II. Coulomb's Law - Worked Examples
II. Coulomb's Law - Worked Examples
II. Coulomb's Law - Worked Examples
Department of Physics
8.02
Fall, 2002
Na + + Cl
NaCl
(+ e ) + ( e ) = 0
(1.1)
(i)
Chemical reaction:
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(1.3)
(1.4)
e+ + e
(1.5)
1 e2
4 0 r 2
(2.1)
have finished the calculation, make sure your answer agrees with the proper amount of
significant digits. You should report your answer with the same number of significant
digits as the given quantity that has the least number of significant digits.
Now we can substitute our numerical values and find that the magnitude of the force
between the proton and the electron in the hydrogen atom is
Fe =
(2.2)
Example 3: Comparing the electrical and gravitational force between electron and
proton.
Question: What is ratio of the magnitudes of the electrical and gravitational force
between electron and proton if we assume that the electron and proton are separated by a
distance equal to the classical electron orbit in the hydrogen atom, r = 0.53 1010 m ?
The mass of the electron is me = 9.11031 kg and the mass of the proton is
m p = 1.7 1027 kg . Does this ratio depend on the distance between the proton and the
electron? In light of your calculation, explain why electrical forces do not influence the
motion of planets.
Answer: The ratio of the magnitudes of the electrical and gravitational force is given by
1 e2
1 2
e
2
4 0 r 4 0
(9.0 109 N m 2 / C2 )(1.6 1019 C) 2
=
=
= 2.2 1039
=
2
2
11
27
31
m p me Gm p me (6.67 10 N m / kg )(1.7 10 kg)(9.1 10 kg)
G 2
r
(3.1)
which is independent of the distance between the proton and the electron.
The electric force is 39 orders of magnitude stronger than the gravitational force between
the electron and the proton. Then why are the large scale motions of planets determined
by the gravitational force and not the electrical force. The answer is that the magnitudes
of the charge of the electron and proton are equal. The best experiments show that the
difference between these magnitudes is a number on the order of 10 24 . Since objects like
planets have about the same number of protons as electrons, they are essentially
electrically neutral. Therefore the force between planets is entirely determined by gravity.
Question: In Figure 4.1 shown below, three charges are interacting. Find the force on the
charge q3 assuming that q1 = 6.0 106 C , q2 = q1 = 6.0 106 C , q3 = +3.0 106 C and
a = 2.0 102 m .
Answer: Using the superposition principle, we have
F3 = F13 + F23 =
q2 q3
1 q1q3
2 r13 + 2 r23
4 0 r13
r23
(4.1)
Since the unit vectors r13 and r23 do not point in the same directions, in order to
mathematically compute the vector sum, we must express each unit vectors in terms of
their Cartesian components and add the forces according to the principles of vector
addition.
Recall that r13 is located at charge q3 and points from q1 to q3 . From Figure 4.1,
we see that
2
r13 = cos i + sin j =
(i + j)
2
(4.2)
The unit vector r23 = i points from q2 to q3 . Therefore, the total force is
F3 =
q2 q3
1 q1q3
1 q1q3
2 (q1 )q3
(i + j) +
i
2 r13 + 2 r23 =
2
4 0 r13
r23
a2
4 0 ( 2a ) 2
(4.3)
F3 =
1 q1q3
4 0 a 2
2
2
j
1 i +
(4.4)
2 2 2 2
1 +
4
4
1 q1q3
F3 =
4 0 a 2
(4.5)
The angle that the force makes with the positive x -axis is
F3, y
2/4
1
= tan
= 151.3
1 + 2 / 4
F3, x
= tan 1
(4.6)
(Note there are two solutions to this equation. The second solution = 28.7 is incorrect
because in indicates that the force has negative i and j components.)
(5.1)
(6.1)
a=
Fe qE qEx
i
=
=
m m
m
(6.2)
Question 2: Suppose the charge + q is released from rest. What is the velocity of the
charge after it has traveled a distance d in the +x-direction?
