Read TOEFL For Students Dec 15
Read TOEFL For Students Dec 15
Read TOEFL For Students Dec 15
line
(5)
(10)
(15)
(20)
The final battle of the War of 1812 was the battle of New Orleans. This battle gave a clear
demonstration of the need for effective communication during wartime. It also showed the disastrous
results that can come to pass when communication is inadequate.
The war of 1812 was fought between Great Britain and the very young country of the United
States only a relatively few years after the United States had won its independence from Britain. The
United States had declared war against Britain in June of 1812, mostly because of interference with
U.S. shipping by the British and because of the shanghaiing of U.S. sailors for enforced service on
British vessels. The war lasted for a little more than two years, when a peace treaty was signed at
Ghent, in Belgium, on the 24th of December, 1814.
Unfortunately, the news that Treaty of Ghent has been signed and that the war was officially over
was not communicated in a timely manner over the wide distance to where the war was being
contested. Negotiations for the treaty and the actual signing of the treaty took place in Europe, and
news of the treaty had to be carried across the Atlantic to the war front by ship. A totally unnecessary
loss of life was incurred as a result of the amount of time that it took to inform the combatants of the
treaty.
Early in January of 1815, some two weeks after the peace treaty had been signed, British troops
in the southern part of the United States were unaware that the war had officially ended. Over 5,000
British troops attacked U.S. troops. During the ensuing battle, known as the Battle of New Orleans,
the British suffered a huge number of casualties, around 2,000, and the Americans lost 71, all in a
battle fought only because news of the peace treaty that had already been signed in Ghent had not yet
reached the battlefield.
played
fought
discussed
examined
Questions 11-21
line
(5)
(10)
(15)
(20)
In the American colonies there was little money. England did not supply the colonies with coins
and it did not allow the colonies to make their own coins, except for the Massachusetts Bay Colony,
which received permission for a short period in 1652 to make several kinds of silver coins. England
wanted to keep money out of America as a means of controlling trade; America was forced to trade
only with England if it did not have the money to buy products from other countries. The result during
this pre-Revolutionary period was that the colonists used various goods in place of money: beaver
pelts, Indian wampum, and tobacco leaves were all commonly used substitutes for money. The
colonists also made use of any foreign coins they could obtain. Dutch, Spanish, French, and English
coins were all in use in the American colonies.
During the Revolutionary War, funds were needed to finance the war, so each of the individual
states and the Continental Congress issued paper money. So much of this paper money was printed
that by the end of the war, almost no one would accept it. As a result trade in goods and the use of
foreign coins still flourished during this period.
By the time the Revolutionary War had been won by the American colonists, the monetary
system was in a state of total disarray. To remedy this situation, the new Constitution of the United
States, approved in 1789, allowed Congress to issue money. The individual states could no longer have
their own money supply. A few years later, the Coinage Act of 1792 made the dollar the official
currency of the United States and put the country on a bimetallic standard. In this bimetallic system,
both gold and silver were legal money, and the rate of exchange of silver to gold was fixed by the
government at sixteen to one.
supplied by England
scarce
coined by the colonists
used extensively for trade
(D)
a method for
an example of
a result of
a punishment for
Cotton
Wampum
Tobacco
Beaver furs
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
Paper money
The Continental Congress
The war
Trade in good
medicate
understand
renew
resolve
line
(5)
(10)
(15)
A rather surprising geographical feature of Antarctica is that a huge freshwater lake, one of the
worlds largest and deepest, lies hidden there under four kilometers of ice. Now known as Lake
Vostok, this huge body of water is located under the ice block that comprises Antarctica. The lake is
able to exist in its unfrozen state beneath this block of ice because its waters are warmed by
geothermal heat from the earths core. The thick glacier above lake Vostok actually insulates it from
the frigid temperatures (the lowest ever recorded on Earth) on the surface.
The lake was first discovered in the 1970s while a research team was conducting an aerial survey
of the area. Radio waves form the survey equipment penetrated the ice and revealed a body of water of
indeterminate size. It was not until much more recently that data collected by satellite made by
scientists aware of the tremendous size of the lake; the satellite-borne radar detected an extremely flat
region where the ice remains level because it is floating on the water of the lake.
