Circularly Polarized Circular Patch Antenna With Coplanar Parasitic Elements
Circularly Polarized Circular Patch Antenna With Coplanar Parasitic Elements
Circularly Polarized Circular Patch Antenna With Coplanar Parasitic Elements
Available at http://www.ijcsonline.com/
Abstract
Circularly polarized (CP) antennas are a type of antenna with circular polarization. Due to the features of circular
polarization, CP antennas have several important advantages compared to antennas using linear polarizations, and are
becoming a key technology for various wireless systems. In this paper, microstrip patch antenna is preferred because of
its low-profile to achieve circular polarization. The probe-fed antenna is placed on FR4 substrate with a thickness of H =
1.52mm and a relative permittivity of 4.0. It consists of two annular rings surrounding a small circular patch on the top
and a ground plane with an unequal lateral cross-slot at the bottom. Simulated results give an AR of 1 and Return Loss
of -23dB at a resonant frequency of 10.50GHz. . Ansoft HFSS Tool is used for the design.
Keywords: Circular Polarization, Microstrip Patch Antenna, Parasitic Elements.
I.
CIRCULAR POLARIZATION
A. INTRODUCTION
Due to the features of circular polarization, circularly
polarized antennas are very useful for various wireless
systems such as satellite communications, global
navigation satellite systems, mobile communications,
wireless sensors, radio frequency identification, wireless
power transmission, wireless local area networks, wireless
personal area networks, worldwide interoperability for
microwave access and direct broadcasting service
television reception systems. Recent decades have seen a
lot of research and development activities in CP antennas
from industries and institutes worldwide.
The CP antenna is very effective in combating multipath interferences or fading [1,2]. The reflected radio signal
from the ground or other objects will result in a reversal of
polarization, that is, right-hand circular polarization
(RHCP) reflections show left-hand circular polarization
(LHCP). A RHCP antenna will have a rejection of a
reflected signal which is LHCP, thus reducing the multipath interferences from the reflected signals.
The second advantage is that CP antenna is able to
reduce the Faraday rotation effect due to the ionosphere
[3,4]. The Faraday rotation effect causes a significant
signal loss (about 3 dB or more) if linearly polarized
signals are employed. The CP antenna is immune to this
problem, thus the CP antenna is widely used for space
telemetry applications of satellites, space probes and
ballistic missiles to transmit or receive signals that have
undergone Faraday rotation by travelling through the
ionosphere.
Another advantage of using CP antennas is that no strict
orientation between transmitting and receiving antennas is
required. This is different from linearly polarized antennas
which are subject to polarization mismatch losses if
281 | International Journal of Computer Systems, ISSN-(2394-1065), Vol. 03, Issue 03, March, 2016
G. Sreedhar Kumar et al
C. Methods of Analysis
There are many methods of analysis for microstrip
antennas. The preferred models for the analysis of
Microstrip patch antennas are the transmission line model,
cavity model, and full wave model. Firstly, the
transmission line model is the simplest one of all and it
gives good physical insight but it is less accurate and it is
more difficult to model coupling. The cavity model is more
accurate and gives good physical insight but it is complex
282 | International Journal of Computer Systems, ISSN-(2394-1065), Vol. 03, Issue 03, March, 2016
G. Sreedhar Kumar et al
to analyze and the full wave models are more accurate and
versatile but this gives less insight as compared to the two
models mentioned above and are far more complex in
nature
DESIGN OF ANTENNA
SIMULATION RESULTS
283 | International Journal of Computer Systems, ISSN-(2394-1065), Vol. 03, Issue 03, March, 2016
G. Sreedhar Kumar et al
HFSSDesign1
-0.00
dB(St(WAVEPORT_T1,WAVEPORT_T1))
V.
ANSOFT
Curve Info
dB(St(WAVEPORT_T1,WAVEPORT_T1))
Setup1 : Sw eep
-5.00
m3 m2
-10.00
Name
-15.00
m1
10.5000 -23.7805
m2
10.6670 -10.0073
m3
10.3240 -10.0768
-20.00
m1
-24.68
0.00
2.50
5.00
7.50
10.00
Freq [GHz]
12.50
15.00
17.50
19.43
XY Plot 4
HFSSDesign1
60.00
m1
10.5000 1.1384
ANSOFT
Curve Info
[2]
VSWRt(WAVEPORT_T1)
Setup1 : Sw eep
50.00
VSWRt(WAVEPORT_T1)
[3]
40.00
30.00
20.00
[4]
10.00
m1
0.00
0.00
2.50
5.00
CONCLUSION
7.50
10.00
Freq [GHz]
12.50
15.00
17.50
20.00
[5]
[7]
[8]
ABOUT AUTHORS
Mr.G.Sreedhar Kumar, working as Sr.Asst Professor, in
Dept of ECE, GPCET, Kurnool. He completed his
M.Tech in year 2009. His research area is Microstrip
Patch Antennas.
Mr.B.Raghu Nandana Reddy pursuing his final B.Tech
in ECE at GPCET, Kurnool. His research area is
Microstrip Patch Antennas.
Name
m1
Theta
Ang
Radiation Pattern 64
Mag
HFSSDesign1
Curve Info
0
-30
ANSOFT
mag(PolarizationRatioCircularLHCP)
Setup1 : LastAdaptive
Freq='10.5GHz' Phi='0deg'
30
2.40
mag(PolarizationRatioCircularRHCP)
Setup1 : LastAdaptive
Freq='10.5GHz' Phi='0deg'
1.80
-60
60
m11.20
0.60
-90
90
-120
120
-150
150
-180
284 | International Journal of Computer Systems, ISSN-(2394-1065), Vol. 03, Issue 03, March, 2016