer to answering the question: Why
is it that the unconscious can furnish in sleep nothing more than the motive-power for a
wish-fulfilment? The answer to this question must elucidate the psychic nature of the
state of wishing: and it will be given with the aid of the notion of the psychic apparatus.
We do not doubt that this apparatus, too, has only arrived at its present perfection by a
long process of evolution. Let us attempt to restore it as it existed in an earlier stage of
capacity. From postulates to be confirmed in other ways we know that at first the

apparatus strove to keep itself as free from stimulation as possible, and therefore, in its
early structure, adopted the arrangement of a reflex apparatus, which enabled it promptly
to discharge by the motor paths any sensory excitation reaching it from without. But this
simple function was disturbed by the exigencies of life, to which the apparatus owes the
impetus toward further development. The exigencies of life first confronted it in the form
of the great physical needs. The excitation aroused by the inner need seeks an outlet in
motility, which we may describe as ìnternal change' or èxpression of the emotions'. The
hungry child cries or struggles helplessly. But its situation remains unchanged; for the
excitation proceeding from the inner need has not the character of a momentary impact,
but of a continuing pressure. A change can occur only if, in some way (in the case of the
child by external assistance), there is an experience of satisfaction, which puts an end to
the internal excitation. An essential constituent of this experience is the appearance of a
certain percept (of food in our example), the memory-image of which is henceforth
associated with the memory-trace of the excitation arising from the need. Thanks to the
established connection, there results, at the next occurrence of this need, a psychic
impulse which seeks to revive the memory-image of the former percept, and to re-evoke
the former percept itself; that is, it actually seeks to re-establish the situation of the first
satisfaction. Such an impulse is what we call a wish; the reappearance of the perception
constitutes the wish-fulfilment, and the full cathexis of the perception, by the excitation
springing from the need, constitutes the shortest path to the wish-fulfilment. We may
assume a primitive state of the psychic apparatus in which this path is actually followed,
i.e. in which the wish ends in hallucination. This first psychic activity therefore aims at an
identity of perception: that is, at a repetition of that perception which is connected with
the satisfaction of the need.
This primitive mental activity must have been modified by bitter practical experience into
a secondary and more appropriate activity. The establishment of identity of perception by
the short regressive path within the apparatus does not produce the same result in another
respect as follows upon cathexis of the same perception coming from without. The
satisfaction does not occur, and the need continues. In order to make the internal cathexis
equivalent to the external one, the former would have to be continuously sustained, just
as actually happens in the hallucinatory psychoses and in hunger-fantasies, which exhaust
their performance in maintaining their hold on the object desired. In order to attain to
more appropriate use of the psychic energy, it becomes necessary to suspend the full
regression, so that it does not proceed beyond the memory-image, and thence can seek
other paths, leading ultimately to the production of the desired identity from the side of
the outer world.4 This inhibition, as well as the subsequent deflection of the excitation,
becomes the task of a second system, which controls voluntary motility, i.e. a system
whose activity first leads on to the use of motility for purposes remembered in advance.
But all this complicated mental activity, which works its way from the memory-image to
the production of identity of perception via the outer world, merely represents a
roundabout way to wish-fulfilment made necessary by experience.5 Thinking is indeed
nothing but a substitute for the hallucinatory wish; and if the dream is called a wish-
fulfilment, this becomes something self-evident, since nothing but a wish can impel our
psychic apparatus to activity.

The dream, which fulfils its wishes by following the short regressive path, has thereby
simply preserved for us a specimen of the primary method of operation of the psychic
apparatus, which has been abandoned as inappropriate. What once prevailed in the
waking state, when our psychic life was still young and inefficient, seems to have been
banished into our nocturnal life; just as we still find in the nursery those discarded
primitive weapons of adult humanity, the bow and arrow. Dreaming is a fragment of the
superseded psychic life of the child. In the psychoses those modes of operation of the
psychic apparatus which are normally suppressed in the waking state reassert themselves,
and thereupon betray their inability to satisfy our demands in the outer world.6
The unconscious wish-impulses evidently strive to assert themselves even during the day,
and the fact of transference, as well as the psychoses, tells us that they endeavour to force
their way through the preconscious system to consciousness and the command of
motility. Thus, in the censorship between UCS. and PCS., which the dream forces us to
assume, we must recognise and respect the guardian of our psychic health. But is it not
carelessness on the part of this guardian to diminish his vigilance at night, and to allow
the suppressed impulses of the UCS. to achieve expression, thus again making possible
the process of hallucinatory regression? I think not, for when the critical guardian goes to
rest -- and we have proof that his slumber is not profound -- he takes care to close the
gate to motility. No matter what impulses from the usually inhibited UCS. may bustle
about the stage, there is no need to interfere with them; they remain harmless, because
they are not in a position to set in motion the motor apparatus which alone can operate to
produce any change in the outer world. Sleep guarantees the security of the fortress
which has to be guarded. The state of affairs is less harmless when a displacement of
energies is produced, not by the decline at night in the energy put forth by the critical
censorship, but by the pathological enfeeblement of the latter, or the pathological
reinforcement of the unconscious excitations, and this while the preconscious is cathected
and the gates of motility are open. The guardian is then overpowered; the unconscious
excitations subdue the PCS., and from the PCS. they dominate our speech and action, or
they enforce hallucinatory regressions, thus directing an apparatus not designed for them
by virtue of the attraction exerted by perceptions on the distribution of our psychic
energy. We call this condition psychosis.
We now find ourselves in the most favourable position for continuing the construction of
our psychological scaffolding, which we left after inserting the two systems, UCS. and
PCS. However, we still have reason to give further consideration to the wish as the sole
psychic motive-power in the dream. We have accepted the explanation that the reason
why the dream is in every case a wish-fulfilment is that it is a function of the system
UCS., which knows no other aim than wish-fulfilment, and which has at its disposal no
forces other than the wish-impulses. Now if we want to continue for a single moment
longer to maintain our right to develop such far-reaching psychological speculations from
the facts of dream-interpretation, we are in duty bound to show that they insert the dream
into a context which can also embrace other psychic structures. If there exists a system of
the UCS. -- or something sufficiently analogous for the purposes of our discussion -- the
dream cannot be its sole manifestation; every dream may be a wish-fulfilment, but there
must be other forms of abnormal wish-fulfilment as well as dreams. And in fact the

theory of all psychoneurotic symptoms culminates in the one proposition that they, too,
must be conceived as wish-fulfilments of the unconscious.7 Our explanation makes the
dream only the first member of a series of the greatest importance for the psychiatrist, the
understanding of which means the solution of the purely psychological part of the
psychiatric problem.8 But in other members of this group of wish-fulfilments -- for
example, in the hysterical symptoms -- I know of one essential characteristic which I
have so far failed to find in the dream. Thus, from the investigations often alluded to in
this treatise, I know that the formation of a hysterical symptom needs a junction of both
the currents of our psychic life. The symptom is not merely the expression of a realised
unconscious wish; the latter must be joined by another wish from the preconscious, which
is fulfilled by the same symptom; so that the symptom is at least doubly determined, once
by each of the conflicting systems. Just as in dreams, there is no limit to further over-
determination. The determination which does not derive from the UCS. is, as far as I can
see, invariably a thought-stream of reaction against the unconscious wish; for example, a
self-punishment. Hence I can say, quite generally, that a hysterical symptom originates
only where two contrary wish-fulfilments, having their source in different psychic
systems, are able to meet in a single expression.9 Examples would help us but little here,
as nothing but a complete unveiling of the complications in question can carry
conviction. I will therefore content myself with the bare assertion, and will cite one
example, not because it proves anything, but simply as an illustration. The hysterical
vomiting of a female patient proved, on the one hand, to be the fulfilment of an
unconscious fantasy from the years of puberty -- namely, the wish that she might be
continually pregnant, and have a multitude of children; and this was subsequently
supplemented by the wish that she might have them by as many fathers as possible.
Against this immoderate wish there arose a powerful defensive reaction. But as by the
vomiting the patient might have spoilt her figure and her beauty, so that she would no
longer find favour in any man's eyes, the symptom was also in keeping with the punitive
trend of thought, and so, being admissible on both sides, it was allowed to become a
reality. This is the same way of acceding to a wish-fulfilment as the queen of the
Parthians was pleased to adopt in the case of the triumvir Crassus. Believing that he had
undertaken his campaign out of greed for gold, she caused molten gold to be poured into
the throat of the corpse. `Here thou hast what thou hast longed for!'
Of the dream we know as yet only that it expresses a wish-fulfilment of the unconscious;
and apparently the dominant preconscious system permits this fulfilment when it has
compelled the wish to undergo certain distortions. We are, moreover, not in fact in a
position to demonstrate regularly the presence of a train of thought opposed to the dream-
wish, which is realised in the dream as well as its antagonist. Only now and then have we
found in dream-analyses signs of reaction-products as, for instance, my affection for my
friend R. in the `dream of my uncle' (p. 48). But the contribution from the preconscious
which is missing here may be found in another place. The dream can provide expression
for a wish from the UCS. by means of all sorts of distortions, once the dominant system
has withdrawn itself into the wish to sleep, and has realised this wish by producing the
changes of cathexis within the psychic apparatus which are within its power; thereupon
holding on to the wish in question for the whole duration of sleep.10

Now this persistent wish to sleep on the part of the preconscious has a quite general
facilitating effect on the formation of dreams. Let us recall the dream of the father who,
by the gleam of light from the death-chamber, was led to conclude that his child's body
might have caught fire. We have shown that one of the psychic forces decisive in causing
the father to draw this conclusion in the dream instead of allowing himself to be
awakened by the gleam of light was the wish to prolong the life of the child seen in the
dream by one moment. Other wishes originating in the repressed have probably escaped
us, for we are unable to analyse this dream. But as a second source of motive power in
this dream we may add the father's desire to sleep, for, like the life of the child, the
father's sleep is prolonged for a moment by the dream. The underlying motive is: `Let the
dream go on, or I must wake up.' As in this dream, so in all others, the wish to sleep lends
its support to the unconscious wish. On page 35 we cited dreams which were manifestly
dreams of convenience. But in truth all dreams may claim this designation. The efficacy
of the wish to go on sleeping is most easily recognised in the awakening dreams, which
so elaborate the external sensory stimulus that it becomes compatible with the
continuance of sleep; they weave it into a dream in order to rob it of any claims it might
make as a reminder of the outer world. But this wish to go on sleeping must also play its
part in permitting all other dreams, which can only act as disturbers of the state of sleep
from within. `Don't worry; sleep on; it's only a dream', is in many cases the suggestion of
the PCS. to consciousness when the dream gets too bad; and this describes in a quite
general way the attitude of our dominant psychic activity towards dreaming, even though
the thought remains unuttered. I must draw the conclusion that throughout the whole of
our sleep we are just as certain that we are dreaming as we are certain that we are
sleeping. It is imperative to disregard the objection that our consciousness is never
directed to the latter knowledge, and that it is directed to the former knowledge only on
special occasions, when the censorship feels, as it were, taken by surprise. On the
contrary, there are persons in whom the retention at night of the knowledge that they are
sleeping and dreaming becomes quite manifest, and who are thus apparently endowed
with the conscious faculty of guiding their dream-life. Such a dreamer, for example, is
dissatisfied with the turn taken by a dream; he breaks it off without waking, and begins it
afresh, in order to continue it along different lines, just like a popular author who, upon
request, gives a happier ending to his play. Or on another occasion, when the dream
places him in a sexually exciting situation, he thinks in his sleep: Ì don't want to continue
this dream and exhaust myself by an emission; I would rather save it for a real situation.'
The Marquis Hervey (Vaschide) declared that he had gained such power over his dreams
that he could accelerate their course at will, and turn them in any direction he wished. It
seems that in him the wish to sleep had accorded a place to another, a preconscious wish,
the wish to observe his dreams and to derive pleasure from them. Sleep is just as
compatible with such a wish-resolve as it is with some proviso as a condition of waking
up (wet-nurse's sleep). We know, too, that in all persons an interest in dreams greatly
increases the number of dreams remembered after waking.
Concerning other observations as to the guidance of dreams, Ferenczi states: `The dream
takes the thought that happens to occupy our psychic life at the moment, and elaborates it
from all sides. It lets any given dream-picture drop when there is a danger that the wish-