Answer: The problem is a one-dimensional kinematics problem with constant
acceleration. Suppose the particle is at rest ( v0 = 0 ) when it is first released from the
positive plate. The terminal speed v of the particle as it strikes the negative plate is
v = 2ad = 2dqEx m
(6.3)
Question 3: What is the kinetic energy of the charge after it has traveled a distance d in
the +x-direction?
Answer: The kinetic energy is given by
K=
1 2 1
mv = m(2ad ) = qEx d
2
2
(6.4)
exactly balanced by the electric force, Fe = qE . During this balancing the oil drop has
moved downwards an additional distance d1 = 1.2 101 m . This balancing occurs when
the E = E j = (1.92105 N C) j . Note that the y-component of the electric field is
y
negative.
M = oilV = oil r 3
3
(7.1)
4
M = oil r 3 = (8.51 102 kg m3 )
3
-6
3
-14
(1.6410 m) = 1.5710 kg
(7.2)
Question 2: What is the charge on the oil drop in units of electronic charge
e = 1.6 1019 C ?
Answer: The oil drop will be in static equilibrium when the gravitational force exactly
balances the electrical force,
Fg + Fe = 0
(7.3)
0 = mg + qE
= -mgj + qE y j
(7.4)
The gravitational force points downward, so therefore the force on the oil must be
upward. Since the electrical field points downward, the charge on the oil drop must be
negative.
Notice that we have chosen the unit vector j to point upward. We can solve this equation
for the charge on the oil drop:
q=
mg (1.5710-14 kg)(9.80 m / s 2 )
=
= 8.0310-19 C
5
Ey
-1.9210 N C
(7.5)
Since the electron has charge e = 1 . 6 10 19 C , the charge of the oil drop in units of e is
N=
q 8.0210-19 C
=
=5
e 1.610-19 C
(7.6)
You may at first be surprised that this number is an integer, but the Millikan Oil Drop
experiment was the first direct experimental evidence that charge is quantized. Thus from
the given data we can assert that there are five electrons on the oil drop!
trajectory downward. Since the electron is negatively charged, the constant force on the
electron is upward and the electron will be deflected upwards on a parabolic path.
(8.1)
eE
qE qE y
=
j = y j
m
m
m
(8.2)
Question 3: The plates have length L1 in the x -direction. At what time t1 will the
electron to leave the plate?
Answer: The time of passage for the electron is given by t1 = L1 v0 .
Question 4: Suppose the electron enters the electric field at time t = 0 . What is the
velocity of the electron at time t1 when it leaves the plates?
Answer: The electron has an initial horizontal velocity, v 0 = v0 i . Since the acceleration
of the electron is in the + y -direction, only the y -component of the velocity changes.
The velocity at a later time t1 is given by
eE y
v = vx i + v y j = v0 i + a y t1 j = v0 i +
m
t1 j
(8.3)
Question 5: What is the vertical displacement of the electron after time t1 when it leaves
the plates?
Answer: From the figure, we see that the electron travels a horizontal distance L1 in the
time t1 = L1 v0 and then emerges from the plates with a vertical displacement
1
1 eE L
y1 = a y t12 = y 1
2
2 m v0
(8.4)
Question 6: What angle 1 does the electron make 1 with the horizontal, when the
electron leaves the plates at time t1 ?
Answer: When the electron leaves the plates at time t1 , the electron makes an angle 1
with the horizontal given by the ratio of the components of its velocity,
tan =
vy
vx
(eE y / m)( L1 / v0 )
v0
eE y L1
mv0 2
(8.5)
Question 7: The electron hits the screen located a distance L2 from the end of the plates
at a time t2 . What is the total vertical displacement of the electron from time t = 0 until it
hits the screen at time t2 ?
Answer: After the electron leaves the plate, there is no longer any force on the electron
so it travels in a straight path. The deflection y2 is
y2 = L2 tan 1 =
eE y L1 L2
mv0 2
(8.6)
y = y1 + y2 =
L1 + L2
2
2
2
mv0
mv0 2
2 mv0
(8.7)
10
(9.1)
(9.2)
Ex =
q cos + cos
q
x
x
r 2 4 0 x 2 + ( y a ) 2 3/ 2 x 2 + ( y + a) 2 3/ 2
4 0 r+ 2
(9.3)
where
r 2 = r 2 + a 2 2ra cos = x 2 + ( y a ) 2
(9.4)
Ey =
q sin + sin
q
ya
y+a
r 2 4 0 x 2 + ( y a) 2 3/ 2 x 2 + ( y + a) 2 3/ 2
4 0 r+ 2
(9.5)
11
We shall make a polynomial expansion for the electric field using the binomial theorem.