The discovery of such a huge freshwater lake trapped under Antarctica is of interest to the
scientific community because of the potential that the lake contains ancient microbes that have
survived for thousands upon thousands of years, unaffected by factors such as nuclear fallout, and
elevated ultraviolet light that have affected organisms in more exposed area. The downside of the
discovery, however, lies in the difficulty of conducting research on the lake in such a harsh climate and
in the problems associated with obtaining uncontaminated samples from the lake without actually
exposing the lake to contamination. Scientists are looking for possible ways to accomplish this.
sits
sleeps
tells falsehoods
inclines
It is completely frozen.
It is beneath a thick slab of ice
.It is not a saltwater lake.
It is heated by the sun.
Rarely recorded
Never changing
Quite harsh
Extremely cold
Questions 31-40
line
(5)
(10)
(15)
(20)
The final battle of the War of 1812 was the battle of New Orleans. This battle gave a clear
demonstration of the need for effective communication during wartime. It also showed the disastrous
results that can come to pass when communication is inadequate.
The war of 1812 was fought between Great Britain and the very young country of the United
States only a relatively few years after the United States had won its independence from Britain. The
United States had declared war against Britain in June of 1812, mostly because of interference with
U.S. shipping by the British and because of the shanghaiing of U.S. sailors for enforced service on
British vessels. The war lasted for a little more than two years, when a peace treaty was signed at
Ghent, in Belgium, on the 24th of December, 1814.
Unfortunately, the news that Treaty of Ghent has been signed and that the war was officially over
was not communicated in a timely manner over the wide distance to where the war was being
contested. Negotiations for the treaty and the actual signing of the treaty took place in Europe, and
news of the treaty had to be carried across the Atlantic to the war front by ship. A totally unnecessary
loss of life was incurred as a result of the amount of time that it took to inform the combatants of the
treaty.
Early in January of 1815, some two weeks after the peace treaty had been signed, British troops
in the southern part of the United States were unaware that the war had officially ended. Over 5,000
British troops attacked U.S. troops. During the ensuing battle, known as the Battle of New Orleans,
the British suffered a huge number of casualties, around 2,000, and the Americans lost 71, all in a
battle fought only because news of the peace treaty that had already been signed in Ghent had not yet
reached the battlefield.
played
fought
discussed
examined
Questions 41-50
line
(5)
(10)
(15)
(20)
(25)
It is often the case with folktales that they develop from actual happenings but in their
development lose much of their factual base; the story of Pocahontas quite possibly fits into this
category of folktale. This princess of the Powhatan tribe was firmly established in the lore of early
America and has been made even more famous by the Disney film based on the folktale that arose
from her life. She was a real-life person, but the actual story of her life most probably different
considerably from the folktale and the movie based on the folktale.
Powhatan, the chief of a confederacy of tribes in Virginia, had several daughters, none of whom
was actually named Pocahontas. The nickname means playful one, and several of Powhatans
daughters were called Pocahontas. The daughter of Powhatan who became the subject of the folktale
was named Matoaka. What has been verified about Matoaka, or Pocahontas as she has come to be
known, is that she did marry an Englishman and that she did spend time in England before she died
there at a young age. In the spring of 1613, a young Pocahontas was captured by the English and
taken into Jamestown. There she was treated with courtesy as the daughter of chief Powhatan. While
Pocahontas was at Jamestown, English gentlemen John Rolfe fell in love with her and asked her to
marry. Both the governor of the Jamestown colony and Pocahontass father Powhatan approved the
marriage as a means of securing peace between Powhatans tribe and the English at Jamestown. In
1616, Pocahontas accompanied her new husband to England, where she was royally received.
Shortly before her planned return to Virginia in 1617, she contracted an illness and died rather
suddenly.
A major part of the folktale of Pocahontas that is unverified concerns her love for English
Captain John Smith is the period of time before her capture by the British and her rescue of him
from almost certain death. Captain John Smith was indeed at the colony of Jamestown and was
acquainted with Powhatan and his daughters, he even described meeting them in 1612 journal.
However, the story of his rescue by the young maiden did not appear in his writing until 1624, well
after Pocahontas had aroused widespread interest in England by her marriage to an English
gentlemen and her visit to England. It is the discrepancy in dates that has caused some historians to
doubt the veracity of the tale. However, other historians do argue quite persuasively that this incident
did truly take place.
With respect
With disdain
With surprise
With harshness
(A) timing
(B) location
(C) understanding
(D) accuracy