fulfilment will miscarry, and attempts a new kind of solution, until it finally succeeds in
creating a wish-fulfilment that satisfies in one compromise both-instances of the psychic
life.'
1
They share this character of indestructibility with all other psychic acts that are really
unconscious -- that is, with psychic acts belonging solely to the system Ucs. These paths
are opened once and for all; they never fall into disuse; they conduct the excitation-
process to discharge as often as they are charged again with unconscious excitation. To
speak metaphorically, they suffer no other form of annihilation than did the shades of the
lower regions in the Odyssey, who awoke to new life the moment they drank blood. The
processes depending on the preconscious system are destructible in quite another sense.
The psychotherapy of the neuroses is based on this difference.
2
I have endeavoured to penetrate farther into the relations of the sleeping state and the
conditions of hallucination in my essay, Metapsychological Supplement to the Theory of
Dreams. Collected Papers, vol. iv, p. 137 (Metapsychologische Ergänzung zur
Traumlehre. Int. Zeitschr. f. Ps. A. iv, 1916-18, Ges. Schriften, Bd. v. p. 520).
3
Here one may consider the idea of the super-ego which was later recognised by
psychoanalysis.
4
In other words: the introduction of a `test of reality' is recognised as necessary.
5
Le Lorrain justly extols the wish-fulfilments of dreams: `Sans fatigue sérieuse, sans être
obligé de recourir à cette lutte opiniâtre et longue qui use et corrode les jouissances
poursuivies.'
6
I have further elaborated this train of thought elsewhere, where I have distinguished the
two principles involved as the pleasure-principle and the reality-principle. `Formulations
regarding the Two Principles in Mental Functioning', Collected Papers, vol. iv, p. 13
(Formulierungen über die zwei Prinzipien des psychischen Geschehens in Ges. Schriften,
Bd. v, p. 409).
7
Expressed more exactly: One portion of the symptom corresponds to the unconscious
wish-fulfilment, while the other corresponds to the reaction-formation opposed to it.
8
Hughlings Jackson has expressed himself as follows: `Find out all about dreams, and
you will have found out all about insanity.'
9
cf. my latest formulation of the origin of hysterical symptoms in the treatise on
`Hysterical Fantasies and their Relation to Bisexuality', Collected Papers, vol. ii, p. 51
This forms Chapter X in the English edition of Selected Papers on Hysteria and Other
Psychoneuroses.
10
This idea has been borrowed from the theory of sleep of Liébault, who revived hypnotic
research in modern times (Du Sommeil provoqué, etc., Paris, 1889).


D. WAKING CAUSED BY DREAMS, THE FUNCTION OF DREAMS, THE

ANXIETY-DREAM
Now that we know that throughout the night the preconscious is orientated to the wish to
sleep, we can follow the dream process with proper understanding. But let us first
summarise what we already know about this process. We have seen that day-residues are
left over from the waking activity of the mind, residues from which it has not been
possible to withdraw all cathexis. Either one of the unconscious wishes has been aroused
through the waking activity during the day or it so happens that the two coincide; we
have already discussed the multifarious possibilities. Either already during the day or
only on the establishment of the state of sleep the unconscious wish has made its way to
the day-residues, and has effected a transference to them. Thus there arises a wish
transferred to recent material; or the suppressed recent wish is revived by a reinforcement
from the unconscious. This wish now endeavours to make its way to consciousness along
the normal path of the thought processes, through the preconscious, to which indeed it
belongs by virtue of one of its constituent elements. It is, however, confronted by the
censorship which still subsists, and to whose influence it soon succumbs. It now takes on
the distortion for which the way has already been paved by the transference to recent
material. So far it is on the way to becoming something resembling an obsession, a
delusion, or the like, i.e. a thought reinforced by a transference, and distorted in
expression owing to the censorship. But its further progress is now checked by the state
of sleep of the preconscious; this system has presumably protected itself against invasion
by diminishing its excitations. The dream-process, therefore, takes the regressive course,
which is just opened up by the peculiarity of the sleeping state, and in so doing follows
the attraction exerted on it by memory-groups, which are, in part only, themselves present
as visual cathexis, not as translations into the symbols of the later systems. On its way to
regression it acquires representability. The subject of compression will be discussed later.
The dream-process has by this time covered the second part of its contorted course. The
first part threads its way progressively from the unconscious scenes or fantasies to the
preconscious, while the second part struggles back from the boundary of the censorship
to the tract of the perceptions. But when the dream-process becomes a perception-
content, it has, so to speak, eluded the obstacle set up in the Pcs. by the censorship and
the sleeping state. It succeeds in drawing attention to itself, and in being remarked by
consciousness. For consciousness, which for us means a sense-organ for the apprehension
of psychic qualities, can be excited in waking life from two sources: firstly, from the
periphery of the whole apparatus, the perceptive system; and secondly, from the
excitations of pleasure and pain which emerge as the sole psychic qualities yielded by the
transpositions of energy in the interior of the apparatus. All other processes in the ψ-
systems, even those in the preconscious, are devoid of all psychic quality, and are
therefore not objects of consciousness, inasmuch as they do not provide either pleasure or
pain for its perception. We shall have to assume that these releases of pleasure and pain
automatically regulate the course of the cathectic processes. But in order to make
possible more delicate performances, it subsequently proved necessary to render the flow
of ideas more independent of pain-signals. To accomplish this, the Pcs. system needed
qualities of its own which could attract consciousness, and most probably received them
through the connection of the preconscious processes with the memory-system of speech

symbols, which was not devoid of quality. Through the qualities of this system,
consciousness, hitherto only a sense-organ for perceptions, now becomes also a sense-
organ for a part of our thought-processes. There are now, as it were, two sensory
surfaces, one turned toward perception and the other toward the preconscious thought-
processes.
I must assume that the sensory surface of consciousness which is turned to the
preconscious is rendered far more unexcitable by sleep than the surface turned toward the
P-system. The giving up of interest in the nocturnal thought-process is, of course, an
appropriate procedure. Nothing is to happen in thought; the preconscious wants to sleep.
But once the dream becomes perception, it is capable of exciting consciousness through
the qualities now gained. The sensory excitation performs what is in fact its function;
namely, it directs a part of the cathectic energy available in the Pcs. to the exciting cause
in the form of attention. We must therefore admit that the dream always has a waking
effect -- that is, it calls into activity part of the quiescent energy of the Pcs. Under the
influence of this energy, it now undergoes the process which we have described as
secondary elaboration with a view to coherence and comprehensibility. This means that
the dream is treated by this energy like any other perception-content; it is subjected to the
same anticipatory ideas as far, at least, as the material allows. As far as this third part of
the dream-process has any direction, this is once more progressive.
To avoid misunderstanding, it will not be amiss to say a few words as to the temporal
characteristics of these dream-processes. In a very interesting discussion, evidently
suggested by Maury's puzzling guillotine dream, Goblot tries to demonstrate that a dream
takes up no other time than the transition period between sleeping and waking. The
process of waking up requires time; during this time the dream occurs. It is supposed that
the final picture of the dream is so vivid that it forces the dreamer to wake; in reality it is
so vivid only because when it appears the dreamer is already very near waking. Ùn rêve,
c'est un réveil qui commence.'
It has already been pointed out by Dugas that Goblot, in order to generalise his theory,
was forced to ignore a great many facts. There are also dreams from which we do not
awaken; for example, many dreams in which we dream that we dream. From our
knowledge of the dream-work, we can by no means admit that it extends only over the
period of waking. On the contrary, we must consider it probable that the first part of the
dream-work is already begun during the day, when we are still under the domination of
the preconscious. The second phase of the dream-work, viz. the alteration by the
censorship, the attraction exercised by unconscious scenes, and the penetration to
perception, continues probably all through the night, and accordingly we may always be
correct when we report a feeling that we have been dreaming all night, even although we
cannot say what we have dreamed. I do not, however, think that it is necessary to assume
that up to the time of becoming conscious the dream-processes really follow the temporal
sequence which we have described; viz. that there is first the transferred dream-wish,
then the process of distortion due to the censorship, and then the change of direction to
regression, etc. We were obliged to construct such a sequence for the sake of description;
in reality, however, it is probably rather a question of simultaneously trying this path and

that, and of the excitation fluctuating to and fro, until finally, because it has attained the
most apposite concentration, one particular grouping remains in the field. Certain
personal experiences even incline me to believe that the dream-work often requires more
than one day and one night to produce its result, in which case the extraordinary art
manifested in the construction of the dream is shorn of its miraculous character. In my
opinion, even the regard for the comprehensibility of the dream as a perceptual event may
exert its influence before the dream attracts consciousness to itself. From this point,
however, the process is accelerated, since the dream is henceforth subjected to the same
treatment as any other perception. It is like fireworks, which require hours for their
preparation and then flare up in a moment.
Through the dream-work, the dream-process now either gains sufficient intensity to
attract consciousness to itself and to arouse the preconscious (quite independently of the
time or profundity of sleep), or its intensity is insufficient, and it must wait in readiness
until attention, becoming more alert immediately before waking, meets it half-way. Most
dreams seem to operate with relatively slight psychic intensities, for they wait for the
process of waking. This, then, explains the fact that as a rule we perceive something
dreamed if we are suddenly roused from a deep sleep. Here, as well as in spontaneous
waking, our first glance lights upon the perception-content created by the dream-work,
while the next falls on that provided by the outer world.
But of greater theoretical interest are those dreams which are capable of waking us in the
midst of our sleep. We may bear in mind the purposefulness which can be demonstrated
in all other cases, and ask ourselves why the dream, that is, the unconscious wish, is
granted the power to disturb our sleep, i.e. the fulfilment of the preconscious wish. The
explanation is probably to be found in certain relations of energy which we do not yet
understand. If we did so, we should probably find that the freedom given to the dream
and the expenditure upon it of a certain detached attention represent a saving of energy as
against the alternative case of the unconscious having to be held in check at night just as
it is during the day. As experience shows, dreaming, even if it interrupts our sleep several
times a night, still remains compatible with sleep. We wake up for a moment, and
immediately fall asleep again. It is like driving off a fly in our sleep; we awake ad hoc.
When we fall asleep again we have removed the cause of disturbance. The familiar
examples of the sleep of wet-nurses, etc., show that the fulfilment of the wish to sleep is
quite compatible with the maintenance of a certain amount of attention in a given
direction.
But we must here take note of an objection which is based on a greater knowledge of the
unconscious processes. We have ourselves described the unconscious wishes as always
active, whilst nevertheless asserting that in the daytime they are not strong enough to
make themselves perceptible. But when the state of sleep supervenes, and the
unconscious wish has shown its power to form a dream, and with it to awaken the
preconscious, why does this power lapse after cognisance has been taken of the dream?
Would it not seem more probable that the dream should continually renew itself, like the
disturbing fly which, when driven away, takes pleasure in returning again and again?