We will then collect terms that are proportional to 1 r 3 and ignore terms that are
proportional to 1 r 5 , where r = +( x 2 + y 2 )1 2 .
We begin with
3/ 2
a 2 2ay
= [ x + y + a 2ay ]
= r 1 +
[ x + ( y a) ]
r2
2
a 2ay
,
In the limit where r >> a , we can use the binomial theorem with s
r2
2
2 3/ 2
(1 + s ) 3/ 2 = 1
3/ 2
3
15
s + s 2 ...
2
8
(9.6)
(9.7)
and the above equations for the components of the electric field becomes
Ex =
q 6 xya
+ ...
4 0 r 5
(9.8)
and
q 2a 6 y 2 a
Ey =
+ 5 + ...
4 0 r 3
r
(9.9)
where we have neglected the O(a 3 ) terms. The electric field then is
E = Ex i + E y j =
q 2a 6 ya
p
3 j + 5 ( x i + y j) =
3
4 0 r
r
4 0 r
3 yx 3 y 2
2 i + ( 2 1) j (9.10)
r
r
where we have made used of the definition of the magnitude of the electric dipole
moment p = 2aq .
The expression for E can also be written in terms of the polar coordinates. With
sin = x r and cos = y r (as seen from Figure 9.1), we have
3p
sin cos
4 0 r 3
(9.11)
p
3cos 2 1)
3 (
4 0 r
(9.12)
Ex =
and
Ey =
12
Figure 9.2 Field lines for (a) a finite dipole, and (2) a point dipole
Example 10: (challenging) Electric dipole field in polar coordinates
Show that the expression for the electric field of a dipole, E , can also be written in terms
of the polar coordinates as
E(r , ) = Er r + E
(10.1)
where
Er =
and
E =
2 p cos
4 0 r 3
(10.2)
p sin
4 0 r 3
(10.3)
Solution: We begin with our expression for the electric dipole in Cartesian coordinates,
3p
sin cos
4 0 r 3
p
3cos 2 1)
Ey =
3 (
4 0 r
Ex =
(10.4)
(10.5)
Then
E( r , ) =
4 0 r 3
(10.6)
13
E( r , ) =
4 0 r
3
(10.7)
E( r , ) =
4 0 r 3
(10.8)
(10.9)
E( r , ) =
2 cos r + sin
4 0 r
3
(10.10)
1/ 2
p
3cos2 + 1)
3 (
40 r
(10.11)
1 dq
r
4 0 r 2
(11.1)
In this expression r is the distance from the charge element dq to the point P where we
are determining the electric field. The unit vector r points from dq to P .
By the superposition principle, the total electric field is the vector sum of all these
infinitesimal contributions. (See Figure 11.1):
14
Figure 11.1 Electric field due to dq at a point off the axis of the wire
This sum is just the vector integral
E=
dq
r
4 0 wire r 2
(11.2)
Recall that a vector integral is actually three separate integrals, one for each direction in
space that will give the component of the electric field in that direction. Each separate
component integral is an integral over the length of the wire.
Coordinate System:
In order to find explicit functions for the components of the electric field, we need
to introduce a coordinate system. We choose Cartesian coordinates with the origin in the
center of the wire. Define the x -axis to lie along the wire. We shall choose the y -axis so
that the point P lies somewhere in the x-y plane defined by z = 0. The coordinates for the
point P are ( x, y ) . The unit vectors (i , j) at the point P are shown in Figure 11.2.
15
The charge element dq is located at a distance x from the origin. The charge dq
is the product of the charge density, , with the infinitesimal length dx :
dq = dx
(11.3)
(11.4)
Finally the unit vector r from the source to the field point P can be decomposed as
r = cos i + sin j
(11.5)
where is the angle that the unit vector r makes with the positive x -axis.
