Boiler RLA
Boiler RLA
Boiler RLA
on Non-Destructive Evaluation
NDE 2011, December 8-10, 2011
ABSTRACT
The Non Destructive Testing plays a key role in Boiler and critical Pressure parts maintenance and in prevention of
catastrophic failures. The safe life of Power Station Boilers and Industrial Boilers depends on the best maintenance of
boiler utilizing effective NDT Techniques during RLA Study. The effective RLA Study by able NDT Experts really
prevents catastrophic failure by giving indication in the concerned NDT in advance prior to catastrophic failure and
extends the Life of Boiler and Pressure parts. For effective RLA Study, the RLA Team must be guided and led by Team
leader with long experience and knowledge in Boiler fabrication, welding, metallurgy, design of boiler pressure parts
and expertise in NDT. And it is advisable that Team leader may be certified as ASNT / ISNT NDT Level III and
experienced since he has to take critical decision on NDT findings. The RLA Team Engineers shall be NDT specialists.
Concluding the false or non-relevant indication as crack indications by inexperienced and not properly trained persons
happens in some of the cases damaging the healthy Boiler Pressure Parts. Scanning by inexperienced persons results
in missing the possible dangerous defects in ageing Boilers. Some Catastrophic Failures can be analyzed. The Failure
analysis proves that it is due to improper NDT Evaluation. This paper explains some of such failures and how to
prevent it.
INTRODUCTION
Boiler Explosion
One Boiler explosion was analyzed after Catastrophic Failure.
Surprisingly it was found that the tight side wall lack of fusion
missed in Radiography Evaluation was the culprit to cause
such a catastrophic failure as earth quake happened. It can be
seen in the photographs. Even the concrete structures which
Material Mix Up
We have to follow the fool proof procedure regarding the
identification of material during manufacturing, erection and
Water Chemistry
Pitting Corrosion
If the DM water has dissolved oxygen, the severe pitting
corrosion shall be formed at water side of the Boiler Pressure
Parts. Photo of such severe Pitting Corrosion, formed inside
the Boiler Steam Drum is given in the Figure. Improper
chemical dozing results in heavy thick coating of water
deposits on boiler pressure parts water side, affecting heat
transfer. The Pitting Corrosion is formed at outer surface of
Boiler Drum also in some of the Sites, if the drum is not
properly covered by insulation and protected from water
entering the insulation.
459
460
Annamalai Samy and Chandrangadan: Proceedings of the National Seminar & Exhibition on Non-Destructive Evaluation
Name of
Pressure Part
01 Boiler Drum
Damage
Mechansim
Effective
NDT Methods
Thermal
Fatigue
MT / WFMT
02 High temperature
Irreversible
Field
Headers S.H Headers,
Creep
Metallography
Re-Heater Headers
damage
to assess level
De-Super heater
due to high
of creep
[above 400C]
temperature
damage
and Pressure
MT
Thermal
Critical
Fatigue Crack Shear wave
in butt
Ultrasonic
weld
scanning
03 High temperature
Headers S.H Headers,
Re-Heater Headers
Ligament
crack at ID
of header
pipe
Video
Fiberscope
& Shear wave
Ultrasonic
Scanning
06 Furnace Water
Wall Tubes
Creep damage
Field
and Thermal Metallography,
Fatigue due above 400C.
to high
temperature
MT
Critical Shear
wave Ultrasonic
scanning
Hydrogen
Damage
Special
Ultrasonic
Scanning
Ultrasonic Testing
Radiographic Testing is more sensitive to reveal volumnar
defects like gas holes and slag. But, the aim of RLA Study is
to detect the possible service induced crack like indications
due to thermal fatigue or irreversible creep damage, etc.
Ultrasonic Testing is more sensitive in detecting tight lack of
fusion and cracks like Fatigue crack, creep crack, Hydrogen
induced Crack and any other crack like indications. The service
induced cracks like Thermal Fatigue Crack and Creep Crack
will be tight in nature. Since, Radiography can not reveal tight
cracks, during RLA Study, Ultrasonic scanning is more
effectively employed. But, UT is highly operator dependent.
CONCLUSION
461
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.