What justification have we for our assertion that the dream removes the disturbance to
sleep?
It is quite true that the unconscious wishes are always active. They represent paths which
are always practicable, whenever a quantum of excitation makes use of them. It is indeed
an outstanding peculiarity of the unconscious processes that they are indestructible.
Nothing can be brought to an end in the unconscious; nothing is past or forgotten. This is
impressed upon us emphatically in the study of the neuroses, and especially of hysteria.
The unconscious path of thought which leads to the discharge through an attack is
forthwith passable again when there is a sufficient accumulation of excitation. The
mortification suffered thirty years ago operates, after having gained access to the
unconscious sources of affect, during all these thirty years as though it were a recent
experience. Whenever its memory is touched, it revives, and shows itself to be cathected
with excitation which procures a motor discharge for itself in an attack. It is precisely
here that psychotherapy must intervene, its task being to ensure that the unconscious
processes are settled and forgotten. Indeed, the fading of memories and the weak affect of
impressions which are no longer recent, which we are apt to take as self-evident, and to
explain as a primary effect of time on our psychic memory-residues, are in reality
secondary changes brought about by laborious work. It is the preconscious that
accomplishes this work; and the only course which psychotherapy can pursue is to bring
the Ucs. under the dominion of the Pcs.
There are, therefore, two possible issues for any single unconscious excitation-process.
Either it is left to itself, in which case it ultimately breaks through somewhere and
secures, on this one occasion, a discharge for its excitation into motility, or it succumbs to
the influence of the preconscious, and through this its excitation becomes bound instead
of being discharged. It is the latter case that occurs in the dream-process. The cathexis
from the Pcs. which goes to meet the dream once this has attained to perception, because
it has been drawn thither by the excitation of consciousness, binds the unconscious
excitation of the dream and renders it harmless as a disturber of sleep. When the dreamer
wakes up for a moment, he has really chased away the fly that threatened to disturb his
sleep. We may now begin to suspect that it is really more expedient and economical to
give way to the unconscious wish, to leave clear its path to regression so that it may form
a dream, and then to bind and dispose of this dream by means of a small outlay of
preconscious work, than to hold the unconscious in check throughout the whole period of
sleep. It was, indeed, to be expected that the dream, even if originally it was not a
purposeful process, would have seized upon some definite function in the play of forces
of the psychic life. We now see what this function is. The dream has taken over the task
of bringing the excitation of the Ucs., which had been left free, back under the
domination of the preconscious; it thus discharges the excitation of the Ucs., acts as a
safety-valve for the latter, and at the same time, by a slight outlay of waking activity,
secures the sleep of the preconscious. Thus, like the other psychic formations of its
group, the dream offers itself as a compromise, serving both systems simultaneously, by
fulfilling the wishes of both, in so far as they are mutually compatible. A glance at
Robert's èlimination theory' will show that we must agree with this author on his main

point, namely, the determination of the function of dreams, though we differ from him in
our general presuppositions and in our estimation of the dream-process.1
The above qualification -- in so far as the two wishes are mutually compatible -- contains
a suggestion that there may be cases in which the function of the dream fails. The dream-
process is, to begin with, admitted as a wish-fulfilment of the unconscious, but if this
attempted wish-fulfilment disturbs the preconscious so profoundly that the latter can no
longer maintain its state of rest, the dream has broken the compromise, and has failed to
perform the second part of its task. It is then at once broken off, and replaced by complete
awakening. But even here it is not really the fault of the dream if, though at other times
the guardian, it has now to appear as the disturber of sleep, nor need this prejudice us
against its averred purposive character. This is not the only instance in the organism in
which a contrivance that is usually to the purpose becomes inappropriate and disturbing
so soon as something is altered in the conditions which engender it; the disturbance, then,
at all events serves the new purpose of indicating the change, and of bringing into play
against it the means of adjustment of the organism. Here, of course, I am thinking of the
anxiety-dream, and lest it should seem that I try to evade this witness against the theory
of wish-fulfilment whenever I encounter it, I will at least give some indications as to the
explanation of the anxiety-dream.
That a psychic process which develops anxiety may still be a wish-fulfilment has long
ceased to imply any contradiction for us. We may explain this occurrence by the fact that
the wish belongs to one system (the Ucs.), whereas the other system (the Pcs.) has
rejected and suppressed it.2 The subjection of the Ucs. by the Pcs. is not thoroughgoing
even in perfect psychic health; the extent of this suppression indicates the degree of our
psychic normality. Neurotic symptoms indicate to us that the two systems are in mutual
conflict; the symptoms are the result of a compromise in this conflict, and they
temporarily put an end to it. On the one hand they afford the Ucs. a way out for the
discharge of its excitation -- they serve it as a kind of sally-gate -- while, on the other
hand, they give the Pcs. the possibility of dominating the Ucs. in some degree. It is
instructive to consider, for example, the significance of a hysterical phobia, or of
agoraphobia. A neurotic is said to be incapable of crossing the street alone, and this we
should rightly call a `symptom'. Let someone now remove this symptom by constraining
him to this action which he deems himself incapable of performing. The result will be an
attack of anxiety, just as an attack of anxiety in the street has often been the exciting
cause of the establishment of an agoraphobia. We thus learn that the symptom has been
constituted in order to prevent the anxiety from breaking out. The phobia is thrown up
before the anxiety like a frontier fortress.
We cannot enlarge further on this subject unless we examine the role of the affects in
these processes, which can only be done here imperfectly. We will therefore affirm the
proposition that the principal reason why the suppression of the Ucs. becomes necessary
is that if the movement of ideas in the Ucs. were allowed to run its course, it would
develop an affect which originally had the character of pleasure, but which, since the
process of repression, bears the character of pain. The aim, as well as the result, of the
suppression is to prevent the development of this pain. The suppression extends to the

idea-content of the Ucs., because the liberation of pain might emanate from this idea-
content. We here take as our basis a quite definite assumption as to the nature of the
development of affect. This is regarded as a motor or secretory function, the key to the
innervation of which is to be found in the ideas of the Ucs. Through the domination of the
Pcs. these ideas are as it were strangled, that is, inhibited from sending out the impulse
that would develop the affect. The danger which arises if cathexis by the Pcs. ceases thus
consists in the fact that the unconscious excitations would liberate an affect that -- in
consequence of the repression that has previously occurred -- could only be felt as pain or
anxiety.
This danger is released if the dream-process is allowed to have its own way. The
conditions for its realisation are, that repressions shall have occurred, and that the
suppressed wish-impulses can become sufficiently strong. They therefore fall entirely
outside the psychological framework of dream-formation. Were it not for the fact that our
theme is connected by just one factor with the theme of the development of anxiety,
namely, by the setting free of the Ucs. during sleep, I could refrain from the discussion of
the anxiety-dream altogether, and thus avoid all the obscurities involved in it.
The theory of the anxiety-dream belongs, as I have already repeatedly stated, to the
psychology of the neuroses. I might further add that anxiety in dreams is an anxiety-
problem and not a dream-problem. Having once exhibited the point of contact of the
psychology of the neuroses with the theme of the dream-process, we have nothing further
to do with it. There is only one thing left which I can do. Since I have asserted that
neurotic anxiety has its origin in sexual sources, I can subject anxiety-dreams to analysis
in order to demonstrate the sexual material in their dream-thoughts.
For good reasons I refrain from citing any of the examples so abundantly placed at my
disposal by neurotic patients, and prefer to give some anxiety-dreams of children.
Personally, I have no real anxiety-dream for decades, but I do recall one from my seventh
or eighth year which I subjected to interpretation some thirty years later. The dream was
very vivid, and showed me my beloved mother, with a peculiarly calm, sleeping
countenance, carried into the room and laid on the bed by two (or three) persons with
birds' beaks. I awoke crying and screaming, and disturbed my parents' sleep. The
peculiarly draped, excessively tall figures with beaks I had taken from the illustrations of
Philippson's Bible; I believe they represented deities with the heads of sparrowhawks
from an Egyptian tomb-relief. The analysis yielded, however, also the recollection of a
house-porter's boy, who used to play with us children on meadow in front of the house; I
might add that his name was Philip. It seemed to me then that I first heard from this boy
the vulgar word signifying sexual intercourse, which is replaced among educated persons
by the Latin word coitus, but which the dream plainly enough indicates by the choice of
the birds' heads.3 I must have guessed the sexual significance of the word from the look
of my worldly-wise teacher. My mother's expression in the dream was copied from the
countenance of my grandfather, whom I had seen a few days before his death snoring in a
state of coma. The interpretation of the secondary elaboration in the dream must therefore
have been that my mother was dying; the tomb-relief, too, agrees with this. I awoke with

this anxiety, and could not calm myself until I had waked my parents. I remember that I
suddenly became calm when I saw my mother; it was as though I had needed the
assurance: then she is not dead. But this secondary interpretation of the dream had only
taken place when the influence of the developed anxiety was already at work. I was not in
a state of anxiety because I had dreamt that my mother was dying; I interpreted the dream
in this manner in the preconscious elaboration because I was already under the
domination of the anxiety. The latter, however, could be traced back, through the
repression to a dark, plainly sexual craving, which had found appropriate expression in
the visual content of the dream.
A man twenty-seven years of age, who had been seriously ill for a year, had repeatedly
dreamed, between the ages of eleven and thirteen, dreams attended with great anxiety, to
the effect that a man with a hatchet was running after him; he wanted to run away, but
seemed to be paralysed, and could not move from the spot. This may be taken as a good
and typical example of a very common anxiety-dream, free from any suspicion of a
sexual meaning. In the analysis, the dreamer first thought of a story told him by his uncle
(chronologically later than the dream), viz. that he was attacked at night in the street by a
suspicious-looking individual; and he concluded from this association that he might have
heard of a similar episode at the time of the dream. In association with the hatchet, he
recalled that during this period of his life he once hurt his hand with a hatchet while
chopping wood. This immediately reminded him of his relations with his younger
brother, whom he used to maltreat and knock down. He recalled, in particular, one
occasion when he hit his brother's head with his boot and made it bleed, and his mother
said: Ì'm afraid he will kill him one day.' While he seemed to be thus held by the theme
of violence, a memory from his ninth year suddenly emerged. His parents had come
home late and had gone to bed, whilst he was pretending to be asleep. He soon heard
panting, and other sounds that seemed to him mysterious, and he could also guess the
position of his parents in bed. His further thoughts showed that he had established an
analogy between this relation between his parents and his own relation to his younger
brother. He subsumed what was happening between his parents under the notion of àn
act of violence and a fight.' The fact that he had frequently noticed blood in his mother's
bed corroborated this conception.
That the sexual intercourse of adults appears strange and alarming to children who
observe it, and arouses anxiety in them, is, I may say, a fact established by everyday
experience. I have explained this anxiety on the ground that we have here a sexual
excitation which is not mastered by the child's understanding, and which probably also
encounters repulsion because their parents are involved, and is therefore transformed into
anxiety. At a still earlier period of life the sexual impulse towards the parent of opposite
sex does not yet suffer repression, but as we have seen (pp. 84-5) expresses itself freely.
For the night terrors with hallucinations (pavor nocturnus) so frequent in children I
should without hesitation offer the same explanation. These, too, can only be due to
misunderstood and rejected sexual impulses which, if recorded, would probably show a
temporal periodicity, since an intensification of sexual libido may equally be produced by
accidentally exciting impressions and by spontaneous periodic processes of development.

I have not the necessary observational material for the full demonstration of this
explanation.4 On the other hand, pediatrists seem to lack the point of view which alone
makes intelligible the whole series of phenomena, both from the somatic and from the
psychic side. To illustrate by a comical example how closely, if one is made blind by the
blinkers of medical mythology, one may pass by the understanding of such cases, I will
cite a case which I found in a thesis on pavor nocturnus (Debacker, 1881, p. 66).
A boy of thirteen, in delicate health, began to be anxious and dreamy; his sleep became
uneasy, and once almost every week it was interrupted by an acute attack of anxiety with
hallucinations. The memory of these dreams was always very distinct. Thus he was able
to relate that the devil had shouted at him: `Now we have you, now we have you!' and
then there was a smell of pitch and brimstone, and the fire burned his skin. From this
dream he woke in terror; at first he could not cry out; then his voice came back to him,
and he was distinctly heard to say: `No, no, not me; I haven't done anything,' or: `Please,
don't; I will never do it again!' At other times he said: Àlbert has never done that!' Later
he avoided undressing, `because the fire attacked him only when he was undressed.' In
the midst of these evil dreams, which were endangering his health, he was sent into the
country, where he recovered in the course of eighteen months. At the age of fifteen he
confessed one day: `Je n'osais pas l'avouer, mais j'éprouvais continuellement des
picotements et des surexcitations aux parties;5 à la fin, cela m'énervait tant que plusieurs
fois j'ai pensé me jeter par la fenêtre du dortoir.'
It is, of course, not difficult to guess: (1) That the boy had practised masturbation in
former years, that he had probably denied it, and was threatened with severe punishment
for his bad habit. (His confession: Je ne le ferai plus; his denial: Albert n'a jamais fait ça)
(2) That under the advancing pressure of puberty the temptation to masturbate was
reawakened through the titillation of the genitals. (3) That now, however, there arose
within him a struggle for repression, which suppressed the libido and transformed it into
anxiety, and that this anxiety now gathered up the punishments with which he was
originally threatened.
Let us, on the other hand, see what conclusions were drawn by the author (p. 69):
1. It is clear from this observation that the influence of puberty may produce in a
boy of delicate health a condition of extreme weakness, and that this may lead to a
very marked cerebral anaemia.6
2. This cerebral anaemia produces an alteration of character, demonomaniacal
hallucinations, and very violent nocturnal, and perhaps also diurnal, states of
anxiety.
3. The demonomania and the self-reproaches of the boy can be traced to the
influences of a religious education which had acted upon him as a child.
4. All manifestations disappeared as a result of a lengthy sojourn in the country,
bodily exercise, and the return of physical strength after the termination of
puberty.
5. Possibly an influence predisposing to the development of the boy's cerebral state
may be attributed to heredity and to the father's former syphilis.