The contribution from dq to the electric field at the point P is given by
dE =
1 dq
1
dx
r =
(cos i + sin j)
2
4 0 r
4 0 ( x x) 2 + y 2
(11.6)
1
4 0
L/2
dx
( x x) 2 + y 2
L/2
(cos i + sin j)
(11.7)
We can now see explicitly the vector nature of our integral expression for the electric
field. There are two separate integrals, one for the one for the x -direction and one for the
y -direction,
16
dx
L/2
1
E=
cos i +
2
2
4 0 L / 2 ( x x) + y
4 0
dx
L/2
( x x) 2 + y 2
L/ 2
sin j
(11.8)
cos =
sin =
(11.9)
(( x x) + y 2 )1 / 2
2
L/2
( x x)dx
4 0 L / 2 (( x x) + y )
We need the integration formulas,
L/2
L/ 2
( x x)dx
(( x x) + y )
2
2 3/ 2
2 3/ 2
i + 1
4 0
L/2
( x x) + y )
2
L/ 2
ydx
L/2
(( x x) 2 + y 2 )3/ 2
L/ 2
( x L / 2) + y
2
(11.10)
( x + L / 2) 2 + y 2
(11.11)
and
L/2
L/2
ydx
(( x x) + y )
2
2 3/ 2
1
( x x)
=
y ( x x) 2 + y 2
L/2
=
L/ 2
1 ( x L / 2)
( x + L / 2)
y ( x L / 2) 2 + y 2
( x + L / 2) 2 + y 2
E( x, y ) = Ex ( x, y ) i + E y ( x, y ) j
(11.13)
4 0
1
1
((x L / 2) 2 + y 2 )1/ 2 (( x + L / 2) 2 + y 2 )1/ 2
(11.14)
xL/2
x+ L/2
2
2 1/ 2
2
2 1/ 2
4 0 y ((x L / 2) + y )
(( x + L / 2) + y )
(11.15)
If we place our field point along the y -axis, with x = 0 , the x -component of the
electric field vanishes,
17
(11.12)
E x ( x, y ) =
=0
2
2 1/ 2
2
2 1/ 2
4 0 ((L / 2) + y )
(( L / 2) + y )
(11.16)
One way to see this is to add contributions from two charge elements that are mirror
reflections of each other about the y -axis. Since they point in opposite directions, they
add to zero (Figure 11.3).
E(0, y ) =
1
4 0
1
j
( L / 2) 2 + y 2 y
(11.17)
and
lim
L
y (L / 2) + y
2
2 1/ 2
(x L / 2) 2 + y
2
y
(11.18)
( x + L / 2) 2 + y 2
1/ 2
=0
(11.19)
This shows that the x-component of the electric field vanishes for the infinite wire and
the electric field of an infinite wire is
E( y ) =
j
2 0 y
(11.20)
18
This result shows us that the field falls off like y 1 and points either away or towards
the wire depending on the whether the charge density is positive or negative.
Figure 11.4 Electric field of an infinite wire (perpendicular to the plane of the page)
1 dq
r
4 0 r 2
(12.1)
In this expression r is the distance from the charge element dq to the point P where we
are determining the electric field. The unit vector r points from the charge element dq to
the point P . (See Figure 12.1).
19
By the superposition principle, the total electric field is the vector sum of all these
infinitesimal contributions. This sum is just the integral
E=
dq
r
4 0 disc r 2
(12.2)
This integral is an example of a vector integral over the surface of the disc. A vector
integral is actually three separate integrals, one for each direction in space that will give
the component of the electric field in that direction. Each separate component integral is
an integral over the surface of a disk. It will turn out that only the non-zero component of
the electric field will be the component in the direction parallel to the axis passing
through the plane of the disk.
Coordinate System:
To see this explicitly, we shall use polar coordinates. We choose polar coordinates
because the geometry of disc has the same symmetry properties as polar coordinates.
Define the z -axis to pass perpendicularly through the center of the disc. Let z be the
unit vector pointing along the positive z -axis. Place the plane of the disc at z = 0.
