Vacuum Oil Quenching: Applications and Unique Properties
Vacuum Oil Quenching: Applications and Unique Properties
Vacuum Oil Quenching: Applications and Unique Properties
Vacuum Oil
Quenching:
Applications and
Unique Properties
Philippe Lebigot Tenova HTC Division: BMI Fours Industriels;
Saint Quentin Fallavier, FRANCE
800
Ac1 700
Austenite + Ferrite
Austenite + Perlite
600
Temperature, C
500
Ms
300
Mf
Ferrite + Perlite
Austenite + Bainite
400
Austenite + Martensite
200
100
A
1
B
10
103
102
Time, seconds
C
104
Vapor
Boiling
Convection
800
Fusion
700
Solidification
Pressure
Temperature, C
600
500
400
300
Liquid
Critical
point
Solid
Evaporation
Solidification
Steam
200
100
0
Sublimation
0
8
10
12
Time, seconds
14
16
18
20
Condensation C
Triple point
Temperature
Cooling Control
As the transfer of the charge is taking place under vacuum or
inert-gas protection after we vacuum purge the furnace, the part
surface is always protected until it is completely immersed into
the oil. Surface protection is very similar whether quenching in
oil or gas.
The major advantage compared to conventional atmospheric
oil-quenching solutions is the precise control of cooling
parameters. With a vacuum furnace, it is possible to modify the
standard quenching parameters temperature and agitation
and to also modify the pressure above the quenching tank.
Modifying the pressure above the tank will induce a
difference in pressure inside the oil bath, which changes the
oil-cooling efficiency curve defined at atmospheric pressure.
Indeed, the boiling zone is the phase during which the cooling
speed is the highest. The change in oil pressure will modify its
vaporization due to the heat of the load (Fig. 3).
31
HEAT TREATING
Convection
Internal door
Mechanical lifter
Sliding door
Conclusion
Vacuum oil quenching is a less-familiar process. Combining
the benefits of vacuum safety with the quality of treatment,
however, provides an industrial solution that is efficient, clean
and competitive.
These advantages face a number of wrong assumptions,
including:
The pieces soaked in oil are distorted. An adequate adjustment and a precise control of the hardening conditions can
often do better in terms of deformation than HPGQ.
The pieces soaked in oil should be cleaned. It is true that
cleaning after quenching is necessary to remove the oil.
However, the oil film on the surface preserves the part to
the point that it is impossible to make the visual difference
between a part soaked with oil or gas. In addition,
generally, a washing solution is already required before heat
treatment. The additional step of cleaning often does not
require more equipment or significant additional costs.
Vacuum oil-quenching furnaces are expensive. Like any piece
of equipment, the competitiveness of a furnace must be an
assessment of its investment cost and operation. Providing
benefits including reduced cost of consumables, this solution
may be more competitive in the medium term. In addition,
the cost of single-chamber oil vacuum furnaces is particularly
attractive, even compared to traditional furnaces.
The option of vacuum oil quenching must be carefully
analyzed by any company planning to invest in equipment
for heat treatment of low-alloy steels. It must be compared
with conventional oil-quenching solutions and the HPGQ
alternative, integrating operating costs and enhancing the
potential productivity gains offered by this technology.
For more information: Contact Laurent Charra, Tenova HTC Division BMI Fours Industriels, 65 Rue du Ruisseau 38897 Saint Quentin
Fallavier, France; e-mail: laurent.charra@tenova.com; website:
www.bmi-fours.com
IndustrialHeating.com JANUARY 2016
33