Then finally come the concluding remarks: `Nous avons fait entrer cette observation dans
le cadre délires apyrétiques d'inanition, car c'est à l'ischémie cérébrale que nous
rattachons cet état particulier.'
1
Is this the only function which we can attribute to dreams? I know of no other. A.
Maeder, to be sure, has endeavoured to claim for the dream yet other `secondary'
functions. He started from the just observation that many dreams contain attempts to
provide solutions of conflicts, which are afterwards actually carried through. They thus
behave like preparatory practice for waking activities. He therefore drew a parallel
between dreaming and the play of animals and children, which is to be conceived as a
training of the inherited instincts, and a preparation for their later serious activity, thus
setting up a fonction ludique for the dream. A little while before Maeder, Alfred Adler
likewise emphasised the function of `thinking ahead' in the dream. (An analysis which I
published in 1905 contained a dream which may be conceived as a resolution-dream,
which was repeated night after night until it was realised.)
But an obvious reflection must show us that this `secondary' function of the dream has no
claim to recognition within the framework of any dream-interpretation. Thinking ahead,
making resolutions, sketching out attempted solutions which can then perhaps be realised
in waking life -- these and many more performances are functions of the unconscious and
preconscious activities of the mind which continue as `day-residues' in the sleeping state,
and can then combine with an unconscious wish to form a dream (see pp. 399-400). The
function of `thinking ahead' in the dream is thus rather a function of preconscious waking
thought, the result of which may be disclosed to us by the analysis of dreams or other
phenomena. After the dream has so long been fused with its manifest content, one must
now guard against confusing it with the latent dream-thoughts.
2
À second consideration, much more important and far-reaching, but equally overlooked
by the laity, is the following. A wish-fulfilment must certainly bring some pleasure; but
we go on to ask; ``To whom?'' Of course to the person who has the wish. But we know
that the attitude of the dreamer towards his wishes is a peculiar one: he rejects them,
censors them, in short, he will have none of them. Their fulfilment, then, can afford him
no pleasure, rather the opposite, and here experience shows that this `òpposite'', which
has still to be explained, takes the form of anxiety. The dreamer, where his wishes are
concerned, is like two separate people closely linked together by some important thing in
common. Instead of enlarging upon this I will remind you of a well-known fairy-tale in
which you will see these relationships repeated. A good fairy promised a poor man and
his wife to fulfil their first three wishes. They were delighted, and made up their minds to
choose the wishes carefully. But the woman was tempted by the smell of some sausages
being cooked in the next cottage and wished for two like them. Lo! and behold, there they
were -- and the first wish was fulfilled. With that, the man lost his temper and in his
resentment wished that the sausages might hang on the tip of his wife's nose. This also
came to pass and the sausages could not be removed from their position; so the second
wish was fulfilled, but it was the man's wish and its fulfilment was most unpleasant for
the woman. You know the rest of the story: as they were after all man and wife the third
wish had to be that the sausages should come off the end of the woman's nose. We might

make use of this fairytale many times over in other contexts, but here it need only serve
to illustrate the fact that it is possible for the fulfilment of one person's wish to be very
disagreeable to someone else, unless the two people are entirely at one!' Introductory
Lectures on Psycho-Analysis, London, 1929, pp. 182-83.
3
[The German of the word `bird' is Vogel, which gives origin to the vulgar expression
vögeln, denoting sexual intercourse. -- TRANS.]
4
This material has since been provided in abundance by the literature of psychoanalysis.
5
The emphasis is my own, though the meaning is plain enough without it.
6
The italics are mine.

E. THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PROCESSES; REPRESSION
In attempting to penetrate more profoundly into the psychology of the dream-processes, I

have undertaken a difficult task, to which, indeed, my powers of exposition are hardly
adequate. To reproduce the simultaneity of so complicated a scheme in terms of a
successive description, and at the same time to make each part appear free from all
assumptions, goes fairly beyond my powers. I have now to atone for the fact that in my
exposition of the psychology of dreams I have been unable to follow the historic
development of my own insight. The lines of approach to the comprehension of the
dream were laid down for me by previous investigations into the psychology of the
neuroses, to which I should not refer here, although I am constantly obliged to do so;
whereas I should like to work in the opposite direction, starting from the dream, and then
proceeding to establish its junction with the psychology of the neuroses. I am conscious
of all the difficulties which this involves for the reader, but I know of no way to avoid
them.
Since I am dissatisfied with this state of affairs, I am glad to dwell upon another point of
view, which would seem to enhance the value of my efforts. As was shown in the
introductory section, I found myself confronted with a theme which had been marked by
the sharpest contradictions on the part of those who had written on it. In the course of our
treatment of the problems of the dream, room has been found for most of these
contradictory views. We have been compelled to take decided exception to two only of
the views expressed: namely, that the dream is a meaningless process, and that it is a
somatic process. Apart from these, we have been able to find a place for the truth of all
the contradictory opinions at one point or another of the complicated tissue of the facts,
and we have been able to show that each expressed something genuine and correct. That
our dreams continue the impulses and interests of waking life has been generally
confirmed by the discovery of the hidden dream-thoughts. These concern themselves
only with things that seem to us important and of great interest. Dreams never occupy
themselves with trifles. But we have accepted also the opposite view, namely, that the
dream gathers up the indifferent residues of the day, and cannot seize upon any important
interest of the day until it has in some measure withdrawn itself from waking activity. We
have found that this holds true of the dream-content, which by means of distortion gives
the dream-thought an altered expression. We have said that the dream-process, owing to
the nature of the mechanism of association, finds it easier to obtain possession of recent
or indifferent material, which has not yet been put under an embargo by our waking
mental activity; and that on account of the censorship it transfers the psychic intensity of
the significant but also objectionable material to the indifferent. The hypermnesia of the
dream and its ability to dispose of infantile material have become the main foundations of
our doctrine; in our theory of dreams we have assigned to a wish of infantile origin the
part of the indispensable motive-power of dream-formation. It has not, of course,
occurred to us to doubt the experimentally demonstrated significance of external sensory
stimuli during sleep; but we have placed this material in the same relation' to the dream-
wish as the thought-residues left over from our waking activity. We need not dispute the
fact that the dream interprets objective sensory stimuli after the manner of an illusion; but
we have supplied the motive for this interpretation, which has been left indeterminate by

other writers. The interpretation proceeds in such a way that the perceived object is
rendered harmless as a source of disturbance of sleep, whilst it is made usable for the
wish-fulfilment. Though we do not admit as a special source of dreams the subjective
state of excitation of the sensory organs during sleep (which seems to have been
demonstrated by Trumbull Ladd), we are, nevertheless, able to explain this state of
excitation by the regressive revival of the memories active behind the dream. As to the
internal organic sensations, which are wont to be taken as the cardinal point of the
explanation of dreams, these, too, find a place in our conception, though indeed a more
modest one. These sensations -- the sensations of falling, of soaring, or of being inhibited
-- represent an ever-ready material, which the dream-work can employ to express the
dream-thought as often as need arises.
That the dream-process is a rapid and momentary one is, we believe, true as regards the
perception by consciousness of the preformed dream-content; but we have found that the
preceding portions of the dream-process probably follow a slow, fluctuating course. As
for the riddle of the superabundant dream-content compressed into the briefest moment of
time, we have been able to contribute the explanation that the dream seizes upon
readymade formations of the psychic life. We have found that it is true that dreams are
distorted and mutilated by the memory, but that this fact presents no difficulties, as it is
only the last manifest portion of a process of distortion which has been going on from the
very beginning of the dream-work. In the embittered controversy, which has seemed
irreconcilable, whether the psychic life is asleep at night, or can make the same use of all
its faculties as during the day, we have been able to conclude that both sides are right, but
that neither is entirely so. In the dream-thoughts we found evidence of a highly
complicated intellectual activity, operating with almost all the resources of the psychic
apparatus; yet it cannot be denied that these dream-thoughts have originated during the
day, and it is indispensable to assume that there is a sleeping state of the psychic life.
Thus, even the doctrine of partial sleep received its due, but we have found the
characteristic feature of the sleeping state not in the disintegration of the psychic system
of connections, but in the special attitude adopted by the psychic system which is
dominant during the day -- the attitude of the wish to sleep. The deflection from the outer
world retains its significance for our view, too; though not the only factor at work, it
helps to make possible the regressive course of the dream-representation. The
abandonment of voluntary guidance of the flow of ideas is incontestable; but psychic life
does not thereby become aimless, for we have seen that upon relinquishment of the
voluntary directing ideas, involuntary ones take charge. On the other hand, we have not
only recognised the loose associative connection of the dream, but have brought a far
greater area within the scope of this kind of connection than could have been suspected;
we have, however, found it merely an enforced substitute for another, a correct and
significant type of association. To be sure, we too have called the dream absurd, but
examples have shown us how wise the dream is when it simulates absurdity. As regards
the functions that have been attributed to the dream, we are able to accept them all. That
the dream relieves the mind, like a safety-valve, and that, as Robert has put it, all kinds of
harmful material are rendered harmless by representation in the dream, not only coincides
exactly with our own theory of the twofold wish-fulfilment in the dream, but in its very
wording becomes more intelligible for us than it is for Robert himself. The free

indulgence of the psyche in the play of its faculties is reproduced in our theory as the
noninterference of the preconscious activity with the dream. The `return to the embryonal
standpoint of psychic life in the dream,' and Havelock Ellis's remark that the dream is àn
archaic world of vast emotions and imperfect thoughts,' appear to us as happy
anticipations of our own exposition, which asserts that primitive modes of operations that
are suppressed during the day play a part in the formation of dreams. We can fully
identify ourselves with Sully's statement, that òur dreams bring back again our earlier
and successively developed personalities, our old ways of regarding things, with impulses
and modes of reaction which ruled us long ago'; and for us, as for Delage, the suppressed
material becomes the mainspring of the dream.
We have fully accepted the role that Scherner ascribes to the dream-fantasy, and his own
interpretations, but we have been obliged to transpose them, as it were, to another part of
the problem. It is not the dream that creates the fantasy, but the activity of unconscious
fantasy that plays the leading part in the formation of the dream-thoughts. We remain
indebted to Scherner for directing us to the source of the dream-thoughts, but almost
everything that he ascribes to the dream-work is attributable to the activity of the
unconscious during the day, which instigates dreams no less than neurotic symptoms. The
dream-work we had to separate from this activity as something quite different and far
more closely controlled. Finally, we have by no means renounced the relation of the
dream to psychic disturbances, but have given it, on new ground, a more solid
foundation.
Held together by the new features in our theory as by a superior unity, we find the most
varied and most contradictory conclusions of other writers fitting into our structure; many
of them are given a different turn, but only a few of them are wholly rejected. But our
own structure is still unfinished. For apart from the many obscure questions in which we
have involved ourselves by our advance into the dark regions of psychology, we are now,
it would seem, embarrassed by a new contradiction. On the one hand, we have made it
appear that the dream-thoughts proceed from perfectly normal psychic activities, but on
the other hand we have found among the dream-thoughts a number of entirely abnormal
mental processes, which extend also to the dream-content, and which we reproduce in the
interpretation of the dream. All that we have termed the `dream-work' seems to depart so
completely from the psychic processes which we recognise as correct and appropriate
that the severest judgments expressed by the writers mentioned as to the low level of
psychic achievement of dreams must appear well founded.
Here, perhaps, only further investigations can provide an explanation and set us on the
right path. Let me pick out for renewed attention one of the constellations which lead to
dream-formation.
We have learned that the dream serves as a substitute for a number of thoughts derived
from our daily life, and which fit together with perfect logic. We cannot, therefore, doubt
that these thoughts have their own origin in our normal mental life. All the qualities
which we value in our thought-processes, and which mark them out as complicated
performances of a high order, we shall find repeated in the dream-thoughts. There is,