Choose an arbitrary point z on the axis for the field point P where we are trying to
determine the electric field. Choose coordinates ( , ) for the plane of the disc. Let
( , ) be the associated unit vectors. Note that = z .
(12.3)
20
(12.4)
Finally the unit vector r from the source to the field point P can be decomposed as
r = cos + sin z
(12.5)
where is the angle that the unit vector r makes with the plane of the loop. The
contribution from dq to the electric field at the point P is given by
dE =
1 dq
1 d d
r =
( cos + sin z )
2
4 0 r
4 0 z 2 + 2
(12.6)
E=
4 0
R 2
0 0
d d
( cos + sin z ) .
z2 + 2
(12.7)
We can now see explicitly the vector nature of our integral expression for the electric
field. There are two separate integrals, one for the one for the direction and one for the
z direction,
E=
R 2
1
4 0
0 0
d
1
cos +
2
2
z +
4 0
R 2
0 0
d d
sin z
z2 + 2
(12.8)
( z + 2 )1/ 2
2
sin =
z
( z + 2 )1/ 2
2
(12.9)
E=
1
4 0
R 2
0 0
2 d d
1
+
2
2 3/ 2
(z + )
4 0
R 2
z d d
z
2
+ 2 )3/ 2
(z
0 0
(12.10)
21
1
2 d
1
zd
E=
+
z .
2
2 3/ 2
2 0 0 ( z + )
2 0 0 ( z 2 + 2 )3/ 2
R
(12.11)
The first integral vanishes. If we examine Figure 12.2, we see that the component of E in
the direction will add up to zero as we add up the contributions from each infinitesimal
piece. The reason for this is that each little vector contribution points away from the
center. Their sum adds to zero (Figure 12.3).
= cos i + sin j
(12.12)
d =
d cos i +
d sin j
(12.13)
So the integral in the direction is actually two integrals for the i and j directions.
Each of these integrals separately vanishes. For example the x -component integral
becomes
2
d cos i
= sin
2
0
i = 0i
(12.14)
22
Thus only the z -component of the electric field is non-zero and our final result for the
electric field along the axially axis is
1
zd
z
2 0 0 ( z 2 + 2 )3/ 2
R
E=
(12.15)
d
1
0 ( z 2 + 2 )3/ 2 = ( z 2 + 2 )1/ 2
R
=R
=
=0
1
1
2
z ( z + R 2 )1/ 2
(12.16)
E=
2 0
z
1 ( z 2 + R 2 )1/ 2 z .
(12.17)
z 1 z2
1
z 1 z2 3 z4
=
1
...
z 2 1/ 2 R 2 R 2 8 R 4
R 2 R2
(1 + 2 )
R
(12.18)
2 0
z 1 z 2
z
1 1
2
R
2
R
(12.19)
2 0
z 1 z 2
z
z
1 1
1 z
2
2 0 R
R 2 R
(12.20)
z
2 0
(12.21)
23
This shows that very near the disk, the magnitude of the electric field along the axial
symmetry axis of the disk is approximately constant /(2 0 ) .
E=
z
2 0
(12.22)
This result shows us that the field is constant everywhere in space, (independent of the
distance from the plane) (Figure 12.4).
(13.1)
Lets assume that the separation between the discs is much smaller than the radius of the
discs, d << R . Lets choose coordinates such that the plane of the discs is perpendicular
to the z-axis, the positive disc is located at z = d 2 , and the negative disc is located
at z = d 2 .
24
2 0
(13.2)
Therefore when we add these fields together, we see that the field outside the parallel
discs is approximately zero, and the fields between the discs is twice the magnitude of the
field of either disc.
25
+ 2 z , z > d / 2
0
E+ =
z , z < d / 2
2 0
(13.3)
0
E- =
+ z , z < d / 2
2 0
When we add these two fields together we get
0 z ,
z > d /2
E total = z , d / 2 > z > d / 2
0
0 z ,
z < d / 2
(13.4)
(13.5)
So the electric field between the plates is twice the magnitude of the field of a single plate
E total =
z , d / 2 > z > d / 2 .
0
26