however, no need to assume that this mental work is performed during sleep; such an
assumption would badly confuse the conception of the psychic state of sleep to which we
have hitherto adhered. On the contrary, these thoughts may very well have their origin in
the daytime, and, unremarked by our consciousness, may have gone on from their first
stimulus until, at the onset of sleep, they have reached completion. If we are to conclude
anything from this state of affairs, it can only be that it proves that the most complex
mental operations are possible without the co-operation of consciousness -- a truth which
we have had to learn anyhow from every psychoanalysis of a patient suffering from
hysteria or obsessions. These dream-thoughts are certainly not in themselves incapable of
consciousness; if we have not become conscious of them during the day, this may have
been due to various reasons. The act of becoming conscious depends upon a definite
psychic function -- attention -- being brought to bear. This seems to be available only in a
determinate quantity, which may have been diverted from the train of thought in question
by other aims. Another way in which such trains of thought may be withheld from
consciousness is the following: From our conscious reflection we know that, when
applying our attention, we follow a particular course. But if that course leads us to an idea
which cannot withstand criticism, we break off and allow the cathexis of attention to
drop. Now, it would seem that the train of thought thus started and abandoned may
continue to develop without our attention returning to it, unless at some point it attains a
specially high intensity which compels attention. An initial conscious rejection by our
judgment, on the ground of incorrectness or uselessness for the immediate purpose of the
act of thought, may, therefore, be the cause of a thought-process going on unnoticed by
consciousness until the onset of sleep.
Let us now recapitulate: We call such a train of thought a preconscious train, and we
believe it to be perfectly correct, and that it may equally well be a merely neglected train
or one that has been interrupted and suppressed. Let us also state in plain terms how we
visualise the movement of our thought. We believe that a certain quantity of excitation,
which we call `cathectic energy', is displaced from a purposive idea along the association
paths selected by this directing idea. A `neglected' train of thought has received no such
cathexis, and the cathexis has been withdrawn from one that was `suppressed' òr
rejected'; both have thus been left to their own excitations. The train of thought cathected
by some aim becomes able under certain conditions to attract the attention of
consciousness, and by the mediation of consciousness it then receives `hypercathexis'.
We shall be obliged presently to elucidate our assumptions as to the nature and function
of consciousness.
A train of thought thus incited in the Pcs. may either disappear spontaneously, or it may
continue. The former eventuality we conceive as follows: it diffuses its energy through all
the association paths emanating from it, and throws the entire chain of thoughts into a
state of excitation, which continues for a while, and then subsides, through the excitation
which had called for discharge being transformed into dormant cathexis. If this first
eventuality occurs, the process has no further significance for dream-formation. But other
directing ideas are lurking in our preconscious, which have their source in our
unconscious and ever-active wishes. These may gain control of the excitation in the circle
of thoughts thus left to itself, establish a connection between it and the unconscious wish,

and transfer to it the energy inherent in the unconscious wish. Henceforth the neglected
or suppressed train of thought is in a position to maintain itself, although this
reinforcement gives it no claim to access to consciousness. We may say, then, that the
hitherto preconscious train of thought has been drawn into the unconscious.
Other constellations leading to dream-formation might be as follows: The preconscious

train of thought might have been connected from the beginning with the unconscious
wish, and for that reason might have met with rejection by the dominating aim-cathexis.
Or an unconscious wish might become active for other (possibly somatic) reasons, and of
its own accord seek a transference to the psychic residues not cathected by the Pcs. All
three cases have the same result: there is established in the preconscious a train of
thought which, having been abandoned by the preconscious cathexis, has acquired
cathexis from the unconscious wish.
From this point onward the train of thought is subjected to a series of transformations
which we no longer recognise as normal psychic processes, and which give a result that
we find strange, a psychopathological formation. Let us now emphasise and bring
together these transformations:
1. The intensities of the individual ideas become capable of discharge in their entirety,
and pass from one idea to another, so that individual ideas are formed which are endowed
with great intensity. Through the repeated occurrence of this process, the intensity of an
entire train of thought may ultimately be concentrated in a single conceptual unit. This is
the fact of compression or condensation with which we became acquainted when
investigating the dream-work. It is condensation that is mainly responsible for the strange
impression produced by dreams, for we know of nothing analogous to it in the normal
psychic life that is accessible to consciousness. We get here, too, ideas which are of great
psychic significance as nodal points or as end-results of whole chains of thought, but this
value is not expressed by any character actually manifest for our internal perception;
what is represented in it is not in any way made more intensive. In the process of
condensation the whole set of psychic connections becomes transformed into the intensity
of the idea-content. The situation is the same as when in the case of a book I italicise or
print in heavy type any word to which I attach outstanding value for the understanding of
the text. In speech I should pronounce the same word loudly and deliberately and with
emphasis. The first simile points immediately to one of the examples which were given
of the dream-work (trimethylamine in the dream of Irma's injection). Historians of art call
our attention to the fact that the most ancient sculptures known to history follow a similar
principle, in expressing the rank of the persons represented by the size of the statues. The
king is made two or three times as tall as his retinue or his vanquished enemies. But a
work of art of the Roman period makes use of more subtle means to accomplish the same
end. The figure of the Emperor is placed in the centre, erect and in his full height, and
special care is bestowed on the modelling of this figure; his enemies are seen cowering at
his feet; but he is no longer made to seem a giant among dwarfs. At the same time, in the
bowing of the subordinate to his superior, even in our own day, we have an echo of this
ancient principle of representation.

The direction followed by the condensations of the dream is prescribed on the one hand
by the true preconscious relations of the dream-thoughts, and on the other hand by the
attraction of the visual memories in the unconscious. The success of the condensation-
work produces those intensities which are required for penetration to the perception-
system.
2. By the free transference of intensities, and in the service of the condensation,

intermediary ideas -- compromises, as it were -- are formed (cf. the numerous examples).
This, also, is something unheard of in the normal movement of our ideas, where what is
of most importance is the selection and the retention of the right conceptual material. On
the other hand, composite and compromise formations occur with extraordinary
frequency when we are trying to find verbal expression for preconscious thoughts; these
are considered `slips of the tongue'.
3. The ideas which transfer their intensities to one another are very loosely connected,
and are joined together by such forms of association as are disdained by our serious
thinking, and left to be exploited solely by wit. In particular, assonances and punning
associations are treated as equal in value to any other associations.
4. Contradictory thoughts do not try to eliminate one another, but continue side by side,
and often combine to form condensation-products, as though no contradiction existed; or
they form compromises for which we should never forgive our thought, but which we
frequently sanction in our action.
These are some of the most conspicuous abnormal processes to which the dream-thoughts
which have previously been rationally formed are subjected in the course of the dream-
work. As the main feature of these processes, we may see that the greatest importance is
attached to rendering the cathecting energy mobile and capable of discharge; the content
and the intrinsic significance of the psychic elements to which these cathexes adhere
become matters of secondary importance. One might perhaps assume that condensation
and compromise-formation are effected only in the service of regression, when the
occasion arises for changing thoughts into images. But the analysis -- and still more
plainly the synthesis -- of such dreams as show no regression towards images, e.g. the
dream Àutodidasker: Conversation with Professor N.', reveals the same processes of
displacement and condensation as do the rest.
We cannot, therefore, avoid the conclusion that two kinds of essentially different psychic
processes participate in dream-formation; one forms perfectly correct and fitting dream-
thoughts, equivalent to the results of normal thinking, while the other deals with these
thoughts in a most astonishing and, as it seems, incorrect way. The latter process we have
already set apart in Chapter Six as the dream-work proper. What can we say now as to the
derivation of this psychic process?
It would be impossible to answer this question here if we had not penetrated a

considerable way into the psychology of the neuroses, and especially of hysteria. From
this, however, we learn that the same ìncorrect' psychic processes -- as well as others not

enumerated -- control the production of hysterical symptoms. In hysteria, too, we find at

first a series of perfectly correct and fitting thoughts, equivalent to our conscious ones, of
whose existence in this form we can, however, learn nothing, i.e. which we can only
subsequently reconstruct. If they have forced their way anywhere to perception, we
discover from the analysis of the symptom formed that these normal thoughts have been
subjected to abnormal treatment, and that by means of condensation and compromise-
formation, through superficial associations which cover up contradictions, and
eventually along the path of regression, they have been conveyed into the symptom. In
view of the complete identity between the peculiarities of the dream-work and those of
the psychic activity which issues in psychoneurotic symptoms, we shall feel justified in
transferring to the dream the conclusions urged upon us by hysteria.
From the theory of hysteria we borrow the proposition that such an abnormal psychic
elaboration of a normal train of thought takes place only when the latter has been used
for the transference of an unconscious wish which dates from the infantile life and is in a
state of repression. Complying with this proposition, we have built up the theory of the
dream on the assumption that the actuating dream-wish invariably originates in the
unconscious; which, as we have ourselves admitted, cannot be universally demonstrated,
even though it cannot be refuted. But in order to enable us to say just what repression is,
after employing this term so freely, we shall be obliged to make a further addition to our
psychological scaffolding.
We had elaborated the fiction of a primitive psychic apparatus, the work of which is
regulated by the effort to avoid accumulation of excitation, and as far as possible to
maintain itself free from excitation. For this reason it was constructed after the plan of a
reflex apparatus; motility, in the first place as the path to changes within the body, was
the channel of discharge at its disposal. We then discussed the psychic results of
experiences of gratification, and were able at this point to introduce a second assumption,
namely, that the accumulation of excitation -- by processes that do not concern us here --
is felt as pain, and sets the apparatus in operation in order to bring about again a state of
gratification, in which the diminution of excitation is perceived as pleasure. Such a
current in the apparatus, issuing from pain and striving for pleasure, we call a wish. We
have said that nothing but a wish is capable of setting the apparatus in motion and that the
course of any excitation in the apparatus is regulated automatically by the perception of
pleasure and pain. The first occurrence of wishing may well have taken the form of a
hallucinatory cathexis of the memory of gratification. But this hallucination, unless it
could be maintained to the point of exhaustion, proved incapable of bringing about a
cessation of the need, and consequently of securing the pleasure connected with
gratification.
Thus, there was required a second activity -- in our terminology the activity of a second
system -- which would not allow the memory-cathexis to force its way to perception and
thence to bind the psychic forces, but would lead the excitation emanating from the need-
stimulus by a detour, which by means of voluntary motility would ultimately so change
the outer world as to permit the real perception of the gratifying object. Thus far we have

already elaborated the scheme of the psychic apparatus; these two systems are the germ
of what we set up in the fully developed apparatus as the Ucs. and the Pcs.
To change the outer world appropriately by means of motility requires the accumulation
of a large total of experiences in the memory-systems, as well as a manifold
consolidation of the relations which are evoked in this memory-material by various
directing ideas. We will now proceed further with our assumptions. The activity of the
second system, groping in many directions, tentatively sending forth cathexes and
retracting them, needs on the one hand full command over all memory-material, but on
the other hand it would be a superfluous expenditure of energy were it to send along the
individual thought-paths large quantities of cathexis, which would then flow away to no
purpose and thus diminish the quantity needed for changing the outer world. Out of a
regard for purposiveness, therefore, I postulate that the second system succeeds in
maintaining the greater part of the energic cathexes in a state of rest, and in using only a
small portion for its operations of displacement. The mechanics of these processes is
entirely unknown to me; anyone who seriously wishes to follow up these ideas must
address himself to the physical analogies, and find some way of getting a picture of the
sequence of motions which ensues on the excitation of the neurones. Here I do no more
than hold fast to the idea that the activity of the first ψ-system aims at the free outflow of
the quantities of excitation, and that the second system, by means of the cathexes
emanating from it, effects an inhibition of this outflow, a transformation into dormant
cathexis, probably with a rise of potential. I therefore assume that the course taken by any
excitation under the control of the second system is bound to quite different mechanical
conditions from those which obtain under the control of the first system. After the second
system has completed its work of experimental thought, it removes the inhibition and
damming up of the excitations and allows them to flow off into motility.
An interesting train of thought now presents itself if we consider the relations of this
inhibition of discharge by the second system to the process of regulation by the pain-
principle. Let us now seek out the counterpart of the primary experience of gratification,
namely, the objective experience of fear. Let a perception-stimulus act on the primitive
apparatus and be the source of a pain-excitation. There will then ensue uncoordinated
motor manifestations, which will go on until one of these withdraws the apparatus from
perception, and at the same time from the pain. On the reappearance of the percept this
manifestation will immediately be repeated (perhaps as a movement of flight), until the
percept has again disappeared. But in this case no tendency will remain to recathect the
perception of the source of pain by hallucination or otherwise. On the contrary, there will
be a tendency in the primary apparatus to turn away again from this painful memory-
image immediately if it is in any way awakened, since the overflow of its excitation into
perception would, of course, evoke (or more precisely, begin to evoke) pain. This turning
away from a recollection, which is merely a repetition of the former flight from
perception, is also facilitated by the fact that, unlike the perception, the recollection has
not enough quality to arouse consciousness, and thereby to attract fresh cathexis. This
effortless and regular turning away of the psychic process from the memory of anything
that had once been painful gives us the prototype and the first example of psychic

repression. We all know how much of this turning away from the painful, the tactics of
the ostrich, may still be shown as present even in the normal psychic life of adults.
In obedience to the pain-principle, therefore, the first ψ-system is quite incapable of

introducing anything unpleasant into the thought-nexus. The system cannot do anything
but wish. If this were to remain so, the activity of thought of the second system, which
needs to have at its disposal all the memories stored up by experience, would be
obstructed. But two paths are now open: either the work of the second system frees itself
completely from the pain-principle, and continues its course, paying no heed to the pain
attached to given memories, or it contrives to cathect the memory of the pain in such a
manner as to preclude the liberation of pain. We can reject the first possibility, as the
pain-principle also proves to act as a regulator of the cycle of excitation in the second
system; we are therefore thrown back upon the second possibility, namely, that this
system cathects a memory in such a manner as to inhibit any outflow of excitation from
it, and hence, also, the outflow, comparable to a motor-innervation, needed for the
development of pain. And thus, setting out from two different starting-points, i.e. from
regard for the pain-principle, and from the principle of the least expenditure of
innervation, we are led to the hypothesis that cathexis through the second system is at the
same time an inhibition of the discharge of excitation. Let us, however, keep a close hold
on the fact -- for this is the key to the theory of repression -- that the second system can
only cathect an idea when it is in a position to inhibit any pain emanating from this idea.
Anything that withdrew itself from this inhibition would also remain inaccessible for the
second system, i.e. would immediately be given up by virtue of the pain-principle. The
inhibition of pain, however, need not be complete; it must be permitted to begin, since
this indicates to the second system the nature of the memory, and possibly its lack of
fitness for the purpose sought by the process of thought.
The psychic process which is alone tolerated by the first system I shall now call the
primary process; and that which results under the inhibiting action of the second system I
shall call the secondary process. I can also show at another point for what purpose the
second system is obliged to correct the primary process. The primary process strives for
discharge of the excitation in order to establish with the quantity of excitation thus
collected an identity of perception; the secondary process has abandoned this intention,
and has adopted instead the aim of an identity of thought. All thinking is merely a detour
from the memory of gratification (taken as a purposive idea) to the identical cathexis of
the same memory, which is to be reached once more by the path of motor experiences.
Thought must concern itself with the connecting-paths between ideas without allowing
itself to be misled by their intensities. But it is obvious that condensations of ideas and
intermediate or compromise-formations are obstacles to the attainment of the identity
which is aimed at; by substituting one idea for another they swerve away from the path
which would have led onward from the first idea. Such procedures are, therefore,
carefully avoided in our secondary thinking. It will readily be seen, moreover, that the
pain-principle, although at other times it provides the thought-process with its most
important clues, may also put difficulties in its way in the pursuit of identity of thought.
Hence, the tendency of the thinking process must always be to free itself more and more
from exclusive regulation by the pain-principle, and to restrict the development of affect

through the work of thought to the very minimum which remains effective as a signal.
This refinement in functioning is to be achieved by a fresh hyper-cathexis, effected with
the help of consciousness. But we are aware that this refinement is seldom completely
successful, even in normal psychic life, and that our thinking always remains liable to
falsification by the intervention of the pain-principle.
This, however, is not the breach in the functional efficiency of our psychic apparatus
which makes it possible for thoughts representing the result of the secondary thought-
work to fall into the power of the primary psychic process; by which formula we may
now describe the operations resulting in dreams and the symptoms of hysteria. This
inadequacy results from the converging of two factors in our development, one of which
pertains solely to the psychic apparatus, and has exercised a determining influence on the
relation of the two systems, while the other operates fluctuatingly, and introduces motive
forces of organic origin into the psychic life. Both originate in the infantile life, and are a
precipitate of the alteration which our psychic and somatic organism has undergone since
our infantile years.
When I termed one of the psychic processes in the psychic apparatus the primary process,
I did so not only in consideration of its status and function, but was also able to take
account of the temporal relationship actually involved. So far as we know, a psychic
apparatus possessing only the primary process does not exist, and is to that extent a
theoretical fiction; but this at least is a fact: that the primary processes are present in the
apparatus from the beginning, while the secondary processes only take shape gradually
during the course of life, inhibiting and overlaying the primary, whilst gaining complete
control over them perhaps only in the prime of life. Owing to this belated arrival of the
secondary processes, the essence of our being, consisting of unconscious wish-impulses,
remains something which cannot be grasped or inhibited by the preconscious; and its part
is once and for all restricted to indicating the most appropriate paths for the wish-
impulses originating in the unconscious. These unconscious wishes represent for all
subsequent psychic strivings a compulsion to which they must submit themselves,
although they may perhaps endeavour to divert them and to guide them to superior aims.
In consequence of this retardation, an extensive region of the memory-material remains
in fact inaccessible to preconscious cathexis.
Now among these wish-impulses originating in the infantile life, indestructible and
incapable of inhibition, there are some the fulfilments of which have come to be in
contradiction with the purposive ideas of our secondary thinking. The fulfilment of these
wishes would no longer produce an affect of pleasure, but one of pain; and it is just this
conversion of affect that constitutes the essence of what we call `repression'. In what
manner and by what motive forces such a conversion can take place constitutes the
problem of repression, which we need here only touch upon in passing. It will suffice to
note the fact that such a conversion of affect occurs in the course of development (one
need only think of the emergence of disgust, originally absent in infantile life), and that it
is connected with the activity of the secondary system. The memories from which the
unconscious wish evokes a liberation of affect have never been accessible to the Pcs., and
for that reason this liberation cannot be inhibited. It is precisely on account of this

generation of affect that these ideas are not now accessible even by way of the
preconscious thoughts to which they have transferred the energy of the wishes connected
with them. On the contrary, the pain-principle comes into play, and causes the Pcs. to
turn away from these transference-thoughts. These latter are left to themselves, are
`repressed', and thus the existence of a store of infantile memories, withdrawn from the
beginning from the Pcs., becomes the preliminary condition of repression.
In the most favourable case, the generation of pain terminates so soon as the cathexis is
withdrawn from the transference thoughts in the Pcs., and this result shows that the
intervention of the pain-principle is appropriate. It is otherwise, however, if the repressed
unconscious wish receives an organic reinforcement which it can put at the service of its
transference-thoughts, and by which it can enable them to attempt to break through with
their excitation, even if the cathexis of the Pcs. has been taken away from them. A
defensive struggle then ensues, inasmuch as the Pcs. reinforces the opposite to the
repressed thoughts (counter-cathexis), and the eventual outcome is that the transference-
thoughts (the carriers of the unconscious wish) break through in some form of
compromise through symptom-formation. But from the moment that the repressed
thoughts are powerfully cathected by the unconscious wish-impulse, but forsaken by the
preconscious cathexis, they succumb to the primary psychic process, and aim only at
motor discharge; or, if the way is clear, at hallucinatory revival of the desired identity of
perception. We have already found, empirically, that the ìncorrect' processes described
are enacted only with thoughts which are in a state of repression. We are now in a
position to grasp yet another part of the total scheme of the facts. These ìncorrect'
processes are the primary processes of the psychic apparatus; they occur wherever ideas
abandoned by the preconscious cathexis are left to themselves and can become filled with
the uninhibited energy which flows from the unconscious and strives for discharge. There
are further facts which go to show that the processes described as ìncorrect' are not really
falsifications of our normal procedure, or defective thinking, but the modes of operation
of the psychic apparatus when freed from inhibition. Thus we see that the process of
conveyance of the preconscious excitation to motility occurs in accordance with the same
procedure, and that in the linkage of preconscious ideas with words we may easily find
manifested the same displacements and confusions (which we ascribe to inattention).
Finally, a proof of the increased work made necessary by the inhibition of these primary
modes of procedure might be found in the fact that we achieve a comical effect, a surplus
to be discharged through laughter, if we allow these modes of thought to come to
consciousness.
The theory of the psychoneuroses asserts with absolute certainty that it can only be sexual
wish-impulses from the infantile life, which have undergone repression (affect-
conversion) during the developmental period of childhood, which are capable of renewal
at later periods of development (whether as a result of our sexual constitution, which has,
of course, grown out of an original bisexuality, or in consequence of unfavourable
influences in our sexual life); and which therefore supply the motive power for all
psychoneurotic symptom-formation. It is only by the introduction of these sexual forces
that the gaps still demonstrable in the theory of repression can be filled. Here, I will leave
it undecided whether the postulate of the sexual and infantile holds good for the theory of

dreams as well; I am not completing the latter, because in assuming that the dream-wish
invariably originates in the unconscious I have already gone a step beyond the
demonstrable.1 Nor will I inquire further into the nature of the difference between the
play of psychic forces in dream-formation and in the formation of hysterical symptoms,
since there is missing here the needed fuller knowledge of one of the two things to be
compared. But there is another point which I regard as important, and I will confess at
once that it was only on account of this point that I entered upon all the discussions
concerning the two psychic systems, their modes of operation, and the fact of repression.
It does not greatly matter whether I have conceived the psychological relations at issue
with approximate correctness, or, as is easily possible in such a difficult matter, wrongly
and imperfectly. However our views may change about the interpretation of the psychic
censorship or the correct and the abnormal elaboration of the dream-content, it remains
certain that such processes are active in dream-formation, and that in their essentials they
reveal the closest analogy with the processes observed in the formation of hysterical
symptoms. Now the dream is not a pathological phenomenon; it does not presuppose any
disturbance of our psychic equilibrium; and it does not leave behind it any weakening of
our efficiency or capacities. The objection that no conclusions can be drawn about the
dreams of healthy persons from my own dreams and from those of my neurotic patients
may be rejected without comment. If, then, from the nature of the given phenomena we
infer the nature of their motive forces, we find that the psychic mechanism utilised by the
neuroses is not newly-created by a morbid disturbance that lays hold of the psychic life,
but lies in readiness in the normal structure of our psychic apparatus. The two psychic
systems, the frontiercensorship between them, the inhibition and overlaying of the one
activity by the other, the relations of both to consciousness -- or whatever may take the
place of these concepts on a juster interpretation of the actual relations -- all these belong
to the normal structure of our psychic instrument, and the dream shows us one of the
paths which lead to a knowledge of this structure. If we wish to be content with a
minimum of perfectly assured additions to our knowledge, we shall say that the dream
affords proof that the suppressed material continues to exist even in the normal person
and remains capable of psychic activity. Dreams are one of the manifestations of this
suppressed material; theoretically this is true in all cases; and in tangible experience, it
has been found true in at least a great number of cases, which happen to display most
plainly the more striking features of the dream-life. The suppressed psychic material,
which in the waking state has been prevented from expression and cut off from internal
perception by the mutual neutralisation of contradictory attitudes, finds ways and means,
under the sway of compromise-formations, of obtruding itself on consciousness during
the night.
Flectere si nequeo Superos, Acheronta movebo.
At any rate, the interpretation of dreams is the via regia to a knowledge of the
unconscious element in our psychic life.
By the analysis of dreams we obtain some insight into the composition of this most
marvellous and most mysterious of instruments; it is true that this only takes us a little
way, but it gives us a start which enables us, setting out from the angle of other (properly

pathological) formations, to penetrate further in our disjoining of the instrument. For

disease -- at all events that which is rightly called functional -- does not necessarily
presuppose the destruction of this apparatus, or the establishment of new cleavages in its
interior; it can be explained dynamically by the strengthening and weakening of the
components of the play of forces, so many of the activities of which are covered up in
normal functioning. It might be shown elsewhere how the fact that the apparatus is a
combination of two instances also permits of a refinement of its normal functioning
which would have been impossible to a single system.2
1
Here, as elsewhere, there are gaps in the treatment of the subject, which I have
deliberately left, because to fill them up would, on the one hand, require excessive labour,
and, on the other hand, I should have to depend on material which is foreign to the dream.
Thus, for example, I have avoided stating whether I give the word `suppressed' a different
meaning from that of the word `repressed'. No doubt, however, it will have become clear
that the latter emphasises more than the former the relation to the unconscious. I have not
gone into the problem which obviously arises, of why the dream-thoughts undergo
distortion by the censorship even when they abandon the progressive path to
consciousness, and choose the path of regression. And so with other similar omissions. I
have, above all, sought to give some idea of the problems to which the further dissection
of the dream-work leads and to indicate the other themes with which these are connected.
It was, however, not always easy to decide just where the pursuit should be discontinued.
-- That I have not treated exhaustively the part which the psycho-sexual life plays in the
dream, and have avoided the interpretation of dreams of an obviously sexual content, is
due to a special reason -- which may not perhaps be that which the reader would expect.
It is absolutely alien to my views and my neuropathological doctrines to regard the sexual
life as a pudendum with which neither the physician nor the scientific investigator should
concern himself. To me, the moral indignation which prompted the translator of
Artemidorus of Daldis to keep from the reader's knowledge the chapter on sexual dreams
contained in the Symbolism of Dreams is merely ludicrous. For my own part, what
decided my procedure was solely the knowledge that in the explanation of sexual dreams
I should be bound to get deeply involved in the still unexplained problems of perversion
and bisexuality; it was for this reason that I reserved this material for treatment
elsewhere.
2
The dream is not the only phenomenon that permits us to base our psychopathology on
psychology. In a short unfinished series of articles in the Monatsschrift für Psychiatrie
und Neurologie (Über den psychischen Mechanismus der Vergesslichkeit, 1898, and
Über Deckerinnerungen, 1899) I attempted to interpret a number of psychic
manifestations from everyday life in support of the same conception. (These and other
articles on `Forgetting', `Lapses of Speech', etc., have now been published in the
Psychopathology of Everyday Life.)

F. THE UNCONSCIOUS AND CONSCIOUSNESS; REALITY
If we look more closely, we may observe that the psychological considerations examined
in the foregoing chapter require us to assume, not the existence of two systems near the
motor end of the psychic apparatus, but two kinds of processes or courses taken by
excitation. But this does not disturb us; for we must always be ready to drop our auxiliary
ideas, when we think we are in a position to replace them by something which comes
closer to the unknown reality. Let us now try to correct certain views which may have
taken a misconceived form as long as we regarded the two systems, in the crudest and
most obvious sense, as two localities within the psychic apparatus -- views which have
left a precipitate in the terms `repression' and `penetration'. Thus, when we say that an
unconscious thought strives for translation into the preconscious in order subsequently to
penetrate through to consciousness, we do not mean that a second idea has to be formed,
in a new locality, like a paraphrase, as it were, whilst the original persists by its side; and
similarly, when we speak of penetration into consciousness, we wish carefully to detach
from this notion any idea of a change of locality. When we say that a preconscious idea is
repressed and subsequently absorbed by the unconscious, we might be tempted by these
images, borrowed from the idea of a struggle for a particular territory, to assume that an
arrangement is really broken up in the one psychic locality and replaced by a new one in
the other locality. For these comparisons we will substitute a description which would
seem to correspond more closely to the real state of affairs; we will say that an energic
cathexis is shifted to or withdrawn from a certain arrangement, so that the psychic
formation falls under the domination of a given instance or is withdrawn from it. Here
again we replace a topographical mode of representation by a dynamic one; it is not the
psychic formation that appears to us as the mobile element, but its innervation.1
Nevertheless, I think it expedient and justifiable to continue to use the illustrative idea of
the two systems. We shall avoid any abuse of this mode of representation if we remember
that ideas, thoughts, and psychic formations in general must not in any case be localised
in organic elements of the nervous system but, so to speak, between them, where
resistances and association-tracks form the correlate corresponding to them. Everything
that can become an object of internal perception is virtual, like the image in the telescope
produced by the crossing of light-rays. But we are justified in thinking of the systems --
which have nothing psychic in themselves, and which never become accessible to our
psychic perception -- as something similar to the lenses of the telescope, which project
the image. If we continue this comparison, we might say that the censorship between the
two systems corresponds to the refraction of rays on passing into a new medium.
Thus far, we have developed our psychology on our own responsibility; it is now time to
turn and look at the doctrines prevailing in modern psychology, and to examine the
relation of these to our theories. The problem of the unconscious in psychology is,
according to the forcible statement of Lipps,2 less a psychological problem than the
problem of psychology. As long as psychology disposed of this problem by the verbal
explanation that the `psychic' is the `conscious', and that ùnconscious psychic
occurrences' are an obvious contradiction, there was no possibility of a physician's
observations of abnormal mental states being turned to any psychological account. The

physician and the philosopher can meet only when both acknowledge that ùnconscious
psychic processes' is `the appropriate and justified expression for an established fact.' The
physician cannot but reject, with a shrug of his shoulders, the assertion that
`consciousness is the indispensable quality of the psychic'; if his respect for the utterances
of the philosophers is still great enough, he may perhaps assume that he and they do not
deal with the same thing and do not pursue the same science. For a single intelligent
observation of the psychic life of a neurotic, a single analysis of a dream, must force upon
him the unshakable conviction that the most complicated and the most accurate
operations of thought, to which the name of psychic occurrences can surely not be
refused, may take place without arousing consciousness.3 The physician, it is true, does
not learn of these unconscious processes until they have produced an effect on
consciousness which admits of communication or observation. But this effect on
consciousness may show a psychic character which differs completely from the
unconscious process, so that internal perception cannot possibly recognise in the first a
substitute for the second. The physician must reserve himself the right to penetrate, by a
process of deduction, from the effect on consciousness to the unconscious psychic
process; he learns in this way that the effect on consciousness is only a remote psychic
product of the unconscious process, and that the latter has not become conscious as such,
and has, moreover, existed and operated without in any way betraying itself to
consciousness.
A return from the overestimation of the property of consciousness is the indispensable

preliminary to any genuine insight into the course of psychic events. As Lipps has said,
the unconscious must be accepted as the general basis of the psychic life. The
unconscious is the larger circle which includes the smaller circle of the conscious;
everything conscious has a preliminary unconscious stage, whereas the unconscious can
stop at this stage, and yet claim to be considered a full psychic function. The unconscious
is the true psychic reality; in its inner nature it is just as much unknown to us as the
reality of the external world, and it is just as imperfectly communicated to us by the data
of consciousness as is the external world by the reports of our sense organs.
We get rid of a series of dream-problems which have claimed much attention from earlier
writers on the subject when the old antithesis between conscious life and dream-life is
discarded, and the unconscious psychic assigned to its proper place. Thus, many of the
achievements which are a matter for wonder in a dream are now no longer to be
attributed to dreaming, but to unconscious thinking, which is active also during the day.
If the dream seems to make play with a symbolical representation of the body, as
Scherner has said, we know that this is the work of certain unconscious fantasies, which
are probably under the sway of sexual impulses and find expression not only in dreams,
but also in hysterical phobias and other symptoms. If the dream continues and completes
mental work begun during the day, and even brings valuable new ideas to light, we have
only to strip off the dream-disguise from this, as the contribution of the dream-work, and
a mark of the assistance of dark powers in the depths of the psyche (cf. the devil in
Tartini's sonata-dream). The intellectual achievement as such belongs to the same psychic
forces as are responsible for all such achievements during the day. We are probably much
too inclined to overestimate the conscious character even of intellectual and artistic

production. From the reports of certain writers who have been highly productive, such as
Goethe and Helmholtz, we learn, rather, that the most essential and original part of their
creations came to them in the form of inspirations, and offered itself to their awareness in
an almost completed state. In other cases, where there is a concerted effort of all the
psychic forces, there is nothing strange in the fact that conscious activity, too, lends its
aid. But it is the much-abused privilege of conscious activity to hide from us all other
activities wherever it participates.
It hardly seems worth while to take up the historical significance of dreams as a separate
theme. Where, for instance, a leader has been impelled by a dream to engage in a bold
undertaking, the success of which has had the effect of changing history, a new problem
arises only so long as the dream is regarded as a mysterious power and contrasted with
other more familiar psychic forces. The problem disappears as soon as we regard the
dream as a form of expression for impulses to which a resistance was attached during the
day, whilst at night they were able to draw reinforcement from deep-lying sources of
excitation.4 But the great respect with which the ancient peoples regarded dreams is based
on a just piece of psychological divination. It is a homage paid to the unsubdued and
indestructible element in the human soul, to the daemonic power which furnishes the
dream-wish, and which we have found again in our unconscious.
It is not without purpose that I use the expression in our unconscious, for what we so call
does not coincide with the unconscious of the philosophers, nor with the unconscious of
Lipps. As they use the term, it merely means the opposite of the conscious. That there
exist not only conscious but also unconscious psychic processes is the opinion at issue,
which is so hotly contested and so energetically defended. Lipps enunciates the more
comprehensive doctrine that everything psychic exists as unconscious, but that some of it
may exist also as conscious. But it is not to prove this doctrine that we have adduced the
phenomena of dreams and hysterical symptom-formation; the observation of normal life
alone suffices to establish its correctness beyond a doubt. The novel fact that we havé
learned from the analysis of psycho-pathological formations, and indeed from the first
member of the group, from dreams, is that the unconscious -- and hence all that is psychic
-- occurs as a function of two separate systems, and that as such it occurs even in normal
psychic life. There are consequently two kinds of unconscious, which have not as yet
been distinguished by psychologists. Both are unconscious in the psychological sense;
but in our sense the first, which we call Ucs., is likewise incapable of consciousness;
whereas the second we call Pcs. because its excitations, after the observance of certain
rules, are capable of reaching consciousness; perhaps not before they have again
undergone censorship, but nevertheless regardless of the Ucs. system. The fact that in
order to attain consciousness the excitations must pass through an unalterable series, a
succession of instances, as is betrayed by the changes produced in them by the
censorship, has enabled us to describe them by analogy in spatial terms. We described the
relations of the two systems to each other and to consciousness by saying that the system
Pcs. is like a screen between the system Ucs. and consciousness. The system Pcs. not
only bars access to consciousness, but also controls the access to voluntary motility, and
has control of the emission of a mobile cathectic energy, a portion of which is familiar to
us as attention.5

We must also steer clear of the distinction between the superconscious and the
subconscious, which has found such favour in the more recent literature on the
psychoneuroses, for just such a distinction seems to emphasise the equivalence of what is
psychic and what is conscious.
What role is now left, in our representation of things, to the phenomenon of

consciousness, once so all-powerful and overshadowing all else? None other than that of
a sense-organ for the perception of psychic qualities. According to the fundamental idea
of our schematic attempt we can regard conscious perception only as the function proper
to a special system for which the abbreviated designation Cs. commends itself. This
system we conceive to be similar in its mechanical characteristics to the perception-
system P, and hence excitable by qualities, and incapable of retaining the trace of
changes: i.e. devoid of memory. The psychic apparatus which, with the sense-organ of
the P-systems, is turned to the outer world, is itself the outer world for the sense-organ of
Cs., whose teleological justification depends on this relationship. We are here once more
confronted with the principle of the succession of instances which seems to dominate the
structure of the apparatus. The material of excitation flows to the sense-organ Cs. from
two sides: first from the P-system, whose excitation, qualitatively conditioned, probably
undergoes a new elaboration until it attains conscious perception; and, secondly, from the
interior of the apparatus itself, whose quantitative processes are perceived as a qualitative
series of pleasures and pains once they have reached consciousness after undergoing
certain changes.
The philosophers, who became aware that accurate and highly complicated thought-
structures are possible even without the co-operation of consciousness, thus found it
difficult to ascribe any function to consciousness; it appeared to them a superfluous
mirroring of the completed psychic process. The analogy of our Cs. system with the
perception-systems relieves us of this embarrassment. We see that perception through our
sense organs results in directing an attention-cathexis to the paths along which the
incoming sensory excitation diffuses itself; the qualitative excitation of the P-system
serves the mobile quantity in the psychic apparatus as a regulator of its discharge. We
may claim the same function for the overlying sense organ of the Cs. system. By
perceiving new qualities, it furnishes a new contribution for the guidance and suitable
distribution of the mobile cathexisquantities. By means of perceptions of pleasure and
pain, it influences the course of the cathexes within the psychic apparatus, which
otherwise operates unconsciously and by the displacement of quantities. It, is probable
that the pain-principle first of all regulates the displacements of cathexis automatically,
but it is quite possible that consciousness contributes a second and more subtle regulation
of these qualities, which may even oppose the first, and perfect the functional capacity of
the apparatus, by placing it in a position contrary to its original design, subjecting even
that which induces pain to cathexis and to elaboration. We learn from neuro-psychology
that an important part in the functional activity of the apparatus is ascribed to these
regulations by the qualitative excitations of the sense-organs. The automatic rule of the
primary pain-principle, together with the limitation of functional capacity bound up with
it, is broken by the sensory regulations, which are themselves again automatisms. We
find that repression, which, though originally expedient, nevertheless finally brings about

a harmful lack of inhibition and of psychic control, overtakes memories much more
easily than it does perceptions, because in the former there is no additional cathexis from
the excitation of the psychic sense-organs. Whilst an idea which is to be warded off may
fail to become conscious because it has succumbed to repression, it may on other
occasions come to be repressed simply because it has been withdrawn from conscious
perception on other grounds. These are clues which we make use of in therapy in order to
undo accomplished repressions.
The value of the hyper-cathexis which is produced by the regulating influence of the Cs.
sense-organs on the mobile quantity is demonstrated in a teleological context by nothing
more clearly than by the creation of a new series of qualities, and consequently a new
regulation, which constitutes the prerogative of man over the animals. For the mental
procèsses are in themselves unqualitative except for the excitations of pleasure and pain
which accompany them: which, as we know, must be kept within limits as possible
disturbers of thought. In order to endow them with quality, they are associated in man
with verbal memories, the qualitative residues of which suffice to draw upon them the
attention of consciousness, which in turn endows thought with a new mobile cathexis.
It is only on a dissection of hysterical mental processes that the manifold nature of the
problems of consciousness becomes apparent. One then receives the impression that the
transition from the preconscious to the conscious cathexis is associated with a censorship
similar to that between Ucs. and Pcs. This censorship, too, begins to act only when a
certain quantitative limit is reached, so that thought-formations which are not very
intense escape it. All possible cases of detention from consciousness and of penetration
into consciousness under certain restrictions are included within the range of
psychoneurotic phenomena; all point to the intimate and twofold connection between the
censorship and consciousness. I shall conclude these psychological considerations with
the record of two such occurrences.
On the occasion of a consultation a few years ago, the patient was an intelligent-looking
girl with a simple, unaffected manner. She was strangely attired; for whereas a woman's
dress is usually carefully thought out to the last pleat, one of her stockings was hanging
down and two of the buttons of her blouse were undone. She complained of pains in one
of her legs, and exposed her calf without being asked to do so. Her chief complaint,
however, was as follows: She had a feeling in her body as though something were
sticking into it which moved to and fro and shook her through and through. This
sometimes seemed to make her whole body stiff. On hearing this, my colleague in
consultation looked at me; the trouble was quite obvious to him. To both of us it seemed
peculiar that this suggested nothing to the patient's mother, though she herself must
repeatedly have been in the situation described by her child. As for the girl, she had no
idea of the import of her words, or she would never have allowed them to pass her lips.
Here the censorship had been hoodwinked so successfully that under the mask of an
innocent complaint a fantasy was admitted to consciousness which otherwise would have
remained in the preconscious.

Another example: I began the psychoanalytic treatment of a boy of fourteen who was
suffering from tic convulsif, hysterical vomiting, headache, etc., by assuring him that
after closing his eyes he would see pictures or that ideas would occur to him, which he
was to communicate to me. He replied by describing pictures. The last impression he had
received before coming to me was revived visually in his memory. He had been playing a
game of checkers with his uncle, and now he saw the checkerboard before him. He
commented on various positions that were favourable or unfavourable, on moves that
were not safe to make. He then saw a dagger lying on the checkerboard -- an object
belonging to his father, but which his fantasy laid on the checkerboard. Then a sickle was
lying on the board; a scythe was added; and finally, he saw the image of an old peasant
mowing the grass in front of his father's house far away. A few days later I discovered the
meaning of this series of pictures. Disagreeable family circumstances had made the boy
excited and nervous. Here was a case of a harsh, irascible father, who had lived unhappily
with the boy's mother, and whose educational methods consisted of threats; he had
divorced his gentle and delicate wife, and remarried; one day he brought home a young
woman as the boy's new mother. The illness of the fourteen-year-old boy developed a
few days later. It was the suppressed rage against his father that had combined these
images into intelligible allusions. The material was furnished by a mythological
reminiscence. The sickle was that with which Zeus castrated his father; the scythe and the
image of the peasant represented Kronos, the violent old man who devours his children,
and upon whom Zeus wreaks his vengeance in so unfilial a manner. The father's marriage
gave the boy an opportunity of returning the reproaches and threats which the child had
once heard his father utter because he played with his genitals (the draughtboard; the
prohibited moves; the dagger with which one could kill). We have here long-impressed
memories and their unconscious derivatives which, under the guise of meaningless
pictures, have slipped into consciousness by the devious paths opened to them.
If I were asked what is the theoretical value of the study of dreams, I should reply that it
lies in the additions to psychological knowledge and the beginnings of an understanding
of the neuroses which we thereby obtain. Who can foresee the importance a thorough
knowledge of the structure and functions of the psychic apparatus may attain, when even
our present state of knowledge permits of successful therapeutic intervention in the
curable forms of the psychoneuroses? But, it may be asked, what of the practical value of
this study in regard to a knowledge of the psyche and discovery of the hidden
peculiarities of individual character? Have not the unconscious impulses revealed by
dreams the value of real forces in the psychic life? Is the ethical significance of the
suppressed wishes to be lightly disregarded, since, just as they now create dreams, they
may some day create other things?
I do not feel justified in answering these questions. I have not followed up this aspect of
the problem of dreams. In any case, however, I believe that the Roman Emperor was in
the wrong in ordering one of his subjects to be executed because the latter had dreamt
that he had killed the Emperor. He should first of all have endeavoured to discover the
significance of the man's dream; most probably it was not what it seemed to be. And even
if a dream of a different content had actually had this treasonable meaning, it would still
have been well to recall the words of Plato -- that the virtuous man contents himself with

dreaming of that which the wicked man does in actual life. I am therefore of the opinion
that dreams should be acquitted of evil. Whether any reality is to be attributed to the
unconscious wishes, I cannot say. Reality must, of course, be denied to all transitory and
intermediate thoughts. If we had before us the unconscious wishes, brought to their final
and truest expression, we should still do well to remember that psychic reality is a special
form of existence which must not be confounded with material reality. It seems,
therefore, unnecessary that people should refuse to accept the responsibility for the
immorality of their dreams. With an appreciation of the mode of functioning of the
psychic apparatus, and an insight into the relations between conscious and unconscious,
all that is ethically offensive in our dream-life and the life of fantasy for the most part
disappears.
`What a dream has told us of our relations to the present (reality) we will then seek also
in our consciousness, and we must not be surprised if we discover that the monster we
saw under the magnifying-glass of the analysis is a tiny little infusorian' (H. Sachs).
For all practical purposes in judging human character, a man's actions and conscious
expressions of thought are in most cases sufficient. Actions, above all, deserve to be
placed in the front rank; for many impulses which penetrate into consciousness are
neutralised by real forces in the psychic life before they find issue in action; indeed, the
reason why they frequently do not encounter any psychic obstacle on their path is
because the unconscious is certain of their meeting with resistance later. In any case, it is
highly instructive to learn something of the intensively tilled soil from which our virtues
proudly emerge. For the complexity of human character, dynamically moved in all
directions, very rarely accommodates itself to the arbitrament of a simple alternative, as
our antiquated moral philosophy would have it.
And what of the value of dreams in regard to our knowledge of the future? That, of
course, is quite out of the question. One would like to substitute the words: ìn regard to
our knowledge of the past.' For in every sense a dream has its origin in the past. The
ancient belief that dreams reveal the future is not indeed entirely devoid of truth. By
representing a wish as fulfilled the dream certainly leads us into the future; but this
future, which the dreamer accepts as his present, has been shaped in the likeness of the
past by the indestructible wish.
1
This conception underwent elaboration and modification when it was recognised that the
essential character of a preconscious idea was its connection with the residues of verbal
ideas (The Unconscious, Collected Papers, vol. iv, p. 98).
2
Der Begriff des Unbewussten in der Psychologie. Lecture delivered at the Third
International Psychological Congress at Munich, 1897.
3
I am happy to be able to point to an author who has drawn from the study of dreams the
same conclusion as regards the relation between consciousness and the unconscious. Du
Prel says: `The problem: what is the psyche, manifestly requires a preliminary
examination as to whether consciousness and psyche are identical. But it is just this

preliminary question which is answered in the negative by the dream, which shows that
the concept of the psyche extends beyond that of consciousness, much as the gravitational
force of a star extends beyond its sphere of luminosity' (Philos. d. Mystik, p. 47). Ìt is a
truth which cannot be sufficiently emphasised that the concepts of consciousness and of
the psyche are not co-extensive' (p. 306).
4
cf. here the dream (Σα−τνρος) of Alexander the Great at the siege of Tyre (p. 13, note 4).
5
Cf. here my remarks in the Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, vol. xxvi,
in which the descriptive, dynamic and systematic meanings of the ambiguous word
ùnconscious' are distinguished from one another.


Freud, Sigmund - The Interpretation of Dreams (1900)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Freud, Sigmund - The Interpretation of Dreams (1900)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Freud, Sigmund - The Interpretation of Dreams (1900)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

INTERPRETATION OF DREAMS 1

THE INTERPRETATION OF DREAMS

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Flectere si nequeo Superos, Acheronta movebo

March 15, 1931

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

The Interpretation of Dreams

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

To write a history of our scientific knowledge of the dream problem is extremely

In a supplement to a later German edition, the author adds:

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

A demonstration of the manner in which one arrives at such a symbolic interpretation

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

character of these pathological conditions, it seemed to me tempting, in spite of all the

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Most of my patients accomplish it after my first instructions. I myself can do so very

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

In the course of my psychoanalysis of neurotics I have already subjected perhaps more

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Preliminary Statement -- In the summer of 1895 I had treated psycho-analytically a

Dream of July 23-24, 1895

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

But why is this consolation so nonsensical?

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Such convenience-dreams came very frequently to me in my youth. Accustomed as I had

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

It is quite as simple a matter to discover the wish-fulfilment in several other dreams

Child psychology, in my opinion, is destined to render the same services to the

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Nevertheless, it is not difficult to parry these apparently invincible objections. It is merely

In scientific research it is often advantageous, if the solution of one problem presents

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

I. My friend R. is my uncle -- I have a great affection for him.

The interpretation of this dream was arrived at in the following manner:

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

Get any book for free on: www.Abika.com

retrospectively in the case of a verbal expression of opinion, preventively if they are to be